Slashdot Mirror


FBI Director Comey: 'Highly Confident' Orlando Shooter Radicalized Through Internet (cbsnews.com)

An anonymous reader writes from a report via CBS News: FBI Director James Comey echoed President Obama's statement that he does not think the Orlando shooting was a plot directed from outside of the U.S. "So far, we see no indication that this was a plot directed from outside the United States and we see no indication that he was part of any kind of network," Comey told reporters. The intelligence community, Comey said, is "highly confident that this killer was radicalized at least in part through the internet." CBS News reports: "The FBI first became aware of the shooter, Omar Mateen, in May 2013 when he was working as a contract security guard and he made statements that were 'inflammatory and contradictory,' Comey said. Mateen told his co-workers at the time that he had family connections to al Qaeda and that he was a member of Hezbollah. Comey pointed out that Hezbollah, based in Lebanon, is a 'bitter enemy' of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) to which he pledged loyalty in 911 calls as the attack unfolded early Sunday morning." According to CNN, at least 50 people were killed inside Pulse, a gay nightclub, marking the deadliest mass shooting in U.S. history.

53 of 404 comments (clear)

  1. Radicalized through Islam by turkeydance · · Score: 3, Insightful

    don't blame the messenger

    1. Re:Radicalized through Islam by MightyMartian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because no other ideological streams produce mass murdering terrorists. Oh wait, there's Tim Mcveigh, Hans Anders Breivik, and apparently a lone nut job James Howell, who has, according to reports, far right sympathies and was, fortunately, arrested before he could produce two attacks on the LGBT community in one weekend.

      There are no lack of ideologically-driven lunatics out there who pick a group, whether that's gays, leftists, government employees, or whomever, and decide they must die in some greater cause. For fuck's sake, Ted Kaczynski's reign of terror was largely the product of his anarchist Ludditism.

      And I think it should be mentioned that the people most often victimized by Islamic terrorists are their fellow Muslims.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Radicalized through Islam by Wootery · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And yet it remains that Islam is way the most prominent ideology behind this kind of thing.

      And I think it should be mentioned that the people most often victimized by Islamic terrorists are their fellow Muslims.

      Right. So? This has precisely zero bearing on the question of whether Islam as a religion is a factor in Islamic terrorism.

      Or were you somehow trying to tell turkeydance not to demonise Muslims (which they never did anyway)?

    3. Re:Radicalized through Islam by MightyMartian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is no question. There's a claim that Islam is especially prone to producing terrorists. Lots of ideologies produce violent terrorists. Many of the US's terrorist acts have been the acts of homegrown terrorists, often anti-government extreme anarchist types.

      That's like claiming Ireland is more prone to producing terrorists because of the IRA and Protestant militias. It's a logical fallacy.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    4. Re:Radicalized through Islam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't even think it was an act of terrorism. The piece of shit who did the shooting only "pledged allegiance" to ISIS after he had already started murdering, which tells me he was pathetically trying to justify his actions. The real motivation is far simpler: he was a homophobe. Homophobes are people who hate gays because they feel enticed by them and are trying to convince themselves that they aren't gay.

    5. Re:Radicalized through Islam by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      The fact is that certain groups are very heavily monitored. The more extreme Christian Identity sects and various other white supremacist churches are constantly monitored by the FBI, and along with groups of survivalists, white supremacists, anti-government anarchists, and the like, are often viewed as being groups who are most likely to produce homegrown terrorists. The Norwegian mass murderer, Hans Breivik, was a Scandinavian version of that sort of white supremacism.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    6. Re:Radicalized through Islam by fsckinhippies · · Score: 2

      I have stopped making sense? You call me a 19 year old? if your only goal is to make snide remarks until someone gives up, I will tell you that you are way out of your league. My open ended statements from the last post are begging for a rebuttal. I guess it is easier if you attack me instead. I am still right. Nothing you can say will change the fact that you are a religious zealot who is afraid to point at their god.

