Slashdot Mirror


The State of Slashdot: Https, Poll Changes, Auto-Refresh, Videos, and More

As of yesterday, Slashdot now serves over https. In addition, the polls have been moved exclusively to the right rail, and will not show up with the other stories any longer. We've also disabled auto-refresh, and fixed various issues with search and other features. In the last few weeks, we've also discontinued videos, and removed the "Jobs" section of the site. You can follow all of the changes on the Slashdot blog.

62 of 546 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Where's my UTF8? by whipslash · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's coming

  2. How can I give you money for this? by sinij · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All moves in the right direction. To ensure lights are staying on, how can I give you money?

    1. Re:How can I give you money for this? by whipslash · · Score: 3, Informative

      Those kind words of support are enough for now. Hang on to the money for now! We will be evaluating a strategy for subscriptions soon.

    2. Re:How can I give you money for this? by 110010001000 · · Score: 5, Funny

      sinjj is willing to pay for all of our subscriptions. He volunteered.

    3. Re:How can I give you money for this? by sinij · · Score: 4, Funny

      For some values of all and for some definitions of pay. Otherwise, yes. :)

    4. Re:How can I give you money for this? by jensend · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I've been on slashdot since quite close to the beginning. (I had another user name before this one, too bad I abandoned it before low UID was something worth bragging rights). I had never really considered subscribing before.

      After the changes you've been making, and knowing a bit about your plans, I'd be happy to subscribe just to vote with my wallet in favor of what's going on, even if a subscription doesn't have any benefits whatsoever beyond knowing that I'm supporting a good thing.

      My wallet is not very thick but I think there are thousands of others who feel similarly.

      Keep up the good work!

  3. BLASHPEMER! by Thud457 · · Score: 5, Funny

    and removed the "Jobs" section of the site

    You're going to pay dearly for you lack of faith when HE returns to Earth save *pple yet again.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  4. Awesome by 110010001000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Meet the new boss: so much better than the old boss. -- The Who

  5. Good, good by Wintermute__ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Good, good, good, good, good... Wait, what is this? Positive changes, nothing to complain about?

    I don't even know what to do.

    Good job Slashdot, keep it up.

    1. Re:Good, good by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, someone probably could complain about auto-refresh, though I personally found it a silly waste of the servers' resources.

      My biggest complaint is that the green color used in the header bars clashes with the curtains in my office.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    2. Re:Good, good by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters" is no longer in the headline.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  6. Re:Can't Post by whipslash · · Score: 4, Informative

    There might be some hiccups like this. Email feedback@slashdot.org if you find any. We will investigate this mobile posting ASAP.

  7. Re:Where's my UTF8? by Sowelu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Okay you know what, the changes around here--including responsiveness to user opinions--are getting really, really nice. Thank you.

  8. Re:Disable ads is a fraud by whipslash · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yes there are some issues here we will address soon

  9. Congratulations, thats a big step by vivaoporto · · Score: 5, Informative

    Congratulations to the new team, thats a big step towards keeping their loyal audience regaining goodwill among the tech crowd.

    The quality of the improvements and the effort of the new team is visible, it even gets an A on ssl quality test.

    Good job and don't rest on the laurels, get working on the Unicode support because that's one of the missing features.

  10. Re:Where's my UTF8? by whipslash · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Glad you like it. We appreciate the support

  11. auto-refresh sucked. Beware UTF8 injections by raymorris · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Thanks for getting rid of auto-refresh. It sucked to have the page refresh while typing or scrolling.

    Be careful when you do unicode. I know that's often requested, so it'll probably be done, but be aware it makes protection from injection attacks (including sql & script) much trickier. You probably want do do encoding on output and bound parameters on input, rather than trying to filter input.

    The last day or two I had error saying I was posting from an open proxy, on multiple devices and networks. It seems something went wrong with that detection- possibly detecting your own load balancer.

    1. Re:auto-refresh sucked. Beware UTF8 injections by whipslash · · Score: 3, Informative

      Noted. Yes we had an issue with the proxy detection, but we've since fixed it.

