Slashdot Mirror


German Carpenter's Testicluar Valve Could Mean An On/Off Switch For Sperm

Press2ToContinue writes: A German carpenter has invented a valve which he claims will revolutionize contraception, by allowing a man to turn the flow of sperm from his testicles on and off at the flick of a switch. It (the switch, of course) is nearly an inch long and weighs less than a tenth of an ounce. It is surgically implanted on the vas deferens, the tube that carries sperm from the testicles, in a half-hour operation, and controlled by a switch beneath the skin of the scrotum.

So far Bimek is the only man who has the switches implanted, one for each testicle. I wonder what other switches we will see implanted into humans in the future?
I think I'd like a valve for adrenaline control.

177 of 287 comments (clear)

  1. Those crazy Germans by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 5, Funny

    >> A German carpenter has invented a valve that gets implanted in the most delicate part of your body via a surgical operation

    Seems about right to me.

    1. Re:Those crazy Germans by Locke2005 · · Score: 4, Funny

      You'd prefer a Jewish carpenter? (I believe that's called the "rhythm method" of birth control.)

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:Those crazy Germans by DarkOx · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, yes a "child of circumcision" does seem more appropriate here.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    3. Re:Those crazy Germans by nigelo · · Score: 3, Funny

      A cut above the rest?

      --
      *Still* negative function...
    4. Re:Those crazy Germans by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I put the stereo on Rhythm and Blues method myself.

    5. Re:Those crazy Germans by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      Whatever turns you on

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    6. Re: Those crazy Germans by pjshane · · Score: 1

      He was thinking out of the box.

  2. How about one for tear ducts? by marcvanh · · Score: 1

    It would look like this.

    1. Re:How about one for tear ducts? by Bosconian · · Score: 1

      Depressing or not, that is official Valve art for one of two mascot Valve guys.

      "Open your browser:"
      http://half-life.wikia.com/wik...

      --
      Scarce, scared, scarred, sacred... -Col. Bruce Hampton
  3. Men can control their stuff with a switch by ClickOnThis · · Score: 4, Funny
    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    1. Re:Men can control their stuff with a switch by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      I'm sure this has a high likelihood of utterly failing, being forgotten, or otherwise having a less than perfect track record.

      You might as well to pull it out and hope that works.

      People will forget, or during various ... er ... activities this will get switched on/off by accident.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:Men can control their stuff with a switch by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      From what I have heard, women have a way to "shut that whole thing down" anyway...

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    3. Re:Men can control their stuff with a switch by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A less than perfect track record, you say? Well, then it MUST be completely worthless! Just like all other forms of birth control!

      No, I'm saying that if the switch is on or off depending on various rubbing of your nuts ... unless there's a blinking light or some other cue to let you know the state it's in, there's a very good chance that at any given point it may not be in the same state you thought it was.

      So, if before and after coitus you can check that it was blinking, and know it didn't change (not sure how) .. great, run wild. You can selectively inseminate.

      But if you can't tell, it doesn't serve much purpose.

      I guess you count have it emit a loud beep when it switched state. Otherwise it's just Schoedinger's nuts. ;-)

      I have no idea if this is meant to be "I can knock up with wife but not the mistress", or you must book several months in advance to have the doctor flip the switch on your balls.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    4. Re:Men can control their stuff with a switch by ClickOnThis · · Score: 4, Funny

      Otherwise it's just Schoedinger's nuts. ;-)

      LOL!

      Or maybe ... Heisenballs?

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    5. Re:Men can control their stuff with a switch by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      Or maybe ... Heisenballs?

      And thus began the worst porn parody ever...

      That's right... oooh...aaah... Now... Say my name!
      Heisenballs.
      You're goddamn right.

    6. Re:Men can control their stuff with a switch by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

      Only for legitimate rape.

    7. Re:Men can control their stuff with a switch by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough the inventor thought of that obvious problem. It uses a safety switch, which requires that a safety button on the back be squeezed in before the switch can be flipped. Honestly the maneuver looks like it would be rather uncomfortable, especially if any significant force is required.

      Now that's probably still not 100% failure-proof, but unless the design is seriously flawed it's going to be *very* unlikely that the valve ever gets opened by accident, and you'd probably notice if there were any attempt at deliberate sabotage by your partner.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    8. Re:Men can control their stuff with a switch by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      And thus began the worst porn parody ever...

      One wonders ... what, precisely, is the standards of evaluating the "worst porn parody ever"?

      I think I'd rather not know.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    9. Re:Men can control their stuff with a switch by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 2

      Well, based on what I've been told about vasectomies, its not a "Kids with the wife, not with the mistress" kind of deal, because after you flip the switch, your gonna need to jerk it like 3 times a day for a week to clear out any lingering swimmers in the tubes. So more of a "Book 6 weeks in advance to have the doctor flip the switch on your balls"

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    10. Re:Men can control their stuff with a switch by runningduck · · Score: 1

      With two switches things can get confusing. You may switch one on but depending on the state of the other . . . argh! At least with light there is a visual indicator.

      --
      -rd
    11. Re:Men can control their stuff with a switch by markdavis · · Score: 1

      >unless there's a blinking light or some other cue to let you know the state it's in, there's a very good chance that at any given point it may not be in the same state you thought it was.

      If you watch the video on the article, it clearly explains that in order to turn the valve back on, it requires pressing a safety button AND flipping the switch. So there is pretty much zero chance that it can be accidentally turned back on (enable through) by accident.

    12. Re:Men can control their stuff with a switch by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      If you watch the video on the article

      I've gone through FAR too much trouble to block and disable all forms of internet videos.

      If TFA doesn't have text, I don't give a crap.

      it requires pressing a safety button AND flipping the switch. So there is pretty much zero chance

      If there's one thing the internet has taught me over the last 20 years or so ... rule #34 pretty much guarantees your "zero chance" is going to be a near statistical certainty. ;-)

      Any sufficiently ... um ... "vigorous and unorthodox activity" ... will always fall outside of what you expect to happen. But the ability to predict the depths of human weirdness is impossible.

      Someone, somewhere is doing exactly that just to get started, and there's probably a video of it.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    13. Re:Men can control their stuff with a switch by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I have no idea if this is meant to be "I can knock up with wife but not the mistress", or you must book several months in advance to have the doctor flip the switch on your balls.

