Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: How Do You Deal With a Terrible Tech Manager?

snydeq writes: From the Know It All to the Overwhelmer, succeeding beneath a bad manager takes strategy and finesse, writes Paul Heltzel in his round-up of bad IT bosses and how to keep them from derailing your career. "While there are truly great leaders in IT, not all inspire confidence. Worse, you can't always choose who will lead your team. But you can always map out new paths in your career. With that in mind, here is a look at some prototypically bad managers you may have already encountered in your engineering departments, with tips on how to deal with each of them." The six "terrible tech managers" mentioned by Heltzel include: "The Know It All," "The Pushover," "The Micromanager," "The Unexpected Boss," "The Fearful Manager," and "The Overwhelmer." Have you ever worked for any of these managers? If so, how did you deal with them?

140 comments

  1. Easy by TroII · · Score: 3, Funny

    I send him a link to Breitbart. Before long he's spending all day tracking down pizza parlors and gay frogs, and staying out of everyone's hair at work.

    1. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Interesting. We send ours links to articles about how innocuous things like office air conditioning are examples of racist, sexist, islamophobic, colonialism.. they spend all day tracking the sexism down in the ducts, adding some entertainment to otherwise dull days.

    2. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, we just keep setting them up for a big fall so they look like a real donkey to the execs

      Oh yeah, and put porn on his works PC

  2. give them silly assignments to make them feel imp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    give them silly assignments to make them feel important

  3. Left one out by Tough+Love · · Score: 2

    Left out a kind of terrible manager: The Complete Psycho. Unfortunately, too common.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    1. Re: Left one out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think sociopath is more common.

    2. Re: Left one out by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      i think sociopath is more common.

      synonym.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    3. Re: Left one out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always thought Sociopath was less severe and more able to function in normal society?

    4. Re: Left one out by geoskd · · Score: 0

      I always thought Sociopath was less severe and more able to function in normal society?

      A psychopath kills for no reason, a Sociopath kills for personal gain

      All things considered, as long as it is not in a sociopaths interest that you should die, you are perfectly safe from them.

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    5. Re: Left one out by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      A psychopath kills for no reason, a Sociopath kills for personal gain

      That is your definition, but if you search the web you can find dozens of other "differences" many of which are contradictory. There is no formal medical definition of either "psychopath" or "sociopath". Psychiatrists use the term "antisocial personality disorder".

      In vernacular English, the terms "psychopath" and "sociopath" are used interchangeably.

    6. Re: Left one out by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Right. Because killing someone is the only way of harming them.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    7. Re: Left one out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Then I worked for a Psychopath. He killed everyone's morale, and with a smile.

      He would literally wait until 4:45 every Friday before coming back from the director's meeting and lunch with his report (our manager) before announcing to us that he promised the new system upgrade before the business opened on Monday morning. Someone in the IT department got screwed every Friday. (okay, i think he missed about 2 a year)

      One particular upgrade took 72 hours on the test / development environment. When he was reminded of that, his answer was "Well, you'd better get started on it."

      Eventually, I got fed up and quit.

    8. Re: Left one out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A psychopath kills for no reason, a Sociopath kills for personal gain

      That is your definition, but if you search the web you can find dozens of other "differences" many of which are contradictory. There is no formal medical definition of either "psychopath" or "sociopath". Psychiatrists use the term "antisocial personality disorder".

      In vernacular English, the terms "psychopath" and "sociopath" are used interchangeably.

      That sounds exactly what a psychopath would say...or is it what a sociopath would say?

    9. Re:Left one out by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      *THIS*

      I tried getting out from under one and was retaliated against and ultimately was terminated (with 17 years of good to outstanding reviews behind me) by a railroad job from said psychopathic asshat.

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    10. Re: Left one out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That is your definition, but if you search the web you can find dozens of other "differences" many of which are contradictory. There is no formal medical definition of either "psychopath" or "sociopath". Psychiatrists use the term "antisocial personality disorder".

