Slashdot Mirror


Movie Theaters Haven't Innovated Beyond Popcorn, Says Netflix CEO (variety.com)

Janko Roettgers, reporting for Variety: Asked about his company's relationship with major theater chains, Netflix CEO Reed Hastings didn't pull any punches on Thursday. "How did distribution innovate in the movie business in the last 30 years? Well, the popcorn tastes better, but that's about it," he quipped. "What Netflix wants to do is to unleash film," he said. "It's fundamentally about growing the movie business." [...] On Thursday, Hastings pushed back against the notion that the company aims to bypass theaters. "We are not anti theater," he said. "We just want things to come out at the same time."

213 comments

  1. Microwave popcorn is cutting edge by OffTheLip · · Score: 1

    That, coupled with streamed or local content (discs) and I am good to go.

    1. Re:Microwave popcorn is cutting edge by reboot246 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Microwave popcorn? Blasphemy!! Buy unpopped kernels and make some real popcorn!

      Seriously, microwave popcorn has some strange chemicals you may not want to ingest.

    2. Re: Microwave popcorn is cutting edge by thundercattt · · Score: 1

      JiffyPop!

    3. Re: Microwave popcorn is cutting edge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My microwave spies on me while i eat my popcorn.

    4. Re:Microwave popcorn is cutting edge by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Insightful

      World-wide distribution on day #1. No more scratched, third-hand, celluloid reels. Better screens, better projectors, better sound. 3D projection on applicable movies.

      At the end of the day it's just a dark room full of chairs with a screen at the front. What else is there to innovate Mr. Hastings?

      Oh, yeah, one thing: http://theoatmeal.com/comics/m...

      Not widely implemented yet.

      --
      No sig today...
    5. Re:Microwave popcorn is cutting edge by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Christ yes! Microwave popcorn is surely one of the signs of the Apocalypse and an abomination before the Lord. "And lo I did see the fifth rider, and he rode in on a rubbery margarine-flavored piece of popped corn, and the name written on the bib tied around his puffy neck was 'Tastes like old shoes'."

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    6. Re:Microwave popcorn is cutting edge by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Christ, where is your theater? The deepest darkest jungles of Peru? I don't think our crappy little local theater has had an actual film projector in years.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    7. Re: Microwave popcorn is cutting edge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Trump tapped my corncob.

    8. Re: Microwave popcorn is cutting edge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just disable all open wifi networks around you and hopefully the microwave wont be able to call home

    9. Re:Microwave popcorn is cutting edge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fuck, there's even popcorn snobs?

      stfu.

    10. Re: Microwave popcorn is cutting edge by vux984 · · Score: 1

      hopefully the microwave wont be able to call home

      Ummm... it has a microwave transmitter built in. It doesn't need wifi... it can talk to the satellites!!

    11. Re: Microwave popcorn is cutting edge by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      If your microwave's magnetron has access to the outside world you have more serious problems than it spying on you.

    12. Re: Microwave popcorn is cutting edge by irving47 · · Score: 1

      Microwaves use around 2.4Ghz just like wifi routers, so maybe if you put a whole bunch of routers/AP's in, you can jam the microwave oven's ability to communicate. Turnabout is fair play?

      --
      I had a sucky sig.
    13. Re:Microwave popcorn is cutting edge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's just a commoner we wouldn't let into the coffee snob aristocracy. Pleb! Repent for your false delusions of grandeur.

    14. Re:Microwave popcorn is cutting edge by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      Microwave popcorn is surely one of the signs of the Apocalypse and an abomination before the Lord.

      Quick story:

      So, my wife loves popcorn. She grew up in a Soviet satellite state and they didn't really have good popcorn, so when she got here and was at university finishing her PhD, she really glommed onto it, and microwave popcorn was such a novelty that she and our daughter used to eat it all the time. It made the house smell like a chemical plant burning down and really tasted bad.

      About a year ago, I was taking the stove top pressure cooker out of the dishwasher and dropped it, breaking the important valves and bits. Now this was a decent stainless steel pressure cooker with the thick bottom for heat distribution and hating to throw it out, I stuck it in the back of the pantry and bought a new one. So one day, I'm at the farmer's market and some guy's selling popping corn from his farm. I had a memory of making popcorn in a big iron pot when I was a kid, and shaking the pot over the stove and then having to pick out the unpopped kernels, and I bought a couple of pounds of this guys popping corn.

      When I got home, I pulled out the broken pressure cooker, put a spoon of coconut oil in and fired it up. Put in a half-cup of popping corn. The phone rang, and I walked away from the stove and lost track of a couple of minutes. When I came back, I was afraid I had burnt the whole thing, but when I opened the top, there was a full 6 quarts of perfectly-popped popcorn without a single unpopped kernal. I didn't have to shake the pot over the flame at all. It was simpler than microwave popcorn and absolutely delicious. We put all kinds of good stuff on our homemade fresh popcorn now. My favorite is cayenne pepper. With the coconut oil, you don't really need butter and we've now tried everything from turmeric to carmel and melted dark chocolate. Or just eat it plain because it's so good.

      So I guess what I'm trying to say to all of you is, leave the microwave popcorn alone. They put chemicals that have nothing to do with popcorn or butter on it just to make it smell like something that smells a bit like buttered popcorn if you've forgotten what real buttered popcorn smells like. Don't eat that shit. It probably will give you cancer. Make your own goddamn popcorn. It's easy. You can thank me later.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    15. Re:Microwave popcorn is cutting edge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not in anyway related to the entertainment business, but here's some thoughts:

      rooms for smokers (not me), rooms for parents with babies (me),licensed-for-alcohol theatres, in-movie delivery of food / drinks, massage chairs, VR chambers, cult classics & theme groups/dress ups, playing super bowl / other sporting or popular televised events. There's scope for increasing appeal in many ways.

    16. Re: Microwave popcorn is cutting edge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hollywood stopped distributing movies on film 3 years ago.

    17. Re:Microwave popcorn is cutting edge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...do not forget the that movie theaters also can provide you with the latest version of the flu epidemic, sticky floors, and a sickly butter-like smell mixed with obnoxious corn smell.
      Would you not rather not have to drive away, stand in line, pay too much, look at a seriously limited snack choice, lose your pause button, and be bunched up with (sometimes annoying) strangers?
      I can see no compelling reason to visit these dangerously close to obsolete venues. Unless they mix it up with something else that people like to do, they are history.

    18. Re: Microwave popcorn is cutting edge by corychristison · · Score: 2

      I prefer air popped, personally.

      We just got a new air popper because the top part melted on the old one to the point it no longer properly diverted the corn to the bowl. It was a cheap $15 unit we got over 10 years ago.

      The benefit of air popped is you have the ability to easily control how much (or little) oil/butter/salt/topping is on your popcorn. Still get some unpopped kernels, though.

    19. Re: Microwave popcorn is cutting edge by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Yep. That'd be why I said "no more...".

      --
      No sig today...
    20. Re: Microwave popcorn is cutting edge by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 2

      YiffyPop

    21. Re: Microwave popcorn is cutting edge by pnutjam · · Score: 2

      The drawback of air popped is how damn loud it is, come on, I'm trying to watch a move.

    22. Re:Microwave popcorn is cutting edge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, microwave popcorn has some strange chemicals you may not want to ingest.

      Harmless to ingest. But it will cause life long problems if you inhale.

    23. Re:Microwave popcorn is cutting edge by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Even water is a chemical. And not only occurs naturally, but can also be synthesized in a lab, through biological processes, or as a by product of combustion.

      Artificial popcorn butter is a mix of flavorings. They may be of natural origin, or they may be synthesized. (usually the latter, it's cheaper these days). You can find the same "chemicals" in real natural butter, good old diacetyl, acetylpropionyl and acetoin. (with diacetyl being the famous one)

      You can also make your own popcorn in a microwave instead of buying the rather pricey bags. It helps to use rather fresh kernels to avoid too many unpopped ones.

      Interesting popcorn seasonings:
      * black pepper and unflavored popcorn salt (it's just fine salt), butter optional
      * Parmesan cheese - the cheap kind that is like powder, very light tasting if done without butter.
      * a spoon of the powdered cheese from a box of Mac'n'Cheese - optional but super cheesey with butter.
      * lawry's season salt (better with butter)
      * popcorn salt (with butter flavor) - it brings it pretty close to the microwave popcorn flavor some people really like (but this is edible in my opinion)
      * sugar and cinnamon - tends to need butter for the sugar to work (superfine sugar can kind of work without butter)
      * sugar, salt and instant coffee - it's weird.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    24. Re:Microwave popcorn is cutting edge by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Artificial popcorn butter is a mix of flavorings. They may be of natural origin, or they may be synthesized. (usually the latter, it's cheaper these days). You can find the same "chemicals" in real natural butter, good old diacetyl, acetylpropionyl and acetoin. (with diacetyl being the famous one)

      It's not the artificial butter flavoring that I object to so much as the stuff they put in that makes it smell like buttered popcorn.