      I'm pretty sure that when you have a vasectomy it's effect is not immediate, i.e. if you go home straight after the op and have sex you can still get your SO pregnant. So you're right, are you seriously supposed to flip the off switch 48 hours in advance or something?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    14. Re:Men can control their stuff with a switch by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      And thus began the worst porn parody ever...

      One wonders ... what, precisely, is the standards of evaluating the "worst porn parody ever"?

      I think I'd rather not know.

      More to the point, who ever watches the non-porn bits of a porn film anyway? It's like people getting awards for costume design or best original soundtrack in the Golden Knob awards (or whatever). Who'd care?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    15. Re:Men can control their stuff with a switch by Altrag · · Score: 1

      Probably not as bad as you'd think since being a parody, it would be the comedic(/comedically terrible) parts you're evaluating rather than the porn itself.

      The few porn parodies I've run across are usually not much different than non-porn parodies other than there being you know.. sex involved. Good ones can be amusing as hell but 99% of the time they're just boring crap running on nothing but weak puns (or whatever the visual equivalent of puns is.. I know there's a word for that..) and you'd be better to watch either a real comedy or a real porn (depending on what you're looking for at the time!)

    16. Re:Men can control their stuff with a switch by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      what, precisely, is the standards of evaluating the "worst porn parody ever"?

      I think I'd rather not know.

      Then perhaps NOT ASKING THE QUESTION would have been a good idea?

      I'll try to underline the whole morass that is spreading your way "Circumspice."[ref 85]

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    17. Re:Men can control their stuff with a switch by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      I've gone through FAR too much trouble to block and disable all forms of internet videos.

      If TFA doesn't have text, I don't give a crap.

      and the comical thing is, someone will accuce you of being a Neanderthal or a Luddite. Do they think a Neanderthal or even a Luddite would be able to block video on an off-the-shelf configuration of a computer?

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    18. Re:Men can control their stuff with a switch by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      So, even if I'm vasectomised (which I am), then if my wife genuinely wants sex, I can't stop her getting pregnant, or carrying it to term?

      OK. That does it. Anal only from here on in.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  4. Good idea? by NMBob · · Score: 5, Funny

    Control it from your iPhone and it posts the setting of the switch to your Facebook page. :)

    1. Re:Good idea? by rduncan10 · · Score: 5, Funny

      iBalls

    2. Re:Good idea? by NMBob · · Score: 1

      That's perfect! OK, we gotta get marketing in on this... We'll worry about the engineering details later... I wonder how much bribe money we'll need for FDA approval?...

    3. Re:Good idea? by Spaham · · Score: 1

      Actually, you could imagine a whole set of particle "generators". Like dash emitting sperm, or rain, or snow, or maybe the time of day etc...

    4. Re:Good idea? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      A hacker's wet dream.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    5. Re:Good idea? by myth24601 · · Score: 1

      iSack

      --
      No matter where you go, there you are.
    6. Re:Good idea? by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      Just be careful it can't be hacked.

    7. Re:Good idea? by NMBob · · Score: 1

      Or better yet, through Facebook your "friends" get to decide if you can even reproduce! Whoa! We need to call Mark. I'm sure he will kick in some bucks.

    8. Re:Good idea? by CCarrot · · Score: 1

      iSack

      Ah, the premium version with complimentary ball-warmers! Good idea!

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
    9. Re:Good idea? by CCarrot · · Score: 1

      Or better yet, through Facebook your "friends" get to decide if you can even reproduce! Whoa! We need to call Mark. I'm sure he will kick in some bucks.

      Hmm...a bit Orwellian, but...switch doesn't get turned on until your license to reproduce is approved by the government?

      I'd...actually be kinda in favor of this. Especially every time I see those starving kiddie commercials...or see the latest tantrum-fest at my local Wal-Mart, with even-odds on whether it's the parents or the kids making more noise...the world would be such a better place if parents had to make even a token sacrifice before they could conceive, rather than having the current genetic russian roulette model.

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
    10. Re:Good idea? by wbr1 · · Score: 1

      This was not how I envisioned the Internet of "Things".

      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
    11. Re:Good idea? by NMBob · · Score: 1

      Make "survival" irrelevant and this is what you get.

    12. Re:Good idea? by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 2

      Control it from your iPhone and it posts the setting of the switch to your Facebook page. :)

      Finally, a realistic explanation of the "poke" option on Facebook...

    13. Re:Good idea? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Hmm...a bit Orwellian, but...
      .the world would be such a better place if parents had to make even a token sacrifice before they could conceive,

      I know that we don't know enough to make a rational decision about who to allow to reproduce ... so I'd just go for a modified flu virus with a 50% probability of sterility and otherwise low symptoms. So you can drop the fertility rate to 30% or so with random drop outs afterwards. That should sort out the population problem in a century or so. Whether that would be quick enough is a moot point.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  5. Re:Bitchiness hormones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Could call it the bitch-switch.

  6. Deja Vu by I_Wrote_This · · Score: 5, Funny

    I remember a report about this (or, more likely, something similar) many years (20+) ago. The Brits on the team called it the Stop Cock.

    1. Re:Deja Vu by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      LOL ... Well played!

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:Deja Vu by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      I remember a report about this (or, more likely, something similar) many years (20+) ago.

      The Brits on the team called it the Stop Cock.

      I, too, recall this from around 20 years ago. I believe, it was tested, but there were complications and it was never developed and other methods of reversible IVDs were developed.

    3. Re:Deja Vu by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same ... was it controlled by magnets?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    4. Re:Deja Vu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's been much longer than 20 years. Below is an early abstract from 1975 (PubMed). Problems include clogging, infection, leakage, lack of biocompatibility, lack of durability, and lack of true reversibility.

      Kuckuck L, Chhina GS, Manchanda SK.
      Development and initial evaluation of a vas deferens valve.
      Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 1975 Jan-Mar;19(1):20-7.

