Slashdot Mirror


New Scientific Test Finds Up To 75 Liters of Urine In Public Pools (theguardian.com)

Scientists have developed a test designed to estimate how much urine has been covertly added to a large volume of water. "The test works by measuring the concentration of an artificial sweetener, acesulfame potassium (ACE), that is commonly found in processed food and passed through the body unaltered," reports The Guardian. The findings are published in the American Chemical Society journal. From the report: After tracking the levels of the sweetener in two public pools in Canada over a three-week period they calculated that swimmers had released 75 liters of urine -- enough to fill a medium-sized dustbin -- into a large pool (about 830,000 liters, one-third the size of an Olympic pool) and 30 liters into a second pool, around half the size of the first. Although the researchers were unable to confirm exactly what fraction of visitors were choosing to quietly relieve themselves in the water rather than making the shivery trip to the changing rooms, the results suggest that the urine content was being topped up several times each day. The findings make for unwelcome reading, but swimmers might find some comfort in the measurements from eight hot tubs, which were found to have far higher urine levels. One hotel Jacuzzi had more than three times the concentration of sweetener than in the worst swimming pool. In total, the team sampled 31 different pools and tubs in two Canadian cities and found ACE to be present in 100% of the samples, with concentrations up to 570 times the background level in tap water samples. They used the average ACE concentration in Canadian urine to convert their measurements into approximate volumes of urine.

153 of 215 comments (clear)

  1. No shit by rossdee · · Score: 3, Funny

    nope, no shit, just pee

    1. Re:No shit by rickyslashdot · · Score: 1

      . . . and we go directly from sweet tea to sweet pee.
      Now THAT's science.

      --
      redneck geek
    2. Re:No shit by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      Yes, but what part of it is actually from sweat? Urine ~= sweat

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    3. Re:No shit by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And frankly, who gives a shit.

      You sweat the same stuff as you get in pee. You're covered in this stuff already. You're probably get more of someone else's on you from shaking hands with someone than you do from jumping in the pool.

      And unless you have a bladder infection, pee is sterile.

      There's no reason for concern, and what's more, people don't want to know. There was a vogue for putting chemicals in the pool that turned purple when they mixed with pee. Guess what? No-one uses them any more, because thinking about swimming in someone else's pee is far more of a (mental) health hazard than actually swimming in someone else's (highly diluted) pee.

    4. Re:No shit by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Funny

      I like the bit about hotel Jacuzzis being much worse. Pee in Jacuzzis is obviously done deliberately.

      "Stop peeing in the pool, kid!"

      "But ... everybody does it!"

      "Yeah but not from the diving board..."

      --
      No sig today...
    5. Re:No shit by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Also interesting is that this gives us a demographic, and ... it's not _just_ the beer drinkers that pee in Hotel Jacuzzis.

      --
      No sig today...
    6. Re: No shit by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yep, I have renal insufficiency, and I was curious if sweating would help lower blood urea nitrogen, uric acid, and serum phosphorus, and sure enough, I found an NIH white paper that found that sweat has higher amounts of them (and creatinine, and potassium) than blood.

      So, I deliberately spend relatively long periods in the hot tub to help excrete fluids and electrolytes. In other words, I pee in the hot tub just because of the fact that I'm sitting in it.

      And my lab results turn out better, not to mention I get less edema in my legs, thus I can tolerate drinking more water.

    7. Re:No shit by Golddess · · Score: 2

      Yes, sweat contains urea. But they didn't measure urea, they measured acesulfame potassium. Does sweat contain acesulfame potassium? That I do not know the answer to, and a quick google does not reveal the answer either.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    8. Re:No shit by avandesande · · Score: 1

      Yes I have to wonder if this acetamine stuff is also being sweated out....

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    9. Re:No shit by alleycat0 · · Score: 1

      Ummm, about that chemical that turns purple when pee is detected: From Snopes:
      "No matter what your parents might have told you, there isn’t any magical chemical that when added to a swimming pool will reveal the presence of urine in the water by producing a brightly-colored cloud."

      --
      I am not a number - I am a free man!
    10. Re: No shit by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      I had the same curiosity regarding gout, which is a buildup of uric acid. The two attacks I had, a year apart, were both during winter months, during periods of relative inactivity. I theorized if I spent more time working up a sweat, that might help flush it out of my system. I didn't go so far as to research it, but some experimental evidence seemed to suggest it helped.

    11. Re:No shit by samkass · · Score: 1

      You sweat the same stuff as you get in pee.

      ...which was my thought when I read about how much more of the substance was in a hot tub. How do they know they weren't just measuring sweat?

      --
      E pluribus unum
    12. Re:No shit by alistair1978 · · Score: 1

      There was a vogue for putting chemicals in the pool that turned purple when they mixed with pee.

      tl;dr? "Contrary to the warning many children are given – that a coloured cloud will appear around them if they pee – there is currently no urine indicator dye that could be used in a pool." "the most common pool myth of all time"

    13. Re:No shit by unrtst · · Score: 1

      The pool in my back yard is clean, maintained and covered. Nobody uses it as a toilet.

      Maybe that's true, but I'd be willing to wager that many home pools would rank near the worst pee ridden pools. Kids playing in them all summer, and they're much smaller. Outdoor pools also have increased evaporation versus indoor pool (I'm not sure what evaporates fastest, but I'm willing to bet there is stuff in pee that sticks around longer than water), and the vast majority of personal pools are outside.

      I suspect the ranking is something like:
      Home pool used only by you and your significant other, and both of you are disgusted by peeing in pools = cleanest.
      Private olympic pool used solely for swimming laps and/or diving = low levels of pee
      Private/club pool used for mix of training and recreation = medium level of pee
      Rarely used hotel pool ... somewhere in here
      Public pool / waterpark = lots of pee
      Well used hotel pool = lots of pee
      Hotel jacuzi = golden shower
      Home pool used by kids = OMGPee

      I'm sure they all vary case-by-case, but if no one is peeing in your pool, I doubt anyone is using it either.