      First, it doesn't really smell like buttered popcorn at all and second, when I was a kid I worked a couple of summers in a lab that made food scents and flavorings. I can tell you for sure that the stuff they put in food to make it smell like what it's supposed to be does NOT occur in that food naturally. And all you have to do is a simple A-B comparison of the two to learn that it doesn't really even smell like the real thing either.

      Real fresh popcorn has a pleasant smell which dissipates naturally in about a half-hour. Microwave popcorn smell lingers like a fart in church.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    25. Re:Microwave popcorn is cutting edge by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      Do theatres still have film projectors? I thought that they went the DVD route.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    26. Re: Microwave popcorn is cutting edge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also about 1,000 times more powerful. How didn't we see this coming??!?

    27. Re: Microwave popcorn is cutting edge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I laughed. The microwave laughed. I shot the microwave. It was a good day.

    28. Re:Microwave popcorn is cutting edge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like when you take out the bag from the microwave and smell it..

    29. Re:Microwave popcorn is cutting edge by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      I remember going to a special showing of all three Back to the Future movies, at a not-so-local theater, from the original celluloid. They were finally retiring their old-school film projectors, so we got treated to the glory of 25+ year old kinda scratched and beat up films. It was pretty cool, as imperfect as it was.

      It must have been in 2008 or 2009, I think.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    30. Re: Microwave popcorn is cutting edge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was the previous administration

    31. Re:Microwave popcorn is cutting edge by dddux · · Score: 1

      It's not just the chemicals that matter, but the taste and smell are so much better, and it only takes a couple of minutes to make them anyway.

      --
      "It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society." - Jiddu Krishnamurti
    32. Re:Microwave popcorn is cutting edge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This guy has no idea what he is talking about. In the past 30 years the quality of the viewing experience in the best theaters has improved dramatically.

      Has he heard of reserved seating?

      What has Netflix done to innovate? Bittorrent still offers better selection and better quality by far.

    33. Re:Microwave popcorn is cutting edge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not implement that comic in reverse - allow us to pay extra to watch the movie from a box seat with its own sound system and unobstructed view.

    34. Re: Microwave popcorn is cutting edge by Rande · · Score: 1

      I tried air popped - but I found that I had to add butter or oil or else the salt just fell to the bottom.
      Plus it doesn't make all that much. I eat a lot more than it makes.

    35. Re:Microwave popcorn is cutting edge by Rande · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I used a broken pressure cooker when I was young.
      Now I use a large glass topped pot.
      Watching the popcorn pop is fun in itself.

    36. Re: Microwave popcorn is cutting edge by corychristison · · Score: 1

      Indeed, it's a matter of preference.

      I like it Air Popped because I don't like a lot of toppings. Just a light drizzle of olive oil and a light dusting of sea salt.

      I usually only have a small amount at a time. I'm not a fan of forever digging bits of kernel shells out of my teeth.

  2. Ticket prices... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

    It now cost $35 per person for ticket and popcorn to see a late night movie.

    1. Re:Ticket prices... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you should layoff the popcorn?

    2. Re:Ticket prices... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you should layoff the popcorn?

      I can only afford a large drink these days.

    3. Re: Ticket prices... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pink Slip Popcorn

    4. Re:Ticket prices... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, we have stopped going to the theatre for most movies.

      For the price of 2 tickets we can wait until the DVD comes out, buy the DVD and watch it as many times as we like.

      Sure, some movies will be better on a big screen, but these are the ones that rely on their effects rather than the story line.

      And we won't pay extra for 3D now, again a gimmick to make up for a poor story line for most movies.

    5. Re:Ticket prices... by NFN_NLN · · Score: 1

      When you pay to watch the movie you should get a voucher for a free DVD of the same release.

    6. Re:Ticket prices... by sexconker · · Score: 2

      The only movie where 3D was worth it was Gravity.

    7. Re:Ticket prices... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Yep, we have stopped going to the theatre for most movies.

      Going out to the movies is the only time I get out of the house. Otherwise, I'm staring at my computer screen while working on my $1B app idea.

    8. Re:Ticket prices... by fyngyrz · · Score: 2

      For the price of 2 tickets we can wait until the DVD comes out, buy the DVD and watch it as many times as we like.

      and...

      o No dealing with other people's screaming babies
      o No babbling children at all (or, if they do, send them to their rooms w/o their cellphones... they'll learn fast)
      o No one playing with their cellphones
      o No one coughing the latest airborne disease out behind / next to you
      o No one talking (or if they do, pause and YELL at them)
      o Movie shows on your schedule
      o The ability to pause for bathroom breaks, snacks, etc
      o No waiting in line
      o No one sitting in front of you
      o Ability to switch movies if it turns out to suck
      o No freaking awful "local advertising"
      o Inexpensive and far higher quality snacks and drinks
      o No floods of someone's drink running around your shoes
      o Better seating (usually a lot better seating!)
      o Resale value for the disc, should you care to go there
       
      ...and that's just off the top of my head. I'm sure there's more.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    9. Re:Ticket prices... by irving47 · · Score: 1

      Found the big city slicker. Are you going to the alamo drafthouse type theaters and ordering a pitcher of beer, or something?

      --
      I had a sucky sig.
    10. Re:Ticket prices... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree vehemently. 3D doesn't have to be vast and sweeping to add to the viewing experience. That's nice, of course, but the subtle depth cues make most 3D versions of movies much more appealing than the 2D versions. If you don't know any better, the 2D is OK, but if you watch the 3D and then fire up the 2D for comparison, the flatness of the 2D is very apparent.

    11. Re:Ticket prices... by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      You forgot fresh popcorn more than you can ever eat using http://www.toptenreviews.com/h... and of course the microwave is really good for one thing specifically, lots of melty butter, actual real live butter to pour over the popcorn. Tips, fill one container with freshly popped pop corn and then decant to plastic tub with, lid, pour over melted butter, put on lid and shake (microwave can get a little bit fussy about too small a volume to heat, so either use lots and lots of butter or add a glass with some water alongside the glass with butter).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    12. Re:Ticket prices... by antdude · · Score: 1

      Why bother eat and drink in theaters? I just save those before and/or after the movie. :P

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    13. Re:Ticket prices... by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Considering just skipping the popcorn, if it's a good movie I've found that I don't really pay any attention to it anyway. I'm just suddenly at the bottom of the bag wondering where all the popcorn went, not worth it in calories nor cash. And without the salt you don't really need the soda either. Have a sugar free gum from your own pocket if you need to chew something out of habit. If the movie can't keep you engaged enough to go without it, you're probably in the wrong movie.

      That makes the ticket price around here ~$14 regular, ~$18.50 "Royal" screening and I always opt for the latter (unless it's only 3D, do not want). Only ~40 great recliner seats with good spacing and a high-end projector and sound system, there's no other special service really but it's all people that want a premium experience and it's dead quiet. I don't mean just "normal" quiet, it's barely so you remember they're there and if anyone does make noise they get the evil eye and go silent real quick. It's really the crowd that makes it worth the premium.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    14. Re:Ticket prices... by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      I'm assuming that's one of the VIP-style, have-your-own-leather-recliner-and-yes-there's-beer places? Because per Fandango, you can get a night ticket for an adult in Manhattan (Regal, Union Square) for around $16.50. While I'm sure the popcorn is overpriced, I somehow doubt it's $20.

    15. Re:Ticket prices... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Found the big city slicker.

      I live in San Jose, the third largest city in California and the tenth largest city in the U.S. So, yeah, I guess I'm a big city slicker.

      Are you going to the alamo drafthouse type theaters and ordering a pitcher of beer, or something?

      If I drink in public, it's because someone else is driving, I'm having a large steak and it's amber ale. The last time that happened was in Las Vegas.

    16. Re:Ticket prices... by jordanjay29 · · Score: 1

      Or at least a discount. If I'm going to see your movie, and then buy it, at full price each time, I might as well just wait until the DVD is out and pay once.

    17. Re:Ticket prices... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      It looks like I've been doing it backwards, butter+salt+garlic in the pot and corn in the microwave. Your idea sounds better.

    18. Re:Ticket prices... by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      It costs me $5 to go see a Tuesday night movie at a theater with electric recliners and a giant screen... $10 on other nights. Some theaters have improved a lot.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    19. Re:Ticket prices... by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      I use a pyrex measuring cup to melt it all because it has a handle and is less work to clean up than a pot.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    20. Re:Ticket prices... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      It now cost $35 per person for ticket and popcorn to see a late night movie.