      Abstract

      In 17 cases of vasectomy, the external diameter of vas deferens was found to be 2.07 +/- .27 mm (Mean +/- S.D.) with a range from 1.7 to 2.8 mm. The internal diameters were 0.93 +/- 0.13 at 5 g and 1.24 +/- 0.16 mm at 100 g insertion force applied to the measuring cone, with lumen ranges from 0.7 to 1.2 and 1.0 to 1.7 mm, respectively. The left-right variations in the same inidividual were of a similar order as between different individuals. Measurements in 6-10 kg rhesus monkeys revealed an internal vas diameter around 0.6 mm with the measuring cone only eased in. At considerably high pressure the vas could be distended to show an internal diameter around 1 mm. The external diameters ranged from 1.5 to 2 mm. Local application to the vas in vivo or in vitro of alpha or beta adrenergic blocking agents, and sodium nitrate had no appreciable effects on the diameters. Three types of valves were developed and tested. The tap-like and the rotary valves were not satisfactorily leak-proof. But the valve with stop-cock mechanism was found to be satisfactory. It was further tested by examining the ejaculate obtained by the method of electro-ejaculation after implanting the valve in the monkey vas. The stop-cock valve is being proposed as a working model for producing reversible vas-occlusion.

    5. Re:Deja Vu by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      It was certainly on the market. It was a matter of discussion between me and my doctor when I was in for my ball-docking. He thought that - because I had no children - I might appreciate having the option to turn my balls back on. I rejected the offer then, and rejected the offer to stop after docking one ball. "Sterilised without issue" would be carved on my gravestone - if I were to have a gravestone (undecided as yet).

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  7. It's made of Maple and stained golden oak by jfdavis668 · · Score: 2

    The switch is countersunk and flush to the surface. Sanded smooth and polished with 000 steal wool. How else would a carpenter make one?

    1. Re:It's made of Maple and stained golden oak by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      But is it mortise and tenon, or tongue and groove? Or indeed a butt joint?

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    2. Re:It's made of Maple and stained golden oak by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't use a butt joint here, maybe somewhere else ;)

    3. Re:It's made of Maple and stained golden oak by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Dato joints.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    4. Re:It's made of Maple and stained golden oak by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Where do you get "steal wool" from? ...nevermind!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    5. Re:It's made of Maple and stained golden oak by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 4, Funny

      Where do you get "steal wool" from?

      Contraband sheep.

    6. Re:It's made of Maple and stained golden oak by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      Steal wool comes from Sheap.

  8. Parental Controls by Major+Blud · · Score: 3, Funny

    Can you get these installed in your kids? It would bring new meaning to Parental Controls.

    --
    If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
    1. Re:Parental Controls by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      Some might thank you.

      Sorry, we're talking about kids. Some might thank you shortly before you die.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  9. Yeah, No! by tiberus · · Score: 4, Informative

    Recall my doctor telling me there would be residual viable sperm around for sometime after I was snipped. Pretty sure you can't just go flippedy flip on the switchety switch and not make a baby with your baby.

    1. Re:Yeah, No! by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they only say the operation worked if you have a negative test 3 months after.

    2. Re:Yeah, No! by JigJag · · Score: 1

      You should read the content of the article. It says that to turn off, it takes a few weeks/months precisely because of residual, but once off, it's off no questions asked.
      When you turn it back on, it's on immediately.

      --
      "The hallmark of humanity is the ability to move beyond sensory inputs" - Mary Helen Immordino-Yang
    3. Re:Yeah, No! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      This is to make sure the vas deferens does not re-attach itself after the procedure. Apparently, something like 1 in 5000 men have that happen.

      There should be a money-back guarantee if that happens.

    4. Re:Yeah, No! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      How often do you need to procreate? Seems like you could keep it in the off state 99% of the time. A month or two to make the change wouldn't be a big deal.

      I just wonder if it's worth it. Might be easier to get a normal vasectomy and just keep some sperm on ice.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re: Yeah, No! by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      It might sound utterly impossible to you. But you're wrong.

      It is MUCH less common since the addition of ligaturing and/ or cauterisation (burning) to the procedure as well as the "snip", but it's still not unknown.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    6. Re:Yeah, No! by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      I was told that they'd give you a second operation in the event of failure. But they also stressed that this would ONLY be in response to their test tube tests failing, not to a pregnancy ; a pregnancy would be taken as evidence that you hadn't been continuing to use contraception as instructed until the test tube tests were passed.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  10. So it's reversable at home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yea, where I see the appeal of such a system, I'm thinking that there just might be some unintended side affects to watch out for.

    Getting the snip the traditional way is a long accepted and relatively painless (Yes I know first hand) procedure. I understand that it's not easily reversed. However, having some system where the decision "to be or not to be" can be made at the drop of a hat might not be all it's cracked up to be. The issue of unintended "to be" settings being selected unbeknownst to the owner of said switch, or the fact that it literally takes a month or so of "not to be" settings before your status really changes might be lost on the casual user.

    However, if you young guys wana give it the collage try, knock yourselves out.... But if you are really done having kids, I really recommend the traditional approach and forget the reversible part.

    1. Re:So it's reversable at home? by Punko · · Score: 1

      But if you are really done having kids, I really recommend the traditional approach and forget the reversible part.

      Yup. Of course, the traditional part is having the wife get her tubes tied during the 2nd birth procedure. That way you even get to avoid the "relatively painless" procedure.

      Mind you, monogamy is still required. If that's not in your cards, then by all means, have your nipper nicked. I'll make a vast difference

      --
      If only we could fall into a woman's arms without falling into her hands
    2. Re:So it's reversable at home? by Locke2005 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Your wife AND your mistress will love you for it!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    3. Re:So it's reversable at home? by tiberus · · Score: 2

      When the wife decided she was done, I manned up and Did The Right Thing(tm). I read a bit about what's involved in tying a woman's tubes and it's pretty much a no brainer. The risks to a woman are simply too high and it's a much more invasive procedure. Plus if my girlfriend gets preggers, it wasn't me.

    4. Re:So it's reversable at home? by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      We asked my wife's OB/GYN - he said "hey, as long as I have her open for the delivery snipping her is just as easy adn quick with minimal or less side effects". Yay planned c-sections

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    5. Re:So it's reversable at home? by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

      I hate to break it to you but that's manning down.

    6. Re:So it's reversable at home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      When the wife decided she was done, I manned up and Did The Right Thing(tm). I read a bit about what's involved in tying a woman's tubes and it's pretty much a no brainer. The risks to a woman are simply too high and it's a much more invasive procedure. Plus if my girlfriend gets preggers, it wasn't me.

      Having you VD snipped is associated with increased risk of dementia in old age. Not sure it's worth it either to you or your spouse to became a vegetable early.

    7. Re:So it's reversable at home? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Yup. Of course, the traditional part is having the wife get her tubes tied during the 2nd birth procedure.