    7. Re:Radicalized through Islam by amiga3D · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Radical Islam is a problem. People that justify the worst barbarism in the name of some ideology are a problem and Radical Islam does this. Sure, they aren't the only nutcases around but they're by far the biggest group and they have a huge fan base that cheers them on. Until people stop pussy footing around the subject we will never deal with it. I pretty much despise the gay culture. Not gays themselves but the culture that you get when they congregate. That said, I just avoid them. It would never occur to me to kill them or even to wish them dead. I am appalled at what happened in Orlando and feel bad for these people's families. I'd never wish this kind of shit on anyone. Some so called Christians think it's okay to persecute and kill gay people but I and the vast majority of Christians reject and repudiate that view. God says to love everyone and that only HE is the judge. Then we get to Islam which has a more aggressive anti-gay policy. It's stoning in their own land and open season everywhere else. I know most of the Islamic people in the US aren't radical but a lot of them are, way too many. Depressingly it seems to be the younger ones who don't remember how shitty it was under Sharia in the old country because their parents fled that insanity. It seems the young Islamic generation has decided to rebel against their elders by becoming just as insane as the people the older generation fled from. I don't know if anything can stop a war but importing more Islamic fundamentalists to the US will certainly increase the chances greatly. I know that the more this type of thing in Orlando happens here it's only a matter of time before people get fed up and retaliate. It's all too likely it'll be against a Mosque or some such place.

    8. Re:Radicalized through Islam by Wootery · · Score: 2

      It's like blaming Christians when someone shoots an abortion doctor.

      Not really, no. A truly terrifying proportion of Muslims hold insane, dangerous, beliefs.

      Islam is absolutely not the equivalent of Christianity.

    9. Re:Radicalized through Islam by bughunter · · Score: 2

      Call it what it is: religiously fundamentalist motivated mass murder.

      It wasn't terrorism. It was most certainly NOT intended to bring about any political or policy change, or even make a political statement.

      It was lethal grade bigotry, inspired by a fundamentalist upbringing - fundamentalist Islam vs Christian is moot.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    10. Re:Radicalized through Islam by Gussington · · Score: 2

      And yet it remains that Islam is way the most prominent ideology behind this kind of thing.

      Only if you're not including time as a metric for your data.
      Every religion has their kill 'em all phase, it just so happens we are living in the Islamic one right now. It doesn't mean that the others aren't as equally ridiculous.

    11. Re:Radicalized through Islam by jandersen · · Score: 2

      And yet it remains that Islam is way the most prominent ideology behind this kind of thing.

      Islam is just the flavour of the day for terrorists - in the past and in other regions of the world it was any of a number of other excuses for venting your desire for hurting other people around you: Fascism, Communism, Protestantism, Catholicism, Buddhism - even football, of all things. As the shooting in Orlando demonstrates, terrorism doesn't start with "I am a Muslim, therefore I feel compelled to go and kill indiscriminately" - it is the other way around. You start with the hate, the desire to kill and hurt other people, the wish to hurt yourself, and then you pick up whatever ideology, religion or other "cause" happens to be around and use this as a thin cover to "justify" your actions. In the case of religion, this is doubly absurd - if you really believe in an almighty and all-seeing God, then you must realize that he will see right through your motivations.

      And as we can glean through what we hear in the news about the poor fools who go to join Daesh, they are very often people who have already had a long history with crime and violence and multiple run-ins with the police. When they volunteer to blow themselves up or get killed in their futile war in Syria, it is just a kind of suicide - to cowardly to simply take an overdose, that's all. However, that said, we all have a responsibility for the fact that there are people in our societies who grow up so deprived of hope and opportunity that they eventually see terrorism as attractive. We will probably see Daesh being wiped out in the next few years at most, but that will not solve the real problem.

    12. Re:Radicalized through Islam by Megol · · Score: 2

      No the ignorant one is you. The Anonymous Coward is correct, people that want to control others will choose something to rally behind. But the real reason is always the same - they don't approve of how other people choose to live and therefore want to force them to change or die (eliminating them).

      Authoritarians are the problem no matter what banner they rally under.

    13. Re:Radicalized through Islam by jafiwam · · Score: 2

      There are 1.6 billion Muslims. They must not be very good muslims, if they don't start killing the rest right now. Or perhaps it is people and not the religion that kills, like guns.

      You are correct.

      Peaceful muslems exist IN SPITE OF the contents of their doctrine and scripture, not BECAUSE OF it.

      If you think otherwise, you are simply ignorant of islam. So are the people who are peaceful and follow it. Some people can manage to take any doctrine and make a positive life with it, however that does not change the fact that islam, in it's pure form is NASTY.