      WTF? I've never paid more than $18 for that kind of combination. So maybe it's an American thing so I logged into the AMC Chicago website, nope about $20.

      Where do you live that you're paying that much for a trip to a cinema?

    21. Re:Ticket prices... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Where do you live that you're paying that much for a trip to a cinema?

      Silicon Valley.

    22. Re:Ticket prices... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Nope. Late night IMAX in Silicon Valley.

    23. Re:Ticket prices... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah ok. I live in Houston, the 4th largest city in the US. A non-matinee ticket rounds up to $12. If you're paying $25 for popcorn, then you're an idiot.

      Just something to think about for people out there who always bitch about how expensive it is to see a movie because for some fucking reason you HAVE to buy popcorn and candy and drinks... how about just going to the movie without buying all of that extra shit? Do you HAVE to have popcorn and all of that extra shit if you watch a movie at home? Would you be offended if you went to a friend's place to watch a movie and they didn't offer you popcorn?

    24. Re:Ticket prices... by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      That's because you are being charged the douche-bag tax.

    25. Re:Ticket prices... by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Why would they do that? If they had their way, you would have to pay each and every time you watched something. Giving out DVDs, even discounts for DVDs runs counter to that purpose.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    26. Re:Ticket prices... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      AMC Metreon: Logan tonight at 7:30pm, $12.90 for the standard session,

      or $20 for the upper market session in the awesome hall complete with recliners, it was the most premium and high-priced session available.

      Hyperbole doesn't help your case. You can literally go to a large chain cinema with popcorn for half the price you quoted.

    27. Re:Ticket prices... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Hyperbole doesn't help your case.

      What hyperbole?

      You can literally go to a large chain cinema with popcorn for half the price you quoted.

      According to my AMC Stubs account, my average ticket price is $17.99. The local AMC doesn't compare to the Metreon or the newer AMC in Newark with reserved seating and alcohol drinks.

    28. Re:Ticket prices... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Ahhh so now the condition is you want an upper class cinema with alcohol.

      That's quite a different statement from your original specification:

      It now cost $35 per person for ticket and popcorn to see a late night movie.

      Good work with the goalpost moving.

    29. Re:Ticket prices... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Ahhh so now the condition is you want an upper class cinema with alcohol.

      Upper class cinema was your comment. I just pointed out that my local AMC is not as nice as the AMC in San Francisco (which I've been to on a few occasions) or Newark (which I haven't been to).

      That's quite a different statement from your original specification:

      It now cost $35 per person for ticket and popcorn to see a late night movie.

      Let's do the math. The average ticket price is $17.99 and the concession combo is $17. Hence, $35 per person. My statement still stands.

      Good work with the goalpost moving.

      What goalpost moving?

    30. Re:Ticket prices... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Good idea. I'll try that with some other stuff in the microwave.

  3. No shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, anyone could've told you that. All they did was change their audio visual system over time, but that's really all.

  4. Profit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Selling you cheap polarized glasses at insane markup is pretty innovative, I think.

  5. Innovation in theaters? by Obfuscant · · Score: 2
    Popcorn? What about digital distribution of digital content displayed via huge digital display systems?

    Now, I know that when it first came out, the digital theater systems tended to "blue screen of death" too often, but please.

    1. Re:Innovation in theaters? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 4, Informative

      While digital changed quite a bit on the backend, how did it actually change the experience of watching a film in the theater?

      Sure, we can point to a spec sheet that says the resolution has improved, but did it really change people's experiences? We had IMAX during the analog days, so we weren't lacking for sharp, hi-res images, and even in everyday theaters the resolution was already high enough that most viewers didn't notice when the digital changeover occurred. The speakers we use today are in many cases the same ones in the same configurations we used decades ago. And when was the last time normal people actually cared about colors? I'd wager it was when Technicolor was still new, if even then.

      There's less visual noise (e.g. specks, film grain, scan lines, etc.) and less cases of a projectionists forgetting to start the movie on time (thanks to it being easier to automate now), but otherwise I can't think of much else I've noticed that's changed, let alone anything that I actually thought was a problem before.

      On the other hand, Netflix has completely changed the way that we as a culture consume media. Binge watching wasn't a thing before they were around. Or how about getting back hours of your day, thanks to Netflix taking 5 hours of broadcast TV and turning it into less than 3.5 hours by stripping out commercials and skipping intro sequences. Packing movies for a trip doesn't involve packing anything extra, thanks to them. These are all things that they helped push into the mainstream.

      I didn't even realize how spoiled I was by Netflix until I signed up for Sling TV. Being able to fast forward, rewind, or pause a VOD? Netflix always can, but Sling sometimes can't. Being able to watch anything available without paying extra? Netflix can, but Sling usually can't. Watching something while my wife watches something else? Netflix, yes, Sling, not without paying even more. The list goes on and on (which was why we cancelled our Sling subscription within the trial period), which just went to show us how much Netflix has changed our expectations about how we consume media.

      Moreover, as someone who never bought popcorn (or any other concessions) in the theaters, I'm not even enjoying THAT improvement.

    2. Re:Innovation in theaters? by tlhIngan · · Score: 2

      Binge watching wasn't a thing before they were around

      Actually, it was. We didn't call it binge watching though. We called them "marathons". During holidays, TV stations would do lots of marathons (especially cable channels) where they'd air the entire season at once (they still do). Theatres had movie marathons where just before a new sequel came out, they'd show the predecessors. Star Wars and Lord of the Rings were popular movie marathon showings, as were Star Trek.

      Heck, people sat down with entire DVD box sets of TV series and watched them one after another.

      And until the invention of the DVR, it was always a challenge recording a marathon since your standard VHS tape only recorded up to 6-8 hours a tape.

      All Netflix did was make it so you could hit a few buttons and conjure up your own marathon on demand, in other words, made it for the ultra-lazy to spend an entire weekend on the couch. (At least even the DVD guys had to go up every few hours to change the disc).

    3. Re:Innovation in theaters? by aevan · · Score: 1

      Drive-in Theaters often had marathon 'dusk till dawn' showings.

    4. Re:Innovation in theaters? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Yes. It's just another CEO putting shit on his competitors.

    5. Re:Innovation in theaters? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      While digital changed quite a bit on the backend, how did it actually change the experience of watching a film in the theater?

      At the cinema near me among other things it's meant many short runs or one off screenings of indie films and even screening sporting events on the big screen. It's brought the price down massively for small players and provides a lot more choice for consumers. I've got to see a few "cult" movies that way and even re-screenings are not so difficult as they used to be. The local cinema even had a session of "The Princess Bride" the other week. With the old distribution system such flexibility would be inconceivable.

    6. Re:Innovation in theaters? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Binge watching wasn't a thing before they were around.

      Yeah it was. Maybe not as much so, but you could rent a whole season of something from blockbuster and binge watch it on VHS, or pick up a box set somewhere cheap and do the same. Then it happened with DVDs especially as they became cheaper. I don't think netflix was the cause of the rise of binge watching it was more due to the general availability of cheaper media. I remember when box sets started to come out, they cost a FORTUNE, but you could rent them for a just about OK price. Then the price slid and slid and slid.

      Or how about getting back hours of your day, thanks to Netflix taking 5 hours of broadcast TV and turning it into less than 3.5 hours by stripping out commercials and skipping intro sequences.

      I thought it was tivo wot did that and then just DVRs in general.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    7. Re:Innovation in theaters? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      The local cinema even had a session of "The Princess Bride" the other week. With the old distribution system such flexibility would be inconceivable.

      Well played, sir.

    8. Re:Innovation in theaters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Netflix didn't innovate anything. Bittorrent and the unlicensed video providers had everything netflix had years earlier and still offer better selection and quality.

      Netflix is going to burn through all their cash getting hustled by hollywood on crap original productions and end up bankrupt and sold to some media conglomerate. That is about the least innovative thing in the world.

  6. Lennard Pottering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The best publicity man FreeBSD ever had.

  7. What does he expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Movie theaters can only show the content they are given. Netflix did little more than that until they started making their own content a few years ago. Showing video over the web? Oh, sure, no one ever did that before Netflix, right? Nope. People weren't downloading movies (illegally but...) in 1998.

    1. Re:What does he expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Netflix did some very decent work with their film recommendation algorithms. Easy to take for granted, but they're pretty good at recommendations.

    2. Re:What does he expect? by lucm · · Score: 1

      Netflix did little more than that until they started making their own content a few years ago.

      And they suck at it. Most of Netflix original content is garbage. Meanwhile, almost every single series made by Amazon Prime is fantastic (Hand of God, Goliath, Man in high castle, Patriot, etc). The day Amazon can make streaming as smooth as Netflix, there's no more Netflix.
       

