Slashdot Mirror


Saudi Arabian Teen Arrested For Online Videos With American Blogger (theguardian.com)

Mazin Sidahmed and Nicky Woolf, reporting for The Guardian: A male Saudi Arabian teenager has been arrested in Riyadh over a series of online videos of conversations between him and a female Californian streaming-video star that went viral. A Riyadh police spokesperson, Colonel Fawaz Al-Mayman, said the teenager, known online as Abu Sin, was arrested on Sunday for engaging in "unethical behaviour" in videos with Christina Crockett, a popular broadcaster on the conversational live-streaming site YouNow. Abu Sin's real name is not known. "His videos received many comments and many of the commenters of the general public demanded for him to be punished for his actions," Al-Maymann added, according to the Saudi Gazette. The two amassed thousands of fans on the YouNow network, and later on YouTube after videos of the two speaking were uploaded there. The videos featured Abu Sin -- a nickname given to him for his broken teeth -- and Crockett communicating despite their significant language barriers. The popularity of the videos of the two of them surprised Crockett, she told the Guardian in an interview. As a broadcaster on YouNow, she can invite her fans to join her broadcasts on split-screen, which is known as "guesting."

107 of 213 comments (clear)

  1. So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    So they had conversation. So what is the problem? It didn't come clear in this post at slashdot.

    1. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      He didn't scream "Alahu Akbar, death to infidels!" at a blonde girl, that's punishable by death if you are a sandnigger

    2. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So they had conversation. So what is the problem?

      Islam

    3. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      You can't talk to women. You can rape them though, even if they are barely old enough to bleed. And if they complain, they'll get convicted for extra marital sex. It's a great system.

    4. Re: So? by meta-monkey · · Score: 2

      Should have used the more politically correct phrase, "dune coon."

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    5. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Racist! \s

    6. Re:So? by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 2

      Racist! \s

      No, the poster is probably right..... Islamic countries are very strict on how you interact with the opposite sex...

      --
      You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
    7. Re: So? by slasher999 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Islam isn't a race, so not it's not.

    8. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qatif_rape_case

    9. Re:So? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      He is living in a religio-fascist country with though-police.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    10. Re:So? by tombak · · Score: 5, Informative

      I am Iranian and I grew up in an Islamic country (although I moved to Canada at the age of 16). I remember getting arrested for such egregious crimes as: 1) having long hair 2) talking to girls 3) one time just hanging out at a park with a group of friends! no girls this time. I got slapped around at the age of 15 by one of these "religion enforcement police" goons because he accused me of being gay because I had long hair (what??). They took me to jail and I was there till 3 AM and only after my mother begged and pleaded with them would they let me go. It was really hard watching my mother cry while surrounded by a bunch of goons. I had it relatively easy, but these Muslim fanatics have inflicted immeasurable suffering on so many young people in Iran/Saudi Arabia... Anyways, the problem IS Islam, and shame on you for saying he is racist. People like you confuse the issue due to their own ignorance. H

    11. Re:So? by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      So they had conversation. So what is the problem?

      FTA:

      Crockett said. "He was dancing and being funny, we would both dance on there because we can't communicate with words. It was pretty funny."

      Saudi it pretty strict. Dancing may have been part of it.

      One of my colleagues (male) was in Saudi for a conference last year and was going to meet with someone (female) to go over a presentation they were working. She suggested they meet in her room. The hotel staff warned them that it was a crime for them to go to either of their rooms unless they were married or related. The punishment for him was jail, she wold have been stoned to death.

    12. Re:So? by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 2

      The "\s" conveys sarcasm.

    13. Re:So? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Glad that you made it out okay, and I really applaud you for recognizing the problem. Iranians who do that and apostetize - as in, become anything else - Atheist, Zoroastrian, Christian, Buddhist, et al, have hope. Those who claim that it's not Islam, it's the Mullahs, are clueless, and a part of the problem. It's not which imam is gonna run the country - it's the fact that imams run the country in the first place

    14. Re: So? by Calydor · · Score: 2

      Yes it is.

      It's a race to the bottom.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    15. Re: So? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      You stole the comment I wanted to make! Great, now you'll get to the bottom before I do.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    16. Re:So? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Noooo, it's all a pure coincidence that highly religious countries tend to have retarded laws...