      Well, on behalf of those of us who have never wanted kids ... I've been pondering getting the, um ... nipper nicked? ... and take it out of the equation entirely.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    8. Re:So it's reversable at home? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I thought I had read that women find men less sexually appealing when they know the man has had a vasectomy.

    9. Re:So it's reversable at home? by E-Rock · · Score: 1

      Way to generalize. I wanted to shut down the babymakers, wife wants none of it. We don't want more kids, but something in her is bothered by the idea of having sex with a sterile man.

    10. Re:So it's reversable at home? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Um, it's kinda hard for spouses to not know these things about each other.

    11. Re:So it's reversable at home? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      Surely, by the time they get to the point of asking if the man has been vasectomised, she's already pretty much decided that she wants to have sex with the guy.

      If they haven't already had the "do you want children?" conversation, they're setting themselves up for a trainwreck anyway.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    12. Re:So it's reversable at home? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      What makes her think that she's got a say in your fertility? After all, it's been a cry since the Pill became available that women "want control of their own bodies." So, don't men deserve the same right?

      If she's interfering with your body, shouldn't she be apologising for imposing her opinions on you.

      I told the wife that I was sterilised without issue before we started going out. She has never had the option of having a baby by me. And she has never even tried to persuade me differently.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    13. Re:So it's reversable at home? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      Nope, that's manning up. What are you going to do? Trade in the "full" wife for an empty one, spurt off a handful more of kids, dumping the previous ones on minimum, grudging income and 2 days a year contact?

      Macho bullshit.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    14. Re:So it's reversable at home? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Go back a couple of messages: I'm talking about married couples here. A wife doesn't ask her husband if he's had a vasectomy, she already knows because he did it some time *after* they got married. The problem is, from what I've read, women have much less desire for a man once this has happened. So the wife, after getting her husband to get the snip so she doesn't have to worry about having another kid they don't want, now no longer wants to screw him, and then has a steamy affair with some guy from work who hasn't had the snip, and gets pregnant...

    15. Re:So it's reversable at home? by E-Rock · · Score: 1

      She can't stop me, but if it negatively impacts her desire to have sex, it defeats the purpose.

    16. Re:So it's reversable at home? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      A wife doesn't ask her husband if he's had a vasectomy, she already knows because he did it some time *after* they got married.

      Not necessarily. I had my vasectomy almost a decade before I ever travelled to the country where I met my wife.

      So the wife, after getting her husband to get the snip so she doesn't have to worry about having another kid they don't want, now no longer wants to screw him

      People change. What proportion of marriages last more than a couple of decades these days? Nearly half (though that varies considerably by country).

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    17. Re:So it's reversable at home? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      [SHRUG] From what I hear, having a kid is a pretty effective anti-sex tool as well.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  11. There's still a delay by flanksteak · · Score: 5, Informative

    I got a vasectomy a few years ago and I was told that there were about 20 'loads' in storage past the vas deferens. So this is not something you can switch on Friday afternoon and expect to be sterile over the weekend.

    1. Re:There's still a delay by swb · · Score: 4, Funny

      20 loads? Why don't they just say about 3 days worth.

    2. Re:There's still a delay by amicusNYCL · · Score: 2

      I got a vasectomy a few years ago and I was told that there were about 20 'loads' in storage past the vas deferens.

      OK. Then after hitting the switch you've got some serious work to do before that big date.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    3. Re:There's still a delay by rubycodez · · Score: 3, Funny

      20 loads to blow before Saturday night? I would take that as a challenge

    4. Re:There's still a delay by JudgeFurious · · Score: 5, Funny

      Because some of us aren't hoarding it like that.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    5. Re:There's still a delay by nuckfuts · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Presumable the decision to produce offspring is not something one would toggle on a weekly basis.

    6. Re:There's still a delay by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      I expect it'd be more something you'd have installed closed, and only ever open it if and when you decide you want to have children, then close again once your significant other was pregnant.

      It's a shame we aren't at a tech level where we could just genetically engineer disabled sperm production until we injest a specific chemical to trigger it.

  12. Nobody has the heart to tell him ... by scunc · · Score: 1

    ... that it's not a good thing to be able to cum at the flip of a switch!

  13. Got wood? by oldmac31310 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just 'came' here to say this

    --
    http://www.acetonestudio.com
    1. Re:Got wood? by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      I think this would "Stop wood".

  14. If the switches malfunction... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    A permanent case of blue balls.

  15. Why did it have to be Germany? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    # Hitler has only got one ball
      Goering has two but very small
      Himmler has something similar
      And poor old Goebbels has no balls at all /#

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:Why did it have to be Germany? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Hitler has only got one ball

      You know, I used to think that was just a goofy song made up by schoolkids during WWII, but I recently learned that the US intelligence apparatus actually came up with that rumor. It was in a pretty scholarly book about US propaganda efforts during the war.

      We'd later see the same thing at work in regard to Gaddafi being a cross-dresser and Castro's beard falling out. I would love to have been a fly on the wall at that meeting. "General, maybe if we could just start a rumor about Hitler only having one nut, we could completely demoralize the German people." I guess they were trying to think outside the box, but still...

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:Why did it have to be Germany? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      # Hitler has only got one ball Goering has two but very small Himmler has something similar And poor old Goebbels has no balls at all /#

      BURMA SHAVE

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  16. Re:Haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Feminism ensured that men do the worrying for women.

  17. We've had this for ages by dmomo · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's called marriage.

    1. Re:We've had this for ages by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      No, that just stops sex altogether.

    2. Re:We've had this for ages by antdude · · Score: 1

      Prove it!

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    3. Re:We've had this for ages by Talderas · · Score: 1

      You've tested your kids genetically to make sure they're yours?

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
  18. Song for the add campaign by raydias · · Score: 1

    They can use ACDC - Big Balls for the add Campaign.

    1. Re:Song for the add campaign by NMBob · · Score: 1

      Now we have to come up with some serious cash to get Iovine away from Apple. This is gonna be BIG!

    2. Re:Song for the add campaign by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Balls to the Walls

      Accept your future

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    3. Re:Song for the add campaign by maharvey · · Score: 1

      Especially after the pressure builds because you forgot and left it "closed"...

  19. Re:Bitchiness hormones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Those switches are software controlled, and these days they're bypassed pretty thoroughly by feminist society before she hits puberty.

