Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: How Will You Handle Microsoft's New 'Cumulative' Windows Updates? (slashdot.org)

Microsoft's announced they'll discontinue "individual patches" for Windows 7 and 8.1 (as well as Windows Server 2008 R2, 2012, and 2012 R2). Instead they'll have monthly "cumulative" rollups of each month's patches, and while there will be a separate "security-only" bundle each month, "individual patches will no longer be available." This has one anonymous Slashdot reader asking what's the alternative: We've read about the changes coming to Windows Update in October 2016... But what happens when it's time to wipe and reload the OS? Or what about installing Windows on different hardware? Admittedly, there are useful non-security updates worth having, but plenty to avoid (e.g. telemetry).

How does one handle this challenge? Set up a personal WSUS box before October to sync all desired updates through October 2016? System images can work if you don't change primary hardware, but what if you do? Or should one just bend the knee to Microsoft...?

Should they use AutoPatcher? Switch to Linux? Or just disconnect their Windows boxes from the internet... Leave your answers in the comments. How do you plan to handle Microsoft's new 'cumulative' Windows Updates?

234 of 405 comments (clear)

  1. Linux. by johnnys · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I run Linux. I keep a Windows system around for minor software that needs it, but I don't put sensitive information on it like mail or personal data.

    Linux is your partner. Microsoft is your master. Choose wisely.

    --
    Sometimes the "writing on the wall" is blood spatter...
    1. Re: Linux. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      ++

      Linux user since more than 5 years.

      But unfortunately thats not a solution for everybody.

    2. Re:Linux. by godrik · · Score: 3, Informative

      Pretty much the same here. I won't deal with it. I have been running Debian for over 10 years so that I don't have to deal with shit like that.
      I keep a Windows VM somewhere for the days where I absolutely need Word or Excel. I don't remember when is the last time that VM was updated.

    3. Re:Linux. by sk999 · · Score: 1

      Linux here as well, both at home and at work (now going on 20 years). As always, there is that one Windoze-only piece of software that i occassionally need at work, but the sysadmins are responsible for keeping that box updated.

    4. Re:Linux. by Life2Short · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree, Macs are great. I only boot into Windows for games. I'm delighted with Steam's attempt to move to Steam OS / Linux, but they have a long way to go. Once games are more widely available for either Macs (not likely) or Steam OS / Linux, there won't be any need for a very large number of people to ever use Windows.

    5. Re:Linux. by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I keep a Windows system around for minor software that needs it

      AKA "games".

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    6. Re: Linux. by Hylandr · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I can build a new PC and buy a used car for the price of a Mac. I have no need for the 'hipster status symbol' that mac ownership is these days.

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    7. Re: Linux. by fisternipply · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seriously dude, lots of people don't care about "status." We use computers as tools to get sh*t done, and we need tools that work all the time without having to screw around with them much. Macs are closest to that ideal.

    8. Re:Linux. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sweet hardware? HAHAHAHA! You're kidding, right?

    9. Re: Linux. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You really aren't trying too hard then. That and if you think gaming is "doing" anything, well...

    10. Re: Linux. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      At the beginning of this year I purchased a new Mac Pro because I have never owned a Mac or used OS X before, so I thought it was high time to become proficient in OS X and I planned to become a full-fledged Apple convert.

      Overlooking the fact that the Mac cost about three times the price of a Windows PC with the same technical specifications, the first thing I noticed after setting it up was that I could not control the master volume on my monitor with built-in speakers from the desktop interface. I thought that I was simply not familiar with the OS yet, but no, after extensive research it turns out that OS X cannot do volume control through an HDMI cable.

      The second thing that bugged me was that I could not open a fresh instance of Safari in full screen mode by default. Surely such a basic function must be supported and I am just a dumb newbie who cannot figure it out... No, it is impossible in OS X.

      Third, I noticed that the USB ports were really finicky. Sometimes upon booting up the computer the mouse or the keyboard would not be recognized, and I would have to pull out the connector and plug it back in. About half of the USB ports had this issue, while the others generally worked fine. It did not help that I am very obsessive about cable management and picky about which ports I keep devices plugged into. At first I thought the issue was with my mouse and keyboard, but it persisted even after trying out several other mice and keyboards. It turns out that according to Apple support forums it is a 'non-issue' common to many if not all Macs. Something to do with the hardware voltage or whatever. I found out that my friend's Mac mini does the same thing.

      Finally, I simply did not like the file management in OS X. I know that Mac users swear by it, and from all I read going in I expected some kind of a magical experience that feels second-nature. Unfortunately that was not the case, and it turns out I prefer Windows file management much more.

      I sold the Mac last month and I do not miss it. I am not one of those people fanatically taking a side in the childish Mac vs. 'PC' debate, in fact I genuinely tried to become a Mac convert and wanted to see the good in it, but in the end it simply was not for me. One of the biggest disappointments was that when I researched all of the issues listed above, many of the complaints and technical support debates dated back to the mid-2000s and nothing has been done to address them. Maybe they are not really even issues and in fact function that way by design, but I wish Apple would at least explain the reasoning behind them.

      Perhaps Linux will be next for me.

    11. Re: Linux. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What? What can't you hook to a Mac? Film Scanners, CT scanners, Drones, printers, cameras. All hook to my various Mac boxes. Possibly some POS hardware dingy who's software was last coded when Visual Basic 4 was hot but not much else.

      I run the full Adobe suite, Maya, Modo, various Autodesk programs (sigh) on the Mac. I can finally hook to the network at work. Recently, I've dropped Parallels because I just don't need it anymore (and Parallels' business model pisses me off).

      Don't know about your world, but mine connects just fine.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    12. Re: Linux. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      You bought a Mac Pro (Darth's trashcan) as your first Mac because you wanted to try one?

      You are definitely holding something wrong.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    13. Re: Linux. by chipschap · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ++

      Linux user since more than 5 years.

      But unfortunately thats not a solution for everybody.

      I've been a Linux user for over 20 years and have watched it grow into something that could be a solution for a lot of people.

      You're right, not everybody; I've often said in these forums that if you need or want to run Windows, go run Windows. I'm not here to try to make you change.

      But the need to run Windows is, I think, often quite overstated. It's certainly the case when you have some mission-critical software that simply can't be replaced. It's true if you want to do certain classes of gaming. And sometimes it's true when you need 100% document compatibility with entities that insist on Microsoft Office.

      My quibble is that there are many who want to run Windows but say they need to run Windows, when they very likely don't. If it's a want rather than a need, fine, go for it, but don't claim that your choice is truly based on Linux's inability to perform.

    14. Re: Linux. by BlackSabbath · · Score: 3

      Pretty much this.
      I've kept a Windows VM around for years to run two applications: eTax (Australian) and Visio. eTax is now web-based and Crossover/Wine supports Visio to a 95% level. It's probably time to ditch the VM.

    15. Re: Linux. by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      imho, Macs are great at giving people the impression they are getting shit done, when in reality a lot of times it's really only consumer level word-processing that's going on.

      And even then you don't get basic stuff like a 'delete' key. Or page up/down keys. Or...

      Still, the keyboard's 'clean', right?

      --
      No sig today...
    16. Re: Linux. by Malc · · Score: 1

      Huh? What are you taking about? Connect a keyboard with these if you want them. There have always been key chords for these and I particularly like that many keyboard shortcuts are the same as on Linux, like the Ctrl+E/-A combos. Pointy-clicky and advanced people are satisfied, but Windows users have to learn a new way (and so what?)

    17. Re: Linux. by bigmadwolf · · Score: 1

      Yep, running Windows a VM on a Linux host is the only sane way to do it if you're forced to use Windows for some task. Dodgy MS update borks things? Laugh and roll back to a snapshot from before the update. RAM and HDD space is cheap.

    18. Re: Linux. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      My quibble is that there are many who want to run Windows but say they need to run Windows, when they very likely don't.

      A good rule of thumb is that if you have to run Windows because of old mission-critical software then it is probably easier to get it going under Wine than on Windows 10.
      Microsoft used to keep new versions compatible, but not so much anymore.
      They have broken the compatibility so much that pretty much all old games sold on gog.com is wrapped with dosbox, even those that worked fine on XP.

    19. Re:Linux. by r_pattonII · · Score: 1

      I too run mainly Linux, specifically Slackware for the most part. I only use Win$ows for playing flight sim. The way I view it is when Micro$oft decides it better controls your operating system updates than the user does, it's time to rethink keeping it. For the longest time Micro$oft has been pushing the upgrade to Win$ows 10. They discontinued the annoying messages "Get your free upgrade". Since all updates will be bundled into one update per month, what's to prevent the updates to contain and upgrade to Win$ows 10 without the user's consent. The only option the user has is to A. not upload any updates, B. do not connect a Win$ows PC to the internet, C. accept all updates whether you want them or not, or D. use an alternative operating system. Micro$oft is being a bully and that behavior should not have to be accepted or tolerated. This "dictating" by Micro$oft to it's users is not helping the consumer, but sure does help Micro$oft. I think the users need to speak with their wallet's and maybe the dictatorship will come to a quick end and put the users first. My personal decision for me is that after this is posted, in about the time it will take me the time to delete the Win$ows partition and create an EXT3 partition to install a Linux distro over the Win$ows partition I currently have, I will be no longer running any Win$ows operating system until Micro$oft changes this policy at a minimum.

    20. Re: Linux. by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Yup, I only have Windows running, either within a VM or by booting into it for the few minutes that I need to run a couple of Windows-only applications.

      And evidently, I need to remember to turn off Windows Update for Win8.1 when I next boot into Windows.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    21. Re:Linux. by nateman1352 · · Score: 1

      I keep a Windows system around for minor software that needs it

      AKA "games".

      Other than games, the very important thing that keeps Windows on my personal system is TurboTax. Like pretty much any other US Taxpayer that has a tax situation too complex for form 1040-EZ and doesn't want to pay ~$150 for H&R Block or ~$300 for a certified CPA. I hired a CPA once and $50 per year TurboTax did a better job!

      Before anyone says Wine, its a non-starter. TurboTax uses a bunch of .Net features that don't work 100% right on Wine like WPF. Unfortunately the Mac version is absolute garbage, so that route isn't viable either. It really sucks, but the easiest way to be a lawful US citizen is to have a Windows system.

    22. Re: Linux. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Huh? What are you taking about? Connect a keyboard with these if you want them. There have always been key chords for these and I particularly like that many keyboard shortcuts are the same as on Linux, like the Ctrl+E/-A combos. Pointy-clicky and advanced people are satisfied, but Windows users have to learn a new way (and so what?)

      So pay extra for a mac, then buy an external keyboard to type normally?
      Oh, and a hub, since you used up your USB port on a keyboard. And a mouse since your not by the trackpad. So make that a powered USB hub. But it's cool, you can put those power chargers in the case you use to hold your ethernet and apple to use-able hdmi cable.

      Cool solution brah.

    23. Re: Linux. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      My quibble is that there are many who want to run Windows but say they need to run Windows, when they very likely don't.

      I think the question isn't so much one of need on an OS level, but rather specific features and or learning how to make alternatives work.

      Switching OSes is a simple sell. Switching OSes + applications, or OSes + learning how to run things in emulators and live with resulting bugs, that sell is significantly harder.

    24. Re:Linux. by bazorg · · Score: 2

      Linux is your partner. Microsoft is your master. Choose wisely.

      well, when Linux is of the Google variety, then it's a partner like the overly attached girlfriend of Youtube fame. It's not that easy to choose, I think.

    25. Re: Linux. by gtall · · Score: 1

      Maybe, but I saw a TV science program on the big collider at CERN with many (most that I could tell) of the geeky scientists toting Mac lappies around. Errr....just from their appearance, they weren't into "hipster status symbol". I'm not sure they'd even know what the term meant or give a flying rat's ass what anyone else was using, only what they were doing.

    26. Re:Linux. by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

      Not always games.

      I have several programs that are Windows only that cost more than the copy of Windows and my entire computer system that's running it. Were a Linux version of it available, AND they allowed a license transfer ( vs having to buy another license ) then it would be a consideration.

      Sometimes there are no Open Source alternatives that can compete with professional level software. In an ideal world there would be, but our world is far from ideal.

    27. Re: Linux. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      My quibble is that there are many who want to run Windows but say they need to run Windows, when they very likely don't.

      I think the question isn't so much one of need on an OS level, but rather specific features and or learning how to make alternatives work.

      Switching OSes is a simple sell. Switching OSes + applications, or OSes + learning how to run things in emulators and live with resulting bugs, that sell is significantly harder.

      After Windows 10 updates bollixed up sound drivers on multiple occasions and two Ethernet drivers now, rendering operable computers inoperative for our purposes, the sell gets easier all the time. And those were just the computers I am personally responsible for, not the ones I give support to. That's a mess of breaks upon updates.

      So for some it might be a choice of learning something new - always fun, at least for me - or spending as much time just getting the damn thing to work like it did yesterday.

      As for myself, I'm rolling back my Windows machines to Windows 7. W8X is a disaster, and W10, while having some nice features, is brittle and fragile. Otherwise, I use OSX and Linux.

      My only lack of understanding in this matter is why so many people aren't capable of understanding more than one Operating system. Laziness? Ford versus Chevyness? Somewhere along the line it became dogma that understanding more Operating systems was bad. The triumph of ignorance.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    28. Re: Linux. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Switching OSes is a simple sell. Switching OSes + applications, or OSes + learning how to run things in emulators and live with resulting bugs, that sell is significantly harder.

      As someone who has tried twice now to make the switch, Linux is only free if you don't value your time.

      I dunno that I'd brag about that. I switched my completely non-computer savvy wife to Linux after she had the shitz of Windows 8, and she's maintaining her computer all by herself.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    29. Re: Linux. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      imho, Macs are great at giving people the impression they are getting shit done, when in reality a lot of times it's really only consumer level word-processing that's going on.

      Hell you can barely game on a Mac.

      Dafuq did I just read? The world class expert who knows that Mac users don't do shit, and to prove it, you can hardly game on them.

      That's about all we need to know from you. Being an anti-hipster just makes you a hipster of a different sort, and if gaming somehow proves your point, well, have a nice day.

      Chillaxe ford versus chevy man.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    30. Re: Linux. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      What? What can't you hook to a Mac?

      hylander is just proving that on the internet, no one knows you are a dog.

      Just regurgitating the old Ford Versus Chevy soundbites, and failing pretty bad at them whne he goes into full contradiction mode, claiming we don't get any work done, and using gaming as the proof of that. Note to hylander: games are not work.

      I don't mind a serious conversation with people about Macs versus PC, but that transcended serious at that point.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    31. Re: Linux. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Huh? What are you taking about? Connect a keyboard with these if you want them. There have always been key chords for these and I particularly like that many keyboard shortcuts are the same as on Linux, like the Ctrl+E/-A combos. Pointy-clicky and advanced people are satisfied, but Windows users have to learn a new way (and so what?)

      Just wait, I know someone is going to bring up the ancient one button mouse any time now.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    32. Re: Linux. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      When you say "type normally", do you actually mean "type like a Windows user"? Whenever you change system you should expect some culture shock.

      This reminds me of a co-worker who's husband had a mac, and his Windows buddies went off on things like the keyboard and never missed a chance to bust on the Mac.

      Since I was giving the guy support, he started in on me about it. Every problem was the mac's fault. Because it was a Mac. Finally, I just told him that his friends were right, and he needed to buy a Windows machine so he could get things done right.

      He did, and his wife told me it didn't make a bit of difference, except now he had to rely on his Windows buddies for support, and that didn't work out very well, as they were better at bitching about Macs than supporting Windows.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    33. Re: Linux. by Immerman · · Score: 3

      >My only lack of understanding in this matter is why so many people aren't capable of understanding more than one Operating system.

      I think it's less laziness than the efficiency of familiarity, combined with the fact that "alternative OSes" historically presented a far more different UI than has become the case with many today. Consider driving a car that had replaced the steering wheels and pedals with joysticks or something - a functionally trivial change in a modern fly-by-wire car, but your ability to maneuver the vehicle effectively is going to be considerably compromised by your unfamiliarity. Yes, 80% of the time that may not matter, but that last 20% is going to be constantly cropping up with irritating reminders of your incompetence until you have a few thousand hours of familiarity under your belt. And long after that you've achieved basic competence, the differences are liable to generate pro-active interference with each other, assuming you still drive normal vehiecls as well

      While an unfamiliar operating system is generally less personally dangerous, the difficulties are still quite frustrating. Even something as ubiquitous as the file load/save dialog often presents a considerably different interface between operating systems, with many non-obvious differences in how you configure and leverage bookmarks and other non-trivial navigation aids, on top of the differences in file system organization conventions. Or heck, take the MacOS file manager with it's drop-down folder heirarchy menu from the title bar - beautiful idea, I sometimes find myself missing it on other platforms, but completely non-intuitive, and until you learn of it it's pretty much impossible to navigate up a folder heirarchy.

