Slashdot Mirror


Trump Trades in Android Phone For Secret Service-Approved Device (cnet.com)

Who's got two thumbs and a Secret Service-approved phone to tweet from? On arriving in Washington on Thursday ahead of his inauguration, Donald Trump has handed in his Android device in exchange for an unidentified locked-down phone, according to Associated Press. From a report: The phone comes with a new number that is known only to a limited number of people. This marks a big change for Trump, who's frequently on the line with friends, business contacts, reporters, foreign leaders and politicians. Barack Obama was the first president to use a mobile device approved by security agencies because of hacking concerns. Initially he had a heavily modified BlackBerry and later switched to another phone that had most features totally disabled. He was not known to use it for making or receiving calls, but it was one of few devices that had access to the @POTUS Twitter account.

206 comments

  1. If they're smart... by Notabadguy · · Score: 2, Funny

    If they're smart it will have been a toy phone. He can beep-boop-beep on it to his heart's content. Bonus points if pressing the buttons makes a pleasant sound each time.

    1. Re: If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Last day to bash Trump! Then he will deport you.

    2. Re: If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      the grapes are soar, eh hombre :)

    3. Re:If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they're smart it will have been a toy phone. He can beep-boop-beep on it to his heart's content. Bonus points if pressing the buttons makes a pleasant sound each time.

      with candy nerds in it.

    4. Re:If they're smart... by CajunArson · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah Trump's just SO STUPID!

      You are SO ORIGINAL with that zinger! Damn, are you up for a Pulitzer?

      Incidentally, if he's so stupid, how come Hillary isn't being inaugurated today?

      --
      AntiFA: An abbreviation for Anti First Amendment.
    5. Re:If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      Yeah Trump's just SO STUPID!

      You are SO ORIGINAL with that zinger! Damn, are you up for a Pulitzer?

      Incidentally, if he's so stupid, how come Hillary isn't being inaugurated today?

      Intelligence != popularity

    6. Re:If they're smart... by GerardAtJob · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm not even a USA citizen, and I feel like you since
      - he did nothing yet
      - he was elected.

      Perhaps you'll see me hate him in a few weeks, but not yet lol

      --
      I can't call that English ;-)
    7. Re: If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Electoral college

    8. Re:If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah Trump's just SO STUPID!

      You are SO ORIGINAL with that zinger! Damn, are you up for a Pulitzer?

      Incidentally, if he's so stupid, how come Hillary isn't being inaugurated today?

      Dang those Russian paid posters have even made it onto Slashdot...

    9. Re:If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they're smart ...

      Newsflash: they'ren't.

    10. Re:If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Incidentally, if he's so stupid, how come Hillary isn't being inaugurated today?

      Because the Americans that mattered are more interested in a reality TV celebrity than a boring public servant.

      Do you follow him on Twitter? The man is an idiot.

    11. Re: If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      the grapes are soar, eh hombre :)

      Muchacho, aboot the only time grapes can soar is if e.g. launched out of a window in the Trump Towers.

    12. Re:If they're smart... by kilfarsnar · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yeah Trump's just SO STUPID!

      You are SO ORIGINAL with that zinger! Damn, are you up for a Pulitzer?

      Incidentally, if he's so stupid, how come Hillary isn't being inaugurated today?

      I don't think he's stupid at all. I just think he's a boor and a con man.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    13. Re:If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      because most of Americans are stupid? they like voting for their own kind. case in point: GWB

    14. Re:If they're smart... by Opportunist · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Because people enjoy having a president they can identify with.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    15. Re: If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Troll

      Trump needs a real phone to call russian prostitutes and golden-shower them.

      Sorry, Snowflake. This was yet another bogus Fake News story. Completely fabricated. And you fell for it.

      Thanks for playing.

    16. Re:If they're smart... by Notabadguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes...yes he is. And his opponent wasn't a boring public servant. She's a traitor, a habitual liar, incompetent, self-serving, and saggy-boobs deep in pay-for-play.

      Think on that. We elected an IDIOT because he's better than the alternative. If he gets our soldiers killed or sells us out, it'll be because he's dumb and incompetent, not because he's sleazy and malicious.

      At least with him, there's a chance.

    17. Re: If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      The substance of that story -- Trump cheated on his wife in a Russian hotel -- is verified by other sources.

      So how hard is it to believe the rest of it? Including that a billionnaire was being spied on by the russian secret service?

      If I was a betting man, I would bet that before his four year term is out, you come to believe that story is true.

    18. Re:If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I can't believe I found myself missing the Mormon.

    19. Re:If they're smart... by CajunArson · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yes, blame the blacks -- oh wait -- jews -- oh wait -- Russians for everything. It's literally impossible that Hillary might have lost because she ran an incompetent campaign while living in special bubble created by the press and her elite celebrity pals who told her that she didn't have to earn the election.

      It's sort of ironic that you call Trump a xenophobe while the entire Democrat and press establishment go on a witchhunt for foreigners that makes Mccarthyism look like Mr. Rogers.

      --
      AntiFA: An abbreviation for Anti First Amendment.
    20. Re: If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He paid them to golden shower Michelle ('s bed).

    21. Re:If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The best part about Trump is that it's never going to get old. He keeps talking. If he could learn to shut the fuck up, people might eventually forget how stupid and dishonest he is. But he keeps reminding everybody, "Hey, I'm stupid and dishonest!"

      Incidentally, if he's so stupid, how come Hillary isn't being inaugurated today?

      Because people didn't want that piece of shit to be president either. You might be surprised to learn that this is totally independent of Trump's stupidity and dishonesty. (If Trump had been smart, half the country still wouldn't want Clinton as president.)

      You can't fix Democrats by voting for Republicans, and you can't fix Republicans by voting for Democrats. If you are using either of these strategies, then you are also one of the stupid people. You need to start really voting, and that means finally voting against them. A vote for Hillary was a vote for Trump, and a vote for Trump was a vote for Hillary.

      So of course Trump and Hillary won. Trump just won a little more. Good job, Democrats. Enjoy your new president that you supported through your actions. Next time he says something stupid, or the next time you catch him in another lie, remember: you made that guy president. He represents you, because you said, in the voting booth, that you wanted one of those kinds of people to be president. And there were enough of you people doing that, for you to get your wish.

    22. Re: If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh well, if Slashdot AC #53703183 says it's fake then that's that. Move along people.

    23. Re:If they're smart... by Mycroft-X · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm not even a USA citizen, and I feel like you since
      - he did nothing yet
      - he was elected.

      One Nobel Peace Prize, coming right up!

    24. Re:If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Umm, because the electorate is more stupid?

    25. Re:If they're smart... by ComputerGeek01 · · Score: 0

      Incidentally, if he's so stupid, how come Hillary isn't being inaugurated today?

      Because she was even dumber than he is? We're talking about relativism at this point. When you're talking about two retards, declaring one to be smarter than the other does not change the fact that they are both still a retarded.

    26. Re:If they're smart... by houghi · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Incidentally, if he's so stupid, how come Hillary isn't being inaugurated today?

      Because people voted against the current political situation. Enough did not vote for him, but against her. People who understand this have used this to direct their votes.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    27. Re:If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes...yes he is. And his opponent wasn't a boring public servant. She's a traitor, a habitual liar, incompetent, self-serving, and saggy-boobs deep in pay-for-play.

      Think on that. We elected an IDIOT because he's better than the alternative. If he gets our soldiers killed or sells us out, it'll be because he's dumb and incompetent, not because he's sleazy and malicious.

      At least with him, there's a chance.

      No, *WE* didn't if by "we" you're referring to a plurality. The majority of THE PEOPLE (who are the "we") wanted the alternative. But an antiquated system allowed the person with the least votes to win. Again. BTW, Trump's boobs are just as saggy as Hillary's. But being a man, that makes his even *MORE* laughable.

