Slashdot Mirror


Are Squirrels A Bigger Threat To Our Critical Infrastructure? (bbc.com)

"The real threat to global critical infrastructure is not enemy states or organizations but squirrels, according to one security expert." Long-time Slashdot reader randomErr quotes the BBC. Cris Thomas has been tracking power cuts caused by animals since 2013... His Cyber Squirrel 1 project was set up to counteract what he called the "ludicrousness of cyber-war claims by people at high levels in government and industry", he told the audience at the Shmoocon security conference in Washington. Squirrels topped the list with 879 "attacks", followed by birds with 434 attacks and then snakes at 83 attacks.
Those three animals -- along with rats -- have caused 1,700 different power cuts affecting nearly 5,000,000 people .

150 comments

  1. Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Were these RUSSIAN squirrels?

    The world needs to know!

    1. Re:Yes but... by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

      Were these RUSSIAN squirrels?

      You can tell by where they are Putin the acorns.

    2. Re: Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Certainly! These are trained by the russian hacker. I once watched a couple of them playing balalayka while sharing a bottle of rasputin.

    3. Re: Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Squirrels are rats with hairy tails, that's all.

    4. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Were these RUSSIAN squirrels?

      The world needs to know!

      No, they were squirrels trained by Chip and Dale. Homegrown terrorists.

    5. Re:Yes but... by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      Where's the "-1, Bad Pun" mod when you need it? :-)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    6. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meanwhile in Russia: Now it's Putin the bird man

      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2198963/Now-Putin-bird-man-Latest-animal-stunt-sees-Russian-president-skies-micro-glider-chief-crane.html

    7. Re: Yes but... by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 2

      Squirrels are rats with hairy tails, that's all.

      My father jokingly called them "tree rats" when I was a kid.

    8. Re: Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do that, too. Actually, I usually refer to them as tree rat bastards.

    9. Re: Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have been called tree rats by most folk in Hampshire/Wiltshire for the last 60+ years,specially round the new forest area(lots of damage to young tree stock after WW2).
      their weeds,so we should use use a weed killer to get rid of the bloody things..

    10. Re: Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      #squirrellivesmatter !

    11. Re:Yes but... by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      Gonna ignore the pun and tell a short story.

      Last summer my wife went outside in the morning and surprised a squirrel that had just dug a hole and was about to drop an acorn in it. It saw her and to hide its actions it started lifting the acorn up and down like a human exercising. Squirrel was totally like, "nothing to see here, just exercising, move along!" LOL

      I'd read about the fact that when scrub jays (a natural enemy that eats and hides the same foods) are around they are more careful about their hiding places, and avoid hiding anything when the jay is watching. They're clearly evolving to the ways of humans, though they probably don't realize we're not stealing their food, we just pull up the ones that sprout, and clean the rain gutters seasonally. To them it seems like food competition.

    12. Re:Yes but... by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 2

      Nyet!
      Moose was sighted standing guard for squirrel!
      Both escaped capture and are suspected to be in vicinity of Frostbite Falls.
      Consultant Coyote has stated capture repeatedly fails due to lack of complicated schemes and devices to apprehend or annihilate subjects.
      Coyote is expecting delivery from Acme Sales Corp. any day now...

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    13. Re: Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Other squirrels will empty a stash in no time at all, seen em watch for the opportunity to do so. Fortunately on the one I seen it was only faking where it was burying the acorn so the theif was busy digging in wrong spot while the other lost his stalker. May not have caught him, may have just been displaying a survival technique. Either way we know too much about squirrels habits. And maybe that's why behavior changes when something takes so much interest

    14. Re: Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Package came yesterday I thought?

    15. Re:Yes but... by mcswell · · Score: 1

      Eh, no talk stink. Those animals gave their lives for this.

    16. Re:Yes but... by mcswell · · Score: 1

      Boris, that you?

    17. Re: Yes but... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I was doing testing when the local power company introduced a new system for outage and crew management. The first field report entering the system listed an outage as caused by a "fried tree rat".

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    18. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that should be a +1.

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
  2. Call To Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Build tremendous walls to protect our infrastructure and make the aminals pay for it!

    1. Re:Call To Trump by sjames · · Score: 5, Funny

      He has a shovel and he's doing his best. He wears one on his head as a trophy.

    2. Re:Call To Trump by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      Why am I always out of MOD POINTS! This is FUNNY!

    3. Re:Call To Trump by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      A shovel of alligators are his entire toolset.
      You don't drain the swamp of lobbyists by putting billionaires who hire lobbyists to run the government

    4. Re:Call To Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh no billionaires used lobbyists, the fucking problem is not that they exist or are used it's that the politicians we are meant to fucking trust sell out to them.

    5. Re:Call To Trump by quicks0rt · · Score: 1

      No, the problem is more nuanced than that. See, we have corporation owned media who also employs lobbyists to fund campaign. On one hand, you hear little to nothing about many political corruptions because established media will not report on it, or downplay it so that least amount of eyeballs and ears hear about those stories. Most often, you will not know what the politician is up-to or what ties he/she has with rich donors until election is over. See, if your only source of political news is CNN, Fox News, MSNBC, or any of the major news network, you will pretty much be in the dark as to who to trust (or distrust). These same network will also try to character assassinate a few "honest" politicians that will run for office. That's because the same corporation that owns these news channels are also funding the politicians they like to put in place. We also have these things called "Super PAC" that legalizes unlimited amount of money to be flown into a politician's campaign. I will leave you to research how that came about. Want to win an election? Cater to your large donors or you will never see the light of day. Of course, Bernie Sander has shown that you can get by with small donations by the thousands of average people, but one thing he didn't have is a major on-going prime-time coverage by the establishment media. And that is almost a crippling factor as not having any fund in your campaign. For the average politicians, they will be hard pressed to compete with politicians who are backed by Super PAC, and you see the conundrum there. Solution? Get rid of legalized bribery (abolish super pac), get money out of politics, and if need be, fund campaign by tax dollars. Yes, your tax dollars. You want your politician to work for you and not the large donors, don't you? Find and contribute to movements like Wolf-PAC or similar that try to accomplish this. Also, level the playing field in the media (or at the very least, make the news channels FACT CHECK all things politics and not be merely neutral). Until then, you will never get rid of lobbyists or politicians who feel the need to use them. BTW, if you think Trump was not under the influence of billionaires or lobbyists, you will have quite a rude awakening.

