Slashdot Mirror


Uber Says Thousands of London Drivers Threatened By English Language Test (reuters.com)

Costas Pitas, writing for Reuters: Tens of thousands of London private hire drivers could lose their licenses due to new English reading and writing requirements, taxi app Uber said on Tuesday at the start of a court battle to halt the plans. San Francisco-based Uber, which allows users to book journeys at the touch of a button on their smartphone, has grown rapidly in recent years but faced bans and protests around the world as regulators play catch-up with technology disrupting traditional operators. Uber launched legal action in August after public body Transport for London (TfL) said that drivers should have to prove their ability to communicate in English, including to a standard of reading and writing which Uber says is too high. "It produces the profoundest of human effects. At one extreme it will lead to the loss of livelihood," Uber's lawyer Thomas de la Mare told the High Court in London. There are over 110,000 private hire drivers in the British capital, according to TfL but around 33,000 would fail to pass their renewal test due to the new language hurdle, de la Mare told the court, citing a calculation of data provided by TfL.

354 comments

  1. "profoundest of human effects" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but self-driving cars won't?

  2. Uber need to get a clue. by JustNiz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It seems just basic common sense to require people that need to deal with the public, including in a safety context, to actually be able to converse in the national language.

    1. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How is that racist? IATA requires all air traffic controllers around the world to be able to respond to aircraft that request service in English.

      Pursuant to requirements of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), ATC operations are conducted either in the English language or the language used by the station on the ground.[2] In practice, the native language for a region is normally used; however, the English language must be used upon request.[

      Language != race, you moron. Same as religion != race, despite what Trump wants to believe.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    2. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In what possible way is requiring someone to have a reasonable level of a skill which is directly related to their job considered 'racist'? The only way that discrimination based on skills could be considered racist is if you believe that a particular race cannot learn that skill...in which case it is you who are racist.

    3. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by ranton · · Score: 1

      It seems just basic common sense to require people that need to deal with the public, including in a safety context, to actually be able to converse in the national language.

      It depends on how strict the requirements are. Most adults read at a 7th to 8th grade level, and around 20% of adults read at under a 5th grade level. Any reading / writing requirements which limits employment to a large percentage of the working class population are likely not in the public interest.

      If they are looking for something around a 3rd-5th grade reading level I could understand that. If they are looking for an 8th grade reading level the law is ridiculous and will likely only serve to limit access to non-native speakers and those without higher education (IMHO).

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    4. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you started so strong too. :(

      Trump isn't the one trumpeting the Muslim ban as racist. Or Islamophobia as racist.

    5. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A few nights ago Rory's Roger iron's busted, so he's gone down the battlecruiser to watch the end of the football game. No one's watching the custard, so he switches the channel over. A fat geezer's north opens, and he wanders up and turns the Liza over. "Now fuck off and watch it somewhere else!" Rory knows claret is imminent, but he doesn't want to miss the end of the game. So, calm as a coma, he picks up a fire extinguisher, walks straight past the jam rolls who are ready for action, and plonks it outside the entrance. He then orders an Aristotle of the most ping-pong tiddly in the nuclear sub and switches back to his footer. "That's fucking it," says the geezer. "That's fucking what?" says Rory. And he gobs out a mouthful of booze covering fatty. He flicks a flaming match into his bird's nest and the geezer's lit up like a leaking gas pipe.

    6. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The goal of Uber is to provide on demand transportation to consumers. The goal of Uber isn't to provide jobs to drivers -- that's not why investors in invested in Uber.

      The interest the government has in requiring a certain level of proficiency in one's advertised offering is in protecting consumers, not providing jobs to tradespeople.

    7. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump's temporary travel ban had nothing to do with race or religion. It was based on country of origin. But that was racist, right? It became "The Muslim Ban".

      England is clearly being racist by banning non-whites from driving taxis.

    8. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're the moron for being gullible trollbait.

    9. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by JustNiz · · Score: 0

      > despite what Trump wants to believe.

      Citation please, otherwise you just sound like yet another whiney butthurt liberal spouting "truthiness".

    10. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by LQ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nothing to do with Brexit. The London mayor, Sadiq Khan (a Muslim and son of a Pakistani bus driver) backs the language test. It is part of a campaign to improve quality and reduce the number of rogue mini-cabs on the road.

    11. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by JustNiz · · Score: 2

      >> England is clearly being racist by banning non-whites from driving taxis.

      I'm presuming you're actually being sarcastic, but if not, then Its actually you who's playing the racist card by assuming that non-native speakers necessarily aren't white. You realise that the majority of the EU is white non-English people right?

    12. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by stephanruby · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm an Uber driver and I met a Chinese former Uber driver who got deactivated in the US for not knowing enough English.

      The first time he got deactivated, he had to pay for and pass an online English language quiz. Of course, he passed the test (I assume one of his family members helped him). Then, he got reactivated, but that didn't last for more than a week or two, and that second time, he got permanently deactivated, because he couldn't get his rating back up and passengers were still leaving the same comments about him not knowing enough English.

      My point is that Uber has a crude rating system. For instance, an average of 4.6 stars can get you deactivated in some cities. But crude as that system may be, it does seem to be working at weeding out the worst Uber drivers (including those that may not know enough English).

      And if we're talking about forcing Uber drivers in the UK to pass an English test, I would love to see some of their sample questions, to see how difficult they made the test.

    13. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      I've come to find out in my life that 99% of the time the person crying racist, is truly the racist. Just like most liberals thinking we need to give minoritys a free ride because their minoritys. When in all honesty. I'm White, and an Electrician. The company i work for has mostly SKILLED minoritys. And yes they get paid way more than minimum wage.

    14. Re: Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bs they are only doing it to could get the foreign people who manage to make a legal living by working hard. You don't have to be proficient in English to drive a damn car. You actually have to pass a test to show you can drive and people can rate you if you fail to follow their directions. This is just more right wing racist bs guised as a legitimate concern.

    15. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are looking for racism such as purposefully dis-allowing or prevent opportunities for capable people in races other than the majority.
      The people tested were incapable, that's the whole point of the article. Does that clear it up for you? Consider this practical exchange:

      "There's a taxi, hey stop! Thanks, yes please take us to the Snack-King on Mulberry Street".
      "Cze"

      "What? Yes well anyway to the great restaurant on Mulberry please."
      "Cze, Mulbeddy Steet?"

      "Well folks, time to walk. Thanks for your time driver, and good luck".
      "Do widzenia"

      It is PRUDENT BUSINESS & CIVIL ETIQUETTE to hire talented and capable people towards roles they can actually do. Especially in regulated businesses. Having a drivers license is only one small part. I lived in other countries, I always learned the language & took jobs where communication was of modest importance until I got better at the language. Yes including washing dishes, etc. Did that country discriminate against me? No! What are they supposed to do- give me keys to the palace to prove they are good people now despite historical steriotypes?

      You are reverse racism'ing, hoping others will cave in to prove they are good people now too. Remember, these drivers were found incapable of communicating. Does that mean anything to you?

    16. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the policeman's character in Hot Fuzz that needed an interpreter was a joke. I guess it's a documentary, though?

    17. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i have no joke here, i just like saying "... also, i fink knives are a good idea.."

      captcha: vehicles

    18. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think most people believe the ban is racist because Trump explicitly said during the campaign that he was going to ban all muslims. However given that such a targeted ban is illegal, the current order was the best he could do. Just because the order's wording isn't explicitly racist doesn't change the fact that the desired effect is to prevent as many Muslims as possible from entering the country.

    19. Re: Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't the UK just vote to get away from the non-white EU?

    20. Re: Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. If that was the case why were only a small handful of Muslim majority countries restricted instead of all of them?

    21. Re: Uber need to get a clue. by JustNiz · · Score: 2

      No they voted to get away from the EU.
      Apparently its actually you that just cant stop injecting that racist shit into everything.

    22. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      It is part of a campaign to improve quality and reduce the number of rogue mini-cabs on the road.

      Shouldn't the level of quality be up to the customer? If I want to save money, I can choose to go to a low quality restaurant rather than a high quality restaurant. Why shouldn't I be able to do the same when I get a ride? Or do you think there should be a government imposed language test for waiters as well? After all, if the waiter can't speak proper English, they won't be able to ensure the customer has no allergies to the food they are ordering, or able to render proper medical assistance if the diner has a heart attack or epileptic seizure during their meal. What if there are children at the table, and they need to ask directions to the toilet? Think of the children!

      Or perhaps this is just politicians using "safety" as an excuse to protect their racket?

    23. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent was describing what is/n't in the "public interest".

      The relevance of public interest to GP is debatable. The accuracy of parent's claims is debatable. Parent was not addressing uber's goals, though. You seem to have introduced that yourself.

      The goal of uber is the same as investors: Make money.

    24. Re: Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are those minorities you work with better at English than you?

      All you did was make an assertion, and then strangely started talking about how you work with people who have minority ethnicities, instead of making any argument to back up you assertion.

      Makes me wonder if you were trying for the old chestnut "I'm not racist because I have many black friends, but ..."

    25. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by myowntrueself · · Score: 0, Troll

      Honestly, I'm not convinced, especially not until Brexit is complete and all those damn funny-sounding furriners from the rest of the Union can be kept out of the country.

      I DO think that Uber ought to assess language proficiency themselves, then hook French-speaking riders up with French-speaking drivers and so on.

      And also if you are going to live in the UK you should wear normal English clothes!!!!!!1111

      In fact normal garments should be handed to foreigners at the ports of entry.

      Some English people feel terribly distressed when they see foreigners wearing their foreign clothing in the street.

      This is a LOCAL country for LOCAL people. Theres nothing for foreigners here!

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    26. Re: Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm alot of the other countries he owns hotels or other ventures in.

      https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/countries-where-trump-does-business-are-not-hit-by-new-travel-restrictions/2017/01/28/dd40535a-e56b-11e6-a453-19ec4b3d09ba_story.html?utm_term=.8bf164e318ec

      The seven nations targeted for new visitation restrictions by President Trump on Friday all have something in common: They are places he does not appear to have any business interests.

      He went as racist as he could without impacting his business, which is where his real loyalties lie.

      You trumpites think he has your best interests at heart, he DOES NOT. If he did have yours and the countries best interests at heart, he would have placed his holdings in a blind trust. You will come to see that, but I feel it will be a long, slow, and hard lesson for you.

    27. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      Nothing to do with Brexit. The London mayor, Sadiq Khan (a Muslim and son of a Pakistani bus driver) backs the language test. It is part of a campaign to improve quality and reduce the number of rogue mini-cabs on the road.

      How about making people feel comfortable by being able to get a cab with a driver that speaks the language of their choice? Then we could have multiple language tests.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    28. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Shouldn't the level of quality be up to the customer?

      Seeing as the UK is a democracy, it already is. And they decided at the ballot box in order to save time having to make the decision every time they get in a damn cab.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    29. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      How is that racist? IATA requires all air traffic controllers around the world to be able to respond to aircraft that request service in English.

      Oh wow. Then how will they understand "Mayday!" (which comes from the French m'aider). Chaos should surely ensue.

      Also, race is massively misunderstood. The 'races' of humanity are nothing more than gigantic extended families.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    30. Re: Uber need to get a clue. by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      Didn't the UK just vote to get away from the non-white EU?

      Right, because the UK did so want to be part of the white EU but not the non-white EU (mainly Spain, Greece and Italy).

      Oh wait, do Slavs count as white...?

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    31. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Racist is now a term used only by liberals when they know their argument would be rejected by any reasonable person. It is their attempt to persuade based on the reasonable person being afraid to agree with the common sense argument because a liberal might call them a name.

      Used to such an overwhelming extent, it no longer has real meaning.

    32. Re: Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He went as racist as he could without impacting his business, which is where his real loyalties lie.

      Obama created the exact same travel ban.

    33. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Hylandr · · Score: 2

      Shouldn't the level of quality be up to the customer?

      No. Otherwise you get all kinds of shady characters buying a car of craigslist stenciling some letters on it and start picking up victims.

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    34. Re: Uber need to get a clue. by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      That is truly one of the most desperate and incompetent attempts at a hybrid strawman/trolling that I can recall seeing...

    35. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Zocalo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Just spotted on the BBC: Londoner accidentally gets Uber to Croydon, via Bristol. That's a £467 bill for what should have been a ~30 minute journey (in central London) that took five additional hours and a few hundred extra miles because the Uber driver didn't speak enough English to understand what the problem was when the passenger woke up and realised what was going on. To be fair to Uber, they're going to refund the fare as a goodwill gesture, but apropos to the story non-the-less.

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    36. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume that's 4.6 out of 10?

      (4.6 / 5 is at least +1.5 standard deviations on most rating scales = exceptionally good rating)
      (4.6 / 10 is about -3 standard deviations on most rating scales = exceptionally poor rating)

    37. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by drnb · · Score: 1

      How is that racist? IATA requires all air traffic controllers around the world to be able to respond to aircraft that request service in English.

      Oh wow. Then how will they understand "Mayday!" (which comes from the French m'aider). Chaos should surely ensue.

      The English language contains many French words or French derived words. "Mayday" is one such English word. So no, aircraft are not using "French" when they declare an emergency.

    38. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be stupid. Mayday is part of English. While a lot of short-hand is used in ATC dialogue for efficiency reasons, if push comes to shove, any combination of pilots and ground-based ATC operators, must be able to converse plainly in English.

    39. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -1 = "I want to get in a cab in Germany where they've passed a law mandating that all cab drivers speak German. Additionally, directions must be given as a single sentence ending in the correct number of consecutive turn verbs."

    40. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you could demonstrate any material way in which Sadiq Khan profits from this move, then your statement might make some kind of sense. Honestly, you Randian free-marketeers are a bit bloody tiresome with your theoretical models that have fuck-all to do with the real world.

    41. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      strangely enough though, Black Cab drivers are exempt from this test...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    42. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Seeing as the UK is a democracy, it already is.

      Nazi Germany was also a democracy, since Hitler was elected. So by your logic, the inmates at Auschwitz chose to be there.

    43. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Raenex · · Score: 2

      I think most people believe the ban is racist because Trump explicitly said during the campaign that he was going to ban all muslims.

      Here's a big clue for "most people", then: Islam is not a race, and Muslims are followers of Islam. Islam is a religion/political ideology based on tyrannical rule over people's lives, and as such is not compatible with Western values.

    44. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by mrbester · · Score: 5, Informative

      The classes for The Knowledge (you have to have this to be a black cabbie) are in English, so you've got no chance of passing if you don't understand the language.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    45. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by nukenerd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ShanghaiBill wrote

      Shouldn't the level of quality be up to the customer?

      You don't know the quality of the driver's English until he turns up or even until after the ride starts.

      Sounds like you follow the Thatcher theory that the market decides best because people are "all-knowing" - so it assumes. But people are not all-knowing.

    46. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      Some English people feel terribly distressed when they see foreigners wearing their foreign clothing in the street.

      Not me. I'd rather be able to recognise a foreigner.

    47. Re: Uber need to get a clue. by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      That is truly one of the most desperate and incompetent attempts at a hybrid strawman/trolling that I can recall seeing...

      Thank you so much, I really appreciate it!

