Slashdot Mirror


Phones Without Headphone Jacks Are Here... and They're Extremely Annoying (mashable.com)

A few weeks ago, we had an intense discussion on what would happen if Apple's next iPhone doesn't have a headphone port -- and what that means for the rest of the industry, as well as the pros and cons of ditching the legacy port. Over the past few months, we have seen many smartphone manufacturers launch new handsets that don't have a headphone jack. Mashable has a report today in which it says that it is already causing frustration among users. From the article: In the Android camp, phones like Lenovo's Moto Z and Moto Z Force and China's LeEco have already scrapped the 3.5mm headphone jack; to listen to music on the company's three latest phones, users need to plug in USB Type-C headphones, go wireless, or use a dongle. I'm all for letting go of old technologies to push forward, but what is happening is actually going to make things worse. The headphone jack has worked for 50 years and it can work for another 50 more because it's universal. Headphones I plug into my iPhone work in an Android phone, in a BlackBerry, in my computer, in my PS4 controller, in my tablet, in any speaker with audio-out, and so on. I can walk into any electronics store and pick up a pair of headphones and not have to worry about compatibility with any of my devices. I know it'll work. [...] With a universal headphone jack, I never have to worry whether or not the crappy pack-in iPhone EarPods I have will work with the Android phone I'm reviewing or not. I also never have to worry if I'll be able to plug my headphones into a friend's phone to listen to some new song. Same applies for when I want to use my earbuds and headphones with another person's device. And there lies the real issue. I will need different dongles -- a Lightning-to-headphone-jack and a USB-Type-C-to-headphone-jack to be prepared because I do carry both iPhone and Android phone on me daily. Dongles also get lost.

316 of 536 comments (clear)

  1. New is not necessarily better by pz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's simple, really. New is not necessarily better. Change for the sake of change is rarely beneficial to the end user.

    But, unfortunately for the public, neither observation helps sell more widgets. Rather quite the opposite.

    --

    Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    1. Re:New is not necessarily better by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's simple, really. New is not necessarily better. Change for the sake of change is rarely beneficial to the end user

      It's called Marketable Obsolescence. Now you "get" to buy stuff you wouldn't have otherwise needed or wanted.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:New is not necessarily better by antdude · · Score: 1

      People say I am crazy to be using very old stuff like analog hearing aids, KVMs from Y2K, VGA, DVI, Casio Data Bank watches, etc. Because they still work fine for me! Newer stuff suck.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    3. Re:New is not necessarily better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's called Marketable Obsolescence. Now you "get" to buy stuff you wouldn't have otherwise needed or wanted.

      Not quite, it's called Proprietary Interface (aka greed). Now you are required to buy stuff that costs $50 only available from an OEM instead of something that costs $5 that's a industry standard made by everyone else.

    4. Re:New is not necessarily better by pz · · Score: 2

      Ah, so there's the issue. You misread, "not necessarily better," as, "is always worse."

      Hope that helps with your reading comprehension.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
  2. Needs a refresh by rfengr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah, but in 3.5 mm there is mono, stereo, passive microphone, active microphone, non-standard inline controls, impedance sensing, FM antenna. So 3.5 mm is far from standard.

    1. Re:Needs a refresh by serviscope_minor · · Score: 3, Informative

      Far from standard except that 99.999% of stereo headphones will work in 99.99% of equipment with an audio jack.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    2. Re:Needs a refresh by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I'll wait for you to find me a set of standard headphones that won't plug into and work straight away with ANY of the above things you mentioned.

    3. Re:Needs a refresh by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      I'd say 99.99% is way too high, more like 20%. Most people I see using phones are using apps, watching videos or listening to music (the most common use I see day to day). Making calls is a relative rarity. I've got a 3 channel 3.5mm jack earbud headset which came with my phone. I used it once or twice. Unless you're on the phone a lot, it's a PITA to dig out.

      IMO, by far the most common use is headphones.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  3. Terrible idea! Agreed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm also a strong supporter of sticking with something universal and that works well. There was no need to start removing this jack from phones except so they could be thinner. However phones are so thin know most people put a phone phone directly into a case to protect it from it being flung across the room because it is so small it's difficult to hold.

    I'm happy my OnePlus 3 still has a jack and I'm hoping the upcoming Nexus Sailfish and Marlin also include the Jack.

    1. Re:Terrible idea! Agreed. by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm also a strong supporter of sticking with something universal and that works well.

      What's this useless "USB" Apple is mandating on all the iMacs?! Stick with ADB and the Printer/Modem ports. It's been Universal on Mac's since the beginning!

    2. Re:Terrible idea! Agreed. by mschwanke97402 · · Score: 1

      I'm also a strong supporter of sticking with something universal and that works well.

      I know what you mean. I really, really miss my 9 pin serial ports. They were completely universal. Everything had them. Laptops, desktops, nearly all industrial equipment. 9 pin serial ports ruled. They worked really, really well. No need to replace them. I can totally see a 9 pin serial port on the bottom end of my iPhone. I could totally plug my 9 pin serial mouse right in to the iPhone that way.

  4. Analogue vs Digital, and DRM by QuietLagoon · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The media content industry wants to get rid of all analogue output jacks because an analogue jack cannot be locked down.

    .
    The media content industry has already done away with analogue video output jacks. Now they are focusing on audio.

    1. Re:Analogue vs Digital, and DRM by Hadlock · · Score: 2

      USB Type-C allows for analog out to a pair of dumb headphones. You can either connect a pair of native Type-C dumb headphones (dumbphones?) or a 3.5mm set of dumbphones to a $3 adapter.
       
      There will also be digital headphones and powered dumphones, but USB Type-C can totally be used to pass an analog signal from inside the phone, directly to a tiny set of speakers strapped to your head. There's no DRM in analog audio signals.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    2. Re: Analogue vs Digital, and DRM by fermion · · Score: 1
      The one good critism is DRM. Right now I can't watch movies on my desktop because my monitor is not HDMI. Which means content providers can block the headphones as well when the jack goes away.

      Which I think it will. I see more kids using Bluetooth headphones. Think in a few year all the cool kids will use these. I wonder if you can pair multiple headphones to the same device?

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    3. Re:Analogue vs Digital, and DRM by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 2

      Wasn't this the big bugaboo of Windows Vista? I'm also curious how you think the media industries will re-introduce DRM in the billions of DRM-free songs that all the major online stores have already sold and are still selling.

      No, I'm pretty sure this is just about space savings and a minimalistic design fetish. Not everything is a conspiracy, and we already won the DRM war for audio.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    4. Re:Analogue vs Digital, and DRM by Zxern · · Score: 1

      Until they can beam the signal directly into our brains there will always be an analogue hole.

    5. Re: Analogue vs Digital, and DRM by Zxern · · Score: 3, Funny

      Lucky for us we can only hear an analogue signal.

    6. Re:Analogue vs Digital, and DRM by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Impossible.

      Until you can jack the interface directly into your brain, there must be an analog final stage. Even if you have to break open the some headphones, solder on to the transducers and calculate appropriate attenuation.

      DRM doesn't work, because if just a single person is able to break it they'll soon have the de-DRMed media up on torrent sites.

    7. Re: Analogue vs Digital, and DRM by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      The movies I download from that torrent site always play perfectly on my non-HDMI monitor.

    8. Re:Analogue vs Digital, and DRM by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The media content industry wants to get rid of all analogue output jacks because an analogue jack cannot be locked down.

      .
      The media content industry has already done away with analogue video output jacks. Now they are focusing on audio.

      Please don't cloudy this issue. This is not driven by the media industry at all. It's a pipe dream that they simply can't achieve due to several differences between video and audio:

      • - Analogue video outputs have a certain limit to quality
      • - Digital video outputs far surpassed anything that could be delivered via analogue
      • - Modern display technology is digital so there's no need for analogue
      • - Audio producing gear is analogue (yes even class D amps ultimately move a simple speaker coil back and forth)
      • - Conversion between audio requirements for speakers, headphones, line-inputs is trivial. You can't close the analogue hole without disabling a speaker. This is quite different than say a digitally driven display where the analogue portion is the output to each individual pixel
      • -The industry has backtracked on key issues regarding DRM in music formats. No one cares about the analogue hole while Apple is selling DRM free music

      So please can we stay on focus here. This change is driven by this insanely stupid push for thinner and thinner with manufacturers outdoing each other in the sub millimetre specs which they haven't realised the vast majority of people couldn't care less about.

    9. Re: Analogue vs Digital, and DRM by Tukz · · Score: 1

      It's not the missing HDMI, it's the missing HDCP capability.
      HDCP is supported by DVI, DP and HDMI, so it's just your monitor that doesn't have HDCP.

      --
      - Don't do what I do, it's probably not healthy nor safe. -
    10. Re: Analogue vs Digital, and DRM by nachtelfjeiu · · Score: 1

      Ah yes but by the time people are accustomed to different headphone formats, it will be a small step to lock them down.

    11. Re:Analogue vs Digital, and DRM by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Audio producing gear is analogue (yes even class D amps ultimately move a simple speaker coil back and forth)

      Of course they do - Class D amps are fully analog switching/filtering circuits with no digital logic within the amplifier itself.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    12. Re:Analogue vs Digital, and DRM by kheldan · · Score: 1

      Correct. They want to close the 'analog hole', so-to-speak. Of course the problem with that is that, in this case, all you have to do is get a dongle that has an ANALOG headphone jack on it, and you're back to baseband audio. Of course what they'd like to do next is ban all analog headphones and dongles to connect them and force people to buy 100% digital headphones -- but that'll only work with people who are technically unskilled. The signal has to become analog at some point so you can hear it. Hacking headphones is trivial for some of us, and there will always be some company somewhere selling dongles using the DAC that the headphones use anyway, to provide a baseband signal. All the above also goes for video; only the technically uninclined are limited by it.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    13. Re:Analogue vs Digital, and DRM by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

      ... I'm also curious how you think the media industries will re-introduce DRM in the billions of DRM-free songs... DRM is about control. It is all about control. The media industry won't lock-down all those DRM-free songs that are "out there" now, but what is to prevent them from, say, locking down a higher resolution version that you may want to buy in the future? Or what is to prevent them from stop selling DRM-free songs?

    14. Re:Analogue vs Digital, and DRM by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The closing of the analogue hole part was an earlier claim that you could "remove" analogue entirely from the audio system by effectively replacing a DAC with a class D amplifier or outputting a DSD stream directly to a speaker coil.

      I don't think such a device ever hit the market but my point was that even if you did build an entirely digital device like that the final transducers are still analogue.

    15. Re:Analogue vs Digital, and DRM by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      I'm still not seeing what a Class D amp has to do with this - you can't feed digital data to such an amplifier and expect to get anything but noise out of it. DACs and amplifiers do totally different things, and too many people are under the impression that Class D amplifiers have something to do with digital when they don't. It's just a very efficient, somewhat complex, and completely analog amplification method that works similarly to a switching power supply. Modulate an analog signal such that you're only dealing with two voltage levels, amplify the modulated signal, and filter out the modulation frequency to end up with a higher-voltage/current copy of what went in.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    16. Re:Analogue vs Digital, and DRM by kheldan · · Score: 1

      Never happen, it would be a huge step backwards, into the early 90's. Besides which that's what equalizers are for. There are too many people who would want to listen to their music through a stereo system of some sort, and they'd be very annoyed at not being able to connect their source directly to it. Besides which, nothing they can do to obfuscate the signal source is really effective: it all has to, in the end, be an analog signal of some sort. With a trivial amount of electronics (off the top of my head, just an audio transformer would probably be enough) your retro PWM sound 'system' would still be easily connected to a nice convenient jack to provide baseband audio. Or, as you say: soundproofed enclosure containing the speaker, and a decen microphone. Either way you have baseband audio again.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    17. Re:Analogue vs Digital, and DRM by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      But it's not going to be a $3 adapter, at least not if you want anything that resembles decent sound quality. The DAC and the headphone amplifier have to fit in there.

    18. Re:Analogue vs Digital, and DRM by rpstrong · · Score: 1

      If USB Type-C can be used to pass an analog signal from the device to the headphone, then why do you need a DAC and amp inside the dongle?

    19. Re:Analogue vs Digital, and DRM by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      Because USB-C can't be used to pass out an analog signal. It's a digital-only interface. Whether or not the manufacturers are saying much about it, the DAC is always going to be in the dongle.

    20. Re:Analogue vs Digital, and DRM by rpstrong · · Score: 1

      Type C can be used to pass an analog signal by way of two configurable sideband channels (SBUs) in Audio Adapter Accessory Mode. Whether anyone is doing so yet is another question.

  5. Charger + headphones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So I guess you can't use a generic charger or a battery pack while using a USB headphones.

    1. Re:Charger + headphones by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Sure you can, you'll just need the right accessories.

  6. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by MouseR · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's been decades I got plagued with loose mini-jack connectors. My 4s and iPad 1 still work perfectly, as do newer devices I have.

    It's been a complain by Apple for long that MiniJack is too thick for the design goals they were targeting. Reusing BT or USB/C or Lightning connectors saves port space, allows for a second speaker (eg., in Apple's forthcoming design if we're to believe the hype). I think manufacturers will come to realize we still want jacks (I do as I dont want to have to charge my headphones) and provide combined-plug allowing charging while still having MiniJack headphones connected. If not, their loss.

  7. Apple Tried This Before... by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    Doesn't anyone remember the G4 cube? I do. Maybe the current crop of Apple execs and designers don't - or they just really don't want to - but it also was released with no headphone/speaker jack. While that was not the sole reason for its failure, it was a contributing part.

    The G4 cube was cute - similar to how the SGI O2 (the "toaster") was cute, but cute did not equate to functionality.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Apple Tried This Before... by Crashmarik · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Can anything Apple does in the PC arena be called a "Success" ? They have about 7% of the PC market. and as it stands Chromebooks are outselling macs.

    2. Re:Apple Tried This Before... by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      I guess that depends on how you define that arena. I credit Apple with killing the floppy drive (arguably not just the 3.5 with the Imac but also the 5.25 with the original Mac) and leading the way towards killing the optical drive as well. They were also a big developer for CUPS.

      Yeah, their market share is slim, but their followers are astonishingly devout. Even though the hardware is no longer unique you still have a better chance of converting a windows person to mac than the other way around.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    3. Re:Apple Tried This Before... by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      I was a mac person. Mac II, MacII FX. They hardly killed the 5.25 inch drive. You might as well say the original PC killed the 8inch disk. It's always been a battle of price point issues vs usability issues.

      When the Iomega Zip disk came out it was easy to see that existing magnetic media wasn't meeting the need. Optical is still hitting a good price performance spot, that may go but not because anything apple does. Just shifting of costs in flash and hard drives. You can get external HDs for roughly 25$/terrabyte and flash drives are down to 25 cents/gig. Flash at 10 cents a gig will destroy dvd r, HD at current levels is already far superior for large applications

    4. Re:Apple Tried This Before... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Profits, not volume. Apple plays the niche well.

    5. Re:Apple Tried This Before... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      No, Apple was not a big developer for CUPS; they bought that from some small company.

    6. Re:Apple Tried This Before... by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      I credit Apple with killing the floppy drive

      Oh, puh-leez, not this mouldy old chestnut.

      The 3.5" floppy format was already inconveniently small for most uses by the late 90s- the typical PC hard drive around that time was several gigabytes- and any viable replacement was likely to take off as soon as it reached a comparable price, regardless of what Apple did.

      Flash pen drives didn't get to that point until several years later, and even writable optical drives which- while getting rapidly cheaper by the late 90s- still cost enough more than the read-only equivalent that the first-generation iMac only included a CD-ROM.