      Go educate yourself with Bill Warner's lectures on Youtube, or his books. Warner is an physicist that pulls the whole thing apart and explains what is going on. So he should be very approachable to the /. crowd. He shows the writings of islam are very strict, that THEY are the last and only word to follow, and the basic premises of the whole thing is suppression and dominance of others, sexual abuse of women and a lot of bits that will end up making an authoritarian and brutal society. What you think you know about the Crusades is a LIE. (Oh, did you know a muslem can LIE to you any time for any reason that includes the benefit of him or islam?)

      You will find the bullshit going on with ISIS right now, throwing gays off buildings, killing lots of folks, taking sex slaves, brutal executions, continual warfare is the natural state of islam and everybody else is a perversion of it. ISIS... IS islam.

      What's worse, is there is no provision and no way to have a "reform" and make it nice. There is no provision to reinterpret. No provision to revise, pick a nicer guy to lead, or any of that. "Religion of Peace" refers to what happens after every other religion and secular society has been wiped out. When they say that, they mean "we are going to destroy you and be happy about it."

      Now here's the real problem, if you take a functioning society of the "in spite of" people and let it persist based on islam, eventually some unstable asshole reads the thing again, islamifies himself, and goes into brutality mode. Yes, it's "people that kill" however islam provides a framework to take a malfunctioning person and orient them into intense brutality. To stop random attacks on what islam doesn't like, you would have to get rid of islam. (Not going to happen.) And if you could, you would then also have to get rid of all the copies of the documents, and we all know how easy that is to do.

      Self actualizing spontaneous terrorism is the natural state of, and part of the purpose of islam. We will be dealing with it until the end of humanity.That is how it was spread, from the beginning. (ok, about 100 years in) The entire thing is one gigantic asshole-creation meme. Having it around means you are always going to have people spontaneously going into "destroyer mode." It _can't_ be stopped. What you CAN do, is learn how to recognize the bad guys to stop them early, or harden yourself against when they do attack by being able to fight back.

    14. Re:Radicalized through Islam by butchersong · · Score: 2

      The call to 911 is standard ISIS procedure. They literally instruct those who will be carrying out attacks like this to proceed in exactly that manner. You call up the emergency number, profess publicly your allegiance to ISIS. It is in the ISIS SOPs... Also, the guy was gay. He'd spent weeks in that club before. He was part of a culture and religion that caused him to hate himself. The story is a gay member of ISIS kills lots of other gay people and himself to buy his way into heaven.

    15. Re:Radicalized through Islam by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 2

      Oftentimes, yes, the interpretation of the faith is a large factor in terrorism for both Islam and Christianity. Obviously, most followers of both will not become terrorists, and the main victims of both have been people inside their faith that aren't deemed "the right type of x" or "not x enough".

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
  2. at least in part through the internet by John.Banister · · Score: 2

    Along with every other idea anyone has.

  3. In other news by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Slashdot poster "Fuzzyfuzzyfungus" highly confident that FBI director Jame Comey doesn't appear to know a goddamn thing about the guy his agency investigated at least twice; but knows to blame the 'internet' thing that damn kids are always getting terrorist propaganda and strong encryption from.

    1. Re:In other news by sjames · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'll second that!

      According to reports the guy has been an angry but not terribly devout nutball for a long time. If anything radicalized him, it was 2 FBI investigations and zero mental health interventions.

  4. Re:More likely idea: unbalanced and violent by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The shooter's old man sounds like a peach, a supporter of the Taliban who basically said, "I never taught my son to kill homosexuals", but then goes on to explain how God will punish them. One can imagine a man from a backwards culture who schooled his son in what to hate, and the son simply took it to the next level. After all, once someone has decided that God's gonna need to start killing some blasphemers, it's not that hard to decide that maybe God needs a helping hand, or in this case, an AR-15.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  5. Re:More likely idea: unbalanced and violent by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2

    This whackjob was apparently a bad egg long, long ago.
    Cheering while watching the events of 9/11. https://www.washingtonpost.com...

  6. Re:More likely idea: unbalanced and violent by gcswt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wow. Ridiculous. Ignore the fact that there are Muslim nations that execute homosexuals. The religion itself is extremely homophobic. Ignore the rhetoric the radicals of the region spew out every day online. Then you somehow think radio "talents" in the United States are the radical ones. WOW. Just WOW.

