Slashdot Mirror


Star Wars Pulls In $1 Billion At Record Speed (reuters.com)

New submitter henrydan798 writes to note that Star Wars: The Force Awakens has set a new record for ticket sales, becoming the fastest movie ever to earn a billion dollars at the till. As the L.A. Times reports, The latest installment in the "Star Wars" franchise grossed an estimated $153.5 million in the U.S. and Canada in its second weekend, beating the lower end of analyst expectations of $140 million. This drives the J.J. Abrams-directed picture to a to-date domestic gross of $544.5 million. "The Force Awakens," which cost an estimated $200 million to produce, debuted last weekend to record domestic ticket sales of $248 million. It also grossed $281 million overseas for a global total of $529 million, topping the previous worldwide debut benchmark set in June by "Jurassic World" ($525 million). This week, with an international estimated gross of $546 million to date, the film became the fastest to surpass $1 billion globally. Were any of those dollars yours? If so, do you think they were well spent?

467 comments

  1. Not my money, yet by ffkom · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Congratulations on the successful marketing! And still, I'm in no rush to see this movie. I'll wait until I can rent a BluRay in my local video store, to watch it at home, where already for significant time the image and audio quality is more pleasant than in most public theaters, not to mention the comfort of having control over volume, play/pause etc., and the absent mob of other people.

    1. Re:Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll wait until I can copy the bluray and throw it up on my 100in crt.

    2. Re:Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Don't bother.

      It's not a bad film., but it's mediocre at best.

      JJ Abrams box ticking plus some awful writing. It's just... meh... the writing is lazy and sloppy. It's like a bunch of old Star Wars scenes stitched together loosely with a half-assed framing story, a Mary Sue lead and some disposable sidekicks. And no, zealots, neither Luke nor Anakin were Mary Sues.

      The story in the prequels was actually better - even if they were a trainwreck due to bad acting and George Lucas's tin ear for dialog. The new film is, at least, not risible... that's the most you can say for it.

    3. Re:Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's actually nobodies money... I mean, does "earned 1 billion" imply that there's tax dollars to be paid on that "1 billion"? unlikely... in fact, it's quite likely that the more revenue it generates, the less profits it will actually post.

    4. Re: Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The more revenue it makes the lower the profit will be ? I'm guessing your wife does takes care of the money.

    5. Re:Not my money, yet by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I saw it at the cinema in Tokyo, it was a much better experience than UK cinemas thati generally don't bother with any more. It's worth seeing at the cinema, it's that good, but only if you can find a cinema that doesn't suck.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:Not my money, yet by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Informative

      It was well written and subtle, with good character development and pacing. The action wasn't boring like a Bay film and I felt it was true to the best of the franchise.

      The only odd bits were a couple of lines that felt out of place because they used modern phrasing, and somehow I expected nothing to have changed in 30 years.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:Not my money, yet by hankwang · · Score: 1

      "at home, where already for significant time the image and audio quality is more pleasant than in most public theaters,"

      What are 'most public theaters' like where you live? I saw the trailer in a local theater and the deep rumbles made me shake in my seat. Can you do that at home?

      And good for you that you can afford it. For me it's a matter of economy. A home theater that can compete with a cinema would cost me in the upper four digits (EUR), to be depreciated over 6 years. On top of that the bluray discs themselves and the value of the home theater room space. Rental prices here are about 14 E/m2/month (costs for home owners are a bit less), so a house with space for an extra 12 m2 home-theater room would cost you about 2 kE/yr to own. Even though I could afford it, it feels like a waste of money.

      Oh and you shouldn't have close neighbors or family members that value quiet time...

    8. Re:Not my money, yet by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Funny

      Also, Han shot first a couple times :)

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    9. Re:Not my money, yet by umafuckit · · Score: 5, Funny

      It was well written and subtle, with good character development and pacing.

      Are you sure you saw a Star Wars movie?

    10. Re:Not my money, yet by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The best way I can find to explain how I felt after thinking about the film was that it has been "autotuned".

      It feels right and great (at least the first half) while you are in the theatre.

      But it doesn't feel right later when you start thinking about it.

      Some people will be satisfied with the feeling of the first half and not too bothered by the retread of a retread of a retread of a second half but unless the next film is better this is not going to be very rewatchable.

      You don't want to see it as I saw it- through less than new 3-d glasses which had a kind of haze around the edge near the frame that couldn't be cleaned with waiters walking back and forth in front of you-- stopping twice to tell us the bar was closing soon.

      I started to feel like "Get the "F" off of me and out of my view-line!"

      Bottom line is- I feel this movie is a designed corporate film where young people who lack experience and training beat people with years of experience and training ( Sounds like Star Trek already right?) and it tosses out 30 years of canon and 50% reboots the series.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    11. Re: Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called Hollywood accounting, where the majority of films make losses on paper, and often the big blockbusters make bigger losses than other movies, because they pay more expensive accountants and have more opportunities to write costs off against the production.

    12. Re:Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably because japs as a rule are way more educated than shit limeys.

    13. Re:Not my money, yet by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      > tosses out canon

      Ahhh the real problem for you is revealed.

      Who the hell cares about that except an infinitesimal fraction of sales? If I were paying 4 billion, I wouldn't wanna be hampered by a hundred stories, many of which would not make good blockbusters themselves, or you'd have to write around.

      No, they are the tails that do not wag the dog.

      This was so much better than the prequels -- compare vs. the character "development" of Annakin and the needless focus on the political machinations, ineptly done at that.

      This is freaking Casablanca compared to that.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    14. Re:Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Im so glad you said that. Seems that so many are in awe of JJ's bling again. I thought it was a rather poor performance and I feel very cheated.

    15. Re:Not my money, yet by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      I agree about Star Trek but this isn't bad at all.

      I missed seeing the Tom Cruise War of the Worlds in the theater because it was an abomination of the story.

      But as an action movie it was sweet as hell. I should have gone.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    16. Re:Not my money, yet by QuantumLeaper · · Score: 0

      You're lying, considering the largest CRT is around 50 inches and around 25 years old too, You could have a 100 inch flat screen, and even bigger. BTW CRT is a Cathode Ray Tube and my 25 inch is quite heavy, I don't want to think what a 50 inch would weigh in at...

    17. Re:Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was well written and subtle, with good character development and pacing.

      Sorry to say this, but you may have been duped into seeing a different movie. Lucky you.

    18. Re: Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      JJ is useless when it comes to the story, but his visuals are great... Still, the movie sucks if the story sucks...

    19. Re:Not my money, yet by gl4ss · · Score: 1, Troll

      the real problem is the introduction of a hyperspace mechanic that breaks the plot to the movie and to all prior star wars movies. so there's that, dunno how much the lore can be fixed for that..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    20. Re: Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This movie felt way too safe, and left myself wondering "hey haven't I seen this before?"

      That aside I felt the directing was a bit weak and hope they find a new director for the next film.

    21. Re:Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The largest CRT was 60" not 50", dumbass.

    22. Re:Not my money, yet by johanw · · Score: 0

      Subtle? You saw the scenes where that Dart Vader wannebee lost his control and damaged his own ship with his lightsaber?

    23. Re:Not my money, yet by johanw · · Score: 1, Funny

      But not the last time when he got

    24. Re:Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They did make rear projection CRTs, I had to help move one before (and no you don't want to know what they weigh)

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    25. Re: Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can only go off of the trailers, but from what I saw the visuals were pretty poor. Lots of obvious CGI and ridiculous things like the very CGI Millennium Falcon and X-Wings flying like 10 feet above the surface of the very CGI ground/water for no reason other than to have CGI particle effects from the dust/mist being kicked up behind them.

      In fact the X-Wing clip reminded me of the scene in Firefox where Gant flies over the ocean, only Firefox looked more realistic due to its practical effects.

    26. Re:Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No idea how they can allow JJ Abrams to do it...guaranteed shite.

    27. Re: Not my money, yet by loufoque · · Score: 1

      You probably have seen Episode IV already; there is little point in wadting money to see a weird kind of retelling tribute without substance.

    28. Re:Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're absolutely correct. Many years ago I remember seeing a demo 110" CRT rear projection at Circuit City (or one of those kinds of stores) that had to be built into a wall because of its size.

    29. Re:Not my money, yet by peragrin · · Score: 1

      no Lucas. so yes he did see a star wars movie.

      even the empire strikes back wasn't directed by Lucas, which is why it was good too.

      let me put it this way. unlike the prequel, there wasn't a scene in which the acting felt stiff, the interactions felt forced, and the jokes felt pushed in by a lame comedian.

      So yes it is a good star wars film. even with the lead "bad" guy being a ****************** (spoiler tag, highlight and copy to your clipboard to reveal)

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    30. Re:Not my money, yet by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Ah, but is he really dead? Seems like they left it open so he could somehow survive if they wanted him for the next film.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    31. Re:Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure you saw a Star Wars movie?

    32. Re:Not my money, yet by Misagon · · Score: 1

      You hit the nails right on the heads there. Those are the same things that disappointed me. I had already tickets for multiple screenings when I got a free ticket for a pre-screening. After that I returned my tickets - so I did not contribute to the sales figures. I don't want to.

      I intend to wait for the BluRay release (April 5) and participate in the fan-edit community.
      I think that because of the cast and the dialogue, the movie does have potential to be turned into a great movie in ways that the prequels did not - and the big thing that needs to be done is to turn the story around.
      A lot depends on which deleted scenes will be included in the release, however.

      --
      "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
    33. Re: Not my money, yet by loufoque · · Score: 2

      If you think it was true to the franchise then clearly you haven't understood the essence of the series.

      It's just a retro remake with no substance. Don't expect a sci-fi epic with a large backstory and world building.

    34. Re: Not my money, yet by loufoque · · Score: 1

      They pretty much ignored all the lore, it's just based on Episode IV, with a few bits from episodes V and VI thrown in.

    35. Re:Not my money, yet by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Can you be a bit more specific with your criticisms?

      For example, Fin developed nicely. Slowly came to see that he didn't just have to run from the First Order, he could fight back and stop it too. Ray managed to overcome her past trauma and accept the force as something she could use, after initially being frightened by it.

      BB8 was good to. He kinda knew he was cute and used it to his advantage.

      Ren was perhaps not very scary when the mask came off, but you later realise that's just a role he plays to get what he wants. It's only when things start going wrong for him that you really start to see him get desperate and cracks appear.

      The pacing was good too. None of the random boredom of the prequels. It was tight, everything having a purpose and advancing the plot. A lot of back story was introduced though the dialogue in a natural way that didn't break the flow, and which related to what was happening to the characters.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    36. Re: Not my money, yet by loufoque · · Score: 1

      I've found UK cinemas to provide a much higher quality than other countries (enough slope so that everyone can see, more legroom, reserved seats), though it is also much more expensive.

    37. Re: Not my money, yet by loufoque · · Score: 1

      The presuels were much better than this farce.

    38. Re: Not my money, yet by loufoque · · Score: 2

      He did manage to make a worse job than the prequels, though he does pander a lot to the original-only fans in pretending those episodes never happened.

    39. Re:Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Lt. Mary Sue of the U.S.S. Enterprise....

      wat?!

    40. Re:Not my money, yet by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
      ..but... but... the spoilers!

      Watch once on the opening night to avoid being spoilered. Then watch it again at leisure.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    41. Re: Not my money, yet by pakar · · Score: 1
    42. Re: Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You probably have seen Episode IV already; there is little point in wadting money to see a weird kind of retelling tribute without substance.

      Sometimes you simply outgrow Star Wars. Wether it's done by Lucas, by Donald Duck or Scrooge I can't give a rat's ass about Star Wars anymore. My kids yes, me no. Let a new generation be lobotomised to the squeeks of punching ball bb-8.

    43. Re:Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At this point a spoiler warning is probably moot, but: SPOILER ALERT.....

      I don't see how he could have possibly survived. He got a light saber through the chest then fell into an abyss on a "planet" that exploded soon after... How you going to plausibly bring him back? Plus, I don't think Harrison Ford wants to do another. Anyway, this was his movie and the next will presumably be Mark Hamill's.

    44. Re:Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'm with you there, film projected jumps around, flickers like it's 1924, not very plesant.

    45. Re:Not my money, yet by malditaenvidia · · Score: 2

      The story in the prequels was actually better

      Now now, let's not say things we will regret later.

    46. Re:Not my money, yet by Dins · · Score: 1

      I thought it was a good movie. Wasn't perfect, but was really good. Kylo Ren was my favorite character. I think he's an interesting bad guy, and just looks creepy and twisted. And when Snoke first appeared I turned to my son and said, "Oh look, it's Gollum". That was before I knew Snoke was voiced by Andy Serkis...

    47. Re:Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're lying, considering the largest CRT is around 50 inches and around 25 years old too, You could have a 100 inch flat screen, and even bigger.

      BTW CRT is a Cathode Ray Tube and my 25 inch is quite heavy, I don't want to think what a 50 inch would weigh in at...

      There is such a thing as CRT projectors.

    48. Re:Not my money, yet by retchdog · · Score: 2

      How you going to plausibly bring him back?

      Midichlorians?

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    49. Re:Not my money, yet by retchdog · · Score: 2

      That's amazing! I have the same password on my laptop!

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    50. Re:Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fucking rich comming from a likely average product of the american education system.

    51. Re:Not my money, yet by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2

      The casting rolls show that he'll be in the next movie. Of course, it could be as a flashback of some sort or a memory (not a Force ghost, but a trick of Kylo Ren's mind that torments him). I highly doubt we'll see him stroll into a scene set in the present and be actually alive.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    52. Re:Not my money, yet by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      My only problem with Ren was that, with his mask removed, looked like a young Severus Snape.

      I half expected him to say: "Well, if it isn't Ren. Our. new. celebrity."

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    53. Re:Not my money, yet by operagost · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, I'm sure the rest of the mob would prefer not to have an abrasive curmudgeon like yourself grumbling all through the movie.

      Theaters suck, we get it. My favorite, Movie Theater, has big easy chairs with wide armrests and swing-out trays. If you need a snack or drink-- including adult beverages-- you press a button and someone brings it to you. And it's clean. And the sound is fine. And it costs about the same as the sticky-floor, Battle of the Armrest theaters.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    54. Re:Not my money, yet by Dins · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I guess he kind of is a young Snape. I just felt he had the most potential, because he's obviously a shitty bad guy in this movie. He keeps having temper tantrums and destroying stuff, continually doubts his abilities in secret while acting tough to everyone else, etc. I think his potential character growth over future movies holds the most promise. And in the end where Snoke says something like, "Find him and bring him to me. It's time to complete his training" that implies that we are going to see some character growth. I hope. Every other character just seemed kind of cliche to me, I guess.

    55. Re:Not my money, yet by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      Yabbut the CRT projector doesn't have a great big CRT. It has three small CRTs whose images are projected onto a much larger screen.

      I don't want to think what a 50 inch would weigh in at.

      My old 48", which you can have if you come get the bloody thing, is 172 pounds.

    56. Re:Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no Lucas. so yes he did see a star wars movie.

      even the empire strikes back wasn't directed by Lucas, which is why it was good too.

      let me put it this way. unlike the prequel, there wasn't a scene in which the acting felt stiff, the interactions felt forced, and the jokes felt pushed in by a lame comedian.

      So yes it is a good star wars film. even with the lead "bad" guy being a ****************** (spoiler tag, highlight and copy to your clipboard to reveal)

      Well, seems you have been mislead by the talentless morons that continue to bash George Lucas. You really think Lucas didn't have his hands all over every single shot in Empire? He hired a director, it doesn't mean he didn't make the movie. Try learning something about the actual production before repeating nonsense bullshit. Abrams channels Lucas' writing and directing-style in VII. Abrams is effectively the most successful student of Lucas, and Lucas is no better or worse than his class peers, Spielberg, Coppola, etc.

      Perhaps if you could do something worthwhile, your poor opinion might matter. In the meantime, stop posting. Thx.

    57. Re: Not my money, yet by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      Here in the States I haven't been to a traditional theater in years. Think of the attractions of a reasonably big-screen TV:

      Comfortable seat. No loudmouths. Bathroom and pause button. My feet don't stick to the floor. Refreshments at grocery-store and liquor-store prices. (And this is Colorado, so there's another refreshment.) If I hate the movie, I can abandon it without hurting my wife's experience.

      And for the rare movie that really merits a big-ass screen, maybe 3D, there's the local tavern theater with excellent seating. It's an expensive movie, but a modest-priced dinner-and-a-movie.

    58. Re:Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >wouldn't wanna be hampered by a hundred stories, many of which would not make good blockbusters

      Hand of Thrawn duology, 'nuff said.

    59. Re:Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He got better

    60. Re:Not my money, yet by foequeue7512 · · Score: 1

      I'm normally right there with you. I did go, but only to take my kids and wife on an outing. The difference in viewing at the theater was that my 13-year-old and I had animated conversations about the movie all the way home, so that was nice.

      As we have all rehashed countless times, dollar count has no meaning (excepting charts that adjust dollar values for inflation, etc.). Number of tickets sold is far more informative.

    61. Re:Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The story in the prequels was actually better

      Now now, let's not say things we will regret later.

      Well TPM was actually a pretty good film (minus Jar Jar). The other 2 prequels though better sweep them under the rug.

    62. Re:Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They will get Rey to suddenly discover that she can raise people from the dead - as well as heal all wounds.

    63. Re:Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Well, seems you have been mislead by the talentless morons that continue to bash George Lucas."

      Well, I don't see Howard the Duck as the highlight of cinema.

    64. Re:Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LMAO, you calling someone dumbass while getting it wrong yourself.....DUMBASS...Mitsubishi is the record holder producing a few 61-inch CRT TVs.. so 61" is the record DUMBASSS

    65. Re:Not my money, yet by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Ah, but is he really dead?

      Yes, otherwise Disney would have to pay him to be in the next movie.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    66. Re: Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering the cooling fluid mess I had on the last CRT projector... I'd say you're a dumbass.

    67. Re: Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heya mate, don't be pissy.

    68. Re:Not my money, yet by blue9steel · · Score: 1

      It was well written and subtle, with good character development and pacing.

      Wait, what? There were some good things about the film, but the writing and character development certainly weren't among them.

    69. Re:Not my money, yet by Yunzil · · Score: 1

      Pretty sure you image and audio quality isn't as good as the IMAX theater I saw it in.

    70. Re:Not my money, yet by danbert8 · · Score: 2

      Hey, if we are actually going by logic, then Kylo Ren is probably dead too as the planet was already exploding, he was bleeding profusely, and there was no chance in hell the Hitler guy actually had enough time to find him, load him onto a craft that couldn't land in the forest, and get off the planet before it imploded into a star...

      If you didn't see the death, there is always a bullshit chance that they survived because "reasons." Hell given the way the emperor "died" in the same way, I wouldn't be surprised if Snoke is really him...

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    71. Re:Not my money, yet by danbert8 · · Score: 1

      Well in the movie time had no meaning. I hate it when they write in specific times that are so obviously wrong. Why say 15 minutes if half an hour of movie time (minimum 20 minutes of uncut time) pass before the 5 minute warning comes? And then the last 2 minutes take no less than 10 minutes. Would the movie have been less exciting if they had said 2 hours until firing instead of 15 minutes? We all knew the new death star was going to blow up before firing... At least make the preparation time reasonable or don't write in specific times to be provided to the audience.

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    72. Re:Not my money, yet by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Rear projection isn't a Cathode Ray Tube, it is a projector lighting up the back of a screen, therefore you have added nothing to the conversation but your ignorance.

      Don't use terminology you don't understand, learn about what a CRT is before trying to correct someone else.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    73. Re:Not my money, yet by danbert8 · · Score: 1

      I must admit when it comes to JJ Abrams, he has ruined Star Trek, but that's because he tried to turn it into Star Wars. He did a very good job with the Star Wars feel in the new movie. Here the flashy quick cuts and the special effects add to the atmosphere. But they aren't excessive like the special effects in the prequels. You can tell they deliberately used real costumes and models in a lot of places even if it does look lame compared to computer generated stuff. I mean in at least 2 scenes there are Gonk droids in the background.

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    74. Re:Not my money, yet by Coren22 · · Score: 0

      SPOILER WARNING (in case missed above)

      Bleeding? Lightsaber wounds don't bleed, they are cauterized as they are dealt.

      He didn't even look spectacularly hurt, he just looked stunned for a bit by Ray's sudden outburst. She got in a few glancing blows, but nothing obviously fatal.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    75. Re:Not my money, yet by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Which they already did apparently. He is already cast for the next two movies, though those could be prequels (or whatever you call a movie that comes before but not first).

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    76. Re:Not my money, yet by vadim_t · · Score: 2

      I saw it recently, and walked out very unimpressed. It's not horrible, or painful to watch. But nothing about it impresses it, and everything is forgettable. And the more you think about it, the less things make sense.

      There's nothing really bold. Yet ANOTHER Death Star? Oh, this one's bigger, whoop dee doo.

      Rey comes from some hole where she barely manages to eat enough, and suddenly can pilot and repair ships, use the Force though she thought it was a myth, and competently use a lightsaber, all without training. She also instantly takes Han's place, while Chewbacca is oddly ignored.

      Kylo Ren really looks like a parody of Darth Vader. He's like an emo teenager with a high position and access to tech to make himself a cool suit. Maybe that was the point, but how is this guy in a leading position of anything? And what is his motivation? Where on earth did he get a positive view of Darth Vader from?

      The plot makes no sense. Let's see, Luke got upset and ran away, but rather than contacting his closest friends made up some sort of treasure map to himself, and decided to hang around on a hill to see if anybody managed to find the map? Seriously, who does that? And how does it even make sense to have a "hunt the floppy" plot in 2015? That plot device is two decades out of date.

      What is the political background? How come the resistance has been sitting on their asses while a third death star was getting built? Why is it a random improperly brainwashed stormtrooper that knows all the details, and not them?

    77. Re:Not my money, yet by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      I also liked the dialog he had with himself about being tempted by the light side, it gives some possibilities for future movies where he moves totally into the light side...perhaps when he turns 21 and grows out of his rebellious teenage years.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    78. Re:Not my money, yet by Piata · · Score: 1

      It was not well written or even remotely subtle. In fact, I think it's the worst written Star Wars movie ever made. The entire plot relies on a massive string of convenient events. It's like they made up a bunch of action sequences, strapped it all together and started filming. The fact that it's a near retread of A New Hope makes it all the worse.

      Time will not be kind to this movie. There's too many problems with it... too many things that don't make sense even for a Star Wars movie. I'd actually welcome another round of prequels over this.

    79. Re:Not my money, yet by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      I was discussing Star Wars with some friends and it was suggested that Jar Jar makes much more sense when you think of him as a really diabolical Sith lord. The bumbling idiot is just a sham he puts on to hide the evil.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    80. Re:Not my money, yet by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      There is no "real" problem. In the real world, problems are complex and have multiple causes.

      I hated the prequels and view lucas as a terrible director but I can also see thru the mess to the design and what Lucas was shooting for. Great storyteller, extremely good secrets and reveals, terrible director who did repeated takes giving his actors no clue what he wanted, and surrounded by yes men during the prequels.

      This is a constructed work autotuned with the basic elements audiences like. It's not a real story any more. It will probably end as well as Lost or the X-Files. i.e. just kinda dribble off with no point.. but dang it sure feels nice.

      Like those set chords of music they play to manipulate your emotions or laugh tracks to provoke you to laugh.

      Look- I'm not even saying it was a bad movie and I'd give it a rating of a 6 (8 for the first half, 4 for the second half). But it's not sitting well. Too many things about the movie bother me and feel unbelievable (even in a science fiction/fantasy setting).

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    81. Re:Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drawing from scifi history, he could be resurrected in much the way Sheridan was resurrected at Zahadum in Babylon 5.

