Slashdot Mirror


Parenthood Can Help You Live Longer In Older Age, Research Suggests (theguardian.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Guardian: Parenthood could boost your chances of living longer in your later years, according researchers who believe the effect could be down to children helping with care and support. While previous research has shown that adults with children live longer than those without, the new study unpicks how the effect plays out in older age. Modig and colleagues used national registry data to follow almost 1.5 million Swedes born between 1911 and 1925 as they aged. The team found that while the risk of death increased with age for all adults, having children was linked to greater longevity. The results are published in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. At the age of 60, men who had children had almost two years more on their remaining life expectancy than those without, at 20.2 and 18.4 years respectively. A similar trend was seen for women aged 60, with life expectancies of 23.1 years for those without children and 24.6 years for mothers. By contrast at the age of 80, parents had a life expectancy of 7.7 years for men and 9.5 years for women, compared to 7 years for men without children and 8.9 years for women without children. The findings reveal that the benefits of having children became more pronounced with age -- an effect that was greater for men than women. Furthermore, the team found that having children had a stronger impact on the longevity of men who were not married than those with a spouse.

193 comments

  1. I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'll never have kids, ever. They can fuck off.

    1. Re:I don't care by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Even if you do like kids, bringing them to the world we have today isn't exactly a gift to them...

      I know a great many youngster even today who deeply resent our generation's wasteful and selfish way of living, the consequences of which we left to them, and that they'll have to sort out when we're gone.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re: I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Me too. Never have kids.

      So having kids adds a few years to your life? Also remember that it takes away 18, possibly more since kids are living at home and still dependent on mommy and daddy much longer now. So the net result is negative.

    3. Re:I don't care by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Even if you do like kids, bringing them to the world we have today isn't exactly a gift to them...

      My take also.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    4. Re:I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We gave serious thought to not having kids for just this reason. In the end we chose the selfish path and had kids anyhow, which is good for us, but I still feel guilty sometimes.

    5. Re: I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      "So the net result is negative."

      And when they leave at 18 to go to university you'll cry your fooking eyes out because you miss them so much. Who needs that hassle. A wife is worse, she'll hang around for like 50 years before she finally gets out of the house in a coffin. So what if you live longer married, it's all negative as she steals 50 years from you. Don't get me started on puppies! Needy furry things with big eyes that sit on your lap.

      a/c, they don't take away 18 years of your life, they give you their life for 18 years.

      You will pivot your life around your kids because they are more important than your XBox, even if they are a PITA sometimes.

    6. Re: I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Never said anything about marriage. As long as I have money, I can get girls. My current girlfriend is 10 years younger than me, and once she gets bored of me, I'm sure there will be another right around the corner. Is she using me for my money? Almost certainly. But I don't care as long as I can pound that young pussy every night.

      As long as I can get under 30s into my 40s/50s I'll be satisfied. And after that, there's always porn. ;)

    7. Re: I don't care by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Good thing that at least some of those people who shouldn't raise kids have the sense not to do so.

    8. Re:I don't care by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Even if you do like kids, bringing them to the world we have today isn't exactly a gift to them...

      My take also.

      Lived through that in the 70s. Thinking "the world we have today" warrants giving up altogether is thoroughly depressing.

      To cheer up people with a realistic view on life I'd say:

      • It's not all gloom an doom
      • The environment will be fixed. Even if it doesn't look that way right now.
      • Crackpot world leaders will eventually be replaced
      • Education leads to less kids that on average are brought up better
      • Kids will teach a nerd one or two things about social stuff. Much like reading a chapter in life's manual.
      • Allow your kids to decide for them selves on "the world we have today"
      • We need people concerned about the world. You seem to be one. Multiply so we have more of them!
      --

      I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
    9. Re:I don't care by known_coward_69 · · Score: 1

      you just described almost every kid that has lived in the last 100 years

    10. Re:I don't care by known_coward_69 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      compared to the 70's, the environment has been fixed

    11. Re:I don't care by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Guilty for what? The environment doesn't give a shit about its state. If everyone now living had your attitude, there would be no more humans who would care about the environment, so the state of the environment wouldn't matter.

      You are a completely illogical being, and for that reason alone, it's a shame you passed on your genes. Oh well. Perhaps your kids will be better.

    12. Re: I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not in China, Indonesia, India...

    13. Re:I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Having children doesn't make you live longer. They just make it seem longer.

    14. Re:I don't care by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Even if you do like kids, bringing them to the world we have today isn't exactly a gift to them...

      I know a great many youngster even today who deeply resent our generation's wasteful and selfish way of living, the consequences of which we left to them, and that they'll have to sort out when we're gone.

      If that's the case no-one should ever have had kids.

      Today, as an average, children are healthier, more likely to have food they need, will be exposed to less crime, have more protections, they're living in an age of more social acceptance, less likely to die in combat (sure, there are always wars, but this is an era of relative peace- over the last several decades globally wars are declining).

      People have been saying for decades that the world is in decline and everything is getting worse, but the truth is: there probably hasn't been a better time to be alive. Every generation thinks the generation after theirs is ruined and going to be terrible.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    15. Re:I don't care by TomGreenhaw · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Brilliant! If we can get everyone to see the light as you do, we can eliminate man made global warming and achieve peace on earth.

      --
      Greed is the root of all evil.
    16. Re: I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Guilty about being white. Nowadays it's a crime to not be a minority, woman, or LGBTBBQ.

    17. Re:I don't care by Maritz · · Score: 2, Funny

      The environment will be fixed. Even if it doesn't look that way right now.

      You're on slashdot mate. The environment is fine. Big conspiracy, hippy illuminati, etc etc.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    18. Re: I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because you're an antisocial twat. Trying to justify the fact no woman would ever want to have your kid.

    19. Re: I don't care by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Must do wonders for your self-esteem to know that you're only getting some because of your bank balance. lol. Each to their own I guess.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    20. Re: I don't care by goose-incarnated · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Must do wonders for your self-esteem to know that you're only getting some because of your bank balance. lol. Each to their own I guess.

      He's aware. Most men aren't aware that they are being used. You sound bitter that he knows what the deal is.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    21. Re:I don't care by geekmux · · Score: 1

      To cheer up people with a realistic view on life I'd say:

      • It's not all gloom an doom

      No, but it's pretty damn consistent.

      The environment will be fixed. Even if it doesn't look that way right now.

      Tell China or India that.

      Crackpot world leaders will eventually be replaced

      Cause that's worked out so well for North Korea.

      Education leads to less kids that on average are brought up better

      Corporate Greed will ensure that automation and AI essentially eliminate any justification to educate a human, and it will lead to far less jobs.

      Kids will teach a nerd one or two things about social stuff. Much like reading a chapter in life's manual.

      Teaching nerds how to save Instagram videos to YouTube isn't exactly teaching things worthwhile. And we just discussed here how that social media "stuff" tends to create more issues and problems in the long run, so perhaps nerds would be better off not learning how to be social media narcissists.

      Allow your kids to decide for them selves on "the world we have today"

      Tell those twentysomethings still living with their parents that kids used to be able to move out on their own, and afford things like a new car. See what they decide about the world we have today.

      We need people concerned about the world. You seem to be one. Multiply so we have more of them!

      There's only a handful of people who still care in a meaningful way. Everyone else is knitting pink pussy hats to riot over the important issues.

    22. Re:I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The environment will be fixed"?? So global warming will be magicked away how? Even if we were to magically stop producing CO2 in the next 20 years you can still bank of most sea-level cities having to be abandoned in the next 50 - 100 years.

    23. Re: I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except they won't. They'll make it worse, and then pass that down to their kids. And so on until all humans are dead.

    24. Re: I don't care by SirSlud · · Score: 1

      I don't understand. Were you born an adult?

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    25. Re: I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That makes no sense. Just because I was once a kid means I should have to have kids of my own? Dumbest thing I've heard in a while.

    26. Re:I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      compared to the 70's, the environment has been fixed

      Not for long, because, as you guessed it, Trump.

    27. Re:I don't care by Kkloe · · Score: 1

      Dont worry, the rest of us are glad that the peoples genes that dont want to have kids will disappear from the collective gene pool

    28. Re: I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not just get pros, if you're only after the sex? Saves you money in the long run.