      What makes it worse is often the differences seem to be added purely for the sake of being different - take the window min/max/close buttons on MacOSX and Ubuntu, which for some reason they decided to put on the left instead of the right which everyone has been made familiar with over the last couple decades. When switching OSes you now need to retrain your "muscle memory" on how to close windows, and if you use multiple OSes on a regular basis you probably end up momentarily confused on both. And to what end? Even if there's some grand philosophical reason to the change (and I've never heard one), the end result is that they made OS migration that much more difficult for the sake of a tiny functionality change.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    34. Re: Linux. by Rhipf · · Score: 1

      If your looking at games that need dosbox and/or ran fine on Windows XP most likely you are talking about 16bit games. Most Windows 10 machines are going to be running the 64bit version of the OS. Unfortunately, 64bit Windows doesn't run 16bit software anymore. I don't know if this is necessarily a bad thing. After all, how long do we really need to keep things backward compatible (ok, 15 years might not sound all that long but in the tech industry that is an eon)?

    35. Re: Linux. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      >When switching OSes you now need to retrain your "muscle memory" on how to close windows, and if you use multiple OSes on a regular basis you probably end up momentarily confused on both. And to what end? Even if there's some grand philosophical reason to the change (and I've never heard one), the end result is that they made OS migration that much more difficult for the sake of a tiny functionality change.

      The majority of my difficulties with switching between OS's is the occasional typing of dir vs OS. I must be completely differnt in mental makeup I suppose. All I do is remember the machine I'm on - Linux and OSX are very close functionally, but since I had to use and support both, I learned them both, and if there is one thing it has taught me is that It isn't terribly difficult. But people might find out fcts they don't want to find out.

      I have this thing, perhaps it is only me, but I do not believe that computing is a one size fits all environment, and just like I have a set of metric tools, and a set of American baed tools, I sues the tool that is best fit for the job at the time.

      I've had to use Windows based options to do video and Art and graphic work. Weak. I have some Windows tools that I use that are better than what I can use on OS X. So I boot into Windows, and there I go. Do the work with the superior tool, and then reboot back to OS X. Others might find that they want one single computer to do every task they would ever want to do. That the particular computer that they decided upon is superior in all ways to the other options, and that anyone who uses a different computer is deficient. That makes them limited, not superior.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    36. Re: Linux. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1
      Some days I'm a dumass

      The majority of my difficulties with switching between OS's is the occasional typing of dir vs OS.

      Obviously, I meant dir vs ls.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    37. Re: Linux. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      I get what you're saying at some point. But I'd still say it's a sort of mental laziness.

      Preach it brother!

      Migrating from Windows to linux is too hard, but XP to Vista to 7 to 8 to 10 is the exact same interface to some folks?

      Wy wife went from a W7 laptop to a W8, it was such a clusterfuck that she refused to use it after a month, I installed Linux Mint, and without >i> any instruction, she just used it.

      I did have to give her some instruction in maintenance, which is a lot easier in Linux mint than anyrhing on the Windows side. But she's a happy Linux user now. Her computer even works after updates.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    38. Re: Linux. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Nobody likes being a newbie. Especially those who consider themselves experts.

      Well, I don't agree. I was a late arrival to Linux, starting around 5 years ago to approach it seriously. Learning was fun, and I still am.

      Then again, I do know a lot of people that don't want to learn anything new, so you are right there, just not about everyone.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    39. Re: Linux. by jimtheowl · · Score: 1

      alias dir='ls -l'

    40. Re: Linux. by dpidcoe · · Score: 1

      I'd argue that it's easier to get along with linux if you're less computer savvy (assuming there's someone to set it up for you). A non-computer savvy person is a lot more willing to live with minor nuisance issues and chalk them up to being caused by some computerey thing they don't care about. Someone who is tech savvy knows they don't have to live with minor nuisance issues, and is generally going to be a lot less forgiving when it comes to minor problems. When that person attempts to fix said problems themselves they usually end up breaking other things, and won't grudgingly decide to just live with the original problem until 3 wasted weekends and 2 total reinstalls later.

    41. Re: Linux. by Hylandr · · Score: 1

      You and everyone else just made my point about consumer-level 'work'.

      I am talking about interfacing with real hardware. Big industrial one-off stuff.

      Go back to your photoshop, Maya scanners drones etc. Play-things for adults.

      Sorry to burst your bubble.

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    42. Re: Linux. by ScienceofSpock · · Score: 1

      I'm a web developer and designer, and I NEED windows. If Adobe would produce a Linux version of Photoshop and Illustrator, I could switch, but they won't because they already have all the customers. I suspect there are a LOT of people in a similar situation. One single vendor holding us back from switching.

    43. Re: Linux. by chipschap · · Score: 1

      I'm a web developer and designer, and I NEED windows. If Adobe would produce a Linux version of Photoshop and Illustrator, I could switch, but they won't because they already have all the customers. I suspect there are a LOT of people in a similar situation. One single vendor holding us back from switching.

      In my original post, I mentioned mission-critical irreplaceable applications leaving someone with truly no choice. For most graphics people, GIMP, Inkscape, etc., will do the job (many of the assertions to the contrary stem more from lack of familiarity than actual limitations). But I do understand that at the professional high end, there may be features that can't be duplicated or a workflow that can't be changed.

    44. Re: Linux. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      I'd argue that it's easier to get along with linux if you're less computer savvy (assuming there's someone to set it up for you). A non-computer savvy person is a lot more willing to live with minor nuisance issues and chalk them up to being caused by some computerey thing they don't care about. Someone who is tech savvy knows they don't have to live with minor nuisance issues, and is generally going to be a lot less forgiving when it comes to minor problems. When that person attempts to fix said problems themselves they usually end up breaking other things, and won't grudgingly decide to just live with the original problem until 3 wasted weekends and 2 total reinstalls later.

      I'd argue back that I am by virtue of my savvy - of which I do not claim expert status at all - that I will use the best tool for the task I am doing. And Windows is not always - in fact for my line of work, not often the best tool for the job. And really, OSX very seldom has issues that requires a total reinstall. That's a Windows thing. The only time I have ever done that on a Mac was when a hard drive failed - sort of understandable in that case. People that have problems because of keyboard layout are seldom that tech savvy. Just experience talking, and that could be wrong.

      I would also argue that your minor nuisance issues ar enot even remotely a nuisance for some of us - just a difference. I seamlessly go between my OSX and W7 in bootcamp. The differences prompt me as to what OS I am in.

      Side note. In the pursuit of the best tool for the job, there are people what use Parallels to Run Windows on their Mac. I use Bootcamp because it allows direct hardware access, and runs better without any performance hit. Yup - I gotta reboot. Nope, not a problem for me. Although I would be interested in hearing why tech savvy people would fixate on one platform to the exclusion of others because of that tech savviness. I find that rather confusing. Is it because they haven't used other systems to find out their capabilities? Is it that they are in a niche tasking where they only use a few tools? There is also a possibility of the pHD effect where one becomes an expert in a smaller and smaller field, versus one who needs to know how to do a lot of things. The microfield people tend to look down on the generalists, while many generalists simply have too wide a range of interests to confine themselves to one small subject

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    45. Re: Linux. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I think it's less laziness than the efficiency of familiarity, combined with the fact that "alternative OSes" historically presented a far more different UI than has become the case with many today.

      WTF are you talking about? Have you not seen Windows 8 or 10?

      This argument made *some* sense back in the XP-Vista-7 days, as those three releases were all very similar to each other UI-wise. But even there there was a significant jump between Win9x/2000 and WinXP, not to mention the enormous difference between Win3.x and Win9x. Win8 was a complete sea-change from Win7.

      If you can figure out how to adapt from Win7 to Win8/10, then you can certainly figure out how to adapt to an alternative OS's UI.

      take the window min/max/close buttons on MacOSX and Ubuntu, which for some reason they decided to put on the left instead of the right which everyone has been made familiar with over the last couple decades. ... And to what end?

      That's pretty simple: the original Windows design is poor, because it's very easy to mis-click when trying to maximize and instead close your program, because some moron at MS though it'd be a great idea to stick the two tiny buttons right next to each other.

      If you have a hard time figuring out how to use a window-close button on the left side, you're going to have a real problem when you're sat down at a Windows 8 or 10 computer with its "charms" and touchscreen-oriented UI.

      I'm sorry, but your arguments are all completely stupid. I can't put it any more charitably than that. Your arguments sounded good back in the mid-2000s, but Windows 8 and Windows 10 have completely invalidated them.

    46. Re: Linux. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      the sell gets easier all the time.

      The sell gets easier when it bollocks something up. There's millions of PCs that are running just fine. All this instability people are talking about, most windows users have never heard of it. For them the sell is purely on telemetry and privacy to which the answer is "uh-hua and?"

      My only lack of understanding in this matter is why so many people aren't capable of understanding more than one Operating system. Laziness? Ford versus Chevyness? Somewhere along the line it became dogma that understanding more Operating systems was bad.

      It's neither bad nor lazy. It's pointless. Why would someone learn Linux unless they have to? Why would anyone learn OSX if they are a happy Windows user? The only reason OSX people or Linux people would learn Windows is if they are forced to use it by work. This isn't a game of leapfrog like in a car market where comparable features change with companies and options leapfrogging each other, it's just an OS. The OS just is and just works. There's no reason to do something unless unless the OS ceases to work.

    47. Re: Linux. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The majority of my difficulties with switching between OS's is the occasional typing

      Ok sorry but you just lost the interest of 1billion people without finishing that first sentence. dir? what is that? The only time a Windows user types dir is when a scammer calls them up and offers to help "fix" their computer. The people who type dir are sys admins and power users. They aren't the ones that won't learn another OS, and chances are they already know multiple anyway.

      I have this thing, perhaps it is only me, but I do not believe that computing is a one size fits all environment, and just like I have a set of metric tools, and a set of American baed tools, I sues the tool that is best fit for the job at the time.

      Bad comparison. A metric driver won't drive an imperial socket. You literally can't use one for the other, just like you couldn't use iOS as a cluster OS in a supercomputer. The Windows vs Linux vs Apple debate is more like using a phillips head screwdriver to drive a pozidrive screw or a JS screw. It's not perfect. You will if you put enough force on it damage either the tool or the item it's being applied to. None the less there are millions of people who assemble IKEA furniture every day who have never even heard of pozidrive and they get by just fine. That's the OS market.

      I've had to use Windows based options to do video and Art and graphic work. Weak. I have some Windows tools that I use that are better than what I can use on OS X. So I boot into Windows, and there I go. Do the work with the superior tool, and then reboot back to OS X.

      What I'm hearing is that you're breaking your workflow between OSes to gain an improvement in overall efficiency due to the downsides that are part of an incomplete toolset. That's an application problem that isn't present in most environments (I'm actually surprised you still find art / graphics work on OSX superior given Apple's and Adobe's recent efforts to screw the OSX users, but I'll take your word for that). The point is your solution presents effort to switch between OSes, effort to learn OSes, and above all a complicated system to setup that allows you to switch between OSes without horrible workflow breaks. It's impressive, but also well out of reach of 99.9% of the users out there who can't so much as figure out how to properly backup a Lightroom catalogue without some hired help.

    48. Re: Linux. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      You and everyone else just made my point about consumer-level 'work'.

      I am talking about interfacing with real hardware. Big industrial one-off stuff.

      Go back to your photoshop, Maya scanners drones etc. Play-things for adults.

      Sorry to burst your bubble.

      Well, aren't you just the alpha and Omega of computing. The one among us who is doing real work.

      Sorry muchacho, its a big world out there, with all manner of real work to be done. I have also done one-off work interfacing with hardware, although I'm not certain how you define "real hardware". All my work was and is real, and nicely paid. Some involves Photoshop, some involves Maya and or Lightwave. Some involves PowerPoint, and some involves Excel (more accurately when dealing with my own work, the Apache Office versions of each)and some involves FCP and it's suite.

      And some involves interfacing and programming different pieces of hardware together, and the design of the interfacing hardware as well as the programming. Soon as I'm done typing this, I'm heading off to install a system I designed to get two radically different real hardware systems to talk to each other, and interface with a software system and networking they were never designed to operate with originally. Your rather snooty put down of anyone that isn't doing what you do sounds more insecure than self confident.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    49. Re: Linux. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      In the other reply you said you don't understand why people only use one OS.

      starting around 5 years ago

      Learning was fun, and I still am.

      That's your reason right there. Unless you're doing this as a hobby no one is going to put 5 years of effort into something. People (as opposed to a good chunk of Slashdotters) use software on their computers. They don't use their OS. It's a common mistake to make when talking among tech-heads. I'm like you, actively enjoy working with and learning new Linux things. But I wouldn't recommend this to anyone who doesn't have an active interest in how the innards of an OS works.

    50. Re: Linux. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      It's neither bad nor lazy. It's pointless. Why would someone learn Linux unless they have to?

      Because they want to? I can't be the only one out there who is interested in stuff just to learn stuff. And it helped me get my wife to use her computer again, after she refused to use Window 8. And unless you have some reason to dig into the details, Linux Mint (or most distros for that matter) require a shitload less learning than say going form Windows 7 to Windows 8. Hell, just maintaining W8 was like a game od whack-a-mole, with things we did for years since W95 suddenly being hidden in odd places. I finally just refused to support it, telling people I don't work with W8

      To repeat your question, why would someone want to learn that?

      Why would anyone learn OSX if they are a happy Windows user? The only reason OSX people or Linux people would learn Windows is if they are forced to use it by work.

      Because there are things that OSX does better? I know to an approximation of a fact that you don't believe that, but having used both for years, and supporting both for years, I'm either an idiot and so wrong as to be incompetent, or else I know what I am talking about in this matter.

      And there are some things that Microsoft computers do better. Why does my commentary on the cases where OSX is better enrage some people who may never have used it, while my saying from experience that in some cases Microsoft OS is better not make them think for s second, so they launch into the same old arguments?

      This isn't a game of leapfrog like in a car market where comparable features change with companies and options leapfrogging each other, it's just an OS. The OS just is and just works. There's no reason to do something unless unless the OS ceases to work.

      At this point - No, the OS doesn't simply just work. Unless you have been living under a rock, you've heard about the havoc that W10 updates has wreaked, Cameras broken, Drivers broken, Internet access broken. People had computers that worked, then an unavoidable update, and bam - they don't any more.

      I hope you aren't going to be one of those guys who demeans what others are doing just because it hasn't happened to you.

      Yet.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    51. Re: Linux. by ScienceofSpock · · Score: 1

      Yeah, most of the people I interact with are designers that work exclusively in Adobe products, so I need to be able to use their output (PSD files and the like) without having to worry if the app I'm using is going to not support some feature or another. So while I could possibly get along with Gimp and Inkscape if I was working by myself, this, sadly, isn't the case.

      I also understand why Adobe hasn't made a Linux version of their software: There probably wouldn't be any NEW money in it. Those of us that require their tools are already subscribed on Windows or Mac, and them creating a Linux version would just mean some of us would switch, so they'd spend money and resources developing new software with virtually no new income, and that's not a good business decision. Would be a great show of goodwill, though.

    52. Re: Linux. by Immerman · · Score: 1

      The entire point of "muscle memory" is that you don't think about it at all - I think "close window", and the cursor moves to the top-right corner of the screen and clicks the box without any further attention from me. For more sophisticated stuff muscle memory becomes more more of an analogy, but it remains "click on this icon that does X at aproximately Y location" and needs minimal thought - just rearrange things and you have to spend time playing "where's Waldo" with the icon you need. Change the icon graphic as well, as is so often the case between analogue tasks on different OSes and it becomes an even more attention-consuming endeavour. Change the basic process as well, which is not entirely unheard of and you may need to relearn large portions of your skilset (for example Open Office, WordPerfect, and MS Word all use fundamentally different underlying concepts of document organization, which is very often reflected in the UI workflow)

      As for laziness - the entire history of civilization is one of laziness, even multiplication was a shorthand technique developed to simplify tediously repetitive addition. Adding superfluous difficulties, even superficial ones, is both annoying and dramatically reduces productivity. Yes, it may often come down to remembering new locations for similar-looking icons, but even that is a non-trivial expenditure of attention, especially if you're not good at memorizing new things.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    53. Re: Linux. by Hylandr · · Score: 1

      Wow, way to over-think things.

      What I am saying is my experience with a Mac was wholly under-whelming. You may have been able to make things work. Bravo for you. My experience with a Mac has been trying to get a square peg to go into a round hole.

      Photoshop, some involves Maya and or Lightwave. Some involves PowerPoint, and some involves Excel

      Everyone can do this. It's not hard. Hell my *phone* can do it. Altering text files to configure two disparate systems to speak with each other? Fantastic.

      But what can your Mac talk to as far as equipment is concerned? Industrial automation? Sensor to shooter systems? IC2? PWM? High traffic network servers ?

      No.

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    54. Re: Linux. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Because they want to?

      As I said in the other thread I agree with this, but this is an incredible minority of users, most of which are likely already running multiple systems.

      require a shitload less learning than say going form Windows 7 to Windows 8

      Agreed which is why Microsoft backpedalled something fierce. Now going from Windows 7 to 10 is seamless for users and only really gets more complicated for the system admin (who's tasks have been replaced by some fisherprice interface that was designed to be "easy", or some additional features like virtual desktops. My mother dreaded the upgrade when I applied it to the family PC. She asked what's changed, and I said the start icon now looks like 4 white boxes instead of 4 colourful ones, and that was ultimately it.

