Slashdot Mirror


Welcome To Alphanumeric Car Hell (theverge.com)

Jason H. Harper, writing for The Verge: Et tu, Hyundai? Until recently, the Korean brand offered two upmarket cars, the Genesis and the Equus. The first name had biblical shades and the latter shared a title with a play where an adolescent likes to get naked and straddle horses. So while the connotations were a bit muddled, at least they were memorable. Now Hyundai has spun Genesis into its own luxury brand, akin to what Toyota did with Lexus decades ago. And in so doing, it has cast off those memorable names in favor of an alphanumeric naming strategy. The Hyundai Genesis is reborn as the Genesis G80 and the Equus sheds its horsey homage to become the G90, which guarantees that I won't remember the new names. I'll just call the G90 the Model-Formerly-Known-as-Equus. And while the two models seemed well differentiated before, now the distinctions are hazy. The G90 apparently has 10 more units of something over the G80. Perhaps it is 10 percent better. Ten percent bigger? Ten grand more expensive? Welcome to Alphanumeric Hell.The rest of the article is worth a read as well.

224 comments

  1. Obligatory xkcd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:Obligatory xkcd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, one strip that exemplifies almost everything that isn't funny about XKCD. It fits this article perfectly, which exemplifies everything that isn't worth reading about Slashdot.

    2. Re:Obligatory xkcd by Falos · · Score: 1

      Odd. You're clearly obsessed with edgy, and it shows that edgy manufacturers know edgyfags want the edgiest letters, X and Z. You should be tickled stupid, mate.

      I imagine everyone knew X has always been edgier than Z, but the gap is remarkable.

    3. Re:Obligatory xkcd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Calling someone "edgy" , and then a "fag" in the same sentence, marks you as something less-than-human.

    4. Re:Obligatory xkcd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Odd. You're clearly obsessed with edging, and fags.

    5. Re:Obligatory xkcd by sittingnut · · Score: 1

      subject may be worth a cartoon (not one of xkcd hits though), but not an article. and certainly not a post here .

      -
      "The rest of the article is worth a read as well."

      no.
      that assumption says more about the interests and level of quality of editors here now.

    6. Re:Obligatory xkcd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, one strip that exemplifies almost everything that isn't funny about XKCD. It fits this article perfectly, which exemplifies everything that isn't worth reading about Slashdot.

      Yet here you are, precious. Bet you've been here a long time.

    7. Re:Obligatory xkcd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all varieties. I spend very little effort on Harley riders, for instance.

      Can't cure edgycancer by ignoring it.

    8. Re:Obligatory xkcd by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      Wow, one strip that exemplifies almost everything that isn't funny about XKCD. It fits this article perfectly, which exemplifies everything that isn't worth reading about Slashdot.

      and, extrapolating the above to your post...

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    9. Re:Obligatory xkcd by Gussington · · Score: 1

      X and Z are so 1980's. The 90's saw the rise of e and i (lowercase of course) as technology leaders, and with the 2000's v and g had a run at the title.
      I'm not sure if we have landed on the coolest letters for this decade, maybe j and k?

    10. Re:Obligatory xkcd by Falos · · Score: 1

      Honestly, someone (raises voice enough for Munroe to hear) might be curious enough to take a look at the last decade's increased use of numbers and symbols in letter substitutions. Probably mostly movie titles. In the edgier genres. Loud trailers with lots of die-hard men, probably bald, shooting stuff and causing explosions and acting so alpha you run out and buy a truck while the protag delivers a badass oneliner right before the audio [almost] climaxes to abruptly cut to a single, echoing drum beat and the title hovers on black:

      F U R 1 O U S
      summer2017

  2. Numbers Are Easy by Luthair · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Weird names and letter combinations no one has a clue what any of them mean.

    1. Re:Numbers Are Easy by i.r.id10t · · Score: 4, Informative

      Numbers are easy, until marketing and/or legal gets involved.

      Porsche numbered their cars based on project number. So the iconic 356 is the 356th project that Porsche Engineering undertook.

      Except Ferry didn't want his first customer to think they were the first... so the first project was #7, so the 356 is actually project number 349 (this is where marketing kicked in for him).

      This carried on with sub assemblies - the 744 transmission, etc.

      Then the 901 was introduced. And after they made 34 cars, Peugeot called their legal department and it was decided that they had an issue with any other car maker making a car and badging wtih a 3 digit number where the middle number is a 0. And so overnight the 901 became the 911.... of course, one of those first 34 cars with the 901 badging are VERY collectible, even over and above any other early 911...

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    2. Re:Numbers Are Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weird names and letter combinations no one has a clue what any of them mean.

      Intel lead the industry in incomprehensible names. The car makers are low tech amateurs.

    3. Re:Numbers Are Easy by kalpol · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And the numbers actually meant something back in the day at least for Mercedes and BMW. A 280SE was the 2.8 liter Super body with fuel injection (Einspritz), so the midsize sedan, unless qualified with an option like the 280SE 4.5 or the 450SEL 6.9, which happened to be a totally different production line than a standard 450SEL. A 300D was the 3.0L diesel, not super or long, so the small sedan, and a 450SL was the 4.5 liter Super Light (sports car). my favorite was a 500SEL (5.0L Super Einspritz Lange). It all made perfect sense.

      --
      12:50 - press return.
    4. Re:Numbers Are Easy by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Sounds similar to the old BMW naming scheme. The first digit denoted the vehicle body type (3 series, 5 series, 7 series) the next 2 digits were for the engine typically the displacement or some close approximation there of (18=1.8l, 20-2.0l, 23=2.3l, 30=3.0l 40=4.4l) then there was a letter typically an i indicating fuel injection c for coupe, l for long wheel base (7 series only) or x for all wheel drive. So if I said I owned a 325i someone would know I had a 4 door 3 series with the 2.5 liter engine that was fuel injected or if I said I had a 740il you would know I had the really big 7 series with the fuel injected 4.4l engine. Granted there were some additional modifiers but they were logical such as M, ti, d, or Z which tell you specifics about the cars. Now they have gotten rid of a lot of the meaning of the last 2 digits when they started putting turbos in the engines so a 535i doesn't have the little 3.5 liter v8 that the older cars has.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    5. Re:Numbers Are Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      BMW made perfect sense too. In the '80s:

      E30 325i - 2.5L
      E30 325e - 2.7L
      E28 528e - 2.7L (same engine as the 325e)
      E28 535i - 3.4L
      E23 745i - 3.2L (with a turbo)

      See, perfect sense. It only got worse from there.

    6. Re:Numbers Are Easy by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      The 535i e28/e34 never had a V8. Was a silky smooth 3.5l straight 6. The e34 530i was a 3l V8, the generation after had a 530i which was a 3l straight 6.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    7. Re:Numbers Are Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stick to what works I suppose - make - model - trim level.

      Chevy Impala LS
      Pontiac G8 GT

      Impala is a well known model name, memorable no doubt to people over several generations. Even I own an unremarkable 2002 Imapa LS - memorable to me because its first car I bought in the US, the car I bought my first (and so far only) daughter home from hospital in, the car that towed all out shit in a 5x8 UHAUL from Alaska to Seattle in 4 days.

      G8 is a bit generic, but those of us in the know from down under, know its really just a LHD rebadged Holden VE Commodore - hopefully the next car I buy will be one of these.

      Haundi or what ever it is on the other hand is memorable for making cheap cars that fall apart. Ive known their cars for 20 years, and they are still the same boring bland cars since forever, they didnt even make good fleet cars because they were unreliable.

    8. Re:Numbers Are Easy by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      I dont trust the car manufacturers with any data at all, not just mileage claims and pollution ratings.

      I was bitterly disappointed to find Ford Galaxies no longer look like aircraft carriers and have 7 litre engines, despite being "500" to compete with the Fiat 500, and the Fiat 500 is now 1300cc, and not 500cc.

      The manufacturers are a dishonest as the salesmen.

      For those who don't know, a Ford Galaxy is supposed to look like this: http://pinthiscars.com/image-post/334-67-ford-galaxie-4-door-wallpaper-4.jpg.html#gal_post_334_67-ford-galaxie-4-door-wallpaper-4.jpg

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    9. Re:Numbers Are Easy by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      In the 90s there was a 323 and a 325, both with a 2.5L engine.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    10. Re:Numbers Are Easy by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      I was referring to the e39 535 which did have a 3.5l V8, but still the last 2 numbers do tell you the displacement even if it isn't clear if it is a big six or the v8 but that would be something that is specific to the body version. So while not old like the e28/e34 we aren't talking the current F10/F11 bodies either. Personally I have never driven one of BMW's big sixes but the little sixes are really nice engines and pretty damn durable and I would imagine that the big six would be as well just with more punch. I had an '85 e28 with the little six (2.8l) that unfortunately got plowed under by a guy who was higher than a kite and didn't see me stopped legally and rear ended me while going 55-60mph.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    11. Re:Numbers Are Easy by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      We never got an e39 535i so I never knew they existed :-) We had the 540i e39, and I guess the market wasn't big enough for both the cars (they must have been very close in characteristics).

      The m30 engines were actually quite great. Super smooth revver all the way up to redline. The one I drove for a few months was a much better driver than the 540i it was replaced with. I'd love to buy a new car with those engines.

      Finally, what a coincidence - I had an '86 e28 with the 2.7l engine (m20). Very nice torque curve and very low revver. Called the Eta engine, if I recall correctly.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    12. Re:Numbers Are Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They still do.

      E250 means a 2.5L engine from the E class. C330 means a 3.3L engine from the C class.