    82. Re:Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hunter2

    83. Re: Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure what else jj Abrams could have done to spell out that those coincidences were not really coincidences

    84. Re:Not my money, yet by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      I saw it first at a generic AMC theater. That one was the only place my friends and I were able to get tickets on opening night. It was fairly standard-issue chain-theater awfulness. We went out later and saw it again at the new location of the Alamo Drafthouse that just opened up in town. It was fantastic, and I highly recommend giving them a try if there's one in your area. Pretty much every theater in town besides the Alamo has now lost my business.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    85. Re:Not my money, yet by danbert8 · · Score: 2

      He wasn't bleeding from the lightsaber wounds, but from the bowcaster shot he received earlier. It even showed him hitting the spot on his side (presumably to do something for the pain) and his blood in the snow.

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    86. Re:Not my money, yet by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      I concur completely.
      My feeling at the end of the film was one of underwhelmed resignation...

      Every point of criticism you have spelled out was exactly what I was thinking during the film.

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    87. Re:Not my money, yet by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      If you can get past the fact that the scriptwriters gave you a rehashed-regurgitated version of Ep IV, then I guess if was a good star wars film.
      IMHO it wasn't that much better than Ep 1, which is sad because the acting and dialogue, generally, was very good.

      It was the story that really failed.

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    88. Re:Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had forgotten that, you are correct.

      AC as Slashdot is having some kind of mental breakdown.

    89. Re:Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it was so well written they made the same movie twice!

    90. Re:Not my money, yet by Rei · · Score: 1

      I didn't expect much from the movie, but actually left generally pleased.

      For those who haven't seen it, it's true to all of the original trilogy conventions and has the same general "feel" to it. To the point that they even have things like a background cameo by Gonk, the walking trashcan droid. The Falcon being even more of a piece of junk than it used to be was another nice touch. It was clearly designed by people who were fans of the original trilogy and not fond of the prequils. They also really nailed the "Nazi-reich" feel to the First Order - the original Empire was rather more vague "bad guys", the First Order really seems to have motivation beyond simply "to exist".

      As for your specific points:

      There's nothing really bold. Yet ANOTHER Death Star? Oh, this one's bigger, whoop dee doo.

      And more capable. They show it simultaneously destroying multiple planets and whole massive fleets in entirely different systems.

      Rey comes from some hole where she barely manages to eat enough, and suddenly can pilot and repair ships

      Did you miss the whole major plot element, the primary characterization of her in the movie, that she's said alive by working as a scavenger, dissecting imperial ships for parts? That's what she's done her entire life to stay alive, finding and extracting the most valuable parts (including gaining access to them) from spacecraft, she better damn well know what's what. And like Luke, whose piloting skill was from riding around on a landspeeder, she has her own junky ride that she uses every day.

      use the Force though she thought it was a myth

      Luke didn't believe in the force either until he started being taught about it by Obiwan, so I fail to see your point.

      and competently use a lightsaber, all without training.

      You mean "losing badly with a lightsaber, and only being left alive because Kylo Ren wanted to bring her with to Snoke as per his orders. She has one successful use of the force in combat right at the end, just like Luke in A New Hope. Against a wounded opponent, who is himself just a teenager struggling to get a handle on his powers.

      She also instantly takes Han's place, while Chewbacca is oddly ignored.

      I don't even know what you're taking about here. Both Chewie and Han liked her, and Han had just offered her a permanent position on the Falcon, with Chewie's approval. So you think Chewie should have suddenly kicked her out after Han died? Really?

      Kylo Ren really looks like a parody of Darth Vader. He's like an emo teenager with a high position and access to tech to make himself a cool suit

      That's just the point, he *is* an emo teenager who is obsessed with Darth Vader and wants to be just like him. To the point that he basically prays to Vader's mask. He's a wannabe who wants to be like his grandfather. The whole First Order is rather cultlike in that regard, something clearly encouraged by Snoke.

      Side point: this is the first time that one actually sees the sith being what we've been constantly told from the beginning that they are: people powerful in the force who've given into their passions, their anger, their rage. When was the last time you ever saw a sith hack the place up in a fit of rage when he was given bad news? Vader choked people, but always seemed cool and in control of his emotions. Let's not get started on prequel-Anakin, who we're constantly told about how angry he is, but it's never more than whiny dialogue. Kylo Ren actually for once shows clear, visible rage.

      Maybe that was the point, but how is this guy in a leading position of anything?

      He's at best co-second-in-command of the First Order. Snoke listens to his commanders at least as much as he listens to Kylo Ren. And they do generally prove more competent, so he

      --
      Shiny New Australia.
    91. Re:Not my money, yet by Rei · · Score: 1

      Seriously? If you think that this is "a massive string of convenient events" unseen in other Star Wars movies, you really need to watch the other Star Wars movies again. They're entirely built around massive chains of convenient events. Remember the first one, where droids just happen to crash on the planet that just happens to contain Obiwan and Luke, and happen to end up with him and his family, they just happen to end up at the Death Star and then a ton of improbable stuff happens there, etc, and then we get to the end where the guy who's only ever shot at womp rats suddenly learns force control and hits a tiny exhaust port at high speeds without his targeting computer, triggering an explosion that takes out the entire Death Star at literally the last minute?

      And as absurdly unlikely as that was, it's nothing compared to the Phantom Menace.. When I saw it in the theatre, during the scene where Anakin accidentally takes off, accidentally flies to the mothership, accidentally destroys it, unintentionally shuts down the droid army and wins the battle for everyone, I swear there were six year olds in the audience saying "come on, don't insult my intelligence"

      --
      Shiny New Australia.
    92. Re:Not my money, yet by Rei · · Score: 1

      That comes from Robot Chicken. But it really does work. Act all slapsticky for the benefit of a little kid who you want to eventually become a sith, give power to Palpatine knowing what he's going to do, etc, then basically melt into the background.

      --
      Shiny New Australia.
    93. Re:Not my money, yet by Rei · · Score: 2

      I saw it twice. Neither were my plan - I was with family for Christmas, and that's what the family did. I had some things that I like after the first viewing, and some that bothered me. After the second viewing, the things that I had liked before I liked even more, and the things I hadn't liked still bugged me.

      Personally, I felt it restored canon and tossed out the canon-breaking of the prequels. Aka, you won't hear a word of "midichlorians" or anything like that in this film.

      --
      Shiny New Australia.
    94. Re: Not my money, yet by Rei · · Score: 1

      Actually, there were good reasons given in the movie for why the fighters kept low - in case you're curious, it's because the tie fighters and their tactics are more optimal for combat at altitude, and also later on they were trying to avoid being spotted from a base far away.

      --
      Shiny New Australia.
    95. Re:Not my money, yet by Rei · · Score: 1

      Agreed on all points - he never should have touched Star Trek, but he did Star Wars as it was supposed to be done, in a manner true to the original trilogies (and as the antithesis to the prequels).

      And the Gonk cameos were one of many great touches ;)

      Really, the only thing that came across as "too CGI-ish" to me were the rapthars. But compared to the prequels, that was nothing.

      --
      Shiny New Australia.
    96. Re: Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not a yank but nice try. How's nigger third grade treating you?

    97. Re:Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are cathode ray tubes. Otherwise where would the beams of light come from? You are fucking arguing with a wikipedia reference... FFS

    98. Re:Not my money, yet by Teancum · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The largest CRT display device I ever saw was about 30 feet by 20 feet high in a football stadium. Most people didn't know it was even a CRT display though, so it probably didn't matter. It was one of the huge electronic signs on a scoreboard, where the individual pixels were actually CRTs instead of light bulbs or LEDs like is done now. A heck of a lot of current went through that display to make it work though.... something like 2-3 Megawatts for just the one display if I remember the load numbers properly.

      I think a couple of those old CRT-based displays may even still be in service, although they are getting pretty dated right now.

    99. Re: Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I built my own custom 300" CRT dumbass!!

    100. Re:Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wikipedia reference

      Two words that should never be combined.

    101. Re: Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You idiot. Luke's pilot skill comes from shooting womprats in his T-16 Skyhopper, not driving his landspeeder. (TAKES AWAY YOUR STAR WARS FAN CARD, RIPS IT UP)

    102. Re:Not my money, yet by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Utilising a 2 inch monochrome CRT driven at a very high accelerating voltage for the size (typically 25 kV), the tube produced an extremely bright picture which was projected via a schmidt lens and mirror assembly onto a semi translucent screen of typically 17 to 19 inches in size. The resultant picture was darker than with a direct view CRT and had to be watched in subdued lighting. The degree to which the tube was driven meant that the tube had a relatively short life.

      Because clearly, a 17-19 inch rear projection CRT is totally the same thing as a 100 inch rear projection TV that isn't a CRT. Also, as the CRT is only 2 inch, wouldn't it be a 2 inch crt with a rear projection setup on it?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    103. Re:Not my money, yet by ffkom · · Score: 1

      "at home, where already for significant time the image and audio quality is more pleasant than in most public theaters,"

      What are 'most public theaters' like where you live?

      Well, they sure have very large screens (but that doesn't improve on the viewing angle given that I can position myself whereever I want at home) and lots of speakers, but those speakers are usually "overdriven" to the effect of making awful noise, and I simply cannot stand the 24fps stuttering anymore, I'm used to watch on displays that interpolate frames to achieve smooth motion. (Yes I know, some people despise this as "non cinematic", but to me it looks much better).

      I saw the trailer in a local theater and the deep rumbles made me shake in my seat. Can you do that at home?

      Yes, my REL subwoofer does a very good job on this. And if want even more rumbling, I can switch on the massage functions of my Inada chair... ;-)

      And good for you that you can afford it.

      Yes, and I didn't claim it was cheap. The most expensive part of my home theater is the house around it that is not populated by other people who could feel disturbed by the sound. But that house would be invaluable also if I didn't ever watch movies in it.

    104. Re:Not my money, yet by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 2

      I think he was deliberately increasing the pain to increase his strength in Dark Side. He was already expressing doubts about his strength in the Dark Side for much of the movie, noting that the Light was pulling strongly on him.

      In the end, when he had that confrontation on the bridge, he had to put his own life in jeopardy by convincing the guy he met to kill him in order to have the motivation to kill him. He's a bit conflicted, to say the least.

    105. Re: Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think it was true to the franchise then clearly you haven't understood the essence of the series.

      It's just a retro remake with no substance. Don't expect a sci-fi epic with a large backstory and world building.

      Yep it definitely wasn't true to the franchise: no Ewoks; no Jar Jar Binks; no Overrated, Incompetent Bounty Hunter; and no lying jedi masters.

      And lets not forget the masturbating wookie.

      So definitely not true to the franchise.

    106. Re:Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think Fin developed nicely. He effectively instantly fell in love and during his love confession said that's why he left the First Order. That's not why he left. He left because his buddy was killed, or so that scene implies. He didn't meet her until much later. I really distaste movies that show instant, mutual love at first sight or moves where the male is constantly perusing the female until she gives in then becomes lost in his wonder.

      The entire movie felt like sections of the earlier movies pasted together and the last scene ended the movie on a sour note to me. Maybe that character will seem better when he does something. That scene didn't make sense. If you're going to visit a temple that's the source of the balance between Light and Dark sides of the source, I wouldn't image it as a village-like collection of stones that they barely showed. Are we supposed to believe he was just standing there for years?

      The plot was completely predictable. The movie overall by itself wasn't bad but it wasn't great and differently not excellent or epic.

    107. Re:Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I forgot to complain about Ray. Luke had to go on a retreat and spend years practicing to become a Jedi. Ren trained for years under him and trained with the Sith. Ray learns to be stronger and better with the force than Ren in under a minute. Bullshit. She didn't even know it existed.

    108. Re:Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why to pedant, pedant. For all intents and purposes 61" == 60", dumbass.

    109. Re: Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      KoTOR had a much better story and better characters. It's pretty sad that Force Awakens wasn't even as good as a video game.

    110. Re:Not my money, yet by j-beda · · Score: 1

      What is the political background? How come the resistance has been sitting on their asses while a third death star was getting built? Why is it a random improperly brainwashed stormtrooper that knows all the details, and not them?

      I certainly would have appreciated more of the political background too. But moving away from taxation of trade routes as the main item in the start-of-film text crawl was a good move.

    111. Re: Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't been to the theatre since I got my projector and 200" screen. It'll even do 3D.

      Fuck all the noise, commotion, cost and filth of going to the cinema when I can relax at home and watch in complete comfort and control.

    112. Re: Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoiler alert: Good writing? R2 waking up right when it did, conveniently with the rest of the map fitting together like a purpose built jigsaw, was way too convenient and sloppy writing. And why did Han take the Falcon to a friendly planet knowing it was traceable, but with no urgency? He should have known they would get attacked.

    113. Re: Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the fact that superluminal long-distance transmission of data is rarely used, if at all (I'm struggling to think of examples)

      It's definitely used to monitor the status of battles from the rebel home base.

    114. Re:Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Models only look fake sometimes. CGI looks fake every time.

    115. Re:Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Score:-1, Not a drooling fanboy

    116. Re: Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I knew that they would have some BS "reason" that they had to do it. Never before had it ever been demonstrated that this was a limitation for TIE Fighters or their variants nor that X-Wings were particularly good craft to use inside of an atmosphere (they should have been using A-Wings or airspeeders), but whatever.

    117. Re: Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure Rey was trained, but mind wiped. Refer to her vision of Kylo destroying Luke Jedi school. Ren was there. She was trained.

    118. Re: Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      B.s. those were physical models, not CGI

    119. Re:Not my money, yet by goose-incarnated · · Score: 2

      It was well written and subtle, with good character development and pacing.

      Subtle is the last word I would use to describe it. Nothing was subtle. Everything about the main characters were predictable. The only difference between ANH and this is that in ANH Luke didn't simply pick up a lightsabre and significantly damage Darth Vader on the first try. If Luke had, in ANH, significantly hurt Darth Vader on his first try it would have been a very boring plot. In TFA this happens. Subtle it aint.

      The action wasn't boring like a Bay film and I felt it was true to the best of the franchise.

      The only odd bits were a couple of lines that felt out of place because they used modern phrasing, and somehow I expected nothing to have changed in 30 years.

      I liked the action. I liked the phrasing as well. Those are the good parts. The poor parts were breaking suspension of disbelief. They shouldn't have done that.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    120. Re:Not my money, yet by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I thought it was reasonable. A professional soldier probably knows how to fight hand to hand, and he did lose in the end. Ray had the force to help her, and like Luke once she let go and trusted it she got good fast. Before that it was probably just enough to keep her alive.

      I think there were hints of the same thing when she picked up a blaster the first time. She seemed surprised that she got a few hits right away.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    121. Re: Not my money, yet by Rei · · Score: 2

      The Resistance is much smaller than the Rebellion - they don't have a lot (or lot of variety) of craft at their disposal. And in the original trilogy you rarely saw tie fighters maneuvering in atmo at all (ever?), while you did see X-wings doing so.

      --
      Shiny New Australia.
    122. Re:Not my money, yet by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      She still got far too good far too quick even for what is effectively a fantasy movie.

      It's like she found C for Dummies on night, leafed through it during her next morning dump and by teatime she'd written Linux.

      (Anyone else having trouble logging in, by the way? Perhaps she wrote slashcode before reading the book...)

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    123. Re:Not my money, yet by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      They did make rear projection CRTs

      And most older video projectors used CRTs. Many could project way bigger than 100".

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      No sig today...
    124. Re:Not my money, yet by delt0r · · Score: 1

      Yea, and those kids better not play on your lawn either right. You probably shouldn't make it so obvious your just an old grumpy person who doesn't like company.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    125. Re:Not my money, yet by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Are there any other instances (in all 7 films) of stormtroopers using light sabers?

      I wouldn't expect a Napoleonic musketeer to know how to ride a horse, let alone handle a lance on one.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    126. Re:Not my money, yet by delt0r · · Score: 1

      The dark side always has encouraged getting angry and using that as the "power of the dark side".

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    127. Re: Not my money, yet by delt0r · · Score: 1

      Its fucking star wars. It doesn't and never had anything deep about it. It is literally "dark side bad, hope bad guys don't win" with all the mentality of movie for 10 year olds. The reason the old ones were good was because you were 10 years old!

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    128. Re:Not my money, yet by delt0r · · Score: 1

      WTF is wrong with you? You feel cheated? By a movie franchise? Let me guess, you take a lot of meds. Get a life and keep your movie experiences in perspective.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    129. Re:Not my money, yet by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      There is one in TFA using some kind of hand weapon sword thing. The guy who calls Finn a traitor and then attacks him, knocking the lightsabre out of his hand.

      In any case, if you were a professional soldier from an early age with nothing else going on I imagine in that 20 odd years you might well have had a chance to learn hand to hand combat skills. It's not like they spend much time on target practice.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    130. Re:Not my money, yet by haruchai · · Score: 1

      And no Jar-Jar Binks although the conspiracy theory that he's secretly a Sith master is plausible and appealing.
      I think this Episode had some of the best acting so far. Driver & Boyega were pretty good and Ridley was terrific.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    131. Re:Not my money, yet by haruchai · · Score: 1

      I don't know where people are finding these shite theaters to bitch about.
      I've not been in any like that in 15 years and I go to most of the blockbusters.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    132. Re: Not my money, yet by MagickalMyst · · Score: 1

      Mod +1 :)

      --
      Political correctness is really just herd psychology pushed by insecure people who desperately seek social conformity.
    133. Re:Not my money, yet by ffkom · · Score: 1

      I like company when there's good opportunity to interact with it. Watching a movie is precisely the opposite: An occasion where other people cannot enhance the experience in any way.

    134. Re:Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come to Slashdot! Read the haters! How about 'Congratulations' on a very good movie, oh wait... your comments are pointless as you haven't seen it yet. I'll be the first to say it isn't perfect but to say that marketing was the sole reason for this movie's success is beyond ludicrous. Popular franchises like Harry Potter, Avengers, Batman pulled no where near this money, and they advertised with all the bells and whistles as well. This is simply put, a great movie. I'm all for you denying yourself a good movie/experience but stop spewing nonsense. The fact that you live in an area that still rents movies on disc says a whole lot. Your sound system is no where near as good as a theater. Visually, sure, you can have it. Watching on a nice LED is better IMO. Play/Pause? You are an adult who can't sit through a movie? And lastly "the mob"? When I went the theater was half full because they are showing this movie almost every hour on the hour. Anything else you care to talk about with no experience?

    135. Re:Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly it was written by JJ Abrams, so massive blatant holes and illogical/improbably events in the plot never get addressed and because it all looks so nice, no one seems to care. Example: Poe. There's a huge crash and ship explosion and he disappears and then magically re-appears later on to save the day. Another example: R2D2 sits around doing nothing, then at exactly the right time magically wakes up and provides the rest of the missing map they need to find Luke. Another example: Han and chewie just happened to be in the exactly the right place they needed to be to find the falcon and save Rey, WTF? It amazes me that when JJ Abrams becomes involved in something, casual AND hardcore fans all seem to shut down the critical thinking part of their brains.

    136. Re:Not my money, yet by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      There is one in TFA using some kind of hand weapon sword thing.

      Saw it yesterday. Not a lightsaber.

      if you were a professional soldier from an early age with nothing else going on I imagine in that 20 odd years you might well have had a chance to learn hand to hand combat skills.

      You imagine, do you? Soldiers - even cloned ones - aren't a homogeneous mass. There are, and always have been, specialists.

      Look at how totally shite Luke was the first time he picked one up.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    137. Re:Not my money, yet by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      I've seen some theory suggestion that Jar Jar is really as old as Yoda. If so, he's a secret survivor that Darth Bane didn't know about so he would have been sneaky even when young.

      I've also seen items suggesting that he is the equivalent of the "Mule" from Asimov's foundation series. He sits in the background and steers the galaxy to benefit him but never takes a lead or does anything obvious or directly.

      And finally, George had a yin/yang thing going in the prequels which had darkness in the light (Mace for one example) and it's possible that Jar Jar is not stupid/completely evil like most Sith. So he would be okay with bad things happening but he doesn't want to burn down the whole galaxy. Jar Jar might even the equivalent of Luke and found a third path outside of the dark and the light but coming from a dark side perspective.

      I like to think that he and yoda would have had a philosophical discussion and Jar Jar would have reluctantly decided he had to kill Yoda after failing to sway him rather than they simply set at each other. But then a nice drunken fist vs yoda battle with Jar Jar either slain or escaping wounded back into the shadows.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    138. Re:Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Well, seems you have been mislead by the talentless morons that continue to bash George Lucas."

      Well, I don't see Howard the Duck as the highlight of cinema.

      Did you actually SEE it? Its actually pretty great, perhaps the best in its genre of comedy/sci fi.

    139. Re:Not my money, yet by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I'm withholding judgment on the speed of her advancement (although I loved the scene where she tries the Jedi mind trick). There may well be an explanation.

      There was of course a movie where a group of badly sewn teddy bears went from "Metal thing - must be god" to "Let's take out those Imperial walkers" overnight. At that rate, they'd have destroyed the Death Star themselves, given another week. (Not that the chicken walkers were particularly good; they would have lost to the US army of WWII.)

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    140. Re:Not my money, yet by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      I thought the viral overdose marketing was way over the top a sure sign of a lacklustre movie. Of course, there can only be one. One record block busting movie per season, this of course a sure sign of cartel like operations. Only one movie, in a group of lacklustre movies at beginning of the school holiday seasons, it seems some how, hmm, conspired to be that way, being able to control release dates and production schedules in order to 'share' the various school holiday starts for the major studios/cinema chains. Spend enough at the top and you control what goes out when.

      Script was just bad Saturday afternoon cartoon fair and a poor remake of the first star wars. The 2nd set again dominated and as typical failed to properly advance the story ie you could swap characters around in the action scenes and apart from the climax not much would change. Want to judge the story alone, watch it in low resolution and you will focus in on it or it's lack, Jar Jar earned his name on this movie.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    141. Re: Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong, they were CGI. Models were used only for landed, stationary shots.

    142. Re:Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you need a snack or drink-- including adult beverages

      Odd that you needed to specifically reference "adult drinks" as if that's unusual or something.

    143. Re:Not my money, yet by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Only one movie, in a group of lacklustre movies at beginning of the school holiday seasons, it seems some how, hmm, conspired to be that way, being able to control release dates and production schedules in order to 'share' the various school holiday starts for the major studios/cinema chains

      What really happens is that Lucasfilm announces a date, and it scares everyone else away. Other studios are fine with releasing movies earlier than that (Hunger Games, James Bond, etc), but the only other movies that studios are willing to release on the weekend of a major, major blockbuster are counter-programming. IE, one studio releases Star Wars, a few others release chick flicks or small independent films. No one wants to release something with a big budget or is similar to Star Wars on or just after its opening date, because it'll get crushed, and the release is a waste. Would even be better not to release anything at that point.

    144. Re:Not my money, yet by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      I'm hoping that in the future there is some explanation for Rey, because as she is right now, she's a total Mary Sue / wish fulfillment character. Literally, she is better than everyone else at almost everything. Her first time flying the Falcon she has no problem flying circles around Tie Fighters, and she can fix up the ship better than Han. She's Forcing and light-sabering without -any- training, enough to beat the Snoke-trained Ren (though at least Ren is mentally-weak enough and injured to partly explain it). Even Luke went through a whole movie of mediocrity and training before he used the Force at the end of Star Wars, and even then he had Obi-Wan on his shoulder.

      The whole "R2 had the map the whole time but he refused to wake up until just the most convenient moment" thing bothered me as well. Other than that, I think the movie was scripted pretty well.

    145. Re:Not my money, yet by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      There is one in TFA using some kind of hand weapon sword thing.

      Saw it yesterday. Not a lightsaber.

      I don't think it matters. They're pretty much the same thing. Given that Star Wars actors take sword-fighting lessons to learn how to fight with a light saber, it shouldn't come as a surprise when the combat that appears on screen looks similar to sword fighting. The mass and center of balance is different (I assume), but otherwise it's pretty much the same.

      Han had never used a light saber (that we know of) before using Luke's with no problem in Empire. Fin seemed to use it pretty much as one would use a sword. He didn't do any special Jedi tricks like reflecting blaster shots, it was mostly just "swing this thing in your hand."

      if you were a professional soldier from an early age with nothing else going on I imagine in that 20 odd years you might well have had a chance to learn hand to hand combat skills.

      You imagine, do you? Soldiers - even cloned ones - aren't a homogeneous mass. There are, and always have been, specialists.