      And there are some things that Microsoft computers do better. Why does my commentary on the cases where OSX is better enrage some people who may never have used it, while my saying from experience that in some cases Microsoft OS is better not make them think for s second, so they launch into the same old arguments?

      Don't get me wrong. I don't believe one is better than the other. I believe that the OS's purpose is to present the application to the user. Differences in application presented are cosmetic ultimately. Photoshop runs in OSX, Photoshop runs in Windows, as a person who needs to use photoshop neither system is better unless one lacks the features or presents the app working in a way which the developer did not present.

      Sure there are slight differences between multi-tasking of apps, and memory management etc, but again this hits powerusers, not common users which is the subject of discussion when we talk about marketshare. Windows would make a perfectly fine server too, but the proliferation of open source server tools made Linux the logical choice. Not because of the OS but because of the apps.

      OSX is nice. I'm sure it's good. But I don't understand what advantage it may have to an end user running programs. If it does have one then I'd probably use it.

      Unless you have been living under a rock, you've heard about the havoc that W10 updates has wreaked, Cameras broken, Drivers broken, Internet access broken. People had computers that worked, then an unavoidable update, and bam - they don't any more.

      Which brings me back to my original point the sell gets easier when something is bollocksed up. Sure things break, but for the vast majority of people in the world it works just fine. But that doesn't make the news. We have 4 installs of Windows 10, 2 of Windows 7, 2 Linux installs, and one OSX (work machine for girlfriend so I have no experience with it) in this house. Within the family there's an additional Windows 10, Windows 7 and OSX. Across this diverse range on a myriad of different hardware each machine runs fine without issue without a single update breaking things, without any interaction needed and nothing suddenly stopping save for a bluescreen earlier this year as a result of my video card letting the magic smoke out. There are many more problems with windows 10 that could be classed as a minor issue (one of my machines without warning reset Edge as the default browser), but for the most part there are million upon millions of Windows 10 installs that actually just work, and Linux or OSX for them is a hard sell.

    55. Re:Linux. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      There's a whole slew of online competitors to TurboTax. All you need is a web browser.

    56. Re: Linux. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I hope you aren't going to be one of those guys who demeans what others are doing just because it hasn't happened to you.

      Woopse hit reply to early.

      No, I don't ever intend to demean. But it is important to realise that there are universally different experience that people have, so someone who may not be experiencing what you are may not understand your point of view.

    57. Re: Linux. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      The majority of my difficulties with switching between OS's is the occasional typing

      Ok sorry but you just lost the interest of 1billion people without finishing that first sentence. dir? what is that? The only time a Windows user types dir is when a scammer calls them up and offers to help "fix" their computer. The people who type dir are sys admins and power users. They aren't the ones that won't learn another OS, and chances are they already know multiple anyway.

      So its a bad thing being a power user? Regardless, I've put a lot of people on Linux, and they are closer to the stereotypical Granddma we talk about. Email, web, and the occasional word processing. My whole comment was in the differences between interfaces. As in many cases, not much. My wife hit her stride on Linux Mint instantly after she refused to use W8 after a month. Her previous computer was a W7 machine.

      I have this thing, perhaps it is only me, but I do not believe that computing is a one size fits all environment, and just like I have a set of metric tools, and a set of American baed tools, I sues the tool that is best fit for the job at the time.

      Bad comparison. A metric driver won't drive an imperial socket.

      Whoosh. My point that you completely whooshed on is not the specific size, but that a person should use the best tool for the purpose. You have metric bolts, you should use metrich wrenches on them. You probably shouldn't be so anxious to disagree with a person that you deliberately misunderstand them.

      What I'm hearing is that you're breaking your workflow between OSes to gain an improvement in overall efficiency due to the downsides that are part of an incomplete toolset. That's an application problem that isn't present in most environments (I'm actually surprised you still find art / graphics work on OSX superior given Apple's and Adobe's recent efforts to screw the OSX users, but I'll take your word for that). The point is your solution presents effort to switch between OSes, effort to learn OSes, and above all a complicated system to setup that allows you to switch between OSes without horrible workflow breaks. It's impressive, but also well out of reach of 99.9% of the users out there who can't so much as figure out how to properly backup a Lightroom catalogue without some hired help.

      Therefore, my opinions are apparently completely 100 percent invalid and wrong. Who knew? I had no idea that it was that difficult to switch between Os's. I must be fsckin amazing! And wrong too, My cousin that thinks Mac users are all homosexuals is the better computer operator in your world. because he's in the 99 percent of operators who are doin' it right. Commit to one platform, and for gods sake, don't learn anything.

      Now was that sarcastic, or just a tl;dr version of your post to me?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    58. Re: Linux. by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

      take the window min/max/close buttons on MacOSX and Ubuntu, which for some reason they decided to put on the left instead of the right which everyone has been made familiar with over the last couple decades. ... And to what end?

      That's pretty simple: the original Windows design is poor, because it's very easy to mis-click when trying to maximize and instead close your program, because some moron at MS though it'd be a great idea to stick the two tiny buttons right next to each other.

      If you have a hard time figuring out how to use a window-close button on the left side, you're going to have a real problem when you're sat down at a Windows 8 or 10 computer with its "charms" and touchscreen-oriented UI.

      Minor quibble, but I'm gonna bite:
      The Ubuntu design is just as poor, because what the designers did was move all three buttons to the left. So you can still mis-click. Moving "minimize" and "maximize" to the left but leaving "close" on the right would have been much smarter.

      BTW, you can edit the configuration in Ubuntu to change the button positions to the right. I don't think I've ever seen such an option in Windows.

      One of MY pet peeves in Xubuntu are single-pixel window borders that make click-and-drag resizing very difficult. But those, too, can be edited.
      There are even pre-designed console commands on the net: https://softsolder.com/2015/01/28/wider-borders-in-xfce-xubuntu/

       

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
    59. Re: Linux. by yithar7153 · · Score: 1

      Ok sorry but you just lost the interest of 1billion people without finishing that first sentence. dir? what is that? The only time a Windows user types dir is when a scammer calls them up and offers to help "fix" their computer. The people who type dir are sys admins and power users. They aren't the ones that won't learn another OS, and chances are they already know multiple anyway.

      Meh, there's always ChromeOS. I kind of wish more people would go to ChromeOS rather than Linux, because now we have Wayland, which locks stuff down "for your protection" like ChromeOS except it's security theater as you can still run arbitrary code which can modify the compositor for example, and boom, you have a keylogger. That's not Wayland's fault, but it's stupid to lock one door and hope someone else doesn't use the other door.

      The problem is that in order for certain things to work, you have to extend the Wayland protocol and remove security features. A KDE developer explains the problem in his blog post. He does also say they'll address it in the future though.

      Flatpak's Wayland security is passive, not active, it basically offloads the GUI sandboxing to the Wayland compositor and relies on the compositor to implement it. The problem is that the Wayland protocol leaves room for a compositor to expose this information to clients via a protocol extension though the core protocol defines no such channels.

      If you use Flatpak with a hypothetical compositor that exposes surfaces and keypresses to clients via a protocol extension then Flatpak won't do much here. KWin exposes window placement and titles to clients via an extension and Flatpak doesn't stop that from happening.

      Things like Subuser and Firejail implement active X11 sandboxing, they just Sandbox X11, whatever the server attempts to sandbox, they get in between the server and the client and decide what can be let through and what can't, no matter what protocol extensions the server implements.

    60. Re: Linux. by dpidcoe · · Score: 1

      I'd argue back that I am by virtue of my savvy - of which I do not claim expert status at all - that I will use the best tool for the task I am doing. And Windows is not always - in fact for my line of work, not often the best tool for the job. And really, OSX very seldom has issues that requires a total reinstall. That's a Windows thing. The only time I have ever done that on a Mac was when a hard drive failed - sort of understandable in that case. People that have problems because of keyboard layout are seldom that tech savvy. Just experience talking, and that could be wrong.

      If you'd actually bothered to read my post, you'd notice I never made claims about any of the things you talk about here. I even specifically talked about linux, no mention of OSX anywhere. And as far as complete reinstalls, unless you're familiar to the point that you don't need to google for solutions, it's extremely easy to bork linux to the point where it's easier to do that than to try and reverse each of the fixes you googled (and perhaps only got partway through before realizing it wouldn't work) for a 50-50 chance of the system never working quite right after you go through all the effort.

      I would also argue that your minor nuisance issues ar enot even remotely a nuisance for some of us - just a difference.

      I'm not talking about differences, I'm talking about actual problems such as my linux install not recognizing the brightness control keys on my laptop, or some bug with the wireless drivers that causes the card to glitch out and reconnect a few times a day. The sorts of problems that are annoying, but you can live with.

    61. Re: Linux. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Good point. I've never actually used Ubuntu after they moved to Unity (I started with SUSE KDE, went to Kubuntu, and landed at Mint/KDE but I have a CNC machine running Ubuntu with Gnome2), so I just assumed they only put the 'X' button on the left since that's what the OP complained about (though I see now I misread what he wrote).

      No, I'm quite sure there's no easy way to move the buttons around on Windows. On KDE, however, it's pretty easy and extremely configurable; you can put space in between buttons, you can move them around anywhere on the bar, you can put in different buttons for more functionality, etc.

      So mea culpa; I really don't see a good reason to move all three buttons to the left since that just gives you the same problem but in a different location. However, if they'd make it configurable (and according to you it is on Unity, I don't know about others except KDE), that's a great feature.

    62. Re: Linux. by segin · · Score: 1

      Worked fine with XP, or XP x64? And if you say "32-bit XP", then go run them "naked" on Windows 10 32-bit and watch them work just as well.

    63. Re: Linux. by segin · · Score: 1

      echo "alias dir='ls -l'" > ~/.profile

    64. Re: Linux. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      If you'd actually bothered to read my post, you'd notice I never made claims about any of the things you talk about here. I even specifically talked about linux, no mention of OSX anywhere.

      OSX is Unix, which is darn near Linux. I move back and forth seamlessly between them. And no, I've never had to reinstall Linux. Windows? Just about once a year.

      I would also argue that your minor nuisance issues ar enot even remotely a nuisance for some of us - just a difference.

      I'm not talking about differences, I'm talking about actual problems such as my linux install not recognizing the brightness control keys on my laptop, or some bug with the wireless drivers that causes the card to glitch out and reconnect a few times a day. The sorts of problems that are annoying, but you can live with.

      I'm the luckiest guy on earth. The worst problem I've had with Linux is a lubuntu install that doesn't care what I set for wakeup. After five minutes of inactivity, I have to log in again.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    65. Re: Linux. by jimtheowl · · Score: 1

      Careful: you just misdirected someone to trash his/her existing profile.

      That should be:
      echo "alias dir='ls -l'" >> ~/.profile

      I don't know the expertise level of the poster, so I was suggesting something simple to try interactively.

      Had I wanted to be 'fancy' I would have suggested:
      alias ll='ls -alFSo'

    66. Re:Linux. by r_pattonII · · Score: 1

      As for games, I have an alternative to Micro$oft Flight Simulator and that is X-Plane. It says it installs in a Linux distro, but I have yet to get that accomplished. It is not an easy task as they make it out to be either. Yes, I read the documentation and the Forum stuff on X-Plane regarding installation, but the bottom line is that it works (X-Plane 9.x) on a IMac but not on Linux for me. BTW, the IMac doesn't have the hardware my custom built box does to be running a graphic intensive program like Micro$oft FSX so X-Plane 10.x is out of the question for the IMac in my mind.

    67. Re: Linux. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      So its a bad thing being a power user?

      Not at all. Just that most people aren't, and that is reflected in Linux's market share.

      My point that you completely whooshed on is not the specific size, but that a person should use the best tool for the purpose.

      My point was that people simply don't providing good enough is good enough. I have a certain screwdriver that is good enough, will I take the 2 second job of jamming the damn thing into the wood, or do I stop everything and spend an hour driving to the hardware store? Yes once I drive to the hardware store I have the tool for the future (akin to your learning to use linux), but still that's a lot of effort because right now I just have one screw and who knows if I will ever have this incorrect screw again.

      I got your point perfectly, but my point is that it doesn't reflect human nature even slightly. We strive on mediocrity and near enough is good enough. Why would an OS be any different?

      Therefore, my opinions are apparently completely 100 percent invalid and wrong. Who knew?

      Wouldn't know, you've yet to present one. You just keep telling me that you have opinions all the time and that I am somehow against them.

      Commit to one platform, and for gods sake, don't learn anything.

      This tl;dr isn't too far off, but it's not an order, more a reflection of what actually happens. Much like while I love tinkering with OSes and playing with multiple ones, I couldn't give a crap how my car works as long as it goes forward when I hit the gas and stops when I hit the brake. I drive a piece of shit right now and I don't get it why people are obsessed with some other ones, because I lack the interest. Just like nearly the entire world lacks the interest to tinker with an OS.

      Near enough = good enough. This is human nature for everything we don't take a very active interest in.

    68. Re: Linux. by Dex+Hex · · Score: 1

      A lady was recently awarded around 10K $ if I'm not mistaken. This was compensation for the windows 10 upgrade disrupting her work. 10K buys you plenty of macs.

    69. Re: Linux. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      This tl;dr isn't too far off, but it's not an order, more a reflection of what actually happens. Much like while I love tinkering with OSes and playing with multiple ones, I couldn't give a crap how my car works as long as it goes forward when I hit the gas and stops when I hit the brake. I drive a piece of shit right now and I don't get it why people are obsessed with some other ones, because I lack the interest. Just like nearly the entire world lacks the interest to tinker with an OS.

      Near enough = good enough. This is human nature for everything we don't take a very active interest in.

      I don't care what market share is, I don't care that mediocre or almost working is the height to which some people aspire. I really don't. I am a person who is curious about many things, from my operating systems, to my vehicles, to my screwdrivers. Damn near everything in fact. Interestingly, that irritates people. But whatever. Maybe they think I'm bragging or something.

      And I even help those who can't be bothered to learn to help themselves. I'm irritating as hell, but that doesn't mean I'm a prick, just the weird guy who explains stuff that they are too (insert whatever word you like) to learn.

      Anyhow thegarbz, I fear we are just in a sort of deadlock here. End situation is I'm happy to be able to carry on untelligent conversations with rocket scientists, Physicists, and other professionals, I'm happy to learn the differences and similarities between Operating Systems so I can tallk and make intelligent decisions regarding them, while others might be more comfortable with discussing the latest episode of "Here comes Honey Boo-Boo", "Braxton Family Vlues", or "Naked and Afraid". And my curiosity leads me to watch an episode or two of each. The experience was a true waste of time. Just a difference in perspective, I suppose. We'll have this on occasion.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    70. Re: Linux. by dpidcoe · · Score: 1

      And no, I've never had to reinstall Linux. Windows? Just about once a year.

      My hdds tend to fail before I need a windows reinstall. So far every single linux install I've done to date has gotten mangled from my attempts to do things on it (even simple things, such as installing steam on debian) that the only help I can get from the support forums is to just reinstall.

      I'm the luckiest guy on earth.

      Either that or you have a bad memory. I haven't once installed ubuntu or debian on a laptop where at least 1 semi-important bit of hardware wasn't recognized, or was only partially supported. The most common offender was the network card(s) not showing up at all, followed by the touchpad/keyboard buttons not being fully recognized, and then occasionally the video drivers. More often than not the fix involved screwing with repos to install some non-free driver, at which point the system would seem to have more and more things broken every time I updated.

      The worst problem I've had with Linux is a lubuntu install that doesn't care what I set for wakeup. After five minutes of inactivity, I have to log in again.

      That's exactly the kind of minor issue I'm talking about. A non-tech savvy person wouldn't know the first place to start and just live with it. I like to at least attempt fixing those sorts of things, but generally the attempt ends up breaking more things than it fixes.

    71. Re: Linux. by chipschap · · Score: 1

      I need to run video games and they just don't work right under wine. Quibble is an understatement. The need is bigger than you think. For now, I'll take your suggestion to continue running Windows, thanks.

      You don't need to run video games, you want to run video games, and this is true unless your livelihood or something serious depends on those games. So you want to run Windows. And that's just fine. You have freedom of choice, which is as it should be. As I said far above in my original post, I'm not here to try to get people to switch away from something they want, like, or need.

    72. Re: Linux. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      And no, I've never had to reinstall Linux. Windows? Just about once a year.

      My hdds tend to fail before I need a windows reinstall. So far every single linux install I've done to date has gotten mangled from my attempts to do things on it (even simple things, such as installing steam on debian) that the only help I can get from the support forums is to just reinstall.

      Strange - I do test a lot of software, so it's a constant issue of cleaning the registry as well. But I have some Linux installs from 2011 that are still going strong.

      Either that or you have a bad memory. I haven't once installed ubuntu or debian on a laptop where at least 1 semi-important bit of hardware wasn't recognized, or was only partially supported.

      I have found that the biggest problem some people have with Linux is they try to impose Windows on it. But then I read......

      The most common offender was the network card(s) not showing up at all,

      How on earth did you do the install? I haven't done an install in years that didn't require an internet connection to do it. You need to connect to the internet, in the first place, so it is remarkable that your connection and install would kill the driver.

      Sumpin seriously odd here.

