Slashdot Mirror


Right To Be Forgotten? Web Privacy Debate in Italy After Women's Suicide (ndtv.com)

The suicide of a woman who battled for months to have a video of her having sex removed from the internet is fuelling debate in Italy on the "right to be forgotten" online. The 31-year-old, identified as Tiziana, was found hanged at her aunt's home in Mugnano, close to Naples in the country's south on Tuesday, reports Agence France-Presse. From the report: Her death came a year after she sent a video of herself having sex to some friends, including her ex-boyfriend, to make him jealous. The video and her name soon found their way to the web and went viral, fuelling mockery of the woman online. The footage has been viewed by almost a million internet users. In a bid to escape the humiliation, Tiziana quit her job, moved to Tuscany and tried to change her name, but her nightmare went on. The words "You're filming? Bravo," spoken by the woman to her lover in the video, have become a derisive joke online, and the phrase has been printed on T-shirts, smartphone cases and other items. After a long court battle, Tiziana recently won a "right to be forgotten" ruling ordering the video to be removed from various sites and search engines, including Facebook.

56 of 424 comments (clear)

  1. "words have consquences" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    but actions shouldn't be remembered

  2. Bravo indeed by qbast · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "after she sent a video of herself having sex to some friends, including her ex-boyfriend, to make him jealous."

    Stupidity kills.

    1. Re:Bravo indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Absolutely. This is all her fault.

    2. Re:Bravo indeed by Tyler+Durden · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah - if an ex sends a video of her having sex to make you jealous, sharing it with the world at large is pretty much the ultimate F U response.

      "So do you want to see just how not jealous I am?" *click*

      --
      Happy people make bad consumers.
    3. Re:Bravo indeed by cecurry · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A "free pass"!? They started putting her words on t-shirts, dude. For one mistake. For all the people screaming about accountability in her actions, I'd like to see you have your biggest mistakes become an object of mockery for everyone in the world.

    4. Re:Bravo indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yet you call the people mocking her "neck-beards" and "basement-dwellers". So why would anyone care what they think, as they are so diminished in your eyes?

      I suspect the mockery wasn't just random internet trolls, who move on to new victims, but her friends, family, coworkers, etc who she had to deal with everyday, which sent her over the edge.

      In that case, she shared the videos with the very people who later turned on her - which is rather ironic, and also deflates your argument.

    5. Re:Bravo indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To be fair, my mistakes are typically not as grave as sending a sex tape to someone who has a motive - nay, a justification - to want to get back at me.

    6. Re:Bravo indeed by PPH · · Score: 4, Insightful

      biggest mistakes become an object of mockery

      Windows Mobile.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    7. Re: Bravo indeed by TWX · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Despite the apparent acquiescence of neck-beards on Slashdot, having the ability to share personal information without sharing it with the entire world is something greatly desired by actual human beings.

      And this capability has never, ever existed. Even huge corporations have tried to make it happen through a collection of technologies and laws called Digital Rights Management and despite tens of millions of dollars and system after system, DRM falls or is circumvented through the final 'analog hole'.

      It's possible to have sympathy while still acknowledging that the risks that led to this outcome were entirely hers to bear in her obviously ill-thought actions that started this. The extreme nature of her particular extreme cultural influence is certainly abnormal, but it does show how ridiculous it is to expect the right to be forgotten to actually do a damn thing.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    8. Re:Bravo indeed by ravenshrike · · Score: 2

      Three mistakes. The first mistake was making a sex tape in the first place. This can be mitigated by using proper file encryption and not giving the file to anyone else. The second mistake was talking on the sex tape, thus personalizing it further. As above, proper encryption and lack of distribution can stop any consequences. The third mistake was sending it to her ex-boyfriend and three others. At which point she was up shit creek and everything that followed was her own damn fault for being a moron.

    9. Re:Bravo indeed by mjr167 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think this falls under... "If you don't want the whole world including your mom and your pastor to see it, don't take pics and put it on the internet".

