Slashdot Mirror


Woman Uses 'Hey Siri' To Call An Ambulance and Help Save Her Child's Life (networkworld.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Networkworld: When Apple released the iPhone 6s, it included a great new Siri feature which enables users to activate the intelligent assistant via voice. Dubbed 'Hey Siri,' the feature is particularly convenient because the iPhone 6s' M9 motion co-processor is 'always listening' and thereby lets users use 'Hey Siri' even when the device isn't connected to a power source. Recently, Stacey Gleeson of Australia used the 'Hey Siri' feature to successfully call an ambulance while she was tending to her daughter Giana who had stopped breathing. "I picked her up and sat down with her on the floor," Gleeson said in an interview. "And as I checked her airways, I looked over and remembered my phone." Thinking quick on her feet, Gleeson said, "Hey Siri, call the ambulance." Fortunately, Gleeson managed to resuscitate her daughter while the ambulance was in route. And while it's impossible to know for sure, it's entirely possible that the time Gleeson saved by not having to call an ambulance manually helped save her daughter's life. "Saving me the trouble of having to physically dial emergency services was a godsend," Gleeson said.

136 of 208 comments (clear)

  1. Yeah - not at all an advert. by queazocotal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "the feature is particularly convenient because the iPhone 6s' M9 motion co-processor is 'always listening' and thereby lets users use 'Hey Siri' even when the device isn't connected to a power source."

    1. Re: Yeah - not at all an advert. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      I hole-hardedly agree, but allow me to play doubles advocate here for a moment. For all intensive purposes I think you are wrong. In an age where false morals are a diamond dozen, true virtues are a blessing in the skies. We often put our false morality on a petal stool like a bunch of pre-Madonnas, but you all seem to be taking something very valuable for granite. So I ask of you to mustard up all the strength you can because it is a doggy dog world out there. Although there is some merit to what you are saying it seems like you have a huge ship on your shoulder. In your argument you seem to throw everything in but the kids Nsync, and even though you are having a feel day with this I am here to bring you back into reality. I have a sick sense when it comes to these types of things. It is almost spooky, because I cannot turn a blonde eye to these glaring flaws in your rhetoric. I have zero taller ants when it comes to people spouting out hate in the name of moral righteousness. You just need to remember what comes around is all around, and when supply and command fails you will be the first to go. Make my words, when you get down to brass stacks it doesnt take rocket appliances to get two birds stoned at once. It's clear who makes the pants in this relationship, and sometimes you just have to swallow your prize and accept the facts. You might have to come to this conclusion through denial and error but I swear on my mother's mating name that when you put the petal to the medal you will pass with flying carpets like its a peach of cake.

    2. Re:Yeah - not at all an advert. by dontbemad · · Score: 1

      I think what bothers me the most is how there is no mention of any competing platform that has had this feature for, say, 2 years now at least?

    3. Re: Yeah - not at all an advert. by 110010001000 · · Score: 4, Funny

      It is *NSYNC not Nsync. What a looser.

    4. Re: Yeah - not at all an advert. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "WHOOSH". Damn, you fucking idiot, you missed the obvious fact this guy was simulating what text-to-speech comes up with most of the time. You read three words and wanted to show off how smart you are when you have really demonstrated what an absolute fucktard you are.

    5. Re: Yeah - not at all an advert. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      copy-pasta

    6. Re: Yeah - not at all an advert. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Who shed?

    7. Re:Yeah - not at all an advert. by Desler · · Score: 2

      Why would there? What relevance do they have to the story? The story is about a particular situation that involved an iPhone not a comparison article about voice agents n

    8. Re:Yeah - not at all an advert. by Aqualung812 · · Score: 1

      I took this as a comment explaining why it doesn't work on all previous iPhone models.

      I wasn't aware iPhones did this, because I don't know anyone with a 6s.

      --
      Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
    9. Re: Yeah - not at all an advert. by LichtSpektren · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one that laughed at "pre-Madonnas"?

    10. Re:Yeah - not at all an advert. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It's funny that the first time this happened didn't get much publicity. I mean, Android phones have had this feature for years so I assume this isn't the first time someone say "ok Google, call 999" or whatever the local variant is.