      Look at how totally shite Luke was the first time he picked one up.

      I think how good Rey was so quickly was the biggest suspension-of-disbelief problem I had with the movie. That's bothersome.

    146. Re:Not my money, yet by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      The story in the prequels was actually better

      Now now, don't mistake the story of the prequels being more ambitious (they were) with being better (they weren't).

      Lucas aimed far higher with the prequels, but he crashed and burned far worse with the plot.

    147. Re:Not my money, yet by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      well that the movie has bad time pacing and interlaces things that are happening at different times is not so problematic as saying that hyperspace works in such a way that they could just put a droid to drive millenium falcon, put it full of explosives and hyperspace it straight to the target through the shields. and get around blockage in ep1. and blow up the deathstar in ep4. the list would go on..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    148. Re:Not my money, yet by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      It was well written and subtle, p>with good character development and pacing. =

      WTF? I saw it today , it was an utter turd. I feel the need to vent so here goes: Nothing new or original, just rehashed scenes from the original Trilogy. Rey was Luke, BB was R2, Ren was Vader with a face made for radio(please put the mask back on!), the Death Star was just a bigger more useless version (make a cup of coffee while the weapon warms up), Luke's vision scenes from Hoth, Lowering the shields, etc etc...
      The dialog was crap, mostly lifted from the original. Han was too old and looked arthritic, and Leia's plastic face was distracting. While trying to be nostalgic it just came across as boring. I spent the whole movie waiting for the new interesting thing to come along and wow and left deflated, like I'd just heard a DJ remix of my favourite song with one extra drum beat in it.

    149. Re:Not my money, yet by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      The whole "R2 had the map the whole time but he refused to wake up until just the most convenient moment" thing bothered me as well.

      This killed me. "He's never been the same since Master Luke left". Really? He's a fucking robot, not a dog. If the fucker won't wake up, then call the helpdesk and reboot him. And then suddenly for no explained reason he wakes up and provides the info everyone needs.
      And why did C3PO have a red arm? Are we supposed to believe that the Republic can afford to build space ships, but can't afford a little electroplating for the general's pet Robot?
      This movie was severely disappointing...

    150. Re:Not my money, yet by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      I agree with GP. There is no story here, just tidbits of the original trilogy we've all seen dozens of times before. As crap as the prequels were, at least there was new material in there.

    151. Re:Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well TPM was actually a pretty good film (minus Jar Jar)..

      No, I'd say Jar Jar was the least of its problems. It is a broken film with barely any redeeming values whatsoever.

    152. Re:Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What movie were you watching? The prequels are nothing but throwback after throwback to the original trilogy, except even Geroge himself doesn't seem to understand why those movies worked. People who pretend the prequels were watchable make me think they haven't seen them in many years.

    153. Re:Not my money, yet by doccus · · Score: 1

      It's the dracula sequel.. "The Force awakens the undead". They can bring back ALL the loverly villians that way, in fact!

    154. Re:Not my money, yet by doccus · · Score: 1

      I concur completely.

      My feeling at the end of the film was one of underwhelmed resignation...

      Every point of criticism you have spelled out was exactly what I was thinking during the film.

      OK that's disturbing. No competently made film should ever encourage questions such as this commenter posed.The fact that he can ask them at all pretty much makes the movie a "fail" in my book.
      Always seems the case when "adding to a franchise" as opposed to "creating a sequel". ... :sigh:

    155. Re:Not my money, yet by kmoser · · Score: 1

      What are 'most public theaters' like where you live? I saw the trailer in a local theater and the deep rumbles made me shake in my seat. Can you do that at home?

      Yes: Taco Bell burrito.

    156. Re:Not my money, yet by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

      There's a fan theory which, if true, means that JJA is pulling an M. Night Shyamalan where the "gotcha" happens two movies later.

      I won't say what it is, in case it's true.

      Also, I won't say what it is, in case it's not true.

      --
      There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
    157. Re:Not my money, yet by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It's just... meh... the writing is lazy and sloppy. It's like a bunch of old Star Wars scenes stitched together loosely with a half-assed framing story

      I guess in this article we can take *spoilers* as a given, right?

      Where we we? The clip show. Yes, they even hang a lampshade on it. When they're looking at the plans of the new death star and somebody says "there must be a weakness, right?" I almost expected a reply about womp rats.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    158. Re:Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you miss the whole major plot element, the primary characterization of her in the movie, that she's said alive by working as a scavenger, dissecting imperial ships for parts? That's what she's done her entire life to stay alive, finding and extracting the most valuable parts (including gaining access to them) from spacecraft, she better damn well know what's what. And like Luke, whose piloting skill was from riding around on a landspeeder, she has her own junky ride that she uses every day.

      Here's the problem I have with that: Luke got his piloting experience in a T-16 Skyhopper. All we really know about him when we meet him is that he's a typical teen who likes to goof around with his friends and race around in hot rods, but has lots of duties and chores. His only desire is to go to the academy, and that keeps getting postponed - his destiny is out of his hands. Then he runs into Ben, who reveals that 1) his dad was a Jedi Knight and pilot, and 2) he has a bigger destiny that could affect the whole galaxy.

      When we meet Rey, she's got mad skills but just scavenges hardware for a few cheap muffins. All we know about her is that she's living hand-to-mouth and waiting for Something Big to come along. There's nothing about her background for the audience grab on to. No reason at all to root for her, except 1) she's hungry and 2) she's a marginalized female who deserves a chance at Something Big, because "female > patriarchy."

    159. Re:Not my money, yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> And how does it even make sense to have a "hunt the floppy" plot in 2015? That plot device is two decades out of date.
      > You mean a key plot element of A New Hope and key backstory element of Return of the Jedi?

      Oh yeah... make that THREE decades.

    160. Re:Not my money, yet by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Nope, they collude and take it in turns, there is hundreds of millions of tax haven dollars up for grabs and they do not leave that to chance where ever possible. Giving a movie clear released with a shit bucket ton of advertising, no matter how bad the movie is, will give it opportunity to return profit as long as no other movies compete directly with it. They lie cheat and steal, that is how they deal, that is their nature. From some of the most mind bogglingly biased reviews, seriously they were saying greatest movie ever, whilst making excuses for it, can not do both at the same time without lying (that is straight up collusion between the major media corporate empires).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  2. god no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but props to Disney. i've never seen so many people i respect so bought-in to a franchise brand event as this.

  3. Tag all timothy articles with timothyarselicker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tag all timothy articles with timothyarselicker

    1. Re:Tag all timothy articles with timothyarselicker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      timothyasslicker

      Why censor it by using something lame like "arse"? Ass isn't even considered vulgarity. It would be like censoring the word "hell" with "heck".

    2. Re:Tag all timothy articles with timothyarselicker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why?

  4. Not my money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck J. J. Abrams and everything he stands for!

    1. Re:Not my money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      J.J. Abrams raped my adulthood!

    2. Re:Not my money! by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      Fuck J. J. Abrams and everything he stands for!

      JJ can do good look at stuff like fringe it was an great TV show. The first of the new startrek was actually okay (the second had awful world breaking plot holes though).

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
  5. Inflation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I might not read any replies until I see the movie. Just in case someone tries spoiling it for me. But...

    What about when adjusted for inflation? Does anyone know how long it took Gone with the Wind took to get to $58,566,760?
    http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/cpicalc.pl
    I hope I did the math correctly.

    1. Re:Inflation by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      You'd also have to adjust for ticket prices vs. general inflation and general size of the economy and better economies around the world due to more economic freedom and more open free speech.

      So given ROW Rest of World sales are about equal or greater than US and growing, you could almost double that. And probably double it again as there is much more than general inflation between a dime or quarter or whatever they charged and $8.50 (which I paid for 3D, not the usual $13+).

      Then there's concession sales, which Disney may get a cut of, or at least that's where the theater's money comes from, shifting that burden off the tickets since ye olden days.

      Basically it would be difficult to properly estimate.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    2. Re:Inflation by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Ok I looked it up. Matinee was 75 cents and evening $1. A dollar in 1940 is over $16 today.

      So prices drop and quality and features (of the literal film anyway) increase. Shame on me for doubting Julian Simon.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    3. Re:Inflation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI, tickets for the first Star Wars movie (later renamed "A New Hope"), were about $3. I don't know what they're charging these days, but you should probably divide the numbers for Episode VII by 3 or 4 to compare.

      Of course, comparing number of tickets sold would be a much better metric, but they aren't looking for an accurate metric, they're looking for hype.

      There is also the fact that the original movie wasn't anticipated to be a huge success, so it wouldn't have been placed in lots of theaters, thus limiting the potential revenues in the first week(s). This film was expected to be huge, and (as I understand it), every big-screen venue in the United States (in the world?) had been reserved for it for a period of a couple of months.

  6. only for the nostalgia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The new film was (a) far better than the train wreck of the prior three, (b) essentially identical to the first (1977) Star Wars plot, (c) decently acted, and (d) a mediocre movie, but one that felt better than it really was in comparison to the horrors of the prequels. It worked on a nostalgic level: it felt like the Star Wars universe again, and it didn't totally fuck it up. It didn't so well work on the level of being original or even fully making sense within its own universe.

    Mixed bag. Not as horrible as the naysayers claim, but not as awesomely great as the fanboys claim.

    1. Re:only for the nostalgia by Trevelyan · · Score: 1

      The film is 50% nostalgia and 50% new 'content'.

      While watching it, I felt it paralleled a new hope a little too much. I guessed it was trying to keep the 'fans' happy.

      After watching it, I took a look at few reviews (I was trying to avoid spoilers before); many pointed out that it's difficult to rate the film on its own. It's clearly there to provide a transition from the old to the new. As such it could be forgiven for its heavy use of nostalgia, but only if Star Wars VIII really is something new and amazing.

    2. Re: only for the nostalgia by loufoque · · Score: 3

      The prequels were good movies. The introduced a big and rich world, a large backstory, and they were very epic. Sure the actual story and acting were a bit weak, but the setting and art direction were very creative and interesting.

      This movie has nothing but fanservice for the die-hard fans of the 1977 movie. They even ruined their own evil character 30 minutes into the movie by revealing things way too early.

    3. Re:only for the nostalgia by Dins · · Score: 1

      After watching it, I took a look at few reviews (I was trying to avoid spoilers before); many pointed out that it's difficult to rate the film on its own. It's clearly there to provide a transition from the old to the new. As such it could be forgiven for its heavy use of nostalgia, but only if Star Wars VIII really is something new and amazing.

      This. I'm giving them a pass on this one as long as the next one breaks some new ground. I'm hoping that's the plan; bring everyone back into the fold with a nostalgic re-make of the original movie, then start branching off in new directions from there.

      If the next one opens with the Rebels on some remote planet hiding from the First Order who are frantically searching for them, I'm done...

    4. Re: only for the nostalgia by Hasaf · · Score: 0

      No, there were not good movies at all. Face it, if Episode 1 really have been Episode 1, there would have been no Episode 2. It was a poorly planned movie with a bad script, bad actors, and poorly thought out animations.

    5. Re: only for the nostalgia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Anonymous because slashdot is not letting me login for some reason)
      They were better at science fiction than the originals, but maybe less casual-friendly. I guess that's the problem with niche movies that become popular.

    6. Re: only for the nostalgia by skam240 · · Score: 1

      Oh yes, you're one of the only people who wasnt a child who thought they were great movies because everyone else didnt understand them. Was the acting actually not horrible and everyone else just didnt get it? Were all of the alien races really not just lame ethnic stereotypes of our own cultures and only you saw through to the truth? Were we all just too simple to get the greatness of Jar-jar?

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    7. Re:only for the nostalgia by jader3rd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It didn't so well work on the level of being original or even fully making sense within its own universe.

      Isn't funny how the Force Awakens is able to make us think of the good points of the prequels.

    8. Re:only for the nostalgia by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      While watching it, I felt it paralleled a new hope a little too much. I guessed it was trying to keep the 'fans' happy.

      It's a J.J. Abrams movie. Aren't *all* his films basically remakes of other, sometimes better, films redone for people with 10s attention spans and little aptitude for plot detail? Just asking.

      Khaaaaaaaaan!

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    9. Re:only for the nostalgia by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      > and it didn't totally fuck it up.

      And that's really all it had to do. Arguably, that's exactly and *only* what it had to do. Were it not for the prequels, episode 7 could probably have trod new ground, left out Han Solo, or been given to a director without quite the reputation as Ahrams. After the prequels, The Force Awakens really needed to be what it was simply to wash off the stink. Otherwise... well... look at Michael Bay and the Transformers movies.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    10. Re:only for the nostalgia by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      Aren't *all* his films basically remakes of other, sometimes better, films redone for people with 10s attention spans and little aptitude for plot detail?

      Yes

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    11. Re:only for the nostalgia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right Abrams closely copied original Star Wars. The story was a ripoff of the original plot right down to potential Jedi in shady alien bar looking for transport vital droid information to rebel forces. Despite the box office success, in my opinion the highly predictable plot hurt the film rather than helped it. The primary reason this movie is popular is because of Lucus's original work. Abram's version wasn't terrible but economically speaking, Seven would have been a gigantic flop without the hype that comes with Disney productions coupled with the mass following Star Wars already had. (i.e. fans like me that will probably watch it 10 times because even a so-so Star Wars movie is far far better than no Star Wars movie)

      On a similar vein... the prequels weren't a "trainwreck". They were entertaining to millions of people. This is especially true among children that almost universally loved it. Typically the ones that didn't enjoy the prequels were either those that hated Star Wars to begin with it or, ironically, disillusioned fanboys. My theory is the latter expected the emotional experience to be like the first Star Wars series... which most fans typically watched with eyes of a 10 year old. Some fans have unrealistic exceptions going in as now as critical minded adults. Children can look a movie for its heart rather adults that tend to be more cynical and pick apart plot holes and weaknesses (of which there many in the original too but as 10 year old you didn't care.)

    12. Re:only for the nostalgia by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      It's a J.J. Abrams movie. Aren't *all* his films basically remakes of other, sometimes better, films redone for people with 10s attention spans and little aptitude for plot detail? Just asking.

      Khaaaaaaaaan!

      I thought, by far, his best movie was Super-8. That was a fun one, and much different from all his other movies.

    13. Re: only for the nostalgia by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      They even ruined their own evil character 30 minutes into the movie by revealing things way too early.

      This movie ruined several opportunities for big moments. Han's son, Rey's skills, Han's end, the whole handling of Snoke, the end of the bigger Death Star. It's as if they just threw it all against the wall and hoped something would stick.

  7. The Force Awakens by penguinoid · · Score: 4, Funny

    But does the viewer?

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    1. Re:The Force Awakens by Crowd+Computing · · Score: 1

      You must be dreaming

  8. I have watched it three times by now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of the three times I have been to that movie in cinema so far I regret no dollars.

    Ok, the story is somewhat simple - but so what? It simply works as a "Star Wars" movie.

    1. Re:I have watched it three times by now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, the story is somewhat simple - but so what? It simply works as a "Star Wars" movie.

      It works as a Star Wars movie if you have the mind of a 6 year old.

    2. Re:I have watched it three times by now by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Perhaps somebody could explain what the hell the title means? Because it definitely doesn't make sense according to all the old EU stuff that they just threw under the bus.

      (The two major parts of the Force were the Unifying Force and the Living Force. Apparently the latter idea was about the Force having a will, judging between light and dark, guiding people, etc. ...so if it can "awaken" supposedly The Force has been asleep or in a coma or something for this whole time? So what have all the Force users been drawing from? Guess thousands of years of Jedi had just misread an ancient document or something.)

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    3. Re:I have watched it three times by now by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      Perhaps somebody could explain what the hell the title means?

      The two Dark Side characters talk about feeling an awakening in the force, and it disturbs them because it's implying that while they've been having a few good years the light side is about to make a resurgence.

  9. Some good parts, some a bit disappointing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think they captured the feel of the older movies well.
    I liked the banter and the action.

    I wish the script and main story was a bit more thought out.

    Worth watching? Yes, but don't expect any oscars.

  10. Squeezing the theaters probably helped by MDMurphy · · Score: 3, Informative

    No doubt the film was popular. How to get all those people in and out a a record pace? Squeeze the theaters by requiring them to show the film on the largest screens for a long period of time, pushing out any other movies. The Hateful Eight was to be shown in a special 70mm roadshow presentation. The problem though was that it could only be shown on smaller secondary screens. Disney required their new movie to show on the largest ones, or else not show the movie at all, on any screen.

    So while their film is popular, it's not just the marketing hype that got it the numbers. A bit of strong arm tactics to push aside other movies seems to have contributed.

    1. Re:Squeezing the theaters probably helped by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I saw it on a regular screen, and the theater had the regular number of big screens for the major films. All the big budget films were available on 3d IMAX.

      Maybe the place you saw it just has poor planning?

    2. Re:Squeezing the theaters probably helped by MDMurphy · · Score: 1

      No poor planning. Well after they'd scheduled things, had special lenses delivered for the presentation, Disney gave them new rules, which included only showing their new film on the largest screen at the theater. This doesn't mean Disney's movie couldn't be shown on smaller screens, just that the largest one was reserved for theirs.
      The same thing happened in Hollywood, forcing the movie out of the Cinerama Dome, with the threat of pulling the movie from all of the chain's theaters if it didn't play there.

    3. Re:Squeezing the theaters probably helped by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      No, actually Tarantino had contracts and Disney said "Okay fine, we'll just pull Star Wars from your theater.. or maybe your entire theater chain."

      It was an asshat move.

      I suspect Hateful 8 is actually going to be a better and more memorable film that maybe even sorta has something new in it unlike the entire last half of the star wars movie.

      You know how you can recite the lines of a film you've seen several times before-- like Rocky Horror Picture Show.

      Star wars-- you could recite the lines on the first viewing in the 2nd half of the film. It was just that predictable. You saw what was coming and what the actors would say before they actually did and said it. Abrahms didn't even try to subvert it a little bit. You know-- set it up and then not do it- and then do it later by surprise? You got "In the next scene we are going from A to F".... "A B C D E F.' -cut-

      Hateful 8 was unable to even open in Houston due to Disney's strong arm tactics.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    4. Re:Squeezing the theaters probably helped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Saw Hatefull 8 - very long very slow, very boring until last act. Star wars meh! its starwars.

    5. Re:Squeezing the theaters probably helped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was an asshat move.

      I refuse to give any more money to Disney after their asshat move of firing many (most?) of their IT staff and making them train their cheap, imported replacements, so asshat moves seems to be their natural response.

      Yes, I know that they withdrew their decision, but that just means they will do it in a more discreet way.

    6. Re:Squeezing the theaters probably helped by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Apparently JJ only has two modes: Zero Originality, and Shit All Over Everything?

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    7. Re:Squeezing the theaters probably helped by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      No, actually ...

      So, you're going to refute my observation that some theaters had enough rooms to have high quality (3d,IMAX) offerings for all the major movies... with a theory based on having heard about some contract, the details of which probably don't contradict what I said? Gee whiz, kiddo.

      If a theater planned the wrong number of showings of a major movie, and had to adjust their showings because of their contract, that is 100% on that theater for being bad at their job. And in hindsight, people making that mistake were idiots; they were betting on the movie having a smaller response than predicted, and it actually exceeded many mainstream predictions. Their contractual business partners, who they rent movies from, may indeed have forced them to fix that evaluation. But the only reason for a negative impact on other movies is resistance from the theater owner, causing them to whine and cry and do a poor job at choosing what to put in what room. It may be that they wanted to keep showing another movie longer than expected, or something like that.

      The whole nature of the complaint is crap. The fact is that it is a matter of planning. If there weren't enough rooms to show those other movies at the same time as the biggest grossing movie ever then that is a planning fail. Nay-sayers said "nay," and they were simply wrong.

      If you want a theater that isn't expected to schedule based on demand, stop visiting theaters that even show Disney movies. Go to an art house theater that only shows independent movies.

    8. Re:Squeezing the theaters probably helped by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Apparently JJ only has two modes: Zero Originality, and Shit All Over Everything?

      I didn't realize it was such a technical subject as to be incomprehensible, but you do realize that the person you're insulting doesn't do the job you're insulting him based on? Completely different people handle movie distribution. Directors and producers probably don't even enter that building, and the bean-counters certainly don't contact them for consultations on theater relations and contract enforcement.

    9. Re:Squeezing the theaters probably helped by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      You're talking about a handful of theaters in the nation with special super-sized screens.

      Large theaters with dozens of rooms in major cities don't normally have that. They have regular, 3d, and IMAX which may also be 3d. There is not normally a single room with a bigger screen than any other room. If a theater in a mall has 16 screens, at least 4 of them are probably IMAX and are exactly the same size. They may have three sizes total, but usually 2.

      People such as yourself are repeating details of a contract that you've probably never seen, and describing it in a way that is clearly not true in its implication. It may be literally true in some marginal way where it is true for those few theaters that have a single super-size marquee screen, but the way it is being phrased could easily mislead a reader into thinking that all 4 IMAX screens would be reserved for Star Wars. I don't doubt they have rules that say at least 1 of the largest-size screens has to be dedicated to just Star Wars. They appeared to have 2 of the 4 showing Star Wars where I went, and the other 2 rotating between 4 or 5 other movies.

      If some idiot has a theater with a single oversize marquee and they were showing something else on it, yeah, that is a total planning fail on their part. If you hate Star Wars and nerds and really wanted to watch some lowbrow western or something, that doesn't change the evaluation; obviously the biggest movie in history would be playing on the marquee screen for a few weeks after release. Duh. Why would a consumer of these products be attempting to covet watching the less popular movie on the biggest oversized screen in town? That seems a pretty silly requirement for satisfaction with your purchase.

    10. Re:Squeezing the theaters probably helped by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      I didn't realize it was such a technical subject as to be incomprehensible,

      No kidding. I wasn't talking about the distribution; I was talking about the predictability of the movie.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    11. Re:Squeezing the theaters probably helped by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      but you do realize that the person you're insulting doesn't do the job you're insulting him based on?

      I think the Zero Originality and Shit All Over Everything modes alluded to are more an indictment of the story, the script, than distribution.
      Perhaps, to clear up any confusion about who is responsible for either option, we should look up who wrote "The Force Awakens":
      drumroll...

      1. Lawrence Kasdan
      2. J. J. Abrams
      3. Michael Arndt

      Those three are the culprits, and who should be held responsible for the two options mentioned above(Zero Originality and Shit All Over Everything).

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    12. Re:Squeezing the theaters probably helped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I laughed so hard at this comment, I spit Coke all over my computer monitor! :)

    13. Re:Squeezing the theaters probably helped by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Look- it's easy to find a video of Tarantino saying these things directly and personally.
      Tarantino puts it on Disney, not on the theaters. I think he'd know.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    14. Re:Squeezing the theaters probably helped by delt0r · · Score: 1

      Disney, as a distributor, does this all the time. They are also the worst to work with, with the reels turning up really late, to be even more strict with returning the prints. I worked as a projectionist back when it was still film. Fun times.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    15. Re:Squeezing the theaters probably helped by dskzero · · Score: 1

      Sounds like any other post-Pulp Fiction Tarantino film.

      --
      Oblivion Awaits
  11. I spent "dollars" for family ticket by sseymour1978 · · Score: 0

    And I do not regret a cent.

    1) That was nice present for kids.
    2) I enjoyed it no less than any of 6 previous star wars movies
    3) My wife also said that she liked it much more than last "Mad Max", which she finds disgusting. While I must say "Mad Max" was impressive, but I would better watch more  "Star Wars" movies that "Mad Max" movies.

    This was right movie in the right time for merchandise.

  12. Overhyped rubbish movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Come on, they blatantly rehashed the most well-received scenes from the original series and filled the rest with a whiny "villain", a female "Luke" (because women), an orange "Yoda" and random action. I wouldn't exactly say I was disappointed, because I didn't expect much more from Disney and J.J. Abrams, but that really was unimaginative and bland, even for them. 5/10, "saved by production value".