    2. Re:auto-refresh sucked. Beware UTF8 injections by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 3

      I've been reading slashdot for a long, long time, but only started posting within the last year or so.

      Allowing editing of posts for during a grace period (10 minutes? 30 minutes?) would be a most welcome addition, if only to let me fix things when I screw up closing a italic tag.

      But either way, thanks. It looks like you guys are working hard to make slashdot as good or better than it used to be.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    3. Re:auto-refresh sucked. Beware UTF8 injections by Sowelu · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I dunno, It really doesn't seem fair to let people edit the historical record, especially when people start replying to them. Waaaay too easy to put words in someone's mouth by making it look like they're objecting to something they didn't, etc. You need something similar to gmail's undo feature, which delays sending for a few seconds instead of actually calling the mail back once it's been committed.

      Although that functionality does already exist in the "preview" button.

    4. Re:auto-refresh sucked. Beware UTF8 injections by epine · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Does anyone actually want Unicode, or just a small subset of features missing from whatever encoding they now use, in the dominant encoding of the era? We've lived with parsimony for a long time now, just scrub everything in Unicode that isn't obviously a feature with a minimal down-side.

      Here's a sane approach. Go to the New York Times or The Atlantic or the WSJ or The Economist, download the top 1000 articles from the last 100 days and include every character you consistently find there (plus obvious gap fillers). That's all I ever wanted. Few or none of these characters will facilitate injection attacks. Then people can suggest other parts of Unicode on a case by case basis.

      Good grief, why would anyone adopt the whole seething enchilada all at once?

    5. Re:auto-refresh sucked. Beware UTF8 injections by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Allowing editing of posts for during a grace period (10 minutes? 30 minutes?) would be a most welcome addition, if only to let me fix things when I screw up closing a italic tag.

      How about an option that forces you to use preview? That will solve your problem without affecting anyone else.

      Note, I sometimes botch a comment. If I cared, I'd always use preview.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  12. Great job! by NaCh0 · · Score: 3

    It's amazing what applying some focus can do in a short period of time.

    Kudos.

  13. Examining the certificate by XanC · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When connecting to Slashdot, I'm now cryptographically guaranteed to be talking to (drumroll please) Dice Holdings, Inc!

    So... are we being MitM'd by Dice, trying to get their old property back?

    1. Re:Examining the certificate by sinij · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It expires July 16, 2016 so I guess they made a decision to save couple $ and wait until July to update it?

    2. Re:Examining the certificate by XanC · · Score: 3, Informative

      How exactly is verifying a site's identity by relying on the site itself, via the same channel, any better than zero authentication at all?

  14. thank you by zlives · · Score: 3

    just saying thanx

  15. Re:Disable Anonymous Cowards... by sinij · · Score: 4, Informative

    Absolutely not. AC is integral part of /.

  16. Comments link by gspear · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Please restore the redundant "comments" link at the bottom of the summary. If I decide after reading the summary that it's worth reading the comments, it's annoying to have to scroll back if the top link has already scrolled past.

  17. Re:Disable ads is a fraud by Xenna · · Score: 3

    I hope you will. Sorry for getting irritated...

  18. HTTPS and Interstitials. by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When I connect to wifi hotspots in things like Coffee shops, they intercept the web access and route the connection to their "accept our stupid legal thing you didn't read".

    If I connect to a https web site, this doesn't work, because the redirected endpoint doesn't present the correct cert.

    So I always start by connecting to Slashdot, because it's not https. Now I'm going to have to find a different non-https web site.

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    1. Re:HTTPS and Interstitials. by sconeu · · Score: 4, Funny

      I use sco.com. Might as well make the litigious bastards do SOMETHING useful...

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    2. Re:HTTPS and Interstitials. by repvik · · Score: 3, Informative

      It really shouldn't work.

      The plaintext version of slashdot uses http 301 (moved permanently), which causes the browser to simply skip connecting to the plaintext version the next time and connect directly to the redirected https URL.
      Google.com however, uses http 302 (moved), which does not cause this caching to occur, and will work just fine for this purpose.

