Slashdot Mirror


Developer Of Anonymous Tor Software Dodges FBI, Leaves US (cnn.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from CNN: FBI agents are currently trying to subpoena one of Tor's core software developers to testify in a criminal hacking investigation, CNNMoney has learned. But the developer, who goes by the name Isis Agora Lovecruft, fears that federal agents will coerce her to undermine the Tor system -- and expose Tor users around the world to potential spying. That's why, when FBI agents approached her and her family over Thanksgiving break last year, she immediately packed her suitcase and left the United States for Germany. "I was worried they'd ask me to do something that hurts innocent people -- and prevent me from telling people it's happening," she said in an exclusive interview with CNNMoney. Earlier in the month, Tech Dirt reported the Department of Homeland Security wants to subpoena the site over the identity of a hyperbolic commenter.

323 comments

  1. Power corrupts... by boa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Unlimited power is apt to corrupt the minds of those who possess it"
    -- William Pitt the Elder, 1770

    1. Re:Power corrupts... by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      1.21 gigawatts!!! *Slaps head*

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    2. Re:Power corrupts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Power corrupts. Absolute power is kind of neat".
      -- Donald Reagan, Ronald Reagan's chief of staff - 1987

    3. Re:Power corrupts... by q4Fry · · Score: 1

      I'm confident that 1.21 gigawatts would "corrupt your mind" in fairly short order.

    4. Re:Power corrupts... by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Of course, once these minds are corrupted, they do not care about getting un-corrupted and think things are fine as they are.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  2. Hyperbolic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Tech Dirt reported the Department of Homeland Security wants to subpoena the site over the identity of a hyperbolic commenter.

    What a bunch of NAZIs!

    I mean, here's some poor bastard who wants to talk about geometry, calculus and math, and those fucking NAZIs at the DHS want him?!

    Talk about an anti-science society!

    1. Re:Hyperbolic by clemdoc · · Score: 4, Funny

      They're lucky they're not trying to meet a parallel commenter.

    2. Re:Hyperbolic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If he (or she) is any good, the Feds will just be running around in circles trying to find him.

    3. Re:Hyperbolic by matbury · · Score: 1

      Godwin's law reached in 3 posts. Is that a record?

    4. Re:Hyperbolic by tysonedwards · · Score: 2

      I get that math is scary, but do we really need to subpoena someone who knows how to effectively calculate mirror images? Surely this is an overreach of their power and they could find a local math professor if they truly have no one on salary who has taken an intro to calculus course.

      --
      Thirty four characters live here.
    5. Re:Hyperbolic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      do we really need to subpoena someone who knows how to effectively calculate mirror images?

      Of course we do! Aren't you aware of the dangers posed by the Al Gebra terrorist network?! I'll bet you're one of them!

    6. Re:Hyperbolic by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      I mean, here's some poor bastard who wants to talk about geometry, calculus and math, and those fucking NAZIs at the DHS want him?!

      What if he wanted to talk about trigonometry, or would that be going on a tangent?

      Talk about an anti-science society!

      I thought we were talking about math, this is kind of an orthogonal comment.

    7. Re:Hyperbolic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that's just insulting, even Mengele wasn't as sick as those running the FBI.

      At least HIS victims were allowed to die.

    8. Re:Hyperbolic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But can you imagine what difficulties the hyperbolic commenter must have in buying clothes, for example? Any clothes produced in a locally Euclidean manifold universe will simply not bend to his specifications at the human scales!

    9. Re:Hyperbolic by Zeroko · · Score: 1

      Hyperbolic space is locally Euclidean (as are all other manifolds), just not globally Euclidean. Locally non-Euclidean spaces are weirder.

      Our universe is also (globally) non-Euclidean (but still locally Euclidean), just at scales large enough to not cause problems for us (unless you happen to wander into a black hole or something).

  3. Game over, the Land of the Free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and the Home of the Brave.

    1. Re:Game over, the Land of the Free by dcollins117 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      People around here think the words "the land of the free and the home of the brave" signify some deeply held core American values, but they are really just lyrics to a song. The phrase first appeared in a poem written in 1814 by Francis Scott Key which was later set to a British tune called "To Anacreon in Heaven" and renamed "The Star-Spangled Banner" which as you know was eventually adopted as the national Anthem.

      My point is that they are just song lyrics, and while pleasing and patriotic they are really no more meaningful or insightful as Frank Zappa's "Watch out where the huskies go, and don't you eat that yellow snow."

    2. Re:Game over, the Land of the Free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      These are the lies we tell the gullible so that they will die for our ideals. Put these in songs, prayers, oaths and repeat ad nauseam and you have an effective brainwashing technique. Works equally well for Capitalism, Islam, Christianity, Socialism, Marxism, etc. Repeat "Death to America" enough times and no one questions "why" -- in the same way that few in the U.S. question capitalism.

    3. Re: Game over, the Land of the Free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I forgot that songs and poems don't mean anything... We aren't talking about "Shake it off" here, the song may just be a song but it is written based on events and principles that are values that Americans used to believe in. To say that lyrics are meaningless devalues the whole art of music.

    4. Re:Game over, the Land of the Free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      People around here think the words "the land of the free and the home of the brave" signify some deeply held core American values, but they are really just lyrics to a song.

      People around here think the Constitution signifies some deeply held core American values, but its just words on a piece of parchment for the CIA to wipe its ass with.

      That's not really the question. The question is whether this state is the best we should aim for. Laws, declarations and anthems, while just being words or sequences of glyphs and phonemes, are tools for projecting and promoting a vision for improvement and coexistence.

      So you say that the American People have given up on ideals as anything meaningful. That's certainly a plausible view of the evidence.

    5. Re:Game over, the Land of the Free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Frank Zappa's "Watch out where the huskies go, and don't you eat that yellow snow."

      I propose a change to the Canadian national anthem..

    6. Re:Game over, the Land of the Free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Illusion is a cumulative amalgamation, friend, not one line.

      The Illusion is waved eagerly at citizens, who then observe reality and become disillusioned.

      GP was an expression of disillusion directed at The Illusion; not actually directed one of the single crumbs that comprise it.

      You might do well to consider the big picture in the future. Sometimes needling over details, whether you're/they're right or wrong about trivial specifics, is irrelevant to the real assertion being made.

    7. Re:Game over, the Land of the Free by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      You are clearly a product of the American education system. They were NOT just words, but ideas on which this republic was based. Unfortunately, the worst generation of all time, the Boomers, have destroyed this nation. And NO I'm not a millennial.

    8. Re:Game over, the Land of the Free by shawn2772 · · Score: 2

      People around here think the words "the land of the free and the home of the brave" signify some deeply held core American values

      No, we think they're aspirational ideals, and as ideals they are meaningful to the degree that we actually try to achieve them.

    9. Re:Game over, the Land of the Free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just lyrics? Just a song??

      You are so far off-base it isn't even funny. Those lyrics are from the US national anthem! Zappa gets respect as an artist, but his 'yellow snow' song isn't exactly national anthem material. Even 'Born To Run' wasn't thematically appropriate for the NJ state anthem, great as that song is.

      The national anthem isn't legally binding, that much is true. However the anthem is supposed to speak to our higher ideals. It's not 'just a song'! When people conduct themselves in a patriotic manner, the anthem is as good a source for inspiration as it gets.

    10. Re:Game over, the Land of the Free by HiThere · · Score: 1

      No, they are echoes of the ideas on which the nation was based. For a closer take of those ideas read the Declaration of Independence...which also has no legal force.

      OTOH, it's worthwhile remembering that at the time the country was being set up, only about 1/3 of the population adhered to those ideals even to the extent of saying they agreed. In many areas the Tories were an absolute majority. And afterwards... Thomas Paine died in a French Jail and President Jefferson declined to write a letter asking for his pardon.

      History isn't as simple as they make it sound in school books. And current events aren't as simple as they make them sound in newspapers.

      All that said, the US president today has more effective control over the US citizenry than the British king did over British citizens in the 1700's. His legal control is less, but his effective control is greater. And even the "liberal" politicians are continually trying to increase it.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    11. Re: Game over, the Land of the Free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, just music with lyrics.

    12. Re:Game over, the Land of the Free by dryeo · · Score: 1

      And I always thought it referenced the free Braves that the Americans wiped out to steal their land after revolting against their King for saying those free natives had rights to their land, fucking tyrant removing peoples right to remove peoples rights.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    13. Re: Game over, the Land of the Free by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      To say that lyrics are meaningless devalues the whole art of music.

      Music has value?

      News to me. I always wondered why people wasted time with it plugged into their ears like brain-sucking vampire.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    14. Re:Game over, the Land of the Free by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      >All that said, the US president today has more effective control over the US citizenry than the British king did over British citizens in the 1700's. His legal control is less, but his effective control is greater. And even the "liberal" politicians are continually trying to increase it. Indeed, the 'liberal' politicians seem to be trying to increase it faster than the 'conservative' politicians (who are NOT conservative).

  4. undermining the Tor system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If she is "one of Tor's core software developers" and she thinks she alone could "undermine the Tor system -- and expose Tor users around the world to potential spying", what does that tell us about Tor.

    Is she saying nobody checks code-submissions she makes?

    What exactly is she saying here.

    1. Re:undermining the Tor system by houstonbofh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, what she is saying is the FBI may believe she can which puts her in a very bad position. If she is successful she "undermine(s) the Tor system -- and expose(s) Tor users around the world to potential spying" and if she is not she is imprisoned for contempt of court. I can see why she left. I can also see why so many security professionals keep their passport current. Way to keep the USA in the forefront of security; scare them to Germany.

    2. Re: undermining the Tor system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do people typically do line by line checks of code or do they use unit testing and other checks? Does everyone check everyone else's code or is there a team or person that checks? Is inserting code the only way someone on the inside can undermine TOR? With big brother being in the state it is in, we have no idea what they could try and force people to do. Why take a chance? Besides what testimony would a court really need from a single dev that they can't get from any other dev? Think about it.

    3. Re: undermining the Tor system by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      They better do line by line checks. Otherwise it isn't likely to be a secure system.

    4. Re:undermining the Tor system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you write doesn't fit with something else she said: "I was worried they'd ask me to do something that hurts innocent people."

      What is she saying there.

    5. Re:undermining the Tor system by 110010001000 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      How can she undermine Tor? Do the developers have some sort of "special access" to the Tor system? If so, then the system isn't secure.

    6. Re: undermining the Tor system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The stuff I work on (in the medical field, though not as far as to require FDA approval) anything even vaguely important it's line-by-line by one or two developers, including the unit tests for that code (which can often tell you a lot).
      That being said, if the FBI has access to the credentials of a core developer, and potentially things like their code signing certificate, then at the very least they have the ability to seriously manipulate the process such as delaying bug fixes that allow exploits by delaying code review.

    7. Re: undermining the Tor system by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      I just hope there isn't some kind of bystander effect in action here.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    8. Re:undermining the Tor system by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Developers are prime targets because if the FBI can coerce them secretly they can introduce flaws that look like innocent mistakes. When discovered people just put them down to human error and move on.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re:undermining the Tor system by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, but they know more about it than most people, and thus are in a better position to break it. That, or the FBI may want to utilise her standing in the community to push through unfavourable code without too much scrutiny.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    10. Re:undermining the Tor system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course they have special access - they write it. Yes, the source code is there to read and there are a whole team of developers, and if she tried to introduce a security-breaking bug it could be discovered, either straight away assuming there are commit reviews, or later on. But, especially if well crafted and obfuscated (see the Underhanded C Contest for examples), it could survive long enough for the feds to get what they want, and it could even be plausibly deniable that it was malicious anyway.