  7. Religion poisons everything by agm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It really does. The Abrahamic religions are barbaric. Let's stop passing these dangerous superstitions onto successive generations.

    1. Re:Religion poisons everything by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      The Soviet Union showed you don't need religion to justify mass evil, merely dogma, ANY dogma.

      It's essentially a variation of: "Having X in place is so very very important that we have to kill lots of people to get X."

    2. Re:Religion poisons everything by agm · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Jesus specifically said he was not replacing the old laws. Not a jot or a tiddle. So you have to add in there the bits about not eating shellfish, wearing mixed thread garments and homosexuality. You have to add in the parts condoning slavery. Not even the New Testament speaks against slavery, it only tells you how you should treat your slaves.

      It's only in the New Testament that the idea of an eternity of hell for not believing is introduced. Is this moral? NO! It it not. "Love me or burn forever" is not a moral teaching.

      Feel free to only cherry pick the acceptable messages in the Bible, but don't pretend the other commands and laws are not there. You are commanded to kill your neighbour for working on the sabbath? Do you? Of course not, because your morality is better than that in the Bible.

      Christianity if nothing like Buddhism. The teachings of Christianity as evidenced in the Bible *are* barbaric. Slavery. Torture. Stonings. The subjugation of women. "No thought for the morrow" is a ridiculous notion.

      Don't paint Christianity as being a benign and loving belief system. It isn't, and it never was. If you think it is then it shows you have not read the Bible or you are so selective in the parts you follow as to make you guilty of not doing the things it commands you to do.

      Am I anti-religion? Damn right I am, and the recent tragedy reveals one of the reasons why.

    3. Re:Religion poisons everything by markdavis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >"Jesus specifically said he was not replacing the old laws. Not a jot or a tiddle".

      Oh really, so his sacrifice didn't replace the old sacrifices? I am afraid it is not that simple.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      >"Don't paint Christianity as being a benign and loving belief system. It isn't, and it never was.

      I said the teachings of Jesus. I am no theologian, but I can read and understand what he was reported to have said and done. And benign and loving is exactly what he preached.

      >"So you have to add in there the bits about not eating shellfish, wearing mixed thread garments and homosexuality."

      Old testament, not Jesus' teachings.

      >"It's only in the New Testament that the idea of an eternity of hell for not believing is introduced. Is this moral? NO! It it not. "Love me or burn forever" is not a moral teaching."

      Nope. Jesus never said anything about hell- that is an invention of others.

      http://www.godsplanforall.com/...

      >"The teachings of Christianity as evidenced in the Bible *are* barbaric. Slavery. Torture. Stonings. The subjugation of women [...] You are commanded to kill your neighbour for working on the sabbath?"

      Nope again- Jesus never taught any of that. I think you are still stuck on the old testament.

      >"If you think it is then it shows you have not read the Bible or you are so selective in the parts you follow as to make you guilty of not doing the things it commands you to do."

      I have read it, and I, like many others, I define Christian as following the teachings of Christ (Jesus), not the rules of the old testament (of which he replaced, AKA Judaism).

      You are certainly correct that there are those out there who have greatly distorted his message and confused what he taught with the old ways (perhaps most). But to lump all religion into a single bucket is just as crazy as declaring one view or one religion is the only "right" thing.

    4. Re:Religion poisons everything by Empiric · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It is you who are "cherry-picking", and compounding it with cherry-picking the interpretation you feel is worst.

      Jesus said not a "jot or tiddle" would "pass away" until "all was fulfilled". And that he came to fulfill it. Therefore, the Old Covenant was superseded by he New Covenant when he did so, via substitutionary atonement on the cross, that is, when "it is finished". You can claim your view is the mainstream on representing Christianity, but that is merely your inaccurate claim.

      Noting that, the OT laws and cultural specifications went a very long way to maintaining a culturally-distinct surviving society under extremely negative conditions. Virtually all other cultures from that time period have ceased to exist. Perhaps, if nothing else, you can acknowledge that these specification have been very effective in a Darwinian or "meme" sense? We'll leave aside the fact that per the only thing you have to judge with, evolution, you have no supportable basis to object to anything. You object to religious norms because of... assimilated religion norms, which you misapply. Your worldview has nothing.