    29. Re:I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's only a handful of people who still care in a meaningful way. Everyone else is knitting pink pussy hats to riot over the important issues.

      You mean those uneducated "gender studies" major who can't even give a coherent definition of "fascism"? I'll "grab" their pussies any day! (And I will squeeze them so hard that they squeal like the little rats that they are.)

    30. Re:I don't care by GuB-42 · · Score: 2

      We'll probably have to deal with global warming is some way later.
      However, there are plenty of other problems that are just as damaging to us that are being addressed right now : nitrates, heavy metals, endangered species, waste disposal, etc... Even China and India seriously start considering it and it is not a stretch to think that a decade or two from now, they will be on par with the west.
      And it works. Every now and then we hear an encouraging story. It may be the ozone layer reforming, endangered animal populations recovering, atmospheric pollution decreasing in some cities, etc... So while the overall trend may be negative now, if we continue making small improvements the trend will eventually reverse.
      There will be scars, sure, but at least, we are closing the bleeding wounds.

    31. Re: I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or a muzzie. Muzzies are super cool and leet with the regressive left now. Allamu Akbar! Allamu Akbar! Radical baby! And oh the prayers are so beautiful!

    32. Re:I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet at the same time a world in which all other freedoms and economic prosperity continues to erode with governments who treat 1984 like a user guide.

    33. Re: I don't care by Lord+Kano · · Score: 0

      Guilty about being white. Nowadays it's a crime to not be a minority, woman, or LGBTBBQ.

      The police won't kill you for being white.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    34. Re:I don't care by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Even if you do like kids, bringing them to the world we have today isn't exactly a gift to them...

      Yeah, bringing kids into a world where they can expect to live to near 90, with almost no chance of dying in a war or plague or starving to death would really suck.

      Plus there's the whole "we can communicate with almost anyone, anywhere, in Real Time" thing. Can't imagine wanting to subject kids to that (an example: when I was a kid, my Dad spent a year in Vietnam. We got letters, occasionally (he wasn't much for writing). Today, if your father is in the middle of a warzone half a world away, you can video-conference with him using any number of internet tools).

      Much better to have had kids back in the Civil War, right? Or WW1 or 2? Or maybe back in the halcyon days of the Black Plague? Or hell, any random famine year during the last 5K years....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    35. Re: I don't care by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Good thing that at least some of those people who shouldn't raise kids have the sense not to do so.

      And it's growing. Many people have done a risk/reward analysis, and marriage and children have become something to avoid rather than do. If you marry, you are very likely to end up divorced, and if you have children, you will end up paying for them through their early 20's, perhaps longer.

      And as we've seen from some of the comments, they will resent you.

      A lot of sociologist types are kind of worried about this trend. Which is why we are seeing these kind of stories. Next up will be how married men make more money.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    36. Re: I don't care by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't understand. Were you born an adult?

      This is Slashdot. Many here were born knowing everything already..

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    37. Re: I don't care by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Must do wonders for your self-esteem to know that you're only getting some because of your bank balance. lol. Each to their own I guess.

      Its a hellava hit on the old ego. But yes, men are disposable utilities. You don't think that that bank balance isn't attracting the love of your life soul mate woman? Life is what it is, make the most of it.

      As some wag once wrote, "If I had a dollar for every woman that found me unattractive, pretty soon, they'd find me attractive." And on that note: http://beforeitsnews.com/media...

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    38. Re:I don't care by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      And you really believe that, historically, things were better? You think it's better for a black person 100 years ago, or 200 years ago, than it is now? How about for women?

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    39. Re: I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Must do wonders for your self-esteem to know that you're only getting some because of your bank balance. lol. Each to their own I guess.

      He's aware. Most men aren't aware that they are being used. You sound bitter that he knows what the deal is.

      If he's getting what he wants out of these relationships is he really being used? Sounds like a better deal than having your wife of 20 years suddenly divorce you, take the house and kids, and the court forcing you to pay alimony and child support. At least he's doing things on his terms.

    40. Re:I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like kids. But I was abused as a kid and I'm afraid to have kids.

    41. Re:I don't care by swillden · · Score: 2

      compared to the 70's, the environment has been fixed

      Yes and no. Air and water quality is dramatically better. Many threatened species have recovered. Our roads, forests and parks are much cleaner. Younger slashdotters probably don't remember the amount of garbage we used to have lying around all over on the sides of roads, etc.; anti-littering advertising and enforcement, and adopt-a-road programs have made it much better. I recall a time in the 70s where I could make $2 ($9 in 2017 dollars) per hour walking down the highway collecting aluminum cans for recycling. It was good money for a kid. Partly that was because the price of aluminum was relatively high, but mostly it was because I could easily fill many large garbage bags with cans every hour, they were so thick on the ground.

      So, locally, where it's fairly easy, the environment has been fixed.

      On the other hand, global warming's effects are likely to be significant, and reversing that trend is much more difficult both because the causes are global and the problem has been most of a century in the making. You don't turn a supertanker on a dime, no matter how much you want to. Heavy metal levels in fish stocks are a local-ish problem, but one that's widespread and very hard to combat since even if we managed to stop all release into the water, the already-released metals will continue cycling through the ecosystem for a long time. Aquifer depletion is another local-ish problem that was created over a decades and will not be corrected quickly or easily, since the aquifers may take millenia to refill. Most likely we'll just have to stop relying on well water in many areas and find alternative sources.

      I don't think we're facing anything remotely close to an insoluble problem, though. Some stuff we'll have to work around or adapt to, other stuff we'll find ways to fix.

      The global population problem is well on its way to being solved -- annual global births per year has been declining for a while now, so while we're still experiencing population growth due to the "filling out" of the age brackets (the global population still skews quite young), unless something happens to change current trends we should never have to deal with more than about 10B people, and it's quite clear that we can feed and house that many with existing technology, much less the improvements coming. And since it seems to be wealth and education that is causing the declining birth rate, and both of those are trending upward globally, it's more likely that the current trends will accelerate, not reverse.

      The coming wave of automation promises to make the human race as a whole dramatically wealthier, and at the same time we're learning how to apply that wealth to enable a high standard of living with less resource consumption and lower environmental impact. The same automation may pose serious challenges to our economic structures, but the rising tide lifting all boats will serve to offset a lot of it, and with some judicious reallocation (e.g. Universal Basic Income) we should be able to address the most severe of the problems.

      Honestly, I think there's no more -- and probably much less -- value to the notion that bringing kids into the world is a bad idea than there was in the 70s. I understand that people whose own lives are not going well feel that way, and I understand that my own relatively privileged position (making decent money, doing what I love, living where I want -- though I have my share of challenges, too, mostly related to my kids) and my naturally optimistic disposition makes me feel quite differently. Still, on balance, and trying to be as coldly analytical and data-based as possible, I really think the world is as good a place for humans as it has ever been, and expect it to continue improving. It'll even survive Trump, I think, and he'll teach us some important lessons.

      I, personally, will not be bringing any more children into the world. I'm expecting to become a grandfather this summer, t

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    42. Re:I don't care by strikethree · · Score: 2

      Today, as an average, children are healthier, more likely to have food they need, will be exposed to less crime, have more protections, they're living in an age of more social acceptance, less likely to die in combat (sure, there are always wars, but this is an era of relative peace- over the last several decades globally wars are declining).

      That is great. Wonderful even; however, kids today have no path to making a living for themselves.

      In the past, I would teach my son how to hunt and gather food. Today, all I can do is send him off to school and hope that he will find a job afterwards. The thinking is, "Nobody owes you a job", which is ultimately true, but then you straitjacketed my son and do not allow him to hunt and gather. How then is he supposed eat?

      No. The ENTIRE reason modern society is such a terrible place to bring children into is because all of the resources are owned. Naturally, owned by someone else. The only way for my son to live is to either accept that his life depends on the whims of someone who owns the resources (slavery with or without chains) or take those resources from the putative owners. The entire situation is a LOT more complex than this simplistic narrative but then we get into "regulations and corruption" when trying to take those resources legally.