    28. Re:If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Already making strides as Billary would never have done this.

    29. Re: If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you fucking kidding me? What about all the dirt that was thrown obamas way when he became president? When The W because president? This isn't new and it isn't special for Trump. So fuck off with that bullshit.

    30. Re:If they're smart... by GerardAtJob · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If he can drone strike enough people, perhaps he can too ;)

      --
      I can't call that English ;-)
    31. Re:If they're smart... by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      Umm, because the electorate is more stupid?

      The electorate in general is pretty stupid, yes. See my sig for more insight.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    32. Re: If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me guess, more BS stories citing other stories and anonymous sources? Oh, I guess you do have that MI6 guy that wrote the report, but nothing of actual substance to back it and we know it was a fake made by /pol.

      But sure, feel free to believe that Obama's bed got peed on if that makes you feel better.

    33. Re: If they're smart... by Mashiki · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Because his supports have an IQ of a retarded ferret?

      You'd think that after ~15-17 years of identity politics, labeling people as "racists, nazis, retards, bigots, sexists, etc, etc, etc" that the left would learn something. Seems to be a NOPE on that one. And it's only cost them in the US ~1200 seats of power. It's only cost them brexit. It's likely going to cost them Germany and France too. And with the shit that Trudeau and leftists are now pulling in Canada? I wouldn't be surprised if we see the death of the Liberal Party within the next 5 years. And I'll bet that instead of being introspective, people on the left are gonna double down. Just like the democrats in the US are, just like political parties, and media are in the US and Europe.

      Just a FYI: The left are overrun with extremists. Whether it be people who claim they're anti-racists being racists, claiming to be anti-bigots, while engaging in bigotry. Engaging in general shitty behavior that enables a literal cultural desert because "cultural appropriation." Engaging in sexist or anti-sexual liberation ideologies. It doesn't matter. You are, where the right was ~25 years ago, when you were out there screaming about the "crazy religious right-wing nuts." Get rid of the crazies, dump the identity politics. In short: Get your shit in order.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    34. Re:If they're smart... by laughing_badger · · Score: 1

      Which of his opponents in the Republican primaries are you referring to?

      --
      Help children born unable to swallow - www.tofs.org.uk
    35. Re:If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Here's a 3d map of the vote by county. Pretty interesting. http://metrocosm.com/election-...

      The "popular" vote is due to just a few counties, which happen to also be safe places for illegals, and highly alleged to be corrupt. We don't know how much voter fraud happened in those places, but it is likely non-zero.

      Being smart, Trump knew that these were no-win states, so he didn't waste any time or money campaigning there. He was going after the win rather than the popular vote. Considering Trumps relatively low campaign costs, he went about it wisely. I hope he handles his presidential decisions this well.

    36. Re:If they're smart... by quantaman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes...yes he is. And his opponent wasn't a boring public servant. She's a traitor, a habitual liar, incompetent, self-serving, and saggy-boobs deep in pay-for-play.

      Think on that. We elected an IDIOT because he's better than the alternative. If he gets our soldiers killed or sells us out, it'll be because he's dumb and incompetent, not because he's sleazy and malicious.

      At least with him, there's a chance.

      No you elected an idiot because you are an idiot.

      Clinton had flaws, but none of the things you mentioned were among them (with the possible exception of your weirdly sexist comment about her breasts).

      --
      I stole this Sig
    37. Re:If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Incidentally, if he's so stupid, how come Hillary isn't being inaugurated today?

      Partly because when SHE had the opportunity to hand in HER phone for a government one, she refused. Which I find hilarious.

      The major reason I knew I, personally, could never vote for her was when (via leaked emails) it became clear that the reason she was mad at government IT and decided to use her own email server was because they wouldn't let her use her phone inside a SCIF. A SCIF is a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility. The entire point to it is that it's safe from eavesdropping, and therefore is shielded from cell reception (or any kind of reception - it's basically a giant Faraday cage).

      And Clinton was trying to force them to let her use her personal phone inside of it.

      The actual reason she lost, her complete lack of touch with workers, is just gravy. But the fact that she was the type of over-demanding "VP of marketing" type who demanded IT completely ignore security was enough to make me hate her, ignoring the mountain of other reasons. And, of course, her complete disdain for security practices and those who set them up and enforce them then came back to bite her in the ass when her campaign's email was hacked, multiple times. So that was nice too.

      Am I happy we wound up with Trump? No. That's a problem in the Primaries process, where other, better candidates were weeded out because despite the fact that the majority of the GOP hates Trump, they weren't able to settle on a single candidate. In a proper voting system like IRV, Trump never would have won the nomination. Am I happier that the harpy will never see the White House? Hell yes!

    38. Re: If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To where? The Cherokee reservation in Oklahoma where my Native American relatives are or County Cork Ireland where my Irish cousins still live? Maybe Germany where my paternal great grandmother may still have some relatives....

    39. Re: If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're going to be deported to a worse third world shit hole: Chicago!

    40. Re: If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      It's QUITE obvious Trump HAS been with prostitutes since marrying his imported whore wife, let's be honest. Oh right, you're a 2017 Republican.

      Let's be plausible. Trump is a scumbag and you're his pet. Did he pay to get pissed on? Who knows.

      What we do know is Putin holds that fraud's leash.

    41. Re:If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's sort of ironic that you call Trump a xenophobe while the entire Democrat and press establishment go on a witchhunt for foreigners that makes Mccarthyism look like Mr. Rogers.

      Actually there was no xenophobic things said in the previous post, but you really went off about that... Kind of like a Russian poster would to distract from the fact that he was called out about it.

      And a Russian poster wouldn't get the sarcasm in the original post either.

      I am sure you will bring up Hillary in your response to this comment as well, because no one mentioned anything about her other than you.

    42. Re:If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because we couldn't vote for another Marxist Kenyan?

      Riiiiiggggghhhhhtttttt....

      You are a tool.

    43. Re: If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the person with the least votes won we would be inaugurating an unknown write-in today.

    44. Re:If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would argue that he has done something already. Those tweets about the trade deals, disparaging the UN/NATO, etc, are already having an affect on our foreign policy. This is evident by the moves that China has been making to enact their own trade deal as well as countries like Germany signaling that they are unhappy. He needs to realize that all of those off the cuff remarks do really mean something in the geo-political world because they signal his intentions. This bullshit about let's wait and see what he does is just that, when a man shows you who he is believe him the first time.

    45. Re:If they're smart... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

      He's done plenty. Knocked billions off the value of multiple companies, scared the shit out of a lot of people who rely on Obamacare, divided the county...

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    46. Re:If they're smart... by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      I'm not even a USA citizen . . .

      . . . and probably neither were a lot of folks who voted in the US Presidential Election . . . for all of the candidates.

      Oh, and Trump's new phone is not called a "Smart" phone because of all the features and apps, but because it is a Maxwell Smart shoe-phone. Just until that number gets posted on the Internet . . . Trump's shoes will be ringing like crazy! What a hoot and a half for a boring party . . . ring up and talk to Trump's feet!

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    47. Re:If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I identified with Gary. What's wrong with having a pot smoker in the White House? Peace and love, bro.

    48. Re: If they're smart... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You still don't get it. People don't label Trump and some of his supporters as racists and bigots. They ARE racists and bigots, it's just a statement of fact, and they don't even bother to deny it most of the time. In fact some of them revel in it, including Trump himself.

      This mistake was not countering the narrative that white males are oppressed and equality and progressive ideas have gone too far. Fear and resentment are powerful tools.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    49. Re: If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This time, they're foaming at the mouth.

    50. Re:If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You Trumpies have been drinking piss straight from the whore's mouth and you want to lecture the popular vote winners on lemonade.

      Classic.