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    17. Re:So? by Copid · · Score: 1

      Hey, at least it was just for dancing and not for witchcraft. They should count themselves lucky.

      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    18. Re:So? by Copid · · Score: 1

      All organized religions? So if we look at any religious country of any sect, we'll find religious enforcers slapping teenagers around and arresting them for their hair length or talking to girls?

      Are all organized religions inherently the same, or is their sameness right now just an interesting historical coincidence?

      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    19. Re:So? by OpenSourced · · Score: 1

      Racist! \s

      No, the poster is probably right..... Islamic countries are very strict on how you interact with the opposite sex...

      Since when being right is any defense against being accused of racism?

      --
      Rome taught me patience and assiduous application to detail. Virtues which temper the boldness of great, general views.
    20. Re:So? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Are you perhaps located in Saudi Arabia? The link works fine for me.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  2. oh my god! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    He talked with a woman! Unclean! Unclean!

  3. Re:What did he do? by Moheeheeko · · Score: 1

    Participated in an online video with a woman who didn't have her face covered. That and I think they danced a little bit.

  4. SJW by Major+Blud · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is the sort of thing that SJW's should be fighting against......instead they decide to focus their efforts on restricting speech in some of the most liberal places on Earth.

    --
    If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
    1. Re:SJW by The-Ixian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because they are mutually exclusive? That's kind of a myopic view of the world you have there...

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    2. Re:SJW by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      ...except these social justice types lose any sense of perspective and end up supporting absurd things, repressive regimes, and leaders that support or benefit from repressive regimes.

      Liberals kind of jumped the shark. These days they excuse all sorts of nonsense that the classic civil rights movement would have nothing to do with.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    3. Re:SJW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Because they are mutually exclusive?"

      When you spend 90% of your time arguing against one and put much more effort and resources behind it, while the other you say is horrible and then move on ...

      Yes, yes they are mutually exclusive. People can consume only so many messages during a day, a week, a month. When one message consumes vastly more of that time that is the one that we care about ... or so is impressed upon people. It's why a reduction in a particular crime can seem like an increase because the news talks about it more. Something that is not as severe a problem or a problem for only a few seems so much more important than something that kills or harms 1000s more people.

    4. Re:SJW by Verdatum · · Score: 1

      ...No they don't. You're just afraid that they do.

    5. Re:SJW by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 1

      This is the sort of thing that SJW's should be fighting against......instead they decide to focus their efforts on restricting speech in some of the most liberal places on Earth.

      You would think they would, but in that part of the world, you would get your teeth kicked out by the police and your ass thrown in a hole and turned loose whenever they feel like it.

      Not like here in the States where they have 'rights'

      --
      You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
    6. Re:SJW by ScentCone · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Meanwhile on Slashdot the only people actually acting like SJWs are the people who use the term SJW...

      No. Calling out liberal totalitarians is not the same as seeking to actually DO the things (like squelching speech through the power of government) that liberal totalitarians actually do. Though you are performing the approved-by-liberal-elites correct response to being called out - immediately lie about it in hopes that will deflect reality.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    7. Re:SJW by ScentCone · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's because the people who run around screaming about "social justice" do that primarily to distract from the fact that justice is the LAST thing they actually want. How about providing some examples of people who stamp their feet, shout down speakers at colleges, and otherwise rant away ... being actually constructive people interested in open conversation rather than repression of anyone deemed insufficiently onboard with their agenda? Some specific examples to counter the well-earned broad brush of derision would be helpful. But what are you going to trot out ... BLM? Occupy Everything? The Eat The Rich With Bernie Sanders movement? People who insist we switch all pronouns to "it?"

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    8. Re:SJW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, it's because SJWs seem to have all the energy in the world to fight windmill giants like microagressions and the Patriarchy (insert x-files tune here), but yet there are nowhere to be seen when it comes to legitimate instances oppression. SJWs are not about doing the "right thing" (tm), they are about experiencing the moral gratification without doing any of the hard work required.

      Oh and #notallsjws

    9. Re:SJW by cecurry · · Score: 1

      Here's an example: http://talkasia.net/2016/09/28... There are people doing things about things, and not just whining on twitter or slashdot. These people are why we have 8 hour workdays and why we no longer have slavery.

    10. Re:SJW by cecurry · · Score: 1

      Yes, why "waste time" by backing up our believes with evidence when we could be enjoying the grand delusion we have in our comfortable worldview without contradictions and consequences?