  3. He's missing the point. by Cyberpunk+Reality · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Squirrels and birds are never going to scare the public to the point of feeling good about hundreds of billions in spending, or freely abandoning long-cherished rights.

    --
    Rule 35 of the internet: "If it can be hacked, it will be". - Charles Stross
    1. Re:He's missing the point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stephen King tried his best tho.

    2. Re:He's missing the point. by Sarten-X · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Squirrels and birds are also never going to be launching coordinated events designed to overwhelm the utilities' abilities to bypass and repair damage. Nobody cares that a foreign nation might be able to shut down a provider. The concern is that they might shut down all providers.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    3. Re:He's missing the point. by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      Squirrels and birds are never going to scare the public to the point of ... billions in spending

      Tell the public they are illegal Sharia atheist squirrels here to overthrow our elections, tax us, chew up our guns, and take our jobs. A reliable source told me so.

    4. Re:He's missing the point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If so, doesn't that make this website Islamophobic?

      I mean, if the squirrels of peace simply want to peacefully behead people in their own trees, what right do we have to complain?

    5. Re:He's missing the point. by NEDHead · · Score: 1

      Hitchcock might disagree

    6. Re:He's missing the point. by umghhh · · Score: 1

      What if squirrels organize? Even if they are not good at organizing I am sure Putin could help here...

    7. Re:He's missing the point. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 5, Funny

      You must have missed the documentary filmed by the noted historian one A. M. Hitchcock.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    8. Re:He's missing the point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nobody cares that a foreign nation might be able to shut down a provider. The concern is that they might shut down all providers.

      This is about the infrastructure (e.g. power lines), not the providers (e.g. power plants). That being said, if there's only one provider in my service area, or a single critical piece of infrastructure that can cut me off from all available provider, then I care a great deal about someone (or something's) ability to damage it.

    9. Re:He's missing the point. by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It would be nice if people could learn to think in terms of threats that fell somewhere between "safe to ignore" and "extinction level event". Or could distinguish between "extreme and expensive" responses and "effective" ones.

      9/11 could have been prevented by simple, conservative and inexpensive countermeasures. After 9/11 politicians droned on about how "9/11 changed everything," but the cold sober fact was that it in fact changed nothing. It just showed that some of the things sensible people had already been telling us to do (like reinforcing cockpit doors or getting agencies to work together despite institutional rivalries) really did need to be done. Instead "9/11 changed everything" became the rallying cry for every pet scheme that had heretofore been correctly dismissed as too expensive, hare-brained, or just plain dumb.

      Which doesn't change the fact that something needed to be done. Here's the lesson I think we should take into this infrastructure debate: we should take sensible and conservative steps to secure infrastructure against terrorism now, before events put foolish ones on the table.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    10. Re:He's missing the point. by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      Why am I always out of Mod Points when the good stuff comes in?

    11. Re:He's missing the point. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      You must be new here.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    12. Re:He's missing the point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shh...speak quietly...that feline over there is a spy and we already know they engage in active domestic terrorism. C.A.T.S is just looking for an opportunity to strike - don't given them any ideas about possible cooperation. Right now our only saving grace is that they are inherently arrogant and solitary - each plotting their own strikes. Should they decided to get organized humanity will not last... they already control the internet.

    13. Re:He's missing the point. by antdude · · Score: 1

      IIRC, humans tried to use rodents, birds, cats, dogs, etc. to take out things.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    14. Re:He's missing the point. by default+luser · · Score: 1

      Specifically, this

      The Bat Incendiary

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

    15. Re:He's missing the point. by PJ6 · · Score: 1

      Squirrels and birds are also never going to be launching coordinated events designed to overwhelm the utilities' abilities to bypass and repair damage.

      That's just what they want you to think.

    16. Re:He's missing the point. by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 1

      9/11 did change something -- passengers will no longer meekly submit to hijackers; they'll swarm and stomp them.

  4. It's Squirrel Appreciation Day. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How dare you criticize squirrels on this day of all days. They are a vital part of our culture and history.

    1. Re:It's Squirrel Appreciation Day. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should be able to use whatever bathrooms they're comfortable with.

    2. Re: It's Squirrel Appreciation Day. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I appreciate squirrels all year long. They make good fertilizer

    3. Re: It's Squirrel Appreciation Day. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      My cat brought me a 'complete' headless squirrel. I considered it a magnificent gift.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  5. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are so many Trump supporters gay?

    1. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They don't want middle eastern muslims to flood the USA and throw them off buildings.

  6. How about ... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2

    Power cuts by drunks running into utility poles? Or idiots shooting out power transformers and insulators? And backhoe operators who don't call first to check for buried utilities?

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    1. Re:How about ... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 0

      "CyberBackhoe" or "CyberDrunk" just doesn't resonate like "CyberSquirrel".