      The idea that everyone would share files entirely using the Internet in the days when that meant dial-up and it was far enough from universal that relying on it to exchange files with others would be a problem? Not practical in the real world.

      Simple fact is that Apple did the easy part of ditching the floppy, but *didn't* bother to include a proper replacement because they knew damn well it couldn't be done without increasing the price. Why do you think virtually every first-generation iMac you saw had a colour-matched external floppy drive hanging off the side?!

      So, no. I don't think they deserve credit for killing the floppy at all. It died when it would have done, regardless.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  8. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Micro USB jacks wear out even more quickly. I wonder what the new connectors will be like. Everything is getting shittier.

  9. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    what you describe is most of the china crap that you buy today.

    that does not mean that in-spec jacks and plugs are a problem. in fact, they are not!

    so, complain about buying dollar buds. but don't say all jacks and plugs are bad, since that's just plain out WRONG.

    its not my fault that you buy crap and complain about the format.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  10. Paypal Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What about Paypal here or Square?

    1. Re:Paypal Here by starblazer · · Score: 1

      The new square reader with NFC and EMV reader is bluetooth.

    2. Re:Paypal Here by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      It doesn't read magnetic stripe cards. You still need the audio jack reader for now, for people who still have cards with no chips. Most credit cards have been replaced with chip cards by now but debit cards are lagging.

  11. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by epine · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It wears out ridiculously fast.

    For what value of "ridiculously"? I don't have a single 3.5 mm jack in the house with bad connection poltergeists.

    But then, I'm still running an NAD 7140 from the 1980s as my stereo amplifier. Had to go in there last week with electrical contact cleaner to take the crackle out of the volume and balance pots, but I'm sure the audio jack still works perfectly. I'd have replaced some of the electrolytics, too, if my ears could hear any defects.

    Obviously, though, I'm not a desirable Apple customer on several counts (ability to fix things myself, willingness to keep using unfashionable equipment that still works fine, ability to tell whether unfashionable equipment still works fine), so there is that.

  12. Poor Arguements by skam240 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While I'm not thrilled at seeing the headphone jack disapear the author's reasons for keeping it apply to maybe .001 of the population. How many people really have a reason to carry both an iphone and a droid on them? Using my headphones on some one else's phone? How often does THAT come up for a normal person?

    --
    I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    1. Re:Poor Arguements by Drethon · · Score: 1

      Your first world problem must be so tragic.

      So says the person posting anonymously on a first world topic forum.

    2. Re:Poor Arguements by skam240 · · Score: 1

      So says the person supporting the person posting anonymously on a first world topic forum.

      What's your point?

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    3. Re:Poor Arguements by just+another+AC · · Score: 1

      What's your point?

      It could be that almost all tech problems are "first world problems" by definition. This is still a tech site, and the job of tech is to make our lives easier.

      In fact the entire article is "smartphone loses headphone jack" so could be replied with the snark - this first world problem must be so tragic!

      So the original "first world problem" poster is just being inflammatory and adding nothing of value to the conversation, while the comment they replied to was adding value (responding to the assertion that almost noone has to carry both apple and android phone and they said they did).

    4. Re:Poor Arguements by 91degrees · · Score: 2

      And for everyone like you, there are roughly 99999 people who only have one phone that they want to plug headphones into.

    5. Re:Poor Arguements by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I have an iPhone at work, but could have opted for the android. The android choices were pretty poor. If my driving decision is the headset, I'd just carry an android for both. The real difference is the SIM. Heck, I have a 2-SIM phone for the day I get tired of hauling around 2 phones and carry one with both SIMs in it. Solves the 2-phone problem pretty simply.

    6. Re:Poor Arguements by Jumperalex · · Score: 1

      Every time they make a decision to buy their next phone and have to consider if they want to buy yet another application specific accessory.

      Or if they have a split household (technology wise) and have to deal with not being able to share peripherals.

      Or want to loan / borrow from a friend

      --
      If you can't be good, be good at it!
    7. Re:Poor Arguements by skam240 · · Score: 1

      *slaps hand to forehead*

      Yeah, that was my point. By repeating the other persons "first world problems" point in response to theirs i was mocking it. Of course the whole discussion is first world problems which is why I was making fun of the person.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    8. Re:Poor Arguements by skam240 · · Score: 1

      Your post is nonsense. You literally point out you're an outlier which makes my point but then you seem to be trying to refute it?

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    9. Re:Poor Arguements by skam240 · · Score: 1

      First line, I was addressing points from the article. You're bringing up new material.

      Second line, what type of household has multiple smart phones but cant afford headphones for all of them? They're a few bucks.

      Third line, who loans or borrows headphones? A) No one wants other peoples ear wax in their ears B) If you're the type of user who finds they need headphones then you probably already have them

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    10. Re:Poor Arguements by mjwx · · Score: 1

      While I'm not thrilled at seeing the headphone jack disapear the author's reasons for keeping it apply to maybe .001 of the population. How many people really have a reason to carry both an iphone and a droid on them? Using my headphones on some one else's phone? How often does THAT come up for a normal person?

      Speaking of poor arguments, yours is a shining example.

      A standardised 3.5 mm headphone port means that the 1 pair of headphones I own works in every single audio device I own from my laptop, to my phone and tablet to my guitar amplifier. I don't have to carry adaptors nor have a specially authorised (read: overpriced) DCMA compliant pair of headphones for each device.

      That is the perspective of a normal person.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    11. Re:Poor Arguements by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      I want to listen to a song on your phone. So I plug my headphones into your phone. Right now that works just about all the time, but in the upcoming Brave New World of phones without a headphone jack it will not.

    12. Re:Poor Arguements by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      One phone, perhaps. But what about the tablet? The laptop? The desktop computer? The stereo system in the living room? My ham radio transceiver? (I know, most people won't have one of those.) Right now I can connect the same headphones to ALL of those things. I'll grant that the stereo needs a 1/4" to 3.5mm adapter, but that's permanently plugged into the stereo.

    13. Re:Poor Arguements by skam240 · · Score: 1

      I literally have never run into "I want to listen to a song on your phone" and I am a mild audiophile.

      I'll state it again. I don't like the jack disappearing but the author of the linked to article is not making the proper arguments.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    14. Re:Poor Arguements by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      Your friend has a song on her phone that she wants to share with you. It's one with enough nuance that listening to it through the speaker on the phone won't work well. So you plug in your headphones because sharing her earbuds would be icky.

    15. Re:Poor Arguements by skam240 · · Score: 1

      Literally never happened to me. When some one says "hey, you should listen to this" I don't break social scene, I make a note and listen to it at home.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    16. Re:Poor Arguements by skam240 · · Score: 1

      So I refuted the points brought up in the article as not being applicable to the common person and you bring up brand new points as a means of refuting mine?

      Brilliant....

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
  13. Bluetooth simply doesn't work in most metro areas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I have a Ford Focus with Bluetooth audio and commute 48 miles into downtown Seattle. It works for only about the first fifteen miles after I leave home. After that, I have to plug the aux audio input jack into my stereo. By leaving off the headphone jack, it means I can only listen to audio books for about the first third of my commute.

  14. What NEEDS to happen... by LVSlushdat · · Score: 5, Informative

    What needs to happen but NEVER will, is people need to STOP BUYING products that do asinine stuff like this.. I guar-on-teeee if NOBODY bought these phones and raised a stink with the manufacturer of said phones, you'd get some action.. Not from the "raising a stink" but from the NOT BUYING....

    --
    THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    1. Re:What NEEDS to happen... by forgottenusername · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I agree 100%, but the fanboy "must have the newest version for prestige" types don't care. In fact, the more exclusionary the better for them. Totally absurd.

    2. Re:What NEEDS to happen... by Improv · · Score: 1

      Do you expect those of us who have been bluetooth-only to go along with this?

      I get the DRM reasoning. It makes sense to be worried about that. But I also don't like how physical connectors tend to break. I used to go through a headset every month because I'm pretty rough on devices; the cables always broke. Some years ago I switched to bluetooth headphones and that problem stopped. Entirely. I need to make sure I keep them charged, but it's well worth that hassle.

      What this means is for my current and previous phone, I have never plugged anything into the headphone jack for the entire time I've had the devices. Which means I don't need that port. Which makes it feel about as useful as a PS/2 port on a modern computer.

      --
      For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
    3. Re:What NEEDS to happen... by dcollins · · Score: 2

      It's almost as though market incentives fail as a vehicle for democratic citizenship, or something.

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    4. Re:What NEEDS to happen... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Don't. This is a thing for normal people who do use it.

    5. Re:What NEEDS to happen... by dwywit · · Score: 1

      As a matter of interest, how do you charge your bluetooth headphones? Plug them into a charging device, perhaps? So how does that cable/socket combo handle your rough handling? Why is it different from a 3.5 plug/socket combo?

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    6. Re:What NEEDS to happen... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think the same thing was seen by Samsung, because they brought the SDcard slot back after weaker than expected sales of the Galaxy S6 when owners of previous Samsung generations were ready for an upgrade went to LG or Motorola to keep their larger memory needs fulfilled. Boycotting and buying the competition (while telling the sales rep in the store why you are buying the competition) seems to help.
      I was pretty direct with that floor guy from Samsung in Best Buy when my girlfriend, her sister and I all bought an LG G4 last year on why I was dropping Samsung this cycle. I wanted a removable battery (I've had them go bad and I had a USB slot fail too), I wanted expandable memory and I wanted a Qi charger. The Samsung S6 was an amazing phone, but I might as well have bought an Apple 6 since it was a clone with a different OS and color.
      That was three phones they missed a sale on because of dropping a somewhat common standard with an SDcard missing. Dropping the headphone jack is going to be a deal breaker for me on the next few phones too. I don't care how great Bluetooth gets, I like the quality of wired sound.
      I want to charge my phone on the go with headphones on. I don't want to have an ridged USB extension coming out the bottom of my phone that increases the height in a cup holder. A ridged connector wears the port out more because of torsion pressures has it acts as a dongle in my pocket, backpack or a car cup holder (I'm not talking about using Bluetooth with a head unit either).

    7. Re:What NEEDS to happen... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      That's fine. You can skip that phone. But I like the idea of a stronger, lighter, thinner, and cheaper phone. I don't mind having to use USB-C to plug in my headphones.

    8. Re:What NEEDS to happen... by gtall · · Score: 1

      The 90's here: fanboys do not exist, get over them.

    9. Re:What NEEDS to happen... by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      I guar-on-teeee if NOBODY bought these phones and raised a stink with the manufacturer of said phones, you'd get some action..

      I agree. Of course, the corollary is that if people keep buying the new phones and don't complain, then the lack of headphone jack is in fact a non-problem. It's entirely possible that headphone backwards-compatibility just isn't something most phone users care about.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    10. Re:What NEEDS to happen... by wwalker · · Score: 1

      Even better. Buy the phone, open it, use it and then return stating specifically that you returned it because it lacks the feature you expected it to have (audio jack in this case). It hurts the manufacturer much more compared to simply not buying. Make sure you can return it of course, but generally you have 2 weeks to return a phone in US for example, as far as I know.

    11. Re: What NEEDS to happen... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Stronger, lighter, cheaper, thinner? So many contradictions in there it's amazing because you're not getting all of those.

      That you are dumb doesn't make something impossible. https://www.youtube.com/watch?... Oppo got rid of the jack, and ended up with a phone that was, at the time, the thinnest in the world, strong (with the video to prove it because so many idiots like you assume that thin and light mean weak), light, and much cheaper than anything close from Samsung. Sure, the jack wasn't the only reason this happened, but it was a contributing factor. Drop the jack, and make vast improvements in the design.

    12. Re:What NEEDS to happen... by HatofPig · · Score: 1

      Magazines and blogs hype latest phone models. Consumers read them, feel like they haverefined taste because of their expert knowledge of consumer products which other consumers don't understand. This is all fed into by salespeople who get perks for learning all the talking points used to sell the phone and become "qualified". Then they count-down the days to release and when it comes out they give their expert review, opining on whether it delivered, etc.

      Actually, that's how basically every fandom works. In the consumer age, everyone who gets hyped for something is a fanboy.

      --
      Silicon & Charybdis McLuhan Kildall Papert Kay
    13. Re:What NEEDS to happen... by Holi · · Score: 1

      Bluetooth sucks for audio. I keep my phone in my back pocket and it constantly loses connection with my headphones. Never had that problem with wires.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    14. Re:What NEEDS to happen... by Improv · · Score: 1

      I charge those headphones about once a week, using a USB charger. While doing so, the headphones are not on my head, and the other end is in the wall; they're entirely still. I think the much lower frequency and the lack of motion while charging has led this to be entirely reliable.

      --
      For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
  15. Simple... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Don't buy phones without headphone jacks, and don't review them either. Plus, phones that thin likely won't hold up in the pants pockets of the 50% of the population that carries them there.

  16. because it's universal by fustakrakich · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That's exactly the problem. The companies want proprietary. Hell, this goes back the earliest Macs, with their unique mouse, keyboard, and printer ports, and their scuzzy drive connectors... I can understand the reasons, but it's one of those things held them back in market share. Imagine, with their unquestionably superior software and CPUs of the time, how much they would completely dominate if they just opened the tent a little bit to let others play.

    And where would the PC be if IBM's bios wasn't pried open? Too bad the same ruling didn't apply to Apple

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:because it's universal by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 2

      FWIW, IBM actually PUBLISHED the SOURCE CODE for their IBM PC BIOS in an actual book!

      Among the service documentation you could buy for the model 5150 was an IBM blue binder manual that had actual scans of MX-80 printouts of the BIOS in 7-dot matrix
      print as well as the actual schematics of everything in the 5150 except the Power Supply, which they bought OEM from Astec at the time.

      You had to buy the SAMS 3rd-party manual for the PC if you wanted power supply schematics.

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    2. Re:because it's universal by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      FWIW, IBM actually PUBLISHED the SOURCE CODE for their IBM PC BIOS in an actual book!

      And then, a neat trick. I really can't see how that passed muster, but then, who am I...

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    3. Re:because it's universal by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      The BIOS did more than just booting the OS (provided disk access, serial/keyboard I/O, basic screen handling, etc.), and decompiling (disassembling, actually) wasn't necessary because IBM published a fully commented source listing. A detailed functional spec was derived from this listing, which was then used to clean-room the code.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    4. Re:because it's universal by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      I really can't see how that passed muster, but then, who am I...

      If you mean as far as why they released the source listing, then it's probably because that's what lots of manufacturers did back then. Apple also made a fully commented ROM listing for the Apple II available. Even if the listings weren't available, disassembling and figuring out how 8K of assembly code works isn't rocket science.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    5. Re:because it's universal by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but to claim they didn't see the open blueprints really is a stretch. The engineers weren't exactly sequestered during the development, or were they? It just sound weird. But, it's all ancient history now. I just see this as another example of how people spend more energy on obstruction than on actual work.

      As far as the headphone jack is concerned, maybe somebody can reinvent the wheel with a universal magnetic/induction coupler, since MagSafe is still under patent. It's probably harder to do that in a "clean room" than the bios though, but one less hole in the case can't be a bad thing.

      From a wiki:
      Apple owns US Patent No. 7311526 ("Magnetic connector for electronic device", issued in 2007) and does not license the MagSafe connector or the patent

      Is this one of those things where compulsory licensing would come in handy? They could still be allowed to collect a reasonable royalty from it. And I wouldn't have to be such an absolutist on the abolition of copyright/patent because of its inherent obstructionism.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    6. Re:because it's universal by Theaetetus · · Score: 1

      That's exactly the problem. The companies want proprietary. Hell, this goes back the earliest Macs, with their unique mouse, keyboard, and printer ports, and their scuzzy drive connectors..