    14. Re:No shit by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      They concentrated on that one because it passes through the human body unaltered, and it's unlikely to be found in the environment beyond the levels that have become common in water supplies. Other artificial sweeteners break down and the metabolic products might be difficult to tell apart from other things. Their estimate could be off by a factor of two in either direction if swimmers at those pools are not representative of the general Canadian population; they might consume more or less ACE than the national average.

    15. Re:No shit by ZahrGnosis · · Score: 1

      So... if someone just spilled a diet sweet tea in a pool, how much would that skew these results? Because I genuinely bet that happens a lot too.

  2. Look at the bright side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    They don't have piss poor swimming pools in Canada.

    1. Re:Look at the bright side by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's a swimming pool for half of August. The rest of the year it's a skating rink.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  3. As a percentage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That works out to around 0.009% urine content.

    I can live with that.

    Captcha: "manure"

    1. Re: As a percentage by PoopJuggler · · Score: 2

      Public pools are fucking disgusting. Think about swimming around in all the fecal matter and snot and pubic hairs and vagina juice and spit and other horrible things that humans secrete.

    2. Re: As a percentage by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      Try natural water, rather than sanitized chlorinated pools. Fish SHIT in it!

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    3. Re: As a percentage by dougdonovan · · Score: 1

      Public pools are fucking disgusting. ok, i'm from arizona where it should be illegal to not have a pool that comes with the house due to the obvious heat but that would be arrogant. fortunately, we have a pool in our back yard that yes, both my wife and i take care of so we don't have to deal with the public or pool cleaning contractors even in our so-called medium neighborhood. we actually live about 5 miles away from what the community calls the ghetto where they are happy with the old fashioned garden hose and a $100 blow up pool, it keeps the kids happy and thats what matters. some of our neighbors actually hire contractors to clean their pools and the horror stories are endless in fact, my wife has actually taken the time to help some of our neighbors with their pools. personally, you get what you invest it.

    4. Re:As a percentage by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      It's not 75 liters, total. It's 25 liters per week. It means that the custodian probably does not ever need to refill the pool. And due to evaporation 100 percent of the water eventually is just bleached pee.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    5. Re: As a percentage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Public pools are fucking disgusting.

      A bit of germs and/or dirt do not constitute "disgusting", rather this is the natural state of affairs for humans and other animals.

      People who are paranoid germaphobes and expect their world to be sterile are fucking weird.

    6. Re: As a percentage by dougdonovan · · Score: 1

      New Scientific Test Finds Up To 75 Liters of Urine In Public Pools by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 02, 2017 @04:54AM (#53960983) I Thought you said, "I am from Arizona, where it would be illegal." And then I thought, Why not move back to Mexico? But then I saw you were talking about pools. And the I thought Oh... AC, what you need to do is simply read, understand and comprehend what the issue is about before you reply.

    7. Re:As a percentage by Joce640k · · Score: 2

      So water evaporates, pee does not?

      (facepalm)

      "Pee" isn't an element.

      "Pee" is water with stuff dissolved in it. The pee water evaporates. The pee solutes do not. This process concentrates the solutes.

      --
      No sig today...
    8. Re:As a percentage by quantaman · · Score: 1

      That works out to around 0.009% urine content.

      I can live with that.

      Captcha: "manure"

      Thank you for calculating that.

      I've see the figures a bunch of time and for some reason kept reading it as 75K litres.

      Needless to say, I wasn't planning on ever swimming again.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    9. Re: As a percentage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Public pools are fucking disgusting. Think about swimming around in all the fecal matter and snot and pubic hairs and vagina juice and spit and other horrible things that humans secrete.

      I don't mind swimming around in vagina juice.

    10. Re: As a percentage by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I used to live in AZ, but I never had my own pool What are these horror stories with pool-cleaning contractors that you speak of? I'm genuinely curious.

    11. Re:As a percentage by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      The pee water evaporates. The pee solutes do not. This process concentrates the solutes.

      Then there are these things pools have called, filter and sanitation systems.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    12. Re:As a percentage by dpidcoe · · Score: 1

      solutes don't generally separate from the solution via filtering unless you precipitate them out first.

    13. Re:As a percentage by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      What about Osmotic filters?

      --
      No sig today...
    14. Re:As a percentage by dpidcoe · · Score: 1

      I actually hadn't considered those, my only experience with pool filtration is the cheaper end of the consumer level stuff and I just sort of assumed big community pools were the same but on a larger scale.

    15. Re: As a percentage by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Likely, not using enough chemicals, so the pools turn funny colors or the pH balance is off causing rashes or other irritation.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  4. Wait, what? by Notabadguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    First - this is a copy/paste from Soylent. I thought they were supposed to be trying to be like Slashdot, not the other way around? We're used to mainstream news beating Slashdot to the punch by days, but when our own RIPOFF site has news before we do, that Slashdot copies...WHAT THE ABSOLUTE FUCK?!?

    Also...this test only works for people who are using one particular artificial sweetener. Since the discussion started around Olympic swimmers - and this test probably wouldn't work in Olympic pools since those swimmers are on rigorous diets...

    Welp, I guess we just shift it to try being more topical.

    1. Re:Wait, what? by Gussington · · Score: 1

      ...and this test probably wouldn't work in Olympic pools since those swimmers are on rigorous diets...

      You do know that an "Olympic pool" is referring to the size, not the fact that only Olympians can swim in them? For 99.99% of their life, an Olympic pool is used by regular pool pissing patrons.

    2. Re:Wait, what? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      First - this is a copy/paste from Soylent.

      Are you aware how this site works and the fact that there are some people contributing stories to both of them?