  20. Oops, valve partially open by Rogue974 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I work at a chemical manufacturing site. Do you have any idea how many millions of pounds of material are lost each year do to a manual valve that was not fully shut.

    I am sorry babby, I guess when I got hit in the groin last week playing basketball, it must have opened the valve!

    Or,

    I closed it, I guess it didn't close all of the way!

    Yeah, not so sure this is a good idea!

    1. Re:Oops, valve partially open by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How is this any worse than "Sorry, I forgot to take the pill"?

    2. Re:Oops, valve partially open by Rogue974 · · Score: 1

      Apples and Oranges. Forgot to take the pill was you didn't do something because you forgot and so it couldn't protect you.

      Valve not closing all the way happens all the time when you think you closed the valve all of the way and it didn't seat properly so you tried and the equipment failed.

      The pill has an extremely low rate of failure when taken properly. Valves have a much higher failure rate when used properly.

  21. Re:Apart from the technical concerns by TheCarp · · Score: 1

    I think the answer would be people who currently would not get a vasectomy at all, but might if it was easily reversible without another surgery? Perhaps some of those people get one anyway, but I imagine its not really of benefit to the people who already get them, or, if it is, simply would mean they would choose the procedure sooner since they don't need to have children first.

    --
    "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  22. Screw that (pun intended). by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Once the Human Brain-Machine Interface tech matures, we will be able to have just-like-the-real-thing sex with virtual women and zero risk of pregnancy, as much as we want without having to pay the women (or buy dinner for them) since they aren't real.

    Of course...a surgery that distributes neuron-interfacing machines throughout the gray matter of the brain is even more invasive than this one....but the potential benefits go way beyond the crazy sex.

    1. Re:Screw that (pun intended). by VernonNemitz · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I first heard of something like this idea long before the Internet became popular. That old story also mentioned a problem, that when the vas is closed, it bursts. This is why when doctors do a vasectomy, they only tie ONE end of each cut tube (the end that leads toward the prostate, not the end connected to the testicle). This invention actually needs a Y-shaped valve, such that when it is closed, only the flow toward the prostate stops, while sperm can continue to flow out into the body cavity, as if one end of the vas had been cut but not tied.

    2. Re:Screw that (pun intended). by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      just-like-the-real-thing sex with virtual women

      What are you talking about? Fat, smelly, basement-dwelling foreveralones like you have been doing that for years now: it's called free Internet porn and a Fleshlight, followed by snugging up to your waifu-pillow and a large pizza.

      On a more serious note, I can see it now: "It's not my fault she's pregnant, Your Honor, she 'flicked my switch' without my permission or knowledge, when I thought she was just sucking on my balls! I shouldn't have to pay child support!"

    3. Re:Screw that (pun intended). by dmr001 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Most vasectomy techniques involve tying (ligating) or fulgurating (burning) both ends. The vas doesn't seem to burst, but there is a complication called "sperm granuloma" where leaking sperm (often happens) can cause inflammation (also often happens) which can cause pain (doesn't happen that often) and in rare circumstances recanalization of the vas.

      Granted, it's been a while since I performed a vasectomy but I was trained to ligate and cauterize/fulgurate both ends. Surgical implantation of this switch sounds tricky: the vas is a slippery little thing, the canal narrow, and the human body doesn't always take kindly to the implantation of foreign material.

      FWIW, most of the volume of ejaculate isn't sperm, but prostatic fluid. Vasectomized guys are shooting blanks, but it's not easy to distinguish between the blanks and live ammo without a microscope. Check out the grin on this urologist as he explains the same.

    4. Re:Screw that (pun intended). by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Once the Human Brain-Machine Interface tech matures, we will be able to have just-like-the-real-thing sex with virtual women and zero risk of pregnancy, as much as we want without having to pay the women (or buy dinner for them) since they aren't real.

      Physics simulation is nowhere near level anything remotely approaching realistic close-contact interaction with anything solid would require, and that's not even getting into AI. But if having sex with the ghost of a love doll is your thing, you're set.

      Simply recording and replaying a first-person all-senses-included sex act should work just fine, though. Or having remote sex via the Internet. I guess online brothels will become pretty popular.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    5. Re:Screw that (pun intended). by umghhh · · Score: 1

      what other benefits do you really need?

    6. Re:Screw that (pun intended). by tehcyder · · Score: 5, Funny

      it's been a while since I performed a vasectomy

      I hope to God that You Are A Doctor.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    7. Re:Screw that (pun intended). by krakelohm · · Score: 2

      Nope, he's a German Plumber.

      --
      You are all a bunch of idots.
    8. Re:Screw that (pun intended). by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      I concur with DMR001 : when I had my balls deactivated there was definitely a hissing sound and smell of singeing flesh TWICE before the doctor asked if I was really sure and wanted him to do the other side. Then incisions, fishing, clamping (which takes some force to crush the vasa deferens - more force than most people expect. The sound effects are unmissable. Strangely, I've never heard it used in the movies.) and a repeat performance on the right ball.

      Both ends of the cut cauterised. No drainage provisions. Basically, the milligrammes of semen get re-sorbed. I would guess probably by being eaten by macrophages. Really, your wouldn't want the dangerous little things around floating around uncontrolled. That's the whole point of getting your balls docked.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    9. Re:Screw that (pun intended). by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      From what he says, he could perfectly well be a vet. Or a farmer - I doubt that it's illegal to do a vasectomy on your own animals. It's not like they need to consent, is it?

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  23. It has been tried before by Scarbo27 · · Score: 1

    I saw something like this at least thirty years ago, I think in "Life" magazine. It was a small golden valve meant to be implanted in the vas deferens. Since I have never heard anything else about it in the ensuing decades, until now, I suspect it did not work then, nor will it now. Too bad, it is an interesting concept and it would be nice to have a reliable but easily reversible contraceptive system for men.

  24. Not instant at all by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    Sperm linger in the canal past the point of the valve. It would probably require a couple weeks to allow the sperm to clear after turning the valve off to ensure this was 100% effective. Of course, the sperm count would be greatly reduced just by turning the valve off, but not to zero.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  25. Re:Accidentally switching this off during rough se by Locke2005 · · Score: 2

    More scared of switching it ON by accident!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  26. Jesus by Spaham · · Score: 1

    The last carpenter who tried this became quite famous...

