Slashdot Mirror


Windows 10 Will Download Some Updates Even Over a Metered Connection (winsupersite.com)

Reader AmiMoJo writes: Until now Windows 10 has allowed users to avoid downloading updates over metered (pay-per-byte) connections, to avoid racking up huge bills. Some users were setting their ethernet/wifi connections as metered in order to prevent Windows 10 from downloading and installing updates without their permission. In its latest preview version of the OS, Microsoft is now forcing some updates necessary for "smooth operation" to download even on these connections. As well as irritating users who want to control when updates download and install, users of expensive pay-per-byte connections could face massive bills.

327 comments

  1. Really, Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    At what point do people get fed up and switch to something else?

    1. Re:Really, Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Never.

      "If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever." - George Orwell

    2. Re: Really, Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When my VST plug-ins run properly under Linux.

    3. Re:Really, Microsoft? by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      At what point do people get fed up and switch to something else?

      Don't know but I'm sure someone will sue M$ for using their telecoms expressly against the users permision

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    4. Re:Really, Microsoft? by cfalcon · · Score: 2

      > At what point do people get fed up and switch to something else?

      I'm pretty sure Windows users will put up with anything.

    5. Re:Really, Microsoft? by stealth_finger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Windows is pissing me off, mac is too expensive and I don't know anything about linux nor have the time to devote to it. What else have you got?

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    6. Re:Really, Microsoft? by Bozzio · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've got the uncomfortable fact that nobody owes you anything and that you'll just have to deal with the reality of your situation.

      --
      I just pooped your party.
    7. Re: Really, Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can roll back to an earlier version like I have and not worry about updates at all... Build 6400 ftw!

    8. Re:Really, Microsoft? by harperska · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Try Haiku. It is free, and much simpler than Linux. The fact that no software exists for it yet just means it's even easier to use.

    9. Re:Really, Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A massive class-action lawsuit is about the only thing that is going to stop Microsoft from doing this kind of thing it seems. In light of how the company has behaved ever since the release of Windows 10, I hope they lose and are fined tens of billions of dollars in cash.

    10. Re: Really, Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess you were too fucking stupid to use a Mac. Vst on linux, shyeah, linux audio is already retarded and broken.

    11. Re: Really, Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What other consumer- grade OS which can be freely installed by OEMs is there? It's not like the average person on the street is going to bother learning Linux.

    12. Re:Really, Microsoft? by ai4px · · Score: 1

      Right about now.... just last week an update broke my wifi driver. I actually rolled back to last week's acronis backup to get my PC working. So yeah, don't know if it is any better, but this morning I'm actually shopping mini-macs for the home PC. Getted damned tired of restarts that take 8 minutes. My tablet will (android and ipad) will both restart like nothing happened. Microsoft has really hosed themselves on this one!

    13. Re: Really, Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just checked my Windows build and it says 2600, sounds sweet and reminds me of that 2600 frequency whistle produced by a freebie from Captain Crunch.
      Build 2600 ftw!

    14. Re: Really, Microsoft? by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      Most people find MATE-based Linux easier to learn than Windows 10, because, unlike Windows 10, Linux looks like the Windows they've used for decades.

    15. Re: Really, Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately updates are going to be a thing until we change this perception that updating is quick and easy. Anything quick and easy done enough times gets boring. Companies also need to become more aware of each other and stop fighting to take over the desktop. Too many apps in the systray makes for a pretty crappy Windows experience, especially when they all wake up randomly and decide to start updating.

      The current tug of war going on to steal user attention for advertising is making computers anti-productivity tools. Too many distractions and too much self-maintenance.

    16. Re: Really, Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yay for the old school BeOS reference!!

    17. Re: Really, Microsoft? by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1

      If it's already installed for them, then there isn't anything more to learn than they'd have to learn with Windows 10 anyway.

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    18. Re:Really, Microsoft? by slk · · Score: 1

      Switch to what?
      Mac is a mess with non-expandable hardware and an OS that has gotten nothing but half-assed "borrowed from the iPad" updates over the last few years.
      Linux does not usefully run productivity hardware such as high speed scanners (yes, I've tried it, and no, the inability to do things like automatic page sizing means it is not usable). It also doesn't play well with gaming (even light gaming) quality GPUs without an awful lot of hassle.
      I've used damn near everything on the desktop (Windows, Mac, Solaris, Linux, FreeBSD, Irix, etc). Right now it pains me to say that Windows 10, especially with WSL, is the least awful option. At least you can get Thinkpad keyboards with it...

      --
      ERROR: Null .sig, core dumped.
    19. Re:Really, Microsoft? by gfxguy · · Score: 2

      That's an awesome post (and you deserve the insightful mods) because you answered both the parent and GP posts. I use very high end software that runs on Windows and currently nothing else. All the idiots that keep telling me to use Linux (I already do when I can) do not understand the reality of most people's situations.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    20. Re: Really, Microsoft? by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Nice. And I won't worry about security or running the most recent versions of the software I'm required to use for work. It's all good.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    21. Re: Really, Microsoft? by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Agreed - everything you install thinks it's the most important thing you use, as if it's the only thing you use , even just simply drivers. My video drivers nag me to update, my printer drivers nag me to update, anything from Adobe, Apple - they all run these f#@king background processes checking for updates. Like much of Windows 10 telemetry and spying, you need to jump through hoops to turn it all off.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    22. Re:Really, Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering they haven't gotten fed up with paying for a fake commodity so far, why would this make them mad now?

    23. Re:Really, Microsoft? by JenovaSynthesis · · Score: 1

      You also forgot the part where Apple will sell you old hardware and never drop prices either.

      --
      Anonymous Cowards generally receive no replies because you're a coward and I'm a bitch :)
    24. Re:Really, Microsoft? by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

      We windows user don't want to throw away the good money we spent on very good products,programs and games that will not run on any other platform. Those being Mac,Linux. Cant talk for the others but im more then willing to switch but unwilling to throw away money to do it.

      --
      Jack of all trades,master of none
    25. Re: Really, Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd need a Powermac to rival what I have now, and... No. Just no.

    26. Re: Really, Microsoft? by tepples · · Score: 1

      Windows 7 still has about three years of "extended support" left, which includes security updates to Windows. Which software that you're required to use for work has dropped support for Windows 7 or 8.1?

    27. Re:Really, Microsoft? by Wootery · · Score: 1

      That's stupid. Of course there's something MS could do to drive people away from Windows.

      Perhaps wholesale breaking of backward-compatibility might do it. Well, if there were a Linux desktop distro worth taking seriously as an alternative, at least (I admit I've not been keeping up on that front).

    28. Re:Really, Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If you want a vision of the future, imagine a butt sitting on a human face - forever." - Dolan Trump

    29. Re:Really, Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am pretty sure your wrong.

      There are 3rd party solutions and settings to almost any or perhaps all windows 10 bs.

      If you do not know how to google try you tube they are easy to find.

    30. Re: Really, Microsoft? by Merk42 · · Score: 1

      If it's already installed for them, then there isn't anything more to learn than they'd have to learn with Windows 10 anyway.

      If it is already installed for them....that's a major hurdle. Finding something other than Windows (or macOS) pre-installed is nigh impossible*, the exception being Chromebooks which seem to do well.


      *yes I know of things like System76, or even the Dell computers, but the average person going into a Best Buy is not going to see them.

    31. Re:Really, Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Didn't they do it in part already, when going from XP to 7 and then again 7 to 8? 7 was based more on a win64 subsystem, as opposed to XP, and 8 again broke a few things that ran under 7. Point is that all Windows ISVs HAVE developed versions of their software for Windows 10, so application support is still good.

      The only thing that would drive people from Windows is if support dried up. Look at Windows Phone to see why. The phones are good, if not great, as is the OS. However, most popular apps that are there on iOS and Android ain't there on this, and that's what caused the Lumia to fail. Similarly, if software vendors stopped making Windows DESKTOP versions of their software - preferring instead MacOS, ChromeOS, BSD or Linux, that's when Windows would dry up. One would see leading signals - like when all laptops or desktops are preloaded with ChromeOS, SteamOS, et al

    32. Re:Really, Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess in your world everyone who uses windows is on win 10?

      Win 10 has 25% and it is dropping slowly and some of us with win 10 know how to use a search engine to find solutions to nearly all the unwanted win 10 shite give it a try or you can keep crying.

    33. Re: Really, Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, windows dev is the easiest dev. By far hands down. With OS X or Linux, I don't even know where to begin and think it would be. It profitable enough to care. Especially for Linux. Then there are mobile apps and web dev.

      Where is the searchable web-based Linux store? Not the terrible integrated stuff. Ubuntu, which is hugely popular as the windows alternatives is ---- like windows and Mac. Take a lesson. The market truly does dictate. No one forces us to buy anything. Except shitty healthcare.

    34. Re: Really, Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol. Mate based. What is that. I know centos deb I into suse. Fucking mate? Fuck you mate. This is the problem. Everyone pedaling thier own little shit version. I know it's also a blessing. But who can really use 20 distros? No one unless that's all you do. Which means you have some other issues.

    35. Re:Really, Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At what point do people get fed up and switch to something else?

      Ha, NEVER. My previous job was at a tech company as a programmer and the only way I could be the only employee out of 100+ running linux as a desktop was to prove that I had equal or better security then their rootkit/spyware that they loaded on everyone's laptop. It took a solid two weeks and me being unrelenting in proving myself right to the point where I had to threaten to quit until they admitted defeat.

      How joe blow at a regular job will ever accomplish this is beyond me.

    36. Re:Really, Microsoft? by Drgnkght · · Score: 1

      This is known as the Sunk Cost Fallacy. (Hint: That money is already gone.)

      Sunk Cost Fallacy
      How the Sunk Cost Fallacy Makes You Act Stupid
      Sunk Cost

    37. Re: Really, Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I see one of these adds in my OS - that will probably switch me off to just a gaming partition.

    38. Re:Really, Microsoft? by Stan92057 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Hint: The money is spent but the guess what? i still have the product....that cant be used on any other platform except for windows. lame argument no matter how many times you post it.

      --
      Jack of all trades,master of none
    39. Re: Really, Microsoft? by budgenator · · Score: 2

      It's not like the average person on the street is going to bother learning Linux.

      So how is that different from average person on the street is not going to bother learning Windows? Most people only use the computer for web browsing and Firefox is Firefox, for the minority that do more LibreOffice is interchangable with Office for everybody except a minority of powerusers and for minscule number that don't use web-based email Kmail will work as well as outlook. Kubuntu is pretty much works automagically, even more than Windows.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    40. Re:Really, Microsoft? by Drgnkght · · Score: 1

      In other words, you lied in your previous post. You aren't actually willing to switch operating systems. You also, apparently, didn't read any of the links I included. Your logic is basically irrational and exactly as described in all of them. You're willing to accept any future abuse from Microsoft because in the past you spent some unknown amount of money on Windows software? Good luck with that. You need to accept that money you've already spent doesn't always determine the best path forward. Situations change and past decisions may need to be re-evaluated.

    41. Re:Really, Microsoft? by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      OpenSuse, it's like Linux, but easy.

      Shh... Don't tell him.

    42. Re:Really, Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But that's already there. I recall a while back when I had Adobe Acrobat 6, which ran fine on XP, but once I upgraded to 7, I had to upgrade Acrobat as well. In fact, when people migrated from XP to 7, there were some applications that wouldn't run under 7, which is why that whole XP mode thing under VirtualPC was there. If that's the deal, then how is it worse than running, say, VMware under a Linux distro? As it is, the CPUs are all pretty much x86s - there ain't too many ARM laptops out there yet, nor are there PowerPCs, SPARCs or MIPS based PCs. So it's not like one would necessarily be emulating a Windows environment with CPU level instruction translations.

      How many software titles are there that you bought for Windows 7 that still run without you having to buy upgrades for Windows 10?

    43. Re: Really, Microsoft? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Anything quick and easy done enough times gets boring.

      Like your mom.

      OOOOOOH SICK BURN!

    44. Re:Really, Microsoft? by Thanatiel · · Score: 1

      A few months ago I abandoned about half my Steam library, switched to a Manjaro-OpenRC and I'm not looking back.
      These stories are a good way to remember why I only have a bit less than 200 games left on my machine.
      That and the fact the computer does what I want and feels much more responsive than it used to.

      --
      Irrelevant news and morons using moderation to mod down what they disagree on. 2018 resolution: so long.
    45. Re: Really, Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which software that you're required to use for work has dropped support for Windows 7 or 8.1?

      Windows updates.

      Our PCs must be secure. Being unable to install updates makes them less secure. Ergo, Windows updates is "software that [I'm] required to use for work [that] has dropped support for Windows 7 or 8.1".

    46. Re:Really, Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. In the real world it's really a matter of separating use cases, Windows for work related apps (Photoshop, AutoCAD, etc.) and a separate Mac/Linux machine for any crossplatform apps. Proprietary lock-in means not everyone has the luxury of living with a one-size-fits-all solution.

    47. Re: Really, Microsoft? by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      What other consumer- grade OS which can be freely installed by OEMs is there? It's not like the average person on the street is going to bother learning Linux.

      The average consumer is in the browser all the time - for webmail, Facebook and porn. The underlying OS makes no difference to them as long as they can see the icon to launch the browser.