      So yeah, you are 100% correct that many of the less important, but still extremely important, things are MUCH better nowadays. What you are missing is that the single most important thing, the ability to survive on their own, has been taken.

      Tell me again how it is a good idea to bring children into this world.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    43. Re:I don't care by flacco · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "New study shows that 18-30 years of hell on earth will extend your lifespan by up to two years."

      Nah I'm good.

      > I'll never have kids, ever. They can fuck off.

      Stay strong. They will say "You'll change your mind someday." That's not true for everyone - I haven't, and don't regret it.

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    44. Re: I don't care by flacco · · Score: 1

      I have a friend from China who is trying desperately not to go back. It's not a money issue - she's got huge stacks of cash - she doesn't want to subject herself and her kid to the environment - educational, and physical (namely the pollution).

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    45. Re: I don't care by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Per capita, the US is far worse. An old saying about pointing at the splinters in somebody else's eye when you have an entire 2x4 plank in your own comes to mind.

    46. Re:I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if you do like kids, bringing them to the world we have today isn't exactly a gift to them...

      If that's the case no-one should ever have had kids.

      Eating chicken isn't exactly a gift to the chickens but people still do it. You could still have kids for selfish reasons.

      Today, as an average, children are healthier, more likely to have food they need,...

      Somewhere around 20,000 children will die of poverty today - and the next day - and the next. That's a 9/11 every four hours.

      There's a still a long way to go. But maybe we'll get there eventually. Imagine a world where the human population was about 1,000 time lower than it is today and where all the governments were along the lines of the Scandinavian socialist governments - where essentially no one was trapped in poverty. That wouldn't be so bad. Humanity could live comfortable lives while accumulating enough knowledge to eventually understand whether there was any fundamental purpose to humanity's existence. If not, they could then stop having children and human suffering would finally be over - because no one would be left to suffer. :)

    47. Re:I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our take, also.

      Sincerely,
      Mom & Dad

      P.S. - Come to think of it, our parents said the same thing about us.

    48. Re: I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " Most men aren't aware that they are being used"

      My wife makes more than I do. She has a post grad degree and I don't. She has no incentive to use me and I'm pretty damn sure I'm not using her.

    49. Re:I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>It's not all gloom an doom
      Just most of it.

      >>The environment will be fixed. Even if it doesn't look that way right now.
      Speculation, apparently based in no small part in ignorance

      >>Crackpot world leaders will eventually be replaced
      By new crackpot world leaders

      >>Education leads to less kids that on average are brought up better
      Shame education keeps getting worse

      >>We need people concerned about the world. You seem to be one. Multiply so we have more of them!
      Everyone thinks that way, that's part of why the world sucks. "I'm right, you're wrong, I'll kill you or outbreed you to make the world better!".

      Humanity has always been a giant shitpile, largely because the universe is a giant shitpile. If anything has changed it is only that we've become more aware of it. Life is awful, and the only reason we don't all jump off a building is that we're so terrified of the prospect of death that we desperately find or create ways to delude ourselves into thinking it is worth living.

    50. Re:I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can someone explain the insight in this comment?

    51. Re:I don't care by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Even if you do like kids, bringing them to the world we have today isn't exactly a gift to them...

      *Yawn*

      I remember people saying this exact same thing in the 60s....and the 70s....and the 80s...and so on. People have been saying this since the dawn of time.

      Everyone thinks the future sucks and it's a terrible place to bring children into it. I say bollocks, what a daffy fuckin' outlook. If you think it's so bad, don't have children. Get out of the way, let your shitty pessimistic genes die out, and make room for the rest of us who aren't scared to face the future.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    52. Re: I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like in Brave New World.

    53. Re:I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a joke. Living now is by far the most advantageous time to have been born at any point in human history. Scores of diseases which once ravaged humanity have been greatly curtailed or eliminated, technology makes our lives easier than ever before, starvation is non-existent in the developed world.

      Just a few short centuries ago you'd have been lucky to live to 30.

    54. Re: I don't care by FormOfActionBanana · · Score: 1

      We have been traveling the world with our baby and having fun. Sorry about the screaming in the back of the plane.

      --
      Take off every 'sig' !!
    55. Re:I don't care by FormOfActionBanana · · Score: 1

      He has decided not to procreate, and he will be keeping to his word, for ever and ever. He also thinks the kids that other people DID have, should fuck off.

      --
      Take off every 'sig' !!
    56. Re: I don't care by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

      I think fewer people grow up themselves, and so should not have kids.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    57. Re:I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Just a few short centuries ago you'd have been lucky to live to 30."

      Not quite. Once you survived birth and your first year of life, lifespan wasn't much shorter than today. Granted, you probably had nutritional issues, chronic ailments, etc, but it's a myth to think people died at 30 like flies back then.

    58. Re:I don't care by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      There's a Greek myth of a king asking a wise god, "What is the greatest gift man could receive?"

      Answer: "To never have been born."

    59. Re:I don't care by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      There's a Greek myth of a king asking a wise god, "What is the greatest gift man could receive?"

      Answer: "To never have been born."

      I'd rather be able to live forever but to be able to forget stuff as needed.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    60. Re:I don't care by micahraleigh · · Score: 2

      People with world views carry the weight of the world.

      People with life views are full of life.

    61. Re: I don't care by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

      Treasure your kids and they will be treasure to you.

      Curse your kids, and they will be a curse to you.

      Happy parent since 08' here.

    62. Re:I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good thing people have echo chambers like this to reassure themselves.

    63. Re:I don't care by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

      To the contrary. People stick around longer because that's what they WANT to do.

      Slashdotters promote eugenics because their mediocrity has brought them into an unhappy relationship with themselves and want the ultimate checkout.

    64. Re:I don't care by gweihir · · Score: 0

      And people with stupid sayings are just stupid. Your point?

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    65. Re:I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that's the case no-one should ever have had kids.

      Sounds right. All the problems I encounter can ultimately be traced back to some idiot having kids.

    66. Re:I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kids today...

      The number of people living in absolute poverty is lower than it has been in three generations. (That's the absolute number. The proportion is lower than it's *ever* been.) On a global level, an individual's chances of dying violently are lower than they've ever been. There's more food, more wealth, more energy, more free time than there's ever been in the world. It's a *fantastic* time to be alive.

      Sure there are problems. But you know what, if you could have asked a median World Citizen from, say, 1950, whether their counterpart today was better or worse off? - they would have laughed in your face.

      There's never a "good" time to "bring kids into the world". There's always reasons to be gloomy. But to say that this time is particularly bad, shows a staggering lack of perspective.

    67. Re: I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, we will become a sort of.. Just an AI.. Running government.. Isn't that the the technically a technocracy? For the best? For everyone? So wealth doesn't exist? Just upper echelon stupid jealous powerful that couldn't get an earth girl? Assholes and the AI? maybe computers will realise that they depend on us? Owe us like a father? Then we are God's? symbiotic relationship? Are they God's?

    68. Re:I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if you do like kids, bringing them to the world we have today isn't exactly a gift to them...

      I know a great many youngster even today who deeply resent our generation's wasteful and selfish way of living, the consequences of which we left to them, and that they'll have to sort out when we're gone.

      So then no chance of passing your world view onto others and instead letting the people you resent get to mold the minds of the next generation. What a nice way to shoot yourself in the foot and ensure everything you believe in dies out.

    69. Re: I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, back then, death was a well understand situation back in those days. Today, as not so much.

    70. Re:I don't care by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

      If you look to your brain to explain what has value to you, you will overlook and far outstrip happiness.

      Will you seize life or just let it pass you by?

    71. Re: I don't care by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      " Most men aren't aware that they are being used"

      My wife makes more than I do. She has a post grad degree and I don't. She has no incentive to use me and I'm pretty damn sure I'm not using her.

      Does the 4-letter word "most" confuse you?

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  2. As always by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 2, Insightful

    At the age of 60, men who had children had almost two years more on their remaining life expectancy than those without, at 20.2 and 18.4 years respectively.

    Correlation isn't causation.

    Also, many of those who gain 2 years in life expectancy lose many more years of piece and quiet having to raise their brats.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:As always by KiloByte · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Also, many of those who gain 2 years in life expectancy lose many more years of piece and quiet having to raise their brats.