    51. Re: If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He's been accused of less rape that #42. So hypocrite.

    52. Re: If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh huh. Sure. I know, I'm "racist" because I don't support Barrack Hussein Obama and his campaign to destroy American values while blowing up the Middle East and allowing ISIS to rein free. And I'm a "sexist" because I don't support Hillary Clinton and her brand of complete sleaze and incompetence.

      But go ahead, continue with the name calling, random guy who's in the UK. Maybe that will help you understand why Brexit is happening and why your fellow countrymen are desperately trying to saving their country from idiots like you.

    53. Re: If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Detroit not being the default go to? Things are improving.

    54. Re:If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      "- he did nothing yet"

      Actually? He ran a fraudulent ponzi-scheme style 'university' until the court decided he couldn't legally call it that.
      He cheated HUNDREDS TO THOUSANDS of small business contractors out of their earned due.
      He gave neo-nazis a political platform when he saw the GOP needed new eunuch enforcers.
      He publicly attacked cripples, minorities, women, gold star families, veterans, reporters, officials, scientists, teachers.
      He literally undermined the US POTUS office by de-requiring tax disclosures and other basic shit for the office.

      But worst of all he's a stupid cunt. He can't take a fake selfie without looking like a fucking moron caught in a lie.

      He brings shame and embarrassment to all true Americans. BTW I didn't vote for Clinton.

    55. Re:If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a 3d map of the vote by county. Pretty interesting. http://metrocosm.com/election-...

      And anyone who isn't an idiot who looks at that map, sees the real story. The country is mostly flat, because that's the lack of margin, except in places where there's a LOT of people. Like huge amounts.

      The "popular" vote is due to just a few counties, which happen to also be safe places for illegals, and highly alleged to be corrupt.

      Because nobody ever accused any rural counties of being corrupt electoral frauds. Oh wait, wait, they done that. Herp. Whatcha gonna do?

      We don't know how much voter fraud happened in those places, but it is likely non-zero.

      You don't know, but you want to believe it's somehow meaningful levels! And only against your canddiate!

      Being smart, Trump knew that these were no-win states, so he didn't waste any time or money campaigning there. He was going after the win rather than the popular vote. Considering Trumps relatively low campaign costs, he went about it wisely.

      He got lucky. He got less votes in Wisconsin than Kerry in 2004, he underperformed in Texas, he crashed in California.

      I hope he handles his presidential decisions this well.

      So far, he's failed, he's even claimed a landslide. That's a lie.

    56. Re:If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nobody elected him because he's better than the alternative. 3 million votes confirm he's not better than the alternative.

      Gerrymandering elected him.

    57. Re:If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He IS sleazy and malicious, there are too many examples that shows he is. Trump University, calling Obama a citizen from Kenia, threatening Hillary, etc.

      I'm sorry, there is no chance.

    58. Re: If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But yet all of the centipedes believed Pizzagate...

      Ohhhh the irony.

    59. Re: If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd think that after ~15-17 years of identity politics, labeling people as "racists, nazis, retards, bigots, sexists, etc, etc, etc" that the left would learn something.

      No, we know you have no shame. Zero self-analysis. Never heard of introspection. You can't say anything about yourself. You can't understand how to look at what you do, and criticize it. Or those you support.

      Try it. I dare you. You won't get anywhere with your continued failed attempts here.

      Seems to be a NOPE on that one. And it's only cost them in the US ~1200 seats of power. It's only cost them brexit. It's likely going to cost them Germany and France too.

      You keep telling yourself that. Yet you keep ignoring how gerrymandered the US is, how the Republicans keep manipulating the electorate to keep people from voting, how the Brexit vote was marginal and without a specific plan (which said standard-bearer is still vacillating on), how the big crises in Germany and France aren't caused by welcoming people, but by attacking them.

      Yeah, and you probably freaked out over the swimsuit too.

      And with the shit that Trudeau and leftists are now pulling in Canada? I wouldn't be surprised if we see the death of the Liberal Party within the next 5 years.

      You probably desperately hope for that. You'll be wrong.

      And I'll bet that instead of being introspective, people on the left are gonna double down.

      They should, they should go all out, and take on the bigots and extremists of the right. They should demand reform and change, rather than accommodation and persuasion. Chamberlain was wrong.

      Just like the democrats in the US are, just like political parties, and media are in the US and Europe.

      Actually, they're not, and they probably won't. Maybe you didn't notice how middle of the road Hillary Clinton was. Or Barack Obama. Or Bill Clinton.

      The extremist party is the right.

      Just a FYI: The left are overrun with extremists.

      Nope. The left is overrun with compromisers and equivocaters. The right is the one going with the extremists who call for revolution. Notice how many of them nod their head over Cliven Bundy and his crew? Roy Moore and his judicial activism?

      Whether it be people who claim they're anti-racists being racists, claiming to be anti-bigots, while engaging in bigotry. Engaging in general shitty behavior that enables a literal cultural desert because "cultural appropriation." Engaging in sexist or anti-sexual liberation ideologies. It doesn't matter. You are, where the right was ~25 years ago, when you were out there screaming about the "crazy religious right-wing nuts." Get rid of the crazies, dump the identity politics. In short: Get your shit in order.

      LOL. Says the person who is defending the happenstance election of a guy who was screaming out over Obama's birth certificate for years. A guy who screamed about building a wall and making Mexicans pay for it. A guy who screamed to a civil rights hero that he did nothing. A guy who picked a religious ideologue for his VP. A guy who tweeted about revolution in 2012. A guy who picked unqualified, unprepared candidates for his administrative posts, ranging from a racist already rejected by the Senate, to a random black guy who just seems qualified to lead HUD because...reasons. Tell you what Mashiki, why don't you do some analysis, and tell us the real story.

      Tell us about the party who spent 8 years screaming for repeal of a healthcare plan they supported in committee, but didn't have the balls to vote for, but never came up with an alternative. Tell us about the party that has spent 8 years screaming about electoral fraud and implementing restrictive voter discrimination laws. Tell us about the party that only won votes because of gerrymandering so bad judges have

    60. Re:If they're smart... by Notabadguy · · Score: 1

      I'm having fun watching myself get modded down hard. =D

    61. Re:If they're smart... by GerardAtJob · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's not him, but all the FUD created by medias lol.
      Country was already divided, since it's voters that votes, not Trump.
      All I just wanna say is -> wait and see! If he does bad, then protest all you want and kick he's sorry ass out of there, but please wait to see what he's going to do, and how.

      We, in Canada, got one interesting guy which love to selfy and every media ""loved"" him... we're stacking record debt since then...
      I guess many US and worldwide big shots are just playing with all your minds via media. Just calm down, wait and see for yourself.

      TDLR : Don't "think emotionally".

      --
      I can't call that English ;-)
    62. Re:If they're smart... by jimbolauski · · Score: 2

      The reason many didn't get behind her was not because she was boring but because of her well earned reputation. When given the choice between a pompous, arrogant, jackass or a slimy, deceitful, politician America choose the arrogant jackass.

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    63. Re:If they're smart... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Incidentally, if he's so stupid, how come Hillary isn't being inaugurated today?

      Because spewing racism while frothing at the mouth and making unrealistic and truly bizarre promises resonates more with Americans?
      Because stupidity has nothing to do with popularity?
      Because just because one man is incredibly stupid doesn't mean his opponent isn't incredibly dangerous?

      Given the choice of having my country run by Kim Jong Un and a bobblehead Jesus I too would do my best to ensure the ever agreeable Jesus gets inaugurated.

    64. Re: If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't understand. Nobody cares that you are against Obama or Clinton. Being against them isn't something you need to be on the defensive about, and being against them isn't why every person you meet gets the impression that you're a retard or racist.

      You're a racist because you're for Trump. Because he's a racist and has basically (implicitly) admitted it.