      The worst problem I've had with Linux is a lubuntu install that doesn't care what I set for wakeup. After five minutes of inactivity, I have to log in again.

      That's exactly the kind of minor issue I'm talking about. A non-tech savvy person wouldn't know the first place to start and just live with it. I like to at least attempt fixing those sorts of things, but generally the attempt ends up breaking more things than it fixes.

      Note that out of many dozens of installs, that's it. That is also less issues than my Windows installs.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    73. Re: Linux. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I'm still not sure we have such a difference in perspective. I agree with you and all your reasons for what you do, and in fact I do quite a lot myself.

      All this somehow got lost in a discussion which centred around the question of why people don't switch to Linux and my only point was that the value proposition isn't there for the common user.

      Not us. We know better and have an interest in knowing better. The common user doesn't. We're in an app world. People are happy with entire operating systems that centre around not having any configurable options and just firing up a browser. Having to learn anything in this world is a dead proposition.

    74. Re: Linux. by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      My only lack of understanding in this matter is why so many people aren't capable of understanding more than one Operating system. Laziness?

      I am a system analyst. 20+ years of it now. Jack of all trades, programming, hardware, networking, etc..

      I just don't want to come home and have to spend another hour or two tinkering with something. I want a toaster at home that plays my games, plays my tv shows, and doesn't mess up for years. I have a mixed environment at home (linux, mac, and and pc), but I'm not beholden to any of them. Whatever works is what I want. When I get the urge to tinker or explore on a computer, I want it to be the fun stuff: learning a new language, playing with a framework, etc.. Fixing your linux/windows box because an upgrade broke the video driver feels like a chore now. It didn't when I was younger and still learning. But by the 100th broken driver...

      For the rest of the mainstream average computer users, I agree with Immerman: "efficiency of familiarity". People get used to something at home, at work, and at friends houses, and they tend to stick with what "feels right". No more complex than that.

    75. Re: Linux. by dpidcoe · · Score: 1

      I have found that the biggest problem some people have with Linux is they try to impose Windows on it

      That's hardly the issue here, but go ahead and keep responding to things I didn't write (or even imply).

      How on earth did you do the install? I haven't done an install in years that didn't require an internet connection to do it. You need to connect to the internet, in the first place, so it is remarkable that your connection and install would kill the driver.

      Sumpin seriously odd here.

      I don't even know if it's worth continuing this discussion at this point. Offline installs are still a thing, and there's usually (though distressingly less now for laptops) the option of installing with a physical cable plugged in as it's generally the wireless that's not recognized. A simple google search for "linux wireless adapter not recognized" will turn up all kinds of results, and you'll even notice that there are often a multitude of different ways of fixing it for the same adapter, making it a game of russian roulette as to which one will work and which one will leave your computer in some weird state that will bite you in the ass 3 months down the road.

      Note that out of many dozens of installs, that's it. That is also less issues than my Windows installs.

      Again, the context of that was just odd issues that tend to invite tech savvy people to try and fix them (and subsequently break things), not that the odd issue is somehow making it unusable. And if you're going to claim that an OS (I don't care which OS) runs flawlessly 99% of the time on all of your computers without a single little nuisance thing requiring your attention to fix, you're a liar.

    76. Re: Linux. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      I have found that the biggest problem some people have with Linux is they try to impose Windows on it

      That's hardly the issue here, but go ahead and keep responding to things I didn't write (or even imply).

      After reading your post, what I wrote is 100 percent relevant - because it is at the root of your problem. You are doing it wrong.

      I don't even know if it's worth continuing this discussion at this point. Offline installs are still a thing

      And there you have it. Every install I've done for years wants you to have an internet connection. Doing an install without one is sortkinda possible, but you are almost certain to have problems, as needed things are not available. Most distros I've used even update the whole OS during the install so you end up with an up to date computer.

      The internet is exactly how the drivers are obtained. You start the install, it Id's what you have, and goes out to get it. There is no one in their right mind who would install offline, and then whine about not having a driver. Because if you do, you will then need to go the old fashioned route - long abandoned - of searching for every driver and manually installing it. And if you don't have an ethernet or wireless driver you're not going anywhere fast.

      You do however, allow me to understand how some of the whiners get in the positions they do. As usual, y'all make great pronouncements of how awful Linux is, with improper whatever support, while doing it incorrectly. Which makes my previous statement about imposing another paradigm on Linux perhaps quite relevent - while you in your imposition of the inferior if not completely wrong installation method, claim that I need to shut up. It's quite relevant. Maybe you'll understand that, maybe you won't.

      That is exactly why I don't have the problems you do. You are doing it wrong, and shouldn't expect things to work right when you are doing it wrong. So if you do it offline - you're almost certain to have problems to whine about. Good day sir, and remember to get that last word in so you can feel like you won. I'd suggest you make it short though, because I'm not wasting my time reading it.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  2. Uninstall KBs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'd be curious even if these are cumulative patches if we could still use the wusa /uninstall /kb:xxxxxxx command to uninstall individual KBs we don't want.

  3. Linux Debian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I kept Windows 7 to update my GPS maps, but I boot 99.9% of the time in Debian.
    Since tye year 2000 times I had tried different Linux distros but never had enough motivation to leave windows.
    Windows 10 provided enough stimulus.

  4. if they screw me up, I will dump windows by swschrad · · Score: 2, Insightful

    just that simple. they are acting like tin-star dictators already, and it seems to get worse every time they get a new brain-fart.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
    1. Re:if they screw me up, I will dump windows by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Remember the boy scout motto, and "be prepared". That means trying it out and ensuring that everything you need to do can be easily done.

      I did that about 1998, and soon switched to Linux. At that time the word processors on Linux were horrible to non-existent, but I switched anyway.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  5. I won't by JohnFen · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've been running Linux exclusively on all my own machines for 15 years or so now, so I won't be worrying about this at all. I do have to use Windows machines for work, but those are supplied and supported by my employer, so I don't have to worry about it there, either. Hooray!!

    1. Re:I won't by houghi · · Score: 1

      That is what I do. Computer security at the company is not my problem. If I see something that is wrong, it wasn't me, so it is not my problem. When they come for the Windows users, I say nothing, because I am not a Winsows user.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    2. Re:I won't by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      The problem is that we still have to actually use Windows at work, which sucks. But oh well, the way I look at it, that's part of what I'm getting paid for: to put up with bullshit. It's called "work" for a reason.

      Hopefully I can get back to an all-Linux job sometime in the near future. But for now, I'll collect my nice paycheck and put up with the bullshit; if there's a problem with Windows, I call the IT people and let them deal with it, then make sure my manager knows that's why my work is late so the blame is assigned properly.

  6. Windows Installer Cache by kelv · · Score: 1

    If this means a Windows 7 install that has been around for 2-3 years won;t have 50GB+ consumed by windows installer cache files I'll be pretty happy with the change. Not sure it is going to mean that though...

    1. Re:Windows Installer Cache by ErikTheRed · · Score: 1

      You can run the disk cleanup wizard to get rid of a lot of that cruft.

      --

      Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
    2. Re:Windows Installer Cache by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

      No, do not run the Disk Cleanup wizard on Windows 7 under any circumstances. It has at least one system-destroying bug.

      See:

      http://www.cnet.com/forums/dis...

      http://www.winhelponline.com/b... ... and many other links.

      In my case it nuked \windows\system32, which I was able to restore by copying the files from another system. Lucky me.

    3. Re: Windows Installer Cache by sexconker · · Score: 1

      That's not applicable to Windows 7. That's for 8.1 and Server 2012 R2.

    4. Re:Windows Installer Cache by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --Looks like both of those links are for Vista, but running something like Crap Cleaner is better than running MS "disk f**k^Wcleanup" anyhow ;-)

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  7. Maybe I'll switch back to Windows by rgbe · · Score: 5, Funny

    After using Linux for 18 or so years, I think it's time to switch back to Windows..... actually, nah.

  8. Disable, then VM or Mac by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My wife's photography business currently runs on Windows 7. We can't accept the risk of Microsoft screwing up her production environment (Photoshop + Lightroom).

    For now, we're going to stop installing Windows updates, and cross our fingers.

    Once that starts seeming too risky, I'll look into moving Windows into a VM with limited Internet access, or we'll migrate to using a Mac for the photo editing.

    Neither option is appealing. I haven't yet figured out how difficult it will be to get monitor color-calibration right if Windows is running on a VM inside Linux. And sufficiently powerful Macs are painfully expensive.

    I'll be curious to see if Microsoft's overall strategy from the past year is going to pay off for them. They're literally driving previously satisfied customers into their competitors' arms.

    1. Re:Disable, then VM or Mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      My wife's photography business currently runs on Windows 7. We can't accept the risk of Microsoft screwing up her production environment (Photoshop + Lightroom).

      For now, we're going to stop installing Windows updates, and cross our fingers.

      Once that starts seeming too risky, I'll look into moving Windows into a VM with limited Internet access, or we'll migrate to using a Mac for the photo editing.

      Neither option is appealing. I haven't yet figured out how difficult it will be to get monitor color-calibration right if Windows is running on a VM inside Linux. And sufficiently powerful Macs are painfully expensive.

      I'll be curious to see if Microsoft's overall strategy from the past year is going to pay off for them. They're literally driving previously satisfied customers into their competitors' arms.

      Mac release updates that break functionality with Photoshop/lightroom digital negatives/importing all the time.. be prepared for even worse support than windows, and ridiculous problems where your recommended solution is to buy a new license.

    2. Re:Disable, then VM or Mac by Archfeld · · Score: 1

      Not to nit-pick but how is Apples update process any different from the model M$ is moving to ? You get what they give, when they want to give it to you and how they choose to dish it out.
      I too like Apple's UI it is quick, slick and keeps several of my extended family members happy, while Windows 7 and 8 work for others that I haven't been able to pry from the platform. I have windows 10 working because I was curious and I know that eventually I am going to have to support it for someone. Other family members use Android and various flavors of *nix. Currently for the business customers I support I keep a pristine machine running their critical software that I load patches on and test run prior to updating the actual production hardware. The cumulative rollouts both eases this process and complicates it when a rare failure does occur.

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    3. Re:Disable, then VM or Mac by vux984 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Its like you've never heard of backups. FFS, your wifes photography business sounds like it runs on one windows 7 computer.

      A windows update that toasts your 'photo editing environment' is less likely than a variety of hardware failures. I'm sure, since you are clearly so conscientious about the reliability and accessibility of this environment, that you have a proper backup solution in place.

      So.. in the unlikely event of an update fiasco... roll back, and carry on...

      For a large enterprises, where it actually makes sense to lab test an update before rolling it out this doesn't work... but for 'your wifes photography business' I can't really figure out what you are trying to accomplish.

      And EVEN the enterprise guys can still lab test before letting the cumulative update through to production... and hold it up if there is an issue. (Although its less clear how they resolve a problem.) But that is a whole other situation.

    4. Re:Disable, then VM or Mac by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 2

      Its like you've never heard of backups. .

      We actually do have a pretty decent backup regimen for the photographs themselves, including online, nearline, and offsite tiers. The photographs are irreplaceable.

      However, Windows is not my day-job OS, and I need to be economical with the time, energy, and number of neurons I spend babysitting that OS. I can institute such a backup policy if necessary, but the more Microsoft makes it necessary, that more likely I am to just switch to a platform that's more reliable and is easier to rebuild.

    5. Re:Disable, then VM or Mac by Proudrooster · · Score: 2

      On Macs you can turn Auto-Update off and update when and if you ever feel like it.

    6. Re:Disable, then VM or Mac by fisternipply · · Score: 1

      Just buy the right Mac. It's a business expense anyway, and she can save time (and therefore $$$) by not having to eff around with it. I'm in the same position, having proprietary tools that run Windows only, and it would be a disaster if that environment got hosed. I run a MBP with a Win7 VM, and from time to time I take a snapshot of the VM so that it can be restored instantly if necessary. Instantly. It has completely stopped me from wasting a day or three every year reinstalling Windows and getting the environment set up again, like I used to do running a Dell.

    7. Re:Disable, then VM or Mac by vux984 · · Score: 2

      However, Windows is not my day-job OS, and I need to be economical with the time, energy, and number of neurons I spend babysitting that OS.

      So what were you doing up until now? Reading each KB article? Vetting each update on a test system? I dont' really see that based on you response, so how on earth does THIS cumulative update model really change anything for YOU exactly?!!

      Meanwhile, a dead simple off-the-shelf backup software packages for windows suitable for a single system seems like a perfect solution...

      For example...this is pretty much exactly what you seem to need...but choose any you like.

      http://www.acronis.com/en-us/p...

      Full Disk-Image Backup

      Back up your entire computer including your operating system, applications and data, not just files and folders to an external hard drive or NAS.

      You've already got the photographs properly protected; so this would be a perfect solution for the operating system.

      that more likely I am to just switch to a platform that's more reliable and is easier to rebuild.

      For Photoshop and Lightroom? What platform OSX? Here, I'll save you some time:

      ====
      Q:
      I installed the latest version of Mavericks and it broke some stuff (instruments) which I cannot afford to have broken. Is there a way to roll back to my previous release? Am currently on 10.9.2 and want to go to 10.9.1 or 10.9.

      A: (paraphrased)
      there is not an uninstall feature for patches, upgrades and even apps.

      Unfortunately the only real way to do this is to wipe the drive, install the pervisous version, assuming you have the installer or can find it and restore from backup.

      http://apple.stackexchange.com...
      =====

      OS X invented cumulative software updates that can't be rolled back.

      And Linux or BSD don't even run photoshop or lightroom.

      So, what exactly is your plan?

    8. Re: Disable, then VM or Mac by Archfeld · · Score: 1

      Nor does windows 7/8. My point was the updates, should you choose to accept them come pre-packaged in a large bundle not a per patch system like M$ KB's used to come. The question was, and still is how do you deal with them if a large rollout causes an interruption due to H/W or S/W failure ?

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    9. Re:Disable, then VM or Mac by Archfeld · · Score: 2

      You can do the same to windows 7/8, and with a little research even to windows X, though admittedly not as easily. My point was the updates, should you choose to accept them come pre-packaged in a large bundle not a per patch system like M$ KB's used to come. The question was, and still is how do you deal with them if a large rollout causes an interruption due to H/W or S/W failure ?

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    10. Re:Disable, then VM or Mac by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Huh? You can ignore updates on OSX. There aren't many of them and when they show up they are well described.
      If you're talking about iOS then that's not comparable to Windows; everyone using Windows except for a tiny handful are using it on computers, not Windows Phones. When slashdot talks about Windows, they mean the real Windows.

    11. Re: Disable, then VM or Mac by Malc · · Score: 1

      You're worried about her workflow but you're going to completely change her environment and make her learn a new way of working? Seriously I'd be more worried about Adobe than Microsoft breaking something.

      BTW, I guess your wife's professional setup doesn't rely on 10-bit graphics? I can see banding in blue sky gradients in Lightroom on my MBP.

    12. Re:Disable, then VM or Mac by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      I'd suggest, that you make a disk image about once a month for easy rollback in case of catastrophic breakage.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    13. Re:Disable, then VM or Mac by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      My wife's photography business currently runs on Windows 7. We can't accept the risk of Microsoft screwing up her production environment (Photoshop + Lightroom).

      As a matter of interest why has the risk profiled suddenly changed for you? Have you been running your machine unpatched for years? Do you think there's something magically worse about a cumulative update vs installing 10 single updates? Did your computer melt into a puddle when you installed the Windows 7 sevice packs?

      The cumulative update process still gives you the option to defer updates as it does in Windows 10 so that any issues are fleshed out before the update gets pushed to you.

      Now a few more questions:
      What makes this process any different from Apples?
      What makes this process any different from the thousands of apps + dependencies clusterfuck that is Windows?
      Why does your wife run her critical business that depends on one PC? I could put a bullet straight through the harddrive of my computer right now and in 30 seconds (time taken to get the laptop, and plug in a HDMI cable) be booting up again, import the current colour profile and continue working where I left off.
      You do have backups right?

      If this change in policy is putting your business at risk you need to seriously reconsider your risk management practices.

    14. Re:Disable, then VM or Mac by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      Hell, even the built-in Windows 7 backup is pretty damned good, even for bare metal restores.

      Also, every time an update is installed on Windows, a restore point is created.

      Without any investment in 3rd party software and a very small investment in time, you can set up a full backup regimen using the built in tools.

      And even when that might fail or is misconfigured, you still have the option to roll back to the last restore point (pre-patch).

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    15. Re:Disable, then VM or Mac by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      Windows 7 has a full backup solution built in and it works well. I have used it many times.

      Boot with the Windows 7 media, choose the restore option and point it to your full backup. Done, bare metal restore.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    16. Re:Disable, then VM or Mac by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Separate your wife's professional computers from the Internet. Seriously, don't go half way. If you are refusing security patches you are risking even more than if you aren't. Ferry data between computers on usb sticks or CDs. There are a few pieces of malware that can hide in photo files, but they aren't common, and if they can't connect out they will often just hide. DON"T transfer zip archives. You don't know what is in them.

      Now that you have your MSWindows needs isolated, install Linux on the machine that connects to the Internet. This has the additional advantage that malware that targets Linux often can't run on MSWindows. Avoid flash as much as possible. (I won't have it installed, but perhaps you need it.)