    11. Re:SJW by LeftCoastThinker · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile on Slashdot the only people actually acting like SJWs are the people who use the term SJW...

      No. Calling out PROGRESSIVE totalitarians is not the same as seeking to actually DO the things (like squelching speech through the power of government) that PROGRESSIVE totalitarians actually do. Though you are performing the approved-by-liberal-elites correct response to being called out - immediately lie about it in hopes that will deflect reality.

      FTFY - While I agree that the progressives have co-opted the liberal title, the reality is that the fascists that we have in government trying to take away your constitutional rights to free speech (oh noes its hate speech, ban it!), gun ownership (guns are bad, right?) or religion (your religion doesn't agree with my world view, therefore I must sue you and take away your livelihood) or association (no, you can't have a male only fraternity) are all PROGRESSIVES who use the label of liberal but generally wouldn't know a true liberal if one bit them in the ass. Very liberal people are known as libertarians, and they have all shifted to the Republican party because the Democrat party is full of fascist Progressives that are diametrically opposed to classical liberalism.

      --
      If you disagree, please post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like
    12. Re:SJW by lgw · · Score: 1

      Sibling post makes a really important point. Let go of the word "liberal" and let it return to the wild. It's a good word than needs to go find itself and discover its original meaning. The fascists in question call themselves "progressives" - let's go with that.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    13. Re:SJW by lgw · · Score: 1

      The contrast is stark, isn't it? "People with real problems putting their lives at risk" vs "I was microagressed, where is my safe space?"

      That contrast is why so much derision is heaped upon "SJW"s, and Keyboard Warriors of all stripes.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    14. Re:SJW by bheerssen · · Score: 1

      "SJWs" do fight against stuff like this, and they do it all the time. This story was on BoingBoing two days ago, for instance. That site is about SJW-y as they get.

      --
      (Score: -1, Stupid)
  5. The Saudi government is barbaric by Captain+Scurvy · · Score: 2

    It will be interesting to see whether continuing incidents like these over the next several years spark enough domestic and international outrage that totlitarian regimes are forced to change their governing practices.

    1. Re:The Saudi government is barbaric by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Saudi Arabia will never have to change as long as they have oil. Everyone is too busy kissing their asses to keep that sweet crude coming.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    2. Re:The Saudi government is barbaric by Major+Blud · · Score: 3, Interesting

      next several years spark enough domestic.

      International, yes, but domestic, hardly. I'm willing to bet that the highly conservative muslim population of Saudi Arabia is in favor of these sort of things.

      If you look at the results of Arab Spring, the totalitarian regimes that were overthrown and replaced with "democratic" ones were done so with what I would not call forward-thinking progressive governments.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
    3. Re:The Saudi government is barbaric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oppression isn't something a person decides they're in favor of. Oppression is something a person is told they're in favor of. Then, they simply parrot it.

    4. Re:The Saudi government is barbaric by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Saudi Arabia will never have to change as long as they have oil.

      Well, that and what given a bunch of cash to the Clinton family will get you, of course.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    5. Re:The Saudi government is barbaric by Captain+Scurvy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Saudi Arabia will never have to change as long as they have oil. Everyone is too busy kissing their asses to keep that sweet crude coming.

      That dynamic has changed radically with U.S. LTO shattering oil prices and turning the United States into the new swing producer. The Saudis are already being forced to restructure their entire government, and while their cheap oil reserves still make them a major player, their influence in that regard has been severely curtailed. t. petroleum engineer

    6. Re:The Saudi government is barbaric by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Just this week a U.S. President tried to veto an overwhelmingly popular bill that let U.S. citizens sue Saudi Arabia for their role in 9-11. So it seems a bit premature to declare their influence in American politics dead. Though it is an encouraging sign that at least Congress has the balls to stand up to them at least a little now--though only when the public overwhelmingly demands them to.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    7. Re:The Saudi government is barbaric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The problem with that bill is very simple- what's stopping other countries from passing the same stupid law in their country so their citizens can sue Americans?
      Nada.
      So, in crossing that Rubicon first, we just green-lighted everyone else to do the same.

