Slashdot Mirror


Higher-End Smartphones Make You Happier, Says JD Power Study (cnet.com)

A new J.D. Power study published Thursday found that users who pay more for their smartphones report higher satisfaction than those who pay less for their smartphones. The study also found that among ATT and Sprint customers, Samsung phones ranked highest in overall satisfaction, while T-Mobile and Verizon customers preferred Apple iPhones. Jessica Dolcourt via CNET writes about the other conclusions made by the J.D. Power study: - Customers of ATT, Sprint, T-Mobile and Verizon (full-service carriers) report more satisfaction than customers on Boost Mobile, Cricket, MetroPCS and Virgin Mobile (co-contract carriers).
- Full-service customers pay an average of $361 for their phones compared with prepaid customers' $137 average.
-Customers who pay more for their phones report higher satisfaction.
- This is likely because high-cost phones perform better. (Editor's note: no duh)

126 comments

  1. Consumers are trained well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Consumers are trained well.

    1. Re:Consumers are trained well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All "consumers" are fully trained.

      The untrained ones are called "customers" and they're a less desirable class of peons because they have expectations and they're uppity about how you fulfill their expectations.

    2. Re:Consumers are trained well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perceived value kicks ass!

  2. $5k hookers make you happier than $5 crackwhores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ..more News at 11, dont go anywhere elsee now.

  3. First time I heard no duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was 1973

  4. Or... by squiggleslash · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...maybe it's because people who buy $600 phones tend to have more money (and less worries) than people who buy $50 devices.

    I'll be honest, the most expensive modern smartphone I bought was a Galaxy Nexus. It definitely didn't make me happier; the quirks and horrible UI actually made me switch to a flip phone in an effort to regain my sanity.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    1. Re:Or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought LG's past flagship phones (Optimus 2X and Optimux 4X) and they both drove me nuts with all of the lag. It wasn't until I got a G3 that I was actually happy, but that probably had more to do with the release of Marshmallow and Android finally not sucking any more.

    2. Re:Or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or... they get more bang for their buck

    3. Re:Or... by frovingslosh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe it is because people who pay $700 for their phone and then see someone else who got a phone for under $100 are damn well determined to justify their choice. Even if it has an Intel chip in it rather than a Qualcomm chip.

      --
      I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    4. Re:Or... by lorinc · · Score: 1

      I can related to this story. I've always bought cheap shitty smartphones ($100) not because of money problem, but purely out of ideology (I'm not giving that much money for a useless toy, which I barely use). It was so slow to do even the basic things a good old nokia did 20 years ago that I finally gave up and but a mid-price phone (around $300). I'm definitely happier. Not having to wait 20 seconds to launch the texting app and then wait another 10 seconds before the keyboard shows up has definitely change my emotion when using the useless toy.

    5. Re:Or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get a Xiaomi Redmi 3S, it's a $100 smartphone.
      I got it primarily because of its small size and because OnePlus decided to stop selling the OnePlus X without marketing an alternative in that segment.
      I don't have any delay when starting programs and the 4Ah battery is a nice perk.

      I don't really see why I would have been happier with a more expensive phone.

    6. Re:Or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know so much. I see a lot of people who claim they have no money with iPhones. I know people who claim they are broke and desperate who have iPhones, and they aren't second hand ones either.

      I think they are taken in by the "only £xx per month" sort of deals, and apparently aren't bright enough to work out they are paying £aa for the phone and £bb for the connection.

      I'm pretty well off, I have a cheap connection (£5) and get a new Chiphone every 2 years or so for £50-£100. I don't see what extras Apple give me (that are worth having) over Android that are sufficient to justify the £500+ cost difference. They seem to do much the same thing and I can put Micro SD cards in my phone.

    7. Re:Or... by PMuse · · Score: 1

      You've got it. People want not to have been wrong.

      They want not to have gotten a lemon when they paid premium $$$.
      They want not to be stuck in a job/career they now despise.
      They want not to have screwed up their children's lives.
      They want not to have voted for a bozo.

      The longer you listen to people talking about choices they now cannot unmake, the more it all sounds the same.

      --
      "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
    8. Re:Or... by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Funny thing is after I lived with the flip phone for a year or so, about a year ago I bought the cheapest smartphone I could ($30, at Walmart!) and was stunned at how much better it was than the GN. OK, the screen was worse, as was the amount of storage -- though the fact it took SD cards mitigated that in part, but it really was faster, smoother, and the UI had less bugs. It resold me on Android.

      I honestly don't think price has much to do with device "niceness" in the Android world. Sure, in the early days, you had a few "cheap" phones with sub-WVGA screens that were barely usable, and right until a couple of years ago even the slightly better ones seemed cobbled together, but right now I'm actually seeing low end hardware that's caught up with Android's needs, while critical features continue to get removed from phones as they get more expensive.

      And some of those removed features do, actually, make the phone less frustrating. That cheap $30 Walmart special had dedicated navigation buttons for example - its replacement doesn't, meaning I have to swipe from the corners to get buttons that'll close a full screen app or just send that full screen app a "back" signal. How is that an improvement? It isn't. The buttons are removed because it interferes with the lines of the device and would make it fractionally bigger, aesthetic considerations that undermine usability and makes the device more annoying to use.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    9. Re:Or... by unixisc · · Score: 1

      ...maybe it's because people who buy $600 phones tend to have more money (and less worries) than people who buy $50 devices.

