Slashdot Mirror


Hacker Weev Admits To Hacking Printers To Spew Racist and Anti-Semitic Messages (softpedia.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Andrew Auernheimer, a black hat hacker known as "Weev," has admitted to hacking thousands of Internet-connected printers and making them print-out racist and anti-semitic messages. As you'd expect, the hack took place after the hacker used a simple port scanner and found millions of unprotected, Internet-accessible printers. He then used a one-line Bash command that sent them a PostScript file on port 9100. This triggered all printers to print his anti-semitic message. Ironically, the hacker is a former Jew turned neo-nazi while incarcerated for a questionable "hacking" incident when he revealed to Gawker that ATT had failed to protect one of their servers. The printer hack affected devices at USC, UC Berkeley, Northwestern, UMass, Princeton, Brown University, the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, DePaul University in Chicago, Clark University in Worcester, and many more.

390 comments

  1. What about the rampages on /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The good old day..

    1. Re:What about the rampages on /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, he's not actually a neo-Nazi. It's calling trolling. Of all the world's "news" outlets, I'd expect better from /. HE WAS A MEMBER OF THE GNAA FOR FUCKS SAKE

    2. Re: What about the rampages on /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you say racist shit, you will be treated as racist. If I throw a drink in your face, then say "just kidding!!", You'd still consider me an Asshole.

      And I still consider him a racist. Trolling is not a justification for being an anti social fu*ker.

  2. Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Ironically, the hacker is a former Jew"

    Is an African American who develops a bizarre hatred of African Americans suddenly no longer black?
    Is a white man who believes that whites are responsible for all the evil in the world suddenly Native American?

    He can disavow Judaism - plenty of Jews do it. They're called "secular Jews." They're still Jews, and he is, too.

    1. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I was born with a penis but consider myself female. Are you saying I can't be a real woman?

    2. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently this (self proclaimed) Aryan uberman has the IQ and maturity of an 8 years old.
      Of course, some said Adolf Hitler was part Jewish. There was enough uncertainty that all the racist Nuremberg laws were carefully worded to exclude top party officials of the NSDAP.

    3. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right. And so this was a false flag operation.

    4. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You can certainly imagine it.

    5. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't be "part" jewish. You are jewish if your mother is jewish. So you're either jewish or you're not. There's no inbetween.

    6. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Nope. You can be a man pretending to be a real woman. You can yell at all your friends who a) won't be your friends long after you yell at them and b) tell you you're not a real woman. You can say you're mad and offended and all that shit. Still makes you a man pretending to be a real woman. Call me when you get your period and have a baby you stupid fuck.

    7. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Is a white man who believes that whites are responsible for all the evil in the world suddenly Native American?

      I see this one happen all the time among affluent west coast new agers.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    8. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most "men" are just boys pretending to be men.

    9. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't be "part" jewish. You are jewish if your mother is jewish. So you're either jewish or you're not. There's no inbetween.

      Yes, however there are differing criteria by which one might be classed a Jew. According the the race laws in force under the NSDAP (to which the poster above alluded), you were a Jew if you had one or more Jewish grandparents. Moreover they had the means to ensure that their particular definition of what it meant to be "Jewish" had significant real-world implications.

    10. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't feel safe anymore on Slashdot..

    11. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by WarJolt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Suppose my father is 1/2 Irish and 1/2 German and my mother is 1/2 Spanish and 1/2 French.
      I would be 1/4 Irish, 1/4 German, 1/4 Spanish and 1/4 French.
      This is how ethnicity works.

      Let's suppose that being Jewish is an ethnicity.
      Now suppose my mother is Jewish and my father is not Jewish at all.
      I would be 100% Jewish.
      That's not how ethnicities work. Therefore being Jewish is a religious thing.

      And it's impossible to renounce your Jewishness, so your identity is force upon you by a religion you may not believe in. Other jews will define you by it. It seems strange to me.

    12. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by gweihir · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No, he is not. His former religion may claim that he is, but in actual fact he is a former Jew. Being a Jew is not something genetic. It takes two brain cells to rub together to see that however, which you obviously lack.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    13. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aww, poor baby. I wonder why it is that all conservatives have such easily hurt feelings, and why they all constantly feel the need to tell us that their feelings are hurt.

    14. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose that depends on whether you define judiaism as a race or a religion. Now given that Jews are just practitioners of judaism in the same way that Christians are practishioners of Christianity I'm inclined to believe you can be a former Jew.

      Maybe you can say that he can't deny his Sephardic or Ashkenazy heritage but that's not the same because not all of those people were Jewish.

    15. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by gweihir · · Score: 1, Troll

      And it's impossible to renounce your Jewishness.

      Actually, it is quite possible. You just renounce the stupid belief that you cannot renounce being a Jew as well. Religion only has power over you if you let it.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    16. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, the irony of posting that as an "Anonymous Coward".

    17. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first on-topic post!

      Seriously, someone needs to just bitchslap that little punk.

    18. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mr Weev openly admitted that he isn't Jewish, he made it up to remove some of the pressure people were putting on his mother.
      Mr Weev was on this thing called Twitter talking about his printing skills as he was doing it. He didn't admit after the fact once caught, he admitted while he was doing it.

    19. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by cas2000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nonsense. 'Jew' is a religious and/or cultural affiliation only indirectly related to genetics (there are jews of all "races"). You can choose not to be a Jew anymore, same as you can choose not to be a Christian or an American (emigrate and renounce your US citizenship). You can even choose not to be a white-supremacist neo-nazi any more.

      Of course to neo-nazis, he'll still be a jew and will always be a jew. with their fuckwitted ideology, the "taint" can never be removed. It's no great strecth of the imagination to guess that this is the "reasoning" behind your objection.

      By contrast, you can't change your genes. You can't choose not to be black or white any more. Not that it matters that much, scientifically speaking - "race" has been conclusively proven to be primarily a cultural construct. The genetic differences are minor almost to the point of irrelevance, aside from cultural prejudices.

      of course, racist fuck-knuckles will never admit or acknowledge this fact.

      Ironically, the hacker is a former Jew turned neo-nazi

      and thus ends the idiotic myth that "hackers" are always smart. here's proof that at least one of them is a complete fucking cretin.

    20. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "He can disavow Judaism - plenty of Jews do it. They're called "secular Jews." They're still Jews, and he is, too."

      I think that is one of the biggest problems people have with Judaism-- you can opt in (convert), but you can never opt out. It's not a race (or is it?). It's not a nationality (or is it?) It's not a religion (or is it?). It's all or none of those things depending upon how your politics swing.

      That's why you can despise and oppose Zionism, while still defending religious and ethnic rights but you will still be labeled an anti-semite.

      Most Jews are various mixes of Euro-asians. The only link they have is cultural. If you reject the culture, you're out of the culture. Tired of Jimmy Buffett? You're no longer a Parrot head. Tired of Judaism (that was force fed to you as a child)? You're still a Jew, because the repressive Jewish elders say that you are and you don't get a say.

      I was born into a religion that is closely related to an ethnicity/nationality, but I was allowed to reject it and be free of it, and no one would accuse me of having that identity. Why can't Jews? They're not magic. They're just war-god worshiping assholes that are one of the largest problems in the world (religious zealots). Some former Jews recognize the destructive evil that Judaism is and choose instead to be enlightened humans instead of Bronze age animals.

    21. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 4, Funny

      "I was born with a penis but consider myself female."

      Cool! You can be a high-maintenance aggressor now.

    22. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ughh, if a catholic does not believe in the authority of the pope, and believes God is a fiction created by the church to get money is he still a catholic? If a jew does not believe all that crap in the torah and Abraham's progeny he may consider himself to still be a jew in some bizzare stretch of logic, but I think abraham would be rolling in his grave.

      While you are bullshitting what is up with the term African American. You just referred to 3 fucking continents and 68 fucking countries. Is it soo hard to refer to someone their skin color. To me the word nigger (Latin for black) is a lot less offenssive than the term 'Afrcan American'. But then again I am a republican, so that automatically makes me a racist who hates all blacks and Homosexuals in the mind of the ever so enlightened liberal intelligencia.
      '

    23. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if 1 of your parents was a Jew and the other was a Nazi. Does that mean your are a jew or a nazi?

    24. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno. If you're gay it's considered unacceptable to try and change; but if you're transgender it's encouraged. There's no real consistency to the way society handles sexual minorities.

      I'm not transgendered; but if I were I really have to wonder why you wouldn't want to be a woman in a man's body. Isn't that every feminist's dream?

    25. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by TheReaperD · · Score: 1

      You don't feel safe or is it more likely that your karma isn't safe?

      --
      "Be particularly skeptical when presented with evidence confirming what you already believe." -
    26. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can quit being Jewish, that's a religion which spans just about every ethnic demographic imaginable. It's relatively harder to disavow being an Israelite, or Hebrew, as that's in the blood. There are plenty of Russian Jews which share just about zero ethnic background with ethnic Jews, for instance.

    27. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Explain how the modern Jew is a completely seperate race?

    28. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by lorinc · · Score: 1

      Try to explain that to the nazis...

    29. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Maritz · · Score: 1

      So is Judaism a religion or a race? I would say the former but it seems to be widely regarded as the latter.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    30. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What an utter nonsense! People can choose any religion they like, and of course someone who disavows being a Jew is not a Jew. Christians can also become atheists, Muslims can be become Buddhists, and so forth.

      Being black is not a choice and not a religion; neither is being white, and so these cases are completely incomparable to the first one. (And in reality, these phenotypes are meaningless except where people artificially identify with them, because all shades in between exist, too.)

    31. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't cut your son, don't observe Pesach, don't grant advantage to other Jews ... congratulations, you are no longer a Jew.

    32. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't choose not to be black or white any more.

      ahem

    33. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weev is a Neo-Nazi, so we have one exception to your rule already. He's a regular on Daily Stormer, providing a lot more exceptions to your rule. Your rule is looking a bit shaky.

      Neo-Nazis are a diverse bunch. In fact I'd say the only thing which unites them is their hatred of Jews, much like the only thing which unites Jews is their feeling they must stick together.

    34. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it's impossible to renounce your Jewishness.

      Actually, it is quite possible. You just renounce the stupid belief that you cannot renounce being a Jew as well. Religion only has power over you if you let it.

      Actually, you must revoke such beliefs in the people around you as well - which usually is impossible. If dropping the religion had been a ticket out of the death camps, there wouldn't be 6 million jews killed. But their own beliefs or willingness to change did not matter - if the nazis believed you a jew, you got the jew treatment anyway. They took the ethnicity/genetic approach, not the religious approach.

    35. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The genetic differences are minor almost to the point of irrelevance, aside from cultural prejudices.

      Human races are distinctive genetic sub-groups with measurable differences in both the genome and exhibited traits that go far beyond skin color and facial shape. Race is predictive of deviations in both physical and mental traits when controlling for all other factors, to say the differences are minor is unreasonable.

      Racist fuck-knuckles are just as ignorant as their social constructivist counterpart.

    36. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by houghi · · Score: 4, Interesting

      OTOH, if your father is 1/1 white and your mother is 1/2 white and half black, you are still called black (Or African American)

      I never figured that one out.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    37. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was born with a penis but consider myself female. Are you saying I can't be a real woman?

      Sure.

      When you give birth.

    38. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought everyone was or should be free to chose his DEITY. Why is it that judaism is treated as both a religion and a "race" ?

    39. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      "Ironically, the hacker is a former Jew"

      ...
      Is a white man who believes that whites are responsible for all the evil in the world suddenly Native American?

      ...

      Nope.

      He'd be a Democrat.

    40. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by TheReaperD · · Score: 4, Informative

      I know it can be confusing but, Jew actually references two separate things. There's "Jew" as in the Judah religion which is something you can adopt or leave as most other religions. When you hear "former Jew", this is always what they are referring to. The second is ethnic "Jew" which refers to family lineages dating back to ancient Sumer and is not something you can leave. Most religious Jews and ex-Jews are also ethnic Jews but, there are exceptions. This is why Christian Jew or Muslim Jew are not oxymorons. Neo-nazi Jews have got to be some of the most self-loathing people on the planet.

      --
      "Be particularly skeptical when presented with evidence confirming what you already believe." -
    41. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol, you ignorant cunt, I liked most of what you said but "nigger" is not "Latin for black". It shares a root going back to it but is not the same thing at all!

    42. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bibi considers it a race since Israel is supposedly secular and yet "Israel will always be a Jewish nation". That's good enough for me!

    43. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      I have to wonder (not having read his rants and no plan to) if he's anti-Semitic or a anti-Zionist (having met several rabbis that identify themselves as the latter, it's obvious there's a bit of a difference).

    44. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by aliquis · · Score: 1

      "Ironically, the hacker is a former Jew"

      Is an African American who develops a bizarre hatred of African Americans suddenly no longer black?
      Is a white man who believes that whites are responsible for all the evil in the world suddenly Native American?

      He can disavow Judaism - plenty of Jews do it. They're called "secular Jews." They're still Jews, and he is, too.

      Can one become American?

      Maybe you are correct on how it should be labeled but I guess one can both have Jewish parents, be a believing Jew, be part of a Jewish community, identify as Jew, ...

      Also I don't see why Nazism and destruction of Jews necessarily have to go hand in hand.

      The German Nazis wanted to create one nation for them and do whatever they thought was best for that one and sure, in their view the Jews was a problem there and led to the genocide of the Jews.

      However if you had Jewish Isareli Nazis would they go around killing themselves? No. They would more likely kill Palestinians and Muslims and whatever. If the purpose of having one race / people whatever in the nation.

      IMHO having on nation for your people is likely a good thing and multiculturalism is retarded since it's blind to the fact that not everyone wants it. That doesn't mean that I think Jews has to go, or anyone else.

    45. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the Nazi's are the authority on whether you're Jewish or not... okay.

    46. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's "niger" (m.), or nigra (f.), nigrum (neut.).

    47. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      Anonymous cowards don't have karma...

    48. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only in America. Over here in Europe Barack Obama would be (and some times is) considered mixed race if he didn't (inexplicably) called himself black. If you have a white parent you can't be black, only mixed race.

    49. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      "Ironically, the hacker is a former Jew"

      Is an African American who develops a bizarre hatred of African Americans suddenly no longer black?
      Is a white man who believes that whites are responsible for all the evil in the world suddenly Native American?

      He can disavow Judaism - plenty of Jews do it. They're called "secular Jews." They're still Jews, and he is, too.

      No. Religion is a choice one makes and has nothing to do with genetics. If he decided not to be Jewish, then he is no longer Jewish.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    50. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

      Race is more of a cultural identity these days, regardless of genetics. I'm half Asian but my skin is quite light... My genetic make-up is less important than my cultural upbringing and heritage.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    51. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I found the Muslim!

    52. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by mt2mb4me · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Here is the problem with that argument. My mother and father adopted me because they couldn't have kids. As far as I know they are a straight hetro couple. According to you, my mother isn't a woman, according to her birth certificate she is.

      I have trans friends, I don't fully understand it, but I don't fully understand most things. They say that your physical sex is developed before your brain "sexes" There are different chemicals that regulate gender (estrogen and testosterone to start with)

      My argument is this: If you can say that mental retardation is a real thing, then there must be differing degrees of change. Unless every down-syndrome kid is making it up, then you have to admit that the brain effects how you act and perceive the world. So, on the far end of the spectrum, you have DS, where do you draw the line between "born that way" and "just making it up for attention". Do doctors try to cure down syndrome, or do they teach the family how to cope with the different. I know there will be people who disagree with comparing the LGBTQ population with someone with down-syndrome. I don't, Reproduction is a part of the biological process. If you are not attracted to the opposite sex, then that is a disability in the mating process. That doesn't mean we need to find a cure, not everyone needs to produce offspring.

      Next, lets look at the inter-sexed. There are people with both or neither fully developed sex organs. So there is proof that gender identity can be muddy from birth. Again, like the down syndrome argument,where do you draw the line? This person has a male sex organ, however, his brain doesn't produce enough testosterone for him to even go though the puberty. Is that a male or a female? So you have a guy with junk that doesn't work, and a high pitched voice, why not let him chop the broken shit off, get some fake tits, and at least conform to one norm in public. I mean, the only person who should know whats between your legs is the person, or people, serving it.

    53. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "ethnic Jews"

      Not really any such one thing.

      There are Ashkenazi, originally from central Europe which are what most people think of when they hear "Jew", and are the predominant group of Jews in the US, especially the NYC area.

      There are also Sephardic, originally from Spain, and then a bunch of other smaller ethnicities including Arab, Ethiopian, etc..

    54. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ashkenazi is the specific ethnicity most people are thinking of when they generically refer to "Jews".

      And Ashkenazi is a very distinct ethnic group with clear genetic differences from the general population.

    55. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      This is like the sex vs gender thing, its a not an important distinction most of the time so its easy to miss. There are Jews of all races because its not closed system, others are allowed to adopt the faith. Other races become included by marriage as well etc.

      There is also the genetic issue of being descended from the Hebrew tribes.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    56. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

      Exactly, the idea that Jews are a separate race is one of the most destructive elements of antisemitism (and one, sadly, largely perpetuated by Jews themselves). This idea goes back to all that "chosen people" stuff from the Torah, but even there it's clear that they were "chosen" not for their racial characteristics, but for their adherence to religious principles. And even if the Hebrews once had a distinct tribal "race" or "ethnicity", thousands of years of interbreeding, diaspora, migration, etc. have long since made that "race" a complete fiction. If you go to modern Israel, you'll find Jews of all kinds of different races and ethnicities, all claiming a long lineage of being "chosen." Ironically, there are likely far more "pure" descendants of the ancient Hebrews amongst the modern Palestinians than among the Ashkenazi (a truth that neither Palestinians nor Israelis wants to admit, of course).

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    57. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sex is anatomy; gender is psychology.