      Cute, furry rodents trump fat white guys any day.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:How about ... by alvinrod · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or meth heads trying to steal the copper out of electric cables or other equipment.

    3. Re: How about ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget CyberLightning attacks by CyberThunderStorms and heavy cybersnow.

      In Europe, lightning strikes have blown up more telephones exchanges than radical terrorist groups.

    4. Re:How about ... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      That explains why the squirrels were chewing on the line, they were just trying to get some cyber' action!

    5. Re: How about ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CyberWeather! We need to build a yuge wall around all bad weather!

  7. This is only what we currently know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are the other animals not attacking? What is moose up to?

    1. Re:This is only what we currently know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is moose up to?

      He's with Boris and Natasha, busy hacking critical infrastructure. Thanks Putin!

    2. Re:This is only what we currently know by mcswell · · Score: 1

      Nyet, Boris and Natasha are busy tryink to make all traffik lights in US turn green at same time. They read about this in American science fiction story, http://www.gutenberg.org/files....

  8. Trees by Fly+Swatter · · Score: 3, Insightful

    .. cause far more outages and damage. Squirrels merely live in trees. Blame the trees.

    1. Re:Trees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only that, but trees near power plants are directly receiving support (air) from... Russia!

      Surely a well-funded Congressional committee must be formed immediately to address this issue.

    2. Re:Trees by lazy+genes · · Score: 0

      Our species left the trees and we're better off for it. I say we make it a law to declaw.

  9. non-stationary. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The number of deaths due to nuclear weapons, as a fraction of total deaths, is very small as well.

  10. Theo the Ratd is a bigger threat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how can you patch holes if no see code?

    Best Korea cartoons present westerners as slimy weisels and such.

  11. Amped up squirrels by burtosis · · Score: 0

    We need cyber countermeasures to deduce how these squirrels conduct their missions and how we can short circuit their diabolical plans.

  12. Squirrels spread their attacks conveniently by grimJester · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Squirrels are just a cost, not a threat. They don't coordinate to attack all at once like a hacker group or hostile country would do. They'll never take out the whole country at once.

    1. Re:Squirrels spread their attacks conveniently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'll never take out the whole country at once.

      You would hope. Probably true in the US. Not necessarily true of all countries.

    2. Re:Squirrels spread their attacks conveniently by Kohath · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, the difference between random factors like squirrels and attackers is that random factors don't learn and adapt and scale up their attacks. Random factors stop randomly. Attackers don't stop unless you stop them.

    3. Re:Squirrels spread their attacks conveniently by phantomfive · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How many spies and saboteurs with well-placed bombs (or high-powered rifles) would it take to disable the power grid? Not many, I would think. There are a lot of threats besides 'the cyber.'

      Security is something for professionals like us to think about always while we're working, but it's not something to panic about. A lot of these news stories like this one are designed to spread panic, and to increase power to those who are spreading panic.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    4. Re:Squirrels spread their attacks conveniently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Random factors tend not to stop either.
      Squirrels will not stop taking out power supplis.
      Animals do adapt to countermeasures, and they go back to their desired behaviour.

      The animals are generally not scaling up (except for crows, which do learn and scale); But neither are attackers, as scaling up increases risk dramatically.

    5. Re:Squirrels spread their attacks conveniently by gurps_npc · · Score: 2

      You need to read white paper I saw recently, titled:

      "The Unbeatable Squirrel Girl (2015)"

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    6. Re:Squirrels spread their attacks conveniently by dywolf · · Score: 1

      that'd be pretty cool though

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    7. Re:Squirrels spread their attacks conveniently by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      ok, someone modded it down, but the push with "cyber security" and power is not a new thing. Remember when they wanted an 'internet kill switch?' It's not about Russians, or Chinese, or fat people in the basement, it's about people using excuses to increase their power. This theme has been going on for as long as the 'invade Iraq' thing was going on........many years before the invasion actually happened.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    8. Re:Squirrels spread their attacks conveniently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what if the Russians send an armada of genetically manipulated ravenous squirrels?

    9. Re:Squirrels spread their attacks conveniently by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      Squirrels are just a cost, not a threat. They don't coordinate to attack all at once

      They pose a mortal goddamn threat to the peaches on the tree in my backyard.

      #FuckSquirrels #KillAllSquirrels #BushyTailedRats

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    10. Re: Squirrels spread their attacks conveniently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kimmy Schmidt?

    11. Re:Squirrels spread their attacks conveniently by Sarten-X · · Score: 5, Informative

      How many spies and saboteurs with well-placed bombs (or high-powered rifles) would it take to disable the power grid? Not many, I would think. There are a lot of threats besides 'the cyber.'

      Far more than it takes to set a flag on a C&C server. Those spies and saboteurs also have to be physically present around the time of the coordinated attack, increasing the risk they'll be caught, and the opportunity for them to double-cross the attacker and reveal the plan to the target.

      On the other hand, malware can lurk for years undetected from a single entry point. A small team of sub-sub-sub-contracted service technicians can deploy malware to an embedded system, and walk away. Sufficiently advanced threats can hide their traffic inside the normal monitoring operations of the utility, cross through the network, and even add personnel records, effectively making their actions look like legitimate employee operations until they shut everything down.

      Targeting infrastructure has been a military strategy for as long as there have been militaries. Modern tactics, however, focus on efficiency. If five malware-assisted spies can take down a target country's utilities with no risk, why spend the budgeted resources to recruit and train (and possibly extract) fifty to do the same job? That budget can then go toward hiring cryptographers to decrypt the target's movement orders, so you spend less budgeted resources trying to find the enemy units. That leaves more budget to use on building better bombs and guidance systems, and so on.