      If you set things up right this isn't much more work than just running two computers, and if you use CDs or DVDs as your transfer medium, you get good backups of all your work. Usb sticks are more convenient, but are also more expensive and not good for long term storage. (Even CDs die over the decades, though.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    17. Re: Disable, then VM or Mac by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      Given the option, which OS would you rather use Photoshop on? Mac, linux, or windows 10?

      Linux, hands down.

      However, I still need to sort out the issue of monitor color calibration. The color-correction pipeline can be surprisingly complicated, because images, Photoshop/Lightroom, and Windows / OS X / Linux(?) are all ready to specify their own transforms. And I'm looking at adding yet another wrapper (Linux as a VM host OS) around that as well.

      I can probably make it all work, it's just going to take some time and effort.

      On the bright side, at least the color-calibration hardware is supported on Linux.

    18. Re:Disable, then VM or Mac by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      So, what exactly is your plan?

      I'm still considering my options.

      Some people have recommended backing up the entire OS using non-free backup software designed for that very task. That would reduce my exposure to the risk of Microsoft pushing a bad update, and I might actually end up going that route.

      OTOH, it doesn't help with the fact that Microsoft will undoubtedly be bundling spyware together with security patches starting in October. Running Windows in a VM would give me a relatively easy and cheap way to prevent Windows from phoning home. But as I mentioned elsewhere, it means having Windows as a guest VM, and that might make my color-calibration life more difficult.

    19. Re:Disable, then VM or Mac by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      So what were you doing up until now? Reading each KB article? Vetting each update on a test system? I dont' really see that based on you response, so how on earth does THIS cumulative update model really change anything for YOU exactly?!!

      Yes, that is approximately what I've been doing. Specifically, I've been leaving automatic updates disabled. Periodically I look for writeups about the current list of known-evil KB's, and allow the rest to get applied.

      The cumulative updates prevent me from selectively installing only the updates I want.

    20. Re:Disable, then VM or Mac by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Some people have recommended backing up the entire OS using non-free backup software designed for that very task

      You can use floss if you like. I thought your goal however was to minimize the time and effort you spend on it though; so an off-the-shelf backup is less work to setup and manage; at least for a single copy of windows 7.

      OTOH, it doesn't help with the fact that Microsoft will undoubtedly be bundling spyware together with security patches starting in October.

      And from your other posts, I'm starting to gather that this is really the only reason why you don't already have automatic updates on; because you'll never catch a patch that breaks some obscure photoshop plugin using the methodology you described.

      So... you aren't *really* all that concerned about cumulative updates breaking your photoshop and lightroom etc. You weren't backing up the OS prior to now, and you really have no patch vetting method that would have caught actual breaking changes.

      However the cumulative updates DOES interfere with your ability to selectively avoid patches with telemetry functionality in them. Most people I know are dealing with this with the use of anti-telemetry tools. (Spybot Anti-beacon, ShutUp10, WindowsPirvacyTweaker, and many others)

      Then you just turn updates on, and rely on these to kill the services, block the hosts, and so on. Its not ideal, but if you are standing for anti-telemetry as a 'principle' (like me) rather than actually being genuinely concerned that Microsoft and the NSA is out to get your wife's business photos then its, in my opinion, good enough.

      And if you want even more, throw a real firewall in front of the system and use any of a number of host block lists at the firewall; and/or block microsoft entirely, use WSUS offline to get the cumulative patches, and don't worry too much about what they want to do, because they can't phone home anyway.

    21. Re:Disable, then VM or Mac by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      One nice thing about the VM, like if you use virtualbox, is you can snapshot (backup) the vm before trying updates out. If they break something, you can just rollback to the prior image.

  9. OSX / Linux by Proudrooster · · Score: 2

    Honestly, I only run Windows for a few specific applications now. I use Windows so infrequently that whenever I boot that disk I have 30+ updates to install. I am very happy with the OS X UI and find it to be much less distracting than the live tiles. Virtual Box works fine for most Windows needs.

    The Live tiles are always tempting me to get off task and go look at something more interesting than my work.

  10. Microsoft's underestimating their legacy base by ErichTheRed · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Appy app apps guy is right - the future in everyone's mind is Apps, not some LUDDITE desktop application or "pre-App web app" -- but I think Microsoft is really dismissing how much legacy code is out there and is broken by various updates. I do systems integration work with an end user desktop focus, and there are _so many_ crappy IE-only, ActiveX or Java applet or Flash or Shockwave (!) monstrosities lurking in corporate IT shops everywhere. Most of it isn't even in-house developed - it was written by really expensive consultants who want another few million to modernize it.

    It will be very interesting to see how they pull this off - whether there will be an exception for Enterprise, etc.

    1. Re:Microsoft's underestimating their legacy base by NotInHere · · Score: 1

      It should be a lesson that if you build on proprietary technologies, you might end up in a mess if the owner of the technology abandons it in favor of a better alternative. Use open non proprietary technologies, they live much much longer. Take TCP for example, everyone still uses it. There were probably tons of proprietary competitors to TCP, but all of them died because in the long (and I mean decades) run, open solutions win.

    2. Re:Microsoft's underestimating their legacy base by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Are you afraid of MS delibrately breaking them? ...

      "DOS ain't done until Lotus won't run!"

    3. Re:Microsoft's underestimating their legacy base by ErichTheRed · · Score: 1

      "Cumulative updates might help with this - because the bugfix will be incorporated into the next month's cumulative update meaning getting the bugfixed version will be straightforward."

      The problem comes not from the cumulative bug fixes, but the applications that, for one reason or another, rely on the buggy behavior. Concrete example - Microsoft has for some time now made IE updates cumulative for the very same reasons they're citing here -- better testing, etc. Since then, I have had more than one incident where I have had to hold back that month's IE updates to machines running some crappy web app until our devs or the vendor got around to fixing the problem. It's not the entire user base in most of these cases, but enough to be a concern. Same goes for .NET -- breaking changes in LOB apps that can't be worked around cheaply.

      The other problem is that MIcrosoft's fixes have been of pretty poor quality lately. Having to apply one rollup that fixes 10 vulnerabilities, one of which breaks a line of business application, means that update doesn't get applied and leaves the 9 other holes unpatched. Same goes if the update kills the whole machine. Anyone responsible for thousands of desktops/laptops just won't roll something like that out and hope it works.

      When you go to cumulative patching that includes feature changes, the OS becomes a moving target instead of a stable development target. Microsoft has a long term stable branch for Windows 10 for just this reason. (I'll bet that's the workaround -- just upgrade your "free with purchase" Windows 7 Pro license to a permanent subscription to Windows 10 Enterprise.)

    4. Re:Microsoft's underestimating their legacy base by Rockoon · · Score: 2

      Are you afraid of MS delibrately breaking them?

      They've done it many times before. They did it just last week. They will do it again.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    5. Re:Microsoft's underestimating their legacy base by MrSteveSD · · Score: 1

      " Microsoft is really dismissing how much legacy code is out there"

      I had any illusions that they cared about that sort of thing shattered when they dumped Visual Basic. It was huge in industry and millions (perhaps hundreds of millions) of lines of code, representing untold millions of dollars, suddenly became legacy code. (VB.NET was/is a completely different language)

  11. Al-la-carte increased complexity of patches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Do people really think al-la-carte Windows patches were a good solution for complexity and stability of the OS? What about when you needed to reboot 5 times to get a new XP install current or that the time to patch was longer than the time to infect from internet worms?

    Apple just has cumulative patches for iOS and macOs and it isn't a terrible problem for them; it probably makes more reliable than having to test every combination for interactions.

    1. Re:Al-la-carte increased complexity of patches by anglico · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But is Apple installing telemetry and all sorts of crap that spies on their users? That's why people want to be able to pick and choose which updates they install. My feeling is the only reason MS is doing it this way is to get that telemetry onto all the computers that refused to install it.

    2. Re:Al-la-carte increased complexity of patches by ls671 · · Score: 1

      Yep, at least it seems that by default they know your ip address as soon as you connect to the Internet. Every time a friend comes by with an iPhone/iPad/iWhatever, I see denied push packets from Apple at my public IP facing firewall.

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    3. Re: Al-la-carte increased complexity of patches by peragrin · · Score: 2

      So a friend visits with their device. The device logs onto your wifi (after you gave them the password) and then are surprised to see the device locating itself so that emails and iMessage works

      Can you explain why an apple device is different from a Google device doing the same thing with hangouts and gmail?

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    4. Re:Al-la-carte increased complexity of patches by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Yes ala-carte is a better solution. Because Microsoft's patches can cause worse problems and headaches than malware. We have anti-malware that reduces the problem to manageable levels. The advice to do what Microsoft tells you to do is just fear mongering designed to keep Microsoft in business. Which of course you work for.

  12. WSUS Offline by Barefoot+Monkey · · Score: 4, Informative

    We'll see what happens, but for now I've taken the precaution of using WSUS Offline to download all updates as of today. If I ever need to install Windows 7 again I have my original disc (and backed up ISO on cloud storage) and I can use the update installer from WSUS Offline to apply the updates I downloaded without ever needing to put the computer on the Internet. (And yes, this tool lets you add specific updates to an exclusion list so that they don't get installed).

    1. Re:WSUS Offline by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Just did a reinstall of Win7 with this as the update tool. Trying to do a "normal" Win7 update using the ordinary, online update process results in the eternal search for updates we all love and enjoy so much.

      And no, the usual ritual "install this particular KBxxxxxxxx update to fix" doesn't fix jack anymore. It almost seems like MS now artificially borks Win7 updates to prove that Win10 is so much better, if only 'cause Win7 is made so much worse.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  13. My long term use of Windows is ending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It is so sad to see it come to such a painful end. I actually bought Windows 1.0 in my youth and have had a machine running a Windows version ever since. I did manage to skip the most disastrous versions (ME, Vista, Bob and friends) and as a result had a pretty good run. By Windows 7 it had finally become a stable workhorse OS that, for a time, served me well as its owner and master.

    With Windows 8.x and then 10 it became evident that Windows as an OS no longer served me as its (paid and rightful) owner but instead answered to an increasingly malevolent master who was working against my will and interests. Its aim was nothing other than to harvest and sell me, my identity, my movements, my thoughts, my keystrokes, as a product like any other meat based commodity. I knew I could not in good conscious willingly give myself over to such abuses. I concluded that Windows 7 would be my last Windows and in my personal view was THE last Windows as I knew the product all these years, with the things that came after no longer sharing a common purpose with those that came before.

    While corrupting the Windows brand was bad even more nefarious was to take the Windows 7 the I own now away from me. The tried heartily to wear me down with deceptive pop-ups and then with malicious corrupting patches but, through great effort, I diligently thwarted them all. Now it seems the end has come, my paid copy of Windows 7 Professional will be corrupted by force or left to wither and be ravaged by wild dogs and the NSA in what I personally view to be a heinous crime against all humanity.

    As a long term Microsoft customer, the sentiment I now associate most with the company is betrayal.

  14. "security-only" bundle by TimSSG · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I will likely use the "security-only" bundle; and try to remove all rarely used Microsoft software other than the Windows 7. I already removed Java and Adobe; now will have to think about removing MS Office because, I foresee, in time the "security-only" bundle will stop patching office. Tim S.

    1. Re:"security-only" bundle by dcollins · · Score: 1

      What's the plan for accessing that security-only bundle? My understanding is that it won't be available to home users, only enterprise users.

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
  15. Very easily by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Step 1) Remove tinfoil hat.
    Step 2) Keep using Windows as usual.

    There. That wasn't hard.

    1. Re:Very easily by unixisc · · Score: 1

      I typically do it by scheduling the update to the nearest weekend, then on Friday afternoon, before leaving, I run the update and reboot the laptop. Done!

    2. Re: Very easily by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Easily said... empty words usually are.

    3. Re:Very easily by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As the Snowden leaks showed the people calling others tinfoil hats were pretty damn naive.

    4. Re:Very easily by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Great. How do I get Win7 to update? So far it's been stuck for 48 hours in "searching for updates" after a reinstall.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Very easily by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Did that. And KB3138612 and KB 3145739. And we're heading into the 38th hour of "looking for updates" as we talk.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:Very easily by Blue+Stone · · Score: 1

      There's an update to windows update that fixes this issue. I had the problem and installed the update and it corrected it.

      https://support.microsoft.com/...

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
  16. Good by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    It is comical to think that IT departments can "pick and choose" which patches to install. They aren't qualified to know which are important or not. I know a lot of corporate IT does this: they select only selected patches that they have supposedly "tested".

    1. Re:Good by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      It is comical to think that IT departments can "pick and choose" which patches to install. They aren't qualified to know which are important or not. I know a lot of corporate IT does this: they select only selected patches that they have supposedly "tested".

      Ok explain how you can secure 5,000 machines where a single infection with ransomwaqre can get you reprimanded AND not have anything break?

    2. Re:Good by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 1

      With a palo alto firewall?

      --
      _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
  17. The way I would handle any important system by Nkwe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I will apply all the patches that the vendor supplies in an automated way where possible and where not, as soon as is practical. While it is true that a vendor could screw up a patch, it is also true that my hard drive could die, malware could get on my system, an other hardware or software problem could corrupt my data, or I could just screw up and delete data myself.

    To protect myself from any of these occurrences, I keep regular backups. I take these backups at a frequency similar to the amount of data I am willing to lose in the event of any failure (including "evil" actions on behalf of my OS vendor.) For me the frequency of backups is generally daily.

    Note that I use the term OS vendor instead of Microsoft here, this because I run several computers with several operating systems (Microsoft, Linux(s), others) and I have had them all screw up a patch.

    Since I have chosen not to write or personally review the source code for all the software I use (because I don't have that kind of time), I choose to outsource that work to several vendors, one of which is Microsoft. Yes, there are risks to running software from Microsoft (or any other vendor), Microsoft may not have my best interests in mind. However their software meets my needs and I have made the calculation that the value the software provides outweighs the risks.

    1. Re:The way I would handle any important system by williamyf · · Score: 1

      I will apply all the patches that the vendor supplies in an automated way where possible and where not, as soon as is practical. While it is true that a vendor could screw up a patch, it is also true that my hard drive could die, malware could get on my system, an other hardware or software problem could corrupt my data, or I could just screw up and delete data myself.

      To protect myself from any of these occurrences, I keep regular backups. I take these backups at a frequency similar to the amount of data I am willing to lose in the event of any failure (including "evil" actions on behalf of my OS vendor.) For me the frequency of backups is generally daily.

      Note that I use the term OS vendor instead of Microsoft here, this because I run several computers with several operating systems (Microsoft, Linux(s), others) and I have had them all screw up a patch.

      Since I have chosen not to write or personally review the source code for all the software I use (because I don't have that kind of time), I choose to outsource that work to several vendors, one of which is Microsoft. Yes, there are risks to running software from Microsoft (or any other vendor), Microsoft may not have my best interests in mind. However their software meets my needs and I have made the calculation that the value the software provides outweighs the risks.

      AMEN Nkwe!

      Security only for servers, with one or two full rollups per year (in low demand periods, with full en-garde vendor support).

      And full rollups monthly for desktops, but in waves, over one or two weeks, starting with less critical groups, and moving onwards in the criticality (Or, artenatively, with canaries in each and every group, and moving onwards to the rest of the respective teams).

      And all this backed up (pun intended) with full backups (Baremetal recovery ones right before 'em patches)

      --
      *** Suerte a todos y Feliz dia!
    2. Re:The way I would handle any important system by c0d3g33k · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, there are risks to running software from Microsoft (or any other vendor), Microsoft may not have my best interests in mind. However their software meets my needs and I have made the calculation that the value the software provides outweighs the risks.

      I think what you're missing is that your calculation is rapidly becoming inaccurate. In the past, Microsoft had to make sure that their software met your (the customer's) needs or they would lose that customer. Their best interest was to prioritize the best interests of their customer base, because they would then keep buying Windows-based computers which is where the revenue came from. Now that the market has shifted, they are placing their interests before that of the customer, and the value of the OS is thus diminished. What people are talking about is not the status quo you refer to that has been true for a few decades, rather it's the status quo that seems to be coming which looks much different. It's one in which you are not the customer to which the software needs to provide value, you are the product. The software will be providing value to the actual customers of Microsoft, which are likely those who want to advertise to you, sell to you and monitor you.

    3. Re:The way I would handle any important system by Junta · · Score: 1

      The generic sentiment is the same, part of the value of a software vendor is how much they can be relied upon to not screw you over in updates. When that equation starts not working out, the answer is not to create long term plans on how you are going to vet each individual minor upgrade, balance the risk of that update versus the risk of not applying it, and so on. The answer is evaluating a long term move to another vendor. There might be some short term making the best of the current situation, but people shouldn't be looking at a long term 'just deal with it' workaround. To put it simply, if you can *credibly* do a better job of evaluating software updates than your vendor, you need to rethink your vendor relationship.

      This is a somewhat subjective call and depends on the circumstances. I would say that MS has indeed compromised this value by laying off their QA team and going to a rolling release model and I won't use them for anything other than Windows gaming, but everyone has to make that judgement call based on their needs and such.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  18. so dialup / system on ISP with very small caps by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    so dialup / system on ISP with very small caps may not get any updates and people with small caps may not want to download an 500-700MB update each month.