      SCSI, or the small computer system interface, was a set of standards created by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), not Apple. You want a unique port? Look at PS/2, created specifically by and for IBM and IBM-compatibles.

    7. Re:because it's universal by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Heh, that's true. Everybody should have just used a regular RS-232 serial port. But it still shows how everybody was trying to set themselves apart and corner the market in some fashion. I'm picking on the Mac because I had to buy an Apple printer, and of course, I could have nothing but the best... 1000 dollars at the time. But hey, it could print postscript right up there with the big boy laser printers (and with 8 colors!), just not as quickly and not nearly so quietly, damn near needed a soundproof room of its own.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  17. I haven't used my headphone jack in 3 years by BenJeremy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Bluetooth works fine, for my over-the-ear headphones AND vehicle.

    Now I'm just hoping Apple gives me decent wireless charging and consistent connectivity to iTunes without having to plug in (this functionality seems spotty, at best)

    1. Re: I haven't used my headphone jack in 3 years by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      Have you looked at a map of the U.S. Population density lately ?

      Give you a hint most of it is near the water.

    2. Re: I haven't used my headphone jack in 3 years by BenJeremy · · Score: 1

      Works in Detroit Metro. Works in my "RF noisy" home, with many BT devices, multiple WiFi routers (my own, but also a number of my neighbors), and rather complete cell coverage.

      Is it LORAN causing interference? Do they still field these systems?

    3. Re: I haven't used my headphone jack in 3 years by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      Your reasoning behind this is what ? "Apple doesn't make stupid decisions ?"

    4. Re:I haven't used my headphone jack in 3 years by khchung · · Score: 1

      I was going to post exactly the same thing.

      After I bought a set of good BT headset last year, I plugged my phone's jack with a plastic dust plug, and haven't pulled it out since.

      --
      Oliver.
    5. Re:I haven't used my headphone jack in 3 years by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Yeah bluetooth works great for decimating your potential list of headphones.

      Mind you given the number of fluff filled ears on the heads of consumer out there who think that the headphones that ship with their phones actually sound any good in the first place this may not be a very wide spread problem.

    6. Re:I haven't used my headphone jack in 3 years by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The major problem with Bluetooth is battery life. When I take a long (12 hour) flight, the battery in my Bluetooth headphones isn't going to make it all the way through an audio book. When I'm travelling on the train for an hour or two a day, I need to charge them up every day. It's just one more hassle I could live without.

      There are other problems with Bluetooth. It drains your phone's battery more than just headphones. It's less predictable than headphones too - you know if you just shove a jack into your phone it will shut up and redirect all audio to the cans, but with Bluetooth all you have is a little icon that is invisible with the screen off. More than once I wasn't paying attention and my phone started reading an audiobook out loud because it wasn't paired to the headphones.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:I haven't used my headphone jack in 3 years by samwichse · · Score: 1

      And I used mine to plug into three different devices yesterday.

      Cheapo 3.5mm jack speakers at my office.
      Line in jack on my Honda Fit
      House speakers have a 3.5mm plug to plug into.

      We also have a set of speakers in the lab that anyone can plug their device into and play tunes while they work. 3.5 mm jack. Works with every current phone except the Moto Z, apparently.

      Sam

    8. Re: I haven't used my headphone jack in 3 years by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Except it doesn't work in urban areas. I live and work on downtown Seattle. I have to plug my phone I since Bluetooth never works.

      So? The rumour - and let's not ignore this is still a rumour that started 2 years ago - is that Apple would ship Lightning headphones with the jack-less iPhones. IOW wired.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  18. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I haven't had to fiddle with poor jacks in nearly 20 years. Stop buying cheap garbage and you'll be okay.

  19. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by legRoom · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It wears out ridiculously fast. I've had to find the "sweet spot" on an untold number of 3.5mm jacks. You either have to twist the plug to the perfect angle or apply pressure on the correct side, or else you get no sound or severely diminished sound.

    This has been my experience as well. Not every jack fails - but it still happens more often than for any other jack type that I commonly use. However, I'm still not happy about the move to USB (or Lightning) for everything.

    Why? Because manufacturers are cheaping out by actually removing the headphone jack, rather than replacing it. If everything plugs in by USB, good - but I still need to be able to plug in more than one thing at a time, and no I don't want to add a bulky hub to do it.

  20. Smartphone size? by theurge14 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Phones are the size of mini-tablets these days and you're telling me there is no more room for a headphone jack?

    1. Re:Smartphone size? by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's due to their quest to get the phones ever thinner. The headphone jack is the thickest element left. By getting rid of that then the smartphone manufacturers can make the phones even thinner.

      Not that there's a huge demand for that as I think most people would prefer to keep the same thinness, or even add a bit of thickness, in order to add a bit more battery and not have to charge the device as often. Or they could add some more sensors to the phone or give it some other capabilities if there was a larger battery. Get back to innovating instead of concentrating on making it thinner.

    2. Re:Smartphone size? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      I hear this argument a lot, but I don't really buy it. Iterations of the iPod Touch have generally been significantly thinner than their iPhone counterparts, yet they've managed to keep including a headphone jack on those.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re:Smartphone size? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I also don't buy it, but for another reason: The 2.5mm jack exists. If it was really about thinness, why not just use that?

    4. Re:Smartphone size? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      We won't be happy until the phone is the size and thickness of an A3 sheet of paper.

    5. Re:Smartphone size? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      This is Apple we're talking about. They're not going to standardize a new audio jack, not the way you're thinking at least. Their idea of "standardization" is to make up their own all-new interface, patent it, then charge every huge licensing fees to use it. So a $5 set of minibuds will now cost $45, with $40 of that being Apple's licensing fee.

    6. Re:Smartphone size? by rasmusbr · · Score: 1

      I think AR apps and games where you keep your screen on for extended periods of time are going to put an end to the thinner phone trend. At least for a while until they figure out a way to get radically more screen time per unit of energy.

      The long term answer to AR usage patters will probably be screens that will switch to a low power reflective mode for use in sunlight and other high ambient light situations.

    7. Re:Smartphone size? by Pulzar · · Score: 2

      I also don't buy it, but for another reason: The 2.5mm jack exists. If it was really about thinness, why not just use that?

      Because you'd have everybody bitch about that, too, as you'd have to use a *gasp* adapter to plug in your headphones.

      If you're going to change it to something incompatible, you might as well change it to something that might give you higher quality audio options *and* be thinner, instead of just thinner.

      --
      Never underestimate the bandwidth of a 747 filled with CD-ROMs.
    8. Re:Smartphone size? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The 2.5mm jack is not incompatible. It is just a different size. There's a world of difference between that and effectively locking down and fundamentally changing the way audio is delivered from your phone.

    9. Re:Smartphone size? by ZorroXXX · · Score: 1

      This my friend is a correct problem analysis

      What is the problem? The 3.5mm audio jack limits the minimum thickness of phones. What is the cause? Physical properties. What is the solution? Standardize a thinner analog audio jack. Possible bonus: Making sure all existing 3.5mm jack "extensions" like additional microphone are included.

      However, this being mainly driven by Apple the obviously correct solution above is not what they want. The problem analysed from their point of view looks like the following:

      What is the problem? We would like to sell more and expensive audio accessories to people, even though they actually do not need this. Also we would like to do this as exclusively as possible, without bothersome competition What is the cause? People already own a lot of existing audio hardware that works just fine. And there is a lot of competition with a low barrier to entry. What is the solution? Remove the option to use the 3.5mm jack (and justify by blaming physical size) and thus force people to just discard all their existing, fully functional audio hardware and buy new (from us).

      And now before you start objecting that the analogue audio signal is not as good as what a digital signal could be (let's ignore for the moment the relevance of this considering the typical noisy environment a phone is used in), then consider the following: There exists zero technical obstacles to designing a jack that defaults to analogue but can be switched into digital. Any objections to this would be of political nature.

      --
      When you are sure of something, you probably are wrong (search for "Unskilled and Unaware of It").
    10. Re:Smartphone size? by kwalker · · Score: 1

      Because it sucked when Nokia phones had a 2.5mm jack and you needed an adapter and it still sucks today.

      I had to have a couple of those phones and jumped at the first chance I had to get a phone with a normal 3.5mm jack. I refuse to go backwards now. I won't buy a phone without a 3.5mm jack, or a MicroSD slot. Thinness be damned. I even use Bluetooth quite a bit, but when I absolutely, positively have to have a long conference call with someone, I use a wired headset so it doesn't die on me in the middle of a conversation because I forgot to charge the thing last night. And the sound quality is generally better, I've been told by multiple sources.

      --
      Improvise, adapt, and overcome.
    11. Re:Smartphone size? by retchdog · · Score: 3, Funny

      Adapter? I just lathed down my headphone plug by 0.5mm.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    12. Re:Smartphone size? by retchdog · · Score: 1

      That difference only matters to hardware designers and hackers. 99% of buyers (and 99.9% of money spent) could not possibly care less, except maybe that a 2.5mm-3.5mm adapter is going to be cheaper but then again Apple users aren't looking for bargains. To them, it's just a slightly different shaped thingie you have to put in your phone to make it works with the headphones you have. Either that, or you use the change-over as an opportunity to buy those new "Beats-2.5mm Apple-Certified Dr. Bass Cans with NSASync"!, and so on.

      So the "world of difference" really just boils down to a fairly simple market analysis problem, and you pick the one that makes you the most money. That's all.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    13. Re:Smartphone size? by havana9 · · Score: 1

      And a 2,5 to 3,5 or even 6,3 mm adapter is way more cheaper AND reliable than an USB to analogue converter.
      Being a pure mechanical adapter doen't have to be supported by the operating system, doesn't consume power and being cheap coul be bought easily by the headphones instead of by the cellphone.

    14. Re:Smartphone size? by chihowa · · Score: 1

      I agree with the sentiment, but using a 3.5 mm to 2.5 mm adapter on a phone is an absolutely horrible experience, especially if you're putting the phone in your pocket. You end up making a gigantic lever (length of the entire 3.5 mm plug + length of most of the 2.5 mm plug + extra length from adapter) that is acting on the little 2.5 mm socket in the phone. If you don't do damage to the phone (which I did, then repaired, then did again on my old Nokia phone), the whole thing is still super annoying to have in your pocket.

      Like it or not, the 3.5 mm plug is going to be here for a while. We can either tolerate a slow transition to a better design (like we did with the 1/4" TRS to 3.5 mm TRS plugs) or come up with lower profile 3.5 mm sockets. You can make a 3.5 mm socket that is equal to, or smaller than, 3.5 mm at the cost of a little structural support. Let's try that.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
  21. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by camperdave · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've never had that problem in 40+ years of using headphone jacks and plugs. Maybe you're using them improperly.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  22. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If it happens once, it's a problem with the headphone jack. If it happens over and over, it's a problem with the user.

  23. Because they break... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I have a drawer full of broken MP3 players, some cheap, some expensive. They all have the same problem... a broken spring contact. I tried taking one apart to solder in a new jack, no way because it's too integrated to the circuit board. If you're not going to keep a phone longer than a couple years, then it'll probably last long enough.

  24. I believe you've already found tge problem. by SeaFox · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The headphone jack has worked for 50 years and it can work for another 50 more because it's universal. Headphones I plug into my iPhone work in an Android phone, in a BlackBerry, in my computer, in my PS4 controller, in my tablet, in any speaker with audio-out, and so on.

    This is the problem with your analog headphone jack -- there's no vendor lock-in possible! This grievous error must be stopped.

    Apple almost had this going on with the original iPhone, they just sank the jack down a couple millimeters into the phone so most headphones couldn't plug in properly because their plug was too large. But soon headphone makers started slimming down the plug diameter, and those crafty Chinese made little dongles for existing phones to connect. And what could Apple do? They couldn't copyright a certain diameter hole. But now, oh, but now... we have digital audio transmission possible and decoding chips so small they can literally be inside the headphones themselves, or even just the plug you hook into the device. So now we can just encrypt everything and make headphone producers pay the device manufacturer for a license to be allowed to make third-party accessories. Apple can make money without lifting a finger now. And you wont be able to use your nice $300 earphones your got for your android device or laptop on your iPhone as well. No, now your get to buy two pairs of headphones for twice the price instead.

    Seriously, though. I can't wait to hear how Apple spins this as being a good thing at the next iPhone announcement in a few months here.

    1. Re:I believe you've already found tge problem. by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Funny

      You are apparently unaware that, to date, the only phones which have shipped without headphone jacks are Android phones...

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:I believe you've already found tge problem. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      "I can't wait to hear how Apple spins this as being a good thing at the next iPhone announcement in a few months here."

      Thinnest iPhone ever!

      Legacy free!

      Water resistant!

      Don't forget to buy your Apple certified earphones ($49.99).

    3. Re:I believe you've already found tge problem. by EETech1 · · Score: 1

      Didn't Apple patent a standard diameter headphone plug, but with two flats on them?

    4. Re:I believe you've already found tge problem. by Pulzar · · Score: 1

      And you wont be able to use your nice $300 earphones your got for your android device or laptop on your iPhone as well. No, now your get to buy two pairs of headphones for twice the price instead.

      If you've spent $300 on headphones, I'm sure the $3 adapter will be within your means. Or maybe you can get the premium monster cable version for $30. Either way, you won't have to buy another pair of headphones.

      --
      Never underestimate the bandwidth of a 747 filled with CD-ROMs.
    5. Re:I believe you've already found tge problem. by Theaetetus · · Score: 1

      This is the problem with your analog headphone jack -- there's no vendor lock-in possible! This grievous error must be stopped.

      Apple almost had this going on with the original iPhone... And what could Apple do? ... Apple can make money without lifting a finger now... I can't wait to hear how Apple spins this as being a good thing at the next iPhone announcement in a few months here.

      Yeah, Apple sure are horr- wait, what was the summary?

      In the Android camp, phones like Lenovo's Moto Z and Moto Z Force and China's LeEco have already scrapped the 3.5mm headphone jack; to listen to music on the company's three latest phones, users need to plug in USB Type-C headphones, go wireless, or use a dongle.

      So, Apple has done nothing yet, while Lenovo and LeEco have, and yet all you rant about is how terrible Apple is, and not them. So, which is it: hypocrite, or Android propagandist?

    6. Re:I believe you've already found tge problem. by mjwx · · Score: 1

      You are apparently unaware that, to date, the only phones which have shipped without headphone jacks are Android phones...

      Actually, they're motorola and ZTE.

      Android isn't sold by a company, it's a platform. If you want an Android phone with a headphone jack, you've got plenty to chose from including options from Motorola and ZTE.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    7. Re: I believe you've already found tge problem. by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      My old Motorola had no phone jack, just a proprietary connector.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  25. It can be fine... by squiggleslash · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...but they need to create a standard for the replacement jack first. And no, Bluetooth is not it.

    I don't think the 3.5mm jack is actually a panacea. It's limited to a single stereo output, and numerous incompatible hacks have been grafted on to allow it be used for microphone input and for phone or music controls.

    But you can't just get rid of it without an adequate replacement at the ready, with cheap adapters available that you can easily just slot onto the end of a 3.5mm jack.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    1. Re:It can be fine... by Shag · · Score: 1

      Whew! For a minute there, I thought Slashdot, which was full of cutting-edge techies when I joined something-teen years ago, had become the domain of crotchety old curmudgeons. Glad to see someone still acknowledging that progress can exist.

      Plenty of other technologies have given way to newer ones in the time this site has been around, and in most of those cases, there's been a period where technology B didn't work well with technology A and wasn't universal, and then after a bit manufacturers supported it and life went on.