      The sad part is I've actually heard my English relatives suggest such a thing (the clothing thing). They actually feel really infuriated when they see people wearing foreign clothes on the streets of England. I'm not making it up, I wish I were. And they are not alone in this. Many English people really are terribly xenophobic.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    48. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Seeing as the UK is a democracy, it already is.

      Nazi Germany was also a democracy, since Hitler was elected. So by your logic, the inmates at Auschwitz chose to be there.

      Hey Hillary!! Go take your meds and lie down to sleep it off.

    49. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by myowntrueself · · Score: 2

      Some English people feel terribly distressed when they see foreigners wearing their foreign clothing in the street.

      Not me. I'd rather be able to recognise a foreigner.

      Indeed, there should be legislation to ensure that all French men wear a beret, striped jersey and a string of onions around their necks while visiting the UK. Can't be too careful!

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    50. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Only to a point. Restaurants that don't meet hygiene standards get shut done. You don't get the choice to keep eating there. Basic minimum standards is a good thing.

      Anyway, how do you specify that your taxi driver must have a good command of English?

    51. Re: Uber need to get a clue. by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      This is just more right wing racist bs guised as a legitimate concern.

      Transport for London, which is pushing this, is chaired by the Mayor of London. He looks just like a right wing racist, doesn't he?

    52. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Cederic · · Score: 2

      Ok, I'll give it a go.

      Reducing the number of taxis increases dependency and demand on public transport, which increases the number of public transport jobs, most of which are unionised. The unions fund Sadiq Khan's election campaigns.

      Profit.

    53. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Hognoxious · · Score: 5, Informative
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    54. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      You don't know the quality of the driver's English until he turns up or even until after the ride starts.

      If I care if the driver speaks English well (I don't), then I would use A DIFFERENT SERVICE, such as a standard black taxi. I know that there is no guarantee with Uber when I choose to use it, but it does offer other features that I do care about, such as a lower price.

    55. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't the level of quality be up to the customer?
      And how should the customer decide? Jumping into a cab and then after 10 minutes saying: please leave me out here (an no I don't pay!), because I'm not happy with your service?

      Or do you think there should be a government imposed language test for waiters as well? Actually in most western countries this is the case, facepalm.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    56. Re: Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And god forbid if the made Uber drivers sit The Knowledge.

    57. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Unionized does not mean what you think it means.

      The amount of workers who are actually in a union is extremely low.

      Unions don't fund "campaigns", neither can they by law nor would the public accept this.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    58. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      They aren't.

      They have plenty of tests to make which they can not even attempt and most certainly not pass without proper english skills.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    59. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by mspohr · · Score: 1

      I don't talk to my Uber driver. He/she knows where I want to go and how to get there. I don't care what language he/she speaks.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    60. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by mspohr · · Score: 1

      I've never seen an Uber car with anything stenciled on the side. They are usually much nicer and cleaner than taxis.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    61. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Same for coastal radio stations and boat owners that want to have an SRC/LRC (shot range/long range radio certification) aka a license to use a radio. Many countries do not require such a license so far, but lots of those are now switching to require it, e.g. France. Ofc. in Germany you require a license to operate such a radio, and that implies you can understand MAYDAY/PAN PAN/ and SECURITÃ messages which are always in local language AND english. Well, MAYDAY not necessarily in local language, mostly they are english only.

      All majour civilian airports use english only, never heard a german radio call to an airport, unless it was a mini privat plane and an airport operated by a club.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    62. Re: Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No he did not.

      All Obama did was require additional checks for visa applicants coming from those countries.

      No-one got pulled off a plane. No green card holders or American citizens were detained. It wasn't thrown out on its arse in the courts.

      There was actual consultation with the agencies that had to implement the EO, before it was finalized, unlike Trump.

      And Trump was the one calling it a ban on Muslims entering the US - well before the media - it was part of his campaign position, and he used exactly those words - plenty of video of it around. Only he didn't deliver on what he promised - like the bully that he is, he only implemented the policy for the countries he could readily push around, not the ones where he had businesses, and not the ones that actively fund terrorists, and not the ones that terrorists who actually kill Americans have come from.

      Basically , there's very little in common between the two orders at all.

    63. Re: Uber need to get a clue. by mspohr · · Score: 1

      "The Knowledge" is a quaint artifact of a bygone era. Today we have GPS and navigation apps with real time traffic information. No need for any knowledge (or language for that matter). My Uber driver knows where I want to go and how to get there... always. Don't talk to the driver.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    64. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cattle a lady! Was this Sir Anthony a yuletide, by any morris?

    65. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      They speak english, yes. But actually they do use "french" when they declare an emergency.
      The intro to a message that is not private are: MAYDAY, PAN PAN and SECURITE ... and they are supposed to be pronounced french. Of course the americans don't do that. However the british do. (I'm sailing often enough in "the channel" ...)

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    66. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      And you started so strong too. :( Trump isn't the one trumpeting the Muslim ban as racist. Or Islamophobia as racist.

      The courts disagreed, saying the ban was discriminatory. I don't see Trump calling for action against white muslims (yes, they exist).

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    67. Re: Uber need to get a clue. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. If that was the case why were only a small handful of Muslim majority countries restricted instead of all of them?

      Try oil. There's far more cause to ban Saudi Arabia, where most of the 9/11 terrorists were from, as was all their financing, and their leader Osama bin Laden.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    68. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Islam is a religion/political ideology based on tyrannical rule over people's lives, and as such is not compatible with Western values.
      That is wrong. Just like Capitalizm does not imply Democracy, Islam does not imply Sharia, hence it is just a religion and not a political ideology. And like Christianity e.g. there are plenty of flavours of Islam.
      Lern to know your enemy, if you think you have one!

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    69. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ask him to repeat after you, "The rain in Spain falls mainly on the plain"

    70. Re: Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If people are supposed to be uncomfortable with whites in white Klans garb, is there any reason why they should NOT be comfortable with muslims in black jilbabs/hijabs/burqhas/...?

    71. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Trump never had anything against any race, but did once call for a Muslim ban. So Trump clearly believes that religion != race, despite what you wrote

    72. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Can you even rate someone specifically for communication skills in the Uber app?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    73. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      And how should the customer decide?

      A customer has two options:
      1. Look at the driver's reviews.
      2. Use a service that requires their drivers to speak English well. In London, you can get that with a standard cab, so that is already an option for people that want it and are willing to pay for it.

      Actually in most western countries this is the case, facepalm.

      Really? MOST western countries have a government mandated language test for waiters? Could you name, say, one?

    74. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by unixisc · · Score: 2

      Can you point to anything where he said that White Muslims are okay? The one time he called for a ban on Muslims, he simply said Muslims: said nothing about their race. The only thing is that he wanted to ban foreign Muslims from entering, since that would be legal, but not US born Muslims of any race, since they do have their 1st Amendment rights. Most US born Muslims are NOI Muslims, like Farrakhan, Ellison, et al. The courts that have disagreed w/ him so far are the 9th circuit court, which is overturned on an average >80% of the time.

    75. Re: Uber need to get a clue. by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Okay. How much oil is there in Pakistan, Bangladesh or Afghanistan?

    76. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Cederic · · Score: 2

      Oh ffs. The Transport and General Workers Union had over 800k members before it merged with Amicus to create the Unite union with 1.4m members. Aslef and the RMT have 100k between them.

      That's a lot of union funding: Unions provide 40-60% (depending on year) of the Labour Party's funding. The Labour party fund political campaigns, e.g. the mayoral election in London, which they'll have spent probably just over £400k on.

      This doesn't even include the various strike actions intended to damage the current government, something that benefits the official opposition: The Labour Party.

      For the benefit of people outside the UK, Sadiq Khan is a member of (and represents) the Labour Party.

    77. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The Nazi Party won a plurality of the vote. They did not win an outright majority, but neither did Sadiq Khan. He became mayor of London with 44.2% of the vote. So he has no more democratic legitimacy than Adolf Hitler had.

       

    78. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1
      What, you can't either read the quote or click on the link? Requiring language proficiency in English is an internationally-enforced regulation for all air traffic control operators. It's not racist. And as for Trump, the courts have held that his travel ban was clearly discriminatory, to the point where he is trying to come up with a new one that seems less racist, while also trying (and the courts giving him the finger) to stop the proceedings wrt his original ban.

      If he were really worried about people from countries that sponsored terrorism, Saudi Arabia should be #1 on the list. Unlike the countries he banned, which had ZERO 9/11 terrorists, Saudi Arabians were the vast majority (15 out of 19) of the 9/11 attackers, and their leader and financer, bin Laden, was a Saudi as well.

      As for me "sounding like a butt-hurt liberal", I'm very happy Trump is now president. Unlike Clinton, who would have been business as usual, Trump is f*cking things up so much that the American voters have no choice now except to fix the system, including electoral financing, or face even worse in the future.

      As I keep saying, you got the government you deserved. Clinton and the DNC's machinations were the deciding factor in Trump's election, not the Russians, by a vast margin. When you have a 2-party system with both parties corrupted and answerable only to monied interests, look in the mirror for why that happened. Maybe one day you'll become a democracy again, instead of a kleptocracy/oligarchy.

      And if you don't, who cares? The world will continue along while you self-destruct. Both China and Russia are now bigger influences in geopolitics, and China now exceeds the US in terms of GDP when measured in terms of purchasing parity.

      Strange how people say Greece is almost bankrupt even though they have a primary surplus (government income - all government expenditures except interest) of 2%, while the US has a primary deficit of almost $2 trillion a year. That's $24,000 a year of new federal debt for every family of 4.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    79. Re: Uber need to get a clue. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      People driving for Uber don't have to pass a language proficiency test. It's supposedly a "ride sharing" service, not a ride hailing app.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    80. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NOT wrong.
      He didn't become president, he became chancellor. And he was just as much "elected" for it as Merkel is now, i.e. appointed by said president because he was leading the majority party.
      The Nazi party won the largest share of seats (33% vs 20% for the second largest) in the election, so consequently Hitler was made chancellor. The same thing applies analogously to Merkel and the CDU.

    81. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Unions don't fund "campaigns", neither can they by law nor would the public accept this.

      Baloney. Unions are, by far, the biggest donors to the UK Labor Party.

    82. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      They do NOT say "PAN PAN". Try "panne" (breakdown). And it's "m'aider" ("help me"), not "mayday", which looks more like may day, the international worker's day.

      "Pan" is about as french as "le crankshaft", "les tires", or "le windshield." Acceptable as franglais slang, same as "tabernac, c'est tout fuckè", but not really french.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    83. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Just as importantly, they need to be able to understand communications between the ground and other aircraft, as well as between other aircraft, so that they don't make a bad situation worse.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    84. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Non-english speakers have no place in a white english-speaking country. Feckin-A ebola .. er ebonics babblers should be put out or put-down. Then go after their DemoRat-Trotsky blo-jobbing poodles like Pelosi , Shumer etcetc ...

    85. Re: Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone expecting Brexit to lower the immigration rate is in for a nasty surprise. Not only has the government said that immigration will not lower, as people didn't vote for that, and not only have the "special" trade deals discussed so far involved increases in immigration by way of reciprocation, but the devalued pound has already increased foreign tourism due to the exchange rate making everything comparitively cheap in the UK. In effect, bigots and xenophobes have voted to get the exact opposite of what they expected and were told. Welcome to Poundland!

    86. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 0
      Is trump a racist? Of course he is - look at how he attacked an Indiana-born judge based on his Mexican heritage. The Justice department sued him twice for not renting to black people.

      And how the hell can you say this crap and not be racist:

      “And isn’t it funny. I’ve got black accountants at Trump Castle and Trump Plaza. Black guys counting my money! I hate it,” O’Donnell recalled Trump saying. “The only kind of people I want counting my money are short guys that wear yarmulkes every day.”

      “I think the guy is lazy,” Trump said of a black employee, according to O’Donnell. “And it’s probably not his fault because laziness is a trait in blacks. It really is, I believe that. It’s not anything they can control.”

      Trump is an ignorant white cracker with a dead cat on his head (Dr. Phil on Jimmy Kimmel),

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    87. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by drnb · · Score: 1

      They speak english, yes. But actually they do use "french" when they declare an emergency. The intro to a message that is not private are: MAYDAY, PAN PAN and SECURITE ... and they are supposed to be pronounced french. Of course the americans don't do that. However the british do. (I'm sailing often enough in "the channel" ...)

      Nautical and Aviation may operate differently. Also using the local language first may be normal, note the original post referred to being able to respond to an English call, it was not suggesting all traffic be in English. In others words it was suggesting local air traffic controllers must be at least bilingual, Local and English.

    88. Re: Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strangely in the last two places I have lived in London drivers that relied on GPS have got lost. I'll take a well trained skilled professional that speaks the same language over a random stranger that does whatever a computer tells them and can't communicate any day of the year.

    89. Re: Uber need to get a clue. by hguorbray · · Score: 1

      There's something to be said for the Black Cab's drivers who have a map of most of London in their heads. We were in London a few months ago in the hotel district north of Kensington and saw plenty of obviously lost Uber drivers stopped in the middle of the street looking down at their GPS or smartphone and loading and unloading in the middle of the street as well...

      We had 2 great rides from Black Cabs - they both spoke English well and got us to our obscure hotel with no problems. On the way home the hotel set us up with a ride service and the guy didn't speak english, barely had room for our luggage and had trouble negotiating entry to the cab dropoff at paddington station due to construction, morning commute, etc.

      I feel the same way driving around San Francisco -some of the stuff changes from day-to-day that I'm not sure the map applications can keep up with or suggest alternative routes to, so I am glad that I have spent hundreds of hours driving around there in the past 20 years, so that I have good knowledge of alternative routes....

      -I'm just sayin'

    90. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      It doesn't. A majority is over 50%. Merkel was not appointed as chancellor because CDU had a majority of seats - these days are long gone. A coalition of CDU and SPD had a majority. In case of Hitler there was no majority, but back then a president had much more power.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    91. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ban had nothing to do with religion? You are easily fooled, want to buy a bridge?

      The problem was Trump talked about a muslim ban before getting elected, all the countries on the list were mostly muslim countries, there was no evidence that there actually is a significant terrorist risk from those countries, especially given that a grand total of ZERO terrorist attacks on the US have been carried out by people from the listed countries.

      Fortunately the judges who ruled on the ban aren't as easily hoodwinked as you are. For matters like this the intent behind the order matters as much as the words, and although they were careful enough to avoid religion in the wording, they couldn't hide that a muslim ban was the intent.

    92. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1
      The guy's a racist. Look at some of his comments about blacks:

      Businesses run by Donald Trump have long faced accusations of racist behavior.

      John O’Donnell, former president of the Trump Plaza Casino, wrote in a tell-all book that the GOP nominee once told him, “Black guys counting my money! I hate it. The only kind of people I want counting my money are short guys that wear yarmulkes every day.”

      Trump responded by telling Playboy magazine that his former employee was a “f**king loser.” However, he also said, “The stuff O’Donnell wrote about me is probably true.”

      Another former Trump employee has claimed that black staff were hidden from Trump when he visited the casino with his wife. “When Donald and Ivana came to the casino, the bosses would order all the black people off the floor,” said Kip Brown, a former livery driver. “It was the eighties, I was a teen-ager, but I remember it: they put us all in the back.”