    48. Re:Really, Microsoft? by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Mac is a mess with non-expandable hardware

      Most people never expand their hardware, they buy a machine, use it as-is for a few years then throw it out and replace it with a newer one...

      and an OS that has gotten nothing but half-assed "borrowed from the iPad" updates over the last few years.

      Well what updates would you like it to have? There's been nothing really compelling added for years to any os...

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    49. Re: Really, Microsoft? by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      Your bitching would have more merit if Windows 7, 8, 8.1, and 10 didn't have radically different UIs.

      MATE, is an alternative to GNOME. The Windows equivalent roughly would be whether you have a version of windows explorer with a start menu and bar at the bottom (ex: MATE), or some tiled bullshit with oddities. MATE is closer to the classic Windows interface than modern Windows interfaces are.

    50. Re: Really, Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think we might be looking at the beginning of a change there.

    51. Re:Really, Microsoft? by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      > I use very high end software that runs on Windows and currently nothing else. All the idiots that keep telling me to use Linux (I already do when I can) do not understand the reality of most people's situations.

      That's not MOST people's situations, that's YOUR situation. MOST people could switch totally to Linux. There are some people who could not, but whatever your "very high end software that runs on Windows and currently nothing else", it doesn't sound like MOST people using that. The most common thing with Windows is "WINE doesn't support $RECENT_GAME, screw Linux imma stay on Windows and put up with anything". That's not the same as "I need Windows for compatibility with this professional program". Plenty of people with that use case, but definitely not "most".

    52. Re:Really, Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mac is not too expensive. You don't spend time friggin around with OS type stuff, you just do your work. Don't you put a value on your time?

    53. Re:Really, Microsoft? by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      I've got the warning about Microsoft screwing you over that I've been telling you since the early 2000s. I'm glad you finally got my message... but why did it take you so long to listen?

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    54. Re:Really, Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At what point do people get fed up and switch to something else?

      Never. if you turn up the heat on the frog, er customer, slowly enough. And that's what being done here.

    55. Re: Really, Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one forces us to buy anything.

      Certainly not English lessons.

    56. Re:Really, Microsoft? by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      You can always run Windows in a limited VM for your "very good products" that you spent money on. And block all outside access completely to it or limit it at your will.

    57. Re:Really, Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could 'learn' to get a copy of a usable Windows. But then again you're not putting either the effort or the cost for a better OS, you deserve none.

      Bend over and Dead with it.

    58. Re:Really, Microsoft? by TheEdgeOfRage · · Score: 1

      Well, there's Fedora, Mint and Elementry. THose are pretty user friendly and easy to switch to from windows.

    59. Re:Really, Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just made your comment my Sig.

      True facts: 1. Nobody owes you anything. 2. You are responsible for dealing with the reality of your situation.

    60. Re:Really, Microsoft? by n329619 · · Score: 1

      Sunk Cost Fallacy

      The Misconception: You make rational decisions based on the future value of objects, investments and experiences.

      The Truth: Your decisions are tainted by the emotional investments you accumulate, and the more you invest in something the harder it becomes to abandon it.

      It depends if the op is picking based on emotional investments rather than a business investment.

      As the op is "more then willing to switch" meaning he/she is not picking based on emotional investments, he/she surely do not fall under this fallacy. Usually those that do fall under this fallacy are fanboys/girls who pick based on emotion and thus apply emotional investments.

    61. Re:Really, Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best thing that MS could do do chase everybody away is to fix every bug and make it free.

    62. Re:Really, Microsoft? by Wootery · · Score: 1

      Didn't they do it in part already, when going from XP to 7 and then again 7 to 8?

      Not really, no. You can still play really old games and run really old business applications in Windows 10.

      About the phones thing: it's at times like this I wish the web-as-the-ultimate-platform pipe-dream were a reality.

    63. Re: Really, Microsoft? by Wootery · · Score: 1

      But, windows dev is the easiest dev. By far hands down. With OS X or Linux, I don't even know where to begin and think it would be.

      How about some specifics? Windows has UWP, WPF, and WinForms. Linux has Qt and Gtk. Or JavaFX if you're into that kind of thing, or various others. Which toolkits specifically do you mean?

      It profitable enough to care. Especially for Linux.

      Well sure, Linux desktop apps are a much narrower market than Windows.

      Not the terrible integrated stuff. Ubuntu, which is hugely popular as the windows alternatives is ---- like windows and Mac.

      What's your point? Ubuntu has a 'store' which is web-searchable. It had one long before Windows did. Not that either are authoritative anyway.

    64. Re:Really, Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is why I dual boot. I can work in Linux and boot into my highly stripped down and optimised copy of Windows 8.1 when it's game time.

    65. Re:Really, Microsoft? by chrish · · Score: 1

      Most people never expand their hardware, they buy a machine, use it as-is for a few years then throw it out and replace it with a newer one...

      Apparently the poster does, since they mentioned this. Personally, I'm really fond of upgrading RAM myself, replacing the hard drive when it fails (or I need more storage, which is probably more likely with SSDs), or the battery when it inevitability loses its ability to hold a charge.

      Well what updates would you like it to have? There's been nothing really compelling added for years to any os...

      I'd be happy if Apple would stop breaking things that developers need. valgrind has been broken for two major OS X (err, sorry, "macOS") releases now, for example. Apple's major innovations on Mac appear to be pointless rebranding, grafting a tiny, pointless iPad to the top of the keyboard, and selling outdated hardware at premium prices.

      I do like the TouchID system though, that's great for security.

      I can't wait for the new MacBook Pro that'll just be an iPad Pro connected to an iPad (for the keyboard) by an expensive hinge.

      --
      - chrish
    66. Re:Really, Microsoft? by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      That's completely wrong - most people need to use MS Office and outlook - and while there are alternatives (and you can use OWA for Outlook), alternatives aren't good enough for large organizations. We're not talking about programmers, we're talking about assistants and accountants and managers who are told from the top down what software they are using. YMMV, but MOST people need to use MS at work. A lot of places offer Mac as an alternative, but in no place I've ever worked have assistants and accountants and managers been given the choice to use Linux. This has ZERO to do with games.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    67. Re:Really, Microsoft? by Insanity+Defense · · Score: 1

      At what point do people get fed up and switch to something else?

      Different times for different people. Summer 2007 for me.

    68. Re:Really, Microsoft? by TechnoJoe · · Score: 1

      When ReactOS (or equivalent) can do most anything Windows can do.

      People & businesses want a drop-in replacement for Windows, and all their software that runs on it. Rewriting (or buying) software for another OS just isn't going to happen. And WINE isn't up to the challenge for graphic intensive games or device drivers.

    69. Re:Really, Microsoft? by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

      no i didn't lie, linux has not corrected the reasons i cant switch OR use my windows based programs. If you were even a tiny amount correct lol then why is linux at 2% worldwide desktop installs.after 25 Plus YEARS clearly if your argument held any water more then 2% would be using Linux. Again your lame argument is just that, useless words that no one cares about.not your money so why would you care...I will stick with 7 untill..

      --
      Jack of all trades,master of none
    70. Re:Really, Microsoft? by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

      You can always run Windows in a limited VM
      useless advice..guess why?

      --
      Jack of all trades,master of none
    71. Re:Really, Microsoft? by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      Let me guess you have some special use case and don't know how to integrate it into a vm?

    72. Re:Really, Microsoft? by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

      Well for one thing no clue how what it takes to go to ALL that trouble to use my programs when Windows 7 just works. And you wonder why people don't switch we don't have to. Their will come a time when my PC dies then i can switch but plenty of after market parts to keep my PC running for at least another 5 years by that time maybe Linux will have things sorted out.. i dought it though, been 25 years so far..You cant just install windows 7 on a VM when you don't have a full copy of windows 7

      --
      Jack of all trades,master of none
    73. Re:Really, Microsoft? by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      Its not hard to learn, Windows 7 does not have a lot of driver support for newer hardware and software. not to mention the exploits to be found after microsoft completely stops supporting it. you dont have to worry about that with linux as long as youre willing to learn a little bit as you go. as ive said on almost every linux post to people saying what you say. start with an easy system and play with it in your spare time. search for open source software for what you do. in my experiences i can find FOSS for almost everything i do with computers. and most of them work rather well. Its technology, you really cant use old systems forever and the current state of where windows is going. i dont see it lasting much longer.

    74. Re:Really, Microsoft? by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

      lol dude Ive been playing with FOSS for better then 15 years Ive tried just about every poor copy FOSS has made.except for 1 program whats it called these days? LibreOffice? Cant seem to stay in one groups hands long. Again when linux catches up and does what I want i will happy switch but not until then. Ive had to reformat my PC far too many times because of that stinking lousy grub bug linux cant seem to fix either. been burned way too many times to trust any linux supporter.

      --
      Jack of all trades,master of none
    75. Re:Really, Microsoft? by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      Well the fact that ive had the same linux OS install across multiple versions of hardware.(ive done the same with this copy of windows. it needs to be sent to the farm soon because of it) i dont understand what you guys do to ruin your system so fast. you claim to be experienced boasting 15 years of this or that. but obviously lack the skills to learn. im just here trying to help, i couldnt give a fuck if your computer works, or if microsoft trolls you for the rest of your life making every penny on your soul that they can. because the bottom line is My shit works! And i never have issues with it short of some piece of hardware maybe committing suicide like the drive that died on me the other day. I try to give advice and maybe even see if i can ask some questions to try figuring out where youre going wrong. but noooo your response is "Microsoft may anal rape me nightly but atleast i dont have to learn!" and you call yourselfs nerds.. maybe the april fools title isnt a lie.

  2. Smooth running of advertising by Alain+Williams · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Do the 'vital' updates include new adverts with which to pester the user ?

    1. Re:Smooth running of advertising by ITRambo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Only if they're considered to be vital by Microsoft, so probably.

    2. Re:Smooth running of advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They did say vital.

    3. Re:Smooth running of advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They are not advertisements but suggestions and hints which only benefit the user.

    4. Re:Smooth running of advertising by wizkid · · Score: 1

      Of course they do.
      Microsoft wants to be the new Google. ALL HAIL MICROSOFT.

      I'm going to go throw up after that last comment....

      --
      I take no responsibility for what I say. Even though I'm never wrong :)
    5. Re:Smooth running of advertising by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

      Now, now Microsoft says they are not ads just .......suggestions. hahahahahaha...

      --
      Jack of all trades,master of none
    6. Re:Smooth running of advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see if the moderators allow my post or not, you can never tell any more.

      There is nothing interesting about this post other than it tows the Microsoft sucks etc line, windows 10 is a spymaster's dream and Linux is awesome and cool. I have 4 machines running windows 10 and at no time have I ever received any advertising. Each one is setup a bit different to see what all goes on with windows 10. My laptop is running the insider preview which I'm on right now the only change is Classic shell. My gaming machine is setup with all the hacks to see what happens including spybot anti beacon, o&o shutup 10, changes to the task scheduler, classic shell, etc. The media machine is an unmodified version of windows 10 and test file server type machine running classic shell only.

        I have never seen any advertising at all. Only the laptop has crashed once using the insider preview which I can expect since it's running the testing stream of Windows 10. I haven't seen any of the supposed crazy driver issues and yes all 4 machines are running completely different hardware, nothing is similar between them. The biggest problem I have to deal with is the insider preview installing updates and forcing me to reboot when I have gone to login. Yes sometimes the updating can take a while but again I'm running the insider preview so I expect things like that to happen.

      The reality is this, yes Microsoft is doing their telemetry crap as another revenue stream but they are no different than Google / Android phones and Apple. On Win7 and win8 it is easy as hell to remove all the telemetry crap. I have written my own scripts to remove all the telemetry, modify the task schedular, and hide the bad updates. There are also scripts available on the net to do the same basic thing. Mine does it all in one run, remove, modify, and hide using one script and a call to a vbscript. In a network environment it is also easy to manage such things. As for Windows 10 as time will goes on, it will become easier and easier to block and remove such junk. With Windows 10, Microsoft sooner or later will have to do what their big clients want or loose money and they will not do that. First they try to see what they can get away with and then they will back down. Windows 10 has been a solid OS outside of one crash for me on a test stream. I have no problems using it as I do running Windows 7 or a mix of Linux based distros via virtualbox, whatever tool is needed for the job.

      The truth is that every time a new Windows version comes out, all the haters come out complaining and bitching about this and that. My favorite are the folks that haven't used any of the new versions of Windows but make complaints based on old Windows XP issues. As time goes on the old version of Windows becomes OK and the next version is crap. Windows XP to Windows 7, Xp was better, Windows 7 to Windows 8/8.1, Windows 7 is better. Windows 8/8.1 and windows 10 are very similar so basically Windows 7 is still better. The pattern has always been the same as have been the complaints from the haters. Yet the serious IT folks know the reality that you use the best tool for the job, a mix of Windows and Linux based distros is the best way to go. Exchange and MS Office is still the best office productivity suites period. Windows 7 for the desktop with a few Linux desktops and a mix of server OSs depending on needs.

      Same as it ever was.

      -GeekPoet

    7. Re:Smooth running of advertising by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Of course not. They are backed into a core part of the OS. You don't get those via Windows Update.

  3. You don't have a choice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    With Windows 10 you gave Microsoft control over their computer. If Microsoft wants their computer to act a certian way, it will act that way regardless as to the way you want it to act.