      But then, while we're having anachronistic fun with impossible alternate economic and social structures, do you think people living around 0 B.C. should have been entitled to 401k plans, too?

      --
      ~ Whence do you come, slayer of men, or where are you going, conqueror of space?
    5. Re:Religion poisons everything by Empiric · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The New Covenant and it's applicability is the entirety of the writings of the Apostle Paul, which constitutes the doctrinal core of the entire New Testament. If there is an issue of who hasn't "seriously studied", that issue isn't mine.

      It is indeed the case that the OT Law has been superseded in deference to the methodology Jesus himself stated--"love God and your neighbor as yourself, upon this the entire Law and Prophets hang". Being superseded, however, does not mean its content is discarded as reference, which remains fully valid in determining what should be done, -provided proper contextual application is done-. It "passes away" in no more of a sense than physics "passes away" when we apply its principles to a present-day application.

      This, "love God and your neighbor as yourself" is the present-day "meta rule" for which the entire cultural and legal content of the OT is to be read and applied toward. There are numerous specific examples of this Jesus performed, such as rejecting the misapplication by the religious "authorities" of the time demanding that he not rescue an injured animal because it would be "working on the Sabbath". Arguable literal correspondence to the text, complete ignorance of the intent and purpose. Jesus corrected that directly.

      It amazes me that anyone with even a child's comprehension of even political documents, such as the U.S. Constitution, still insists on such an obvious False Dichotomy equivalent to "Do you accept the Constitution, or do you reject it entirely by applying it in any way other than how I personally interpret the Constitution's intent?" Stop this erroneous argument. Rejecting that in fact the Constitution is the document defining the U.S. legal and structural system is not in question, nor is there an issue of whether it has "passed away", nor can it be discarded. The question is one of interpretation of how it is to be applied, to a current time and context. If you can grasp that, you can grasp this stance on the OT. I'll assume you need some time to grasp this obviousness, and it isn't just direct intellectual dishonesty when you are discussing the particular topic of the bible, using reasoning you apply to nothing else whatsoever.

      --
      ~ Whence do you come, slayer of men, or where are you going, conqueror of space?
    6. Re:Religion poisons everything by agm · · Score: 2

      >"So you have to add in there the bits about not eating shellfish, wearing mixed thread garments and homosexuality."

      Old testament, not Jesus' teachings.

      >"It's only in the New Testament that the idea of an eternity of hell for not believing is introduced. Is this moral? NO! It it not. "Love me or burn forever" is not a moral teaching."

      Nope. Jesus never said anything about hell- that is an invention of others.

      http://www.godsplanforall.com/...

      >"The teachings of Christianity as evidenced in the Bible *are* barbaric. Slavery. Torture. Stonings. The subjugation of women [...] You are commanded to kill your neighbour for working on the sabbath?"

      Nope again- Jesus never taught any of that. I think you are still stuck on the old testament.

      It's all very confusing. Isn't Jesus and God the same thing? Didn't this god command those things in the old testament? This god is not supposed to change it's mind on things. It's all very schizophrenic.

      I take the more reasoned approach: none of it is real. it's all poppycock. It needs to go the way of alchemy and phrenology. In the meantime I maintain the opinion that Christianity is an immortal belief system.

  8. Re:Why does the media use the term "gay nightclub" by Fwipp · · Score: 2

    Because he shot the place up because he hated gay people. Duh.

    He also had a documented history of racism, which might explain why he went on Latin Night.

  9. Obama's officials covering up their failures by mi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Even without the Internet, this guy could've simply attended a talk by an imam:

    killing gays according to Islamic law should be done "out of compassion"

    (This sort of bigoted hatred is Ok, but arguing that sayers of such stuff should be carefully watched would get you banned from Facebook, Twitter, and Reddit.)

    FBI Director James Comey echoed President Obama's statement that he does not think the Orlando shooting was a plot directed from outside of the U.S.