      I'll be honest, the most expensive modern smartphone I bought was a Galaxy Nexus. It definitely didn't make me happier; the quirks and horrible UI actually made me switch to a flip phone in an effort to regain my sanity.

      Actually, I just bought an iPhone 7 - in fact, upgraded mine. Didn't feel like $600, since it's amortized over 24 months. Two reasons that I did it - one was to get Apple Pay support (yeah, I could have gotten an iPhone 6, but I bought my 5s just weeks before the iPhone 6 was released, and my contract had just started). The other was storage capacity - had just 16GB on the 5s, now have 128GB w/ this one. So I won't have to worry about Cloud backups for a while, especially since both my iCloud and OneDrive 5GB quotas are getting filled.

      But I won't say that other phones make me unhappy. Like I have a Moto X and a Lumia 550 as well. The Moto X was originally a replacement for another Lumia from Verizon, since that latter missed support for many apps that I needed. I use it as a work phone, nothing more. The Lumia I bought as a travel phone for $150 (w/ no carrier), and use it when I go abroad. It does the jobs well, and I'm pretty happy w/ it.

      The iPhone is what I use though for things closest to my heart - chatting w/ family

    10. Re:Or... by Solandri · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's the trend I see in Consumer Reports auto owner surveys. Owners of expensive luxury brands like BMW, Mercedes, and Jaguar tend to be happier with their vehicles, even though they report these vehicles as having more problems than other cars.

    11. Re:Or... by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      Maybe it is because people who pay $700 for their phone and then see someone else who got a phone for under $100 are damn well determined to justify their choice. Even if it has an Intel chip in it rather than a Qualcomm chip.

      My thoughts exactly.

    12. Re: Or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft phones work pretty well. I Like my lumia 735 which is $120 from Verizon store.

    13. Re: Or... by unixisc · · Score: 1

      I just wish that Verizon would upgrade their Windows Phones to Windows 10 Mobile. Say what you will about desktop Windows 10, on the phone platform, Windows 10 Mobile is better than Windows Phone 8

    14. Re:Or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a few years ago, cheap smartphones were shit and you needed something high-end for a decent experience, but that's no longer the case.

    15. Re:Or... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I don't see what extras Apple give me (that are worth having) over Android that are sufficient to justify the £500+ cost difference. They seem to do much the same thing and I can put Micro SD cards in my phone.

      Of course you don't understand: you're trying to apply logic to the situation. There's a very good reason Apple iPhones are worth so much more than others: they make you feel good! Of course, that probably doesn't make sense to you because you're not thinking emotionally. You'll just have to buy an iPhone to find out. It's just like Jeeps: "It's a Jeep thing, you wouldn't understand."

      I see a lot of people who claim they have no money with iPhones. I know people who claim they are broke and desperate who have iPhones, and they aren't second hand ones either.

      Anyway, I know someone like this too. She's a single mom, scrimping and saving and worried about getting enough child support from her ex while struggling with a mediocre-paying school job, yet she has an expensive iPhone 6 that isn't quite even paid off yet, complete with expensive-ass full service with Verizon. The phone is barely even functional because it's so beat up that the screen frequently doesn't work, the Otterbox Defender it's in is falling apart (and looks like a counterfeit to me, as the "rubber" is falling apart plus the plastic parts are busted into multiple pieces, but this item was purchased at an actual Verizon store so supposedly it's genuine).

      My current advice for phones to people who want a nice phone without spending a ton of money (and of course is what I do) is to get a used Galaxy S4 or S5 on Ebay, and to get the Sprint or maybe T-Mobile version, then sign up for service with Ting. You can get a very nice S5 now for $150-200, and an S4 for less than $100 (the S5 is a little faster, and is waterproof). The prices on these things has come down lately because of the new S7s (the non-exploding kind, it's only the Notes that explode, the regular S7s and S7 Edges don't seem to). And of course, these phones are great IMO for several other reasons: removable batteries, SDcard slots, and lots of super-cheap parts available for them on Ebay, including spare OEM batteries for less than $10. The gorgeous AMOLED screens (on both) and waterproofness on the S5 are also really nice, and they're fast enough for modern, normal usage.

      In light of her phone being on its last legs and her not being in the best financial situation, I showed her my phone and told her what I was paying for service (about $20/month) and how little my phone cost, to convince her to stop wasting so much money on an iPhone and Verizon service, but she just doesn't want to give up the iPhone.

      It's like an addiction IMO. There's simply no grounding in reality or practicality for having one of these things when you're on a budget, and it's really awful that people who are the least able to afford these overpriced fashion statements are the ones most convinced that they "need" them when there's so many cheaper alternatives. This isn't to say that all lower-income people are dumb enough to buy into this scam, otherwise all those dirt-cheap prepaid phones and service plans at Walmart wouldn't be selling. Sorry if this is sexist, but personally I'd love to see a study comparing people by income level, the phone they have, how much they spend on cell service, and finally, what sex they are. I'm willing to bet good money that there's more women in this trap than men.