    8. Re:The Saudi government is barbaric by aralin · · Score: 1

      It does help not to be listed on the spinning wheel of countries that we are going to regime change when we re-spin it next time. In 2001 Iraq won followed by 2003 Afghanistan, 2005 winner Iran was delayed, 2007 winner was Paraguay and I believe next time it was Hillary as Sec of State picking contestants in 2009 when Syria won and 2011 when Egypt won, but she lied and said it was Libya. She was out for 2013 Ukraine and 2015 winner Brazil, but she is expected to oversee personally the 2017,19, 21 and 23 drawings. :)

      But Clinton Foundation would not be enough, fighting for us the war in Yemen is certainly much more in line with the magnitude of payments we require.

      --
      If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
    9. Re:The Saudi government is barbaric by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      If you're a petroleum engineer then you should realise the incredible power that the Saudis and their cheap oil have over the expensive and hard to process North American crap. Heck the entire industry and countries all over the world breathed a collective sigh of relief at the announcement from OPEC this week.

      The dynamic has changed ... slightly. Not radically. You couldn't even remotely use the word "radically". Heck since we lifted sanctions on Iran we saw how little influence we really have and the past 2 years has seen oil and gas in the USA suffer greatly as a result of strategic decisions from OPEC nations.

    10. Re:The Saudi government is barbaric by Ost99 · · Score: 1

      With the exception of Tunisia. They seem to have elected mostly sane people.

      --
      ---- Sig. gone.
    11. Re:The Saudi government is barbaric by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      You genuinely believe that donations to the Clinton Foundation is what keeps them in power and unpunished? rofl

      Why would I believe something that you made up in your own head to fight as a strawman? Oh, I get it. Because you're hoping that by distracting with that juvenile rhetorical technique, that people will forget that the Clintons DO in fact rake in millions of dollars for their own family and cronies (only a sliver of their foundation's revenue goes to anything other than internal paychecks and perks/expenses) in exchange for providing political access to those who pile on the cash. Of course you know this, and are trying to wish it away. Especially the part where she was encouraging that while she was in office, giving lots of access to those who paid her husband. But do carry on, and pretend it didn't happen. Feel better now?

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    12. Re:The Saudi government is barbaric by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Saudi Arabia will never have to change as long as they have oil. Everyone is too busy kissing their asses to keep that sweet crude coming.

      Actually, the price of oil continuously declining will lead to the same effect. Also, w/ new oil reserves in Canada and US, as well as Russia too struggling to get more cash, there is only gonna be more downward pressure on their prices

    13. Re:The Saudi government is barbaric by Copid · · Score: 1

      Don't you know? Saudi Arabia has always been a pariah in American government and only just recently with the rise of Hillary Clinton has it started to work its way into the halls of power over here. Selling the Saudis weapons and ignoring their human rights abuses is a totally new thing, just started in 2016!

      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    14. Re:The Saudi government is barbaric by Copid · · Score: 1

      Well, when the oppressed revolt against the oppressors and take over the government, more often than not they decide that maybe oppression isn't so bad after all. Most of human history isn't a struggle to end oppression so much as a battle over whose turn it is to hold the whip.

      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
  6. Re:What did he do? by MitchDev · · Score: 1

    I'm more surprised anyone really wants to live in Saudi Arabia, but some folks like that kind of totalitarian nonsense...

  7. Re:What did he do? by cecurry · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah, how could anyone "want" to live where their family is and their entire genetic line has existed for several millennia? Why don't they just pack up and move someplace better? Because it's easy.

  8. Re:What did he do? by rhazz · · Score: 1

    And we just sold them tanks.

  9. Re:What did he do? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 5, Funny

    To be fair a little dance is a slippery slope.

    First you do a little dance, that leads to making a little love, and then you get down tonight. Get down tonight.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  10. this is a cultural issue, not a technology issue. by nimbius · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think its terrible and I dont think he deserves it

    which is a pretty reasonable response, but what most Americans don't understand or for that matter tend to respect are cultural differences. Theyre quick to point out the injustice of the Saudi criminal code yet conveniently overlook the fact that it is a criminal offence to dance at the Jefferson Memorial, or that until 1967 interracial marriages were illegal in a plurality of states. Transgender Americans can still face prosecution for simply using the toilet in 5 states, and it wasnt until 2015 that gays could be married in the land of the free.