    1. Re:so dialup / system on ISP with very small caps by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Yes. Every month it will be bigger than the previous month.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
  19. Windows 7 Best OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I still consider Windows 7 as the best OS Microsoft ever made. As far as updates go I completely disabled them after the update gate fiasco. If you feel like me and had to disable windows updates because you can't trust them not to update your entire operating system then it's probably best to part ways, like a psychotic girlfriend that spies on your every move. Trust is a two way street. Once you break that trust the relationship can never be the same. Time for me to go back to Linux. As unrefined as it is, at least they're trying to do good things for their users instead of exploiting them. I'll never run a Mac OS or Google OS for the same reason. Microsoft didn't just cross the line, they got in a spaceship and flew light years past it at ludicrous speed.

  20. Linux by markdavis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    >"Ask Slashdot: How Will You Handle Microsoft's New 'Cumulative' Windows Updates?"

    I run Linux and have for decades. That is how I handle dealing with Microsoft. Of course, that doesn't do most people much good...but people allow themselves to be slaves to Microsoft. The stunts Microsoft has pulled over the last several years shows they are just as controlling, unreasonable, and manipulative as ever.

    There is never a better time to move away from MS-Windows.... Linux is just as robust as ever, it has a lot of great applications, lots of support structure, and more and more business software is finally moving to be cloud based and/or web-front ended so the clients can run whatever they like.

    Change is never easy, though.

    1. Re:Linux by markdavis · · Score: 1

      >Go fuck yourself, Mark Davis.

      Brilliant, informative, and insightful reply, Anonymous Coward. I wonder how much you are being paid to be a troll.

  21. Windows 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Upgrade to windows 10 for free (actually already done it).

  22. Hotfixes were always cumulative. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Microsoft hotfixes were never "individual" in the first place.

    There are two servicing branches for Windows. GDR and LDR. GDR is what used to go out on Windows Update. LDR is for changes that are considered more risky, and is a superset which also contains GDR changes. All changes are cumulative, per binary. Once you install an LDR fix, that binary stays on LDR branch until a service pack is applied.

    At service pack time, GDR and LDR branches are merged.

    There's no such thing as an "individual" Microsoft patch. All binaries are patched cumulatively; the only question is what cumulative version you have installed for a given binary.

    All that's changed is that they don't want to actually document bugs that are fixed in the hotfixes in detail, and they want to force everyone to more or less the same patch level, because 90% of the time, customers having problems are running old bits that aren't being tested by Microsoft any more. There's an ongoing religious argument over "patch to the latest" vs "don't touch it to keep it stable". But in truth, if you hit a new, unfixed bug, and Microsoft created a new hotfix for you, or even if you just install the latest security update, you were always forced to accept all the cumulative changes between the patchlevel you were at, and the new hotfix you are installing. It's just that at the moment the heavy handed "force em to patch" faction has the upper hand at Microsoft now.

  23. Ah the old "And this time I really mean it" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You are one of those "and this time I mean it" people.

    You won't dump Windows. Microsoft has probably crossed over your "line in the sand" 10 times in the last year.

    They understand they have a captive audience. You might be ruffled about what they force down your throat, but they know you just complain and take it up the arse again the next time too.

    1. Re:Ah the old "And this time I really mean it" by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I've read similar stories too. On Slashdot, I totally dismiss them; Slashdot readership is not representative of computer users in the slightest. I haven't used Windows for years for personal machines, but I also don't think of myself as a typical computer user; if I were, Microsoft would have been out of business ages ago.

      I've read similar stories elsewhere too, but only a handful. Guess what? They really don't matter. 0.1% of MS users defecting to Mint or Ubuntu or OSX just isn't going to affect them significantly, when they're using their new techniques (spyware, advertising, Windows Store) to significantly increase their profits on the users who do remain, which is almost all of them.

      I applaud the tiny, tiny minority of Windows users who have finally decided enough is enough and at least tried switching to something else. I wish they had done it sooner instead of waiting until the abuses were this bad, but I guess it's better late than never. But there's just no evidence that these people are really that significant in number. MS doesn't need 100.0% marketshare to continue its evil ways; a nice 94% or so is plenty. With so many customers absolutely refusing to leave them no matter what, it's entirely to their advantage to abuse them as much as they want instead of trying to keep them happy. I'm really not sure what took them this long to figure out they have a captive audience.

  24. if you can't virtualise it by desertrat_it · · Score: 1

    disconnect it from the internet.

    I advise that on general principle, anyway.

  25. Conflict of interest: For MS, bugs are profitable. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ideas: (partly a re-post from Stop updating completely? Methods and comments)

    1) Autopatcher and WSUS Offline Update: Use Autopatcher until Microsoft begins its new system of hiding even more completely what it is doing with its updates. Kvasio said to use WSUS Offline Update, another community driven solution.

    Apparently Microsoft approves of WSUS Offline Update. This is from the Microsoft web site: Update Offline Virtual Machine with PowerShell and WSUS Offline Update: Part 1

    Update Offline Virtual Machine with PowerShell and WSUS Offline Update: Part 2

    2) Windows on an isolated network: Don't allow any Microsoft operating system to have a connection to the internet. Use Linux on a separate computer on a separate network for internet connections. Use Bluetooth to communicate between the Windows OS network and the Linux network.

    For Microsoft, convincing people that Windows is buggy is profitable. An article I wrote last year, Microsoft Windows XP "end of life", makes the point that Microsoft fixed 319+828+459=1,606 bugs in Windows XP since Windows XP SP1 was released. Now Microsoft says Windows XP is still too buggy to use. We have 16 computers running Windows XP and haven't had any problems. And software does not have an "end of life", it continues to do what it always did.

    Do secret government agencies pay for vulnerabilities? Why do Adobe Flash and the Windows operating system have so many vulnerabilities? Do Adobe Systems and Microsoft sell vulnerabilities to secret government agencies and fix them when they are publicly discovered?

    Get serious about recognizing abuse. Quoting this comment, with modifications: We've seen Microsoft's continuous stream of lies and incompetence... including a number of "bugs" and "mistakes" that appear deliberate.

  26. No updates are good updates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I still use Windows 7. It is what my company uses and I have to maintain a certain degree of compatibility. I also create content, both for myself and for the company I work for. I've avoided MS updates for years simply because Microsoft has proven time and time again that they cannot be trusted, and guess what. Everything still works. My non-Microsoft applications do not mysteriously uninstall themselves after an update, the driver for my printer/scanner does not suddenly stop working because it is not "the latest" available, and my anti-virus software has, so far, kept me reasonably safe from malware attacks. I consider myself lucky in that regard, but it is worth the risk in my opionion to avoid all the known spyware and software issues created by MS updates. I don't need my flightstick driver to stop working simply because it is not signed by Microsoft.

    As part of my work I sometimes have to do on-line research. I do not need to see targeted ads for stuff I do for work. Just because I sometimes go to certain medical websites does not mean I have a medical condition, visiting a gun manufacturer's website does not make me a gun nut, and looking at the latest thing that Boeing is up to does not make me a pilot or a world traveller. I don't need to waste my time digging through spam for pills, guns, or airline fare "special" offers. If I'm actually interested in any of those things I'll do the research myself. I'm not going to buy stuff simply because I received a "targeted" scam.

  27. Patch as we always do. by Deathlizard · · Score: 1

    Frankly, if this finally fixes the issue where windows 7 searches windows update for hours taking 100% of a core and 1-2GB of RAM in the process then I'm all for it.

    One of the reasons I was recommending people to upgrade to windows 10 was for this issue alone. Hell, Half of my "my computer is slow" calls this week were for this issue alone, which now I can't recommend to upgrade to 10 cause it's no longer (technically) free.

    1. Re:Patch as we always do. by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      The last full installer of widows 10 not the anniversary update (untested) will update both updates and clean installs of windows 7 and 8 keys with full activation of windows 10 after the free cut off date.

    2. Re:Patch as we always do. by Deathlizard · · Score: 1

      Yes i know that. That's where the 'technically' in my first post comes in. Anniversary Does not take 7 or 8 keys at least from the test I did but the December update still does and you can update that to anniversary no problem, but no one really knows if it's going to come up as a pirate at some point or another. I highly doubt MS will do this but you never know.

      It would have been just easier to extend the free offer indefinitely but if MS doesn't want to do that then so be it.

    3. Re:Patch as we always do. by Jeff250 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft recently released a fix for the issue of Windows Update pegging the CPU for hours here: https://support.microsoft.com/...

    4. Re:Patch as we always do. by Rockoon · · Score: 3, Informative

      rankly, if this finally fixes the issue where windows 7 searches windows update for hours taking 100% of a core and 1-2GB of RAM in the process then I'm all for it.

      Microsoft broke windows update on purpose here. The solution is to (1) disable windows update (2) reboot (3) download the june (?) update to windows update via web browser (4) install it (5) now download the latest windows update via web browser (6) install that too.

      Now it will work again.

      One of the reasons I was recommending people to upgrade to windows 10 was for this issue alone

      Thats why they broke it on purpose.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    5. Re:Patch as we always do. by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      Anniversary Does not take 7 or 8 keys why??

      It just makes it harder on people who want to a clean install down the road on systems with good keys be for the cut off date.

    6. Re:Patch as we always do. by yuhong · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, at this point it doesn't. They intend to roll out older updates into the rollup over time.

  28. Whining about what, exactly? by TiggertheMad · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There a lot of complaints in this thread about this new *feature*, but hasn't the horse already escaped the barn? If you are using Windows, you are trusting them to do the right thing with your OS when you install it. How is this rolled up set of patches really going to change things? Either you trust them to do things right, or you go download *nix.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:Whining about what, exactly? by Zocalo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's the all or nothing approach. Previously, you could read the patch notes (such as they were) and make an informed decision as to whether to "patch ASAP", "test thoroughly, then patch", "whenever", or "not required (e.g. telemetry/GWX crap)" on a patch by patch basis. Other than the paucity of real data and Microsoft's far too frequent attempts to slip a turd in there, that's really not all that different from any other patch system, on any other OS - unless you are compiling from source that you have looked personally diff'd and examined the changes, you are still trusting your patch provider to do the right thing; binary packages on *nix are no different from binary .msu or .exe files on Windows Update in that respect.

      Now, while you can still defer the installation, you don't have that per-patch flexibility. That could potentially mean that you have to choose between breaking something critical to you (e.g. the USB webcam borkage of the recent Windows 10 update) and leaving your system exposed to some critical and remotely exploitable vulnerability instead of just patching the critical hole and waiting for Microsoft to fix the USB webcam issue. Yes, when it works, the new approach will be simpler, easier for everyone to manage, and will no doubt help alleviate some of the problems with Windows Update's seriously broken version control mechanisms, but Microsoft's track record on "when it works", has been pretty dire lately. It's also much easier for Microsoft to slip something nasty in there, again something their track record on has been pretty dire of late.

      Frankly, I'm all for this latest brain dead move by Microsoft. Those that have a bit of technical nous can figure out some viable approach to patch management and additional security layers easily enough (they shouldn't have to, but still), while many of those that don't are inevitably going fall foul of a series of future USB webcam style screw-ups in the future. Same result in both cases; more pain for using Windows and a greater chance that alternatives will be considered, and anything that disrupts the Microsoft monoculture is fine by me.

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    2. Re:Whining about what, exactly? by aduxorth · · Score: 1

      Ditto regarding desktops, which I'm not too worried about, however on the Server Dept, not such a good idea.
      We have some older machines that we look after, that need to have the patches checked and blocked due to software/ hardware installed.

      Just hoping our patch mangement system will have a solution.

    3. Re:Whining about what, exactly? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Frankly, I'm all for this latest brain dead move by Microsoft. ... Same result in both cases; more pain for using Windows and a greater chance that alternatives will be considered, and anything that disrupts the Microsoft monoculture is fine by me.

      Me too, but after so many years of seeing what MS users are willing to put up with, and how few people ever actually do try any alternatives, I seriously doubt MS is going to lose any significant number of customers with these user-hostile moves. They're getting bolder and bolder, and do we see anyone actually switching? No, not really. Most likely, they've finally figured out (as I've been advocating for quite a while) that they can easily screw over their customers for greater profits and still afford to lose a few; the greater profits from the remaining customers will more than make up for the loss, and since most people (and especially businesses) are completely unwilling to leave the Windows ecosystem, there's really not much limit to how much they can be screwed, so MS might as well do so. It's every corporation's mission to maximize profit, and MS has the somewhat-unique position that their customers are locked-in and won't leave, so it's to their advantage to screw them over however they can for more money: higher license fees, advertising, spyware, etc. The biggest problem MS has, and the biggest competitor, is their older Windows versions, so the biggest danger is people just sticking with old versions. Well MS has figured out how to deal with that: forcibly push everyone to Win10 and then force-feed them advertising and spyware and use that to make more money on them. Maybe they'll intentionally break old hardware with Windows updates to get people to buy new PCs, which means new Windows licensing fees.

      Anyway, I don't expect them to lose very many users no matter how awful they get, but things have gotten easier for Linux users (such as things like online tax prep services, Firefox/Chrome taking over the web browser market, etc.), so I'm enjoying sitting back with some popcorn and watching all the Windows users suffer with some new outrage every week. It's a lot like watching Game of Thrones and seeing people constantly getting murdered or brutalized; most of them are jerks anyway so I don't feel too bad for them, and the same goes for Windows users: they made that choice, so they have to suffer the consequences.

  29. Just roll with it by Noxal · · Score: 2

    Should they use AutoPatcher? Switch to Linux? Or just disconnect their Windows boxes from the internet

    How about just...fucking apply the cumulative updates and move on?

    1. Re:Just roll with it by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      HELL YES.

      If you've decided you trust Microsoft to provide you the operating system that controls your computer and gives you access to all your critical data, then why are you doubting them when it comes to telemetry and spyware and advertising? Your chosen vendor has decided these things are best for you. It's asinine for you to say otherwise.

      If you disagree with your vendor about the software they provide you to this extent, then why are you still using them and their product? You don't trust them with their spyware, but you do trust them to give you a secure OS to protect your data? Is it not obvious how twisted that thinking is?

  30. Grudgingly, an improvement by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    Windows is a monolithic mess, and managing patches for it has always been difficult. A lot of these patches require newer updates anyway, so it's just easier to delay, test, and then iterate mass-deployment rather than manage on a per patch basis. In the past, I'd just wait for the service pack and install that when the time came rather than dealing with the individual updates, unless I really needed a fix RTFN. Then MS killed the service packs. I guess this is a return to that, with more frequency.

    If this is an issue about trusting individual patches, it's a fool's game. If you can't trust the patches, why are you trusting the OS and its vendor? MS has made it clear that they intend to market collected data on its users for profit. If you intend to use windows anyway, then keep that in mind when deciding your operating strategy. Use a util like OOSU to disable the crap, a start replacement that does not preload the shellexperiencehost/searchui processes (like startisback), build a custom whitelist for windows firewall, and do a system image before every monthly update in case something breaks. It's that or stick with an ancient version of windows or use another OS.

    1. Re:Grudgingly, an improvement by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      If you can't trust the patches, why are you trusting the OS and its vendor?

      Are you looking for someone safe to blindly trust?

      Thats your problem right there. Nobody is safe to blindly trust.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    2. Re:Grudgingly, an improvement by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      You say that all high and mighty like you haven't managed 80,000 computers who run dozens of combinations of software where our customers demand 99.97% uptime YET DEMAND no ransomware and security for HIPPA and PCI credit processing compliance!

      We CANNOT RUN some updates. IE 6 uses TLS 1.,0 and it breaks the clients 17 year old app so that security patch can not work. We use App-v to run the ancient app as one example.

      How is this an improvement? We have one guy whose sole job is mostly just testing patches all day long on a VM. THIS IS UNACCEPTABLE if any security patch requires patches that break IE 6, java 7, or any other app our customer demands we use.

      Oh you say tell the customer to update it? Ha. THey will tell us to screw off and go to a competitor and we signed a contract saying we support x,y, and z and will keep them secure too. Nothing is allowed to break

    3. Re:Grudgingly, an improvement by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      High and mighty? wtf? I just said that in my experience testing and updating 1 service pack a year is a lot easier than queuing up a half dozen 'batch tuesdays' worth of patches to test every month. The other nice thing about them is they weren't forced. Obviously, my solution for win10 only works well for personal machines, or maybe a small office.

      Overall, I agree with your post, but good luck managing all those patches. Don't be angry with me. Be angry with microsoft, and possibly the vendors of whatever other software that requires IE6 (wtf?). I get the bind you're in, but it sounds like your customer's software needs replacing.

    4. Re:Grudgingly, an improvement by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Of course not, but if you don't care about the trustworthiness of the vendor or OS, the trustworthiness of the patches is irrelevant as is the debate over patch control, at least as far as security goes.

    5. Re:Grudgingly, an improvement by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      It's better than that.

      There are no "Security Patches." People generally imagine you can skip CommDlg32.dll update 3, 4, 5, and 6, and only apply CommDlg32.dll update 7, because 7 is a security patch. Surprise: Update 7 is the 7th version of CommDlg32.dll. The "Security Patch" doesn't go into your CommDlg32.dll binary and modify that one little broken thing; it's all prior updates, rolled together.