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    3. Re:What does he expect? by jordanjay29 · · Score: 1

      You clearly haven't watched any of Amazon's original comedies. Talk about your steaming piles of garbage.

  8. Not really true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There have been attempts to give the movie theater a more club-like atmosphere where groups could sit around small tables, and also to integrate movie theaters with entertainment complexes that also featured bumper cars, arcades and the like. The problem is that that costs more money per customer, so somebody has to pay more. But maybe some merchandising genius will eventually hit on a formula that works. People do enjoy watching first run movies and live sports in a crowd where the reaction of the spectators is part of the entertainment, and a source of stories aftewards.

    1. Re:Not really true by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      We had a theater that cost less or the same for most shows that had tables and food. Alamo Drafthouse Theaters are popular for serving beer.

      I'd say our local theater has started doing a lot of 'innovative' things compared to how I remember theaters growing up.

      Our local theater has started serving beer as well.

      For 9PM and later shows rated R movies are no one under 17. With or without a parent.

      They have early morning AM shows for kids.

      They have shows with lower volume and higher house lights for autistic kids that are sensitive to the dark and loud noises. So they can get out and socialize.

      They replay old movies all the time and will have a "Back to the Future" or similar Marathons.

    2. Re:Not really true by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Our local theatre introduced a "Gold Class" theatre. 40 seats in total, all recliners. Full service selected up front from the menu at the bar and you could tell them when to bring your food in (a beer every 10 minutes is always a safe choice). Best of all, adults only. No one ever threw popcorn or talked in that theatre.

    3. Re:Not really true by ezelkow1 · · Score: 1

      People do enjoy watching first run movies and live sports in a crowd where the reaction of the spectators is part of the entertainment, and a source of stories aftewards.

      And that is why I dont go to the movies. Having to deal with stupid crowd reactions during a first run movie is not something I want or enjoy, at most it would be a story afterwards about how annoying it was

    4. Re:Not really true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We've got this at our local as well.
      They also put on the big televised sporting events for $10-15 and include a mini pizza & basic drink (soda, beer, wine) - that's in the bigger rooms so a few hundred people watching which is quite fun.

    5. Re:Not really true by jordanjay29 · · Score: 1

      Pretty much. I always shake my head at people who tell these stories as if they were the best thing ever, and I have to bite my tongue to keep from groaning and saying something nasty when they get to the part where "and the whole theater applauded when the credits rolled." No, no, no, no, no, no, NO! The movie is not a theater production, and unless you're at a premiere with the cast and crew, no one in that movie cares that you applauded for them.

      Give me a DVD or streaming version and I'll watch the movie and appreciate it, I might even post on social media about it. But I'm not going to be a dumbass and applaud.

    6. Re:Not really true by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Pretty much

      Eh. I think you're an unusual case. Most people seem to like a crowded cinema when the uadience responds to the film. But yeah, if you hate the audience, it's probably best you stay at home.

      The movie is not a theater production, and unless you're at a premiere with the cast and crew, no one in that movie cares that you applauded for them.

      What about the piano player? Doesn't he deserve some applause?

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    7. Re:Not really true by jordanjay29 · · Score: 1

      I'm definitely not an unusual case for the readership here at /. I'm wondering if you're in the right place?

      If I ever get to see a silent movie with a live piano player, I will absolutely applaud for them after the show.

    8. Re:Not really true by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      I'm definitely not an unusual case for the readership here at /. I'm wondering if you're in the right place?

      No one likes douchey members of the audience. For not liking legit audience reaction, I think you are in a minority here.

      If I ever get to see a silent movie with a live piano player,

      Only an option in a very big city, but they do exist. I've seen a few now.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  9. Popcorn by xfizik · · Score: 1

    I don't remember what popcorn tasted like 30 years ago, but it doesn't taste that great nowadays so maybe Netflix could do something about that as well.

    1. Re: Popcorn by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2

      It was better 30 years ago. Coconut oil and fake butter flavor with big salt crystals. Now it's coated in some sort of nanotech salt and the texture is more crunchy, like packing material. Fortunately I only need to go for IMAX-worthy presentations these days.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    2. Re:Popcorn by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

      If he's referring to the fact that it's generally tepid, stale, costs $10/tub and you have to pay for salt then I guess I prefer the pre-innovated stuff; warm, generally fresh, $5/tub popcorn and a complementary salt shaker on the counter.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    3. Re: Popcorn by jordanjay29 · · Score: 1

      I wondered why my latest packages have come with buttered and salted packing material.

    4. Re:Popcorn by Rande · · Score: 1

      It's pre-salted at the local cinema here...and it's _far_ too salty. Not really interested in consuming 3tp of salt in one sitting.
      So I just skip the popcorn entirely.

  10. Netflix didn't "innovate" by globaljustin · · Score: 0

    Netflix was a successful DVD rental by mail company that got the MPAA and copyright holders to put their content online for streaming. That is not some kind of "tech innovation"

    Yes, I'll grant you that Netflix's deal to allow streaming required *marketing* innovation...some kind of innovative way to package the deal to copyright holders...that is true.

    That's business and marketing innovation...it's not tech. An example of tech innovation is Youtube. They were able to build a system that allowed users to upload video and it worked well on the low-bandwidth internet of the time. The innovation was the technical ability to code and program a system to allow users to do that and make it scale.

    Why does this matter?

    Billions of dollars are invested into "innovative tech startups" every year...it's better for our industry (and our jobs!) if investors and the general public understand exactly what "innovation" actually is...in other words, I'm promoting anti-hype.

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re:Netflix didn't "innovate" by lgw · · Score: 1

      Netflix was quite innovative in their CDN. If you haven't worked "at scale" before: every time you add a 0 to the end of your user base, there's a whole new set of lessons to learn. Netflix is the single biggest source of web traffic (by bytes) on the internet. Getting there required innovation.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    2. Re:Netflix didn't "innovate" by RevDisk · · Score: 1

      They also open source their software, which is interesting. Somewhat their hardware as well. I've learned quite a bit about building scaling web sites from watching what they do. Vastly smaller scale, obviously. Still very educational.

    3. Re:Netflix didn't "innovate" by globaljustin · · Score: 1

      Getting there required innovation

      Yes, from engineers on a project doing regular coding work....but that's not what I'm talking about.

      "innovation" is such a misused and over-broad term these days....

      Netflix's concept is not "innovative" from a startup perspective.

      Everyone in the world thought it would be cool to watch movies over the internet...the only problem was copyright holders.

      --
      Thank you Dave Raggett
    4. Re:Netflix didn't "innovate" by lgw · · Score: 1

      Netflix's concept is not "innovative" from a startup perspective.

      So ... they don't defraud VCs out of their money?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    5. Re:Netflix didn't "innovate" by globaljustin · · Score: 1

      no, the concept of what defines "innovation" is so ruined by hype and nonsense it is hurting our industry

      --
      Thank you Dave Raggett
    6. Re:Netflix didn't "innovate" by lgw · · Score: 1

      Innovation is what engineers do when they create real products that reach many people. Ideas are easy, and an idea that no one turns into a product is worthless.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    7. Re:Netflix didn't "innovate" by globaljustin · · Score: 1

      that definition is entirely too broad and doesn't address the question were discussing

      --
      Thank you Dave Raggett
    8. Re:Netflix didn't "innovate" by lgw · · Score: 1

      I think you're trying for some sort of private narrow definition,but, sorry, can't guess what it is.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  11. My best movie going experience by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

    was sitting on a log in a rainforest watching The Neverending Story projected on a bed sheet.

    Maybe they could try that.

  12. Things out at the same time *is* anti-theater by elrous0 · · Score: 1

    No one in their right fucking mind is going to pay $10 for a popcorn, $7 for a soda, and $15 for a movie ticket PER PERSON if they can watch that shit at home with their whole family for a small fee. OF COURSE that would put theaters out of business.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re: Things out at the same time *is* anti-theater by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2

      You're claiming that nobody really likes theatres, that they just put up with them for the sake of access to new content.

      You might be projection your options onto the masses. And not in 70mm.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    2. Re: Things out at the same time *is* anti-theater by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      How many theaters have even have 70mm projectors anymore? How many even have pseudo-IMAX? Shit, my local theater is still showing most movies in 2K. I can go buy a 4K HDR TV at Best Buy right now with a better picture than my theater, and pick up a 7.1 sound system while I'm at it--all for less than what I would have paid for a 1080p TV just a few years ago. And I can make my own damn popcorn for a lot less than $10 a bag.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    3. Re: Things out at the same time *is* anti-theater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many theaters have even have 70mm projectors anymore?