    At least, he is not blaming an anti-Islam movie by some weirdo...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Obama's officials covering up their failures by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Informative

      It might have escaped your notice, but a certain holy book beloved of Jews, Christians and Muslims has this rather interesting passage:

      "If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them."
      Leviticus 20:13

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Obama's officials covering up their failures by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      I'd say there are a large number of Evangelicals, Mormons and Catholics out there who have expended enormous amounts of energy to block same-sex marriage, and in some cases to actively pursue agendas to deprive homosexuals of civil rights protections and even full enjoyment of civil liberties.

      Yes, not as spectacular as shooting them up in a nightclub, but the message is pretty clear "God hates fags". I guess that it's some sort of advancement that most of these groups don't want to actually kill them, but then again, Thomas Jefferson thought it quite a step in the path of liberty when he wrote a law only wanting to castrate homosexual men, as opposed to having them executed.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    3. Re:Obama's officials covering up their failures by quantaman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Even without the Internet, this guy could've simply attended a talk by an imam:

      killing gays according to Islamic law should be done "out of compassion"

      (This sort of bigoted hatred is Ok, but arguing that sayers of such stuff should be carefully watched would get you banned from Facebook, Twitter, and Reddit.)

      FBI Director James Comey echoed President Obama's statement that he does not think the Orlando shooting was a plot directed from outside of the U.S.

      At least, he is not blaming an anti-Islam movie by some weirdo...

      I know, this stuff is crazy.

      The good news is that there’s 50 less pedophiles in this world, because, you know, these homosexuals are a bunch of disgusting perverts and pedophiles.

      [...]

      But these people all should have been killed, anyway, but they should have been killed through the proper channels, as in they should have been executed by a righteous government that would have tried them, convicted them, and saw them executed.

      [...]

      That’s what the Bible says, plain and simple.

      Oh wait, wrong religion.

      Because the crazy imam calling for the killing of gays is totally representative of Islam.

      But the crazy pastor calling for the killing of gays is just some nut who has nothing to do with Christianity.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    4. Re:Obama's officials covering up their failures by Raenex · · Score: 3, Interesting

      But the crazy pastor calling for the killing of gays is just some nut who has nothing to do with Christianity.

      Your point would be more compelling if there was a Christian state throwing gays off the roofs of buildings or involved in a rash of terrorist murders.

    5. Re:Obama's officials covering up their failures by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      Sodomy was still illegal in 13 states until 2003. The punishments weren't so extreme, but it was still possible for a gay man to be sentenced to prison and hard labor.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    6. Re:Obama's officials covering up their failures by meglon · · Score: 3, Informative

      You're right... that's one of the big differences between muslims and christians.... muslims take their religion seriously, while christians only give it lip service. Course, we have to ignore places like http://www.thenewcivilrightsmo... don't we.

      His argument is compelling, and spot on for truth. People in the US are more in danger from the activities of "christian" fundamentalists than they are from islamic fundamentalists.

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
  10. Re:Why does the media use the term "gay nightclub" by NotInHere · · Score: 2

    Because the terrorist has done shooting in that nightclub because it was a gay nightclub?

    The fact that it was a meeting place for gay people was more relevant for him doing the attack than the fact that it was a nightclub.

  11. Re:More likely idea: unbalanced and violent by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I spent some time on a traditionalist Catholic forum, and there's nothing the father of the shooter said that hasn't been said by many Catholic posters on that site. Most of those posters were clearly fluent English speakers, so I'm assuming they were American, Canadian, British, Irish and Australian, so we're talking residents of the First World, and they often had the same view. "Oh sure, you shouldn't attack homosexuals, but you know, they're going to pay for their unnatural acts!"

    In fact, in certain religious communities, like traditionalist Catholicism, Evangelical Christianity (and related groups like the Pentecostals, Seventh Day Adventists, and the like), and in conservative Islam, there's an incredible obsession with homosexuality. Some of it may come from Judaeo-Christianity's roots, the Old Testament made it pretty clear homosexuals are to be executed, and even ol' St. Paul made it clear in the New Testament that homosexuals were part of a special group of really bad sinners. And this was passed on to Islam well, but all clearly linked back to the Mosaic laws prohibiting homosexual acts.