      This. You gain 1.8 years, lose 18.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    2. Re:As always by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in fact, looking at the the statistics, it would take a real "special" person to come up with their conclusion. making children makes you live longer? or is it maybe that living longer gives you a higher chance of having children. does being a swede make you dumber or are you dumber because you are a swede?

      here's a fucking idea - I have personally observed this in many, many cases. woman has kid = her body and mind get fucking wrecked and Never fully recovers. they're saying this makes her live longer? fucking swedes.

    3. Re:As always by gweihir · · Score: 0

      Also, many of those who gain 2 years in life expectancy lose many more years of peace and quiet having to raise their brats.

      Oh, yes. I know some people with young kids that would sometimes just like to drown them and be done with it. (Not seriously, of course, but you get the point...)

      At only 2 years it is also quite likely other factors are causing both. For example, religious people have more children and live longer. But they also waste a massive amount of lifetime and brainpower on their religion, so that is a net loss as well.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    4. Re:As always by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "or is it maybe that living longer gives you a higher chance of having children."

      For that to be true, those 80 years olds would have to be making babies.

      "woman has kid = her body and mind get fucking wrecked"
      It's certainly true that the stomach loses shape and the tits sag. But then the tits were only pert to attract a mate. Her brain is fine, she just understands the purpose of life a bit better, so she doesn't think in your terms.

      You'll feel different when you're older.

    5. Re:As always by Ogive17 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I know I fight a losing battle each time I defend being a parent on /. but I don't agree with your assessment.

      I was 33 when my son (only child) was born, so I had a good decade of "freedom".. I enjoyed my 20s but wouldn't say I miss them.

      Now my kid is 4, there are frustrating moments but also experiences I would never trade. Best thing is that I now have a great excuse to play with toys again. When I'm at home, I feel younger because of my son.

      I don't go out with friends nearly as much but to say you lose 18 years, that's ridiculous.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    6. Re:As always by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Plus, the 1.8 years you gain are at the very end of your life when you're not going to enjoy it much.

    7. Re: As always by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First stage is denial. You've got about 7 good years left, then you will be deemed not cool and he'll rebel the next 7 years. Then he'll be right back after you cover his huge college bill and need you a good deal longer.

    8. Re: As always by SirSlud · · Score: 2

      You know this because you were a shitty kid? Or a shitty parent?

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    9. Re:As always by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "woman has kid = her body and mind get fucking wrecked"

      Absolutely agree. This happened to my partner after my son was born...probably soon to be ex.

    10. Re:As always by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Post natal depression is a very real thing. I know many women medicated for it.

    11. Re: As always by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      Was that meant as a response to my post?

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    12. Re:As always by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm totally with you. I was 42 when the first of my two kids were born. I did a lot of things when I was single and childless, but by the time I was 40 I had done about all I needed to do on my own. The kids are a whole new set of great experiences and the "playing with toys thing" is real. I'd like to see how many of the posters so opposed to kids have actually had any, but maybe its a good thing they don't!

    13. Re: As always by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Yes, having a child is so terrible that most parents choose to have at least one more. I won't berate your choice to not have kids, but you berating or mocking anyone else for having kids lacks any understanding of the joy of being a parent, even when things are tough.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    14. Re:As always by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      But most go through childbirth just fine. The vast, vast majority, in fact. This is again about lacking perspective - you hear all these cases, and they stand out in your mind, but most experiences with having and raising children are amazing. There are a lot of people who regretted having kids. Maybe they weren't ready, maybe they didn't have the patience. But the percentage of people who've had planned kids and regretted it is tiny compared to the people who chose NOT to have kids and ultimately regretted it.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    15. Re: As always by swillden · · Score: 3, Insightful

      First stage is denial. You've got about 7 good years left, then you will be deemed not cool and he'll rebel the next 7 years. Then he'll be right back after you cover his huge college bill and need you a good deal longer.

      My oldest child is 24 and my youngest 15, so I've been through all of that, and in fact much more parental challenge than is normal... and I still agree with Ogive17. Being a parent is awesome. Hard, absolutely, occasionally heartrending and frustrating, but those who skip it aren't gaining 18 years, they're losing the richest experiences life offers.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    16. Re:As always by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "of piece and quiet"

      Dude, I don't know if I can take your comment seriously when you spell like that... Jesus Christ.

    17. Re: As always by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2

      Hard, absolutely, occasionally heartrending and frustrating, but those who skip it aren't gaining 18 years, they're losing the richest experiences life offers.

      Right - every successful parent I know feels that rearing children is a chance to reevaluate most of life's choices, learn everything anew with improved understanding, and to realize what it is to be part of this thing called Life, and by extension Society. Sure, fewer books get read, fewer vacations are taken, and the Netflix queue only ever grows in length, but it's important to note that most parents don't lament those delays and most deathbed regrets are devoid about notions of game release dates.

      People who revel in "their 18 years" (ha, they forget that most people have 2+ children) almost always insist that the experience of people who have reared children does not exist or that it does not have really have deep and important meaning. Because apparently parents don't actually understand something unique that wouldn't be obvious without 18+ years of experience.

      But, frankly the most surprising aspect of this research is that the stress of childrearing doesn't seem to take years off one's life!

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    18. Re: As always by swillden · · Score: 1

      But, frankly the most surprising aspect of this research is that the stress of childrearing doesn't seem to take years off one's life!

      No doubt!

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    19. Re: As always by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

      Especially since the toys they have now are the ones I wanted to exist when I was a kid.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    20. Re: As always by avandesande · · Score: 1

      It turns you into a human being....

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    21. Re: As always by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This times a million for me. I had great goals for toys that I wanted when I was a kid that had a great influence on the educational decisions in my life, the biggest being fpv quad copter races. The trs80 hadn't been created when I first had this goal and had no idea how it could be realized, but I do now, can design and build all the electronics, hardware and software. Now need to replace propellers with rockets, then I'm out of ideas what to do,

    22. Re:As always by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      At the age of 60, men who had children had almost two years more on their remaining life expectancy than those without, at 20.2 and 18.4 years respectively.

      Correlation isn't causation.

      To me this feels like an extension of those studies we've seen countless times about lonely/socially isolated/people who don't get laid often dying sooner than people with friends/lovers. Having kids is going to much more likely for a person with a strong social network, so it will appear having kids makes you live longer if that's what you're focusing on.

    23. Re:As always by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

      My favorite thing about being a Dad is I can just tell them straight out Jesus is the only way to find happiness on earth.

      Everyone else in their life is forbidden from telling them that ... hollywood, school, government workers.

      The world hates that kind of stuff and I feel sad for each one of them.

      But it's a happy life for me.

    24. Re:As always by Glarimore · · Score: 1

      Now my kid is 4, there are frustrating moments but also experiences I would never trade. Best thing is that I now have a great excuse to play with toys again. When I'm at home, I feel younger because of my son.

      Isn't it a bit early to be making that claim? You're less than 25% done with your tenure.

    25. Re:As always by myth24601 · · Score: 1

      I know I fight a losing battle each time I defend being a parent on /. but I don't agree with your assessment.

      It's easy to put down people with kids from the safety of your mothers basement.

      --
      No matter where you go, there you are.
  3. It just feels that way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It just feels that way.

    1. Re:It just feels that way. by Salgak1 · · Score: 1

      It just feels that way.

      . . .especially at 3AM when your 3-month-old wants a bottle RIGHT THE HECK NOW, and obviously has VERY healthy lungs.

      Good times, good times. . . . . (grin)

    2. Re:It just feels that way. by KiloByte · · Score: 5, Insightful

      wants a bottle RIGHT THE HECK NOW

      Not a bottle, a tit. A tit that used to belong to you.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    3. Re:It just feels that way. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Soundproofing the room helps. Best money you'll ever spend.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:It just feels that way. by Salgak1 · · Score: 1

      Actually, not in my case: wife couldn't nurse. So it was still mine, all mine. . . . MUAHAHAHAHA!

  4. Spite is a helluva motivator! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You ungrateful twerps ain't getting my shit! I'm going live long enough to spend it all!"