      There's nothing wrong with an individual born with a penis preferring to wear skirts, behaving in culturally 'feminine' ways, or being attracted to culturally 'masculine' people. When it comes time for making babies, though, nothing short of major, experimental surgery is going to allow that person to carry a child. The cultural stereotypes of masculine and feminine are deeply ingrained in our collective consciousness, largely due to the practical aspect of who has the appropriate biological equipment.

      Handedness is also ingrained in our cultural consciousness. There is a "right" way to do things and "gauche" behavior, even though most of us are born with the correct anatomy to be either right handed or left handed. We've (mostly) given up on trying to teach lefties to become righties. Obviously, if someone is born with only a left arm, they're going to be a lefty, but gender roles, beyond physically carrying the child and lactating, are not dependent on anatomy.

    58. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      "Ironically, the hacker is a former Jew"

      Is an African American who develops a bizarre hatred of African Americans suddenly no longer black? Is a white man who believes that whites are responsible for all the evil in the world suddenly Native American?

      He can disavow Judaism - plenty of Jews do it. They're called "secular Jews." They're still Jews, and he is, too.

      Even if he and "the Jews" accepted he's no longer a Jew - why the hell would the neo-Nazis? The old-time-Nazis killed many who thought of themselves as Germans (and even fought for them in the first World War), and didn't practice the religion in generations.

      IOW, no he isn't a neo-Nazi, because they won't accept him as anything but an example how opportunistic Jews are; certainly not as one of their own.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    59. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a Smith.

      I can trace my lineage back through a series of Smiths.

      My father was a Smith, my grandfather was a Smith, and so on, back to a great guy who was actually a blacksmith.

      I can change my name to Jones, but that doesn't change my lineage.

      I can't stop being a Smith descended from an actual blacksmith.

      s/Smith/Jew/g

    60. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by retchdog · · Score: 1

      i think he just misheard it when his parents told him that they were "ashkenazi jews".

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    61. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by retchdog · · Score: 1

      How is this, logically, an exception to the "rule" cas2000 stated? Individual people can easily do apparently incoherent or self-defeating things. In fact, the ability to persevere in this is sometimes a great strength, though often a weakness and almost always quite painful.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    62. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      My wife worked in an office where there was a man who had gone all the way with a sex change to become a woman and was in a lesbian affair with a (real) woman. It actually made my head hurt to think about it.

    63. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      In 1939 they were.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    64. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      You mean like Tony Stark?

    65. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not even the worst thing. I had a friend in high school who's mom was 1/4 Cherokee. Which means he could claim being "Native American" on college admissions paperwork because he had 1/16 or some nonsense, and get all the quota-filling goodness that entails.

    66. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      "ethnic Jews"

      Not really any such one thing.

      There are Ashkenazi, originally from central Europe which are what most people think of when they hear "Jew", and are the predominant group of Jews in the US, especially the NYC area.

      There are also Sephardic, originally from Spain, and then a bunch of other smaller ethnicities including Arab, Ethiopian, etc..

      Isn't it odd the Israeli society is quite racist and classist between the Jews of different origins?

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    67. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which religion does Bob Dylan practice these days?

    68. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      I always found it rather odd how culturally we treat Jewish people as a Race and a Religion.
      You can be a former Jew, by disallowing the religion. However if you treat it as some Racial background, then you can't change it.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    69. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      The Dude: Would you come off it Walter? You're not even fucking Jewish, man.
      Walter Sobchak: What the fuck are you talking about Dude?
      The Dude: You're fucking Polish-Catholic!
      Walter Sobchak: What the fuck are you talking about? I converted when I married Cynthia, Dude.
      The Dude: Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah...
      Walter Sobchak: And you know this!
      The Dude: ...And five fucking years ago you were divorced man!
      Walter Sobchak: When you get a divorce you get a new license? You turn in your library card? You *stop* being Jewish?

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    70. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by mrchaotica · · Score: 2

      I never figured that one out.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-drop_rule

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    71. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does their foreskin grow back?

    72. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Jew' is a religious and/or cultural affiliation only indirectly related to genetics (there are jews of all "races").

      Just last week I had this same discussion with my friend at a Chinese restaurant. I told him, "Did you know that there are Jews all over the world?" He disagreed. I told him that there are even Chinese Jews. Of course he disagreed again. I told him I'll prove it by asking the waiter.

      I asked the waiter, "Do you have Chinese Jews?" He said, "No Chinese joos. We have apple joos, orange joos, grape joos. But no Chinese joos."

    73. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being a Jew is not a race. It's a religious choice.

      The race thing is to obfuscate the whole theft of Palestine by making it seem like there is an ancestral right of the primarily white zionists to the land of primarily brown historical Semitic people.

    74. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Isn't that further confused by the Jews allegedly being decendents of Abraham and God's "chosen people"? Sure you can start to believe in judaism, but you can't become a decendant if you're not and according to the book there were a lot of other decendants of Noah and his family. You have people of jewish origin finding and losing their faith, but you don't really see any attempt to convert the rest of the world.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    75. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who says Jew and Nazi are mutually exclusive?
      Look at Israel...

    76. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, you have that backward. his former religion does not claim that he is. everybody else does.

      If a Jew converts to Christianity, then wants to switch back, and move to Israel, he/she will discover they have lost their "right of return" on the basis of not being Jewish. The Israeli citizenship laws are controlled by religious authorities.

    77. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So your wife worked at South Park Elementary?

      Is your wife Principal Victoria or Ms. Choksondik?

    78. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So much wrong in this thread. Jew is inappropriate slang. Nomadic intercommunity breeding culture that follows the same religion but contain a genetic variation from the goyim population. Just because we can trace back to Ireland doesn't mean that my 1/4 Irish means much, Ireland hasn't been around as long, so although your cute analysis works for you, for the Jewish people who trace back to BC can state their ethnicity is in fact 1/4 or 1/2 Jewish. It is all in the context of how you say it.

    79. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by phorm · · Score: 1

      Uh no, because your two examples are generally tied to something more physical (actual skin color, DNA), whilst religion is not a fixed/physical attribute. So you can be "black" and Jewish, "Native" and Christian, but you can't really be a Christian Jew. Now others within the religion might still consider him differently based on his former religion, but if you really want to go down that road you could end up with somebody who's a secular Jew Christian Muslim Athiest...

    80. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot is being racist towards anonymous cowards. I find that offensive.

    81. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a historical thing called the one drop rule. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-drop_rule

    82. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife worked in an office where there was a man who had gone all the way with a sex change to become a mutilated man

      FTFY.

    83. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but a Jew turned neo-Nazi seems like a very special kind of stupid.

      Just saying.

    84. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Most religious Jews and ex-Jews are also ethnic Jews

      As most Jews are Ashkenazi (and not Sephardic), the above statement would be incorrect.

    85. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      Only in America. Over here in Europe Barack Obama would be (and some times is) considered mixed race if he didn't (inexplicably) called himself black. If you have a white parent you can't be black, only mixed race.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    86. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes. the only reason you would claim such a thing is to invade women's restrooms to rape women and girls.

    87. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Wain13001 · · Score: 1

      It depends on which parent. If your mother is a Jew, you are a Jew.

    88. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by wwalker · · Score: 1

      thus ends the idiotic myth that "hackers" are always smart. here's proof that at least one of them is a complete fucking cretin.

      There are plenty of examples of antisemitic/racist people who are technically considered "smart". Bobby Fischer comes to mind, who was also a (former) Jew, but wildly antisemitic in later life. Unfortunately being rational and smart are not the same thing.

    89. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Israel has a serious problem of retaining Jewish identity. They try in every way they can - there's a reason they made Hebrew their official language even though it was barely spoken at the time and went to some lengths to promote it, and named their currency the shekel, and even outright bribe people of Jewish ancestry to immigrate there.

    90. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by gweihir · · Score: 1

      A (very apologetic) Jew once explained to me that because they believe they are the "chosen race", they do not try to convert others. Apparently it is possible to become a Jew if you want to, but it is exceptionally difficult. While most religions go for the "assimilate" approach (think "The Borg"), Judaism goes for out-breeding the competition. Mistaking them for a "race" likely comes from that approach as they mingle far slower and some subgroups may appear to be racially homogeneous.

      As they are still around in numbers after a long, long time, that approach seems to be working at least to some degree. They also seem to have managed to absorb enough outsiders to not suffer significant genetic degeneration, unlike some other (smaller) religions that use a similar approach.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    91. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd have linked to Micheal Jackson, personally.

    92. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      considering it's a religion, not really an ethnicity, apples and oranges

    93. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by sudon't · · Score: 1

      It should be obvious that one can be ethnically Jewish, and not religiously Jewish. The whole matrilineal descent thing is not so much religious as cultural, i.e., there is no scriptural basis for that custom. This notion first shows up in the Mishnah. Prior to the Hellenistic period, patrilineal descent was the norm. You can renounce Judaism, but if your parents are Jewish, you are still Jewish. If your mother is Jewish, and your father is a goy, most Jews will consider you Jewish, but you can say you're half-Jewish if you like. So, just like one can renounce Catholicism, but not Irishness, one can renounce Judaism, but not Jewishness.

      --
      -- sudon't

      Air-ride Equipped

    94. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a mild misunderstanding of national socialism. You have this concept of nationalism in it which you define a nation somehow in the popular hitler case that definition is of course blond haired blue eye'd aryans. However in the abstract that definition could be changed to whatever suites your brand; you can for instance have black national socialists where nation is defined as black people, or even do it geographically anyone living on this island.

    95. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      No. Actually she worked in a DOD facility for the US Air Force as a civilian program manager. I never actually have watched South Park although I have seen ads for it. The only cartoon I ever liked was The Road Runner. Nothing else comes close.

    96. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      No, he was legally a woman. Had his shit cut off and plastic boobs. He looked like a 4 or 5 even after all the cosmetic surgery. A lot of money to be an ugly bitch. I feel kind of sad for him/her.

    97. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was born with a penis but consider myself female. Are you saying I can't be a real woman?

      Obviously, that Y chromosome is pretty telling, it's what we use to define "male".

    98. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      The power of religion comes, like all other power, from one of two sources: Voluntary compliance, or the threat of violence. It does not matter if the god is real - the believers are, and some of them are willing to use force up to and including execution to ensure nonbelievers do as they believe their god orders.

    99. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      My dad's dad was Italian, so my last name is Italian.

      My dad's mom was Irish and Scottish.

      My mom's dad was German, English, and Irish, so technically I'm mostly Irish, and well, I'm about as white as white can be.

      But my mom's most is only mostly Dutch. Her (my grandma's) parents were both Dutch as far as they were concerned, but her mom's mom's grandma (my grandma's grandma's grandma) was the child of freed black slaves in what's now the Netherlands Antilles, and so "Dutch" that way.

      So I guess I'm black. Heck, even my mitochondrial DNA would agree 100%!

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    100. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are hilariously misinformed.

      Ethnic Jews are one of the most continuously insular and persecuted diaspora populations, which results in their distinct genetics being easily traced back thousands of years. Jewish genetics are still pronounced and more similar to Jews from across the global diaspora than their fellow citizens of whatever the latest city their families landed in. This has made Jewish people a veritable goldmine population for people who are actually involved with and knowledgeable about genetic research, like myself.

      If you're actually interested in learning something, and not just spewing bullshit into the aether, I'd recommend you read through this comprehensive wikipedia entry: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_studies_of_Jewish_origins

    101. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lots of you genetics-ignorant fools posting in this thread, like there always are.

      If you're actually interested in learning how genetically distinct ethnic Jews are (making them a known goldmine research population for geneticists like myself), even across the diaspora and compared to the other citizens of their latest location, read this comprehensive article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_studies_of_Jewish_origins

    102. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but Harry Ostrer's propaganda doesn't count as real research.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    103. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF is a 'decendent', you thick git?

    104. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >implying a distaste for a few of the citations out of dozens on that page invalidates the entire article and field consensus on a noncontroversial subject if you actually understand genetics

      Whatever, I'm in the field and I know I'm correct

      You can lead a fool to education, but ya can't make it learn
       

    105. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Again, there's no 'ethnic Jew'. You're confusing a few different things.

      There are Ashkenazis which you probably mean when you say 'ethnic Jew' but Ashkenazis are the ethnicity, Jewdaism is the religion. Are most Ashkenazis Jewish? Yes. But they are not one and the same. An Ashkenazi could be any religion, but will still genetically be an Ashkenazi. A Jew can be any ethnicity and come from any genetic background.

    106. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the fucking article. There IS a distinct "ethnic Jew" based solely on genetics, and both Askenazi and Sephardics fall into that category.

      Read the fucking article.

    107. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, you are quite correct. That is where free society comes in. In free society, the second factor is not a factor anymore and that is one of the most important reasons to fight for free society: The freedom to ignore others that believe they are entitled to dictate what you think and how you have to live.

      In the real world, it often comes down to a trade-off between what you lose if you resist religion and what you are actually willing to give up and this can be extreme. For example in some Theocracies, you are free to renounce the state-religion, but that carries a death-penalty. (Most religions had instances of that at some time in history, so no religion is really any better here...) Still, some people chose to not give religion power over their minds even under these extreme circumstances. It is a harsh choice, but it is a choice.

      Fortunately, a Theocracy is ultimately doomed to fail, just as any other form of Totalitarianism. It kills innovation, flexibility, economic resilience and sooner or later runs into changed conditions it cannot handle. That alone would already be a good idea to not have one, it is just not a viable model for a long-term prosperous (or surviving) society. Unfortunately, it can take a long time to reach the point of failure.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    108. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      one can take up judaism and become "jewish", then change that. the idea that a religion can be an ethnicity is kind of retarded. hmong people, that are actually cambodian, vietnamese, chinese, etc., also live by this fallacy.

    109. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It says "Auernheimer is a former Jew converted to Mormonism" but I think there's an extraneous letter.

    110. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a descendent without a spell-check, you obnoxious bellend.

    111. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why does it make your head hurt?

    112. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are free: every Pakistani is free to become a Muslim and every American is free to become a Christian. A few people escape the conditioning. Judaism is the religion, Jewish is the race.

    113. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not any more than Boston is racist against Irish these days. It might manifest itself in some small groups, but for the most part no one gives a fuck.

      --Mixed race Israeli who previously lived in Boston for just over 15 years.

    114. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by surd1618 · · Score: 1

      If I had mod points today I would put one here.
      I want to add, that there are several different physiological conditions where a person appears to be one gender, until they hit puberty, whereupon they 'turn' into the other. And then there's the people who decide they are the other sex than they appear to be, and even when it upsets or endangers their lives they consider it to be important enough to change that they do.

    115. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by houghi · · Score: 1

      So either I am black, because we all are descendants from Africa or Aboriginals are not black. Got it.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    116. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you saying I can't be a real woman?

      Yes. Hard objective evidence doesn't lie.

      I was born with a penis but consider myself female.

      And I sexually identify as an attack helicopter.

    117. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by TheReaperD · · Score: 1

      No, but, hitting them repeatedly with a clue by four can be very satisfying.

      --
      "Be particularly skeptical when presented with evidence confirming what you already believe." -
    118. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by TheReaperD · · Score: 1

      Yea, it's not as simple as I put it but, it's easier for people to digest. In reality, like most ancient ethnicities, they're so watered down by millennia of cross-breeding with other ethnicities anyway that the whole idea of ethnic identity is pointless at face value. Even if a family could prove that they're "pure," who the hell cares?

      --
      "Be particularly skeptical when presented with evidence confirming what you already believe." -
    119. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by TheReaperD · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. When I post as anonymous coward because I modded in a thread, I get my credit/loss even though my account information is not shown. But, I am logged in at the time and just check "Post Anonymously" box.

      --
      "Be particularly skeptical when presented with evidence confirming what you already believe." -
    120. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Being sexually interested in men or women doesn't necessarily correlate to feeling like you are a man or a woman. Apparently, this person felt that they were supposed to be a female, and felt that they were a female on the inside, but was interested in women still.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    121. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't make this shit up. So, is this scum bag in favor of hurting Jews? Can you imagine this savage telling Jews to go back to Isreal. Or saying that Jews killed Jesus.

    122. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Suppose my father is 1/2 Irish and 1/2 German and my mother is 1/2 Spanish and 1/2 French.
      I would be 1/4 Irish, 1/4 German, 1/4 Spanish and 1/4 French.
      This is how ethnicity works.

      Let's suppose that being Jewish is an ethnicity.
      Now suppose my mother is Jewish and my father is not Jewish at all.
      I would be 100% Jewish.
      That's not how ethnicities work. Therefore being Jewish is a religious thing.

      And it's impossible to renounce your Jewishness, so your identity is force upon you by a religion you may not believe in. Other jews will define you by it. It seems strange to me.

      Hold on, still trying to keep up with your logic here.

      So . . . if you weigh as much as a duck . . . wait, that can't be right.

    123. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by ABZB · · Score: 1

      Judaism defines itself as both a *nation* and a religion. The conversion process entails both adopting the religious practices & moral principles, as well as becoming a citizen of the Nation of Israel (the modern State of Israel is a separate entity, although it makes any Jew-by-religion a citizen as said individual desires via the right-of-return law). That said, use of conjugations of 'Jew' irks me, as proper name of nation is Bnei/Am Yisrael (children of Israel/nation of Israel, respectively). 'Jew' only became a thing sometime after the first exile period, as the vast majority of survivors were from tribe of Yehuda (yehudim), which morphed into Jew over language transfers. Unlike most nations, it does not recognize renunciation of citizenship. You might not pay your taxes, so to speak, but you're still a member. (If a convert does so, it does work, under retro-active assumption that initial conversion was not sincere). on the matrilineal descent - keep in mind that the 'codified date' of 2nd century CE is the date of the first published work, the pre-existing oral laws were written down, it is incorrect to assume that any such thing sprang into existence then. There are circumstantial evidences from some canonical texts, but nothing that works (well) outside of the axiom system of Judaism in any event. All said, I am the opposite of surprised, some of the worst, most destructive antisemites in history were (and are) self-hating Jews.