    1. Re: Overhyped rubbish movie by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Thank God someone else who isn't brainwashed thinks this movie isn't God. My coworkers went as far as to call anyone who disagrees it isn't the best ever as idiots

    2. Re: Overhyped rubbish movie by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      The interesting thing is that of my co-workers, I've encountered Millennials who both loved it and hated it.
      I was actually quite surprised that someone in their twenties would come to the same conclusions about the film that I did, that it is overtly derivative, and with no back story about the new characters. This has given me a new hope.

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
  13. Some of those dollars were mine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Although I don't find the movie that good. Too action packed, a lot of special effects, but painfully lacking story and character development. After seeing this new film I have watched again the original trilogy. Oh, my, they were works of art compared to this one! You could actually find a scenario in those movies, the characters really had clearly defined goals (other than "shoot'em all"), there have even been some plots and clever schemes on both sides, and most important, characters really talked to each other during the movie! And this is talking about a trilogy that was essentialy commercial and not-that-deep compared to the well developed SF literature of the time.

  14. Not shocking but mildly disappointing by quantaman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Mild spoiler warning.

    Of course it made a billion dollars, it's a decent Star Wars movie. They could have made a great Star Wars movie if they didn't just remake A New Hope. Of course that would also risk a bomb that would kill ticket sales for the further installments.

    Better to shoot for mediocrity and guarantee billions than to shoot for greatness and risk the cash cow. Hopefully the next non-Abrams director will be willing to make a new movie.

    --
    I stole this Sig
    1. Re:Not shocking but mildly disappointing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is the best reason I have heard yet to get rid of the copyright cartels.

      Better to shoot for mediocrity and guarantee billions than to shoot for greatness and risk the cash cow.

      Why do you think VIII will be any different?

      Get rid of the copyright cartels. I'm considering buying a $125 ship in Star Citizen. Why? They're shooting for greatness.

      I got a camrip of TFA. I'll probably see it in theaters this week, but that's only because when I return from vacation I'm sure I'll have to deal with an endless torrent of co-workers who are Big Bang Theory fans and I'm planning being as snotty as possible about how much the movie fucking sucks. Camrip was in Spanish, and I only speak a little Spanish.

      Get rid of the copyright cartels. As far as I'm concerned, Star Trek: Renegades was the 11th Star Trek movie. Crowdfunded. Star Trek Continues. Crowdfunded. Star Trek the New Voyages. Crowdfunded. The complete and utter shit that was Star Trek into Darkness and the fact that Star Trek Beyond is the SECOND fucking time the Enterprise gets completely destroyed? Copyright cartel funded and rationalized on the same basis: guarantee billions instead of shoot for greatness.

    2. Re:Not shocking but mildly disappointing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it made a billion dollars, it's a decent Star Wars movie.

      But did it make the Kessel run in less than 12 parsecs?

    3. Re:Not shocking but mildly disappointing by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      I'll probably see it in theaters this week, but that's only because when I return from vacation I'm sure I'll have to deal with an endless torrent of co-workers who are Big Bang Theory fans and I'm planning being as snotty as possible about how much the movie fucking sucks.

      May The Force Be With You...
      Always.

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    4. Re:Not shocking but mildly disappointing by Rei · · Score: 1

      Wasn't it 14? ;)

      --
      Shiny New Australia.
    5. Re:Not shocking but mildly disappointing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Better to shoot for mediocrity and guarantee billions than to shoot for greatness and risk the cash cow."

      Exactly... and why every Star Wars movie moving forward is likely going to be mediocre. Many criticized Lucas for the prequels but I loved them. They weren't Oscar performances but they were still fun. It was still Star Wars without trying to be Star Wars. It added to the Star War universe rather than just rehash. As an obsessed Star Wars fan I'll of course watch the new series too but to me this new series was more a remake. I liked the prequels better (or at least thus far hopefully Abrams decides to provide more of his own input on the next one)

    6. Re:Not shocking but mildly disappointing by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      Wasn't it 14? ;)

      Maybe, but ironically, for a geek movie, the parsec is a unit of distance, not time... equivalent to about 19 trillion miles or 3.26 light-years.

      How could a shoot first, ask questions later pilot like Han make such a rookie mistake?

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    7. Re:Not shocking but mildly disappointing by Rei · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's a reference to The Force Awakens. Rey mistakenly says "This is the ship that made the Kessel Run in 14 parsecs!", annoying Han who shouts back "12!"

      Rather than hiding the oddities/cheesinginess in the original trilogy, the Force Awakens really seemed to embrace them. Gonk makes a reappearance. Chewie's much-maligned crossbow turns out to actually be a good weapon. The Force being used as a deus ex machina to all problems is lampshaded with Fin's response to being called out on the fact that he hadn't at all thought through his rescue plan (Fin: "We'll use the Force!" Han: "The Force doesn't work that way!") Pretty much everything that the original trilogy got called out on, the new movie embraces or lampshades it.

      As for the parsec issue - according to Lucas, traveling through hyperspace isn't moving in a straight line, it requires navigation to avoid being thrown offcourse by effects from stars and other obstacles, so the fastest route is generally the shortest, riskiest route. In particular the expanded universe the Kessel system is near the very dangerous Maw black hole cluster, so a short Kessel Run time means those foolhardy enough to take a route skimming close to the cluster.

      (We of course have to take for granted that superluminal travel is possible in the Star Wars universe without time dilation effects - it's a fundamental aspect of the canon Star Wars universe; without it, nothing that happens in the Star Wars universe makes any sense)

      --
      Shiny New Australia.
    8. Re:Not shocking but mildly disappointing by delt0r · · Score: 1

      It is star wars. It is right there in the franchise name. Star wars. What the fuck did everyone expect? Shawshank redemption in a galaxy far far away?

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    9. Re:Not shocking but mildly disappointing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > What the fuck did everyone expect? Shawshank redemption in a galaxy far far away?

      "Luke was here"

      "So was Rey."

    10. Re:Not shocking but mildly disappointing by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      (We of course have to take for granted that superluminal travel is possible in the Star Wars universe without time dilation effects - it's a fundamental aspect of the canon Star Wars universe; without it, nothing that happens in the Star Wars universe makes any sense)

      A very common convention in lots of movies and books. There aren't that many that have interstellar travel without worrying about relativistic effects.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  15. Still sucks by Billly+Gates · · Score: 0, Troll

    I dont know what I saw? It may have familiar props and actors in it. But it wasnt star wars.

    It is amazing what a big marketing budget can do to brainwash consumers. Light side or dark side doggie biscuits even. But phantom menace was God too when it first came out and no one would dare say anything bad due to death threats. Even Slashdot talked about how cool that prequrl is.

    It didn't become OK to say it sucked until later.

    The fact even Finn could defeat a dark Lord of the sith shows how much of a joke it is.

    If it wasn't Star wars no one would see it. It's all branding

    1. Re:Still sucks by Noble713 · · Score: 1, Troll

      I dont know what I saw? It may have familiar props and actors in it. But it wasnt star wars.

      Please define "Star Wars" in your mind. And be specific about the elements missing from Ep7.

      The fact even Finn could defeat a dark Lord of the sith shows how much of a joke it is.

      Spoiler Warning....


      Did we watch the same movie? I never saw Finn defeat a Sith Lord. I saw Finn LOSE to a partially-trained Jedi apprentice who fell to the Dark Side. And said apprentice defeated Finn even after getting shot with Chewie's bowcaster and running hundreds of meters outside to confront the heroes in the forest.

    2. Re:Still sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's totally all branding. Apart from purposefully being a structural copy of the original film, with many of the same events in it, and being full of fan references to the original movies. It couldn't have been more blatantly sucking the original films dicks.

    3. Re:Still sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Defeat means that Finn put all those little bombs in "new deathstar" thermal vents and the whole apparatus goes boom... and the sith lord was defeated. Defeat does not always mean that somebody is killed.
      Ofcource they will now produce a new movie where there is a price if somebody brings in Finn's head ...

    4. Re:Still sucks by Time_Ngler · · Score: 1

      And said apprentice defeated Finn even after getting shot with Chewie's bowcaster and running hundreds of meters outside to confront the heroes in the forest.

      I realize that exercise isn't a priority for most geeks, but I think we can both understand that at least a normal human being, much less a highly skilled jedi knight is able to run around the block and not pass out from exertion.

    5. Re:Still sucks by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Yea this bothered me. If Finn had shown ANY skill during the fight with the storm trooper earlier then perhaps I would have believed he could last more than a few seconds before Kylo cut off an arm or cut him in half.

      JJ Abrahms has this problem since star trek. You have a young person with years less experience and training and they consistently outperform everyone else. It destroys my sense of disbelief.

      All they had to do was show Rey using force jumps in the ruins and mine control on the food vendor-- and it MIGHT have been remotely credible. But she makes more progress in half a movie (and years less time in the story) than Luke AND Anakin did with training by masters, field experience, and a lot of time.

      It's not incredible... it's simply not credible.

      Kylo Ren had been trained by a master jedi for years and then went on to serve on the dark side for so long that his master was partially forgotten and partially legendary (at least a decade per the portrayal in the movie itself).

      ---
      But I agree the first half of the movie *felt* good. It was meticulously tuned to push the right buttons and say the right things.
      The second half.. well predictable would be too kind a word. You know what they would say and what they would do before the characters even said it themselves. It was simply lame.

      But good star wars feel in the first half.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    6. Re:Still sucks by Noble713 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I realize that exercise isn't a priority for most geeks

      And having served as a Marine Corps Officer, I think I'm more familiar with physical exertion than most geeks. You emphasized the distance ran, I would emphasize getting shot, and from a noticeably high-powered weapon at that. If you shot me in the side with a Dragunov rifle (which fires the same 7.62x54mm rounds as the PKM light machine gun) and told me to run the Marine Corps obstacle course ( less than 100m), and THEN fight another Marine....I'd almost certainly lose, regardless of the melee skills of my opponent.

      But Ren didn't lose, he won. The entire argument of "Ep7 sucks because the Dark Jedi lost a saber fight with a Stormtrooper" is moot...because it's factually incorrect.

    7. Re:Still sucks by dbrueck · · Score: 1

      But she makes more progress in half a movie (and years less time in the story) than Luke AND Anakin did with training by masters, field experience, and a lot of time.

      It's not incredible... it's simply not credible.

      Hmm... aren't you making an assumption that there is no alternative explanation for this that fits in the story? Yes, given "she makes an incredible amount of progress in a short amount of time", then one conclusion *could* be "therefore, the story is broken", but why assume that's the only possible explanation?

      I wondered if her rapid pace at discovering the force wasn't discovering at all, but remembering. i.e. I won't be surprised if in Ep8/9 we find out that she had been a Padawan in training at Luke's school and when things went crazy there, they took some of the promising kids and hid them away on various planets, wiping their memories as a way to protect them. Her vision after finding the lightsaber would seem to suggest this is at least possible.

      Anyway, yeah, /maybe/ that part of the story is screwed up. Or maybe, since this act one of a new multi-act story, you're supposed to wonder about some things that eventually get explained. :)

    8. Re: Still sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I keep seeing this criticism but I'm not sure what else jj Abrams could have done to make it more clear that rey had force training previously... Or that ren was severely injured before they fought.

    9. Re:Still sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disclaimer: I am not a marine and you could probably easily hand me my ass in 2 seconds flat.

      As a marine, you don't have: force healing, force precognition, force reflexes, force telekinesis (you do remember Luke running around on Degobah, right?), Jedi mind tricks, force this that and the other thing, you name it.

      So, here is AC's summary of what was missing from the movie: the mysticism.

      And why the fuck is there yet another death star?! (Ok, it's a small moon that is a space station, but whatever.) Is that JJ's take on the Sun Crusher?

    10. Re:Still sucks by skam240 · · Score: 1

      Yes, you are the rare enlightened soul who is blessed with insite beyond all others!

      How can you say it wasnt Star Wars? It was basically A New Hope with the scenes mixed a bit. Now that certainly doesnt make it a great Star Wars movie but to say it wasnt one at all is just stupid when almost every scene was from prior movies.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    11. Re:Still sucks by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      The fact that someone gave a lightsaber to a stomrtrooper and he knew how to.....swordfight is kind of ridiculous. If someone gave me a lightsaber and told me to use it, I swear I would chop my arm off. Or maybe my leg.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    12. Re:Still sucks by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      The second half.. well predictable would be too kind a word.

      I'll bet you didn't predict they would build a death star. Too lame of a plot for that to happen.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    13. Re:Still sucks by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      The fact even Finn could defeat a dark Lord of the sith shows how much of a joke it is.

      What? Finn lost to Kylo Ren (had his spine sliced up), who isn't Sith, he's a knight of Ren.

    14. Re:Still sucks by LaurenCates · · Score: 1

      I don't have a problem with what you're saying IF that's the explanation.

      I have a problem with the things that the movie decided to withhold. Like Rey's history. At the end, Leia hugs Rey and Rey is the one to go find Luke. Why? All signs point to her being a Skywalker (and there's still a lot of debate over which one is her parent...there's even some debate that she's the granddaughter of Obi-Wan). But the Skywalker theory makes the most sense, and re-hashes the "child on a desert planet" theme that the Skywalkers have going.

      But you don't know with 100% certainty that the explanation you gave is true, and neither do I. Which wouldn't be so bad, except there's really no good reason why they should have left that detail out. It's not going to be a point of ambiguity once it's revealed, and chances are, once it is revealed, the plot will carry on without making a fuss over it.

      For what it's worth, it wouldn't have occurred to me that Rey was training with Ben (that's the presumption I'd make, since both would be training with the only guy they COULD be training with) because everyone around her seems to kind of not give a shit about her. Leia and Han talk about bringing Ben home, but nobody has a thing to say about Rey. Kylo Ren is more consumed with killing his father than locating a potentially powerful ally (and didn't seem like he was expecting another person strong with The Force to arrive out of thin air). The child was presumed to be old enough to walk and talk, but not a moment's thought was given to this "missing" padawan. So, the sense I get from the writing is either everyone is suffering from amnesia (LAME!) or she was strangely hidden away and maybe taught a few things but couldn't really remember any of it until the plot required that she needed to.

      I've been told for pointing that out, that apparently I need a movie to spell things out for me. Those fanboys can bite me. If the writers can't be bothered to fill in enough details to make it unambiguous, that's not my problem.

      --
      Some people don't believe in fairies. I don't believe in The Patriarchy.
    15. Re:Still sucks by psycho12345 · · Score: 1

      Seriously this. I still do not understand why people thought it was ridiculous that Finn almost beat Kylo, after the movie amply demonstrates

      1) Chewies Bowcaster hits like a truck. Repeatedly shows Stormtroopers being throw off their feet from a single shot
      2) Kylo hammers on his wound prior to the fight and the movie shows a pool of blood on the snow, showing how badly Kylo is bleeding out

      The fact that Kylo nearly beats both Finn and Rey is a testament to his hatred/dedication.

    16. Re: Still sucks by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      He is or was a professionally trained Jedi and gifted with the force where he can dual blindfolded. Finn has no training at all with that weapon

    17. Re:Still sucks by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      The fact even Finn could defeat a dark Lord of the sith shows how much of a joke it is.

      Bingo.

      But rest assured, in the next film were going to get all the backstory on both Fin and Rey, about how they sort of "sprouted, wholly formed as Jedi badasses" out of nothing. I can hear the Abrams apologists now enthusing about "JJs brilliance" that by giving us nothing about Fin and Rey(or Kylo Ren) in the first film, and then to fully flesh them out with history, etc in the second film... When in reality that sort of fleshing out and back story should have happened in TFA, not the next film.

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    18. Re:Still sucks by Rei · · Score: 1

      Um, said stormtrooper lost every lightsaber battle he entered into.

      --
      Shiny New Australia.
    19. Re:Still sucks by Rei · · Score: 1

      But she makes more progress in half a movie (and years less time in the story) than Luke

      You mean, when Luke, whose previous dogfighting experience was shooting womp rats, evaded turbolasers down a long trench pursued by a mature Sith lord and destroyed the death star by nailing a tiny target without his targeting computer on?

      Versus when Rey nearly lost to a badly wounded teenage sith apprentice?

      --
      Shiny New Australia.
    20. Re:Still sucks by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      but he didn't chop his own arm off, which is quite an accomplishment when wielding a giant, sizzling laser

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    21. Re:Still sucks by Rei · · Score: 1

      I've noticed that light sabers do seem to have some sorts of safety features. For example, when a person goes flying through the air out of control, their light saber usually retracts. I don't know whether the canon is that this happens on its own or whether the wielder calls the retraction, but it seems to be a general thing. Also, when a person loses their grip on a light saber (such as when it gets knocked from their hand), it also retracts automatically.

      Nobody seems to be really concerned about novices injuring themselves with light sabers... heck, in Ep 4, Obiwan didn't even react when Luke started handling his father's lightsaber with it pointed at his head, or when he turned it on and started swinging it around in a crowded space right next to him without any sort of training.

      --
      Shiny New Australia.
    22. Re:Still sucks by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      I've been told for pointing that out, that apparently I need a movie to spell things out for me. Those fanboys can bite me. If the writers can't be bothered to fill in enough details to make it unambiguous, that's not my problem.

      And there you have it. One of the key problems with the film, there is no backstory or any inclination as to why Fin or Rey have been thrust into the Jedi roles they take in the film.
      Of course we will be informed, in the second film, what their stories were, but to leave that sort of important details out in this first film is a real problem.

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    23. Re: Still sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Sun Crusher thing made me think of Doc Smith's solar-sized triode thing.

    24. Re:Still sucks by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Nobody seems to be really concerned about novices injuring themselves with light sabers... heck, in Ep 4, Obiwan didn't even react when Luke started handling his father's lightsaber with it pointed at his head, or when he turned it on and started swinging it around in a crowded space right next to him without any sort of training.

      Yeah, I basically count that in the category of "unrealistic"

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    25. Re:Still sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really. Consider:

      A) Stormtroopers originally had a special plan specifically to kill lightsaber wielding opponents (the order 66 shenannigans).

      B) The Stormtrooper that fights Finn with a melee weapon that is not a lightsaber but doesn't get cut in half by one. Clearly it was designed so that it could deal with lightsabers.

    26. Re:Still sucks by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Sometimes in the movies, lightsabers seem really strong, they can cut through steal. Other times, they bounce off flesh with hardly any damage done. They are certainly not consistent weapons.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    27. Re:Still sucks by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      The difference is that in New Hope Lucas directly addresses those points in the movie.

      The movie says that ...
      Luke is already an experienced and qualified flyer with years of experience flying in a narrow canyons at high speed firing at 2 meter targets with a mounted weapon.

      Biggs tells the rebellion, "Luke is the best brush pilot in the galaxy".
      Luke says it's no different than shooting Womp Rats in the canyons back home.

      Extending to a filmed but deleted scene..
      Biggs also says to Luke (in a deleted but filmed scene in a bar on Tatooine) "You may be the hottest bush pilot this side of Mos Eisley, Luke, but those little skyhoppers can be dangerous. They move awfully fast for tropospheric craft "faster than they need to. Keep playing engine jockey with one and someday, whammo! You're going to be nothing more than a dark spot on the damp side of a canyon wall."

      Extending to the Star Wars Wikia..
      The T-16 Skyhopper
      "Even so, these airspeeders were often used as training vehicles by the Rebel Alliance, due to the fact that their flight controls were similar to those of X-wings. "

      Womp Rat
      http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki... [wikia.com]
      These are two meters long and moving.

      Thermal Exhaust Port
      http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki... [wikia.com]
      "The target area is only two meters wide. It's a small thermal exhaust port, right below the main port. The shaft leads directly to the reactor system."
      - Jan Dodonna on the attack on the first Death Star

      So Luke spent his misguided youth flying at high speeds down canyons shooting at moving 2 meter targets with a mounted youth in a craft with the same control system as X-Wings.

      And the mission was to fly down a dangerous canyon at high speed and fire at a 2 meter target with a mounted weapon! Sounds tailor made! lol.

      To be fair, he didn't really dog fight either. He flew in and did a bombing run.

      --

      If Rey and done anything or they said anything in the movie to justify her massive immediate mastery of the force, it would have helped a lot. As I said above, a trivial example would have been a scene of her force leaping in the ruins of the StarDestroyer. Another trivial example would have been a scene of her mind controlling the food vendor for a little extra food.

      But instead there was nothing. It was as bad as Chris Pine in Star Trek. A completely unqualified, untrained person drops into the role and out performs people with years more experience and training. I know from experience in the SCA that someone with even a few months training and experience is going to cut a novice to pieces in seconds. You have no muscle memory. You have no reflexes. And you have no clue.

      And neither did Rey.

      Fin... was less clear. He was trained and experienced and probably had several kinds of martial arts training which might have included Kendo.
      But to show him getting owned by another storm trooper and then holding his own against Kylo Ren was dubious. He should have show skill and won the battle against the storm trooper and then he would have had more credibility. But at least he wasn't un credible. Just a bit of a stretch.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    28. Re:Still sucks by Beck_Neard · · Score: 1

      > It is amazing what a big marketing budget can do to brainwash consumers

      The marketing was so pervasive that some people _need_ to believe that it was an amazing movie. They have to rationalize their beliefs and predictions for themselves.

      They'll eventually come around to the truth, though.

      --
      A fool and his hard drive are soon parted.
    29. Re:Still sucks by quantaman · · Score: 1

      Spoilers Obviously.

      I realize that exercise isn't a priority for most geeks

      And having served as a Marine Corps Officer, I think I'm more familiar with physical exertion than most geeks. You emphasized the distance ran, I would emphasize getting shot, and from a noticeably high-powered weapon at that. If you shot me in the side with a Dragunov rifle (which fires the same 7.62x54mm rounds as the PKM light machine gun) and told me to run the Marine Corps obstacle course ( less than 100m), and THEN fight another Marine....I'd almost certainly lose, regardless of the melee skills of my opponent.

      But Ren didn't lose, he won. The entire argument of "Ep7 sucks because the Dark Jedi lost a saber fight with a Stormtrooper" is moot...because it's factually incorrect.

      The problem is we didn't really see Ren hurting from the gunshot wound. We saw him get shot, and we occasionally saw him wince and bleed, but that doesn't really register with the audience. If I could see him obviously hobbled or otherwise hurting as he fought it might be relevant, but what I actually saw on the screen was Ren defeating Fin by a narrow margin, and losing to... the girl with a slightly less memorable name. Ren as the bad guy is frankly not scary.

      I think that kind of issue was indicative of the movie, there's decent ideas but they didn't think them through so they didn't really work. Imagine if Ren was a rage-filled fanatic with a ridiculous amount of power instead of a little kid with a temper tantrum. Now I'm actually scared of him.

      More to the point think about how meaningless it was when they Death Star fired and blew up a Republic that basically had no role in the movie. Imagine instead if they spent the first half of the movie trying to sneak through First Order space in order to reach the Republic, and they knew they just had to reach the Republic fleets to be safe and decipher the map. Imagine we had regular scenes on Republic planets, perhaps with Han Solo, trying to smuggle them through First Order controlled territory. And then a giant Death Star comes out and simply destroys the Republic, Han Solo, and all of their plans?

      I think I'd actually care about the new Death Star firing in that case.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    30. Re:Still sucks by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I guess it's not inconceivable that lightsabers might have different power settings. So at the lowest setting it might be like the stun setting on Star Trek's phasors. Certainly something you might want to have when swinging one around blindly with blast helmet on (like Luke was doing on the Millennium Falcon against the training ball which likewise shot at him with what appeared to be a very low power blaster).

      Still, one of the things that bothered me a bit was how Finn was able to use one with at least some apparent skill when we've been lead to believe that a lightsaber was a Jedi's weapon and one isn't going to be able to use it effectively without training. I kind of expected him to clumsily try to use it, before giving up and grabbing a blaster from a fallen stormtrooper (a weapon he would be familiar with).