    1. Re:Spite is a helluva motivator! by XXongo · · Score: 1

      "You ungrateful twerps ain't getting my shit! I'm going live long enough to spend it all!"

      No, it's "you ungrateful twerps are going to inherit all this crap I've accumulated over a lifetime and filled my house with, my garage with, and a storage unit I'm renting for a hundred dollars a month, because I keep telling you that it's all valuable and you'll want it someday and also maybe there's something really collectable buried under all that broken furniture and cheap junk."

  5. Common cause by Pascal+Sartoretti · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You need to be in good health to have children. You need to be in good health to live longer.

    1. Re:Common cause by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Quite a few "parents" these days could have fooled me. When you see two blobs waddle to some all you can eat buffet with their little blobs, you really have to wonder.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Common cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking more along the lines of there being somebody around to help with stuff when you're too feeble to do it yourself.

  6. No, it does not by gweihir · · Score: 1, Informative

    It found a correlation, it did not find a causation. It could well be the other way round or there could be a third factor that causes both things.

    Seriously, stop reporting such nonsense.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re: No, it does not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I was thinking this too. Healthier and richer people are likely to live longer, and also likely to be preferred for starting a family with, so it very well might be the other way around.

      Weak ass clickbait summary as is usual for this site.

    2. Re: No, it does not by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 3, Informative

      Healthier and richer people are likely to live longer, and also likely to be preferred for starting a family with

      Only it doesn't work that way: it's a well established fact that rich, usually educated people have fewer children than poor uneducated people.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    3. Re: No, it does not by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Idiocracy

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    4. Re: No, it does not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, interesting point. I wasn't considering about kids out of wedlock, but that people would choose to have kids with rich and healthy people and less desirable wouldn't have kids at all.

      I wonder how unplanned children factor into this. As well as single mothers.

    5. Re: No, it does not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Healthier and richer people are likely to live longer, and also likely to be preferred for starting a family with

      Only it doesn't work that way: it's a well established fact that rich, usually educated people have fewer children than poor uneducated people.

      To a point, then as they get richer the number of children tend to go up again so perhaps it's that rich, educated people tend to only have as many children as they know that they can afford (nannies for.)

    6. Re: No, it does not by XXongo · · Score: 1

      Only it doesn't work that way: it's a well established fact that rich, usually educated people have fewer children than poor uneducated people.

      To a point, then as they get richer the number of children tend to go up again

      I have seen this speculation, but in the only evidence I've seen, the signal has been in the noise. There may be a very slight uptick in number of children as affluence rises, but so far the statistics to show that are poor.

    7. Re: No, it does not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your post suggests that babies born out of wedlock and unplanned children are the same thing? In my case it most certainly was not unplanned, I just happen to think marriage is an anachronism.

    8. Re: No, it does not by avandesande · · Score: 1

      According to TFA having one child was enough to create the benefit

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
  7. Wife impact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does the last sentence mean that the children have positive effect on the life expectancy of men and women negative? :) Or does it mean, that a spouse already adds to the men life expectancy, and having children has smaller affect that having children and no spouse?

  8. Translation by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    People are worried about the future and don't want to risk having kids they most likely won't be able to provide for, more people are dying than being born. We have to counter that! Now, we can't pay them more to be financially secure enough to be able to afford having a family, so let's make up some bullshit to make them pump out a few units!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Translation by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Who's "we"? The fucking Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health? A sinister organisation, to be sure...

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    2. Re:Translation by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      That might be the case in a few rare instances - it might keep people from having litters instead of just one or two kids. I know I wouldn't want more than the two I have because I wouldn't be able to maintain any semblance of the lifestyle I have right now. But if you look at the broader picture, the smart people with money are having fewer kids, while the poorer people with no hope of being able to financially support their kids are the ones "pump"-ing them out.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
  9. Stress? by EzInKy · · Score: 1

    Raising children is stressful, and stress makes people stronger.

    --
    Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    1. Re:Stress? by Bratch · · Score: 1

      Maybe stronger, but not to live longer. Short term ok, but avoid long term stress.

      "Telomeres are a protective casing at the end of a strand of DNA. Each time a cell divides, it loses a bit of its telomeres. An enzyme called telomerase can replenish it, but chronic stress and cortisol exposure decrease your supply. When the telomere is too diminished, the cell often dies or becomes pro-inflammatory. This sets the aging process in motion, along with associated health risks."

      http://www.apa.org/monitor/201...

      --
      Beware of the Redittor who loans you a Sharpie.
  10. bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    political manipulation to encourage a higher fertility rate to prop up the economy.

    1. Re:bullshit by Maritz · · Score: 1

      That's just what they want you to think..!

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  11. Loneliness by bluegutang · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Loneliness is a significant health risk which causes a person's death risk to increase.

    Having kids gives you someone to care about, and someone who cares about you, and someone you see on a regular basis. That does a lot to decrease your loneliness.

    This explains why the effect is stronger for men than women (men tend to have fewer social contacts), and stronger for single than married men.

    1. Re: Loneliness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A dog has the same effect, except they are cheaper, less needy, and like you a lot more.

    2. Re:Loneliness by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Loneliness is a significant health risk which causes a person's death risk to increase.

      There's that old correlation/causation thing again. A depressed and withdrawn person is going to be lonely. But the cause of the lonliness is alomst certainly the depression. A person such as myself functions better and recharges the mental batteries by being alone. Alone != lonely.

      Having kids gives you someone to care about, and someone who cares about you, and someone you see on a regular basis. That does a lot to decrease your loneliness.

      You're taking your own mental state and insisting it is everyone's. It isn't. Western society at present favors the extrovert, who needs to be around people, and suffers when they aren't. Present day social pressures have made having wife and children extremely risky for men. So it is completely possible to have a rich life without the present day entanglements of a spouse and children.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    3. Re:Loneliness by parkinglot777 · · Score: 1

      Loneliness is a significant health risk which causes a person's death risk to increase.

      There's that old correlation/causation thing again. A depressed and withdrawn person is going to be lonely. But the cause of the lonliness is alomst certainly the depression. A person such as myself functions better and recharges the mental batteries by being alone. Alone != lonely.

      I don't understand how you try to invalidate GP statement. Alone is surely not equal to loneliness. Loneliness is a feeling (mental). Alone is simply a state of being (physical).

      Also, depression should not be the cause of loneliness. It should be in reverse. Loneliness MAY LEAD to depression, and it is a symptom of depression. Some people may sometimes feel lonely, but they MAY NOT be depressed (and often they aren't). However, depressed people often times (if not all the time) feel lonely because they tend to (mentally) separate themselves from people/social.

      Having kids gives you someone to care about, and someone who cares about you, and someone you see on a regular basis. That does a lot to decrease your loneliness.

      You're taking your own mental state and insisting it is everyone's. It isn't. Western society at present favors the extrovert, who needs to be around people, and suffers when they aren't. Present day social pressures have made having wife and children extremely risky for men. So it is completely possible to have a rich life without the present day entanglements of a spouse and children.

      This is another part of your reply that is confusing to me. I don't understand why you think GP is shoveling the idea to you. To me, instead, it is a statement which has some merits. If you simply change the word "kids" to something else, such as "close friends," "pets," "partner," etc., you still get the similar meaning.

  12. Sweden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Run this test again in the US, Russia, India, Colombia, and a bunch of other countries with divergent living parameters and see if you get the same thing. I hear Sweden is a very nice place to live in. Those other places I mention don't even compare, so I'm curious to replicate the study there.

  13. Uh, who's caring for whom again? by geekmux · · Score: 2

    "...researchers who believe the effect could be down to children helping with care and support...

    By helping with care and support, are you referring to all the twentysomethings who still live with their parents? Just curious how this study takes into account the fact that the young generation can hardly afford to take care of themselves today, much less care for aging parents.

    Also, having kids helps you live longer? Did they take into account the physical, mental, and financial strain that parenthood can bring? I'm willing to bet 99.999% of parents are scratching their heads over this one too.

    1. Re:Uh, who's caring for whom again? by Maritz · · Score: 1

      It's an observational study. They found a correlation. That's all. Calm down.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    2. Re:Uh, who's caring for whom again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... twenty-somethings who still live with their parents ...