      If this sort of wailing and gnashing of teeth happened every time - and was actually successful - we'd still be using 5.25-inch floppies, MFM/RLL drives, keyboards with "AT" connectors, EGA graphics, token-ring networking over coax, long-distance communications through DB-9/DB-25 serial ports limited to 56K, and so on.

      Even if a new standard is developed, there's a bit of a chicken-and-egg problem, in that somebody has to be the first to adopt it, and during the transitional period there's less motivation for industry to make things for it. Just look at USB in the '90s. That was a standard, developed by IBM, Intel, Microsoft, Compaq and others, which should have had enough weight in the PC world, but rather embarrassingly the first mainstream product to use it was the iMac - and Apple wasn't even involved in creating the standard.

      Five, ten years from now, I anticipate we'll all have USB-C headphones (except Apple users, who might have something non-standard), and there will be USB-C ports everywhere, and we'll look back at this thread and laugh.

      --
      Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
    2. Re:It can be fine... by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Five, ten years from now, I anticipate we'll all have USB-C headphones (except Apple users, who might have something non-standard), and there will be USB-C ports everywhere, and we'll look back at this thread and laugh.

      I don't think so. Comparing the 3.5" TRS connector to USB is apples and oranges - there are a LOT more devices that use the TRS connector for various and sundry things, and those devices aren't going to move to USB-C. This is a smartphone-specific issue with very little overlap elsewhere, and the rest of the world isn't going to standardize on a connector that's far more expensive to implement, doesn't offer any articulable benefits to them, and is often an inappropriate choice.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    3. Re:It can be fine... by phayes · · Score: 2

      When PC's started coming out without serial ports, I remember the exact same gnashing of teeth, and wailing that this was a technology that HAD to be present on all PCS because of it's idiot-proof design and the fact that EVERYONE needed it for one thing or another. MY GOD PEOPLE, CIVILIZATION WOULD FALL WITHOUT INTERNAL SERIAL PORTS!!!

      Fast forward to today: Yeah, I have a USB-serial cable in my bag which I use regularly but I'm the vanishingly small exception and almost nobody cares. This panty knotting party will blow over and be forgotten in a few years as well.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    4. Re:It can be fine... by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      If this sort of wailing and gnashing of teeth happened every time - and was actually successful - we'd still be using 5.25-inch floppies, MFM/RLL drives, keyboards with "AT" connectors, EGA graphics, token-ring networking over coax, long-distance communications through DB-9/DB-25 serial ports limited to 56K, and so on.

      The replacements for all of the things you mentioned were welcomed because all of those things became inadequate for the purpose. The replacements filled a real, genuine need.

      Dropping the headphone jack isn't in that category at all.

    5. Re:It can be fine... by supremebob · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this feels more like the decision to drop the Ethernet jack on the MacBook Pro just to make the device thinner. Not every place in the world has fast and reliable Wi-Fi, and I now I have to carry around a Thunderbolt to Ethernet dongle for configuring some network equipment.

      In other words, it's a "solution" that just causes more problems.

    6. Re:It can be fine... by phayes · · Score: 1

      Every single computer, router, modem, firewall and most printers came with serial ports a decade or so ago and the Gordian panties crowd was just as worked up about losing the internal serial port. USB dongles? NOT ACCEPTABLE!!! WHINE!!!

      Now, most new network equipment comes with USB serial ports or can be configured over a management ether port and the predicted fall of civilisation has not come to pass (however with Trump/Hillary...).

      Most new TVs, sound systems, game boxes are ethernet/wifi connected and know how to chromecast/airplay/DLNA/...

      Technology moves on. Deal with it.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    7. Re:It can be fine... by amxcoder · · Score: 1

      And I carry around several of the USB-to-RS232 adapters as well and use them in my day to day job ALL THE TIME. I wish they didn't disappear, but I'll admit that the uses for them have shrunk to a very small subset of (usually) tech personel of some type or another. Now, the quality of the adapter can be iffy, as not all them meet exact RS232 spec's and chipsets, so I've also had issues with some that work fine on most equipment, but some equipment won't talk to them because they are out of spec, making having top notch most expensive converters the ones that I have to buy to be reliable across the biggest set of devices.

      The mini-phono jack however is not a 'niche' connector used by a shrinking group of computer nerds. It's EVERYWHERE. From day to day use phones, mp3 players, car stereo's, home stereo's, laptops, PC's, and extends into the pro-audio world on everything (well technically pro-audio uses 1/4 phono, but even then, a $2 passive adapter will adapt it to work with 1/8" mini). I even see some devices (Samsung TV's) that use 1/8" mini as a serial port. I've also seen Android apps that let you send serial commands from the headphone jack. So the uses are more than audio as well, even though that is the use case for 99.9% of people.

    8. Re:It can be fine... by phayes · · Score: 1

      The pro audio crowdfunding will continue to use Jacks. Everyone else? Not needed.

      It's already to the point where eveyone who comes to my house and wants to play a song asks if they can AirPlay/chromecast it.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
  26. Removing all the ports -- TOO SOON!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm sick to help with Dongles. My MacBook Pro runs out of ports. The MacBook is beyond stupid. I want to cry for people when I see these crazy hub attachments to get the ports they need just to use their system the way they need too. I like the clean look and the idea of proximity and wireless but it is way to soon to get rid of all these ports!

    I have an easy solution. iPhone 7... Fuck you Apple I'm buying a 6S. iPhone 7S comes and fuck you Apple I'm not upgrading. iPhone 8 comes or my iPhone 6 breaks I'll be looking for another 6. I don't want a dongle. Otherwise if I wait it out a few more years say 3-5 maybe wireless audio will be better.

    Another thing that annoyed the crap out of me today was changing and recharging batteries on all my devices. This fucking sucks guys! Some days I think this is worse than dealing with all the cables... I mean I still have to plug in to charge. Then when I'm at the office and everyone of 100 people in close proximity all have 5-10 wireless things and we're all stepping on each other... This fucking sucks...

    I bought a dedicated music player. A Cowon P1. It doesn't have any wireless. It runs linux. It has a fucking headphone jack. So really what Apple and these other guys are doing is driving an anti-convergence. The golden days when my mp3 player and phone became have once again parted ways. Now my phone is just a phone and I can tap out msgs, take a few notes, check email, or in a limited way check a web site while I'm out and waiting... But it doesn't do music. That's my opinion. I'm doing doing Apple music streaming with Beats headphones.

    BTW Apple if you you happen to read this. I've spent $1000s on my headphones. So remove the port... Fuck you. Oh but there's a dongle? Go slap yourself in the face with it. This is bullshit.

    1. Re:Removing all the ports -- TOO SOON!!! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      So basically you're mad as hell at Apple, so you're going to keep using Apple products anyway? No wonder Apple does stuff like this; their customers absolutely refuse to abandon them, no matter how badly they're treated.

  27. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by Etcetera · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It wears out ridiculously fast. I've had to find the "sweet spot" on an untold number of 3.5mm jacks. You either have to twist the plug to the perfect angle or apply pressure on the correct side, or else you get no sound or severely diminished sound.

    This has been my experience as well. Not every jack fails - but it still happens more often than for any other jack type that I commonly use.

    This is cray. I've used tons of audio jacks over the years (being both an audio person and a mobile DJ). I've worn our FAR more micro-USB ports (and more expensively to replace) than I've ever had problems with headphone jacks. And the two times I've had problems with headphones, a tiny amount of solder fixed it.

    More to the point -- simpler is better.

  28. Not entirely terrible by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

    You could do something like tape the adapter to the headphones, or just leave it on the headphones (like 6.5mm to 3.5mm adapters)

    Most earbuds are terrible crap that's physically broken anyway.

    For some other pressing need you might have a 3m or 5m long cable with a jack on one end and a USB C on one end (or a 40m long one and if it's broken on one end, cut it)

    3-way jack (stereo + microphone) are even sillier, I don't want to know about them.

    Other way around : leave a female USB C to male jack adapter on a female jack input somewhere (or a USB C to RCA), use a USB C to USB C cable (we'll see)
    Feel free to see it as a dick move and it is, but you had multiple format to worry about already (like dual mono big jack vs small stereo jack vs RCA) and USB C has analog audio still.

  29. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by rtb61 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So instead you want to break your power charging plug hole, the one you now generally use once per day and that with a fixed battery. So instead a potential proprietary socket, that will wear out, destroying the phone because no it connects to nothing and you can not pull out a flat battery and replace it with a charged battery. Yep, gullibly being sold another B$ marketing line. So with an existing ear socket phone you can listen through the usb socket with the right hardware and software but not fucking while you are charging the phone but that's OK you can swap out the battery and charge it separately, oh wait no you fucking can't.

    When I am sitting back at home listening to my phone with a headset, as I am not moving, I charge up the phone at the same time, it's common sense and I have decades old cd/radio players that still plug fine their headsets work fine, so worn socket, likely crappy off spec plugs.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  30. I'm shopping for a phone now by Snotnose · · Score: 4, Insightful

    expect to buy one in the next couple months (OK, I'm not all that serious about it yet). The 2 things I demand are a regular headphone jack, and an SDCC card slot. If a phone has both of those I go on to look at other features.

    Using the headphone jack I can plug my phone into my stereo system and listen to MP3s. Granted, it's not top quality. But it's better than earbud, and definitely better than nothing. My stereo has neither USB nor bluetooth, and damned if I'm gonna buy a new stereo with my new phone.

    1. Re:I'm shopping for a phone now by Snotnose · · Score: 1

      I store my music on my SDCC card, and thought the disconnected thing was a bug in the HTC firmware. Please tell me Marshmallow has solved this problem.

      Phone reboots suck ass cuz it takes 3-5 days for my HTC One V to get around to looking at what's on my SD card. Until it does both EFS file explorer and Mortplayer can see the directories, but I can't play them.

      BTW, 3-5 days was not a typo. Not minutes, not hours, farking days.

    2. Re:I'm shopping for a phone now by evilviper · · Score: 1

      My stereo has neither USB nor bluetooth, and damned if I'm gonna buy a new stereo with my new phone.

      A bluetooth receiver costs all of $5... I've got a couple to retrofit otherwise decent (and expensive) older car stereos/entertainment systems. The sound quality of bluetooth in general is no match for hard-wired, but it's an option.

      My concerns are much more practical... FM radio is a nice option to have in phones, and the headphone cord doubles as the antenna. Bluetooth obviously can't do that.

      I also like the no-brainer ability to just plug in a cord and everything works... No navigating menus to select the device you want to send sound to.

      I also flatly refuse to hassle with a bunch of different devices with separate batteries that need routine recharging. That's the only reason I don't carry around a bluetooth earpiece and keyboard with my phone... If they could both securely clip-on to my phone and have contacts allowing them to recharge their own batteries from my (larger) phone while not in-use, I'd love to have them. Until that happens, no go. My corded ear-buds (sitting in my bag for years) will be ready to go whenever I want with no maintenance.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:I'm shopping for a phone now by Njovich · · Score: 1

      expect to buy one in the next couple months (OK, I'm not all that serious about it yet). The 2 things I demand are a regular headphone jack, and an SDCC card slot.

      How about a starting your search with the Nokia 3110 classic? Assuming by SDCC you mean SD Card Controller. What does SDCC stand for?

    4. Re:I'm shopping for a phone now by willy_me · · Score: 1

      If connecting to a home stereo you could use an adapter / dongle. Better yet, a cable with the correct ports on each end. I assume you leave your cable connected to your home stereo. Be it a 1.8" cable or a USB-C cable, it does not make much of a difference when you are not carrying it around with you.

    5. Re:I'm shopping for a phone now by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      expect to buy one in the next couple months (OK, I'm not all that serious about it yet). The 2 things I demand are a regular headphone jack, and an SDCC card slot. If a phone has both of those I go on to look at other features.

      Yes, me too. I would also add that the ability to swap out batteries is still on my "must have" list, although that's becoming less of an issue as the years go by.

    6. Re:I'm shopping for a phone now by lhowaf · · Score: 1

      Very insightful. I'm surprised nobody else mentioned the FM radio issue. I doubt USB headphones could act as an antenna either so the manufacturers will likely just drop FM.
      Also, the ability to use one headphone/mic on different devices is a big deal. Abandoning the 3.5mm jack is just a way of forcing customers to cough up more cash in return for less value.

  31. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've never had that problem in 40+ years of using headphone jacks and plugs.

    Actually, I have had this problem before - but not for the past 20-30 years. Back in the days when cheap transistor radios were a thing, I semi-regularly had earphone/headphone jacks break on me. Usually you could easily re-solder them, unless the manufacturer did something evil like encase it in rubber.

    But with computers, iPods, and smartphones? Never had an issue.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  32. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by Nemyst · · Score: 1

    Quite frankly, who cares about fashion when you buy stuff like NAD? Just look at the latest stuff from McIntosh and such, they're perhaps even uglier than they used to be, but that doesn't matter. Sound quality is still excellent and will completely trash anything you'll find at an Apple store or referred to by an Apple employee.

  33. Re: Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

    > I'm still running an NAD 7140 from the 1980s

    Sweeet. A couple months ago, I got a solid TEAC amp, powering a set of KEF bookshelf speakers. Combined with Apple Music subscription, I'm listening to all sorts of awesome stuff. Got to the point I stopped watching junk food tv, put the tv on a rolling stand and roll it into and out of the room as needed.

    Enjoy!

  34. Re: Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by Noah+Haders · · Score: 2

    Apple Store doesn't sell hi fi. They sell portable Bluetooth speakers. Of course the quality is worse.

  35. I doesn't have to be bad by curiousdave · · Score: 1

    The electronics, powered by the lightning jack, in a lightning-to-headphone-jack adapter could be small enough to be part of the jack body. An optional version including a lightning jack could provide for charging and other accessories.

    Strap on battery packs are typically designed to fit the phone model. Those designed for jack-less phones could extend the lightning jack.

    With only one hole to deal with wishing for a water resistant iPhone 7 could become a reality.

  36. Re: Bluetooth simply doesn't work in most metro ar by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    I take transit (or occasionally drive) from 40 miles south of Seattle, back and forth to UW. My old Sony DR-BT101 Bluetooth headphones work very reliably with my iPhone for the entire trip, including in downtown and at the U.

    However those headphones are "old" Bluetooth... when I've tried out various Bluetooth 4 devices, I've run into frequent problems (usually audio that's noticeably lagging the source - not so much disconnections). I'm not particularly enamoured with what I've experienced from newer revisions of the spec.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  37. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So what's the objection to everyone using BT headsets? People hate wires today.

  38. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    Just look at the latest stuff from McIntosh and such, they're perhaps even uglier than they used to be, but that doesn't matter. Sound quality is still excellent and will completely trash anything you'll find at an Apple store or referred to by an Apple employee.

    Because even with the mellow analog sound, how big is that tube smartphone going to be?

  39. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by quenda · · Score: 1

    Obviously we should never have moved from the original 1/4" (6.35mm) audio headphone jack, which just works.
    As a bonus, phones would have to be a little thicker, so might not have such crappy battery life now.

  40. Oh please, DO NOT remove the headphone jack. by tchjsa11 · · Score: 1

    I cannot stress this enough, DO NOT remove it. That is all.

  41. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    I vehemently disagree about the praise for the 3.5mm headphone jack. The same problems it had in the '80s are still with us today.

    The problem has always been, like every connector ever devised by humankind, "Good ones are good and cheap ones suck". I've got a Sangean portable radio that I've had at least 20 years, and I've never had sound cut out or had to mess with moving the plug around to get it to work. My Gen One iPod still works fine. My old brown Zune 30gig with the mechanical drive inside has never had any problem with the headphone jack, and I've plugged and unplugged my phones tens of times a day.