      That's the actual definition. People don't get to redefine words just because they have degrees, words are used to communicate and stem from common usage, if a person has a degree in language or special knowledge of psychology they have the ability to catalog things, not to change them.

    11. Re: Left one out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A psycho kills for a reason. The reason might not make sense to you - but it does to him."Feels threathened by confident people" for example. Or "Killing a 'clever' guy is fun"

    12. Re: Left one out by sjames · · Score: 1

      You are far from safe. There are a lot of things that may be in the sociopath's interest that are not in yours. For example, you getting the blame for the destruction he caused. You giving up a family holiday so he doesn't have to. You working 80 hour weeks so he looks good to his manager (until you burn out, then you're useless to him so he'll purge you to make room for fresh meat).

    13. Re: Left one out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or even, "I don't like Mondays."

    14. Re: Left one out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of you. Look for another job. Once you are confirmed to start, don't give notice. Don't say anything. Ask for the extra important work and set it up to not deliver. Do you really think this type of person will provide good references.

      Let him find out Monday morning. And update the executives that he knew it was late and he told you to keep a secret from them.

      Tell him you complained to hr.

      When he goes to hr, admiring there is an issue himself, all the cards start to fall.

      These people are liabilities and need to be dealt with. If I ever get to the point if nothing to loose, illl take them out just like sex offenders. Trash needs to be destroyed.

    15. Re:Left one out by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      That will teach you to spend 17 years at one place. WTF were you thinking?

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  4. You forgot one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The "blithering idiot" manager, that doesn't have a clue what technology is. We had some of those. We just sat back and let them fail until the next one came along. In 15 years and a new manager every 2 years, we finally got one that knew how to do his job.

    1. Re: You forgot one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's like mine. The Graphic Designer who was promoted to VP of Engineering, and now oversees about 60 engineers. He very openly says he knows nothing about code, so he wants things explained in simple terms. Nepotism runs high where I work.

    2. Re:You forgot one... by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Informative

      I had a boss who was technical but in a different field. The thing was, he knew what he didn't know - so he used to listen and delegate. If you wanted to make the case that it should be done this way, or that way, or not done at all he'd listen to you.

      He'd give you a damn good roasting if you got it wrong. But it was your decision, so why not?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    3. Re: You forgot one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Alas, it is better to have an ignoramus than a manager who thinks he his a tech, and that he actually *thinks* he knows something.

    4. Re: You forgot one... by goose-incarnated · · Score: 3, Interesting

      He very openly says he knows nothing about code, so he wants things explained in simple terms.

      You have the best type of manager.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    5. Re:You forgot one... by sh00z · · Score: 1

      So how exactly is this terrible? Sounds like the best I could hope for.

    6. Re:You forgot one... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Where exactly did I say it was?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  5. Escalate, then quit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    First you bring up the issue with the boss's boss. If nothing is done, then you quit. If you're good at what you do in technology you shouldn't have trouble finding work anyway. If you're useless or burnt out, maybe you can apply to be the next terrible tech manager. Many of them started that way and got "promoted out of the way".

    1. Re:Escalate, then quit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're good at what you do in technology you shouldn't have trouble finding work anyway. If you're useless or burnt out, maybe you can apply to be the next terrible tech manager.

      Useless? Burnt out? You mean "doesn't blog" right?

      It doesn't matter how good you are at what you do. If you don't blog about yourself constantly, you're not narcissistic enough for the social media marketing industry, which is what "tech industry" means today. Be tech-social or die.

    2. Re:Escalate, then quit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know this is a joke, but still... for the record, I work in tech, and I'm successful, my job pays well, and I do not do anything related to social media or even web development. The whole social media buzz is mostly crap vapourware anyway which will be the very first industry to tank at the smallest economic trouble. Me? I work in industrial product development like aerospace and critical infrastructure. I would never work for a garbage pointless social media shop.