    Don't like it? Install a different OS. Can't do that yourself? Learn how or find someone who can. Hardware won't let you? Buy better hardware. That's your fault for buying locked down hardware to begin with. Can't find non-locked down hardware? Learn how or find someone who can.

    At this point Microsoft has made it perfectly clear who owns a computer that runs Windows 10: Microsoft.

    1. Re:You don't have a choice. by ai4px · · Score: 1

      I opened file explorer the other day and it actually had an advert for MS cloud storage! Not a web browser pop-in, but wthin file explore. Amazing... they are really pissing off their retail customer base and I'm quite sure there's a reason our IT department hasn't upgraded everyone to 10 yet.

    2. Re:You don't have a choice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With Windows 10 you gave Microsoft control over their computer.

      I take it you stopped reading EULAs before Vista came out. That's when "we'll fuck you and the computer purportedly in your possession any way you want and you'll like it or else" (slightly paraphrased) was included with more or less blanket permissions. Windows XP mostly restricted itself to disabling itself until reactivation whenever you upgraded your hardware.

      XP reactivation was a comparatively benign process although an invasion of ownership and privacy. And the rights for fucking with you and your hardware reserved in Vista were mostly used for region-locking your CD drive and similar half-legal stuff remotely connected with Microsoft's legal obligations.

      So people have gotten used to sign their soul over to the devil without thinking for decades. It's just that the devil now actually goes collecting on his contracts.

    3. Re: You don't have a choice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technically you are Dell or Acer or HP customer.. not Microsofts as the OEM redistributes for Microsoft.

    4. Re:You don't have a choice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I simply disabled the windows update service (among several others) once I got my Win10 machine in a stable state. No ads, no forced updates, nada. Working fine. Just need to stay aware of new security issues and workaround them (95% of them have no effect on me since I have disabled all of the cruft such as smb anyway).

    5. Re:You don't have a choice. by tepples · · Score: 1

      Can't find non-locked down hardware? Learn how or find someone who can.

      So here's my question to those Slashdot comment section users who can:

      Which current 10" laptop models are currently recommended for running X11/Linux, with working Wi-Fi, webcam, screen brightness, and suspend, without presenting a "Please press Space then Enter to wipe everything" prompt at every boot that others won't know how to skip? Or must one just accept the increased bulk and weight of a 14" model from System76?

    6. Re:You don't have a choice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IT will fold, it's hands are tied. The question is wether YOU'll fold or not.

      I do understand the problem, but the compny has made it very clear it wants to be the problem.

    7. Re: You don't have a choice. by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Pick one. Chances are it will work. I've installed Linux on hundreds of laptops. You are still talking about "issues" that haven't been an issue for more than a decade.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    8. Re: You don't have a choice. by tepples · · Score: 0

      Pick one.

      For the sake of the present argument, let's pick the ASUS T100TA.

      Chances are it will work.

      Nope. Suspend, camera, and Bluetooth are broken on T100TA.

    9. Re:You don't have a choice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well if it is so bad for you there are solutions that are quick and easy or maybe you are foolish enough to use Cortana. Btw people do not buy windows 10 it forced on them.
      All you fucking cry babies on /. act so Superior because you do not have win 10 and assume they have a massive market share and call the rest of the world morons fuck you try looking it up.

      I use win 10 only because win 7 would not run on skylake and i have NEVER had any of the issues you cry about every time there is a story on win 10 because i searched for solutions as soon as it was in stalled.

      BTW what latest hardware is not locked make a claim and do not back it up fuck you. Running old hardware makes you so Superior like the linux twits who act like windows is not embedded and one would have to give up a lot to use linux like gaming or drivers working on high end gpu's.

    10. Re:You don't have a choice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do have a choice cry about it or look for a solution like what people have always done for any issue on windows they did not like. Why is that so hard now because it's win 10?

    11. Re:You don't have a choice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Thinkpads are pretty good. I use a T61: just be sure that you get the model with Intel video card rather than Radeon/Nvidia (those are crap driver-wise).

      Crank out the $20 for a T9300 Penryn CPU and the $25 for 2x2GB of RAM (the 4GB DDR2 SODIMMs and the T9500 Penryn are off the sensible price chart) and you are good enough for most serious work. The repair manuals are good: get acquainted with them for CPU/RAM/fan unit changes. Changing the CPU is astonishingly annoying, though not half as annoying as changing the Pccard slot. This was better when Thinkpads were from IBM rather than Lenovo, but at least they still hand out the instructions and with time you learn a few shortcuts of your own.

      They are a bit bulkier than current-day offerings but it doesn't matter all that much since you can cram them in a backpack with climbing gear and expect to get them back out in working condition.

      Forget about the latest 3D video games though. But they are good enough for stuff like video editing and multitrack recording.

    12. Re:You don't have a choice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the space then enter thing about?

    13. Re:You don't have a choice. by alexo · · Score: 1

      I see the Windows 10 fiasco as a great opportunity to promote Linux, maybe something in the spirit of the "Get a Mac" campaign.

      However, I don't think that there are commercial interests behind the "Linux on the desktop" idea, so there is no-one willing to foot the bill.

    14. Re:You don't have a choice. by thegreatbob · · Score: 1

      Would anybody here contribute to a Kickstarter or other croudfunding scheme that intends to make and distribute non-partisan Linux/OSS television commercials?

      --
      There is no XUL, only WebExtensions...
    15. Re:You don't have a choice. by TechnoJoe · · Score: 1

      One of Microsoft's own rules of security: If you run someone else's software on your computer, it isn't your computer anymore.

  4. F*** by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I just got boned this weekend during some video editing by an UPDATING NOW...OOPS CRASHING!...RESTART...CRASH...RESTART...CRASH... sequence that took 2 hours and a bootable USB stick to resolve I've been relying on switching my network to a "metered" connection to avoid getting crapped on when I'm just trying to get something done, but it looks like that's about to become a thing of the past. Thank you Microsoft! May I have another?

    1. Re:F*** by olsmeister · · Score: 1

      Just block it at the firewall.

    2. Re:F*** by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The other thing that is fun is some updates will reset things. The latest windows 10 update reset the 'ethernet is metered' setting I entered since I'm on satellite internet that gets crazy expensive, or downright useless (throttling to barely above dialup if you are 'hogging' the bandwidth). An edge was always malware, but is now forceful nagware. 'PLEASE USE ME, I BEG YOU! EVERYTHING ELSE WILL KILL YOUR PUPPY!'

    3. Re:F*** by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      At this point it becomes simpler to install Linux - From Scratch.

    4. Re:F*** by Kjella · · Score: 2

      I just got boned this weekend during some video editing by an UPDATING NOW...OOPS CRASHING!...RESTART...CRASH...RESTART...CRASH... sequence (...) Thank you Microsoft! May I have another?

      if ( os() = win10 ) { while (you.gape() != goatse.gape() ) { fuck++; } ) }

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    5. Re:F*** by DworkinLV · · Score: 1

      Seriously, I already block most MS servers (Except Updates and CRLs. I don't run on an actual metered line, but live in an extreme rural area, DSL @ .4-.5 mbs FTW) and don't want updates from 3 to 4 Windows 10 setups to murder the limited net access I have.

      Before long Router vendors "SHOULD" be offering choices like "Block MS Telemetry", and "limit update times to certain times of the day", and "Block all unnecessary MS servers" option.

      Its not hard to setup a linux firewall to block this stuff. And cron jobs that modify the firewall behavior at certain times aren't all that hard. If Microsoft pushes too hard someone will profit on mitigating the problem. And I don't think MS would want us to block entire sites like "IOnedrive", "Bing" and the "Store". I already block them at my business and home. Others should too until MS gets the message that their BS isn't acceptable.

      My machine, my Network, my rules.

      --
      Browsing without an adblocker is like fucking without a condom - Mal-2
    6. Re:F*** by swimboy · · Score: 2

      if ( os() = win10 ) { while (you.gape() < goatse.gape() ) { fuck++; } ) }

      FTFY, don't want to get caught in an endless loop, especially one as dangerous as this

      --
      Ask me how the Heisenberg Principle may or may not have saved my life.
    7. Re:F*** by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Syntax Error: Invalid Left-hand side in assignment (os() = win10)

    8. Re: F*** by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..and you fail at reading comprehension.

    9. Re:F*** by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is single-handedly killing the PC industry. Good job Micro$uck.

    10. Re:F*** by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You will.

    11. Re:F*** by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You almost sound like you'll get a choice.

    12. Re:F*** by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Running a computer with security vulnerabilities is like driving a car with a flat fire. If you're stubborn you'll drive anyway because you're going somewhere and you want to get there, but you're endangering yourself and others. If a cop stopped you on the highway for driving with a flat tire, and took an hour to fix it for you and did it for free, you'd be grateful. But if Microsoft does the equivalent thing to your computer, then you're complaining? How can you be so rude?

    13. Re:F*** by lgw · · Score: 2

      Syntax Error: Invalid Left-hand side in assignment (os() = win10)

      Not an error, that's them sneaking in the forced upgrade.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    14. Re:F*** by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sigh no it does not what is faster install linux and not do what you want or install well known fixes for win 10 issues.
      Linux drivers and people who use linux and their colossal arrogance is the reason i quit linux.

    15. Re:F*** by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      I suspect thirdparty firmware for routers, like Tomato/DDWrt/OpenWRT might be the first to introduce a feature like that.. I'd love to have that feature on Tomato as thats what I'm running on my Asus router.. Though I don't run Windows on any of my systems here, I do have family members/friends of family members who often bring Windows systems in the house and use the guest wifi I have configured on the router, which just connects to the internet, nothing else..

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    16. Re:F*** by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      controlling updates can be done in settings.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1kGMCfb2xw

      https://www.safer-networking.org/spybot-anti-beacon/

      http://www.majorgeeks.com/files/details/destroy_windows_10_spying.html

    17. Re:F*** by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    18. Re: F*** by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft sold a defective product.

      They have people slowly trying to catch up to the defective car with the flat tire that they sold you. They can't fix it, by they will patch it so that it lasts till Tuesday, then they'll be back again.

    19. Re:F*** by bmk67 · · Score: 1

      I left for coherent punctuation.

    20. Re:F*** by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      I've been relying on switching my network to a "metered" connection to avoid getting crapped on when I'm just trying to get something done, but it looks like that's about to become a thing of the past. Thank you Microsoft! May I have another?

      Yes but only if you keep using Windows.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    21. Re:F*** by n329619 · · Score: 1

      Pro tip: If you value your production, either disconnect from internet or don't use Windows 10. There are plenty of alternatives including different OS, one click download turn off Windows 10 updates and manual instructions to turn off updates on the internet. If you can't find one, you're not looking hard enough.

    22. Re:F*** by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why go the esoteric route of pretending the Ethernet connection is metered -- not that Win10 even officially supports that configuration -- when there's a perfectly good policy item for this.

      Win+R, "gpedit.msc"
          Computer Configuration > Administrative Templates > Windows Components > Windows Update > Configure Automatic Updates: Enabled, "2 -Notify for download and notify for install"

      Being notified every day that there are windows defender definition updates may get annoying, but at least it asks before downloading (and/or installing) updates.

  5. Good by b0bby · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The people on metered connections, or those who care enough to set their non-metered connections to metered just to try to get some control, may finally be pushed to try something new. I'm always impressed at how well Mint has worked on any recent installs, and I haven't come across any showstoppers for my use. More users for Linux (and MacOS, but I don't really care about that).

    1. Re:Good by Mitreya · · Score: 2, Informative

      The people on metered connections, or those who care enough to set their non-metered connections to metered just to try to get some control, may finally be pushed to try something new.

      Don't worry, they'll be sent back to Microsoft by the RTFM crowd and issues with gaming, miscellaneous required software and hardware support.

      I'm always impressed at how well Mint has worked on any recent installs, and I haven't come across any showstoppers for my use.

      Let me ask you this -- have you had to research your hardware first?
      Last time (a few years ago, admittedly), I complained about issues getting WiFi in Ubuntu to work, I was told (here) that I should have researched my hardware better before trying to install.

      Don't get me wrong, I prefer Linux for work and for command line convenience. But as a personal computer there are still some gaps.

      Now I'll wait for being down-modded by everyone claiming that their grandma has been running custom Linux for years without ever noticing that it replaced her Windows box. (I would really like to meet one of those grandmas!)

    2. Re:Good by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      You have clearly not used Linux or not used in a LONG time. I get better hardware support on Linux than I do on windows. About the only thing LInux doesn't support better than windows hardwarewise is hardware Dongles. Microsoft and manufacturers deliberately refuse to make drivers work with windows, I've got a perfectly functional scanner that won't work with anything newer than XP but works wonderfully on Linux.

      With most newer hardware these days it's supported in Linux before it's even sold, often months ahead of Windows.

    3. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Windows 8 to Windows 10 transition on my wife's laptop killed the touchpad, because the driver was incompatible with Windows 10. She had to use an external mouse for a month until the drivers were released. Let's not forget the three times an automatic Windows 7 update hosed the install for my grandmother then my mother. Linux is far from perfect, but let's keep things in perspective here. Windows ain't no sanctuary of functionality and smooth updates.

    4. Re:Good by Slalomsk8er · · Score: 1

      Sorry no grandma - I only got a grandpa that is on Ubuntu for years. It is not so hard to pull off as I had the choice of hardware and trained him on to Firefox before switching.