    1. Re:Jesus by bobbied · · Score: 1

      That would be Joseph to you.... And I'm pretty sure it was Mary who was making the claim not Joseph. Last time I when though the story it was Joseph who was dubious about this and was going to refuse to go through with the marriage to the pregnant girl. At least that's how the recorded story goes. According to tradition, Jesus wasn't involved in fathering any children.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  27. This probably isn't something by EdwardFurlong · · Score: 1

    you would be switching on and off all the time. Say you don't want kids in the next 5 or 10 years.

  28. Just skip it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    From a male's perspective....

    1) Sex is expensive. Either you are paying a prostitute, which is expensive, or you are dating a woman, which is expensive, or you are married, which is the most expensive (especially when the divorce bill comes around and basically wipes you out).

    2) Sex is time-consuming. Include the time invested in managing one's appearance, finances, etc., in order to acquire a partner, and then further time cost of maintaining that partner. This is slightly less of a problem for prostitution, provided you live in an area where it is readily available and legal (which most don't).

    3) Sex is dangerous. It spreads disease. It makes you vulnerable to charges (false or otherwise) of rape, which can be life-destroying. It risks pregnancy which (if unwanted) can be life-destroying. Prostitution is illegal in most places.

    4) Sex never satisfies. Or rather, the satisfaction never lasts. No matter how much you get, you still want more.

    5) Sex is gross (your opinion may vary, but the more you learn about biology the more disgusting it becomes).

    6) Sex is not necessary. To overcome the desire, just masturbate. To overcome loneliness, hang out with friends. Plenty of research demonstrates that friendship cures loneliness whereas romance does not (and in fact can make it worse). Google it.

    One does not need any puritanical/religious beliefs to see that it is in one's selfish best-interest to avoid sex altogether. The stigma associated with being single is gone. You can more fully self-actualize if you can free yourself from slavery to this instinct which serves the species at your expense.

    No, I am not a gross hairy nerd who can't get laid, so skip the ad hominem fallacies and focus replies on the actual content of the post, thanks.

    1. Re:Just skip it. by mrex · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Plenty of research demonstrates that friendship cures loneliness whereas romance does not

      I call BS. I don't sleep (and I mean actual sleep, not sex) with my friends, and that's one of the best parts about a relationship. Sounds like some researchers spiked their studies with narrow word definitions.

    2. Re:Just skip it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sex is not necessary. To overcome the desire, just masturbate.

      If you think masturbating in any obviates the desire for sex, you've clearly had some pretty shitty sex in your time.

    3. Re:Just skip it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      From a female's perspective....

      1) Sex is biologically expensive. Either you are taking hormonal supplements to disrupt your biological processes to prevent contraception, which is a health risk, or you are risking 10 months of your life flushed down the john for 10 minutes (if you're lucky) of pleasure. And after the 10 months you get to raise some rugrat for the next 16 to 18 years, 'cause heaven forbid the mother handing the brat over to the baby-daddy, signing a support agreement and just walking away saying 'watch for the check in the mail, hon!'. That's not a woman's place in the world, son.

      Or...you can try to convince the asshole you're with that "bareback ain't where it's at", and watch him have a tantrum like a two-year-old (ooh, is that foreshadowing?)

      2) Sex is time-consuming...well, it is if your partner knows what the hell he's doing. If not...well, at least it's quick.

      3) Sex is dangerous. It spreads disease. It makes you vulnerable to rape, which is life-destroying. It risks pregnancy which (if unwanted) can be life-destroying.

      4) Sex never satisfies...well, see point 2.

      5) Sex is gross (your opinion may vary, but the more you learn about biology the more disgusting it becomes).

      6) Sex is not necessary. To overcome the desire, just masturbate. To overcome loneliness, hang out with friends. Plenty of research demonstrates that friendship cures loneliness whereas romance does not (and in fact can make it worse). Google it.

      There, FTFY.

      The stigma associated with being single is gone.

      I really don't know where you get that idea from. I don't recall much of a stigma for single guys, but the 'spinster' image for women is all too alive, I'm afraid.

      Consider this: A single guy in his 40's who's never married is a bachelor, a playboy, a swinger, etc. while a woman in her 40's who's never married is...a spinster. What else? Cat lady? Cougar? MILF? None of these terms have very positive overtones, and some are downright insulting.

    4. Re:Just skip it. by Grishnakh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, exactly. That sounds like it was written by someone with a personality disorder that makes them not really crave human contact (I mean besides sex, though including it as well). There's probably a DSM-IV name for it. The simple fact is: normal people want to be touched. Babies that aren't touched enough either die or develop major personality disorders when they grow up.

    5. Re:Just skip it. by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      The very existence of sex dolls demonstrate that men want more than a functional release of their sexual energy but not the complete, capricious woman.

      I have to disagree a bit with this one. It's quite possible sex dolls are purchased not by men who are avoiding a relationship with a real woman, but by men who can't get a relationship with a real woman (or a woman they're attracted enough to to bother with). If a man is extremely unattractive, or has a quirky personality that turns off women, then since prostitution is generally illegal, a sex doll may be the only alternative he has to masturbation.

    6. Re:Just skip it. by Grishnakh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Consider this: A single guy in his 40's who's never married is a bachelor, a playboy, a swinger, etc. while a woman in her 40's who's never married is...a spinster. What else? Cat lady? Cougar? MILF? None of these terms have very positive overtones, and some are downright insulting.

      I see some really selective stereotyping here. What about the "40-year-old virgin" guy? They made a movie about that 5 or 10 years ago. That guy definitely isn't considered a "playboy".

      And how is a MILF considered "insulting"? That sounds like a compliment to me; usually older women are (were) seen as past their prime, not really someone a younger guy would want sex with. A MILF or cougar is. It's a compliment to women who aged well.

      As for spinsters, I think part of the problem there might be the social circles that women are in. Who's actually calling you (or any women you know like this) a "spinster" or similar? This sounds like a problem largely of these women's own making, by voluntarily being in social circles that have these attitudes. The guy who's a 40yo virgin and hangs out with his nerdy friends doesn't have this problem because all his buddies are in the same boat; they might get shit from their parents but that's about it, and usually 40yos don't live with their parents any more. Remember also, women tend to be much more social than men, and are conditioned that way from early childhood. So older single men seem to frequently end up just living alone and being alone much of the time; they're not around anyone who's going to make up derogatory names for them and their singleness.