    You should spend some time on these sites, to get a window into the kind of mind that believes there's an infinite omnipotent being that apparently obsesses about what is done with our genitals, and has a special place in Hell for those that insert them in the wrong place, or who pick a life partner that doesn't fit the narrow view. While Omar Mateen may be at the harsh end of the spectrum, before people pat themselves on the back for being so very secular and advanced, state-level sodomy laws were only finally thrown out in the US in 2003, and major religious organizations like the Catholic and Mormon Churches fought tooth and nail to prevent gay marriage, so while none of them advocated the murder of gays (well, most did it, there were some social conservative types who certainly want to make it illegal again), they were doing everything in their power to deprive homosexuals of full constitutional and legal rights.

    I think a number of churches and religious sects really need to do some soul searching. This bizarre, almost fetishistic need to constantly rail against the LGBT community, to invoke conspiracies like the "Gay agenda", to constantly promote fear and, yes, hatred, needs to be confronted.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  12. The FBI getting in front of Criticism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Orlando Police are going to be dogged by the 3 hour delay. The FBI decided that they need to get in front of the public first so they can get forgotten first.

    Legitimately and eventually, the Orlando police will have to answer the question, why they wait 3 hours. They are tasked with protecting the public. So, here we have a situation where they (officers could be killed) risk life. And they sat back until some huge amount of force was assembled. Meanwhile the victims, and these are not hostages, but actual potential targets, crazy dude gets to shoot people for 3 hours.

    If you are a police officer, this is a situation where you surly say, I might get injured/killed, but this is my job. People are being killed, I am tasked with protecting the public. Do firemen wait for the fire to burn out before saving people?

    I remember that high-school shooting where rich white kids were being shot. Those police did not wait 3 hours.

  13. That was fast! by laing · · Score: 2

    AFAIK, the FBI is still waiting to obtain and decrypt all of the shooters electronic devices. Comey's announcement comes after Obama confidently saying the same thing only this morning. I would not normally expect such a proclamation THE FIRST WORKDAY AFTER THE EVENT. Normally an exhaustive forensic effort would result in some bureaucratic report being generated about a year from now.

  14. Re:"B-b-b-but all religions are equal" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    > Deaths from savage Christians angered by Piss Christ: ZERO

    Well, they certainly tried to kill people over a Scorsese movie - firebombing theaters where it was showing.

    And then there are the 8,000+ killed by christians in the Bosnia genocide.

  15. Re:Why does the media use the term "gay nightclub" by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

    Are you fucking kidding? 49 people, almost all who were homosexuals, were killed, in a gay nightclub popular in the area, by a man who, from everything we can gather, had a particular grudge against homosexuals.

    But nope, nothing at all to do with gays. Nothing at all.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  16. Re:Why does the media use the term "gay nightclub" by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Jesus fucking Christ. It was a gay nightclub targeted by a guy who even his father admits had recently become incredibly outraged by the sight of two gay men kissing.

    Why is it that certain people are so fucking keen to trying to minimize the anti-LGBT aspects of this crime. It's almost as if they want to be about Islam, or perhaps no matter what it's about, it shouldn't be about homosexuals.

    As I say elsewhere, would you complain that the media talked about the attack on a *black* church in Charleston? Do you think that's inappropriate?

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  17. Time for common sense Internet control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Countries where people don't have such free access to the Internet don't have these kinds of incidents.
    Time for to enact controls on this dangerous assault medium.
    No one really needs access to that much Internet.
    What's up with these web nuts and their weird pastimes anyway?
    Isn't it worth it if we can save just one life?
    Our cities are bathed in blood and these Internet companies are profiting from it.
    The First Amendment mentioned freedom of "the press". There are no printing presses used to make the Internet.
    We just want to register and track Internet users.
    And subject them to background checks before they can go online.
    And prevent them from using dangerous tools like "encryption" to hide their usage.
    We've got to close the WiFi loophole that lets people access the Internet without a background check.
    Who could argue with these common sense measures?
    If you don't agree with this, you have blood on your hands.

  18. Re:More likely idea: unbalanced and violent by fsckinhippies · · Score: 2

    Ammunition didn't kill anybody. The guy that pulled the trigger killed. People get run over every day, many times it is with malice. Did the gasoline (or diesel) kill the person?

  19. This is an great time to discuss common sense laws by Vermonter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We need common sense internet laws. I mean, why does a person even need a 50 Mbps internet connection? You don't need that much bandwidth unless you are planning on breaking the law. If the internet had been better regulated, this man would have never been radicalized.