      I literally LOLed when I saw that advert. Only Apple would advertise a three year old feature as the latest and greatest innovation.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    11. Re: Yeah - not at all an advert. by rossdee · · Score: 1

      How many iPhone users does it take to wreck a nice beach?

    12. Re: Yeah - not at all an advert. by Script+Cat · · Score: 1

      I forget what those are called. Something like "Flowers for Algernon".

    13. Re: Yeah - not at all an advert. by XXongo · · Score: 1

      That post really made me thunk.

    14. Re: Yeah - not at all an advert. by kwelch007 · · Score: 1

      Says the person that relied on Autocorrect to Post

    15. Re: Yeah - not at all an advert. by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      Theirs a lot of fingers of speech in they're.

    16. Re: Yeah - not at all an advert. by NotDrWho · · Score: 4, Funny

      Three.

      One to wreck the beach and two to sit back in the coffee house loudly bragging to everyone that they don't even *OWN* a television.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    17. Re: Yeah - not at all an advert. by ubrgeek · · Score: 1

      Really? I stopped thunking about the post when I got to "in route"

      --
      Bark less. Wag more.
    18. Re:Yeah - not at all an advert. by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      I think what bothers me the most is how there is no mention of any competing platform that has had this feature for, say, 2 years now at least?

      Well, that's because Android users are never in any danger and thus don't need to call an ambulance ever. Because Google keeps them safe with all they know about them.

      Well, I'm joking

      Welch used his phone's "OK Google" feature to search heart attack symptoms.

      "I touched a link and up came a list of symptoms. I was realizing that I had all of these symptoms," Welch said.

      So with Siri you call an ambulance, and with Google you search for the symptoms of a heart attack. Minor difference there.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    19. Re: Yeah - not at all an advert. by jsh1972 · · Score: 1

      I think it's the part where "Apple releases a great NEW feature", as if no one had ever thought of it before. That's the impression I got anyway.

    20. Re:Yeah - not at all an advert. by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      If Apple invented everything, why the fuck did they invent Microsoft and Google? They have to compete against Windows and Android now because of these two.

    21. Re:Yeah - not at all an advert. by Yvan256 · · Score: 2

      In the UK it's 0118 999 881 999 119 725.

      3.

    22. Re: Yeah - not at all an advert. by vossman77 · · Score: 1

      This needs to be put to song like Laika's song "Bad Times". Lyrics:

      If you receive an e-mail with a subject of "badtimes", delete it immediately / Without reading it. this is the most dangerous e-mail virus yet. / It will re-write your hard drive. not only that, but it will scramble any / Disks that are even close to your computer.

    23. Re:Yeah - not at all an advert. by oldcarsmell · · Score: 1

      "Man, I really wish we had AI that felt like a human and we could hold conversations with" "God damn NSA spying on us with always on microphones"

    24. Re: Yeah - not at all an advert. by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      And there's me thinking he was trying to call out all the grammar nazis early on. Whoosh indeed.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    25. Re:Yeah - not at all an advert. by sudon't · · Score: 1

      So with Siri you call an ambulance, and with Google you search for the symptoms of a heart attack. Minor difference there.

      I assume you're being sarcastic here. Obviously it would make a huge difference whether you could get your phone to make an emergency call if you couldn't reach, or operate, your phone, than being able to use voice commands to run a web search, (a function which, incidentally, Macs have had since OS 8, at least). It seems to me that the latter is primarily useful to people who wish to continue playing with their phones as they drive, and then to the minority of people who are handicapped in some way. OTOH, I can envision a number of situations in which the Siri's functions could save your life.

      I don't use Android, so I don't know, but if OK Google can be used to command the phone, then yes, it's comparable. Otherwise, I don't know what some people are getting at with their criticism. You know, I've never liked Apple, the corporation. But their products, especially their OS's, are undeniable. Particularly when compared to the competition, which always seems to be a copy of the Apple product. There are a lot of valid complaints to level at Apple. This isn't one of them.