    31. Re:Still sucks by Noble713 · · Score: 1

      The problem is we didn't really see Ren hurting from the gunshot wound. We saw him get shot, and we occasionally saw him wince and bleed, but that doesn't really register with the audience. If I could see him obviously hobbled or otherwise hurting as he fought it might be relevant,

      I'm not sure why that wouldn't "register with the audience", it registered fine with me. He was pretty obviously trying to muscle through the pain of his injury, and succeeding.

      but what I actually saw on the screen was Ren defeating Fin by a narrow margin,

      He aggressively dominated the tempo against Finn from the first blow, culminating in burning a hole in his shoulder. Finn recovered enough to score a glancing blow on Ren's shoulder, after which Ren promptly disarms him in 2 moves. I don't consider that a narrow margin but I suppose we could argue the point indefinitely.

      and losing to... the girl with a slightly less memorable name. Ren as the bad guy is frankly not scary.

      I think that kind of issue was indicative of the movie, there's decent ideas but they didn't think them through so they didn't really work. Imagine if Ren was a rage-filled fanatic with a ridiculous amount of power instead of a little kid with a temper tantrum. Now I'm actually scared of him.

      I think he works as a realistic villain partly because he's *NOT* an all-powerful badass. He's young, inexperienced, and highly unpredictable. He's not disciplined enough to control his powers well. It reminds me of a Vice video I saw about hitmen in Peru: most of the sicarios are teenagers. Kids on a power trip are not to be taken lightly.

      More to the point think about how meaningless it was when they Death Star fired and blew up a Republic that basically had no role in the movie.

      Agreed on this point. It's a persistent problem with JJ Abrams and his sense of world-building and scale (or lack thereof). And now I'm wondering how a movie with a 2-hour runtime can somehow not find time for a few scenes to help get the audience emotionally invested in the consequences of Starkiller Base.

    32. Re:Still sucks by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Still, one of the things that bothered me a bit was how Finn was able to use one with at least some apparent skill

      Yes lol. I've taken fencing lessons, and I can tell you, picking up a sword and trying to use it is a good way to kill yourself.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    33. Re:Still sucks by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      But she makes more progress in half a movie (and years less time in the story) than Luke

      You mean, when Luke, whose previous dogfighting experience was shooting womp rats, evaded turbolasers down a long trench pursued by a mature Sith lord and destroyed the death star by nailing a tiny target without his targeting computer on?

      Yup. He destroyed a stationary target of two metres because he was used to hitting moving targets of two metres.

      Versus when Rey nearly lost to a badly wounded teenage sith apprentice?

      What? Badly wounded? All his limbs still worked, all his force-voodoo still worked and he was, from all appearances, at full strength.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    34. Re:Still sucks by Rei · · Score: 1

      I like the concept that light sabers are nothing more than a plasma sheath over a solid (or, since this is Star Wars, "force field") core, magnetically constrained by a solenoidal field around the core, and with the ability to impart bursts of plasma and/or surges of high-amperage electrical current when there's a short between the plasma and the core (aka it strikes another object - except another corresponding magnetic trap, such as another lightsaber)**. In such a case then it's perfectly reasonable that there would be different power settings or that small details of the target might influence its performance.

      ** - The only problem with this hypothesis is that there would be a really bright flareout whenever a lightsaber was cutting something substantial, which you don't see. But really that's unavoidable in the real-world - you don't, say, burn through thick steel blast doors without a huge amount of light being given off, that's why people welding and cutting steel need goggles to protect their eyes. Also, we don't know what "blaster" shots are, so it's hard to say why or if they'd be deflected in such a hypothetical lightsabre design - they certainly seem to be subluminal, so they're not just laser beams. But in general the "magnetically constrained plasma cutter" design makes sense. It even makes expanding/retracting the lightsabre easy, as a nested collection of solenoids works out to be a linear motor - it'd automatically telescope when you turned it on, and retract when you reversed the field on alternating elements. And the color would require nothing more than a slow leak of gases from the core that tend to glow with certain colors when ionized, such as for coolant or simply to increase the visibility of the plasma. Really, the main hindrance to making such a thing in the real-world that comes to mind is the vast amounts of power and energy required in such a small device.

      --
      Shiny New Australia.
    35. Re:Still sucks by Rei · · Score: 1

      So the womp rats were armed with turbolasers and were shooting him, and some of them were sith lords trying to gun him down in the Empire's most advanced fighter craft? Sorry, but we're specifically told that his success was due to him using the Force. He pulls the exact same thing that Rey does - closing his eyes, reaching some sort of inner peace, opening them and then doing some seemingly miraculous Force-guided action. The whole point of both of these movies is about an untrained but Force-gifted individual learning to make use of their latent abilities for the first time.

      And seriously, "massive immediate mastery"? Luke is the only one who had "immediate mastery". Rey reached it incrementally - first being totally dominated mentally by Kylo Ren in the forest, then being somewhat dominated mentally but ultimately learning to shut him out during the interrogation, then failing to give commands to the storm trooper, then succeeding, and ultimately, after losing to Kylo Ren (who only kept her alive because his mission was to bring her to his master), learning how to make use of it during a sabre battle. She was given repeated incremental rounds of practice. And it was anything but "mastery", she was fighting a wounded teenager apprentice who was in so much pain that he had to stop periodically, breathing heavily and hitting is side to control the pain.

      And Fin held his own against Kylo Ren? Perhaps you weren't watching the same movie as me. Or perhaps to you "held his own" means "taking more than 15 seconds to be slaughtered by a badly wounded opponent".

      Kylo Ren is no master. Far from it, it's a point made many times. He himself talks about it. Snoke talks about it. He makes many screwups, including being so emotionally invested in overcoming his resistance to killing his father that he lets himself get shot in the process. He's no Vader, despite how much he desperately wants to be.

      --
      Shiny New Australia.
    36. Re:Still sucks by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Whatever Rei. I think you are being unreasonable. It'll be pointless to continue this further. May the force be with you.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    37. Re:Still sucks by haruchai · · Score: 1

      Something about Rey's look made me think of Qui-Gon Jinn

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    38. Re:Still sucks by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      That sounds like something that could actually be constructed.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    39. Re:Still sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can swordfight, what Finn was doing was not swordfighting. He looked quite convincingly like someone who's just picked up a sword and is trying to stick the pointy bit in the other guy.

      To me Ren looked like someone who's good enough to be dangerous but is overly cocky and is playing with his opponent. He didn't take a number of opportunities to finish Finn when he could have and that was plain to anyone who knows how to use a sword.

      Ray on the other hand has appalling technique, there are a few points she tries to lunge at Ren which would embarrass anyone with any training. I'd probably put her on the top end of someone who's a natural but really has no idea what they're doing.

      Overall it looked like 2 people entirely untrained against someone who has had some training but frankly isn't very good. The only off putting thing about it was how poor Ren was. I put that down to him just being generally incompetent and only in his position as a big fuck you to Han and Leia.

    40. Re:Still sucks by Rei · · Score: 1

      Yep, it actually could - although somewhat underpowered versus what you see in the movies due to the limitations of the power source with modern technology, cooling issues, field strength limitations, etc. But the basic technology is already there - just a magnetically constrained plasma cutter with the core (telescoping solenoids) as the electrical return on your circuit. There's no reason it wouldn't work, it's not much different from how we already cut things today. The plasma on plasma cutters doesn't extend to "sabre length", but that's because it diffuses - constrain it in a solenoidal field and it should have no trouble doing so. You'd probably even get the standard random crackling sparks when two "sabres" hit each other (not from shorting between the cores - they're not closing a circuit - but from plasma-leaking to the cores during magnetic reconnection of kinks from the interaction of the two nonaligned fields.)

      --
      Shiny New Australia.
    41. Re:Still sucks by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Even if you made a light saber that had to plug into a 440 volt outlet, that would still be really cool (I would not be the one to wield it though lol)

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    42. Re:Still sucks by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I pay little attention to media, and looked at as little as I could because I wanted to avoid spoilers. All I knew was that it was a Star Wars movie set after the original trilogy. I liked it. There were several things I didn't like, but I'm hoping some of them get resolved in the next movie.

      I don't trust the review of anyone who doesn't realize that Finn lost to an already hurt Kylo Ren. He handled the light saber like it was an unfamiliar weapon. He didn't hurt himself with it, but I assure you that a novice can use a hand-to-hand weapon without hurting himself or herself.

      The people I knew who saw Phantom Menace were not complimentary about it, with one exception. There was no pod race in this movie, nor a kid with a flair for piloting accidentally winning a war. And why do you think it wasn't a Star Wars movie? It had the obligatory cute droids, inexperienced person on a crap world who turns out to be very strong in the force, explosions, blasters, X-wing fighters in action, and light saber fights. It looked like Star Wars to me.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    43. Re:Still sucks by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Ren as the bad guy is frankly not scary.

      At the start, he seems pretty scary. But the more you get to know him, the more you realize that he's not supposed to be scary. He's weak. He's a novice. It's why he doesn't really accomplish anything after interrogating Poe.

    44. Re:Still sucks by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      The fact even Finn could defeat a dark Lord of the sith shows how much of a joke it is.

      Finn and Rey were both novices and both got one over Ren, making him effectively useless. Has there been a more ineffective villain in the history of movie making?

    45. Re:Still sucks by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      Um, said stormtrooper lost every lightsaber battle he entered into.

      But only just. Ren is supposed to be Sith, he should be able to dispatch novices without blinking. TFA made him look useless.

    46. Re:Still sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Ren is supposed to be Sith

      Who told you that?

    47. Re:Still sucks by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that perfectly healthy individual bleeding everywhere, who had just fought some other dude. Wut?

  16. Ouch! by Evtim · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Don't want to sound....whatever.....put any qualifier that comes to mind here....but I am done with cinema going in general and Star Wars in particular!!

    I see now that the whole idea of what movie and movie going is, has changed. It is a much larger "consumer experience" that involves merchandizing, social media, a plethora of buttons being pushed cleverly on kids and their parents, social engineering, social media, stiffing political correctness.......and the quality of the actual film is not significant anymore! It is a product, not a movie!

    The actual movie [only a part of the product]....ouch! Let's not bother repeating the obvious - just go to IMDB and read the top 50 "non-professional" reviews. 47 are negative and the points why TFA sucks tremendously are explained eloquently and in detail. The official reviews are an insult to our intelligence....my the gods even the guy who [hilariously] destroyed Ep 1-3 (red letter media) is buying the crap...I cannot continue...only curses come to mind :(

    But man, the product worked like a charm! I watched it on 25th at 11:00 AM in the one of the only two places in NL where you get the 3D IMAX stuff. I had the best seat in the whole theater and was prepared to love the film. I did Ep.4-6 marathon the previous day, brushed my figures (R2D2, Imperial walkers) and posters - we are talking about a boy who saw the originals at age of 7 - a life time devoted fan!

    Every family took a picture of their kids next to the model of BB-8! Merchandizing was everywhere....Every family kept on taking pictures inside the theater and sharing them in the last few minutes before the show. The cinema cleverly had a gallery of images form the trailers flashing on the screen starting from 10 minutes before 11. Guess what - everyone took a snapshot the moment they appeared like they'd been force mind tricked - I am sure that was the intention of showing the images. I honestly felt alien, like being surrounded by a herd of strange animals and you are not sure what they'd do next...

    The show started at 11:00. Sorry , wrong, wrong , wrong....there were ....wait for it....25 minutes of ads of which only 3 for movies the rest was beer, the cinema chain, Coca Cola.....I got crazy!!! You pay premium for this and they give you half an hour of ads!!! Also - politically correct BS as beer ad that says to drink responsibly and that women do not like drunken men (fuck you, you are a beer manufacturer!).

    And then the show starts and I realize that I cannot bare the loudness of the sound. Surely I am partially to blame - for some inexplicable reason my hearing has grown more acute in the last year or so (go figure!) but still I am sure it was already at the the very edge of what is tolerable...I though why are not the parents worried about the kid's ears?!? So I watched the show with my in-ear headphones plugged in and the sound was just loud enough (no kidding).

    Shame on JJ, shame on the official reviewers for buying this (hey, Empire magazine, do you remember your wall of shame, giving Attack of the clones 5/5 (WTF!!) - you are about to repeat that if you are not honest), shame on the whole industry for turning movie going into this....I don't know what this is..., shame on all of us for still supporting this, shame , shame, shame...

    I am so sorry that one of my most precious dreams is being destroyed....the kid from the former communist state walking with his father in the streets of Sofia in 1980 (that's the delay you got back then) and we see a poster with stormtrooper firing the rifle and the title Star Wars. My father goes "this seems like a movie in space, you like this kind of things, what with reading Jules Verne and such...shall we try" [no ads back then, no reviews - you go "blind" to a movie unless someone has seen it and tells you]. ....we watched it sitting on the stairs between the rows - there were no chairs left. We went out and I said "again"...and we went on the other side of the cinema to join the line for the next performance...RIP!

    1. Re:Ouch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For someone that doesn't like it, you sure put in a lot of hate effort. Perhaps you should do something more productive than get swept up in the biggest product promotion of the year? Failing that, go and have a wank.

    2. Re:Ouch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you, 70? Western cinema going has been this way since the 1990s (can't speak for soviet Sofia and other similar places), except people now have smartphones. I saw it in NL too on the 18th, at the 23:59 showing. No one was taking photos inside, and no one was talking loudly either.

      The movie was entertaining, i'll give it that. Nothing groundbreaking, but it was certainly great visually. I agree with you on one thing, the IMAX sound was way too loud during action sequences.

      P.S. I didn't read any reviews on IMDB before seeing the movie, I wanted to judge for myself. I also avoided watching trailers.

      zyx

    3. Re:Ouch! by Crowd+Computing · · Score: 1

      I see now that the whole idea of what movie and movie going is, has changed. It is a much larger "consumer experience" that involves merchandizing, social media, a plethora of buttons being pushed cleverly on kids and their parents, social engineering, social media, stiffing political correctness.......and the quality of the actual film is not significant anymore! It is a product, not a movie!

      Lucas practically invented the it's a product not a movie school of movie-making! Google Star Wars lunchbox. What about the Star Wars expanded universe media? It's all part of the merchandising. If somebody invented Facebook in the 70s, I'm sure your BBS will be spammed by Star Wars promos in glorious green.

    4. Re:Ouch! by vel-ex-tech · · Score: 1

      Wow, am I so glad I decided to wait for a camrip.

      I'll probably see it with a friend or two later this week but probably not in 3D. I mean, I love 3D when it's done right e.g. Gravity or Interstellar. I think I saw both of those two to three times each. Oz the Great and Powerful was pretty good 3D also.

      I had to pick two things out of your comment.

      Guess what - everyone took a snapshot the moment they appeared like they'd been force mind tricked - I am sure that was the intention of showing the images. I honestly felt alien, like being surrounded by a herd of strange animals and you are not sure what they'd do next...

      I know this feeling well. Very well put. The mass hypnosis surround this movie has been surreal. (Also the notion that a surprising number of co-workers have that I'm somehow excited about this movie is just... bizarre.)

      Really, the only reason I'm going to see it is so that I can be flippant about it when I return from vacation and the Big Bang Theory fans start asking me about how much I liked Star Wars.

      drink responsibly and that women do not like drunken men (fuck you, you are a beer manufacturer!)

      What. The. Actual. Fuck. Really? Why is? Argh! I can't even! Fuck political correctness. I would have walked out.

      Two problems. No, three problems. 1.) If I'm a man today, not that it matters, because either way, I'm NOT FUCKING ATTRACTED TO WOMEN. 2.) If I'm a woman today, this time it matters, because DON'T FUCKING TELL ME WHAT I FIND ATTRACTIVE OR NOT! 3.) Thank you for reminding me I live in man's world, where everything revolves around men even if we've shifted to beating them up. Four things. 4.) Help me out here! Do men like drunk women?

    5. Re:Ouch! by Yunzil · · Score: 1

      47 are negative and the points why TFA sucks tremendously are explained eloquently and in detail.

      Right, because fanboys' opinions are the most objective and are therefore better than anyone else's.

      It's a good movie. Much better than the prequels and at least as good as RotJ. Sorry if that disappoints you.

      I am so sorry that one of my most precious dreams is being destroyed

      Ahahaha, what? Star Wars has *always* had a huge marketing angle. It's a vehicle for selling toys.

    6. Re:Ouch! by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      I see now that the whole idea of what movie and movie going is, has changed. It is a much larger "consumer experience" that involves merchandizing, social media, a plethora of buttons being pushed cleverly on kids and their parents, social engineering, social media, stiffing political correctness.......and the quality of the actual film is not significant anymore! It is a product, not a movie!

      Have you seen Space Balls? They make fun of the fact that Star Wars was over merchandised. You can find interviews with George Lucas talking about how he plans merchandising around the movies he makes. If you thought merchandising was an after thought with the original trilogy, you are so, so naive.

    7. Re:Ouch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... women do not like drunken men ...

      The real question: Whether men do not like drunken women? Watch 'Blind date' (1987) to see how drunk, obnoxious women are treated. This might be why gender equality is impossible.

    8. Re:Ouch! by Rei · · Score: 1

      No, they should give into their hate. Their hatred makes them strong. They should feel it flowing through them... let it guide them. Let it make them powerful.

      --
      Shiny New Australia.
    9. Re:Ouch! by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      Interesting how his post is modded +5 Insightful.
      Why do you think that is?

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    10. Re:Ouch! by Beck_Neard · · Score: 1

      The whole thing felt like what would happen if you asked a jackass genie to give you a new star wars film like the originals. The genie laughs to himself and gives you The Force Awakens. Then tells you to be more careful with your next wish.

      Star Wars is dead and has been dead for a long time. Deal with it.

      If you look at the marketing around this movie, it was just incredible. J J Abrams was supposedly the "Best Director Ever"; a star wars fanboy and master genius. Even though he ruined Star Trek by being a bitch for his corporate masters and turning it into standard soulless Hollywood fare, don't worry! He loves Star Wars and he'll stay true to the spirit of it.

      The real geniuses are the social media masters. The people who know what buttons to push and how to make things viral. They own the world now. They can sell us anything. That's the take-away lesson from this movie.

      All the late night talk shows. Celebrity endorsements. Merchandising. Posters. Social media. Memes. Everyone who was 'in' on the story of the movie coming out and saying it was brilliant, amazing, and that the fans will love it. And the fans duly did what they were told and loved it

      --
      A fool and his hard drive are soon parted.
    11. Re:Ouch! by Evtim · · Score: 1

      Not anymore +5......see, even here the distorted reality filed works...I guess the guys above missed the part about "brushing my action figures and posters"...one of IMDB reviewers said "see how every negative reviewer is called hater; that should tell you something..." - point confirmed!

    12. Re:Ouch! by Evtim · · Score: 1

      Thank you for making the point perfectly clear! Everyone who disagrees is hater....listen dude, I spent the time because I CARE! Don't you care when something good is being demolished? When something that you held dear was bastardized, twisted and perverted....no really I think someone else needs a wank here...

    13. Re:Ouch! by Rei · · Score: 1

      Good... good...

      --
      Shiny New Australia.
  17. The experience! by De_Boswachter · · Score: 1

    [...] at home, where already for significant time the image and audio quality is more pleasant than in most public theaters, not to mention the comfort of having control over volume, play/pause etc., and the absent mob of other people

    Not to mention standing in line, dodging the trails of popcorn on the floor before the movie had even begun, the lengthy commercials, those blasted 3D glasses.

    All perfectly good reasons for taking my kids with me and gratefully spend my money on this whole circus. Plotholes and other nitpickings about the movie taken aside, I wouldn't hesitate to go again.

  18. And it still hasn't been released in China by Ghostbear · · Score: 1

    Jurassic World had been released in China when it opened. TFA isn't released in China until early Jan. So breaking this record is only the beginning.

  19. Dollars made mean nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What's always bugging me is that those numbers have no real relation to other movies (except for "We made X dollars!"). What'd really enable movies to compete with each other is numbers of tickets sold. Prices can change. Let's say an indie movie charges 5 dollar per ticket and a highly anticipated movie charges 10. Attaching dollars made in total to this obscures the real numbers of popularity. This gets worse when comparing the box office over time (say, gone with the wind vs star wars).

    1. Re: Dollars made mean nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The dollar value is a better judge of popularity, because demand increases as prices decrease. Clearly a movie that can sell 100 tickets for $100 a ticket is more popular than a movie that sells 100 tickets for 10c each. The opportunity cost of the ticket represents value to the audience.

  20. Rollercoaster by MrKaos · · Score: 0

    You can either get on the ride and enjoy it or not, but once your done none of your whining about how the movie and your expectations don't align matter.

    Your money is gone and it ain't coming back.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    1. Re:Rollercoaster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your money is gone

      Speak for yourself.

    2. Re:Rollercoaster by MrKaos · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your money is gone

      Speak for yourself.

      I am. I didn't have any expectations and I had a great time. You guys are all the same you know, when something new comes out you ignore it because it's unfamiliar and when you get what you ask for you complain because it is.

      You just can't sit back and enjoy it for what it is.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    3. Re:Rollercoaster by dbrueck · · Score: 2

      Haha, so true. If it had been any more different from the original trilogy then people would be complaining that it departed from the heart and soul of SW, that it was Star Trek rebranded, etc. I took my kids to it, we had a great time too - it was fun and it felt nice and Star Wars-y.

      If I was to sit back and pick the movie apart then, sure, I could find problems with it. But what's the point of doing that? I exchanged some amount of money for some amount of entertainment, and in the end I felt it was a good trade. Me looking for flaws in the movie will just decrease the enjoyment I got out of it and will in no way improve the subsequent movies, so why bother?

      We like the Star Wars universe, we got to see more of it, and now I'm cautiously optimistic about future installments. WIN!

    4. Re:Rollercoaster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I mean "speak for yourself" as in "my money is not gone, so don't tell me that it is". I am old enough to be able to tell commercial hype and paid reviews from actual quality and honest recommendation. My money is unspent (on this). I only downloaded it because of ESR's comments about the filming location of the last scene, where new Luke finds old Luke. And what can I say: If that unimaginative "best of" remake keeps you entertained, I pity you.

    5. Re:Rollercoaster by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      No, I mean "speak for yourself" as in "my money is not gone, so don't tell me that it is".

      I see, so you responded to try to poison my experience.

      I am old enough to be able to tell commercial hype and paid reviews from actual quality and honest recommendation.

      And cynical enough to be incapable of suspending judgement too, it would seem. That you even read them shows a pretty toxic attitude and not very good for your mental health.

      My money is unspent (on this). I only downloaded it because of ESR's comments about the filming location of the last scene, where new Luke finds old Luke.

      Oh, so you reduced it to your bandwidth costs instead, you still spent your money, but instead wasted your potential to experience joy with others by watching a downloaded fragment of the movie to confirm it wasn't up to you 'standards', or was it the whole movie you watched. You sound very sad, lonely and pathetic to me. It's a real shame for you.

      And what can I say: If that unimaginative "best of" remake keeps you entertained,

      Just say nothing, anything you do say just spoils it for others and no one is interested in you opinion anyway.

      What entertains me doesn't get made into movies, like Eon, Redemption space, The City and the Stars, They're sci-fi *books*. What entertained me about Star Wars was going to have a good time with my friends, bringing the kids and grandpa, getting there a little late to get some ice cream which helped us avoid the ads, piling into the seats we *booked* and sitting there with my best friend who I saw the original movies with. You think it's about a movie, I think it's about people. That's why...

      I pity you.

      Actually, you pity yourself. I wouldn't be surprised if no one wanted to see the movie with you because you ruin the experience for everyone around you with your moaning and groaning and you instead justify that by saying 'you didn't want to see it anyway'.

      People like you are why new stories for movies don't get made because you suck the oxygen out of the room and there is no fun when you are around. I have zero expectations from movies anymore because of whiners like you and your constant, draining pointless negativity that poisons everything.

      Which is, of course, an excuse for you to maintain your misery, which you can wallow in alone. If you want to remain pathetic, that's your choice.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    6. Re:Rollercoaster by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      Haha, so true. If it had been any more different from the original trilogy then people would be complaining that it departed from the heart and soul of SW, that it was Star Trek rebranded, etc. I took my kids to it, we had a great time too - it was fun and it felt nice and Star Wars-y.

      Thank goodness some people have a clue. I pretty much did the same thing.

      We like the Star Wars universe, we got to see more of it, and now I'm cautiously optimistic about future installments. WIN!