      Sometimes you really do need to think things through before you act cause sometimes "oops" just doesn't cut it.

    10. Re: Bravo indeed by cecurry · · Score: 2

      No sir, it does not show how ridiculous it is to expect the right to be forgotten to do a thing. That's a technological problem -- it has absolutely nothing to do with why or how her video was shared in the first place. If you want to argue whether or not we have the means to solve the problem of sharing information and redacting it, then I'm all for it. But don't argue that it's a "ridiculous expectation" and certainly don't argue that it has anything to do with her decisions.

    11. Re:Bravo indeed by cecurry · · Score: 2

      Yes. This is a universal problem not limited to shaming of a sex tape.

    12. Re:Bravo indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People who truly need "protection from shame" aren't the ones making sex videos to get revenge on someone, and then sending them out to multiple people.

    13. Re:Bravo indeed by ranton · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We're seeing a new phenomenon relative to the entirely of human existence -- it's not natural for people to adjust to.

      What are you talking about? For how much of human history do you think it was easy for average people to leave their society and start a new life? For how much of human history do you think average people had a large enough community to enjoy actual anonymity at any point in their life?

      For most of human history you had small villages with a few hundred people, so anything you did followed you for life. I'm probably even being generous with that "few hundred" figure. Even in large cities people were segregated into smaller communities. What do you think would have happened to a woman who had sex in public for their ex-boyfriend and a few other people to watch in 1200 AD? It probably wouldn't have a happy ending for the woman.

      Our society (especially in the US) has enjoyed perhaps a couple hundred years providing an unusual level of anonymity and chance for a new start in life. The final result of the information age will almost certainly put that to an end. Our societies need to spend more time dealing with the consequences of a lack of privacy and the permanency of information instead of kicking that can down the road with stupid laws and an idealistic view of human history.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    14. Re:Bravo indeed by pr0fessor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      People want to share personal information with other human beings without sharing it with the rest of the world.

      Granted there are people who share share private information in confidence with their friends and family but this isn't what happened. She sent a spiteful and mean video to her friends and ex-boyfriend in order to publicly humiliate and hurt him. It became more public than she had intended but if it had humiliated only him I imagine she would be feeling awfully satisfied.

      I wouldn't do that to an ex and if one did it to me I wouldn't be sharing it with the world... the entire situation is out of control.

    15. Re:Bravo indeed by networkBoy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Look I feel bad for the gal, but:
      she sent a video of herself having sex to some friends, including her ex-boyfriend, to make him jealous.
      Has nothing to do with file encryption or security best practices... It is *common sense* not to do something such as this. Sending someone what is effectively self destructive in an attempt to anger them is literally begging for retaliation, while providing said ammo.

      This woman was stupid on an epic scale.

      Star wars kid, tron guy, etc. all silly and sure, embarrassing, but not actually damaging nearly at the level of a sex tape.

      What. Was. She. Thinking?

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    16. Re: Bravo indeed by ranton · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because really, it's not her fault: it's a new situation created by technology that humans weren't equipped to deal with.

      The new situation is people who think there are no consequences for their actions. The Scarlet Letter was published in 1850, and I'm guessing it wasn't a revelation even then that public knowledge of questionable sexual behavior could have severe consequences for the rest of your life (or even result in death quite quickly).

      We need to realize as a society that privacy and anonymity were the aberrations in human history.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    17. Re: Bravo indeed by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If Facebook had just removed the videos and prevented them from being re-uploaded, maybe banning accounts that did so after being warned, that would have been enough. Combined with de-listing on major search engines the problem would have been near as possible resolved.

      Facebook doesn't do enough to ID videos and remove them automatically. YouTube has that technology, just try uploading a modern movie and see how long your account lasts.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    18. Re: Bravo indeed by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      People have feelings. They make mistakes, then change in response to those mistakes. The horrible thing about this is, she was actively prevented from growth by people who wanted to freeze her identity at a moment in her development which caused her pain, and force her to writhe there, suffering, for the rest of her life.