      He does not care for the OS. YouTube, Facebook, Gmail, a local news site, and the Webcams on the homepage of his golf club is all he cares about in a PC.

      For me the support got a lot easier after ditching Windows as I had to fix his profile once a week and write the ghost back every few months.
      Now I just go and update Ubuntu every 6 months ;)

    5. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The people on metered connections, or those who care enough to set their non-metered connections to metered just to try to get some control, may finally be pushed to try something new. I'm always impressed at how well Mint has worked on any recent installs, and I haven't come across any showstoppers for my use.

      Mint? Try video editing with Kdenlive on that. Works great until you try saving. The file dialog for saving is an empty white rectangle with no clickable areas. All you can do is close it again.

    6. Re: Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a way you did research your hardware.. you paid the lowest bidder for hardware that was just barely Windows (version) compatible. On the date they put it in the box. *no implied warranty or fitness for use or updates. Linux Distros do the best effort they can when nobody is paying them and there are strict IP laws about what they can include or copy.

      Remember that next time you buy a PC that you need to research the Linux compatibility before you pay money for it.

    7. Re:Good by b0bby · · Score: 1

      Let me ask you this -- have you had to research your hardware first?

      If I were buying a new machine, I'd probably do some research. For a standard desktop, I wouldn't sweat it. The last laptop I installed Mint on was a few years old Sony which was given to me to dispose of by a co worker who was sick of Windows not working on it for her. I put in an SSD and ran the Mint install to see how it would work, and everything except the camera worked out of the box. I did a little googling and less than half an hour later that was working too. Would I want to tell my mom to get that camera working? No. But it wasn't beyond anyone who's at the point of worrying about limiting Windows update.

      That laptop I sometimes use to connect to Windows desktops at work, and even RDP works well. There is literally nothing I want to do on a regular basis that I can't do on that machine. Admittedly I don't use Adobe Creative Suite or anything specific like that, nor gaming, which could be a dealbreaker for some people.

    8. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to agree. I've been using Linux (with KDE based desktops) since 2007. Other than games I wanted to play (read as all my RL friends were playing) were made for windows I have had ZERO problems with usability and minimal problems with hardware. None of the hardware problems couldn't be solved by a quick "google for the answer" It almost always turned out to be a driver issue.

    9. Re:Good by Mitreya · · Score: 1

      I put in an SSD and ran the Mint install to see how it would work, and everything except the camera worked out of the box.

      The distribution will also matter. There are too many out there.
      I do consistently hear good things about Mint lately, so it will be first on the list to try.

    10. Re:Good by tepples · · Score: 1, Redundant

      I get better hardware support on Linux than I do on windows.

      I guess it really depends on which particular make and model of laptop you have. Recent Ubuntu on an ASUS Transformer Book T100TA still has broken suspend, broken camera, and broken Bluetooth.

    11. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every time I tried to install Linux on a laptop I have had hardware issues. The first time was probably before or around 2010, and the last time was maybe 2 years ago. First issue was installing my distribution of choice, since it ran on 32-bit UEFI. I think at the time only Debian supported live booting from that. But even afterwards a myriad of issues that were never solved to my knowledge made it a massive pain, despite very light usage. For starters, putting the laptop to sleep, or hibernation, simply froze it and required a hard reset. Next, sound didn't work at all, there were no functional drivers for it. Then, no Wi-Fi driver worked out of the box. In order to get Wi-Fi (and a few other features like seeing battery consumption) to work I had to manually upgrade the kernel and download 3rd party drivers, then edit a bunch of config files manually. Afterwards it worked fine... except Wi-Fi just wouldn't work at least half the time the laptop booted. Since it was impossible to put it to sleep or hibernation I basically had to restart the thing a random number of times (typically 2 or 3) before I could use the Internet, including logging in to see the network status. Oh, and it liked to freeze up randomly. I think it had to do with reaching a threshold of CPU usage, but I could never isolate the issue. One day it just stopped booting so I basically ripped it apart since I wasn't too interested in getting a new one from ASUS.

      Maybe the laptop was a piece of shit, but Linux hardware support still clearly leaves a lot to be desired.

    12. Re: Good by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      There is nothing out of the ordinary Scott my Mom, save she is far less computer literate than most, and has often thanked me that she doesn't have all these problems with that awful Windows the way her friends do.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    13. Re:Good by b0bby · · Score: 1

      I would certainly recommend Mint; I have several friends who also have had good luck with it although one is having some driver issues syncing a Samsung phone. I like CentOS on servers but I think Mint is a better desktop.

      I do remember the days of frustrating little issues which would take days of forum hunting to resolve (if I ever managed to), so I am very aware of what a minor miracle it is when everything Just Works.

    14. Re:Good by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      > Microsoft and manufacturers deliberately refuse to make drivers work with windows

      The problem wasn't that they deliberately broke drivers. The problem was that Microsoft didn't follow the NT HAL paradigm with TWAIN.

      When NT4 came out, Microsoft had a SERIOUS problem with lack of driver support for anything that resembled an imaging device. If you wanted imaging hardware that supported NT, you were stuck paying enterprise-level prices for it. The mainstream industry basically told Microsoft, "find a way to make TWAIN work on NT, or we aren't going to support NT."

      Microsoft knew manufacturers would eventually come around if they abolished non-NT Windows... but they also knew there was a chance the strategy could fail if Win2k had an imaging-driver problem as bad as NT4's, and consumers were to dig in and refuse to adopt XP. And in fact, much of the early "stuff doesn't work on Win2k" was a lingering artifact of that problem.

      So, Microsoft wrapped Twain in a shell of duct tape, and made it (sort of) able to limp along under NT architecture. Basically, they made it so the vendor could re-wrap their old source in a new binary wrapper specific to a version of Windows whenever a new version of Windows came out. The problem was, only someone with the original sourcecode could do it... and lots of manufacturers either went tits-up during the first dotcom crash, or were acquired by other companies with zero interest in making even the slightest effort to support older hardware.

      As a result, lots of scanners that initially didn't support NT4 or Win2k AT ALL eventually DID support Win2k. A few even got later drivers to support XP.

      WDM (since Vista) has slowly brought a degree of sanity to Windows imaging drivers, but once again broke backwards compatibility as badly as before. Many scanner drivers ignored WDM (or released really, really buggy WDM drivers) and supported only TWAIN. Those are the scanners that worked under Vista, but broke under Windows 7 (which made TWAIN strictly a front-end for back-end drivers)

      Now, we (finally) have vendor-supplied miniport drivers that work kind of like a SANE back-end. We're still (mostly) stuck with TWAIN as a version-specific front end, the key difference is that NOW, Microsoft releases THEIR OWN generic TWAIN driver that uses the miniport-implemented scanner driver, so old scanner drivers can at least continue to work (albeit, often with reduced functionality) under newer versions of Windows.

    15. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The people on metered connections, or those who care enough to set their non-metered connections to metered just to try to get some control, may finally be pushed to try something new. I'm always impressed at how well Mint has worked on any recent installs, and I haven't come across any showstoppers for my use. More users for Linux (and MacOS, but I don't really care about that).

      While Mint is neat Kubuntu might be a better option. If I remember correctly Mint tends to be dated. I have successfully installed Kubuntu on netbooks, 7+ year old systems including laptops and a netbook or two.

      So IMO Kubuntu is a good compromise between Mint and Ubuntu due to up to date packages and windows user friendly GUI.

    16. Re:Good by LVSlushdat · · Score: 2

      Now I just go and update Ubuntu every 6 months ;)

      Why in the WORLD don't you put these end-users on an Ubuntu LTS? You must LOVE the extra work upgrading Ubuntu every six months rather than
      every 5 YEARS....... I've put some elderly relatives/friends on Ubuntu, and I'd NEVER in my worst nightmare use anything but an LTS. Several of these
      folks were originally put on 10.04 then upgraded to 12.04, and now they're on 14.04 EasyPeasy, only have to worry about it once every 4 or so years..

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    17. Re:Good by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      I've got 4 friends who have Windows 10 systems they got around Christmas last year. Every damn one of them is begging me to find the time to upgrade them to Linux. 2 of the 4 had older systems I'd upgraded to Linux and they want to have their new shiny i7 system cleaned of the malware that is Windows 10, and the other 2 are referrals from some other friends who heard I do Linux "upgrades"...

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    18. Re:Good by erapert · · Score: 1

      Every time I tried to install Linux on a laptop I have had hardware issues.

      System76 makes fine Linux laptops.
      And if you read /. at all then you've no doubt noticed that Dell sells Linux laptops too.
      This won't solve your problems with laptops you currently have issues with, but in the future perhaps you should consider buying a laptop from one of these vendors.
      Need some incentive? Apparently Dell's Linux laptops are $100 cheaper than their Windows laptops because they're not making your pay the Microsoft tax.

    19. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Warning this comment may or may not appear do to the moderators not liking my making fun of Linux. Some can handle it and some can't.

      Of course, just install your favorite flavor of Linux and all your problems are solved. Linux is so perfect you won't even get sick or die from cancer. Need windows just run Virtualbox session of Windows.

      See all problems solved or what a second,

      You could leave version of Windows installed and just use Virtualbox for Linux flavor of the month. The best part is all your software will still work without wiping your machine and starting from scratch. You can enjoy using Linux without any hassles too.

      -GeekPoet

    20. Re:Good by Slalomsk8er · · Score: 1

      Easy, so he runs the same version that I use and to make changes more gradual for him.
      And yes, I love the extra work as I will see my family and be fed some nice cake and coffee while I'm and my grandparents place.

      No cake for you if you remote update every 5 years!

  6. Hi, we're Microsoft. by ilsaloving · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Fuck you.

    1. Re:Hi, we're Microsoft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I concur!

      Another reason to never use Win10. WTF is Microsoft thinking? H1B's making all the decisions over there? *sigh*

    2. Re: Hi, we're Microsoft. by HannethCom · · Score: 1

      Nope, I'm pretty sure it is Marketing that has taken over there. Just look at all the ads, stupidity of Modern, stupidity of the ribbon bar and marketing loves their telemetry!

      --
      Microsoft, Apple, Google, Amazon what's the difference? All steal money from devs and control with walled gardens.
    3. Re: Hi, we're Microsoft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Nadzilla chant:

      `toupper(marketers marketers marketers marketers!)`

      Bloody filter errors.

  7. With a non-stop stream of by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 1

    "WTF are they thinking!?" style news stories surrounding Win10, I have to ask...

    Aside from gaming, is there ANYTHING Win10 does better than Win7? (and for the snark among you, I'm talking about a real advantage, not in regards to telemetry, spying, less control, etc.)

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
    1. Re:With a non-stop stream of by i_ate_god · · Score: 1

      I do like the flat UI

      --
      I'm god, but it's a bit of a drag really...
    2. Re:With a non-stop stream of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      1. Win10 gets a better console. Yep, still outdated, but better than that of Win7.
      2. As a Java developer who is forced to use Win at work, the Linux subsystem is a nice addition.

    3. Re:With a non-stop stream of by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      Have you noticed how nobody seems to want to advertise on W10?

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    4. Re:With a non-stop stream of by Scoth · · Score: 2

      I've had the pause and resume copy/moving come in handy several times. It's also much more resilient to network blips while moving things around thanks to that.

      Directly mounting ISOs in virtual drives without needing PowerISO or other third party software is kind of cool.

      I like the corner-snapping that windows can do now - I made a lot of use of the side by side and drap-to-top functionality, so the corner one is even better. Especially on today's big monitors.

      Nothing earth-shattering, but nice little improvements. I don't actually hate Windows 10 at all, aside from the privacy issues.

    5. Re:With a non-stop stream of by caseih · · Score: 1

      Glad to know someone does! Most people I know really don't like the flat white look. It's quite hard on the eyes. I've found a couple of free themes that make things look a lot better. Sadly it's really hard to find good, free themes. A lot of nice ones are from cleodesktop, but they not free. And themes only work on certain builds, due to requiring hacks to the Windows theming dlls.

    6. Re:With a non-stop stream of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, most people do like the flat ui look. As long as you don't mention Microsoft.

    7. Re:With a non-stop stream of by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      Task manager is finally functional, I'm not sure why it took them 20 years to get a functional task manager.

    8. Re:With a non-stop stream of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can move windows to a quadrant of the screen instead of just a half using the WinKey + arrows. I think that's the only thing I feel like I'm really missing out on.

    9. Re:With a non-stop stream of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mounting ISOs? Corner snapping? These are advancements? I've been using these on my Linux rigs for years!

    10. Re:With a non-stop stream of by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      It's very nice for 2 in 1 devices - laptops that convert into tablets. I don't use the latter feature often, but when I do it's a godsend. The same thing is why I haven't switched my brand new laptop to GNU/Linux yet, despite the latter being an OS I massively prefer. None of the major desktops that support the desktop paradigm (that is GNOME 2, Cinnamon, and MATE - both GNOME 3 and Unity go some way to avoid being that) are particularly touch friendly, and the concept of the UI switching modes depending on environment seems to be foreign to FOSS developers right now.

      Other than that, and the ability to run Ubuntu command line applications, it's not much better than 7 and has a lot of downsides, particularly the UI latency which in some areas, such as the Start menu, is ridiculous.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    11. Re:With a non-stop stream of by erapert · · Score: 1

      Aside from gaming, is there ANYTHING Windows does better than Linux? (and for the snarks among you, I'm talking about things the OS does, not about software that may or may not exist on either system).