    124. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by zakeria · · Score: 1

      No, not unless you can somehow change your chromosomes

    125. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by partofthepuzzle · · Score: 1

      Aren't we confusing Judaism as a religion with the culture that surrounds it? A person can choose whether or not to be a member or follower of a religion. There are ethnic and cultural identities that are also historically linked to religions. Although I was raised in a Reform Jewish religious tradition (Bar Mitzvah, Confirmation, etc.) I have no interest in nor do I observe, follow, identify or believe in Judaism. I do have a cultural identity that is in part rooted in N.Y./N.J./Boston Ashkenaz Jewish culture. But I am not a Jew. If a person who was raised Catholic rejects the church and says they no longer want anything to do with it, don't people uually say that person is a former Catholic?

    126. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "clue by four"

      I see what you did there ...

    127. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by vandamme · · Score: 1

      Ethnicity, culture, and race are separate things. My wife has a relative who's adopted, and it's interesting to hear a little black girl speaking Flemish.

    128. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I was presenting myself as the absurd conclusion of the one-drop rule. One out of my sixty-four great-great-great-great-grandparents was black, and the other sixty-three of them were white, all of them and their children considered themselves of European / Euro-American ethnicity, and I look as white as white can be... but according to the one-drop rule I'm "black"! (With the additional twist that, as mitochondrial DNA is inherited matrilineally, and it was my mom's mom's mom's mom's mom's mom who was black, a mitochondrial DNA test of me just says I'm black, period).

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    129. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the Nazi is male and rich and powerful it is not as important as otherwise. There are historical examples I have run across in books.

    130. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by hucker75 · · Score: 1

      No, he's not Jewish. My Aunt used to be a Christian, and now she's an atheist. She is no longer a Christian.

    131. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      It actually made my head hurt to think about it.

      Errrr, why?

      Does your head hurt often when you think about what sexual activities other people have which don't involve you? That would be a pretty serious symptom if true. I'd get professionally tested if I were you - there could be all sorts of things wrong to cause that. A tumour, for starters.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    132. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      even when it upsets or endangers their lives they consider it to be important enough to change that they do.

      Having a friend who cut his cock off a couple of weeks ago ... that is so sore.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    133. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Unless every down-syndrome kid is making it up, then you have to admit that the brain effects how you act and perceive the world. So, on the far end of the spectrum, you have DS

      I get where you're coming from, but Down Syndrome isn't a good example to use. It's a binary state, not a spectrum. If you have triplication of chromosome 21, then you have Down Syndrome (a.k.a. "trisomy-21") ; if you don't have that particular chromosomal anomaly, then you don't have Down Syndrome. State of one or zero, not a spectrum.

      (I'm not aware if it is possible or impossible for one to have partial duplication of a chromosome, or what it's effects would be if it were possible. It would probably matter which individual genes were duplicated, which would make for a very complex suite of syndromes.)

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    134. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's not a toomahh"

    135. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by mt2mb4me · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, Down Syndrome was probably a bad choice. So, let's change it to Autism, or Bipolar disorder, or acromegaly, or blindness. The point still stands, there are people who suffer from different levels of functioning below "perfectly 'normal' and healthy" Brain functioning, and hormones have way more to do with who you are then what you tell yourself you are.

      here is another lame example, in my younger years, I went out drinking with some friends. One of my friends fell down a few steps because he was intoxicated. His immediate response was "I meant to do that" Clearly, he didn't, but his brain was still pushing the idea he was in complete control of the situation. I am pretty sure that our brain does its best to make sense of a situation, it acts as if it is control, when really, it is just logging errors.

      I need to lose weight, my nephew needs to gain weight. Skinny people like to say "hey have some self control" to us fatty. The reality is, my nephew eats till he is full, as do I. He doesn't get enough calories, and I get too many. Our brains are wired different, the more studies done the more it proves it. I have seen many many fatties loose tens if not hundreds of pounds, just to gain it all back a few years later. When your brain is calibrated a way, it is hard, if not impossible, to change it.

      That being said, unless someone was born inter sexed or had some other sexual amorality, I think reassignment surgery should wait till after puberty. Until your sexual organs mature, you don't really know how you will end up. An imbalance of estrogen at 5 could clear itself up by 18.

    136. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, Down Syndrome was probably a bad choice. So, let's change it to Autism, or Bipolar disorder, or acromegaly

      Better choices, more spectral diseases. Like I said, I get your point.

      The reality is, my nephew eats till he is full, as do I.

      That's the trick. Eat until you're not full.

      Get up from each meal unsatiated. Techniques such as simply choosing a smaller plate at the galley hatch can lose you a stone a trip. Eating a piece of fruit about an hour before the galley opens also helps (there's an EN_GB idiom about "don't go shopping when you're hungry" which addresses the same point).

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    137. Re:Apparently he can change his family tree! by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      "African American" isn't a religion. Judaism is.

    138. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      I agree with your basic premise, you should always wait until after puberty to do anything rash like sexual reassignment surgery. In fact I think you should wait until after puberty has completely run its course before you make any life changing decision.

      I will have to disagree on why your drunk fried said "I meant to do that" though. Being drunk did not make your fried dumb enough to actually believe that he meant to fall down the steps. It was an attempt to do one of three things:
      1. save face
      2. make fun of himself or the situation
      3. let you know that his is okay so that you aren't worried about him (by far the most likely)

    139. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      Nick?

    140. Re: Apparently he can change his family tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not so much irony as it is sensible to not log into my account at work.

  3. Admits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He posted on twitter before, during, and after the act.

    1. Re:Admits? by sumdumass · · Score: 2

      Good thing you said "act". What he did is hardly hacking unless we want to claim getting things to do what they were design to do hacking just because the owners had no clue they set it up to do it.

      Seriously. . Port scanning and sending a file is called a hack now?

    2. Re:Admits? by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      Seriously. . Port scanning and sending a file is called a hack now?

      On Slashdot? No. For the general public? Yes, probably. Heck, he used a Bash command! Anything today involving a command line is obviously "advanced computer use" for most people.

      Also, I'm sure you've seen plenty of articles in the past few years talking about "iPhone hacks" or "Kindle hacks" or whatever, which often involve little more than being able to hit the "advanced" button on some menu and select a different option. If it's not a clear button that appears on your home screen and shouts "Click Me!", it now seems to be a "hack" in general parlance.

      The word has become diluted significantly in meaning.

      Though, to be fair, the general public never really understood the distinction. A Bash script would always have been a mystery to most people. And the media has always been quick to use the word "hacker" whenever a nefarious computer deed has been done, regardless of the technical complexity involved, or whether any significant "cracking" of security features had been involved. I've seen people who have downloaded files unintentionally made available on the public internet branded as "hackers" in news articles if they then make that information available (and if it's embarrassing to someone).

  4. Printer with public internet ip? why? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Printer with public internet ip? why?

    1. Re:Printer with public internet ip? why? by Obfuscant · · Score: 5, Informative
      Because they got connected to a network and nobody thought about how the data was getting to them. The admins made it easy to connect, using DHCP to grant them addresses and not being in tight control of every attached device. Notice that most of the targets (all?) were universities.

      Except some places. Here, for example, the admin blocks access to known printers at the router.

      But this was not "hacking a printer". It was using a publicly available printer for the purpose it was designed to do. It took no intelligence to do this, no modification to the printers, only a brute force scan of the net for addresses with an open port 9100. Yawn. Very impressive.

    2. Re:Printer with public internet ip? why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But this was not "hacking a printer". It was using a publicly available printer for the purpose it was designed to do.

      Exactly, yet I still presume some prosecutor will file a boatload of criminal charges over this incident. Sooner or later, people have to be responsible for their own security. If you hook up a printer to the internet and configure it to accept jobs from the entire world, you pretty much deserve to have a few swastikas and dickbutts being printed out.

    3. Re:Printer with public internet ip? why? by msauve · · Score: 3, Informative

      DHCP doesn't mean the IP isn't fixed (they can use static leases), and many universities have large IP blocks, so they don't use RFC1918 addresses.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    4. Re:Printer with public internet ip? why? by Gumbercules!! · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Many years ago I worked in a University. All devices, printers included, had public IP addresses (and open ports). It was a hang-over from a previous time, when that was just how the uni set things up and deeply tied into the internet billing (charge by the byte) system the uni had. I was only a lowly desktop guy at the time but it was still a real problem for us. Every desktop PC, server, printer, whatever had a public IP. To block any ports, and I am being fully serious here, required approval from the university senate. Not an IT group - a bunch of arts lecturers and student guild type people. And they equated "blocking ports" with "censoring the internet". So absolutely every time we tried to change things, senate voted it down and we were stuck, for many years, with only ports for SMB blocked - every other port was open. To the world. On all our devices. We were allowed firewalls on devices like PCs - but that's not so easy on a printer.

      Every morning we had to restart every printer with a HP jet direct (and many times during the day) because it turns out of you port scan an old jet direct, it hangs. We'd also have to leave printer trays open over night, so they couldn't just waste printer paper all night long, printing NIMBDA crap. We used to find that if you installed Windows on a PC or server with the NIC connected, it was literally infected before the installation was complete (truly).

    5. Re:Printer with public internet ip? why? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Because people are stupid. And I do not mean users, I mean the sysadmin that configured the printer with a public IP or allowed it to get one from the DHCP server. An ordinary user would at least have some level of valid excuse...

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    6. Re:Printer with public internet ip? why? by turbidostato · · Score: 5, Informative

      "DHCP hands out internet ip's?"

      DHCP will hand you out whatever IP address it is configured to. Why do you think it would work any different?

      "WTF why"

      If you mean, technically, the right question would be WTF not? If you are asking why some institution would manage public IP addresses that way, that's because universities got into the Internet thingie quite soon and quite a lot of them got B classes and they assigned public IP addresses just to any single device that required and IP (there was no NAT and basically no need for that back then) and some of that management has percolated to present day.

      "why not give printers fixed IP's"

      Because back then, it worked basically in a self management way; once IT departments started to appear, they were usually less capable and less available than the self-management they were meant to substitute so in order to both avoid back-pressure and allow things being done, in many situations they ended up going for the less resistance path -any way, the one that gave them less work, and so you end up with a DHCP environment both giving public IP addresses and no assignations (and usually only minor segmentation).

      Now, go off my lawn.

    7. Re:Printer with public internet ip? why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Printer with public internet ip? why?

      Because at least one of those universities (the one i worked at) had EVERYONE on publicly accessible IP's including printers. Printers were all default settings. I tried to ask questions about the sanity of this and was brushed off because "well if someone who's working from home wants to print to their dept printer, we need to let them do that." Every god damned machine had a +15 character 31337 password and yet they did cheeseball shit like changing the default RDP port, allowing every twit to RDP from home, never changing passwords, not enforcing strong passwords for users, and emphasizing security through obscurity. When i suggested VPN, they acted as though i just insulted their mothers dog and fed me BS about "there's no budget for someone to setup and maintain that".

      Leaving that black hole was the best career move i could have made despite the crummy benefits package i now have.

      Posting as AC because i used to work for one of those mentioned in the summary.

    8. Re:Printer with public internet ip? why? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      They can't be on the DMZ. Most likely he guessed and "walked" (war dialed) the internal private IP range of 192.168.1.x and attempted port 9100. OTOH, firewalls are SPI at the least so I'm not sure how he pulled that off. The fact the private IP assigned was static or dynamic doesn't matter with regards to this ability.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    9. Re:Printer with public internet ip? why? by radicimo · · Score: 1

      >only a brute force scan of the net for addresses with an open port 9100

      Still giving him too much credit. Probably just searched in Shodan for those addresses.

      --
      100 REM PISS OFF CODE FASCISTS 200 GOTO 100
    10. Re:Printer with public internet ip? why? by radicimo · · Score: 2

      My bad. Actually he articulates in the article using masscan and not Shodan.

      --
      100 REM PISS OFF CODE FASCISTS 200 GOTO 100
    11. Re:Printer with public internet ip? why? by zenlessyank · · Score: 1

      Invisible mod points applied.... Thank you for the laugh. It has been a while since I have been in that kind of environment. It is unreal how many non-IT people are in charge of the most important aspects. The only thing worse than University network play callers are in the medical realm. Doctors think they are God over EVERYTHING and when you combine university AND medical facilities.....hang on to your sanity.

    12. Re:Printer with public internet ip? why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At USC, they have a class A address space, and a policy that requires that you not evade per-port billing fees by using NAT. So per-policy, you must put you printer as well as expensive, highly insecure Windows based sequencing machines directly on the Internet, which you get to have re-imaged by the vendor as often as they'll visit. They do protect you at the campus level by blocking outbound port 25, so USC doesn't look like direct spammers.

    13. Re:Printer with public internet ip? why? by adri · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the university I worked at! One /16 for everyone.

    14. Re:Printer with public internet ip? why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many universities are using public IPs for all devices since they have large allocations (and that's how internet was supposed to work). Firewalls are used to deny incoming connections, but apparently they had misconfigured theirs.

    15. Re:Printer with public internet ip? why? by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Precisely. I (and many others) used to print our assignments that way, issuing a print command from home, then picking up the paper later in the day. 'Hack' my ass. It is no more a hack than posting a comment on an open public forum with anonymous access.

    16. Re:Printer with public internet ip? why? by antdude · · Score: 2

      I remember when my friends' employers have their computers, printers, etc. wide open online. You could send winnuke, print requests, netshare, etc. It was crazy! :O

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    17. Re:Printer with public internet ip? why? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      At one time printers were extremely expensive. These most likely still are and are not the brother desktop variety but more like the document center types. Anyways because of the expense the printers were shared between departments usually on different subnets which would require routable addresses for the printers.

    18. Re:Printer with public internet ip? why? by Kvathe · · Score: 3, Funny

      From the email I received last week:

      "The University’s Office of Equal Opportunity and Access and Bias Response Team are investigating hateful anti-Semitic fliers that were sent Friday, March 25, to several networked print and FAX devices. Other universities across the country also have reported receiving similar fliers."

      I'd be much more impressed if they had IT investigating.

    19. Re: Printer with public internet ip? why? by shitzu · · Score: 1

      "Fixed" as opposed to what? I give out all my fixed ip's through dhcp. Its much easier to manage and everything is in a single plaece.

      The question here is why the printers are accessible through the internet.

      I myself have printed out many hefty manuals on the modern wifi printers that have been left with factory settings with public printing. I never considered that "hacking" though. It is strange what nowadays passes as "hacking".

    20. Re: Printer with public internet ip? why? by shitzu · · Score: 1

      You throw around nice terms like "walk" and "spi" having no clue of network architecture and how ip actually works. Stateful package inspection has no relevance to inability to pass NAT to the internal network. It requires a reverse NAT action from their router to reach inside.

      Also you assume that the printers were on private ip range and NATted - which they probably were not.

    21. Re: Printer with public internet ip? why? by shitzu · · Score: 2

      In most likelyhood of a HP variety. Or something behind a jetdirect print server. If i remember correctly 9100 is HP proprietary standard although some other manufacturers have now started to listen to it.

    22. Re: Printer with public internet ip? why? by shitzu · · Score: 1

      Sysadmins have assigned public ip, because that is how it works in a uni. There is no NAT. NAT is a hack for the puny humans who do not have /16 ip blocks lying around. So assigning an ip from a private ip range would not work at all...

      Also it is not at all stupid to assign said public ips with dhcp. On the contrary - it is very smart.

      However it was stupid to allow public access from the internet to said ip addresses.

      And it is stupid to assume that all networks are like your network at home.

    23. Re:Printer with public internet ip? why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Printer with public internet ip? why?

      Because they got their ip block in a time when there were many more adresses available than anyone needed. so they still have more adresses than they need, and don't need any stupid NAT or stupid "private addresses". Seems they could need a very simple firewall though - getting the same level of security as NAT offers is easy - just drop those UDP and TCP+SYN packets coming in from the outside.

      When ipv6 gets more traction, this will be the state for all. No NAT anymore, no need for it. Everything in the world on public adressable ip's as it should be.

    24. Re:Printer with public internet ip? why? by houghi · · Score: 1

      I often hear when a simple hack happens is that is was very easy to do and not a chalange at all. To me that does not make it less scary, it makes it more scary.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    25. Re:Printer with public internet ip? why? by swb · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure this is how it worked at the University I worked for, although I left before even dialup IP was widespread.

      But we did have a giant Appletalk internetwork and a friend and I always wondered how much campus infamy we could create by printing smut all over campus through all of the many LaserWriters visible on the the Appletalk network.

      The downside was that printing was relatively slow and while waiting to print I think you could see some kind of computername and zone name of the user who was currently printing, making it uncomfortably non-anonymous. We didn't know of any way to schedule or script printing jobs, either on MacOS v6 computers, so doing it off hours when there was less chance of someone wondering who was using their printer wasn't an option, either.

      What's surprising is that we don't hear about this happening very often with IP printers. Either most are firewalled or nobody has thought to do it. Although you would think that the same idiots behind fax spamming would have considered this as well.

      I've often toyed with the idea of making my printer publicly printable -- toss 5 sheets of paper in the tray, enable it for a few days and see what happens. My general fear has been rather than get someone's screed or porn, I would just get 5 pages of garbage printed due to printer language issues.

    26. Re:Printer with public internet ip? why? by Vermonter · · Score: 1

      Assuming this "hacker" didn't bypass any security protocols, then he should be charged with something like the internet equivalent of trespassing, not the equivalent of breaking and entering.

    27. Re: Printer with public internet ip? why? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      You throw around nice terms like "walk" and "spi" having no clue of network architecture and how ip actually works.