      As you note, E used to stand for Einspritzmotor but is commonly referred to as executive in their marketing material now, while I believe C stands for compact.

    13. Re:Numbers Are Easy by superdave80 · · Score: 1

      I question your definition of 'perfect sense':

      So, the 325i is a 2.5 liter? OK, sounds good.

      So the 2.7 liter should be 327i, right? Oh, no, wait it's 325e?

      Oh, there is ANOTHER 2.7 liter model? THAT one must be the 327i, correct? What? It's the 528e? Where did the 8 come from?

      You already lost me.

    14. Re:Numbers Are Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What they mean? Because "Impreza", "Cobalt" and "Focus" tell you oh-so-much about the vehicle.... Riiiight.

    15. Re:Numbers Are Easy by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Ford 500s were supposed to have 500 ponies (back in the day). Other end of the market vs a Fiat 500, which had 2 gerbils (one of which was dead) for power.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    16. Re: Numbers Are Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoosh much?

    17. Re:Numbers Are Easy by maz2331 · · Score: 1

      They still follow roughly the same logic, though now the last pair of digits are a "performance category" that is only nominally related to the actual displacement. Thus we have the 2.0 l turbo-4 in the 320i (180 HP), the (much better tuned) 2.0 l turbo-4 in the 328i (240 HP), and the 3.0 liter turbo-6 in the 340i (340 HP). In the previous generation, the 328i put out 230 HP from a naturally-aspirated 6, and the 335i did 300 HP from a turbo-6. With the slight bump in power, they bumped the nomenclature to match.

      Of course, it's all marketing spin and BS, but at least it's still internally consistent.

    18. Re:Numbers Are Easy by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      Stick to what works I suppose - make - model - trim level.

      Chevy Impala LS
      Pontiac G8 GT

      Impala is a well known model name, memorable no doubt to people over several generations. Even I own an unremarkable 2002 Imapa LS - memorable to me because its first car I bought in the US, the car I bought my first (and so far only) daughter home from hospital in, the car that towed all out shit in a 5x8 UHAUL from Alaska to Seattle in 4 days.

      Not to be confused with the recently discontinued the Chevy Impala Limited LS. Which really meant it was a 2012 Impala, still sold alongside the new Impala, to minimize confusion. Much like the Malibu classics.

    19. Re:Numbers Are Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would reply with the numbering scheme of both Boeing and Airbus, but the whoosh is already in play.

    20. Re:Numbers Are Easy by Cederic · · Score: 1

      My Mercedes is a '250' but doesn't have a 2.5l engine.

      Someone I work with has a 350e and it has two engines, neither of which are 3.5l.

      So no, it's not tied to engine size. It's more akin to the 'relative performance' metric that BMW use.

    21. Re:Numbers Are Easy by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I think Nvidia may have Intel beat when it comes to adding numerics though.

    22. Re:Numbers Are Easy by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Weird names and letter combinations no one has a clue what any of them mean.

      You people are complaining over one number, try the EVO VIII MR FQ 340... or it's full name, the Mitsubishi Lancer Evoltion VIII MR FQ-340.

      There are 3 different models of the EVO VIII MR FQ, a 320, 340 and 400 BHP model. Beyond this you have other marques in the Lancer Evolution line, the RS and GSR in addition to the MR line... Not to mention the normal Lancer saloons (ES).

      Hyundai on the other hand tend to have quite simplistic naming conventions.

      i10 - City car (A segment)
      i20 - Subcompact (B segment)
      i30 - Compact (C segment)
      i40 - Medium (D segment)

      This is a lot less confusing than their previous models (Getz, Sonata, Granduer).

      Numbers are an easy way to differentiate between models that are similar but have different engines or levels of tune. A BWM 320i and 328i share the same chassis and engine, but at different tunes (and different turbos IIRC). Its much easier for the consumer than having to guess that the Renault Felcher has a 1.5L N/A and the Renault Clitoris has a 2.0L Turbo.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    23. Re:Numbers Are Easy by mgoddard · · Score: 1

      Numbers are easy, until marketing and/or legal gets involved.

      Numbers are easy but cannot be trademarked. The alpha numeric also isn't much better (remember i486 vs Pentium?)

    24. Re:Numbers Are Easy by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      Weird names and letter combinations no one has a clue what any of them mean.

      Names like G80 eliminates problems with copyright infringements.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    25. Re:Numbers Are Easy by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      I dont trust the car manufacturers with any data at all, not just mileage claims and pollution ratings.

      I was bitterly disappointed to find Ford Galaxies no longer look like aircraft carriers and have 7 litre engines, despite being "500" to compete with the Fiat 500, and the Fiat 500 is now 1300cc, and not 500cc.

      The manufacturers are a dishonest as the salesmen.

      For those who don't know, a Ford Galaxy is supposed to look like this: http://pinthiscars.com/image-post/334-67-ford-galaxie-4-door-wallpaper-4.jpg.html#gal_post_334_67-ford-galaxie-4-door-wallpaper-4.jpg

      worse than that, the Dodge Intrepid could not carry even one fighter plane.
      when i was a kid, i would drive a meteor and mom would drive a comet, and dad would drive a galaxy

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    26. Re:Numbers Are Easy by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      https://www.google.com/search?...

      They might have issues with Cherry.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    27. Re:Numbers Are Easy by bibendum59 · · Score: 1

      Other manufacturers were similar. At one time Volvo used a naming convention where the first digit identified the series, the second the number of cylinders and the third the number of doors (e.g. 242 = 4 cyl, 2 door) . Ferrari used the total engine displacement as the first two digits and the number of cylinders as the third (e.g. 308=3.0L, 8 cyl), but complicated things by using the displacement of a single cylinder for 12cyl cars.

    28. Re:Numbers Are Easy by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Actually, Infiniti had a pretty good naming system until they totally messed it up. The series were all letters, G, J, M, Q, etc. The second letter, which was always X if present, meant it was a SUV. The next two digits were the engine displacement. Sometimes there was an extra letter at the end, 't' for touring, 'x' for all wheel drive on the non-SUVs, but that was relatively uncommon.

      For example.
      G20t - G series, 2.0 L engine, touring. G35x, G series, 3.5 L engine, all wheel drive. The G series has also had 3.7 L, and 2.5 L engines, so you'll see G20's, G25's (rare), G35's, and G37's running around.
      I30 - I series, 3.0 L engine. It was basically an upgraded Maxima, so when Nissan changed the Maxima from a 3.0 L to a 3.5 L, the I30 became the I35.
      M35 - M series, 3.5 L engine. If you upgraded to the 4.5 L engine, you actually got a M45.
      QX56 - Q series SUV, 5.6 L engine.
      JX35 - J series SUV, 3.5 L engine.
      and so on. Until they changed their naming system, the only vehicle that didn't fit was their first SUV which was the QX4 (actually had a 3.5L engine).

      Then they totally messed it up with the Q-nonsense. I still don't know what they were thinking.

  3. Math is hard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (90-80)/90 != 10%

    1. Re:Math is hard by danbert8 · · Score: 2

      No, English is imprecise. If the G80 is 80% good and the G90 is 90% good, than the G90 is 10% better than G80 even though G90 isn't 10% better than G80 is.

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    2. Re:Math is hard by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, English is imprecise. If the G80 is 80% good and the G90 is 90% good, than the G90 is 10% better than G80 even though G90 isn't 10% better than G80 is.

      90% of something is 12.5% more than 80% of something.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    3. Re:Math is hard by danbert8 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but "10% better" English translated into math terms could mean add 0.1 OR multiply by 1.1. A mathematician would interpret it in the latter way, a common person may assume the former.

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    4. Re:Math is hard by aix+tom · · Score: 1

      on the other hand: "percent" is the unit, meaning "per hundred"

      So 90 "per hundred" IS 10 "per hundred" better than 80 "per hundred". Note that the unit doesn't change in this case.

      Of course or 90 pieces or 90 kg or 90 mp/h or 90 "cool" AREN'T 10% better than 90 pieces or 90 kg or 90 mp/h or 90 "cool".

      But 90% are 10% better than 80%, the same sense that 90 mp/h are 10 mp/h better than 80 mp/h.

    5. Re:Math is hard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still wrong, but your example might help you understand.

      90mph is 10mph AND 12.5% faster than 80mph. Simplest explanation: 10mph is 1/8th or 12.5 percent of 80mph. With a baseline of 80mph, 10mph=12.5%.

  4. How much is that weight in elephants? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Worst article ever? What next? Some lazy ass complains that he can not understand numbers in clock?

    1. Re:How much is that weight in elephants? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Worst article ever? What next? Some lazy ass complains that he can not understand numbers in clock?

      "The United States notwithstanding, most of the rest of the world has sensibly moved on to measurements based on factors of ten - centimeters, kilograms, and so on. But for some bizarre reason, people worldwide stubbornly refuse to move to a decimal time system. What the heck does 11:15pm mean, anyway? And noon - when in the world is that? I can't understand any of it. Why anyone insists on sticking with such an obtuse, arcane, and difficult-to-master system of time measurement is beyond my comprehension."

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:How much is that weight in elephants? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Who are you quoting there? My guess is Bennett Haselton.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    3. Re:How much is that weight in elephants? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      I was just throwing together a made up quote in response to the gp.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    4. Re:How much is that weight in elephants? by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      Worst article ever? What next? Some lazy ass complains that he can not understand numbers in clock?