      At least one. It's a really cool mechanism, too. The projection system is on a track that raises up into the projection position during the program, then lowers back down to the floor of the projection booth for reel-swapping. And I don't mean just a few feet, but it's probably 20-30 feet up from the floor.

      Imax theaters are competing against that, at least for my money. Every time I see "Imax", I think of a wrap-around screen and an 18kW sound system. No commercial theater I've ever been in can hold a candle to it. And the movies made for it tend to take you on first-person fly-throughs of things. Whee!

    4. Re: Things out at the same time *is* anti-theater by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

      All the old reasons for going to the theatre are obsolete. While there might be some voyeurs that'll let things slide, all the IR cameras pretty much mean they'll just kick you out straightaway now. What possible reason could people have to "like" the theatre?

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    5. Re:Things out at the same time *is* anti-theater by dbIII · · Score: 1

      No one in their right fucking mind is going to pay

      It impresses the girls, so you've pointed out well where the mind is focused when paying for all the marked up cinema fare.

    6. Re: Things out at the same time *is* anti-theater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're claiming that nobody really likes theatres, that they just put up with them for the sake of access to new content.

      That's a much less extraordinary claim than the amusingly far-fetched idea that people like theaters.

      What would there be to like about them? Are there any reasons that a person might want to go to them, other than access to something they otherwise can't get? I gotta admit, I'm totally drawing a blank on what else they offer.

    7. Re: Things out at the same time *is* anti-theater by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the benefit of some jerk two rows up talking on his cellphone, or the fidgeting kid who won't stop moving round or talking, or the crying baby, or the guy who's snoring, or the 300 ads the theater runs before they even start the 100-odd movie trailers.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  13. Amen! by jediborg · · Score: 1

    There are certain kinds of people that like to shout out loud, at the actors in the theater. There are those who like to talk amongst themselves whilst watching a movie, occasionally conducting a kind of running commentary on the movie while they are watching it

    I AM NOT ONE OF THOSE PEOPLE. But maybe if movies came out in theaters and netflix on day one, all those people could watch it together at home and i can enjoy the movie at the theater in peace, or vise versa.

    1. Re:Amen! by aevan · · Score: 1

      *waves hand

      Guilty. If the movie sucks, we tend to savage the hell out of it (though hopefully not loud enough to disturb others overly). Rapt attention is reserved for a good movie, but bad movies have their own appeal...kinda. Were we at home, we'd likely just have turned it off, but some of us at work made weekly outings for dinner and a movie, and the bad ones were more fun.

      Also: Rocky Horror Picture Show showings. Have props ready.

    2. Re:Amen! by Talderas · · Score: 1

      RHPS is a film that is over 40 years old. It should be common sense that midnight showings of anything is going to attract a different type of crowd than what you would be expecting during a normal movie going experience. It's also an anomaly in that it's one of those movies where pretty much every normal behavior that should be expected of movie goers is intentionally thrown aside, figuratively and literally.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
  14. Provide a new menu... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well I don't go to theaters anyway, but if I did I'd much rather beef tenderloin wrapped in tortilla w/mushrooms and garlic... and many other options...
    Problem"" is profit.. charge an arm and a leg for worthless popcorn...

  15. Wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They found new and innovative ways to piss of customers while at the same time raise prices ("hey, you wanna buy glasses for the 3d movie you just bought the ticket for? that's extra!").

  16. In 30 years we got... by subanark · · Score: 2

    1. 3D
    2. Better sound and video (I remember some movies being limited to complaint movie theaters)
    3. Chairs (reclining)
    4. More previews (and annoying pre-screening stuff)
    5. Online ticket purchases

    1. Re:In 30 years we got... by JeffOwl · · Score: 2

      I'm pretty sure 3D has been around longer than 30 years. Sure the tech has evolved, but I find it just as much of a gimmick.

    2. Re:In 30 years we got... by Drethon · · Score: 1

      1. Meh, saw Avatar in 3D, 3D wasn't bad but I will not pay the premium for 3D again... should not have paid the price in general for Avatar.
      2. Very nice, though at the same time there have been significant home theater picture and sound.
      3. Meh, don't think any of the local theaters ever installed this.
      4. Ebbeh! This innovation leads to more Netflix.
      5. Meh, I've never purchased tickets online, if the theater is so packed I need to, I don't really want to be there.

      Amusing list of innovations though.

    3. Re:In 30 years we got... by TooManyNames · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Online ticket purchases for a minimal convenience/service fee of 1.35 per ticket. What a deal!

      --
      "Is not a sentence" is not a sentence. Well damn.
    4. Re:In 30 years we got... by davidwr · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure 3D has been around longer than 30 years.

      I think he meant 3D using today's polarized-glasses tech, not ancient red-and-blue 3D.

      Unless you are into cheese, red-and-blue, or nostalgia, or you are watching an art film intentionally made to use "old tech," today's 3D is far better than the old way.

      --
      Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    5. Re:In 30 years we got... by davidwr · · Score: 1

      Avitar would've been great in 3D if 3D didn't give me a headache.

      I would up watching it in 3D with a group, with one eye closed most of the time.

      But for the headache, I would gladly pay a *small* premium for 3D for films where 3D really adds "value."

      --
      Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    6. Re:In 30 years we got... by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure 3D has been around longer than 30 years.

      How about at least 64 years?

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    7. Re:In 30 years we got... by Carrot007 · · Score: 1

      Er

      "Polarized 3-D projection was demonstrated experimentally in the 1890s."

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Yeah new.

      --
      +----------------- | What is the question!
    8. Re:In 30 years we got... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first 3d movie that is made where things aren't being tossed at the audience is when you know it is being used for the story and not just a gimmick.

    9. Re:In 30 years we got... by Drethon · · Score: 1

      For the most part, avatar did 3d right. They only had something jump out of the screen a couple times. Avatar as a movie just felt like Mass Effect 3 to me in a way, good concept and good parts but if it had just been done right...

    10. Re:In 30 years we got... by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

      So they've managed to catch up with my living room then poison it with 4) and 5) I don't think would work anyway...

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    11. Re:In 30 years we got... by rfengr · · Score: 1

      Last 3D movie I saw was Space Hunter in 1983. It used polarized glasses.

    12. Re:In 30 years we got... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Meh, saw Avatar in 3D, 3D wasn't bad but I will not pay the premium for 3D again... should not have paid the price in general for Avatar.
      2. Very nice, though at the same time there have been significant home theater picture and sound.
      3. Meh, don't think any of the local theaters ever installed this.
      4. Ebbeh! This innovation leads to more Netflix.
      5. Meh, I've never purchased tickets online, if the theater is so packed I need to, I don't really want to be there.

      Amusing list of innovations though.

      So Blue Lives Matter was a crap movie, has little to do with 3D.

    13. Re:In 30 years we got... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and I care about almost none of that.

      I don't watch 3D films because the glasses are annoying on my glasses, the 'rumble' boxes are just annoying, some have this weird thing where they serve you dinner while you are watching the film... we'd rather go to a proper restaurant afterwards... All this stuff is just a waste on their part.

      Cinemas don't need to 'innovate' - They do one thing and they do it well; They just need to keep incrementally improving it as tech progresses but they don't need to do stupid gimmicky shit like everyone shouting ME! ME! ME! to try and differentiate themselves.

      It's the gimmicky shit that would put me off going to the cinema!

      I feel this sort of thing is a big problem in the tech world - We have had things that have hit perfection - They fulfil their purpose optimally, and only really need minor tweaks to keep them current, but this addiction to 'innovate' has caused their developers to keep trying to 'improve' it with BIG REVOLUTIONARY CHANGES!!111!!1!1, and ended up making the thing worse, and they never see this and continue to turn the thing into piece of shit.

    14. Re:In 30 years we got... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      And what more could you want? The cinema is pretty damn good for what it is and what it does. Why does everything need to innovate?

    15. Re:In 30 years we got... by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Avatar was meant as a treat for the eyes, not plot candy for the brain. It would have been a lot better if it turned out that the Na'vi had been taking over the bodies of the humans, and for years had been going back to Earth with seed pods to "civilize" this planet; that our tendency to congregate in cities instead of living in rural areas stemmed from the fact that we were being herded to live in cities so that soul trees could grow in the wild spaces so that Eywa would awaken here.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  17. farewell iPic by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

    "Shunned by major theater chains, Netflix last fall struck a deal with iPic Entertainment, a small chain with 15 theaters."

    How long until MPAA finds some excuse to cut off iPic Entertainment from mainstream distribution?