      Also, you're absolutely wrong about a single 40yo guy being called a "swinger". A "swinger" is a married person who, together with their spouse, engages in extramarital sex. You've never heard of "swingers parties"?

      But basically, you seem to be looking at George Clooney and assuming he's representative of all 40+ single men, which honestly is rather insulting because most men aren't blessed with his looks or charisma. Most 40+ men who are single are that way either because they're like the 40yo virgin guy (but not remotely as attractive as Steve Carrell; that's Hollywood for you), nerdy and/or unattractive and uninteresting to women, not because they've actively avoided marriage.

    7. Re:Just skip it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      1. "Dating a woman" isn't particularly expensive, compared with other forms of entertainment. Unless she makes you pay for everything, in which case you should probably dump her anyway, because that's a toxic relationship right there. And "marriage" is extremely cost effective, in terms of shared expenses and labour.

      2. "Include the time invested in managing one's appearance, finances, etc., in order to acquire a partner, and then further time cost of maintaining that partner." - see above. If your natural state is "total slob", then "managing one's appearance" might be a challenge, but for average people it's not that big a deal - most people I know tend to shower and change their shirt most days. "Time cost of maintaining a partner" - again, if you're married, that means "talking to them". This is not a "cost". I like talking to my wife.

      3. Lots of things are dangerous. Driving a car kills as many people as STDs. Pollution kills many more. Sunshine, bad diet, medications, lack of medications... the list of things that can kill you is long. That's not, in itself, a reason to avoid all these things.

      4. You could say as much for eating. How is that even an argument?

      5. Counterpoint: no it isn't. Don't project your hangups into a universal truth.

      6. What do you mean by "necessary"? We could all give up and stop breathing right now, and the world would keep turning just the same - nothing is "necessary" in that sense. You're talking about some, necessarily subjective, quality of life. So again, this is a purely subjective assessment.

    8. Re:Just skip it. by jalet · · Score: 1

      You're so right there's even a french song by Gogol 1er https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/... et La Horde about this : https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      Votez ecolo : Chiez dans l'urne !
    9. Re:Just skip it. by Shompol · · Score: 1

      1) Sex is expensive....you are married, which is the most expensive

      Unless your wife makes more than you do. What do you need money for, anyway? Cannot take it to your grave.

      2) ...Include the time invested in managing one's appearance, finances, etc.,

      And normally you don't need to manage either? Might save on rent as well in #1 and move into a cardboard box.

      3) Sex is dangerous.

      Do it with a steady GF or your legal GF. Avoid putting it in other men if you can help it.

      No matter how much you get, you still want more.

      Do it daily or something? Add a productive use of lunch hour?

      5) Sex is gross

      So is eating, pooping, and beings made of meat

      6) Sex is not necessary.

      it is not

      friendship cures loneliness whereas romance does not

      Unless your SO is also your friend, which makes the whole "research" kinda meaningless

      One does not need any puritanical/religious beliefs to see that it is in one's selfish best-interest to avoid sex altogether.

      Completely true. And that is why we don't put it into everything that moves. However, if you go overboard with it your self-interest might come to an untimely end with nobody to take the flag -- which still is a perfectly valid choice.

    10. Re:Just skip it. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Sex isn't expensive. It's just part of the package when you have a relationship. Relationships are important to most people. If friendship was enough or better we wouldn't have "incels" complaining that the government doesn't get them laid.

      I think your mistake is to look at sex s something that fulfills an urge. Like you need to pee or something. It's not, but that's why you have such s low opinion of it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    11. Re:Just skip it. by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      SSRI can do that, though. The desire just goes away and it makes life much much easier.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    12. Re:Just skip it. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a typical Slashdotter of today. I guess all the normally-adjusted humans have abandoned this shitty site.

    13. Re:Just skip it. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I am not a gross hairy nerd who can't get laid

      No, fairly obviously you are a gorgeous hunk with autism, a combination of Brad Pitt in Thelma and Louise and Dustin Hoffman in Rainman.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    14. Re:Just skip it. by tehcyder · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I see you ignored my request that you skip the ad hominem fallacy and respond to the content of the post.

      The thing is, the content of your post was a combination of "I'm a special snowflake" adolescent cynicism and retarded MRA talking points.

      It's only the ad hominem part that's amusing.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    15. Re:Just skip it. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Sex is not necessary. To overcome the desire, just masturbate.

      If you think masturbating in any obviates the desire for sex, you've clearly had some pretty shitty sex in your time.

      Or some pretty special wanking.

      Actually, I don't find it hard to believe that a slashdotter would get more pleasure out of masturbation than sex, it's a matter of practice makes perfect.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    16. Re:Just skip it. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Masturbation gives me a 100% clear conscience and lets me spend more time on the important things in life.

      Those Star Wars figurines won't collect themselves.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    17. Re:Just skip it. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Also, you're absolutely wrong about a single 40yo guy being called a "swinger". A "swinger" is a married person who, together with their spouse, engages in extramarital sex. You've never heard of "swingers parties"?

      This is slashdot. GP is using the term in its 1950s sense, the golden age when men were men, women were grateful and sheep were worried.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    18. Re:Just skip it. by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      I call BS. I don't sleep (and I mean actual sleep, not sex) with my friends, and that's one of the best parts about a relationship.

      Speak for yourself. After 10 years of marriage, I still find having someone else in the bed to be very uncomfortable. They move around (disturbing you), make noises (disturbing you). Apart from the sex, sharing a bed is a real pain in the bed.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    19. Re:Just skip it. by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Or they're brought for a joke.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    20. Re:Just skip it. by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      I don't recall much of a stigma for single guys, but the 'spinster' image for women is all too alive, I'm afraid

      So, you're arguing for polygyny? Suits me. Take the women who want babies and a husband off the market so the rest of us can concentrate on our sex lives.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  29. Re:Apart from the technical concerns by tmetzcc325 · · Score: 1

    It would be used as birth control. You wouldn't need condoms or the pill if you hook up after a night of partying when you're 22, but you'd still be able to have kids in the future. But it would never work from a technical standpoint.

  30. Adrenaline by m-kirkcaldie · · Score: 2

    "I think I'd like a valve for adrenaline control." (a) no you wouldn't, it would be like cutting off half the internal regulation system which allows your body to work efficiently in sync with current and anticipated demands - literally, mission-critical regulation - and (b) the *experience* of adrenaline / arousal is generated by a separate system which distributes adrenaline around the brain - the adrenaline in your bloodstream comes from the adrenal gland and activates the tissues of the body, but the adrenaline in your brain is generated by a cluster of neurons called the locus coeruleus, and they secrete it directly onto the neurons. No way to shut that off except using drugs which block receptors (i.e. beta-blockers and related compounds).