    3. Re:Wait, what? by Notabadguy · · Score: 1

      ...and this test probably wouldn't work in Olympic pools since those swimmers are on rigorous diets...

      You do know that an "Olympic pool" is referring to the size, not the fact that only Olympians can swim in them? For 99.99% of their life, an Olympic pool is used by regular pool pissing patrons.

      Yes....I realize that. But like I said, the original story started around olympic swimmers admitting to peeing in the pool. Not non-olympic swimmers peeing in an olympic sized pool.

    4. Re:Wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If they tested on a pool used by Olympic swimmers, maybe they'd find traces of PEDs.

    5. Re:Wait, what? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      First - this is a copy/paste from Soylent. I thought they were supposed to be trying to be like Slashdot, not the other way around? We're used to mainstream news beating Slashdot to the punch by days, but when our own RIPOFF site has news before we do, that Slashdot copies...WHAT THE ABSOLUTE FUCK?!?

      This just shows how Slashdot is circling the drain. SoylentNews has been better than Slashdot in many ways for quite some time now, most especially with its software and how the user interface works.

      One gigantic improvement they made: you can both moderate and comment in the same story. I *never* moderate on this site because of that moronic rule, and the moderation here is obviously shit, largely because of that most likely. Anyone who can make good moderations is likely to also have something to say, so forcing them to choose one or the other is simply stupid and counterproductive. On the other site, you're perfectly able to do both, just not directly in the same thread (e.g., you can't down-mod someone who responded to your post, because that's obviously biased).

      There's also far less AC trolls over there, and there's no APK filling the place up with his spam and insanity. The main downsides to SN are 1) there just aren't as many commenters, and 2) there's a few ultra-right-wing extremists (much worse than the ones here) who've made a home there.

    6. Re:Wait, what? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      First - this is a copy/paste from Soylent.

      Are you aware how this site works and the fact that there are some people contributing stories to both of them?

      I know how it works: Soylent is people!

      Or is that just the Green kind?

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  5. Those kind of article stick into our head forever! by JcMorin · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sometimes. I would prefer to enjoy life and be a total ignorant. Yet slashdot remind me that reality is not always good to know. That said, once you learn it, you never forget it! Happy swimming!

  6. What about Ritz Carlton Bed sheets? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So what's the concentration in bedsheets at the Ritz Carlton Moscow?

    I'm just asking.

  7. "enough to fill a medium-sized dustbin" by DogDude · · Score: 2

    What the fuck is a "medium-sized dustbin"? That's a truly bizarre comparison to make in order to describe a volume of liquid.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:"enough to fill a medium-sized dustbin" by swb · · Score: 4, Funny

      Duh, just convert it to imperial pecks and you'll instantly visualize it as a dustbin.

    2. Re:"enough to fill a medium-sized dustbin" by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

      The term is British for trash can.

    3. Re:"enough to fill a medium-sized dustbin" by fredrated · · Score: 1

      Is 'dustbins' metric or something?

    4. Re:"enough to fill a medium-sized dustbin" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Think of it in the terms of how much semen your mom packs away every night.

    5. Re:"enough to fill a medium-sized dustbin" by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

      One pound of unobtainium can weigh over a million pounds, so I guess it makes sense.

    6. Re:"enough to fill a medium-sized dustbin" by dmomo · · Score: 1

      I prefer my measurements in metric assloads for volume, shit-tons for weight, and Libraries of Congress for data.

    7. Re: "enough to fill a medium-sized dustbin" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Guys, let me answer that one. I'm an expert.

      I recently upgraded my kitchen trash can, which caused me to shop for bags rather more carefully than ever before. As far as I can tell, the "average" bag is 13 US gallons (average=seen most frequently on the shelves), which is equivalent to 50 liters. So, these scientists are a little off in their conversion since 75 liters of piss equals about 1.5 dust bins (trash cans)

    8. Re: "enough to fill a medium-sized dustbin" by ChrisMaple · · Score: 2

      Thank you for your dustbin of history ... oops ... history of dustbin.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    9. Re:"enough to fill a medium-sized dustbin" by arth1 · · Score: 2

      What the fuck is a "medium-sized dustbin"?

      One you can fit an occult practitioner into.

    10. Re:"enough to fill a medium-sized dustbin" by Kellamity · · Score: 1
      I said the same thing last week when something in another article was described as the size of a 'baby aspirin'. What the fuck is that and how big is it??

      In my mind, a dustbin is a small bin you might sweep into. A medium sized one wouldn't be very big. Maybe they are talking about a dumpster??

    11. Re:"enough to fill a medium-sized dustbin" by gijoel · · Score: 1

      1/100,000 of a library of congress.

    12. Re:"enough to fill a medium-sized dustbin" by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      What the fuck is a "medium-sized dustbin"?

      I assumed that was some imperial unit given that we had metric numbers in the post for once (go slashdot!)

    13. Re:"enough to fill a medium-sized dustbin" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's a weird unit. If it helps, it's about the equivalent in volume to a Volkswagen Beetle trunk.

    14. Re:"enough to fill a medium-sized dustbin" by Squiffy · · Score: 1

      75 liters is a cube about 42 cm or 17 inches on a side.

    15. Re:"enough to fill a medium-sized dustbin" by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      http://www.britishbins.co.uk/d...

      Traditional galvanised bin is 45cm diameter wide and 60 cm high or 18 inches by 24 inches
      1.5 feet by 2 feet high and holds around 80 litres. just over 21 american gallons.
      17.6 british gallons.

    16. Re:"enough to fill a medium-sized dustbin" by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      It's a receptacle that holds around 75 litres :)

      More serious answer - a trash can - It's in the Guardian so aimed at a British audience that would have no trouble visualising this.