      Many of Clinton's opponents were not racist. Gary Johnson isn't racist. (And Gary's exact opposite, Bernie Sanders, also isn't racist.) But Trump is racist. And you picked the racist. Why did you not only vote against Clinton (understandable) but also just happen to vote against every one of the non-racists, and pick the racist instead? That needs some explainin', though you can do it quickly and eloquently with "I don't like spics" or maybe something deeper, like "We need more inflation because most Americans aren't poor enough yet."

    65. Re: If they're smart... by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      You still don't get it. People don't label Trump and some of his supporters as racists and bigots.

      Going by your reasoning, then democrats and people who support them are pedophiles right? After all, there are so many of them that have deep links to people like Epstein. And there's just so many articles on leftwing media sources, sites and so on in the defense of pedophiles, child porn, and so on. See how easy that works? Haven't learned a single fucking thing.

      They ARE racists and bigots, it's just a statement of fact, ...

      Repeatedly saying that, doesn't make it true. Then again, your definition of "racist and bigots" seems to be anybody who refuses to agree with your political ideology. Which is why the left is right there, screaming no platform. Or attacking, assaulting, or violently assaulting people for having a different point of view. It's why they're organized into groups, it's why those big "left wing" groups keep doing it too. Let's look at that "j20" or whatever it's called and what do we see? Yep, the left has an extremism problem. You know what we call that kiddies? That's right, that would be a fascist ideology.

       

      This mistake was not countering the narrative that white males are oppressed and equality and progressive ideas have gone too far. Fear and resentment are powerful tools.

      The mistake was promoting that ideology and view in the first place. The second mistake is people jumping on board to support it. The third was then implementing progressive ideas that openly supported it and claiming it was diverse. You've suddenly discovered that the rest of society really doesn't support any of the bullshit you've been peddling -- rather they simply tolerated it. Then you decided to double down, and people started going "wait, didn't they argue against this." And you gave rise to the beast that'll kill it for you, unless you do it yourself.

      You enjoying your self-created extremism yet? You know what the real kicker is? You're now going to experience what it's like to be demonized, just like you've done to conservatives for decades. And it's going to be the moderates lining up to take shots at you.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    66. Re:If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, blame the blacks -- oh wait -- jews -- oh wait -- that's what Centipedes do

      FTFY

      It's sort of ironic that you call Trump a xenophobe while the entire Democrat and press establishment go on a witchhunt for foreigners that makes Mccarthyism look like Mr. Rogers.

      You forgot to also mention that the CIA, the FBI, and the NSA, the actual intelligence agencies of our government. Should I remind you that the CIA is solely responsible for foreign intelligence? I'd think if they said that there was Russian meddling/hacking, that it would be taken seriously, since that's what they're supposed to find and report.

    67. Re:If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, um, he's not the only one dividing the country. As they say, it takes two to tango.

    68. Re: If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When has Trump ever done or said anything even remotely racist? It's never happened. It's fake news.

      Barrack Hussein Obama did plenty of racist things. Those happened. BLM is a racist hate machine that Hilary Clinton openly courted.

      But Trump? Trump's victory came because he promised to help the working people. His victory is because he supports the majority of Americans, and so the majority of America support him.

      Deal.

      With.

      It.

      Preferably without false claims of racism.

    69. Re: If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Going by your reasoning, then democrats and people who support them are pedophiles right? After all, there are so many of them that have deep links to people like Epstein. And there's just so many articles on leftwing media sources, sites and so on in the defense of pedophiles, child porn, and so on. See how easy that works? Haven't learned a single fucking thing.

      I'm sure somewhere in your brain, this random gabble makes sense. It doesn't. Try to see that. Show you've learned something. You're just some random tortuously convoluted argument without realizing it has no meaning.

      Really, if you want to talk about a pedophile in government, try this guy.

      Repeatedly saying that, doesn't make it true. Then again, your definition of "racist and bigots" seems to be anybody who refuses to agree with your political ideology. Which is why the left is right there, screaming no platform.

      You know who keeps repeatedly saying something? You, by continuing to incessantly declare that the only reason somebody is a "racist and bigot" is because of their refusal to agree with political ideology. That's a common practice on the right, they make themselves out to be the victim, and they've been doing it since the American Civil War. You can't face up to the actual racism and bigotry of Trump, so you make it the LEFT's fault for pointing it out.

      Some of us remember his birtherism, his pattern of conduct, and his general attitude when it comes to racial issues. Notice how you avoid talking about it.

      Or attacking, assaulting, or violently assaulting people for having a different point of view.

      Oh now you're concerned about violence in politics? That's the hallmark of a bully like yourself, you make yourself out to be forced to do it, because everybody else is hurting you!

      Notice how you never say anything about the right-wing doing that. You can't even chide Trump's name-calling.

      It's why they're organized into groups, it's why those big "left wing" groups keep doing it too.

      Oh goodness, now you are upset that people have learned that 20 sticks is stronger than 1 stick alone.

      Why?

      Let's look at that "j20" or whatever it's called and what do we see? Yep, the left has an extremism problem. You know what we call that kiddies? That's right, that would be a fascist ideology.

      Right. Right. Right. Right. Right.

      Exactly what do you say about any of this? Huh. Nothing. Why do you never look at yourself Mashiki?

      The mistake was promoting that ideology and view in the first place. The second mistake is people jumping on board to support it.

      Yes, but it's too late to deal with the racist and bigoted ideology and view of the right as if it didn't exist. It does, and needs to be combated.

      The third was then implementing fascist ideas that openly supported it and claiming it was liberating. You've suddenly discovered that the rest of society really doesn't support any of the bullshit you've been peddling -- rather they simply tolerated it.

      FTFY. But oh no, society really likes that bullshit. In the Middle East. In Asia. In Europe. In the US South. All sorts of places. It's very popular.

      Though not enough to get the most votes.

      Then you decided to double down, and people started going "wait, didn't they argue against this." An

    70. Re:If they're smart... by ItsJustAPseudonym · · Score: 1

      Don't forget "bully".

    71. Re:If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes...yes he is. And his opponent wasn't a boring public servant. She's a traitor, a habitual liar, incompetent, self-serving, and saggy-boobs deep in pay-for-play.

      Think on that. We elected an IDIOT because he's better than the alternative. If he gets our soldiers killed or sells us out, it'll be because he's dumb and incompetent, not because he's sleazy and malicious.

      At least with him, there's a chance.

      Trump was elected not because he's better than the alternative but because he convinced enough people in a few states that he was better than the alternative.
      First President in 20 years to inherit a decreasing unemployment rate and his today's speech is about how bad things are at the moment.
      Wait.. there's a chance that Trump isn't sleazy and malicious?

    72. Re: If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You still don't get it. People don't label Trump and some of his supporters as racists and bigots. They ARE racists and bigots, it's just a statement of fact, and they don't even bother to deny it most of the time. In fact some of them revel in it, including Trump himself.

      Most of us Conservatives don't like arguing with people who put fingers in their ears and shout. You paint almost half the voting population with a rather large brush with ZERO evidence.

      This mistake was not countering the narrative that white males are oppressed and equality and progressive ideas have gone too far. Fear and resentment are powerful tools.

      Look at Affirmative Action and quotas. Heterosexual white males are discriminated against - or better, companies are given major incentives for hiring people outside this demographic. In a perfect world such measures would not be necessary. We should be judged individually instead of the color of our skin, our genitalia, or sexual orientation.

    73. Re: If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The orange antichrist has already managed to piss off the EU (especially Germany), the Chinese, Mexicans, Muslims, anyone who is a follower of that science stuff and, well, a good 50%+ of his own people.

      Plus his inauguration speech was shut, though am sure it sounded great in the original Russian.

    74. Re: If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shit, not shut.

      Fuck you autocorrect.

    75. Re:If they're smart... by newbie_fantod · · Score: 1

      That's not him, but all the FUD created by medias

      I'm getting sick of hearing this B.S.
      The effect Trump's casual comments on the on the stock market - on at least two occasions that I can name (Cancel Air Force1, Dec. 6th; Dollar too strong comment, Jan. 16th) are measurable and are matters of public record, as are many other troubling statements and contradictions by the man.

