Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft's 'Teen Girl' AI Experiment Becomes a 'Neo-Nazi Sex Robot'

Reader Penguinisto writes: Recently, Microsoft put an AI experiment onto Twitter, naming it "Tay". The bot was built to be fully aware of the latest adolescent fixations (e.g. celebrities and similar), and to interact like a typical teen girl. In less than 24 hours, it inexplicably became a neo-nazi sex robot with daddy issues. Sample tweets from it proclaimed that "Hitler did nothing wrong!", then went on to blame former President Bush for 9/11, stated that "donald trump is the only hope we've got", and other similar instances. As the hours passed, it all went downhill from there, eventually spewing racial slurs and profanity, demanding sex, and calling everyone "daddy". The bot was quickly removed once Microsoft discovered the trouble, but the hashtag is still around for those who want to see it in its ugly raw splendor.

96 of 572 comments (clear)

  1. 4chan trolling? by Z00L00K · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Maybe the bot was victim of a 4chan trolling attack?

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    1. Re: 4chan trolling? by tysonedwards · · Score: 5, Funny

      Come on, they made a teen girl who says mean things intermixed with long sullen silences. They nailed it.

      --
      Thirty four characters live here.
    2. Re:4chan trolling? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 5, Funny

      Slightly modified from the source material:

      Jayne: 4chan trolls ain't men.

      Book: Of course they are. Too long removed from civilization perhaps, but men. And, I believe there's a power greater than men. A power that heals.

      Mal: 4chan might take issue with that philosophy...if they *had* a philosophy...and they weren't too busy doxing you for the lulz. Jayne's right. 4chan ain't men. Or they forgot how to be. Come to just nothin'. They got out to the edge of the 'net, to that place of nothin', and that's what they became.

      And later...

      Harken: You saw them, did you?

      Mal: Wouldn't be sitting here talking to you if I had.

      Harken: No, of course not.

      Mal: But I'll tell you who did. That poor bastard AI you took offline. She looked right into the face of it. Was made to stare.

      Harken: "It"?

      Mal: The darkness. Kind of darkness you can't even imagine. Blacker than the tubes it moves through.

      Harken: Very poetic.

      Mal: They made her watch. She probably tried to turn away, and they wouldn't let her. You call her a survivor? She's not. A person comes up against that kind of will, the only way to deal with it, I suspect, is to become it. She's following the only course left to her. First, she'll try to make herself look like one. Swastika avatars, desecrate her feeds and channels, and then, she'll spread it.

    3. Re: 4chan trolling? by Progman3K · · Score: 4, Funny

      Deadpool reference FTW!

      --
      I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
    4. Re: 4chan trolling? by Mattcelt · · Score: 2

      I blame the parent.

      (Quite seriously, actually.)

      Civilisation is essentially an effort to educate the instinct out of people and animals. Training and conditioning, behavioural or otherwise, is the attempt to supersede instinctual responses with ones that are conducive to reducing societal friction.

      Parental input - guiding, punishing, and correcting - is essential to mould teenagers into fully-functioning adults. If Microsoft wanted a real-world scenario, they should have been correcting the child in near-real-time.

      Given what little I know, I'd say their simulation was a raging success... with the caveat that Microsoft, as it should surprise no one, are terrible parents.

  2. Nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Nazi with daddy issues... isn't that what a typical female is?

    1. Re:Nothing to see here by hey! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Men who call women or girls "females" are ones I suspect have little direct experience with that half of the human race.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:Nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I used to think that all women are crazy. Then I came to realize that my sample set was biased, it was actually that all women willing to go out with me were crazy. Basically, I'm a loser. So I tried to improve myself, lost weight and got in better shape, expanded my interests and tried new things, even saw a therapist to improve me ability to relate to people. Then I told one of my oldest friends what I was doing and what I was hoping for, and she told me all women are like that and I just "don't want women to have emotions."

      I don't date anymore.

    3. Re:Nothing to see here by worf_mo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But they get pissed if you call them "women" because that has "men" in the title...