      Thanks for being a dick.

      But to respond to your comment directly; yes, I assume that the printer is on a private ip. Why not? Who in the fuck puts client devices on the internet these days??!! It's just back practice all around. I'm not saying it can't happen, but in my professional experience with the SMB market, NAT implies extra client address space as well as implicit security. Of course, having a firewall functionality (SPI minimum) provides explicit protection. With regards to SPI, I'm of the understanding that you can't pass NAT traffic from outside in unless the client in the private IP subnet requests an open connection; otherwise the traffic is dropped. Is that not the case?

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    28. Re:Printer with public internet ip? why? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      DHCP hands out internet ip's?

      Of course, or did you think the internet consisted of plug in your modem + magic?

      WTF why and why not give printers fixed IP's works better for a lot of stuff.

      If you had a public routeable IP address pool why would you screw up your network infrastructure and not use it?

      I have 5 public IP addresses. The only reason my printer is not on the internet is because I have 7 devices. Now a more important question is where was the firewall and the network security. This is something that is 100% independent of your IP address.

    29. Re:Printer with public internet ip? why? by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      Well as others have pointed out you certainly can assign static IPs via DHCP. Usually you say this "MAC address gets this IP" in the vernacular of whatever configuration method your server software uses.

      IPv6 will ultimately help with this but in the IPv4 world I am of the opinion that basically nothing other than routers (and devices performing similar functions) and DNS servers should have hard coded 'fixed' addresses on a well designed network. Which is not say that lots of other servers and resources should not have static address assigned via DHCP, you probably don't want the mail server 'moving'.

        That said subnets sometimes have to change.

      Life is better when you can update all the Ip address in one place and then just reboot everything or send a renew command to the old addresses. You can also check all the leases when finished to make sure everything important actually got its new address and nothing was missed. The first time you change the subnets a 150 person department exists on Saturday afternoon you will be glad its all DHCP. Because I can tell you if even one printer does not respond Monday morning someone is going scream!

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    30. Re: Printer with public internet ip? why? by shitzu · · Score: 1

      You're welcome.

      My point is that SPI is totally irrelevant on accessing NATted private IPs from outside. The router drops the packets from outside not because of SPI, but because it has no instruction what to do with those packets. If you try going around calling your opinions "professional", you should know that.

      As far as private ips are concerned - it is quite obvious from the article that the printers had public ips. Universities put them on public ips. That in itself is not a bad practice as they have no shortage of ip addresses like the rest of us. Bad practice is leaving them open to internet.

      Also - if you are "of the understanding that you can't pass NAT traffic from outside", how do you propose that they "guessed and "walked" (war dialed) the internal private IP range of 192.168.1.x and attempted port 9100" as you so elegantly put it?

    31. Re:Printer with public internet ip? why? by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this is a lot like "hacking" your neighbor's unsecured WiFi or the Facebook account someone left signed in at the library.

      My first thought on reading the summary was that somebody's going to do the same thing with unsecured, publicly accessible 3D printers, and we'll see a story about hundreds of 3D printers around the world spontaneously printing dildos.

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
    32. Re: Printer with public internet ip? why? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      My point is that SPI is totally irrelevant on accessing NATted private IPs from outside. The router drops the packets from outside not because of SPI, but because it has no instruction what to do with those packets

      So you're saying forged packets aren't broadcasted in the open? I've seen plenty of firewall rules where the source from = public IP to destination = private IP. That could be internal 192.168.x.x or 10.x.x.x. Obviously, if that private IP subnet doesn't exist, there won't be a route for it.

      Also - if you are "of the understanding that you can't pass NAT traffic from outside", how do you propose that they "guessed and "walked" (war dialed) the internal private IP range of 192.168.1.x and attempted port 9100" as you so elegantly put it?

      Forged packets? I suppose HP printers will attempt communication via DNS lookup to the outside (because of all those stupid silly feature services for ease of access). I haven't confirmed this however. But as a precaution, I always statically assign MFP devices outside of DHCP scope with no DNS settings in the IP configuration. If they need to scan-to-e-mail, I'll just relay internally via IP instead of hostname to a server specifically designated for relaying SMTP traffic back out via an email Smart Host.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    33. Re: Printer with public internet ip? why? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      I've seen plenty of firewall rules

      Correction, I meant firewall logs.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    34. Re:Printer with public internet ip? why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every desktop PC, server, printer, whatever had a public IP. To block any ports, and I am being fully serious here, required approval from the university senate.

      That is awesome. It's almost like they actually believe the Internet should be an even playing field for everyone.

      When I got Dorm Ethernet in the 90s, I also got a real IP. When I started hosting my own email, the "security officer" decided it was a "network management issue" and told me to stop. I refused, because she was just making up policies she couldn't point to. I later found out through friends she had tried to get my port shut down, but the Residence Halls were paying for the port, and they didn't back her up, so my email stayed up. 3 university.

      Even this "hack" is beautiful, in a way. I wonder how many of the universities will respond to it by closing the "security problem". Unfortunately a printer is probably too full of 0-days to belong on the Internet, and now that weev has paved the way there'll be spam problems, but I'd still rather my children go to the university who decides the correct response to this is Nothing.

    35. Re:Printer with public internet ip? why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When ipv6 gets more traction, this will be the state for all. No NAT anymore, no need for it.

      Nonsense. Comcast, being the greedy fucks that they are, will surely continue to charge you for multiple IP addresses. Even with IPv6.

      NAT will be going nowhere.

    36. Re:Printer with public internet ip? why? by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      I would be willing to bet that non-firewalled printers with public IPs have stuff spewing out of them all the time.

      It is just the hate speech that has made this news.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    37. Re: Printer with public internet ip? why? by goarilla · · Score: 1

      Actually it's 2 different but closely related HP technologies.
      First it was an expensive addon network module that gave network printing capabilities (LPD and later IPP as well) to HP's printers.
      Later it also became a HP network service that listens on port 9100
      This brings forth a confusing situation where you have to setup the JetDirect module on old printers (HP 4250) to be able to networkprint non JetDirect protocols :S.

    38. Re: Printer with public internet ip? why? by shitzu · · Score: 1

      You should really read up on some networking.

      So you're saying forged packets aren't broadcasted in the open? I've seen plenty of firewall rules where the source from = public IP to destination = private IP. That could be internal 192.168.x.x or 10.x.x.x. Obviously, if that private IP subnet doesn't exist, there won't be a route for it.

      You are misguided if you think that just setting a private ip as a destination address the packet would reach from the internet to a NATted LAN. The router only routes packets to NATted subnets for which there are NAT entries - either from configuration or dynamic port mappings that usually are generated from NATting outgoing traffic. It would be dropped even without the SPI.

      Forged packets? I suppose HP printers will attempt communication via DNS lookup to the outside (because of all those stupid silly feature services for ease of access).

      Do you mean that the attacker would forge packets to printer's tcp port 9100 as a forged answer to its outgoing DNS requests? That would again not work, as there is no NAT mapping in the router to printer's address port 9100 as a result of its DNS request unless the DNS request originated from port 9100...

    39. Re:Printer with public internet ip? why? by khz6955 · · Score: 1

      "Many years ago I worked in a University. All devices, printers included, had public IP addresses (and open ports). It was a hang-over from a previous time"

      I recall a distributed campus of up to twenty locations, where the printers were connected through Novell Netware servers running on IPX and they had no such problem. Then they 'upgraded' to Win NT :(

    40. Re: Printer with public internet ip? why? by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 1

      I work at one of the universities that got "hacked". We do have NAT--any university that hands out thousands of IPs to student devices connecting over wireless has NAT--but we also have tons of legacy systems and admins who can't be bothered to lock things down properly. Hopefully this gave some of them a kick in the ass.

      --
      Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
    41. Re:Printer with public internet ip? why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is not the public IP. I work at an institution where every single device gets a public IP, and there's nothing exposed. You see, there's this thing called "a firewall"....

    42. Re:Printer with public internet ip? why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back in the days when ethernet was 10Mbps you did not want your print traffic going up the building fiber to your
      router, and back down to the building, and you could not afford L3 closet switches (nowadays you generally don't
      bother with L3 switches and just throw bandwidth at the problem.) Anyway, that addressing stays in
      place, because it would take a relatively tedious initiative involving multiple departments to move all the print
      queues, for no perceivable benefit.

      Instead we try to get the printers to do it with internal firewalls, but the firmware there is somewhat deficient. So
      as a backup we have a list of printer IPs in the firewall. But then that list needs to get synced, and not all printers
      are administered by a central authority.

      The news reports are a bit overblown though. At a good number of these places, only a few stray printers which
      had slipped through the cracks got hit, out of hundreds.

    43. Re: Printer with public internet ip? why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But to respond to your comment directly; yes, I assume that the printer is on a private ip. Why not? Who in the fuck puts client devices on the internet these days??!!

      Universities. Plug something in to the network, get a routable IP. They're changing, some faster than others, but in my experience, even firewalls are a relatively recent imposition from campus IT structures. Faculty want to be able to collaborate, which often means a server for data sharing, testing, or whatever else, and aren't often patient with the IT work-study student manning the help desk.

      Campus-wide firewall only showed up here about 8 years ago, after someone hacked a random admin computer and used it to break into the registrar's billing system. Any random device plugged into a port still gets a routable IP without any authentication, but most of the incoming traffic will be filtered.

    44. Re:Printer with public internet ip? why? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      But it was 'on a computer,' so the sentence automatically gains a few years.

    45. Re:Printer with public internet ip? why? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Back in the dialup days, I used to port scan the nearby range for any computer with netbios open - pretty common when windows 98 was still new. Then I'd leave text files on people's desktops telling them to fix it before someone worse than me stumbles in and steals all their data or wipes their computer for a laugh.

    46. Re:Printer with public internet ip? why? by antdude · · Score: 1

      Hahaha. I remember my friends sent messages on screens and printers. :D

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    47. Re:Printer with public internet ip? why? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Funny. If you do not filter it in a firewall, the problem _is_ the public IP. The firewall is a follow-up measure you use to make it secure again and the sysadmins in question quite obviously failed to do so. Stop defending them, they messed up.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    48. Re:Printer with public internet ip? why? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      the internal private IP range of 192.168.1.x

      My god, man ... you've just provided the information to hack almost every router on the planet.

      You're going to jail for being a terrorist!! :-P

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    49. Re:Printer with public internet ip? why? by skids · · Score: 1

      At least in their BETA program, I believe you get a block. In fact the IPv6 address space is so large, core ISP routers do not generally carry routes below block level, and although the autoconf features in IPv6 are a complete farce which should never be actually used, they do serve an unwitting purpose in preventing subnetting below a certain mask on a technical level.

    50. Re:Printer with public internet ip? why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did some contract work at Nortel back in the day. World-wide AppleTalk network: I could choose a printer in Tokyo from Canada if I wanted. Of course actually doing that and printing stuff out not in your own department was frowned upon! :D

    51. Re:Printer with public internet ip? why? by skids · · Score: 1

      the problem _is_ the public IP

      Ridiculous. If discrete firewalls are follow-up measures to anything, it is a poor host firewall/OS/application security. There is absolutely nothing wrong with running a public IP.

      Post-IPv6 the only place you'll find any NAT is in complicated cloud NOCs that were leveraging some of its more esoteric properties.

      As to the sysadmins, well, we could chase every stupid printer an independent department orders and plugs into the wall, but we'd get fired for falling behind on other initiatives if we wasted our time on that.

    52. Re:Printer with public internet ip? why? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Your level of not-understanding is fascinating. Of course, a properly firewalled IP is not public anymore. Or are you maybe confusing "public IP" and "non-private IP"? The former is Internet-reachable, the latter gets routed in the Internet when packets are sent to it, but it may well be not public because there is a firewall in-between that filters it. That would mean you have trouble distinguishing between what range an IP is from and whether the Internet transports packets to a specific IP address up to the border of some access network. Is that it?

      Or maybe you are unfamiliar with the concepts of "default-open" and "default-closed"? A public IP is a default-open approach and needs to be explicitly isolated from the Internet by additional measures to make it non-reachable. A private IP address is default-closed because it only becomes Internet-reachable with additional measures (e.g. static NAT).

      Seriously, if you are confused about these ideas, you have no business being in this discussion. But I suspect you are just intentionally trolling.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    53. Re: Printer with public internet ip? why? by skids · · Score: 1

      Usually when you see martian sources on packets coming in from an ISP it's just that ISP's internal private addresses on their own equipment leaking out. However some ISPs do not correctly filter so you can get 3rd-party martian sources. You'll rarely ever see a martian destination since the ISP has no reason to install a route to a private network pointing towards you in their table. When that happens there has probably been some major screwups on the BGP level on both ends, assuming you peer. Also a lot of DPI firewalls will log the source and destination backwards if the packet matches a filter for a return packet and they do not bother checking whether a session actually exists before doing so, so what you're actually seeing is a privately addressed destination trying to leave the network (which, if you don't handle in the routing tables, should really be kiled at the edge firewall or failing that, by a competent ISP.)

      These printers were on public IPs. In the typical case there was a firewall in place but the job of getting the IP of that printer installed in the firewall, or getting the host firewall on the printer configured, got bungled on a small handful of them. I know here every once in a while when the contractor that provides the printer shows up they do a firmware upgrade and accidentally wipe the device configuration, then realize they screwed up and ham-fist it back together again, whether host firewall policies survive that ordeal is a crap shoot.

    54. Re: Printer with public internet ip? why? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Do you mean that the attacker would forge packets to printer's tcp port 9100 as a forged answer to its outgoing DNS requests? That would again not work, as there is no NAT mapping in the router to printer's address port 9100 as a result of its DNS request unless the DNS request originated from port 9100...

      No, I was thinking along the lines that the printer wouldn't have a reason to initiate a connection to the outside unless it has the means to do so. In that case, a public IP for HP ePrint via the cloud. By not providing DNS servers to lookup a hostname, the printer can't resolve the public IP and thus wouldn't initiate a connection. But I do see your point about ports. In the case of ePrint, it would be ports 80, 443, 5222, and 5223.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    55. Re:Printer with public internet ip? why? by skids · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the chuckle. I'm a professional in the industry. Public IPs get used all the time, where the institution is not address-poor. The proper way to administer a default-closed network is to put in a firewall that is default-closed and then only put in rules for allowed traffic, whether or not you are NATting some of your clients. NAT adds zero security over a proper firewall. Less so now than it used to, but it actually hurts visibility into security investigations by adding an unnecessary layer of indirection. Fortunately there is better reporting these days. In my particular sector, however, some of our users are tech veterans used to being allowed to run services themselves, rather than go to a third party for servers, so that just does not fly. Instead we have to wage a campaign of attrition where we slowly remove inbound access from small segments during office moves and see who complains.

      I don't know where you learned "non-private IP" == firewalled IP, maybe in a class, or is Cisco trying to control the vocabulary again with their silly certifications? In the general vernacular, Public == non-Private.

    56. Re:Printer with public internet ip? why? by qubezz · · Score: 1

      Much more fun to drop a bunch of fart noises into the startup folder and then winnuke the machine

    57. Re:Printer with public internet ip? why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not DHCP being the culprit, it's UPNP. The printer has a built-in server to accept print jobs and is UPNP-enabled. The router is also UPNP-enabled. This grants the printer access from outside the LAN because admins failed to turn off default options. It's foolish, but not as stupid as an admin having to explicitly port-forward and then wonder why his printer's been 'hacked'.

    58. Re:Printer with public internet ip? why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your a little wrong here. First printer are given static addresses even on a LAN. A client machine needs to be able to find the printer and if it is using DHCP that address will change thus making the client not being able to find the printer. Your clients use DHCP but anything that is serving a service to the network must have a static address.

      For these printers to be on the public network some stupid lazy Sysadmin had to poke a hole through the firewall for port 9100. In a secure setup you would need to connect to the internal network through a VPN in order to print. Yes I have seen this before. It all comes from being lazy or just plain stupid.

      The best cure for this is to send 999 copies of a 8"x11" BLACK jpeg to the printer. After spending a few 100 dollars on toner they finally will take the thing off of the public network.

      You are right THIS IS NOT! A HACK. This is no more than viewing a web page or sending an email. Maybe spam but not a hack.

    59. Re:Printer with public internet ip? why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he shouldn't be charged with anything. Some people set up their printers to accept print jobs from anywhere. Why would printing to them be a crime?

    60. Re:Printer with public internet ip? why? by uniquegeek · · Score: 1

      Universities typically own large groupings of public IPs as they were the first places to have them. It's a legacy thing.

      If this happened 20 years ago, it wouldn't be as surprising. The fact that many devices are STILL public now is disturbing. The problem is either political, or a result of poor planning.

    61. Re:Printer with public internet ip? why? by uniquegeek · · Score: 1

      To me, this is more indicative of a bigger problem that needs to be fixed.

      Either an IT person becomes an IT manager with no management training, or a Management person becomes an IT manager with no IT training. Head honchos above this position typically don't have IT training.

      All below that are (mostly) skilled technical people, who aren't allowed to use their technical expertise to solve a technical problem because the people above them are either incapable of understanding, or let the ego of their own position prevent people from doing their job. This leaves IT people both not allowed to do their work AND getting the blame when it goes wrong.

      If accountants were constantly told to not follow basic accounting principles, how do you think that would go over?

      How do we get business and managers to start taking us seriously?

  5. Yawn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spamming open printers is a high school-level, skiddy prank, at best.

  6. News at 11 by OzPeter · · Score: 1

    Asshole acts like asshole

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    1. Re:News at 11 by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      I don't blame this guy. Sure, he's got extreme views, but he has done all those companies a great service by showing them how UTTERLY STUPID THEY ARE by allowing public access to their printers.