      You can make all the comments you want about openness and transparency and accountability, and they may have merit, but that doesn't change the fact that this woman genuinely grew past the point where these videos accurately reflected her as a human being, she tried to communicate that, no one would listen, so she killed herself. The people didn't have a greater understanding, they had a misunderstanding which could not be corrected, and we lost her and everything she had to offer as a consequence.

      I can relate. I wish I'd hung myself instead of trying to overdose, I might be enjoying her peace.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    19. Re:Bravo indeed by amicusNYCL · · Score: 2

      if it was that big of a mistake, why film it?

      I think you're completing missing the point. The "mistake" wasn't her having sex. The mistake was her sending the video to her ex.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    20. Re:Bravo indeed by coinreturn · · Score: 5, Funny

      Fuck you.

      Well sure, as long as you're not taping it.

    21. Re: Bravo indeed by guruevi · · Score: 2

      There are certain things you just can't ever live down. If you murder someone, you don't get to change your identity and say you made a mistake and then live on. Many a politicians make mistakes that will live on forever. If she got an STD or a kid from the ordeal, she can't just move to Tuscany and forget about it. People make mistakes, some will follow you for the rest of your life, that's called being an adult.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    22. Re: Bravo indeed by cecurry · · Score: 3, Informative

      But this IS new. While public shaming certainly existed before (and, interestingly, is considered inappropriate in our modern judicial system), to not admit that instantaneous electronic dissemination of information by anonymous individuals -- who face no consequences for their actions -- is radically different than what any society has ever dealt with before would be absurd.

    23. Re: Bravo indeed by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      The horrible thing about this is, she was actively prevented from growth by people who wanted to freeze her identity at a moment in her development which caused her pain, and force her to writhe there, suffering, for the rest of her life.

      Some people become a meme and they survive the experience. Some don't. Don't suggest that anyone forced her to suffer. They did confront her with her actions on a daily basis, but those are her actions. How she feels about them is her business.

      I can relate. I wish I'd hung myself instead of trying to overdose, I might be enjoying her peace.

      If you truly can't be happy again, then I support your decision. But these things do pass, even what happened to her. Some people survive many years of torment and go on to live if not a normal life, at least a full one.

      I can't speculate intelligently on why she killed herself when others don't. There's lots of potential reasons. Maybe she lacked a support network others have, or perhaps it's something about her upbringing, or even her brain chemistry. But her suicide does not inherently tell us whether there should be a right to be forgotten.

      What we really need (eventually?) is acceptance or tolerance, not to be forgotten. What we need to know as a species is that people do stupid shit, then they are remorseful, and then they change. I don't believe that the right to be forgotten is a step in that direction. It is instead an attempt to deny human nature, and pretend it doesn't exist. My fear is that it will actually lead to a less permissive society, because we will become so very good at pretending things won't happen; while at the same time, it will provide more opportunities for abuse, for precisely the same reason.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    24. Re:Bravo indeed by Sique · · Score: 3, Insightful
      This is a common mistake you made here.

      You messed up two things.

      1. Doing something stupid.
      2. Having a free pass to do something illegal, just because someone else was stupid.

      Yes, it is stupid for instance not to lock your front door. But it is still illegal to burglar a house with an unlocked door. Everyone who forwarded the video was doing something illegal. And it is not the fault of the woman when someone else does something illegal. It's primarily the fault of the people doing something illegal. But she was still suffering the consequences of someone else acting against the law.

      Whoever excuses criminal behavior with the stupidity of someone else has a deeply twisted mind.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    25. Re:Bravo indeed by MooseTick · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Star wars kid, tron guy, etc. all silly and sure, embarrassing, but not actually damaging nearly at the level of a sex tape."

      How is a sex tape damaging to most people? I think its a shame that basically everyone likes sex, nearly everyone enjoys sex, yet its somehow offensive and humiliating for people to know or see you having it.