  5. Happy about what? by ark1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Life? Phone? ROI? Value?

    1. Re:Happy about what? by SolemnLord · · Score: 2

      How comfortably light their wallets feel.

    2. Re: Happy about what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Stockholm Syndrome. They are stuck with it, paid too much to ditch it. They come to love it.

    3. Re:Happy about what? by GeekWithAKnife · · Score: 1

      Life? Phone? ROI? Value?

      Allow me to suggest an alternative to question marks. (Note that I am disagreeing with you)

      Happy about about value. What is value? benefit minus the cost.

      Can you get the same benefit at a lower cost? -that's the value difference between offerings (in this case phones).

      As phones become more of a status symbol the value is less practical and more subjective than ever. The benefit is becoming more subjective as well.

      This is why others may envy a person driving a lambo despite the fact the car has very little practical benefit. It is ill-suited to city streets, it has no space, it has poor mileage, expensive to maintain, expensive to insure, needs a lot of parking space and sometimes it's not even comfortable to be in.

      Once again we see that "normal" chimps envy other "rich" chimps because those have a stick and a tin can. Why? because they have things other chimps do not have. That has value. Sounds ridiculous? not really. It has social value. Other chimps look up to those stick wielding, can banging "rich" chimps.

      The practical value is depending on their ability to influence other chimps. Everyone wants to be friends with those elite chimps. To be in their good graces because they have connections and they "know people" and to maybe get a go with their new gizmo because, let's face it; they have sticks, cans and what do the rest have? -nothing. (possibly everything and a lot better but it's not popular so does not count for much)

      The sad thing is that marketing, commercials, product placement etc have found this neural bug in humans that exists in chimps and have fed us the value proposition. We are now somewhat convinced that those happy successful people, they have this special stick that makes special sound on the special can; and that makes them happy! if only we could be happy like them with that stick and tin can imagine what life could be like! -While all the time this has no practical value other than to sell you shit.

      Unhappy with life>? let companies that make shit create surveys to help you make a decision to be happier. It's simple; BUY! BUY!! BUY!!!

      As the parent post asks what is return On Investment? -theoretically everlasting happiness. Practically your mileage varies on your productivity and specific requirements which most likely mean there is no ROI - it's a net loss but so is alcohol and cigarettes and bubblegum and...

      --
      A 'singular oddity' is an event that cannot be explained and only happens when you are alone.
    4. Re:Happy about what? by thebullshitpatrol · · Score: 1

      wow I must be the only person that likes nice shit (especially when other people know I have it :^]) and doesn't see my decision to buy it as submitting myself to some orwellian scheme to distill me into a chimp.

  6. Running iOS 9 on iPhone 4S does NOT make me happy by Sebby · · Score: 1

    Ever since upgrading it to iOS 7, I've been swearing more at my phone than any other device I own (PC, Android or Mac).

    --

    AC comments get piped to /dev/null
  7. Re:Running iOS 9 on iPhone 4S does NOT make me hap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Running on ios10 on 5 seems fine.

  8. except if its a Note 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    except if its a Note 7 (sorry couldnt resist)

  9. So ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this after or before self-selection bias is accounted for?

    Buyers in badly want of something are more likely to rate it higher AND to have high reservation prices. The higher the price on anything, the more likely that the people buying it are just the ones who happen to be sort of crazy about it.

    1. Re:So ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Post-purchase rationalization. People who spend more for something will rarely admit that they got ripped off, so they try to convince themselves that the product was worth it.

      This is standard behaviour for most Apple customers.

    2. Re:So ... by lxs · · Score: 1

      But, as several posts in this thread prove, that argument works both ways. If you buy a crap phone you convince yourself that you're better off because it was so cheap.

    3. Re:So ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is just more justification fabricated by the people who got ripped off.

      If the cheap phone doesn't cause headache, then you ARE better off. My phone cost $150, it does everything I want and I haven't had any problem with it. I have also used cheap phones that were laggy and annoying, but I don't buy those.

  10. Relatively speaking... by slasher999 · · Score: 1

    So in my case I just switched to Android and I'm absolutely sure I'm as happy - if not happier - with what I picked up (OnePlus 3) as I would be with an S7, Pixel XL or iPhone 7. OP3 isn't a $100 phone, but it's not an $800 phone either.

    1. Re:Relatively speaking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought a moto G 2nd edition when it was on sale for $100, and I'm very happy with it. That said, I talk, text, take the occasional photo, and check e-mail, so I'm not a heavy user.

    2. Re:Relatively speaking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. I even teach Android programming and don't care about API 7. I refuse to spend more on a phone than I've bought winter beater cars for in the snow belt of Ohio....

      400$ is actually a very nice "sweet spot" where you still get very nice hardware but it is literally 1/2 the cost of 'top of the line' phones.

      My only gripe about OP3 is that it has built in battery and that my Otterbox case for it doesn't have the sandstone finish (basically super high grit non-abrasive sand paper, which makes holding the phone SOOO MUCH easier... and I want on EVERY tablet/phone case from now on...) (But I also refuse to not put a 'real' protective case on my 400$ phone....

      also 6GB of RAM is going to help future proof OP3 with new versions of Android that require more ram...