      "The United States notwithstanding, most of the rest of the world has sensibly moved on to measurements based on factors of ten - centimeters, kilograms, and so on. But for some bizarre reason, people worldwide stubbornly refuse to move to a decimal time system. What the heck does 11:15pm mean, anyway? And noon - when in the world is that? I can't understand any of it. Why anyone insists on sticking with such an obtuse, arcane, and difficult-to-master system of time measurement is beyond my comprehension."

      do places/organizations that use 24 hour time, like the military, have 24 hour watch faces or just use the same 12 hr thing? (actual question, not some sort of failed attempt at humor)

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    5. Re:How much is that weight in elephants? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      It depends.

      There are 24 hour analog faced clocks, but mostly they use digital clocks as they are easier to read.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    6. Re:How much is that weight in elephants? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a wall clock with a 24 hour watch face.

    7. Re:How much is that weight in elephants? by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      It depends.

      There are 24 hour analog faced clocks, but mostly they use digital clocks as they are easier to read.

      aha, talk about overlooking the obvious, i never thought of that, thanks.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  5. Alternate title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Internet Man Confused By Numbers; New Media Sponsors Ramblings

    1. Re:Alternate title by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      First thing I thought when I saw this and read the summary was "That's not the style of story Slashdot would normally run".

      Reading the "story" itself confirmed it.

      Either the new owners don't get Slashdot, they want to turn it into something more profitable or that someone somewhere had a vested interest in running this story.

      Honestly not sure which.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    2. Re:Alternate title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The new owners clearly don't get Slashdot. They post the DEC logo whenever a story about digital media or music comes up. They think it's just some random word and have no clues about the history and innovations that DEC created.

    3. Re:Alternate title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      100% correct. The new boss is the same as the old boss.

      The new guys think that they know what the site is about, but it's pretty clear that they don't. They're shoehorning their 'vision' into the site with worthless articles like this while paying lip service to the notion that 'oh yeah, we'll totally make Slashdot awesome again'. I also see that the cross promotion has finally started (see the 'Innovative Wirefly plan comparison tool!' link at the top of the page)

      It's also not surprising that the former crop of editors was fired, but what is surprising is that the new 'editors' are somehow so much worse that I have serious doubts that they could summarize their way out of a wet paper bag.

      TL;DR - Slashdot's new owners talked a big game, but apparently have no clue how to give the community what it wants.

    4. Re:Alternate title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to see some stats on when Slashdot suddenly sourced the verge/buzzfeed for seemingly every other article. Is there some kind of revenue sharing system for referral clicks?

    5. Re:Alternate title by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Slashdot's new owners seem to occasionally run anti-UBI articles, but take about 2 minutes to mark any pro-UBI submission as SPAM.

    6. Re:Alternate title by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      When did /. have competent editors?

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    7. Re:Alternate title by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      A minor improvement over Forbes with its malware-ridden adverts.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    8. Re:Alternate title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never, really, but at least a few of them at least halfway knew what the people coming to slashdot might want to talk about. In fact, I get the impression that 'editing' slashdot might be these guys' first jobs, and that they got them because they are personal friends/employees of the new boss. I can't find much on the other 'editors', but BeauHD works for another BIZX company (phonedog) doing awful videos, which apparently makes him qualified to work for Slashdot somehow?

    9. Re:Alternate title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to see some stats on when Slashdot suddenly sourced the verge/buzzfeed for seemingly every other article. Is there some kind of revenue sharing system for referral clicks?

      It's a side effect of replacing the entire Slashdot team with millennial doofuses

    10. Re:Alternate title by NotAPK · · Score: 1

      Thanks for posting the link through to YouTube: that guy is insufferable!

  6. No! No It Is Not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The rest of the article is worth a read as well.

    TFS wasn't worth the read, manishs. No need to bother going to The Verge to read the article.

    1. Re:No! No It Is Not. by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's no need to bother going to The Verge, period.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:No! No It Is Not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After reading TFS, I checked to see if this was a Bennet Hasselton article.

    3. Re:No! No It Is Not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, this "news" is actually just someone's reaction to news that is already fairly irrelevant to most people.

      Next you'll tell me that electronics and things I actually care about are named this way too!

  7. it's a log scale by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    wait till you see G100

  8. news that matters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who cares what cars are named? what a huge waste

    1. Re:news that matters? by avandesande · · Score: 1

      I think that's the point though...we are in post marketing times and people just don't care what the car is named and car makers are acting accordingly.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
  9. 1936 Packard by Anna+Merikin · · Score: 1

    Was their 120 20 per cent better than the 100?

    Was their Twin Six twice as good as their plain six?

    Is the AMD FX8350 twice anything of the FX4175?

    What's your point?

    1. Re:1936 Packard by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      Is the AMD FX8350 twice anything of the FX4175?

      What's your point?

      i7, i5, i3.. Intel went to complex numbers.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    2. Re:1936 Packard by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      A 1936 Packard, or a 1996 Packard Bell?

    3. Re:1936 Packard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      i7, i5, i3.. Intel went to complex numbers.

      That's because the performance gains are mostly imaginary.

    4. Re:1936 Packard by rvw14 · · Score: 1

      The first computer I purchased was a Packard Bell 286.

  10. The rest of the article? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That excerpt was awful. How can the rest of the article be "worth a read as well"? I don't think I want any more insights into the goings on of an author who is way too attached to the idea of a teenage boy getting naked with horses.

  11. Slashdot's new slogan? by jenningsthecat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "News nerds don't give a shit about. Stuff that matters only to marketdroids".

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    1. Re:Slashdot's new slogan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm still trying to figure out if they were trolling us by insinuating that 90 is 10% more than 80.

  12. The rest of the article is worth a read as well. by 110010001000 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "The rest of the article is worth a read as well."

    Well the summary was complete shit.

  13. WTF Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What the fuck is an article like this doing on here?

    Whatever next, a review of Britney's new album, or an instructional video showing how to assemble IKEA furniture ?

    1. Re:WTF Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of what I stumbled across the other day.
      Not as funny as when I was young. But people grow up you know. I guess Britney nude on acid on IKEA furniture would be just right for /..

      https://thump.vice.com/en_us/article/ikea-acid-youtube-video-part-one

  14. /. is becoming more and more irrelevant by cpotoso · · Score: 5, Insightful
    /. is becoming more and more irrelevant

    why is this a worthy topic? why is this a worthy article?

    Gosh, I miss the good old days where interesting things were discussed rather than these stupid topics.

    1. Re:/. is becoming more and more irrelevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. There is no place in a site "for nerds" for this generic marketing dribble. At least post a video of someone shocking the G80 and G90 with a Tesla coil to see which one survives longer.

    2. Re:/. is becoming more and more irrelevant by wannabe · · Score: 1

      I think your nostalgia is clouding your perception of what was reality. Much the same as so many people in the older generation have come to forget the realities of the 1950s and 1960s and instead believe The Andy Griffin Show or Leave it to Beaver was some historical documentary on true life.

      Sadly, there has always been crap that rolled through the front page. Back in the 90's we complained that other sites did a better job whether it was Fark or Kuro5hin or later on Digg or some other now-defunct site that was left burning in the wreckage of the dot-com meltdown. I'll give you the signal to noise ratio around here has been on the low side for a while, but even before Taco and the founding posse drove off in their gold plated Lamborghinis stuffed full of sweet, sweet VA Linux stock options there was still noise.

      Now get off my lawn. Grandpa has to take a nap!

      --
      "Draw them in with the prospect of gain, take them by confusion." Sun Tzu
    3. Re:/. is becoming more and more irrelevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because interesting tech articles now have 20-30 comments each on them after 24 hours but you put up a flamebait article or an article any wanna-be can make a joke about and suddenly the numbers go up to 3 digits in 5 hours. Do you think 98% of Slashdorks have any interest in Irish tax law or the fiscal health of Apple? Heck no... if it were Dell getting slammed by the EU over tax issues it would probably make the front page but it would have about 40 comments.

      The editors here know what kind of article butters their bread. There's no serious tech culture here in the land of haters and armchair lawyers.

    4. Re:/. is becoming more and more irrelevant by spun · · Score: 1

      You were here in the 90s, Mr. 8 digit user ID? Because I was, and no, it was never this bad in the 90s. There was none of this crap. Yes, this is my first time logging in in about 10 years, and I did it just because this article was about the dumbest thing I've seen here, and I had to point and laugh. Seriously.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    5. Re:/. is becoming more and more irrelevant by redmid17 · · Score: 2

      The upside is that we haven't seen Bennett in months!

    6. Re:/. is becoming more and more irrelevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      by wannabe ( 90895 )

      You were here in the 90s, Mr. 8 digit user ID?

      I think you lost your reading glasses, old man. :)

      I had a 5-digit ID too, and from my memory, there's some truth to both of your statements. Slashdot the past few years has been markedly worse than it used to be, but even back in its "glory days" it still had a lot of garbage that attracted the same kind of complaints.

      One of those content slumps is why I quit following the site for a while, and when I got around to checking back I'd forgotten my password and no longer had access to the email I used so recovery was no option. Which is why I post as AC now, if I bother to post at all. For a while I tried to remember the password, but eventually I quit, and by then I didn't even want to make a new account. IMO it hasn't been worth making a new account here for years.

    7. Re:/. is becoming more and more irrelevant by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Just don't tell anybody that a 1TB HDD doesn't actually have 1024^4 bytes of capacity or there'll be 97 articles about that.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    8. Re:/. is becoming more and more irrelevant by yoshi_mon · · Score: 1

      Someone upvote the AC to let the lofty 4 digit UID guy know that he needs to take a refresher course in digit counting.

      I want to 2nd that /. has always had some fluff as its content. And props to wannabe to remind us of when K5 existed and was the answer to /. "going soft".