      Here, let me fix that for you.

    12. Re:With a non-stop stream of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows 10 has two digits. Windows 7 has one digit.

      2 > 1

      Advantage confirmed!!!

    13. Re:With a non-stop stream of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? Is it then better than the piece of crap that is on Win8.1? On Win8.x the task manager tries to hide any data from user and it does not remember anymore what were the previous settings. So for example if one goes to details view he has to manually select the data columns every single time after a reboot. Perhaps MS is just trying to hide the amount of CPU and disk resources their spyware is taking.

    14. Re:With a non-stop stream of by Ambassador+Kosh · · Score: 1

      Windows 10 runs faster on multicore processors. On a quad core i7 I get about 15% faster performance with MATLAB or my own HPC threaded applications on Windows 10 vs Windows 7 due to the newer scheduler. It was added in Windows 8 but refined a lot in Windows 10.

      For my simulations I now get almost identical performance on the same hardware with Windows 10 and Linux and it used to be that Windows was always slower. This has made it easier to do testing on other systems. I mostly deploy on Linux but Windows is also a supported platform.

      I also get a bit better battery life under Windows 10 compared to Windows 7 or 8.1.

      --
      Computer modeling for biotech drug manufacturing is HARD! :)
    15. Re:With a non-stop stream of by Ambassador+Kosh · · Score: 1

      Oh one really important thing I forget is the Windows Subsystem for Linux.

      With that I can run most linux binaries under windows without changes. This has made it far easier to work with linux systems since you have a real bash and ssh to work with. I can even compile my simulations under WSL and run them without problems.

      WSL has made doing linux development much faster and easier and I look forward to the updated WSL in the april windows 10 update and integration with VS 2017.

      --
      Computer modeling for biotech drug manufacturing is HARD! :)
  8. Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ditch Windows, move to Linux or BSD and let Microsoft rot... Been on Nix since 2001 and it just works

  9. One up side by Groo+Wanderer · · Score: 5, Funny

    There is one real up side to this. Microsoft as you know only puts out small, efficient updates in the minimal needed package sizes. This should be great comfort to users on metered connections, they are only being lovingly graced with the minimum needed amount of bytes. Can you imagine if Microsoft was one of those companies that pushed out near-daily 100+MB behemoths to update a spelling error in notepad's FAQ? Luckily they don't do this, and we all win!

                        -Charlie

    Note: Yes this is sarcasm. If you didn't get that by the 19th word, go play with some tiles.

    1. Re:One up side by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That's probably what Microsoft is actually thinking. They recently introduced differential updates... Welcome to the 1980s... so that Windows Update patches are smaller. So they probably figured that they could now force them on people on metered connections.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:One up side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      notepad has a FAQ?

    3. Re:One up side by zlives · · Score: 1

      don't read it yet, its full of grammatical errors. Just wait till win11.

    4. Re:One up side by Groo+Wanderer · · Score: 1

      Luckily he won't have to. The latest diff patch slated for April 1 should fix over 72% of those. It weighs in at a mere 73GB and is considered essential by Microsoft because an exec's husband wrote portions of it for the Bob project. Awfully caring of Microsoft to help out users like that.

    5. Re:One up side by zlives · · Score: 1

      i think you are mistaken, April 1st is the release date of win11 hypervisor which lets you select the fully operational and supported version of windows of your choice. Sadly it only includes Vista 1.0, win95 1.0, and win10 as options.
      April 1st 2020 is the release for win7 and winXP.

      and before you go and say that you can do this already using linux or osX well... win11 doesn't require the internet to connect to the internet. the 73 GB is really a super compressed version of all the internet.

  10. We control your OS, not you... by evolutionary · · Score: 2

    Basically, MS found people taking control of their updates using the metered connection feature. This of course is the problem with auto updates, especially run by control freaks: they can ensure control over your operating system. Funny thing is...you PAY them for it. (See Mark Tawin, Tom Sawyer, Whitewash chapter...) If this isn't proof that MS cannot be trusted with updates I don't know what will. You can still turn the Windows Update service off in the services panel (under administrative tools in the control panel). And given that MS wants to in effect hijack your operating system, I'd keep it turned off, switch to a Linux distro (Linux Mint is nice) and drop Windows 10 in essence telling MS to F*** off.

    --
    "Imagination is more important than knowledge" - Einstein
    1. Re:We control your OS, not you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But Microsoft already have their money from you. You paid the Microsoft jizya* when you bought the computer.

      *jizya = the extortion money Islam requires Muslims to extract from "people of the book" (Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians) for allowing them to live. Protection money.

    2. Re:We control your OS, not you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only Microsoft could be "over the fence and gone" by now.

      And in this analogy, does that make RMS like Injun Joe? Because, honestly, that's a pretty apt comparison.

      Joe Douglas was a respectable guy. He was scary lookin' due to smallpox scars, but a decent person. He was half native american, half black. Obviously, this brought him a great deal of disrespect from all of the latent-racists around him. AFAIK, he was a free man, even prior to the civil war. When the civil war was over, there were a lot of former slaves that needed a place to live where they could be relatively safe. So Joe Douglas bought a tract of land at the edge of town and developed a subdivision for them. It's still known as "Douglasville", and it sits along Hill Street between 7th and 9th streets in Hannibal, MO. (I lived about a block from there while I was growing up.) That area is now well within the downtown area of Hannibal, but in the mid-to-late 1800's, it was at the outskirts.

      He sold these plots and homes at a reasonable price and even negotiated loans with terms that the free-but-with-nothing blacks in the area could afford. He was a pretty powerful influence in favor of a downtrodden group of people. He brought them up to the level of merely "poor". That's a pretty amazing feat for the time.

    3. Re:We control your OS, not you... by erapert · · Score: 1

      You paid the Microsoft jizya* when you bought the computer.

      Not if you bought a Linux laptop from Dell.

  11. I Will Never Again Use Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use a MacBook Pro at work and an Google Pixel for my mobile. Never again will I allow Windows on my personal network. As a sysadmin, I've seen and heard too many bad things. Some of my organisation will be upgrading from Windows 7 to Windows 10 this year. I've played with it, and I'm not impressed.

    Windows is no longer intuitive. Linux Mint is a great personal option for most people. Gamers are stuck.

  12. Who Owns This Thing Anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just part of the continued push companies like Apple and Microsoft are making towards consumers having no control over their own electronics that they paid thousands of dollars for. Don't want to update? Too bad. You don't have a say in the matter. Eventually the other shoe will drop and Apple and Microsoft will turn off the ability to open applications that aren't from the app store on desktop computers by default and you'll have to find some obscure option buried in the system settings to turn it back on. This of course will all be in the name of protection consumers.

    1. Re: Who Owns This Thing Anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are you throwing apples name into this? I've been using OS X and macOS since 10.3. Not once has Apple not let me install something or cancel an update and do it on my own time. Apple may lock down the iPhones but their computers are not wall gardened.

  13. This isn't new. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This isn't new, I was pushed a few updates last year despite being set as metered.

    Disable startup of the BITS and Windows Update services. I think I took away "System"'s execute privilige from them as well. Turn them back on according to your schedule to manually update.

    1. Re:This isn't new. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      That's basically the way to go.

      For now.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  14. Found the LUDDITE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Only LUDDITES hate automatic appdates because they're too stupid to know how to use apps! Modern app appers love automatic appdates because it lets them app even more apps while apping other apps!

    Apps!

    1. Re:Found the LUDDITE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fuck?

    2. Re:Found the LUDDITE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You sir are an imbecile!, An imbecile is 3 steps down from a Luddite, which, judging from your post, seems to be something you despise. Keep it up, people like you give retards a bad name!

    3. Re:Found the LUDDITE! by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Only LUDDITES hate automatic appdates because they're too stupid to know how to use apps! Modern app appers love automatic appdates because it lets them app even more apps while apping other apps!

      Hmmm most other OS's automatic updates don't require hours of down time and often unexpected reboots. M$'s automatic update system could only be worse if it was designed by a government employee

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    4. Re:Found the LUDDITE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think it wasn't? CIA has to keep their wiretaps up to date.

    5. Re:Found the LUDDITE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buddy, we at NSA work hard in order to make WU as painless as possible for the users.

    6. Re:Found the LUDDITE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You mean people like you who don't obviously don't get the joke.. the joke that's actually on people like you who love mobile/'cloud' garbage and are dragging the rest of us down with you..

    7. Re:Found the LUDDITE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm most other OS's automatic updates don't require hours of down time and often unexpected reboots.

      Neither does Windows 10, sorry about your pirated copy.

    8. Re:Found the LUDDITE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "M$'s automatic update system could only be worse if it was designed by a government employee"

      Are we sure it wasn't?

    9. Re:Found the LUDDITE! by budgenator · · Score: 2

      I'd be happier if the software on my computer would check for and download updates during my mostly unused bonus time, when it's convenient for me, rather than when it's convenient for Microsoft during my anytime data.
      Of course required to keep Windows running smoothly. probably started out meaning required to keep Windows from turning your computer into a brick, but marketing will interpret that as "anytime we want to install more effective spyware or telemetery".

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    10. Re:Found the LUDDITE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LUDDITE!

    11. Re:Found the LUDDITE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends which government employee...government has a lot of regulation, and some parts of it would be intolerant of downtime, reboots, etc...could end up being better!

  15. Unacceptable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Flatly, violently unacceptable. Whoever decided to implement this; the entire chain, need to be fired.

    At.

    Fired at.

    1. Re:Unacceptable by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      No.

      Fired out.

      Of a cannon.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Unacceptable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.

      Fired out.

      Of a cannon.

      at each other.

      Repeatedly.

    3. Re:Unacceptable by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Repeatedly.

      Noooo, think of the poor guy that has to clean that cannon. Human garbage is really disgusting if mixed with gunpowder.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  16. Re:Cry me a river by ITRambo · · Score: 1

    No matter what goes wrong with Windows MS PR claims It only affected a "small number of users". Followed by the fix will be coming "soon".

  17. Re:Cry me a river by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Oh cool, you pay for me to have an unmetered connection available?

    Thank you, I really appreciate it!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  18. My current build of windows 8 is likely my last... by Tyr07 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've been running Windows 8, the start menu change didn't bother me and I found it ran rather well and stable.

    I've secured my install, and finally after windows 10 garbage and microsoft doing shitty "telemetry" I mean I can't believe they even call it that.
    It's flat out spyware that watches how you use it and sells the information to people, and advertisers.

    Anyway, I stopped windows update when I saw this coming out as I knew I couldn't trust their updates and just have to watch out for exploits released and lock it down myself. Fortunately I don't need a lot of windows services for how I use my system.

    After things finally stop running on windows, I'll be switching to fulltime linux. In fact, just for multi-media / gaming, is the only reason I keep windows.
    I dual boot to linux as is. I'll be sad to lose some performance and ability to play some games, but I'll get over it.

    Using my bandwidth and my hardware that I pay for that is not subsidized by microsoft to serve me ads and collect data from me by microsoft, is not happening.

  19. I will not use an OS if it does not let me decide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how I want to use it. the last thing anyone wants is to be forced to install things they do not want. I prefer a GNU/Linux distro because I have more control over my user experience going that route. I'm not much of a gamer, maybe some retro gaming at the most so the lack of top tier games doesn't effect me like it would some people. Steam covers everything else an emulator doesn't to suit my needs. I just want to browse the web, watch videos, maybe edit some videos or pictures etc... but above all I want to have the keys to my desktop and not have anything forced on me like Microsoft seems to love to do. At least with GNU/Linux, I have the ability to remove parts of the OS I do not want, and do not have to pay big $ for an edition that lets me decide how to manage my computer. Microsoft has really dropped the ball here, but with a few changes they could resolve these issues and stop losing users to alternative offerings.

  20. Re:Cry me a river by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When 100 people with problems scream louder than the entire internet, and your install base is in the hundreds of millions, yes, it is a small number of users.

  21. You will obey Microsoft, resistance is futile... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

    ... forcing some updates necessary for "smooth operation" to download even on these connections...

    It seems that Microsoft really needs to keep those data harvesting operations running smoothly, as they may now be a source of revenue for Microsoft.

  22. Ok MS you own ME $20 per meg so that 1GB updates by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Ok MS you own ME $20 per meg (one of the highest roaming fees) so that 1GB update.
    Costs you
    Data = $20480
    IRS paper work fees = $100
    Bill pay fee = $10
    Bank fees = $50

  23. I fixed my windows 10 update problems perminantly. by colin_faber · · Score: 0

    By no longer using it.

  24. Thank God by Holi · · Score: 5, Funny

    Thankfully I have a Kaby Lake processor and Windows 7, thus I don't have to worry about updates anymore.

    --
    Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    1. Re:Thank God by Holi · · Score: 1

      Link in case you missed that story:

      https://tech.slashdot.org/stor...

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    2. Re:Thank God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whoosh

  25. Limited connections, means just that. by CptLoRes · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There are very real scenarios where you have truly limited connections where every byte counts. People working offshore on boats for example know what I am talking about. It's not uncommon that the entire ship crew have to share a single 512Kbit/sec satellite connection for their public internet (they also have dedicated channels for ship critical systems). A single unwanted download session could then make this unusable for everyone. Or even worse if you get a rouge win10 machine on the dedicated systems it could take down the critical parts also. It's sad when your OS is looking more and more like a piece of malware.