    I've thrown away a bunch of clever little low-cost devices where the headphone jack is just shit.

    You really think that USB-C isn't going to have the exact same problems? I've got an ASUS tablet over here that I use to read out on the back porch and I've got to do all sorts of jiggery-pokery to get the thing to charge because the USB-mini (or micro, I can't remember which is which) jack has gotten looser than the Octomom's hoohah. All jacks go bum. I don't care if it's Thunderbolt or USB or firewire or eSATA or whatever.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  42. Re: Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

    Apple Store doesn't sell hi fi.

    Not any more, they don't.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  43. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Because even with the mellow analog sound, how big is that tube smartphone going to be?

    Oh man, I would definitely carry a tube smartphone.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  44. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    I'm still running an NAD 7140 from the 1980s as my stereo amplifier.

    Listen, I can get you a really good deal on some ceramic dialectric directional cable elevators that will increase your signal/noise ratio by 60%. YOU CAN HEAR THE DIFFERENCE.

    http://www.reddragonaudio.com/...

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  45. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by Rei · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Indeed, I've never had a modern 3,5mm headphone port wear out. I've had a lot of micro-USB ports wear out. : And it's only logical that would be the case, the electrodes on the headphone port are far more robust than those on a micro-USB port.

    I know that the standard response to "3,5mm port removal is the feature that nobody requested" is "it'll be painless and we'll be able to use the extra space to more useful internal hardware without having to make the phone bigger". But just ignoring the "painless" thing... how much more "capability" can you add in such a little space? That's enough for what, maybe 5% more battery time?

    Maybe I'm wierd, but I couldn't give a rat's arse how thick a phone is... I just want it to be robost and not a big headache.

    --
    Hourglass says she knows a kid in Iowa who grows up to be president.
  46. Bluetooth == Wifi-like channel congestion. by knorthern+knight · · Score: 2

    Yeah, out in the boonies, it works. But wait a few years, until you take a bus with a bunch of kids with iToys. You know how difficult it is to get a clear WiFi channel in a crowded environment? Well, the same thing will happen with Bluetooth. Your device will be fighting it out with a whole bunch of other devices over limited radio spectrum. The resulting fiasco is completely predictable.

    --

    I'm not repeating myself
    I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user
  47. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So far, my objection is that they don't work well. I got a BT hands-free headset, and had the idea of listening to audiobooks on my commute. Nope - after a while, my Android phone somehow borked the volume. It plays so soft I can't hear the thing. Until this tech gets much more reliable, it's too early to kill the analog jack.

    --
    Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
  48. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by chipschap · · Score: 1

    I use Monster Cable to connect my Bluetooth Sennheisers to my smartphone. Oh, wait ....

  49. Re: Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by chipschap · · Score: 2

    Crappy jacks in crappy phones have their connections break away from the circuit board.

  50. Hardware by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

    If you play sound through bluetooth does the audio quality even come from the phone itself? Or are you depending on some headphone that is now a headphone with a battery and a low power soundcard fit in?

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    1. Re:Hardware by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      There are actually two sorts of bluetooth audio. SCO uses a very nasty lossy compression codec to carry low-quality mono audio - it was intended for phone calls, not music, and is responsible for the poor reputation of bluetooth audio quality as many early headsets used it. There is also A2DP, which still uses lossy compression, but at a much higher bitrate, stereo, and at 48KHz sampling - good quality audio, as the compression noise is below what human hearing can detect. That's what modern bluetooth headphones use.

      But you've still got the issue you pointed out: There's not a lot of room in those headphones for decent transducers and electronics, so a lot of them sound like crap anyway, much like 99-pence earphones usually do. If you want quality sound, you have to pay a penalty in cost and in weight. The laws of physics are unforgiving.

    2. Re:Hardware by Khyber · · Score: 2

      "There is also A2DP, which still uses lossy compression, but at a much higher bitrate, stereo, and at 48KHz sampling - good quality audio, as the compression noise is below what human hearing can detect."

      I've got a pair of custom-built wireless+wired headphones. It uses Polaroid PBT598 hardware. It connects using A2DP. It also has an aux-in input jack.

      You can EASILY tell the difference between the same audio track over A2DP vs the aux cable jack. A2DP adds way more of ye olde MP3 'underwater' effect.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  51. Re:If you have this problem.. by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

    Being a stupid shit is your fault, but everyone else's problem. Here's to hoping someone flushes soon.

    (Apple hasn't released a phone sans headphone jack. Those would be Android phones, you bigoted, hateful shit.)

  52. Re:refuse to buy by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    My car has a 3.5 but not bluetooth, my 10 stereo systems, all my other laptops.. We have three bluetooth headphones but why fuss with the battery, two of the three use the alternate 3.5 plug because they're on mp3 players without bluetooth.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  53. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by whoever57 · · Score: 1

    But then, I'm still running an NAD 7140 from the 1980s as my stereo amplifier.

    What do you need that newfangled stuff for? I have a Quad 33/303 setup.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  54. Re:The inconvenience is the point by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    They did lose out on the power cord market when they all switched to USB.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  55. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This has been my experience as well. Not every jack fails - but it still happens more often than for any other jack type that I commonly use.

    If that is true, then it is true because it is the jack that you use far more often than any other type of jack. I treat headphones like crap, and headphone jacks even more horribly. The last time I had one actually break was on a PowerBook 145 (where I broke at least two or three headphone jacks). Even with massive abuse, I haven't broken one in any hardware built in the past twenty years.

    On my first iPhone, I did have one instance where the jack thought headphones were plugged in when they weren't. That took a little bit of jiggling with a pair of headphones to resolve. But at no point have I ever seen a modern jack break. Not in my gear, not in gear belonging to anyone I know.

    I have, however, seen Lightning plugs break off in the jacks. Not only will you lose your headphones when that happens, but also the ability to charge your phone. On the plus side, Apple is going to sell a LOT more AppleCare plans after people break their third or fourth Lightning jack. So my stock loves the idea....

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  56. As If Blutooth... by rally2xs · · Score: 1

    ...is some kind of foolproof answer to anything. My Android currently has a blutooth function that is hosed - does not pair with either the phone interface in my car's radio or the phone interface in my big GPS. When it does pair, then it drops out the next day. And, its like pulling teeth to get it to see my fitbit. Its toast. But neither of these functions are all that important. OTOH, if I couldn't use headphones with it 'cuz the blutooth is toast, that would be a repair or replacement bill. Replacing my HTC-1 with the new HTC-10 appears to be about a $699 expense due to the "$100 off" offer going around. Pricey damned thing. May have to drop around to one of those repair places that have sprung up and see what a new mobo would cost to have installed...

  57. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by dgatwood · · Score: 5, Informative

    So what's the objection to everyone using BT headsets? People hate wires today.

    In no particular order:

    • Hitting pause on NetFlix, then hitting play again, and having no sound for the first two seconds, thus missing half a line of dialog
    • Relatively poor sound quality
    • Having a radio transmitter basically in my ear
    • Having another device to charge every day, and possibly more than once per day

    That first one by itself is a showstopper for me. The rest just add more reasons to question the sanity of Apple's upper management. Not that I needed more reasons to question their sanity given that they're still trying to make the d**n things thinner even after they were forced to reengineer parts of the iPhone 6 Plus to fix bending problems....

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  58. Re: Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by Noah+Haders · · Score: 4, Funny

    that's the darkest wiki entry ever for a consumer electronics product. literally:
    * reaction at launch
    * criticism
    * discontinuation

    at the very least, they could link to what the reviewers said at the time it was released.

  59. Relax, it's going to be better than you think by BarneyGuarder · · Score: 2

    I get the anxiety over a change like this. There will be some pain involved in the transition, particularly if you have an analog headset you like. However, as USB-C audio gains traction it will work well.

    Standards will mature so that any headset will work with any phone, car, computer, etc. Power consumption will come down. DRM won't be enforced in the headset. Charge through connectors will become common. In other words, as the market grows, things that piss people off will get fixed.

    At the same time, more features will be available. High end headsets will have high end DACs built in with PAs that are tuned to the speakers in the headset. In addition to basic headsets, advanced headsets will be available with DSPs for programmability.

    Also, the analog 3.5mm jack is no picnic. It has been extended ad-hoc over the years and phones never know what could be plugged in.

    So relax, it will be alright. Even if the analog jack disappears completely, it will take a while.

    1. Re:Relax, it's going to be better than you think by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      So relax, it will be alright. Even if the analog jack disappears completely, it will take a while.

      This is my hope. Removing the jack seem really premature, as there is no replacement for it that I know of that isn't inferior. If there was such a replacement available, I would have no objection.

      So I'm hoping that either Apple's decision will not become that standard for non-Apply devices, or that will take so long that someone can come up with an alternative that is at least as good as the old jack.

  60. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've had to find the "sweet spot" on an untold number of 3.5mm jacks.

    Well... Your partners say you try to find it and give you an "A" for effort.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  61. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by rsborg · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So what's the objection to everyone using BT headsets? People hate wires today.

    In no particular order:

    • Hitting pause on NetFlix, then hitting play again, and having no sound for the first two seconds, thus missing half a line of dialog
    • Relatively poor sound quality
    • Having a radio transmitter basically in my ear
    • Having another device to charge every day, and possibly more than once per day

    That first one by itself is a showstopper for me. The rest just add more reasons to question the sanity of Apple's upper management. Not that I needed more reasons to question their sanity given that they're still trying to make the d**n things thinner even after they were forced to reengineer parts of the iPhone 6 Plus to fix bending problems....

    I've used about 10 BT headsets over the years. The best ones for latency of response are my LG HBS 730's (not the newer ones) and those were really good (100 milliseconds, no sound delay) However, I don't wear BT headphones because they strain my neck, fall off, or (in the case of those cheap Amazon eel-looking ones - simply didn't hold in my ear too well.

    They're really convenient, but there's a reason I don't use them anymore (other than they wore out). I use Apple Earpods (don't buy those on Amazon either - too many knockoffs and AZ doesn't care if you get scammed) - they're essentially sweatproof, they stay in nicely, don't tangle, and are relatively cheap for decent sound quality ($30).

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  62. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by ITRambo · · Score: 2

    Probably the same size using vacuum transistors. http://www.extremetech.com/ext...

  63. Re:I believe you've already found the problem. by SeaFox · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You are apparently unaware that, to date, the only phones which have shipped without headphone jacks are Android phones...

    No, I'm very aware of that -- it's kinda the point of TFA. There are already devices with this design decision, and there seems to be no positive in it (for the consumer), it just saves the manufacturer a few cents a unit and makes locking music playback down easier. All the ways people could listen to music on their phone without using the 3.5mm headphone jack were available before the change, so removing the port only stands to remove that other option for the user. It adds zilch to the customer experience.

    The issue here is, unlike the Android platform, the customer can't just say "Well, if Apple is going to get rid of the headphone jack on the next iPhone, I'll just get another manufacturer's iOS smartphone". That's why this is a bigger deal.

  64. Gets the history wrong by evilviper · · Score: 3, Informative

    The headphone jack has worked for 50 years and it can work for another 50 more because it's universal.

    50 years ago, most everyone's headphone jacks were 1/4" (6.35mm), and only monaural. They introduced 3.5mm (still mono) way back when, but almost nobody was using them until much more recently. When stereo was needed, two 3.5mm jacks/pins were used side-by-side. It was only more recently that 3-connector stereo jacks were introduced.

    They also shrunk it again to 2.5mm, which was popular on dumb phones and 2-way radios, but that one didn't catch on too well. But you can just as easily say that sub-mini plug has been around for decades, so we should all be happy to use that...

    And they added a 4th conductor, most often for video (but possibly for a microphone), but nobody agreed to a standard so the wiring is always incompatible between devices, and that didn't catch on very well, either.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    1. Re:Gets the history wrong by SuricouRaven · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think the Belling-Lee connector might have the record. Introduced in the 1920s, still in common use today. It just barely edges out the banana connector.

      If you go back any further you're down to binding posts and clips to hold a bare wire - it's arguable if those count as connectors at all.

    2. Re:Gets the history wrong by dZap · · Score: 2

      The 3.5mm stereo jack has been standard on personal audio devices for close to four decades. The first Walkman had two of them in -79. I don't know what you call recently.

    3. Re:Gets the history wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I am super old (40s). I have never once in my life seen a side-by-side jack, outside of an airplane. 1/4" jacks were entirely a thing for high-end home stereos (still are). I used modern stereo jacks in the late 70s with crappy radios and kids toys, I doubt they were a new thing.

    4. Re:Gets the history wrong by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      They introduced 3.5mm (still mono) way back when, but almost nobody was using them until much more recently

      The 3.5mm plug/jack was introduced in 1964 (52 years ago).
      The 3.5mm plug/jack was universally adopted for portable equipment once portable equipment became... portable. I.e. the Sony Walkman, the very first prototype of which was shown off in the early 70s and from the moment it was announced was stereo.

      Just simplifying it to unchanged for 50 years isn't wrong in the eyes of history. I can take my current state of the art headphones and plug them into that very first Walkman just like I can take a set of headphones from the 70s and plug them into my top of the line smartphone complete with it's video output and it will just work. The fundamentals of it are unchanged.

    5. Re:Gets the history wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I seem to remember the 3.5mm stereo jacks being common in the 1980's since that's what sony used on the walkman

    6. Re:Gets the history wrong by n3r0.m4dski11z · · Score: 1

      " still in common use today"

      I for one have never once seen that connector. And I see ALOT of different connectors.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Looks like coax, but with a large RCA type centre post? looks like RCA but with a weird circle on the (female? trans?) end? On the other hand, you got BNC which provides a lock and already merges RCA and f-type. Why does your connector exist?

      --
      -
    7. Re:Gets the history wrong by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      I see them all the time - every TV in the country has one on! ... in the country. I think I see why you don't recognise it.

      It exists because it was introduced a very, very long time ago when precision machining was very expensive, and because it works almost perfectly. Yes, an F or BNC would lock better - but it's only used on stationary equipment, so the advantage that offers would be too small to justify the trouble of adaptor leads and replacing wall-mounted antenna sockets.

      For new technology to replace old, it is not enough for the new to be better. It must be better by a margin sufficient to exceed the transition costs.

    8. Re:Gets the history wrong by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

      It's used in Britain and Australia for connecting the TV antenna to the TV, basically their version of an F connector.

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
  65. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by Falconhell · · Score: 1

    To my dispointment, a number of my live sound colleagues have blown up iphones by plugging in via mini jack to XLR, and forgetting to switch of phantom power. They should know better, luckily they play dumb and tell Apple it just stopped working, and get replacements.

  66. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

    When it's thinner than 10mm it's just not really adding any value.

    But I'd like to see a phone out of hard rubber that could bend and you could have in the back pocket without cracking the display.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  67. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

    If you are looking for style you need to go for naked tube amplifiers.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  68. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

    Because not all audio equipment uses Bluetooth.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  69. Re:If you have this problem.. by EvilSS · · Score: 1

    ...it's your own fault for buying more Crapple products. Let go of them, you'll be happier for it.

    Apple makes Motorola products now?

    --
    I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
  70. Re:Bluetooth simply doesn't work in most metro are by NotAPK · · Score: 1

    From the Apple support pages themselves!

    This is quite good.

    However, while there is a lot of information about interference from Microwave ovens and WiFi, I could not find anything specifically about shipping or radar. Perusing information about the UHF band shows that two-way radio could be a source of interference, however most shipping uses VHF for ship-shore and ship-ship communication. The ISM band is the most likely cause of interference, however, again, I can't easily identify anything that would be used by regular commercial shipping.

    Sorry, it's a useless post, can anyone else illuminate us?

  71. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

    Compared to even crappier phones by apple or microsoft then an android is pretty OK.