    17. Re:"enough to fill a medium-sized dustbin" by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      Many Canadians use British language. They generally use the British spellings of many words (such as colour, defence, realise). In the case of trash can / dustbin, both terms are in common use in Canada, probably because of the influence of that big place south of the border; in England you would rarely encounter trash can.

    18. Re:"enough to fill a medium-sized dustbin" by vandamme · · Score: 1

      No, it's an Imperial Dustbin.

  8. So what? by msauve · · Score: 1

    Urine, although not sterile as often thought, is pretty close to it. Pool chlorine takes care of the rest.

    To quote William Claude Dukenfield, "I don't drink water. Fish fuck in it."

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    1. Re:So what? by lucm · · Score: 1

      To quote William Claude Dukenfield, "I don't drink water. Fish fuck in it."

      Technically, Claude is wrong. For the most part fish don't really fuck; what they do is more like synchronized masturbation with no physical contact. That may or may not be more disgusting, depending on your personal preferences.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    2. Re:So what? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      It depends on the skill and funding for a lot of "expensive" testing by a city or state government.
      Or some contractor showing up to do a test and add more chlorine (or other method) been used in time and on time.
      Wait for the related heath issues and risk some member of the local press do their own testing..

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    3. Re:So what? by execthis · · Score: 1

      Actually what is the chemistry involved? Does the chlorine bond with the ammonium in urine to form a salt or something?

    4. Re:So what? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Actually what is the chemistry involved? Does the chlorine bond with the ammonium in urine to form a salt or something?

      No, the purpose of the chlorine compound added to pools is to kill bacteria and fungus.

      It's bad to urinate in chlorinated pools, because the chlorine reacts with the high carbamide content in urine to form cyanogen chloride, which is an extremely poisonous biological warfare blood gas, and nitrogen trichloride, which can cause neurological disorders.

    5. Re:So what? by execthis · · Score: 1

      Very illuminating!

      What about the reaction between urine and the newer sterilization agents that are being used - I think they are now oxygen-based? Lately most pools and spas I've been seem to have shifted away from chlorine.

    6. Re:So what? by EzInKy · · Score: 1

      Does this "ACE" stuff also exit the body through the sweat glands?

      They have inhibitors for that.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    7. Re:So what? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      And honey is bee barf. And you don't even want to know where that milk comes from.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re:So what? by Squiffy · · Score: 1

      Fresh urine contains more urea than anything else. It's C=O with a couple of NH2 groups coming off the C. There are also some cations in there.

      Bleach is NaOCl.

      I'm not a chemist, I'm just guessing for the fun of it. I think the nitrogens end up getting oxidized you end up with some N2 and CO2.

      Someone who knows more than I do should chime in.

    9. Re:So what? by Squiffy · · Score: 1

      CNCl and NCl3 have positive delta H. Why would they be stable in a pool of water? CN- also has positive delta H. Why would it form when there's already a perfectly stable C=O?

  9. 75 liters is a lot. by Snufu · · Score: 1

    But I think I can reach 100 liters in time for the Tokyo 2020 Olympics.

  10. So... 90 PPM ? by Tehrasha · · Score: 2

    ...The human tongue cannot taste salt until the PPM is around 5000.

    1. Re:So... 90 PPM ? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Pee Per Million?

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:So... 90 PPM ? by execthis · · Score: 2

      I don't know about that. I know that the level for olfactory detection of chlorine gas is around 6 ppm.

  11. Up To... by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    this is a WiFi contract

  12. Re:Didn't South Park already do this? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1
    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  13. Of course just knowing is gross, but... by swb · · Score: 5, Informative

    ..it's 5 hundredths of a percent of the water volume. And since urine is 95% water, you're talking about less than 4 liters out of nearly a million liters of water. It wouldn't surprise me if the mass of dead skin or even hair was greater than non-aqueous urine components.

    And since our swimsuits aren't hermetically sealed against our bodies, I'd wager there's some measurable amount of fecal matter in the pool too. Maybe some vaginal discharge and/or menstrual fluid, too. And you can't discount the amount of mucus and other sinus discharges along with some saliva from the people who like all of the above so much they get water in their mouths.

    But in spite of all this (assuming the filtration and chlorination systems are working), the water in the pool is still way cleaner than most other bodies of water people swim in.

    I've seen pictures of the Ganges that make me retch and people *bathe* in that water.

    1. Re:Of course just knowing is gross, but... by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      If you smell "chlorine" it is because there isn't enough.

    2. Re:Of course just knowing is gross, but... by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Well yes, people are dirty slimy pussy bloody hairy pussy shitty animals after all. So are all other living creatures. Staying away from all bodies of water is a good idea if contact with all that bothers one.

    3. Re:Of course just knowing is gross, but... by execthis · · Score: 1

      ..it's 5 hundredths of a percent of the water volume. And since urine is 95% water, you're talking about less than 4 liters out of nearly a million liters of water. It wouldn't surprise me if the mass of dead skin or even hair was greater than non-aqueous urine components.

      sounds like a cool name for a band

    4. Re:Of course just knowing is gross, but... by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      Except that the filtration and *chlorination* systems are often NOT up to par, certainly not in a manner that will kill, well, shit, cholera, skin disease, etc.
      If I don't smell chlorine in the air, i don't get in the pool.
      If I don't both feel and taste the hints of chlorine in the pool, i get out.

      What's hilarious about this comment is how utter ignorance actually results in the OPPOSITE behavior of what you desire. If you smell chlorine and the water stings your eyes, etc., it's chemical proof that (1) the pool is likely not be being treated correctly and/or (2) the pool has elevated concentrations of urine, sweat, and other bodily junk -- which produce the chemical byproducts that you smell. That's NOT the chlorine itself -- it's a sign NOT to go into the water if you're fearful of those things.

      If the pool "stinks of chlorine," it's likely much more full of urine.