      It could very well be a slow tech news day. Talking about how marking droids, or trashing them if you so prefer, is a time honored tradition so why not have a thread about it.

      --

      Really, I know what I'm doing...Ohhhh, look at the shiny buttons!
    9. Re:/. is becoming more and more irrelevant by mister_playboy · · Score: 1

      Speaking of things worth pointing and laughing at...

      Yes, this is my first time logging in in about 10 years

      Who posted this comment, then?

      You were here in the 90s, Mr. 8 digit user ID?

      There aren't any 8-digit UIDs yet, we still have half of the 7-digits UIDs unassigned.

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
    10. Re:/. is becoming more and more irrelevant by wannabe · · Score: 1

      Not to get into some kind of old-fart pissing match, but yes, I was here in the 90's. I signed up in '98 I believe. BTW - while I would think someone sporting the 4-digit UID would know, the UID is in the parens right next to your name. Hence mine is 5-digits.

      While I don't quite have a grasp on your personal tolerance for stupidity, I'm going to make an educated guess based off my spotty memory for seldom-travelled internet sites and say that if you spend some time combing through the archives, this article might actually rank as Pulitzer worthy material. I specifically seem to remember a series of articles put out by John Katz that had something to do with bringing a computer to a little girl in the backwaters of Afghanistan in late 2001 / early 2002 that makes this article look like Hemingway. Of course, if I recall, the whole story was bullshit and he got called out hard for it. But then again, most of Katz's work will go down with scrapings from the bottom of a toilet bowl in the annals of slashdot stupidity.

      But, whatever floats your boat in the quality department. I'm not here to judge.

      --
      "Draw them in with the prospect of gain, take them by confusion." Sun Tzu
    11. Re:/. is becoming more and more irrelevant by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      Was it outrageous when Infiniti did exactly the same thing?

  15. Please shut up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The G90 apparently has 10 more units of something over the G80. Perhaps it is 10 percent better. Ten percent bigger? Ten grand more expensive?
     
    Linux kernel 4 apparently has one more units of something over the Linux kernel 3. Perhaps it's 33% better? 33% bigger? 33% more buggy?!?!?!?!!?!
     
    Oh! The Humanity!
     
    You sound like a crying little dope with that kind of moron ravings. If you can't handle that there are revision numbers, version numbers and model numbers maybe you need to seek some special attention, precious little snowflake.

  16. "The rest of the article is worth a read" by LichtSpektren · · Score: 4, Funny

    No, it really isn't.

  17. 90 compared to 80? by Vermonter · · Score: 1

    That would be 12.5% more, not 10% more

  18. With a reason? by jxander · · Score: 4, Informative

    So long as there's rhyme and reason to the numbering scheme, I have no problem with it.

    BMW does this, and it's awesome. The first digit is the body style (3 is small, 5 is mid, 7 is large), and the next 2 digits are the engine displacement. They add letters on the end for extra little features: i for Fuel Injection, s for Sport Package, L for Luxury Package, etc. So a 328is is a small car with a 2.8L engine, fuel injection and sport package.

    They recently added even numbers to denote 2-door variants, and left odd numbers for 4-doors. They've also started putting x or i in front for SUVs or Electric/Hybrids respectively, but the concept holds. The alphanumeric scheme serves a purpose.

    --
    This signature is false.
    1. Re:With a reason? by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Best Car Name Ever: Bonus points* if you can tell me where it is from:

      6000 SUX

      * These be worthless "Whose Line" style points.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    2. Re:With a reason? by almitydave · · Score: 4, Informative

      BMW does this, and it's awesome. The first digit is the body style (3 is small, 5 is mid, 7 is large), and the next 2 digits are the engine displacement. They add letters on the end for extra little features: i for Fuel Injection, s for Sport Package, L for Luxury Package, etc. So a 328is is a small car with a 2.8L engine, fuel injection and sport package.

      Except when they don't, and put a 2.0 liter engine in a *30, or a 3.0 liter engine in a *28.

      They recently added even numbers to denote 2-door variants, and left odd numbers for 4-doors. They've also started putting x or i in front for SUVs or Electric/Hybrids respectively, but the concept holds. The alphanumeric scheme serves a purpose.

      The odd/even thing is stupid, especially when the 4 series is just a 3 series with 2 fewer doors, but the 6 series is not related to the 5 series stylistically (other than sharing a platform). The fact is that BMW is prone to marketing nonsense in their names like every other manufacturer. Hyundai is switching to alphanumeric model names, because that's what all mass-production luxury car makers do (it's true of BMW, Audi, Mercedes, Lexus, Infiniti).

      --
      my, your, his/her/its, our, your, their
      I'm, you're, he's/she's/it's, we're, you're, they're
    3. Re:With a reason? by jxander · · Score: 2

      Hell yeah, Robocop. Back when Robocop was both a solid action flick and remarkably prescient social commentary.

      --
      This signature is false.
    4. Re:With a reason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not true anymore. The 2.8 is long gone. BMW 328i is now a 2.0.
      The BMW 335i is a 3.0. Both engines are also turbo.

    5. Re:With a reason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So long as there's rhyme and reason to the numbering scheme, I have no problem with it.

      BMW does this, and it's awesome. The first digit is the body style (3 is small, 5 is mid, 7 is large), and the next 2 digits are the engine displacement. They add letters on the end for extra little features: i for Fuel Injection, s for Sport Package, L for Luxury Package, etc. So a 328is is a small car with a 2.8L engine, fuel injection and sport package.

      They recently added even numbers to denote 2-door variants, and left odd numbers for 4-doors. They've also started putting x or i in front for SUVs or Electric/Hybrids respectively, but the concept holds. The alphanumeric scheme serves a purpose.

      My Nissan 350Z is smaller than a Bimmer 3, with a bigger engine and it has a big fucking Z in the middle of the steering wheel. YMMV, literally.

    6. Re:With a reason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      BMW's inconsistency isn't even new. In the 80's the 325i had a 2.5L, the 325e and the 528e both had the same 2.7L, the 535i had a 3.4L, and the 745i had a 3.2L (with a turbo).

    7. Re:With a reason? by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1

      So long as there's rhyme and reason to the numbering scheme, I have no problem with it.

      BMW does this, and it's awesome. The first digit is the body style (3 is small, 5 is mid, 7 is large), and the next 2 digits are the engine displacement.

      Except when they aren't; these days, the next 2 digits may, or may not, have any connection to the engine size. For example, both the BMW UK page giving technical data for the 3 series and the BMW USA page for building your own car, after selecting the 3 series sedan indicate that both the 320i and the 330i have a 2-litre turbo 4, with the 330i just having a more powerful version.

    8. Re:With a reason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except its not. 328i is a 2.0L turbo, and the 435i is a 3.0L turbo. The 540i is also a 3.0L turbo, roughly the same engine but slightly higher output, because reasons.

    9. Re:With a reason? by ausekilis · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This used to be true, but has changed somewhat after the E46s (model year 1998-2005), E90's (2006-2011) and F30s (2012-present). For example, the E46 328ci did have an inline 6 cylinder 2.8L. The E90's started introducing turbos. And most of the F30s have a turbocharged 4 cylinder that displaces less than 2L (source), the 335 has a turbocharged 6. It used to be reliable and have that direct correlation to some aspect of the car, now it's just a rough estimate of comparable performance, 318 < 328 < 330 < 335.

    10. Re:With a reason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those bastards. Screwed up a perfectly good naming convention.

      captcha: condemns

    11. Re:With a reason? by jxander · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Except when they don't [wikipedia.org], and put a 2.0 liter engine in a *30, or a 3.0 liter engine in a *28.

      Fair point. There are exceptions (most notably the M and Z series) but even those follow clear patterns for the most part. The Z1 - Z4 were simply sequential, they made a Z1 roadster until they upgraded the design to Z2, etc... (Z8 and Z9 are still dumb.) And the M series are just amped up versions of existing models, based on the associated number. An M3 is a 3-series (small frame) with all the bells and whistles. Likewise an M5 is a tricked out 5-series (mid-size).

      The odd/even thing is stupid

      No argument here. I didn't like the decision, especially as someone who drove an old 328is 2-door (1999 E36 platform). But I still respect that they've made a choice (whether or not I agree with that choice) rather than just slapping random letter number combos on their cars.

      --
      This signature is false.
    12. Re:With a reason? by jxander · · Score: 1

      Ahh. My last bimmer was an E36, so apparently I missed all the major fuckery.

      At least they're keeping the relative performance numerically sound, if not adhering directly to the physical characteristics.

      --
      This signature is false.
    13. Re:With a reason? by jxander · · Score: 1

      The Z is a few cm shorter, but a couple cm wider. For all intents and purposes, they're basically the same size

      Pardon the watermarks:

      BMW E36 Blueprints

      350z Blueprints

      350z Super GT Blueprints

      --
      This signature is false.
    14. Re:With a reason? by swb · · Score: 1

      But everyone on the Internet refers to BMWs by some "Exx" nomenclature, instead of their nameplate model designations.

      I'm not sure why this is done, either, unless it's to show you're some kind of BMW sophisticate. I would assume the common labels with model year would provide the same information.

    15. Re:With a reason? by Sique · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The Z8 and Z9 are named thus because the project began as Z07 with Z meaning roadster, and 07 being a homage to the BMW 507 from the 1950ies.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    16. Re:With a reason? by Sique · · Score: 1

      The E number is the body. As you can mount different engines into the same body, and have different shapes (sedan, station wagon, coupé...) based on the same body, the E number tells you the actual body. BMW doesn't have model years as the american manufacturers do, but the E number is a close relative.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    17. Re:With a reason? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      They recently added even numbers to denote 2-door variants, and left odd numbers for 4-doors

      You mean like the 4 Series Gran Coupe? Is that the not 2 door but 4 door, not Coupe but 4 door car that makes a lot of sense of BMW's naming?