    2. Re: News at 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assholery apologist spotted.

    3. Re:News at 11 by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      I don't blame this guy. Sure, he's got extreme views, but he has done all those companies a great service by showing them how UTTERLY STUPID THEY ARE by allowing public access to their printers.

      Lets try a simple thought exercise. Would you also not blame this guy if instead of sending out anti-Semitic messages he instead sent out naked pics of you jerking off to bestiality porn while on a business trip to a very conservative location?

      After all its the fact that he could send his message and not the content of the message that is important according to you.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    4. Re:News at 11 by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      It could have been worse. I remember when something like this happened at work (for very similar reasons) except whoever was doing it was sending seemingly unlimited jobs that would run through entire reams of paper and eat through toner, so when you'd get to work in the morning there'd be a huge stack of wasted paper. This is pretty damned childish, but he could have done worse by inverting the image so it was mostly printing black and had it spit out thousands of copies.

      Got fixed quickly enough and it's not a difficult fix either, but I suspect that a lot of people leave them open because someone has some kind of special set up that they just need to print that for whatever reason won't play nicely with a particular set up and if they happen to be important enough (or complain enough to someone actually important who just wants to stop hearing from them) then IT usually just gets stuck making it work even if it's not following best practices.

    5. Re:News at 11 by RuffMasterD · · Score: 1

      Yeah, he did some real good public service there. We should give him a fucking Nobel prize for service to the community or something \s

      What next? Stab people to teach them a lesson for being so utterly stupid by not wearing stab proof vests in public? Burn peoples houses down to teach them a lesson for being so utterly stupid by not installing sprinkler systems? Put cyanide in the municipal water supply to teach everyone a lesson for being so utterly stupid by not installing cyanide detectors in the municipal water processing plant? Blow up a dam to teach people downstream a lesson for being so utterly stupid for living downstream of a dam? Same dumb-ass logic.

      --
      Human Rights, Article 12: Freedom from Interference with Privacy, Family, Home and Correspondence
    6. Re:News at 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't blame this guy. Sure, he's got extreme views, but he has done all those companies a great service by showing them how UTTERLY STUPID THEY ARE by allowing public access to their printers.
      Flag as Inappropriate

      If I leave my wallet on a table of a cafe, I'm a bloody idiot.

      If you take the wallet, you are a fucking thief.

      Simple, innit?

    7. Re:News at 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, I'm happy he did this. I've been trying to get the University where I work to take this seriously. Since he did this, they're now taking it seriously and have made the necessary changes. I would actually thank him if I could. He accomplished in a day what I've been trying to do for months (ever since *I* discovered it - and I haven't been here that long).

    8. Re:News at 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that what you describe is a crime. What he did was not a crime.

      If you send TEXT that accuses someone of jerking off to beastiality porn then you're fine as long as it is true. If you send an IMAGE of someone jerking off to beastiality porn without their permission then you're fucked. Like Gawker vs. Hulk Hogan fucked... like $140 million fucked. And that's before the criminal obscenity charges start pouring in for distributing obscenity.

    9. Re:News at 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing you just said is remotely relevant here. He didn't ask what was legal, he asked what his personal level of offense would be. Kinda like me asking whether you'd prefer a calm reasoned discussion of differing view points, or for me to come over to your house and beat the living shit out of you.

  7. blackmail can be done as well by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    If you don't pay me 1K I will print page after page of pure LINES the ink costs will be more then the 1K

  8. Why? by BoRegardless · · Score: 1

    There are a lot of incompetent IT departments who never have pen tests.

    1. Re:Why? by Rhys · · Score: 2

      You've clearly never worked in higher ed. Very Important Professors like to hand a (grad) student a printer and tell them to "set it up" -- by which they mean plug it in, find an IP it can sit on (probably squatting on someone else's but who cares it mostly works), install it on the prof's machine, and get back to that research said student is supposed to be doing.

      You will note the IT folks were never involved in this sequence.

      --
      Slashdot Patriotism: We Support our Dupes!
    2. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've clearly never worked in higher ed. Very Important Professors like to hand a (grad) student a printer and tell them to "set it up" -- by which they mean plug it in, find an IP it can sit on (probably squatting on someone else's but who cares it mostly works), install it on the prof's machine, and get back to that research said student is supposed to be doing.

      You will note the IT folks were never involved in this sequence.

      I have four classes to teach, assignments to grade, apply for grants for my research why the f++k would I care about a printer?

    3. Re:Why? by uniquegeek · · Score: 1

      Or if they were, the Very Important Prof had a hissy fit, and a manager with no IT background told someone how it would be done.

  9. In other words, Weev is a self-hating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trump supporter

    1. Re:In other words, Weev is a self-hating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for reminding several people that trump exist and that they should vote him if they want to fuck the government real good.

  10. I did this like 20 years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But different types of messages. Good stuff.

  11. Not a hack by mattyj · · Score: 1

    I wish people would stop calling this guy a hacker. He just walked through an unlocked door. Hardly breaking and entering.

    Entering, maybe, but not breaking. Not a hack.

    Well, what he did wasn't a hack, but what he is may be considered a hack.

  12. "white nationalist"....former jew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The reason why Auernheimer chose to do this is rooted in his personal history. Back in 2010, while a member of the Goatse Security group, Auernheimer exposed a flaw in a public AT&T server to Gawker Media before telling AT&T about it. This incident led to the exposure of details about 114,000 iPad users.

    FBI indicted Auernheimer, who was later sentenced to 41 months in jail, during which time he joined a "white nationalist" movement. Ironically, Auernheimer is a former jew converted to Mormonism.

    lol.

  13. Are local printers fair game to print to under the by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    Are local network printers in a public place fair game to print to under the law?

    I know of libraries where you have to pay to print and they have some kind of card / coin system hooked to the printers and copiers.

    Some hotels have free printers in the guest areas some even have them on the guest network.

      DePaul University seems to have pay printing with 3rd party software?

    But will the printers just show up in windows add printers just by it doing an local network printer scan? Now what if you are at a place with pay printing or printers that use some kind of AD lockdown / windows based pay printing but you don't know that (say they have free wifi) and windows just auto finds the printer / jet direct card did you just brake the law?

  14. Basement-bound man-child thinks he's clever by WheezyJoe · · Score: 2

    The 80's called... they want their prank back.

    --
    Take it easy, Charlie, I've got an Angle...
    1. Re:Basement-bound man-child thinks he's clever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 80's called? Did you warn them??!

    2. Re:Basement-bound man-child thinks he's clever by cas2000 · · Score: 1

      No, I didn't. Fuck 'em, they deserve it. For https://www.youtube.com/watch?... and many other atrocities.

  15. Not exactly an accurate summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ironically, the hacker is a former Jew turned neo-nazi while incarcerated for a questionable "hacking" incident when he revealed to Gawker that ATT had failed to protect one of their servers.

    He wasn't incarcerated simply for 'revealing' the problems with ATT's lousy security. He was incarcerated because he took advantage of the problems to download as much information as possible on other customers. Not the same thing.

    If I leave my car unlocked on a city street, I'm an idiot. If you steal it, you are still a thief. It seems like the same principle applies to his latest exploit.

    1. Re:Not exactly an accurate summary by KGIII · · Score: 1

      That depends on where you live, sort of. Principally, they're still a thief but, if the car is running or the keys are in the ignition then it's "Unauthorized use of a motor vehicle." Well, that depends on where you live but in at least three jurisdictions that's the law as far as I understand it.

      They're still going to prison but it's a different crime. There's also grand theft, which means it was a value greater than a certain amount, and amount that varies by jurisdiction - or so I'm given to understand.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  16. "hacking a printer" maybe the pay system by just by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    "hacking a printer" maybe the pay system by just useing the open door to get past it.

    Now let's say an hotel has payed breakfast but it's some what hidden as where that is listed and there is no on at the wide open door to the breakfast room and no system to stop people from useing the door at all?

  17. Re:ethics in journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    For someone who seems to hate that movement a lot, you sure seem to post about frequently when it has nothing to do with story.

    I'm further reminded of a post of yours from the other day in a different story. Let's see if you can spot the logical fallacy in your own comment.

  18. Re:meaningless by mi · · Score: 1

    SJWs will call anybody a "racist", "homophobe", "misogynist", or "anti-Semite" these days

    Not "anybody"... What if he printed something like "Sanders2016" on all of those printers? You'd have those same folks defending him...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  19. Re:Are local printers fair game to print to under by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

    did you just brake the law?

    Woah... Slow down there cowboy!

    --
    Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
  20. It's amazing... by Xabraxas · · Score: 1

    What self loathing will make some people do.

    --
    Time makes more converts than reason
    1. Re:It's amazing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's in the Jew's interest to spread the "threat" of anti-Semitism. This is the same reason why SJWs will never admit that women earn as much as men for the same work. If they lose their victim card, then we'd start holding them accountable for terribad shit they do.

      Jews are the Nazis of Palestine...

    2. Re:It's amazing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well said!

  21. Re:Nazi-shmazi... by Xabraxas · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Neo-communist? The McCarthyites have come out in full force ever since Bernie started his run. I still haven't figured out if the communist label is out of laziness or stupidity.

    --
    Time makes more converts than reason
  22. Re:ethics in journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Weev is on Slashdot, I have seen him post several times.

    I am sure he will comment on this one at some point.

    I'm waiting for it! ;)

  23. Re:Nazi-shmazi... by Required+Snark · · Score: 2
    You just admitted that you are a supporter of Weev, whether you admit it or not. You can lie to yourself about this all you like, but it's obvious to the rest of us.

    So where is your swastika tattoo? On your skin and/or in your brain?

    --
    Why is Snark Required?
  24. car analogy by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    I think of some car analogy with public stuff that is wide open to any but was not meant to be.

    Like an semi official ramp that let's you unknowingly skip a toll they say it's maintenance use only but's not signed or very poorly signed and it shows up on GPS's and places like google maps.

    Back ways into parking lot's that are not meant to be used but are and do show up on GPS's and places like google maps.

    Permanent parking only lot's that are not singed / very poor singed / look like are for local businesses (but are really for some other uses or employees only) and look like ones that any one can use.

    Private roads that look like real ones and show up on GPS's and places like google maps.

    Now in cases like that they can try to throw the book at but will it stick?

  25. Re:ethics in journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When will @realDonaldTrump acknowledge his #gamergate fan base? #VoteTrump2016

  26. Total actual damages: 10 reams of paper, $25 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forth coming FBI indictment claim of damages: $17,000,000.32

    1. Re:Total actual damages: 10 reams of paper, $25 by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      $17,000,000 that's like 1000 toner rolls.

  27. You guys don't understand this race thing by BitZtream · · Score: 0

    the hacker is a former Jew turned neo-nazi

    Okay guys, you're born a Jew or your are not born a Jew. If your mother was a Jew, you're a jew. If you're mother wasn't a Jew, You aren't a Jew. Its not something you get to pick.

    Contrary to what Madonna thinks, Jews don't get to choose to be Jews and Catholics don't get to follow 'some' of the rules. You either are or aren't, there is no in-between.

    Following Judaism doesn't make you a Jew, it makes you a follower of Judaism. Being born to a mother who is of Jewish decent makes you a Jew and you're a Jew for life in that case.

    So, just for reference and clarity ... Any jew who calls himself a neo-nazi ... is ignorant moron who has no fucking clue what he's talking about. How fucking stupid can you get. Let me guess, he also has brown here and brown eyes and thinks the Aryan is going to rule the world ... with their blonde hair and blue eyes ... right?

    Fucking moron.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    1. Re:You guys don't understand this race thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Contrary to what Madonna thinks, Jews don't get to choose to be Jews and Catholics don't get to follow 'some' of the rules. You either are or aren't, there is no in-between.

      That's total bullshit. No Catholic follows all the rules. And there are plenty of people of Jewish descent who simply ignore their so-called heritage. Even more telling are those galleries of "20 Celebrities You Didn't Know Were Black". Heck, even many recent African immigrants will refuse to be identified with African Americans.

      In reality, race, ethnicity, and religion are largely a personal choice and a cultural construct. Sure, someone with jet black skin can't pass for having generations of Swedish ancestors, and vice versa, but both light skinned and dark skinned individuals can usually identify as dozens of different ethnicities.

      Any jew who calls himself a neo-nazi

      Hitler had Jewish and African ancestry, and apparently knew it too. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/his...

    2. Re:You guys don't understand this race thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the hacker is a former Jew turned neo-nazi

      He's not much of a hacker, and if he'd just drop some acid he might get over his self-loathing wannabe-nazi phase.

    3. Re:You guys don't understand this race thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's a Jew who doesn't practice (not likely believe in) the Jewish faith. He may be a Neo-Nazi convert or some other bullshit, it is not completely certain. Most of all, he is a massive scale troll who likes to offend certain types of people. Basically, he likes to put racist and/or homophobic shit in people's faces and laugh at their reaction.

      In the same vein as the paintings of Jesus made of excrement, I want to call him an artist.

    4. Re:You guys don't understand this race thing by N1AK · · Score: 1

      That's total bullshit.

      Although I'm happy for someone to self-identify however they like, and I would happily stop identifying someone based on a label if they asked or I thought it offended them, I don't think that is entirely fair sentiment. Jew has traditionally, and still does for many people, mean someone descended from ancient Hebrews; in that way it differs from religion in that it isn't a label of your religious convictions. Obviously someone who doesn't self-identify as a Jew can make that personal choice, but I don't think that makes someone else who defines them as a Jew wrong. You can call your standard style house "a space station" but I'm still going to call it a house when talking to other people (even if I am happy to humour your preference in person) because I also get to define what I think words do or don't mean and your definition doesn't overrule that.

    5. Re:You guys don't understand this race thing by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      If your mother was a Jew, you're a jew. If you're mother wasn't a Jew, You aren't a Jew. Its not something you get to pick.

      Wow, you sound just like my Grandmother! I mean, really, this is not a facetious joke. When I turned out atheist, I got that lecture repeatedly. Of course back as a young teenager, I wanted to be different and super special and everything, so I was all with the "ha! I'm not a jew" etc etc.

      Fast forward a few decades and I'm still atheist, but I make the best chicken soup in the family.

      Also, as you said:

      So, just for reference and clarity ... Any jew who calls himself a neo-nazi ... is ignorant moron who has no fucking clue what he's talking about.

      There are parts of being Jewish you literally cannot renounce. You can stop worshiping (of course), and you can pretend your heritage/upbringing is different from what it is/was, but there are people out there who will blindly hate you no matter what you do. There is nothing you can do to renounce that side of things.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    6. Re:You guys don't understand this race thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This illustrates a problem that Jews are guilty of propagating.

      Too often Jew (heritage), Jew (genetics), Jew (religion), Jew (culture) and Jew (Citizen / Country) are confused and mixed up on purpose. This seems to be deliberate. This is frequently used to accuse other people of bias. It prevents attacks one one part, since the attacker is suddenly guilty of attacking all parts.

      This is true both for "inside" and "outside" attackers.

      However, consider:

      You certainly can renounce your religion, your culture and your country.

      Jew (genetics) is a fallacy, as mentioned earlier, because you could be a mix.

      Jew (heritage) can be disowned or disavowed.

      If I'm wrong, define the words I'm missing.

  28. Re:meaningless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes and suddenly none of those things exist because you wave your magic three letter acronym at people that point them out.

  29. Re:Nazi-shmazi... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It tends to be both, since the former tends to engender the latter.

  30. Winner: weev by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and then, the day came when Slashdot put GNAA leaders' articles on the frontpage, giving them attention.

    >

  31. Re:meaningless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes and suddenly none of those things exist because you wave your magic three letter acronym at people that point them out.

    Oh, I know plenty of homophobes, racists, sexists, and xenophobes, and they are primarily found among progressives and social justice activists.

    Oh, and "SJW" isn't "my" magic three letter acronym, it is something the so-called "social justice" activists came up with themselves, before they dragged it through the mud, like everything they touch.

  32. Re:"hacking a printer" maybe the pay system by jus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    My understanding is the hotel can ask you to leave, and if you don't, only then does it become a problem. If you go in, pick up a few muffins, and leave, and nobody tells you to stop, it seems like you'd be in the clear. I tried searching for someone being arrested for eating a hotel's breakfast, but the only stories that come up are a) a guy who was chased off, then came back and pretended to be a cop; and b) a woman who refused to leave, then punched a hotel employee. So they weren't arrested for eating the breakfast, but for trespass (refusing to leave) and impersonation and assault.

  33. Re:ethics in journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Gamergate will never die while people keep using it as the evil triggering boogeyman that dared to kick some hipster ass.

  34. I'd be more impressed if they played music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    like the videos of floppy drives or dot matrix music.

    I want the printers to play funky town. printing nazi crap is lame. I assume to make a printer stepper motor do that would actually take a bit of hacking, more than sending a specific file to print.

    1. Re:I'd be more impressed if they played music by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1
    2. Re:I'd be more impressed if they played music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Challenge accepted.

      Post the printers IP address.

    3. Re: I'd be more impressed if they played music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      192.168.1.2

    4. Re: I'd be more impressed if they played music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      192.168.1.2? That's the same combination I use on my luggage!

      Wait, wrong joke.

  35. Re:meaningless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would print out "You are going to end up like the Bernie baby"
    Not really hacking if printer is open for anyone to print on it.

  36. Re:ethics in journalism by Mashiki · · Score: 2, Informative

    Funny, it doesn't look very defunct. Then again, it might look that way to an outsider, especially since it's basically won. Sites that were unethical, spouting garbage or running identity politics are either gone or suffering heavily financially. People who parroted those views have either quit or been fired, or moved down in the world to even worse sites. Not only can't you stop mentioning it, the media can't either. There's still 1-2 stories nearly every day about it. I think my personal favorite is how gamergate is now all the evils of the internet and worse then 4chan all rolled into one. Never mind of course that Weev was never a e-celeb or proponent. He was a successful troll in some aspects but that's it. Note how many articles there are spouting his pov...a whole not even one page of results from one of the main gamergate hubs. Yep, such a huge following, not only that but he's labeled as exactly who he is right off the bat. A member of GNAA, and his view points are spelt out right too.