      --
      -- sudon't

      Air-ride Equipped

    26. Re:Yeah - not at all an advert. by INT_QRK · · Score: 1

      Heard on Guard (243.0MHZ): "Hey SIRI, Bandits 070T 56nm raid size 2. Warning Red Weapons Free. Engage missiles"

    27. Re: Yeah - not at all an advert. by Lendrick · · Score: 1

      I love speech wreck ignition.

      Incidentally, just for fun, if you have an android phone, try to use speech recognition to search for "speech wreck ignition". No matter how clearly you enunciate it and no matter how long you pause between words, it absolutely refuses to search for anything other than "speech recognition".

    28. Re: Yeah - not at all an advert. by danlip · · Score: 1

      or "except the facts"

    29. Re: Yeah - not at all an advert. by antdude · · Score: 1

      It is loser. What a loser.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    30. Re:Yeah - not at all an advert. by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      "That number again..." Dammit, now you've got that number stuck in my head again.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
  2. Another piece of Apple advertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Get this filth out of here. Next week we'll hear about the brave bystander who rescued a toddler from a burning building using an Apple product.

    And why is the headline red anyway?

    1. Re:Another piece of Apple advertisement by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      If Apple's trend with laptops continue, in a few years we'll hear about how Gordon Ramsay used a MacBook Air to cut vegetables.

  3. NSA funded story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is supposed to make us love how its always recording our conversations

    1. Re:NSA funded story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Say all you will, but you'd have to be totally blind not to have mixed feelings about this.

      It's indeed one case, one very important one, where the functionality is literally a life saver and worth having.

      I hate apple enough, I value privacy enough, but the benefits illustrated on this post aren't so easily dismissed.

  4. I see a TV series in the making here ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    2016's Lassie. Kid trapped at the bottom of the well. Leaves iPhone at the top and calls out "Hey Siri" ...

  5. Hot, thick jizz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Masturbating Apple fanboys incoming!

    1. Re:Hot, thick jizz by Yvan256 · · Score: 2

      Dubbed 'Hey Siri,' the feature is particularly convenient because the iPhone 6s' M9 motion co-processor is 'always listening' and thereby lets users use 'Hey Siri' even when the device isn't connected to a power source.

      As an Apple user, this really creeps me out.

    2. Re:Hot, thick jizz by mark-t · · Score: 2

      Am I the only one who thinks it would be hilarious to be on a crowded bus and shout "hey Siri" and watch as about fifteen to twenty or so phones all go "ding" at about the same time?

    3. Re:Hot, thick jizz by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      I still occasionally mix live sound. One night I was using my iphone to play background music outdoors when the SMS recieved tone sounded, thru a the large PA system. To my amusement, about a third of the crowd pulled out their phones to check. :)

    4. Re:Hot, thick jizz by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Ivan Petrovich Pavlov would be proud.

  6. Literally 0 advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Over just picking up the phone and calling 911.

    "And while it's impossible to know for sure, it's entirely possible " my ass. It's a non-story. It's a piece of advertisement by Apple/NSA to make us think it's good they're devices are always recording our conversations.

    1. Re:Literally 0 advantage by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      911 works even on a locked and or phone with no sim does siri do the same?

    2. Re:Literally 0 advantage by Desler · · Score: 1

      Yes.

    3. Re:Literally 0 advantage by Shimbo · · Score: 1

      And hopefully Siri calls the correct emergency number rather than 911 ;)

    4. Re:Literally 0 advantage by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      I don't think even Apple would suggest using Siri for this rather than dialing 911...

    5. Re:Literally 0 advantage by Falos · · Score: 1

      They're all over this. They're carefully standing in front of light sources so when they make the front page they're literally glowing. The emergency response system did this - I don't see AT&T or Verizon posturing and saying "we're just so glad that we were able to help".

      But the moment anyone catches the smell of potential liability they'll boilerplate about 911 services so fast your head'll spin. "Wait, no, don't do this, it's a bad thing now, not a good thing."