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    1. Re:farewell iPic by sconeu · · Score: 1

      iPic is pricey, but good. Small theatres, full-bore recliners, blankets, pillows, storage areas IN CHAIR, free popcorn, in-seat food and bar service.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  18. Been to a VIP movie lounge lately? by mark-t · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I can't stand going to general admission shows since I first tried it a couple of years back now. Reserved seating for the movie, in-seat menu service for meals or concession before the movie starts, wider and more comfortable seats than GA, and with a bit more legroom to boot. Tickets are a bit more than GA, but man are they worth it!

    Gonna go see Disney's classic tale of Stockholm syndrome tomorrow afternoon with my wife in a VIP lounge....and there won't be any screaming kids. I heartily recommend it if you are willing to shell out the extra couple of bucks per ticket for an improved theater experience.

    1. Re:Been to a VIP movie lounge lately? by Misagon · · Score: 1

      What you are after is exactly the opposite of what I am after when I want to see a movie.
      Weird smells, chewing noises all around you and people who are talking and walking around in the theatre. Please, no!

      --
      "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
    2. Re:Been to a VIP movie lounge lately? by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

      If the GA experience is $50 for an extra couple bucks VIP lounge best be a euphemism for in-call service.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    3. Re:Been to a VIP movie lounge lately? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That shit aint new motherfucker.

    4. Re:Been to a VIP movie lounge lately? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Not brand new, no... it's been around for about 4 years and change, but the experience is still a pretty sweet one, and considerably more recent than movie popcorn that the story alleges is the theater's only innovation.

    5. Re:Been to a VIP movie lounge lately? by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      Ahh, Business class movies. Once you go business, you are really hard pushed to go back to economy.

  19. Not true by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Theater innovations since the late 1980s:
    * More IMAX/OMNI screens
    * More stadium seating
    * Buy tickets online or at a kiosk
    * More special screenings for people with autism or other special needs
    * More regular screenings of foreign or art films in "regular" movie-houses
    * More (or maybe better advertised) "events" like the Doctor Who events and MST3K events in the last few years
    * Movie-theater gift cards

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Not true by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Here's a hint about innovation: If you're saying "more" then you haven't discovered any.

      I don't blame the theaters for charging a lot for popcorn, they've got to make money somewhere and most of the independent theaters have gone out of business because they didn't charge enough for snacks, or find any other way to remain in existence. But really, how could they possibly remain relevant as a home theater experience comparable to the theater became affordable to the masses?

      My popcorn beats the living shit out of the theater's popcorn, too. I popped it in ghee and then added a little butter recently, but usually I do it with spices in olive oil. And then there's beer. Even when theaters have beer, it's not as good as what I've got at home.

      I've had a 52" LCD for around seven or eight years now, maybe longer, and if I would have watched half of even the new-to-me movies that I've watched on it in the theater to begin with, I'd have long since paid for it by staying home. I wouldn't have, so it's not literally saving me money, but I definitely feel I've got my money's worth out of it. And that's not even taking into account gaming, watching reruns, etc.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Not true by Zxern · · Score: 1

      Imax used to mean really fucking big screen, sadly most of the new imax screens being built today are little bigger than the standard screen sizes, with the imax logo slapped on it and boosted ticket prices.

    3. Re:Not true by lgw · · Score: 1

      Here's a hint about innovation: If you're saying "more" then you haven't discovered any.

      That's certainly not true. Doing something as a one-off, or in a way that it only works in very limited applications is different from figuring out how to make it mainstream.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    4. Re:Not true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know those are all complete crap right...

      Are you a marketer?

    5. Re:Not true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prototype to mass market isn't really an innovative process, just one of scale and replication. The processes to scale and replicate it might be innovative, but not the result.

    6. Re:Not true by jordanjay29 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. The only local IMAX used to be at the science museum, which was the only place large enough to hold the 100 foot screen, where you could practically sit anywhere and get the same great experience. Now they're just oversized screens at your local theater that aren't worth the 50% upscale prices.

  20. digital technology for one thing... by Idisagree · · Score: 1

    [snip]....Digital movies are projected using a digital projector instead of a conventional film projector. Digital cinema is distinct from high-definition television and is not dependent on using television or high-definition video standards, aspect ratios, or frame rates. In digital cinema, resolutions are represented by the horizontal pixel count, usually 2K (2048×1080 or 2.2 megapixels) or 4K (4096×2160 or 8.8 megapixels). As digital cinema technology improved in the early 2010s, most of the theaters across the world converted to digital. [snip]

    1. Re:digital technology for one thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Digital cinema is indisputably, undeniably _inferior_ to quality film projection. It caught on because the industry loves it because of production and distribution costs and logistics. The rest is marketing because when they change something they have to tell the masses it's an improvement.

  21. disagree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there's been plenty of "innovation," or attempts at it. dinner theatres, nicer seats, etc.

    the problem with the film industry is MOVIES SUCK

    10 years ago I used to watch almost everything, nowadays I might see 1 or 2 a year and it's almost always a waste of my time.

  22. really? by kaatochacha · · Score: 2, Funny

    "What Netflix wants to do is to unleash film," he said. "It's fundamentally about growing the movie business."
    How magnanimous. And here I believed they just wanted to make a lot of money.
    So I'll be waiting for my free netflix account, since all they want is to "grow the movie business".
    Good lord: You sell entertainment. Don't pretend like you're healing lepers.

    1. Re:really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He said movie business, not movie charity, you freeloading pirate!

  23. More than popcorn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They darn well innovated the 'plush' theaters. Does no one remember the crappy chaired, cemebt floored, small theaters of the 70s - 90s? Hell it wasn't until about the 2000s that sound buffering wall carpet, light paths along the floors, and reclining seats with cupholders came on the scene. Yeah it was a reason to jack up prices, but still... theaters have come a looong way.

  24. Well by nitehawk214 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Considering Netflix rarely gets any new movies anymore, one thing movie theaters have that Netflix doesn't is new movies.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  25. A bit of history by jediborg · · Score: 0

    The womens Bra was NOT invented by the undergarment industry in the 1800's. They where just making undergarments that people had been wearing for the last 50 years. A woman running a small business in NYC making dresses invented the Brazier so her dresses would look better on her customers. After a year she was selling and making more braziers than dresses. Eventually she bought a factory and started manufacturing and selling braziers across the country. By the time they started gaining mass appeal, the existing undergarment industry tried to launch a advertising campaign against them, but it was too late.

    This pattern repeats throughout history. Small business invent products that become whole new industries, and literally create new jobs that didn't exist before. This is what politicians are talking about when they say 'Small businesses are the lifeblood of the economy, they are the true job creators" its not just a good sound bite, its actually true. In the brazier example, the existing undergarment industry didn't really suffer, they where still producing underware worn around the buttocks area by both men and women. However sometimes these new growing small businesses will cannibalize existing big ones who failed to see the demand in the market for the new product and go out of business.

    Once upon a time Netflix was a small business. They created a whole new industry, new jobs that didn't exist before, and cannibalized BlockBuster. Of course movie theaters are next. Of course they didn't innovate for 50 years, they had no incentive to do so so long as the Hollywood studios has iron grip on Washington politicians and could push the TV networks around with their Hollywood prestige and money

    But now the Hollywood studios have started turning their backs on movie theaters. TV Networks are no longer small fry, and the theaters that are making money are the ones actually innovating (Ever heard of alamo drafthouse? Cheap tickets and decent food+beer served to you while you watch!) I won't be surprised if movie theaters become niche in the future. it would just be so much better to watch the latest marvel movie day one on my couch on my screen with my favorite beverage and meal.

    1. Re:A bit of history by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Brazier/brassiere.

      One is for holding up boobies, the other is something workmen warm their hands on.

      You can see how confusion arises...

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    2. Re:A bit of history by tsqr · · Score: 1

      A woman running a small business in NYC making dresses invented the Brazier so her dresses would look better on her customers.

      The word you're looking for is "brassiere". A "brazier" is a cooking device. And yeah, I know what you meant; context and all that. I'm just one of the shrinking number of literates that find this sort of thing jarring and distracting. Not as annoying as someone using a smartphone in a theatre, but see below. Don't fret though; eventually we'll all die out.

      Personally I enjoy going to see the occasional film in a movie theatre. We have a very nice television and comfortable couches, but it's nice to get out of the house once in a while for something other than "must do" errands and dinners out. Our local place has reserved seating in a nice, clean auditorium with very comfortable reclining chairs equipped with cupholders. And we haven't been disturbed by inconsiderate moviegoers in a long, long time.

    3. Re:A bit of history by jediborg · · Score: 1

      Whoops! Lol yeah sorry about that.

    4. Re: A bit of history by easyTree · · Score: 1

      We have a relatively local Indy single-screen cinema in art deco style with reservable sofas-for-two at no extra cost.

    5. Re:A bit of history by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      I you haven't figured out how to slip your hands into a brasserie to warm them up, you are really missing out. I warn you though, there's a significant amount of trial and error, grievous error, involved in figuring it out.