      So yes, if the feds put pressure on the developers of your favourite open source security software I'd be worried. And given that most projects have at least some US developers, I'd be worried anyway.

    11. Re:undermining the Tor system by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Well if they have special access to the running Tor network and they can slip in obfuscated flaws then the system isn't secure.

    12. Re:undermining the Tor system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think the FBI or the courts have the authority to impose this on a software developer. It is a form of compelled speech which the courts have struck down in the past.

      http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/compelledspeech.htm

    13. Re:undermining the Tor system by 110010001000 · · Score: 2

      If people can make commits to Tor without too much scrutiny then the system isn't secure.

    14. Re:undermining the Tor system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are you people voting this up?

      houstonbofh is making up his own story here.
      What she woman said was literally: "I was worried they'd ask me to do something that hurts innocent people"

      Stop voting up houstonbofh, he literally wrote up a pretend story about what he thinks the woman could theoretically have meant.

      He's making things up, nowhere does it say the woman "is saying is the FBI may believe she can which puts her in a very bad position".

      Nowhere.

      All it says is what OP wrote, plus "I was worried they'd ask me to do something that hurts innocent people"

      Stop making things up.

    15. Re:undermining the Tor system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Okay, sure, we get it, a brick is secure. Anything more complex is not. Can we move on now?

      Of course Tor can be compromised more easily by a developer. Do you regularly download new copies, compile from source, verify that the binaries match the source, and verify that the changelogs posted match the changes that you downloaded? No? Geez, it's like you don't want to check whether things are secure or not!

    16. Re:undermining the Tor system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Murica evil. guberment evil. I not help evil thugs.

      That's what she's saying. It's a subpoena. It's not an arrest warrant. There's a huge difference.

    17. Re:undermining the Tor system by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

      No I don't do that, because I know it isn't secure anyway. Tor isn't secure either.

    18. Re:undermining the Tor system by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      no system is secure. why do you keep parroting that same thing over and over?

      (fingered, mate. fwiw)

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    19. Re:undermining the Tor system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Obviously they'd ask her to only backdoor a specific pedo's copy of tor and not everyone else's copies.

    20. Re:undermining the Tor system by mrchaotica · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Do you regularly download new copies, compile from source, verify that the binaries match the source, and verify that the changelogs posted match the changes that you downloaded? No? Geez, it's like you don't want to check whether things are secure or not!

      And then cross-compile again on several heterogeneous architectures (including at least one very old one) and verify that all the output matches, in order to avoid the Ken Thompson hack? And did you do all this for every single piece of code running on the machine, including things like the hard drive firmware and CPU microcode?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    21. Re:undermining the Tor system by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      I'm just responding to posts. I know no system is 100% secure, but some are more secure than others.

    22. Re:undermining the Tor system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >contempt of court
      >in a country you no longer reside

      nice try schlomo

    23. Re:undermining the Tor system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, of course they have "special access". They have "special access" to the endpoints, both your PC and all up-to-date node machines. They are the developers. When you download their software and run their binaries you give them "special access" to your computer by allowing them to execute any commands they wish within the limits of the permissions you grant them.

    24. Re:undermining the Tor system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are many differences to you and me that melt away in the eyes of law enforcement. When you add secret courts, secret laws, Patriot Acts, NSLs, and other Gestapo-level shit into the mix, it starts getting dangerous. I wouldn't trust the FBI any farther than I could throw them.

    25. Re:undermining the Tor system by butzwonker · · Score: 2

      It is impossible to create a system that does not allow the developer(s) of the system to slip in flaws. No source code auditing can prevent that, since either the auditors can control the distribution of the executables, in case of which they could slip in a flaw, or they cannot control the distribution of the executables, in case of which one of the developers could slip in a flaw.

      The best that could be done is to do all development in teams, preferably randomly assigned, and ensure that all code changes and code distribution is done in teams as well, so there is literally always someone looking over another one's shoulder. Pretty hard to get much done in that way, though.

    26. Re:undermining the Tor system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure you fully understand what the word "subpoena" means. The main difference between the "poena" in question and an arrest is that an arrest comes with the right to silence.

      To be fair, you're right: that is a huge difference.

    27. Re:undermining the Tor system by tom229 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I decided to verify some of this speculation with information easy to obtain.. It turns out she's a very minor contributor. 3 commits, ever. To suggest her code contributions wouldn't be reviewed by the plethora of more active maintainers is pretty wild. Tor is open source, the FBI can make "clever" contributions on their own. They don't need the secret help of a very minor contributor. Furthermore, exit nodes are a much better avenue for compromise.

      Something fishy is going on here. If she's running and offering this bad of an excuse ("I don't want people to get hurt") it sounds like she's got something more I important to hide. Don't be surprised when more of this unravels and she turns out to be complicit in some illegal activities on that network.

      --
      If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
    28. Re:undermining the Tor system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Murica evil. guberment evil. I not help evil thugs.

      You feeling well there?

    29. Re:undermining the Tor system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... And you're willing to take a chance that they won't force you anyway? Thankfully this Isis is not that naive.

    30. Re: undermining the Tor system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They better do line by line checks. Otherwise it isn't likely to be a secure system.

      If you spent half as much time auditing the TOR source code as you do shitposting on Slashdot, maybe it would be a secure system.

    31. Re: undermining the Tor system by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      I'm not qualified to audit the TOR source code. But I am well qualified to shitpost on Slashdot.

    32. Re:undermining the Tor system by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      No, what she is saying is the FBI may believe she can which puts her in a very bad position. If she is successful she "undermine(s) the Tor system -- and expose(s) Tor users around the world to potential spying" and if she is not she is imprisoned for contempt of court. I can see why she left. I can also see why so many security professionals keep their passport current. Way to keep the USA in the forefront of security; scare them to Germany.

      I would say that in the current climate ANYONE who lives in the USA and who works in computer or network security, and doesn't work for the US government, should get out of the USA while they can.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    33. Re:undermining the Tor system by vel-ex-tech · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, keep following those etymologies like you found the true meaning of this or that magickal term, as if citing the true etymology of the word gives you some magickal power over those who would destroy liberty. Sir James George Frazer called. He wanted to ask you more about your system of magick for an updated edition of The Golden Bough.

      My memory isn't what it used to be, but wasn't it a subpoena that Apple fought for weeks and weeks not so long ago? A subpoena that attempted to coerce Apple into spending time and resources writing custom firmware?

      Maybe Lovecruft here didn't think she would be able to mount the same quality defense against such a subpoena as an international megacorp known for having a veritable money bin of wealth sitting around.

      I don't give a shit if it's called a subpoena or whatever the fuck that means in your system of magick. It's clear what the government is doing.

    34. Re:undermining the Tor system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If people can make commits to Tor without too much scrutiny then the system isn't secure.

      Malicious code doesn't have to be a simple "sendcopytoFBI(data)" function call. It can look a lot more innocent.

      Check out the 2014 Underhanded C Contest for examples of code that looks normal but leaks information. How many of those would be caught - and if so, which ones could be excused as a simple programming mistake?

      Cryptography is hard. Security is hard. Especially with Tor, due to its popularity and anonymity.

    35. Re:undermining the Tor system by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Facts don't belong in this discussion.

    36. Re:undermining the Tor system by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      By that argument you can't trust any software, because it's always possible for subtle errors to slip by reviews and testing.

      In a sense you are right, it's always best to be careful, but in practice if you never dare type your password in because the keyboard firmware might be backdoored... You won't get much done.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    37. Re:undermining the Tor system by gizmo2199 · · Score: 1

      But the thing is that outfits like the NSA (because, let's face it, all the FBI has to do to search or hack into your machine or wifi network, is get a rubber-stamped warrant)--who don't need a warrant and go after very hard to infiltrate targets, rely on very obscure and hard to reproduce vulnerabilities in hardware or software, that only they know about, and then very cleverly exploit those vulnerabilities to pown the system.

      And then if that doesn't work, they get their friends at the CIA to exploit the 3Bs of encryption--burglary, bribery, and blackmail.

      --
      This Sig does not Exist.
    38. Re:undermining the Tor system by Shinobi · · Score: 1

      And don't forget to verify what compiler settings are used when you check the compiled software ,so you don't incorrectly mistake compiler optimizations for malicious code and vice versa.

      And, in the end, it all hinges on your intimate knowledge of the code and the architecture in question, compared to the knowledge of the attacker.

    39. Re:undermining the Tor system by myowntrueself · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh. Then the system isn't very secure, is it? I don't know "Isis Agora Lovecruft". Should I trust her code?

      Wait WHAT? Her *name* is Isis!?!?!? How the fuck wasn't she on the no-fly list!

      Sheesh, there go your TSA and Homeland security dollars right there! Those guys really dropped the ball on this one!

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    40. Re:undermining the Tor system by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      If single developers can introduce flaws then the system can't be trusted anyway.

      Look at the history of Linux related security holes, especially the ones that have come to light since Snowden. Based on the amount single-developer flaws that have opened gaping security holes and based on your assertion, I doubt theres any software, open source or otherwise, that can be trusted.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    41. Re:undermining the Tor system by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

      No I am right, period. You can assume that any computer system is insecure and the software cannot be trusted. However some systems are more secure than others.

    42. Re:undermining the Tor system by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Correct. So is Tor secure?

    43. Re:undermining the Tor system by Kierthos · · Score: 2

      You don't know the people who run Slashdot. Should you keep posting?

      All I'm saying, is there's reasonable caution, and there's outright bloody paranoia.

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    44. Re:undermining the Tor system by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      What does posting here have to do with security? I don't care that the people who run Slashdot know me. They know who I am anyway in general with all the cookies and they have my IP address and email. However the point of using Tor is to be "bloody paranoid".

    45. Re:undermining the Tor system by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      You're on to something here. I think she may turn out to be accused of not using a condom in Sweden.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    46. Re:undermining the Tor system by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      100% correct. Congratulations.

    47. Re:undermining the Tor system by myowntrueself · · Score: 2

      Something fishy is going on here. If she's running and offering this bad of an excuse ("I don't want people to get hurt") it sounds like she's got something more I important to hide. Don't be surprised when more of this unravels and she turns out to be complicit in some illegal activities on that network.

      This is the USA, most things are illegal.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    48. Re:undermining the Tor system by gizmo2199 · · Score: 2

      It's funny you should say this, because (and more interestingly) a former tor developer, who also has a PhD in CompSci, is now the lead researcher for a security firm closely aligned to to the FBI, in fact employing some of the agents responsible for catching DPR and shutting down SilkRoad.

      "Matt Edman is a cybersecurity expert who worked as a part-time employee at Tor Project, the nonprofit that builds Tor software and maintains the network, almost a decade ago."
      "By 2012, Edman was working at Mitre Corporation as a senior cybersecurity engineer assigned to the FBI's Remote Operations Unit, the bureau’s little-known internal team tapped to build or buy custom hacks and malware for spying on potential criminals. With an unparalleled pedigree established from his time inside the Tor Project, Edman became an FBI contractor tasked with hacking Tor as part of Operation Torpedo, a sting against three Dark Net child pornography sites that used Tor to cloak their owners and patrons."

      http://www.dailydot.com/politi...

      And she's worried the FBI might try to use her to "infiltrate" Tor. Please, they're already using consultants who probably get paid 3x whatever she's making to actively deanonymize Tor.