      Racism in Trump corporations was not confined to its owner’s remarks and personal behavior. While fighting against a proposed Native American casino in New York that would have competed against his Atlantic City properties, Trump took out anonymous ads featuring photos of “drug paraphernalia” whose copy read, “Are these the new neighbors we want?” It continued: “The St. Regis Mohawk Indian record of criminal activity is well documented.”

      There's two federal actions against him for discriminating against black tenants, there's his racial remarks about the judge hearing the case against Trump University (can't get much more recent than that, so can't say "it was in the past"). The guy's an asshole. There's plenty more ...

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    93. Re: Uber need to get a clue. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      What's your point? The vast majority of 9/11 terrorists were from Saudi Arabia, as was their leader, as was the largest chunk of funding for al Qaeda. Saudi Arabia would be #1 on any list that didn't take into consideration oil.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    94. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In case of Hitler there was no majority

      Exactly. Hitler had only a plurality, so the Holocaust was wrong. If he had a few more percent, it would have been fine, and the Jews would have no legitimate complaint since their extermination would have had implicit majority approval, but the bottom line is Hitler didn't have the votes.

    95. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by magarity · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't the level of quality be up to the customer?

      So, require everyone to take the language test but not to "pass" it. Just let their Uber profile shows their score so potential riders can decide if they want to have to talk loudly and wave their arms a lot in exchange for a discount?

    96. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Anyway, how do you specify that your taxi driver must have a good command of English?

      When I take a taxi, I want to have private conversations on my cellphone without the driver eavesdropping. So I want a driver that does NOT have a good command of English. In America, this is generally not a problem, but I read the Uber reviews anyway and choose a driver with poor ratings for communication. Unfortunately, it looks like I will no longer have that choice in London, so I will just take the tube instead.

    97. Re: Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have already had an experience to be in a wrong place and no gps, route planner and talking with a colleague over phone/radio could help there. At one occasion I left the cab and walked to next settlement (we ended up really in a middle of nowhere and then I left). The point is - the Knowledge helps. The knowledge of surrounding area help to find the proper place. Drivers surely will be automated away but that does not mean they could not be better than the machines. Surely this is not the reason they get automated in the first place (hint: it is the price of their work).

    98. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      Spineless Troll.

    99. Re: Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds like the opening sentence in a US foreign policy planning meeting.

    100. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      > Islam does not imply Sharia

      Imply? no. Its far more explicit than that.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    101. Re: Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A very exciting theory, only slightly let down by the fact that what benefits the black cab trade harms Uber and vice-versa, and in any event neither Uber nor black cabs make any appreciable difference to use of public transport, which is mainly driven by demographics and far outstrips cab use. There is not a single additional tube or bus worker who is in their job as a result of a cabbie or Uber driver giving up.

    102. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Islam does not imply Sharia, hence it is just a religion and not a political ideology.

      At the core of Islam is a beating, black heart. You think ISIS and Islamic rule in countries like Iran happens in a vacuum? It's there at the roots.

      Lern to know your enemy, if you think you have one!

      Indeed, here's two links for you to start you on your way:

      Dr. Bill Warner - Why Are People Afraid

      Islam has bloody borders:

      "Nevertheless, there is a problem that goes back to the very beginnings of Muslim history: From the time that the first Muslims established themselves as the rulers of Medina, Islam was a political and increasingly a legal system as well as a faith. In Medina Muhammad continued to be a prophet, but he also became the head of a state and a military leader. With the exception of Southeast Asia (where Islam was spread by traders from the the subcontinent), what we now know as the Muslim world was established by conquest. It is no accident that in traditional Muslim thought the world is divided into two spheres--the realm of Islam (dar ul-Islam) and the realm of war (dar ul-harb). Put simply, it is assumed that the border between Islamic rule and the rest of the world marks a state of war, even if periods of armistice are possible. One should be cognizant of the important fact that there are Muslim thinkers today who are reformulating the nature of Islamic law (sharia) and of Islamic war (jihad) in a much more liberal manner. But one must also recognize that there is a weighty tradition to the contrary and that a large number of Muslims, possibly the majority, does not favor these reformulations."

    103. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      an excuse to protect their racket?

      Uber are the racketeers here, the politicians did nothing while Uber broke numerous laws and dramatically devalued the retirement savings of tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of small business owners around the globe.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    104. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      ...because nobody on the tube can eavesdrop?

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    105. Re: Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a country, we hold ourselves to higher standards

    106. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      There's no end to your knowledge.

      Pity there's no beginning either.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    107. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by johanw · · Score: 1

      Even after the brexit you'll have plenty of paki's and other people from your former colonies to replace Brittish workers.

    108. Re: Uber need to get a clue. by mrbester · · Score: 2

      Real time traffic info is used by the black cabbies as well. The difference being they know that if there's a jam on, say, Kensington High Road, simply trying to use the adjoining streets to get around it (which is what a navigation app would suggest) would be a bad idea. They'd also know which roads to avoid based on time of day, so they don't get caught up by deliveries, bus routes, pedestrian numbers (office workers, tourists, school children) and a host of other factors.

      The Knowledge isn't just knowing every street in London. It's knowing the city and its inhabitants in order to calculate a route. In your head. Instantly. With the ability to recalculate at every junction. No app comes close.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    109. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      NO ONE won the presidential election of 1932.

      2 months after Hitler was appointed interim chancellor the NSDAP won the German general election with Hitler as their leader.

      Don't cherry pick your history. Hitler and his party won many popular votes for various issues. The NSDAP were psychotic before Hitler was their leader and had plenty of support in their early days too.

    110. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Nazi party won the largest share of seats (33% vs 20% for the second largest) in the election

      Hindenberg got nearly 49%.

    111. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      NO ONE won the presidential election of 1932.

      In that case Hitler didn't, so I'm right.

      Don't cherry pick your history.

      Which WWI veteran in ill-health appointed you as chancellor?

      The NSDAP were psychotic before Hitler was their leader and had plenty of support in their early days too.

      How does that prove Hitler was elected?

      You really are a fucking idiot sometimes.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    112. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      So the leader of a party which won a general election didn't get elected?

      How did you slip through the no child left behind policy? You cherry pick my post removing the one line about Hitler getting elected and then complain. No wonder you have no clue.

    113. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Heck, even China requires English if you want to graduate from university. They're not stupid - having a second language to communicate with your side that the other side doesn't understand when you're in the room in negotiations is damn handy.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    114. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Linking an article about sharia makes no sense, rofl.

      AGAIN: Islam does not imply Sharia law.

      Read something about Islam, not about Sharia law.

      Sharia is a middle age law system which is actually much different than middle age law systems in the christian world. Most Islamic regions don't have Sharia Law, go figure.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    115. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I travel internationally a lot, and I prefer to use services like Uber / Grab / Lyft because it's much easier to book a journey that way than try to explain to somebody who doesn't speak English well where I want to go, especially when it's out of the way, or when I'm somewhere that people don't use addresses / street names much. For instance, I've had multiple ten minute broken conversations with a huddle of remorque drivers pointing at maps in Cambodia trying to explain where I need to go when it's just 15 minutes drive outside of the city centre. Uber, by comparison, is easy. Pick the destination, and the Uber driver will show up and get me there, no conversation needed.

      In that light, if an Uber driver doesn't speak English well in an English-speaking country, so what? They don't really need to in order to offer the basic service. Would they get a higher ranking if they did? Probably. But it's not necessary.

      And to be honest, when calling a normal taxi, you don't always get people who speak good English anyway.

    116. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      By law probably, but actually no.

      The PILOT has to be bilingual. At least that are the rules to get radio license for a airplane or naval radio. Anyway, as I said before: in some countries the pilots/captains don't need a radio license, so obviously they don't need to be bilingual, so obviously the ground based radio operators need to be bilingual.

      But I'm just nitpicking :D

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    117. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      You can "write" it here as you want.

      It is pronounced french ... not english. Arguing about "spelling is pretty pointless. The spelling is standardized to "PAN PAN" and "MAYDAY", even if they say: "maider" (know won who does not speak french has an idea how to pronounce this spelling anyway).

      In other words if I select a message type on my digital radio the written options are "PAN PAN", "MAYDAY" and "SECURITE" ...

      And of course we say "pan pan", what else should we say? Perhaps it sounds like "pane pane" to you ... as I said: the writing here on /. is irrelevant as it does not transport the sound.

      So what was your point. I think we agreed and you try to make an argument again?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    118. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      That does not make them funding campaigns.

      That makes them donators to parities, big difference. And: sorry, I doubt that. From what should they have the money? Hu? Unions are supposed to pay "wages" to workers that are on strike, on behalf of the union and don't get "ordinary wages".

      I doubt unions have enough money at the end of the year to give meaningful donations to a party.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    119. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      France, Germany, Denmark, Switzerland, Italy, Spain, Portugal

      You can not be a waiter in any of those countries if you don't speak the language ... in Germany you can get barely away in working in an Irish pub and demanding the guests to speak english.

      And obviously: that is not government mandated, how do you come to that idea? But for a working permit, you have to show language skills. So the only ones who could in theory (bold for a reason) work as waiters without the necessary language skills are EU citizens, as they do not need a special permit.

      Imagine a Chinese in a Chinese restaurant in Paris or Berlin not able to speak french or german, sorry: not going to happen.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    120. Re: Uber need to get a clue. by mspohr · · Score: 1

      Countless others have made the same argument as to why they could never be replaced by a computer. In the end they are replaced.
      Hubris is dangerous.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    121. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      The majourity of Muslims does not life in Arabica or other "arabic" influenced nations.

      The majourity of Muslims live in Asia! Particular Indonesia, Malaysia, India and China, and if you want to count it in: Pakistan.

      All those nations have no problems with radical Muslims or Sharia. Only Saudi Arabia and its satellite states have. Turkey was "safe" before Erdogan came, Egypt had a military coup a few years ago to remove Islamic idiots from power.

      Go figure: Sharia is a middle age law, and no one who has a sane mind want it back. Just because people have chosen to have Islam as their religions does not make them directly idiots, except you believe everyone who is into gods is an idiot, then you had a point ;D

      The ISIS idiots on the other hands are simply power hungry idiots. That they establish Sharia law has nothing to do with their religion, but their mindset.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    122. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Unlike you, I'm required to have a radio license :D
      So it is pretty safe to assume I know something about it, rofl.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    123. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      More than 50 countries use french - so that's more than 50 countries that would know how to get it right. Also, English speakers would probably like to know the etymology of the words that have been "adopted into" English - and a lot of those words are of French origin. After reading my post, they would know that mayday originated from the french m"aider (help me), and is not just some arbitrary code word. Yours? Not so informative. Same as understanding that "panne" is french for broken. Knowing that, if they ever heard someone say "moteur en panne" they would probably guess that someone was saying their motor was broken. They would also be able to guess that "panne d'electricitè" would mean a power failure. "M'aider, auto en panne" would mean "help me, car not working." All that just from knowing that "panne" actually means something in another language.

      My post also made it clear what the pronunciation sounded like, so why not just admit you don't know any french.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    124. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's awful, him cherry-picking your alternative facts and all.

    125. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. In general, how about just learning the language? Its disrespect and ignorance that leads to not include into society but rather exist besides it and despise it.

    126. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, you can't either read the quote or click on the link? Requiring language proficiency in English is an internationally-enforced regulation for all air traffic control operators.

      Correct, and here's one of the reasons for that.

    127. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear fellow whitey,

      You should really go spend some time where people look at you funny and maybe even treat you differently (and NOT necessarily better) because you're a different colour from most of them. I think it'll give you lots and lots to think about. It certainly did me.

    128. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      ...because nobody on the tube can eavesdrop?

      No, because cellphones don't work on the tube, so that solves the eavesdropping problem.

      Disclaimer: The last time I was in London was five years ago, so maybe things have changed.

    129. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your a moron. Nobody is talking about read comprehension. Its being able to speak the language.

    130. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      France, Germany, Denmark, Switzerland, Italy, Spain, Portugal

      You can not be a waiter in any of those countries if you don't speak the language

      You are full of crap. I have been to Spain and was served by a non-Spanish speaking waitress (she spoke English and Catalan). A quick Google search brought up zero legal language requirements to work as a waiter in ANY of the other countries you mention.

    131. Re: Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Marvelous if the GPS has 'the knowledge', all too often it doesn't, and then if the driver doesn't actually know where he is, well you can guess the rest.

      I'll give you a real example; near where I live there is a park I often go to for a run. There is a large gate, which has been locked for years, and a small side gate that is open to allow pushbikes through. Every time I go to the park (and I mean EVERY time) a car goes past me heading for the closed gate, and soon after passes me going back again while the driver takes his hands off the mobile phone long enough to scratch his head.

    132. Re: Uber need to get a clue. by Flavianoep · · Score: 1

      Hitler was chancellor from 1933 to '45, which amounts to 12 years. It was not written on the German constitution in any way that a chancellor would have a 12 year tenure without being reappointed. Hitler also suppressed the German congress, if I recollect my lessons right. Thus, Nazi Germany was by no means a democracy.

      --
      Linux is for people who don't mind RTFM.
    133. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      That does not make them funding campaigns.

      That makes them donators to parities, big difference.

      That seems more like a very, very small difference.

    134. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I can choose to go to a low quality restaurant rather than a high quality restaurant.

      IMHO there should be a baseline of standards so you don't end up with unlucky fried kitten instead of chicken.

    135. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I doubt unions have enough money at the end of the year to give meaningful donations to a party.

      Unions are different in different countries. In the UK and some Commonwealth countries unions do give meaningful donations to a party. In the USA (where unions are very different again and almost powerless) of days long past the unions were involved in the political process.

    136. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by dbIII · · Score: 1

      No it's more a libertarian thing I'd say, where the large number of poor in an ideal libertarian society means that their below minimum wage chauffeur can be chosen for their language skills. Taxis? Ubers? They are for nobodies. Drive on Pedro

    137. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by dbIII · · Score: 1

      the politicians did nothing while Uber broke numerous laws

      Not quite correct. The politicians have not been doing nothing, they have been drinking and dining on Uber's dime while being "lobbied". The first thing Uber do when they come into a place is to make friends with the powerful. It's a bit insulting that they are treating the west as if it's all a 1970s African dicatatorship, but it seems to be working in terms of slowing down legal processes if nothing else in most places.

    138. Re: Uber need to get a clue. by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Here's my comment when people do this shit.
      "Women shouldn't wear headscarves? Are you going to tell the Queen that are you?"
      In other places:
      "What do you have against Nuns?"

    139. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Neuronwelder · · Score: 1

      Well can't they just carry digital translators with them??

    140. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Raenex · · Score: 1

      The majourity of Muslims live in Asia! Particular Indonesia, Malaysia, India and China, and if you want to count it in: Pakistan. All those nations have no problems with radical Muslims or Sharia.

      Indonesia: "Aceh Province, on the northern tip of Sumatra island, stands alone in having formally established Shariah law in Indonesia, a Muslim-majority country with a relatively secular Constitution. In Aceh, women are required to dress modestly, alcohol is prohibited, and numerous offenses -- from adultery to homosexuality to selling alcohol -- are punishable by public whipping.