  20. So they finally unvailed the new Bogeyman by future+assassin · · Score: 2

    and its called the Internet.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  21. SHOOTER WAS A CLOSETED HOMOSEXUAL by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Interesting

    FBI spews USUAL fabricated BULLSHIT as "highly confident" "intelligence".

    Deeply conflicted individual, drank alcohol. Couldn't recite prayers. Not Muslim to speak of.

    The fact is, there is more documentary evidence of his connection with the NYPD than there is for ISIS! LOL.
    https://t.co/5OcOKyBMe4

    Guess what? NYPD thought he was... GAY!

    The Pulse is a place this sad young man was found to visit FOR THREE years! The staff knew him as a semi-regular.
    http://m.palmbeachpost.com/new...

    He had a Grindr account. He was closeted and took it out on his wife. He hated other gay people that were happy. That's why he killed them. He was miserable on the inside

    Yeah, but "ISIS!"

    But you'll fall for anything, won't you? So you get this bullshit: "Clinton calls for escalated violence in Iraq and Syria in wake of Orlando attack"
    https://t.co/pKBUY6BGv4

    That's why it's called brainwashing. You can't even evaluate this contrary evidence. On one hand all defamatory about "big government", until that government is the FBI, telling you your ugly hatred and provincial phobias are valid. Then it's "high confidence".

    The only hope for this world is the rapid disintegration and collapse of the United States into a hopeless and internally preoccupied failed state. You can't save a bag of tools this stupid.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
    1. Re:SHOOTER WAS A CLOSETED HOMOSEXUAL by halivar · · Score: 2

      Deeply conflicted individual, drank alcohol. Couldn't recite prayers. Not Muslim to speak of.

      Don't discount the power of guilt and shame as catalysts for religious fundamentalism. Such a person may feel the compulsion to go to extremes to achieve the spiritual righteousness that their own weak flesh could not give them. What those extremes look like depend on what the person believes their religion's doctrines to be.

    2. Re:SHOOTER WAS A CLOSETED HOMOSEXUAL by Timothy2.0 · · Score: 2

      A closeted gay man who can't come to terms with who he is versus who his religion tells him to be, then lashes out by doing the unthinkable, doesn't fit the general narratives of hate and paranoia the government and media have spent, literally, years developing in the population. If *someone* doesn't tie it to either anti-gay violence or radical Islam, then how can the powers that be exploit it for political gain?

  22. Don't hate gays by huckamania · · Score: 2

    Just don't think they should be able to coop the term marriage. They can have all the same rights, just call it something besides gay marriage. Also think husband and wife should be used for a man and a woman exclusively. Be creative, come up with some terms that won't confuse everyone when you bring your wife Bob to the family reunion. Most people supported civil unions but that wasn't enough. Now people are being sued for not baking a cake.

    I'm also against the current argument that transsexuals can choose the bathroom they feel most comfortable using. I do support allowing people to change their sex, but it needs to be a legal proceeding. Otherwise, they may as well say anyone can use any bathroom, shower facility, etc because anyone at any time can say they feel like a person of the opposite sex. I don't hate gays, just don't agree with their agenda.

    Same with Muslims, don't hate them, but not going to turn a blind eye to their religious and political tenants (Islam is both a religion and system of governance). There are lots of Muslim countries and they all seem to have serious issues with their non-Muslim neighbors. And there are Muslim insurgents in secular nations that are trying to turn those into Muslim countries. It is they that have divided the world into the part of peace (Islamic) and war (non-Islamic). They fight amongst themselves because Shia and Shite don't recognize the other as being proper Islam (and thus the other is in the region of war). I also don't like their stance on women and the wearing of the hijab, that they don't allow people to leave Islam (which is un-American), that they do not assimilate, that there are millions who support the tactics of terror, that they blow up and destroy historical and cultural artifacts (especially if they are of another religion), that the rules for their behavior changes if they are in the region of war (allowed to drink, lie, steal, have gay sex, etc if it is in support of Jihad) and I could go on. But I don't hate them, just want them to modernize and reform, which is unlikely cause apostasy is a death sentence in Islam.

    BTW, all of your long posts about history are really insensitive. This Muslim inspired massacre occurred this week, not centuries ago.

  23. Re:hippy hater by EzInKy · · Score: 2

    Why do you hate hippies then?

    --
    Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.