      TFA makes sense to me so, to answer your question; no. This refers to the 70-something grandparents that refuse to accept they lost the mobility and flexibility (mental and physical) to function in a machine-driven society. It's their 40-something children that have to ensure they aren't driving a car, falling down stairs, or eating expired food. As you've noted, those 40-somethings are still looking after their own children, meaning they don't have a lot of time to care for the grandparents. It's easy to believe that less attention causes a shorter life-span

    3. Re:Uh, who's caring for whom again? by Slyswede · · Score: 1

      Also, having kids helps you live longer? Did they take into account the physical, mental, and financial strain that parenthood can bring? I'm willing to bet 99.999% of parents are scratching their heads over this one too.

      Not sure which part of the world you live in, but the study looked at Swedes, who typically don't have to worry about tuition fees, health insurance, maternity/paternity leave and other common U.S. parenting challenges. :)

      That said, what other posters have already suggested about children providing positive experiences to your old age lifestyle is the most likely mechanic behind these observations. Not sure I would find enough reason to stick around if I found myself unable to enjoy life due to geriatric problems and no one left to mourn my passing.

    4. Re:Uh, who's caring for whom again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The plural of anecdote isn't data, but...

      In my extended family, the aunts and uncles without children certainly seem to have aged worse than those who did. My youngest aunt (0 kids) is visibly older and in much worse health than the eldest (4 kids), despite a 10 year age gap in her favour. There's a definite trend that when the last of the kids move out, the parents go into shockingly rapid decline, despite their newfound time and money.

      Although I agree that it's stressful, costly and exhausting having kids, there certainly to be some upsides, not least that you're all but guaranteed plenty of exercise....

    5. Re:Uh, who's caring for whom again? by kubajz · · Score: 1

      No, twentysomethings do not usually have parents who are 60 and have a life expectancy of further 20 years. They talk more about children perhaps in their 50 who will now take care of their parents at the same time as taking care of their twentysomethings. And no, I am not scratching my head, I guess I am that 0.001 percent... loneliness is a real killer, or if you want this in more romantic words, love gives life :)

    6. Re:Uh, who's caring for whom again? by geekmux · · Score: 1

      No, twentysomethings do not usually have parents who are 60 and have a life expectancy of further 20 years. They talk more about children perhaps in their 50 who will now take care of their parents at the same time as taking care of their twentysomethings.

      I was kind of making light of the fact of just how much this study will change once today's generation of caregivers are the ones who need caring for, but you managed to sum that up quite nicely to reflect on this compounding issue that will grow well beyond the bounds of viable solutions.

      And no, I am not scratching my head, I guess I am that 0.001 percent... loneliness is a real killer, or if you want this in more romantic words, love gives life :)

      Again, I was reflecting on the early years of parenting, across many sleepless nights. Cannot argue with your latter statement though. Love does give life.

  14. Perception is everything by fluffernutter · · Score: 3, Funny

    Are you sure it doesn't just feel longer?

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  15. Live longer in older age by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Probably one of the worst reasons for having children. I'd much prefer to live longer when I'm young.

    1. Re:Live longer in older age by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      That's ok, less people in the world for my kids to step over as they take over the world.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    2. Re:Live longer in older age by Maritz · · Score: 1

      I'd much prefer to live longer when I'm young.

      That'd be quite a trick.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  16. Doubt it by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    If you live in Ouagadougou in Burkhina Fhaso perhaps, here Gramps and Meemaw are put in a home and visited once a year or not at all.

  17. My great aunt disagrees by houghi · · Score: 1

    My great aunt never had kids. Hendrikje van Andel-Schipper. She became the oldest person in the world. She opensources her body and was the reason investigation as to why people age are done in The Netherlands.
    Other things have been found out thanks to her as well.

    One of the things they do have noticed, the doctor that does the investigation told me, was that it seems (but has not yet proven) a lot of centinarians are very positive minded people. More than average. They tend to be more open and social and less stressed.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  18. Partij Voor de Vrijheid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    De enige partij die luistert naar het volk!

    Stemmen voor Geert!

  19. Does the article discuss if it's just an indicator by NotSoHeavyD3 · · Score: 1

    What I mean is that I'd expect simply being able to have kids is an indicator of physical and mental health. I'd expect those that don't have kids are more likely to have physical and psychological issues linked to poorer health and a reduced life span.

    --
    Did you know 80 to 90% of the moderators on slashdot wouldn't recognize a troll even if one dragged them under a bridge.
  20. They "believe" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Believe" isn't science. Maybe people with children live longer because unhealthy people have less children. Then "having" the children adds nothing to the average age.

  21. Quality of life by Dorianny · · Score: 2

    Children often push their doctors and their elderly parents to go for a "everything and the kitchen sink" approach to healthcare, even when the odds of a good prognosis are minimal and the extended life comes at the coast of great pain and degrading condition. I wonder how much discrepency comes from childless people being free to choose "quality of life" instead of quantity

    1. Re:Quality of life by myth24601 · · Score: 1

      Even if not pushing for extraordinary life extending therapies, it could be that those elderly who have dedicated advocates during their declining years benefit more than those who don't.

      --
      No matter where you go, there you are.
  22. Using the word "CAN" is making no claim at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By using the sales buzzword "CAN", you've deflated this claim to nothing. Legally, in the United States, if a drug has NEVER been proven to work, but chemically speaking ought to work, you are permitted to use the word "CAN" when selling it. As for me, I'd be in much better physical shape had I never met my X wife. 2.5 years driving 1,600 - 2,400 miles per month to see my kids and being raked back and forth over the coals by a turd lawyer on a regular basis were necessary to get my children back in school. A quarter million dollars later, I achieved my goal, but it took a terrible toll on my physically.

    1. Re:Using the word "CAN" is making no claim at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be strong mate, and good luck with it. Sounds like you've been through the worst already, so I hope things pick up for you.

  23. Children... or a partner? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd like to see this data up against data that shows the longevity of people who have some sort of intimate support (spouse, S.O., partner) who provides emotional and physical support throughout their adult lives. I bet there's more of a correlation there then there is in just having children.

  24. It's not gonna work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We see through your lies !

    Everyone thinks they want to raise kiddos, until they actually have to. Then it's not quite all the fun and games those with kids attempt to make it out to be.
    They're just trying to trick us into joining the twenty year misery train they have elected to ride. Hahahaa. No

    Parents will -never- tell you their true feelings about raising children. Ever. One simply does not ever admit that making the decision to raise a child was the worst decision they ever made.

    If you ever start to get that urge, just go out in public once in a while and see the little screaming heathens in action. Restaurants, movie theaters, grocery stores, etc. etc. Note the lack of the cheery face on the parent who is stuck with " heathen duty " at that particular moment. It will likely resemble something more along the lines of " Kill me please ".

    Now, picture yourself with twenty years of that ahead of you. ( assuming you don't have a special needs child when then becomes a lifetime membership )

    That should be more than enough to derail that train in a hurry.

    1. Re:It's not gonna work by footNipple · · Score: 1

      We see through your lies !

      Everyone thinks they want to raise kiddos, until they actually have to. Then it's not quite all the fun and games those with kids attempt to make it out to be. They're just trying to trick us into joining the twenty year misery train they have elected to ride. Hahahaa. No

      Who are you, Malthus? You must really feel strongly about this topic as you've posted a boatload of anonymous, high negative energy posts.

      Anyway, serious question: Do you wish your parents felt the same way as you and would have acted accordingly?

  25. Correlation, not causation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in this study they show the parents whose children do NOT live near them are more likely to live longer, you would think this would stop some of the completely unsupported conjecturing they were spouting, but nooooo....

  26. Dearth of info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The reason this is, is because people with children tend to stay active and involved later by virtue of ther kids and grandkids. It's the acitvity and engagement that make the difference. There is nothing magical about starting a family in this regard, it could just as easily be staying active and engaged in a community, a neighborhood, whatever. They could probably do a study on people that are a part of a church community or neighborhood community and come up with the same result. Older age isn't the suspect, it's the isolation and atrophy that can occur during those years. Duh, 21st century science.