      Ultimately, the goal is to win the war. With modern society relying on border-crossing communications, it is no longer really important who can put supplies into what territory, as was important until around 1960. Now, it's important to convince the locals that you're protecting them from the evil oppressive enemy, and doing that means minimizing civilian deaths. Better targeted bombs, better intel, and attacks that don't involve blowing up a power plant full of civilian workers, are all ways to reduce your side's death count.

      Security is something for professionals like us to think about always while we're working, but it's not something to panic about. A lot of these news stories like this one are designed to spread panic...

      There's very little panic, except for a few uninformed headlines where a laptop with malware became a complete takeover of the US power grid. On the other hand, the DNC hack is a great example of how information-based warfare will be conducted, and the news article you linked explains it well. Unlike Watergate, there was never a Russian physical presence in the DNC. There's nobody in the US that can be arrested for it. After the initial breaches, there was almost no evidence of the digital presence. The reality of the situation once it was discovered was met with skeptics like you, who underestimate how useful such an attack could be.

      While that holds true, the attacks won't likely escalate. As soon as an enemy attacks the American power grid, every American company will treat information attacks more seriously, and the low-hanging fruit will disappear.

      ...and to increase power to those who are spreading panic.

      There's nobody really getting more power from this, though, except for a few hucksters who are selling fraudulent security systems. The threats have been real and the attacks have been ongoing for the past few decades, and the people who have been wise enough to care have found that there are solutions available. There are backup generators and UPSes protecting vital systems from outages of the power grid. There are airgaps and mitigations protecting secret information. There are encryption algorithms and opsec protocols protecting identities... Security is cheap, but it is very user-driven. The user has to care for security

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    12. Re:Squirrels spread their attacks conveniently by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I feel like you have a reasonable assessment of the security problems the country faces, but I think you underestimate the resources required to exploit them. It's probably takes more than five malware assisted spies to take down the infrastructure (say, the power grid). It takes a lot of training, expertise, and if you want to target SCADA systems, a lot of expensive equipment, and if you want to attack hardware that is properly air-gapped, then even more effort and a bit of luck, too. It's not a cheap operation to take down a big system (which is why no hacker has done it yet for the lulz although maybe they are trying?)

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    13. Re:Squirrels spread their attacks conveniently by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I have a first edition of Samurai Squirrel (1986), it definitely leaves me wondering, "What if they're fighting for the enemy?!" We'd be totally screwed.

    14. Re:Squirrels spread their attacks conveniently by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      I apologize for the length of these posts... Weekends get boring, and I tend to ramble about these things.

      It doesn't really take much. For a nation-state attacker, it takes almost no resources in comparison to a foreign-based physical operation.

      First, understand that there are two different kinds of attacks being discussed here. The DNC hack was a general APT penetration, while attacks on SCADA systems (like Stuxnet) are usually more targeted and require more expert knowledge. Since they work hand-in-hand, I'll describe a mix of the two in a major hypothetical attack.

      Let's suppose Strong Badia wants to attack Elbonia. Strong Badia first launches a campaign against several technology companies in Lower Slobbovia, with phishing bait emails trying to get internal credentials. They use those credentials to compromise public-facing servers, and use those servers to launch more attacks against Elbonian companies. That second round of attacks looks like it comes from Lower Slobbovia, so it's more difficult to investigate. This multi-stage effort relies on automated tools (available for a few thousand dollars) to exploit common software. Since the phishing mails are sent in bulk and do indeed rely on luck to get hits, they're automated for scale. They can be run by one social engineer working part time, who usually just needs to wait until he gets a few particularly useful credentials.

      With credentials in hand, Strong Badia turns to making their presence persistent. A small number of experts (two or three, even) establish more permanent access credentials, and plant malware that they can use to restore access if it's ever disrupted. This effort is targeted to a specific network infrastructure, but again most of the tools are automated. This time, they aren't automated for scale, but rather to hide their presence better. Attack packages can be uploaded and held, hiding their traffic from monitoring systems. Again, this is only a couple of people to decide which servers (and users) are worth attacking and map out the Elbonian network.

      In the case of the DNC hack, that was about all that happened. The attackers gained access to the DNC, became persistent, and copied out documents. As I recall, there is evidence (in writing style, level of expertise, and preferred attack patterns) that the DNC hack had up to a dozen operatives. Other attacks get more complicated.

      If a target is "special", it might need a more customized approach. For the sake of analogy, this is the point in the heist movie where the crew realizes that the bank's security is something new, and they need to recruit that quirky specialist to get the job done. They'll go out and buy a copy of the bank's vault, posing as a wealthy individual who just has to have the best protection for their widgets. Similarly, in out hypothetical attack, this is where Strong Badia claims they need the latest and greatest in Elbonian technology, and purchases a SCADA system just like what their target has. While the purchase of such equipment does indeed take some effort, I don't count it as part of the attacking force. The purchasers would likely think they're actually purchasing equipment for a legitimate construction project, so it's a little unfair to count them against the trained spies.

      With equipment, an expert in that system (our fourth Strong Badian team member) can begin reverse-engineering it to find new zero-day vulnerabilities, and perhaps with the aid of another Strong Badian, he can turn it into a malware package for that target.

      That malware can then be handed back to the APT team, who have the understanding of the Elbonian bureaucracy. They can create fake problem reports that require a call to tech support, and the social engineer can assist in making it seem legitimate. To jump an airgap, they might need a participant in Elbonia, but that could be a simple matter of attacking the Elbonian support subcontractor in a similar manner, and such an attack could be executed by the very same five-man band.