    26. Re:Bravo indeed by tnk1 · · Score: 2

      I sort of agree with you, but would point out that all of your examples signed up for a public life. If you go into politics and you don't have an effigy made of you, you're probably not really getting all that far. If *they* cry about it, well, then they're idiots.

      This woman did something that is pretty much self destructive and, let's be honest, stupid even for someone who doesn't know "information security practices". I mean, all you have to do is think ahead a little. Yeah, you may have made him feel bad, success. Now that he feels as bad and probably angry as she wanted him to, what is he going to do? Well, it just so happens that he has a nude video of you having sex. I wonder how that happened?

      I agree that this world can be incredibly unforgiving for something like that which gets into the public eye. And that's why I encourage people to do what ever they can to understand and teach their children that actions have consequences. There are no takebacks on some things no matter how much you cry or sue about it.

      I'd like to say that this was karma hitting her in the ass for being manipulative, although I'd have to agree that this is all out of proportion to what probably was deserved. Unfortunately, that's the way life goes.

    27. Re: Bravo indeed by William+Baric · · Score: 2

      No, this is "radically different". This is not even new. The whole village was always aware of all gossips about everyone. The only difference is the size of the village we live in. We went from living in a village of a few thousand individuals to living in a village of 7 billion individuals.

      Not only was there a lot less anonymity in the past, but there was also a lot less forgiveness. In the past, her behavior would not bring her only mockery, but animosity. She would have been relegated to the social status of a completely worthless whore. No one would have supported her and she would have been socially ostracized. In the past, no one would have cared about her suicide. Not even you.

      Was the past more morally correct? Are we now more morally correct? This is debatable. But one thing is for sure, your argument is plain false.

    28. Re:Bravo indeed by guruevi · · Score: 2

      I don't find it at all "Out of proportion". HER reaction is out of proportion to what happened. Sure you may have a month or so of being laughed at on the Internet and then Paris Hilton or whatever other fucktard releases a video or someone kills a gorilla and everybody forgets all about you and your stupid memes. I think it was Louis CK or Jim Gaffigan that said: if you don't like what people say about you online, stop googling yourself every 5 minutes.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  3. Right to be Forgotten by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You're asking for something that is impossible, to be a "Right"

    The "online" part is irrelevant (and just as impossible). I can no more "forget" on demand short of you lobotomizing me, and you don't have that right.

    So, lets stop tossing words like "rights" around, when they cannot apply.

    BTW, she handled it very poorly. She could have milked it (trademarked the phrase) and become a famous porn star, with a catch phrase and all. Embrace that which makes you famous (like the Kardashians) and you'll be both Rich and Famous.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    1. Re: Right to be Forgotten by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2

      It IS impossible.

      And she did make her own choices. What she doesn't want to deal with, are the consequences OF those choices.

      1) she chose to be filmed
      2) she chose to give that video away

      Those were her active choices. The consequences of those choices aren't hers to make.

      You go to the top of a mountain, and open up a down pillow, and scatter the feathers to the wind (your choice), Now, go gather up all the feathers you just let blow away. Once that pillow is ripped open, and the feathers fly, they are impossible to gather back. There is no "right" to have the feathers gather themselves back into the pillow, no matter how badly you feel about the situation.

      Labeling consequences as "hate" is simply a lame attempt at engendering an emotional response to affect people's actual reasoning power. It works far too often. Care to try again ?

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    2. Re:Right to be Forgotten by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      You always assume too much. My point was that we allow criminals to be reformed and move on with their lives in most cases. Yet when it comes to someone who made a mistake and it was publicised on the internet...

      Before making assumptions, it's better to ask for clarification if there is any doubt.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  4. we need to be protected from stupid decisions? by citylivin · · Score: 2

    "she sent a video of herself having sex to some friends"

    How about don't use your real name online? Just because everyone in the world seems to have abandoned that concept in the last 15 years doesn't make it any less important, or relevant.