  27. Worse than it ever was, same as ever by XXongo · · Score: 2

    Even if you do like kids, bringing them to the world we have today isn't exactly a gift to them...

    My take also.

    I don't know of any time in history in which people didn't say exactly that same thing. Only which threat is looming changes: It's wrong to bring children into a world in which Nazi armies are taking over the world. It's wrong to bring children into a world in which the Communist monolith is spreading totalitarianism across the world. It's wrong to bring children into a world in which nuclear annihilation could occur at any moment...

    1. Re:Worse than it ever was, same as ever by gfxguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      People lack historical perspective (in fact, most lack any kind of real perspective at all). Really. Pick any previous century and tell me how much better your life would have been. If there's anything wrong with our current society, it's that what people are whining about is mostly a joke compared to how things used to be. I'm not saying it's perfect - it's not, and it never will be; I'm saying things are always getting better, even if there's some bad that comes along with it. But we let the media and other whiners influence how we feel about society, and it's almost always negative.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    2. Re:Worse than it ever was, same as ever by gweihir · · Score: 0

      Your argument is entirely faulty and broken. It does not matter what the historical perspective is. My take is that current conditions are not good enough. Whether they were worse or better previously does not matter at all. Or are you one of those persons that think if you have been served poison before, that suddenly makes the rotten food you get now acceptable or even good?

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    3. Re:Worse than it ever was, same as ever by gfxguy · · Score: 2

      No, I'm saying anyone that thinks there was a time in history better than now to have kids is a delusional idiot, and I'm thankful that few people feel the way you do otherwise none of us would be here. If you really thought the world was too terrible to live in, you'd probably have rectified your situation by now.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    4. Re:Worse than it ever was, same as ever by gweihir · · Score: 1

      You seem to be stupid, because I very explicitly just did _not_ claim that.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    5. Re:Worse than it ever was, same as ever by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      And what I'm saying is that you obviously find value in living in the present.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
  28. And even if you don't live longer ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... it will surely seem like it.

  29. Correlation can have multiple possible causes by XXongo · · Score: 1

    in fact, looking at the the statistics, it would take a real "special" person to come up with their conclusion. making children makes you live longer? or is it maybe that living longer gives you a higher chance of having children.

    For that to be true, those 80 years olds would have to be making babies.

    No. It may be true that living longer is a signal of better health, and better health also has the property that one is more likely to have children.

    For example, some fraction of people with poor health may be less fertile. Or, people with poor health may be less likely to find mates.

  30. wups by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

    fooled by /. interface!

    --
    "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
  31. In my case and many others it's causation by raymorris · · Score: 1

    For many people, having kids makes you care a lot more about your life expectancy. You want to be around to meet your grandchildren.

    I had my daughter when I was 40 in out of shape. A smoker who never exercised, I hadn't run since I was a teenager (and then because the cops were chasing me). I wanted to be able to run and play with my daughter. I want to be alive for her wedding, and dance with her at her wedding. My life expectancy matters to me much more than it used to. So my priorities have changed and so have my habits (still working on some of them).

    One of my best friends was similar - he was a typical beer-belly guy. He had a kid and now runs marathons.

  32. Live longer, or ... ? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    It just seems longer?

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  33. Nope nope nope by Notabadguy · · Score: 2

    So if I read this right...

    18-25 years of financial drain, emotional stress, and missing free time, MIGHT lead to an end-of-life benefit of ~2 year extension.

    No thanks. I'll keep those 18-25 years, my money, and my free time.

    Disclaimer: My wife and I didn't have kids, and now its too late - and we don't regret it.

    1. Re:Nope nope nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Counterpoint: My wife and I did have a kid. Now she's 19 with a great work ethic, sense of humor and is a well-adjusted human being.

      We're responsible grownups so money, stress and free time issues were essentially non-issues. Quite the opposite, it was the most gratifying experience either of us have ever had, and would 100% do it again even if we knew those issues would be significant.

      TL;DR: Different strokes for different folks. Shrug.

    2. Re:Nope nope nope by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      18-25 years of financial drain, emotional stress, and missing free time, MIGHT lead to an end-of-life benefit of ~2 year extension.

      That's not really what it's about, but to each their own.

      I don't regret having my son at all...he's grown up to be a good person and I'm proud of who he's become. He's a smart, responsible man with a sense of self and I consider him to be a net gain to the world in many ways. Perhaps I got lucky, but raising him was for the most part a genuine pleasure.

      Parenthood isn't for everyone, but I'm glad I had my son. I couldn't care less if having him lengthened my life or not, that wasn't the goal for me.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    3. Re:Nope nope nope by Notabadguy · · Score: 1

      18-25 years of financial drain, emotional stress, and missing free time, MIGHT lead to an end-of-life benefit of ~2 year extension.

      That's not really what it's about, but to each their own.

      I don't regret having my son at all...he's grown up to be a good person and I'm proud of who he's become. .

      Of course you don't regret having your song. Having a child alters your neurological pathways to become more nurturing, which is how the human race continues. There's an ample body of work out there on it. If I'd had kids, I have no doubt that the same biological changes would have affected me and made me strive to raise my child well. But I didn't - and am financially, emotionally, and free-time(ly) glad that I didn't.

      http://www.iflscience.com/brai...
      http://www.popsci.com/pregnanc...

    4. Re:Nope nope nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      18-25 years of financial drain, emotional stress, and missing free time

      Why portray such a dismal view of what its like to have a kid when you have absolutely no idea what its like to have a kid? You claim to not regret it, yet you sound so bitter about it.

      Was it a choice you made? A choice she made for you? One you both agreed on? Unable to have kids? Did time just get away from you?

    5. Re:Nope nope nope by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Of course you don't regret having your song. Having a child alters your neurological pathways to become more nurturing,

      Sure, but the fact remains that if my son had grown up to be a worthless shit or a mean-tempered prick I wouldn't be proud of him- I'd feel like I'd done the world a disservice, a net loss if you will. But that's not what happened.

      I know more than a few parents who make no secret of the fact that they wish they'd never had children. Their children suck and they're honest enough to admit it (not like they could really deny it, to be frank). I credit my son turning out well to both luck and skill, but either way I'm proud of who he turned out to be.

      I'm glad that you're happy with the decision not to have kids. They're not for everybody, that's for sure. A lot of people want to have kids but not a lot of people want to raise kids, those are two totally different things, lol.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    6. Re:Nope nope nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having children is to continue our species, to teach them to be good people is to improve society. Choosing not to have children because it's too much work is an act of ultimate selfishness.

      And now you'll likely die lonely and alone and the world will entirely have forgotten that you ever existed. The end result of a life of selfishness.

    7. Re:Nope nope nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this is how evolution works. Thank you

    8. Re:Nope nope nope by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      Different poster, maybe I can help explain. I have to listen to friends gripe about their kids a lot. They have endless litanies of problems. They blame all kinds of things on their kids and ditch plans or financial obligations because of their kids.

      Then they have the gall to hound me about having kids. They make condescending remarks about how I'll change my mind. They claim that they love having kids when they're in hound mode but next time johnny burns a cat to death it's back to complaining.

      So yeah, I guess I'm a little bitter about it. The hypocrisy, lies, and bullying attempts to get me to make the same mistake make me a tad bitter.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    9. Re:Nope nope nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, I would get a broader, less biased perspective, rather than listen to a bunch of people with absolutely no parenting skills complaining about why their kids are so fucked up.

    10. Re:Nope nope nope by dieguiariel · · Score: 1

      This-> They're not for everybody, and being a dad surely doesn't make you a better person. I'm 39 and a recent dad. My little girl has 2 years old. I don't know if she's going to give me extra years, but after this two years i know that she is giving me great years. (Finally have an excuse for play with some of my wife's Jem dolls,and a real reason to say OMFGP without the F) I think that having kids must be a very personal choice, some people will enjoy raising a kid, sharing time with them, - the good and the bad times - and some people will enjoy spending time with his/her partner or hobbies or whatever brings them happy moments.

    11. Re:Nope nope nope by dieguiariel · · Score: 1

      I live in a third world country and believe me, here, people have kids as a result of a life of selfishness. They're make their children work for them. You can see mothers and fathers in corners waiting under a tree, drinking, while the kids are working on the streets, under the sun, or rain, begging for some cash to eat. Usually having more than 3 kids per family.