    6. Re:Literally 0 advantage by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      It's completely hands-off calling, and in a first-aid situation that is an advantage. Whether it's worth the monitoring is another question.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    7. Re:Literally 0 advantage by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. Help will probably not arrive for minutes, so a short delay to make Siri realize she should call the emergency number wouldn't be that serious. The important thing here is that it's completely hands-free.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    8. Re:Literally 0 advantage by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I'd have to get the phone in my hands, hit the button, swipe right at the bottom, and touch "Emergency", myself. There are cases, like CPR and arterial bleeding, when those seconds can be important. It wouldn't be important for most first aid situations.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  7. AI by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    This is proof that AI and the Singularity is here. Venture Capitalist firms need to invest NOW to get in on the ground floor. Also, we are going to be living on Mars in 10 years and on another star in 50!

    1. Re:AI by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      No we're not, the entire universe is just a simulation, and this just proves it.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    2. Re:AI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He didn't say the sun, he said a star! They're much smaller, not as hot.

    3. Re:AI by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Sure we can. I saw it on Star Trek once.

    4. Re:AI by Yvan256 · · Score: 2

      The Sun is our star. He said another star. Two completely different things.

      I also asked my co-workers about this, and one suggested that we'll be living in black holes in millions of years. Another replied "that would suck".

  8. Wow, that's a far-reaching stretch. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    To credit Apple with saving this girl's live is a HUGE stretch of the imagination. It shows a lot of balls for Apple to take credit for this when in reality the time it takes to unlock a phone and dial 911 on speaker is about 3 seconds.

    1. Re:Wow, that's a far-reaching stretch. by Desler · · Score: 2

      Apple isn't taking credit for anything. This is a puff piece by Network World.

  9. How long until the total surveillance state ... by jschultz410 · · Score: 1

    So, we already have the FBI/NSA/CIA/etc using national security letters (or maybe even just plain requests) to get your location data from your cellphone because "you've shared" your location with a 3rd party (e.g. - Google maps). Therefore, that data is no longer "yours" and instead belongs to the business and is largely free to be shared with whomever else they want at their discretion.

    How long before a similar logic is applied to your "always on" microphone tracking every word you say? I guess we'll just have to trust these giant corporations to protect the privacy of their users rather than comply with the desires of big government ......

    Orwell was right about Big Brother but we've chosen to do it to ourselves (through our cellphones).

    1. Re:How long until the total surveillance state ... by joh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      None of these always-on systems track every word you say, because this would run your battery dry in no time. They all have just a low-power minimal voice-recognition in hardware that only recognizes the keywords and only then wake up and hand over control to the SoC itself for what you're actually saying.

      Besides, if Big Brother wants to listen to your microphone he can just do that anyway, no need for such tricks. If you don't trust your networked microphone containing device not to listen to you, don't carry it to begin with. This is true for every fucking phone or tablet or computer.

    2. Re:How long until the total surveillance state ... by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Orwell was not completely right about Big Brother. Big Brother is here, yes. But it's being helped by millions of Little Snitches. The irony is that it's the people themselves that are buying the Little Snitches, carrying them everywhere they go and even paying to keep them running and connected.

    3. Re:How long until the total surveillance state ... by Xenna · · Score: 1

      Voice recognition in hardware?
      I call bullshit on that one.

      Perhaps it's a low power subsystem, but coding voice recognition in hardware sounds incredible to me. Do they have different chips for differen languages?

    4. Re:How long until the total surveillance state ... by Chelloveck · · Score: 2

      None of these always-on systems track every word you say,

      YET

      because this would run your battery dry in no time. They all have just a low-power minimal voice-recognition in hardware that only recognizes the keywords and only then wake up and hand over control to the SoC itself for what you're actually saying.

      Keywords like "Hey, Siri", or "OK, Google". Or "bomb" or "overthrow" or "cocaine" or...

      Besides, if Big Brother wants to listen to your microphone he can just do that anyway, no need for such tricks. If you don't trust your networked microphone containing device not to listen to you, don't carry it to begin with. This is true for every fucking phone or tablet or computer.

      Quite right. But, even though they can key up the microphone at any time, they don't know when it's interesting to do so. That's where the keyword recognition comes in. Say the secret phrase and it surreptitiously sends a few seconds of audio to the NSA who can then decide whether or not to add you to the list of listening targets.