      She's a tad paranoid if you ask me.

      --
      This Sig does not Exist.
    49. Re:undermining the Tor system by Kierthos · · Score: 1

      Don't take the chance, man. Turn off all your devices, close the curtains, cancel mail delivery, and wrap tin foil around your head.

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    50. Re:undermining the Tor system by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      They don't need obscure vulnerabilities. There are tons of well known exploits in all operating systems and networks. MacOSX has a one-line CLI root access bug in its shipping system for example. You don't need to be clever.

    51. Re:undermining the Tor system by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      My guess is we are only hearing half of the story. Maybe she ran for other reasons.

    52. Re:undermining the Tor system by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      That's what I said.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    53. Re:undermining the Tor system by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      No. I am just not foolish and think that networks and computer systems are secure. Personally it doesn't matter to me if they are or not.

    54. Re:undermining the Tor system by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Even if we assume America won't abuse it, which is anathema to the American political philosophy of chaining up government, the rest of the world will.

      Does anyone think Russia, or China, or any of the dictatprships or corrupt nominal democracies across any continent on the Equator or mid east won't?

      Quit building the 1984-like tools to aid those places keeping their boots on their humans' faces...forever.

      I am ashamed my government is demanding cracks in these things for transient crime or even terrorist activities, when dictatorship and misery still rules half the world and will happily misuse these tools...once built.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    55. Re:undermining the Tor system by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

      How can I trust it is you that actually said it? You could be an imposter. Maybe YOU are Isis Lovecruft!

    56. Re:undermining the Tor system by butzwonker · · Score: 1

      Definitely secure enough for my needs, and I don't know of any more secure system. (I2P? Freenet?)

      I should mention that I'm not a globally persecuted terrorist, though.

    57. Re:undermining the Tor system by myowntrueself · · Score: 2

      100% correct. Congratulations.

      Back in the old country I actually had a friend who developed his own operating system, from the ground up, because he didn't trust anything from anyone else.

      It was a lot of work to build and he couldn't really do much with it... Unfortunately (or fortunately depending on your perspective) civilization requires that people work together and trust one another.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    58. Re:undermining the Tor system by butzwonker · · Score: 1

      No, if your bloody paranoid you should definitely not use it. Tor is only for people who are ordinarily paranoid.

    59. Re: undermining the Tor system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How exactly does the FYI coerce someone into doing something for them? I'm a slave to no man, and no one has the ability to make me do anything, unless they drug me out of my mind in which case that's going way darker than this story holds meaning they would have just entered her house, she would have been on no fly list etc. The point being is you can always say No or better yet don't say anything and she already has a lawyer so if she disappears her lawyer should be ready to go on a crusade for answers. You people watch too many movies. If she was a big target, she would already be in custody. She's no one and is only making things worse trying to get attention like she's being victimized. Has the government broken a law in her case? I bet I could find a few laws she has already broken, I hope the book she gets hit with is big and heavy.

    60. Re:undermining the Tor system by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Touche, sir. I'll add her to the list of people I've been accused of being.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    61. Re:undermining the Tor system by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

      My guess is Tor is no more secure than anything else. If I was law enforcement the first thing I would do would be to subvert the Tor network and monitor the exit nodes. Also, I think you really are a terrorist and just aren't admitting it.

    62. Re:undermining the Tor system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Correct. So is Tor secure?

      It's more secure after one key developer removed herself from the immediate grasp of an Orwellian government with a dim view towards privacy, human rights and due process.

    63. Re: undermining the Tor system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then stop asking if they are. See upthread. Stop playing "Marathon Man" games. -smdh-

    64. Re:undermining the Tor system by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      What you write doesn't fit with something else she said: "I was worried they'd ask me to do something that hurts innocent people."

      What is she saying there.

      That she knows enough about how it works to be able to compromise it and she's not willing to go toe to toe with the US authorities so she ditched out before it started. Smartest move she could've made, the best move is not to play and all that.

      This is basic reading comprehension, not rocket science.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    65. Re:undermining the Tor system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Lame attempt to change the subject into an irrelevant rant about "etymologies". Seriously, who cares?

      An arrest warrant is a licence to lock you in jail, with conditions. A subpoena is a licence to lock you in jail, with conditions. An arrest warrant can be fought. A subpoena can be fought. That's the similarity. The difference is that one is an ultimatum, forcing obligations upon you and allowing you to avoid imprisonment if you are willing and able to fulfil those obligations, whereas the other protects you against such obligations and puts the responsibility on your accusers.

      Now you can examine word origins with your magnifying glass on your own time, but please stop trying to project your fixation onto me. Your evasive complaints about the word "subpoena" mean nothing, and I'm not interested in your theories on etymology or magick.

    66. Re:undermining the Tor system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gotta leave with the family too, lest "evidence" starts being found pointing to family members for anything from drugs to pedophilia to murdersprees.

      When it comes to the FBI, the CIA, and various hired SWAT companies across America, the chance to disappear even some toddlers as an "incentive" to further violate human rights is but an aphrodisiac in their inhumane offices.

    67. Re:undermining the Tor system by Hotawa+Hawk-eye · · Score: 1
      That's not quite sufficient. Take Weird Al's advice and:

      Turn off your computer and make sure it powers down
      Drop it in a forty-three-foot hole in the ground
      Bury it completely, rocks and boulders should be fine
      Then burn all the clothes you may have worn any time you were online!

      Do it now "before it emails your grandmother all of your porn."

    68. Re:undermining the Tor system by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      The ken thomspon hack is overrated. You can't inject subversive code into a program without code to do the injection and code which is the virus itself and this code has to exist somewhere even if its only in binary form so despite what some people think it, its not magic , its not invisible, it can be detected. Yes yes, all the tools are subverted etc - well good luck writing code that can be injected into every tool and work properly in every situation. That would be the holy grail of virus coding.

    69. Re:undermining the Tor system by stealth_finger · · Score: 0

      My memory isn't what it used to be

      Obviously not or you remember magic is spelled with a c. Did all the red wavy lines not give it away or are you trying to be clever somehow like that guy who insists on saying grok instead of understand.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    70. Re:undermining the Tor system by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Don't be surprised when more of this unravels and she turns out to be complicit in some illegal activities on that network.

      There are many possibilities which don't involve involvement with illegal activity - including that she may have mental problems.

      But as the saying goes... just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    71. Re:undermining the Tor system by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      How can she undermine Tor? Do the developers have some sort of "special access" to the Tor system? If so, then the system isn't secure.

      Probably in the same way a vault designer could compromise their vault. It's all locked up tight unless you put this here and tap there and it all opens up * not a thing that happens but you get the idea.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    72. Re:undermining the Tor system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that's exactly the kind of person they want to go after.
      Given its popularity, going after the main creator/contributor risks the ire of those who know what this is even about, and they've been having problems hiring coders lately already, what with their blatant disregard for laws, rights, privacy and other things we illegally hold dear.

      A minor contributor who could potentially allow some kind of back door with a 4th commit, or just through any vulnerabilities in whatever bits of code she made, that's worth going after, in particular thanks to any coercion being more easily swept under the carpet.

      "What? oh, we hear she might've uh, used it once or something sure, but our arrest of her great-grandfather for war crimes and hitching electrodes to her youngest child's genitals are a matter of TERRORISM AND NATIONAL SECURITY, not some silly The Onion route program. That's a satire site, you know."

    73. Re:undermining the Tor system by zifnabxar · · Score: 1

      Sure she hasn't done much on the git repo, but her cv which is hosted on a Tor site, seems to suggest she's been pretty involved with the project for a while.

    74. Re:undermining the Tor system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could have spent a little more time to discover that she appears to be maintaining the nextgen spec for Tor. She also appears to be actively involved with accepting/rejecting proposed changes to the spec. Just because someone is not contributing to the mainline project doesn't mean they're not actively involved in it.

    75. Re:undermining the Tor system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      You are clearly not looking hard enough. She is the lead developer of BridgeDB and has been working on OONI:
      https://www.torproject.org/about/corepeople.html.en
      Looking at the checkins on BridgeDB shows that she at least has been very active:
      https://gitweb.torproject.org/bridgedb.git

    76. Re:undermining the Tor system by c · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This might be relevant. Not a contributor to the core code base, but somewhat in the loop.

      Given the competence and professionalism shown by the FBI on this, I imagine their method for choosing a target was less about how important they are to the project and more about how accessible and vulnerable they are to law enforcement threats.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    77. Re: undermining the Tor system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll post whatever the fuck I want

    78. Re: undermining the Tor system by vux984 · · Score: 1

      I can't speak to whether she is a core developer or not, nor how relevant she might be to the tor project.

      But the idea of counting code commits is idiotic -- next you'll be telling us the building architect and construction foreman aren't some of the best people to point at the weakest spots in a building project because you checked how many nails, welds, and bolts they were responsible for and found the number close to zero.

    79. Re:undermining the Tor system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exposing Tor users around the world to potential spying doesn't fit with her being worried that she would be asked to do something that would hurt innocent people? Really?

    80. Re: undermining the Tor system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Omg spelling mirstake! All pnts made are now invalidated!! Do us a favor and jmp off a vry high brdg.

    81. Re: undermining the Tor system by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Uh, I think *developer* means you actually *develop* the software. Otherwise she would be an architect. She removed ONE line of code (a double free). That is it. That isn't a core developer.

    82. Re:undermining the Tor system by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      That is foolish. You shouldn't trust a computer or network that is insecure. It doesn't mean that computers and networks are bad or not useful. You just can't trust them to be secure.

    83. Re: undermining the Tor system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.

    84. Re:undermining the Tor system by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

      Close but not quite correct. One could also do source code auditing using an anonymous download of the "official" executables for comparison, posing as one of many end users.
      The authors could then still slip in a flaw, but the executables compiled by the developer(s) would not match the executables from the anonymous download.

      This could be beaten with the Ken Thompson hack, but I think the Ken Thompson hack is not easy to implement in an undetectable way.
          - First, the developer(s) would need to control the distribution of the compiler executables, not only that of the TOR executables.
          - Second, the developer(s) would also need to need to compromise those debugging tools the auditors might use, otherwise a look at the executables would show what is going on.

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
    85. Re: undermining the Tor system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh tor is no more secure than anything else? Thanks for heads up! I knew I should be using plain text for all my online banking needs! Since it's no more secure than ANYTHING else.

    86. Re: undermining the Tor system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She's been a lead software developer for the tor bridge distro for 3 years, but she's only has 3 commits? All together she has 6 years at tor, 3 commits.

    87. Re:undermining the Tor system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, she has no background in CS. She studied feminist theory or some such shit.

    88. Re: undermining the Tor system by vux984 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I was speaking in general to the notion that counting commits means anything; I don't know anything about her. And I certainly wouldn't get all pedantic about the term 'developer' as used in an article on the web; where everyone from a system architect, to the person who edits the content on the company intranet via CMS is routinely called a 'developer'.

      But fine, you've made me look... happy?

      https://www.torproject.org/abo...

      "Isis: Lead maintainer and developer on BridgeDB. Used to work on OONI."

      So where does that take us:
      https://bridges.torproject.org...

      "When using Tor with Tails in its default configuration, anyone who can observe the traffic of your Internet connection (for example your Internet Service Provider and perhaps your government and law enforcement agencies) can know that you are using Tor."

      "This may be an issue if you are in a country where the following applies:
      1. Using Tor is blocked by censorship [...]
      2. Using Tor is dangerous or considered suspicious: in this case starting Tails in its default configuration might get you into serious trouble. [...]