      Aceh (pronounced AH-chay) began its experiment with Shariah in 2001, after receiving special authorization from Indonesia's central government, which was intent on calming separatist sentiment in the deeply conservative region. Now, Shariah police officers roam the province, raiding everything from hotel rooms to beaches in a hunt for immoral activity.

      In the decade and a half since, Indonesia as a whole has drifted in a conservative direction, and Aceh, once an outlier, has become a model for other regions of the country seeking to impose their own Shariah-based ordinances, alarming those who worry about the nation's drift from secularism."

      Malaysia: "The Malaysian Parliament is set to debate a controversial bill that could see stricter forms of sharia law introduced in the state of Kelantan, but critics have warned the so called hudud bill would result in whippings and even the amputations of limbs for crimes such as theft. [..] Kelantan's state capital Kota Bahru is deeply religious and many of its citizens live by a strict adherence to Islam. At shops and supermarkets there are separate queues for males and females, while signs advising women to cover up are common outside offices and government buildings."

      India: An interesting political situation with a complex history. The Muslims there are said to be very much not extremists. But maybe that's more because of the history and the current political climate, where Hindus are the dominant population and agitators (after having been dominated earlier by Muslims themselves), and the Muslims that are there were the ones who stayed in India, while practically all the Indians left Pakistan during the split. Even so, India still suffers Islamic terror attacks, especially from neighboring Pakistan (remember those bloody borders), and there are calls for Muslim-rule areas within India.

      Pakistan: A hotbed of terrorism and militant Islam, and dominated by Sharia.

      China has problems with Islamic separatists, but they are an authoritarian state and have managed to keep a lid on it.

      Other countries you haven't mentioned:

      Afghanistan: Taliban and al Qaeda.

      Philippines: Home to an Islamic separatist movement. In the news recently.

      Or I can name several countries in Africa, like Mali, Nigeria, and Somalia.

      Or I could talk about Russia.

      I'm going to stop here because I don't want to make an exhaustive list.

      Turkey was "safe" before Erdogan came

      Yes, because a popular military commander picked up the pieces from the Ottoman empire and forced a secular government on the nation. Several military coups and a nearly century later, it's being undone by an elected Muslim leader, and the last military coup has failed.

      Do you see a pattern here? ISLAM HAS BLOODY BORDERS. It's founding prophet was a military warlord who imposed Sharia law.

      The ISIS idiots on the other hands are simply power hungry idiots. That they es

    141. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From your poor writing, I can understand why you are touchy.

    142. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Askmum · · Score: 1
      A bookie's got blagged last night.

      Blagged? Speak English to me, Tony. I thought this country spawned the fucking language, and so far nobody seems to speak it.

    143. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Askmum · · Score: 1

      It seems just basic common sense to require people that need to deal with the public, including in a safety context, to actually be able to converse in the national language.

      It depends on how strict the requirements are. Most adults read at a 7th to 8th grade level, and around 20% of adults read at under a 5th grade level. Any reading / writing requirements which limits employment to a large percentage of the working class population are likely not in the public interest.

      If they are looking for something around a 3rd-5th grade reading level I could understand that. If they are looking for an 8th grade reading level the law is ridiculous and will likely only serve to limit access to non-native speakers and those without higher education (IMHO).

      Understanding a language is more than x-grade level teachings. If you live in a country for all your life, you could have skipped school alltogether without any impairment to the understanding of the country's language.

      OTOH: as a non-native to the country you may need years and years of learning to be able to understand the locals.

    144. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      No, that's a 4.6 out of 5 stars. Thankfully, the overwhelming majority of passengers will just rate their drivers a 5 out of 5 stars without really thinking about it (unless the driver really did something to upset them).

      It's not like they're rating a book on Amazon, where the distinction between a 5-stars book and a 4-stars book means the difference between your top most favorite book and a book that may be really good -- but that you wouldn't consider a part of your top 10 list.

      Also, you have to know that Uber is incentivized to deactivate and delay the reactivation of new drivers because doing so, before the driver is able to complete his quota by the deadline, allows Uber to avoid paying the signup bonus and the referral bonus.

    145. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      When a customer rates a driver negatively, he is forced to select/write a reason.

    146. Re: Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      London black taxis and private taxis offer different services and so are not fungible for all use cases, do depending on the journey you wish to take a black cab may not be a service you can take.

    147. Re: Uber need to get a clue. by dave420 · · Score: 1

      They are no replacement for the Knowledge. It's not just road routes, but understanding and predicting traffic flows, using local knowledge to preempt problems GPS units can only ever react to.

    148. Re: Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the vast majority of private hire drivers are not Uber drivers

    149. Re: Uber need to get a clue. by dave420 · · Score: 1

      You honestly don't see the difference between a hate organisation with a history of violence and murder, and a religious observance which encompasses no intrinsic ill will towards anyone? Wow.

    150. Re: Uber need to get a clue. by mspohr · · Score: 1

      I use Uber in different countries because the drivers may only speak their local language. I don't have to worry about communicating my destination. The app tells them where I want to go and how to get there.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    151. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by dave420 · · Score: 1

      ISIS: Started in Iraq, after a US invasion created a power vacuum and allowed many groups against the US to flourish. Among them was an Al Qaeda affiliate, who are annoyed with the US's actions in Saudi Arabia during the first gulf war.

      Iran: Political Islam was arguably created (as we know it), and definitely fostered, as a way of uniting people against the puppet installed by western interests.

      So no, they didn't start in a vacuum - they were both formed as responses to US foreign policy.

      That you wouldn't even mention that shows you either don't know about Islam, or are intellectually dishonest enough to consciously ignore it. Pick one.

    152. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by dave420 · · Score: 1

      That's going to happen when racism is now socially acceptable to such a degree someone can campaign on it and get elected president of the US. It's like complaining the word "fire" has lost all meaning when everyone in the burning theater is screaming it.

    153. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Raenex · · Score: 1

      ISIS: Started in Iraq, after a US invasion created a power vacuum and allowed many groups against the US to flourish. Among them was an Al Qaeda affiliate, who are annoyed with the US's actions in Saudi Arabia during the first gulf war.

      Doesn't change the fact that it's part of Islam's beating, black heart, following in the footsteps of their prophet Mohamed and seeking to reinstate an Islamic caliphate.

      Iran: Political Islam was arguably created (as we know it), and definitely fostered, as a way of uniting people against the puppet installed by western interests.

      Doesn't change the fact that it's part of Islam's beating, black heart, following in the footsteps of their prophet Mohamed and seeking to reinstate an Islamic caliphate.

      So no, they didn't start in a vacuum - they were both formed as responses to US foreign policy.

      Now go on and repeat your excuses for all the other places around the world where Islam is seeking or has gained authoritarian rule. The common factor is Islam.

      That you wouldn't even mention that shows you either don't know about Islam, or are intellectually dishonest enough to consciously ignore it. Pick one.

      *snort* Learn some history and study the basic tenants of Islam, and then look at the world around you. There's a reason Islam is the most violent, authoritarian, and expansionist mainstream religion in the world today. Islam has bloody borders:

      "Nevertheless, there is a problem that goes back to the very beginnings of Muslim history: From the time that the first Muslims established themselves as the rulers of Medina, Islam was a political and increasingly a legal system as well as a faith. In Medina Muhammad continued to be a prophet, but he also became the head of a state and a military leader. With the exception of Southeast Asia (where Islam was spread by traders from the the subcontinent), what we now know as the Muslim world was established by conquest. It is no accident that in traditional Muslim thought the world is divided into two spheres--the realm of Islam (dar ul-Islam) and the realm of war (dar ul-harb). Put simply, it is assumed that the border between Islamic rule and the rest of the world marks a state of war, even if periods of armistice are possible. One should be cognizant of the important fact that there are Muslim thinkers today who are reformulating the nature of Islamic law (sharia) and of Islamic war (jihad) in a much more liberal manner. But one must also recognize that there is a weighty tradition to the contrary and that a large number of Muslims, possibly the majority, does not favor these reformulations."

    154. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      Why can't they just learn the fucking language of they country they live in?

    155. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      I can't imagine how you can claim that Islam does not imply Sharia law given Sharia law, or Islamic law (Arabic: ØØ±ÙSØØ©âZâZ (IPA: [ÊfaËriËÊa])) is the religious law forming part of the Islamic tradition.

      take a look at this from the Islamic Supreme Council:
      http://www.islamicsupremecounc...

      Its absolutely clear that Sharia (Islamic Law) and Islam (the religion) are absolutely intertwined to the point of being the same thing.

    156. Re: Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You honestly think a sizable portion of those practicing Islam encompass no intrinsic ill will towards anyone? Wow...

    157. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      So, if anyone tries explaining anything, it can be ignored because of Islam's "beating black heart"?

      I know some Muslims around here who have no desire to install Sharia law. In the US, I'm much more worried about fundamentalist Christians who want to impose their authoritarian beliefs which they claim were drawn from the bible.

      Moreover, I do know some history, and there was a time when the most vibrant and very tolerant society was Muslim. The practice of Islam has changed since then, but it shows that Islam is not inherently evil or backward.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    158. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Clinton and the DNC's machinations were the deciding factor in Trump's election, not the Russians, by a vast margin.

      Nobody knows the extent of the Russian intervention currently.

      Moreover, Trump did not win by much of a margin. He lost the popular vote decisively, and a small number of changed votes would have changed the results in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania and gotten Clinton elected. Like in 2000, there's lots of things that could have gone differently and changed the outcome of the election. In 2000, Gore would have won without the butterfly ballot in that one county (it's obvious that more people were confused and voted for Robertson by mistake than Bush's margin of victory in Florida).

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    159. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Trump is, as far as I can tell, racist as well. Whether this has anything to do with his dislike of Islam is an open question.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    160. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Your contention above was that Trump believes that religion is the same as race. I demonstrated that to be clearly false. Yeah, he made stupid comments about that IN judge, and in the past, he did talk more loosely about non-Whites in ways that no 'racially sensitive' person would. But there is absolutely nothing in his history that indicates that he thinks that religion is the same as race

    161. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Raenex · · Score: 1

      So, if anyone tries explaining anything, it can be ignored because of Islam's "beating black heart"?

      It's not explaining anything by ignoring the big picture and making excuses. Islam is authoritarian, violent, and expansionist, and that's reflected across the globe. Blaming US foreign policy doesn't cut it. But then I'm sure we've had this conversation before.

      I know some Muslims around here who have no desire to install Sharia law.

      Wow, I'm so relieved! I guess there's nothing to worry about then, because you know some Muslims who express that opinion. However, there are other Muslims who think otherwise.

      In the US, I'm much more worried about fundamentalist Christians who want to impose their authoritarian beliefs which they claim were drawn from the bible.

      In the US, you can have displays of "Piss Christ" and countless criticisms of Christianity without anybody getting killed, despite the United States being 70% Christian, but if you try to draw Mohammad you'll be attacked with guns, despite Muslims only being about 1% of the population.

      Moreover, I do know some history, and there was a time when the most vibrant and very tolerant society was Muslim.

      That's "McHistory", peddled by liberal professors and media. What they don't tell you is that society was formed by conquering, and that non-Muslims were second-class citizens. And by today's standards, fundamentalist Islamic countries are completely regressive and authoritarian.

      The practice of Islam has changed since then, but it shows that Islam is not inherently evil or backward.

      No, that's willful ignorance speaking. Islam is fundamentally authoritarian, violent, and expansionist. If anything, Islam is changing to get with modern times, even though useful idiots like the Southern Law Poverty Center like to brand reformers as "anti-Muslim extremists".

    162. Re: Uber need to get a clue. by knorthern+knight · · Score: 1

      > Today we have GPS and navigation apps with real time traffic information.

      And today we have guys driving cars into subway tunnels and getting stuck on the tracks when following their GPS...
      http://www.citynews.ca/2017/02...

      Another scarey situation is in the province of British Columbia, on the west coast of Canada. There are quite a few towns/cities on islands off the coast. The Ferry system is considered part of the highway system. In evenings or foggy conditions, people have literally driven off the ferry dock into the water. They didn't know they were supposed to wait for the ferry to come along first.

      I'll pay for a knowledgable taxi driver, thank you.

      --

      I'm not repeating myself
      I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user
    163. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      So then how do you find only drivers with a certain level of english? Or must a person weed through all the comments to find someone who can speak english well.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    164. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Neuronwelder · · Score: 1

      You have a right to your own beliefs but there is another side to this coin. English (and all other languages) have a lot of words that sound the same, yet have a different meaning. Even for someone who speaks fluent English it takes many years before they can start to master the vast vocabulary of "fancy" words. On top of that: Words change meaning, they come up with new words, the meaning of a word can change if the sentence changes, and words have different meanings in different work fields.. If you look at Websites like www.acronymfinder.com (you will notice that it has fields for different meanings of an acronym). Acronyms are constantly used, more and more, in newspapers, magazines, and even articles on the Web.. And finally: If you work a cab until you are exhausted, how much is left of you at the end of the day to study? .. People who study other languages have gone though this.

    165. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      His a moron? Or my a moron?

    166. Re: Uber need to get a clue. by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      "The Knowledge" is a quaint artifact of a bygone era. Today we have GPS and navigation apps with real time traffic information.

      .... which 'knowledge' cabbies routinely beat, by significant margins. You see, maps don't contain everything, and real-time traffic information can't tell you what the traffic is likely to be in 15 minutes from now.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    167. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      When an Uber driver gets deactivated, he gets taken off the Uber platform and can't pick up any customer any longer.

      And only Uber and the driver know the real underlying reason(s) for a particular deactivation. It could be that the driver is not a safe driver, or that he can't follow GPS navigation (or relies too much on GPS navigation at the cost of common sense), or that he has a dirty car, or that he's rude and smells, or that he doesn't know enough English, etc. The equivalent would be like Amazon pulling out all the books from its search results that didn't have at least five stars (which wouldn't make sense for Amazon to do, but which makes sense for Uber to do because having the wrong driver is also a safety issue).

      On the other hand, customers also do get rated, and customers that don't speak a word of English usually have a rating of 4.35 stars (the lowest I've ever seen in my area), so that probably means the customer may not even be at the right pickup area (because that customer probably can't understand a single word of what the Uber app says) and a driver can anticipate all kinds of trouble trying to pick up such a person.

    168. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1
      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    169. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      And yet Sanders would have wiped his clock, no matter what Trump or the Russians would have done. The Trump presidency lies squarely on the shoulders of Clinton and the DNC.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    170. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      And yet Sanders would have wiped his clock, no matter what Trump or the Russians would have done.

      How can you know that? I know he was doing better than Clinton in polls, but the Republicans had been attacking Clinton for decades, and had not been attacking Sanders. Sanders was a self-declared socialist, and you may have noticed there are people here who think that socialism is effectively Leninism. The Republicans would have attacked fast, hard, and dirty.

      I subcaucused for him at my state Senate district convention (which is more significant than voting in a primary), but I'm trying to be realistic here. I think he'd have been a worse candidate than Clinton, and I don't think he'd have been as effective a President. I liked his policies better.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    171. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      You're making very broad statements here, and not providing any support for them. Your complaint about the Golden Age of Islam appears to be that " that society was formed by conquering, and that non-Muslims were second-class citizens [wikipedia.org]." without telling me in what way that differed from any other society of the period.