    This is not a problem for the internet, its a problem of novice internet users emailing sex tapes around. I would have some sympathy if she was hacked, but she clearly brought this on herself. We all make mistakes, but we don't all make fools of our self online using our real information. That's a fairly specific choice she made. It may not have been thought through, but let that be a lesson to everyone who decides emailing a sex tape around is a good idea.

    --
    As a potential lottery winner, I totally support tax cuts for the wealthy
  5. Are you for real? by stkris · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The four comments on this story all blame the woman for her own stupidity?

    Are you guys for real? Yes I assume you are guys.

    Just because someone makes a stupid mistake we don't have the right to keep on blasting her for it! And she asked please would you stop and leave me alone. And the idiots still kept on pestering her. Making t-shirts? I cannot belive it! Sure - it's not illegal to do that but the people doing it place themselves square into the neanderthal part of the intelligence and compassion scales! I bet you guys know how to google - so don't just take my word for it - but an environment in which you are continously beeing harrassed can cause all kinds of damage in a persons soul. Some people in Italy and on the net really should think hard and long about their own behaviour! Are you all 13 years old? I don't think so!

    And then to come here and you all continue the blame fest on her for beeing harassed and mobbed enough to take her own life? HELLO! She took her own life. That is no joke!

    I had to thaw up my old account for this because I'm shocked and ashamed of what Slashdot has became.

    1. Re:Are you for real? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

      "Just because someone makes a stupid mistake we don't have the right to keep on blasting her for it!"

      Actually, you do have the right. It's not morally acceptable, it's bullying, but it is free speech. I do wish people would be a little more responsible of their mocking of other people. None of us are immune to becoming the next "idiot on the web".

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    2. Re:Are you for real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      She did a stupid, vain thing on the internet and got made a laughingstock by millions as a result, same as Tron Guy, Star Wars Kid, Chris Crocker, or any number of other internet 'celebrities.' I doubt you launched to the defense of them, though. Wonder what's different here? Hmm...

    3. Re:Are you for real? by NatasRevol · · Score: 2

      Wait, who else is to blame for the woman's stupidity besides herself?

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    4. Re:Are you for real? by ranton · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Having sympathy for the woman and having outrage that these kind of stupid decisions end up creating even more stupid laws are not mutually exclusive. Having more outrage about laws that affect billions of people (even if only slightly) than sympathy for a single human life is also quite natural, consider 150,000 people die each day.

      If there was no such thing as Right to be Forgotten laws, there would be nothing but sympathy for this woman. But considering the political climate it is reasonable most of us are upset at the people peeing in the pool everyone else has to swim in.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    5. Re: Are you for real? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Totally disagree. She made the video expressly to humiliate her ex-boyfriend. She distributed it to his family and friends. That's called revenge porn.

      Nobody gets a free pass on this regardless of their sex. Anything else sends the message that women need to be protected from the consequences of their own decisions because they are women. Your comment is both sexist and misogynistic - if it was the ex making sex videos of himself and sending it to her family and friends in an attempt to humiliate her, and she spread it around, we'd be laughing at the dumbass and celebrating his Darwin award. Let's not have double standards based solely on sex - it's demeaning to women.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    6. Re:Are you for real? by NatasRevol · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You are completely and utterly wrong.

      1. She engaged in consensual sex act.
      2. She approved of it being filmed (Bravo!)
      3. She sent it, unbidden, to former lover & friends.

      Those were her choices. There was never ANY agreement that the video was private. And most assuredly, the recipients would not have agreed to it. She gave up her privacy when she CHOSE to send the video to others, without any agreement in place.

      They had the freedom to do what they wanted with it. She tried to embarrass her ex-lover by sending it, so he turned around and embarrassed her by sharing it further.

      The ONLY one at fault is her.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    7. Re: Are you for real? by JustNiz · · Score: 2

      I'm assuming from your username you are actually female, in which case Thank you for being female and also understanding the true meaning of equality, and standing up for it!
      It boggles my mind how so many women apparently think a clear double-standard is somehow self-evidently right, and worse, how so many pathetic manginas agree with them.