      "Tor bridges, also called Tor bridge relays, are alternative entry points to the Tor network that are not all listed publicly. Using a bridge makes it harder, but not impossible, for your Internet Service Provider to know that you are using Tor."

      isislovecruft #1: 1,619 commits, 130,599++ / 82,789--
      https://github.com/isislovecru...

      and
      https://ooni.torproject.org/

      "A free software, global observation network for detecting censorship, surveillance and traffic manipulation on the internet"

      isislovecruft #2 with 271 commits, 31,590++, 23,581 --
      https://github.com/TheTorProje...

      She removed ONE line of code (a double free). That is it. That isn't a core developer.

      That burning feeling in your cheeks... that's the shame. Assuming you are a decent human.

    89. Re: undermining the Tor system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a pretty strange conclusion there.

      This is the FBI. They don't care what is possible, what can't be done, or even about the laws of physics.

      If the FBI demands you slow down the speed of light, the fact it's physically impossible means nothing.
      They have hundreds of laws to put you in prison under 23 hour a day torture sessions for life when you fail to comply.
      They have entire boards of judges that will agree the FBI is in the right for doing it.

      No, the fact you conclude tor is breakable as possible only proves you have never once in your life had any dealings with the US federal government. It says nothing about tor.

    90. Re:undermining the Tor system by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      > Murica evil. guberment evil. I not help evil thugs.

      You feeling well there?

      Looking at where we are now, and the choices we have going forward? No, I am not feeling too well lately.

    91. Re:undermining the Tor system by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      That is foolish. You shouldn't trust a computer or network that is insecure. It doesn't mean that computers and networks are bad or not useful. You just can't trust them to be secure.

      I agree. The thing is that at this point in the development of computer systems what people should really be preparing for is for all that encrypted data to be 'out there' because quantum computing is quite plausibly going to be able to break any of the widely used encryption systems available today. Ie its not if but when your encrypted data goes public. Its just like SETEC Astronomy.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    92. Re:undermining the Tor system by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      How the fuck wasn't she on the no-fly list!

      Maybe they realized that being on the no-fly list would have zero effect on her because she wears skirts?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    93. Re:undermining the Tor system by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Correct. So ask yourself: is Tor secure?

      A better question is "Is Tor more secure then what I am doing now?" or "Is there something more secure then Tor that I can use?" There is no perfect security, but there is better and worse security. (MS CHAP anyone?)

    94. Re:undermining the Tor system by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      She's a tad paranoid if you ask me.

      Perhaps, but the consequences of being not paranoid enough are quite high!

    95. Re:undermining the Tor system by houstonbofh · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sure she hasn't done much on the git repo, but her cv which is hosted on a Tor site, seems to suggest she's been pretty involved with the project for a while.

      Exactly. Only one person can actually commit, so if several people collaborate on some code, only one gets the credit. I collaborated with a lot of developers for one open source project, but never made a single commit... But all the developers knew me, and if I e-mailed one a code snippit, it was likely to be used.

    96. Re:undermining the Tor system by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Also, she has no background in CS. She studied feminist theory or some such shit.

      And I have a social science degree. Back when I started, a CompSci degree was not all that... The real world was far ahead of the Universities.

    97. Re:undermining the Tor system by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      I would say that in the current climate ANYONE who lives in the USA and who works in computer or network security, and doesn't work for the US government, should get out of the USA while they can.

      And go where? I have to say that the list of countries that will not just ship you back to the US does not include a lot of wonderful places.

    98. Re: undermining the Tor system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I got tired of Gentoo years ago.

    99. Re:undermining the Tor system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is your second attempt to troll with an inane comment and I'm the only one exactly dumb enough to respond. Try being more, or less, subtle.

    100. Re: undermining the Tor system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I am well qualified to shitpost on Slashdot.

      But I used to like you on Bad Astronomy [assuming you're the same 110010001000].

    101. Re:undermining the Tor system by sl3xd · · Score: 1

      Noah Webster strikes again.

      Magick is a valid spelling, much like colour or flavour. Now stop proving your ignorance.

      --
      -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
    102. Re:undermining the Tor system by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      This is your second attempt to troll with an inane comment and I'm the only one exactly dumb enough to respond. Try being more, or less, subtle.

      Hey what with all the federal laws, state laws, county laws, city by-laws, regulations etc etc you really never know whats legal unless you walk around with a team of lawyers! Even then its doubtful, theres probably some jurisdiction where walking around with a team of lawyers is illegal!

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    103. Re:undermining the Tor system by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      I would say that in the current climate ANYONE who lives in the USA and who works in computer or network security, and doesn't work for the US government, should get out of the USA while they can.

      And go where? I have to say that the list of countries that will not just ship you back to the US does not include a lot of wonderful places.

      Well no English speaking country, thats for sure.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    104. Re:undermining the Tor system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi! - Anonymous Coward here who is also Kate Krauss, a colleague of Isis's at Tor. I'm our Director of Communications and Public Policy. Isis is one of our major devs and usually keeps a low profile. We don't know what the FBI wants--but she was concerned that if they tried to subpoena her for whatever it is--that it might include a gag clause. SO--very cleverly, she did two things. [0] She started a personal web canary months ago here: https://fyb.patternsinthevoid.net/canary.html and [1] She decided to publish this blog post: https://blog.patternsinthevoid.net/ explaining what she knows so far. You can read more about her on her blog.
      Isis will not be trapped or isolated in the way that some cherished people in our community have found themselves when harassed by law enforcement. Isis is brave, brilliant, and she is taking matters into her own hands. We're not very easy to backdoor, it turns out.

    105. Re:undermining the Tor system by HiThere · · Score: 1

      IIUC, many of the TOR routers are operated by the US government, and the system is not inherently secure against changes of code in the machines that are running it. Why does this surprise you?

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    106. Re: undermining the Tor system by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Tor is a program running on computers. It's almost certainly corruptible if you can control both the software and the machine that it's running on. The US Govt is said to run many Tor nodes.

      Mind you, this might not break the system, but only weaken it enough that it would be relatively easy to break in individual cases. It could facilitate route tracing, e.g., but cutting the length of the paths that need to be traced in half. Etc. (I'm no cryptographer, but that kind of thing seems obvious to me.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    107. Re:undermining the Tor system by Nick+Mathewson · · Score: 1

      Isis mostly works on Python stuff like bridgebd: https://gitweb.torproject.org/bridgedb.git/

      On the Tor daemon itself, she's got a pretty good patch series on https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/7144 that I hope she'll have time to refactor soon. Maybe accusing her of being a total phony is not the best way to help her there?

      (omg slashdot still exists)

    108. Re:undermining the Tor system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man someone needs to brush up on reality if they think Tor is about being paranoid...

    109. Re:undermining the Tor system by tom229 · · Score: 1

      Very informative, thank you. It's a bit odd to read about how your colleague is going through so much mental turmoil over the uncertainty of the FBI's interest in her, but then systematically refuses to return their calls. I'd recommend she return their call, record it, and publish it. This would help clear up some of the speculation and confusion. She seems extraordinarily and unusually afraid of law enforcement, which raises suspicion.

      --
      If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
    110. Re:undermining the Tor system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you check the Tor webpage it lists her as the lead maintainer and developer for the bridge components which are used to help conceal that you are passing tor traffic. Shes not a core Tor developer but she is important for one of the major components that support it.

      https://www.torproject.org/about/corepeople.html.en
      Isis, Developer
      Lead maintainer and developer on BridgeDB. Used to work on OONI.

    111. Re:undermining the Tor system by geekgirlandrea · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is false; Isis does a lot of valuable work on Tor and on some related projects like bridgedb, but she does not have commit rights on the Tor daemon itself. The people who do are me (Andrea Shepard), Nick Mathewson and Roger Dingledine. All patches are reviewed by at least one committer other than the patch author.

    112. Re: undermining the Tor system by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      no fanx you prik

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    113. Re:undermining the Tor system by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      So trying to be clever then. Also colour and flavour are the English spellings and we don't spell it magick so that point fails. It's basically just an old spelling that's still in the dictionary, of which you are obviously intimately familiar with every single word otherwise your acrasial outrage would not be justified.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    114. Re:undermining the Tor system by dave420 · · Score: 1

      And maybe she didn't. As you don't have even half the facts, jumping to conclusions isn't painting you in the most rational of lights.

    115. Re:undermining the Tor system by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      The Ken Thompson hack could work in a limited environment, with only one compiler for the applicable code, which is what most people had at the time. It became obsolete with the introduction of gcc.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    116. Re: undermining the Tor system by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Coercion here means that there's a court order, which takes money and time and energy to fight, and she cooperates or is jailed for contempt of court. She isn't going to disappear, and her lawyer will be able to talk to her. She can be held in jail indefinitely as long as she refuses to cooperate.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    117. Re:undermining the Tor system by gweihir · · Score: 1

      My take also. It could also be pressure or a court order that forces her to keep vulnerabilities she finds secret and only tell the FBI about them.

      What you are seeing here, folks, is history in the making. Not quite like the Jews fleeing Nazi Germany, but the fundamental principle is not so different. It is ironic though, that people are fleeing in the opposite direction these days.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    118. Re:undermining the Tor system by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Indeed. In the US, you have no reasonable expectation of the rule of law being applied to your case. This is what a budding police-state looks like and the future direction this is going is pretty clear.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    119. Re:undermining the Tor system by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Any good code review flags obfuscated code as even more red (if that were possible) than an obvious backdoor.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    120. Re:undermining the Tor system by alexandru_preoteasa · · Score: 1

      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there aren't people actually out to get you.

    121. Re:undermining the Tor system by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      You
      http://www.dictionary.com/brow...
      Are
      http://www.merriam-webster.com...
      Wrong
      http://www.oxforddictionaries....

      Grok is a perfectly acceptable, defined, word contained in the dictionaries that record the meanings of the english language. Language evolves, get over it.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    122. Re:undermining the Tor system by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      I never said it wasn't a word. You fail reading comprehension. I said that guy insists on using an obscure word that's basically never used instead or the more standard one everyone groks in order to try and sound clever. Just like this guy insisted on spelling magic as magick. It might be in the dictionary but it doesn't mean that you don't look like a twat for doing it.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    123. Re:undermining the Tor system by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      I said that guy insists on using an obscure word that's basically never used instead or the more standard one everyone groks in order to try and sound clever.

      Frak that, I thought we were in a cyberspace forum where people use words from science fiction to communicate as the audience is expected to like the same things as us. If that isn't true, time might just go all wibbly wobbly.

      That last one was a stretch, but the point is you write for your audience, we aren't writing for English class here, we are doing informal writing, where style is less important than substance, and writing towards a more technically inclined audience where many of the members grew up reading hard sci fi like Heinlein. Personally, I never read Stranger in a Strange Land, and never really took to Heinlein, but I knew what grok meant, and never really saw a big deal with it in common informal speech.

      I ran across grok as the Linux command well before ever looking the word up, so I just used that meaning of the word:

      http://doc.gnu-darwin.org/xmba...

      Not everyone on an online forum is going to write like an English teacher, and expecting everyone to use formal speech on the internet will end up constantly frustrating you. It is much like railing against TXT SPCH.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  5. Only one thing to do with traitors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hang them by the nuts until they are dead.

    Nowhere to run baby and nowhere to hide.

    1. Re:Only one thing to do with traitors by houstonbofh · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hang them by the nuts until they are dead.

      Nowhere to run baby and nowhere to hide.