    1. Re:Limited connections, means just that. by Calydor · · Score: 2

      I have a 448/96 kbps ADSL connection. I live so far from the DSLAM that literally nothing else is available.

      I am thankful on a daily basis that I took so many steps to prevent Win10 from getting installed on either computer in this house, because those update sizes, at times I don't get to decide, would render the internet effectively unavailable. Last I heard was 4 GB of updates getting pushed at one time, to two computers ... yeah, that's three solid days of downloading.

      If Microsoft pays for putting fiber in the ground here, THEN we can talk about Windows 10, but until the world is unambiguously covered in 20 mbps or above connections they are cordially invited to traverse and autofornicate.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    2. Re:Limited connections, means just that. by mea2214 · · Score: 1

      They should simply firewall all attempts to connect to microsoft.com on the router terminating the 512Kbit/s link.

    3. Re:Limited connections, means just that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or even worse if you get a rouge win10 machine

      Phew! My win10 machine is blue.

    4. Re:Limited connections, means just that. by knorthern+knight · · Score: 1

      > Phew! My win10 machine is blue.

      Including the screen... ba da boom.

      --

      I'm not repeating myself
      I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user
  26. Please just stop this nonsense already. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GFY, MS

    Love, AC

  27. What's this Windows 10 you speak of? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Those of us who know, use "Squid".

  28. Just disable the update service by Solandri · · Score: 1

    Tap the Windows key, search for "services". Start the Services Desktop app. Scroll down to "Windows Update" and double-click it. Set it to disabled, and stop it if it's currently running. If you're paranoid, you can disable BITS (Background Intelligent Transfer Service) as well.

    I had to do this on a computer running security camera software (very inconvenient if it reboots in the middle of a night due to an update). But you can do this if you just want to be in control of when your computer updates (I had to do it on my gaming laptop as well because Win 10 keeps trying to install newer generic Intel video drivers which are incompatible with Nvidia switchable graphics). Just repeat the process and temporarily enable the update service when you're ready to update.

    1. Re:Just disable the update service by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      "I had to do this on a computer running security camera software (very inconvenient if it reboots in the middle of a night due to an update)"

      Why do you have critical infrastructure running on a desktop????

      --
      Good-bye
    2. Re:Just disable the update service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because go fuck yourself, that's why.

  29. ISP Future Letter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear valued customer, we paid your Windows 10 update and therefore consider your complaints as something to be ignored. Happy surfing and enjoy your mandatory updates!

  30. Come on guys by subanark · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The hate for MS is real. This isn't inherently a bad idea. If a 50K update patches a security hole that would allow someone to turn your computer into a member of a bot net, you'd be glad you got that update.

    1. Re:Come on guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, where can I join you when a totally irrelevant update turns out not being 50k but costing 50k ?

    2. Re:Come on guys by prunus.avium · · Score: 1

      Except when that 50kB patch puts you over your bandwidth limit for the month -- if you have a bandwidth limit -- and costs you "up to $100 at [the providers] discretion at any time". Quoted section from a large ISP for overage charges.

      And that's assuming there was only one update for the entire month. There was a reason to set the ethernet connection to metered for many people.

    3. Re:Come on guys by subanark · · Score: 2

      If your at the point where 50Kb will push you over, just turn off internet completely.

      In any case you will always find someone negatively impacted by any change that affects millions (if not billions) of people.

    4. Re:Come on guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      right because ms forcing shit on you is benevolent. because 99.9999999% of infected fucktards can tell they're infected. because ms is legally liable for their software and the results of bug exploitations.

      yes, this is an inherently bad idea.

      food go bad because the refrigerator mfgr 'decided' the device should no longer work because you chose to stop providing it an intertubes connection?

      lost your job because your car mfgr 'decided' your car can't start because you refused to do what they wanted?

    5. Re:Come on guys by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      "This isn't inherently a bad idea."

      You do realize that some people's Internet costs dollars per megabyte, right? And they're probably in the middle of the freaking jungle, where they don't much care about some hole that might be exploited by ten-megabyte web ads, because they don't go anywhere near sites like that?

      Microsoft are completely clueless about computers in the real world, which is why more and more people are trying to get away from them. My next Windows PC will basically be a $2000 game console, because I'd never try to do real work on a Windows PC again.

    6. Re:Come on guys by iris-n · · Score: 2

      If you could control updates to your computer, your post would make sense. You would have

      Option 1 - No updates
      Option 2 - Metered connection, just small and security critical updates
      Option 3 - Update at will.

      But we live in a world where there is no Option 1, and nobody trusts Microsoft to actually use Option 2 as they claimed.

      --
      entropy happens
    7. Re:Come on guys by subanark · · Score: 1

      It's more about some port being open which is exploitable to attacks, maybe something like a bug in the system clock that will brick your computer on a certain date, or maybe they need to revoke a trusted cert.

      No matter what you do, when you manage a system that is widely used, you will negatively impact someone.

    8. Re:Come on guys by tepples · · Score: 1

      Joining a botnet would put you even further over your bandwidth limit for the month.

    9. Re:Come on guys by thegreatbob · · Score: 1

      I did a fun little experiment with Win 10 developers preview; after it expired, I rolled back the system date... this allowed it to boot one last time. After running for a few hours, it bluescreened with a message "SYSTEM_LICENSE_VIOLATION", and appeared to self-destruct... it would not even attempt to boot after that.

      --
      There is no XUL, only WebExtensions...
    10. Re:Come on guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's your responsibility to monitor the things that cost you money. Not anyone elses.

    11. Re:Come on guys by Calydor · · Score: 2

      Which is why Windows 10 makes it possible to pick which updates to install and when to install them!

      Oh wait.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    12. Re:Come on guys by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I wish a provider did try and charge me $100 for 50kB over the limit. The resulting win the courts would be quite lucrative for me.

    13. Re:Come on guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when the fuck has a windows update of any kind been a measly 50 kilobytes? just a CHECK for updates can suck down a couple hundred *megabytes*

    14. Re:Come on guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if it's a 10MB update (not unreasonable), and you're currently roaming internationally and paying $30/MB for data? (again not unreasonable at all, this is the actual rate for several USA carriers for roaming in some countries)

    15. Re:Come on guys by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You do realize that some people's Internet costs dollars per megabyte, right?

      Maybe those people will get a clue and switch to an OS vendor that aligns better with their situation and needs. I doubt it though.

      Microsoft are completely clueless about computers in the real world

      I see no evidence to support this claim. Instead, it's pretty obvious that they simply *don't care* about users' petty little problems, like having extremely expensive metered connections. If you have one of those, that's your problem, not Microsoft's. If you don't like the way they manage their OS, you're free to pick another. But how many people are going to?

      My next Windows PC will basically be a $2000 game console, because I'd never try to do real work on a Windows PC again.

      People keep making these bold claims, but they never follow through.

    16. Re:Come on guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The hate for MS is real. This isn't inherently a bad idea. If a 50K update patches a security hole that would allow someone to turn your computer into a member of a bot net, you'd be glad you got that update.

      But since Microsoft by default uses a peer to peer mode to push out patches, doesn't that make Windows 10 a bot net

    17. Re:Come on guys by michael_wojcik · · Score: 1

      And Microsoft has never screwed up an update, so they're perfectly safe.

      And they've never installed anything users didn't want.

      And they never forcibly reboot your system, or nag you to do so.

      Oh, wait.

    18. Re:Come on guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > People keep making these bold claims, but they never follow through.

      Sure they do. Linux desktop use, after staying stagnant for years, started rising the MONTH Windows 10 came out. In just a year, it went up by about 20% of its original value. Sure, the total value is still like 2%, but we are still talking millions of feet actually moving to Linux for real, *and staying there*, starting RIGHT when Windows 10 released. Corresponding to a bunch of people on forums saying that they would be doing exactly that.

      A bigger factor is this: as people become aware of Windows data monitoring, they start to split their actions and activities to safer devices. That could be older versions of Windows (a common solution now), macs, or Linux boxes. This doesn't change total amount of Windows installations much, and some people are literally maintaining two machines now instead of one for this reason. Someone who runs a Windows box to play games and a Linux box for all their productivity could easily show up as 1 Windows user in some website-based poll.

  31. More Anti-User stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And MS continues to make Win10 worse that ME and Bob put together.

  32. This sentence makes my ass twitch. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... forcing some updates necessary for "smooth operation" to download even on these connections ...

    I have several ass-related jokes queued up, but can't decide which one I like best.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:This sentence makes my ass twitch. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      such as use of vaseline to facilitate "smooth operations"

    2. Re:This sentence makes my ass twitch. by Calydor · · Score: 1

      I think you misspelled 'sand paper'.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
  33. Do you presume the Government has no input by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    into the current design?

  34. Inevitable by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

    Feature added.
    People use the feature for purposes other than intended
    Feature removed.

    What did everyone expect?

    1. Re:Inevitable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh snap. You mean that feature which costs me 15 GiB worth of patch was useless and I downloaded another 8 GiB patch just to remove that feature?

  35. You don't own your computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The PC industry is rapidly catching up to the telecom industry for consumer hostility. Hell one might think they're in cahoots with the crap that's being pulled here.

    1. Re:You don't own your computer by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      It's not "The PC industry" doing this. It is literally JUST Microsoft.

  36. Fuck software by AndyKron · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I am so sick and FUCKING TIRED of all the constant updates from every fucking piece of software. Fuck computers.

    1. Re:Fuck software by spire3661 · · Score: 2

      We are at the point now where things simply refuse to run if you dont update it. Every time there is an update for Geforce Experience, Nvidia purposefully breaks my recording functionality to force me to update their software. No choices, either update or the program refuses to run...Thats where we are now, get used to it.

      --
      Good-bye
    2. Re:Fuck software by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Try Raptr with their PlaysTV app, they have an Nvidia optimized version and an AMD optimized version and they work quite well for recording 1080P 60 FPS, you can even record live coms or go back after the fact and record a commentary if you wish.

      As for TFA? This is why I've advised my customers to avoid Windows 10 like an STD. I've researched my behind off and there really is no way to remove the spying, its baked far too deeply into the core of the OS and every time you turn around MSFT does more douchebaggery with that OS so its just not worth the hassle. You'll spend more time fighting the OS than you will actually getting shit done, its just not worth the BS.

      Windows 7 gets updates until 2020 and Win 8.1 until 2023 and hopefully by that time Nutella will go the way of the sweaty monkey and we'll actually get someone in there who knows more than buzzword bingo. With the Ballmernator it was "We gotta be Apple! We'll ape iOS poorly!" and with Nutella its "We gotta be Google! We'll ape ChromeOS/Android poorly!" while both forgot the fundamental purpose of an OS which is STFU, get out of the way, and let the user run their programs with the least effort or interference by the OS not to give them inroads into markets they suck at (Ballmernator and his Apple fetish) or to give them an endless revenue stream selling the user's data to every business and TLA with a checkbook (Nutella and his google fetish) which is why they couldn't even break 40% giving their flagship away.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    3. Re:Fuck software by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Amen - posted from my brand new Ubuntu box. I loved waking up this morning knowing my machine would start right away, with nothing in my way. Im stuck with windows for my VR development gear, at least for now, but those machines no longer hold personal information of any kind. I basically turned them into 'arcade installs'. If MS hadnt lost their mind and forgot what an OS is, i might be willing to pony up for Enterprise and LTSB, but all im really trying to buy is trust, and that is long gone.

      --
      Good-bye
    4. Re:Fuck software by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      Love Ubuntu.. When I get offered updates on Ubuntu, *I* choose when to reboot, *if* a reboot is *even* necessary... Back when I still used Windows, it seemed like every damn update wanted a reboot... Soooo glad I don't have to worry about MS problems anymore...

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    5. Re:Fuck software by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I am so sick and FUCKING TIRED of all the constant updates from every fucking piece of software. Fuck computers.

      There's an easy solution. Just unplug your network cable and wireless antenna.

      Note that this is something you should probably be doing anyway if you're inclined to not apply updates because you're sick of updates, or at the very least tell us your IP address so we can block you at our firewall along with the rest of China and Russia.

    6. Re:Fuck software by erapert · · Score: 1

      Im stuck with windows for my VR development gear, at least for now...

      Unreal Engine 4 handles VR quite well (disclaimer: my day job is developing VR using UE4) and SteamVR will be coming to Linux very soon.

    7. Re:Fuck software by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      while both forgot the fundamental purpose of an OS which is STFU, get out of the way, and let the user run their programs with the least effort or interference by the OS not to give them inroads into markets they suck at

      This is simply wrong. The purpose of a commercial OS is to make money for the company that sells it, and as much money as possible. If that means making users' lives miserable in the process, and selling off their private info, then so be it. Even if they do illegal things, that's OK as long as the cost of lawsuits or government fines is less than the profit generated.

      Honestly, I'm utterly shocked lately at how many people simply do not seem to comprehend the fundamental purpose of a for-profit corporation like Microsoft, and keep expecting companies like that to act morally, and are then disappointed when they don't. This isn't rocket science; it's very simple. If an action will make the company more money, then it's the right action to take. Spyware, adware, forced updates, etc., make MS more money, so for MS they're the proper course of action. Worrying about pissing off users will not make MS more money (since they're not going to abandon Windows anyway), so wasting time and resources on that is not the proper course of action.