    6. Re:A bit of history by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 2

      a brasserie

      No thanks, I just ate.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    7. Re:A bit of history by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      Sweet jesus, it's the typo that just keeps on giving. Thank god braised feelings don't kill.

  26. I dont agree with article by dimko · · Score: 1

    The only thing it didn't do - it didn't die. All in all it has evolved into DVD/HD etc. Next evolutionary step will be VR experience in movies or even interactive movies. But hey, Cinema has it's niche. Some people prefer bicycle over motorbike and for many good reasons.

  27. Not the point by HideyoshiJP · · Score: 2

    Netflix is missing the point. While admittedly, movie theaters haven't done anything revolutionary for a while, they have steadily updated the picture and audio quality. These two things are the reason I continue to go to theaters instead of watch on my home theater.

    1. Re:Not the point by Misagon · · Score: 1

      Not really. Audio quality peaked about twenty years ago.
      A nth-generation screening copy of a film has practically the same resolution as digital 2K (about 1080p), and 2K is still the norm among projectors out there.

      And during these years, theatres have been "upgraded" to show stereoscopic "3D", often with the "Real D" system.
      However, with "Real D" you get less than half the light intensity of a 2D movie and worse: cross-talk between the left and right eyes. And then there are the artefacts that are inherent in stereoscopic 3D: fast action becomes a blur, gimmicky 3D effects in movies (yes, in 2017 we still have those) and also cinematography has to be simpler to work in 3D - which diminishes the art. And that is if you are one of the lucky 80% that are able to watch stereoscopic images, and watch them without getting a headache.
      Therefore, You can not say that "Real D" has good image quality.

      Then most showings are in 3D, so that you would have to pay more for worse image quality to see the movie. The only alternative for 2D is often a small shoebox-sized theatre some way out of town that does not have good audio.

      Also, Real D is not compatible with the more brighter types of screens out there because of the need to avoid light scattering, so screens have had to be downgraded.
      And this means that when 2D movies are screened, they are screened on these same duller screens that are inferior to the ones that were used twenty years ago.

      Yes, in the recent years Laser-IMAX has emerged, and that one is properly bright. There is however the so-called "Lie-Max" that is labeled IMAX but is basically what I have talked about above and you should not confuse the two.
      Laser-IMAX has the only 3D tech out there in real theatres that has decent image quality ... but the screen is closer to the audience than in regular threatres, so you have to make sure to get a seat right in the middle of the theatre or else you would have to watch it from a skewed angle. The screen's aspect ratio is also smaller, which means that some movies are shown zoomed in.
      That is if there is a Laser-IMAX theatre in your area at all, and you think you can spend two-three times the price of a normal ticket...

      --
      "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
  28. Reserved seating by reagan9000 · · Score: 2

    Not true. In my city in the US, theaters have introduced at-seat table service and reserved seating. The former is nice to have but the latter is transformative. No queues, no racing for seats, no getting stuck in lousy seats or separated from your friends. Contrary to Netflix's self-interest, there are still films that benefit from being viewed in a movie theater, and reserved seating completely removes any tension or unknowns from the experience.

    1. Re:Reserved seating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, except for the coughing, the noise, the children, teenagers being dicks and the round of applause from mouthbreathers at the end of the movie.

    2. Re:Reserved seating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoken like someone who has never tried watching a movie at home with coughing, noisy children, and mouth breathing teenagers.

    3. Re:Reserved seating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you have never been to an Alamo Drafthouse, Flix Brewhouse, or Movie House & Eatery. There are only special times during the day when babies are allowed, otherwise, no one under 18 is allowed in the theater. Noise is minimum, especially when you consider the volume of most movie screenings.

    4. Re:Reserved seating by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Reserved seating sucks. Unless you're familiar with a particular theater, you don't know where the good seats are. You don't know until you get into the theater that the person in front of you is 7 feet tall and wears a top hat, or that the person on your left you weighs 400 pounds and talks and farts without pause, or that the person on your right is pulling his pants down, or that behind you are children spilling their gallon soft drinks and resting their feet on your shoulder.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  29. Useful Innovation by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    What about digital distribution of digital content displayed via huge digital display systems?

    It basically looks just the same as that from a film. It might save the cinema money but it does nothing for the customer. There is pseudo-3D I suppose but that shrinks the screen and gives many people a splitting headache after a few minutes. So I suppose the criterion should be innovation that is good for the customer.

    1. Re:Useful Innovation by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      It basically looks just the same as that from a film.

      The fact it "looks just the same" (not really, if you know what to look for) doesn't mean it isn't innovation.

      So I suppose the criterion should be innovation that is good for the customer.

      Why? Isn't an innovation that makes it easier to distribute content in higher quality an innovation, even if you can't tell the difference?

    2. Re:Useful Innovation by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

      Why? Isn't an innovation that makes it easier to distribute content in higher quality an innovation, even if you can't tell the difference?

      Yes technically it is an innovation but unless it does something to improve the cinema experience why do I care? It is like the innovation of circular tea bags. Yes this is technically an innovation and yes it will temporarily boost sales but only until everyone figures out that it makes no difference whatsoever and goes back to what they were doing before. What a lot of people seem to forget is that it is not innovation we want it is useful innovation.

    3. Re:Useful Innovation by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Yes technically it is an innovation but unless it does something to improve the cinema experience why do I care?

      Who says you have to care about any innovation? The Netflick flack is claiming there has been none, not that there has been nothing that Roger W Moore cares about. "There has been no innovation" is not the same as "there has been no innovation that I care about."

      What a lot of people seem to forget is that it is not innovation we want it is useful innovation.

      And the digital distribution of movie content is useful to a lot of people, just not to you. That's ok, but it doesn't mean it doesn't count at all.

    4. Re:Useful Innovation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It might save the cinema money but it does nothing for the customer.

      That is because customers are to stupid to notice what it does for them.
      You no longer have to wait for the local cinema to get their hands on the movie. It will be shown in all cinemas the day it is released.
      It didn't use to be that way.

  30. That's an example of back-end tech by davidwr · · Score: 1

    From a movie-watcher's point of view, there is very little difference between a digital theater and a brand-new 70mm print on its first trip through the projector.

    From a theater-owner's perspective and from the distribution-channel's perspective, there are huge differences.

    So, I guess it's a difference in distribution but not one most consumers will notice, except that they may notice the lack of streaks on the screen.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:That's an example of back-end tech by lgw · · Score: 1

      No "innovation in distribution" was Netflix's claim, which clearly isn't true. As a viewer, since I never see movies in the first couple weeks of a run, digital was a huge jump in quality for me. But given the nearly empty theater around me when I go, clearly I'm in the minority as my habits here.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  31. It's not that they suck Re:disagree by davidwr · · Score: 1

    For me, it's that they aren't as cost-effective as entertainment as they used to be.

    If movies were $1 each I'd see dozens a year. As it is, I see only a few a year in the theater.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re: It's not that they suck Re:disagree by easyTree · · Score: 1

      But but but each movie costs £2^32 to shoot and it's your responsibility to pay.

  32. Movie theaters by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    Going to the movies, use to be about watching something on a HUGE screen, with a LOT of sound. Other than a 10-15 foot tall screen, you can still have a 40-50-60 inch screen, with a lot of sound for an inexpensive price, enjoy the movie in your own home, eat your own snacks. Taking a "typical" family of 4 to the movies these days, can, in places, run around 100 bucks by the time you figure in the gas, tickets, snacks. Plus, considering the movies released these days, are reboots, or part 5,6,7 of something, there isn't a lot of movies, for me anyway, that I want to spend a lot of money on.

  33. Then make assets from film available by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    I'm not asking for the asstes to be made available for free, just available like assets in the Unity asset store. I know that asset flippers have been getting a lot of attention and making the whole notion seem like a bad thing, but that is something that needs study.

  34. No, but that sounds exactly like my local theater. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're not a VIP, this is just what they're turning all theaters into.

  35. Back to the future Re:More than popcorn by davidwr · · Score: 2

    They darn well innovated the 'plush' theaters.

    More like re-invented them.

    Ever been to a classic theater from before WWII?

    Some of those are very ornate and very classy, on par with a classy stage-play theater or concert hall, except the acoustics generally aren't as good as a concert hall. Many of them are now used for stage plays or other events instead of film.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Back to the future Re:More than popcorn by camperdave · · Score: 1

      It went the other way around most of the time. Pre WWII theatres were converted from stage-play theatres to cinemas. That's why they were ornate and classy in the first place.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  36. Theater Merchandising? by crow · · Score: 1

    Why don't movie theaters do merchandising?