    One also can't forget that gamergate unlike those on the regressive left or regressive right doesn't believe in identity politics being the answer, rather that identity politics is cancer. Which means if someone has a good idea, it doesn't matter who they actually are. But, then again you've got all those people on the regressive left side of the spectrum that are pedophile defenders or openly pedophiles, that you like to rally around.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  37. Bummer by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    Should have just stuck to quietly replacing every instance of the word "strategic" printed with the word "satanic."

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  38. Counterproductive by sjames · · Score: 1

    It looks like sending him to prison the first time was counter-productive. What a surprise.

    1. Re:Counterproductive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He does seem to be a prime example of the problem with the prison system, that sending assholes to prison turns them into even bigger more extreme assholes.

  39. Who is weev? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    For those who don't know, weev is a member of a group that calls themselves the GNAA They formed over a decade ago for the purpose of committing abuse on Slashdot and other places. Every wonder why Slashdot scans you for being an open proxy before you post? That's because they abused unsecured proxies to flood Slashdot with thousands of spam comments. They flooded many other blogs in the same way, with the same spam inviting people to join their group. I suspect the message being flooded to printers is probably pretty close to the typical spam that gets posted to Slashdot. The background on weev actually explains a lot; the old messages used to include text like, "lol, jews did wtc," which clearly the antisemitism associated with weev. While they claim to be a security organization and spawned "Goatse Security," they're mostly a bunch of immature script kiddies looking to cause as much trouble as possible.

    Note: Shame on you, Slashdot. Apparently I can't even post "Gay Niggger Association of America" (misspelling is intentional, to avoid the lameness filter), which happens to be ontopic and very relevant here. I understand the desire to get rid of spam, but surely there's a better way to stop it.

    1. Re:Who is weev? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I went to school with Weev, always was a fun guy.

    2. Re: Who is weev? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard he liked to blow dead bears.

    3. Re: Who is weev? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that's David Cameron.

  40. Holy Fax Batman by fhage · · Score: 1
    Wait until the Weev finds out about all the telefacsimile systems left on the public network.

    He'll have a direct line to "hack" critical hardware inside banks, law and investment firms, medical labs and offices and the even the Pentagon.

    We're obviously doomed.

  41. Re:meaningless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course they exist, I just won't automatically jump on the bandwagon to socially exile anybody without some kind of proof any more.

    That said, they gave a copy of the Nazi nonsense weev was spreading, so yes, I have to agree that it was racist and disgusting.

  42. Dumbass by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

    I would have pumped a stock or something.

    1. Re:Dumbass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...you would have committed actual securities fraud so you could be sent to jail for it?

    2. Re:Dumbass by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      Rich jail.

  43. A perverse yet good deed. by dsmatthews9379 · · Score: 1

    The IoT insecurity issue is one that needed highlighting in a way that people would notice, without any real harm being done. If this makes people close a few holes and go looking for others then it is without doubt a very good thing.

    He could have done much worse, there are pieces of information that would fit onto a single page that could actually do a lot of harm if violent sociopaths got hold of it. So I see the Neo-Nazism thing as just an advertising ploy, like the sound of a door bell, microwave beep or phone ringing etc. in TV advertisements, a trigger. It makes you stop and take note, but it isn't the real message.

    He wouldn't need to use such ploys if most people were not so shallow and ignorant in the first place. Then again advertising would not work either, if the majority of people were intelligent.

    1. Re:A perverse yet good deed. by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Yet I don't think anyone is really going to learn anything from it.
      All the people who don't think computers are some sort of mysterious magic already know it's a stupid idea to put a printer on the internet.

    2. Re:A perverse yet good deed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, if he had printed goofy cat pictures or random pages from the Principia Discordia I'd just be laughing about this, there'd be no down side.

  44. Okay. by man_ls · · Score: 1

    Does this guy also think it's okay to sit in someone's car and imagine themselves on a road trip if they leave their doors unlocked, or walk into someone's garage and start cataloging their possessions if they leave their roll-up door open overnight?

  45. Re:ethics in journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like how you move from saying that this guy is racist (which he is), to implying that everyone who was a part of gamergate, including all the GLBT, minorities, etc. are taking part in a racist movement. Just because some game journalists are corrupt and try to convince simpletons that gamers are dead or racist/mysoginistic boogeymen when called on their corruption doesn't mean that everyone is in some kind of rush to join the morons at stormfront. Some of us would prefer to live in a world where the amount of melanin in one's skin was simply not important for any reason.

    I can find plenty more racist among so-called progressives and they scare me more as they have more influence than some random idiot who I cannot ever remember taking seriously. Every sufficiently large group has undesirables in it. Even your in-groups. Ponder that, please.

  46. Anti-Fill-in-the-Blank - goes unreported by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1

    I am sure he could have had the printers spew out plenty of things that would go unreported... as long as they were politically correct.

    I am sure this guy violated FAX spamming and unauthorized computer access laws, but, on a related note the USA now punishes thought crimes.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  47. Re:ethics in journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shhh, we're not supposed to call out the fallacy of guilt by association. You're allowed to use it against the *bad* guys, anyhow! I mean, we already know they're bad, so we couldn't just be mindlessly reinforcing our own predetermined biases! That's what the dumb people do, and we're not dumb, now, are we?

  48. We should send him the giant new ipad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    made by Microsoft. It's called "Surface" and only will cost taxpayers $9K.

      Brilliant!

  49. Re:ethics in journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm gonna post this as an AC but my posting style and verbiage choices will probably ruin my attempt at anonymity.

    I've been known to frequent a chat where our young Mr. Weev is known to hang out. In fact, I've conversed with him in "public" and in private numerous times. I hate to ruin this but it has gone on long enough. Weev is not now, nor has he ever been, racist. Oh, you'd think he is but I can assure you he is not.

    You might ask yourself this, "Then why, Weev, why?" Well, I can tell you the answer to that... The answer is, "For the lulz." No, seriously - it's just for the lulz. If you're not sure what lulz are then I'd recommend searching the internet and then keep searching. And, lest you scoff in disdain, sometimes lulz are not only a worthy goal but a necessity. Lulz make the internet go 'round. Hell, lulz make the world go 'round. Without lulz, we'd have nothing.

    At any rate... I suspect nobody will believe him if he comes out and says it was for the lulz, later in life perhaps, but now you know. He's about as racist as you are, really. He might even be slightly less racist than you.

  50. Re:ethics in journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heh... Always in a rush, you are... ;-) Your brevity and verbiage belies your intent. Ah well... As I said above, lulz were had. Meh...

  51. The real news is the prison conversion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How damn effective prison gangs can be at "integrating" a person

  52. Not so sympathetic by eyrieowl · · Score: 1

    Weev made a much more sympathetic figure when he was busy being a symbol of prosecutorial overreach and badly designed computer security laws. He's a lot less sympathetic as a committed white supremacist troll. Also see: This is why we can't have nice things.

    1. Re:Not so sympathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wasn't overreach. Weev is fucking garbage. Period.

    2. Re:Not so sympathetic by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      That doesn't mean the government can't be such overreaching garbage that Weev looks good by comparison.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    3. Re:Not so sympathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weev is fucking garbage

      No, he broke up with Shanley ages ago.

    4. Re:Not so sympathetic by flink · · Score: 1

      Now he's a good example why "tough on crime" and sending people to prison for minor non-violent infractions (or things that shouldn't be infractions in the first place) is a really bad idea. He didn't repent in prison: he got radicalized and came out worse.

  53. Guiltee! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because hacker. No need to look at anything else. It's the law!

  54. Re:ethics in journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All these flavors...

  55. Re:Are local printers fair game to print to under by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, that's our Joe. He's sometimes got novel things to say but at least he now uses a spell checker. Surely, you've seen him post before, right?

    His grasp of the English language is different than what you or I have. In his defense, he does have a grasp on it and he does horrible things with it. Horrible, shameless, unspeakable things.

    But, he's finally enabled spell check. That's enough to make me happy. Well, it makes me happy except when his spell check lets "payed" (I hate that spelling) through or lets him slide on homonyms. It's still a huge improvement.

    So, thank you Joe, for using that spell check. I've been posting AC to him for ages and I appreciate how far he's come.

  56. Re:Nazi-shmazi... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, it is mi you're replying to, so the label's partly out of asshole-ish-ness, some stupidity, and a heaping helping of reactionary retardedness.

    His juvenile sig indicates exactly his small mentality.

  57. Sounds familiar ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chapter 4 of "Stealing the Network: How to Own the Box"

  58. Conversion available both ways by Bruce66423 · · Score: 1

    According to Israel, the only way to stop being a Jew is to become a Christian - though the Nazis didn't agree.

    Also according to Israel, conversion by an Orthodox Rabbi makes you a proper Jew. One of the hot topics is whether Reform Rabbi's conversion are acceptable - at the moment they are not.

  59. Re:meaningless by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

    My gosh, you slaughetered that straw man.

    I live when people make up random shit, claim that someone they don't like would do it if only they could, then get angry and righteous about it. In fact you remind me of Angry Frank:

    http://harryenfield.wikia.com/...

    Now I'm going to have a chuckle watching some youtube clips.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  60. Hacking? by ruir · · Score: 1

    Sending jobs to open printers in the Internet without any kind of authentication is "hacking"? Slashdot, what have you became...

    1. Re:Hacking? by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      IKR?

      I was going to post the same thing. Using a device the way it was intended to be used is not hacking...

      The only novel part of this is the fact that he used shodan or something to find the printers in the first place.

      I mean, telnetting to the SMTP port and sending a spoofed e-mail is not hacking. Nor is sending a print job to a printer...

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
  61. Hacking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As you'd expect, the hack took place after the hacker used a simple port scanner and found millions of unprotected, Internet-accessible printers. He then used a one-line Bash command that sent them a PostScript file on port 9100.

    There was hacking involved here? That's not hacking, there was no "creatively overcoming and circumventing limitations of systems to achieve novel and clever outcomes". Heavy emphasis on the word circumventing and novel here. He made use of unsecured systems that were open for anybody to use to print stuff in the intended way. But even if the nature of the material may have been offensive, it was still covered by the 1st amendment. The worst they can do is blame him for using the printers without the owner's permission and bill him for the wasted ink and paper. If he'd printed pictures of Miley Cyrus' bare butt instead of hateful racist bullshit he'd get off with a slap on the wrist for a frat party prank that went out of hand and would have to spend a few hours of community service mopping up vomit at a hospital or scooping up turds in dog-shit part.

  62. Re:ethics in journalism by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

    Funny, it doesn't look very defunct. Then again, it might look that way to an outsider, especially since it's basically won.

    Ah yes, claiming a win after an astonishingly thorough defeat. Reminds me of something:

    Black Knight: Just a flesh wound.
    Arthur: Look, stop that.
    Black Knight: Coward! Coward!
    Arthur: Look, I'll have your leg. Right!

    Arthur cuts off the Black Knight's leg.

    Black Knight: Right, I'll do something bad to you for that!
    Arthur: You'll what?
    Black Knight: Come here!
    Arthur: What are you going to do, bleed on me?
    Black Knight: I can't be beaten!
    Arthur: You're a crazy person.
    Black Knight: The Black Knight always wins! Let's fight! Come on then.

    Arthur cuts off the Black Knight's other leg.

    Black Knight: All right; we'll say the fight was equal.
    Arthur: Come, Patsy. (to his servant)
    Black Knight: Oh, oh, I see, running away then. You cowardly offensive man! Come back here and take what you deserve to get. I'll bite your legs off!

    Sites that were unethical, spouting garbage or running identity politics are either gone or suffering heavily financially.

    Like Gawker, right?

    One also can't forget that gamergate unlike those on the regressive left or regressive right doesn't believe in identity politics being the answer, rather that identity politics is cancer.

    No, they just believe in "ethics" as defined by (a) making shit up about people, (b) doxxing them and (c) the hate campaign,

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  63. Of course it is hacking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everything is hacking as soon as someone calls it hacking. Everyone is a hacker as soon as someone says the word. It's the digital equivalent of a bogeyman. It is indeed short-hand for either "I don't know what I'm saying but I want to sound impressive" or "I'm trying to scare you here, heck I might be scared myself", or both.

    Does that make the terms entirely meaningless? Why yes, yes it does. Why do vapid outfits like softpedia, and the whole of the computer security industry for that matter, even American Lawmakers, keep on using the terms anyway? You tell me.

    1. Re:Of course it is hacking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still cringe whenever I say I'm hacking on the Linux kernel, but it's OK, I've been told that's just Imposter Syndrome.

  64. Re:Are local printers fair game to print to under by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    It's like having a piano that's now in tune, but he's still hitting the wrong keys.

    If by pure chance he hits the right keys, he hits them in the wrong order.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  65. Re:Nazi-shmazi... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0

    Fun fact: Joseph McCarthy was right, there really were Communists in the State Department. And these people really did mean to use their positions to overthrow the elected US government. Why couldn't it have happened? Subversion had worked great in the Chinese Communist revolution only a few years before. Time after time, patriotic Chinese resisting the foreign influence of Communism found their orders altered, their supplies missing, and their shells full of sand instead of gunpowder. By whom? Secret Communists in their own government, who had wormed their way to the top over decades. Mao couldn't have won without them. There are enormous monuments all over China dedicated to the invaluable services they performed.

    This isn't some crazy cold war paranoia. This shit really happened. For real. Hell, ask Bernie's Brownshirts what kind of government they support for America - it sure ain't anything to do with the Constitution or a government that represents the interests of its citizens. Obama is on record at being angry about the separation of powers in the Constitution, he wants to just be able to rule by decree without any recourse to anyone. He just complained about it again in Argentina. OMG PARANOIA NUTBAGS BLAHBLAHBALHB WHARRRRAGARBLLLLL

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  66. Words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Both Racist AND Anti-Semitic messages? ... That means anti-semetism isnt racism!

  67. Re: Nazi-shmazi... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've noticed from this and some of your other comments that you truly are a wingnut, aren't you? Obama on record complaining about the separation of powers? Do go on!

  68. Re:ethics in journalism by Mashiki · · Score: 2

    Ah yes, claiming a win after an astonishingly thorough defeat. Reminds me of something:

    So who were they defeated by? Looks like to me you're pretty damn salty that a leaderless grassroots revolt against shitty journalists that ran their own giant story/article writing collusion group akin to Journolist(which was called Gamejournopros). The leaks from that easily show exactly how much collusion was going on in that. And you're also very salty at just how these incestuous people were caught giving giving hand outs to their friends, people they were shacked up with, or fucking. Sure does speak a lot about people who don't give a shit that they're being lied to, and like it instead.

    Like Gawker, right?

    Well GG has never actually claimed for gawker, except costing them 7 figures in ad-revenue and showing people exactly how shitty they are. And showing advertisers exactly how shitty companies like Gawker are. You know, Gawker the same site that believes that bullying people is good. For a group of supposedly evil people though, GG's response was to donate to an anti-bullying campaign. But anti-GG? Oh they were right out there supporting what ol'Sam was saying. But other sites? Yep. Some are just significant drops in traffic, others have closed for good.

    No, they just believe in "ethics" as defined by (a) making shit up about people, (b) doxxing them and (c) the hate campaign,

    So who have they made shit up about? I'll wait. I'm sure you're going to try trotting out something on Quinn. You know, the same piece of shit that filed multiple false DMCA claims, and then slapped order against her ex because he pointed out that she was a domestic abuser, and was trying to warn others away from her. Also, who has GG doxxed? I'm sure they'll be forthcoming. I'll be happy to point out various anti-GG individuals who have openly doxxed people, and continue to do so to this day. Oh, like that prominent anti-GG person Graham Lineham. FYI, one of the most prominent anti-GG people was arrested a few months back for trying to tell a terrorist how to build a bomb. But they also wrote for big name progressive sites, and as a feminist too.

    And what hate? Find it. Because I'll tell you something, anti-GG's have done a very good job of attacking anyone who refuses to fall in line with their group think. I think my person favorite is when anti-GGers decided the "if you're supporting GG, and you're a minority/women/etc., you're a racist/sexist/homophobes." But that's really all their arguments boil down to anyway, trying to claim that they're being harassed and screaming that people are racist/sexist/homophobes because they're losing an argument or being shown that they're actually the shitty people out there. I think my favorite out of all of that has been when Quinn and Sarkeesian ran to the UN crying about how demands for proof of their statements and criticism of their work was harassment.

    The entire thing has done a wonderful job of proving how many people can't be bothered to actually read the news beyond what they're being told. Then again, I kinda like this bit too. Where people starting saying "muslims are terrorists," the media will start screaming "not all muslims are terrorists, you're just islamophobic!!!" But if one person in GG does something wrong, all of GG has done something wrong. Yep, no agenda there at all.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  69. Portscanning is not hacking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just because he's got a funny "hacker name" doesn't mean he's newsworthy.

  70. Haters gonna Hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NT

  71. Define Racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Racism is groundless hate based only on race.
    1) If you have reasons to dislike certain groups (e.g. based on statistics [1]), then this is not racism.
    2) Criticism is not hate.

    [1] like ones saying that blacks commit 50% of murders in USA while being only 13% of the population. Which scientifically proves them to be way more aggressive.

    Stop being a liberal already. Liberalism is a mental disorder.

    -- Ed

    1. Re:Define Racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Racism is groundless hate based only on race.

      Nope, try again.

      Racism is discrimination against a group based upon race by a more privileged racial group. Or sometimes it's just racially based discimination, regardless of privilege. But it certainly isn't some idiotic "only if you don't have reasons". Everyone has "reasons". The reasons are usually fucking stupid, such as your idiotic cart-before-the-horse crime example.