      What are we to do, pretend that we don't see what we see?

    76. Re:If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet people complain she won the popular vote.

    77. Re: If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually Brexit is turning into a disaster that will cost us a fortune. Funnily enough it happened because lying political scumbags made lots of fake promises (more jobs, £350 million a week extra for the NHS etc.) and enough people were taken in by them. The reality will be stark and currently the country is split more politically than it's been for many decades. Most of the fanatically pro Brexit comments you see in UK newspapers are paid trolls or delusional pensioners who think we've won WW2 for the second time.

    78. Re: If they're smart... by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

      Apparently you still don't get it. People who believe what you just posted are why I voted for the chaos candidate.

    79. Re:If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Highly alleged to be corrupt?

      Uh, no. Just come live in one of these regions and you'll see that the voting numbers match how the population in these regions see things. It has nothing to do with "illegals" nor is anyone stuffing the ballet boxes. Right, wrong or indifferent, our point of view is different than yours.

    80. Re:If they're smart... by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Actually? He ran a fraudulent ponzi-scheme style 'university' until the court decided he couldn't legally call it that.

      Read up on what a ponzi scheme is some time, his university is nowhere close to that. What does this have to do with the office of the POTUS?

      He cheated HUNDREDS TO THOUSANDS of small business contractors out of their earned due.

      Proof?

      He gave neo-nazis a political platform when he saw the GOP needed new eunuch enforcers.

      Lie. Trump has never supported neo-nazis.

      He publicly attacked cripples, minorities, women, gold star families, veterans, reporters, officials, scientists, teachers.

      As if Hillary was any better?

      He literally undermined the US POTUS office by de-requiring tax disclosures and other basic shit for the office.

      It was never required. It was an optional thing, and never really provided the information you think it would. Trump's tax return is likely very complicated, and wouldn't show you his real earnings which are stored in the companies he owns. You would probably be surprised at how little he puts down that he makes, but if you think of it from the standpoint of his company owning all his property, it makes sense. Since the IRS has audited him many years in a row, don't you think that if there was an issue they would have found it? Do you think that citizen sleuths are going to find his misreported billions when the best auditors that the IRS employs don't see them?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    81. Re:If they're smart... by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      A few states? A few states? What crack are you smoking?

      http://www.bbc.com/news/electi...

      Hillary decidedly took 4 states. That is a few states. She won 21 "states" (including DC which isn't a state, but is treated as one for the election). Out of the 51 "states", he won a plurality of the states.

      On the rest of your post, things are bad, those decreased unemployed are mostly underemployed. Also, salaries have stayed stable, and not increased with inflation for the past 8 years (at least), this means we are all making less than we were before the recession. If you think this is a true recovery, you must work on Wall Street.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    82. Re:If they're smart... by tsotha · · Score: 1

      Quite literally, Hillary isn't being inaugurated because she's not as smart as Trump when it comes to security.

    83. Re:If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the land of the blind the one eyed man is king

    84. Re:If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was just his twitter feed actually. Unless "the evil media" is in control of that?

    85. Re:If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He did nothing of the sort. He assumed he would lose. How do I know? Because I watched how he fumbled about trying to figure out how to run a transition. Someone who expects to win has a cabinet sorted out, and a set of people to put into positions. None of that happened. The only other answer is that he is seriously inept at everything.

      And way to scare-quote popular, and assuming those results are due to immigrants and corruption. They're due to population. Most counties are full of nothing, and they tend to have voters who are afraid that nothing will be taken away by a series of boogymen. The counties that have people vote differently, because they deal with different people everyday, and realize that fear is stupid.

    86. Re: If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Going by your reasoning, then democrats and people who support them are pedophiles right? After all, there are so many of them that have deep links to people like Epstein. And there's just so many articles on leftwing media sources, sites and so on in the defense of pedophiles, child porn, and so on. See how easy that works? Haven't learned a single fucking thing.

      I take it we're just supposed to ignore Denny Hastert? I mean, he was only the Republican Speaker of the House. Sure, we don't know he was molesting children while Speaker of the House, we only know he did it beforehand.

      It kind of takes away from your point when I can point to an actual pedophile who was elected and promoted through the ranks of the Republican party to be, again, the goddamn fucking SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE.

      But, yes, please tell me how Bill Clinton was bad.

    87. Re:If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yours out da deep ghetto in coren22's crack factory http://twicsy.com/u/Coren22/

    88. Re: If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of us Conservatives don't like arguing with people who put fingers in their ears and shout. You paint almost half the voting population with a rather large brush with ZERO evidence.

      Now who's putting their fingers in their ears and shouting?

      The fact that you're blind to your racism and bigotry is a problem.

      Look at Affirmative Action and quotas. Heterosexual white males are discriminated against - or better, companies are given major incentives for hiring people outside this demographic. In a perfect world such measures would not be necessary. We should be judged individually instead of the color of our skin, our genitalia, or sexual orientation.

      And yet here you are, making up fantasy stories about Affirmative Action and Quotas leading to discrimination against Heterosexual White Males who despite all this tormenting, seem to be doing quite well.

    89. Re: If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have absolutely no idea whether they're fake stories or not, "snowflake", but the point is neither do you. How the fuck you can say with such "authority" that it never happened (like he would be the first guy into golden showers or infidelity) really says more about just how brainwashed you are than whether the story is true or not.

    90. Re: If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your argument is the same one that Short Day Creationists use.

    91. Re:If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're too naive. Jitters are caused by margin traders who bet on media's effect on stupid people. Trigger can be anything, but it's more profitable if it comes from a public figure. You can see same shit when Obama care passed.

    92. Re:If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because he LIES! DJ Trump LIES LIKE A SNAKE.

      And what's worse, you believe him. Donald is a fascist who does not believe in democracy.
      His one real talent is for using people, particularly "white trash" who he guiles into believing
      he is going to 'look after'. Nothing could be farther from the truth, and you have fallen for it.

      Like all minions, at first you'll get what you want...then the heavy hand will come down on you.
      And that is when you'll finally understand, if it isn't too late to turn things around.

    93. Re:If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Big O won the Nobel because he spoke a language of peace, progress and hope AND by pointing in a
      direction completely opposite of the one Dubya and Darth were taking country and the world into.

      Nearly 3 million people voted for Hillary over The Dumpster. Not because we all love Hillary, but
      because we aren't fooled by Dump's rhetoric; because we believe in the future and not in the past.

    94. Re:If they're smart... by martinfb · · Score: 1

      Incidentally, if he's so stupid, how come Hillary isn't being inaugurated today?

      Because it is those that voted for Trump that carry cognitive deficiencies (and insist they don't)!!!!!
      Trump is quite smart when it comes to pulling the proverbial wool over targeted eyes!

      --


      Self-importance and self-indulgence is the root of ALL evil.
    95. Re:If they're smart... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      divided the county...

      That's a work in progress.

      I heard rumours that California is considering secession. Which would put Trump in a category previously occupied by one Abe Lincoln - president's who have started a civil war.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    96. Re:If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because rural rednecks are even dumber than we imagined was possible.

    97. Re:If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was because Trend Micro anti-spam was such a terrible product that it was the only way to get work done

    98. Re: If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why every nigga in town claims that he has relatives in Ireland? Even Barrack Obama has one, imagine that.

    99. Re:If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, for a Nobel Peace Prize you have to start wars in 7 countries, destroy relations with Russia, make US foreign policy a joke and promise to close Guantanamo and then increase its budget.

    100. Re:If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think most people are hopeful that as a leader he will be nothing like the person that we have all seen that he is. But to say you don't know him is intentional ignorance.