    5. Re:Of course just knowing is gross, but... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      [urine only] 5 hundredths of a percent of the water volume...It wouldn't surprise me if the mass of dead skin or even hair was greater than non-aqueous urine components...

      You are not helping. It's like clicking on a goatse link hoping to find a better picture.

    6. Re:Of course just knowing is gross, but... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It's reacting with urea, which is also present in sweat, you ignoramus. And chlorine does not actually smell like a swimming pool.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    7. Re:Of course just knowing is gross, but... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Talking of hair, I took my kids for a swimming lesson last week. The pool has a strict policy that you have to wear those stupid hats.

      Anyway there's this guy there, tribal tattooed hipster twat, with a beard you could lose a badger in. And then he gets out and takes the hat off and he's as bald as two fucking coots.

      Tell me, what's the point of this rule, other than "because"?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    8. Re:Of course just knowing is gross, but... by chihowa · · Score: 1

      It's called baleen; he was feeding.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    9. Re:Of course just knowing is gross, but... by epine · · Score: 1

      Fresh urine is sterile. Day old urine, not so much. Mother nature decided not to split hairs and gave us more or less the same revulsion to both. Besides, you shouldn't drink too much fresh urine, no matter how sterile. It's hard on the kidneys (which is way less hard on the body than thermal runaway due to terminal dehydration, so don't let your camel spill a drop).

      In any kind of debate about purity, what instantly kicks into gear is a purity spectacle, because we all want to brag about our elite and inviolable pea-under-the-mattress gross-out threshold.

      It's a method of social signalling where we implicitly brag about being clean, clean, clean.

      For precisely the same reason that long hair on women is a prized signal: many dietary deficiencies make hair brittle, and thus long, even, healthy hair impossible to maintain. It takes years and years to grow hair out, so it can't be faked anytime soon after you've be pogromized (I am clean! I am consistently well-fed! I am not the reviled underclass!)

      The social side of our disgust reflex is 75% purity theatre.

      The other 25% is functional innumeracy. "I'm not actually very good at working out the real risks here, so I'm just rolling with optimal optics." It's thus important to make this signal look extremely automatic, and not calculated, otherwise even the dull knives begin to notice how it conflates with risk-assessment innumeracy.

      Then you get this group of people who become so practiced at making their every emotional ripple look automatic and non-negotiable, they manage to self-destruct any form of ironic detachment concerning their internal emotional messengers. "I'm just playing the cards as they lie, emotions are never wrong—oh, those, poor, mangled trees."

      Okay, honeybun, emotions are an evolutionary tool, and God took many shortcuts in order to pack our many survival instincts into such a small suitcase, e.g. cheesecake as an absolute good. (Or, maybe, constant war with your own self-image is a covert fitness fillip. Who can say, really? Human sexual drama moves in mysterious ways.)

      Does a Urine-Revealing Pool Chemical Exist?

      No, but we say it does to the worst of the usual suspects. By any means available, give the little buggers a sense of their every move always being watched (fine print: may contribute to risk-assessment innumeracy later in life—but who's counting? Only bunch of snivelling geeks, who are easy enough to ward off anyway with a mere half-hour ritual in front of the bathroom mirror every morning.)

      Trump is obsessed with what his staff wears. Don't let their costumes distract you.

      In a striking case of character assassination by tailoring, Sean Spicer, the president's freshly appointed press secretary, stepped to the podium over the weekend for a briefing that disappointed the president, The Washington Post later reported. He was wearing a gray pinstriped suit jacket that looked as though it had been hurriedly borrowed from a man twice his size. The sleeves were sloppy; the collar didn't fit; the fabric looked cheap. The tie was poorly knotted. The shirt collar was so snug that his neck overflowed its boundaries. Spicer's attire was not just a tad ill-fitting. It was distracting and sloppy. It epitomized the cliche style of the used-car salesman. Spicer's clothes wholly undercut a message that was already riddled with falsehoods.

      Of the entire administration, only Steve Bannon looks properly equipped to survive a month in the Bedouin desert.

  14. Re:Those kind of article stick into our head forev by lucm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    At least it's outside your body. Think of what happens when you go to a public bathroom that smells bad: what you're breathing was previously inside someone. I mean, the actual molecules that are entering your nose used to be part of someone else digestive system. Maybe even more than one person.

    That's a lot worse than a bucket of piss diluted in a big pool filled with chlorine.

    --
    lucm, indeed.
  15. Re:My name is Joe, and I am Canadian. by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 1

    I'm not a Starfleet commander, or T.J. Hooker. I don't
    live on Starship NCC-170... , or own a phaser. I don't
    know anybody named Bones, Sulu, or Spock (picture of Dr.
    Benjamin Spock is shown on screen behind him). And no,
    I've never had green alien sex, but I'm sure it'd be
    quite an evening. (Pomp and Circumstance begins playing.)
    I speak English and French, not Klingon! I drink
    Labatt's, not Romulan ale! And when someone says to me
    'live long and prosper', I seriously mean it when I say,
    'get a life'. My doctor's name is not McCoy, it's
    Ginsberg (nude picture of Dr. Ginsberg shown on screen).
    And tribbles were puppets, not real animals. PUPPETS! And
    when I speak, I never, ever talk like Every. Word. Is.
    Its. Own. Sentence. I live in California, but I was
    raised in Montreal. And I believe in priceline.com, where
    you never have to pay full price for airline tickets,
    hotels, and car rentals! I've appeared onstage at
    Stratford, at Carnegie Hall, Albert Hall, and the
    Monkland Theatre in NDG. And, yes, I've gone where no man
    has gone before, but... I was in Mexico and her father
    gave me permission! My name is William Shatner, and I am
    Canadian!

    p.s. I also enjoy pissing in swimming pools.

    Checkov, Load photons and fire on that disgusting bastard.