      W

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    15. Re:Squirrels spread their attacks conveniently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the nation state level, I don't think it operates the same way. That is, I don't think they rely on a few dumb operators. Looking at what the NSA does, they're able to attack the supply lines and send you pre-compromised hardware. They have advanced exfiltration systems that don't need to touch your network at all. They have malware that cannot be decrypted by any machine other than the target that makes you think there's nothing wrong. It's also custom, just for you, so AV programs aren't going to see it.

      I know they labeled the DNC hack as an APT, but it appears to be an ordinary criminal gang. It simply doesn't match the profile of nation state level attacks. They want long-term access without getting caught. Sending an email like the one to Podesta got someone ~2 days of access, as best we can tell. Enough to download a few emails, only to end up locked out. When nation states do spear phishing, they have a custom written piece of malware disguised as a legitimate attachment. It won't be noticed by any AV programs. They will use that to make sure they have long-term access to your systems.

      They just don't operate the same way because they don't have the same goals. It's not like Russia is the only possible culprit here, either. Kim Dotcom was telling everyone on Twitter that Wikileaks would take Hillary down back in 2014. I thought his team was primarily east European, too. I am by no means clear on who did this, but it simply doesn't look like nation state level hacking to me. I wouldn't be surprised if they had hacked such a soft, juicy target like this--no doubt along with many other countries--but it seems like a crazy risk. There was nothing in there that looked like it would sway the election. So why risk all those state sanctions on a long-shot like Trump? The Democrats were practically ready for war over this. So you bet it all on releasing some political flunky's emails? It just doesn't compute to take that big a risk for a 1% chance of victory.

      We've concluded far too much on far too little evidence.

    16. Re:Squirrels spread their attacks conveniently by big-giant-head · · Score: 1

      You have obviously never watched squirrels for any length of time .. They do coordinate attacks and can be darn pesky if they and racoons convert to ISIS we are DOOMED!!!!

      --

      So Long and Thanks for all the Fish.
    17. Re:Squirrels spread their attacks conveniently by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      At the nation state level, I don't think it operates the same way. That is, I don't think they rely on a few dumb operators. Looking at what the NSA does, they're able to attack the supply lines and send you pre-compromised hardware. They have advanced exfiltration systems that don't need to touch your network at all. They have malware that cannot be decrypted by any machine other than the target that makes you think there's nothing wrong. It's also custom, just for you, so AV programs aren't going to see it.

      Those statements are mostly true, but only to a certain extent.

      The APT teams aren't operating at a nation-state level. They are nation-state funded, but they're still operating more like an experiment, mostly due to the lack of available expertise in the field. Think more along the lines of the Manhattan Project. A very small number of people are doing the real work, and a lot of people figuring out how to apply this new weapon strategically.

      Yes, the intelligence agencies have lots of fancy tools, and they're shared among the APT teams as needed, but usually the attacks are boring script-kiddy stuff. Most of the time, pass-the-hash and Word macros will get the job done, so there's no reason to risk exposing the elite tools and zero-day vulnerabilities.

      I know they labeled the DNC hack as an APT, but it appears to be an ordinary criminal gang. It simply doesn't match the profile of nation state level attacks. They want long-term access without getting caught. Sending an email like the one to Podesta got someone ~2 days of access, as best we can tell. Enough to download a few emails, only to end up locked out. When nation states do spear phishing, they have a custom written piece of malware disguised as a legitimate attachment. It won't be noticed by any AV programs. They will use that to make sure they have long-term access to your systems.

      The Podesta hack and the DNC hacks were separate events, by related teams. They used different tactics, but shared some (but not all) infrastructure. Both teams were involved in the DNC hack, but apparently weren't aware of each other's presence, since they'd attack servers that the other team had already penetrated.

      In the DNC hack, they did have long-term access. One group had been active on the network for over a year, and the other was sloppier, and was detected after only a month of activity.

      The Podesta attack wasn't particularly specialized. It was a wide attack using automated tools. There was no attachment, just a link to a bit.ly-shortened URL that wouldn't be caught by the spam filter. There was nothing downloaded from the phishing site, either. It just decrypted the Base64-encoded parameter in the emailed URL, and displayed that. Again, don't fall into the mental trap that nation-state attacks must be highly-sophisticated next-generation hacks. In hacking, if it's stupid and it works, then it isn't stupid.

      They just don't operate the same way because they don't have the same goals. It's not like Russia is the only possible culprit here, either.

      Russia isn't the only possible culprit, but they are the only likely culprit. Their same infrastructure (bit.ly account, phishing site host, and mail-sending botnet) had previously been used to attack 1800 accounts in 2015. Those accounts were overwhelmingly non-Russian military personnel. There's a great analysis of the hack by pwnallthethings on Twitter. I highly recommend expanding the thread and reading.

      As for goals, the goal is simple: Gather any useful access. Hacking Podesta's email was probably a lucky stroke for the attackers, but they were more likely looking for anything useful. If not Podesta, then someone else might have made a good victim. If they got someone's account, but it wasn't particularly useful at the time, they don't care. The automated tool is

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    18. Re:Squirrels spread their attacks conveniently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why wouldn't they expect repercussions? They know this is an important election to either side if they've done any political analysis at all. Trying to back a complete dark horse with some crappy emails doesn't sound like a winning bet at all.

    19. Re:Squirrels spread their attacks conveniently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One more thing, I should note that erratasec & co. aren't exactly thrilled with this evidence either. It just doesn't look like Russia to me.

      I think it's some east European hacking group, but I don't seriously think that everyone in that area is working for Putin any more than I think that every US hacker is working for Obama or Trump.