    8. Re: Are you for real? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think YOU are mistaken. I never said that she made the videos with her ex - she made them with other men (including more than one at a time) after the split, with the express purpose of humiliating him in front of his friends and family to whom she distributed the videos.

      When she distributed it to people who never even asked to see it, she lost all right to claim any sort of "privacy." There was no prior "understanding" between her and any of the recipients that "hey, this is private, just fyi, so keep it confidential." She was attempting emotional blackmail, and the motivation makes it revenge porn.

      If someone tried to humiliate me, I'd make it very public (actually, already happened a few times) as a way of holding them accountable for their actions. They would have NO right of privacy in what they had said. Anything less gives power to the perp, and she was the perp in this case.

      She was the one who tried to do the whole public shaming thing, but, like pissing in the wind, when the wind doesn't blow the right way, you're going to get splash-back.

      Once you make something public, there's no take-back. That's the way the world works, and has worked long before the Internet. Gossip is part of human nature.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    9. Re: Are you for real? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 3, Insightful

      She made multiple videos, each with her having sex with one or more men, in a misguided and ultimately fatal attempt to humiliate him. She sent those videos, unsolicited, to his friends and family. The intent makes it revenge porn. She was trying to send the message "see how many men want me", and instead sent the message "I'm a stupid slut." She was the one who lost all right to privacy when she willfully sent them unsolicited to his friends and family.

      Anyone who doesn't live their whole life in the drama bubbles on Facebook or twitter could have told her the risks, but she probably wouldn't have listened anyway. The desire for revenge clouded her judgment.

      That so many posters automatically assume that the guy was the perp shows just how much sexism is alive and well.

      It would equally be revenge porn if, in an attempt to humiliate a neighbor, they had intentionally distributed porn featuring the neighbor's kids to all the members of the neighbor's church. "Look at how my neighbor raised their kids." The intended target doesn't have to be in the video. Humiliation by association. It's real.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    10. Re: Are you for real? by JustNiz · · Score: 2

      I totally agree that men are just as guilty of reinforcing this attitude. In fact I'd blame men more than women, since women are only human and like most of us are obviously gonna try for whatever they can get.

      Due to a combination of the traditional-gender-model brainwashing most males get right from birth at home and school, and the PeeCee bullshit that the mass media continually bombard us with, apparently very few men can even mentally grasp the concept of true gender equality. Most just go along with it rather than ever call out instances of blatant double-standard behavior, so are directly guilty of further enabling it, and more than a few are (wierdly) actively encouraging it. Meanwhile the rest of us just shake our heads in frustration.

  6. Re:Blame Someone Else by TheDarkener · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Blame Someone Else for your own stupidity.

    Agreed.

    She must be an American at heart.

    There are stupid people all around the world, my friend. Pointing the finger at a country and calling its people stupid is like pointing at the Sun and calling it helium.

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  7. Re:Blame Someone Else by micahraleigh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    America takes a lot of derision from other countries because we tend to focus on individual freedom/responsibility.

    At least compared to other places.

    The suicide part ... that was ultimately her decision alone. If someone "forces" you to commit suicide, it's not really a suicide.

  8. That poor woman by sinequonon · · Score: 2

    The internet is a very cruel place. We see the worst aspects of the human race on a daily basis. I don't know how we fix that.

    --
    -Bob-
  9. Re:Fuck her. by Dishevel · · Score: 2

    Every humans life starts with a specific amount of value.
    That humans actions raise or lower that value over time.
    She was a person who not only wanted to hurt other people, but did so in a stupid way. Then when her actions unsurprisingly backfired she lacked any ability to deal with it in an adult manner and just made shit worse. She was a bad person, that dug a hole and then attempted to fix it by digging deeper and was of the opinion that the only solution was death.

    She looked decent, that though, sadly was the limit of that lives worth.