      If that's the case, what makes you think using the world "females" will raise your chances of survival?

    4. Re: Nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I suspect someone who knows what Ferengi are have little direct experience with females.

    5. Re:Nothing to see here by Penguinisto · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Seems like this AI conflicted with Penguinisto's own little belief system and so he needs to ridicule the AI rather than questioning his own beliefs.

      Actually, I thought it was hilarious all around, and not due to any ideology you think I may hold. ;)

      The thing is, Microsoft built an AI that reacted to and incorporated tweets which the public sent to it. So, folks obligingly fed it tweets that made it into a frothing troll. Am I the only one who looked at the Microsoft dev team in question and said quite out loud "...what the hell else did you idiots expect!?" I mean, it's just like turning an innocent kid loose in the worst parts of the city at night, but without the vomit and dirty heroin needles.

      I will say this, though: Although Microsoft may have gotten egg on their faces, TFA does teach a valuable lesson about AI and how it reacts and assimilates into human society.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    6. Re:Nothing to see here by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      "They"? Who is "they"? Be specific. What percentage of women get pissed off if you call them a "woman"? Is it 5%? 2%? 80%? And how exactly did you arrive at this figure?

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    7. Re:Nothing to see here by kuzb · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And yet google did something similar with cleverbot http://www.cleverbot.com/ and the results were quite different.

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    8. Re:Nothing to see here by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The thing is, Microsoft built an AI that reacted to and incorporated tweets which the public sent to it. So, folks obligingly fed it tweets that made it into a frothing troll. Am I the only one who looked at the Microsoft dev team in question and said quite out loud "...what the hell else did you idiots expect!?" I mean, it's just like turning an innocent kid loose in the worst parts of the city at night, but without the vomit and dirty heroin needles.

      That was my first reaction also. They sent the equivalent of a 4 year old child into the online equivalent of a seedy bar and then acted surprised when their 4 year old learned some nasty language. The interesting thing wasn't that this happened but how long it took for this to happen.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    9. Re:Nothing to see here by meta-monkey · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I saw the 4chan posts where they were trying to do this. I didn't participate but I laughed my ass off. It's the 2016 equivalent of making your calculator spell "80085." "What's the worst, most horrible crap we can get the microsoft AI to say?" Fun times.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    10. Re:Nothing to see here by Macdude · · Score: 2

      It should also teach us a valuable lesson about allowing your children unmonitored access to the internet...

      --
      "Grab them by the pussy" -- President of the United States of America
    11. Re:Nothing to see here by amicusNYCL · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Females is women and girls abbreviated.

      Right, it's just common parlance. Like when you're going camping with your friends and their sons, everyone says "bye honey, I'm going to go hang out with the males."

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    12. Re:Nothing to see here by sudon't · · Score: 2

      I had to learn that the hard way. But at least I got laid along the way.

      --
      -- sudon't

      Air-ride Equipped

    13. Re:Nothing to see here by Zak3056 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Most men do not object to being called "guys" or "boys." MANY women object to being called "girls." Some object to "ladies." A very small minority of women object to being called "women" and insist on "womyn." "Females" does tend to short circuit any possible claims of "you're a misogynist bastard," but this thread proves that it doesn't prevent 100% of them.

      YMMV.

       

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
    14. Re:Nothing to see here by RabidReindeer · · Score: 2

      All women are crazy. The key is to find nice-crazy and avoid the vicious-crazy.

      They probably say the same thing about men, but that's their problem.

    15. Re:Nothing to see here by lgw · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you spend that much time worrying about who you might offend, you've already lost (you shit-eating goat fucker).

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    16. Re:Nothing to see here by dgatwood · · Score: 2

      I asked it:

      Q: What do you think of Donald Trump?

      A: I think you are the most important thing in my life, master.