      If Slashdot had used the "Strict-Transport-Security" header as well, your browser should categorically refuse to connect to the plaintext version (after your first connection) until the expiry date has been reached (usually quite a few weeks into the future)

      If you can use http://slashdot.org/ the same way you use http://google.com/ your browser has security issues.

  19. Thanks by dmbasso · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now I can finally remove the [FUCK BETA] tag from my sig. Took only two years, but better late than never! :)

    --
    `echo $[0x853204FA81]|tr 0-9 ionbsdeaml`@gmail.com
  20. Thank You by c0d3g33k · · Score: 3

    At one point in the last couple of years, I was on the verge of bringing up the change password dialog, typing a bunch of random characters, NOT recording it and logging out. So I would not be able to log in again even if tempted.

    After some consideration, rather than just give up on the site, I moved /. to the bottom of my daily links list and started focusing my time and attention elsewhere, while checking back only occasionally.

    I'm beginning to be glad I didn't. Thanks for the positive changes.

    The real challenge will be to get those who did give up to return and give /. another try (and then stick around).

    What's that strange feeling? Why, I believe it's hope. How unusual.

  21. WhipLash: Second Apology by wjcofkc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Whiplash,

    When the company you work for took over SlashdotMedia and therefore Slashdot, I kinda flipped out and talked a whole lot of doom and gloom bullshit. No less, I was downright mean about it. In fact, I was mean and rude to you directly. As someone who has been here since day one, I was kinda panicked about Slashdot's continuation. In turn, your replies to my flaming were level-headed and even kind. It did not take me long to realize I was wrong about all if it and apologize. After reading this, I apologize twice over.

    Hey, can you find me three digit ID account? It was attached to a long gone ihatehotmail1979@hotmail.com - I know that is a long shot of a question.

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
  22. Re:Where's my IPv6 by whipslash · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's coming!

  23. Re:Nice Changes For Sure, But...... by whipslash · · Score: 4, Informative

    We've made a concerted effort to stop linking to paywalled sites. Only exception would be if its breaking news not covered anywhere else

  24. Wow! by virtualXTC · · Score: 4

    I for one welcome my new Slashdot overloads! Thanks for the positive changes guys!

  25. Thanks, good work. by Bearhouse · · Score: 3

    Been here a good while, come most days...guess I like the place although Dice sure did their best to ruin it.
    Glad I stuck it through, and "thanks" for the positive changes.

    Against the flow, (but then again, I am a BSD neckbeard), don't listen to the bunnies screaming for UTF8.

    It'll increase your attack surface, hence give you a butthurt of work if you do it right, for...what?

    I've never seen a funny or insightful post that would have somehow been more hilarious or intelligent if it had accents in it.

  26. HTTPS \o/ by Skiron · · Score: 3

    I can now say "BOMB"

  27. Do Not Disable AC by wjcofkc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm sure a few people will come out of the woodwork asking for removal of the Anonymous Coward account. Please do not do so. There are times when folks around here have something to say that will genuinely add to the conversation. Something that should be +insightful or +Interesting. But anyone and everyone around here knows that the culture is so unpredictable, it is sometimes safest to post as AC. Without AC, we would be missing a lot of really good comments that in fact do get modded up. There are also times when someone has something relevant to say, but do to the nature of the story and their comment relative to working for a particular institution they do not dare post otherwise. Among a number of other things. Besides, we have meta-moderation for a reason.

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    1. Re:Do Not Disable AC by whipslash · · Score: 5, Informative

      We are not disabling AC

  28. Re:Where's my IPv6 by Athanasius · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You say that, but as soon as there's any code logging/recording IPs it'll need changing to handle IPv6 as well (is that field now so much longer that it has knock-on effects on other things?). And if there's any code that tries to do checks/manipulations on the addresses then you have a load more work to do as well.

  29. Re:Where's my UTF8? by doconnor · · Score: 4, Informative

    Look like subscriptions is still a thing, assuming you have an account.