    --
    _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
  16. Asparagus by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I never really liked swimming in public pools. But I've swum in the Atlantic & Pacific Oceans, the Mediterranean, Adriatic and Baltic Seas and the Gulf of Mexico, and fish fuck in all those places, so really, it's a wash.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Asparagus by Strider- · · Score: 1

      Hey, and the city of Victoria, BC (among others) still dumps its sewage straight into it too, poop and all.

      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
    2. Re:Asparagus by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      OTOH, the places with the most pollution have the least fish.

      I personally am not squeamish about fish. I've eaten fish eggs, and I knew what they were when I ate them!

      Competing with fish fucking: dinosaur pee!

  17. Re:The way to deal with this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "Heat" that thermal cameras see is far-infrared light, and it doesn't pass though most dense materials, including water.

  18. Re:Those kind of article stick into our head forev by gweilo8888 · · Score: 2

    It's nonsensical fear-mongering, nothing more. (That's something of a Slashdot specialty, these days.)

    75 liters of urine in an 830,000-liter pool is 90 parts per million. Even at the tripled concentration of the hotel jacuzzi, that's still only 271 parts per million. Choosing a random model (the J-335, which fits five people and has a typical fill capacity of 1,249 liters, that's a grand total of 1.4 cups of pee in the entire jacuzzi, and that's the worst sample they could find, mind you.

    It's extremely diluted, to the point where even if you drank the water it would almost certainly have no effect on you.

  19. pretty clean pool then by gravewax · · Score: 1

    They must cycle the water in the pool regularly or not have many kids in it, would have expected it to several times that volume

    1. Re:pretty clean pool then by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Or maybe they're not measuring properly. They're only looking for one specific artificial sweetener. So people who don't consume foods with that sweetener will have their urine go undetected.

      That said, the idea of a kids-free pool is very attractive.

    2. Re:pretty clean pool then by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      If you're referring to the people being attractive, that's not what I'm talking about. I'm referring to the pools being kid-free as being an attractive feature: much less urine in the pool, no floating turds, no noisy brats running around and screaming for no reason, etc. This isn't to say that kids are all bad, but since no one seems to be able to come up with a way of limiting places to only the well-behaved kids, not having any kids at all is the next best solution.

  20. Thirsty!!! by wkwilley2 · · Score: 1

    Where's Bear Grylls when you need him?

    --
    Have you ever fallen asleep at the keybhanusdiog?
  21. What about ... by Tjp($)pjT · · Score: 1

    What about the concentration of ACE in sweat. Urine isn't the only liquid we 'sapiens ooze ...

    --
    - Tjp

    I am in wallow with my inner money grubbing capitalistic pig. ... Oink!

  22. Confounding factors by russotto · · Score: 1

    So if I took perfectly clean water and spilled an ounce of Coke Zero into it, how much urine wold that be measured as?

    1. Re:Confounding factors by burtosis · · Score: 1

      So if I took perfectly clean water and spilled an ounce of Coke Zero into it, how much urine wold that be measured as?

      Slightly less than if you opened a snickers bar, slipped it into the pool, then when the screaming and pointing erupted scream "I'll save you all" and take a big bite out of it.

    2. Re:Confounding factors by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Geez, you can't even get the joke right. It's an "Oh Henry!" bar, look at some images and you'll understand.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  23. Re:shit science, ignores sweat by Imrik · · Score: 1

    More importantly, what makes them think the people urinating in the pool are typical Canadians as far as ACE consumption?

    I suspect that the people urinating in the pool are, on average, significantly younger than the average Canadian. Both because younger people are more likely to be in the pool and more likely to urinate in it. Younger people will frequently have significantly different diets than older people.

  24. Ocean/Sea? by antdude · · Score: 1

    What about the sea/ocean? Not near the sewers though.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    1. Re:Ocean/Sea? by AC-x · · Score: 1

      Fish pee, fish pee everywhere...

    2. Re:Ocean/Sea? by antdude · · Score: 1

      But is it safe compared to humans'? :P

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    3. Re:Ocean/Sea? by MiniMike · · Score: 1

      Fish drink considerably less diet soda than humans, so according to this test it would be much safer (assuming lower levels of urine == safer).

  25. Re:The way to deal with this by AC-x · · Score: 2

    You do know that stuff doesn't actually exist, right?

  26. some how the mythbusters did not test any thing by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    some how the mythbusters did not test any thing with this.

  27. Re:Those kind of article stick into our head forev by Aighearach · · Score: 1

    "ignoramus"

  28. Re:urinating in reservoir by Aighearach · · Score: 1

    They only emptied it a week early, they didn't really empty the reservoir just because of that. It is a place with lots of water, and water was still removed from the river at the normal rate.

    I know it sounds like a good story if you phrase it just right, but it isn't actually true.

    Another factor is that if you change your operations of the reservoir in response to the vandalism, it encourages a full legal response. A municipal site manager would know that, for sure.

  29. How can they tell? by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

    This is Canada. Are they sure it's pisswater, or is it just that somebody spilled Canadian Beer?

    --
    Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
  30. Re:Those kind of article stick into our head forev by arth1 · · Score: 2

    It's extremely diluted, to the point where even if you drank the water it would almost certainly have no effect on you.

    True, but don't forget the other additions, like spit, snot, semen, blood, sebum, pus, fecal matter, dandruff, pubic hairs and dead skin. The biomass that gets caught by filters is not insignificant, and it has generally been in the pool for a while before it gets sucked into the filters.
    It's relatively safe with chlorination and good immune systems, but still something to remember before opening your mouth in a pool.

  31. Re:Those kind of article stick into our head forev by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Clearly you don't know anything about homeopathic medicine! Water has a memory, so if someone pees in the hot tub, even if you drain all but a teaspoon of the water and refill the tub it will still contain the essence of that person's urine.