      Okay, I say it like it's a done deal, and even I don't believe that they're doing it yet. But it'd be possible, and it allows for previously unheard-of levels of snooping. Without voice recognition it's not feasible because it'd take too much manpower to even spot-check all those microphones. But if you can enlist the aid of the device itself to secretly alert the authorities... Now you're talking! What law enforcement agency wouldn't like to have an informant in every pocket? Make the list of keywords downloadable, too. Get word of an ISIS plot? Load "ISIS" into the keyword list. Whoa, they changed their name to "Totally Without A Terrorism Scheme" this week? Update the list, let the phones alert us when someone talks about TWATS! AMBER alert? Load the kid's name into every phone in the area. Sure you'll have a ton of false positives, but Think Of The Children! Honestly, is it any more ridiculous then sending a text message with a vague description of the kid to every phone in a 100 mile radius?

      Sure I'm paranoid. But am I paranoid enough?

      --
      Chelloveck
      I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    5. Re:How long until the total surveillance state ... by joh · · Score: 1

      What different languages? It's "OK Google" or "Hey Siri" with no regard to language and that's it. The keywords are the same in all languages. There may be some adjusting (tables downloaded onto the chip), but not more.

      And I'm not saying you can't abuse that, but I will never understand how people can demand to do nothing that can be abused. There's a risk and we have to minimize it.

  10. Turn on your microphones so we can listen or... by internet-redstar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Turn on your microphones (which could potentially be used for mass surveillance) or let your children die... Is this an advertisement by Apple or the NSA?

    1. Re:Turn on your microphones so we can listen or... by Desler · · Score: 1

      It's neither. It's just more adclick bait from Network World.

    2. Re:Turn on your microphones so we can listen or... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      The Vorlon would answer: Yes.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  11. Mother Saves the Daughter's Life by twmcneil · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Kudos to the mom for knowing how to save her child's life. This is important knowledge that every parent should possess and be able to put to use. Great job mom!

    Oh, and she called for an ambulance with her phone.

    --
    "The ferrets, they're every where I tell you!"
    1. Re:Mother Saves the Daughter's Life by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      This is pretty much what I was thinking.

      How long before the liability lawsuit against "assistant" app makers / service providers for incorrectly calling an Uber instead of an ambulance...

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    2. Re:Mother Saves the Daughter's Life by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      To do it by touching the phone would take me several seconds. There are a few situations in which I'd have a much better use for those seconds. Arterial bleeding comes to mind.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    3. Re:Mother Saves the Daughter's Life by juancn · · Score: 1

      I am CPR trained (I have two kids), usually all you can do is buy time for the emergency services to show up. Essentially you postpone/reduce brain damage. The first thing they teach you you is asses the situation, get somebody to call emergency services, start CPR and sustain until help arrives. In this case Siri played the role of the third party that calls 911 which is not a small thing. Seconds count in these situations.

  12. I'm amazed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Siri actually understood her request and did the right thing? That IS news!

    1. Re:I'm amazed... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Siri is actually pretty good, and usually understands my request and does something appropriate. Of course, there was that one time in Duluth when I asked Siri to find a restaurant serving fish, and she insisted that the only one was a single restaurant supply store.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  13. Yeah by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

    But would she have done so in public?

    --
    Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  14. Are you serious?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Are you serious?? Do you really think saving three seconds to manually call 911 did any help at all???

    This is propaganda marketing by Apple.

    1. Re: Are you serious?? by Grumpinuts · · Score: 1

      It was dark and she'd dropped the phone.

    2. Re:Are you serious?? by dwillden · · Score: 2

      She was doing resuscitation on her daughter, it was dark, yes it may very well have been key in saving the daughter's life. In life or death situations every moment counts.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    3. Re: Are you serious?? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Then turn on the fuckin' lights. Or don't drop the phone in the first place.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:Are you serious?? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Are you serious?? Do you really think saving three seconds to manually call 911 did any help at all???

      Yes. Yes it does. CPR to be effective needs to be constant quick and as early as humanly possible. Even basic training will teach you if there is more than one first aider present to share duties to minimise the fractions of a second between breath and compression. If someone enters cardiac arrest blood pressure drops instantly and that has an immediate effect on the body.