    But I'm good as long as it's possible to make calls on the phone - or make an occasional text message.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  72. so everyone was bashing apple for nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    People were bashing for leaked rumor that Apple will have phone without headphone jack and all the Android fanboys went haywire and started bashing Apple. Guess what, all of Apple phones have 3.5 mm jacks but some Android phones do not. Where are those Android fanboys hiding?

  73. The key word was/is 'universal' by hughbar · · Score: 1

    Doesn't anyone understand that half of the consumer offer is (what I call) 'binaries' now? For a specific razor, there is a specific blade, printer and printer cartridge (preferably with phone-home and self-destruct for any third party supplier), coffee machine and specific coffee capsule. So basically, you buy the thing and then you buy the accessory until the thing wears out.

    If people start making stuff according to universal standards, then things fit in other things and the sky will fall. I agree that this argument is weak when applied to headphones, but it's part of it. For example, once we have bluetooth only, let's encrypt the stream, so that only Apple headphones (or Whatever TM and licensed) work.

    --
    On y va, qui mal y pense!
  74. Re:get over it by SuricouRaven · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The headphone jack interface is ancient. So is the Edison screw light bulb, but that fitting is still commonplace. Simply being old is not a good reason to abandon technology. The floppy drive was killed off not because it was old, but because superior alternatives were available. What is the superior alternative to the headphone jack? What else can offer the same convenience, low cost, universal compatibility, and reliability?

  75. I keep saying it... by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

    Apple should adopt the 2.5mm Blackberry (and one of the Nintendo products?) smaller headphone jack.

    Start a trend, get it moving, I don't mind us all ditching 3.5mm over the next decade for a smaller, essentially identical jack if that's what's needed. Ditching it entirely though is stupid.

    Also this ridiculous headphone standard (start / stop / vol up / vol down) needed to be bloody universal, the fact it wasn't is criminal.

  76. Re: Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by Damouze · · Score: 1

    To call that that "HiFi" would be the understatement of the year.

    I bet Apple at least tried to get the trademark for HiFi around the same time this device was first announced.

    --
    And on the Eighth Day, Man created God.
  77. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'd rather deal with wear than the new DRM possibilities that come with "digital" headphones/earbuds.

  78. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

    +1. I got a LeEco phone in part because it doesn't have a giant pointless dust-and-dirt ingress port in it any more. Never used headphones on a phone, never will, and on the remote chance that I needed it for some reason I'd plug in a USB-C to 3.5mm jack. Sheesh, if people are so attached to their vintage audio jacks, make sure you buy a phone that has one. It's not like you're being forced at gunpoint to buy a LeEco or Lenovo.

  79. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by Damouze · · Score: 1

    I have a Bluetooth headphone set that I bought years ago and the sound quality on that one was total crap. It didn't even seem to be the headphone set itself, but the bluetooth connection. The best way to describe the crappy sound would be that the devices were constantly adjusting the playback speed. It was like listening to a record on a cheap record player with a bad drive string.

    That was the first and last time I used a bluetooth audio device.

    --
    And on the Eighth Day, Man created God.
  80. Idea already implemented, already failed by sonamchauhan · · Score: 4, Informative

    Perhaps the Peter principle applies to bad ideas, as well as people. Perhaps a 'headphone-ports considered harmful' meme has arisen to its level of incompetence within Motorola. And it attempts to propagate itself every decade or so...

    In 2006, I remember being bugged that my Motorola SLVR required a special USB headphone jack. Plus, you couldn't charge the phone and use the headset at the same time (say, for listening to music). Other people thought so too... from this phone's top rated Amazon review :
    "CONS... No dedicated headphone jack ( form over function compromise)"

    So the idea failed and Moto went back to headphone jacks.

    Now its 2016. Bluetooth and Apple seem to have encouraged this meme to reemerge at Motorola. So we now have ... the Moto Z Force, with its innovative USB headphone port. And it appears you cannot charge the phone and use the headset at the same time. .

    1. Re:Idea already implemented, already failed by sonamchauhan · · Score: 1

      Correction to the wrong Amazon link provided:
      http://www.amazon.com/gp/custo...

  81. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And also - If Apple has any claims that they are environmental-friendly, they can stuff that by now.

    Adding a battery-pack to every headphone is frankly insane. Not only it's not environment friendly if you look at the materials used, but it also adds a extra energy usage that is completely unnecessary. So - It's more costly to the consumer, environment-unfriendly and user-unfriendly, adds nothing to the quality of the music, and is incompatible with the standards used in (sane) equipment.

    Yeah - great move Apple.

  82. Apple Forgets by freeze128 · · Score: 1

    The Apple II computer even had a 3.5mm audio out jack and Audio In jack. They should preserve the functionality in the iPhone so I can emulate an Apple II on it and connect it to a cassette player to load basic programs from tape.

    1. Re:Apple Forgets by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      The Apple II computer even had a 3.5mm audio out jack and Audio In jack. They should preserve the functionality in the iPhone so I can emulate an Apple II on it and connect it to a cassette player to load basic programs from tape.

      The IBM PC had a cassette port. Any "PC" that doesn't isn't actually a Personal Computer.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  83. Innovation by freeze128 · · Score: 1

    Sure, Apple needs to innovate new features, but the alternative isn't worth the inconvenience.

    I would be willing to sacrifice the standard headphone jack if the new phone would somehow manage to beam the audio directly into my brain (not just my ear canal - That could be tapped by unwanted listeners). It should also not require surgery. Now *THAT'S* Innovation!

  84. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by Tukz · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't baggy pants prevent the phone from cracking in the back pocket? Tight jeans will stress the screen a lot more.

    And the lack of belt would have the added benefit that the back pocket is lower, thus not sitting on it when sitting down.

    It seems to me baggy pants is actually good for having your phone in the back pocket.

    But alas, I suspect you weren't trying to be funny at all.

    --
    - Don't do what I do, it's probably not healthy nor safe. -
  85. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 5, Funny

    You mean Monster Aether? Plugs into the wall like those room perfume thingies, and spreads complex organic molecules tuned to the specific BT frequencies, to help carry the signal and keep it coherent. Reduces noise in BT headsets and results in a more natural, warmer sound, and completely eliminates bit-flutter. Comes in pine & lavender or sweet jasmine. Only €49,99

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  86. Re: Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The micro USB wear issue is largely because the port wasn't designed for regular use. The USB logo certification spec only requires 500 plug-unplug cycles. USB Type C spec requires 10,000.

  87. Re: Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by nachtelfjeiu · · Score: 2

    That cheap? Surely it isn't a real monster product at that price.

  88. Re: Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by nachtelfjeiu · · Score: 1

    A wired headphone doesn't require charging. It always just works. Hey wasn't there a marketing company with that slogan?

  89. Obviously... by XSportSeeker · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I don't think there are many people out there saying that removing a choice is actually good for consumers, no matter what the justification is for all the phones that have already been released, and the ones that are coming.
    Problem is, people have to speak with their money, and I'm not sure they will.

    I mean, if Apple released an iPhone 7 that demanded an obligatory rectal exam for usage, there would still be lines to buy it. That's the problem that has been plaguing the smartphone business lately. I'm not an Apple hater, but at some point, fandom turns against the capability of a company to really innovate and really design products with consumers in mind. It's financially great for companies to have a horde of mindless fans that will buy whatever you churn out while not understanding the changes that were done, but it's also very easy to see why they wouldn't bother to spend money in creating something unique anymore after a certain point.

    I personally don't even use wired headphones anymore, but I still think this is problematic. At best, an awful decision to allow for something people don't really need (even thinner smartphones with paltry battery capacities to follow), and at worse, a move to force consumers to spend more on stuff they never asked for, like clunky adapters, headphones with proprietary cables or clunky bluetooth gear that needs pairing, inherently more unsecure and becoming just one more thing to charge and worry about.

    Say what you will, but replacing microUSB to USB Type-C has advantages and is a move vouching for better standardization and more capabilities to come. Eliminating a regular audio port, even if lightning ports and USB Type-C ports did give a hugely improved audio quality (which they don't, not for the average consumer) is just bullshit. It's anti-consumer, no matter what shit justifications these companies are giving for the move. This is removing choice. Anyone who wanted either Bluetooth phones or "better quality" audio via USB Type-C or Lightining ports could still have it with the audio port still there. There's nothing to be gained. Removing audio ports also won't change devices price... there's probably nothing cheaper among components than an audio port. There's probably also nothing more universal than it.

    Seems also to be a calculated move... I'll point fingers here, sue me. Why the heck wouldn't Moto Z phones include a goddamn headphone jack in any of their Moto Z Mods for instance? It just sounds like this is the new way these phone companies found out to screw us over to force us to spend more money. I wouldn't be surprised if at a later date we found out that several companies colluded to make this move to sell more overpriced headphones out there.

    Added to all that, it's yet another port disappearing from devices. I understand that it's pretty great to have a standard that does it all, but if you keep taking ports out of devices, you end up with crap like the recent MacBook with it's obviously insufficient single USB Type-C port.
    Now, you can push someone to buy and carry around a dongle just because you couldn't put a couple more ports on your laptop (still think it's stupid and a design flaw), but to force smartphone owners to carry extra dongles, some bulky case, or anything extra like that just so that people can do what they already could do with previous versions - like charging a smartphone while still listening to stuff with a regular headphone. That's just backwards.

    It's like releasing an entire new TV line that is 3D only. No, you can't watch things in regular 2D anymore because 3D is the new thing. We have the 3D glasses for you at "discount" prices, but if you are really cool we have expensive ones to match your coolness. If you are a poor lameass though, you can buy a 2D dongle and keep living in the past.

    It's not like smartphones are already plateauing with less and less people buying new models because the ones they already have are "good enough", amirite? They also needed to make them less attractive

  90. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    And the jack hole is about 1 mm larger on all sides, so 3.5mm takes 5.5mm minimum. So any of the super-thin phones drop the headphone jack because it's to thick to include and hit the marketing goals.

    at least with USB-C you can physically plug in something. I hate bluetooth because it's yet another item to keep charged. And without a cord, it's much easier to forget them and leave them somewhere. The looks of it are that the owner of the phone will need to keep a [lightning|USB-C] adapter appropriate for their phone around, and you can keep using your 3.5mm headphones forever. Though anyone who uses headphones on a computer and isn't an audiophile uses USB headphones because they are easier and generally higher quality than the obsolete 3.5 analog headphones.

  91. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

    The problem has always been, like every connector ever devised by humankind, "Good ones are good and cheap ones suck".

    Many connectors, especially the modern ones designed to shave the price down compared to the older ones are better summarized as "the best ones suck and cheap ones suck really really hard".

    Like, e.g. USB micro.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  92. Re:Bluetooth simply doesn't work in most metro are by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    My cars both have USB inputs into the audio system. You can USB into them, and not use 3.5mm jack or bluetooth.

  93. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by arth1 · · Score: 1

    To my dispointment, a number of my live sound colleagues have blown up iphones by plugging in via mini jack to XLR, and forgetting to switch of phantom power. They should know better, luckily they play dumb and tell Apple it just stopped working, and get replacements.

    That should be the least of their worries. Plugging pre-amped headphone level output into mic level inputs isn't good for the mixer either. At least use a passive direct box that can match impedance and attenuate the signal. Better ones do re-amp, balun and 48V stripping, but even a $25 direct box is better than blowing your mackie/motu/whatever, and having to software gate a horribly clipped signal.

  94. Technology is slowing down. by TheNarrator · · Score: 1

    I think this is a symptom of technology slowing down. They can't make the phone go faster or have a better screen or have a new sensor, so they start doing crap like this. I think now we are at a point with computer technology where we were in 1970 with space technology. We have had decades of rapid progress and we think it will continue into the future indefinitely, but things are about to stagnate in a major way. There is no clear path forward for CPU technology from 14nm. Intel missed a technology generation, extreme ultraviolet lithography is not ready for prime time yet. PC sales are slowing down, phone makers aren't able to come out with anything new or exciting. Winter is coming.
       

    1. Re:Technology is slowing down. by swb · · Score: 1

      I think you're sort of on the right track, but I think it has even LESS to do with potential technological or engineering innovation.

      My sense is that the finance people have basically taken over, and that technology/engineering is being completely driven by financial modeling. Basic technology and innovation is being dictated by what the elaborate revenue models tell them, and the models are built in a way to min/max production cost and consumer spending.

      I see this in all kinds of technology situations, where what appear to be the dumbest engineering decisions are made because it requires you to spend more.

      I expect the same with the elimination of the heapdhone jack. They will eliminate the 3.5mm jack and replace it with a lightning based audio connector. The specs won't be released until after the phone is available to purchase and they will be the exclusive provider of native Lightning headphones *and* Lightning-3.5mm stereo adapters at huge premiums, raking in nearly exclusive revenue on them for months. They will eventually acquiesce and approve third party 3.5mm adapters, but their licensing process will also also guarantee they get a percentage of ALL of them.

      Now, if you look at it from a technology perspective, maybe the 3.5mm jack does need to go. But you don't need much of an imagination to think that maybe there could have been some other jack design implemented that would have still have accomplished the other putative design reasons (thinner, more internal space) and not tied up in a bunch of exclusive-to-Apple IP.

  95. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by ColaMan · · Score: 1

    ahem.

    "You're holding it wrong."

    --

    You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
    There is a lot of hype here.
  96. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

    Like, e.g. USB micro.

    For sure. USB mini is far stronger mechanically, and for me, having a phone that's a millimeter thicker is a small price to pay for reliability.

    --
    Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
  97. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by macs4all · · Score: 1

    But then, I'm still running an NAD 7140 from the 1980s as my stereo amplifier.

    What do you need that newfangled stuff for? I have a Quad 33/303 setup.

    Pah, whippersnappers!

    Dynaco PAS-2/Stereo 70 FTW, baby!

  98. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

    Most devices made between 1980 and 2005 use really large mechanical 3.5mm jacks that are only secured by solder, so the problem you are describing is exactly that, where the solder joints have been cracked on the PCB jack mount itself.

    And this could have been easily avoided by fastening the connector to the board with epoxy so that *it* absorbs the strain instead of the solder joints.

    --
    Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
  99. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by macs4all · · Score: 2

    To my dispointment, a number of my live sound colleagues have blown up iphones by plugging in via mini jack to XLR, and forgetting to switch of phantom power. They should know better, luckily they play dumb and tell Apple it just stopped working, and get replacements.

    That should be the least of their worries. Plugging pre-amped headphone level output into mic level inputs isn't good for the mixer either. At least use a passive direct box that can match impedance and attenuate the signal. Better ones do re-amp, balun and 48V stripping, but even a $25 direct box is better than blowing your mackie/motu/whatever, and having to software gate a horribly clipped signal.

    Fortunately, most mixers made after the 1950s have these magic devices called "Input Gain", which can match the sensitivity of the input channel to an extremely wide range of signal levels, including so-called "line levels". Portable device headphone outputs can almost always be adjusted to be well within this range. So, unless you ignore that red "clipping" indicator on your input-strip, signal level mismatch isn't a problem. And if you're sourcing from a phone, any impedance mismatch (which probably doesn't matter anyway) is not going to be the limiting factor as far as "fidelity".

    As far as the phantom power goes, well, that's hardly the phone's fault, now is it? Don't use cheap boards with "global" phantom power!

  100. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by SpankiMonki · · Score: 4, Funny

    Everyone hates all-caps.

    NOT ME!

  101. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by Sax+Russell+5449D29A · · Score: 1

    It's not as simple as to say that all 3.5mm jacks suffer the problems you described. The good ports cost a lot more and they won't put them where they're not thought to be under an active insert/remove cycle. For example many motherboards, even high-end ones, have shitty 3.5mm jacks because most people don't fiddle with the back-side connectors on a daily basis. You put your speakers or headphones in and they stay connected for even months at a time.