    20. Re:Squirrels spread their attacks conveniently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the difference between random factors like squirrels and attackers is that random factors don't learn and adapt and scale up their attacks.

      That's just what the squirrels want you to think!

  13. Water vapor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Water vapor combustion products from power plants stays in the atmosphere, condenses and forms ice that downs power lines.

    It's a vicious cycle. So....more funding for climate change studies.

    1. Re:Water vapor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds almost as bad as crystallized di-hydrogen monoxide.

  14. Lets kill all wildlife and mother nature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think Mother Nature should be nuked first

  15. We need a fleet of predators to combat the jihadis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If only we could have a huge fleet of small, autonomous predator drones to take out these nut jobs wherever they find them.

    Something like a Global Hawk, Eagle or Talon, but smaller and more numerous.

    If only.

    Think, think, think.

  16. Wrong question by NEDHead · · Score: 1

    Are BIGGER squirrels a threat to our infrastructure

  17. The threat is real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A squirrel climbed under the engine of mark during a storm. It chewed through one of the wires. It cost me around $7K to fix it, because the engine and everything else had to be taken out. We should take the war to them before they sand us back to stone age.

  18. Crazy Ants FTW by turkeydance · · Score: 2

    They are frightening because they make no sense, because of the utter disarray of their existence. “They run around the floors like they’re on crack, and then they die,” he said. “They’re freakin’ crazy, man.” link: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12...

    1. Re:Crazy Ants FTW by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      Crazy ants are also drawn in by EM fields. So are some other species, and a couple of different kinds of insects. Palm roaches and grasshoppers love newer PC's, stuff like Roku boxes, some types of cable boxes for example. Older PC's like P2/P3's? Crickets, especially the crickets we have in the NE US and Canada. Our company lost 3 remotes in FL and TX a few years ago to crazy ants, best thing you can do is seal them up as best as possible and put a "best practices" training system into place for people who have to open them so they get properly resealed.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:Crazy Ants FTW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like a job for a massive bug zapper. One good-sized tesla coil ought to fry millions of the little bastards

    3. Re:Crazy Ants FTW by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      From getting to work on them roaches love the Xbox 360S you know the one with the touch controls? That one. Causes the system to shutoff and/or eject discs at random.

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
  19. Good thing homeland security is on the job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We all know that our power grid is the most vulnerable parts of our infrastructure. I for one rest easy knowing that the trillions we spend on homeland security protects us from these tree-dwelling, buck-toothed terrorists. From here on out, whenever I see one of those HS jackets, I'm going yell Squirrel!

  20. Code words for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Replace "Squirrels" with Immigrants

    Replace "Birds" with non-whites

    Replace "Snakes" with Snowflakes

    1. Re: Code words for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please don't dog whistle.

  21. Squirrels? They are Terrorists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for going after that poor unprotected infrastructure.

    Send all of them to Gitmo on a one way ticket.

  22. We understand the "squirrel problem" by davidwr · · Score: 4, Informative

    Problems like this have existed for decades or more and we know how to prevent it.

    It's a business decision whether to invest in prevention, mitigation, both, or neither.

    The "foreign government cyber-warfare" problem is less well-understood and is ever-evolving.

    ----
    For what it's worth, most "mother nature" problems can be handled by having adequate redundancy and/or backup systems and, for most users, having an expected service level that allows for the grid (or internet, or other utility) to be offline for several seconds at a time while backup systems kick in. A state-level attacker is likely to be aware of the backup systems and attack both simultaneously.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:We understand the "squirrel problem" by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      The point is that squirrels (and similar furry or feathery threats) have caused demonstrable damage.

      But, as far as infrastructure is concerned, terrorists have yet to rise to the level of the local rodent and bird population.

      Allay thy fears. Quail not.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:We understand the "squirrel problem" by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Is that because they aren't trying very hard, or there are only a few of them, or is it because people are so afraid of them that lots and lots of effort gets put into preventing attacks?

      There might be layers of points to be had. ;)

  23. That may be true most of the time by davidwr · · Score: 1

    But there were two particular days in 1945 when that wasn't the case.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:That may be true most of the time by hey! · · Score: 2

      Those are what are known in statistics as "outliers". They can be safely thrown out, unless the conclusion you're after depends on them.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:That may be true most of the time by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      They weren't even the deadliest bombing raids in history. A March 1945 incendiary raid on Tokyo killed more people than either nuke.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    3. Re:That may be true most of the time by q4Fry · · Score: 1

      Yes, but that raid took more than a single plane and warhead. With those 334 B-29s and atomic bombs, you could have killed at least a quarter the population of 1940s Japan.

  24. Its not the Number of "Attacks" by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

    It's not the number, in any system as large as the American electrical grid some percentage will always be down. The threat is some incredibly inconvenient parts of the grid going down at inconvenient times. Squirrels might cause thousands of "attacks", but they will never randomly knock out three levels of backups at key installations spread across the continent at the same time that China just happens to launch a nuclear attack.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
  25. Give the fucking squirrels a break by Godwin+O'Hitler · · Score: 1

    And stop thinking mankind is the ultimate in evolution.
    I so wish there was competition between species for dominance of this planet.

    --
    No, your children are not the special ones. Nor are your pets.
    1. Re:Give the fucking squirrels a break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is competition. We won.

    2. Re:Give the fucking squirrels a break by tomhath · · Score: 1

      I never brake for squirrels, whether they're copulating or not.

    3. Re: Give the fucking squirrels a break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the ultimate evolutionary goal is to steal food from bird feeders, the tree rats (squirrels) could give us a run for out money.

    4. Re:Give the fucking squirrels a break by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      There is competition. We won.