    Abu Sin knew what he was doing. Sometimes incarceration is a risk you take to try and make a cultural change or statement.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  11. Re:So....why was he arrested? by GrumpySteen · · Score: 4, Informative

    Saudi Arabia has laws banning men from engaging in any form of socializing with any women they aren't married or related to. Public lashing is a common punishment for those offenses, too, so it's not just a few days in jail that he's facing.

  12. Re:What did he do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    We? So what role did you personally have in selling them tanks?

  13. Re:So....why was he arrested? by Verdatum · · Score: 2

    Saudi Arabia has a whole set of laws governing how single men and women are allowed to interact with each other. I think it's a terrible idea to extend these laws to online interaction with foreigners. But, apparently, enough people over there think it is appropriate enough a thing to do that an arrest was made.

  14. Re:What did he do? by ScentCone · · Score: 2

    He financed their construction.

    Well, that's not entirely clear. If the Saudis bought them, then the Saudis financed them. If the Saudis bought them for less than what they cost, then either the manufacturer(s) subsidized some of the cost, or the taxpayers did. Which brings us to the fact that such expenses come out of the discretionary budget, which means it's essentially paid for almost entirely by income taxes or by debt that will be serviced by income taxes ... and that means that only about half of the people in the country actually have a hand in financing such things because the other half pays no income taxes. And of the half that does pay them, of course a small portion of that group pays the majority of those taxes.

    So, "we" is indeed not an obvious thing, here.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  15. Re:this is a cultural issue, not a technology issu by wbr1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Abu Sin knew what he was doing. Sometimes incarceration is a risk you take to try and make a cultural change or statement.

    Abu Sin was a young boy talking to a woman. To say he fully understood the ramifications of his actions is absurd. He almost certainly knew it was a social taboo, but to say he was trying to make cultural change is really stretching. We do not know his intentions, but Occam says hormonal teenager trumps activist any day.

    That said, this probably happens quite a bit with teenagers, just not out in the open. Then, afterwards, after the physical and mental scarring endured, these young men learn hate. And that hate is not towards his oppressors, the regime and religion that beat him down. Instead it is twisted at women or those who do as they did, that they should suffer the same punishments. This is how these types of systems stay in place and prosper.

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
  16. Re:So....why was he arrested? by loonycyborg · · Score: 1

    But woman in video isn't subject to those laws, thus this interaction can't be in the scope of the law.

  17. Re:What did he do? by elrous0 · · Score: 2

    Yep, if you don't nip this in the bud, pretty soon women will be demanding to leave the house without their husband's permission.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  18. Re:So....why was he arrested? by ScentCone · · Score: 1

    Look, all that really matters is that Hillary Clinton has the Saudis' backs, as long as they give her family a bunch more cash.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  19. Re:this is a cultural issue, not a technology issu by ScentCone · · Score: 1

    You're undoing your own argument. Culturally, nobody gives a damn if you dance at the Jefferson Memorial, though some people might give a damn if a bunch of people wasted time writing and fussing about legislation to change that law that nobody cares about. On your other topics, you've made your own counterpoint. Culturally, the west has moved very quickly on areas like gay marriage. In practical terms, it's a done deal. There will be lots of little rough edges to clean up for a few years yet. Meanwhile, the Wahabbists and their ilk in the Middle East are going full-throttle backwards into the medieval days they miss so badly.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  20. Re:So....why was he arrested? by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Informative

    But woman in video isn't subject to those laws

    No, but unfortunately, as a Saudi, the man in this case certainly is.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  21. Re:Religion poisons everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    > Once again religion demonstrates it's worthlessness.

    Oh please, its not "religion." Its fucking human nature. Stalin was the biggest killer in modern history Mao Zedung the second and Hitler was probably third. The first two were officially atheist the last was only nominally christian because that's just what white people in germany were.

    As long as you are focused on "religion" as the cause of the problem rather than just another neutral tool that can be co-opted you are never going to improve the world. Know your enemy.

  22. Fuck that entire culture. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Fuck it. The sooner it is wiped off this earth the better.

  23. Re:Hillary was there first by elrous0 · · Score: 1

    Not just Hillary, but pretty much every U.S. politician for decades now. Oil trumps morality any day, and it also crosses all party lines.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  24. Meddling [Re:SJW] by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It may be a matter of not sticking ones nose in another country's business: fix our own backyard first.

    Meddling in the Middle East just seems to make things worse. If they wanna be medieval and keep resisting modernization, there should come a point where we give up trying to modernize them and instead focus on issues closer to home.