      And RAM is why I think most phones that are cheap end up being 'aggravating' to those who have them... because the phones become slower the longer you have them or when you get an new update.... because they start running out of ram

    3. Re:Relatively speaking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I considered a OnePlus 3 but was put off by the low resolution screen, non-replaceable battery and no microSD slot. I also don't like OLED displays because they wear out much faster than LCD.

    4. Re: Relatively speaking... by ian_billyboy_morris · · Score: 1

      I've found the battery fairly good on mine, and with 64gb of storage I've not noticed the lack of an sd slot. My main complaint is that sometimes the data connection doesn't reestablish when switching from WiFi back to 4g or when I get off the tube. I've switched to a different mobile network the other day and it seems to be better so it may have been Three's fault

    5. Re:Relatively speaking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bought me a MOTO E for $30. I was satisfied up until I dropped it and the screen cracked. So I thought, no big deal, went out and got an LG for $40 and was satisfied again.

    6. Re:Relatively speaking... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I also don't like OLED displays because they wear out much faster than LCD.

      That's an old saw. I have a Galaxy S5 and my housemates a couple of Galaxy S4s with AMOLED screens; they all look perfect.

    7. Re:Relatively speaking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like the colour blue. My phone has a very blue coloured theme. Blue also happens to be the colour that wears out the fastest on OLED displays. Try running your phone with a blue theme for a few years and see how well it holds up. I can pretty much guarantee that you will end up with a yellowish display.

      Even if I were to buy a new phone every couple of years, which I don't, I still like to repurpose my old phones when I get a new one. It kind of helps to have a fully working screen to be able to do that.

  11. having more money by darkain · · Score: 1

    Having more money makes you happier!? NO SHIT!?

    1. Re:having more money by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Having more money makes you happier!? NO SHIT!?

      Possibly they may have less money because they bought a more expensive phone ;D

      I would definitely be happier with a more powerful gaming PC though. I haven't considered that but I guess I should :D

      I would also be it with a great beautiful house and a garden.

      Any volunteers? Don't I deserve to be happy damnit?! YOU INSENSITIVE CLODS!

    2. Re:having more money by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Having more money makes you happier!? NO SHIT!?

      Only until your needs are met, including some entertainment. After that, more money does not mean more happiness. With that said, fancier phones have more RAM, and faster NAND. I have found these to be far and away the most critical measurements to look at to determine how a device will behave. CPU speed is way way down in importance below whether the screen looks good or how good the audio is.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:having more money by ClickOnThis · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Many studies have indicated that people are happier when they feel well-off compared to others as opposed to being well-off in an absolute sense.

      https://sciencehouse.wordpress...
      http://www.telegraph.co.uk/new...
      http://livingeconomics.org/art...
      https://www.quora.com/Is-it-mo...
      http://content.time.com/time/h...

      It's a bit distressing to learn that we get a kick from schadenfreude, but there it is.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    4. Re:having more money by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      This is why there will always be class warfare.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    5. Re:having more money by PMuse · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up.

      One thing that buying a premium phone will get you is features that the base phone doesn't have. Just knowing that you have something* that your neighbor doesn't will make you happier. Heck, your neighbor's jealousy of your shiny new toy will make you happier, all by itself.

      *Even if the something is, rationally, not very different. e.g., 24.2GB of usable storage compared to 22.8GB.

      --
      "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
    6. Re:having more money by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Just knowing that you have something* that your neighbor doesn't will make you happier. Heck, your neighbor's jealousy of your shiny new toy will make you happier, all by itself.

      I know some people feel this way, but I've never really had this experience. I don't care what my neighbor has, or whether it's better or worse than what I have.

      Maybe I'm atypical, but I've never gauged my happiness or self-worth by my place in life relative to other people or their possessions. I don't really care if someone else has a nicer car or phone or house or whatever, and I also don't care if my car/phone/house/whatever is nicer than theirs. Why would I? That's what I don't get.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    7. Re:having more money by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Indeed, once upon a time people were excited and super happy to get a large 12inch Television.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    8. Re:having more money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TITLE SHOULD READ:
          Higher-End ANYTHING Make You Happier, Says JD Power Study

  12. no control by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

    What they didn't say is how it compares to people who do not use a smartphone (e.g. feature phone users) or people who do not use a cell phone at all.

    Technology may not make people happy but bad technology certainly makes people unhappy.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:no control by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      It's even more useless than that. The overall difference is about 4% absolute (8.3 vs 7.86 on a 10-point scale) between the two groups in the actual study, or you could say that one group is 5.5% more satisfied than the other based on the numbers. I have no idea how a .4 difference in satisfaction translates to anything in the real world. Is it the difference between winning an Olympic medal or being set on fire, or is it the difference between only getting chocolate ice cream instead of strawberry ice cream?

      The only thing I can tell is that you apparently need to spend about $200 ($361 on average vs. $137 on average) more to get .4 satisfaction.

    2. Re:no control by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Technology may not make people happy but bad technology certainly makes people unhappy.

      An excellent point.

      Frustration with my fancy new TV's 73 kabillion settings (none of which seem to do jack shit) has almost driven me back to the plain ol' "stupid" TV I used happily for years. If I hadn't gotten rid of it, I'd probably tear the new one off the wall and stick the old one back up there.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  13. Or is it self-justification? by LesFerg · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is likely because high-cost phones perform better.