      3 seconds is a long time without a heartbeat.

    5. Re: Are you serious?? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Then turn on the fuckin' lights.

      Or don't, because you don't need to. Seriously, why is someone so pissed off about her using an advanced feature on a phone?

      Or don't drop the phone in the first place.

      Right, stupid cow. Dropping her phone as her child fights for its life. What a stupid woman.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    6. Re:Are you serious?? by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      You can dial emergency numbers without unlocking your device.

      I am with the AC, literally 3 seconds of time. That amount of time would not make any difference in this situation.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    7. Re: Are you serious?? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I'm more pissed at this being treated like it's noteworthy. I'm used to reading stories on /. that are not stories that belong on /., but this takes it to a new height by not even being a story.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re: Are you serious?? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      I'm more pissed at this being treated like it's noteworthy.

      Then complain about that rather than berating the poor woman for her actions in a crisis.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    9. Re: Are you serious?? by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      I'm also not really a huge fan of hysteric women. In every zombie movie I eventually start rooting for the zombies when someone starts screaming instead of walking (not even running, WALKING) away.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    10. Re: Are you serious?? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      I'm also not really a huge fan of hysteric women.

      Anything else you're not a huge fan of that has nothing whatsoever to do with the story?

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    11. Re:Are you serious?? by dwillden · · Score: 1

      It wasn't a matter of unlocking her device. Her hands were full, she was trying to resuscitate her daughter. Far easier to just call out for the phone to dial.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    12. Re: Are you serious?? by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      It was dark and she'd dropped the phone.

      Actually, she was doing CPR on her daughter. Can you manually call an ambulance on your magic non-iPhone while doing CPR on a person?

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  15. Dogberryism by XXongo · · Score: 2
    I laughed at the whole thing.

    This was brilliant; I wonder why he posted as anonymous coward*; I want to give him credit.

    *(Well, I can guess why-- he probably figured that half the moderators would rate this -1 incoherent and his Karma would drop to values you have to measure in Kelvin. Say, why doesn't slashdot have a moderation "-1 incoherent", anyway?)

    1. Re: Dogberryism by jsh1972 · · Score: 1

      It was brilliant, someone needs to write a program that you can feed text into and convert it to this lol

    2. Re:Dogberryism by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I seem to remember it being intensive porpoises not purposes. Perhaps he rambled it from memory.

  16. Yeah sure by joh · · Score: 1

    Do you really think "they" would need you to turn the microphone on to listen to you if they want to listen to you? I mean, are you people actually thinking for moment before saying such things? If they want to use phones for audio mass surveillance they would be idiots to have to trick you into turning on the microphone first.

    And then? "Damn, he tricked us by disabling Siri! What do we do now?!".

    If you're carrying any connected device with a microphone, using voice recognition or not just does not make a trace of a difference anymore.

  17. "let us spy on you so we can rescue you!" by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2

    And while it's impossible to know for sure, it's entirely possible that the time Gleeson saved by not having to call an ambulance manually helped save her daughter's life.

    Extremely unlikely. The few seconds difference it might make is lost in the noise in all the factors that affect the response time. This rings as a bullshit justification of constant surveillance: "We're always watching out for you! Like a helpful older sibling."

    --
    Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
    You cannot wash away blood with blood
    1. Re:"let us spy on you so we can rescue you!" by dwillden · · Score: 1

      It's not constant surveillance. It isn't recording everything you say. The low power M9 Processor is listening for the key activation phrase and nothing else. And in life and death situations where CPR is needed every moment can count.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    2. Re: "let us spy on you so we can rescue you!" by jsh1972 · · Score: 1

      That's about the difference if they picked up on first or second ring.

  18. I don't get it by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    Did this lady not have hands? Because I could see how a lady without hands or arms using Siri to call for help would be newsworthy. Perhaps there was some other reason why she was incapacitated and could not simply dial '911'? Otherwise, what service has Siri provided here, other than saving a second and a half to unlock the phone and dial?