      As for their marketshare numbers, they really don't matter that much. They're not going to make money with people who stick with Win7; that product has already been sold, and has been in the market for quite some time. They don't have to worry significantly about people choosing between Windows and other OSes, so there's no reason to offer Win7, or an otherwise less-user-hostile OS; that will simply cost them more money in resources and give them less profit. The obvious course of action is to simply coerce users into upgrading into Win10 where they can generate more profit through spyware. While many users will hold out for a while, eventually they'll be forced to upgrade to 10, which is why they've locked out Win7/8 for the newest CPUs for instance. Users' hardware and software isn't going to last forever; eventually they'll want something newer and faster, or want to use some newer SW which only works in 10, and they'll be forced to adopt it. And any users who really can stick with an ancient system forever aren't going to make MS any money anyway, so there's no point in catering to them.

    8. Re:Fuck software by antdude · · Score: 1

      Ditto. I miss the old days of computing that didn't have so many issues, security vulnerabilities, bloatness, better usabilities, user experiences, coolness, designs, simpleness, reliabilities, etc. :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    9. Re:Fuck software by antdude · · Score: 1

      Apple also want reboots too. Argh!

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    10. Re:Fuck software by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      I am so sick and FUCKING TIRED of all the constant updates from every fucking piece of software. Fuck computers.

      Most insightful response in the thread, because this is what ORDINARY people are thinking every day, not just the Slashdot crowd.

      I've breathed computers since the C64 days and love technology in general, but since smart phones showed up, it's been one massive disappointment after another. I gave up on web development as a career for a reason.

    11. Re:Fuck software by swillden · · Score: 1

      Ditto. I miss the old days of computing that didn't have so many issues, security vulnerabilities, bloatness, better usabilities, user experiences, coolness, designs, simpleness, reliabilities, etc. :(

      Actually, what you miss is the days when computers weren't connected to the Internet. They've always had security vulnerabilities -- in fact consumer systems were far worse than they are now -- but it didn't used to matter so much. The always-on net provides an always-available attack vector, and also means that once your device is pwned, it's an always-on threat to the rest of the network.

      As for the rest (bloat, usability, etc.)... that's in the eye of the beholder. If you want to run DOS, you can still run DOS. Personally I find modern systems and apps to be much more usable. I suppose there are exceptions, but I can't think of any at the moment.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    12. Re:Fuck software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The amount of updates has not changed that much, but their content and the way they are distributed has. Previously user would select, if and when he would install a new version. Now companies force updates through by disabling software until user updates it. And usually the changes are actually downgrades, as they have removed functionality in the name of simplicity and have added spyware in the name of monetizing and screwing their paying customer.

  37. Just do it. by JustNiz · · Score: 2

    It amazes me just how abusive Microsoft can make their products and still people will put up with it, keep using them and even buy more. After Windows 10 especially, I bet even Microsoft are surprised at how far they can abuse people and still get away with it.

    Come on guys, just totally ditch Windows already. You already know you should. Just do it.

    1. Re:Just do it. by cloud.pt · · Score: 1

      Google comes to mind. Not sure why though, and that's the gist of it really - you can't be hurt by what you can't feel. Much like initial agencies snooping around secretively, indiscriminately.

    2. Re:Just do it. by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      At least Google is fairly high-quality software, user-friendly, and free to the end-user (its far more bug-free and secure and controllable than Windows at least). I think most people intuitively realise there must be a hidden cost somewhere, which involves ads their private data. I mean even Google make no secret of that.

      Buying/using windows is kinda like paying for your own prison. The worst of both worlds. Not only is is a shit, buggy, user-unfriendly product, its not free, not secure, It takes over your PC and removes control from you, it also advertises to you, and Microsoft also secretly snoop and sell your data. Its basically a quadruple (or more) whammy to google's single whammy.

    3. Re:Just do it. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      It's incredible how people are so quick to call it abuse. The reality is a large number of users just don't give a shit and take an "updates happen" approach to their world view. An even larger number of users are actively thankful for these updates being pushed without them needing to exercise brain cells.

      For Microsoft to be abusive users first need to feel abused.

    4. Re:Just do it. by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

      Ever paid for an mmo? Used steam? bought agame with onlin drm? Used an iphone? Most people fed this, even technologically literate people. The free market DOES NOT WORK when the business is 100 miles away PLUS the internet, before the internet corporations couldn't shove policy with broadband they will just do what the want and kids/idiot adults will just keep feeding money to apple, valve+steam and the big game companies. Game companies pioneered the walled garden with mmo's and drm, then smart phones came along... once MMO's took off and dlc/microtransactions to that small retard percent of the population gave companies like riot at league of legends massive profits, that 3% or less of the population is SOOO profitable and so fucking stupid with money that 97% of us even if we make the dont pay decision get fucked by that idiotic 3% because these businesses can sustain on that at scale.

    5. Re:Just do it. by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      Theres a BIG difference between "convenience" and "forced on you whether you like it or not".

    6. Re:Just do it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet even Microsoft are surprised at how far they can abuse people and still get away with it.

      Don't be so damn naive. Microsoft has spent millions on market research to determine how fast they can boil the frog.

    7. Re:Just do it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It amazes me just how abusive Microsoft can make their products and still people will put up with it, keep using them and even buy more. After Windows 10 especially, I bet even Microsoft are surprised at how far they can abuse people and still get away with it.

      Come on guys, just totally ditch Windows already. You already know you should. Just do it.

      Its not a matter of ditching windows, if it was they wouldn't do this cause they know they couldn't get away with it.

      Its a matter of "Windows or nothing".

      What am I gonna use instead a Mac? That's even worse in terms of your own computer not being yours.

      No linux distro ever has managed to make a competitive desktop. I hear WINE recently got out of beta after what, 20 years? Yea, that's gonna support my gaming habit.

      Name one alternative for your average home user. Go on I dare ya.

    8. Re:Just do it. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Theres a BIG difference between "convenience" and "forced on you whether you like it or not".

      Indeed. But the latter is not something we are talking about. As said in my premise the vast majority of users don't have a concept of "like it". Updates just are. The idea that updates happen more often is just accepted. The idea that a company will push security updates to people who generally just accept the updates is not abuse.

      You ask why people put up with it? Show me the outraged public, then we can talk about alternatives to putting up with it.

      And as if to comically prove my point I just got a notification that 6 applications have updated on my phone, and I'm not even going to look at that list.

    9. Re:Just do it. by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      >> But the latter is not something we are talking about

      Speak for yourself. You introduced the concept of most people not caring, not me.

      >> And as if to comically prove my point I just got a notification that 6 applications have updated on my phone, and I'm not even going to look at that list.

      Not even close to the same. Your phone almost certianly gives you the option of how to accept updates, which you have already decided to set or leave set to automatically download/install updates. because sheep like you have been sucessfully brainwashed to not care about whatever dogfood/spyware etc someone freely throws on your phone. The same option in Windows 10 doesn't even exist. You HAVE to take whatever they decide to throw at you.

    10. Re:Just do it. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Speak for yourself.

      No, you're speaking for yourself. I'm generalising on the wider market.

      Not even close to the same.

      You missed the point I was trying to make in my last few sentences which was that people in general just accept updates as a thing that happens. The fact my phone updated 6 apps while I was making my post was just an example of where the callousness comes from. If "we" expect everything to update then "we" don't give a crap if the updates are forced on us.

      We in this case being the 99% of people not on Slashdot

    11. Re:Just do it. by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      >> No, you're speaking for yourself. I'm generalising on the wider market.

      On what evidence? gut feeling? How about some actual data if you're going to speak for everyone?

      >> You missed the point I was trying to make
      No I totally got it, I just think (for my case at least) its bullshit.

      >> We in this case being the 99% of people not on Slashdot
      Ahh I see you have personally polled 99% of readers here about this? OR are you just bei ng arrogant enough to automatically presume nearly everyone else marches lock-step to your opinions?

    12. Re:Just do it. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      On what evidence? gut feeling? How about some actual data if you're going to speak for everyone?

      Sales figures, and general lack of outrage anywhere other than tech forums. The absence of data is data in itself in our hyper bitchy everyone blogging about everything they hate world.

      (for my case at least) its bullshit.

      I do agree. As someone who uses a PC for controlling mechanical devices in many cases the ability for a system to update and shut itself down is most definitely bullshit.

      Ahh I see you have personally polled 99% of readers here about this?

      See my reply above. Are you saying that 99% of Slashdot readers don't complain about updates? Your UID is too low for me to ask "are you new here?"!

  38. I'd score your post higher by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but I'm a lowly A.C.

  39. Here's something to think about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My niece just lost her undrgrad class project due to this latest SNAFU. She's a millenial with school/community provided wifi, so no firewall for the masses. The first thing her mom and her said when they coordinated a call to the IT Uncle was 'I just need to know if I have to buy her a new PC so she can get her work done'. If this is the main thought of the masses (and yes, it's a common refrain here), Microsoft is doing this sh!t to sell more hardaware with their bundled crapware installed.

    Prove me wrong.

    1. Re:Here's something to think about by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Except if people can afford to keep buying new hardware, they can probably afford to buy a mac instead, so that what they'll end up doing...

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  40. Re:My current build of windows 8 is likely my last by thegreatbob · · Score: 1

    Bought a copy of 8.1 when 10 came out, with the intention of leaving the Windows ecosystem entirely (for personal purposes, anyhow) by 2023 when the security updates cease.

    --
    There is no XUL, only WebExtensions...
  41. enterpise desktops by fish_in_the_c · · Score: 1

    Most large business 'fix' this problem by creating a different entry from the MS update server that lives on their local network. Allowing them to control when updates are pushed to their desktops. Why not use the host file to 'fix' this problem if you have metered connection.

    --
    âoeTolerance applies only to persons, but never to truth. Intolerance applies only to truth, but never to persons.
    1. Re:enterpise desktops by StormReaver · · Score: 2

      Why not use the host file to 'fix' this problem if you have metered connection.

      Because you shouldn't have to. After being raped, would you suggest that the victim just keep a better brand of lube around? Or would you suggest that maybe the rapist needs to be in prison? Or barring that, maybe suggest that living in, "Rape City, USA" is a bad idea?

    2. Re:enterpise desktops by tepples · · Score: 1

      Why not use the host file to 'fix' this problem if you have metered connection.

      Because Windows has started to use a different resolver for "servicing" the operating system, such as updates and telemetry.

    3. Re:enterpise desktops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly why sane people avoid that miserable country.

    4. Re:enterpise desktops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, it can't. Not on Windows10, no, not even on Enterprise LTSB, no neighter dns- nor hosts-hijacking works, the ip's for windows update are hardcoded, so STOP SPREADING THE BULLSHIT ABOUT THE HOSTSFILE!!!

      Also, even if you have a WSUS, Windows10 will still download updates from Microsoft. If you still think thats not true, setup a windows10 VM, "disable" everything you can and point to a (working) wsus set to download and install every update automatically, it accumulated >100GB internet-traffic in the first six month of windows10 - on a machine that just sits there, absolutely no user using it (it's there for this exact

    5. Re:enterpise desktops by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Yes, I would suggest the victim keep a better brand of lube around, if they're utterly refusing to leave "Rape City" where rape is actually legalized and an everyday occurrence for most residence.

  42. Me, too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft is trying to play the snobby, expensive walled garden game like Apple, but Microsoft really sucks at it.
    Just like they tried to play the iPod game and iPhone game and lost those battles, too.

  43. I don't run WinX, but while repairing it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've noticed that they spent considerable time making it usable, however convoluted, without a keyboard and only soft-power buttons. I'm speaking specifically about how WinX has been 'productized' for consumer electronics, no longer desktop PC's. For instance, being able to get into the boot options/repair menu without an F8 key. I don't like it or agree with the changes, but the effort on their part is evident.

    Editorially, Finally! the holy grail of the 1990's, 'productized software'. Pbbbbth!

  44. The patch to stay current with Zero-day exploits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mindset is futile; as there will ALWAYS be zero-days you aren't going to have patches for. You can solve the script kiddie issues at the infrastructure level... the real problem is how do you save an unpatched network of hundreds of engineers and office workers from themselves and the 'Click here to see your pictures' emails as they come in with the 'in the wild' exploits from 6 months ago?

  45. You're the idiot who keeps using that software. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Try not being an idiot and change it. The reality of your situation is that you can act. You're just lazy or ignorant or prefer to just complain.

    Tell your vendor that if they don't get off Windows onto Linux then you will leave as a customer. If there is no alternative AT ALL, then take another job. If your job required you to tongue wash the CEO's car every morning, you would leave. If you were self employed and the government regulation meant you were giving up all your money in taxes etc and paying for complianc with new laws, YOU WOULD STOP and do something else.

    And you CAN (but YOU DECIDE NOT TO) do something about this.

    And when others tell you "Move to Linux", that is their way to tell you you can change your situation. Complaining that they're wrong, you can't, is a lie.

    1. Re:You're the idiot who keeps using that software. by Wootery · · Score: 2

      Except that (assuming you don't know gfxguy's situation ahead of time) you have no idea whether that's actually true in this case.

      For some work, there is simply no practical FOSS alternative.

    2. Re:You're the idiot who keeps using that software. by Calydor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you're ever pissed off about how oil and power companies are ruining the environment, you can get rid of your car and get a bicycle.