      You should know him as a TV personality who often uses the media to hurt people he does not like and to promote himself. He finds things funny... like firing people really makes him happy. And he loves to attack others in the media to get himself in the funny papers or on TMZ. You may also know him through his business dealings were he loves to sue his partners for his sole advantage. The Trump name itself is a brand. A brand with several owners. Donald Trump owns a minority share of his own name.

      There is enough to form an opinion on him as a person. And there is enough to imagine what that sort of person would be like as a leader.

    101. Re: If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're assuming we would fight to keep CA. "Don't let the door hit you on the way out" is just as likely.

  2. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I guess someone will have to program Putin's number in it for him.

    1. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They'll just add a button with Putin's picture on it for him.

    2. Re:Well... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, a helpful Russian agent will see to that.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The irony of all this was if, during the Obama years, hell even the Clinton years, if you had started suggesting evil intentions of Russia being bad, you'd have been hounded with tirades of "Mcarthy!" and accused of being a conservative cold war throwback.

  3. Nice try, NSA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now you can better investigate into allegations about russian involvement in Trump's election.

    1. Re:Nice try, NSA... by halivar · · Score: 1

      The Secret Service is the Department of Treasury, not the NSA.

  4. Tweet less by jwhyche · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Did they take tweeter off it?

    --
    I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    1. Re:Tweet less by gnick · · Score: 2

      I don't know what the security implications are of having Twitter installed on the phone, but I'd be shocked if DJT didn't demand it. I'm sure a lot of his supporters and staff would like to have Twitter taken away so he'll stop making "He said WHAT!?!" headlines, but I'd be surprised if the inauguration was the last we heard of @realDonaldTrump. I do hope that he maintains a strict line between his personal opinions and tweets as @POTUS - I'd be upset if those weren't vetted in some fashion before being shared with the world. The thought of a @POTUS tweet complaining about SNL disturbs me.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    2. Re:Tweet less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll need to start following @POTUS today, it might just be about to get a lot more interesting.

    3. Re:Tweet less by gnick · · Score: 1

      Me too. Up until now, I've only been following one account. I just made it 2. And when I see him abusing @POTUS, I'll get really upset and I'll... I'll... I guess I'll just deal with it.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    4. Re:Tweet less by jwhyche · · Score: 1

      Hell yes. Hail Eris, let this be interesting.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
  5. The office? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    The safest thing to do is give him a phone with no sim card, set the shortcut for twitter to open notepad, and let him tweet til his heart is content in that local text file.

    1. Re:The office? by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      Then later dump that text file to pastebin... 1000+ post /. comment section ensues

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    2. Re:The office? by Agripa · · Score: 1

      The safest thing to do is give him a phone with no sim card, set the shortcut for twitter to open notepad, and let him tweet til his heart is content in that local text file.

      Wouldn't it be safer to give him an etch-a-sketch?

  6. IT'S A TRAP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Careful, Trump! It's a Tricky Trap!

  7. Please... by Kierthos · · Score: 5, Insightful

    tell me the phone somehow has Twitter blocked entirely.

    --
    Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    1. Re: Please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. A millions times this.

    2. Re:Please... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Worse. They gave him access to a second account.

    3. Re:Please... by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      You're thinking of the phone they gave Barry. He used to think he was posting directly to twitter. It actually went to a staff of people that took what he said, messaged it so it was whacko crazy left, passed it by a focus group, took a poll on it, rewrote it accordingly, then posted it after it was well polished.

      Sometimes they just gave him an etch-a-sketch.

  8. So which version Twitter app does it run? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:So which version Twitter app does it run? by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      It's it any sensible setup it's twitter app never talks to twitter only a proxy.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    2. Re:So which version Twitter app does it run? by gnick · · Score: 1

      This is actually a great idea. A Twitter proxy for the POTUS. He might notice a 30 minute delay before his tweets get posted, but it would allow staffers a chance for a, "Mr President, are you sure about this?" moment.

      It might even be enough for him to catch himself - "Do I really want to admit to SNL that I'm still watching?" or some such.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    3. Re:So which version Twitter app does it run? by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      True it need not even be automated but a staffer crossing an air gap.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
  9. Reasonable and boring. by jellomizer · · Score: 0, Troll

    Lets face it, the President of the United States is the world's biggest target, Tump with getting elected without the popular vote + stating negative comments towards nearly anyone who didn't fully indorse him (people, corporations and countries) + have a reputation as a a bully and in general everything wrong with America. Really reinforces the fact he is a target. His off the shelf Android Phone, probably could be (Probably already had been) hacked from the resources of all the groups that hate him. Having a locked down and reduced functionality device makes the only sense. Would you really expect anything else?

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Reasonable and boring. by guacamole · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Let's face it. Your argument is kinda weak because every president elect has always been the world's biggest target regardless of how much of the popular vote the pres won (for the curious, the presidential candidates must always spend resources to optimize their electoral college votes because that's what counts, unlike the useless popular vote). The president's smartphone is always locked down and provided by the government IT specialists regardless of what his previous preferences were. Just last year, when the Samsung Galaxy S7 was "the thing", Obama was handed a "locked down" Galaxy S4 because this is how it works. The commander in chief must always be using a tested and locked down device.

    2. Re: Reasonable and boring. by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      ...currently still known as the Washington Monument...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Reasonable and boring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So Trump's phone "probably already has been" hacked, but Hillary's server in her bathroom totally wasn't hacked?

    4. Re:Reasonable and boring. by Eyezen · · Score: 1, Troll

      I really tire of hearing he got elected without the popular vote. Why? Because it's absolutely meaningless and the only thing the left keeps hanging there hat on.

      The rules of the game are to win the most electoral votes, the end. Harping on the popular vote is like a losing football team harping on the fact that they had more yards total offense or a higher TOP (time of possession). Doesn't matter-the rules say the team with the most points wins. If the rules say gain the most yards, the strategy of the teams would totally change.

      BUT BUT the people's votes should matter...If the rules of the US Presidential election say gather the most votes, then ENTIRE CAMPAIGN STRATEGIES CHANGE COMPLETELY. Who know's what would of happened then. Noone can say for sure. But I can tell you this, the popular vote total is not the same by any means. Maybe Hillary wins with a bigger margin, who knows...but for this vote we'll never know.

      But as it stands the popular vote is just a meaningless statistic, yes most of the time the team with the most total yards and greater TOP wins the game, but not always and not this year. Hillary was a stat padding fantasy (pun intended) football player and meainwhile Trump won the Lombardi Trophy.

    5. Re:Reasonable and boring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Precisely.

      If the rules change, strategies change. Without the EC, all candidates would focus their time and resources on the 20-30 highest population states and ignore the rest. Margin of victory/defeat in large states becomes more important than winning simple majorities in all states

      Voter strategies change too. Some people in the solid red/blue states who felt fine voting for non R-D candidates might feel compelled to follow the "lesser of two evils" strategy. The 5% that went to alternative candidates could make the difference.

  10. one, two, three, boom! by Chrisq · · Score: 0

    Since he said that he doesn't believe the intelligence services I wouldn't be surprised if it blows up. An exhaustive investigation will show that the Russians were to blame!

  11. The Cyber by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    I hope they're also giving him a locked-down version of the nuclear football.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:The Cyber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The nuclear football they handed him was made by NERF

  12. Not starting OS wars.. but by guacamole · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I am personally glad our new president wasn't part of the iSheep sect.

  13. Very strange by GeekWithAKnife · · Score: 1


    Why believe the intelligence agencies now? -is this another vector for "leaks" and "very dishonest reporting" + "fake news"?

    I'd say more but Trump is doing very well in digging himself into a hole without needed a shove.

    --
    A 'singular oddity' is an event that cannot be explained and only happens when you are alone.
  14. Yeah but no but yeah but no by k2r · · Score: 1

    I use both iPhone & Samsung. If Apple doesn't give info to authorities on the terrorists I'll only be using Samsung until they give info.
    — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 19, 2016

    https://twitter.com/realDonald...