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    1. Re:I don't get it by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Her phone was out of reach. She dropped it when she entered the room.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    2. Re:I don't get it by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Why was it out of reach? Was she tied up? Is she missing arms and legs? Did the phone fall into a gaping chasm??

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    3. Re:I don't get it by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      And ... she couldn't turn around and pick it up?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:I don't get it by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      As I said, she dropped it when she entered the room. She then went to check on her dying child, and, realising an ambulance was required, summoned one in the quickest way possible.

      I don't know why everyone's so annoyed about what happened.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    5. Re:I don't get it by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Sure she could. But she didn't have to, so why would she?

      Someone, once, was the first person to call an ambulance on a mobile phone. Would you have berated them for not using the landline?

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    6. Re:I don't get it by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Did this lady not have hands?

      That's a good assumption to make. A better assumption is that she was preoccupied with saving someone. In nearly all cases this requires use of said hands which is why in an emergency situation the first thing you do is call for help loudly before you even started things like checking airways. That way if someone comes and the person needs CPR you can actually get started with the important things like CPR while someone else talks on the phone.

    7. Re:I don't get it by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      It's just because the article is written like it is novel and interesting, but it's not. Often these articles are about apple products but not always.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    8. Re:I don't get it by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      If that mobile phone was a smartphone, yes. Walking down the stairs and picking up the landline would probably have been faster than finding the telephony-app in the pile of apps...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    9. Re:I don't get it by The-Ixian · · Score: 2

      Sure she could. But she didn't have to, so why would she?

      Because we all know how well voice functions work.

      This story could just as easily been "Woman saves child despite Siri calling her friend Annie instead of the requested ambulance"

      She is lucky it worked out, but taking the 3 seconds to dial 911 would have been the safer choice, imo.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    10. Re:I don't get it by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      The important thing was to get her hands doing CPR NOW. If it takes an extra minute to get Siri to call the ambulance, that's lost in the noise.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  19. Siri also by Luthair · · Score: 1

    opened the calendar to Friday and ordered some french fries.

  20. So they got it from Star Trek by Theovon · · Score: 1

    Computer: Tea, Earlgrey, hot.

    1. Re:So they got it from Star Trek by dwillden · · Score: 1

      Which produces a beverage almost but not entirely unlike tea.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
  21. Oh how could she have done it without SIRI? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Oh. I know. Grabbing the phone, hitting the three numbers necessary to call your emergency service (which is admittedly easier on a real phone but on one that buries that "telephony-app" somewhere between the hundreds of inane apps nobody needs but you can't uninstall) and turn on speakerphone (again, something that's easier on a real phone), putting it down next to her daughter and listening to the emergency service while helping her daughter.

    Nonstory coming your way, film at 11.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re: Oh how could she have done it without SIRI? by jsh1972 · · Score: 1

      Most phones I've used have an emergency call button right on the lock screen.

    2. Re:Oh how could she have done it without SIRI? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      And that's why you need SIRI.

      Meanwhile, on my old Nokia 7110 you could simply push the emergency button for a 911 call.

      SIRI: Solving problems we didn't have before phones got smart.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  22. Re:Siri will help you find abortion clinics by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Of all the reasons to hate Apple, why hate it for that non-issue?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  23. Re:Shouting Fire! in a crowded theater. by dwillden · · Score: 1

    Valid question. There is an aspect of it learning your voice. But same with the "OK Google" on Androids and I've had the radio trigger that a couple times when what the DJ's said was similar enough in sound a pacing to trigger it.

    --
    I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
  24. Re:Triggered By News by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Great. Exactly what we needed. More stuff we can't talk about because someone's going to be "triggered"...

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  25. Slow news day by rebelwarlock · · Score: 1

    Someone used a phone! To make a call! Holy shit, you guys! I don't think you understand how important this is! Fuck off.

  26. Re:This should end in hilarity.... by MrLogic17 · · Score: 1

    They already thought of that- part of the "hey siri" setup is training your voice. You have to say the trigger phrase 3 or 4 times to teach it your individual voice.
    I guess it also helps with false positives with background noise.

    Personally, I like to keep control over when the phone is listening and taking actions.