    Maybe the people who forked out all that cash are just trying really hard to convince themselves they got something better than the cheaper options?

    It's a coping mechanism to hold of the fits of depression when they accept that it's still just a phone with some annoying silly apps on it.

    --
    If I had a DeLorean... I would probably only drive it from time to time.
    1. Re:Or is it self-justification? by maugle · · Score: 1

      I disagree. Cheap phones are slow, and trying to scroll through barely-responsive webpages at 10fps gradually frays one's mind. I'd pay a good sum to avoid going back to that again.

      ...Unfortunately, the phone makers know it, and keep releasing updates that suck away more resources right around the time a newer, faster, more expensive phone is released. Not naming names, but iHate it when companies do that and I wish they'd Think Different.

    2. Re:Or is it self-justification? by chipschap · · Score: 1

      Maybe the people who forked out all that cash are just trying really hard to convince themselves they got something better than the cheaper options

      (Glances over at iPhone 7 people ...)

    3. Re:Or is it self-justification? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must have different cheap phones to me. 3 or 4 years ago the difference between cheap tablets and phones and iPads/iPhones was colossal. But the Chinese manufacturers have caught up with Apple pretty much. I don't doubt a £700 iPhone is a better phone than my £70 Cubot phone. I just don't think it's £630 better. I'm not even sure it's £30 better.

  14. A well known psychological bias by GuB-42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't know the name of this bias but when someone invests a lot in something, he will tend to convince himself that he made the right choice.
    That's how audiophiles will clearly notice the effect of their $1000+ cables and will consider it money well spent whereas the one who used zip chord will probably be less satisfied, even though he paid 100x less for the same objective result.

    1. Re:A well known psychological bias by ArtemaOne · · Score: 2

      Reminds me of the people who pay a fortune for digital cables that pass the 1s and 0s no better than the cheap cables (not referring to how quality affects it over a great distance). And then I'm reminded of the people who would convert their 128kps MP3s to 160kps and imagine they hear an improvement.

    2. Re:A well known psychological bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe this effect is described as cognitive dissonance, where two competing beliefs are held simultaneously. The mind tries to reduce dissonace by justifying ones actions by adjusting one's beliefs to better fit better the narrative. An example here would be: "I bought an expensive phone because I thought I wanted it, therefore I will find satisfaction in it because I don't waste money lightly."

    3. Re:A well known psychological bias by EightBells · · Score: 1

      "cognitive dissonance"

    4. Re:A well known psychological bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I no longer have the URL handy, but I clearly remember a "customer satisfaction" study about a decade ago which found that the customers who paid sticker price for their cars were the most satisfied with their purchase out of all car buyers.

    5. Re:A well known psychological bias by QRDeNameland · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
    6. Re:A well known psychological bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Loss Aversion
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loss_aversion

    7. Re:A well known psychological bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Memory says, 'I did that.' Pride replies, 'I could not have done that.' Eventually, memory yields."

    8. Re: A well known psychological bias by pgn674 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the theory of cognitive dissonance is where people rationalize their choice in order to avoid buyer's remorse. This isn't my field, buy it may be that the phenomenon is stronger when more expensive or more socially valuable or more powerful items are chosen. There was an upheaval in the theory in 2007 when researchers used monkeys choosing m&m's, and a mathematician saw that and said the experiment was invalid because they feel victim to the Monty Hall Problem. I think later experiments avoiding Monty Hall got new, valid evidence for the theory.

    9. Re:A well known psychological bias by Velocifero · · Score: 2

      Confirmation bias may be more accurate.

    10. Re:A well known psychological bias by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      That's how audiophiles will clearly notice the effect of their $1000+ cables and will consider it money well spent whereas the one who used zip chord will probably be less satisfied, even though he paid 100x less for the same objective result.

      I disagree.

      Yes, the moron who spent $1000 on speaker cables will indeed "hear" a difference and think it was money well spent, thanks to something akin to the placebo effect.

      However, the guy who uses cheap lamp wire or other perfectly adequate wire, because he understands that the $1000 wire is just a big scam and knows how wire works, will also be satisfied, perhaps even more satisfied, because he didn't waste $997 and can feel smug about not being a sucker like the first guy.

      This happens to me every time I meet an iPhone user.

      The second path is a little harder, though: you have to do some research before you buy things (esp. expensive things), and not just listen to what marketers and salespeople tell you. But thanks to the internet, that really isn't that hard these days.

    11. Re:A well known psychological bias by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      MP3s are very lossy, and there really is a difference between 128kbps and 160kbps (not "kps", that's kilometers per second) files, particularly in the upper ranges.

      However, if you're talking about actually recoding an existing 128k MP3 to 160k, instead of going back to the lossless version (CD/WAV or FLAC) and re-encoding from that, then yeah, that's really, really stupid. You can't get more information out of less information.

    12. Re:A well known psychological bias by ArtemaOne · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I did mean kbps. Increasing the bitrate would actually make the file sound worse, as it is being re-encoded.

  15. Slashdot Sez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SPEND MORE MONEY. You are not happy with your current cell phone. Spend more money on a cell phone so you can be happy. Also, Samsung paid us to write this "story". Ignore reports of Samsung Phones exploding. SPEND SPEND SPEND.