    1. Re:Meddling [Re:SJW] by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Because we as a nation are ALREADY meddling, we owe assistance to those displaced by conflicts we've meddled in. But, that's not a reason to continue meddling.

  25. Video of his arrest by Ecuador · · Score: 1

    Apparently he was streaming when he was arrested (police arrives at 7:00): https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
  26. Re:So....why was he arrested? by Snufu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Christina: 'Today we are having our follow up split-screen live stream with Abu Sin in Riyahd. What up Abu!'
    Abu appears in the split screen. He is in the middle of a public square, his hands are bound to a pole and his shirt is removed. In the background is crowd of onlookers and a large masked man in black unrolling a whip.
    Abu: 'Whassup Christina Just chillin since our last stream, Yo!'
    Christina: 'Cool. Do you like Beyonce?'
    Abu: 'Totally, but my AAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHH.... favorite is Justin Beiber.'

  27. Re:Hillary was there first by halivar · · Score: 1

    Oil trumps morality any day, and it also crosses all party lines.

    TRIGGERED.

  28. Re:Religion poisons everything by GNious · · Score: 1

    Saudi Arabia and their stupid pointless shitty laws

    Meanwhile, they have a teenage pregnancy rate that's almost 1/3 of the US'

    Just saying, it does seem to have an effect.

  29. Re:Religion poisons everything by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

    You're right... though I don't limit it to Islam. I hate all religions.

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  30. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  31. Re: What did he do? by Stickasylum · · Score: 1

    It's for their own good, right? Wouldn't it be great if we didn't have to put up with all these "used" women and sloppy seconds?

  32. That's all it takes? by Hotawa+Hawk-eye · · Score: 1

    If all it takes is that "the general public demanded for him to be punished for his actions" then I demand that Colonel Fawaz Al-Mayman be punished for his actions, along with every member of the police that arrested Abu Sin. Who's with me?

    Think it'll work? *crickets*

  33. Re:Religion poisons everything by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 2

    Between the honor killings, forced marriage and FGM happening in Saudi Arabia I can understand why their teen pregnancy rate is so low!

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  34. Re:this is a cultural issue, not a technology issu by StormReaver · · Score: 1

    [Americans are] quick to point out the injustice of the Saudi criminal code yet conveniently overlook the fact that it is a criminal offence to dance at the Jefferson Memorial, or that until 1967 interracial marriages were illegal in a plurality of states.

    I think most Americans are quick to point out stupid laws in the U.S., too, when they become aware of such laws. But most Americans are just too stupid to vote out the Congresscritters who enact such laws.

  35. Funny thing about "them" by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    Can't hold hands, kiss in public, but they can have sex with goats/sheep, car mufflers etc and it's ok. What a backwards society!

  36. Re:What did he do? by thegarbz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because it's easy.

    You're going for facetious but you're right on point. It IS that easy. The world is a small tiny place. Until we start colonising Mars we're barely 30h worth of travel distance from anyone at any given time. If the goal is to simply get away from a shithole, heck you can do that in 4-5 hours for most of them.

    I personally really don't understand the obsession people have with a place. It's just a place. There are many places in the world each with their own benefits. If one isn't completely happy with where they are, go someplace else.

    By the way, greetings from the Netherlands. An awesome country which I didn't grow up in, don't have any family in and don't have a genetic line relating back to. I do miss my sister, so I called her up a few days ago and then booked a flight. Going to have a fun weekend abroad next week.

  37. Re:So....why was he arrested? by lgw · · Score: 1

    forceful penetration is the standard for rape. Women cant break that law,

    Wow, you really abstain from internet porn, don't you? I have to say I admire your restraint.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  38. Re:What did he do? by unixisc · · Score: 1

    I'm more surprised anyone really wants to live in Saudi Arabia, but some folks like that kind of totalitarian nonsense...

    Not exactly Saudi Arabia, but you have Janet Jackson who married a Qatari sheikh and moved to Qatar, which is a Wahabi country like Saudi Arabia. Similar shit

  39. Re:What did he do? by parkinglot777 · · Score: 1

    You're going for facetious but you're right on point. It IS that easy. The world is a small tiny place. Until we start colonising Mars we're barely 30h worth of travel distance from anyone at any given time. If the goal is to simply get away from a shithole, heck you can do that in 4-5 hours for most of them.