  32. Re:The turning point by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    Nonetheless, peeing in a swimming pool is an indication of a sociopath's personality.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  33. Re:The way to deal with this by Kellamity · · Score: 1

    Wait, are you saying an Adam Sandler movie LIED to me?

  34. Re: The way to deal with this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Like what, throw bananas at them?

  35. Just throw in some of that indicator dye... by Clifton+Beach · · Score: 1

    ...that someone still needs to invent

    --
    42 hidden comments
  36. Re: The way to deal with this by EzInKy · · Score: 1

    OP's revenge would be to swim in their toilets?

    --
    Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
  37. Re:Those kind of article stick into our head forev by Freischutz · · Score: 2

    Sometimes. I would prefer to enjoy life and be a total ignorant. Yet slashdot remind me that reality is not always good to know. That said, once you learn it, you never forget it! Happy swimming!

    At least it's outside your body. Think of what happens when you go to a public bathroom that smells bad: what you're breathing was previously inside someone. I mean, the actual molecules that are entering your nose used to be part of someone else digestive system. Maybe even more than one person.

    That's a lot worse than a bucket of piss diluted in a big pool filled with chlorine.

    Seriously? In the case cited 75 liters of urine in a pool containing 830.000 liters of water we have an urine percentage of (75/830.000)*100 = 0.009036145% where 95% of that 0.009036145% urine is sterile water assuming they are talking about 75 liters of factory standard piss as it can be obtained from the manufacturer. The average human being accidentally ingests about 1kg of insect parts each year. That's 1 kg of critters, some of which crawled round on, and fed off of, faecal matter and rotting tissue!!! Ever wondered how delicacies like mouldy cheese and escargot were invented? I'll let you in on a secret, your ancestors fed off of things like rotting meat, ergot infested and otherwise spoiled grain, cats, dogs, insects, rats, mice, insects, slugs, soup made of bones dissolved in sour whey, the list goes on... If you two continue on this trajectory you'll both turn into Howard Hughes.

  38. Hot Tubs by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

    Why do people with hots tubs always have to try and one up everyone else. It's not some kind of pissing contest!

  39. Re:urinating in reservoir by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    This reservoir has a fence round it that's impervious to all animals, does it? And a net over the top to stop dead birds landing in it? Make that a really fine mesh, or live birds could shit in it & insects could get in.

    Now consider how credible the story is.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  40. Re:Dustbin? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    If only someone could invent a kind of interweb where you can type an unknown word in and it finds a definition of it. I'll wager a useful thing like that might be easily worth a hundred of Her Majesty's finest pounds.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  41. Average sweetener consumption by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

    Whats the variation of this? I can't imagine sweetener consumption is so uniform that you can get to those 75l without a huge interval of uncertainity.

    --
    bickerdyke
    1. Re:Average sweetener consumption by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      With a large enough sample size, it is expected to average out.

      75L of urine is a single instance of voiding a full bladder for each of 215 people... people 'randomly selected' from the population by their willingness to urinate in a public pool.

      Sure, you have no idea what the diet of each of those people is, but you can make a pretty good estimate of the average diet.

      Having said that, I'd want to do a quick count of who uses the pool on a weekly basis. If you have a large senior fitness class or get hit by the new-moms-and-babies set, that could explain all the urine... and you could tighten your estimates a bit since you could make better guesses about the average diet.

  42. That's impossible by stud9920 · · Score: 1

    That's not possible: they put a chemical that would react with your pee and give a bright color.

  43. Re:Those kind of article stick into our head forev by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    I would prefer to enjoy life and be a total ignorant.

    How will this make you enjoy a public pool any less? You'll still come out smelling horribly with irritated eyes and skin dying for some moisturiser, and that has nothing to do with the level of urine in the pool. Hell anything that dilutes the chlorine is probably a plus.

  44. Re:Those kind of article stick into our head forev by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    Clearly you don't know that urine has medicinal properties, according to auto urine therapy.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  45. Newer scientific studies show pool water has ... by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    Newer scientific studies show pool water has medicinal properties.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  46. Ig Nobel? by stereoroid · · Score: 2

    I can see this research scoring a nomination for an Ig Nobel Prize in Chemistry this year. For comparison, last year's prize went to Volkswagen AG for their innovative vehicle pollution control measures.

    --
    (this is not a .sig)
  47. Re:Those kind of article stick into our head forev by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

    I like to go to the public bath, or onsen, in Japan. You wash thoroughly, then get into a bath with other people of the same gender, completely naked. Even nudists usually carry a towel or something to sit on because, you know, sweat and all that. In fact the baths are usually pretty hot and you can't help sweating a lot.

    They don't use chlorine or anything like that in the pools. Often it's natural spring water. Somehow it's not a health hazard, although etiquette says you shouldn't drink that water.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  48. In this case, #2 is a distant #2 by jpellino · · Score: 1

    To maintain internal salt/water balance, freshwater fish pretty much constantly excrete liquid waste.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  49. Other factors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What if someone spilled a bit of their diet soda in the pool by accident? How would that impact the numbers? Does that molecule get excreted in sweat, also?

  50. Re:The way to deal with this by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    Along with a number of Nickelodeon TV shows!

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  51. 75L of urine in a pool by Gumbercules!! · · Score: 1

    Which is a real problem in those little seashell pools you get that hold about 80L...

  52. Re: Those kind of article stick into our head fore by TimMD909 · · Score: 1

    I smoke a pack a day which kills my sense of smell enough that this isn't an issue.

  53. 75 liters in 830,000 by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    You really, really, REALLY have to be into homeopathy if you think at that dilution it can have any meaningful effect on you.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  54. Humbly. by joboss · · Score: 2

    Sorry.