    --
    Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
  10. Yes, I too wonder, where SJWs stand on this by mi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When Brendan Eich was "outed" as an opponent of "gay marriage", the online bullies forced his resignation from Mozilla's top job.

    When blamed for the resulting degradation of Mozilla software's quality, the bullies insist, it was their First Amendment right to criticize and boycott Mr. Eich — and that he should have known, that "words have consequences" and censored himself.

    Resigning is no different from suicide in this case — a person is driven to an unpleasant and unwanted action by the words of those, who hate/despise him...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Yes, I too wonder, where SJWs stand on this by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2, Interesting

      the bullies insist, it was their First Amendment right to criticize and boycott Mr. Eich

      ... and they were right. They do indeed have the right to speak and boycott.

      Resigning is no different from suicide in this case

      Except the resignation was driven by constitutionally protected speech, and the suicide was not. Even if you want to argue that she had no privacy rights, she still owned the copyright on the video, and no one else had the right to copy or publish it without her explicit permission.

  11. A shame indeed by fyngyrz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, it's truly a shame that the world has become a place where you cannot escape your mistakes, large or small, if someone, anyone, is the least bit interested in seeing to it that you can't. No matter how hard you try, no matter how sincere you are, no matter what lengths you go to to adjust your behavior or act in ways to mitigate or reverse any damage you might have done, or have been perceived to have done.

    It's part and parcel of the retribution over rehabilitation mindset, I think. Despicable, really.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  12. Re:Constitution... doesn't apply in Italy by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just to elaborate a bit, all speech is constitutionally protected in the US

    ... except for libel, slander, perjury, credible threats, inciting violence, copyright violations, security clearance violations, illegal recordings, disclosing sealed court documents, public obscenity, etc.

  13. Re: come on, you can read by orlanz · · Score: 2

    Actually SCOTUS is designed just fine (screaming Fire ... Building.. Etc). It's the check against their power that is broken... Congress and Executive.

    SCOTUS was specifically designed to avoid the whims of the political parties and sway of public opinion. That's why their word is supreme and the positions are lifetime.

    SCOTUS only says what is correct per their expertise. Rarely are they wrong. If there are problems with their rulings, it is up to Congress to fix or address. Unlike the Executive, people have direct voting rights to Congressional members.

    But I guess it is just more money and fun to talk about ONE position for 2 years... sadly nothing better is on TV.

  14. Errrm, ... seriously, I don't get it. by Qbertino · · Score: 2

    So this women deliberately had sex with multiple men at the same time. Ok, I understand that. I've had my share of threesomes & orgys/âoegangbangs" and the ladies always loved it.

    She had herself filmed while doing so. For free. Ok, I get that too. Some people dig this, and if she and her lovers looked good doing sex she'd being doing other people a favour with nice free amateur pron. Good thing.

    Here it gets weird: She had herself filmed to make someone - aparently her ex-lover - jealous. Thats imature, silly and dumb, but whatever.

    She sent her ex-lover and some other peole the video. Ok. Fits her plan and intent.

    Then she gets hysterical as the video ends up on the internet. Calls for legal measures to have the video removed, gets depressed and finally kills herself. ... I mean WTF??!?

    Isn't it blatantly obvious to *anybody* that step 2 already basically guarantees that your sextape will end up on the internet with anywhere between a few hundred up to a few million seeing it? What is wrong with people? ... This whole szenario is so patently absurd I almost have difficulty believing it.

    I seriously don't get it.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  15. Stupidity has consequences... by gweihir · · Score: 2

    Why is this a surprise? Why do some people think others should be protected against their own, severe stupidity?

    Seriously, it was completely clear and obvious that this video would end up on the Internet. After all, she published it (by sending it to her ex) without conditions or restrictions on its use. That somebody utterly stupid (sorry for speaking ill of the dead, but it is a fact here) may take their own life when they realize how massively they have screwed up is also not new.

    There is _zero_ need to do anything here. Stupid people will always be around and it is not possible to make the world safe for them. A lot of damage can be done by trying though, so the effort itself is utterly evil.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.