      That's what they want you to believe.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  26. Focus! by pipingguy · · Score: 1

    Was typing a comment but got distrac

  27. you gave me an excellent idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Meth heads: Free copper, climb the pole!

  28. Around here it's raccoons by Streetlight · · Score: 1

    Here in Colorado Springs the problem seems to be raccoons in older parts of town. Not sure if raccoons are good to eat but some hunters shoot squirrels for food. Those found dead in substations fried on transformers are precooked.

    --
    In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
  29. Especially in Sacramento, CA by kenwd0elq · · Score: 1

    In the Central Valley of California, we have a long dry season and (generally) a short cold wet season. Squirrels rip the insulation off of buried power cables during the dry season. Then when the rains come, rain water shorts out the systems causing power outages. This used to be exceptionally common, but has been less so during our 5-year drought.

    I'm actually surprised that we haven't had more power failures in the last month's "Pineapple Express" storms; my power hasn't even flickered in several months.

  30. This isn't nuts by movdqa · · Score: 1

    I've noticed rising squirrel populations in our housing development over the last ten years (chipmunks and a few other critters too). Sometimes they gnaw on parts of your house but they mostly go after the trash. I guess that it's the lack of natural predators that has their populations growing. If you want to see a safe habitat for squirrels, walk around Boston Common where the pigeons and squirrels can compete for your snacks.

  31. Nothing to see here, move on. by westlake · · Score: 1

    Telegraph companies were dealing with problems like these in the 1840s. It's a damn nuisance when a rodent chews through a cable or a storm brings down a pole. But these are random, localized, events that aren't likely to cause any lasting harm.

  32. No coordination by hawguy · · Score: 1

    When squirrels coordinate their attacks to target a large geographical area, then I'll be worried about them.

    1700 attacks affecting 5M people is only 3000 people per incident. I'm not sure what time range those numbers cover but if it's 35 years (based on the talk being called "35 Years of Cyberwar: The Squirrels Are Winning"), that's only 50 incidents per year, which doesn't seem like a lot if spread across the USA or the world.

    I've never been in a squirrel related power outages (that I know of), but have been in 2 car-accident related outages, I'd imagine that cars are a much bigger source of outages.

  33. I believe it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given the holes these bastards chewed into my trash cans I believe it.

  34. Not equivalent by RobinH · · Score: 1

    Squirrels are an event that you can plan for - it happens all the time and it's a calculated cost. They're not intelligent actors trying to sabotage your system, they're just varmints doing what they do. Someone probing and making a list of the vulnerabilities of your system so they can perform a massive across-the-board outage of your infrastructure is a completely different thing. When a squirrel takes out a transformer it only affects a local area and for a short duration of time. Since it happens all the time the utilities are used to it and are good at locating and repairing the damage. Someone messing with the infrastructure internally is going to be pretty much unprecedented and could be difficult to figure out and fix.

    --
    "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
  35. Those Threatening Squirrels by SenseiTim · · Score: 1

    Squirrels chew on everything. Like all rodents, squirrels' teeth grow throughout their lives.

  36. so how about some capsaicin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    built into the cable jacket?

  37. Yes, squirrels are. by Jerry · · Score: 1

    A power transformer across the street from my office window on the 2nd floor of the NE State office bldg was blown out three times during the ten year period before I retired. I watched the last rascal jump between two insulators and draw a 21,000 volt spark. There was an explosion and fell to the pavement. With the power down and nothing else to do I went outside to check the squirrel. His skin was split from his left rear foot pad to his left front paw, like a zipper had been unzipped. And the air was filled with the odor of cooked squirrel. I didn't see the previous rascal's demise but I went out to investigate it as well. It had somehow gotten jammed and the current cooked him and then carbonized him before it exploded.

    --

    Running with Linux for over 20 years!

  38. "Concerted attack by rodentia" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, the difference between squirrels and attackers is that squirrels don't learn and adapt and scale up their attacks.

    So speaks someone who doesn't have a bird feeder in their yard. Squirrels most certainly *do* learn and adapt their attacks and they will never, ever stop until they get what they want. Their pace of learning and adaptation may sometimes be slower than a human enemy, but they will always be the more relentless adversary for they are driven by evolutionary survival imperatives and those are ultimately stronger than mere religious or political convictions.

    On a more direct note (and the reason I'm posting AC): some years back I was part of deploying some critical new infrastructure and one of the scenarios the engineers had to address with the design was "concerted attack by rodentia". Aka rats, squirrels, etc. It can be done and it is done for genuinely critical stuff.

    1. Re:"Concerted attack by rodentia" by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      they will never, ever stop until they get what they want.

      Squirrel Terminators.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  39. What about optogenetics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's just what the damned belka want you to think! Then you find out that they're being controlled by an optogenetics device and the next thing you know we're all planting cabbage patches in the back yard.

    You can never be too paranoid these days.

  40. Squrriels and power! by TigerPlish · · Score: 1

    True story... back in the Stone Age, BI (Before Internet) I was at my first weather school in the USAF, at Chanute AFB IL, on a smoke break (remember those?), it was an instructor and a few us students.. we were on a side of the building that faced a sub-station.

    There was a small explosion, we felt a very slight disturbance, a teeny tiny shockwave I guess. People started pouring out of the school -- the power had gone out at the school and surrounding buildings. After assessment, we were told "Go home, it'll be hours before it's fixed." A squirrel had gone and shorted out a transformer.. a big transformer, not those little ones you see up on poles. We later heard there was spalling around the transformer. Yea buddy, a squirrel and some metal made for shrapnel!