    Then we have those good ports that last for ages. My '09 Sony Walkman has been in almost daily use since I bought it, and there's still no need to find 'sweet spots'. As a side not, I have to say the battery on that device has been amazing too as it hasn't degraded noticeably to this day.

    --
    -SR
  102. so... by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    If you don't like phones without a connector, just don't buy them and quit complaining like a little bitch.

  103. I can't wait... by dohzer · · Score: 1

    I can't wait for the 3D audio and 4k audio upgrades that try to convince me to buy new headphones.

  104. Apple is pulling a Sony by r0kk3rz · · Score: 1

    Looks like Apple is pulling a Sony, which is to release rumours about a controversial feature which mysteriously never appears after your competition have already copied you.

    Sony did this with the Playstation 4, and the rumours saying that bought games would be locked to one console, which Microsoft dutifully followed causing a large backlash and sales hit

    So despite all the rumours about the next iPhone lacking a headphone jack, I expect it will be there just like it always has been

  105. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Micro USB jacks wear out even more quickly. I wonder what the new connectors will be like. Everything is getting shittier.

    And increasing their usage will decrease their lifetime.

    I like my headphone jack near the top of the phone, not at the bottom where the usb port typically is. I also may want to listen while I am charging. I also don't like the extra bulk of BT headphones, nor the cost for what is often crappy audio quality.

  106. Re:For real by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

    Speakers only need 2 wires and you can add a third for a mic.

    If you want stereo, you'll need three wires and four for a mic.

    --
    Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
  107. Re: Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    at the very least, they could link to what the reviewers said at the time it was released.

    I don't know if someone changed the wiki entry since last night, but there are links to reviews at the bottom of the article and above the notes.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  108. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by kheldan · · Score: 1

    ..no, it 'wears out fast' FOR YOU. There are many, many people out there who never have a problem with it. You, I'll have to assume, and a relatively small percentage of people, are just not as careful with things as the rest are, and as a result, you break phone jacks. I'd also suspect you're one of those people for whom you have to replace headphones themselves every so often because you inadvertently rip the cables out of them. You just have to be more careful with things and mindful of how you're moving in relation to where the 'phones are plugged in. Or, perhaps, you'd be better off with Bluetooth stereo headphones. I understand the ones that support the latest Bluetooth specifications are pretty good-sounding.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  109. Re: Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by mSparks43 · · Score: 1

    because Slashdot is now thirds or fort in line for witing comments, and the only plaice that doesn't offer the functionality.

  110. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by deathguppie · · Score: 1

    I've never had a modern 3,5mm headphone port wear out.

    I have. I listen to audiobooks while I work. I usually go through a pair of earbuds every month. (the wire breaks right at the connector) The newer aluminum edged phones are better but the old plastic edge phones the jack hole :) would inevitably stop working.

    The point is USB type-C earbuds are over $40. I can't even imagine paying that much for something I'm going to throw away in three or four weeks, and I can't see that little USB connector holding up either.

    --
    once more into the breach
  111. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by infolation · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's why I fitted my phone with an XLR socket.
    It's sufficient to bear my own bodyweight.

  112. Re: Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    You don't have to avoid new phones. There's good new phones out there, which have standard headphone jacks. Just not from stupid Apple.

    The Galaxy S7 just came out, and it still has a headphone jack.

  113. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by deathguppie · · Score: 1

    Here is how it's done. Step one: download the Audible app. Step two: listen to audiobooks at work all day every day while walking around and working. Step three: replace the headphones every three to four weeks due to the wire breaking inside the housing at the jack end. Step four: Suddenly realize that you have to hold the jack in a specific position for it to work...

    I've done this to several phones. The jack comes out of the phone right at the bend in my leg while the phone is in my pants pocket. The Jack gets a crazy amount of torture. I've learned to try to find earbuds whose jack comes out and does an immediate 45 degree turn but they are surprisingly hard to find. One of those sets will usually last me several months as apposed to weeks.

    I've tried bluetooth headsets, but the batteries are uncomfortable, they never last that long and the bluetooth sucks the battery life of my phone

    --
    once more into the breach
  114. The head phone jack is universal but not needed by upuv · · Score: 1

    The head phone jack has been great. It did the trick. And for a lot of people if not most it still does. To change to another jack format is just stupid. It'll be excessively costly for consumers and frankly a waste.

    I however have switched to wireless I use standard headphones with a bluetooth wireless receiver. And I love it. Why? Well my phone has become so much more than an audio device (phone,music,books). It's now my credit card, subway pass, door key etc. My phone is constantly being removed and put back into a pocket. The number of time my head phone wires have gotten caught on the odd thing here and there and caused my phone to go flying me to look like I have been yanked by the back of my head and have had my headphones ripped forcibly from my head are countless. All this stopped instantly once I went to a bluetooth receiver. I use the headphones I like and the controls for my audio and phone are now on the receiver. I don't even have to bring my phone out for audio tasks. They are so small I can place the receiver on my sleeve, in my pocket, clipped to my jeans where ever. I can move it around so that it doesn't get in the way of what I am doing.

    And the best part is the receiver is only $25. I have a couple of them. One extra in the bag just in case the batteries die. But they rarely do.

  115. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    So instead you want to break your power charging plug hole, the one you now generally use once per day and that with a fixed battery. So instead a potential proprietary socket, that will wear out, destroying the phone because no it connects to nothing and you can not pull out a flat battery and replace it with a charged battery. Yep, gullibly being sold another B$ marketing line. So with an existing ear socket phone you can listen through the usb socket with the right hardware and software but not fucking while you are charging the phone but that's OK you can swap out the battery and charge it separately, oh wait no you fucking can't.

    Yep, this is what Apple buyers are happily signing up for.

  116. Re:Bluetooth simply doesn't work in most metro are by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    Cars with BT audio usually also have USB ports. Does yours not?

    My 2015 Mazda has BT audio as well, and a USB port. I've never used BT audio (though I do use BT for making phone calls through the hands-free system, and also for reading texts sometimes; the system will read them to me aloud). Instead, I just bought an inexpensive 32GB USB thumb drive, copied my whole music library onto it, and that was that.

    No, I don't want to listen to streaming audio from the internet; I don't have unlimited data so that would be quite expensive.

  117. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by Rei · · Score: 1

    So you've had the earbuds wear out, not the port. Agreed. Cheapo earbuds often have a weak point between their plug and their wires. Cheapo anythings for any sort of port usually do. ;)

    --
    Hourglass says she knows a kid in Iowa who grows up to be president.
  118. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by Nemyst · · Score: 1

    I find that this quest for thinness is actually detrimental at this point: phones are so big and thin that they become more and more likely to get damaged from bending.

  119. Re: Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

    It would require a CRT screen...

  120. No, it was FUD by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

    Basically what happened is one "security researcher" who wasn't that good at the "research" part of his job upgraded a system to Vista and had audio issues. He then wrote a blog piece about how Vista sucked and theorized that it was DRM causing issues. This got echo-chambered over the Internet tons and because "Vista's DRM won't let you have good audio."

    It amused me since, when I read it, I had Cakewalk Sonar loaded in the background and was working with pro audio at the time, in Vista, no issues at all.

    What had really happened is his system had a old, low end, integrated soundcard. The manufacturer provided poor quality Vista drivers that didn't work well in full duplex (recording and playing back) mode. So if you were using the mic and output, sound quality was degraded. This was a function of the sound chip and its drivers, not Vista. It was, and is, fully capable of doing 24-bit 192kHz or greater multi-channel audio in and out, as are subsequent versions of Windows.

    The DRM that showed up in Vista related to audio is "protected audio path" and is only relevant to shit like Blu-ray playback. The media industry won't give out licenses to AACS and BD-J unless the whole setup it DRM'd including the drivers. So Vista added this capability (and subsequent Windows versions keep it). A program can say "I am playing DRM'd content, you need to protect this" and the driver will then make sure that screenshots/recording can't happen, that it only plays on HDCP enabled outputs and shit like that. However normally all that is turned off and it affects nothing if you don't use it. While it is silly, it was either implement it, or Windows would never be able to (legally) play Blu-rays.

    1. Re:No, it was FUD by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I guess my sarcasm didn't show through. By "bugaboo" (a mythological monster, like "boogeyman"), I meant "completely unsubstantiated conspiracy theory". I agree, it was complete nonsense, but I had forgotten the details and how that all got started, so thanks for that.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    2. Re:No, it was FUD by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      Gotcha. I still get people who ask about it occasionally (I work in computer support for a living) so I'm used to giving the spiel. Since Slashdot was one place it got repeated a lot my sarcasm detector was turned off :D.

  121. Re: Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by Threni · · Score: 1

    I'd rather a dodgy headphone socket than a dodgy USB socket. Headphone sockets could easily be made to never fail due to coming off the motherboard, dry joints etc. I've no interest in Bluetooth headphones because of the cost and need to manage the battery and because I have no other devices they would work with.

  122. Also, you have options by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    It isn't like all phones are doing this. In fact, usually if some companies start doing something stupid and not giving people what they want, someone else will make and advertise products with those features.

    For example I'm not a fan of the "no removable battery, no SD card" trend. Lots of phones have gone that way in the name of thin... however LG apparently figures there's a market for people who want those features and the LG G5 has them. So guess what phone I've ordered?

    It really isn't that difficult a problem, unless you are a fanboy who is overly dedicated to a given product. If you don't mind a feature going away, ok no problem, buy the new unit and be happy. If you do mind, go and buy another product that has what you want.

    However what I can't respect and get annoyed with are fanboys who will cry about something like this, and then go and buy the product anyways, acting like this had no choice in the matter and they "had" to upgrade. They are the problem.

  123. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by JohnFen · · Score: 1

    My objection is that bluetooth headsets just suck. At least, I've never found a set at any price point that is good enough to use for listening to music.

  124. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by Khyber · · Score: 1

    " It wears out ridiculously fast."

    Which is why all of the 3.5mm jacks on my mixer boards, ISA-based sound cards, and old CD players are STILL 100% functional, despite being older than a decade for every one of them?

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  125. Re: Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by Khyber · · Score: 2

    "USB Type C spec requires 10,000."

    That means precisely jack shit when manufacturers use cheap-ass solder that can't withstand any sort of shear stresses. I've already destroyed two USB Type-C ports due to this.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  126. Dear Moderators by sunderland56 · · Score: 1

    Troll? Seriously?

    This is why slashdot is becoming useless. It has nothing to do with ownership.

  127. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

    1966 HH Scott Stereomaster w/ Klipsch horns.

    --
    C|N>K
  128. Personally by johnsmithperson123 · · Score: 1

    I would rather have a thicker phone with more battery life than a thin phone anyway. You know what they call a thin phone? Broken.

  129. It's fanboy rationalization by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

    You see it all the time with fanboys of a given brand. When that brand does something stupid or something they don't like, they have to rationalize it away how it isn't just not bad, but is actually a GOOD thing. That way, they can continue to be a fan and needn't reevaluate their position, which is important since being a fan of a brand often means having your ego tied up in the success of that brand.

    You see it a lot with Apple fans since Apple is known for changing things on a whim with no warning or input.

    Doesn't even have to be changes either, fans will do it when something is just disappointing. I saw a funny one with one of our former students who was a total Apple fanboy. The iPad 2 was coming out and he'd really hyped himself up for it. I told him that some of the things he was hyped for (like a high DPI display) weren't going to happen, tech just wasn't there yet. So it launched and was underwhelming to him at least. It was just a bit of an update to the old one. Now I don't see an issue with that, makes sense to refresh your products with the latest tech, even if the refresh is just minor. Just means that they are more for new customers than people upgrading. However he was very let down.

    But then, over the course of about 5-10 minutes, he managed to find all kinds of rather stretched reasons as to why it was better and he had to have one, and then placed an order. It went from "I am disappointed," to "I must have this ASAP," in the course of just a few minutes. Nothing changed, no new information, he just rationalized the decision he'd already held: That he wanted a new toy from the brand he was a fan of.

  130. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    Ya unless Apple makes really shitty connectors on their products, I'm failing to see how this isn't a case of user error (or someone making shit up). I can't think of the last time I've seen a 3.5mm TRS plug fail. I make a lot of use of them between my personal devices for listening to music and connecting computers to capture/presentation setups at work. I really honestly can't remember when I last experienced one fail on me. I'm not saying it never happens, but it is rare enough that it isn't even a problem I consider. They are quite reliable, in no small part because they are dead fucking simple.

  131. Too thin by Brian+Kendig · · Score: 1

    If a phone is too thin to have a headphone jack, then it's too thin. I'm annoyed by the trend of making phones so thin to the point where it compromises structural strength (remember BendGate?), isn't thick enough for the camera lens (iPhone 6/6S), and requires dropping standard ports. Allow another millimeter or two and use the extra space for a better battery!

  132. Charging is a big issue by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

    Bluetooth can work fine if you don't use something a lot, but headphones are the kind of thing you may wish to use for extended periods. I've never seen a BT device that isn't massive that has any staying power. Like I have a Plantronics Voyager Legend. This is a new, high end, and fairly large ear piece. It curves over your ear and has a unit that sits behind with electronics and a sizable battery in it. For all that, it is lucky to get maybe 6 hours of talk time fully charged (which will only get worse as the battery ages). Less if you use the high quality audio mode.

    That's not great, and that is for a bigass part. You take something small, like the Earin phones one of our students has, and it is a bit over an hour if you are lucky. On the other hand my little Shure earbuds will work as long as the device feeding them will. Despite the cord, they are actually no larger to carry than the Plantronics earpeice as well. Oh, and they work with my computer, my phone, my receiver, and so on with no fiddling, just plug and go.

    I don't hate BT audio devices, but earbuds have good reasons to exist.

  133. Re: Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    I'm thinking Pip-boy.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  134. Re: Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by rhodium_mir · · Score: 1

    The problem with CRTs is they start to burn in after just TWO WEEKS

    --
    You can't spell "oneiromancy" without "roman".
  135. Re: Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by jittles · · Score: 1

    That cheap? Surely it isn't a real monster product at that price.

    Just like a printer, they get you on the refill cartridges.

  136. Re:get over it by mark-t · · Score: 1

    By the time floppy drives stopped being standard on computers, not only was alternative and superior technology available, but it was so ubiquitous that including the obsoleted technology served no purpose for most people.

    While you can certainly argue that alternative and possibly even superior technologies are available for the headphone jack, they are not so universally used that the headphone jack has already largely fallen out of disuse, as the floppy drive had by the time they had decided to replace it. Maybe that time will come, but we are not there yet.

  137. Re: Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    Slashdot, oh Slashdot, why can we still not edit our posts?

    I've been asking for this since forever. Every fucking blog, forum, and comment-enabled site on the internet has this functionality. Even Yahoo allows you to delete or edit your comments. But it's just too fucking tricky to implement this at Slashdot I suppose.

    Now, cue the fucking wankers who'll piss their pants yelling about how that would permit comments to "be taken out of context" or snivel about "proofreading your writing" or "that's what the preview button is for". Like those shitbags have never made a mistake in their lives or ever needed to go back and edit something.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  138. Re: Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by magnusk · · Score: 3, Informative

    MicroUSB was designed for 10,000 cycles, the same as Type-C. You might be thinking of MiniUSB, but even that was for 5000 cycles, not 500. Standard A/B was designed for 1500 cycles.

  139. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by mark-t · · Score: 1

    Many jacks wear out because the standard audio jack has a moving part - a mechanical switch that allows the device to detect that a jack is plugged in so that the device can "know" to use the headphones for audio output instead of the speakers. This mechanical switch easily could be replaced with an optical sensor that detects when something is plugged into the jack without getting rid of the jack entirely.