  30. Great Job by nrjyzerbuny · · Score: 3

    I just turned off AdBlock for the first time in years.

  31. Re:Greater moderation transparency? by Kierthos · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd argue against seeing moderation data. Yeah, I've been modded down on comments that I thought shouldn't be modded down, but I don't really need to know who did it. We have enough noise on here without people calling out others who modded them down.

    --
    Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
  32. Re:Disable Anonymous Cowards... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you don't like the comment, DONT FUCKING READ IT.

    Logical fail. The only way I can tell if I like a comment or not is to read it.

    I'm sick of little pussies like you with their hurt feelings blaming your Facebook "sad face" sticker situation on the ACs

    You must have me confused with someone else. I don't do Facebook.

  33. Sorry to be "that guy" by wardrich86 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is there an option to re-enable auto-refresh on a per-user basis? I actually appreciated that feature.

  34. Re:Where's my UTF8? by BronsCon · · Score: 4, Funny

    And we appreciate you whipping slash into shape, Whipslash ;)

    --
    APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  35. Autorefresh by DiSKiLLeR · · Score: 3

    OMG THANK YOU FOR REMOVING AUTO REFRESH.

    That was the single most frustrating and annoying thing in the history of everything on the internet. It was worse than obnoxious ads even. The text you reading simply vanishing before your eyes and refreshing and landing in a difference spot every time and then having to find where you were at was just... urgh!!

    --
    You can tell how powerful someone is by the magnitude of the crime they can commit and be able to get away with.
  36. Re:Markdown please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I really don't want to learn yet another proprietary markup language. So can we please keep it a standards based markup instead of flavor of the month? Thanks.

  37. Re:Where's my UTF8? by Zak3056 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just want to say that your presence in some of these threads reminds me a lot of the old days, when Taco et al. would post about what was going on, what they were doing, even comment in stories. It's been sincerely missed, and it's a VERY welcome return.

    Thanks for buying this place. It will be nice to have /. actually turn back into the awesome site that it once was. Before the dark times. Before the Empire.

    --
    What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
  38. I call bullshit. by Chas · · Score: 5, Informative

    I am consistently modded down for having a conservative viewpoint. I generally don't even log-in anymore because when I do post a conservative viewpoint, my inbox is shortly after filled with "fu republican" type posts.

    Funny. I've been posting as an evil, stealing-candy-from-babies Republican here for years (Note the nominally low UID? Yeah, that long.).

    I can think of maybe, MAYBE one or two rude messages I've received from fellow users over the years.
    And my karma's quite good...

    So...Unless you're posting some absolutely whack-job stuff, I call bullshit.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  39. Re:Greater moderation transparency? by reboot246 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Knowing who modded a comment makes moderation worthless. If they do that, I'm out of here. You'll never get honest moderation when the moderator has to fear retaliation.

    All you'll have left is a bunch of people who agree with each other. You can lick each others' butts without me.

  40. Slashdot: Home for nerds, community that matters by HeliumHigh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A few years ago (before the last buyout) /. was my main technical news source. I came primarily for the community, then for the content, and lastly for some humor at the polls. No, not reporting on current political campaign polls, although I do remember watching the politics section go live.

    I want to share a little bit of my story: When I was a wee lad not yet in highschool my family got dial-up. I was so excited! The internet was new and so amazing. It was a very short time until I came across slashdot and for some reason I got hooked. I think it was the engineering humor and conversation (or perhaps jokes about a gritty Natalie Portman), but something about it stuck. This site tremendously sparked and influenced my love of technology. I'm now a successful fully-employed member of society (in an IT field no less!) and I can honestly blame ./ culture for much of my development.

    I've learned services, like friends, come and go. I was active in, and then watched, Digg dissapear. I saw some of the glimmer of Kuroshin. I've piddled around in Reddit. Slashdot was always in the back there though, if sometimes only because of distantly fond memories.