      Yeah, I think that Abrams had to hook into the old movies to make the connection. I also noticed that there was a lot of hooks from the Star Wars books, which had some pretty good stories if you aren't expecting hard sci fi and were just reading for entertainment. I share your cautious optimism and I think that this director knows that there are some pretty caustic people out there who attempt to ruin it for everyone.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  21. This was the one. by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 0

    >Were any of those dollars yours?

    Nope. This was the movie which crystalized in my mind the basic movie watching conundrum of "I'd prefer to see it at home, yet I can't".

    For most movies I get around this by watching it at home or sometimes on a plane. For the occasional one I'll see it at a theater, but that would be for something I'm looking forward to. For instance, I watched the recent spate of Bond movies at the movie theater.

    This movie is different in that I kind of would like to see it, but certainly not enough to put up with a movie theater, yet it isn't available through the internet without resorting to hackery that I don't do. Most movies are either good enough, or available. This one is neither.

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    1. Re:This was the one. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Most movies are either good enough, or available. This one is neither.

      You can rest assured that they will get it out on video as quickly as possible so that they can begin selling it. I'm looking forward to seeing it at home on my mediocre home theater, which at least finally got DTS. (Those cheap bastards.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:This was the one. by dbrueck · · Score: 2

      Are movie theaters in most cities really that terrible, or has it just been a long time since you've been to a movie theater? So many people gripe about having to put up with a theater experience and I just don't get it.

      Within 20 miles of my home there are 4-5 "megaplex" theaters where, for a $5 matinee ticket, you can go see the very latest movies on incredibly good screens with terrific audio systems, you stand in no waiting lines, you sit in large, plush semi-reclining chairs with stadium (sloped) seating. The room is clean, the floors are clean. Heck, even the bathrooms are clean. Even if you pay a few bucks more to go at night, you still don't really wait in line and there's never any jostling for seats because you can buy your tickets online and choose your exact seat ahead of time.

      At home we have a pretty nice setup for watching movies, but we still occasionally go to the theater not to "put up" with a movie theater, but because of it - it's a fun experience.

      FWIW I'm not trying to rip on you, I'm just genuinely curious. :)

    3. Re:This was the one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our local cinema has lines. You can buy online for extra money. Once inside there is food on offer that you would't want to eat. No alcohol. You sit down and watch 45 minutes of ads for films and other things. Then you watch the movie and there's no pause button and people hate you for looking at your phone.

      At home I have a TV, Roku, computers, wine, a comfortable chair a pause button and the means to avoid watching adverts.

    4. Re:This was the one. by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      Within 20 miles of my home there are 4-5 "megaplex" theaters where, for a $5 matinee ticket, you can go see the very latest movies on incredibly good screens with

      If that were the case here, then I would agree. But my cheapest ticket is $20 for standard seating, or $30 for a recliner. I paid $120 for the family to see and every single one of us thought it was shit.
      For $5, I'd go every week, but at these prices I'm lucky if I go once a year.

  22. Sequals make money by houghi · · Score: 1

    People wonder why we get so little new movies. This is the reason. Because they make money.

    Their marketing departments understand something that e.g. banks also understand: getting new customers is hard. They also now understand how they can use social marketing to up the hype.

    I expect to see more repackeged material with Newer/Faster/Better on it. Oh well, as long as the massses are happy, who cares. At least Disney now has a bit more money to invest copyright laws.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  23. The social engeneering by Evtim · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Forgot to expand that part....so the message to the new generation is that if you are born proper (jedi) no training or effort is needed to master anything. The girl in the movie did not require any mentoring and in a few hours learned how to beat a Sith and knew better the Millennium Falcon than Han Solo! This drivel is a very poor and damaging attempt of PC girl-power shit. Listen, idiots, the female lead of all time and space is Ellen Ripley! We have done it many years ago, why is everyone hailing TFA for it?! Breaking such major Star Wars universe rule [you need to learn to use the Force and light-sabres] for the sake of PC points (but also financially rewarding, get it;) is...cynical to the extreme.

    And I thought Lucas went senile with the whole "Han shot first" stuff...telling the kids that they should let hired assassin kill them for the sake of not appearing...what...bad?!? Who in their right mind would blame someone in this situation for taking a chance at Greedo?!

    JJ outdid all this easily...I have the nagging feeling that a large group of marketeers was set to work and they scrambled "action points" - stuff that needs to be in to please this group or the other. At the end all the points were ushered in the script and the plot was twisted to accommodate them regardless of what it did to consistency with the SW universe rules...give it to bean counters to make...well...anything and watch the world burn!

    1. Re:The social engeneering by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      If it helps, it's not just a female lead thing. Chris Pine (and everyone else in the star trek reboots) outperformed people with years more experience and training. I think JJ feels that young people want the young protagonists to be successful and don't want to see someone of a reasonable age to reflect the required skills and experience.

      And things just happened with no prior foreshadowing or explanation.

      Only to be outdone when things happened so predictably that my audience was voicing what was going to happen before it happened.

      "Oh they'll find a weakness" "oh that person's going to kill that person", etc.

      If it wasn't star wars, it would not be getting such a good reception.

      But.. it does at least feel right for the first half.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    2. Re:The social engeneering by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Being born special is a common trope in fantasy. Harry Potter, Neo, Anakin and then Luke... Many comics go that way too. Last son of Krypton, mutants, billionaires... It's not supposed to be a life lesson.

      Anyway, Finn managed to come from being abducted and brainwashed as a child to bring a hero. He made a good role model for kids.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:The social engeneering by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      But.. it does at least feel right for the first half.

      For the most part. It still bugged me to no end that Rey was familiar with the Falcon's legendary feats, and familiar enough with it to fly it, but didn't recognize it during all the years it sat there in town, or even when they were looking for a ship for their escape from Jakku - the moment it touched down at the lot for storage, I'd have thought it would have become an instant celebrity. It also bugged me that Finn went to the lower gun seat and somehow still managed to pick off the TIEs even though Rey was hugging the ground for a good part of the chase - the upper gun would have made a lot more sense. And snap zooms had no business being in there *at all*. This is Star Wars, not Firefly or BSG.

      I need to stop now, or else I'm going to come up with more.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    4. Re:The social engeneering by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      It also bugged me that Finn went to the lower gun seat and somehow still managed to pick off the TIEs even though Rey was hugging the ground for a good part of the chase - the upper gun would have made a lot more sense.

      The only conclusion I could come to is that at that point in time the Falcon didn't have an upper turret, and Rey knew that. Perhaps when it comes out on DVD I can look at that scene, frame by frame to see if a turret was there. It was trying to see it during the scene and it didn't seem obvious that there was an upper turret.

    5. Re:The social engeneering by Isaac-Lew · · Score: 1

      You could say the same about Luke in A New Hope...he was able to pick off TIE fighters in the Falcon with zero instruction or training. Also, how credible is it that he was able to to fly an X-Wing with enough skill to attack and destroy a planet-killing ship the size of a small moon?

    6. Re:The social engeneering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The issue wasn't with Finn's ability, but rather the fact that he was placed facing the ground with almost no useful firing arc, instead of facing toward the sky where he'd actually have been able to see his targets.

    7. Re:The social engeneering by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      Being born special is a common trope in fantasy. Harry Potter, Neo, Anakin and then Luke...

      True, but Harry stumbled along for a while while Hermione saved his ass more than a few times; Neo got many/most of his skills uploaded; Anakin and Luke got actual training - and Luke still got his hand chopped off. Being born special shouldn't mean you don't have to work to achieve. There is no meaning, no appreciation, without the struggle and desire to become more than you are. Having everything simply handed to you is a cop-out (and lazy story telling).

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    8. Re:The social engeneering by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2

      Biggs tells the rebellion, "Luke is the best brush pilot in the galaxy" and he knows how to fly tight combat situations having flown his T-16 Skyhopper in Beggars Canyon hunting Womp Rats which are the same size as the exhaust port.

      In a deleted scene...
      "You may be the hottest bush pilot this side of Mos Eisley, Luke, but those little skyhoppers can be dangerous. They move awfully fast for tropospheric craftâ"faster than they need to. Keep playing engine jockey with one and someday, whammo! You're going to be nothing more than a dark spot on the damp side of a canyon wall." âBiggs Darklighter to Luke Skywalker[src]

      The T-16 Skyhopper
      http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki...

      Where it says...
      "Even so, these airspeeders were often used as training vehicles by the Rebel Alliance, due to the fact that their flight controls were similar to those of X-wings. "

      Womp Rat
      http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki...

      Thermal Exhaust Port
      http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki...
      "The target area is only two meters wide. It's a small thermal exhaust port, right below the main port. The shaft leads directly to the reactor system."
              âJan Dodonna on the attack on the first Death Star[src]

      So apparently Luke is already a trained flyer with years of experience flying in a dangerous canyon at high speed firing at 2 meter targets with a mounted weapon (on his T-16 Skyhopper).

      So the mission is to fly down a dangerous canyon at high speed and fire at a 2 meter target with a mounted weapon! Sounds tailor made! lol.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    9. Re:The social engeneering by NormalVisual · · Score: 1
      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    10. Re:The social engeneering by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      http://metro.co.uk/2015/08/11/...

      http://www.hasbro.com/en-us/pr...

      http://scifi.stackexchange.com...

      Upper Turret clearly visible.

      Good point. Half the time he would have no shot while the Tie Fighters would have a big fat plate shaped target to shoot at.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    11. Re:The social engeneering by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      The guns are there: http://overmental.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/MF-sky-790x337.jpg

      Okay then. I agree, it's really dumb that Rey would tell Fin to get into the lower turret when she was going to be flying low. I wonder if in the "Making of" videos one of the actors will relay how they pointed this out and were told to shut up, like when the actors did the same with training astronauts on how to drill vs. training drillers on how to go into space in Armageddon.

    12. Re:The social engeneering by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      I don't think that's too unbelievable if you acknowledge the expanded universe. The YT-1300 was supposed to be a standard, very common, and easily customizable, model of freighter. Setting aside Endor, where it was turned into basically a giant fighter, I always took it as the in-universe equivalent of the DC-3. They're everywhere, if a bit dated; and operated by everyone from private to commercial to civil service to military. And could you tell one of those from another on sight from the outside? Also, the Falcon itself was stated on multiple occasions to not look its part. All of that is exactly what you want for a smuggler's ship. At the same time, the flight controls are pretty standard. In fact, they're fairly similar across most aircraft. Now, as to why Rey, with her age and apparent background, is a crack pilot *at all*, non-specific to the Falcon, that's another (good) question.

      As to the fact that the Falcon was unique on-screen; well... we only ever saw a single Firefly-class freighter too, didn't we?

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    13. Re:The social engeneering by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      Have you ever seen the first Star Wars film, Episode IV, "A New Hope"?
      It doesn't sound like you have.

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    14. Re:The social engeneering by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      I have the nagging feeling that a large group of marketeers was set to work and they scrambled "action points" - stuff that needs to be in to please this group or the other. At the end all the points were ushered in the script and the plot was twisted to accommodate them regardless of what it did to consistency with the SW universe rules

      Good Lord Sir, you have said it better than anyone!
      That is exactly what has happened here.
      Perhaps at one time there was a decent script, then some dipshits got involved and twisted it into the nonsense it is in the theatres now.

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    15. Re:The social engeneering by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Okay then. I agree, it's really dumb that Rey would tell Fin to get into the lower turret when she was going to be flying low.

      Maybe Rey isn't as ultra-competent as we were led to believe. ;-)

    16. Re:The social engeneering by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      Maybe Rey isn't as ultra-competent as we were led to believe. ;-)

      Sssshhhh. Don't tell any of the columnists over at the Mary Sue.

    17. Re:The social engeneering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Okay then. I agree, it's really dumb that Rey would tell Fin to get into the lower turret when she was going to be flying low.

      I don't remember her telling him to use the lower turret, I thought it was just something like "the gun turret's over there"?

  24. blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A droid in distress? Yes
    A damsel in distress? Yes
    A even bigger, deadlier "deathstar"? Yes
    Planets exploding? Yeah ...
    Stupid flying inside the "deathstar"? Yes
    A new, deep voiced, sith lord? Yes
    A new sith apprentice (new anakin)? Yees
    A even bigger mainline star destroyer? Yeah ...

    So whats new here? Nothing? Bits and pieces of every star wars movie put together in "new soup"?

  25. Dont know why. by drolli · · Score: 0

    But somehow i am utterly non-interested.

  26. sad because by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there are so many childish fuckers called adults these days.

    1. Re: sad because by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Just sit back and enjoy the show.

      Don't overanalyze.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  27. Not a movie by vikingpower · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Star Wars is not a movie anymore. It is a heavily marketed brand. It can't even qualify for the label "science fiction", compared to the truly good SF movies around. Heck, Interstellar is a lot better than that, even with the hole(s) in the plot and the "Amurrica yeah!" spirit. I mean - I'm an adult. You'd literally have to drag me to a Star Wars movie, kicking and screaming.

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    1. Re:Not a movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ... It can't even qualify for the label "science fiction",...

      It never was science fiction, and was never intended to be, it's a fantasy movie.

    2. Re:Not a movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Definitely think it's a movie, but just like JJ's "Star Trek" interpretations, it's just "Fast and Furious in Space". Which isn't what Star Trek, or arguably Star Wars were about. It IS however what sells... which is I think straight to your point.

    3. Re:Not a movie by umafuckit · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It was always like this. I remember being deluged Star Wars toys in the 80s too. Nothing has changed. The original movies also weren't much good. I liked them as a kid and watched them when the came on at Christmas but now I find them utterly unwatchable. This isn't the case for everything I watched as a kid. e.g. Back To The Future is still fun.

    4. Re:Not a movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It can't even qualify for the label "science fiction", compared to the truly good SF movies around.

      Never could. The series is a space-based fantasy, not science fiction.

    5. Re:Not a movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hair splitting. There was a time when nobody would have had a problem calling it "science fiction" simply because robots, aliens and ray guns.

      Literary SF fans hate the fact that their genre wasn't taken seriously until the 1970s, and go to extreme lengths to delineate what constitutes "real" or "hard" SF, and pooh-pooh whatever doesn't qualify. They can't accept that the bar for what constitutes SF in film may be much lower than that for books. Not to mention genres change and mix over time. Bottom line is: nobody cares except pedants.

    6. Re: Not a movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't get to decide what Star Trek (or anything else) is or is not. The rightholders do. And they decided right because the new Trek is millions time more popular and profitable - and hence better - than the crap you fanboys loved. Wake up and smell the coffee, nerds: as an audience you are irrelevant. Stay home and fap to your fanfiction, we Real People do not care a millifuck. :)

    7. Re:Not a movie by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      I found the perfect phrase to sum up Interstellar: "The least realistic black hole since The Black Hole."

    8. Re:Not a movie by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Star Wars was never intended to be hard SF. It's pure space opera. The spaceships and robots serve only to create a setting for a reasonably epic story, the technology is not the focus. The characters are.

    9. Re:Not a movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Space opera ? I have in mind something rather different than Star Wars upon hearing that expression, e.g. Dan Simmons' "Hyperion" series.

    10. Re:Not a movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose you've witnessed one first hand so you'd know right?

    11. Re:Not a movie by halivar · · Score: 1

      Star Wars is not a movie anymore. It is a heavily marketed brand.

      Huh? My childhood's Star Wars-themed bedroom seems to indicate that you simply didn't notice that Star Wars has always been a heavily marketed brand.

    12. Re:Not a movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Star Wars was never intended to be hard SF. It's pure space opera. The spaceships and robots serve only to create a setting for a reasonably epic story, the technology is not the focus. The characters are.

      Even as a space opera it's pretty shitty. Star of the Guardians is infinitely better, storywise, character wise and oh yeah it has lightsabers as well. People want a good female character like Ripley from Alien ? Put Lady Maigrey on the silver screen.

    13. Re:Not a movie by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      The Force is magic. Magic instantly disqualifies it as sci fi. Otherwise it would be.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    14. Re:Not a movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anymore? It's just meant for kids, maybe you didn't realize it at the time when you were young and saw it but the oldest people who cared about it at the time were probably 15

    15. Re:Not a movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for saying this. I'm hoping the science-based M**********s are gone from the movies forever.

    16. Re:Not a movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Star Wars is not a movie anymore. It is a heavily marketed brand.

      Instead of Star Wars, I just watched Spaceballs again and had a good laugh.

      "No wonder! I'm surrounded by Assholes!" lol lol

    17. Re:Not a movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The Force is magic. Magic instantly disqualifies it as sci fi. Otherwise it would be.

      I'd like to know where you got that idea. SF stories have long included magic, even if they're not about magic.

      Typically it's couched in scientific technobabble to hide the fact that it's magic, like in Star Trek.

    18. Re:Not a movie by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      I'd like to know where you got that idea. SF stories have long included magic, even if they're not about magic.

      Let's see what Wikipedia has to say on the matter.

      Science fiction is a genre of speculative fiction dealing with imaginative concepts such as futuristic settings, futuristic science and technology, space travel, time travel, faster than light travel, parallel universes and extraterrestrial life. Science fiction often explores the potential consequences of scientific and other innovations, and has been called a "literature of ideas."[1] It usually eschews the supernatural, and unlike the related genre of fantasy, historically science fiction stories were intended to have at least a faint grounding in science-based fact or theory at the time the story was created

      Fantasy is a genre of fiction that uses magic or other supernatural elements as a main plot element, theme, or setting. Many works within the genre take place in imaginary worlds where magic and magical creatures are common. Fantasy is generally distinguished from the genres of science fiction and horror by the expectation that it steers clear of scientific and macabre themes, respectively

      Star Wars in particular stays mostly to the science-y part of the spectrum, albeit with a lot of handwaving and soft principles (how the heck do hyperspace and lightsabers work?). But debatably the central plot point of the entire story is Luke and the other Jedi, whose Big Thing is that they manipulate this phantom, unexplainable, unmeasurable force of nature to accomplish things without using any instrumentation or technology or anything.

      So yeah. Fantasy.

      Maybe when you examine Star Trek on a per-episode basis it comes off as magic (Janeway: "Just shoot it with the deflector dish already!"), but I was under the impression that the underlying principles e.g. warp drive Alcubierre drive, although admittedly I don't think the theory existed formally at the time) and the transporter (something using quantum entanglement, I assume) have science-based explanations in-universe.

      If you can point me to a scientific in-universe explanation of the Force, I'll recant.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    19. Re:Not a movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the very beginning, Star Trek started out with the Talosians psychically creating illusions in Pike's mind, and Gary Mitchell and Elizabeth Dehner gaining the ability to read minds and telekinetically move objects.

      This is magic. I don't care if you stick in a line with Spock saying "there must be an energy source nearby..."

    20. Re:Not a movie by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Oh, TOS. Yeah, I haven't really seen any of that series other than the movies.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    21. Re:Not a movie by Beck_Neard · · Score: 1

      It's best to describe Star Wars as fantasy transplanted into a sci-fi setting. Planets take the place of cities, spaceships take the place of ships, and lightsabers take the place of swords. And the Death Star takes the place of the Magical Weapon of Doom (The one ring, the ark of the covenant, the soul cube, etc.). But if you switch all of that back you still get a completely coherent story.

      Sci-fi ranges the spectrum from 'hard' (completely plausible in princple) to 'soft' (sufficiently advanced technology), so you can't really say the presence of magic per se disqualifies something as sci-fi. Instead, it's what you do with the magic that counts. My personal interpretation is that good sci-fi should deal with the impact of technological developments on human society, ethics, and outlook on the future.

      --
      A fool and his hard drive are soon parted.
    22. Re:Not a movie by skam240 · · Score: 1

      So what you've done is taken "usually eschews the supernatural" and implied that this means "always". ...and honestly Star Trek has always been just as bad on hard science. I mean, just because they had some nonsense about Q coming from another dimension doesnt mean that he wasn't just a D&D god they had to deal with.

      There's always been a "fantasy" element to Sci-fi. Just look at Jules Verne, one of the original authors of the genre. A lot of his stuff was most certainly not grounded in the hardest of science of his day and was very much fantasy based.

      I've been saying this a bit lately on Slashdot because there seems to be a movement about to reshape the meaning of the term "sci-fi": I'm sorry you want the genre name to mean something it never has meant to be but you're just going to have to make due.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    23. Re:Not a movie by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I'm getting a bit tired of the "We don't know what's in a black hole so it can be anything we want it to be no matter how ridiculous." trope myself. At least when The Black Hole did it, it was still somewhat fresh.

    24. Re:Not a movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Q was a character in like 2% of episodes, versus Jedi being a central theme in every movie. But sure, whatever.

      So you're saying they're exactly the same and I'm saying they're totally different and somehow I'm being the unreasonable one. Are you one of those people who says the word "literally" now has no meaning because so many people abuse it, too?

      (/. is being a real bastard about letting me log in today for some reason)

    25. Re:Not a movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (same problem with posting)

      I never said those two points were exactly the same but that's great you saddled me with that. My point is that both series employ ample amounts of "magic" in the guise of science. Shoot, faster than light travel is basically magic as far as we understand it.

      And even when we think we're being terribly scientific we are often not. Take one of my favorite Sci-fi authors, Asimov. I've sure he thought he was being terribly scientific with various characters wearing nuclear reactors around their necks. In a modern context, how stupid. Yet he is still a giant of the genre, and for good reason.

      Finally, I'm thoroughly entertained that rather then combat my ideas you try to slander me as someone who doesnt understand what the word "literally" means. Good work! You are a truly insightful person!

    26. Re:Not a movie by delt0r · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree more. I saw a quote on the internets recently attributed to George lucas (probably fake but meh), "i make movies for 12 year olds, if adults watch them, that's their problem".

      Some of the older sci fi/fantasy movies that stand up are: Total Recall (1990?), Alien, Aliens, The Running man , and Terminator. Even Dune the movie was good. Can't think of others of the top of my head. More recent ones that i think are good would be: Minority Report, Edge of Tomorrow (yea groundhog day should be in there somewhere), The Martian, Moon (little slow and predictable), Apollo 13(it just good), Firefly/serenity. Clearly i have taken liberties on what i define as sci fi. Yes 2001 is *not* on my list because that movie is stupid.

      Over all i feel that any hard sci fi is very poorly represented. This is true in books as well. So i have learned to turn that part of my brain off as much as i can.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    27. Re:Not a movie by delt0r · · Score: 1

      Black hole was more accurate. Really. I should know, i have a Masters in Astrophysics.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    28. Re:Not a movie by delt0r · · Score: 1

      Imagine a movie of that. The Shrike, the best bad/good guy "who side is that thing on anyway?" charater EVER. Would be soo cool. It also would be R18.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    29. Re:Not a movie by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      rather then combat my ideas you try to slander me

      Shoot, faster than light travel is basically magic as far as we understand it.

      I was under the impression that the underlying principles e.g. warp drive (Alcubierre drive)

      Well it's better than replying to points I've already debunked.

      I never said those two points were exactly the same but that's great you saddled me with that.

      There are obviously arguments for either of Star Wars and Star Trek to be fantasy. I just think that Star Wars is a much more clear-cut case.

      And even when we think we're being terribly scientific we are often not. Take one of my favorite Sci-fi authors, Asimov. I've sure he thought he was being terribly scientific with various characters wearing nuclear reactors around their necks. In a modern context, how stupid. Yet he is still a giant of the genre, and for good reason.

      historically science fiction stories were intended to have at least a faint grounding in science-based fact or theory at the time the story was created

      And another already-addressed point...

      Finally, I'm thoroughly entertained that rather then combat my ideas you try to slander me as someone who doesnt understand what the word "literally" means. Good work! You are a truly insightful person!