  55. Re:Those kind of article stick into our head forev by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    For the life of me, I simply cannot imagine the appeal of sitting around with a bunch of naked dudes, or sharing a bath with them (esp. when many of them are likely to be old, fat, etc.). The thought of it makes me ill.

  56. Re:thank goodness for chlorine by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    How are asshole cops "useful" when you're adult? (Fighting crime, doing investigations, establishing a police presence to deter crime, etc., do not require one to be an asshole.)

  57. Re:My name is Joe, and I am Canadian. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    Yes, but does this really apply across Canada? Canada is a huge country spanning many time zones, from British Columbia (including Victoria island) and Yukon in the west, all the way to Newfoundland in the east. It's wider than the continental US.

    I've only been to Canada a few times, to Ontario and BC and Yukon, but I find it hard to believe that this phenomenon you cite exists all across the country. I don't remember anyone talking like that in BC. And also, that accent reminds me a lot of how people talk in Minnesota, which is in the US. On top of all that, there's a bunch of people in Quebec who speak French, not English.

  58. Re:The turning point by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    About 1,500 years ago, people stopped shitting in the pools and tubs: That was a big turning point for community health.

    Waitaminute... so you're saying that back in those days, when people went to communal pools, it was considered perfectly acceptable to be relaxing in the pool while floating turds were in the water with you?

    I have a hard time imaging humans, even in ancient societies, liking the idea of being in constant contact with other peoples' turds. Even most animals are smart enough to avoid turds and try to dispose of them somewhere outside their home. Housecats bury them in litter if they can, and if they can't find a litterbox will find some back corner somewhere to leave them, unless they're really mad at you and want to express their displeasure by crapping on your pillow.

  59. Re:Those kind of article stick into our head forev by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    And don't forget, after that water evaporates, and then falls back to the Earth as rain, and then is collected and purified and used in the public water system for you to drink, it still contains the essence of that person's urine....

  60. × Medicine Science New Scientific Test Finds by patmcclung · · Score: 1

    "Everybody pees in the pool." Michael Phelps

  61. Re:Those kind of article stick into our head forev by zephvark · · Score: 2

    You'd much rather sit in a bath with thin, muscular young men? Tell us more.

  62. Re:Those kind of article stick into our head forev by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    No, I'd rather sit in a bath by myself at home, or with my girlfriend.

    Though if I absolutely must share a public bath with a bunch of naked people, a bunch of beautiful naked women (and no men) would be tolerable I suppose.

  63. what about spillage? by Chaset · · Score: 1

    That's the first thing I thought, too. I figure people are more likely to spill their drinks in the Jacuzzi, and they'll be more concentrated in the smaller volume, too.

    --
    -- "This world is a comedy to those who think, a tragedy to those who feel."
    1. Re:what about spillage? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Also, likely this molecule doesn't break down easily, so why wouldn't it concentrate in the pool water?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  64. Re:Those kind of article stick into our head forev by lucm · · Score: 1

    If you two continue on this trajectory you'll both turn into Howard Hughes.

    If the price to pay for becoming immensely wealthy is to keep your piss in bottles and swim in a pool of handsanitizer twice a day, sign me up.

    --
    lucm, indeed.
  65. Re:Those kind of article stick into our head forev by Altrag · · Score: 1

    Why? You don't generally go to a public bath with the purpose of staring at other dudes' junk. And even if you do, those same guys might be on the beach tomorrow and other than a small part in the middle of their body you get to see the exact same scenery if that's what you want to look at. Or changing in the locker room at the local swimming pool. Or anywhere else that its common to see guys in little or no clothing.

    I mean I don't see the point of going to a public bath when I have a perfectly good shower at home, but its not because I'm worried about seeing a few dongs (I've got the internet after all.. its not like you can avoid those.) For me, its purely a question of "why bother?" And well, doubly so given that I don't live in a place where public baths really exist (and if there are any, they wouldn't exactly announce themselves given the negative perception of well.. a bunch of naked dudes hanging out together.)

  66. Re:Those kind of article stick into our head forev by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    You don't generally go to a public bath with the purpose of staring at other dudes' junk

    No, but if you're surrounded by them you can't not see it.

    And even if you do, those same guys might be on the beach tomorrow and other than a small part in the middle of their body you get to see the exact same scenery

    I don't know about you, but I don't go to highly crowded beaches. When I do go to a beach, I find a spot that's not too close to other people. A public bath is far, far more crowded than just about any beach I've ever seen. Beaches are outdoors; public baths are not, so naturally there isn't going to be as much room in them.

    Or anywhere else that its common to see guys in little or no clothing.

    Like where? I do my best to avoid crowded locker rooms. I'd honestly be perfectly happy if I could just have my own indoor pool and exercise room and never set foot in a men's locker room again. I find them completely disgusting.

    I mean I don't see the point of going to a public bath when I have a perfectly good shower at home

    Yeah, I agree about this, I was just commenting on the OP's comment about Japanese public baths. I have honestly no idea why people would go to such a thing. But it's not just them; European or European-style saunas are the same way. Yuk.

    they wouldn't exactly announce themselves given the negative perception of well.. a bunch of naked dudes hanging out together.

    See, this is exactly my point. Why would a bunch of supposedly-straight dudes want to get naked and hang out together? It boggles my mind. I don't even care much for hanging out with other men when we're all fully clothed.

  67. Re:Those kind of article stick into our head forev by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

    Their method should lead to a reasonably accurate result. They started with the average concentration of the sweetener in the urine of Canadians; people who consume lots of ACE will have more, people who avoid it will have less. (Hardly anybody will reach zero because the stuff is now showing up in the water supply.) The math could be off if the population of swimmers at those pools is not a representative sample of the Canadian population, if ACE is excreted in sweat, if significant amounts are coming from the bodies of swimmers (food or drinks still on the lips or spilled elsewhere), or if soft drinks are getting spilled into the pool.