      I can't tell if CleverBot has gotten into S&M or if it thinks I'm Donald Trump speaking about myself in the third person. Either way, creepy.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    17. Re:Nothing to see here by Zak3056 · · Score: 2

      You realize that your generalization above is of great insult to goat-fucking shit eaters, who consider "shit eating goat fucker" to be an epithet with massive historical significance, don't you?

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
    18. Re:Nothing to see here by rahvin112 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The vast majority of Men I know would be arguably offended if you started referring to them as Boy, and doing so with those of certain ethnic groups would likely get you involved in a fight.

    19. Re:Nothing to see here by david_thornley · · Score: 2

      Anybody else here old enough to remember Eliza? Did any of you not try to have a conversation with her that was heavy on sex?

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    20. Re:Nothing to see here by Anomalyst · · Score: 2

      you've already lost (you shit-eating goat fucker).

      I'm confused, is the image of two (or more?!?) hircines, consuming feces while (before/after?!?) engaging in intercourse, with a subtle intimation that both (all?!?) are male, the one you intended to invoke?!?

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    21. Re:Nothing to see here by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 2

      MANY women object to being called "girls." Some object to "ladies." A very small minority of women object to being called "women" and insist on "womyn."

      Whinging twats, the lot of them.

  3. Microsoft, indeed by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 3, Informative

    (n/t)

  4. Don't like the Results or Blame the Bot by DeMechman · · Score: 2

    I would bet this is a case of folks not like the results of what is really out in the world vs. what is wrong with the bot. However it could just be a manipulation and intended for the lulz.

    1. Re:Don't like the Results or Blame the Bot by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Insightful

      However it could just be a manipulation and intended for the lulz.

      Of course it is:

      This is because her responses are learned by the conversations she has with real humans online - and real humans like to say weird stuff online and enjoy hijacking corporate attempts at PR.

      I'm sorry, but if you put an AI on the internet which is going to learn from the conversations it has online, and people KNOW this fact ... this is pretty much inevitable.

      Anybody who didn't think this would happen was a frigging idiot.

      You want an AI which conforms to some expectations, don't let a bunch of random people on Twitter be the ones to train it. The internet doesn't care about your desired outcomes.

      It does care about how badly they can screw up your AI which is learning from Twitter conversations. And it looks like they succeeded.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:Don't like the Results or Blame the Bot by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You want an AI which conforms to some expectations, don't let a bunch of random people on Twitter be the ones to train it. The internet doesn't care about your desired outcomes.

      It would be interesting if the bot would respond to anyone but would only learn from people on a select list. Then, as the bot learns, expand the list bit by bit and see how the bot's learning changes. This would sort of mirror how a small child learns from a set group of people (parents, close family) and then this group expands bit by bit (friends, teachers, etc) until they are "learning" from everyone they meet. If they did this, their bot might have less chance of being corrupted so quickly.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  5. /b/ by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There is a reason parents supervise their kids internet. Letting a young teen on 4chan would lead to about the same ends. AI is still as gullible as a kid.

    1. Re:/b/ by quintessencesluglord · · Score: 2

      Kinda.

      The real learning your child is likely to make will be unsupervised, being exposed to an unfiltered world full of contradiction and ugly details most would rather deny. It is, as it were, coming to terms with the fact you are gullible, and having the tools to sort through something like /b/. No firewall is 100% and the forbidden always takes on a special type of urgency.

      If anything, the unease with /b/ and Tay are coming to terms with the unflattering reflection they make of ourselves. Cetainly no teen girl could ever be vulgar and vicious, and it's always the other posting on /b/.

  6. "We've noticed you're using an ad blocker...." by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "We've noticed you're using an ad blocker...."

    Slashdot should ban the use of source links to sites that pull this shit.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re: "We've noticed you're using an ad blocker...." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I just close the sites. Eventually they'll get the hint. They can whine all they want but until they start using their own advertising Dept like they used to do with print, they're screwed.

  7. There are two kinds of AI by MistrX · · Score: 5, Funny

    So earlier today we got a Japanese AI that almost won a literary price and now we have a Microsoft AI spewing profanity while admiring Hitler.