  140. Vote Against This With Your Dollars by BrendaEM · · Score: 1

    Just because they want a kickback from the MPAA and RIAA, doesn't mean that you have to buy it.

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/c/BrendaEM
  141. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by c · · Score: 2

    how much more "capability" can you add in such a little space? That's enough for what, maybe 5% more battery time?

    Not even. The last number I saw was about 2% for an iPhone. Compared to something like 20% through making the entire phone either 1mm or 2mm thicker.

    Apple being Apple, it wouldn't surprise me if they remove the headphone jack, increase the thickness of the phone a smidgen, and claim the "innovative" decision to remove the jack led to a 10% increase in battery size.

    --
    Log in or piss off.
  142. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by deathguppie · · Score: 1

    The port wore out on my galaxy s3 and then on my nexus 4. On both those phones it was about a year and a half before the jack started cutting in and out no matter what earbuds I used. The all metal frame on my note 4 has actually been holding up very well. I think it was just the plastic frame wearing and allowing to much movement over time breaking the solder connection.

    --
    once more into the breach
  143. Re: Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by thegarbz · · Score: 3, Informative

    I don't know who modded this up but it is wrong.

    The Micro-USB jack was designed for the same amount of cycles as the the USB-C port. The MINI-USB jack was not designed for so many plug cycles, and even that was larger than 500. Furthermore the Micro-USB jack was designed such that the failure point is the cable end, not in the jack itself.

    The micro-USB wear issue is due to cheap and nasty connectors combined with poor integration, nothing more nothing less. There's a world of difference in quality out there and the good connectors rarely if ever have an issue.

  144. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    You either have to twist the plug to the perfect angle or apply pressure on the correct side, or else you get no sound or severely diminished sound

    Is anyone else really impressed that BabyDuck is able to change the pressure exerted on side contacts by rotating a round plug within a round socket?
    I mean I know that post was mostly garbage, but there seems to be a whole new type of physics invented in it.

  145. Why can't we have thicker phones? by no1nose · · Score: 1

    Why can't the iPhone be twice as thick and have a headphone jack and better battery life? At some point we will be walking around with phones as thin as a black widow's silk.

  146. Re:The author's entire rant is rendered moot by supremebob · · Score: 1

    BlueTooth might be standard on anything build in the last 3 or 4 years, but it doesn't help with backward compatibility with older devices.

    Neither of my cars support BlueTooth audio, for example, so I'm using the 3.5 headphone jack on my iPhone daily to play podcasts in the car. If I get a new phone, now I'm going to need a pair of Lightning to 3.5 audio jack dongles. Knowing Apple, they'll charge $24.95 for them, and they'll incorporate some kind of DRM to slow down third party copies of the adapter.

  147. Re: butters and clowns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Salute from their knees or a wheel chair to reach the light switch?

  148. Re: Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    Exactly how is using a USB device easier then a simple plug?

    Ask two people how a car is easier than a horse. One person from 1898, and one person from 1998.

    USB is easier because it's universal. You have more options on location and presentation of the jack.

    They have no drawbacks either, except for adding a few cents to the cost of the slave labor that makes your phone,

    Space, weight, cost, and fragile. You missed some of the drawbacks of jacks. Also, re-read with the definition of "obsolete" being "old-fashioned". You might find that if your vocabulary is good, other people are easier to understand.

  149. Re: Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is plain wrong. Micro-usb was designed for 10,000 cycles.

    That's even in the overview section on the USB wikipedia article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USB#Overview, which links to the relevant USB-IF docs from 2007, so it's baffling that this got voted +5 Informative.

  150. Re:If you have this problem.. by kuzb · · Score: 1

    Found the Apple fanboy. Also, hateful and bigoted? Pot, meet kettle. Go back to playing pokemon in traffic.

    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
  151. What a bunch of 21st century Luddites! by digitalFlack · · Score: 1

    Lets see

    People complained about electronic locks when a mechanical key would do fine

    DOS users complained about how the mouse was for simpletons
    Then complained about trackpads replacing mice,

    Records replaced by tapes, then DVDS, then by streaming

    ATMs replaced tellers, then went online

    RFIDs replaced bar codes which had replaced stamping a price on each retail item

    Credit cards replaced checks, and are replaced by electronic wallets

    Copper wire based phones were replaced by cellular and Internet based phones

    Add your 20-30 favorites implementations here.

    All in the last 50 years since the simple audio jack came out.

    How about instead of whining and complaining about technologies and products you don’t like or want, you just but something else.

    Spend your electrons elsewhere.

    Apple and Google (et al) experiment on technologies, glasses, social networks, chips, screens, VR, cloud stores, Lightning, Thunderbolt and USB-C connectors, Bluetooth and NFC. That’s why they are in business and you are all pundit wannabes.

    Get over yourselves.

  152. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by mschwanke97402 · · Score: 1

    I agree with you on the Micro-USB ports. They are total crap. Don't know how many broken ones I've been asked to repair on people's tablets and phones.

  153. Bad idea by dahmak · · Score: 1

    So you won't even be able to listen to music when you are charging your phone, or when you want to plug your phone to an external speaker, this idea stinks and is really bad news, I definitely will never buy such a device.

  154. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by Rod+Beauvex · · Score: 1

    Ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding. We have a winner, folks.

  155. Re: Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

    Oh, I'm sure there are worse. Cuecat is a decent example:

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wik...

  156. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

    Holy fuck man. I might disagree with you on a lot of shit, but at least I can laugh with you about this.

    [quote]Cable Elevators are a classic audiophile upgrade which will work on any surface from carpet to concrete. By moving cables away from surrounding surfaces the negative dielectric field interaction is completely removed, preserving the delicate audio signal's purity. [/quote]

    I've been doing it wrong. I should just make some cheap 3D printed versions, apply some chrome spray paint and undercut them on E-bay.

  157. this is why i buy lg by luther349 · · Score: 1

    there smartphones still have removable batterys and 3.5mm jacks lol.

  158. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

    You mean Monster Aether? Plugs into the wall like those room perfume thingies, and spreads complex organic molecules tuned to the specific BT frequencies, to help carry the signal and keep it coherent.

    Shut up shut up shut up they might hear you. And then there will be a product. Gawd...

    You're like the guy who said he didn't know it was loaded...

  159. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by Fishchip · · Score: 1

    TIL arglebargle_xiv is everybody, and nobody uses an Apple device.

  160. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by Holi · · Score: 1

    So your one of those guys who has a phone holster on his belt? You do know that's only slightly less fashionable then a fanny pack don't you?

    --
    Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  161. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by mjwx · · Score: 2

    Micro USB jacks wear out even more quickly. I wonder what the new connectors will be like. Everything is getting shittier.

    This is a feature, not a bug.

    Apple, et al. are starting to require new ways to make people "need" a new phone every year. Sales are flattening because the smartphone craze is over, everyone who wants one has one. Beyond this software and hardware releases are becoming more steady and aren't the huge leaps they were in previous years. So making the hardware crappier and adding in features that can force obsolescence is now the preferred way of generating sales.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  162. Bluetooth specifications by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Agreed. Alternatives need to mature more before being used as primaries. Weird USB connectors aside, Bluetooth or something akin to it needs to simply work better. Also things need to get much less expensive. You can buy some 5$ earbuds and use a 3.5mm jack and reasonably expect it to work (sound quality aside).

    I don't have an electrical outlet on my back deck, so I have tried a number of portable wireless devices for music as an alternative. If you read the box of any product with Bluetooth, it will list the "official" specifications. They state that there will be a range of 33 feet or 10 meters. I've yet to see ANY working device actually achieve that specification. I've tried "cheap" 70$ devices that literally had a range of a few inches. You had to have your phone sitting right beside it, which is ironic because the devices would also have a 3.5mm aux port also which you could use wired at a even greater distance. At that range it would even be useless with headphones and your phone in your pocket unless you taped it to your head. My current device is actually pretty good, but I had to pay a couple of hundred dollars for it, and even it doesn't max out the specification distance, and will have significant sound issues (cutting out and noise), as you approach it's own max distance. Mind you that would be sufficient for personal use for headphones, but again you are paying significantly for it.

    So before they go pretty much totally wireless they really need to mature and refine the technology first as otherwise you will have a more expensive less useful product that is only going to frustrate users. Pairing can also be frustrating, and in many cases the technology is pretty rudimentary in actually functionality, which could be a software thing, but may have to do with the actual standards themselves needing some work. As mentioned I have a bunch of Bluetooth devices, some work better than others... Who knows perhaps Apple will implement a really good design, I just know my current experiance has been wildly inconsistent.

  163. Re: Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by gzuckier · · Score: 1

    Belts only work if your hips are larger than your waist. A good alternative would go over your shoulder and through your crotch. Very positive pants retention and ability to carry heavy items.

    --
    Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  164. Re: Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by gzuckier · · Score: 1

    I accidentally put mine down sideways last week and it became invisible for two days until the wind blew it over.

    --
    Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  165. Re: Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by gzuckier · · Score: 1

    I write all lower case and let the keyboard capitalize what it wants.

    --
    Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  166. Re: Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by gzuckier · · Score: 1

    Best advice I ever got from salesman at good audio store when I was looking for decent phono plugs: just solder the cables in. For the frequency of connecting and disconnecting, the fact that my iron was usually hot anyway, and the freedom from connector hassles it was optimal.

    --
    Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  167. Re: Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by gzuckier · · Score: 1

    Yeah;how does one connect to power and phones simultaneously?

    --
    Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  168. Re: Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by gzuckier · · Score: 1

    I'm just going to install Bluetooth into my auditory nerves.

    --
    Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  169. In praise of USB by jgotts · · Score: 1

    As traditional as I tend to be regarding technology, I'm going to spend a few minutes singing USB's praises.

    Wherever I go, I can find several different ways to charge my phone. I can buy a device to charge my phone at any gas station. I can piggy back on a random person's power bank. Most people own at least one nowadays. I can go into any restaurant and if I ask politely, I can probably get access to a free USB port. Many restaurants just have them for customers. Even basic motels costing $40/night offer USB charging. All computers have USB ports, with few exceptions. Nearly all cars made today have them. Every power strip at my employer has at least two USB ports. USB has fulfilled its promise of being universal. I remember quite clearly when charging your phone was an ordeal. That wasn't very long ago.

    All external hard drives are now interchangeable. If you have a hard drive with data on it, you can share it with anybody, or you can plug it into most routers. Does anybody remember the bad old days before there was a standard for external hard drives? I do.

    What I've seen recently is a further development in USB. Most small-to-medium sized electronics devices are beginning to either be powered by USB or offer USB charging, or both. The devices with USB are often cheaper than their counterparts, because the manufacturer can use cheaper, off-the-shelf components. Even my solar-chargeable camping lantern has a USB charging port, though I can't imagine ever needing it.

    The idea here is that it is possible that in addition to all of the above uses of USB, we could eventually add all new headphones to the mix. They're going to be more expensive at first, but it won't be too long before Chinese manufacturers figure out how to make them for a couple of dollars. I do realize that the Type C connector has a different shape, but we're already accustomed to transitioning USB equipment. There is still a small amount of mini-USB equipment but the transition is nearly done. We'll have to do another one, and hopefully it will work out for the best.

    I'll be waiting for equipment to start adopting Type C more commonly. I have no desire to be an early adopter, but I feel like this new style of headphones could work.

  170. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by CaptSlaq · · Score: 1

    It wears out ridiculously fast.

    For what value of "ridiculously"? I don't have a single 3.5 mm jack in the house with bad connection poltergeists.

    But then, I'm still running an NAD 7140 from the 1980s as my stereo amplifier. Had to go in there last week with electrical contact cleaner to take the crackle out of the volume and balance pots, but I'm sure the audio jack still works perfectly. I'd have replaced some of the electrolytics, too, if my ears could hear any defects.

    Obviously, though, I'm not a desirable Apple customer on several counts (ability to fix things myself, willingness to keep using unfashionable equipment that still works fine, ability to tell whether unfashionable equipment still works fine), so there is that.

    Yamaha M4 here, with a Parasound PHP 850 in front of it. Long live the affordable analog!

  171. Re: Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    Other than leaving out the cost, weight, size, and fragility. Other than that, yes, no reason to leave it out.

  172. Re:Cut the fake histrionics. by phayes · · Score: 1

    So, AC, where were you when serial ports were no longer on the newest models? You're either too young to remember (in which case, grow a pair, log in and learn to do your own research, worm) or purposefully forgetting the apple bashing fests of yore where haters were predicting that Apple would burn in flames for removing the holy serial port.

    The histrionics are on the part of those claiming that the sky is falling because some phones will no longer have a mini-jack.

    --
    Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
  173. If you're going to replace it by surd1618 · · Score: 1

    If Apple has a better idea than a headphone jack, I'd be all about it. Do they? I doubt it. Demonstrate some actual function improvement or GTFO. Simply swapping the analog for the digital is incredibly annoying, not only because the interfaces might not be compatible, but also because now I have to worry about the quality of the DAC as well as the speakers if I want good sound. It is a problem multiplier.

  174. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by MercTech · · Score: 1

    "I vehemently disagree about the praise for the 3.5mm headphone jack. The same problems it had in the '80s are still with us today. It wears out ridiculously fast. I've had to find the "sweet spot" on an untold number of 3.5mm jacks. You either have to twist the plug to the perfect angle or apply pressure on the correct side, or else you get no sound or severely diminished sound. Plugs that can do both audio and a microphone seem to suffer this fate even faster."

    Try cleaning the socket. And if you habitually keep a device in a lint filled pocket; consider getting one of the headphone hole covers so popular in several Asian countries. Plain or bling, the covers also keep moisture out if you use your phone out in the weather. Unless you allow the contacts to get dirty or corroded; you won't have a problem with a headphone jack.

    --
    NRRPT/RCT
  175. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by MercTech · · Score: 1

    Get some shirts with pockets. Hard to crack a phone in a shirt pocket unless you do a face plant trying to qualify for Jackass air time.

    --
    NRRPT/RCT
  176. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by legRoom · · Score: 1

    If that is true, then it is true because it is the jack that you use far more often than any other type of jack.

    Not so. I plug in my phone and (back before the headphone jack broke) my tablet to charge about twice a day. On the other hand, I only plug in my headphones maybe twice a week.

  177. Re:Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by CaptSlaq · · Score: 1

    Oh man, I would definitely carry a tube smartphone.

    This is probably the closest you are going to get today: Woo Audio WA8

    Today I learned that portable vacuum tube amplification exists. Holy cow that's gotta be a bit insane.

  178. Re:"legacy port" Its not if its still used! by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

    When something is used by the majority of people its not "legacy". Are the tires on a car a legacy feature?

    Full rubber on a wooden rim? Yeah, pretty much.

    --
    Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  179. Re: Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

    You don't have to avoid new phones. There's good new phones out there, which have standard headphone jacks. Just not from stupid Apple.

    The Galaxy S7 just came out, and it still has a headphone jack.

    Are you some kind of paid shill, or just a plain normal moron? Which Apple phones don't have a standard headphone jack?

    --
    Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  180. Re: Headphone Jack is Pretty Crappy by joerdie · · Score: 1

    You clearly have yet to see the IT Crowd.

  181. Small correction ... by dizdar · · Score: 1

    Headphones I plug into my iPhone work in an Android phone...

    Except that Apple decided a long time ago to swap the mic & ground pins on the 4-pin headphone jack and break that compatibility. Now you have to buy Android or Apple headphones which have volume and play/pause buttons on them. Because Apple couldn't possibly have a connector that is actually standard. That'd break their business model of "give me your money".