    Sincerely and with as much honest and integrity as Hillary Clinton,

    Slashdot /.

    1. Re:Slashdot Sez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Joke's on them. I don't have a phone and I'm already happy.

  16. AMAZING!! I LEARNED SO MUCH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Huge thanks for this article!!!!!!

    This now has me contemplating ALL of the cheap stuff in my life, NOT JUST MY PHONEE!

    I WANT TO BE HAPPIER! THANKS MR. POWER!!

  17. Is it better or is it our imagination? by cdman52 · · Score: 1

    I would love to see a study on this but I always wonder if there is some kind of internal bias that happens when we spend a lot on something. Are people happier with expensive smart phones because the phone is actually better or are they happier because spending more made them more invested in the decision and since no one wants to admit they dumped a lot of money onto a piece of crap they trick themselves into thinking they are happier with it. But people who don't spend a lot don't have as much of their ego invested in the decision so they can see the flaws and don't care pointing them out since they didn't spend an embarrassing amount on the phone in the first place.

  18. confirmation bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    people who spent a large chunk of money on something will NEVER say it was stupid.

  19. Dunning, Kruger, you've done it again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If only Apple had copyrighted confirmation bias...

  20. Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Flushing money down the crapper leaves me feelin' satisfied, NOT.

  21. Yeah right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Flushing money down the loo leaves me feelin' satisfied, NOT.

  22. I have to disagree by BurnTim · · Score: 1

    I'm certainly not happier having spent more money on my Galaxy Note 7.

  23. be a clown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mohammed: Did you see Mohammed at the meeting today?
    Mohammed: No, but his brother Mohammed showed up.
    Mohammed: What did Mohammed talk about?
    Mohammed: Mohammed introduced us to Mohammed who is also a mason!
    Mohammed: A mason? No shit? How long has he been one?
    Mohammed: About five years. He was referred to the local lodge by Mohammed.
    Mohammed: Ah, yes, Mohammed. He has a shit ton of connections around town!
    Mohammed: Yes, and our brothers, police be upon them, Mohammed and Mohammed from Egypt came, too.
    Mohammed: I've been thinking of becoming a clown.
    Mohammed: A clown, Mohammed, why?
    Mohammed: So I can film myself being gay.
    Mohammed: Oh, you.
    Mohammed: So anyway, is Mohammed, Mohammed, and Mohammed coming to the next party?
    Mohammed: Indeed. Mohammed was so funny last time.
    Mohammed: Well it wouldn't be a party without Mohammed.
    Mohammed: Yes, my friend. POLICE BE UPON THEM!

  24. Happiness != satisfaction with phone service by No+Longer+an+AC · · Score: 2

    I'm very pleased with my phone's hardware. It came out 2 years ago and I've had it for about 18 months.

    What I'm dissatisfied with is the fact that it's still running Lollipop.

    Overall though it really hasn't affected my overall happiness in life.

    1. Re: Happiness != satisfaction with phone service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My phone is 3 years old (original moto x) and had been great. Fully unlocked and running cyanogenmod marshmallow.

  25. The comparison factors are skewed by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

    If you read the details of the linked study, you can see that the criteria for "happiness" is different for contract plans vs. non-contract plans. Specifically, cost isn't factored into the "happiness" score for the contract plans, but it is factored in for non-contract plans. This would tend to artificially raise the happiness score for contract plans, since factoring in the high cost would likely lower the scores.

    Also, battery life gets a much lower weight towards the score for non-contract plans than for contract plans. This is significant, because non-contract phones tent to have much better battery life than the flagship models.

    What this proves is that you can make number say whatever you want them to say.

    1. Re:The comparison factors are skewed by PaulRivers10 · · Score: 1

      What this proves is that you can make number say whatever you want them to say.

      How is this even a question? JD Power has companies pay them to produce "studies". "This study paid for by large cell network providers and expensive phone manufacturers" "Gee, did they find that you should join a large network and pay large amounts of money for your phone?" "Why yes they did! What a shocker. Up next - republicans say they're the best, and democrats say they're totally the best! After that, luxury automobiles make people happier - this study funded by lexus and bmw. After that larger houses make people happier and their kids grow up healthier, says a leading research group funded by a large homebuilding company. What's that? That's right, you'd enjoy this news broadcast a lot more on a large 4k tv - says expert study, funded by samsung, sony, and lg. What shocking info will we bring you next?"

  26. Re:$5k hookers make you happier than $5 crackwhore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    People who drive a Ferrari or Porsche generally live healthier overall and have a substantially better quality of life. They also have larger homes in general.

    We should abandon Obamacare and give everyone a Ferrari.

    Also, give one to everyone in Japan - that should increase the size of their houses.

  27. Retards usually are happier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to my extensive research.

    1. Re:Retards usually are happier by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      Retards usually are happier

      According to my extensive research.

      Im happy to confirm that.... Oh wait

  28. Don't forget wish fullfilment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You pay more, you hope for more. And are less likely to report disappointment.

  29. Confirmation bias by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

    -Customers who pay more for their phones report higher satisfaction.
    - This is likely because high-cost phones perform better. (Editor's note: no duh)

    OR it could be that they spent more so they feel they must like it more. This is actually pretty common, especially in the higher end markets. Common and exploitable.