    18. Re:With a reason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the 3 series has a 320i which is a 2.0L turbo, a 328i which is a 2.0L turbo also (with more power) and a 335i which is a 3.0L turbo. They haven't stuck to their old naming system (which was useful and made sense) for many years

    19. Re:With a reason? by dargaud · · Score: 1

      Yes, many european car brands used to have sensible numbering schemes. The higher the numbers (1xx / 2xx / 3xx...) the more expensive / luxurious the car, and the higher the end digits, the more recent they were. More or less. Then in the 90s they all shifted to completely dumb named like the mudpit, the vavina, the ratist or crap like that, impossible to remember 6 months after they came out. I'll sure be glad when this fad is over. Yup, my car is a T5, with one number increase every 15 years.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    20. Re:With a reason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing you have stated actually hold true today as others have pointed out.

      L stand for Long wheel base, not for Luxury.
      There is also a 2-series with 5 doors, that is not related to the 2-series with 2 doors. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BMW_2_Series

    21. Re:With a reason? by jxander · · Score: 1

      That's because everyone on the internet it looking to do repairs or modifications. Exx is a chassis (aka "platform"), so it will dictate compatibility. Any number of engines or transmissions can be installed into that chassis over several years

      For example, the E36 was the 3-series platform through the 90s. A replacement headlight, seat, stereo, etc. will be compatible in any of those years, and any engines (e.g. a 1992 316i and a 1995 325tds).

      And yes, the year and model will provide that same info, but platform number is a broader and more useful number in the repair niche

      --
      This signature is false.
    22. Re:With a reason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They add letters on the end for extra little features: i for Fuel Injection

      Oh, so all the models without an "i" don't have fuel injection? As a matter of fact, the i does not stand for "Fuel Injection," but rather "inexpensive." The i BMW models are more affordable. All BMWs use fuel injection. Glad I could help!!

    23. Re:With a reason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your BMW decoder ring is decades out of date. They're as bad as everyone else now. The last two digits haven't reliably stood for displacement in a long time, and the rest of their naming scheme is just as screwed-up.

      For example, the current 328i doesn't have a 2.8L engine, it has a 2.0L turbo.

      Both the 4-series and 6-series cars can be had with 4 doors. To add to the confusion, they insist on calling these cars "coupes."

      They haven't made a car without fuel injection since the Carter Administration, so the 'i' is largely perfunctory and is occasionally swapped out for other letters when they feel like it. Such as 'e' to denote the low-output eco version, and later on to mean hybrid, or 'd' to denote diesel. Some turbos have a 't', some don't. It's an unholy mess.

  19. And more... by courcoul · · Score: 1

    Then, of course, the maker might get perverted into adding subversions. So we can go to G90.3.5

    And maybe even take a hint from Apple's phones: G80.7+

    1. Re:And more... by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      Then, of course, the maker might get perverted into adding subversions. So we can go to G90.3.5

      And maybe even take a hint from Apple's phones: G80.7+

      If Infiniti add subversions, BMW will add gits.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    2. Re:And more... by balbeir · · Score: 1

      You mean behind the steering wheel ? Aren't those already part of the standard BMW package ?

    3. Re:And more... by Nikkos · · Score: 1

      This is a total rip-off of Infiniti. There's even pictures on some of the infiniti boards that clearly point out how Hyundai has copied body mouldings, taillight designs, etc, from Infiniti.

      Now they're even copying Infiniti's numbering scheme - G37, Q70, Q80, etc.

  20. CPUs, graphic cards... by guises · · Score: 1

    There was a time when I paid attention to new graphic cards and all of their extra confusing numbering schemes. Looking back, I don't know why I wasted so much time on that. The only time it matters is when I'm shopping for a new one, which doesn't happen that often, and I buy a new graphic card way more often than I buy a new car.

    ... There is one thing though. Nvidia used to get a little sleazy when it comes to model numbers, rebadging previous generation GPUs as lower-end chips of the current generation. I don't know if they're still doing that, but it's something that's obviously intended to exploit the ignorant. Which is me, now. Probably not so much of an issue for cars.

  21. Apparently the amount of crap you report... by Darth+Twon · · Score: 1

    Is inversely related to ones ability to math.

    90 is actually 12.5% bigger than 80.

    Unless of course they meant G80 and G90 as base-17 numbers, in which case, the G90 is really only .357% 'better' than the G80. Probably not worth the added cost.

    --
    Take this sig and smoke it.
  22. 500 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If numeric names are so hard to remember, then why is it that when you say 500, everyone immediately thinks Fiat?

    1. Re:500 by tomhath · · Score: 1

      I don't. But if you mentioned a Z/28 I might be with you.

  23. So confusing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree, 80 to 90 doesn't tell you NEARLY as much information about the different cars as Genesis and Equus. What a well thought out criticism.

    1. Re:So confusing by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      I agree, 80 to 90 doesn't tell you NEARLY as much information about the different cars as Genesis and Equus. What a well thought out criticism.

      Genesis: The original humans were naked.
      Equus: They learned to ride horses before they learned to put on clothes.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  24. Yeah by Ender_Stonebender · · Score: 1

    Because this kind of naming has worked out so poorly for brands like Mercedes and BMW . Not too mention Lexus and Acura with similar naming schemes for most of their cars.

    Maybe Mr. Harper should pull his head out of his butthole?

    --
    Loose things are easy to lose. You're getting your hair cut. They're going there to see their aunt.
    1. Re:Yeah by omnichad · · Score: 1

      It's what you do for luxury models. You put numbers in the name, but hide the numbers in the price.

    2. Re:Yeah by Sique · · Score: 1
      For Mercedes and BMW it worked, because you could just tell from the specs how the car was called. You knew that an Mercedes with a 3.0 litre injection engine was most likely be called the 300 E (Einspritzung being the german word for injection). You knew that a 320 ti was a compact BMW with a 2.0 litre twin cam injection engine.

      Since a few years, especially BMW has left that path, and now there is no connection between specs and naming anymore. Mercedes decided that the E no longer points to the type of the engine, but shall denote the size, E being the medium sized Mercedes cars. It's to early to tell if the new naming scheme eats into the selling numbers of BMW and Mercedes.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    3. Re:Yeah by lgw · · Score: 1

      Oh, no, you never hide the price of a status symbol! That's why the number associated with most luxury cars goes up with the price.* If your neighbor also gets a luxury car of the same brand, you can immediately see which is most expensive just by comparing the number on the back. Audi is the odd duck there as they don't decorate their model number with fine-grained pricing information.

      *Tuner sports models are the exception.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  25. On the verge of total garbage. by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    I think I gave up on this site because of censorship in their forums. They couldn't handle ideas contrary to their narrative. Not really surprised they are generating this kind of innanity.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    1. Re:On the verge of total garbage. by Frederic54 · · Score: 1

      You, old guy like me, remember the good old /. from 1998, but this article is really useless!

      EDITOR: Please no more article like this.

      --
      "Science will win because it works." - Stephen Hawking
  26. What exactly is this post about? by fredrated · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Someone doesn't like the name of a car?

    1. Re:What exactly is this post about? by ausekilis · · Score: 4, Funny

      I liked playing the "Anal __blank__" game with car model names. Ford has some of the best "Anal Ranger", "Anal Expedition", "Anal Excursion". Plymouth has a zinger with their Prowler. Now with model names being replaced by numbers, how are we bored people supposed to laugh about car names?

    2. Re:What exactly is this post about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like your game, but it seems most of the far East don't know how to play. Anal Qashqai, Anal C'eed and Anal Corolla don't really work.

      Fortunately, Mitsubishi saved the day with the Anal Lancer.

    3. Re:What exactly is this post about? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Someone doesn't like the name of a car?

      Yes, but if we instead ran an article about how CPU's no longer put their speeds into the product title Slashdotters would loose their cool.

    4. Re:What exactly is this post about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's an ad for Hyundai's brand new "Lexus" brand.

    5. Re:What exactly is this post about? by dargaud · · Score: 1

      Anal corona is the winner you mean ! French cars aren't bad either: anal laguna, anal zoe, anal master, anal expert, smart anal, anal captur, anal golf (!), anal cactus (!!!), and for the winner: anal fiesta...

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    6. Re:What exactly is this post about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anal Equus and Anal Pony do seem to work, and to hurt very much thank you.

    7. Re:What exactly is this post about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try playing that game with some old Austin/British Leyland cars like the Princess,Ambassador and Maestro.
      Volvo would be crap, "Anal 340GXL" doesn't have the same ring to it (no pun intended)

    8. Re:What exactly is this post about? by Bratch · · Score: 1

      I drive an Anal Frontier, where no man has gone before.

      --
      Beware of the Redittor who loans you a Sharpie.
    9. Re:What exactly is this post about? by chooks · · Score: 1

      Hmm...anal leaf.. .sounds more like an anatomic structure

      --
      -- The Genesis project? What's that?
    10. Re:What exactly is this post about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      anal 69 sounds challenging, though.

    11. Re:What exactly is this post about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You missed the originator of the game and all-time never-to-be-bested entry, the Ford Probe.

    12. Re:What exactly is this post about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. They'd tight it, you stupid nigger.