    I'm not sure it is that "easy" if you consider how "immigration" works differently in different places. Some people would lover to get out of the shithole, but then it is impossible politically, financial, and/or economically because of where they are at the time (or where they want to go). Talking is easy. Doing it is a completely different story...

  40. Re:What did he do? by unixisc · · Score: 1

    Yeah, cecurry turned out to be right. B'cos it is easy - the way Saudis can just pick up visas at a travel office in US embassies in their country (in sharp contrast to other countries). Also, becoming a citizen is easy if one have at least something like $250k that you can bring into the country.

    As far as places go, a place is a place in the US - you have a uniform standard of living anywhere and everywhere. It's different from third world countries, where typically, the capital and a few major cities are decently livable, but other places are dumpsters. I'm not sure whether that's the case in KSA - they do have enough cash to make the entire country filled w/ El Dorados, but then again, since the 50s, they had been more busy funding mosques, madrassahs, dawa and jihadi groups worldwide that they may have overlooked the part where you can use money to make your desert country a real paradise.

  41. Re:Ah, Saudi Arabia by unixisc · · Score: 1

    In those countries, do people buy anything other than Mercs, Beamers, Porsches and so on?

  42. Re: What did he do? by mi · · Score: 1

    when a girl and Huy get together, it almost always leads to passion and hormones.

    One of the more hilarious typos for sure...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  43. Islam poisons everything by unixisc · · Score: 1

    In Islamic jurisprudence - where the rules of a religion are translated into applied laws of a country - there are 4 schools - Hanafi, Shafi'i, Maliki and Hanbali (talking about Sunni Islam here - there are 2 in Shia - Jaafari and Khomeni'i). Most Muslim countries in Asia follow the Hanafi school - that is countries like Jordan, Iraq, Turkey, the stans (to the extent they're followed at all), Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Kuwait. Egypt and Syria follow a blend of Hanafi and Shafi'i, since al Azhar university in Cairo is where most of Shafi'i doctrine evolved. Other than that, Shafi'i is followed in Yemen, Somalia, Sudan, Indonesia, Malaysia and Brunei. Maliki evolved in Andaluz - Islamic Spain - and is the school followed in most of North Africa, aside from the East - Egypt, Sudan and Somalia.

    Wahabism is an implementation of the 4th school - Hanbali - and would otherwise be an asterisk, but it's there in 2 countries - Saudi Arabia and Qatar. Since Saudi Arabia is the country that has Mecca and Medina, that makes it unignorable. Otherwise, there are stray sects of Islam all around - like Ibadi in Oman - which nobody notices.

    1. Re:Islam poisons everything by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Stalin and Hitler were there, but the GP is almost right. As was pointed out above, he did everything he could to avoid saying 'Islam'.

      But if one looks at history, more people have been killed over the centuries in the name of Islam than by either Stalin or Hitler. It started w/ the Arab conquests after Mohammed's death, then at the turn of the first millenium, there were the massacres that accompanied the conquest of the Indian sub-continent. Then in the Middle East, there was always warfare in the ex Byzantine provinces until they were Islamized, as well as the Muslim conquests of North Africa. Oh, and then there was the slave trade, which Europeans and White Americans are always blamed for, but which was started by Arabs taking captive Blacks (who they call 'Abid' or the n-word) and selling them.

  44. It is the economy, stupid by mi · · Score: 1

    Saudi Arabia remains a very rich country. Its subsidized citizens are obscenely rich, but even the non-citizens are doing rather well. It has, for example, a large population of Indians, who, despite having no prospect of citizenship, like their salaries much better there, than in their own reasonably free country.

    For another example, it had a large contingent of Arabs from Palestine until 1991 (when the fools celebrated Saddam Hussein's invasion into Kuwait and were summarily expelled by the Saudis over it). They too preferred Saudi Arabia over the more secular destinations (like most other Arab countries).

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:It is the economy, stupid by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      "Sure they're evil, but they made the trains run on time..."