      But hanging all of congress and most of the justice department will take a while.

    2. Re:Only one thing to do with traitors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just hang them in serial from the Burj Khalifa.

    3. Re:Only one thing to do with traitors by johanw · · Score: 2

      There are lots of places to run and escape the evil empire the US has become. Just like before 1989 Russian dissidents fled to the west, now western dissident flee to other countries.

    4. Re:Only one thing to do with traitors by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      Just hang them in serial from the Burj Khalifa.

      In serial??

      Parallelization is where its at.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    5. Re:Only one thing to do with traitors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seriously think she has nuts? You're weird.

    6. Re:Only one thing to do with traitors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wood chipper. Fast. Efficient. Fertilizer.

    7. Re:Only one thing to do with traitors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But then we would be left with Hillary... :(

    8. Re:Only one thing to do with traitors by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      But then we would be left with Hillary... :(

      I am not sure she does not have balls. She has shown a set on occasion or two. Most when blatantly lying.

  6. Germany belongs to NATO ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Germany belongs to NATO. BTW, she was planning that trip way before FBI wanted to talk to her so it's just a "personal brand" PR stunt.

    1. Re:Germany belongs to NATO ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is NATO relevant in this?

    2. Re:Germany belongs to NATO ... by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Not at all. Just an AC throwing FUD.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  7. Why did she go to Germany? by DatbeDank · · Score: 4, Informative

    She should be heading to a country that doesn't have an extradition treaty with the US.

    1. Re:Why did she go to Germany? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      She is only wanted for questioning.

      Yet.

      So the problem is not a country with an extradition treaty. The problem is a country with CIA darkrooms. Depending on how much the U.S. may be willing to let their mask slip in "allied" countries, Germany might not be far enough from the grip of Uncle Sam Mengele.

    2. Re:Why did she go to Germany? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Unless she's accused of an extraditable crime, she can't be extradited.
      She's hasn't yet been accused of a crime. She's wanted as a material witness in an ongoing investigation.

    3. Re:Why did she go to Germany? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Berlin is swarming with crypto hipsters and us crypto dissidents. In some streets and restaurants you can't even order in german anymore. Thanks to their nazi and stasi past the germans are very tolerant towards people who hate spy agencies, especially in berlin, where you can even visit one of the former torture prisons of the stasi. I guess we will have to wait a long time until we see gitmo being made a museum where people can watch the waterboarding cells.

    4. Re:Why did she go to Germany? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Berlin is swarming with crypto hipsters

      I can imagine them going around saying things like "Vpu zbpugr Xelcgb, oribe rf xüuy jne."

    5. Re:Why did she go to Germany? by mekkab · · Score: 1

      this works in the rot13-er-izer: "Vpu zbpugr Xelcgb, oribe rf xhruy jne."

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    6. Re:Why did she go to Germany? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh, she's not being charged with a crime, she is being chased by FBI agents who want to give her a magic piece of paper. They can't do that outside the US.

    7. Re:Why did she go to Germany? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm... Maybe the feds asked her to go there?

  8. You know... by MitchDev · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ..there was a time when people would think it was ridiculous to fear that the US would "I was worried they'd ask me to do something that hurts innocent people -- and prevent me from telling people it's happening,"...Shows how far America has fallen...

    1. Re:You know... by 110010001000 · · Score: 2, Informative

      When was this? This isn't new. As Ronald Reagan said: "The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help."

    2. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, those first few minutes after the Declaration of Independence were really great.

    3. Re: You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Frankly, it IS ridiculous. Go back to your echo chamber, the real world is too complex to explain to someone like you. Seriously, do you base all your opinions on Internet stories?

    4. Re:You know... by boa · · Score: 4, Informative

      AFAICT: You're quoting Reagan out of context. He was speaking about farming and government subsidies. This is what Reagan actually said:

      "When I first started traveling abroad as President, especially to our annual economic summits, I suggested that the best foreign aid or development program the United States could give the world was a crash study in free enterprise. And this idea was, to say the least, greeted with skepticism. But when America's economic miracle took over and as we created during the past 67 months 17 million new jobs, I noticed that the idea of fostering growth through encouraging the entrepreneur began to take hold -- even to the point where the emphasis on agricultural subsidies, once so sacrosanct in other nations, is giving way at these summits to ideas on how to develop more free enterprise. There seems to be an increasing awareness of something we Americans have known for some time: that the 10 most dangerous words in the English language are, ``Hi, I'm from the Government, and I'm here to help.'' [Laughter]

      Well, of course, sometimes government can help and should help -- natural disasters like the drought, for example -- but we need to look to a future where there's less, not more, government in our daily lives. It's that philosophy that brought us the prosperity and growth that we see today. That's why we've proposed nothing less than a total phaseout by the year 2000 of all policies that distort trade in agriculture, and I'm speaking of worldwide. This proposal reflects one of my abiding beliefs -- I think it's a belief that you share: The solution to the world agricultural problem is to get government out of the way and let farmers compete."
      https://reaganlibrary.archives...

    5. Re:You know... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      I would add the words "ronald reagan" to that list, as well. that guy fucked us over so badly and for so long, and yet quite a lot of people see him as some kind of saint or model. the disconnect is strong, with this one, master yoda says.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    6. Re:You know... by 110010001000 · · Score: 2

      It applies in general. Lincoln rerouted all the telegraph lines in the 1800s so the government could listen in on telegraph traffic.

    7. Re:You know... by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Well considering he was head of the government for a long time I would think he would be at the top of the list.

    8. Re:You know... by careysub · · Score: 0

      Well, of course, sometimes government can help and should help -- natural disasters like the drought, for example -- but we need to look to a future where there's less, not more, government in our daily lives. It's that philosophy that brought us the prosperity and growth that we see today.

      Interesting that you point that out. Looking at U.S. economic growth rates since 1947 shows that the net rate of economic growth has declined since the start of the Reagan era. But hey, FREEDOM!

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    9. Re:You know... by starless · · Score: 1

      When was this? This isn't new. As Ronald Reagan said: "The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help."

      Actually, the words are mainly terrifying when the person from the government is Ronald Reagan...

    10. Re:You know... by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      He was president just as long as Bush Jr, Bill Clinton, and Obama....

    11. Re:You know... by boa · · Score: 3

      "Looking at U.S. economic growth rates since 1947 [stlouisfed.org] shows that the net rate of economic growth has declined since the start of the Reagan era."

      Not sure what your point is, besides being a distraction. The graph you link to, shows growth deltas, not absolute growth rates. IOW, it doesn't show that the growth has declined, just that the GDP is less volatile.

    12. Re:You know... by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      ROBO-REAGAN SMASH!!!!!

    13. Re: You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck off, shill.

    14. Re:You know... by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Right, he is tied for the top of the list.

    15. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still applies, regardless of context.

    16. Re:You know... by Kierthos · · Score: 1

      ..... *cough* *cough* FDR *cough*

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    17. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're misquoting him. He said terrifying, not dangerous.

    18. Re:You know... by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      You beat me to it.

      FDR is why presidents are limited to two terms nowadays

    19. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Time was, people looked to the U.S. as a beacon of freedom, hope, human rights and security from tyrannical governments and non-state groups.

      Before someone pops up and says, "yeah well, everywhere else is worse!", let me stop you right there. The point isn't that there are worse places to be. The point is that now there are some better places to be.

      In fact the loss of higher ideals by our alleged leaders is a striking fall from grace. They no longer act like they understand the principles the Founding Fathers were aiming for. They no longer care, by deeds rather than words, what the constitution says. Instead they merely seem to care about, 'Will our latest round of questionable behavior affect me personally'. Oh, and 'have I been sufficiently obsequious towards authority and toed the party line about terrorism and security'.

      Freedom? I guess that's for suckers. At least if leadership behavior is your guideline.

    20. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact he was going after farm subsidies and suggesting that a less regulated grain market would be good for the US shows what an absolute fuckstain the man was. Like usually you can follow the money and figure out why someone is saying something.

      This is just crazy talk and if iowa didn't have so much primary power it could have lead to a national famine.

    21. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Discarding volatility, there's a fairly clear up trend until 1980 (as in, accelerating growth) and a down trend (decelerating growth) after that. Are you really unable to see it, or just pretending because of ideological reasons?

  9. Spying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I were writing software, I wouldn't be in the US, either.

    All of the top software companies are spying on you.

    Google, Facebook, Amazon, Microsoft, etc. All of this is ********SPYWARE********. What don't you understand about this???

    You should run a *BSD, because it respect you, and won't spy on you.

    1. Re:Spying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should run a *BSD, because it respect you, and won't spy on you.

      In case of *BSD, the spying is outsourced to the ISP.

  10. Secure system by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    A secure system isn't secure if a single developer can subvert it.

    1. Re:Secure system by butzwonker · · Score: 2

      Then again, being able to subvert a system and fearing that you might be forced to subvert it (whether or not you're successful) are two very different things, aren't they?

    2. Re:Secure system by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Yes. Was there a point?

    3. Re:Secure system by KiloByte · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Underhanded C Contest provides plenty of ideas how a smart developer can subvert a system even in face of thorough code review.

      And in Isis' case, if she was forced to make such a subversive commit, she could either:
        * refuse to be a traitor -- certain contempt of court
        * do it and get caught (immediately or after the fact) -- likely charge of contempt of court (they'd suspect she tipped the reviewers)
        * do it successfully -- and be a traitor of what we believe in

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    4. Re:Secure system by butzwonker · · Score: 1

      Nope, I was just posting random jibberish.

    5. Re:Secure system by flopsquad · · Score: 1

      A "secure system" isn't

      FTFY

      --
      Nothing posted to /. has ever been legal advice, including this.
  11. What do they expect? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If they act like untrustworthy douchebags, then surprise surprise people don't trust them even when they're working on a legitimate investigation. Naturally because they insist on acting like untrustworthy douchebags, no one even has any idea if it is legitimate.

    Well done, FBI, you're your own worst enemy.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
    1. Re:What do they expect? by jarablue · · Score: 1

      So basically everyone who uses TOR now is a child predator? Gotta love the FBI. I wonder if we are all criminals just waiting to be arrested. Can't stand the fucking fact that they commit crimes but prosecutors look the other way. Yet if a public citizen does 1/20th of half the shit a cop does, the book is thrown at them. Fucking sickening. What about cops who have relationships with high school girls, yet some poor schmuck who sends a selfie of a 17 year old get's years in prison? O fucking KAY. Relish in it guys. Careful what you look at, or don't. It doesn't matter anyways. They can forge the evidence either way.

  12. There is no Subpoena by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless leaving a business card with a note that says "please call" on her door is the same thing as a judicial subpoena.

    This is a case of "panic and run" if I ever saw one.

    1. Re:There is no Subpoena by PPH · · Score: 4, Insightful

      same thing as a judicial subpoena.

      It's worse. You have no legal recourse. Once the FBI 'talks' to you, they can include a gag order and you can't discuss the particulars of the conversation with anyone. Just like an NSL.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:There is no Subpoena by bagofbeans · · Score: 1

      Actually, you can discuss with your lawyer. Perhaps carefully, but an NSL can be fought legally.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lavabit

    3. Re:There is no Subpoena by john.r.strohm · · Score: 1

      The problem is that, after she retained counsel, and her attorney called the FBI agent who'd left the business card, the FBI agent declared that the Bureau would not deal with her attorney, but would bypass him.

      This is a BIG Bozo no-no in the Justice System. You do NOT "go around" someone's attorney.