  72. Antisemetic Jew? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AKA "undercover" hasbara troll.

  73. Re:ethics in journalism by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    You might ask yourself this, "Then why, Weev, why?" Well, I can tell you the answer to that... The answer is, "For the lulz."

    For the lulz? Here is a one-hour interview with Weev on a well-known White Supremacist podcast. There are no lulz to be had, but a good deal of racism, discussion of "White Genocide" and promoting "noble European values".

    http://www.redicecreations.com...

    Promoting racism "for the lulz" and doing it at a scale like Weev does is an interesting way to get one's entertainment, you have to admit.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  74. Re:"hacking a printer" maybe the pay system by jus by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    The problem is he port scanned to find the printers. The law in many places views that as going to every house in a town and checking to see if the front door is unlocked. Even if it is, all you did was avoid a "breaking an entering" charge but are still guilty of trespass.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  75. Re:meaningless by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

    Bullshit! I voted for Sanders and if this weev fellow had printed "Sanders2016" on those printers I'd be saying the following:

    "This Weev is an idiot, you don't support a candidate by breaking the law and accessing a huge number of networked resources you don't have authorization to use. Throw the book at him and send him to PMITA federal prison for life."

  76. Re:ethics in journalism by serviscope_minor · · Score: 0

    Looks like to me you're pretty damn salty that a leaderless grassroots

    No I'm just astonished that despite being founded on a fabrication (there were no reviews) and a harassment campaign people still keep insisting GG are somehow the good guys.

    For a group of supposedly evil people though, GG's response was to donate to an anti-bullying campaign.

    While simultaneously trying to bully Anita Sarkeesian and Zoe Quinn off the internet. Okey dokey then.

    So who have they made shit up about?

    1. Zoe Quinn

    I'll wait. I'm sure you're going to try trotting out something on Quinn.

    Yep!

    You know, the same piece of shit that filed multiple false DMCA

    Ah right so her doing something after this all blew up justifies you starting it off by making up lies. Ethics, got it. Must have been a pre-emptive ethical freedom strike.

    And what hate? Find it

    Visiting those cesspools? No thanks! I've seen enough before.

    I think my favorite out of all of that has been when Quinn and Sarkeesian ran to the UN

    Yes, you can just run right up to the UN and they let you in. True story. I'm sure the UN didn't, you know, invite them. And I must say that you seem, in your own words, rather salty about that if I say so myself.

    The entire thing has done a wonderful job of proving how many people can't be bothered to actually read the news beyond what they're being told.

    The irony, it burns.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  77. He did the right thing by confessing... by Max_W · · Score: 1

    at least people will know who is really behind all this hacking hoopla and stop blaming poor people in Russia, China, Ukraine, etc.

  78. Re:Nazi-shmazi... by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

    A neo-communist? Only someone to the EXTREME right would think a New Deal Democrat (that's truly what Sanders is), is a communist.

    If he aint talking about government ownership of all means of production....he isn't a communist.

  79. Re:Nazi-shmazi... by mi · · Score: 1

    Yes, Bernie Sanders is a Communist. And that particular article came out before he started to run for Presidency. The "Socialist" label he prefers is hardly better (Socialism is nothing but Communism-lite), but he was and remains a member and supporter of openly Communist organizations. As recently as 2014 Bernie Sanders was hailed by Democratic Socialists of America — a "New Left" organization comprised of what was left of the Socialist and Communist movements of the "Old Left". And he was not merely endorsed by these assholes (the way, Trump was endorsed by Duke) — Sanders was a distinguished speaker at a DSA gathering that year. On the same page the Senator is also called "DSA member".

    The funny part is, most of his defenders would dispute — often angrily — the "Communist" label while also disagreeing, there is anything wrong with being a Communist. So, before going any further, please, state for the record, whether you are one of such people... Thanks!

    While Fascism/Nazism is largely extinct from public life (though, sadly, not from government), Socialism/Communism — the far more murderous school of thought — is rearing its even uglier head... And not only on Slashdot.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  80. Re:Nazi-shmazi... by mi · · Score: 1

    You just admitted that you are a supporter of Weev

    Wow, it really would not take much to be convicted in a People's Court with you presiding... What would it be, your honor, 25 years of hard labor, or an execution in the basement?

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  81. Re: ethics in journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a childish prank, which he should refrain from doing. It's about time for more age appropriate 'lulz'.

  82. Re:meaningless by mi · · Score: 1

    you slaughtered that straw man.

    But it was not a straw man — look at CronoCloud's post below, for example. According to that, we should be seeing something posts rebutting Weev like this:

    This Weev is an idiot, you don't support a political philosophy by breaking the law and accessing a huge number of networked resources you don't have authorization to use.

    See? Though the words are right, they are lukewarm and hatred and passion are missing. CronoCloud is not calling Weev "Communist", for example, which you have to be to really support Bernie Sanders, for example. Not even "Socialist" (a.k.a. Communist-lite), which Sanders calls himself.

    And, certainly, no SJW would call Weev "racist" or "homophobe" in that case — which is what I actually predicted.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  83. Re: Are local printers fair game to print to under by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mmm, then are mDNS, uPNP, SSDP or any other service broadcast technology a form of luring the curious or even entrapment ?

  84. Re:meaningless by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

    But it was not a straw man

    Yes it was because none of those events happened.

    See? Though the words are right, they are lukewarm and hatred and passion are missing.

    You absolute despicable liar. You cut off this bit of the quote:

    Throw the book at him and send him to PMITA federal prison for life

    He's calling for him to spend the rest of his life in a hellhole.

    CronoCloud is not calling Weev "Communist"

    Uh, so?

    which you have to be to really support Bernie Sanders, for example

    My god you have no idea what communism is. It's also funny that you think it's an insult. A clue for free: many people here aren't American and in any case, it's not 1950 any more.

    Not even "Socialist" (a.k.a. Communist-lite), which Sanders calls himself.

    "socialist" is only an insult if you're an incredibly silly person. To the rest of the world it's a simple fact. Are you going to criticise ChronoCloud for not including other irrelevant facts like a complete listing of all of Sanders' policies?

    And, certainly, no SJW would call Weev "racist" or "homophobe" in that case

    You know, words mean things. "racist" and "homophobe" are actually words that have meanings. They're not simply genericised insults. They are actual words with actual meanings. Citation: the dictionary. Any one you choose. If you post racist, homophobic things (and such things are often associated with Nazis, neo or otherwise) then you're racist and homophobic. If you send "vote sanders" messages, then that has no bearing on whether you're racist or homophbic.

    which is what I actually predicted

    So far all you have successfully predicted is that "SJWs" have a substantially better grasp of English than you do.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  85. Re:Nazi-shmazi... by mi · · Score: 1

    If he aint talking about government ownership of all means of production....he isn't a communist.

    He may not be talking about it openly, but there are enough dog whistles in there to attract vast packs. But, whether he talks about it is irrelevant — whether he believes in it is important. And he does... Bernie Sanders is a member of an organization, that is a thin front for Communists.

    They know of the toxicity of the "Communist" label (preferring "Socialist" instead), but aren't shy about their admiration for Marx. For example, here DSA speaks fondly of the founder of Communist Party of Italy. Separately a member of DSA's "National Committee" David Green once wrote:

    Our goal as socialists is to abolish private ownership of the means of production. Our immediate task is to limit the capitalist class’s prerogatives in the workplace.

    David Green, 2007 (page 10)

    Ah, you'll say, that's all from capitalist haters, just can't be true, right? Well, here is fresh from DSA's own mouth (emphasis mine):

    And while Sanders’ platform calls primarily for government to heal the ravages of unrestrained capitalism, it also includes more radical reforms that shift control over capital from corporations to social ownership

    Good enough for you? Far less evidence was used to claim "Trump is a KKK-supporter" or something like that...

    Anyone replying to this post and expecting to continue the conversation, please, be sure to state unambiguously:

    • Whether you dispute DSA being a Communist organization (at least in substantial part).
    • Whether you dispute Bernie Sanders being a member.
    • Whether or not you think there is anything wrong with Communism to begin with.

    Responses missing clear answers to the above will be returned unopened. Thank you.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  86. is this really hacking? by mangamaster03 · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't call this hacking...more like sending spam. He blasted a message to any device who would listen, and those that responded printed out what he sent.

  87. Re: Nazi-shmazi... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Brainwashing is most likely really. Look at the fox news crowd squawk "socialist" and "communism" incessantly at Obamacare a freaking market based healthcare option.

    Meanwhile those who didn't take in the height of cold war propaganda uncritically look at them like they are having psychotic break.

  88. Re:meaningless by mi · · Score: 1

    Yes it was [a "straw man"] because none of those events happened.

    Talking about hypothetical events has nothing to do with a "strawman" argument which is defined thus:

    A straw man is a common form of argument and is an informal fallacy based on giving the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while actually refuting an argument that was not advanced by that opponent.

    Talking about a hypothetical can be a valid and useful rhetorical vehicle and not necessarily a "straw man". Talk about "grasp of English"... Or Logic, for that matter.

    You absolute despicable liar. You cut off this bit of the quote

    I cut off the part I deemed irrelevant. My linking to the original post is enough to refute accusations of "lying".

    My god you have no idea what communism is.

    Born and raised in the USSR, I have a much better idea of what Communism is, than 90% of Americans.

    "socialist" is only an insult if you're an incredibly silly person

    Khmm... One would've thought, Hans Christian Andersen dispensed with that line of reasoning a century and half ago... No, darling, simply calling anyone who believes something names is not enough. Socialism (a.k.a. Communism-lite) is the most murderous school of thought known to humanity so far — even Hitler's peculiar brand of Fascism is but a distant second. So, yeah, to people who pay attention to semantics, "Socialism" is a dirty word.

    You know, words mean things. "racist" and "homophobe" are actually words that have meanings.

    Finally, we agree on something! Yes, the words have meanings and the very point of the starter of this thread was that SJWs have made these particular terms meaningless by applying them to everyone who disagrees with them.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  89. Re: ethics in journalism by jsh1972 · · Score: 1

    Well, at least they're not "SWATting" people yet... BRB someone at door

  90. Re:meaningless by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

    Talking about hypothetical events has nothing to do with a "strawman" argument which is defined thus:

    Except you are ascribing those hypothetical actions/arguments to a very real group of people, and then attacking the people based on those. Classic straw man.

    lurn 2 reed

    cut off the part I deemed irrelevant. My linking to the original post is enough to refute accusations of "lying"

    You are a rotten liar. You claimed there was no harsh language and the but you deemed "irrelevant" was... all that harsh language. In other words you deemed irrelevant the bit that completely contradicted you.

    Born and raised in the USSR, I have a much better idea of what Communism is, than 90% of Americans.

    Then you've suffered a complete brain bypass. Sanders is not by any measure of anything "communist".

    Khmm...

    Crikey you're an idiot. I mean I really don't know how else to put it. You're equating Stalin and Chairman Mao to the current governments of quite a few European countries.

    Yes, the words have meanings and the very point of the starter of this thread was that SJWs have made these particular terms meaningless by applying them to everyone who disagrees with them.

    Oh I see, you got really angry about something you yet again made up. I think you should perhaps seek medication because you have a very tough job distinguishing fantasy from reality and you get very, very angry about those fantasies.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  91. Re:meaningless by mi · · Score: 1

    Except you are ascribing those hypothetical actions/arguments to a very real group of people

    Which argument have I attributed to any group of people?

    You claimed there was no harsh language

    I never made such a claim, nor used the word "harsh". If you insist on accusing others of "lying" over such things, you better be "squeeky fucking clean" yourself.

    I pointed out the absence of any significant passion in CronoLog's response. His language was harsh, but nothing to raise fists about or to chain oneself to one's car. As someone would say, it was "low energy"...

    Sanders is not by any measure of anything "communist".

    He certainly is. To avoid duplication, if you wish to continue this topic, please, follow up to this other post of mine — and be sure to to answer the three questions I ask at the end in your reply. Thank you.

    you got really angry about something you yet again made up.

    I didn't. Some AC did. I, actually, corrected him slightly.

    tough job distinguishing fantasy from reality and you get very, very angry about those fantasies.

    Sorry, I'm not going to argue the abuse of terms like "racist" with someone so deeply in denial as you. I consider your and others' disputing of Sanders being a Communist to be much more important this year but have limited bandwidth.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  92. Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I thought they were called "reesearchers"??

  93. Re:meaningless by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

    I never made such a claim, nor used the word "harsh".

    I never said you used the word harsh. I said you claimed there was no harsh language. You specifically said:

    hatred and passion are missing.

    empassioned hatred is harsh. You need to understand the difference bewtween descriptions (what I used) and quoting (what I didn't).

    I can't be arsed to argue with you any more. Either you have such a poor grasp of English that it's clearly unproductive or you are intentionally misrepresenting as much as you can in order to "win".

    At least you've stopped trying to pretend that socalism and stalinism are the same, at least in this thread. I'll take that as a win, for sure.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  94. Gender Ideology Harms Children by sycodon · · Score: 0

    The American College of Pediatricians

    1. Human sexuality is an objective biological binary trait: “XY” and “XX” are genetic markers of health – not genetic markers of a disorder.

    2. No one is born with a gender. Everyone is born with a biological sex. Gender (an awareness and sense of oneself as male or female) is a sociological and psychological concept; not an objective biological one.

    3. A person’s belief that he or she is something they are not is, at best, a sign of confused thinking.

    4. Puberty is not a disease and puberty-blocking hormones can be dangerous.

    5. According to the DSM-V, as many as 98% of gender confused boys and 88% of gender confused girls eventually accept their biological sex after naturally passing through puberty.

    6. Children who use puberty blockers to impersonate the opposite sex will require cross-sex hormones in late adolescence. Cross-sex hormones (testosterone and estrogen) are associated with dangerous health risks including but not limited to high blood pressure, blood clots, stroke and cancer.

    7. Rates of suicide are twenty times greater among adults who use cross-sex hormones and undergo sex reassignment surgery, even in Sweden which is among the most LGBQT – affirming countries.

    8. Conditioning children into believing a lifetime of chemical and surgical impersonation of the opposite sex is normal and healthful is child abuse.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    1. Re:Gender Ideology Harms Children by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The American College of Pediatricians

      1. Human sexuality is an objective biological binary trait: “XY” and “XX” are genetic markers of health – not genetic markers of a disorder.

      2. No one is born with a gender. Everyone is born with a biological sex. Gender (an awareness and sense of oneself as male or female) is a sociological and psychological concept; not an objective biological one.

      3. A person’s belief that he or she is something they are not is, at best, a sign of confused thinking.

      4. Puberty is not a disease and puberty-blocking hormones can be dangerous.

      5. According to the DSM-V, as many as 98% of gender confused boys and 88% of gender confused girls eventually accept their biological sex after naturally passing through puberty.

      6. Children who use puberty blockers to impersonate the opposite sex will require cross-sex hormones in late adolescence. Cross-sex hormones (testosterone and estrogen) are associated with dangerous health risks including but not limited to high blood pressure, blood clots, stroke and cancer.

      7. Rates of suicide are twenty times greater among adults who use cross-sex hormones and undergo sex reassignment surgery, even in Sweden which is among the most LGBQT – affirming countries.

      8. Conditioning children into believing a lifetime of chemical and surgical impersonation of the opposite sex is normal and healthful is child abuse.

      From Wikipedia:

      The American College of Pediatricians (ACPeds) is a socially conservative association of pediatricians and other healthcare professionals in the United States. The College was founded in 2002 by a group of pediatricians including Joseph Zanga, a past president of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), as a protest against the AAP's support for adoption by gay couples.[1][2] The group's membership has been estimated at between 60 and 200 members.[1][3] ACPeds describes itself as "a national organization of pediatricians and other healthcare professionals dedicated to the health and well-being of children... committed to fulfilling its mission by producing sound policy, based upon the best available research, to assist parents and to influence society in the endeavor of childrearing."[4]

      Zanga has described ACPeds as a group "with Judeo-Christian, traditional values that is open to pediatric medical professionals of all religions who hold true to the group's core beliefs: that life begins at conception; and that the traditional family unit, headed by a different-sex couple, poses far fewer risk factors in the adoption and raising of children."[5] The organization's view on parenting is at odds with the position of the American Academy of Pediatrics, which holds that sexual orientation has no correlation with the ability to be a good parent and to raise healthy and well-adjusted children.[3][6][7] The American College of Pediatricians has been described as a fringe group by the American Civil Liberties Union and the Southern Poverty Law Center, with the latter organization labeling the ACPeds as a "hate group" with "a history of propagating damaging falsehoods about LGBT people".

      You need to check your sources, or be more transparent that you are representing the views of a right-wing fundamentalist fringe group as a respected group of healthcare professionals.

    2. Re:Gender Ideology Harms Children by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      From: http://www.acpeds.org/about-us
      ---
      Core Values of the College

      The American College of Pediatricians:

              Recognizes that there are absolutes and scientific truths that transcend relative social considerations of the day.
              Recognizes that good medical science cannot exist in a moral vacuum and pledges to promote such science.
              Recognizes the fundamental mother-father family unit, within the context of marriage, to be the optimal setting for the development and nurturing of children and pledges to promote this unit.
              Recognizes the unique value of every human life from the time of conception to natural death and pledges to promote research and clinical practice that provides for the healthiest outcome of the child from conception to adulthood.
              Recognizes the physical and emotional benefits of sexual abstinence until marriage and pledges to promote this behavior as the ideal for adolescence.
      -----
      The American College of Pediatricians is a fraud. They've got around two hundred members, and were formed by a group who left the respected American Academy of Pediatrics in protest after that organisation endorsed gay marriage. The purpose of the organisation, the sole reason upon which they were founded, was to provide a legitimate-seeming medical front for those who have religious or moral objections to any deviation from their strictly heterosexual norm.