      No, I didn't say you didn't understand what it means. I postulated that you're one of those descriptivist twats that claim the English language has no objective meanings.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    30. Re:Not a movie by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      "Hard" science fiction is not some sort of praise, it's a subgenre in which the book or movie tries to stay reasonably close to what we know of science, and the science or technology is important to the plot. I don't know what you mean by "literary SF fans", but the fans I knew and know didn't seem all that bothered about what non-fans thought. There have been attempts to define science fiction, but I've never seen such definitions taken too seriously.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    31. Re:Not a movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I regretted the warp reference as soon as I posted it. On the other hand, I'll take the Force over the Heisenberg Compensator any day. Star Trek's teleporters, which show up in virtually every episode, shouldn't be possible as we understand physics today. Why do they work? Fake sciency device, that's why.

      Really, debating the scientific accuracy of either series is ludicrous. By the time we've figured out how to move about the galaxy with any real efficiency we wont need to anymore. Both series put forth a future for humanity in which certain major aspects of society remain completely static while others have progressed immensely. If you want to really sit down and rationalize things out, most of the prominent Science Fiction depicting anything beyond the near future is nothing but pure and utter fantasy.

    32. Re:Not a movie by vikingpower · · Score: 1

      Amen ! There have been plans once, but they never came to anything, although Dan Simmons was optimistic about the whole thing. Think Kassad and his lover-in-a-simulation. Think of the Yggdrasil! Think Brawne Lamia with the Schrön loop harbouring Keats. Think fucking Martin bloody Silenus and his poetry !! Man... that is mouth-watering....

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
  28. it certainly didn't earn 1 billion dollars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or some studio accountants are getting fired in the new year.

  29. Billion dollars wasted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine how much useful work could of been done for a Billion dollars, like developing a new version of Linux without systemD or sex robots.

    1. Re: Billion dollars wasted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the general public were willing to pay $1b combined for such a product, then they will. Bear in mind the production cost was estimated at $200 m and marketing globally is probably another $100m. So if you want to invest $300m on your Linux sex robots, then yeah you might have a shot at pulling in $1b in sales.

    2. Re:Billion dollars wasted by bargainsale · · Score: 1

      I'm perfectly happy with the old version of Linux, with the sex robots. You can always uninstall them if you need the disc space.

      --
      Aberrations have appeared in my destiny prognostication engine!
    3. Re:Billion dollars wasted by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      Imagine how much useful work could of been done for a Billion dollars

      Like teaching English grammar to Slashdotters...

  30. yeah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But the net profit is still in the red for Star Wars...

    CAP === 'spatula'

  31. better cinema, how? by pterry · · Score: 1

    Could you elaborate on what didn't suck about the cinema you went to?

  32. Only 1, 2 and 3. by X10 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I watched Star Wars 1, 2 and 3 when they came out. When they released 4, 5 and 6 and called them "1, 2 and 3", I decided these couldn't be worthwhile. No way I'm going to see this new film, created by Disney.

    --
    no, I don't have a sig
  33. Needs to account for inflation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is like $100M in 2010 dollars

  34. Star Wars performance in India by macrewtech · · Score: 1

    BO performance is average in India because of Indian movie "Dilwale".

  35. and yet, somehow.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    it will still "lose" money for tax purposes.

    1. Re:and yet, somehow.... by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      it will still "lose" money for tax purposes.

      And the "paying the secondary actors, stagehands, IT staff and caterers" purposes.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  36. It is very, very bad... by luismontbau · · Score: 5, Informative

    Not trying to sound like Jay Sherman, but if we keep going to bad movies, they will keep making them... I read all the reviews first, and went confident I was going to see an entertaining movie. I do not go to see a movie called 'Star Wars' hoping to it to be a philosophical experience, but man, it sucked big time... My main complaints: 1.) It is almost identical to the first movie. Desert planet? Check. Young, force-sensitive user that's unware of it? Check. Stranded, cute robot with a secret message to deliver? Check. Escape from said planet trying to deliver message? Check. Han Solo and Chewbacca conning the wrong guys? Check. 2.) The bad guys suck. In the first movie, Darth Vader intimidates. He is strong, powerful, and no one messes with him. Kylo Ren? A weak crybaby that is hit SEVERAL TIMES by a stormtrooper that never held a lightsaber before!!! And he is prone to tantrums. Even worse, when he removes his helmet, he looks like an idiot. I have the perfect Sith name for him: Darth Dumbo. You're welcome, Disney! 3.) The Emperor is replaced by Gollum. Enough said. 4.) Can someone explain to me why the zero-calories version of the Empire bother building a planet-sized weapon, and have thousands of armed soldiers, if they are going to leave the most vulnerable part of their humongous weapon completely unattended? Not a single guard? Han Solo & Co. just waltz in, plant bombs and there it goes! These guys are the galactic equivalent of the Dodo. I was 8 when I watched the first movie. I should have know better than to go to this kind of movie at my current age.

    1. Re:It is very, very bad... by DirkDaring · · Score: 2

      I thought it was good, simply because I was entertained by it. But I agree with all of your comments. In the end I just couldn't believe this was the best story they could come up with. A re-make of EP IV.

    2. Re:It is very, very bad... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      if they are going to leave the most vulnerable part of their humongous weapon completely unattended? Not a single guard? Han Solo & Co. just waltz in, plant bombs and there it goes!

      I thought about that too, then I realized it kind of fits most of our current security practice, too. They had a planet-wide shield to keep things out, and behind it was plenty of insecurity. How many companies today rely on a single firewall? How many companies are running without a firewall? And for that matter, our own critical infrastructure is woefully understaffed. In California, we have prisons with guard towers that are empty. Why put people in prison if there aren't enough guards to keep them there?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:It is very, very bad... by Yunzil · · Score: 2

      but man, it sucked big time

      Wow, look at how wrong you are.

      Kylo Ren? A weak crybaby

      That wooshing noise you heard was the entire point of Kylo Ren's character sailing over your head.

      that is hit SEVERAL TIMES by a stormtrooper that never held a lightsaber before!!! ...While bleeding out from having been shot in the abdomen by a weapon that can blow several stormtroopers through the air. Seriously, did you even watch the movie, or were you distracted by scribbling notes about things that bothered you?

    4. Re:It is very, very bad... by Lisandro · · Score: 3, Informative

      Same here. The movie is chock full of unforgivable plot holes. From what i can remember right now...

      ...... SPOILERS AHEAD ......

      So, Luke is missing. For no apparent reason. But somehow there's a map to his location. Conveniently split in two halfs. Which everyone is aware of, again, for no apparent reason. And one is withheld by no other than R2D2?

      Finn, raised as a soldier his whole life, suddenly grows a conscience and quits after slaughtering a village. Doesn't stop him from killing a shitload of his old mates afterwards. Isn't he a bit too self aware?

      Poe Dameron pulls a resurrection that would make Jesus jealous. Zero explanations provided. ...same as the magical appearance of Chewy and Han Solo on the Millennium Falcon, which is now literally in the middle of nowhere. That one was cringe worthy. ...but not as much as Luke's lightsaber showing up in the exact saloon our heroes visit. Out of all the saloons in the galaxy.

      Kylo Ren: worst villain ever. One minute an incredible badass who can stop a blaster shot without even looking at it, the second he's been beaten up by a janitor with zero sword experience.

      An Rey. From scavenger extraordinary to master of the force in literally a little over 30 minutes. The "you will release me" scene was just too much.

      What exactly the Resistance was resisting to all these years?

      Why do Rey an Leia hug at the end? Did they even meet before that?

      Man, i could go on all day. The movie is a treat to the eyes and Harrison Ford just shines on it. The rest? You've seen it all on EP IV. With better writing, i might add.

    5. Re:It is very, very bad... by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      I should wonder how a guy who can stop a blaster shot mid air without even looking at it manages to get shot several times a while after, but i turned off my brain by that moment.

    6. Re:It is very, very bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No different when some guy in a brown cloak can surreptitiously sneak around, find a switch that deactivates the force fields around the station, and there's no sense of any sort of security systems on said area or the controls. But, maybe it's analogous to the big "emergency pump deactivate" switch at US gas stations or Kanban button?

      The one thing I didn't like were the sniveling "generals", who looked like they were maybe 25 yrs old. Perhaps the long-running war is really tough on the Empire, and that's what they have left to promote up the ranks? They should've given them all hipster beards and some sort of Imperial flannel shirts, skinny jeans and Vans shoes, and maybe some indications of tattoo "art", too. What, no product placements for imperial Stella Artois beer?

      At least Kylo Ren wasn't directly Benedict Cumberbatch, but the actor appears to be along the same lines.

      Other than that, I enjoyed the mix of reminders of things past, and lack of references to horrors past (Phantom Menace, et al).

    7. Re:It is very, very bad... by squiggleslash · · Score: 2

      I haven't seen it yet. That said, everything about Kylo Ren suggests he's a dark joke at the expense of Star Wars fans themselves. He (apparently, spoiler if this is true) kills his father (aka George Lucas, the creator of Star Wars and thus the father of all Star Wars fans) upset that Solo/Lucas is in favor of one side of the force (the lightweight version of Star Wars epitomied by the prequels) when he himself pines for Darth Vader and the myth he represents (aka the darker, "original", Star Wars where Han shoots first and doesn't stand on Jabba's tail.)

      So rather than having a Darth Vader figure for the new Darth Vader, they have this kinda nerdy, anti-social geeky Darth-wannabe character instead.

      If you've ever written the words "George Lucas destroyed my childhood" (or some equivalent replacing the word "destroyed" with something more obnoxious) then Kylo Ren may be intended to be you.

      Which if true is pretty hilarious, in my opinion. The question I have is where did the idea come from? Lucas said his ideas were rejected for the new movie, so it's not one last middle finger from him. But I wonder how many involved in the film are sympathetic to him.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    8. Re:It is very, very bad... by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      Poe Dameron pulls a resurrection that would make Jesus jealous. Zero explanations provided.

      First of all, love the line. Secondly, Poe does explain what happened. He basically woke up from the wreck after Fin had already walked off.

      Why do Rey an Leia hug at the end? Did they even meet before that?

      Women are sensitive to each others feelings. Leia, master diplomat and politician, saw someone who was emotionally upset and alone, walking off of the Millennium Falcon. Either way, not a huge deal breaker in the movie.
      I more or less concur with the rest of your statements.

    9. Re:It is very, very bad... by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2

      They learnt the lesson. They had two guards for the secret entrance to the nuclear reactor. They didn't stop the attack, so point in posting the dumb guards.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    10. Re:It is very, very bad... by c · · Score: 2

      A weak crybaby that is hit SEVERAL TIMES by a stormtrooper that never held a lightsaber before!!!

      What?!? Thye showed a stormtrooper actually hit a target? Star Wars is ruined! Damn you, JJ Abrams, damn you to hell!

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    11. Re: It is very, very bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sir, absolutely nailed it.

    12. Re:It is very, very bad... by umafuckit · · Score: 1

      I was 8 when I watched the first movie. I should have know better than to go to this kind of movie at my current age.

      This is exactly the point. All of these movies are only good if you are 8. The only reason Star Wars kept going is because of the good will it generated in many of its viewers when they were 8. Some people were prepared to go back for more because it was a way of reliving their childhood.

    13. Re:It is very, very bad... by dskzero · · Score: 1

      He seemed a bit distraught about what had happened earlier, though.

      --
      Oblivion Awaits
    14. Re:It is very, very bad... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      So, Luke is missing. For no apparent reason

      Combination of self-imposed exile and searching for old Jedi Temples; he finally realized that he has basically no real Jedi training.

      Finn, raised as a soldier his whole life, suddenly grows a conscience and quits after slaughtering a village. Doesn't stop him from killing a shitload of his old mates afterwards. Isn't he a bit too self aware?

      I got the feeling that this was either his first mission, or his first mission that wasn't something he could justify to himself.

      Poe Dameron pulls a resurrection that would make Jesus jealous. Zero explanations provided. ...same as the magical appearance of Chewy and Han Solo on the Millennium Falcon, which is now literally in the middle of nowhere. That one was cringe worthy. ...but not as much as Luke's lightsaber showing up in the exact saloon our heroes visit. Out of all the saloons in the galaxy.

      The Force guiding people to where they need to be.

      Kylo Ren: worst villain ever. One minute an incredible badass who can stop a blaster shot without even looking at it, the second he's been beaten up by a janitor with zero sword experience.

      Incredible 'take that' to people who think Darth Vader, mass murderer, child killer, and all around bad guy, is a likable and marketable character.

      An Rey. From scavenger extraordinary to master of the force in literally a little over 30 minutes. The "you will release me" scene was just too much.

      Yes. This would have been better if she'd been getting whispers through the Force or something. Imagine if, while strapped to the chair, suddenly very softly, in the background, they played clips from the 'not the droids you're looking for,' 'republic credits will be fine,' 'your master will reward you' and so on.

      Similary, 'Finn, where did you learn to use a lightsaber?' "I didn't, but as a stormtrooper, I have all sorts of weapons training. I was scared I'd take my own arm off the whole time, though."

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    15. Re:It is very, very bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The opening fight scene was fucking ridiculous, from the get go, you have troopers running out of a recently landed craft in a battle scene reminiscent of D-day.
      Couldn't you have just fired at the peasants from the air, fried them to a crisp, or is it just more FUN to risk your life running and firing and deliberately and uselessly putting your troops lives in question?

      I loved the movie - I expected EXACTLY what I got, a quick re-run of EP4 with Ford-as-legendary old man. Now I'm an old man too, I felt right at home.
      Of course it was shallow, but all of the Star Wars material was originally aimed at 8 year olds, and the intellectual and critical threshold of your average 8 year old is exactly that - shallow.
      Get a life, take a deep breath, it's only a kids' movie...

    16. Re:It is very, very bad... by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      I think what you really have to realize is that this movie was written for 8 year olds. It was a children's story and taken as that with child logic and plot holes, it does pretty well on the adult side. There were certainly some Pixarish type dialogue and awkward moments, but there certainly have been much worse movies for adults than this. Still, I wish it was written for more teens than pre-teens like the Harry Potter stories.

    17. Re:It is very, very bad... by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      Not bad points, but I think about half of them will be explained later and there are much worse implications of the movie. As for Finn, I bet we find out he is force sensitive also. The other stormtrooper dies in his arms and I bet he felt it. He feels what's going on around him, the big picture comes zooming into focus. Kylo Ren feels it also and seems to know, halts and looks at Finn at the end of the battle and later knows it was that particular stormtrooper before anybody tells him. The force is guiding him and that's how he ends up meeting Rey and being where he needs to be all those times.

      As for the resistance, I suspect that is the covert section of the Republic. Empire breaks up, Republic forms, resistance takes up the fight behind First Order lines in a way that is not direct war between the two. Still, for a galactic empire, even for remnants of one, man power has always seemed fairly scarce. If trying to make sense of it, I suspect that the Old Republic or the Empire were made up of a few thousand relatively sparsely populated worlds. Enough that the trade federation would default to robot warriors and a million or two clone troopers would be a major force in the galactic scene of things.

    18. Re: It is very, very bad... by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      So, "whenever you notice something like that, a wizard did it", right?

      I fear I might be overanalysing what its essentially supposed to be a kids movie, but c'mon. The plot was clearly secondary to providing iconic scenes (f.e. Han and Chewy returning to the Falcon). Say what you want about the originals; at least they were consistent in their mythology.

    19. Re: It is very, very bad... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      When the driving force of the movies is literally described as something that imparts visions, clues and hints, and people are casually described as having fates and destinies, yes.

      But you're equally correct; the plot is there to connect the set pieces. And VII does an amazingly better job of doing that well. Unlike, say, TPM.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    20. Re:It is very, very bad... by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      My main complaints: 1.) It is almost identical to the first movie. Desert planet? Check. Young, force-sensitive user that's unware of it? Check. Stranded, cute robot with a secret message to deliver? Check. Escape from said planet trying to deliver message? Check. Han Solo and Chewbacca conning the wrong guys? Check.

      Death Star, but only bigger? Check. Mysterious Hologram Emperor? Check. Weird Catina filled with oddball aleins? Check. Darth Vader but only more useless and less intimidating? Check. Legions of Nazi-like enemy. Check. Death Star is only moments from destroying the Hero's planet, but it get destroyed instead? Check.
      Not one single piece of original plot or character whatsoever...

      2. Even worse, when he removes his helmet, he looks like an idiot.

      When Rey asks him to remove his helmet I had to stop myself laughing out loud "Put it back on, Put it back on!" The guy looks like a doofus, and it's pretty hard to be intimidated by a teenage emo Marilyn Manson impersonator. Worst casting decision ever.

      3.) The Emperor is replaced by Gollum. Enough said.

      And has a stupid name that even sounds like Gollum. Snoke? Who the fuck thought that sounds like a good name for a potential evil galactic overlord? It was like they tried to go for a Prometheus style super alien, but ended up with a stupid cartoony Gollum instead.

      Can someone explain to me why the zero-calories version of the Empire bother building a planet-sized weapon, and have thousands of armed soldiers, if they are going to leave the most vulnerable part of their humongous weapon completely unattended? Not a single guard?

      And why build an exact type of weapon that got defeated twice already? But it's bigger! And now it takes longer to fire, so you've got more time to get out of the way! If the Simpsons can cater to both Children and Adults, why can't the Star Wars?

    21. Re:It is very, very bad... by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      That wooshing noise you heard was the entire point of Kylo Ren's character sailing over your head.

      Really? Feel free to explain the complexity we missed, because the Ren I saw couldn't compete mentally with the complete non-jedi Poe, and failed miserably with the possible Jedi, but completely untrained Rey. And even if he was shot, do you think Vader would've not executed any Stormtrooper he came across without blinking?
      Also where did he get Vader's helmet from? And why did he wear a mask? At least Vader had a decent excuse.
      Sorry but you idea that anything in TFA went over our heads is laughable. It was as lame and predictable as a story could get. The last 20 minutes I felt like I was watching a mashup of ROTJ and ANH. Not one new idea whatsoever in the whole film.

    22. Re:It is very, very bad... by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      Secondly, Poe does explain what happened. He basically woke up from the wreck after Fin had already walked off.

      That's not a good explanation. Finn searched the wreckage, found Poe's jacket but not him. The ship sinks in the sand then explodes, so either Poe ejected from the TIE fighter before it crashed, somehow without his jacket on, and woke up later, or he was unconscious in the TIE Fighter, and somehow his jacket feel off, and Finn couldn't see him, and he survived being submerged in sand and then blown up? None of those is even remotely acceptable as an explanation.

      Women are sensitive to each others feelings. Leia, master diplomat and politician, saw someone who was emotionally upset and alone, walking off of the Millennium Falcon. Either way, not a huge deal breaker in the movie.

      Wow sexist much? Sorry that was a deal breaker that both my wife and teenage daughter pointed out immediately afterwards. Two strangers hug like old friends, and Han's death is given all of 5 seconds of pouting from Chewy before everyone has moved on and forgot he even existed.
      The movie was crap from start to finish.

    23. Re:It is very, very bad... by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      I got the feeling that this was either his first mission, or his first mission that wasn't something he could justify to himself.

      He says later he worked in sanitation which made no sense. Unlike the army which has all sorts of roles, Stormtroopers are ALL front-line fighting troops. You don't get "all sorts of weapons training", then get assigned a role to fixing the toilets, then get picked for a landing mission to invade a village.

    24. Re:It is very, very bad... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      I saw the movie again last night, actually.

      He does indeed mention that Jakku was his first battle. He also mentions he worked sanitation. Also that he was taken as a baby.

      So, I hypothesize that what happened is that, during his training and indoctrination phase, he worked sanitation. Think cleaning out the head in Full Metal Jacket, or even marines being put on honey-dipper detail.

      So yeah, it actually makes perfect sense. During early education and training, Finn worked sanitation detail in that area.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    25. Re:It is very, very bad... by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      Wow sexist much?

      Not too much.

    26. Re:It is very, very bad... by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      I saw the movie again last night, actually.

      He does indeed mention that Jakku was his first battle. He also mentions he worked sanitation. Also that he was taken as a baby.

      So, I hypothesize that what happened is that, during his training and indoctrination phase, he worked sanitation. Think cleaning out the head in Full Metal Jacket, or even marines being put on honey-dipper detail.

      So yeah, it actually makes perfect sense. During early education and training, Finn worked sanitation detail in that area.

      Sorry but that doesn't work for me. That may be how it works in the 21st century earth military, but Imperial Stormtroopers are in a high tech universe where robots can perform complex surgery, there is simply no need to have a human be a soldier and a janitor like in our world. In this universe, all your soldiers are a pure fighting force, which has been implied in every movie up until now. In fact, thinking back to every scene from the previous 6 films that involved some sort of menial task, it was always done by a robot or lower class alien, never a Stormtrooper.
      Same goes for the flame thrower scene. It was completely out of whack for a futuristic invasion force to have to resort to such clumsy old fashioned weaponry.

    27. Re:It is very, very bad... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      It's not a question of having droids do the work.

      Remember, these stormtroopers aren't clones that are genetically altered to be loyal. They're human beings being raised and indoctrinated, and yeah, the old methods work the best there. Same as modern military training.

      As for flamethrowers being 'clumsy, old fashioned weaponry,' how ELSE are you going to put an entire village to the flame?

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    28. Re:It is very, very bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > As for flamethrowers being 'clumsy, old fashioned weaponry,' how ELSE are you going to put an entire village to the flame?

      Thermal detonators?

    29. Re:It is very, very bad... by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      ... and yeah, the old methods work the best there. Same as modern military training.

      Clearly they don't since the janitor couldn't handle the heat of a real battle. Had Fin been burning babies from a toddler instead of cleaning up poo, he would have no such issues.
      And since robots do all menial tasks in Ep1-6, at what point did someone in the First Order say, hey let's get the men to clean the toilets instead of those robots that have been doing it our whole lives? It was a stupid plot device that threw me completely out of the story (yet again).

      As for flamethrowers being 'clumsy, old fashioned weaponry,' how ELSE are you going to put an entire village to the flame?

      Any one of the myriad of laser weapons found in this universe. If you have "Star Destroyers", "Death Stars" and "Star Killers", I'm sure that demolishing a small village isn't too much of a problem.

    30. Re:It is very, very bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, Finn didn't say he cleaned toilets, he only said he worked in sanitation. Maybe he supervised toilet-cleaning droids?

  37. Re: Tag all timothy articles with timothyarselicke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I think arse is the same as ass in the UK. Kind of like mum is mom.

  38. Yes, my money too by johanw · · Score: 1

    But only because I don't have a 3D setup at home. Over 6 months I will just torrent the DVD.

  39. So much revenue! by jargonburn · · Score: 1

    I wonder if it actually made a profit , though. :S

  40. It's a TRAP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My eyes cannot repel crap of this magnitude!

  41. Get over your sense of ownership by Chewbacon · · Score: 1

    I agree the best episodes were 4-6. 1-3 were pretty bad. Bad story telling, bad acting (Ewan McGregor did ok). I didn't think episode 7 was bad. I enjoyed it. Where I differ from many people is I take the position that it is not my story. I just listen to it. If I didn't take that road, then I would've left during Wolverine when they claimed hydrochlorothiazide slows your heart rate. If they make episode 8 a film about Jesus, then fine, but I'm not buying it. I take no loss when it comes to my memories of the first films Lucas released. Actually, I'm pretty thrilled this gets my sons into Star Wars and I can watch them enjoy it and see it for the first time vicariously.

    I realize it may make your cereal taste better this morning, but get over yourselves. So you haters may have paid $100 for a night at the movies with the family and were disappointed. Guess what, you spent some time with the family. If you showed up with a sour-puss mentality "this better be fucking awesome and rock my world" then you deserved to get your feelings hurt. It isn't the first time you saw a bad flick at an exorbitant price.

    --
    Chewbacon
    The Bible is like Wikipedia: written by a bunch of people and verifiable by questionable sources.
    1. Re:Get over your sense of ownership by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here here, bunch of loud-mouth complainers here. It was a pretty decent movie with great special effects.

    2. Re:Get over your sense of ownership by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, people who don't agree with your views are automatically "haters", eh? As simple as that, you just dismiss them, you wonderful product of the current "tolerant" and "politically correct" society!

  42. Hollywood accounting by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

    When all is said and done, they'll only have a few hundred million $ loss.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  43. International appeal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You described two things going on in movies: international appeal and merchandising.