      This would be true even if the Martha Stewart case had not happened. After the Martha Stewart case, everyone should know that talking to the FBI *AT* *ALL* is a very bad idea. The ONLY thing you say to them is "Give me your business card and I'll ask my attorney to call you."

    4. Re:There is no Subpoena by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >FBI agent declared that the Bureau would not deal with her attorney, but would bypass him.

      I guess that's why the FBI contacted the attorney to find out where to send the subpoena to her. You know, to bypass him or something.

    5. Re:There is no Subpoena by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 2

      And yet: "On Dec. 2, he called Agent Burnett and presented himself as Lovecruft's lawyer. Lovecruft told CNNMoney she had been willing to meet the FBI with her attorney present. But Rosenfeld was told by agents that they would circumvent him and approach Lovecruft directly. At the time, the FBI wouldn't say why it sought her. "

      So good luck with that.

    6. Re:There is no Subpoena by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, since the FBI can't comment about ongoing investigations, we're left with taking the word of person who will tell CNNMoney that she'd be willing to talk to the FBI with her attorney, but won't, for some reason, simply call the FBI and tell them that directly.

    7. Re:There is no Subpoena by geekgirlandrea · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that official policy against recording their interviews, and felony charges for 'making false statements' if they can manage to trip you up on something.

  13. Isis by 110010001000 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Her first name is Isis. What are the chances?

    1. Re:Isis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That she has the head of a cow? Come on, don't leave us hanging.

    2. Re:Isis by 110010001000 · · Score: 2

      Isis is a goddess of Egypt who listened to sinners who worshipped her. I thought a clever boy like you would have made that connection.

  14. Somethings not right here by tom229 · · Score: 1

    Her reason for fleeing doesn't even make sense. The FBI doesn't need her to write compromising code, Tor is open source. If Tor is in a state where she's the linchpin for all code submissions, then that's a pretty gaping security problem with that software anyways. Furthermore, Tor has never really been as secure from law enforcement as its users like to think. There's only a handful of exit nodes, and law enforcement could do a lot by simply compromising one, code intact. .

    I wouldn't be surprised if we find out later that she's running for very different reasons.

    --
    If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
    1. Re:Somethings not right here by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Agreed. As usual we only hear half of the story. She ran away to Germany because an FBI agent left a card at her house while she was in vacation in Hawaii?

    2. Re:Somethings not right here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They just need to sneak into her house and install a small rootkit into her MBR partition. Even if her computer is encrypted, when she enters the password on the compromised machine, the FBI gets access to all her files and data. Germany has a constitutional protection of the rooms you live in. Nobody may enter without your permission not even the landlord, and especially not the police. The only exception is when there is acute danger (like somebody crying for their life behind the door) or when there is a grave crime and a warrant ordered by a judge.

    3. Re:Somethings not right here by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      The FBI can't "sneak into" your house either. If you think the intelligence agencies in the US and Germany play by the rules then you are hopelessly naive.

    4. Re:Somethings not right here by jm_sullivan · · Score: 1
      A lead Tor developer is paranoid about a government request to interview her? I'm shocked...

      Who saw that coming??

    5. Re:Somethings not right here by myowntrueself · · Score: 2

      The FBI can't "sneak into" your house either. If you think the intelligence agencies in the US and Germany play by the rules then you are hopelessly naive.

      Indeed, in the USA theres no need for them to 'sneak' in. No, they walk in openly and serve NSL's to anyone who witnesses them.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    6. Re:Somethings not right here by will_die · · Score: 1

      There is a big difference from knowing that some people in the government make mistakes, break the rules (and get caught) to being paranoid that they are actually coming after you with plans to take your bodily fluids like she does.

    7. Re:Somethings not right here by tom229 · · Score: 1

      As I pointed out in another comment in this article, she's a very minor contributor. 3 commits in the history of the project, all relatively recent. This is publicly available information on Tor's github page.

      --
      If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
    8. Re:Somethings not right here by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      Germany has a constitutional protection of the rooms you live in. Nobody may enter without your permission not even the landlord, and especially not the police. The only exception is when there is acute danger (like somebody crying for their life behind the door) or when there is a grave crime and a warrant ordered by a judge.

      We *used* to have *that* here too.... Its all gone now.. George Orwell was right, just 32 years early....

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    9. Re:Somethings not right here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like the FBI can't plant hidden microphones to record protected private conversations, right?

    10. Re:Somethings not right here by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      And yet you didn't keep reading the article: "On Dec. 2, he called Agent Burnett and presented himself as Lovecruft's lawyer. Lovecruft told CNNMoney she had been willing to meet the FBI with her attorney present. But Rosenfeld was told by agents that they would circumvent him and approach Lovecruft directly. At the time, the FBI wouldn't say why it sought her. "

      Moron.

    11. Re:Somethings not right here by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      Actually yes they can if they have reason to believe you are engaging in terrorist activity. The FBI has engaged in a number of warrant-less wire taping.

    12. Re: Somethings not right here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Three recent commits... The FBI has there eye on her... Runs away... I guess her code has been thoroughly audited since this story broke. Or at least I hope so. There are many scenarios where this chick could be innocent of wrong doing, and their are many scenarios where this chick could be guilty of wrong doing. But all that is important right now is whether her commits improve or degrade Tor's purpose. If they don't, they should be removed for safety's sake as an act of caution.

    13. Re:Somethings not right here by Agripa · · Score: 1

      Indeed, in the USA theres no need for them to 'sneak' in. No, they walk in openly and serve NSL's to anyone who witnesses them.

      They can get a "sneak-and-peek" warrant but I assume they have an alternative and less rigorous process as well and it is not like parallel construction couldn't be used to prevent court review and exclusion of evidence. If they do not find anything, then there is no remedy for the 4th amendment violation; the innocent have no 4th amendment rights.

      The risk is that someone who is paranoid enough may have left tells or even worse for the FBI, video surveillance active. What happens when someone who has not been formally notified reveals to the local authorities or just publicizes armed people breaking into their home with or without a secret warrant or its equivalent?

    14. Re:Somethings not right here by sabbede · · Score: 1

      And wasn't TOR originally a military project? Not only is the code completely public, it came out of a Navy research lab. What would they need her for that they can't get from somebody who already works for the Federal government?

  15. WWII by fishscene · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How many thousands of people gave their lives in World War 2 so that we could have the freedom to escape the U.S. government and fleet to Germany? I'm surprised we haven't felt the earthquake from all the bodies rolling in their graves. :(

  16. Re:What a Coward said by a Coward by johanw · · Score: 1

    Yes, all those jews that fled from Germany in the 1930's were cowards too who had done nothing wrong.

  17. Re: signs of a guilty conscience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Words spoken by a true patriot

  18. Jesus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jesus, CNN is a fucking government stooge what a complete and utter bitch.

  19. Unit tests, read by 1-3 others (not iine-by-line) by raymorris · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't work on Tor specifically. In the important / well organized open source software I've been involved with, submissions are typically read by 1-3 other people, and there are unit tests and/or regression tests.

    When I say the code is "read", I mean the same way you might read this post. You aren't looking at individual letters and words, you're reading sentences and paragraphs. You could easily overlook typos (but you might catch some typos too).

    Often the unit tests aren't 100% thorough. Especially, they tend to cover the expected/correct case. If the code is supposed to send an MMS message, it is tested that entering a phone number and a message causes the message to be sent. often untested is what happens if instead of a phone number some injection code is entered. What happens if the message is millions of characters long? If the disk is full or the network is unavailable what happens?

    > Is inserting code the only way someone on the inside can undermine TOR?

    There are several other ways. In systems intended to be secure, flaws in the design create problems just like flaws in the implementation can. Someone could undermine Tor by suggesting a feature that seems useful and good.

    Policy decisions matter for security - when you download the tor client, how do you know you're not getting a trojaned copy? That's based on how the Tor project operates, separate from any code submitted.

    Somebody has the tor.org TLS key. If a sophisticated attacker had the tor.org key, they could impersonate tor.org and cause a target to download a trojaned copy of the tor client. Even if the target checked the hash of the download, they would probably get the hash from tor.org, which is really the attacker. If I thought about for more than 60 seconds, I could probably think of some more ideas.

  20. Re:signs of a guilty conscience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The government openly views the ToR network as a tool used for one purpose - to obstruct justice. Obstruction of justice and conspiracy to commit same are both serious crimes in the US. Being involved in any way with ToR makes you a co-conspirator in every obstruction crime committed on the network.

  21. A bit late? by Euphorinaut · · Score: 1

    I'm not complaining, but why are we seeing this post now rather than sooner? Is the point of the post not necessarily her fleeing but more that the recent even of the subpoena lends some credibility to her fears that may have seemed paranoid before?

  22. Their intention was to breed a culture of fear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The government has succeeded in shooting its self in the foot. Rather than work with the people it is supposed to represent, it uses secret courts and gag orders to keep the population in the dark...

    And yet people still sing "land of the free, home of the brave"?

    simple solution to fixing our problems:

    NO MORE SECRETS IN GOVERNMENT! there is literally no argument for them that cant be countered with an open government.

  23. Welcome to the United States Comrade.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Honestly our police forces are acting more and more like the KGB every day. We already imprison people for minor offenses if they are poor, the rich never see the inside of a jail cell for smoking pot.

    We also make sure we have enough laws to make everyone in the country a criminal no matter what. Yes all of you are currently breaking a law in one way or another, and if we cant nail you on that, Disorderly conduct is a GREAT catch all.

    Also dont forget to turn in your neighbor or friends if you suspect any TERRORISM! (Terrorism is the new "anti patriotic" persecution angle)

    You have to be a fucking fool to do anything in this country without doing everything in your power to hide your tracks, basically act like a foreign spy in the USA and view all as your enemy.

    1. Re: Welcome to the United States Comrade.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's wrong about rich people not going to jail? Where's the point in being privileged if you cannot use your privileges? Why should a member of the Ruling Elite abide by the laws made to keep the rabble in check?

  24. Can someone explain me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't TOR supported by NSA and CIA? always i read the same, that the TOR networks is backed by gobernment money? can someone explain that to me?

    1. Re:Can someone explain me? by butzwonker · · Score: 1

      Sure, I can explain. TOR originally evolved out of research by the US Navy but is now developed as an open source projects by volunteers. It has occasionally been used for secure communication by US government organizations (see main TOR project page), though there is no evidence that they used it or use it on a large scale. It is not supported or endorsed by the NSA or CIA---at least not officially.

      Here is a list of current and past sponsors:

      List

      is backed by gobernment money

      Of course, definitely. The National Science Foundation has contributed at various times, as the above list says.

  25. Re:What a Coward said by a Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She just wants the Snowden affect

    If that is what she wants, she should go to Russia in stead of Germany.

  26. What CNN didn't say by Qzukk · · Score: 5, Informative

    The FBI agents refused to deal with her lawyer, and intimated that they would pick her up off the street to interrogate her without a lawyer present.

    https://www.techdirt.com/artic...

    I don't think their actions are the actions of people who are operating within the rules of law. Their actions are the actions of people who are afraid of being caught violating the supreme law of the land.

    Another fact that the CNN article didn't make clear : the developer was already in the process of moving to Germany.

    --
    If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    1. Re:What CNN didn't say by will_die · · Score: 1

      Read that article you put the link for.
      What the FBI said was "âoeBut⦠if we happen to run into her on the street, weâ(TM)re gonna be asking her some questions without you present.â
      She was not under arrest or suspicion and the FBI did not have any reason to detain her. They could ask her any questions they wanted and could also ask her to get in a car and come with them but had no legal ability to force her to do that.
      Let me guess now people are going to say the FBI would of kidnapped her and forced her in the car.