      It's an example of the rich tradition of political pressure groups taking names that sound non-political, because people are instantly suspicious of anything an overtly political group says.

    3. Re:Gender Ideology Harms Children by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems like anyone can make anything an organization these days. Can't wait for some pedos to get together and make the "American Pediatric Association" and proclaim that smothering the sexuality of children until they reach an arbitrary age is harmful to their development and that the age of consent should be abolished. Then we can see how many people start quoting them.

    4. Re: Gender Ideology Harms Children by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But still, puberty blockers. Is that a thing?

    5. Re:Gender Ideology Harms Children by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      1. Human sexuality is an objective biological binary trait: âoeXYâ and âoeXXâ are genetic markers of health â" not genetic markers of a disorder.

      This is, of course, untrue.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    6. Re:Gender Ideology Harms Children by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      1. Human sexuality is an objective biological binary trait: “XY” and “XX” are genetic markers of health – not genetic markers of a disorder.

      Please explain hermaphrodites and people with XXY, or other genetic differences.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    7. Re:Gender Ideology Harms Children by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Please explain hermaphrodites and people with XXY, or other genetic differences.

      Such as trisomy-21, also known as Down Syndrome ; triplication of the 21st chromsome rather than the normal diploid (duplicated) state.

      I would infer from the tone that the ACPeds take that they don't consider such organisms to be human. Which is problematic as there is a good chance for some of them at least to produce fertile offspring with others who are accepted member of the human species.

      The definition and meaning of "species" gets a bit awkward at the edges.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    8. Re:Gender Ideology Harms Children by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      Yes, and most would be surprised just how many organizations there are like it.
      For every legitimate scientific institution there are multiple political groups with names easily confused with it, and they are used to discredit real science.
      Also, many of the once legitimate scientific institutions have been taken over by political groups or industries. FDA and CDC are some prime examples where industry has completely taken control of the scientific organization created to regulate them.

    9. Re:Gender Ideology Harms Children by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      I say, go for it.
      If we are lucky people will recognize it for the farce it is and it will make them start to question other organizations.
      Most likely though, you will get a huge group of followers who are too fucking stupid to comprehend what the message of the organization is and you will have to back out and explain what you were really doing the whole time to keep the legislation from being passed.

  95. What an ass by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    Seriously, what an asshole.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  96. Fuck Weev by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Weev is a fucking pussy

  97. Hacking thousands of Internet-connected printers? by khz6955 · · Score: 1

    Sending a one-line Bash command to an open port isn't hacking.

  98. Re:ethics in journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gonna spill the beans on the gamergate movement.
    It is a thing that started and is at least half composed by /v/ users, and it is in part or started as at least as a hate movement, but not against women or anything similar, but against bad developers that use other tactics to push their shitty games on people instead of you know, quality.
    If depression quest was let's say an awesome actraiser like game, they would regard Zoe Quinn as a heroine for "having to sleep with the fucking media to get a good game out" rather than "someone helping kill games".
    And well, she talking to her "friends" to basically censor the whole thing off the entire internet didn't helped either, given that funny thing called the Streisand effect

    But the rage from /v/ actually started WAY before gamergate.
    It brewed during the whole last generation of consoles, where they watched as games being turned into basically movies with some shooting segments sold in tiny DLC pieces, with every single website giving those atrocities 11/10 (with a very few exceptions that got quickly kicked out of the media, just ask mr.Jeff Gerstmann).
    And to add salt to the wound, those companies paid people to constantly go to the board and pretend to be users praising the game unrealistically, with fun pseudo memes like "now that the dust settled, can we all agree that "your childhood murdered and butchered 2: now even less gameplay" is the best game of the series?".
    So when Ms.Quinn basically showed to /v/ that "indie games will be even worse, because they will be a bunch politized of html files that nobody will criticize because the reviewers are all my friends and you're a mysoginistic biggot if you criticize", shit blew up.

  99. No by bigsexyjoe · · Score: 1

    He might have Jewish heritage. (Although it's not clear that is even the case.) But that doesn't make him a Jew, as Judaism is a religion.

  100. More like fax spamming than hacking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's already illegal to send spam faxes. That is essentially what he's done. If they want to charge him with something, they should start there, instead of typical unauthorized access to a network or some such bs.

  101. Re:Are local printers fair game to print to under by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are forgetting intent.

  102. It's like rain on your wedding day by pentagramrex · · Score: 1

    If I'm Jewish enough for Hitler, I can join in. A silly boy made a prank who has nasty beliefs. Nothing new here, move along. Just don't give them guns.

  103. Re:Are local printers fair game to print to under by Falos · · Score: 1

    The devices were put in free-game mode. Granted, maybe not every admin was aware of the fact (more like "not still employed") but that doesn't change the reality of the first point.

    The devices were put in free-game mode, possibly with the awareness that Some Punk Kid might do something obnoxious, and thus ruin it for everyone by breaking the Have Nice Things implied-truce. A risk to acknowledge and accept because some of us are just fucking nice and do shit like that anyway, strange as that may seem to the modern American mind. I'm pretty sure lots "art experiments" go even further about exposed stuff..

    THIS is the obligatory XKCD, which is to say weev did something permitted but is still a dick. It even reminds us that society has ways of reacting; laws from a nanny state are appropriate for crimes but not for correcting manner.
    https://xkcd.com/1499/

  104. Hacking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sending a print job to a printer port is not "hacking" except perhaps to an overzealous prosecutor with only a vague understanding of modern technology.

  105. Re:meaningless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You believe caging a human being and raping them for the remainder of their life is a just punishment for this crime? Is this what Sanders supporters really think? One thing Mi's hypothetical scenario was right about was that you would say something irrational and idiotic.

  106. Is his real name Eric Morecambe? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    If by pure chance he hits the right keys, he hits them in the wrong order.

    Obligatory Grieg's Piano Concerto?

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    1. Re:Is his real name Eric Morecambe? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I know the thing you're referring to, but I was thinking of a guy I used to know who knew every single command (and the many many additions & variations) in the language we worked with, but couldn't write a decent program to save his life.

      "Great with notes but shit at tunes" was how I put it. In a way, the superclass of the proverbial "Penny wise and pound foolish".

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  107. Re:meaningless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Born and raised in the USSR, I have a much better idea of what Communism is, than 90% of Americans.

    really? because your posts tend to show the reverse.

  108. Re:meaningless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    again, your background is apparently irrelevant, because you still believe that socialized democracy = socialism = communism.

    none of those things is the same.
    you state they are.
    ergo: you don't have a f'ing clue what communism is.

  109. What PDF software looks like an IP printer? by swb · · Score: 1

    It would be kind of amusing to create a public printer that generates PDFs just to see what people might print. You'd have to have some basic protection to limit the number/size/amount of documents printed, and probably have it on some read-only system that couldn't get exploited.

    But it might be entertaining to see what got printed.

    The tragedy of this thing is that the dumb guy chose to bulk print offensive stupidity.

    Much more enjoyable would have been a more calculated strategy to create some kind of apparent conspiracy by "accidentally" printing apparently real documents, and carefully distributing the "pieces" like some kind of puzzle, distributing them across the country (or even world) and/or altering the "message" to have it appear that your fake conspiracy had some geographic movement or flavor.

    An obvious (and probably not believable one) would be messages tracking victims of a zombie outbreak.

  110. Re:ethics in journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're right about that but there isn't much point trying to tell that to Ratzo, Serviscope or Amimojo. It would threaten their world view that all women are damsels that need saving.

    I'm not sure if they play games at all or are just involved in different gaming circles but I could see the ground work for shit blowing up back when Mass Effect 3 was released with that shit ending. A lot of people were left pissed off by the response to their complaints, being talked down to and being called entitled. People who care have been unhappy with the state of gaming for a while and having "their" media attack them for their hobby was the final straw.

  111. Re:ethics in journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Defeat?

    Yeah sure, that's why Totilo wrote a whole article about the ethical changes they were making at Kotaku about responsible disclosure and such. All the other sites followed suit. Totally wasn't because of Gamergate. Nope, just happened to be about that time by pure coincidence.

    Or did you mean we didn't achieve what you claimed was our goal despite none of us having any interest in it. Well yeah of course we didn't do that. Didn't build a fkn skyscraper out of jelly either.

  112. Re:ethics in journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Promoting racism "for the lulz" and doing it at a scale like Weev does is an interesting way to get one's entertainment, you have to admit.

    It is also REALLY effective and REALLY easy. It has the bonus of getting notice. It has the bonus of having fans. It has a monetary bonus (sad but true). It has a brand bonus.

    You're right, it is interesting. It's brilliant if you've got nothing better to call on. It's absolutely affective. From the outside looking in, it sure as hell is good quality lulz. It's probably too good. It's also too easy. However, if you're a lulz practitioner and someone gives you a microphone then what are you going to do? It's brilliant. It's too brilliant. You might even notice the too easy trend.

    It's brilliant enough that it needs more lulz. Wanna know the best way to get lulz? Well, I can't tell you. It'd ruin the chance to go it. (Hi Weev! I know you're reading this.) He's already posted in this thread. It is a bit much. Lulz could be had at an even greater level. 'Tis tempting, tempting indeed.

  113. Re:meaningless by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

    He accessed MANY systems he did not have authorization to use, committing many crimes, federal ones.

      We need to send a message to the next over-privileged nerd out there who thinks of doing a stunt like this or it keeps happening. Perhaps we'd have less of this shit if that spoiled brat Morris hadn't been coddled because his dad being NSA.

    While I wouldn't want Weev actually raped, I want hard time for him.

  114. NOT a hack. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He sent a print job to a bunch of printers, doing exactly what a printer driver would do, to a bunch of unsecured devices. Big deal. Stop glorifying this as some masterful hack simply because of scale.

  115. Re:meaningless by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    Idiots will call anybody a "SJW" these days; that term has become meaningless.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  116. Re:meaningless by mi · · Score: 0

    At least you've stopped trying to pretend that socalism and stalinism are the same

    What a liar you are! I never mentioned "Stalinism" at all. My claims are:

    • Socialism is Communism-lite.
    • Bernie Sanders is not merely a Socialist, but an actual Communist.

    I'll take that as a win

    Now that was a classic "straw man" — you misattributed a claim ("Stalinism") to me and claimed "victory" over it.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  117. Re:meaningless by mi · · Score: 0

    none of those things is the same.

    The differences are merely quantitative. And even the "lite" versions are dangerously destructive, with Venezuela being the most recent proof.

    you state they are.

    A lie.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  118. Re:Nazi-shmazi... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no, what he said was a complaint about how that separation empowers obstructionist opponents who would stand in the schoolhouse door of progress trying to hold it back no matter how needful it is.

    as usually, your ODS got in the way of your telling of it.

    few more fun facts:
    -Bernie isn't the one with brownshirts. Bernie isn't the one that formed a militia to protect his events:
    http://www.rawstory.com/2016/0...

    -No McCarthy wasn't right. No, they weren't going to overthrow the elected government. McCarthy was a nut. And so are you.

  119. Re:meaningless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wish only serves to prove that you still do not know what you are talking about.

  120. You think the Jews have it bad.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OTOH, if your father is 1/1 white and your mother is 1/2 white and half black, you are still called black (Or African American)

    I never figured that one out.

    How about your Father is full blood Cherokee and your Mother is full blood Creek. So you the child are either 1/2 Cherokee or 1/2 Creek. You can't claim tribal rights but to one tribe. So now your are only 1/2 Native American. So neither of your parents signed up on the rolls so now your and Indian that isn't an Indian any more. Why? No BIA card. Can't be a real Indian without a BIA card. Without the card I guess you genes change and what are you? Your not black, white, Jew, or Asian. /dev/null I guess.

    This is real about some friends of mine.
    A friend of mine is 1/2 Cheyenne and 1/2 Pawnee he married a woman who is 1/2 Navajo and 1/2 Plebeo. The woman is registered on the Navajo rolls as 1/2 Navajo. When they have a child and the child is registered with the Navajo tribe she is 1/4 Navajo. Now if this child grows up and say marries a Cherokee her children will now be below the required 1/4 blood quantum required to be Navajo so now you have a full blood Indian that isn't an Indian. Yes it is Federal law that makes this so.

    By Federal law three things are measured by blood quantum, dogs, horses, and Indians.

    And you Hebrews thought you had it bad.

    Native America
    Fighting Terrorism Since 1492

  121. Re:meaningless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you literally just stated that they are the same thing, before denying you ever said it.
    your post history is also rife with similar equivocations of the terms.

    yet you cant even get right the hierarchy as to which is a variant of which.
    calling socialism a lite version of communism is like saying an automobile is a kind of car, when in fact it is the reverse that is true.

    Socialism has a very clear and concise definition:
    "an economic model in which the means of production is own socially, ie by the public or their agents in government".
    Note that private property still exists.

    Communism begins with that model, but then expands it to reduce the ownership of private property, while increasing the role of the citizen's obligation to the State as an abstract of the people.

    Stalinism begins at communism, but becomes an overtly political model as well adding the government model of Totalitarianism, while simultaneously promoting extreme nationalism (which is probably where dingbats like you get it confused with Nazism).

  122. Re:Nazi-shmazi... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trump's father was a member.
    Trump himself affirmatively repeats what they say, on twitter and facebook.
    His sons go on their radio shows.

    sounds like pretty good evidence to me.

  123. Socialism is Communism-lite (Re:meaningless) by mi · · Score: 1

    calling socialism a lite version of communism is like saying an automobile is a kind of car

    Huh?

    your post history

    Is that why you post anonymously? So that I can not refer to your post history?

    Communism begins with that model, but then expands it to reduce the ownership of private property, while increasing the role of the citizen's obligation to the State as an abstract of the people.

    Exactly! Which is why I claim, the differences between Communism and Socialism are merely quantitative (as opposite to qualitative) — you may still own a toothbrush under Socialism, but not a restaurant. And if you are lucky to own a car, you can not use it to make money — because that turns it into "means of production".

    That "expansion" you mentioned happens gradually but inevitably as Individuals gradually lose rights to the amorphous Collective represented by the more equal.

    Stalinism begins at [...]

    Irrelevant. Not going into fine points of variations (Stalinism vs. Leninism vs. Trotskyism vs. Maoism vs. whoeverism). Though their adherents would kill the others over these fine points, all of them are disastrous to any country, where attempted in earnest.

    If you wish to continue this lovely discussion, please:

    • Start posting under your own name (even if this undoes your moderations);
    • State for the record, whether you agree, that Communism is evil (I don't want to waste time convincing you of Socialism being "lite" version of it only to hear "so what?" at the end).
    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Socialism is Communism-lite (Re:meaningless) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no political system is inherently evil.
      trying to make a purity test out of it only reveals your ignorance.

      (and the AC is because I already moderated in this thread when it was first posted. but believe me, I had not already used the points, your ignorance would have been overrated into oblivion)

  124. Re:ethics in journalism by Mashiki · · Score: 1

    No I'm just astonished that despite being founded on a fabrication (there were no reviews) and a harassment campaign people still keep insisting GG are somehow the good guys.

    No one said it was reviews, except the people too dense to take a look outside of their echo chamber. It was positive coverage, and it was, multiple times. And in that, there were other people. Can you find that actual harassment? I'll wait.

    While simultaneously trying to bully Anita Sarkeesian and Zoe Quinn off the internet. Okey dokey then.

    Really? Where is this bullying...oh right...now I remember: SJW101: "Criticism is harassment and bullying."

    Yep!

    You should try harder, just saying.

    Ah right so her doing something after this all blew up justifies you starting it off by making up lies. Ethics, got it. Must have been a pre-emptive ethical freedom strike.

    So what were the lies again? If you're banging someone, and you're writing about them, that's an ethical breach. Funny how even MSM reporters can figure that one out.

    Ah right so her doing something after this all blew up justifies you starting it off by making up lies. Ethics, got it. Must have been a pre-emptive ethical freedom strike.

    You mean trying to silence someone's review on their "game" because they didn't like the review? Well that isn't a lie. That she was sleeping around with multiple people who were writing about her? That wasn't a lie. That going by her own definition of rape(cheating on someone), she was committing rape. That also wasn't a lie. So what were the lies again?

    Visiting those cesspools? No thanks! I've seen enough before.

    Oh, so you enjoy your echo chamber and don't like being exposed to ideas that would throw your world into disarray, and counter that your view point is actually incorrect. Very good, stay in that echo chamber.

    Yes, you can just run right up to the UN and they let you in. True story. I'm sure the UN didn't, you know, invite them. And I must say that you seem, in your own words, rather salty about that if I say so myself.

    Do you actually know how hard it is to do a presentation at the UN without one of the following? Money, connections, and positions of power. Those people don't have that, people they know who were/are directly involved with them do have it though. So yes, running to the UN.

    The irony, it burns.

    Oh yes, the irony. That part where you'd rather enjoy your ideological hugbox because reality doesn't fit with your preconceived notions and what the media tells you.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  125. Re:ethics in journalism by Mashiki · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure if they play games at all or are just involved in different gaming circles but I could see the ground work for shit blowing up back when Mass Effect 3 was released with that shit ending. A lot of people were left pissed off by the response to their complaints, being talked down to and being called entitled. People who care have been unhappy with the state of gaming for a while and having "their" media attack them for their hobby was the final straw.

    It started way before the ME3 debacle. It hit a head with it though, the incestuous relationship between "game journalists" and the people they were writing about though, blew the top off it. People will only take shit so long, and like you said when those so called journalists decided to start attacking the people that make them money, that was it. It's going to go down in marketing history as one of the biggest clusterfucks in the 21st century and how to kill your brand in one easy step.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  126. Re:Nazi-shmazi... by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

    That was some interesting information.

    What a shitshow this is turning out to be.