      You will have trouble getting to work, picking up the kids, buying groceries and getting around, but BY GEORGE you stuck to your principles and the oil and power companies ... didn't notice at all.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    3. Re:You're the idiot who keeps using that software. by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      One of the most moronic things I've read in a long time.

      Try not being an idiot and change it. The reality of your situation is that you can act. You're just lazy or ignorant or prefer to just complain.

      Sure, I can take the moral high ground and live on unemployment.

      Tell your vendor that if they don't get off Windows onto Linux then you will leave as a customer. If there is no alternative AT ALL, then take another job.

      Except the reality of the situation is Windows is not that bad to lose your job over. Moreover, I'm one user of one of our dozens of systems that run this software, and we're one company of hundreds that use it. The company is very good, but I'm doubting they'll throw away their cash cow because I'm complaining. Again, you really don't get the reality of most people's situation. Let's say you're an X-Ray technician, and the software you use, which is the industry standard used at 95% of the hospitals, runs on Windows. Do you take the moral high ground and throw away your career just because the excellent software you're using runs on Windows? Good luck with that.

      This isn't A Knight's Tale and you can't change your stars. Get over yourself. If I was writing website back ends (and sometimes that's the work I do), I insist on Linux because I can. If you're running Adobe AfterEffects, you have no such luxury, and Adobe doesn't give a f#@ what you think, and your company just wants you to get it done with the tool all the other artists are using that they've already paid for.

      All this grandstanding the Linux zealots are throwing out there doesn't take into consideration that, in reality, Windows isn't THAT bad to lose your job over. Most of us are grown up enough to deal with it. I have a preference - I prefer Linux when possible, but I'm flexible enough to use whatever they give me.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    4. Re:You're the idiot who keeps using that software. by n329619 · · Score: 1

      Alternatively, you could try getting a hundred balloons onto a beach chair and send your kids off to school. You'll save so much money, you'll be green inside and out.

      This crazy Canadian did it, so can you.

    5. Re:You're the idiot who keeps using that software. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have a car and have absolutely zero problems getting around. In fact most of the people around here don't have cars either. That's because I chose where I wanted to live and what I wanted to do. I made it happen instead of sitting on my ass like a typical lazy American.

      An easy life is an unrewarding one., but go on making your excuses/refuges.

    6. Re:You're the idiot who keeps using that software. by R.Mo_Robert · · Score: 1

      If you're ever pissed off about how oil and power companies are ruining the environment, you can get rid of your car and get a bicycle.

      You will have trouble getting to work, picking up the kids, buying groceries and getting around, but BY GEORGE you stuck to your principles and the oil and power companies ... didn't notice at all.

      Look, I know you weren't necessarily striving for accuracy and were just trying to make a point, but as someone who commutes to work (and the gym, the grocery store, and almost everywhere) by bicycle, you're wrong about most of those things. It's actually easier for me to bike than drive to work because otherwise I'd have to worry about the parking nightmare that is most downtowns, and if you don't think you can do groceries you might want to look up "rear rack" (and rear panniers). Don't ever plan on having kids but it's certainly possible to transport them, as well (I see lots of dads and the occasional mom doing so here). You might be right about the oil companies to some extent, but it's certainly been noted that younger generations are less interested in car ownership than older ones were at that age, so somebody's noticing.

      --
      R.Mo
    7. Re:You're the idiot who keeps using that software. by Calydor · · Score: 1

      I did say trouble, not that it was impossible. You have to agree that buying groceries for the next two or three weeks is a LOT easier when you're driving home in a car than a bike, no?

      That's the problem with analogies, though. There will always be cases where they don't fit, or with you where you'd equal the use case of someone who CAN painlessly switch to Linux because everything you do now has a direct Linux equivalent.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
  46. Automatic updates can be easily disabled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For f...'s sake, automatic updates can be disabled easlily with group policies This has been known for years. And a simple registry tweak disables automatic driver updates as well.

    1. Re: Automatic updates can be easily disabled by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Will it's a good thing that most Windows users use Active Directory then!

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  47. Power management in new CPUs by tepples · · Score: 1

    Unlike Windows 7, Windows 10 gets drivers for the power management features in newer CPUs, such as Kaby Lake and Ryzen.

  48. No, we got updates anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Article is bull.
    Got a new laptop at the end of 2015 before 'anniversary edition' came out.
    Installed Win7 and turned on metered connection.
    Win10 was downloaded without prompting me.
    Win10 then performed updates when it was set to metered connection.

    I removed all the Win10 spyware and blocked all outgoing data.
    Disabled windows update, bits, shell experience, and gutted out cortana,, onedrive, and edge AND NOW I have a working copy of Windows 10 that does not need an internet connection.

    Summary: The only way to get Win10 to not use your metered connection is to block all communications, or dont use Win10.

  49. Fuck You, MS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No default route, Firefox can use a proxy...

  50. Re: You're the idiot who keeps using that software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try using real examples comparable and it isn't so bad drama queen. Grow up, come back when your mind is working like an adult. Hint: when you realize people do what they can do and don't have choices to choose any occupation in the world just by saying so.

    Same to all of you man-children. Jesus fucking Christ this gets old. No connection to real people.

    I'm in the Bay Area. Every place else is different. We have almost unlimited options here. No place else is like that. Real people aren't like this. This is why trump won. Thank god.

  51. The abuse continues from Redmond... by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

    Every few days I read yet another story about the abuse MS keeps heaping on the poor souls who, for whatever reason, still use Windows 10.. Part of me feels sorry for those who either *must* use Windows, for whatEVER reason, or those who just aren't aware of there being viable alternatives to Windows.. And part of my laughs my damn ass off at all the abuse that MS inflicts on their victims. I supported/used Windows for 20 years as a user and a sysadmin. During my career I also used Linux quite a bit, having discovered it via Slackware in 1994. After I retired, I decided I was done with anything MS, and moved all of my systems to Linux.. Couldn't be happier..

    --
    THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
  52. Canadian law arguably prohibits this by davecb · · Score: 2

    CASL, our anti-spam law, specifically requires informed consent before anyone installs anything on someone else's computer. There's a class action suitin the wings, waiting for "private right of action" to allow suits this summer.

    The CRTC is the only organization that can lay charges, and you should see the rats scurrying around trying to keep the right to lay suits from coming into force (;-))

    --
    davecb@spamcop.net
  53. Re:My current build of windows 8 is likely my last by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have Win 7 SP 1 running fine with updates off and haven't had any problems with software compatibility at all. Just use 7.

  54. Grandparents by PedroReina · · Score: 1

    Here you have mine: picture
    I. e.: real people older than 80 using a Debian box, I take care of installing and administering, they just have the fun (ssh to the rescue just in case).
    They moved from MS Win 98; they have trouble using computers no matter wich OS they use, but be sure that all their hardware is working, the KDE UI is not confusing and they are very autonomous.

    1. Re: Grandparents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy cow, you have almost 40,000 photos on your server. You must like
      photography :)

  55. Re:My current build of windows 8 is likely my last by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After things finally stop running on windows, I'll be switching to fulltime linux. In fact, just for multi-media / gaming, is the only reason I keep windows.
    I dual boot to linux as is. I'll be sad to lose some performance and ability to play some games, but I'll get over it.

    Nowadays one can apparently use PCIe bypass to give a virtual machine direct access to GPU. Once that is done windows doesn't notice anything and games appear to run normally. I have not personally done this yet, but soon since my win 7 seams to be about to croak. People are stating very minor performance cost (less than 5%?). In addition VM also offers control over sate of win 10. Playonlinux can run most things relatively painlessly, for everything else there is PCIe bypass and VM.

  56. Re:My current build of windows 8 is likely my last by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bought a copy of 8.1 when 10 came out, with the intention of leaving the Windows ecosystem entirely (for personal purposes, anyhow) by 2023 when the security updates cease.

    Stop giving Microsoft money on purpose. You probably already owned several 8.1 copies without even knowing when you bought it.

  57. Re:My current build of windows 8 is likely my last by erapert · · Score: 1

    In fact, just for multi-media / gaming, is the only reason I keep windows.

    Why not just switch over full-time? Why bother dual booting?
    Multi-media all runs perfectly fine for me in Ubuntu (I did install the non-free packages/codecs).
    Check out Steam and see which of your games don't run natively; many of the remainder will run under Wine or PlayOnLinux. For the ones that still won't run then try a VM with GPU pass-through. For the small remainder that still won't run then... well, I got over it and I'm sure you can as well.
    The freedom from M$ bullshit was worth it for me. Maybe it'll be worth it for you too.

  58. Re:My current build of windows 8 is likely my last by Tyr07 · · Score: 1

    Eventually I will, but I'm not interested in investing into especially expensive graphics cards to get the same performance under windows.

    As for multimedia, linux is almost completely on pair, so more realistically I'd just say for gaming. Just because I can get a game to run under linux, does not mean it runs well. You usually suffer some frame drops on a lot of games and I like to keep mine at 60 when possible.

    It's also far less forgiving to multi tasking while gaming. I can run many games even in fullscreen on windows, and switch to other screens and processes without any hiccups, but if I'm using wine to run it, I'm likely asking for a crash.

    Right now I don't need to give it up as my current windows OS isn't 10, and still compatible with it. But as you said, for what I can't run, I'll get over it.

    But I'll get over it when I need to, not to burn microsoft for something they already got my money for. I'm only hurting myself at that point.
    By refusing their next OS and not purchasing more of their products, that's how I get them.

  59. Isn't that special by stolidobserver · · Score: 1

    I remember when I "upgraded" to Windows 10. Shortly thereafter, Comcast decided the South should have data caps because they can. I got a bill for overage and I was like nonplussed as to how that happened. I looked at my data usage and here is what I found: Onedrive, which I had put one text file in for testing, 1kb, had generated 180GB of traffic for the month... syncing that 1kb text file. Thanks Microsoft!

  60. Android does too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google updatesâ Google Play over metered connections too, yet no one complains about it publicly (try Googling about the issue, hahaha), and Slashdot doesn't post about it!

  61. That's called gradualism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and is practiced by subversives.

  62. Re:My current build of windows 8 is likely my last by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only 12% of steam games run on linux.

  63. For some of us, this has always been the case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Until now Windows 10 has allowed users to avoid downloading updates over metered (pay-per-byte) connections, to avoid racking up huge bills.

    Not quite.
    It only allows you to mark a Wifi connexion as metered (none of the ones I've ever used is). It doesn't allow you to mark an Ethernet connexion as metered, and if I plug in my tethered 'phone, it shows up as an Ethernet connexion. My 'phones data is metered, but MS won't allow me to mark is as such, and has never been interested in changing this.

  64. OS verification is OFF by tepples · · Score: 2

    Installing anything other than stock Chrome OS on a Chromebook requires first putting the Chromebook in developer mode. Whenever a Chromebook in developer mode is turned on, the firmware displays a 30-second interstitial warning to the effect "OS verification is OFF; press Space to enable OS verification". Pressing Ctrl+D closes the interstitial. Pressing Space instead warns the user that reenabling OS verification permanently deletes everything stored on the Chromebook, with Enter to confirm doing so.

  65. Use an older PC, Wine, or VirtualBox by tepples · · Score: 1

    Try one of these:

    A. Use a PC with a pre-Ryzen or pre-Kaby Lake CPU.
    B. Use Wine in GNU/Linux.
    C. Use Windows 7 in VirtualBox in GNU/Linux.

    If all three are unacceptable, please explain in detail how each is unacceptable.

  66. Re:My current build of windows 8 is likely my last by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sells the information to people, and advertisers

    PROVE IT.

    Jesus Christ, no-one has actually shown that the telemetry in Windows 10 does anything nefarious at all, they all just throw accusations at Microsoft without evidence. Microsoft's stance is that the telemetry is gathered to help with resolving bugs and improving the system. It's the modern way of doing things in software, since most people wouldn't submit bug reports if something broke even if the option do so was available (i.e. people are lazy). Automated telemetry is an attempt to gain the info anyway, invisibly. Tons of software does it these days precisely this reason - to improve the software.

    Sounds more like people don't want to give Microsoft the benefit of the doubt. Well fuck the idealists, this is how it has to be.

  67. If it weren't for games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  68. Who uses metered connections nowadays? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No one runs their Windows 10 desktop on their mobile phone...

  69. Re:My current build of windows 8 is likely my last by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > no-one has actually shown that the telemetry in Windows 10 does anything nefarious at all

    You open notepad, that sends a packet to Microsoft. That's envelope information about your life, your schedule, to anyone watching packets coming from your house. Inside that is at least something about the fact that you are launching notepad.

    It's wildly nefarious. Top to bottom, shaft to tip.

    Resist this crap or you don't own a machine at all.

    Also you are probably a shill.

  70. Re:My current build of windows 8 is likely my last by erapert · · Score: 1

    That's perfectly fine with me: I have more Steam games (on Linux) than I can play and more coming out every week.
    I don't lose sleep over not being able to play the latest Metal Gear Solid on PS4 nor the latest Halo on XBone nor being unable to play iphone games-- I just go a little further and choose not to lose sleep over Windows-only games as well.

  71. Easy Solution by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

    Just disable the Windows Update service:
    URL:http://www.thewindowsclub.com/turn-off-windows-update-in-windows-10)