    2. Re:What CNN didn't say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think their actions are the actions of people who are operating within the [limitations] of law. Their actions are the actions of people who are [not] afraid of [...] violating the supreme law of the land.

      Fixed this for you.

    3. Re:What CNN didn't say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It'd be a real shame if you were to run into a couple of armed guys who were looking for you and waiting for a chance to catch you all by your lonesome. Not a threat, of course, this is just for questioning. In the middle of the street. Because that's where the FBI goes to question people all the time. They'll just set up a little table right there on the sidewalk, set out the documents or whatever it was they want her "opinion on", give her a nice comfy chair and ask her a few questions. I drive by them doing that every day.

      Let me guess now people are going to say the FBI would of kidnapped her and forced her in the car.

      Cops don't "kidnap" people. They arrest them for resisting arrest, then try and figure out how to make it stick.

    4. Re:What CNN didn't say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...could also ask her to get in a car and come with them but had no legal ability to force her to do that.

      Haven't you been following the news the past couple of decades? When it comes to the three-letter agencies, "legal" doesn't seems to be a consideration anymore. (Heck, it's not just the agencies; legal doesn't seem to be a consideration for killing random US citizens, regardless of where they are on the planet, not does it come into play when killing random people in general, especially if they don't happen to have pasty white skin.)

    5. Re:What CNN didn't say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This deserves to be modded up. Thanks, Qzukk!

    6. Re:What CNN didn't say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure how far your head is in the clouds, but it's pretty far up there. Try to imagine yourself in the situation: Two black SUVs full of suits drive up to your front door, and ask if you want to have a chat. No, it's not compulsory. But if you say no they'll just declare you a person of interest and take you in anyway, and then detain you for as long as they legally can without charging you with anything, and then maybe let you go. Or arrest you then on a bogus charge that will take you lots of lawyer money to fight, which they can drop without penalty 1 day before the first evidentiary hearing anyway. By that point, you've spent lots of money on your lawyer, half of your assets are seized from a search warrant (which will take many more months to be returned, at all), you were in a holding cell for at least one or two wonderful nights, your girlfriend isn't returning your calls, your boss told you not to bother coming in, and it will take who knows how long for you to get your life back on track. Sure, you could bring a case of prosecutorial whatever; that just means more time, more legal fees, and it won't get you back anything you've lost. You just wanted to be left alone in the first place. What do you think to yourself at that point? "Gee, maybe I should have just agreed to talk to them without a lawyer present." That's how it works.

      Voluntary interviews with law enforcement are a fairy tale. They always have the leverage on you, and you're never there truly of your own free will, and if you weren't of interest to them why would they be talking to you anyway?

    7. Re:What CNN didn't say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      In addition, while that sounds like a threat, the FBI agent, at that point in the conversation, may have believed the person he was talking to was impersonating her lawyer. He probably thought it was a journalist trying to insert themselves. Come back when the FBI has actually done something bad, not when some person is "stressed" because they are worried that the FBI might do something bad at some time in the future just because they want to talk to her. 99.999% of the FBI's work is the boring police work where they need to ask people questions to catch the actual bad guys.

      If you're going to work on TOR, be ready to answer a few questions from the police every once in a while. You can't possible be so naive as to believe that TOR is never used for illicit activities.

    8. Re:What CNN didn't say by strikethree · · Score: 1

      The FBI agents refused to deal with her lawyer, and intimated that they would pick her up off the street to interrogate her without a lawyer present.

      That is... scary. Terrifying really. Being forced, by "agents of the law", into a situation with severe legal ramifications without access to a lawyer? Seems like it violates a Constitutional Amendment of some sort...

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    9. Re:What CNN didn't say by strikethree · · Score: 1

      BTW, I am getting a 404 when going to your link: https://www.techdirt.com/artic...

      Was the article pulled? Do you have another source?

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    10. Re:What CNN didn't say by sabbede · · Score: 1

      It sounds a little worse than it is. Law enforcement is allowed to lie to suspects, including bluffs like, "We'll pick you up and won't let you talk to your lawyer." They wouldn't actually do it if they had any intent to prosecute. Or intent to not get sued.

    11. Re:What CNN didn't say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Link is working for me this morning.

    12. Re:What CNN didn't say by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      If $THEY pick you up and try to talk to you without your lawyer present, STFU. $THEY can't legally require you to talk. Don't lie, just insist that you aren't going to talk without your lawyer. $THEY can put you into a situation with severe legal ramifications without access to a lawyer, yes, but they can't make you talk, and they will have to let you lawyer up ("habeas corpus") at some point.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  27. Warning signs? by DRMShill · · Score: 1

    One a scale of 1(fictitiously idealized America) to 10(Trumps America) this makes me about a 3.5 or 4 in uneasiness. Not nearly enough to head for Canada but enough to maybe read up on them.

    1. Re:Warning signs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not nearly enough to head for Canada but enough to maybe read up on them.

      Things to learn:
      1. Watch hockey
      2. Put maple syrup on almost everything you eat
      3. Wear a tuque in winter
      4. If you're moving to Québec, learn french (easy enough as we use a lot of english words) and eat poutine
      5. Become atheist (we have to increase that 23.9%)
      6. Become condescending and/or passive-agressive against your fellow Americans, especially religious and political people
      7. Profits!

    2. Re:Warning signs? by Agripa · · Score: 1

      I would not rely on Canada.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    3. Re:Warning signs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada gave Matt Dehart(from the Courage foundation) back to his torturers in America.

  28. The country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    of the brave and free, if they ever were such, is going down the drain. Things are turning to shit so fast in the greatest surveilance nation in the world.

    1. Re:The country by sabbede · · Score: 1

      Things are turning to shit so fast in the greatest surveilance nation in the world.

      What does the UK have to do with this?

    2. Re:The country by dave420 · · Score: 1

      You are parroting the nonsense cliché that arose from a journalist counting the number of cameras on a single street in London and then extrapolating that out for the entire country. It also didn't mention that the vast majority of cameras are in private hands, and that the data protection act is very strong and well enforced, and provides very strict control over what data can be collected (including video), disseminated, and kept.

      So please stop. I know it sounds funny, and you might even think it's pretty edgy, but it's unfounded nonsense.

    3. Re:The country by sabbede · · Score: 1

      And what does that have to do with the false hyperbole to which I was responding?

  29. Re:Actions of a criminal by jmd · · Score: 1

    I think the concern here is more about a National Security Letter than say a court subpoena.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_security_letter

    And this person has posted an NSL canary

  30. Re:signs of a guilty conscience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >government openly views the ToR network as a tool used for one purpose - to obstruct justice.

    And yet...

    https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jul/29/us-government-funding-tor-18m-onion-router

    Tor, the internet anonymiser, received more than $1.8m in funding from the US government in 2013, even while the NSA was reportedly trying to destroy the network.

    According to the Tor Project's latest annual financial statements, the organisation received $1,822,907 from the US government in 2013. The bulk of that came in the form of "pass-through" grants, money which ultimately comes from the US government distributed through some independent third-party. ...
    The two largest single grantors of federal money were SRI international, a non-profit research and development centre that aims to bridge the gap between abstract research and industry, and Internews Network, an international non-profit that funds programmes supporting democracy and human rights. The latter gave $555,413 in funding originally from the US Department of State, while the former gave $830,269 in funding ultimately stemming from the US Department of Defense.

    The Tor Project also received direct funding from the National Science Foundation and the US Department of State, totalling $100,325 and $256,900 respectively.

  31. Rich hipster expat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who can just "move to Germany"? You can't get a job there, so the only reason would be if you have family money and a sense of entitlement.

    1. Re:Rich hipster expat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes you think she wouldn't be able to get a job there?

    2. Re: Rich hipster expat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True story. I spent a year in the US during 2000-2001. I took a year off work. I worked for an R&D company in the UK developing security software. I am English. Getting into the US was easy. Leaving the US was much harder. I didn't work while I was there - I was very comfortable, financially. But the day I attempted to board the 737 to leave went downhill fast from the moment I checked in. I was detained for 14 hours and interviewed at length regarding my previous employment. I was not allowed to sleep, smoke or contact anyone waiting at home. I had no representation in the US. I was granted a few bottles of water and a couple of pre-packaged sandwiches. Also a blanket. While being interviewed the two suited gentlemen would often talk to each other in Spanish. I didn't understand a word of Spanish. The threats against my liberty came thick and fast. I largely refused to say anything. I was then deported.

      When I finally arrived in England I was immediately detained again, by the English. Again, two suited men. Rather posh accents. They were succint and to the point. They wanted to know what my intention for visiting the US was, and how my job as a security software developer played into the visit. I was detained for 11 hours, although I was only interviewed for 5 hours. The remaining six were in detention. I remember shivvering from the cold. I was only wearing a t-shirt and jeans. They had confiscated my belt and footwear.

      After release, at 1.50 AM, I had to get a taxi home. Public transport was finished till morning and car hire was closed. The taxi ride covered 90 miles.

      When I arrived in my home town I immediately went to my parents home. They had no idea what had happened, and had assumed my flight was delayed.

      A week later I was summond to a meeting in London with the Home Office. I still have the letter. I was offered the opportunity to attend volunarily, otherwise I would be arrested and detained. I attended, was interviewed twice that day by two different groups. One group of two men, one suited and one quite casually dressed. Then, later that day, by a panel of 3 much older, suited and well spoken people. A fourth person sat off to one side of the panel. I heard him speak only once, which was when I was escorted into the room. He dpoke very briefly to the nearest panel member, in an American accent. I was questioned, once more, about my previous work. Whether I had discussed or shared any nature of my work during my visit to the US. It was my job to convince them I hadn't. And they learned everything about my visit. It was made very clear to me that refusing to provide the information they requested would have dire consequences fir myself, my family (I had no children then), my friends, and the people I associated with in the US.

      This is my story. It happened a long time ago. I don't trust Government. Government obviously doesn't trust me.

    3. Re:Rich hipster expat by sabbede · · Score: 1

      Word is she was already planning a move, so it stands to reason that she already had a job lined up or at least a solid foundation upon which to build a new life.

  32. How is she legally living in Germany? by gizmo2199 · · Score: 1

    Last I checked they don't just hand out residency permits, and tourist visas for Americans expire after 90 days, at which point she has to leave Germany.
    How did she do it?

    --
    This Sig does not Exist.
    1. Re:How is she legally living in Germany? by famebait · · Score: 1

      Pure speculation: If you're a notable security professional who hinders the feds for a living, you probably have your exit strategy planned well ahead, and it is no stretch of the imagination for that plan to include your friend's company abroad already waiting with the job offer you need to immigrate, and only too happy to welcome any existing clients you can bring along.

      --
      sudo ergo sum
    2. Re:How is she legally living in Germany? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe she found a job

    3. Re:How is she legally living in Germany? by will_die · · Score: 1

      Say she is Syrian and claim asylum.
      Or just not leave, like in the USA the government still has to catch you before they can kick you out.

    4. Re:How is she legally living in Germany? by ImprovOmega · · Score: 2

      Notable security professionals usually can line up a job in the country of their choice and being highly skilled in a necessary area will very often speed along the process. Most every country is looking for talented IT workers and the demand is only apt to increase.