    12. Re:Nope nope nope by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      and being a dad surely doesn't make you a better person.

      It's made me a better person in lots of ways. YMMV, lol. :)

      It's brought me a lot personal growth in various ways that are kind of hard to quantify, but I definitely feel I've benefited greatly from being a father.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  34. Yeah but by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    "Parenthood Can Help You Live Longer In Older Age, Research Suggests"

    Yeah, but will it make up for the decade or so they took off your life in the first place? ;) lol

    Think of having kids as an accelerated stress & wear test- if you survive them then you're probably good to go for at least a few more years after they leave home.

    Just replace the carpet, drapes, furniture, appliances, bedding, and a few windows and you'll be back to where you were before you had 'em.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    1. Re:Yeah but by ErichTheRed · · Score: 1

      "accelerated stress & wear test"

      Absolutely agree. Look at before and after pictures of US presidents. They age a lot more than 8 years (or 4) in that job. However, most of them have the personality type to withstand it, having either been in politics for a lifetime or run businesses, or fought wars, or whatever.

      From the presidential biographies I've read, I'd never last in that job. You're subjected to lots of stress:
      - Hounded by the press and political factions every hour of every day
      - Having to simultaneously protect and make happy hundreds of millions of people who are all different and have completely different aims
      - Having your life scheduled down to the minute
      - Constantly traveling
      - Being woken up in the middle of the night to deal with a crisis that may or may not be known or threaten the country
      - Commanding one of the biggest (if not the biggest) military forces in the world and having to decide how and where to use it
      - Having the power and ultimate authority to destroy the world with nuclear weapons
      - Never being able to disconnect or unplug -- I'm sure bathroom breaks are scheduled events
      - Meeting world leaders who you may hate but have to work with, or like but have to disappoint, etc.
      - Actually knowing all of what your intelligence agencies know -- this would be the ultimate deal-breaker for me; I'm sure there's so much going on that the public never sees and not all of it is pretty or neatly packaged.

      If you can make it through that, sure, you're set for life. But it's a lot to get through!

  35. Re:As always - a crap shoot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Also, many of those who gain 2 years in life expectancy lose many more years of piece and quiet having to raise their brats.

    This. You gain 1.8 years, lose 18.

    Or you could gain 18 years + 1.8 years. I was uncertain about having kids, but went with my wife's wishes. Ended up with two Eagle Scouts who paid for their own college education via academic scholarships, one a National Merit Scholar. Their growing up was a delight punctuated only by fights over messy rooms. I now enjoy spoiling my grandchildren.

    It's a crap shoot, though. My neighbor's son stole three cars by the time he was 15 and is now a career criminal. I wish I could claim the difference was my superior parenting, but know better. I made my share of mistakes and then some. I just got lucky. YMMV, there are no guarantees.

  36. Exactly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I were rich, I'd simply have a girl on call for blow jobs. Sex? She doesn't want me, so why go through the effort and pretense? With oral, a pro still has to make the same effort as a lover to get you off, no room to pretend.

    1. Re:Exactly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I were rich, I'd simply have a girl on call for blow jobs. Sex? She doesn't want me, so why go through the effort and pretense? With oral, a pro still has to make the same effort as a lover to get you off, no room to pretend.

      Not sure if you're the same as GGP, but if so - your current GF who's 10 years younger than you still doesn't want you - you admit that as much when you say "Is she using me for my money? Almost certainly. But I don't care as long as I can pound that young pussy every night."

      Unless what you are actually saying is you want a relationship, but haven't figured out how to get past whatever emotionally stunting trauma you suffered that allows to value women as equal partners in a relationship.

  37. Maybe it calms them down? by ErichTheRed · · Score: 1

    When you're talking about the overall population as a whole, and expanding your study across socioeconomic lines, maybe the factor they're looking for is the calming factor kids have on the average person's personality. (I know any parent will think I'm crazy, but keep listening.) Being a parent is financially, emotionally and physically stressful. I have a 3 and 6 year old, and that phase where the second was a newborn and the first still always needed something was an absolute nightmare in terms of sleep and emotional well-being. I'm only now starting to climb out of the no-sleep, constant-stress fog.

    However, one thing I'm not is impulsive. I don't go tell off my boss when I'm having a bad day or rage-quit my job regardless of how nuts someone drives me. I highly doubt I'm going to get the sudden urge to skydive, or bungee jump or drive 110 MPH on the way home from work. Extend this out further, and people with kids might be less likely overall to smoke, take drugs, drink heavily or any other vice that reduces lifespan. Yes, of course there are plenty of parents who still do this stuff (and they're the most noticeable either on the news or reflected in their kids' behavior.) But I think overall, having responsibility for another human calms people down. People might also subconsciously want to stay healthier so they stick around. Childless people, even married childless couples, might not have that same drive below the surface. I've worked with lots of 20-somethings who just throw up their hands and walk out the door when they're mad about work...less doable when you have kids, even if your spouse has a job. There really is a settling-down that takes place -- it's rare that I see someone who has kids _and_ an angry chip on their shoulder; usually they're the divorced ones pissed off about paying child support, etc. If you're happy, it extends to other aspects of your life. If you're pissed off all the time, you just make everyone miserable.

    Do I ever wish I didn't have kids? Sure, it's easy to look at no-kid couples and singles who go through life without a care in the world, have millions of dollars in the bank by the time they're 50 and do whatever they want whenever they want. But I've kind of done that -- we had kids later. I wish we had done more, but if we stay healthy enough we can do that later. And if we do a good job, the kids won't come back to live in our basement. I know it's impossible to defend being a parent, but I'm really glad we did it. It was pretty telling when my father in law, who's Mr. Spock as far as emotions go, told me "Congratulations, having kids was the best thing I ever did." after we found out. He's right, and sometimes it's a pain in the butt, but who else am I going to play Lego Worlds with? :-)

  38. Or... by xlsior · · Score: 1

    ... Healthy people are more likely to get pregnant/have kids than those who are less healthy?

  39. bah by chronotis · · Score: 1

    Never mind living longer in my old age. I want to live longer NOW! I can already imagine what I would do with an extra few days or weeks per year.

  40. Living longer, wrong metric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some people without kids may live longer, but that does not mean they had a better Life.

    Perhaps the non-parents had a Real Life, and spent their time doing what they wanted and enjoyed.
    And, as a result they died a little earlier and 1000 times more satisfied with life.

    I'm a parent. The day you have kids your Life is over. You will have a 'life', but its not the same as the Life you would have with no encumbrances.
    Kids will make you age faster. Kids will prevent you from doing what you want, when you want it. They are expensive, and the reality is that no amount of love will REALLY pay back the metric ass-load of money you are putting out.

    I notice that a lot of parents sing the 'Parental Reality Tune' when you get a few drinks into them. I suspect most parents say they like being a parent much more than they actually do.

  41. I've been hearing all that since the 80s by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    and it's been downhill non stop.

    The crackpots have been chipping away at the fixes.

    Those same crackpots are stronger than they've been since the 40s...

    They've noticed all that education and they don't like it. They're working on eliminating it and replacing it with religion and authoritarianism...

    Kids will teach a nerd because what we used to call a nerd is now a neckbeard and they still mercilessly bully the neckbeard.



    And the last thing I want to do is let my kids decide. They're kids. They don't know shit from shinola.

    If I see any silver lining it's that Columbine scared the bejeebus out of the jocks and gym teachers so they've put the breaks on institutionalize bullying (e.g. when the teachers join in the fun) and that Birth Control is getting cheaper and more effective. The only way to keep people from being abused is to have so few of them you can't. It worked when we killed 22million in WWII.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  42. Or just maybe... by sarku · · Score: 1

    You're living for someone other than yourself... wow, what a concept.

  43. But I want to live longer in younger age by gshegosh · · Score: 1

    not older.

  44. Stop being an insensitive clod... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some of are not able to have children and once you find this out, you are like over a certain age when you are no longer allowed to adopt.

    Seriously I'd like to have children but fate and US laws prevent it.