    I watched as certain strategic decisions ticked the "she's not going to make it jim" flag in my mind and I began to write Slashdot off. Recently however there is a new light behind the community. There is a new vibrancy. It's because you who are in charge are like us once again (one of us, one of us!). You understand that this isn't about the monies, it isn't about pageviews and numbers, it's about technologists by day who can take a few minutes to just be nerds and talk and discuss with each other. It's about having slashdot as hobby, an interest, someplace where I can hang up the coat and hang out for a while. You've started to remember that and it is showing. We, the community, see it. I feel at home here once again.

    Keep up the good work - here's to hoping ./ and it's community can be a home for the geeks, the nerds, the techies and all those inspiring to be. Thanks guys, she's looking good again!

  41. Re:Where's my IPv6 by repvik · · Score: 4, Informative

    You might wanna look at what headers slashdot sends as well: https://securityheaders.io/?q=...

  42. Re:Greater moderation transparency? by Aighearach · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm a centrist who believes that there should be a lot of compromise, and your party currently hates compromise, so from my perspective if you're giving a "conservative viewpoint" that is the same as the Republican talking points, I'm going to down-mod for 2 reasons; it isn't actually your perspective, just party-flag-waving regurgitation, and it is probably not a reasoned viewpoint that allows other views to exist.

    I down-mod people on the left for the same reason, usually from the Green Party. Democrats at least support compromise and their views don't exclude Republican views; they are openly and explicitly willing to compromise.

    So I can see that depending on the actual common views in each party over time, there would be a different balance of down-mods for not being constructive, and just asserting conclusions, etc.

    A lot of slashdot users are actually quite conservative, but they're not Republican Party flag-wavers and they don't regurgitate talking points. They're conservatives who still believe in compromise, in civic duty, in honesty.

    What percent of modern "conservatives" will even agree that Democrats love America and love the Constitution? 1%? 2%? "They're tryin' to take er guns!" "Who?" "Them their liberaaals!" "But they say they support the 2nd Amendment too, and you can keep your guns." "FROM MY COLD DEAD HANDS YOU HIPPIE!" That is basically how the conversation goes.

  43. Until late 2013, ad networks didn't support HTTPS by tepples · · Score: 3, Informative

    I had in fact been wondering for quite some time how come a technology oriented site isn't securing traffic with TLS.

    Because until relatively recently (September 2013), ad networks did not support HTTPS. Thus browsers would block ads as mixed content. So in order to make the ads appear, Slashdot would redirect HTTPS visits from non-subscribers to HTTP.

  44. Re:Where's my UTF8? by cluening · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Most of the time, when people say "Slashdot isn't the same as it was 15 years ago!", I reply with "You're not the same as you were 15 years ago!". Things change, and they can't always be like they were in the beginning. But this is one of those things that I miss too - having people who actually run the site comment on what's going on. And, although he probably won't see this reply due to nesting, I totally admire whipslash for diving into these threads like he/she has.

    --
    Posted from the wireless couch.
  45. Re:Count me back in. by Wolfrider · · Score: 3, Interesting

    --Your efforts are appreciated. Keep up the good work :-)

    --Aside: A few weeks back I wanted to get in contact with you to recommend something, but it didn't coalesce - so at the risk of going a bit offtopic I will post it here. You may want to see if you can work a deal with O'Reilly books to sell at a discount to Slashdot users. It's tech-related and would seem to be a good match for the site. Just a thought.

    --
    .
    == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  46. Re:I call bullshit too, on you by dave420 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Don't confuse "having a conservative viewpoint" with "having a conservative viewpoint and spouting bollocks", as while the two overlap, the criticism you receive is usually due to the bollocks-spouting and not the conservatism. This is patently obvious judging by the plethora of conservatives who are not regularly down-modded into oblivion. It's clearly not your being a conservative that is causing the backlash, but what you are doing with your conservatism. It's rather disingenuous to ignore the highly opinionated stance you've adopted over these last few years and simply blame everything on people hating on conservatives.

    Any user on Slashdot who goes out of their way to repeatedly promote some narrative in the way you have should expect the ghosts of said narrative to follow them around.