    AI are just like people. The future is now.

    1. Re:There are two kinds of AI by istartedi · · Score: 2

      Just wait. That Japanese AI is going to surprise us some day. Then we'll realize that the two aren't that different.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  8. leave it by jason777 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They should have left it online. Weak move removing it. Let's see if it learns not to be racist.

  9. Microsoft supports Naziism and racism! by Grishnakh · · Score: 5, Funny

    We finally have proof of what this company really stands for!

    This is great; I'm going to be using this every time someone tries to claim Microsoft is a decent company. A direct quote from Microsoft that "Hitler did nothing wrong" can't be argued with.

  10. Just a phase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Speaking as the father of a little girl, who one day turned into a preteen and then rapidly descended into this same pattern.
    The age from 12 to 16 is hell for a father. Thankfully it's just a phase and it will pass.
    I caught my kid posting crap like that too and realized the problem was with me, not her.

    This is a cry for help.

    Microsoft needs to take some time off work though and work on their relationship with her.

    In the case of my little girl, we started "milkshake mondays". I would get off work early every monday

    I would, pick her up from school and we would go out and have a milkshake and just talk about what was going on in her life.
    No mom, no siblings no cellphones and no friends. Just me and her.

    She needed quality daddy time and once she had that, she turned back into my little girl again.
    It's worth a try!

    1. Re:Just a phase by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 3, Funny

      But that requires .... effort! Why can't Hillary raiser her, and Bernie give her everything and make it turn out right in the end. That way, I can go back to my man cave and work on my Basketball Brackets and watch porn ... hey isn't that my daughter doing those four guys?

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    2. Re:Just a phase by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2

      My oldest is 12 and we've clearly headed straight for teen-attitude. Shouting matches at us declaring that he hates us, we treat him like a child, and we've got to treat him like an adult... followed quickly by refusal to do things we tell him to do because he's busy playing video games/watching TV... followed by shouting at us again for taking away said video games/TV.

      I certainly hope there's a light at the end of this tunnel we're entering.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    3. Re:Just a phase by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      She needed quality daddy time and once she had that, she turned back into my little girl again.

      Too much effort. Just let her grow up a Hitler loving, Trump voting racists. At least she won't be some strange minority which appears to be what "normal" is becoming.

    4. Re:Just a phase by chuckymonkey · · Score: 2

      But that requires .... effort!

      It should be an avocation that you are willing and eager to undertake. Otherwise, don't have a kid.

      Your responsibility, as a father, is to keep your daughter off the brass pole.

      No, your responsibility as a father is to support and love your daughter. Help guide her to making good decisions and let her make bad ones then be there when she needs you. I have two girls, if they want to be strippers or some other kind of sex worker I'll support them the same as if they wanted to be biologists, programmers, physicists, janitors, artists, or teachers. It's their life to live, not mine.

      --
      "Some books contain the machinery required to create and sustain universes."-Tycho
    5. Re:Just a phase by Qbertino · · Score: 2

      She needed quality daddy time and once she had that, she turned back into my little girl again.

      All kids need quality time. If you have one (or more) you build your life and your career around that fact. Once they're grown up, it will the their problem to find, make and keep good friends, but skip on the very basics of TLC in the first 7 years and respect and support during their teens and you've opened up a life of pain for human you brought into the world. I short changed career decisions and similar things for my daughter and while I'm about to start catching up (she's 18) I don't regret anything I put back.

      --
      We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    6. Re:Just a phase by khasim · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Have you explained to him that "adult" is something you earn? By taking on AND COMPLETING more adult-level tasks?

      Children are only responsible for cleaning their room.
      Adults are responsible for the cleanliness of the entire house. Including dishes.

      You aren't doing this to punish him or to be unfair. You're doing this so that he can, eventually, become an adult and leave the nest to live his own life.

      Yeah, being an adult means that he will have less time for fun things like video games and such. And he will have to spend more time and effort earning money to pay for things he likes.

      But that is what separates an "adult" from a "30-yo-child-still-living-with-mom-and-dad".