      So if you avoided non-essential update 3, 4, 5, and 6 because "they might break something," now you have to tell Microsoft or your third-party software vendor that something in 3, 4, 5, 6, or 7 broke a particular tool, and you don't know which update did it because you skipped four updates.

      The counter-argument is you delayed 3, 4, 5, and 6, and someone else probably hit that problem already, so it's been fixed by now.

  31. If you don't trust the vendor ... by MacTO · · Score: 2

    If you don't trust the vendor, then it's time to look at someone else's products.

    That being said, we are talking about Microsoft here. Many people disagree with their decisions, but they are more or less reliable. Their marketing may be agressive, but they aren't going to go to the point of breaking a product on purpose. They are going to test their patches to the best of their ability, and they are a large enough firm to have the means to do it well. Yes, there will be problems for some users. That is to be expected. Unlike many vendors, Microsoft has relatively little control over the hardware their product is used on or the software that is used on their operating system. So do take precautions like doing regular backups and be prepared to restore those backups if you end up being an edge case where things break.

    While you can possibly do better than Microsoft, you can certainly do worse.

    1. Re:If you don't trust the vendor ... by HideyoshiJP · · Score: 1

      There is a stark contrast between Windows 10/Nadella-era Microsoft and Microsoft previously, though. Also, you say they have little control over the hardware, but when they break their own controller, that's pretty bad.

    2. Re:If you don't trust the vendor ... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      When MS released the Modern/Metro interface they got ripped, big time. When Linux screwed up with KDE 4/Gnome 3 fiascos, a LOT (far too many) of FOSS advocates were quick to make every excuse in the book. "Oh, it's OK because it is Linux." A lot of that happened right here on /.

      Oh, BS. I remember it quite differently: there was no end to the bitching and complaining about both KDE4 and Gnome3, and for good reason too. Gnome3 was so disliked that it directly spawned not one, but two new DEs: MATE and Cinnamon, because people were so mad about it and wanted Gnome2 (or something close to it) back. KDE4 was a disaster (though many blame part of it on distros making it the main KDE version even though KDE themselves said it wasn't ready for primetime use) that many people abandoned KDE and never came back. Both these fiascos were hugely controversial and generated a lot of ill feelings.

      However this is probably the first time ever, that I've heard the FOSS community really get upset, I mean upset at Linux itself, not at MS. Not that it seems to be doing much to stop (or redirect) the systemd juggernaut.

      Then you're either a liar or you haven't been paying attention. Gnome3 and KDE4.0 both caused just as much upset as systemd, if not more so (I'm leaning towards more so, because regular users notice their DE a whole lot more than they notice their init system). Personally, it sounds like you're a liar who's on the anti-systemd bandwagon and is trying to twist things there to get more people on your side.

  32. It's like nobody here knows by quonsar · · Score: 1

    you can just disable the Windows Update service. problem solved.

  33. I switched all my company 85 computers to Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I had everything switched to Linux Mint 17 last year
    If I was going to have to retrain everyone anyway. I was certainly NOT going to
    train them on a Micro$oft product that I had to pay for, and then pay to protect, then pay a Yearly fee

  34. Why not have an 7 SP2 and 8.2 to have a new base by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Why not have an 7 SP2 and 8.2 to have a new base level before starting this

  35. What happens to the zero day updates by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    What happens to the zero day updates that some times comes out.

  36. Don't give a fuck by Nyder · · Score: 1

    I don't care what MS does. Fuck them. It's obvious this is a plan to get people to upgrade to W10, which by the way they are forcing it, means you want to stay really far away from it.

    I wait on installing updates anyways, since MS has shown they will push broken updates and push telemetry data bullshit on windows 7 also.

    --
    Be seeing you...
  37. Switch by pubwvj · · Score: 1

    "This has one anonymous Slashdot reader asking what's the alternative"

    Switch OSs.

    Mac.
    Linux.
    Unix.

  38. Don't use Microsoft by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    for anything other than enjoying computer games or ensuring games created are well coded and are ready to sell.
    Move any real work over to an OS you have full control over.
    Use and enjoy Microsoft for games, end user testing, just move the real world important work away from any MS product.
    Trying to work around and with mandated, pushed updates is extra work. That time could go to product testing, development on any better OS that is totally controlled in house.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re:Don't use Microsoft by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2

      Easy for you to say. Home users rarely are impacted except for a few scattered Windows 10 users with funky old drivers from updates.

      What this shitstorm is going to hit is the enterprise. Where a patch can be devestating, but security and being up to date also is a must. Just imagine 100 applications and 70,000 computers all with different needs filled with very old quirky shit taped up where customers still demand we use IE 6 for much of it. We have a hack to get it to work under Windows 7 with Citrix. These patches break TLS 1.0 which is insecure yes, but our clients can not run without it!

      Explain how we can move to Linux and use active directory and group policy and security auditing and SCCM to push applications that are all win32 based in such an environment?

    2. Re:Don't use Microsoft by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Just imagine 100 applications and 70,000 computers all with different needs filled with very old quirky shit taped up where customers still demand we use IE 6 for much of it. We have a hack to get it to work under Windows 7 with Citrix. These patches break TLS 1.0 which is insecure yes, but our clients can not run without it!

      Explain how we can move to Linux and use active directory and group policy and security auditing and SCCM to push applications that are all win32 based in such an environment?

      I'm not sure how you're going to succeed in getting that mess to work reliably on Windows 10, much less Linux.

      With the situation that bad, you need to go back to those vendors and demand better software (esp. Linux versions). If they can't deliver, it's time to migrate to new vendors who can. We can blame MS for a lot of stuff, but I don't really see how we can blame them for shitty 3rd-party software vendors requiring IE6 for their "enterprise" application to work. The blame rightly goes to the customer for selecting this crap, and then not keeping on top of things and making sure mission-critical applications will continue to work on newer OSes, and not switching to vendors who have better products (or just building your own in-house if the ISVs are this bad).

  39. Re:Separate Your Habits! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What people really need to do is separate their Internet browsing habits from their real computer.

    You can do this by browising in a VM. Keep your real computer separate.

    Companies like Microsoft are trying to mine and profit from your personal shit. Keep those bastards out.

  40. easy by frovingslosh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Back in the days of XP SP1 I bought a laptop. It wanted to install a "security update" right away, but I put it off. wanting to get comfortable with my new computer and my new operating system first. I also used a live Linux CD on the computer a lot.And if you recall, these were the days that Microsoft was particularly vocal about their hatred for Linux. After about a month I finally told Windows that it could install the "Security Update". I didn't notice any obvious change in Windows, but I did see one big change with my laptop, it could no longer connect to the Internet when I ran my live CD!

    I checked everything. The CD was still the same and still had the proper CRC checksum. I made another CD anyway but, as expected, the results were the same. After a lot of work I finally tracked down the problem. The laptop NIC, like all modern NICs, had a small eeprom on it that stored the MAC address (that's how they can mass produce NICs that all have unique MAC addresses). And it turns out that there is plenty of extra space in the eeprom not needed for the MAC address, and the NIC used that space to store start up configuration settings, and mine were now set to values that made no sense and kept the NIC from working properly. Interestingly, XP ignored how the NIC was configured and reconfigured it as it wanted so that the device would work. But Linux, which worked fine on the computer for a month, didn't suspect that anything was wrong and tried to use my hardware as it was configured.

    Once I understood this I was able to run :Linux again. It was a pain, I had to manually issue some commands every time I booted the CD, but I was able to work around the problem. Eventually Linux code was changed to not trust configuration settings and configure the NIC in the same way that Windows did and I no longer had to manually reconfigure the NIC on every boot.

    I'm a cautious computer user. I have a decent hardware firewall and I also use a good software firewall (not one from Microsoft). So now I was in a position where the only malware that had ever done me harm was a Microsoft Windows Update. It wasn't too hard to figure out how to not experience another problem like this one. I've never accepted a software update from the malware provider who screwed me since then. I never will. I have had no malware experiences since then. So how I'll deal with the new update policy is to leave my Windows settings just as they are and not let Microsoft break anything else.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  41. Updates off by cfalcon · · Score: 2

    My main box has been Linux. It is a lot more hassle to run Windows stuff under Linux, of course, but the writing was on the wall when Windows 10 seemed so sketchy. When I found out that the telemetry updates had been pushed MONTHS prior and then went live for 7 and 8, that was what made it clear to me that I must switch sooner: that was hugely disingenuous. I dual booted for awhile to get stuff switched over, and now my box's Microsoft code is DLLs for WINE.

    What I COULD do, if I was inclined to keep a Windows partition around, is to grab just the security updates, and use those. That's probably what most slashdotters who give a fuck will do. I just don't give a fuck. I just can't ever keep up with the endless update debt of Windows, and fighting that seems almost impossible. It's this huge list of everchanging clusterfuck, and if I'm going to have to sysadmin my shit, it may as well be on an OS that isn't actively trying to fuck me over. I'd much rather prefer the accidental breakage of New Bullshit than the deliberate breakage of Known Hostile Entity.

    At work, our Linux boxes obviously don't care about this, and our Windows boxes are Somebody Else's Problem, but those are Enterprise, so who cares anyway.

    But I'll just use Fedora.

    It is said, Windows users will put up with anything. Well, I won't, which is why I'm not a Windows user.

  42. Re:My opinion... by cfalcon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    > Windows haters can do the same, in case it's over fake "security concerns" w.r.t. Windows 10, in which case, they need a one-way trip to Guantanamo Bay in order to learn what REAL invasion of privacy is. Fucking children.

    You should probably look into what you agreed to send Microsoft in the EULA (hint: everything you ever do, say, everyone you know, who you communicate with, the contents of those communications, etc etc etc).

    But keep going with that amazing comparison. You could write ad copy:

    "Microsoft Windows: It's better than being detained indefinitely and tortured in a military prison on a communist island!"

    That you have to compare a long term detainment and part time torture camp to the OS you bought and paid for shows just how Windows users will put up with anything. Ludicrous comparison to compare something you buy and pay for with indefinite detention.

  43. Re:Why not have an 7 SP2... they do (sort of) by bspus · · Score: 2

    MS recently released an official update roll-up for win7 SP1, including all post SP1 updates up to May 2016 (I think)

    They don't want to call it a SP because that would force them to increase the support deadline for the OS, which we know they don't want to do.

    That in fact is the reason windows service packs have gone extinct, or at least are rebranded as other forms of cumulative updates.

    Nothing for windows 8.x that I know of

  44. Re:Why not have an 7 SP2 and 8.2 to have a new bas by ayesnymous · · Score: 1

    What good would that be if SP2 includes all the telemetry patches?

  45. Simple, I don't run Win 7/8.1, I run Win 10 by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As a counter for all the MS hate around here and all the Linux fans who think it will be taking over the world someday soon...

    Windows 10 works just fine, I have it installed on over 20 computers, I've installed it on many more, it works very well...

    I used Windows 7 the other day, it felt old all of a sudden, amazing when it felt so new just 7 years ago, but it is now out of date and the idea of staying on Win 7/8.1 is just not reasonable anymore...

    Yes, you can use Linux if you want to, it has a purpose, but it won't be replacing Windows as the mass market desktop OS, well... ever...

    Something else might, OS X could if Apple would licence it for use on other computers besides Macs, but really there isn't anything else for the mass market...

    1. Re:Simple, I don't run Win 7/8.1, I run Win 10 by Ozoner · · Score: 1

      I do agree. I still use Windows because so much of my essential software will only run on Windows.
      I have a string of Unix qualifications dating back many years. I have a couple of Linux machines and periodically try new releases, but I always seem to run into some major problem...

      However my main dislike of Linux is what I perceive as the childish users and flakey implementations. Really garish screens with dragons, blood, skulls and the like.

      This whole thread is such a good example. The original OP asked a reasonable question, and got nothing back except a string of childish rants. If only the Linux fans could see that their schoolboy attitude is holding Linux back...

    2. Re:Simple, I don't run Win 7/8.1, I run Win 10 by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > Windows 10 works just fine if you don't care about being spied on.

      FTFY. When even MS admits they Are unable to stop Windows 10 tracking then you've just admitting to being MS's bitch. But I guess you have no respect for yourself since MS sure doesn't have any for you.

      Only a complete idiot blindly trusts Microsoft.

      The rest of us actually have a pair and don't allow MS to pretend they own our computers, nor our network connections.

      > I used Windows 7 the other day, it felt old all of a sudden,

      /sarcasm I used the wheel the other day. It felt a few thousand years old. It is now out of date and is just not reasonable anymore -- oh wait, it works.

      Ah, that explains it -- just another dumb hipster who thinks "Ooh, shiny!" is somehow more magically stable then something that has been around for a while. Windows 10 == more lines of code == more bugs, but keep on being a shill because Windows 7 works just fine for those of us using it.

      But I don't expect an apologist to understand why Microsoft's forced upgrades on Windows 7 and Window 8 users leaves a bad taste with customers and users start looking for alternatives.

    3. Re:Simple, I don't run Win 7/8.1, I run Win 10 by epine · · Score: 1

      I used Windows 7 the other day, it felt old all of a sudden, amazing when it felt so new just 7 years ago, but it is now out of date and the idea of staying on Win 7/8.1 is just not reasonable anymore...

      Nice job. You just nailed the limbic limbo: seven deadly sins, seven year itch, and even a bonus baby-boomer Streisand reference ("oh, oh, oh, feelings ...") complete with soulful ellipsis.

      You might want to bend your GF's ear and check her expiry date, I think she's due.

      So, yes, there are oh, oh, oh, reasons ... why this kind of language is universal in advertising, and shockingly out of place in a serious technical discussion.

    4. Re:Simple, I don't run Win 7/8.1, I run Win 10 by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      /whoosh -- talk about completely missing the point.

      1. Why is it even on in the first place ???

      2. Stop moving the goal posts. We're talking about Windows 10 spying. /sarcasm Oh I see, "Because everyone else does it that makes it OK in Windows 10" ?!?! NOT.

      MS should / could be setting a good example -- not abusing their power.

      You apologists crack me up with your stupidity; the rest of us have no issues keeping MS accountable on our machines.

    5. Re:Simple, I don't run Win 7/8.1, I run Win 10 by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      > Hipsters don't use Windows. They use Macs.

      I guess you missed the last 20 years of Visual Basic, and .NET.

      > You are hereby banned from Slashdot for a period of one day.

      Considering I've been using /. for ~20 years ... missing a day .. Yeah, that's nice.

      --
      Old grumpy programmer: Get off my LAN!

    6. Re:Simple, I don't run Win 7/8.1, I run Win 10 by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      What part of Opt-In do you not understand? The Opt. or the In?

      I didn't have to do this bullshit with Windows 7.

    7. Re:Simple, I don't run Win 7/8.1, I run Win 10 by reikae · · Score: 1

      I use Windows 10 on my main computer. It's just an OS; my self-respect and masculinity (or lack thereof) aren't in any way linked to whatever software I've installed on my PC.

      I don't know where you got the idea that the parent poster thinks new software is magically more stable than old software, as the poster didn't make any claims about the relative stability of Windows 10 and 7.

      Btw, what exactly do you do in order to "keep MS accountable" on your machines? I'm not even sure what keeping MS accountable really means here. (Possibly because English isn't my first language and I'm not very familiar with that expression in this context.)

    8. Re:Simple, I don't run Win 7/8.1, I run Win 10 by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I'm glad that W10 works for you. For me, on a recent laptop shipped with W10, no additional hardware, recent Kaspersky scan (which didn't find the Chromium malware, so go figure), it's got a lot of annoyances, and assorted things stop working for a bit.. It's made me nostalgic for when Vista was considered a bad update.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    9. Re:Simple, I don't run Win 7/8.1, I run Win 10 by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      And if Linux or OS X works for you, that is fine as well...

      Honestly, I'd like to see real competition in the OS dept, it would do all of us, including MS some good...

      But I see OS X being the real chance to have it, not Linux, for many reasons which have nothing to do with tech and everything to do with marketing, business, sales, and who has what incentive to promote things...

      If Apple, now that Steve is gone, would change direction (it isn't the 90s anymore when they did it last time) and licence OS X to everyone, they could have a real shot at it...

  46. Need I even update? by rewardian · · Score: 1

    Are Windows Updates even necessary? I've tried reviewing each and every Security update available via Windows Update, but I start zoning out when the patches involving random edge cases like spoofed printer drivers. When I re-install Windows 7, and then its updates, I do so out of emotional neuroticism, not a some measured security standpoint. I doubt I am any more secure after the several hour endeavor, though I appreciate Microsoft keeping all the packages available for me. I'll just turn it off.

  47. Reciprocity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Before w10, Win 7 updates ran effortlessly without issue.

    After w10, after banning telemetry and the rape of my systems, update checks sent every system into a stress test hell with 50-100% cpu for hours. It became apparent what MS is doing to systems that block their bullshit.

    Fuck m$.