    When people are done seeing a movie, there should be a shop that sells copies of the soundtrack, copies of the other movies in the franchise, related toys (as appropriate), etc. They could even sell the Blu-Ray of the movie you just saw (whether restricted sales to movie-goers, sold to anyone, or pre-sold with day-of-release delivery).

    There is so much in the way of movie merchandising, and the theaters seem to completely miss it. Even if they're contractually locked out (which is stupid), they could lease a separate store adjacent to the theater that sells movie merchandise. (Perhaps I should start that chain--too bad I already have a good job.)

    1. Re:Theater Merchandising? by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      Good point. Theatres in my area usually have an arcade, a variety of food options beyond popcorn & soda and... well, that's it.

      They really should have a joined space (separately accessible outside theatre hours) that sells movie-related merchandise. I'd certainly make sure posters were on the list. And though you'd ultimately have to measure-and-order, I think using the bricks & mortar presence to market licensed movie costume replicas wouldn't be a bad idea, even if it's just a fairly normal jacket.

      Throw in a decent large-format high quality printer and sell actor cut-outs on demand as well.

      It might not have as much markup as popcorn, but I bet you'd have a huge boost to your net income.

  37. Assigned Seating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is a freakin' movie theater, not a $100 ticket performance.

  38. E-Magine by JBMcB · · Score: 2

    In Michigan we have theaters called E-Magine. Awful name, outstanding theaters. All of the theaters themselves are fairly small, which means you aren't sitting too far away from the screen. The screen stretches from wall to wall, and they are all dimensioned properly. All of the seats are motorized extra-wide recliners. For a couple of extra dollars you can sit in a row with more leg room than you could possibly need. All the screens, projectors and speakers are properly maintained. They also have reserved seating so you can pick your seats hours before you show up to the theater. Most theaters also have waiter service, so you can just sit down and they'll bring you a drink and popcorn, including liquor, before the movie starts.

    They also have special matinee showings for kids with sensory issues, so no trailers, they keep the lights on dimly, and turn the sound down, which is fantastic.

    Ticket prices are, of course, a bit more than regular, but we don't see many movies so it doesn't matter that much to us.

    --
    My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
  39. Netflix is full of it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Plenty of innovations beyond "popcorn" fools. Go to an Alamo Drafthouse or similar. Order some adult beverages, food, have it delivered to you, and watch the idiots with their cellphones get kicked out.

    Don't recall movie theaters doing this when I was younger.

  40. OMG! Buritos! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, and Taco Bells will suddenly appear in cinemas around the country, along with a mini-Starbucks and Baskin Robbins!
    Whoppers and fries!
    Smoked sausages!
    wriggly things on sticks! ( ref Simon Green - The Nightside series, for the noobz )
    Unicorn poop!

    although all of it has probably been eliminated by lack of cost-effectiveness ( not enough profit...)

  41. Bullshit! They DO innovate.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My local cinema has installed transgender bathrooms, and has a special "safe space" in each theater where snowflakes can watch the movies without being bullied by normal people. Netflix can't match that.

  42. Re:No, but that sounds exactly like my local theat by ezelkow1 · · Score: 1

    this

    we went to do our usual christmas eve movie. The only option was a theater that was basically a 40 seater with recliners and reserved seating. Ticket price was still the same.

    They've finally started to realize that was people want is to just watch movies at home, and so they are just trying to replicate that experience. This is why I never go to the theaters unless prodded by friends, otherwise my own home theater setup provides a much better experience

  43. Re:No, but that sounds exactly like my local theat by mark-t · · Score: 1

    Any appearance that I might have been suggesting that *I* was somehow more important than anyone else because I go to such lounges is a misinterpretation on your part, since I was only referring to the term "VIP" as it applies to what they happen name their lounges.

    Also, they can't turn all theaters into such lounges because minors are prohibited from them, primarily by virtue of the fact that they serve alcohol.

  44. It's a lovely snark, but: video game finals! by davecb · · Score: 1

    My theatre (Cineplex, in Canada) hosts video game finals.

    WorldGaming.com, my old customer, is now part of the Cineplex chain.
    There's nothing like a theatre full of gamers cheering their heroes on!

    I'm a motocrossman, myself, but these folks are serious

    --
    davecb@spamcop.net
  45. Digital Cinema by TheSync · · Score: 1

    "How did distribution innovate in the movie business in the last 30 years?"

    Umm, I don't know, how about getting rid of film and adopting the Digital Cinema System Specification?

    1998 was the first public demo of a digital cinema projector. As of 3 May 2016, 98.2% of the world's cinema screens are now digitized, likely saving $1 billion in distribution costs.

  46. I don't care what Netflix says or thinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm never giving that company another dime of my money. They can go bankrupt tomorrow as far as I'm concerned.

  47. Re:Useful Innovations by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 2

    It basically looks just the same as that from a film.

    You must be too young to remember film, or too senile to remember it. Scratches and dust on film was very noticeable, and became more annoying the longer a film was in use. It's been a while since I've seen a digital projector glitch, but I remember film getting stuck and melting somewhat frequently. And don't forget the projectionist getting the reels mixed up.

  48. There are some real innovations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Movie and a restaurant is a real innovation. AM specialty movies (we saw Matilda with cereal in pajamas). Beer in movie theaters. But the real question is directed toward mainstream movies theaters. They've innovated a little, but very little. There's buy your ticket online, pick it up at the door (a real treat if you hate lines). There's reward points for watching. Beyond that, almost every "innovation" involves serving the distributors: 3d movies (never cared for them), digital distribution direct to the camera (I care about what's presented to me, not how it's delivered to the theater). Cell phone blocking equipment (barely seems to work better than the old standby, ejecting patrons from the theater).

    Most of the "movie innovation" doesn't serve the audience. It serves the industry. That's why I'll go to a smaller, better run theater like Alamo Drafthouse. I want a good experience for me, I don't care as much about the experience for the distributor.

  49. Uhh by easyTree · · Score: 1

    Not true - a few years back they innovated by employing Gestapo tactics against anyone not in possession of a photographic memory, seeking to augment with the help of a video recording device.

    Pushing - the - envelope!

  50. So many butt hurt whiners here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm actually impressed at the number of butt hurt whiners here!

    Thanks /. for continuing to lower the bar.

  51. I second the tumeric by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Tumeric is a very good addition IMHO. In small amounts it makes everything bright yellow without changing the taste at all and in larger amounts it adds a slightly bitter taste that goes well with garlic and salt.

  52. None of those problems in some places by dbIII · · Score: 1
    My local cinema isn't crowded most of the time (and does trailers only before the movie) so most of those problems do not apply. Maybe try going off peak or to an "art" cinema that pays with bills with mainstream stuff as well.

    Resale value for the disc, should you care to go there

    I think those days are long gone.

  53. The public doesn't let theaters change. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the early 2000s, when movie theaters were starting to replace their film projectors with digital projectors, I expected theaters would vastly broaden the variety of shows to include things like letting the audience play multiplayer video games on the big screen or show live sports. I also expected these kinds of shows to be very popular in theaters, perhaps even more popular than theatrical runs of movies. Unfortunately, these kinds of "alternative content" never grew beyond a tiny niche. The most popular kind of non-movie in movie theaters turned out to be the Metropolitan Opera.

    The public has such ossified expectations about what experience a movie theater should provide they couldn't even handle the Hobbit movies running at 48 frames per second. That's a far smaller change than movie theaters running video games and sports and it accompanied one of the most popular and biggest budget movie franchises but it was still too much.

    Movie theaters can change and they have tried to change but if the public punishes them for trying, they won't. All the ambitious, creative people in Hollywood now work on cable TV, streaming, video games and VR because the public rewards those mediums for innovating.

  54. iPic Theaters are slick by SpiceWare · · Score: 1

    Over the holidays I took family to the iPic Theater here in Houston for a screening of Rogue One. They have some really innovative seating pods - pairs of recliners share a table, and have a short sound proofing wall wrapped around them to help cut down on noise from other patrons.

    I posted some photos of them at the end of this blog entry - Two million pounds of ice on a subtropical island!

  55. Movie Tavern by nessman · · Score: 1

    What's gotten me back into the theaters is that a Movie Tavern nearby about a year ago. Reserved seats, comfy large leather recliners in a stadium seating arrangement, lots of legroom, waiter service to your chair with meals, snacks, beverages, beer and wine - and a button at your chair you can push to summon your waiter back for more beer. Prices are not much higher than most theaters, the food is Applebees price and quality and the beer is cheaper than the popcorn.

    I like Netflix, but they have too many 2nd rate movies that barely made it to the big screen.

  56. Simple Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This controversy can easily be solved by digital distribution of popcorn. I have a crowdfunding page if you want to contribute.

  57. Kanker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    esdfgdrewdasfse