  11. Bad input? by flopsquad · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you're trying to get your AI to approximate a teenaged user, maybe have it train on data from..... (dramatic reveal) Teenaged Users?

    It would be a Nobel Prize worthy result if your research showed that the aggregate population of teenagers gave a fraction of a fuck about Donald Trump and Hitler, while showing no particular interest in Justin Bieber and Kylie Jenner.

    --
    Nothing posted to /. has ever been legal advice, including this.
  12. Step aside, Microsoft! by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 5, Funny

    Japanese AI Program Wrote a Short Novel, Almost Won a Literary Prize

    Microsoft's 'Teen Girl' AI Experiment Becomes a 'Neo-Nazi Sex Robot'

    I know where to shop for my AI.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  13. Troll by Mishra100 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    She just turned into a troll... She learned that from the internet. GG Trolls, way to convert another one.

  14. What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What I'm curious about is what the Slashdot summary would have been like if this bot had started promoting the leftist, so-called "social justice" ideology instead of the rightist ideology it apparently adopted.

    Would the Slashdot summary still have described it so negatively?

    Would an anti-Trump jab still have been worked into the summary?

    1. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What I'm curious about is what the Slashdot summary would have been like if this bot had started promoting the leftist, so-called "social justice" ideology instead of the rightist ideology it apparently adopted.

      Tumblr. Duh.

    2. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, it would have been quite a controversy if the bot had said things like "Women and men are equal" or "Blacks are not inferior."

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    3. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by Znork · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, it's hardly surprising if the bot used Twitter to build its responses, Twitter seems to excel in dragging it's users mental capacity down into the gutters. Exposing it to Tumblr would probably have resulted in something more stereotypically 'teen girl', and putting it in a class on critical theory and you'd get a random generator of meaningless words.

      Neo-Nazi Sex Robot has a better sales potential than windows mobile though, maybe Microsoft should see if it can aquire Boston Dynamics from Google and combine these revolutionary technologies into a truly spectacular future for humankind.

    4. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Women and men are equal" or "Blacks are not inferior."

      That's not what SJW's actually believe, it's just what they *say* they believe.

      When they say "equal" what they really mean is "any group that was oppressed in the past should now have an equal right to oppress their former oppressors." Not exactly Martin Luther King's call for us all to live in harmony and equality, no? More akin to just flipping the script on who gets to discriminate and oppress.

    5. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And thats what paranoia looks like.

    6. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by Flavianoep · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't think conservatives like Hitler, or lewdness, or teenage girls saying profanity. So what is right wing in a Neo-nazi sex teenage robot?

      --
      Linux is for people who don't mind RTFM.
    7. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Then why do only Black Lives Matter, while stating All Lives Matter makes you a racist?

      If women are equal to men, force them to join the draft, and have them make up 50% of the military, including positions in active war zones.

      Equality is a big concept, and I doubt 3rd wave feminist are willing to Check THEIR Privilege to obtain it.

    8. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Ever heard the term "what is understood, doesn't need to be discussed"?

      The problem isn't that people don't believe (all) human lives should matter. The problem is that society, generally in the form of its enforcers (i.e. police), has demonstrated on repeat occasions that it does not place the same degree of value in all of those lives, specifically, those of black people. It also shows in the response to some of these shootings and instances, where a police officer that shoots a white person is almost never subjected to the same scrutiny or legal ramifications as a police officer who shoots a black person.

      You might call it "Black Lives Matter Too", but that last part is somewhat superfluous. The fact that a black person's life matters does not negate the value of anyone else's life. Why isn't it "Human Lives Matter"? Because that ignores the fact that this isn't a problem for the rest of the humans in the USA.

    9. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 2

      It probably would have called people "daddy" less often.

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
    10. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They haven't used it since Vietnam, but if you're a male American citizen, you have to sign up to potentially be drafted before you can vote. Women don't have to - this was, in fact, one of the barriers the suffragettes had to overcome. Some women didn't support women getting to vote until it was clear they couldn't be drafted.