  48. Sticking with Windows reluctantly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I've tried to like Linux and I just don't. It's OK in a pinch but it's not the OS I can use day to day on a desktop. I always end up with some flaky issue that just never resolves itself and I don't want to take the time to mess with it. Windows has it's downsides for sure, but it supports the hardware I use and runs pretty stable. I have a desktop with Win 8.1 and notebook with Win 10. My second choice would be a Mac which I used for about 10 years before returning to Windows fully last year.
    I understand those who think Linux is the greatest thing since sliced bread. But the fragmentation of distributions have totally messed up any chance of Linux winning over the average user. Unless you include OS's like Chrome OS and Android which are splintered versions customized by Google. I would welcome Apple allowing OS X to be properly installed on more hardware but I don't see that happening.

  49. Gradual move to Linux planned by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

    I already use Linux for highly sensitive stuff aka online banking. Because I don't trust Windows to handle my PINs and TANs. Firefox under Linux obviously works, or I could not do my online banking with Linux.

    Next will be e-mail, here I need to look for a way to move my mailbox over (currently in SeaMonkey on Windows). Essentially, I need an alternative for the e-mail part of MozBackup that works with Linux.

    I expect that Office stuff will be easy, as I'm already using Libre Office on Windows. Loading the same files into the Linux version should be no problem, right?

    Games can stay on Windows for now, although I might experiment with WINE a bit more.

    --
    C - the footgun of programming languages
  50. WSUS offline + PortableUpdate by Ormy · · Score: 1

    I run windows 7 because I use my PC for gaming. By the time win7 is no longer supported by the latest games I expect steamOS/linux to have caught up on gaming performance/compatibility and I can leave microsoft forever. I refuse to use win8.x or win10 and I highly doubt microsoft will ever make a good OS (like XP or 7) again. Until then...

    From October I will be disabling windows update and manually downloading the monthly security-only updates from microsoft.

    I will be using WSUS offline and PortableUpdate (for redundancy, they do the same thing) to download all currently available individual updates (minus telemetry and GWX updates) incase I need to format/reinstall win7 in the future. I tried Autopatcher but I find the interface slow and clunky, these two are better.

    1. Re:WSUS offline + PortableUpdate by dcollins · · Score: 1

      Are you sure that the security-only update will be accessible that way? I thought it was for enterprise users only, unavailable to home users.

      (And if they continue on this trajectory of Trojan-ing feature changes as security updates then I'm not sure how much even that buys us.)

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    2. Re:WSUS offline + PortableUpdate by Ormy · · Score: 1

      I thought it was for enterprise users only, unavailable to home users.

      I'm not sure how it will actually work (anyone know?) but I expect the updates will be available on microsoft's website for manual download by anybody. If you have to download it through windows update I should be fine since I'm using win7 Ultimate. Worst case, I can't access them directly but someone helpful will doubtless upload them to the pirate bay.

  51. Just swallow it by swb · · Score: 1

    The Windows 10 forced upgrade GWX thing was a pain in the ass, but from my perspective the Windows Update train has long left the station.

    We've been thrown a dozen or more updates every month for how many OS revisions via Windows updates? The summaries are at best links to a web of Microsoft KB articles, one of which might have some useful information about what the patch does.

    Maybe some desktop operations teams at bigger companies with the manpower, time and resources to check and test all of them before rolling them out dig into each and every one to find out what they do.

    But everyone else? It's just not even remotely practical to figure out what every single patch does, let alone try to understand the precedence angle on patches that require other patches first. There's just too many, the documentation is more or less written with the idea that nobody really reads it.

    So you basically just suck it up, assume that the majority of the time the patches work, do what they're supposed to do and improve security.

  52. Re:Conflict of interest: For MS, bugs are profitab by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't recommend using XP on any kind of network, certainly not the internet. Even if you use a modern, secure browser it just doesn't have a lot of the security features that they rely on to protect you. It's good for old games and that's about it.

    The reason XP has so many flaws is that it was designed to be compatible with single user operating systems, i.e. the Windows 9x line which itself was compatible with and built on top of DOS. To facilitate that they made the default account an administrator with full rights to do anything with no further prompts. The default on those systems is to trust everything, including network connections. They didn't want to break stuff. Even the firewall was only enabled when practically everyone was running a third party one anyway, and people still moaned about stuff written for Windows 98 not working.

    There is a lot of hate Microsoft for, especially the Windows 10 forced upgrades, but the evidence strongly suggests that most of it is just incompetence.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  53. Can you sue MS for copyright violation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm not a lawyer, but I read something about a creative work being automatically copyrighted the moment you create it. If MS copies that work to its telemetry, wouldn't that be an actionable copyright violation? A good lawyer (I know, an oxymoron) might be all that's needed to stop MS, Android, etc. from slurping our private files.

    1. Re:Can you sue MS for copyright violation? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      First, I doubt you can prove illicit copying, considering that the telemetry goes out encrypted to specific IP addresses. Second, are you sure there's nothing in the EULA allowing Microsoft a limited license to whatever you do?

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  54. Jhou vill take it and jhou vill like eeet by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is just Microsoft's way of removing your ability to cherry pick which updates you will install, and which ones you won't.

    This allows them to wrap one of those Windows 10 upgrade updates into a critical bug update so you have to choose.

    Kinda like how Congress wraps their stupid little pet projects and other bullshit that would never pass muster in a million years into a general budget or defense budget bill.

  55. Windows XP: Accounts must be "limited user". by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    Quote from the parent comment, about XP login: "... they made the default account an administrator with full rights to do anything with no further prompts."

    Good point. Our experience is that all XP user accounts should be changed to limited user. An XP limited user has very limited rights.

    Also, we use Windows XP with a software firewall and Malwarebytes Anti-Malware. We have only 16 Windows XP computers, so our experience is limited, but we aren't having problems, even though all those computers are connected to an internal network and the internet. (We have some valuable software that is not compatible with later versions of Windows.)

  56. Make backup images & new VM's now by sasparillascott · · Score: 1

    If you're running Windows 7 & 8.x and you have kept Microsoft's backported Win 10 monitoring updates out etc., be sure and backup your machines drives with a good imaging utility now - before we see what happens in October (so you have control and can restore).

    If you're wanting to setup new Windows VM's, move to 8.x (supposedly security updates through 2023, at least before all this) or do fresh installs of 7, do them now (and make backup images) before October while you still have access to the hotfix's, remember Microsoft is going to gradually roll old hotfixes into the big update blobs and presumably they'll go away.

    Long term though - the writing has been on the wall since 10 came out - Microsoft is a tyrant and you need to make a plan to move off of them if you don't want your PC (and all your data and communications on it) to be Microsoft's 8itch. Moving to a multiboot Linux and Windows setup - planning on a Windows VM in Linux for most Windows only needs with direct booting for games.

  57. How I handled it by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    I installed linux.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  58. Yes, we need lists of Microsoft's abuses by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    On April 8, 2014, Microsoft ended support for Windows XP. The day after, Windows XP began having keyboard problems. Keys were stuck; it was not possible to login. That was acknowledged by Microsoft and mostly fixed, although all Windows operating systems seem to have that problem occasionally. I wasn't able to find an article about that, although I saved it somewhere.

    One article about Microsoft's abuses and mismanagement: Windows at 30: Microsoft's biggest blunders (Nov 25, 2015).

    Quotes:

    "Microsoft has been its own worst enemy."

    "... disastrous Windows ME..."

    "Microsoft was found to have a monopoly in Windows, which isn't a crime. Microsoft used that monopoly to crush Netscape. Microsoft execs stupidly documented every step of the process in emails that ended up in court. None of the Microsoft senior executives came across well on the stand."

    "Microsoft got off the hook in 2001 because the new Bush administration's DOJ didn't want to pursue the case." ("didn't want"???)

    "With [IE6, Internet Explorer version 6], Microsoft lost an enormous amount of goodwill, as users began to understand that their computer was at risk because of a bad piece of Microsoft software."

    "From my point of view, ever since IE6, Microsoft has blatantly put its own financial interests ahead of its customers' security, for about a decade and a half."

    "Windows 8 and Windows RT: Killing the Windows brand"

    "Why would anyone in their right mind name an operating system "Windows RT," knowing full well that it won't run Windows programs? Beavis, meet Butthead, and a billion-dollar write-off."

  59. Windows by tystoy45 · · Score: 1

    Have not used a windows computer in over a decade, went to mac until this year, now I use nothing but linux. Tim Cook and company are on the way out of the computer business, Jobs died and now there is no innovation to be found on the apple campus. Switch to Linux!!! Windows & Mac suffer from the same thing, no innovation, lots of greed.

  60. I switched to Linux, here is why.... by cmiller173 · · Score: 2

    So I had messed around with various distributions of linux over they years (and frequently work on linux/unix/solaris systems at work) but had never taken the full plunge for my personal daily driver until a couple of months ago. I had take the Win10 upgrade from the win7 that had original shipped, and didn't have any issues with drivers/etc. but something kept bothering me. It started with not being able to control when updates occurred, I'd be in the middle of something and windows would decide that right now was when it had to update. There isn't much the torques me more than being interrupted when trying to hack out some code. Then I was trying to boot a newer linux distro off a thumb drive and found the startup process wasn't letting me get to the bios to choose the boot device, which I found out was due to the computer being in some sort of hibernate state even though I told windows to shut down. Apparently in order to improve boot times Win10 actually puts the system in a hibernate like state when you shut down, unless you hack the registry or use a special parm on a shutdown command.

    TL;DR I got fed up with it and switched to Ubuntu-MATE, and replaced the hard drive with a SSD. Booting from cold no takes 15 seconds including entering the password.

  61. It's time by Sheik+Yerbouti · · Score: 1

    You don't have to put up with Microsoft anymore. Switch to Linux I did in April and it's a perfectly viable alternative to Windows at this point. It's come a hell of a long way. And Steam on Linux is really a game changer (no pun intended).

  62. Re:Conflict of interest: For MS, bugs are profitab by operagost · · Score: 1

    And software does not have an "end of life", it continues to do what it always did.

    OK, you put a Linux 2.0 kernel-based system on the internet. It still does what it used to do.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  63. Tinfoil Hat anyone? by ET+Admin · · Score: 1

    Don't want to be spied upon? Don't have a medical record, SS#, bank account, ccard or address. And never, ever drive down the street in a licensed vehicle and enter any national chain store. So yes, a homeless gypsy born using a midwife living in the Alaskan tundra has the ultimate data security.

  64. Re:Blacklist except during update by sexconker · · Score: 1

    It'll just fill up a secret, super-hidden file while it can't access those IPs. Then when you allow the IPs to get your updates, it'll send off the files.

  65. Microsoft Has Abandoned Quality for $$$ by CAOgdin · · Score: 1

    I've used Linux and Windows (and Unix, and OS/360 and IBSYS, etc.) for years, and have several clients on Windows.

    The key issues for them are industry-specific software products at the core of their businesses which, without, they would have a significantly smaller number of business opportunities. These products are often poorly maintained, or not updated very often, and so require very strictly-configured Windows systems. Wine (or other attempts to emulate Windows) is not a solution; it merely introduces even more problems that need more frequent attention.

    I've always argued for Windows over Apple, because, my reasoning was, Windows is an "open" ecosystem, while Apple is a "closed" system. Now that M$ is closing up its' systems, giving us less stability, and forcing updates we don't want or need (e.g., "telemetry," which is just a cover word for "spying"), that distinction is significantly eroded.
    The "one-size fits all" approach to Windows maintenance leaves me scared, and unhappy.

    We still need stable operating systems, delivered by honorable people trying to do their best in a constantly-moving field, and I fear that we (and include myself) have let M$ corrupt themselves and their products by flocking to them despite rampant, unmitigated bugs and defects accepted without rebellion. For instance: Look at the sad state of affairs in the inability of huge fractions of the Windows 7 and 8 customer populations who can't get Windows Update to run reliably

    The market is ripe for a new commercial (not open-sourced) operating system that can become the new standard bearer, because I doubt Microsoft will reverse their trend; they're capitalizing on past success, and tempting future failure.

    I would prefer an open-sourced solution (for security reasons), but time has proven that there is little incentive for improving and stabilizing products that are good, but not rewarded with huge income. While I appreciate the Linux movement, and the common source of kernels, there is too little invested in pre-release testing, because there's no money...and it's been so successful, M$ clearly decided, last year, with Windows 10, to follow that same lead. M$'s twist is to make revenue from the final product. So far, not one of my clients (and I) have found a need to move to Windows 10, largely because of Microsoft's changes in licensing agreement, and their abandonment of insistence on quality in their paid-for and delivered products.

    Fortunately (for me), I've decided to retire at the end of this year, so I'll stick with my existing infrastructure at home 'til they pry it from my cold, dead fingers. My clientele are fearful, because the alternatives they've interviewed to take my place are generally unskilled, and barely able to change batteries in their laptops. So, part of the problem is the acceptance of these declining standards Microsoft USED to uphold, by the self-proclaimed "techies" who are too brainwashed to understand the problems they have to get around to keep business systems running, all the time.

  66. Ask Slashdot: How Will You Handle Microsoft's... by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Linux.

    --
    This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
  67. How will I be affected? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
    Not a bit.

    It's ... 6 or 7 years since I sacked Windows, and I see no reason to switch back.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  68. Re:My opinion... by segin · · Score: 1

    You should probably look into what you agreed to send Microsoft in the EULA

    Surprise! I did. And maybe I'm not as paranoid as you, but seriously, this is fairly standard stuff for any software that has built-in telemetry. Do you know why telemetry is important? Because it shouldn't take four years to fix the next Windows Vista. If Microsoft fucks up a UI decision, they need to know quickly and have the changes rolled back or fixed in the next update. Not four years later.

    Even if you want to push the "but Stallman said it's 1984!" argument...

    1. Stallman needs to lay off the drugs
    2. Your PC is literally the last thing the government's going after if they're going after you. Far easier to go after your communications than the device used to make said communications, with exceptions being in E2E encrypted comms.
    3. If Microsoft was really snooping all the interactions on your PC, backbone operators would notice a few gigs of traffic coming from every Windows 10 PC that wasn't there before. You think capturing just the keystrokes is enough useful data? No, you also include metadata such as typing speed, where it was typed, screenshots, etc., and that turns a few kilobytes of typed text info a few megabytes of metadata to make sense of it all. Somebody would notice something if it really was as bad as people like yourself try to argue it is.
    4. And most importantly Hanlon's razor applies to all human interaction. Never attribute to malice that which is easily explained by stupidity. And, let me tell you, people (governments included) are pretty damned stupid.

    Now, run along now, and make sure to refit your tinfoil hat because Wi-Fi's giving you brain cancer that can send your throughts to the NSA or whatever paranoid conspiracy crap you're buying into.

  69. Re:Why not have an 7 SP2... they do (sort of) by PingSpike · · Score: 1

    They've actually been doing this for a long time. Windows 2000 had what by all accounts was a SP5, just renamed a rollup.

    The weird part is they set the terms so there's not really much reason for the shenanigans that I can see. They could just set a drop dead date regardless of SP.

  70. Re:No more updates... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    MS seems to have decided that they have the rights to:
    1) Monitor all windows uses, without consent;
    2) Force any software changes they wish, overriding our own settings or expressed wishes;
    3) Turn windows into adware by pushing ads out to windows users - probably related to point 1;

    They absolutely DO have these rights (and they DO have consent: it's in the EULA you agreed to and which has the force of law as proven in court cases). If you don't agree with these terms, then it's your job as the customer to find a better vendor.

    My primary OS now is Linux, installed on multiple computers, and it would continue to be regularly updated. MS has made dumping their OS one of the easiest decisions to make.

    Too bad all MS users aren't as smart as you; most of them will just bend over and take it.

  71. Here is what I will do by mombodog · · Score: 1

    From this link https://blogs.technet.microsof...

    "Also from October 2016 onwards, Windows will release a single Security-only update. This update collects all of the security patches for that month into a single update. Unlike the Monthly Rollup, the Security-only update will only include new security patches that are released for that month. Individual patches will no longer be available. The Security-only update will be available to download and deploy from WSUS, SCCM, and the Microsoft Update Catalog. Windows Update will publish only the Monthly Rollup â" the Security-only update will not be published to Windows Update. The security-only update will allow enterprises to download as small of an update as possible while still maintaining more secure devices."

    So I am only going to apply Security-Only Updates. Download it from the Microsoft Update Catalog page, which can only be used with Internet Explorer. This will only be good for a currently patched PC starting in October.

    http://catalog.update.microsof...

    I also noticed this wording.

    "From October 2016 onwards, Windows will release a single Monthly Rollup that addresses both security issues and reliability issues in a single update."

    So I doubt it will include All optional updates, just security and reliability updates.

  72. Re:My opinion... by yuhong · · Score: 1

    I recommend that you read this instead: https://technet.microsoft.com/...

  73. An important quote from an KB article by yuhong · · Score: 1

    From https://support.microsoft.com/... :
    "Reduces the network connections on a Windows system that doesn't participate in the Windows Customer Experience Improvement Program (CEIP)."

  74. Re:My opinion... by segin · · Score: 1

    I run the insider preview, disabling telemetry would be nonsensical. I want Microsoft to see every colossal fuck up fucking up on my end before it gets pushed to your machine. One thing I've learned with 10 years of writing software, you can never have enough debugging feedback.