  27. Re:Hey Siri by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Thank you. I knew I could rely on someone remembering that on /.

    If that was the emergency service number, yes, I could see how SIRI could be of any use. Then again, I would probably have stored it as "!!Emergency number" in the phone.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  28. Re: Shouting Fire! in a crowded theater. by jsh1972 · · Score: 1

    Hilarity ensues

  29. OK Google by Shinare · · Score: 1

    Yeah... this is something new...

  30. The Slashdot rule by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    This article should have been about a mother using the Android voice assistant for this to have been taken as a heroic technology example. Of course, she would first have had to yell, "Launch antivirus!" and wait for the phone to be scanned to eliminate the possibility of that ambulance call going to a Nigerian scammer.

    The iPhone is a walled garden, and that's the way I like it.

  31. Re:Shouting Fire! in a crowded theater. by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

    The potential for abuse is high, if that's all it takes. Just walk by someone with an iPhone 6 and yell that, and the iPhone owner is on the hook for making a fraudulent call..and ambulances are expensive, I doubt the hospital would just eat the cost of mobilizing it.
    Someone should put some less drastic, silly command for Hey Siri or OK Google in a movie, and see how many in the theater it affects.

    --

    Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
  32. I stopped thunking by XXongo · · Score: 1

    Really? I stopped thunking about the post when I got to "in route"

    You've got a pint. That should have been "in root."

    1. Re:I stopped thunking by Larry+Lightbulb · · Score: 1

      I thought it was a bit of a damp squid.

  33. What they don't tell you... by clickety6 · · Score: 1

    The interesting part missing from the article is that it was actually an NSA agent that called the ambulance...

    --
    ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
  34. Re: Shouting Fire! in a crowded theater. by Desler · · Score: 1

    Your question is stupid. If you have it enabled and say that it will do what you ask. What other answer were you expecting?

  35. Editing by sexconker · · Score: 1

    Try editing. WTF does "in route" mean?

    1. Re:Editing by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      I am going to take a wild stab in the dark and say it means "on the way" ?

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    2. Re:Editing by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Then why didn't they write "en route"?

    3. Re:Editing by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Because they screwed up? While "in route" is wrong, it's perfectly understandable.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  36. Re:This should end in hilarity.... by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

    And as we all know, your voice is your passport... totally unique... which is why we have so many voice-is-your-password authentication mechanisms....

    --
    My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
  37. Here's what my iPhone 6 Plus would do... by nuckfuts · · Score: 1

    "OK, I found this on the web for 'call an ambulance'. Take a look:"

  38. Thank you Reader's Digest by axewolf · · Score: 1

    For this heart-touching story about how an insidious device that listens to everything you say and relays the information to the government (for the sole purpose to destroy your freedom and in turn your very life) is actually a good thing.

  39. Fun little prank by Toshito · · Score: 2

    What happens if someone shout "Hey Siri call an ambulance" in a crowded room full of iPhone 6?

    --
    Try it! Library of Babel
    1. Re:Fun little prank by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I tried this a few weeks ago on a friend with an iPhone 6S. Evidently, Siri will only recognize YOUR voice. Makes sense. Imagine showin up in an apply store and yelling "hey Siri, call the police."

  40. Re: Shouting Fire! in a crowded theater. by narcc · · Score: 1

    It's implied that the person shouting "Hey Siri, Call an Ambulance" is doing so with the intention of initiating that action on another person's phone, possibly a group.

    Some people seem to have this wacky idea that 'Hey, Siri" and "Okay, Google" respond only to their voice. That's not even a little bit true. This means that anyone can initiate an action on your phone without your consent. That should make you a little nervous.

  41. Re:Hot, thick jazz by Macman408 · · Score: 1

    It is trained, at least somewhat, to your voice. I don't know how selective it is, though. And as for the creepy-factor, you can turn it off, as I have done.

  42. Just wait until Siri has more AI by anti-disney · · Score: 1

    In the future you might have Siri call the police if it believes you are intoxicated or to tell the police that you're speeding. This would be the perfect tool for law enforcement. If you talk to a friend about buying drugs, Siri will narc on you.