    Lucas perfected Disney's merchandising back in the late 70's. Lucas is a great marketer and deal maker.

    Movies have to be made with international appeal. Action! Action! Action! That doesn't have to be translated or put into cultural context. That's why shit like the Transformer movies make a shit load of money. The Star Trek reboots were crap compared to ST:TOS because of this. ST:TOS has the cultural context of the US during the 1960s. Much of what went on goes over the head of the younger generation. Shit, I didn't get the significance of Kirk kissing Uhura and I grew up in the late 70's! Whereas; the vapid action of ST:Reboots has very little cultural context.

    In other words, if you want know why movies suck now - besides having to use them to market toys and other shit - is because they need to get Chinese people to watch it - movies need to have a World wide non-cultural specific appeal to make it big these days.

    Me? I'm waiting for the DVD to come out and if it's less than $20, I might get it.

  44. JJAbrams played it safe by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
    This movie is exactly a reproduction of the original ANH. From a protogonist in a dusty planet dressed in rags who is unaware of his/her potential, to evil man in mask, distant more evil villain, climatic X wing fighters making bombing run...

    Having said that, this one leverages on the fan base, its speculation about possible connections between the characters. Back in the 1970s no one asked "Who is Luke Skywalker?" or speculated he could be related by blood to super villains. Despite being hinted at as Darth Vader = Dark Father in German.

    This time the net is abuzz with speculation about Rey. Everyone has all but concluded that Rey is the daughter of Luke. Some people hoping for a twist think she could be a grand daughter of Obi Wan. Or Obi Wan might have had a daughter who married luke, thus Rey could be Rey Wan-Skywalker.

    I hope they pull a totally unexpected twist and make Rey an aunt of Luke and Leia. Anakin's father is left dangling in the canon, with some vague hints by Shmi that Anakin had no father. Anakin's father could be from a long living tribe (Yoda was 900 years old), well endowed with the Force who go into suspended animation who wake up time to time to create off-spring to bring balance to the Force. "To eradicate the Evil, and to establish Righteousness, I will return to the Earth from time and again" said Krishna Geetha 4:8

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:JJAbrams played it safe by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      Everyone has all but concluded that Rey is the daughter of Luke.

      I know I'm going to be pretty disappointed if in Ep. VIII Luke doesn't say to Rey, "No, I am your father".

    2. Re:JJAbrams played it safe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love how, in hindsight, people can invent the most creative things to see in the originals.

      Nothing was "hinted" at by Darth Vader's name. Read Lucas' own account of how the movies were written. The idea of Vader being Luke's father was written into the Empire script DURING the filming of the movie. Years after New Hope was released.

      And while I'm nitpicking, "dark father" in German is "dunkler vater".

      But you made a good attempt at bullshit! Kudos.

  45. Should help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    elevate my Disney stock which is up over 300% since I bought it back in 2009.

  46. It wasn't a movie by Torp · · Score: 1

    It was an extended trailer for the next movies. They barely managed to introduce all the characters.
    It's the beginning of a long lived Disney(tm) franchise.

    While Lucas went batshit insane with episodes 1-3, and shouldn't be allowed to write a script ever again, all of his movies at least had memorable scenes. It appears JJ Abrams can't do that, I don't remember any specific scene after seeing episode 7. None. And that goes for the other film by him that i tried to see, the Star Trek reboot a couple years ago.

    Saw this one in cinemas, not sure I'll bother with the next 12 to 20 episodes.

    --
    I apologize for the lack of a signature.
  47. Re: Tag all timothy articles with timothyarselicke by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Way off-topic, but: In English, ass means either donkey or (colloquially, and less common now), stupid person. Arse means backside (Saxon derivation, as I recall). some time under 100 years ago, Americans started substituting ass for arse and now use ass to mean all three things. I'm not sure exactly when this happened - the two English definitions of ass are in the 1901 edition of Websters.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  48. Wait, what? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I thought piracy was supposed to be killing the creative industries?

    1. Re:Wait, what? by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      It is. By the industry's own accounts they would have paid back the USA's national debt with this movie had it not been for piracy.

    2. Re:Wait, what? by GonzoPhysicist · · Score: 1

      That would only matter if there was something creative about this film.

      --
      horror vacui
  49. Off course, Star Wars marketing is obnoxious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For months you can not escape the Star Wars marketing. On every single radio station, on every single television station. It doesn't matter what store you go to, there was always some obnoxious message about Star Wars, whether it was in candy, in sports articles, in toys, ... That last weeks they even dared to set up light shows and even statues/living statues in my local city.

    I've never watched any Star Wars movie. I've seen a few shots, but I never felt the urge to continue watching a movie about people in plastic helmets or in pyjamas waving fluorescent light sticks. But now it has become all too obnoxious. Where is my right to not see what I don't want to see? At work you hear small talk about this movie, I'm made fun of because I've never watched the old movies as if I'm a hermit who lives under a rock and who has to be avoided at all cost.

    This brainwashing has gone too far. Star Wars is a movie for kids that might be enjoyed by some adults. But it is not Culture with a big 'C'. It is Marketing with a big 'M'.

    I don't like pop culture. What's wrong with that? I don't know what is the right music to listen to for the snobs. I also don't know what is the wrong music to listen to for the snobs. But there apparently is a list with songs/artists that are 'right' and that are 'wrong'. I don't like either. They all sound the same to me. I've the same feeling towards those 'must see' movies. They are all the same to me. A style that has been developed to be enjoyed (read paid for) by as many people as possible. Music, movies, TV shows, books, they all suffer from the same problem: it are clones of what was done before.

    Where is the theater that was still alive in the 80's? The local theater with local talent and writers are gone. They have been replaced by multinational productions with a multi-million organization behind it. Those organizations have gone so far that they managed to close the local theaters because their writing was so general (but still copyrighted), that everybody was 'plagiarizing'. Where are the many local music groups? Just the act of making music is enough for the local syndicate of RIAA to extort money from them and to funnel the money to the US.

    Literally nothing of our culture that has persisted for thousands of years has survived the Anglo-Saxon imperialism. And now I'm being made fun of for not embracing this meaningless pop culture?

  50. Yep! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Saw it in 3d IMax - great flick. Expensive (over $13USD / ticket), but great fun, and true to the original movies. My only unanswered question is, is Rey Luke's daughter, or Kylo's?

    1. Re:Yep! by Zappy · · Score: 1

      Probably Yoda's daughter she is.

  51. Re: Off course, Star Wars marketing is obnoxious.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're not making fun of you. We'll keep ignoring you. Nobody cares, you can emarginate yourself as long and as much you like.

  52. Soo, if you could recite the lines in advance.... by Texmaize · · Score: 1

    Did it occur to you that if you could recite the lines before they happened, maybe the force awakened in you while you were watching the film?

    Hey everyone, my money is on this padiwan taking the gold in olympic fencing!

    --
    "Liberalism is a very noble idea, currently controlled by some very bad people. Be sure you do not get the two confused.
  53. It'll make 3 billion in 14 parsecs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "12!!" Somebody make a list of all the "callbacks," in fact.

  54. Cowboys and Aliens by mdsolar · · Score: 1

    Luke had daddy issues, which was the plot of episodes IV-VI. The big disappointment here is that Ford did difficult daddy better in Cowboys and Aliens than in this film. Basically a throw away.

  55. Episode 8 by ITRambo · · Score: 1

    The next one should be directed by Whedon and be call Scruffy the Vampire Slayer, with vampires of course. People would still go see it.

    1. Re:Episode 8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The next one should be directed by Whedon and be call Scruffy the Vampire Slayer, with vampires of course"
      Abraham Lincoln, Sith Hunter.

  56. Earplugs by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

    Don't know about you but when I'm dragged to the theater I always bring earplugs. You hear the movie fine and cut out the noise of everyone around you. I hated sitting through the ads but didn't pay attention (because they're ads) so I didn't know what they were about. Someone I was with said it spoiled who was a good guy and who was a bad guy in the movie.
     
    Anyway I'm usually just talking with people during all that crap and just pay attention when the movie is on. Normally I check those sites that tell you when e movie actually starts and the preroll ends but we were with someone who really had to see the trailers and garbage. (Personally I find trailers are just condensed spoiler reels so I never watch.) Yeah going to the movies blows. I would have rather waited for the home video but by then I imagine the whole thing would be spoiled, not that I heard anything about the movie until I got there. It was fun. A New Hope but for a new generation.

  57. Plinkett by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only reason to see the film is for the inevitable Plinkett review.

  58. Why all the hate? by CimmerianX · · Score: 0

    I thought it was a good movie. Action, some drama, hell we at least get some 'character' in the characters this time.
    Even my wife liked it.

    It was just fun...

    And star wars was never science fiction, it was always science fantasy.

    1. Re:Why all the hate? by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      It was just fun...

      The problem that I had with it is that it really wasn't fun (maybe for kids, but not for me as an adult). I wanted to wait for it to come to blu-ray, and the only reason I went t see it in a theater was because I knew I wouldn't be able to avoid spoilers for that long and because I wanted to give it the benefit of its best presentation with an enthusiastic audience. But I at least expected a fun experience.

      I knew that early reviews are worthless these days. The big studios are masters of buying reviews now, and so brainwashing everyone with hype that even honest reviewers get caught up in it. So I certainly didn't expect it to live up to the reviews, and adjusted my expectations accordingly.

      But what I didn't expect it to be was so...boring. The plot was just a retread of the original trilogy (seriously, yet another Death Star, REALLY?). The characters were either paper-thin or annoying. The whole thing left me wondering about all the scenes that must have been left on the cutting room floor so they could focus on the big action set pieces and moving the plot along. It really does feel like a 4+ hour movie that's been cut down to 2 hours, with a plot that moves WAY too fast.

      This constant need to keep the plot moving at a break-neck pace left a bunch of characters that are hard to really care about, relate to, or even understand. Finn's character transformations are so ridiculously abrupt that he comes off as mentally ill. Poe and Rey are so paper-thin that they could have been CGI-generated and I wouldn't have even noticed. And Kylo Ren is such a whiny emo that it was hard to even take him seriously, much less find him at all intimidating.

      And all the fan service was really more sad than anything. Does no one else find it painful to watch a 73-year-old Han Solo who doesn't seem to even realize that 32 years have passed? Why does no one else in the movie notice that this cocky young pirate is now almost an octogenarian (and still playing the character as the exact same cocky young pirate)? His time on screen was at once painful to watch and unintentionally funny. And the requisite cameos from everyone else just felt forced and compulsory. I would have rather have only seen C3PO and R2D2, and left the original cast in the original trilogy where they belonged.

      All-in-all, it wasn't a TERRIBLE movie (like The Phantom Menace). It was just boring and hollow. I wasn't going into it expecting a thoughtful movie (this is Star Wars after all, and produced by Disney no less). But I did expect to have fun, and to care about at least one of the characters. But at the end I walked out of the theater feeling like I hadn't really watched anything. It was like eating cotton candy without even the sugar taste.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  59. Since The Road by future+assassin · · Score: 1

    where I took my son and we paid $20+tax for two tickets and another for popcorn and drinks, I said fuck it no more of this BS. Got a large screen tv and a media players and never looked back. Just hit the pawn shops a few weeks after a movie comes out and then get it for $4 actually now don't even care I just free load when I can with torrents. I gto 800+ dvd's to got plenty of re-watch material.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  60. It was worth it. by jader3rd · · Score: 1

    I think that it was worth it to see the Force Awakens in movie theaters. J.J only pulled off one universe defying trick (which is way better than what he did with Into Darkness), by allowing Han to hyperspace past planetary defenses and come out of hyperspace well into the planets gravity well. It's been well established in Star Wars that hyperspacing doesn't work once you're close enough to a strong gravitational pull. And if you could all weapons would become hyperspace rockets. The movie is fun, though one thing that myself and all of my siblings agree on was that the character that we all liked the most was Poe. He was kind of over powered in the middle battle, but we still like him. The big disappointment is how powerful they made Kylo Ren at the beginning; stopping a blaster bolt he didn't even see coming with the force, while concentrating on something else; and then near the end couldn't seem to not get hit. The next beef with the movie was with how fast Rey took to using the force as good or better than Anakin, Luke or Obi-wan after they had years of practice. One thing which was introduced that I really liked, was how Kylo was feeling a pull from the light side of the force. That certainly never came up as a possibility in the movies, and I never saw it in the Extended Universe. I hope they explore that more.

    1. Re:It was worth it. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      While the movie was too much of a remake of the original movie for my taste, it had considerable differences.

      Kylo Ren is not a fully trained Sith, and screws up. He seems to be losing it by the end of the movie. Then again, he's repeatedly hurt, and still readily defeats a storm trooper.

      Rey is shown teaching herself the Jedi mind trick, and gets the summon-the-lightsaber thing down the first time. She apparently uses the Force in some manner in her final battle, and is clearly stronger in the Force than Kylo. I don't see that this makes her using the Force better than Luke or Anakin or Obi-Wan. She clearly has a whole lot of potential.

      As far as hyperspace skipping the shields goes, the Millennium Falcon is the only ship to complete the Kessel run in twelve parsecs, and clearly in Han's hands is capable of remarkable feats. For that matter, it may have had its hyperdrive modified. I was willing to believe that Han and Chewbacca could manage to pull it off.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    2. Re:It was worth it. by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      Kylo Ren is not a fully trained Sith, and screws up. He seems to be losing it by the end of the movie.

      Kylo Ren isn't Sith, he's a Knight of Ren. Fully trained or not, he was capable of killing off all of the other Jedi apprentices, and performing other impressive feats with the force through most of the movies. Plus, we learn from all other Star Wars movies that "losing it" makes you more powerful in the Dark side.

      Rey effectively becomes the most powerful, well trained Light Side force user in a day. It's dumb, and extremely inconsistent with the rest of Star Wars.

      Fine, make hyperspacing into gravity wells possible. But once possible, anyone can do it. Even military grade rockets, once made possible there's no reason for any weapon to be anything but hydrogen bombs mounted on planetary defensive penetrating rockets. Through lazy writing J.J. did it again where he gave his hero's an ability just for the convenience of the plot.

    3. Re:It was worth it. by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      by allowing Han to hyperspace past planetary defenses and come out of hyperspace well into the planets gravity well.

      Oh Christ you just reminded me of this scene. And moving at over 300000km/second they manage to pull out with only metres to spare. I know we have to bend the rules for the plot, but hell why not just give them a time machine?

    4. Re:It was worth it. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Ren was dangerous, but he wasn't unstoppable. He made it clear in the movie that he needed more training.

      Rey is not the most powerful Light Side Force user. She was the best in that situation at using the Force. She's obviously exceptional, obviously intelligent, and very definitely untrained.

      What ever gave you the idea that Star Wars had consistency? A maneuver that Han can pull off in the Millennium Falcon, and we don't know if he can do it reliably, is not necessarily one that can be pulled off by anyone else or any automated system.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    5. Re:It was worth it. by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      What ever gave you the idea that Star Wars had consistency?

      All of the other Star Wars I have seen and read thus far.

    6. Re:It was worth it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I don't seem to remember ever owning a droid."
        - Obi-Wan Kenobi

  61. Well, "yes". And "ish". by Lisandro · · Score: 4, Informative

    Is it a movie to be seen on theaters? Absolutely.

    Now, is it a good movie? So... no. Not by a long stretch, i might add. Looks great, Harrison Ford is fantastic and it is loaded with iconic scenes... but man, the script is a poor rehash of EP IV, and ridden with glaring plot holes as well.

    1. Re:Well, "yes". And "ish". by delt0r · · Score: 1

      Did you even watch the originals? There are the very definition of a plot hole. It is fucking star wars, with swords and magic in space! What the fuck did you expect?

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    2. Re:Well, "yes". And "ish". by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      Is it a movie to be seen on theaters? Absolutely.

      Now, is it a good movie? So... no. Not by a long stretch, i might add. Looks great, Harrison Ford is fantastic and it is loaded with iconic scenes... but man, the script is a poor rehash of EP IV, and ridden with glaring plot holes as well.

      Actually, for a movie written for nine year olds, I thin it was a pretty good movie. They probably pulled in Pixar people as it had their feel at times.

    3. Re: Well, "yes". And "ish". by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      Plausibility. I can be down with space wizards and light swords alright, but you have to play by the same rules you've created. My problem was not with the SW mythology but the fact that the plot made no sense whatsoever.

    4. Re: Well, "yes". And "ish". by delt0r · · Score: 1

      It made as much sense as A New Hope. Really Just As Much Sense. So if this one doesn't then neither does any of them.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
  62. jar jar abram from now on he will be known by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as far as i'm concerned this first billion comes from curiosity and die hard fan , but this one is even worst then the ewoks , that sith apprentice would be more at his place trying to subdue chicks by flexing his biceps on a guess bilboard then at the helm of an evil empire and army , not even going to go on "this new starwar taste like a reheated week old microwave dinner" the story is a bad mashup of previous starwar movies , a desert planet orphan discover he's a jedi , deathstar 3 , death of said jedi-to-be mentor , cute irreverent robot ....... i could go on a long long time

  63. Star Wars VII: There No Hope by Yergle143 · · Score: 1

    This movie sucked, was worse than the prequels and it is shameful that it got made in the first place.
    I am surprised critical opinion did not pan it outright. Boy was I fooled.
    Star Wars as a franchise though may have some merit. The fans have more imagination than the makers.
    Please go on being a true believer if it makes you happy.

  64. Re:It was worth it. (spoiler) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "J.J only pulled off one universe defying trick"
    What about looking up in the sky and seeing in realtime a the destruction of [important planet] from light years away? That kind of proliferation of scientific ignorance drives me crazy. Thanks for making us all dumber for having watched the movie Mr. Abrams.

  65. Don't forget 20 minutes of ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was surprised when they said the movie started at 11:00, and the actual movie didn't start until almost 11:30. They showed a bunch of ads for phone companies, cars, all sorts of crap, then the damn previews started AFTER all that. Finally 5 minutes after they said "now for the feature presentation" I got to watch Star Wars. I'm never going to the theatre again, what did my admission pay for if I had to watch all those ads?

  66. The Force Awakens: Yawn.... by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

    It wasn't bad, but it wasn't good either. C+ is the best I think its worth. It sort of reminded me of a tv episode... I was underwhelmed really. I wouldn't go see it again.

    On the good side the casting and acting were exceptional, except for Kylo Ren(Adam Driver), but you already knew that. The space-chases, gun fights, light-sabre fights, etc were good.
    The bad side? The Story. But that is what we've come to expect from Abrams. The not-so-subtle "were too lazy to come up with our own ideas so lets re-use plot points from the first film(Ep IV)". I think you know what I'm talking about. That was really sad, and yes, lazy. These guys were given the keys to the kingdom, and what is the best they could come up with?

    --
    We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
  67. Was worth it with a few minor setbacks I won't by nensondubois · · Score: 1

    disclose due to spoilers.

    There were a few things that didn't make sense such as the lightsaber in Bespin and how that can't be explained... I might be giving too much away already.

    There were a few emotional scenes and I almost cried even when I went with other people to see it I was still a little embarrassed.

    I think anyone should see it, provided they watched all the previous installments, or at least A New Hope, Return of the Jedi and Empire Strikes Back.

    --
    http://gamehacking.org/vb/threads/12747-nensondubois-codes http://twitter.com/nensondubois_
  68. 8-chan poser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't bother.

    It's not a bad film., but it's mediocre at best.

    JJ Abrams box ticking plus some awful writing. It's just... meh... the writing is lazy and sloppy. It's like a bunch of old Star Wars scenes stitched together loosely with a half-assed framing story, a Mary Sue lead and some disposable sidekicks. And no, zealots, neither Luke nor Anakin were Mary Sues.

    The story in the prequels was actually better - even if they were a trainwreck due to bad acting and George Lucas's tin ear for dialog. The new film is, at least, not risible... that's the most you can say for it.

    Perhaps you need to just go back to 8-chan where people will believe your pesudo-intellectual bullshit.

  69. Re: Tag all timothy articles with timothyarselick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As usual, it's another case of the Americans getting the English language wron,g and then accusing the English of getting it wrong instead.

  70. Midichlorians by rmdingler · · Score: 1

    If you can point me to a scientific in-universe explanation of the Force, I'll recant.

    Altering events and the actions of others by personal force is unproven, but far from impossible.

    I like the explanation that the force is an ability to predict the likelihood of near future events, possible because of an altruistic parasitic life form.

    It is in line with the present tilt of research that seems to indicate we are a macro-organism made possible by many contributing and formerly uncredited life forms.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  71. Even sillier to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The 'non-canon' post-ROTJ universe had a lot better plotlines they could have followed instead. Even some of the dumb and hackneyed ones were better than the reviews I've read of the new movie.

    Most importantly though: A whole generation of Star Wars fans grew up with Jacen Jaina and Anakin as the Organa-Solo offspring, and they just throw it all out because of 'NIH' syndrome, similiar to what happened in the prequel era (Hint: Boba Fett got a backstory that neither made him the prototype for a clone army, nor a Mandalorian, but rather a perfect fallen lawman, the sort who would make an excellent bounty hunter.)

  72. This makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The prices are much higher now than they were in 1977, when the original movie came out. The Imax 3D prices in 1977 were between 1.25 and 2 dollars. They are closed to 20 dollars now.

  73. Darth and Droids ; Reddit by Keybounce · · Score: 1

    Has this gotten my money? Not yet. I plan to watch the Darths and Droids version of this movie first.

    Now, I'd like to discuss two things that were mentioned in Reddit. I'm not asking for spoilers, I just want to open up some wild mass guessing.

    First, what is the likelyhood that episode 8 will reveal that the guy whose name translates to a type of fish will turn out to be Sith-lord Binks, having stayed in the background since Palpatine double-crossed him way back in episode 3 by promoting Doku instead of him.

    Second, how likely is it that Luke -- and yes, I saw while skimming through that he is missing (or otherwise out of the way) at the start of the movie will turn out to have turned dark at the end of 6 (after all, Yoda made a prophecy about him, etc. -- all the pieces are there, he could just have been acting "good" with the goal of Father+Son ruling the galaxy ... but darn it, daddy died. Hmm, maybe Luke + Binks as episode 8 lords?)

    Yea, I know, but I said: Wild mass guessing.

    (I think Binks as Sithlord would make a great plotline; I don't know if that's what will happen. Luke having turned bad at the end of 6, and hiding it from those near him at first, only to get away to found his own Evil Inc.? Until I found out that he starts this movie off in hiding, I didn't think that was possible. Err, did I just say "No, that's impossble"?)

  74. How old is Finn supposed to be? by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    "Finn, raised as a soldier his whole life, suddenly grows a conscience and quits after slaughtering a village. Doesn't stop him from killing a shitload of his old mates afterwards. Isn't he a bit too self aware?"

    He says that was the first battle he's been in... which is a bit odd, as he admits to be taken as a child and trained as a soldier by the empire his whole life... yet they decided to train him for what 20-25 years prior to him seeing any action? I guess they have so many soldiers they can take their time apparently and I guess the loss of two deathstars and like 30 years of war with rebels didn't make enough of a dent to force the empire to perhaps fast track some soldiers into battle...

    Also the purpose of Kylo's mask is what? To make him look and sound scary? I mean Vader had one, but that was to breath,,, If it is supposed to be just a combat helmet, why doesn't he just sound like a stormtrooper. That in itself seemed to make him a bit lame. Other possible explanations are that he is just so much of a Vader fanboi that he just "liked" it, also lame. Of course it is probably meant as some sort of stupid metaphor or something...

    As for some of the things mentioned, I can forgive him wasting his mates, as it could simply be explained that they were trying to kill him first, so survival is a more a motivator than morals. As for the Kylo fight, I can excuse it, as 1) he did get his ass handed to him eventually, and 2) he is supposedly trained as a solider is whole life so has some martial training, and it does show him going up against another trooper with a melee type weapon, he perhaps also had training on, so not outrageous he might get a few lucky licks in. Also I think they made Kylo wounded to account for it also prior. Ray's 7 second jedi abs is a bit much, at least Luke had a bit of training on the falcon, and then a puppet montage later on,,,