  27. What. The. Fuck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously... what? A south korean company is going to launch new cars under a new brand. Ok. A bit offtopic for this site but anyway. And the rest of article? numbers are bad? funny names? "a Bimmerophile is still likely to parse the difference between a 230i Coupe and the M240i xDrive, just because they’re passionate about the brand"?

    Sorry, I forgot to add more interjections above, but I'm in shock for what passes for "articles worth publishing or aggregating" these days...

  28. Best to avoid offending someone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because somewhere on the planet, someone will take offence to a name, feel triggered by the microaggression hidden in the name if you read it backwards and sites like theverge will be all over them, claiming that it's a part of a plan by the white patriarchy.
    So better choose a non offensive name.

    1. Re:Best to avoid offending someone by Sique · · Score: 1
      It has not necessarily to do with not offending anyone.

      Rolls Royce for instance had a model named Silver Mist. It never sold in Germany. But not because someone was offended by the name, just because Mist in German means manure or garbage. Who would drive an expensive car and tell everyone that he drives manure?

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    2. Re:Best to avoid offending someone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, I seem to recall in the 1970's the Chevy Nova had a problem in Mexico and other Spanish speaking countries because the name Nova translates to No go. and that hurt sales.

  29. Volvo models by DudeTheMath · · Score: 4, Funny

    Once upon a time, Volvos had a three-digit model number: the first digit was the series, the second the number of cylinders, and the third the number of doors. So you'd know just from the model that the 245 was the lower-end four-cylinder station wagon (the "fifth door").

    When they ditched that system (in the '80s?), the first model was something like the 740; their own ad poked fun at themselves, asking "No doors?"

    --
    You save only 59 seconds over 8 miles by going 75 instead of 65. Do you really have to pass that guy? Do the Math!
    1. Re:Volvo models by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who owned several Volvos from this era... The badges on them often neglected the last digit for a generic 0. Both of my 240s (244 and 245) had no designations of doors on the body badge. It was understood when you called a parts guy or the dealership what you were talking about when you said 244. There's plenty of documentation for the 700 series that does reference the third digit... The 900 series too. The only time I ever recall seeing the third digit on a body badge was my 142.

    2. Re:Volvo models by dieguiariel · · Score: 1

      i still have a 244, (1975), and the badges mantain the last digit.

  30. As opposed to names by tomhath · · Score: 1

    Would the author prefer meaningful names like:

    Lucid Lynx
    Karmic Koala
    Jaunty Jackalope
    Intrepid Ibex
    Hardy Heron
    Gutsy Gibbon
    Feisty Fawn
    Edgy Eft

    Yeah, I know they're sorted alphabetically. But which is Version 8.x, 9.x, etc?

    1. Re:As opposed to names by Fire_Wraith · · Score: 1

      There's nothing that stops you from doing both:

      Gingerbread 2.3 – 2.3.7
      Honeycomb 3.0 – 3.2.6
      Ice Cream Sandwich 4.0 – 4.0.4
      Jelly Bean 4.1 – 4.3.1
      KitKat 4.4 – 4.4.4
      Lollipop 5.0 – 5.1.1
      Marshmallow 6.0 – 6.0.1
      Nougat 7.0

    2. Re:As opposed to names by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I know they're sorted alphabetically. But which is Version 8.x, 9.x, etc?

      In that case, the letter IS the version # for all practical purposes. You don't need to match it up to a number.

      Until they loop the alphabet in a couple of years. But maybe they'll increment the letter of the second word (Angsty Beaver?)

  31. Non-US car markets change names all the time by magarity · · Score: 1

    In China in each body style adjustment after 2 or 3 years gets a new name. For example, what in the US is called the VW Jetta over the years is called Santana, Bora, Sagitar, Lavida, and several others I forget.

  32. If you're on SlashDot and driving a Hyundai by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 0

    If you're on SlashDot and driving a Hyundai, your time might be better spent upgrading your skills and/or switching jobs.

    >> The rest of the article is worth a read as well.

    Not if it's as annoying as the summary. Besides, this is SlashDot: RTFA is for noobs.

    1. Re:If you're on SlashDot and driving a Hyundai by Arkham · · Score: 1

      If you're on SlashDot and driving a Hyundai, your time might be better spent upgrading your skills and/or switching jobs.

      Maybe so, but those Genesis aren't the cheap Hyundai Excel many of us remember as a $5995 car. The cheaper G80 is a $47k car, not that I'd consider getting one.

      --
      - Vincit qui patitur.
    2. Re:If you're on SlashDot and driving a Hyundai by Howitzer86 · · Score: 1

      What cars do successful programmers drive? When is it too late to try to become one?

      I made the mistake of dropping out of college with just an associates degree, to pursue a job outside of that industry that was offered to me. It was a big leap for the time and I was quite happy. Now I see what I've managed to do with it, and I'm no-longer so happy.

    3. Re:If you're on SlashDot and driving a Hyundai by morgandelra · · Score: 1
      I own one, a 2010 Genesis serves me well, I do a fair amount of cross country driving crossing over mountains and it is a pleasure to drive.

      I had had a Hyundai Elantra from 2002 that had impressed me greatly with its reliability and how it took everything I through at it from the DC Beltway to water crossings to some (small scale) off roading fun. I could afford something more expensive and "upscale" in 2010, but this met my needs at a much better price, so I am quite happy with it all.

    4. Re:If you're on SlashDot and driving a Hyundai by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an AAS, but I didn't "drop out" with "just" an AAS. I got an AAS and was done with college.

      I'm quite successful, but it took a while to get there. As I finished that AAS degree, the dot-com bubble burst and I took generic office work for about 4 years. I taught myself to do PHP and turned that into a successful interview at a desperate development company. From there, I kept working, learning, and getting better. Now, I have about a decade of .Net and SQL Server experience, which is currently something that can get you a decent paycheck just about anywhere outside of hipsterville (a.k.a. San Francisco). I live in "flyover country", where that decent paycheck goes pretty far. I have a house with a mortgage payment that is less than half of a month's salary, I own my car outright, and I've saved enough money to have a safety net for at least 6 months if things turn sour. Any excess savings goes toward improving the value of the house. And I'm not even terribly careful with spending on games, gadgets, and impulse-buy items.

      Don't knock an AAS. It can take you pretty far. Your finances will generally improve the farther you get away from high cost-of-living urban centers.

      And the best part is that I got my AAS entirely from state scholarship programs. I had (and still have) exactly zero student debt. Plus, without a BS degree, you get an instant rejection by brain-dead HR scrubs in companies you don't want to work for anyway. Filtering works both ways.

  33. News for nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    stuff that matters....

  34. Check your hypotenuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    10 percent better than 80 is 88...so that's not it

    1. Re:Check your hypotenuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He meant percent points, why is everyone hang up on that?

  35. Their goal is clear... by Parker+Lewis · · Score: 1

    Hyunday already changed the internal design of its cars to be "restrained", like the German makers. Now they're changing the external layout. The next natural step is to change the names to be alphanumeric, like Mercedes/BMW/Audi.

  36. I killed a Hyundai in Vegas... by Travco · · Score: 1

    just to watch it die. The radiator was blocking the view out the windshield. The Lexus had a slightly cracked plastic cover on it's bumper. Air bag didn't go off, wasn't needed. - Who cares - it was a Hyundai

  37. Audi still seems to get it right by Arkham · · Score: 1

    Audi A4 2.0T quattro : Translated:
    A4 = more expensive than A3, less expensive than A6
    2.0 = 2.0 liter engine
    T = Turbo
    quattro = all wheel drive
    It would be nice if they were all that straightforward.

    --
    - Vincit qui patitur.
    1. Re:Audi still seems to get it right by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 0

      You mean boring?

      Why would I drive an A4, when I could drive a Giulia instead?

      --
      Eat the rich.
    2. Re:Audi still seems to get it right by Arkham · · Score: 1

      You mean boring?

      Why would I drive an A4, when I could drive a Giulia instead?

      The article isn't about the car, it's about the naming of the car not making sense. While a "Giulia" is a unique name, it doesn't tell you anything about the car and how it compares to others in the Alpha lineup.

      As to why to choose the A4, here's a reason.
      Giulia Reliability POOR
      A4 Reliability VERY GOOD

      Maybe that's compelling for you, and maybe it isn't.

      --
      - Vincit qui patitur.
    3. Re:Audi still seems to get it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alpha

      It's Alfa

    4. Re:Audi still seems to get it right by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      My point is that the "A4 2.0T" is a boring-ass name, but "Giulia" is evocative and exciting. Who cares whether it tells anyone anything about engine size or number of wheels driven. If you need that information advertised on the back of your car for everyone to see, isn't that a little pathetic?

      Why should the name tell me anything about where a car sits in a given lineup? The only people who care about that are the ones who always desperately need to one-up their neighbors.

      A proper name gives a car an identity of its own, a connection. That's why Alfa dropped the alphanumerics (LOL), because they sell cars for enthusiasts, not driving appliances made to fit into a strict hierarchy.

      Don't get me wrong, I drive a Peugeot 406 TS4, which is another boring name meant to signal car size, model generation, trim level and engine variant. The boring-ass name does not stop me from enjoying my car, but I would have preferred a proper name for it. Personally, I just call it "Pierre" ;-)

      --
      Eat the rich.
    5. Re:Audi still seems to get it right by toddestan · · Score: 1

      The idea behind those model names is to emphasize the brand, not the model. So you're not supposed to say you're driving a A4 2.0T, but an Audi. Or you don't say you drive a MKT, but a Lincoln, or a LS460, but a Lexus, or a Q50 but an Infiniti. Making a big deal out of the model itself is for less prestigious brands such as Ford or Toyota with their Mustangs and Camrys. Or so the theory goes.