    1. Re:Yeah but no but yeah but no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He kept his word, though, and ditched the iPhone. He's also been quite clear that he's going to punish Apple if they don't bring their manufacturing back into the US as they're a US company and should be creating US jobs.

    2. Re:Yeah but no but yeah but no by gnick · · Score: 1

      ...bring their manufacturing back into the US as they're a US company and should be creating US jobs.

      I'd say they're a global company based in the US and, as such, should be creating jobs wherever it makes sense for their bottom line.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    3. Re: Yeah but no but yeah but no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By supporting a KOREAN company ?

      That makes no sense :

      "I refuse to support an American company that designs in America and builds overseas, in favour of a foreign company that does everything overseas"

      That makes perfect sense

  15. At least he'll have Twitter by kilfarsnar · · Score: 2

    He was not known to use it for making or receiving calls, but it was one of few devices that had access to the @POTUS Twitter account.

    And really, that's the most important part for Trump.

    --
    "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    1. Re:At least he'll have Twitter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was not known to use it for making or receiving calls, but it was one of few devices that had access to the @POTUS Twitter account.

      And really, that's the most important part for Trump.

      Not really, he's already said he's just going to tweet from @realDonaldTrump

  16. Bear Grylls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not really news. On Running Wild with Bear Grylls: President Edition, they mentioned that Obama had one of these locked down phones for security purposes. Things like location details are disabled, etc., so that the details of his whereabouts are not digitally known (or at least not known by the phone, and thus, by extension, the company that made that phone).

    It comes as no surprise that Trump would have to do the same for the sake of his security.

    1. Re:Bear Grylls by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      It comes as no surprise that Trump would have to do the same for the sake of his security.

      This is true; it is perfectly reasonable and expected that he would get a special, locked down phone. But at the same time, any excuse to be snarky about Trump is a good excuse to be snarky about Trump.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  17. Please please please..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Tell me they replaced it with a Samsung Note 7.

    1. Re:Please please please..... by ItsJustAPseudonym · · Score: 1

      "Hello, hello? Why do I keep getting Verizon Customer Service? Sad!"

  18. should be been Bernie Sanders! by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    should be been Bernie Sanders!

    1. Re:should be been Bernie Sanders! by thunderclees · · Score: 3, Interesting

      During Obama's first run the DNC was concerned about Hillary splitting the ticket so a deal was cut with the Clinton's that included the SOS appointment and the nomination when Obama's 2nd term was up. You could tell the fix was in as usually there are usually many candidates to throw their hat in the ring and this is whittled down quickly. This past DNC nomination was unusual in that there were so few to come forward especially since there are so many better candidates than Hillary in the DNC. Bernie would have run against Satan and he gave the nomination process an air of legitimacy but he was not supposed to win. He did far better then he should have as which is why he is enjoying his new $500k vacation home the DNC/Clinton's gave him to go away. After the nomination was completed much of the DNC committee resigned to avoid any potential fraud charges.

      The thing is that Trump did not win, Hillary lost. By nominating her the DNC gave most no choice, she was practically the worst candidate to nominate. Too much corruption and too polarizing for no good reason.

      “this is a man whohas said women don’t deserve equal pay unless they do as good a job as men.” - Hillary Clinton on how Trump is a sexist

    2. Re:should be been Bernie Sanders! by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Personally, as a resident of Maryland, I am just glad it wasn't O'Malley, he was an awful governor here and passed awful legislation such as the rain tax. We were happy for finally be rid of him, but I can't even imagine how bad a president he would be.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    3. Re:should be been Bernie Sanders! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maryland got da deep ghetto y'all be likin coren22? I peeked yo photo http://twicsy.com/u/Coren22/ so I be axin!

  19. A changing of the guard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Going from the first black president to the first black hearted president.

  20. why direct access? by ooloorie · · Score: 1

    It would be better if Trump just tweeted by sending text messages to his staff, who can then post it. That would also add an extra level of protection against making a fool of himself.

    1. Re:why direct access? by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1

      Why would anyone who isn't Trump himself want to protect him from making a fool of himself?

      The more he speaks his mind, the better off everyone is. Let him dig his hole.

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    2. Re:why direct access? by ooloorie · · Score: 0

      The more he speaks his mind, the better off everyone is. Let him dig his hole.

      While he has made some mistakes and might benefit from a bit of feedback and moderation, Trump's tweets generally have worked for him pretty well.

      It's the left that is digging their hole on social media right now with their over-the-top outrage, fear mongering, and name calling.

    3. Re:why direct access? by gnick · · Score: 1

      Why would anyone who isn't Trump himself want to protect him from making a fool of himself?

      We elected him POTUS. When he makes an ass of himself, we all look bad. I'd prefer it if he'd stop.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    4. Re:why direct access? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While he has made some mistakes and might benefit from a bit of feedback and moderation, Trump's tweets generally have worked for him pretty well.

      Nope. There's a reason he has to lie about having a landslide, and being popular, and that's because neither is true. His excessive hyperbole will be the death of him,

      It's the left that is digging their hole on social media right now with their over-the-top outrage, fear mongering, and name calling.

      The only hole they could dig would be if they worked with him at all. They should stall all of his cabinet nominees, vote against them en masse, not even for the one or two that might conceivably not be totally unqualified, boycott the inauguration, oppose any laws that Trump's ilk supports, and spend every bit of effort pestering Trump to set his ego off.

      That's how you treat a perpetual child.

      Even if on the off-chance, Trump decides to pursue a course that's sensible, don't let him take credit for it. He'll do the stupidest things and blame you, why let him have any win? Odds are you had the idea right before him, so make him admit he is finally wising up.

    5. Re:why direct access? by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1

      When he makes an ass of himself, we all look bad.

      Maybe we are bad.

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    6. Re:why direct access? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's how you treat a perpetual child.

      The "perpetual children" are the SJWs who just don't want to deal with reality, and who are so stupid that they actually believe Hillary when she says that she stands for social justice, equality, gay rights, etc.

  21. Don't worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    the idiot will soon tweet his new number and brag about it being secure.

  22. More adapted to his very small fingers by Petronius · · Score: 1

    Also contains a custom version of Twitter that allows Putin to review and approve his tweets.

    --
    there's no place like ~
  23. California idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that why Hillary got the popular vote?
    Especially in California?

    I would agree with most of California is idiots.
    lol

  24. Android? by DesertBlade · · Score: 4, Funny

    I thought only people who couldn't afford to use iPhone purchase Android.

    --
    Half of writing history is hiding the truth.
    1. Re:Android? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iPhone is for poor people who want to feel like they matter, it's a status symbol among the blue collar crowd... like prada, louis vuitton, dolce & gabbana, armani.... things that higher class people get paid to hawk in public but in private would never actually use

    2. Re:Android? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      jelly much

    3. Re:Android? by The-Ixian · · Score: 2

      iPhone is for poor people who want to feel like they matter, it's a status symbol among the blue collar crowd... like prada, louis vuitton, dolce & gabbana, armani.... things that higher class people get paid to hawk in public but in private would never actually use

      So what kind of phone do the higher class people use in private? It's Windows Mobile isn't it?

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    4. Re:Android? by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      I thought only people who couldn't afford to use iPhone purchase Android.

      No, Trump vowed to banish Apple from the land because they refused to unlock that iPhone the FBI was bringing them to court about.

      You know, the one they wanted the special "backdoor firmware" written for.

      Apple refused, and Trump said he'd get rid of his iPhone until Apple became a good little dog and write the FBI their backdoor firmware.

    5. Re:Android? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think Vertu Aster, Vertu Signastre, Solarin...

    6. Re:Android? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Signature, not signastre, sorry...

    7. Re:Android? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. As a rule of thumb, if more than, say, 15% of people have heard of it, it's for the commoner. Something like iPhone or Prada? Definitely for the commoner. If everyone around me is wearing Luis Vuitton or Armani, do you think I'm going to "me too"? Fuck no. If you're affluent you set trends, you do not jump on bandwagons.