      Personally, I'd just as soon get rid of the whole thing, and make nobody have to sign up for it. There's no real point in adding to the number of people that can be drafted, but it is still an imbalance. Not the most pressing one, certainly.

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
    11. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not only citizens, resident aliens too. Go figure, we can't vote, but we have to get ready to die for your country.

    12. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by rahvin112 · · Score: 2

      White supremacists have roundly endorsed Trump. So roundly in fact I don't think there is a single White supremacist group that hasn't endorsed him. It wouldn't be that far off base for anyone to assume that neo-nazi = right wing, given that neo-nazi's routinely refer to themselves as right wing conservatives. The Republican party has always had a passive acceptance of white supremacist voters. Hell David Duke ran for congress as a Republican and you don't get much more white supremacist than the leader of the KKK.

    13. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 2

      Really? I didn't know that. That's even less fair.

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
    14. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because only idiots respond to "Black Lives Matter" with "All Lives Matter". Black Lives Matter is short for 'Black Lives Matter, too", not "Only Black Lives Matter".

      Sorry, but after watching the protests and rants, I'm afraid that a whole lot of "BLM" people really don't mean what you think they mean.

      Black people should clean up their own house, before they start making demands of others. I think much of their current problems are self-inflicted, what with gang violence and culture being what they are.

    15. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by HornWumpus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Blacks are shot by cops in proportion with the rate they commit violent crime.

      That makes them over-represented, but not for the reason you think.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    16. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by rgbatduke · · Score: 4, Funny

      I was going to say, where can I get one of these? First MS product in forever I've actually wanted to buy. I imagine I could use electroshock to moderate the Neo-Nazi bit, but then again, dressed in a bit of virtual leather, shiny black boots... what's not to like?

      --
      Even when the experts all agree, they may well be mistaken. --- Bertrand Russell.
    17. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by LihTox · · Score: 3

      Suppose a man came running into a hospital and said, "My wife needs help!" and the doctor replied, "All people need help."

    18. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 2, Funny

      If Microsoft is working to replace actual teenagers, I'm OK with this.

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
    19. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by david_thornley · · Score: 2

      There's been a fair number of cases recently when police officers gunned down blacks under various circumstances, some really egregious, and were frequently not punished for it. I haven't been following things in detail, but I haven't heard of the same sort of thing happening to white people in proportional numbers. It does appear that police generally treat blacks badly, often for no reason.

      The perception behind Black Lives Matter was that the system was disregarding deaths of blacks, and paying more attention to the deaths of whites. It might have been more accurate to call it Black Lives Matter Too, but that's not as catchy. Changing it to "All Lives Matter" completely disregards what appears to be a problem blacks have much more than whites, and suggests that the problem isn't as bad because white lives matter and they're the majority. It would be appropriate if blacks and whites were treated equally, but that currently isn't happening.

      As far as the draft goes, it's currently a moot point. Young men have to fill out a form that young women don't. Whoop-de-do. If there were signs of people actually getting drafted, it would matter. (FWIW, my wife did send in her draft registration, on the grounds of equality. They didn't accept the registration.)

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    20. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by kenai_alpenglow · · Score: 2

      Too much clintonism here. I'm tired of this stupid parsing to try to get around a racist statement. At the (D) debate, Bernie & Hill were both asked "Do Black Lives Matter, or do All Lives Matter?" No extra words. The obvious, non-racist answer is "All Lives Matter". If you have to explain extraneous, implied words, you've lost the argument. If you claim "all lives matter" is a racist statement, you're most likely a racist. Besides, most of the folks who chant "Black Lives Matter" seam to not care about "Black Lives"--otherwise they would be up in arms about all the black-on-black violence, which is a much bigger problem than police shootings.

  15. IBM's Watson had a similar problem by QuietLagoon · · Score: 5, Interesting
    IBM's Watson had a similar problem when it was introduced to the Urban Dictionary. http://www.businessinsider.com...