  38. begs the question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe this article could be improved if it begged a question.

  39. You're not supposed to make an informed decision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CPU makers do the same thing, and it's on purpose. You basically just need to know one thing: The car you bought is not the current model. There are faster, more economic, more roomy, more whathaveyou cars for you to buy. They can not risk that the market establishes a memorable "this is the one to get" model. That would make their investments into the other models worthless and lock them into a combination of features that might not be particularly profitable to them.

  40. I don't care this much about cars by jdavidb · · Score: 1

    which guarantees that I won't remember the new names

    I don't care enough about cars to remember their names. I just need four wheels and a seat. I'm lucky if I remember the name when I really need to know it like communicating with a mechanic or my insurance.

    And I'm happy that way!

    1. Re:I don't care this much about cars by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      I can never remember the make and model of my car...

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:I don't care this much about cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because cars beyond mid 70's, with few exceptions, are not worth remembering. They are filled with "safety" crap you can't disable, emission crap you can't disable, special metals, glues and crap, they are ugly pieces of plastic crap to take you from A to B and the whole trip is just horrible and one can't just wait to be at point B as soon as possible.

  41. Rock names by TheSync · · Score: 1

    The worst naming was a company that used rocks for their product names.

    Granite, Amethyst, Quartz, Topaz. These were video encoders, transport stream processors, video servers, etc., but I was never able to remember which was which.

  42. Two Whole Fucking Numbers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That IS HELL! Regardless of fact that I don't give a shit about Hyundai. This is hell and the devil is poking me in the ass with his big fat red swollen pitchfork-dick!
    THIS IS HELL!

  43. Equus -- That's not Correct by Beezlebub33 · · Score: 1

    If I remember Equus correctly, the young antagonist doesn't 'straddle' horses, he blinds them. That's a rather weird error to make.

    --
    The more people I meet, the better I like my dog.
  44. Computer analogy by omnichad · · Score: 1

    Buying a new car is now just like buying a new GPU. Bigger numbers sometimes mean better, except when they don't.

  45. Alphanum hell has been here a long time by Dracos · · Score: 1

    It all points back to every luxury brand, regardless of origin, wanting to seem European, especially like German upscale brands. What the non-Euro brands rarely understood, or eventually forget, is that there is (or was) logic and meaning in the Deutsche-luxo name soup: it told you something about the car itself, usually something about size class and/or powertrain.

    Some of the invented Japanese luxury brands got this, and mostly still do. Cadillac and Lincoln just need to stop trying to be non-American with their nonsense model names (MKZ? CTS4? WTF).

    These Hyundai model names have no meaning because they're pure marketing constructs. Beyond "G is for Genesis" and a vague notion that 90 is somehow more than 80, they're empty.

    1. Re:Alphanum hell has been here a long time by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      It seems the most important part is the history of your branding.

      For instance, Peugeot has been doing the digit-zero-digit naming scheme since forever ago. So you know a Peugeot 107 is a small car, and that it's newer than a Peugeot 106. It wasn't 100% bulletproof, for instance the 306 replaced the 309. But on the whole, it mostly made sense.

      However, I think they started to notice a problem a couple of years ago when they launched the *08 models, so now they all just end in 08, and they've become ordinary numeric model names, with no direct connection to which model generation.

      And their stable-mates at Citroën pulled an Audi some years ago and just went C-Zero (electric car), C1, C2, C3, C4, C5, C6 and C8. Booooring :-(

      --
      Eat the rich.
  46. Ill just stick with Mustang by Sam36 · · Score: 1

    Yep

  47. Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Jason is a moron. "Equus" is the genus that horses are in. Who cares that some nutbar named their book that.

    1. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also the name of a computer system builder, lest we forget that we're on a site that's ostensibly primarily about computers and technology.

  48. This is /. ... by Yaztromo · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure people here are used to using (and certainly aren't afraid of) alpha-numeric strings.

    Yaz

  49. Ferrari was one of the worst number offenders by TigerPlish · · Score: 1

    In the first 20 years, it went like this:

    125
    250
    330
    365

    What that meant was displacement of each cylinder in CC. So a 250 was in reality a 3 liter engine. Then they had MM, TR, GTO tacked on after the number. The names and numbers didn't even appear on the cars. It's just what people called them.

    Then in the 70's things got weird. a 512BB is a five liter flat 12.
    A 512 TR is a 512BB hit repeatedly with an Ugly Stick.

    A 308 is a 3 liter V8. A 288? 2.8 liter turbo v8. (they got that motor from Lancia when Lancia pulled out of F1)

    F40? THeir 40th anniversary car, with the 288 engine, F50? That'd be thier 50th anniversary car, V12. Enzo? It was the F60. La Ferrari? That's the 70th anniversary car.

    Now? Who knows! F12 means what? Front twelve? A 458 means what? Does FF start for Fast as Fuck? (it's a 4 wheel drive shooting brake).

    Those Italians, no consistency! ;o)

    Which one would I pick? 365 GTB/4. Daytonna with four cams. Or an F12, it's spiritual successor.

    --
    The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
    1. Re:Ferrari was one of the worst number offenders by PPH · · Score: 1

      Porsche was bad for a whle.

      356, 356A, 356B, 356C
      901
      911 (too many variants to enumerate)
      912, 912E
      914, 914/6
      916
      918*
      924
      928
      944
      959
      964
      968
      980
      993
      986
      996

      I may have forgotten a few. I'll check my garage.

      *Because logically and/or chronologically, this fits between the 916 and 924. Yeah, right.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  50. Dear New Owners: by twmcneil · · Score: 1

    We appreciate that you are trying to improve /. and keep it going. We really do. But you need to hire a computer nerd that will slap you up aside the head when you try to post up TFAs that don't fit.

    Like this one.

    --
    "The ferrets, they're every where I tell you!"
  51. The rest of the article is worth a read as well. by bytesex · · Score: 2

    Nah - the first part of the article wasn't worth a read to begin with.

    --
    Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
  52. This is NOTHING! by freeze128 · · Score: 1

    You're concerned about the naming convention of model numbers from a brand new car company? They have only 2 different models. If you want alphanumeric hell, just look at nVidia's GPUs! I challenge you to figure out what the numbers mean, and they have DOZENS of models.

  53. Oblig. old joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Five Germans in an Audi Quattro arrive at the Italian border.

    The Italian Customs Officer stops them and tells them "It'sa illegala to putta 5 people in a Quattro."

    "Vot do you mean it's illegal?" asks the German driver.

    "Quattro meansa four" replies the Italian official.

    "Quattro is just ze name of zefokken automobile" the German says unbelievingly. "Look at ze dam papers: ze car is designed to karry 5 persons"

    "You canta pulla thata one on me!" replies the Italian customs officer. "Quattro meansa four. You have five-a people ina your car and you are thereforea breaking tha law."

    The German driver replies angrily, "You idiot! Call your zupervisor over. I vant to speak to someone viz more intelligence!"

    "Sorry" responds the Italian officer, "He can'ta come. He'sa busy witha 2 guys in a Fiat Uno"

  54. BMW FAIL! by lamer01 · · Score: 1

    All BMWs have injection so the i is superfluous. 3 is not small anymore, the 1 and 2 are. the 328is has a 2 liter 4-cylinder as does the 320i.

  55. Explain the M240i xDrive then by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 1

    So long as there's rhyme and reason to the numbering scheme, I have no problem with it.

    BMW does this, and it's awesome. The first digit is the body style (3 is small, 5 is mid, 7 is large), and the next 2 digits are the engine displacement. They add letters on the end for extra little features: i for Fuel Injection, s for Sport Package, L for Luxury Package, etc. So a 328is is a small car with a 2.8L engine, fuel injection and sport package.

    Fair enough, but can you explain the monstrosity that is the M240i XDrive then? I'm not a BMW fan. I don't hate them. I just don't care about this kind of car. M apparently means Performance. OK.... I don't speak German so maybe in German using M for "Performance" is actually OK because for all I know the German word starts with M. Then we come to the 240 part, which according to you is the engine size. However, the M240i has a 3.0 liter engine. And you say that "i" means fuel injected. Really? Because if you go back in time like 20 years that actually would have meant something but as far as I know no major car manufacturer makes a carburetor any more so all cars are fuel injection now. So it's "fuel injection" as opposed to what exactly? I have no idea what xDrive even means but maybe that actually is helpful if you're familiar with line. To me that looks like a bunch of randomly chosen gibberish but you're welcome to educate me here if you disagree.

    1. Re:Explain the M240i xDrive then by ausekilis · · Score: 1

      M is for their Motorsport division, who takes the base car and upgrades it - Much like Shelby will take a Mustang and turn it into a real car. The M3 is a top-tier three series that often has wider tires, wider fenders, lower stance, bigger engine, and upgraded transmission/brakes.

      240 is a "2 series", and "40" used to be displacement (e.g. 4.0 L), but is now rough performance. Educated guess is the performance is similar to a naturally aspirated 4.0L engine.

      X-drive is BMW's term for four wheel drive. So a 335xi would have "X-Drive", and be four-wheel.

      'i' is for "fuel Injection" which was coming into vogue in their 80's models. You'll see a lot of E30 "325is" and "325ci" where 'c' is "coupe" and 's' is "sport". Here "sport" refers to a sport package, stiffer suspension and minor performance oriented upgrades like brakes... nowhere near the changes in an "M" car.

      More info here

  56. What's the problem? by hawguy · · Score: 1

    I don't see the problem -- Genesis and Equus are just as opaque as G80 and G90, and I hadn't heard of any of those model until reading this article.