    Second one, in North Miami - our building had only one way in for power, a 3-phase feed off a pole (!), then buried underground (!!) and into the power. Power goes out, but it was only one phase. The boss and I go to where the noise came from.. and there was a dead squirrel on the floor, with charred fur and a blown-out left hindleg. I still have the picture. It took FPL 3 hours to come and replace one fuse on the pole. Our 90 KVA UPS took the phones and network gear through those 3 hours with plenty to spare. No, we had no generator. Just a mondo UPS.

    Fucking squirrels!

    --
    The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
  41. Squirrel Hunting SysAdmin by Da+Cheez · · Score: 1

    I'm a security-conscious sysadmin, which is why I spent my Saturday hunting squirrels.* You're welcome, America.

    *actually, because free meat. Didn't know about The Rodent Threat until reading this, but you're still welcome, America.

  42. What about fiber cuts? by Doke · · Score: 1

    The article only deals with power cuts. What about fiber data line cuts? We had a squirrel chew through one of our WAN links, inside a conduit. I can't imagine that could have tasted good.

    1. Re:What about fiber cuts? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      The main rodent threat is that the evil creatures are suicide short-circuiters, getting into our transformers and infringing on our personal liberties. Chewing through things is less common and less destructive.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  43. Not such a threat, really by excursive · · Score: 1

    They're not killing nearly as many people as toddlers with guns, and we're not doing anything about those!

    http://www.snopes.com/toddlers...

  44. Squirrel Army by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally, the segment from Scrubs makes sense. The janitor was building a squirrel army for rodent terrorism.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxCfxxeGhXA

  45. a low tech 'threat' response by swell · · Score: 2

    "Rats must chew or their teeth grow through their heads!" - Hemlock Stones in Firesign Theater's - The Tale of the Giant Rat of Sumatra

    These growing rodent teeth, just like a dog or cat's claws are relentless. Imagine yourself a rodent with a need to chew- what would you choose? A rock? A discarded piece of fruit? It happens that the insulation used in much wiring is preferred.

    I experienced this problem when rodents chose to chew the wiring in my new car at the place I was required to park overnight. It happens that a low tech solution was ideal. I acquired some spongy insulation that is normally used to insulate hot water pipes, and wrapped it around parts of my wiring harness.

    The soft foam did not satisfy the chewing urge so the rodents never bothered my car again.

    Whether animals or humans create some sort of threat, we should understand their motivations in order to form an ideal response. OFF TOPIC: and when we treat humans badly and expect them to be nice in return we are both blind and stupid.

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
  46. Would not surprise me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Several years ago, a large chunk of downtown Winnipeg was subjected to a power outage. Cause? A squirrel managed to span two wires at the local substation, causing a short that knocked out the substation.

    Now, I don't blame the squirrel. I blame the guys who designed the substation. Either space out the wires properly or use better short protection.

  47. CORRECT! by mmell · · Score: 1

    Trump didn't win . . . Hilary lost. So good of you to admit that.

    1. Re: CORRECT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump won, hillary lost. Get over it and you'll feel better.

    2. Re: CORRECT! by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Trump won, the US lost.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  48. What is the max harm squirrels can do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is one of those arguments, rephrased:
    Squirrels do more damage than nuclear bombs every year.
    Therefore fearing the effects of nuclear bombs is unwarranted.
    Or: Something has not happened yet, so we don't need to fear it.
    See Nassim Taleb on black swans.

    Counter argument: Once upon a time, mass migrations of squirrels moved across America, at least in Illinois and New York. On story was old by a farmer in Illinois who's farm was eaten to little nubs on the ground by a wave of squirrels he estimated at 1.2 mile wide by 4 miles long. In a day or two they every bit of plant matter except for large branches of trees.

    A squirrel migration in New York decimated everything in it's path in the late 1800's for miles until they entered a large river and man drowned.

    Google squirrel migration.

  49. Shitty infrastructure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget termites and drunk drivers hitting the wooden posts.
    Other civilized countries bury their cables underground for exactly that reason.

  50. Instead of shit happens, Squirrels Happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I actually had a squirrel take out a telephone cable on the pole about a 15 years ago when DSL was the fastest option. Gnawed through the insulation to expose bare wires which was causing shorts. Started noticing intermittent drop outs and completely down when it rained. They kept wanting to blame it on me or internal wiring in my house even though it was working normally for years up to that point. This was at a time BEFORE WIFI when the defacto troubleshooting steps for them was "do you have a lamp sitting next to your modem or computer". Anyone remember that bullshit troubleshooting? After a week of phone tag I had them send a tech out. I felt vindicated when the tech showed me the section of damaged cable. Replaced it and was back to normal.

  51. Squirrels have brought down Nasdaq at least twice by rla3rd · · Score: 1
  52. Squirrels are a natural disaster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Squirrels are a natural disaster, not a malicious security threat like hackers and foreign governments. This proves Cris Thomas is just an idiot.

  53. Yes, It's the Squirrels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And not just for the chewing! For every human being with ADHD, you can take them offline simply by yelling "squirrel!" Or you know, by pointing to an actual squirrel...

    Squirrels. It's the threat from within, I tell you!

  54. There's even a standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's even an IEEE standard to protect against animal attacks
    http://beyondstandards.ieee.org/smart-cities/ieee-1264-guides-utilities-in-mitigating-animal-intrusions-to-increase-grid-reliability/

  55. How many squirrels were killed by cars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is the important question; The minor inconvenience of being without electricity for a few hours is nothing compared to getting a radial in your face.

  56. MSP's by raind · · Score: 1

    I had a Comcast tech tell me the critters are his nemisis. Also grow rooms!

    --
    Get up!