    2. Re:It is the economy, stupid by mi · · Score: 1

      That argument certainly worked for a vast number of people, yes. And Saudis aren't even that evil...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  45. Re:Religion poisons everything by unixisc · · Score: 1

    Not to mention, girls are allowed to marry in their teens, under Islamic law. After all, Mohammed, when he was in his 50s, married a 6-year old girl Aisha and consummated it when she was 9. And in Islam, Mohammed is 'al insan al kamil', or the perfect model for mankind, and so there is no way they would outlaw pedophilia

  46. Re:Notice that this is about the Saudi people by unixisc · · Score: 1

    Mod this up. Here in the West, most people assume that all people throughout the world wanna be free. But when they do become free, or get a choice, mob rule ensue. In fact, the Saudi royals are probably more advanced than their populace, who are just fed whatever the madrassahs teach. If the Saudi government was overthrown and replaced by a 'democracy' - the way the US did in Iraq and would like to do in Syria - al Qaeda would win the popular vote.

  47. Re: not our business by slashrio · · Score: 1

    How the 'souvereign state of Saudi Arabia' treats its civilians is not our concern. We have no business intervening with their internal affairs.
    Now, if it were the 'islamic terrorist state of Iran' where this happened, then of course it would have been a totally different story as Saudi Arabia is an ally to the petrodollar whereas Iran is not.

    --
    "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
  48. Re: embraced by slashrio · · Score: 1

    As long as S.A. keeps selling its oil in US$ the US will not intervene with anything that happens inside the country, and will protect them militarily against other countries, except Israel.

    --
    "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
  49. Re:What did he do? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Having done it multiple times I can say that most countries do not place financial on the list, and when they do they do it for select countries. Politically also works in peoples favour in many places. This is also not new. I look at some cities in the Netherlands and they have had a majority immigrant population for a really long time. My airport taxi driver was Iranian and had been here for 35 years. Not wealthy, not well off, just didn't want to be there anymore. My sister grew up in Australia. She and her boyfriend said fuck it we're moving to Vienna recently and so she did. Sure there's paperwork but for the most part I look around and I see people of all colours, accents, backgrounds, wherever I go. People from war torn countries who are recent immigrants are easier to pick out on their inability to speak local languages than people who have been here for a long time. This has been universal in every country I've been in (except for China and Japan, very few immigrants there).

    Yeah we may not all be able to go straight from being bombed to sipping martinis in Aruba, but to claim that immigration is some incredibly complicated thing to the point where its bad enough that you happily remain in a wasteland is more a reflection of the lack of effort.

  50. Re:What did he do? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    B'cos it is easy - the way Saudis can just pick up visas at a travel office in US embassies in their country (in sharp contrast to other countries). Also, becoming a citizen is easy if one have at least something like $250k that you can bring into the country.

    Yeah because the USA is the only destination to go to that makes the GP right. /sarcasm

    Heck given the choice between the USA and the middle east I'm sure some would prefer the desert shithole. In the mean time there are many countries far more welcoming to immigrants and you really can just pickup and move. ... Like my Iranian taxi driver who's been here for a few years now. Not wealthy, not well connected, just didn't want to live in Iran anymore so he upped with his family and came to europe. No claiming assylum, nothing but a standard immigration process which most countries don't treat with hostility... Unlike the USA... Who are even hostile towards tourists.

  51. Re:this is a cultural issue, not a technology issu by Copid · · Score: 1

    Could I summarize this post as, "All countries' laws are basically equal in terms of injustice/ridiculousness?" I'm guessing not, but that's really the only solid claim i can really extract from it.

    --
    An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
  52. Re:this is a cultural issue, not a technology issu by Copid · · Score: 1

    Just like before 1967, a white person just had to find another white person to marry. The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread.

    --
    An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
  53. Re:Religion poisons everything by Copid · · Score: 1

    Why do I get the feeling that the teenage pregnancy rate is not a statistic we're likely to get any clarity on in Saudi Arabia? If the "official" rate is 1/3 of the US, it seems like a pretty good bet that it's even higher than that in reality.

    Kind of like how Iran has no gay people.

    --
    An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
  54. Re:What did he do? by unixisc · · Score: 1

    You are right. If one is a Muslim w/ any amount of devotion, and has a skill that's desired by any business tycoon in the GCC countries, then it's a far better idea to settle in one of those countries. Just like the family of clock boy Achmet.

    We're talking here about a Saudi guy who does not care for such rules, and who's now arrested for that. For him, he'd have done better by first getting out of there and then entertaining himself and anyone else this way. Although if he just knows Arabic, that would potentially be an issue - since there are no non-Muslim Arab countries.

  55. Re: What did he do? by MitchDev · · Score: 1

    ;)