    Most consumers only have one or two cars and only shop for a new car ever 5 -10 years, so they need to learn the current models when they shop, and they can learn alphanumeric models just as easy as unique model names. And if the increasing number signifies increasing cost, that sounds even better.

    Unless manufacturers went with functional names "Ford Econobox", "Hyundai SmallSUV", "Toyota SmallHybrid", "Chevy HugeAssSUV", then there doesn't seem like much difference between using model numbers or model names.

  57. Who cares? by nedlohs · · Score: 1

    G80 and G90 are *exactly* as meaningful as "Genesis" and "Equus", which is exactly no meaning whatsoever.

  58. ///M is for Motorsport by gosand · · Score: 1

    but in general, yes, it means Performance. :)

    I agree, at this point the i for injected is somewhat a leftover. They have a pretty long history at making cars, and have stuck with it.
    I actually haven't kept up with their model for the past 10 years or so. I've had a few BMWs. A 1988 528e sedan (5 series, e = efficient instead of performance), a 1997 318i sedan (3 series, 1.8 liter), and a 1988 M3. -- that one is special. :)

    Yes, they haven't always strictly held to the naming convention, but you know basically what you are getting. If you say a BMW 3-series, you have a general idea what it is. The years for a model are designated by a generation you may hear about... e.g. E30 (3-series from 1982-1994) or E28 (5-series from 1981-1988). It's a pretty good system, and scales much easier than names do. But it can get pretty abstract. I have never heard of the model you mentioned.... but I would guess it is a 2-series (smaller than the 3 series, so likely a coupe - whereas the 3 is either coupe or sedan), not sure about the engine but you covered that... and xdrive I would guess is all-wheel-drive. They used to put an x in the badge for that back in the 80s.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  59. Stupid author by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The Hyundai Genesis is reborn as the Genesis G80 and the Equus sheds its horsey homage to become the G90, which guarantees that I won't remember the new names. I'll just call the G90 the Model-Formerly-Known-as-Equus.

    Ah yes - the new standard in "journalism". "I'm an ignorant jackass and don't like what someone had done - and my personal tastes rule!"
     

    The G90 apparently has 10 more units of something over the G80. Perhaps it is 10 percent better. Ten percent bigger? Ten grand more expensive?

    Look jackass, companies have been using alphanumeric model indicators just about forever. Nobody but you seems to be confused by them, go away and get the fuck over yourself.

    1. Re:Stupid author by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always thought it was so you had to say the the marque of the car when saying the name, so a Ford F150, or a Suzuki G90, or a Hyundai ix35?
      That way the brand gets advertised whenever people (who are not car people who know that a 218 is a small, ugly, 4 door, BMW SUV) mention that they bought a 218, They say they bought a BMW 218.
      Or Nissan 370Z, whatever.
      It's marketing.

  60. Model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who cares about some korean shit

  61. For those who are confused by numbers ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... there's always the Twingo.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  62. Names are just as useless by undefinedreference · · Score: 1

    Number designations are good, provided they include information. None of the modern car manufacturers (except, possibly, M-B) have numeric designations that actually mean anything. Pulling a number and adding a letter or three to it is not clever, it's a reflection of a complete lack of intelligence and/or creativity.

    Names are even less meaningful, unless they last a long time. GM is the grand master of random names on random cars. They have done it so much that I often learn of some flop they built under a name I never heard of that was only available in X markets. Toyota is close to them, with their wide array of almost indistinguishable cars (take a look at their economy car line and tell me how these are clearly differentiated...I dare you).

    In my opinion, companies should use a size/class name or letter identifier, then a series of completely standardized numbers/characters to define the body style & propulsion, then a unique trim name/identifier. Tesla does about the best I've seen in recent years - "Model S P90D" = Model S, Performance configuration (P), 90kWh battery pack (90), and AWD (D). Maybe this is why they appeal to tech people so much, aside from the fact they're electric.

  63. Good Cars by Thelasko · · Score: 1

    It used to be all of the desirable cars were named with a bunch of numbers and letters (mostly German and Japanese). This was probably due to those manufactures spending more resources designing cars than marketing them.

    It makes perfect sense for a new brand to follow the strategy that is well established in people's brain.

    --
    One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
  64. This is an ad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is an ad for Hyundai cars. Why the fuck is it on Slashdot?

  65. This car article needs a computer analogy by stephows · · Score: 1

    Windows 1.0
    Windows /286
    Windows /386
    Windows 3.0
    Windows 3.1
    Windows 3.11
    Windows 95
    Windows ME
    Windows 2000
    Windows XP
    Windows Vista
    Windows 7/8/9/10

  66. Kinda like Bennett's posts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This summary and article make me nostalgic for Bennett Haselton's blogposts.

  67. Just as well by Silicon-Surfer · · Score: 1

    Huyandai have had some aweful names in the past, like the "Terracan" SUV which was obviously a Can of Terror, and the Trajet people mover which was just Tragic!

  68. car names by siamesevodka · · Score: 1

    Just put the word "anal" with any of the Ford Models; Edge, Focus, Probe, Excursion, Ranger. Who has the bigger problem naming cars?

  69. http://www.medecine-esthetique-92.com by chirurgienfr · · Score: 1

    La Clinique de l'Espoir accueille toutes les personnes dont l’ambition est de restaurer, de perfectionner une partie ou l’ensemble de leur apparence physique, que cela concerne le visage, les seins ou la silhouette en général. Disposant du matériel approprié et recommandé pour toutes les interventions de chirurgie plastique, reconstructrice et esthétique, la Clinique Internationale Hannibal fait valoir les diverses aptitudes de ses chirurgiens, dont on peut apprécier sur ce site, leurs différentes qualifications et les interventions auxquelles ils sont habitués. Sinon, de manière générale, ce sont toutes les interventions visant à embellir le visage ( blépharoplastie, lifting du visage, rhinoplastie, etc.) ; les interventions pour sculpter la silhouette (abdominoplastie, lifting des cuisses, lifting des bras, etc.) ; ou encore les interventions pour raffermir la poitrine (lifting des seins, augmentation ou réduction mammaire). La grille tarifaire de ces interventions est clairement indiquée sur ce site. Pour les patients étrangers particulièrement, les prix de leurs interventions leur donnent droit à un hébergement dans un hôtel dont ils peuvent consulter la durée du séjour aussi.

  70. http://www.chirurgie-esthetique-en-tunisie.info by wh131284 · · Score: 1

    Médecins en chirurgie plastique, reconstructrice et esthétique, nos chirurgiens ont plusieurs spécialisations dans le domaine : microchirurgie, chirurgie expérimentale, traitement et prise en charge des grands brûlés, ce sont donc des plasticiens complets, qui après une expérience internationale, aujourd’hui en Tunisie, accueillent avec la Clinique Internationale Carthage Médical, pour leurs chirurgies esthétiques, de nombreux patients. Ce site affiche l’ensemble des interventions qu’avec ses pairs, ils réalisent au sein de la Clinique Internationale Carthage Médical. Parmi ces interventions, il y a la chirurgie de la silhouette dont l’un des buts est de corriger les difformités physiques congénitales ou accidentelles. Il s’agit de l’augmentation des fesses par pose de prothèse, par lipofilling, ou par injection d’acide hyaluronique. Par ailleurs, il est mis en lumière ici, les différentes interventions de la chirurgie du visage, de la chirurgie des seins ; les techniques opératoires, le déroulement des interventions, leur duréeles complications possibles. Mais pour palier à ces complications, c’est avec des chirurgiens expérimentés, ayant exercé préalablement dans des structures internationales, donc respectueux des normes et de la déontologie professionnelle, que la Clinique Pasteur collabore. On trouvera aussi sur ce site, le tarif d’une abdominoplastie, le tarif d’une liposuccion, bref les prix de toutes les interventions de chirurgie esthétique qui sont faites à la Clinique Intarnationale Carthage Médical. http://www.chirurgie-esthetiqu...

  71. Top Gear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How I feel when they talk about Jaguars on the show.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaguar_Cars

  72. Shortage of words by chazd1 · · Score: 1

    There is an interesting story behind the story. We have run out of words. It is true. In a world now run by unique Identifiers such as 32 character GUID strings. The world has just plain run out of words that can be re-purposed. Charles

  73. Leyland P76 by tetranz · · Score: 1

    Any Kiwis or Aussies here old enough to remember the Leyland P76?

  74. C'mon guys, let's focus on the real issue here! by psyhofreak · · Score: 1

    The fact that marketing departments are stupid isn't really that important to us, really. It's old news. What's more important is that 90 is not 10% more than 80, but rather 12.5%.

  75. SAAB goes to 11 by ripvlan · · Score: 1

    While this is a questionable /. story (is it really news that somebody doesn't like letters and numbers?) ---

    But I'll add this modernal social media "news"....

    SAAB had the 90, 900, 9000 - and then had to wrap around with the next set of cars. So 90,000 became the 9-3, 9-5. I remember a somewhat humorous interview from them explaining it all.

  76. Marketing doesnt do math by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

    Depends on what sort of scaling we're talking about. If it's a completely relative scale with no reference points, then any values for a and b where b=a*.125 would be just as valid and informative. If it's a scale using a number line, with or without a definite end point, then the actual distance between the two matters, and if it's a unit like percentage then each value's distance from the ends of the scale also is significant and meaningful.

    However: Most likely marketing chose the numbers using the 10s die from a pair of percentile dice, and therefore the only thing that is meaningful here is that the one with the higher number is probably intended to be seen as the more upscale model. So the right answer is that the one with the higher number is intended to be approximately 10% cooler.