  31. sock poetry by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    In days of old, when knights were bold,

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  32. Re:Pull Out by Fwipp · · Score: 1

    Have you touched a penis before? Do you not know about precum?

  33. Re:Hearing by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Personally, I would like to see a hearing switch, to stop all noise at will.

    I don't understand why you'd want a hearing switch on your dick. Or maybe I've lost the thread here.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  34. What does this change exactly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Get a woman pregnant and you're financially responsible for her for the next 18.75 years. Notice I said 'her' and not 'your children' because that's where all the child support goes. It's a meal ticket for tens of millions of women who don't feel like supporting themselves in any way whatsoever. These women don't want to be housewives either, they'd rather just get knocked up, kick you out of your house and start collecting a check from you.

    If this device isn't at least as effective as a condom in preventing pregnancy, it's worthless.

  35. A whole new meaning by CCarrot · · Score: 2

    Wow, that just brings a whole new meaning to that sudden panicked thought "wait...did I leave the faucet running?!?"

    --
    "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
  36. Adrenaline control? by mark_reh · · Score: 1

    The main thing I learned in my endocrinology classes in dental school was this: hormones are nothing to screw around with. They affect so many different things and messing with them causes so many unintended consequences, it is best not to play around with them unless there is a medical reason to do so.

  37. Thanks just the same but, by fredrated · · Score: 1

    no.

  38. Re:Pull Out by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    No, but the other head sure is retarded. Babies happen, stupidity wins!

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  39. Testicluar? by bestweasel · · Score: 2

    Editors don't have a testiclue.

    1. Re:Testicluar? by Opyros · · Score: 1

      I wonder whether this device contains a nozel.

  40. Makes sense by DavidHumus · · Score: 2

    You should always choose a carpenter for working with wood.

  41. Stop Cock was good, but by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 1

    wouldn't "Ball Valve" be a more accurate plumbing pun?

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  42. Leave your balls alone. by seoras · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I had 2 kids with my ex wife who then nagged me into getting a vasectomy.
    It's very easy, easier than going to the dentist for a filling in fact.

    However I then started getting pain in my nuts.
    You see they tie off your vas and the sperm has no where to go - think of the car chase scene in the Blue's Brothers with all the cop cars piling up on top of each other. That's your epididymis swelling up with all the sperm piling up.
    This German inventor's idea doesn't solve this problem however it does allow you to switch back on if you do get congestive epididymitis.

    After I split with her I had it reversed.
    2 hours on the table and a couple of big black grape fruits the next morning.
    3 months for the bruising to fade.
    I timed it to be when I was writing my thesis for my masters. Plenty of quiet, sitting down working time.

    I've now got 5 kids and no.6 due in March. Pisses my ex off no end.
    I still, occasionally, get congestive epididymitis.

    Interesting fact. Vasectomy is illegal in France. Smart country.
    The only positive was it raised my Testosterone level to somewhere near where it was when I was 16.
    Going back to University for a year, single, sterile and horny as a teenager made for a very memorable time in my life. ;)

    As a war veteran of vasectomy my advice is this.
    Leave your nuts alone to do what they are supposed to do!

    1. Re:Leave your balls alone. by phorm · · Score: 2

      Not all of us want six kids (or to abstain for the rest of our lives), especially when we're hitting over forty or fifty. In most couples I know of it's a mutual decision.

    2. Re:Leave your balls alone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Vasectomy is NOT illegal in France. This is a legend. It is hard to get but you can perfectly get it if you know a urologist who practices it. Talk to "planning familial"...

      (source: anonymous French person)

    3. Re:Leave your balls alone. by phorm · · Score: 1

      Ditto here. Or rather, I do have feeling, but it's a whole lot less.
      Our bodies are built to (in general) make sex an enjoyable experience. With a condom you're getting some of the thrust and friction, but missing out on a bunch of the rest

  43. Actuated with a wooden mallet. by dsmatthews9379 · · Score: 1

    Ah, no thanks...

  44. Re:Accidentally switching this off during rough se by aXis100 · · Score: 1

    Watch the video, it has a locking pin to prevent the flow being switched back on accidentally. Unlocking it requires a double action of depressing the pin and activating the switch.

  45. Motorcycle by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    The other day I went for a motorcycle ride.. I'm not sure if it is the case for all motorcycles, but on this motorcycle there is a switch that turns on a final 'reserve' tank so that you know you need to go pronto to get gas. Well I went for a motorcycle ride and I ran out of gas in the middle of nowhere. With great vigor I went to switch to my reserve tank only to find that it already WAS on the reserve tank.

    And that, my friends, is why I would never want to have this procedure.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  46. Forget the arguing. by BrandonDouglasGoken · · Score: 1

    Can I volunteer for this in the USA? If so how?!?! It's brilliant.

  47. Forget the arguing by BrandonDouglasGoken · · Score: 1

    Where can I volunteer for this human research in the USA?

  48. A corpus callosum switch... by Chysn · · Score: 1

    ...would be a fascinating experience.

    --
    --I'm so big, my sig has its own sig.
    -- See?
  49. Beep by phorm · · Score: 1

    I like the beep idea. If the switch is on the (sperm) enabled setting, a gradually increasing warning tone.

    Beep. Beep beep . Beepbeepbeep, beebeebeebeeeeeeeeeeeee.... (aaand I'm spent).

  50. I don't need .... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... to shut it off. Just turn down the flow a bit.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  51. Shocked not to see the expected pun. by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    Something is wrong with you people!

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  52. Re:Apart from the technical concerns by Talderas · · Score: 1

    If you look at the statistics of men receiving vasectomies they're usually 40+ and have children. Doctors will strongly discourage men that lack either of the criteria away from the vasectomy. 26 and you have a kid but don't want more kids or 45 and no kids? They'll try to convince you not to have the operation. As this procedure is reversible, it would provide a way for younger men to get a vasectomy-like procedure without permanently killing your ability to have children.

    --
    "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
  53. Power source by codewhisperer · · Score: 1

    Hmm... I wonder if the testicluar valve is nucular-powered?