      Hint: you need something better than repetition to win arguments. Another hint: you need something better than repetition to win arguments.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    172. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Raenex · · Score: 1

      You're making very broad statements here, and not providing any support for them.

      No, that would be you, except for your anecdotal, "I know some Muslims". I'm the one who's been providing links which support my case.

      Your complaint about the Golden Age of Islam appears to be that " that society was formed by conquering, and that non-Muslims were second-class citizens [wikipedia.org]." without telling me in what way that differed from any other society of the period.

      You're the one who claimed Muslim society was a special golden age of vibrancy and tolerance back then. They conquered other societies, made Islam supreme, and relegated other religions to second class status. That's fundamental Islam, as it was and as it is now.

    173. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I can't imagine how you can claim that Islam does not imply Sharia law given Sharia law
      Because most "islamic" states have no sharia law?
      What has the single example you know about it have to do with it? Or don't you know what the word "implies" actually means?

      Its absolutely clear that Sharia (Islamic Law) and Islam (the religion) are absolutely intertwined to the point of being the same thing.
      And this is absolutely wrong ... otherwise every islamic nation had sharia law (that is what the word "implies" does mean)

      Do I really need to count up all the _democratic_ _state of law_ _non sharia_ Islamic nations? Considering what Erdogan is doing, we probably have soon one less ... if that is the point you want to make.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    174. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      ISLAM HAS BLOODY BORDERS. It's founding prophet was a military warlord who imposed Sharia law.
      That is wrong, at that time Sharia did not exit.
      Muhamed btw. basically only proposed to fight against pagans, and mainly he fought against other muslims, ironic, isn't it?
      Muhameds plan was to spread the "true god" ... the same god christians and jews worship ... to pagans.

      ISIS is fundamental Islam, following the example of Mohamed.
      No they are not. They follow their own weird mindset. Sharia was introduced and formalized in books to read long after Mohamed.
      While Sharia popped up here and there 200 years after Mohameds death, it never was very popular. E.g. the biggest islamic nation probably was the Ottoman Empire. It never had Sharia. Big parts of the empire kept widely autonomous status. It was a so called multi culture, multi lingual empire, and multi religious. Converting to Islam, basically did not happen under "islamic rule".
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Furthermore sharia is a big system of rights, laws and privileges, e.g. most countries you mention where regions have parts oh Sharia established have a pretty common legal system, and under Sharia falls only marriage, inheritance, child care, divorce etc. In other words: no beheading or stoning.

      If those countries have regions that are violent (like indonesia): then it is because they want to separate, not because they want Sharia as the "better law".

      Or do you really think every muslim is automatically an idiot?
      http://edition.cnn.com/2010/WO...
      https://www.famousscientists.o...

      Ah, yes, Pakistan, how can you be so wrong?
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Regarding the other countries you listed: you seem to be interest, why don't you read up the history of them. Then you easily realize that the problems there have not really anything to do with what religion is dominant there (or not so dominant but practiced by the ruling class)

      I'm actually pretty tired about this islam phobia ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    175. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Raenex · · Score: 1

      That is wrong, at that time Sharia did not exit.

      Sharia is based on Mohamed's rules, sayings, and actions:

      "The Sharia comes from the Koran, the sacred book of Islam, which Muslims consider the actual word of God. The Sharia also stems from the Prophet Muhammad's teachings and interpretations of those teachings by certain Muslim legal scholars. Muslims believe that Allah (God) revealed his true will to Muhammad, who then passed on Allah's commands to humans in the Koran."

      [..]

      "The Koran sets down basic standards of human conduct, but does not provide a detailed law code. Only a few verses deal with legal matters. During his lifetime, Muhammad helped clarify the law by interpreting provisions in the Koran and acting as a judge in legal cases. Thus, Islamic law, the Sharia, became an integral part of the Muslim religion."

      Muhamed btw. basically only proposed to fight against pagans, and mainly he fought against other muslims, ironic, isn't it?

      Except he actually fought against Christians and Jews, too, though of course there's always some pretext to justify it. And what other "Muslims" did Mohamed fight against, seeing as how Muslims are followers of Islam and its founding prophet Mohamed?

      Muhameds plan was to spread the "true god" ... the same god christians and jews worship ... to pagans.

      You're missing the part about how Christians and Jews were corrupted, and Mohamed was to be the final and "true" word about "God"/"Allah". Don't think you should stick your ass in the air 5 times a day to Allah? Don't think Mohamed is a real prophet? Then you're an infidel and will burn in hell. The endgame of Islam is to have the entire world submit to Islam.

      No they are not. They follow their own weird mindset.

      Since you're just repeating yourself, I'll do the same: "You seriously need to watch the video I linked in my last post and take the quoted text from my other link seriously. ISIS is fundamental Islam, following the example of Mohamed. Their founders are steeped in Islamic studies, and everything they do has justification in Islam.

      Sharia was introduced and formalized in books to read long after Mohamed.

      The same can be said about Christianity. Yet Islamic scholars believe Sharia is authentic and trace back to Mohamed, though differences exist among sects, just as they do in Christianity.

      While Sharia popped up here and there 200 years after Mohameds death, it never was very popular. E.g. the biggest islamic nation probably was the Ottoman Empire. It never had Sharia.

      Your own Wikipedia link says otherwise: "The Ottoman legal system accepted the religious law over its subjects. At the same time the Qanun (or Kanun), a secular legal system, co-existed with religious law or Sharia.[133] "

      Converting to Islam, basically did not happen under "islamic rule".

      Uh huh. That's why countries that were largely Christian turned into Muslim countries after being conquered, and had nothing to do with their second-class citizen status.

      If those countries have regions that are violent (like indonesia): then it is because they want to separate, not because they want Sharia as the "better law".

      Funny how you earlier claimed, "All those nations have no problems with radical Muslims or Sharia.", but when I point out the problems, you ignore the root religious cause. It's always some other reason, and never Islam, despite the sources saying exactly what they care about is Islam. You were wrong, but continue to wear your rose-colored glasses.

      Ah, yes, Pakistan, how can you be so wrong?

      Are you talking to yourself with regards to the Islamic Republic of Pakistan? From your

    176. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Huffington Post? Yeah, that's a great source of news. Brought to you by the people who routinely denounce Fox News

    177. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      You're the one who claimed Muslim society was a special golden age of vibrancy and tolerance back then. They conquered other societies, made Islam supreme, and relegated other religions to second class status. That's fundamental Islam, as it was and as it is now.

      I didn't say it was perfect. However, you have completely failed to distinguish Muslim actions from Christian actions. There was a lot of conquering other societies and making Christianity, or some brand of Christianity, supreme and relegating other religions (typically but not exclusively Judaism) to second class status.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    178. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Raenex · · Score: 1

      I didn't say it was perfect.

      But you claimed it was special, and then used that as a lame example of how Islam isn't inherently what I say it's been all along.

      However, you have completely failed to distinguish Muslim actions from Christian actions.

      Bullshit. I can't help it if you have your head in the sand. This is now my third time having this debate with you (previously: 1, 2), and all you do is keep repeating a version "not all Muslims" while trying to equate all religions as equally bad, while ignoring their roots, history, and reality on the ground today.

    179. Re: Uber need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and this kind of stupidity is why Trump got elected, not because "Liberals called me names!(tm)"

      No, the vast, vast, majority of Muslims do not have intrinsic ill will towards anyone. Sure, individuals have grudges and ill will against other individuals, but intrinsic ill will? No.

      Grow up. The fact you hate Muslims (and uppity blacks and gays and messicans and...) doesn't mean they hate groups you're a member of.

    180. Re: Uber need to get a clue. by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      No, he didn't, you're repeating an outright, and blatantly obvious, lie. Obama never banned travel from those countries, he never cancelled visas or green cards issued to people from those countries, and people were able to get visas from the countries in question.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    181. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Sanders would have lost even more decisively. The opinion polls showing him in the lead did so without any substantive campaigning against him. If you think the average Trump voter was ever going to vote for a self-avowed socialist, who supported BLM (and was closely associated with the civil rights movement), after a relentless RNC+Trump+Kochs/otherbillionaires campaign portraying him as a ushering in a Venezuelan government, you have another thing coming...

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    182. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      The quotes are all over the net. Not just huffpost. The court judgments wrt Trump's discrimination against blacks is part of the public legal record. His remarks about blacks and jews are also something he admits he probably said. So bite me.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    183. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. You're ignoring everyone who sat on their asses rather than vote, as well as everyone who went 3rd party. Dream on. The only ones who would have a gut "socialism == communism" reaction were dyed-in-the-wool republicans. Everyone else already knows that socialism has nothing to do with communism.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    184. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by JimSadler · · Score: 1

      Christianity was often violent, expansionist and discriminatory in Christian history. And the faith could be used as an evil tool. For example slaves who were fed a certain diet of Christian teachings tended not to rebel and kill their masters and ministers were used to help keep slaves docile. And that is not remote history. Today hate groups such as the KKK often are a major part of Baptist churches. Islam is under going about what Christianity was under going in 1850. Given time the problem will moderate itself.

    185. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      And this debate is likely to repeat itself at least until you get some reading comprehension.

      There is a period in which Islam had the most advanced civilization on Earth. Considering when it was, this isn't a really high bar, but it does demonstrate that Islam can support a good civilization.

      "Not all Muslims" is a perfectly reasonable response when discussing an absolute. If Islam were inherently evil, then the people I've known who were Muslim would tend towards evil. If the reasonable points of view can be fostered, which apparently isn't happening any time real soon, Islam stops being a problem while remaining Islam.

      If you think I think all religions are equally bad, then either I haven't really addressed the subject, I haven't been clear, or you haven't been listening. Of the world's major religion, Islam is my least favorite, partly because of the large number of extremists and partly for other issues I'm not going to discuss here.. Muslims today are doing pretty much what Christians did centuries ago. Currently, Christian terrorists are a very minor problem. Not that many centuries ago, Christianity was a violently evangelical religion, just as bad as modern-day Islam.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    186. Re:Uber need to get a clue. by Raenex · · Score: 1

      And this debate is likely to repeat itself at least until you get some reading comprehension.

      It'll continue as long as you have your head in the sand but still want to spout your bullshit.

      There is a period in which Islam had the most advanced civilization on Earth. Considering when it was, this isn't a really high bar, but it does demonstrate that Islam can support a good civilization.

      You're moving the goalposts. You claimed "the most vibrant and very tolerant society was Muslim", used that as a lame example of how Islam isn't inherently what I say it's been all along. You ignore today's standards and the hard truth that Islam is a backwards ideology that treats women and other religions as second-class citizens.

      "Not all Muslims" is a perfectly reasonable response when discussing an absolute.

      I wasn't discussing the absolute of all Islam or all Muslims. I was talking about its beating, black heart, which consists of its violent roots, backwards ideology, and fundamentalist followers.

      If Islam were inherently evil, then the people I've known who were Muslim would tend towards evil.

      Many people do not take their religion seriously or choose to cherry pick what they want to believe in. That fact doesn't magically wash away the inherent evil within Islam, nor does it make the fundamentalists who are following it any less real or Islamic.

      If the reasonable points of view can be fostered, which apparently isn't happening any time real soon, Islam stops being a problem while remaining Islam.

      I sort of agree that Islam, theoretically, can be reformed, in which case it would have a cold, dead black heart at its center instead of a beating one bathing in the blood of jihad.

      If you think I think all religions are equally bad, then either I haven't really addressed the subject, I haven't been clear, or you haven't been listening.

      You've several times made comparisons to Christianity, while ignoring the roots, history, and central tenants of the faith. You even tossed in Buddhists for good measure. All to argue that there isn't something inherently evil in Islam.

      Of the world's major religion, Islam is my least favorite, partly because of the large number of extremists and partly for other issues I'm not going to discuss here..

      And yet you keep your head buried in the sand and ignore the root causes and the entire history of Islam that makes it so.

      Muslims today are doing pretty much what Christians did centuries ago.

      And here you go again. Since you want to repeat arguments, let me quote myself in one of my earlier replies to you: "And this is where it's helpful to actually look at the basis of the religion. Jesus, as described in the gospels, was basically a hippie who preached virtue, love, and peace. Muhammad, as described in the Quran, hadith, and Sunna, was a conquering warlord."

      It matters, and that is why Islam is going to be much harder to reform, and that's reflected on the ground and throughout history.

  3. There's Only One Thing They Care About.... by segedunum · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ......and that's Uber. They don't give a flying fuck about drivers.

  4. Actually... by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

    Wait, doesn't the UK require some minimum level of literacy before you can get a driver's license?

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    1. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah! And they should require some minimum level of driving ability before you can get a teacher's license!

    2. Re:Actually... by squiggleslash · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not sure it's necessary, British road signs are generally (with a small number of easily memorable exceptions) pictographic. For example, the sign meaning "Road works ahead" is symbolized by a man opening an umbrella.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    3. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does driving have to do with teaching? I am a teacher, and I walk to work. Most of my colleagues commute to work via bus or subway.

      On the other hand, given that in London, most traffic signs are in English, emergency services are conducted in English, and the primary (or secondary) language of the typical passanger is English, there is a reasonable argument to support such a requirement.

    4. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoosh~

    5. Re:Actually... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2

      Well, as long as they can read the road signs. I guess communicating with the passenger or reading road names isn't important...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    6. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not forgetting animals

      https://goo.gl/maps/rUERqgTUWbA2

      And it doesn't mean keep your head down

    7. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does road work in Britain result in a lot of broken active water mains? Why the umbrella? Wouldn't it make more sense for workers to survey before digging than having them dig recklessly and then having them (and passerbys) use umbrellas to avoid getting too wet? The Brits are a strange folk -- but Benny Hill pretty much clued me in on that (oh, and standing in formation in bright red uniforms while my ancestors picked them off from behind trees was also a clue). A sweet people, but a bit daft -- perhaps too little sunshine has created some sort of deficiency over the generations?

      Don't get me started on warm beer...

    8. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does driving have to do with teaching? I am a teacher, and I walk to work.

      I'm guessing your subject is something other than Logic or Reading For Comprehension.

    9. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it doesn't mean keep your head down

      That's because it's a duck, not a goose.

    10. Re:Actually... by will_die · · Score: 1

      In 2014 they removed the driver's license test in 19 languages, now you can request translator to read you the questions in 20 languages.

    11. Re:Actually... by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      I was wondering the same thing when I read that. Umbrella what the hell.. Also might as well drink piss if you're going to drink warm beer.

    12. Re:Actually... by tsqr · · Score: 1

      Whoosh~

      Invalid whoosh. Cab drivers need to communicate with their customers in order to provide a minimum level of service. Teachers don't need to be able to drive in order to provide a minimum level of service.

    13. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Much like almost anywhere else in the world.

    14. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sign shows a shovel that looks a bit like an umbrella. It's very similar to road works signs in other countries, but with a comparatively large shovel.

      I've never had warm beer in the UK. I don't know where that meme comes from.

    15. Re:Actually... by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      I believe that the answer to that is an affirmative NO. It's possible in the EU to take driving tests with an interpreter.

      As others have stated, the putative driver still needs to be able to read and understand road signs (which are generally either place names or are not textual).

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    16. Re:Actually... by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      I guess communicating with the passenger or reading road names isn't important...

      I don't speak or read German, but I was able to read the place names while driving through Gernany. Although, I'll admit that there can be doubt sometimes. For example, try looking for a sign to "Venice" while in Italy.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    17. Re:Actually... by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Informative

      Mainstream American beers are served ridiculously cold to hide the fact that they don't actually taste of anything.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    18. Re:Actually... by FormOfActionBanana · · Score: 1

      Yes, in a sense. There is a vision test, where the examiner asks you to read a sign some distance away, before starting the car. But that is it as far as I can remember.

      --
      Take off every 'sig' !!
    19. Re:Actually... by FormOfActionBanana · · Score: 1

      Emergency services are conducted in English...
      What does that even mean? A howling siren, a tracheotomy - these don't require language.

      --
      Take off every 'sig' !!
    20. Re:Actually... by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Thanks for explaining the woosh to me, I didn't understand what driving had to do with teaching either.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    21. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why's that? If the beer is any good, surely you want to taste it. Though if the stuff you call beer tastes like piss, I perfectly understand preferring it cold so you can't taste it. That said if you don't like the taste of beer, just drink something you do like the taste of.

    22. Re: Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Conan! What is best in life? A howling siren, a tracheotomy...

    23. Re: Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of uncouth worker would show up for work without their umbrella?

    24. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a reason why they call American beer "warm piss"

    25. Re:Actually... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It'd be a rather large shovel unless you were loading feathers. The irregular triangle is a pile of sand/earth.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    26. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the US, it's a coffee cup being filled from a thermos.

    27. Re:Actually... by dave420 · · Score: 1

      The person was talking about drivers licenses, not taxi licenses. You don't need to speak English to drive in the UK.

    28. Re:Actually... by tsqr · · Score: 1

      The person was talking about drivers licenses, not taxi licenses. You don't need to speak English to drive in the UK.

      Yes, and the GP was talking about literacy, not language. This is all off-topic anyway; the original article was about taxi (including Uber) drivers' ability to speak English. The UK requires that all licensed private hire drivers are able to communicate in English at an appropriate level. Drivers need to be able to communicate with passengers to discuss a route or fare, as well as read, understand and respond to important regulatory, safety and travel information. More here.

  5. English? Really...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm American, and I've got a neighbor who is from somewhere around London. Nice guy, but his cockney accent is so thick I can rarely understand him. I get tired of saying "What?" everytime I talk to him.

  6. Maybe I'm missing something. . . by Salgak1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    . . . but as an initial point, what's wrong with requiring drivers in ENGLAND to show mastery of ENGLISH ??

    But secondly, that's actually a minor hurdle, compared to the "knowledge" required to pass the legendarily hard London Cab Drive License Test.

    Specifically:

    To achieve the required standard to be licensed as an “All London” taxi driver you will need a thorough knowledge, primarily, of the area within a six-mile radius of Charing Cross. You will need to know: all the streets; housing estates; parks and open spaces; government offices and departments; financial and commercial centres; diplomatic premises; town halls; registry offices; hospitals; places of worship; sports stadiums and leisure centres; airline offices; stations; hotels; clubs; theatres; cinemas; museums; art galleries; schools; colleges and universities; police stations and headquarters buildings; civil, criminal and coroner’s courts; prisons; and places of interest to tourists. In fact, anywhere a taxi passenger might ask to be taken.

    1. Re:Maybe I'm missing something. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People driving for Uber don't have to pass that test.

    2. Re:Maybe I'm missing something. . . by mindwhip · · Score: 1

      London taxi (black cab) drivers are different from private hire (usually "normal" cars with a meter fitted as well as slightly more exotic things like limo and minibus hire).

      Black cabs have privileges that private hire don't with regards to road access, taxi ranks and other similar things and have the requirement of the Knowledge in addition to the checks required for private hire. Private hire cars (which normally need to be "pre-booked" by phone) or have a limited number of allowed pick up locations, have licences that require a less stringent check, focused more around basic suitability for driving with passengers, correct fare calculations, knowledge of a smaller area of London around where the taxi operates from, criminal checks etc.

      --
      [The Universe] has gone offline.
    3. Re:Maybe I'm missing something. . . by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      . . . but as an initial point, what's wrong with requiring drivers in ENGLAND to show mastery of ENGLISH ??

      Because the UK as a whole decided to bring in tons of people who don't speak English into their country, and now those people want to make a living. And also because at no point in the "hail the car with an app", "type in destination", "get in the car", "wait" and "leave the car" process do you need to talk to the Uber driver.

      But secondly, that's actually a minor hurdle, compared to the "knowledge" required to pass the legendarily hard London Cab Drive License Test

      At this point, a test of a person's ability at memorizing locations is entirely pointless. If Google Maps can pass that test, then everyone using it should automatically pass it. In fact, I'll bet for any randomly selected set of destinations, Google Maps will out perform the cab driver average.

    4. Re:Maybe I'm missing something. . . by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      That's a brilliant article!
      To wish I had points to upvote...

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    5. Re:Maybe I'm missing something. . . by Salgak1 · · Score: 1

      Actually, as I'm told, several UK Governments in succession decided to bring in tons of people who don't speak English, and then failed to require that they learn the national tongue. And while Google Maps is pretty good. . . it can glitch, and can have trouble deciphering vague descriptions. . . .

    6. Re:Maybe I'm missing something. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps this was useful at one time, but with easy GPS and route finding, these requirements are somewhat obsolete. The knowledge may shave 15-30 seconds of wait time (while the driver plugs the location into google maps or whatever), but I wouldn't say this is as important as being able converse in English (so a tourist can ask about a local eatery, museum, or to settle a dispute with the cab driver)

    7. Re:Maybe I'm missing something. . . by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      If they have any type of experience, Than I highly doubt that, See my comment above about the streets of Las Vegas, NV.

    8. Re:Maybe I'm missing something. . . by ccguy · · Score: 2

      Actually, as I'm told, several UK Governments in succession decided to bring in tons of people who don't speak English, and then failed to require that they learn the national tongue. .

      That makes sense, because as a Spaniard with thousands of British citizens living in my country I can assure you almost none of them have bothered to learn even basic Spanish and in fact many get upset if you can't speak to them in English.

    9. Re:Maybe I'm missing something. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At this point, a test of a person's ability at memorizing locations is entirely pointless. If Google Maps can pass that test, then everyone using it should automatically pass it.

      The thing is, google maps can't pass that test. Can it tell you the difference between two churches and anyone prominent that goes to either? Can it tell you the best days to get in that great kebab shop that doesn't have a website or facebook page, and who there is the best cook? A London black cab driver can.

    10. Re: Maybe I'm missing something. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Hey, do you know that new Indian restaurant the opened opposite that fitness centre down Holborn way?"

      See how well Google maps does with that. Btw,"Holborn way" is not a street name, it's a direction relative to the car's current location.

    11. Re: Maybe I'm missing something. . . by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      And also because at no point in the "hail the car with an app", "type in destination", "get in the car", "wait" and "leave the car" process do you need to talk to the Uber driver.

      If I may state a fact, you are a disingenuous idiot.

    12. Re:Maybe I'm missing something. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell the wealthy Brits who live or retire in Spain to go home then if you like. Watching your economy tank even more will be most amusing. Admit it, Spain is practically a 3rd world country.

    13. Re:Maybe I'm missing something. . . by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      Can it [Google Maps] tell you the best days to get in that great kebab shop that doesn't have a website or facebook page, and who there is the best cook? A London black cab driver can.

      Really? There are over 27,000 restaurants in London, with 1700 new ones opening just in 2015. Unless London Cabbie's are all the Rain Man in disguise, I don't see this happening.

    14. Re:Maybe I'm missing something. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And while Google Maps is pretty good. . . it can glitch, and can have trouble deciphering vague descriptions. . . .

      Case in point, about a month ago I looked up the location of London Bridge and the locator was around 6 blocks north of the river (inland). It has since been corrected, but Google Maps can't always be relied on.

    15. Re: Maybe I'm missing something. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      done correctly, this is the first wave of autonomous driving: type in an address, get delivered to the requested location, pay a service fee

      nothing disengenuous or idiotic about it. where's you're head at?

  7. Motive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Uber: "Please don't disqualify the illiterate fools so that we can take advantage of them"

  8. Perhaps Uber should offer training by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Uber should step up and offer language training.

  9. Tough decision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In most cases I would support a requirement that people who interact with the public be fluent in the native language. On the other hand, English is a European language, so such a requirement would be RAYCISS!

    1. Re:Tough decision by Godwin+O'Hitler · · Score: 2

      The European/Worldwide language for non-natives is called EFL.
      It's a subset of English but would probably get them by in Britain, and probably get them through an English test.

      --
      No, your children are not the special ones. Nor are your pets.
    2. Re:Tough decision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technically, every English-speaking person's idiolect is a subset of English.

  10. Threatened by literacy by ne0n · · Score: 1

    The only people threatened by literacy are Taliban-minded morons. Does the Taliban think English drivers should be passing licensing tests with gestures, grunts and a childlike wonder at the glyphs on road signs?

    --
    $ :(){ :|:& };:
    1. Re: Threatened by literacy by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      You left out "drooling at the sight of bare ankles" which must surely communicate something.

  11. Level of testing by fleabag · · Score: 1

    i don't think there is an argument that a cab driver should speak the language of the country they are working in, and as a heavy user of Uber in London, I've never had a driver who was unable to speak to me.

    If you look up the tests, you'll find that they are heavy on written English - complex comprehensions, writing short essays. I don't see why that is remotely necessary for a cab driver.

    It has far more to do with the traditional cabs attempting to secure their market.

    1. Re:Level of testing by Salgak1 · · Score: 1

      There is a lightyear's worth of difference between a London Cab and an Uber. London Cabbies are required to have an encyclopedic knowledge of the geography of London: not just the roads, but where every possible venue is. . .

    2. Re: Level of testing by fleabag · · Score: 1

      Satnav has made that knowledge utterly irrelevant. I'm sitting in an uber right now - no idea if the driver knows where he is going, but he can follow instructions.

      My journey will cost about £13 in an uber rather than £25 in a cab. Nicer car, too.

    3. Re:Level of testing by Anonymice · · Score: 1

      From my experience, most immigrants have a better grasp of the English language than the locally born & bred cabbies.

      I'm all for this test, however I don't think it should be restricted just to those with foreign passports...

    4. Re: Level of testing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Take me to the Ministry of Transport".
      "Que?".

  12. more for taxi drivers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    London has one of the best cab drivers in the world due to requirement about memorizing nearly the entirely of the city map. They call it a "knowledge" and it takes year or more of training before they can become a cab driver.

    1. Re:more for taxi drivers by ranton · · Score: 1

      London has one of the best cab drivers in the world due to requirement about memorizing nearly the entirely of the city map. They call it a "knowledge" and it takes year or more of training before they can become a cab driver.

      I get upset when any taxi driver isn't using a navigation tool with access to current traffic patterns. If my company isn't paying for the ride I'll often have Google Maps open on my phone to make sure the driver isn't taking a poor route. No amount of human "knowledge" is better than a real time traffic updated navigation app.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    2. Re:more for taxi drivers by Aaden42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'd say there are at least some times when a certain amount of human "knowledge" beats the magic app box.

      > No Service

      I agree that drivers who use real time traffic data are likely to do a better job, but having a basic understanding of the entire city's street layout without being beholden to a GPS device is a really valuable skill for a driver. The tech can certainly augment human knowledge by providing dynamically changing information they couldn't otherwise know, but it's an inferior substitute for a driver who instantly knows several viable routes to get where they're going.

    3. Re:more for taxi drivers by Highdude702 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I live in Las Vegas, NV. The roads are plagued with a sea of traffic cones. Google maps doesnt account for that unless there is an accident or the road is completely closed. I've been driving service work around Las Vegas since I was 15. After 15 years of driving this city daily. Google maps can not get you from one end to the other faster than I can. I have guys I work with call me and ask whats the fastest way to get from point A to point B. Human Knowledge beats shitty "AI" Algorithms all day. Also I can do it without siphoning your personal information along the way..

    4. Re:more for taxi drivers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NO NO NO NO NO!!!!

      Let me share my recent experience driving in Paris. I had to get across town, it's typically a 2 hour drive, but at rush hour I was expecting it to take around 3. In the end it took around 4, and the GPS tried to route me every which way around the city, the ring-road (in both directions) right through the city, then back around the ring-road. It was a disaster.

      This came about because not being a local I trusted the GPS system with live traffic updates to plot the best route for shortest time. In a dynamic system, all it managed to do was consistently find the local time-minimum for the journey time every 15-20 minutes. As the traffic situation evolved it made a series of "best" decisions that ultimately found a sub-optimal solution. There is no way the GPS could beat a local driver with experience who knows how the big picture will change over the hours ahead.

      Yes, if all traffic data goes into Google then Google has a chance of solving this. But keep in mind there is a lot more to it than just knowing the current traffic situation (the "real time" from your post) you have to predict the future traffic based on past observations.

    5. Re:more for taxi drivers by Cederic · · Score: 1

      In London? Fuck yes, human knowledge has a serious edge over a real time traffic updated navigation app.

      The app wont know the traffic patterns ten minutes and two miles away. The driver will.

    6. Re:more for taxi drivers by marquisdepolis · · Score: 0

      The app wont know the traffic patterns ten minutes and two miles away. The driver will.

      I think you got that the wrong way around buddy.

    7. Re:more for taxi drivers by FormOfActionBanana · · Score: 1

      Black Cabs charge by distance so the driver will take you the shortest way. If they think you can save time by another route, they will generally ask the customer first as it will cost more.

      --
      Take off every 'sig' !!
    8. Re:more for taxi drivers by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      No amount of human "knowledge" is better than a real time traffic updated navigation app.
      That is in most cases wrong. Neither does such an App naturally have all the traffic infos, nor does it know the "sneak ways" a cab can use. E.g. we have pedestrian areas in my city, no map will tell you to go through it: but cabs are allowed to do so. Then again the cabs are on radio and get updates much faster.

      And yes: in germany if you want to have a "cab license" you are required to memorize the map of the city, too. In other words: a cab license for Hamburg is not valid in Berlin.

      And: I often enough watched a guy putting in the destination in his "navi" and taking so long we could already half thee before he finished it.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    9. Re: more for taxi drivers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sydney's the same - a longish commute in Sydney might be 40 min at 0200, but the same drive during the wrong part of the day could be anything up to 3 hours . I've seen GNSS systems estimates of travel time be wrong by +/- 45 min on a 1.5 hour journey as the traffic patterns change dynamically.

    10. Re:more for taxi drivers by Cederic · · Score: 1

      You'd best write to New Scientist then.
      https://www.newscientist.com/a...

    11. Re:more for taxi drivers by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      London has one of the best cab drivers in the world

      I lived there for a year and I never met him.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  13. No London Knowledge test? black cab drivers by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    No London Knowledge test? black cab drivers spend a lot of time studying to pass that test also you need to pay for the many tests needed to pass and uber drivers can just start driving?

    1. Re: No London Knowledge test? black cab drivers by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      Uber is a minicab firm and minicab drivers follow a different set of rules to black cab drivers.

  14. Re:English? Really...? by Godwin+O'Hitler · · Score: 1

    Funnily enough people from other parts of Britain, who I'm pretty sure don't understand him any better than you, don't complain and in fact think it's quaint.

    --
    No, your children are not the special ones. Nor are your pets.
  15. Re:English? Really...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm American,

    My commiserations but the problem is probably because he is speaking English, not American.

  16. uber is taking crazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To become a cab driver in London is insane - it called "the knowledge."
    There is no way you can do this and not speak English.

    Here is a new york times short documentary about it
    http://nyti.ms/2lvvMo4

  17. They could lose their jobs? GOOD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Its a matter of public safety that I can clearly communicate with the driver. If I speak English I need to have the driver speak English, and if I am in an English speaking country I am going to statistically speak English. If the driver does not have the basic skills for the country they are working in the should be forced to get these very basic skills and if they lose the job they have for not having them then that is simply the free market at work!

    1. Re:They could lose their jobs? GOOD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its a matter of public safety that I can clearly communicate with the driver.

      Baloney.

      If I speak English I need to have the driver speak English, and if I am in an English speaking country I am going to statistically speak English. If the driver does not have the basic skills for the country they are working in the should be forced to get these very basic skills and if they lose the job they have for not having them then that is simply the free market at work!

      Let the market decide. If you have some need for a driver who speaks a specific language, you should be able to pay the going rate for this level of service. I don't, and I don't want to pay extra because of your anxieties/ignorance.

    2. Re:They could lose their jobs? GOOD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You wanna put the market to the test? When Uber adds a driver speaks X langauge filter on hiring and it doesn't put just about all the ones who don't speak the dominant language out I'll believe.

    3. Re: They could lose their jobs? GOOD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it's just fine to get a license to drive around all day, and that doesn't bother you? Only if they use the Uber app you're bothered??

  18. L'anglais c'est de la merde by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alors je ne peux pas être Uber parce que je ne parle pas anglais ? L'anglais c'est de la merde, monsieur, oui, anglais is poopy.

    1. Re:L'anglais c'est de la merde by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alors je ne peux pas être Uber parce que je ne parle pas anglais ? L'anglais c'est de la merde, monsieur, oui, anglais is poopy.

      Le rosbif dit à la petite grenouille : casse toi de la perfide Albion.

  19. Bewar Pandora's box by JimSadler · · Score: 1

    In this universe of strange consequences I foresee people making a legal claim of language disability and expecting a welfare like program to support them as they can not work due to a language deficit. There are even some people who are mute who could communicate through an app on their phone with customers. Should we remove them from the work place due to language difficulties? Then there is the tiny problem of the US having no official, national language. Can you imagine a ghetto youth in Chicago trying to understand the queens English when his native tongue is a very weird ebonic argot.

    1. Re:Bewar Pandora's box by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      So, Mute.. chances are their deaf also. I'm rather sure being deaf disqualifies you to have a license. Cant hear emergency vehicles, Also why wearing headphones while driving is illegal. Looks like I just torched your straw man..

    2. Re:Bewar Pandora's box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm fairly certain you are allowed to drive when you're deaf: https://www.gov.uk/deafness-and-driving

    3. Re:Bewar Pandora's box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being deaf DOES NOT disqualify you from driving (at least in the UK, and a few other countries) Emergency vehicles have Bright Flashing Lights in addition to the sirens.

      Also, while using a phone while driving is illegal, I'm not sure headphones are. Have you seen/heard "youths" driving around with incredibly loud stereo systems? Do you think they can hear a siren? Also quite a few top-end cars are very well sound-insulated, you won't hear a siren until it's very close. (even closer with the stereo on, even at a reasonable volume level)

  20. Uber's angle should be obvious by DrXym · · Score: 1

    All those non-English speakers form a core part of its exploitable workforce. Maybe they need to supply a phrase book for drivers to passenger interaction - "I am having a heart attack", "I've left my wallet", or "Please stop raping me".

    1. Re:Uber's angle should be obvious by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      Lets face it. If they are going to rape you, I don't think the language you beg them not to will matter. But your other 2 are valid points.

    2. Re:Uber's angle should be obvious by DrXym · · Score: 1
      I'm being facetious of course. The reality is that cab drivers, hackney or minicab should be held to a standard suitable for someone operating public transportation. That should being able to speak the country / area's language, pass a police background check, receive certain health & safety training and be driving a fully insured, taxed and inspected vehicle.

      It's not hard to understand Uber's angle in all this. Foreign speakers represent a rich seam of low wage workers who they can exploit to run their service.

  21. proper testing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well as most of the non-English speaking ubersexual drivers are probably driving on a British driving licence,how about we make it a compulsary part of the basic driving test ?
    The fact that there are thousands of people driving illegally on "kahn" licences and that there are plenty of doctors who for £150+ will happely lie about how long a person has supposedly been a patient is probably not helping the situation..
    Just keep your fingers crossed that it's not you or one of your family/friends that gets involved with one of these illegal licence holders,they have no insurance,so unless you can afford a private prosecution and they have seizable assets,your up shite creek if you get crippled/killed by one..

  22. OK Google by kiviQr · · Score: 2

    Does it apply to self driving cars? If yes "OK Google" needs to step up.

  23. Re:English? Really...? by Highdude702 · · Score: 0

    That's why we left you cunts to begin with. Couldn't understand you! lol

  24. Can't understand english? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eat pepperoni pizza, light a cigar and fart on your own face.

  25. The value of speaking English by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I once got into a taxi at an airport in Chicago. Before we set off the driver pointed at the meter talking in thick Pidgin English that I could barely understand. The only word I could pick out was "meter." I just nodded politely and said yes because I wanted to get to my hotel for a meeting. When I got to the hotel he started wrangling with me to about paying more than was on the meter, apparently he had turned it off at some stage of the journey for some unfathomable reason. He got really belligerent about it too. The hotel was reimbursing me for the trip and after about five minutes of him, the hotel concierge and me trying to discuss it I just asked the manager to reimburse him what he wanted because I hadn't a clue what was going on and it was only another $20 or so.

    I know that some people like apps like Uber because they minimize human communication, but it's still a vital skill. As long as you're not asking drivers to write a book report on Ulysses by Joyce, expecting them to communicate clearly in the local language is not too much to ask for.

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
    1. Re:The value of speaking English by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Not sure about Chicago but isn't meter tampering illegal in pretty much every city?

  26. London Taxi Drivers? by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

    I thought I had read somewhere that Taxis drivers in London England were the most heavily skilled, regulated, and trained. Your training was supposed to be equivalent to like a bachelors degree. Someone did brain scans, and the amount of geographical data in them means they are wired significantly differently than the average mans.

    And now the only requirement is that you can speak English?

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    1. Re:London Taxi Drivers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's black taxis that have the high requirement, they are the ones you can hail on the street. Pre-booked taxis, generally called "minicabs" don't have such requirements.

    2. Re:London Taxi Drivers? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I thought I read somewhere that you're a fat ill-informed polack cunt.

      Apparently I'm right, since you don't know the difference between a black cab, a minicab, and someone who gives you a ride because he just happens to be going that way, honestly.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  27. Re:English? Really...? by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

    Could be worse, he could be Welsh where the BBC would likely subtitle him if conducting an interview.

    --
    Time to offend someone
  28. Re:English? Really...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually it is the Brits who changed their accent not Americans. How Americans sound is a time capsule of how Brits sounded back in 1700s.

  29. Most "English speaking" people... by denzacar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...still need subtitles and a dictionary to fully understand a Guy Ritchie movie.

    On the other hand... the B1 level which is required is the equivalent of "GCE AS level / lower grade A-level" which is the equivalent of a 13th-grade exam.
    Which about 55% of UK students don't take.

    Meaning that 55% of UK citizens, raised and educated in UK, don't qualify.
    Or that they would have to fork up 200 pounds to take (and pass) an "expected for university admission" level of knowledge of English.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Most "English speaking" people... by Dogers · · Score: 1

      On the other hand... the B1 level which is required is the equivalent of "GCE AS level / lower grade A-level" ...

      From their description I'd argue that it's not AS level, it's more GCSE than AS level. But then maybe exams have just gotten that much easier in my time..

      --
      I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you.
    2. Re: Most "English speaking" people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Learning a foreign language to B1 is comparable to A level, but English is the native language and works differently.

    3. Re:Most "English speaking" people... by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      >> ...still need subtitles and a dictionary to fully understand a Guy Ritchie movie.

      Speak for yourself. I presume by "English Speaking" you're including Americans. As a Brit living in the US It's more than clear to me that what they speak actually isn't English, its American.

    4. Re:Most "English speaking" people... by JustNiz · · Score: 4, Informative

      From the article:
      "Drivers must have B1 level English, or the equivalent of a GCSE in the subject".

      FYI This is nowhere near A level.

    5. Re:Most "English speaking" people... by painandgreed · · Score: 2

      Speak for yourself. I presume by "English Speaking" you're including Americans. As a Brit living in the US It's more than clear to me that what they speak actually isn't English, its American.

      Our funny accents give it away, don't they?

    6. Re: Most "English speaking" people... by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      English is the native language and works differently.

      English isn't the native language for someone from Lavaturia or Kbongistan.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    7. Re: Most "English speaking" people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm Australian, and visit the US a lot.

      American's , particularly in the mid-west, can barely understand what I'm saying more than 50% of the time. I'm from Adelaide , so I speak something close to English English, not Strine, Ocker or Bogan.

    8. Re: Most "English speaking" people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      English is the native language of England.

    9. Re:Most "English speaking" people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Understand the main points of clear standard input on familiar matters regularly encountered in work, school, leisure, etc
      Deal with most situations likely to arise while travelling in an area where the language is spoken
      Produce simple connected text on topics which are familiar or of personal interest
      Describe experiences, events, dreams, hopes and ambitions, and briefly give reasons and explanations for opinions and plans"

      Yeah, certainly sounds like something a native speaker would need to hard study for, rather than say, a basic level of proficiency necessary for customer facing work in a service industry.

    10. Re:Most "English speaking" people... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It's not really about English language skills. It's about reducing immigration. Discourage people from coming to the UK to do these kinds of job by setting a high bar for them.

      The government won't do anything sensible about immigration for political reasons. So instead it targets very specific groups like this, with a policy that plays well as a Daily Mail headline.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    11. Re:Most "English speaking" people... by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      >> It's not really about English language skills. It's about reducing immigration.

      Please cite an actual reference (i.e. not just an opinion piece).

    12. Re: Most "English speaking" people... by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      I'm from the south west of England yet for some reason here in Arizona more people I meet the first time think I'm from Australia than UK.

    13. Re: Most "English speaking" people... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Was that worth posting? It sure as hell wasn't worth reading.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    14. Re:Most "English speaking" people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think you're parsing this statement as its intended.

      B1 refers to a standardized level of proficiency:

      * Can understand the main points of clear standard input on familiar matters regularly encountered in work, school, leisure, etc.
      * Can deal with most situations likely to arise while travelling in an area where the language is spoken.
      * Can produce simple connected text on topics that are familiar or of personal interest.
      * Can describe experiences and events, dreams, hopes and ambitions and briefly give reasons and explanations for opinions and plans.

      The "Or ..." is that you can bypass this if you have a high-school level education in english language. They're not saying B1 can be alternatively stated as a GSCE-level qualification; but that drivers are required to have one or the other.

    15. Re:Most "English speaking" people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And GCSE level english is not exactly encouraging literacy!

    16. Re:Most "English speaking" people... by denzacar · · Score: 2

      It's not really about English language skills. It's about reducing immigration. Discourage people from coming to the UK to do these kinds of job by setting a high bar for them.

      B1 level English is already a prerequisite for immigration.

      If anything, B1 being a level of the same tests one takes whether one is coming to UK to study or work (university enrollment has a slightly higher minimal grade), this requirement practically guarantees that only immigrants will be driving for Uber.
      They had to get that qualification in order to enter the country.
      All some UK citizens have is a driver's license.

      Both groups still need a Private Hire Vehicle license, a valid credit/debit card and a proof of residence.
      And while these can be... worked around... driving without a valid driver's license would be inviting disaster for a potentially illegal immigrant.
      Cops routinely stop people. Even people born in UK.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    17. Re:Most "English speaking" people... by denzacar · · Score: 1

      From the article:
      "Drivers must have B1 level English, or the equivalent of a GCSE in the subject".

      FYI This is nowhere near A level.

      I provided a link with comparison of equivalencies, which lists B1 as "British general qualifications: GCE AS level / lower grade A-level".

      It is so cause B1 is not a grade one gets on a test NOR is it a kind of a test one does.
      It's a descriptor of a group of tests and minimum scores which one would need to take and pass in order to qualify for a visa.
      Most equivalent tests are not a pass-fail test, so there is some overlap between grades and equivalency between the tests as well as the range of scores which fall under the B1 group.
      BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY, these tests were intended for people who are COMING INTO UK.

      Someone taking an IELTS test, which is one of the approved tests for a B1 level qualification, would be tested either for an academic or a general training grade.
      I.e. For the purpose of enrollment into a university OR or into some other school - or to immigrate into UK.
      It's the same test in both cases. The scoring and grading is the same. It's just that the "content, context and purpose of the tasks" are different.
      I.e. Academic version uses bigger words.

      The only difference being that one needs a slightly higher minimum grade to enroll into a university than one needs to immigrate into UK.
      5.5 vs. 4.0, which are REALLY REALLY CLOSE due to rounding up of the raw scores as they are recalculated to a band scale.

      Thus the situation is that the only people with a ready B1 (or higher) qualification are - LEGAL IMMIGRANTS.
      There is no equivalence for a UK-born citizen, as B1 is a level intended for approximate equalization and naturalization of foreigners to UK, not the other way around.
      They might as well be asking for a non-UK birth certificate.

      ONLY point where both groups intersect in qualification being the enrollment into university.
      Which for Brits means taking their GCE A-levels - and for immigrants taking the same IELTS test, only the "bigger words" version.
      Which they already did to get in. UK and the university.
      And while immigrants who DO take that test are ALL coming with an intent to enroll into a university - 55% of UK highschoolers decide not to.

      Thus, a B1 level requirement becomes equivalent of an "university enrollment" for UK-born citizens of UK - and either an immigration visa or a study visa for immigrants.
      Which doesn't sound as counter-intuitive when you consider Uber's standards.

      Uber's driver-partners are highly educated. Nearly half of Uber's driver-partners (48 percent)
      have a college degree or higher, considerably higher than the corresponding percentage for taxi
      drivers and chauffeurs (18 percent), and above that for the workforce as a whole as well (41
      percent). Only 12 percent of Uber's driver-partners have a high school degree or less, whereas
      over half (52 percent) of taxi drivers and chauffeurs have a high school degree or less. Seven
      percent of Uber's driver-partners are currently enrolled in school, mostly taking classes toward a
      four-year college degree or higher.

      Hey... That's their workforce in the US. People who took their college entry tes

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    18. Re: Most "English speaking" people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm American, and lived in Australia for several years. It took me a month or two before I reached a comfortable level of understanding with the locals. This was in Brisbane, BTW, where "Received" is not really what you hear on^H^Hin the street. :)

    19. Re:Most "English speaking" people... by denzacar · · Score: 1

      I'm saying that one can be a born and raised UK adult without actually speaking something that resembles English one would need to speak/read/write in order to pass a test.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    20. Re:Most "English speaking" people... by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      >> I provided a link with comparison of equivalencies, which lists B1 as "British general qualifications: GCE AS level / lower grade A-level".

      Once again:
      From the article:
      "Drivers must have B1 level English, or the equivalent of a GCSE in the subject".

      GCSE is the qualification you do exams at 16 to get. You need to do another 2 years of full time study on top of that to get an A level.

    21. Re:Most "English speaking" people... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Indeed. It used to be A1, but they increased it to B1 because fuck immigrants and their families.

      It would be reasonable to require mandatory English language courses, perhaps with a requirement to pass a test within say 3 years of arriving. Instead they have made it so that you have to pass the test first, and it's extremely difficult for many people.

      For example, some people don't have easy access to an English language school in their country. My fiancee has to travel 1.5 hours each way to attend a suitable school. There are also issues about the need for unrelated IT skills because many of the available courses are moving their teaching materials and assessments online.

      For people workers, sure, there is more of a case for language skills. In this case though, it seems that the exam is not suitable. The BBC reported that one paper asked candidates to write an essay about the planet Mars. It's not really a "can this person speak reasonable English" test, it's a "does this person have essay writing skills" test.

      Don't get me wrong, I agree there should be standards for drivers, but that's not what the government is doing here. It's about numbers and putting barriers in the way.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    22. Re:Most "English speaking" people... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It's an opinion. It's my assessment of their actions over an extended period of time.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    23. Re:Most "English speaking" people... by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      As a Brit I honestly can't imagine how. All the kids born in the UK I've ever met can, even those from the most insular non-english-speaking communities.

    24. Re: Most "English speaking" people... by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      I'm from Australia and live in the US, and 90% of people here think I'm English. I just think they can't tell the difference (to be fair, there's not a huge difference between urban Australian and RP/London English).

    25. Re:Most "English speaking" people... by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Indeed. It used to be A1, but they increased it to B1 because fuck immigrants and their families.

      Yes indeed, when we have a net increase of half a million people PER YEAR in our population and we are already overpopulated, letting any immigrants who want to enter is not particularly high on my list of priorities.

    26. Re:Most "English speaking" people... by denzacar · · Score: 1

      So everyone just passes English? Why give out grades at all then?
      https://www.theguardian.com/ed...

      The falls are due in large part to new government policies that force 17-year-olds who got a D or lower in English or maths last year to resit those exams, meaning more students overall were sitting the tests.

      While stats do vary on passing grades from year to year - it's not 100% of students.

      2016 %gaining grades, A*-C:
      English 60.2
      English Literature 75.1

      I'm saying that one can be a born and raised UK adult without actually speaking something that resembles English one would need to speak/read/write in order to pass a test.

      Currently, that's about 40% of UK citizens who've been training for that test nearly every day of their lives, ever since they learned their ABCs.
      And if you think they'll retain that level of knowledge once they finish with school, you clearly never had to watch adults struggle with multiplication of 2-digit numbers without a calculator.
      God forbid asking someone to calculate a square root.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    27. Re:Most "English speaking" people... by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      >> Currently, that's about 40% of UK citizens who've been training for that test nearly every day of their lives, ever since they learned their ABCs.
      Good. Its working then.
        If they're not even intelligent enough to pass a simple GCSE then I certainly don't want them in charge of driving me around.

  30. Re:Muslim work ethic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But... What about clockboy? He invented such a grand alarm clock that he got to visit Obama at the whitehouse, and a got a free higher edumacation courtesy of SLW'ers.

  31. What Disruption by Luthair · · Score: 1

    The only thing Uber is doing is making easy to run taxis without obeying the rules. These already existed, they were called bandit taxis, they aren't disrupting anything.

    This is the equivalent of starting a car company and making vehicles that don't obey crash safety and emissions laws.

  32. Re:Muslim work ethic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, a real friggin genius. Later clock-boy tried to game the system for "discrimination" but the Texas judge through it out of court, faster than you can say 9-11. Best of all, clock boy has to pick up the tab for all the lawyers in the case. Ouch!

  33. An abomination and Government over reach by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 3
    We have to get rid of all these burdensome job killing government regulations.

    An English language test? What a stupid idea! If you give in now, next they will demand all drivers to know how to drive cars. Will demand all drivers to know names of neighborhoods and streets too. We. must. put. a. stop. to. government. overreach.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  34. Re:English? Really...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And you happen to be the only American who speaks decent English?

    Somehow, I think the problem is more likely to be with your English comprehension skills than with anything related to your neighbor (sic).

  35. Craziness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    For a functional community, every one needs to be able to communicate. Language requirements within that community are not racist or a burden. They're needed to ensure a functional society. One in which everyone of every race, religion, sex, etc can actually interact and not live in isolated bubbles. For some reason Progressives want to segregate people in to colonies within a community. That actually drives people apart and reduces diversity. It creates discrimination from all directions. If you truly want a diverse culture of people, you need to bind people together around a few very common things.

    Language breaks down barriers by allowing people to actually communicate and share ideas. It's crazy that Progressives are against that. Unless, of course, their real aim is chaos and completely tearing apart the fabric of society in some effort to create revolution and remake the world in a different image.

    1. Re:Craziness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a functional community, every one needs to be able to communicate. Language requirements within that community are not racist or a burden. They're needed to ensure a functional society. One in which everyone of every race, religion, sex, etc can actually interact and not live in isolated bubbles. For some reason Progressives want to segregate people in to colonies within a community. That actually drives people apart and reduces diversity. It creates discrimination from all directions. If you truly want a diverse culture of people, you need to bind people together around a few very common things.

      I'm sure you will further agree that once a majority of the community speaks a different language than the "official" language, everyone else should be required to adopt the new standard.

      Language breaks down barriers by allowing people to actually communicate and share ideas. It's crazy that Progressives are against that. Unless, of course, their real aim is chaos and completely tearing apart the fabric of society in some effort to create revolution and remake the world in a different image.

      You have a very simplistic notion of language and communication. The world is already different, at least outside of your bubble. Forcing everyone to use a single language degrades communication and narrows ideas.

  36. Re:English? Really...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's a very broad and mostly wrong statement. The current-day American accent may be closer to some 18th century English accents than most present day English accents are, but both have changed considerably and regional variations in the UK were much larger at the time than they are now. While some of the differences are indeed due to changes in (mostly) southern England that happened after the first waves of English settlers in North America, many of the characteristic features of the American accent developed independently in later periods.

  37. Obama based list based on ISIS/Daesh control by drnb · · Score: 1

    Bullshit. If that was the case why were only a small handful of Muslim majority countries restricted instead of all of them?

    Umm alot of the other countries he owns hotels or other ventures in.

    Obama created the list of seven nations, and he did so based on large areas of those countries being under ISIS/Daesh control or influence.

    1. Re:Obama based list based on ISIS/Daesh control by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Informative

      Obama increased the checks for issuing visas. He didn't retroactively invalidate ones that were already issued.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:Obama based list based on ISIS/Daesh control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obama isn't the president anymore. We had this thing called an election because we wanted someone else making the rules. Since Obama is no longer president, whatever he did without the consent of Congress can be undone with a hand wave. Seeing as Obama REFUSED to work with Congress for the most part, that means most of what he accomplished can be undone with a hand wave.

      The president doesn't make laws, he signs laws passed by Congress. You cheered his executive orders, I laughed knowing they would be easily undone. Now you cry due to your ignorance.

    3. Re:Obama based list based on ISIS/Daesh control by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2

      We had this thing called an election because we wanted someone else making the rules.

      Actually, both you and Trump are delusional. The president doesn't make the rules. Congress does - that's why it's known as the legislative branch - they make the legislation. The executive branch is in charge of implementation. The judiciary is there to make sure the other two don't f*ck up and pretend they are a law unto themselves and can make shit up as they go along or rule by edict, rather than having to follow the law of the land, including the constitution.

      Your education system is broken when it takes foreigners to explain to you how your country works.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    4. Re:Obama based list based on ISIS/Daesh control by drnb · · Score: 1

      Obama increased the checks for issuing visas. He didn't retroactively invalidate ones that were already issued.

      That was not the point being addressed. The point being addressed was why some nations are on the list and others are not.

    5. Re:Obama based list based on ISIS/Daesh control by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      You tried to create a false equivalence. You got called on it.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    6. Re:Obama based list based on ISIS/Daesh control by drnb · · Score: 1

      You tried to create a false equivalence. You got called on it.

      No, I disproved the theory that Trump's business interests had anything to do with being on or off the list. There was no equivalence false or true, just a statement of fact about who made the list and by what criteria.

      Perhaps you are getting me confused with some other poster who made a "Obama did it too" response.

    7. Re:Obama based list based on ISIS/Daesh control by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      The list was a rider on an appropriations bill that Obama had to sign. Have you any evidence that Obama had anything to do with it other than that?

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    8. Re:Obama based list based on ISIS/Daesh control by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      So, why did Trump use that particular list?

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    9. Re:Obama based list based on ISIS/Daesh control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obama "REFUSED" to work with congress? That's fucking rich right there.

    10. Re:Obama based list based on ISIS/Daesh control by drnb · · Score: 1

      So, why did Trump use that particular list?

      You noticed "based on ISIS/Daesh control" in the title? It was a good list of places to slow down with and take careful looks.

    11. Re:Obama based list based on ISIS/Daesh control by drnb · · Score: 1

      The list was a rider on an appropriations bill that Obama had to sign. Have you any evidence that Obama had anything to do with it other than that?

      "Had to" is a gratuitous interpretation. If it were truly an anti-muslim ban his signature would hardly be a sure thing. However since the list was quite logical, a list based on large areas of those countries being under ISIS/Daesh control or influence, it is quite the assumption to say he disapproved of the list and was forced to accept it.

      The fact that the democratic party and the media were not up in arms at the time also indicates little to no controversy.

      Which is all a distraction, the larger point stands. The list is not based on where Trump does business.

    12. Re:Obama based list based on ISIS/Daesh control by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Nice excuse, but I don't know that that's the real reason.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  38. Re:English? Really...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly. The real problem is that it's not just your accents that are stuck back in the 18th century.

  39. 25 years ago by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine, Australian, flew to the USA. Don't remember the airport. He took a "cab" and after 30 minutes driving in circles the driver gave him a map and asked him to find the route to the destination. The drivers english was incomprehensible. Turned out he did not even understand what the destination was supposed to be. It was not an "official cab", though.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  40. sorry but.. by SuperDre · · Score: 1

    If you can't speak English on a certain level then you no business to drive people around. Learn the god damn language (of the country you're gonna live in) as soon as possible and as good as possible.. I also hate it when I have to talk to someone who speak so broken English (or my native language), where you have to repeat a lot over and over for them to understand or them to you..

  41. It's (not) brain surgery ... by BenBoy · · Score: 1

    Y'know what really pisses me off? The requirement that I gotta pass a bunch of tests like the 'man' says in order to pursue my career as a $%$@$ brain surgeon. And don't start me on the insurance costs... #$$@# the man! What am I supposed to do about my livelihood, which has been lost owing to these restrictive laws and regulations?? You're taking away my way of making a living!!
    [sniffle]
    Just to clarify: fuck Uber.

  42. speaking as the son of an immigrant by Pax681 · · Score: 1

    who came from Italy to start a business in Scotland(yes..yes.. a bloody chip shop!..LOL)
    MY father always said.. If you want to go anywhere and take money from people then it's only polite to speak the language
    you MUST be able to communicate on a basic level and Uber are just being sphincters as usual...
    My father learned the language from scratch when he came here , those who come now should do the same or quite frankly bugger off!

    1. Re:speaking as the son of an immigrant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is Italians are thoughtful, intelligent people, with a history of innumerable contributions to civilisation, spanning millennia.

      The Uber driver is a different beast altogether. Generally they are a paki, wog, or sand nlgger. Six months ago they were in the desert having sex with goats and camels. Their "wife" is at home in a council flat packed with another 8 or 9 assorted goat humpers. She is chained so that she can't go out, and covered head to toe in a block sheet with eye slits.

      The uber driver does not use his wages for the benefit of his family. Hell no. That's what the government is for. The uber driver spends his money on alcohol, tobacco, curry, and sex with subsaharan monkeys.

      An uber driver always welcomes a trip to the airport. It's good money. He can wash his feet in the foot bath, and engage in anonymous homosexual activity in the bathroom stalls. For him, it's like hitting the daily number.

      So please, don't compare your hard working dad to the subhuman animal known as an uber driver. Hour dad is human. These middle eastern, "asian" (got to love that slight of hand!) pigs are a different species entirely. They truly aren't human.

  43. GPS beats Experience by aberglas · · Score: 1

    I caught a cab to San Francisco recently (yes, not Uber, my account broke for unknown reasons). The driver was old school and obviously know every road in the Bay area. But he lived by two different GPS services he used. He says he used to use his knowledge, but now, getting through the traffic, he always relies on GPS and related traffic information.

    (On the day, he dropped me two blocks from my Hotel -- the walk was faster than the drive.)

  44. Toast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They do realize that this is basically an admission that they are exploiting ignorant people that either don't know any better or have limited options for fair treatment, right? Good god, these companies are the slime of the earth. May the rest in disgrace when they crumble.

  45. Driver Speaks the language the customer wants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Driver should speak the language the customer wants.
    If that is Mandarin, great!
    If it is English, great!

    I'd be pissed if I was in China and a native speaker, but the cab driver only spoke English.

    Why is that different in the UK?

    In a visit to central America for a job, I was given a 15 minute Spanish test - written and oral - before they'd place me. I didn't feel disrespected at all. At the time, Spanish wasn't a language I could speak well, so I was placed in a position where English worked best.

    If Uber has a native Chinese speaker and makes that an available option for customers to request, I see it as a plus for the driver and the customer, provided the driver isn't lying about their skills in any specific language.

  46. MASSIVE goalpost shift by dbIII · · Score: 1

    You are full of crap. I have been to Spain and was served by a non-Spanish speaking waitress (she spoke English and Catalan

    Catalan IS a Spanish language you shameless goalpost shifter.

    1. Re:MASSIVE goalpost shift by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Catalan IS a Spanish language you shameless goalpost shifter.

      Actually, Catalan is more closely related to French.
      So can you cite the Spanish law that requires waitresses to speak fluent Spanish OR Catalan (or Basque)?
      I don't think you can, because no such law exists.

    2. Re:MASSIVE goalpost shift by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I did not say there is a law.

      I said it is a requirement to work in that job. Big difference.

      Catalan is not "more closely" to French. It is basically exactly in the middle between Castilian and Occitan and a significant French influence.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  47. Another MASSIVE goalpost shift by dbIII · · Score: 1
    It doesn't matter what it is related to what matters is that it has been a major language spoken in Spain since before the country of that name existed.

    So can you cite the Spanish law

    Another goalpost shift to avoid admitting deliberate deception.

    You must have utter contempt for the people reading this site when you play such petty little deceptive games that rely on ignorance of the reader.

  48. Better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Give the passengers a language test in all those other languages they'll need to communicate with the drivers...