    Bet these very same owners say the phones sound "warmer".

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
  30. Out of sheer shame.. by alexborges · · Score: 1

    ... of overspending on a trinket, 6GB Joe and Jane will say anything to save face.

    --
    NO SIG
  31. Self delusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course it is better, I paid more for it. If it were not better, I would have made a mistake and that I cannot admit to you or myself.

  32. Not only they make you happy, but... by LordHighExecutioner · · Score: 1

    ...they keep you warmer, as it has been confirmed by Samsung.

  33. Happiness vs satisfaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll just note that the slashdot headline mentions happiness, while the summary mentions satisfaction, which makes more sense. Essentially, the buyers of higher-end smartphones are more satisfied _with the smartphone_, whether they are in general happier or not in their life as a result isn't really the issue, or the effect of the higher-end smartphone.

  34. One question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's the opposite of "Buyer's remorse"?

  35. Re:$5k hookers make you happier than $5 crackwhore by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    The headline and the summary say two different things though. Logically the most satisfying phones should be the high end but reasonably priced ones like the OnePlus 3. Better specs than other flagships, great software and 1/3rd the price.

    But in fact people would rather have a worse phone and pay more for it.

    Perhaps you could extend you analogy to cover this.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  36. Scientific proof by Laxator2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    There is an old example of how scientific proof can be obtained for the conclusion that you actually want.

    A scientist puts a flea on the table and shouts at it:

    "Jump!"

    And the flea jumps.
    Then the scientist carefully cuts off the flea's legs, puts it back on the table and shouts:

    "Jump!"

    And the flea does not jump.
    After this, the scientist happily writes down on his notebook:

    "After it lost its legs, the flea cannot hear anymore."

  37. 361!??!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jesus I only pay 30 bucks a month and I think I'm more happy because I'm not being taken to the cleaners every month.

  38. They are richer by MoarSauce123 · · Score: 1

    Those who can afford high end smartphones are simply richer and do not have to worry about how to make the mortgage payment or feed the kids.

    1. Re:They are richer by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Those who can afford high end smartphones are simply richer and do not have to worry about how to make the mortgage payment or feed the kids.

      That'd be my guess, or else they have such low self-esteem that a shiny gadget makes their pathetic life seem cooler.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    2. Re:They are richer by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      That's not necessarily true. I've noticed, and I've seen at least one other comment in this discussion here saying, that a lot of people with the latest iPhones are frequently people who complain about money problems and are not even remotely rich. The monthly payment plan makes it possible for them to afford these phones, even though they really have no business spending that money on a high-end phone when they don't have any savings and probably wouldn't be able to pay their rent if they had a hiccup with their paycheck.

  39. Samsung! Samsung! by codeButcher · · Score: 1

    I bought a Note 7 the other day, and my happiness went through the roof!!!

    --
    Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
  40. maybe this way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    people who are happy to use phones are more likely to invest a larger amount of money than people who just need to carry a means of communication around.
    With that in mind I don't expect those people to be dissatisfied with their phone either, they are probably just indifferent as long as the phone gets the job done. Like, no need to buy a gold plated hammer if the conventional one can also sink a nail ...

  41. Bullshit by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    If a higher-end smartphone makes you happier, perhaps it's time to reexamine your life.

    A loving spouse, good health, good friends, or hobbies or a job I enjoy can make me appreciate my life more fully and as a result be "happier".

    But a fancier smartphone? Nope. My life and my general happiness doesn't operate at that low a level.

    But if I had the new Gillette Mega-Radical 5-Blade Super-Torque Pro razor, now that would make me happier. Oh yeah baby.

    *terrorized by the urge to buy, I drive to Walmart with a renewed sense of purpose in life*

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    1. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if I had the new Gillette Mega-Radical 5-Blade Super-Torque Pro razor, now that would make me happier. Oh yeah baby.

      That bad boy better come with two strips of aloe, for moisture, as well.

    2. Re:Bullshit by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      I flat refuse to get tied down with phone contracts, and also refuse to pay large sums of $$$ for the phone, therefore, I've always stayed with one MVNO or another, currently Ting, where my usual phone bill for two phones is between $25-$35/mo.. I'd previously used bottom-feeder phones bought off eBay, but decided I'd like a bit nicer phone, so I spent a whole $65 and bought a Nexus 4, rooted it so I could get adblock to work properly.. Couldn't be happier with it.. I snicker at those who are willing to blow northwards of $500 on a flippin telephone, then pay northwards of $75/mo to be able to use it...

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    3. Re:Bullshit by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I spent quite a bit more than that for my phone, but it too was a used phone from Ebay, a Galaxy S5 (about $150). I'm quite happy with it, and a couple of years ago when it was new it was the fanciest phone out there, and still is very, very nice (plus it has great CyanogenMod support, lots of cheap repair parts available in case something breaks, cheap OEM batteries available, etc.). It's still getting regular OS updates too. I'm quite happy with it and don't see why I'd want to pay any more than that for a phone when I can get a barely-used flagship phone for so cheap just by staying a couple years behind the cutting edge. Phones have plateaued technologically anyway, so I don't see how newer phones are really any better; I don't need a 4k screen, when my 1080p screen already looks fantastic. Maybe in 2-3 years I'll upgrade to what's state-of-the-art today.