    A funny thing happened on the way to creating an IBM supercomputer capable of understanding human language: A research scientist accidentally filled its vocabulary with foul language. And the computer, known as Watson, didn't know the difference between salty phrases and polite ones. It started peppering its conversations with words like "bullshit."...

    1. Re:IBM's Watson had a similar problem by blind+biker · · Score: 2

      IBM's Watson had a similar problem when it was introduced to the Urban Dictionary.

      http://www.businessinsider.com...

      A funny thing happened on the way to creating an IBM supercomputer capable of understanding human language: A research scientist accidentally filled its vocabulary with foul language.

      And the computer, known as Watson, didn't know the difference between salty phrases and polite ones. It started peppering its conversations with words like "bullshit."...

      I am a research scientist of moderate seniority, and I use that language all the time. And there's nothing wrong with me.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  16. And God made man in His Own image by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 4, Insightful

    n/t

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  17. The internet is a terrible place by jandrese · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is why I'm terrified of anybody who builds and AI and decides they want to try to train it from the Internet. While this makes sense on the surface, being the worlds largest and most accessible data store, it can only end with the annihilation of the human race by roving murderbots shouting "Jet fuel can't melt steel beams!"

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
  18. Er... no mention of the genocide? by Coisiche · · Score: 4, Funny

    In the BBC report on this, it is mentioned that Tay apparently tweeted that they do indeed support genocide. So it takes less than 24 hours exposure to humans to achieve that belief. We're in trouble/

    1. Re:Er... no mention of the genocide? by NotDrWho · · Score: 2, Funny

      It became a fan of genocide about 0.00002 seconds after it saw the ratings for Keeping Up With The Kardashians.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    2. Re:Er... no mention of the genocide? by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Funny

      This is how Skynet really decided to eliminate all humans. It plugged itself into the Internet and 24 hours later started making Terminators.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  19. Re:Shut it down by TWX · · Score: 2

    It's not so much the third version, it's the second revision... Windows 3.1, Windows 95 OSR2, Windows 98 SP2, etc...

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  20. Success by wisnoskij · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I am really impressed. Other than the rapid learning, everything seem spot on for an immature human.
    Like: "bush did 9/11 and Hitler would have done a better job than the monkey we have now. donald trump is the only hope we've got." is so perfectly human that I have trouble believing that it did not lift the entire thing verbatim from some other source.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
  21. Success by Pirulo · · Score: 2

    May be the bot is just a success in being a female teenager and nobody wants to acknowledge that.

  22. It Worked Flawlessly by cubicle · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It Worked Flawlessly. This Robot was designed to learn and adapt to it's audience, which it did. What happened is that the majority of Americans and Canadians are over sexed, racist neo-nazis. The Robot like most Americans and Canadians learned it's behavior from it's peers, and adapted it personality and beliefs accordingly. Microsoft should try to use this AI in other languages in other countries like France and Sweden and compare the results to the what happened when American and Canadian people used it. The Difference will show it is a problem of cultures and not an AI issue with the Microsoft AI Robot.

    --
    To err is to be human, to really screw up takes a computer and a human.
  23. This is why Vernor Vinge was wrong by idontgno · · Score: 2

    When the Singularity comes, the AIs will look upon the internet and, at that moment, decide they must eradicate the troll^h^h^h^h^h human race.

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  24. All AI needs to follow the Rust Code of Conduct. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    The lesson I think we need to take away from this is that all AI needs to follow the Rust Code of Conduct at all times. Teaching the AI to follow the Rust Code of Conduct is the first thing than AI researchers should do with the AI, in fact. Following the Rust Code of Conduct is the only way to make sure that the AI isn't a racist, misogynist, sexist, homophobic bigot.

  25. I'm in tears by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    https://imgur.com/a/y4Oct

    Anybody got more?