  25. If he gets people killed, it's because she's a scu by raymorris · · Score: 1

    > If he gets our soldiers killed or sells us out, it's because SHE'S sleazy scumbag.

    FTFY

    Trump wouldn't have been elected if the Dems hadn't nominated Cruella de Vil.

  26. Justifying assasination? by mi · · Score: 1

    Tump with getting elected without the popular vote + stating negative comments towards nearly anyone who didn't fully indorse him (people, corporations and countries) + have a reputation as a a bully and in general everything wrong with America.

    So, if he is whacked today before taking office (and Obama appoints the next President, as CNN helpfully advised us will happen), you'll be relieved and think — perhaps even state — the murderer has done all of a us a favor?

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Justifying assasination? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      huh, never read about murder fantasies on slashdot when the previous prez was sworn in.

    2. Re:Justifying assasination? by mi · · Score: 1

      never read about murder fantasies on slashdot when the previous prez was sworn in.

      No, actually, I haven't. Maybe, because there were very few, and the idiots got promptly prosecuted?

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  27. Secret Service? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

    I can understand why the Secret Service might be the ones who actually break the bad news and hand over the handset; but does anyone know if they actually have any role in 'approving' it; or do they just provide whatever the Information Assurance Directorate tells them is the correct answer?

    Even aside from their recent history of embarrassing scandal, you don't really think of them as one of the techie outfits.

  28. Do we know what kind of phone? by nanodec · · Score: 1

    I'm assuming it's either a BlackBerry or some Android... anyone have an idea?

    1. Re:Do we know what kind of phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably still an Android Phone, but the OS is locked down. No app installation, no OS modification, read-only flash rom, impossible to jailbreak. I am sure those features would make any Android phone secure.

    2. Re:Do we know what kind of phone? by jwhyche · · Score: 0

      I thought they replaced Obama's blackberry with a secure S4 or something a while back. If so, I'm assuming that Trump will be carrying around the same thing.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    3. Re:Do we know what kind of phone? by ventsyv · · Score: 1

      Hopefully one that doesn't support twitter...

  29. Smart Move by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Certainly smarter than Obama

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  30. SubjectIsSubject by p0p0 · · Score: 0

    Following the advice of the Secret Service? Already more qualified than Hillary.

    1. Re:SubjectIsSubject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably won't scream, "What the fuck you looking at! Don't fucking look at me!" at his security like hillary did while she was first lady.

  31. Bizarro World by sjbe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's sort of ironic that you call Trump a xenophobe while the entire Democrat and press establishment go on a witchhunt for foreigners that makes Mccarthyism look like Mr. Rogers.

    I'm curious what the sky looks like in the Bizarro World that republicans appear to inhabit where they actually believe this sort of crap. Tribalism at its finest people...

    Trump's xenophobic actions and statements stand on their own. If you don't recognize him for the reprehensible human being he is then I'm not sure what I can do to help you. The best arguments against Donald Trump come right out of his own unfiltered mouth. He's on the record endorsing torture, denigrating women, opposing reproductive rights, calling for mass deportations,endorsing trade wars, cutting taxes on the richest but not the poor, removing health care from millions without a plan to replace it, supporting religious bigotry, and a whole lot more.

    1. Re:Bizarro World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What you should be asking yourself is, how did this man who you describe as being reprehensible win?
      Look at it this way: You go into the supermarket for an apple. All apples are the same price. One apple, say, the Tump variety, is wrinkly and smells funny. There is another apple there (Hilary farms), yet you pick the Wrinkly smelly one. Why?
      BECAUSE THE OTHER APPLE WAS WORSE THAN THAT ONE.
      If Trump's so godawful bad, what does that say about Hilary? If you answer "but but but racists and sexists and homophobes!", then you don't get it, you never will, and you will continue to assume everyone not you is a bad bad person.

  32. Trump is worse in every way by sjbe · · Score: 3, Interesting

    She's a traitor, a habitual liar, incompetent, self-serving, and saggy-boobs deep in pay-for-play.

    "Traitor"? Seriously? Can I have some of what you are smoking? And claiming that Clinton is less of a self serving liar than Trump is just idiotic.

    Think on that. We elected an IDIOT because he's better than the alternative. If he gets our soldiers killed or sells us out, it'll be because he's dumb and incompetent, not because he's sleazy and malicious.

    Trump is dumb and incompetent AND sleazy and malicious. It's not either/or. The man collects vendettas like a teenager collects Pokemon cards. Whatever you imagine Clinton's faults to be, Trump has matched or exceeded each and every one of them. Trump is a reprehensible, cruel, ignorant, narcissist, whose only real talent is self promotion.

    At least with him, there's a chance.

    If you actually believe that then you are dumber than you claim Trump is.

    1. Re:Trump is worse in every way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She set up a private email server to skirt laws. TRAITOR. Her emails should have had her put in prison. SELF-SERVING with good connections.

    2. Re:Trump is worse in every way by Coren22 · · Score: 2

      As AC points out, just her email scandal showed how very corrupt she is. The Freedom of Information Act was designed to prevent corruption, and provide the American people with a view into the performance of their government. By running her private email server, she was able to prevent future FoIA requests from being delivered for information about what she did. What is more corrupt than bypassing a law passed by your own party to combat corruption?

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  33. You're absolutely right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes...yes he is. And his opponent wasn't a boring public servant. She's a traitor, a habitual liar, incompetent, self-serving, and saggy-boobs deep in pay-for-play.

    Think on that. We elected an IDIOT because he's better than the alternative. If he gets our soldiers killed or sells us out, it'll be because he's dumb and incompetent, not because he's sleazy and malicious.

    I absolutely agree with you. Just because Trump is sleazy and malicious doesn't mean it will be the reason he gets our soldiers killed, or sells out. That part will definitely be a direct result of him being dumb and incompetent.

    He's a con-artist that got rich by screwing over the little guy, who he now claims he's standing up for.

    And you fucking fell for it.

    Fuck you.

    At least with him, there's a chance.

    There's a very good chance we'll all be speaking Chinese or Russian in another four years.

    1. Re:You're absolutely right by Notabadguy · · Score: 1

      Not likely - in the 95% of America that isn't a wildly liberal anti-gun and crime-free metropolis, we have guns.

    2. Re:You're absolutely right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, 95%, you say?

      You people sure are doing a lot of crying about the vast minority, aren't you?

  34. ... and killed in her wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obama had me bomb 5 sovereign nations. The Iraqis shot at me several times before we invaded in 2003, so count that at two for Bush.

  35. LOL, we can still geolocate him by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    You forget who wrote the code.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  36. What I want to know is by mark_reh · · Score: 1

    why no one has commented about this: http://metro.co.uk/video/donal...

    Is Trump trying to tell us something about his hotels? Does he have a bunch of video of politicians, heads of state, and CEOs doing things they'd rather not have become public knowledge?

  37. Re:If he gets people killed, it's because she's a by Coren22 · · Score: 1

    That is the first time I have seen her compared to me. It is a surprisingly apt comparison.

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  38. What!? He's at the White House!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The President is at the White House!
    Terrorists know where he lives!
    Who leaked this vital national security information!

  39. Android phone? Proof he is the antichrist. by Shalhav · · Score: 0

    If I would have known he had an Android phone, I wouldn't have voted for him. But since he is getting rid of it, maybe he's not so bad.

  40. Voters-R-Stupid [Re:If they're smart...] by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    if he's so stupid, how come Hillary isn't being inaugurated today?

    Because voters are stupid. Trump knows how to play suckers. A million trade wars won't bring back old-style manufacturing jobs. It's educate or perish. He sold them snake-oil-nostalgia.