    5. Re:How is she legally living in Germany? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's really not hard to get a residency permit.
      I flew over, and within the 90 day window, applied at the Auslandersbehorde in the city where I wanted to live, and had a Aufenthaltserlaubnis valid for 3 years issued. The only requirement was that I had 3 months savings (€3000) in order to find a job locally.

      Having immigration dealt with at the city level rather than federal makes it a hell of a lot easier, as you get face-to-face contact; and since I was wanting to live in a small town, practically no wait as that office had no backlog. Downside, was the office hours was "Wednesday 10-12" ... so, 2hr window a week. But, worth it.

  33. Re:signs of a guilty conscience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And your words are the words of a spineless bootlicker.

  34. Worst Thanksgiving Ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As if visiting the family wasn't stressful enough.

  35. Re:Actions of a criminal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I believe she's trying to avoid being questioned for criminal wrongdoing and using her reputation as a "hacktivist" to get others like the EFF to politicize her situation and obstruct the FBI from investigating her activities. Posting an NSL canary would be a logical move to try and convince people that she's being sought for her hacktivism rather than for any criminal actions.

  36. Islamo-fascists use it too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Agora:
    "I was worried they'd ask me to do something that hurts innocent people..."

    Apparently she has no idea, or simply does not care, that islamo-fascists use her software to perpetrate horrible, evil crimes against humanity. I suppose she might be thinking if the public does not have knowledge of that fact then she can have a clear conscience, hang out at Oktoberfest and pretend her reality does not include goat fuck-ing islamo-fascists using Tor to kill innocent people she allegedly has an interest in protect.

    Fail, fail, fail.

    1. Re:Islamo-fascists use it too. by dave420 · · Score: 1

      ChrisQ? Is that you?

  37. Good for her. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now we just need to get more American's to stand behind it.

  38. Re:signs of a guilty conscience by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

    I don't think her actions are the actions of someone who conscientiously wants to avoid aiding the government in violating people's privacy. Her actions are the actions of someone who is afraid of being caught for doing something she knows she could get in trouble for. Her actions are the actions of a criminal.

    Yes, something criminal like helping people hide their data from the US government.

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  39. Re: signs of a guilty conscience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Words spoken by a true patriot

    #MAGA !! High Energy! TEN FEET TALLER!

    Trump 2016

  40. Re:What a Coward said by a Coward by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

    Yes, all those jews that fled from Germany in the 1930's were cowards too who had done nothing wrong.

    And then those Jews who stayed in Italy and supported Mussolini. Things didn't work out too well for them actually.

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  41. Re:signs of a guilty conscience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If that were the case, then the FBI would be going after all of the Tor developers which they are not. She's not the only one, nor even the most key developer working on Tor.

  42. None of you are getting what she's saying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She's saying that the FBI will force her to put in a backdoor into TOR and then threaten to throw her in jail forever if she reveals the backdoor.

  43. Tor already cracked? by Comboman · · Score: 2

    or the FBI have already cracked the current version of Tor and want to spread some FUD around to slow down any updates and/or convince people that newer versions of Tor are unsafe and they should keep using the current version. Don't underestimate the level of douchebaggery you're dealing with here.

    --
    Support Right To Repair Legislation.
  44. Welcome to the Matrix, Neo. by MTEK · · Score: 1

    Agent Smith would like to have a word with you. In person.

    1. Re:Welcome to the Matrix, Neo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agent Smith would like to have a word with you. In person.

      Neo: You were right, Smith. You were always right. It was inevitable.

  45. Willkommen in Deutschland. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heimat der Gestapo, Stasi und Bundesverfassungsschutz.

  46. Soo... by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

    When you hauling in Hillary Clinton for questioning. Seems like you're dragging your feet on that investigation, sorry, security review.

  47. The TrueCrypt saga continues. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because, hey, if you can't control 'em, break their toys. Or, at least, threaten to.

  48. Re: signs of a guilty conscience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes because, you know, all legislation is just and righteous.

  49. Re: What a Coward said by a Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In deed, a wise choiceeeeee - heimerdinger

  50. For a justice system perhaps? by jopsen · · Score: 1

    Germany has good privacy laws, and a real justice system.
    As an EU member nation an extradition order could be appealed to the European Court of Human Rights.
    Not that Germany will extradite her for no good reason. Particularly there is requirements as to the severity of the crime, etc.
    These things are hard to prove, if you have no case. Also spy agencies aren't very popular in Germany.
    Particularly not the US agencies, which have been caught spying on Germans; and it weren't that long ago CIA was murdering people in Germany.

    After all, she doesn't need escape civilization, just the reach of secret courts, show trials and unconstitutional laws.

  51. Re:What a Coward said by a Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would rather be in prison a martyr for my cause than a coward

    Ya okay buddy, get back to us when that happens and you have been Big Bubba's chunk of pleasure meat for the past fifteen years.

  52. Running away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The wicked flee when no man pursueth; But the righteous are bold as a lion. - Proverbs 28:1

    Lovecruft refused to leave her San Francisco apartment for a week.

    "There was this feeling the air had changed, and that I couldn't breathe," she said. "I'd look at my bike and think, I'm not supposed to go outside. Maybe some agents will pick me up off the street if I ride my bike. I'm just going to stay here, and not respond to anyone when they knock."

    And now she's left the country in order to avoid being served a subpoena. This will only make things worse for her if the DOJ declares her a material witness and issues a warrant for her arrest, which going to Germany may or may not protect her from.

    I don't think her actions are the actions of someone who conscientiously wants to avoid aiding the government in violating people's privacy. Her actions are the actions of someone who is afraid of being caught for doing something she knows she could get in trouble for. Her actions are the actions of a criminal.

  53. Re: What a Coward said by a Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Comparing her to the plight of the Jewish community is ridiculous, and doesn't even make sense. This isn't a life or death scenario. She ran, fight or flight kicked in and go figure she flew, no courage whatsoever just fear. She's weak, she could have stayed to fight but she got backed into a corner and ran.

  54. Run... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Run you clever girl run.

  55. Lets be frank by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets be frank

    TOR was developed by the US Navy, and still gets most of its funding by the US Government.

    Its developers for the most part co-operate with US authorities.

  56. (disambiguation) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For those who don't get the joke. The Godess Isis of the Ancient Egyptian religion was "worshipped as the ideal mother and wife as well as the patroness of nature and magic. She was the friend of slaves, sinners, artisans and the downtrodden, but she also listened to the prayers of the wealthy, maidens, aristocrats and rulers."

    1. Re:(disambiguation) by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      For those who don't get the joke. The Godess Isis of the Ancient Egyptian religion was "worshipped as the ideal mother and wife as well as the patroness of nature and magic. She was the friend of slaves, sinners, artisans and the downtrodden, but she also listened to the prayers of the wealthy, maidens, aristocrats and rulers."

      Isis! Apophis! Osiris!

      EEEE AAAA OOOO!

      O Thou burning sword of passion, that art tempered on the anvil of flesh! I adore Thee, Evoe! I adore Thee, IAO!

      O Thou slimy lust of the grave, that art tangled in the roots of the tree! I adore Thee, Evoe! I adore Thee, IAO!

      and all the other 167 cries of adoration.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  57. If you can't break tor - break the developers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The objective of this is fairly clear - Tor still seems to be a sound service, and attacking it at a technology level seems to have failed.

    However, if developers contributing to it are too afraid to be involved, then maybe with enough time the can find a compromise.

    The FBI has engineered a nice bit of publicity to shake the tree, so they may actually succeed. Surely there is an appropriate XKCD strip for this ?

  58. Re:Unit tests, read by 1-3 others (not iine-by-lin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somebody has the tor.org TLS key. If a sophisticated attacker had the tor.org key, they could impersonate tor.org and cause a target to download a trojaned copy of the tor client. Even if the target checked the hash of the download, they would probably get the hash from tor.org, which is really the attacker.

    What "hash"? Indeed, a simple "SHA256SUMS" file doesn't provide any benefit that HTTPS doesn't, which is why torproject.org doesn't publish such files. They do, however, publish PGP signatures of every package they release. To verify such a signature, you need to have the public key in your keyring, which means going to a keyserver to get it. Thus, if anybody ever tried to spoof the signature, they'd have to publish their key to the keyservers as well, which other people would notice and raise the alarm (all of which has actually happened, at least once, in the case of the Tor Browser Bundle.)

    Obviously this system can never be foolproof, but people who care about security have actually thought about the issue.

  59. An excellent example of "Policy decisions matter" by raymorris · · Score: 1

    Thank you for that excellent example of "Policy decisions matter for security - when you download the tor client, how do you know you're not getting a trojaned copy? " Many projects only publish a hash with which to verify that your copy is unaltered. The Tor project could have done the same. As you point out, that creates only the APPEARANCE of security, especially if TLS is already in use. By making a policy decision to use GPG signatures, Tor security was improved.

    An established developer could well weigh in on such discussions either arguing that GPG/PGP improves security, or that it's a hassle that virtually nobody will actually use anyway. In that way, they can influence the security of the project apart from making any changes to the source code.

  60. Germany has ordered dev to insert backdoor before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't exactly call Germany a safe place to operate from. It's pretty clear from past court cases that the United States can't order someone to insert backdoors. As bad as the United States is chances are your safer operating from the US than many other countries. Look at the Apple case. It wasn't precedent, because we already had clear precedent saying you can't make someone develop something to assist in a law enforcement investigation. There are also organizations like the EFF which are *highly likely* to take up your legal case should the government attempt to force you to do this sort of thing. The EFF isn't perfect and won't take every case, but something like this is definitely going to get there attention [and clearly has].

    Compare this to Germany where the courts have ordered developers to backdoor anonymity software in the past (and it was done too, with a persecuted individual getting arrested in 2003):

    http://www.securityfocus.com/news/6779

    I do think that there should be an effort to increase funding for Tor and decentralize everything including developers locations. When people operate out of a variety of different locations and particularly ones in jurisdictions that tend not to cooperate with each other the better off we're all likely to be. Yea- so maybe one person in Russia, one person in China, one person in Brazil, one person in Ice Land, one person in Sweden, one person in Canada, one person in Belize, one person in Ecuador, one person in Venezuela, one person in Cuba, etc. With enough developers reviewing each path combined with more decentralization the harder it will be for even the most powerful of governments to force a backdoor.

  61. Re:An excellent example of "Policy decisions matte by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's true. I think this is an issue that a lot of projects are going to have to solve in the near future, and while the current system is better than nothing, it can still use a lot of improvement (e.g., requiring signatures from multiple parties.) Certainly the developers have to be part of that decision process.

  62. Germany won't help. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    The US can make it a very big, royal PITA no matter what her status is in Germany.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  63. So you admit to losing the argument (c.f. Godwin)? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    N/T.

  64. Re:signs of a guilty conscience by geekgirlandrea · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Her actions are the actions of someone who quite rationally fears 'just talking' to people who might return armed and bearing a warrant if rebuffed. In a world where the POTUS bombs wedding parties with flying robots and cracks jokes about it, if you aren't a criminal you aren't doing enough.

  65. She's probably correct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sadly

  66. Sunday, 01 May 2016 By isis agora lovecruft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the final week of November 2015, a Special Agent from the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Mr. Mark Burnett, knocked on the door of my family's home and left his card, with an additional phone number penciled in. All my family members residing in America had planned a week-long vacation and were all on a remote island. When the FBI receives DHS flight records as if they're the morning paper, I must admit that whatever reasons for why the Bureau didn't know that I or my family were absent escape me entirely.

    Read the rest: https://blog.patternsinthevoid...