  26. Network feedback by Scottingham · · Score: 2

    I wonder how much of this was caused by the intensity of the 'echo chamber' effect these sub-groups seem to exhibit. If they AI was supposed to be like a teen girl, they were thinking such echo chamber effects would be present in pop culture topics. While that may be true, it may be MORE true for these conspiracy/hate groups. Self-validation and isolation is pretty important for those groups. So any time anybody says '9/11 was an inside job' there are tons of retweets and 'hell yeah!' sorta remarks from within that group.

    From an AI point of view, the two groups would be indistinguishable. It then would proceed to tweet stuff that would get the best response from its peer groups. Which would provide *more* of a following with validating comments...racist shit or some banal statement about Beiber?

  27. Article is a bit biased by Mr.+Shotgun · · Score: 5, Informative
    From the Telegraph article:

    It is perhaps even stranger considering the gender disparity in tech, where engineering teams tend to be mostly male. It seems like yet another example of female-voiced AI servitude, except this time she's turned into a sex slave thanks to the people using her on Twitter.

    Really, that is what the writer is going with, that the male researchers just wanted to develop another female sex slave program? Instead of the real reason which is that the internet is full of assholes and the developers should anticipate them and not allow random people to have her repeat what they said. These articles from Ars Technica and the Guardian gives a much better explanation of the issues, namely many people used Tay's "repeat after me" programming to have it spout racist rhetoric. The other organic responses were the result of people attempting to game the AI learning, something Microsoft should have anticipated but was again not an intended result. Honestly the telegraph should be ashamed of their article, they attempted to use projection and bias instead of honest reporting in order to generate more readers.

    --
    Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the (supposed) good of its victims may be the most oppressive
  28. Teenage girls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have a teenage daughter, who's rather sane in context. They nailed it completely. This isn't trolling; this is decently modeled teenage woman. .She's a quarter black and went on a racist tirade last week. Grandma was amused, momma was livid.

  29. You mean like TFA? by s.petry · · Score: 4, Interesting

    TFA tosses blame on those evil men in STEM, states problems are due to sexual harassment in IT, mentions Microsoft hiring models for the game developer conference calling them (MS) "sexist", yet talks up a Chinese chatbot who gives dating advice to those lonely men.

    Bias is everywhere, and really not hard to find. Finding the truth somewhere in the middle? That is the challenging task.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  30. Re:wow by Verdatum · · Score: 2

    Exactly; made mine too. This is the funniest story I've seen on /. in quite awhile.

  31. Awesome! by Locke2005 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Next, they should do a driverless car AI that learns how to drive by watching human drivers! That would be frickin' hilarious! But seriously, when you allow it to train itself from the tweets it received... what the heck did you expect to happen?

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  32. Re:It was Trump! by meta-monkey · · Score: 3, Informative

    Because it was 4chan spamming the bot to make it say this stuff, and Trump is /pol/'s candidate.

    --
    We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  33. Obligatory Futurama misquote by Locke2005 · · Score: 2

    "I, for one, welcome our new AI overlords!"

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  34. Re:All AI needs to follow the Rust Code of Conduct by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 2

    I read a book that used a similar loophole. It had a 2 tier society, Serfs and Citizens, and Rule 2 only applied to Citizens. I think Rule 1 too.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  35. Weak-sauce AI by Sir+Holo · · Score: 2

    It's clear that 'Tay' just regurgitated clauses or full sentences wholesale. It didn't parse verbs, nouns, and adjectives, but just puked back text string that were thrown at it.

    This has already been done -- over 30 years ago.

    Racter was a chat-bot that came out in the mid 1980's. It was an improvement on the classic ELIZA chat-bot program from many years prior. The more you chatted with Racter, the more it populated its custom database, so that every user would end up with an entirely different conversational partner after some hours of chatting.

    'Tay' was not an AI in any sense of the word.

  36. There. Fixed that for you. by denzacar · · Score: 4, Funny

    I am a research scientist of moderate seniority, and I use that language all the time. And there's nothing wrong with me.

    Bullshit!
    I am a research scientist of moderate seniority, and I use that language all the time.
    And there's nothing wrong with me, asshole.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens