Slashdot Mirror


Female Engineer Sues Tesla, Describing a Culture Of 'Pervasive Harassment' (theguardian.com)

A female engineer has spoken out about a discrimination lawsuit against Tesla that she filed last year. AJ Vandermeyden, 33, has accused Tesla of ignoring her claims of "pervasive harassment" and says she has suffered "mental distress" and "humiliation." From a report on The Guardian: Vandermeyden, 33, shared her story with the Guardian at a time when Silicon Valley is reeling from the explosive allegations of former Uber engineer Susan Fowler. Offering a rare public account of discrimination from a tech worker who remains employed at her company, Vandermeyden said her dedication to Tesla motivated her to advocate for fair treatment and reforms -- despite the serious risks she knows she faces for going public. "Until somebody stands up, nothing is going to change," she said in a recent interview, her first comments about a discrimination lawsuit she filed last year. "I'm an advocate of Tesla. I really do believe they are doing great things. That said, I can't turn a blind eye if there's something fundamentally wrong going on." Vandermeyden began at Tesla in 2013 and was eventually promoted to a manufacturing engineering position in the general assembly department, which consisted mostly of men and where she was paid less than male engineers whose work she directly took over, according to her complaint.

12 of 360 comments (clear)

  1. Let's take a second and think about this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    "which consisted mostly of men and where she was paid less than male engineers whose work she directly took over" This seems to imply this just because she is a woman, I'm a dude and I've been in this position myself, hell I've even been in a engineering management position and made less than the guys I was in charge of of.

    Sure this all could just be because she's a woman, but there is at least a real possibility that there were other reasons contributing to her situation.

  2. She is not an "Engineer". by Jahoda · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ok, well, first off, this woman is not an "Engineer" in the sense that she holds any academic credentials or certifications (neither am I). The article clearly states she started working at Tesla in 2013, was *promoted* to vehicle assembly. She is an "assembly engineer" in the same way that a guy working on the floor at Ford making IC cars is.

    After this, following claims that she was held to unreasonable performance standards and subject to sexual harassment on the shop floor, , she transfered to the "purchasing department", which Tesla was apparently glad to accomodate.

    These are simple facts which may or may not be relevant to the case, which appears to me that Tesla hired this woman, and has been happy to allow her to shift roles in the company and build her skillset. Apparently, she just purchased a Model-S. I have worked in IT for 15 years, and I sure can't afford a Model-S. So, anyway, sounds like a pretty damned good job to me.

    1. Re: She is not an "Engineer". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      She is an Engineer in the same way that someone working at the Apple Store is a Genius.

    2. Re:She is not an "Engineer". by aicrules · · Score: 5, Insightful

      She definitely shouldn't have mixed the harassment and equal pay claims. That will only hurt her case. The "equal pay" claims will be impossible to prove anything and will make her just look like she nagging and therefore draw more skepticism into her harassment claims. The harassment, if true, is unacceptable. That kind of behavior is impossible to ever get away from completely, but management's reaction to it especially within a company that public, should be way better.

  3. Looks like its a legal specialty now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    >Therese Lawless, Vandermeyden’s lawyer,
    > who represented former Reddit CEO Ellen Pao in her high-profile discrimination lawsuit against venture capital firm Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers.

    Well, we know how that turned out for Ellen.

    >Vandermeyden recently took out a hefty loan to buy the cheapest version of the Model S Tesla car and has a reservation for the upcoming Model 3

    So after launching a potentially very expensive lawsuit you decide to get a "hefty" loan and buy a Model S? Huh.

  4. Re:Horrible...if true by grasshoppa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In my experience, I'd say a majority of sex and gender related claims are false. People use hotbutton issues to throw a fit when things don't go their way. Didn't get the promotion? Obviously it was because of your gender. Group of people laughing near you? They're obviously making fun of you. and so on...and so on.

    That said, I have seen situations of real, honest to goodness harassment and discrimination. Worse, I've seen companies try to "quietly" handle it ( ie: hush it up ). Those who step up and refuse to be victims have my utmost respect.

    However, they appear to be the minority.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
  5. Re:Huh? Harassment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Agreed. Living in California. My wife is French. In her own words "most men here don't seem to have any balls" Its amazing how many guys are afraid to look at and try to interact with women (regardless if they are married or single); so many US men have been conditioned to be soft/nurturing types. And women have become conditioned to believe any male interaction is harassment. However, many women actually like guys who act like men and give women attention. Not talking about the attention from aggressive alpha-males who are macho and groping. Rather, guys who understand and appreciate that women are different than men and rejoice in the feminine side.

  6. Re:Shop mentality vs office mentality by Archfeld · · Score: 5, Informative

    I was working in a print shop many years ago, and as far as I was aware there were only 2 of us in the area, both guys, and we were telling blond jokes. An hour or so later my companion and I were summoned to the department directors office and told that we had been the subject of a sexual harassment complaint for telling inappropriate joke at work. A women had let herself in the back door and was literally stealing special forms paper and had overheard us telling the jokes and complained to management. We, both guys were forced to take a sexual harassment education class and issue a formal apology to a woman who was then fired for stealing supplies. The bottom line is it is not how you intend the joke or to whom you are directing it to, but how anyone who hears it interprets it, whether you intended them to hear it or not.

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  7. Re:Shop mentality vs office mentality by TWX · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think they subjected you two to the sexual harassment classes so that they would have latitude to fire her.

    My workplace can be very uptight and on first offenses that don't involve physical contact they usually just leave it with a warning. It sounds like they figured they would have to play rules-lawyer all of the way around in order to preclude her from having grounds to complain for being fired when she was doing what she wasn't supposed to be doing.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  8. Wolf-crying? by lucaiaco · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have been working in the US for several years, and I have noticed this dangerous trend of constantly labeling as misogynist or racist behavior anything that targets a woman or a minority for things that have nothing to do with race or gender. As an outsider (I am from Europe, and worked in Asia), I can say that nowhere I have seen such an obsession with these two topics. If a white person sucks, and get fired, you talk about the actual causes of the firing. If it's a woman or a minority doesn't get hired, or get fired, it's often sexism and racism. I am sure there are real cases of racism and maybe even sexism, but this constant and indiscriminate wolf-crying is going to delegitimize real victims and actually make people hire fewer of these people.

    If I were to hire in this country, I'd be damn sure not to hire a woman or a minority which had a background in social justice (even a blog post or some classes in college would be a no go). There is just a chance that the person is some sort of fanatic. It sounds awful, but from what I can tell that equates to having a ticking bomb ready to explode under my ass. I don't care what your race or your ethnicity is, if shit hits the fan bad things may happen, and the last thing I would want is to have a lawsuit for discrimination and a wave of bad publicity for my business. Aww, yes, I am a such an awful person. Well, sorry, and welcome to the real world.

  9. I hope this doesn't hurt my chance at promotion by bobm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    from the article:

    She is hopeful her lawsuit and public comments wonâ(TM)t end her career at a company she loves.

    Would a sane person really think that suing the company they work for won't impact their future with the company?

  10. Re:Huh? Harassment? by bobbied · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Who has the power here?

    No no. Sexual harassment is a very specific kind of action and although it seems like the accuser has all the say about this, in most places I've worked there where clearly defined parameters necessary to establish that harassment actually took place. In order for it to be harassment it must be unwanted behavior that is either obviously harassing or behavior that continues AFTER it was communicated it was unwelcome.

    Asking a peer out on a date, once, is not harassment. Continuing to ask after being told to stop asking IS harassment. Giving complements on appearance or dress is not harassment, unless it's communicated that it's unwelcome. Telling off color jokes *might* be harassment if the joke is obviously inappropriate for the office, continuing to do so after somebody asks you to stop IS a problem.

    The biggest issue most folks have understanding this is with manager subordinate relationships. This is where things get dicey at times because the subordinate may not feel free to object. The smart manager stays clear of such entanglements and complications by making it a policy NOT to fraternize with the lower ranks. It is here where most of the serious mistakes and career ending events happen. Don't be stupid and don't give a chance for any false accusations to gain root by always having your guard up. Have "private" meetings in public places, offices with windows or don't close your door, make sure your office has windows and if you have an admin that they can observe what's happening in your office. DON'T socialize ALONE with your subordinate, but always make sure there is a group or other parties there. Also, if you catch wind of ANY inappropriate possibly harassing behavior among your subordinates, dig out the HR mandated training because it didn't take the first time and DEAL with the behavior BEFORE it gets out of hand. Project professional behavior and expect the same.

    It's not hard, just don't be stupid, keep it professional and if you are the boss, keep witnesses around when dealing with subordinates.

    If you do these things: 1. Keep things professional, 2. Stop any behavior when asked, 3. keep your interactions with subordinates appropriate and in public view, you won't have an issue when HR receives a complaint. If you DO have an issue and you where not caught being stupid, then you need to bail anyway because HR is messed up where you work.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101