      I agree about Ting too. I have 3 phones on that, and the bill is around $55/month, so less than $20/month per phone. It helps using WiFi calling when I'm at home to keep my usage down.

    4. Re:Bullshit by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      I snicker at those who are willing to blow northwards of $500 on a flippin telephone, then pay northwards of $75/mo to be able to use it...

      Same here. I use a $99 Android phone. Spending $500 to $800 or so on a phone seems slightly nutty to me.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  42. Monster cable satisfaction by camg188 · · Score: 1

    In other news...
    People who buy premium digital Monster cables at Best Buy report higher satisfaction than those who buy generic cables from Microcenter.

  43. Re:$5k hookers make you happier than $5 crackwhore by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    Whether or not people with Porsche have healthier lives, there have previously been studies that show that how much you spend on your car does not correlate to your satisfaction levels with your car. So this news about smartphones would suggest you're better off buying a top of the line smartphone and a junker than you are a Porsche and a "LeEco" phone.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  44. Re:$5k hookers make you happier than $5 crackwhore by pnutjam · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If the carrier doesn't sell it, most consumer don't know it exists.

  45. No doubt by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 1

    When you spend $600+ for a phone, rather than getting one that, for one quarter of the price, will do almost everything that the big one does, you are doing that because you want to show the world that you do not have a small cock. Those overpriced phones are status symbols, period. It does not matter how well they work, provided that they do the basics. What matters is that you can produce them in public, and that everybody around you will see what a successful person you are.

  46. False "feel good" by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    In our narcissistic self absorbed world, it's like a junkie getting a fix. It works for a few days/weeks/months. Then, as with a junkie, you want more and more and more. It's an endless cycle. We have one guy at work that has traded/bought a 5 new phones this year, always chasing the mythical "next best thing. I usually keep a midrange phone about 2 years.

  47. Meaningless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When people pay a lot of money for a product they rarely will declare that they are an idiot who paid a premium price for a lump of crap. This is particularly true with cars. Many will lie and brag about paying a higher price than they really paid while others will try to make an impression by claiming they paid way less than they actually paid. And the same is often true in describing quality. A model that rides like a piece of junk and is too dangerous to be on the roads may be described in glowing terms. After all, who wants to brag about being the fool that purchased the rolling death trap.

  48. Samsung by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    ...maybe it's because people who buy $600 phones tend to have more money (and less worries) than people who buy $50 devices.

    This also explains why Samsung is top because those owners will never have to worry about being able to stay warm at night.

  49. Value makes me happy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no way the $600 phone is five times better than the $120 phone. I actually like the Windows phones as much as Android.

  50. Re:Running iOS 9 on iPhone 4S does NOT make me hap by thebullshitpatrol · · Score: 0

    Your alternative is 2 years of support with a Nexus device or less with a 3rd party Android device. Choose wisely.

  51. WTF! by Codeyman · · Score: 1

    RTFA: People with higher end smart phones are not happier.. they are happier with their phones. People with Ferraris are not happier than people who own Toyota, they just like their car more. Why do you need a study to prove that?!

    If people were not happy with higher end products that they paid more money for, they wouldn't pay more money for it. Which means there would be no demand for higher end products, which implies that society would not reward innovation, which means that the economy will collapse...

  52. Status-Seekers by pipingguy · · Score: 1

    Positional good reinforces poor existing self-image, news at 11.

  53. Money can't buy happiness... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    users who pay more for their smartphones report higher satisfaction than those who pay less for their smartphones

    ...except when it can.

  54. Re:Running iOS 9 on iPhone 4S does NOT make me hap by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    Bullshit. My Galaxy S5 is more than 2 years old and is still getting updates (in fact it just got one which I'll install just as soon as I do a backup just in case).

  55. Re:Running iOS 9 on iPhone 4S does NOT make me hap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it running 7.1.1? If not, it's outdated garbage.

  56. Re:Running iOS 9 on iPhone 4S does NOT make me hap by thebullshitpatrol · · Score: 0

    wow cool, your S5 runs Marshmallow now? easily one of the best mobile OS's of last year.

  57. Rewording by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

    Happier people buy higher-end smartphones. It's obvious that this is complete BS because the aforementioned or article-mentioned points can be debunked AND proven. Is this is statistical push by Samsung to subconsciously quell those in fear and get their name back out there as a "Happy" product? I thought that "Happy Happy xyz" crap only worked in Japan.

  58. Re:$5k hookers make you happier than $5 crackwhore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish someone'd give me a Ferrari. I could sell it and even if it was a cheaper second-hand Ferrari, it could pay my bills for ten years.
    This is the world we live in, I struggle to get by, constantly looking for a little job here, a little job there, hoping for the permanent employment that will never come, being jobless most of the time, and some people blow ten years worth of living money on a car. And while I'm working the hardest I can, even when I'm not employed (I do community work and looking for jobs is also hard work), the Ferrari owners of this world basically sit on their asses all day. Sigh.

  59. Re:Running iOS 9 on iPhone 4S does NOT make me hap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    False dichotomy. Some of us are smart enough to use custom ROMs.

  60. Just in, money makes you happy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That people with more money are happier is hardly news worthy.