    3. Re: Escalate, then quit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't do social media either. Except github and irc. I was still scouted by Google (but I declined) and web dev is part of my job. I think that if you do OSS and are good enough, you don't need to do tricks to get a job.

    4. Re: Escalate, then quit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't do social media either.

      Virtue signaling much?

      Except github and irc.

      So you're a liar.

    5. Re:Escalate, then quit. by smillie · · Score: 1
      The last company I worked for had us IT guys scattered around the country so we had weekly conference calls with the boss. Every now and then they had a "jump" call where the bosses boss hosted the converence call and the boss wasn't supposed to be there. That way anyone could complain without the boss knowing who said what. My trusting nature was on strike that day so I suggested that one company change that was mentioned meant that I should start looking for a new job.

      Not one minute after the call ends my boss who "wasn't listening in" called me to reassure me that my job was secure. Since I was the only one of our team in the entire state, I was reasonably certain that was aready the case.

      I quietly let some of the team who I trusted know that the anonymous calls were anything but.

      I could have left then but I was 60+ years old and desided to just ride it out until retirement. They re-orged shortly after and I ended up with a new boss so it worked out for me anyway.

      --

      Dyslexics Untie!

  6. 1. Scram by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Get out if you can! It's not worth your health and sanity to stay for a bit more money.

    I had a sinister boss during a past slump, and had to wait a while to find another company. Economic slumps suck: choices die faster than summer daisies in Death Valley.

    1. Re:1. Scram by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It really looks bad on a resume` to bounce from place to place, but I wholeheartedly agree. If the company is willing to keep bad managers around then they can do so without my help.

      Besides, nothing feels better than having a job in hand when you give your notice.

  7. I had a know-it-all by dwywit · · Score: 1

    He had all of the theory and none of the practice. I eventually quit, but he "decided to leave" a little later.

    --
    They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
  8. Oh ... my. by buss_error · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've had a boss that was all of these. Very frustrating.

    I've often wondered why folks in tech expect 24x7 access to their employees. If you work at Burger King, you don't have to put in 90 or 100 hour weeks - or if you do, it's with overtime pay. But if you're in tech, this seems to be the default expectation and don't you dare ask for overtime or even a bonus. Gosh no. Don't expect profit sharing either.

    --
    Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
    1. Re: Oh ... my. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have one who's three of these right now. Know it all, became a manager with no training and no clue how to manage people.

    2. Re: Oh ... my. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reverse Question: What do you do when you get promoted to a management position in a different department and have no clue how to manage people? Do you quit, or try to do the job?

    3. Re: Oh ... my. by Type44Q · · Score: 0

      Polonium in their coffee.

    4. Re: Oh ... my. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I told them up front on my original interview that I never wanted to be "promoted" to management, and they kept to it.

      I have noted various other techs who made the jump to management.

      They eventually found out that the thing that made them valuable and special as managers (that they were techie) evaporated (in about a decade) until suddenly they weren't valuable as managers anymore. Unless of course they managed to pick up actual management skills in the meantime.

      Staying technical matters. Once you make the jump to management you have a definite tech decay curve. So plan wisely. Getting back into tech is much harder than staying in.

    5. Re:Oh ... my. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They think it makes them look like good, tough managers, squeezing so much time out of employees. In reality, they're increasing the odds those employees leave and the company will have to deal with a constant rotation of employees who have to keep learning the products from scratch and don't have a personal connection to them, so it will be more difficult to track down deeper issues and make major changes. Also, I just don't think it's realistic to expect more than 8 hours of quality work out of an employee a day. Stretch the hours out and you just get exhausted employees taking longer to do the same things.

    6. Re:Oh ... my. by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      Because I can get anybody to flip a burger. The problem with tech is that for many companies IT is 24x7x365 but the IT department still expects to act like they are working 8-5. So reality collides with their notions and reality wins.

    7. Re:Oh ... my. by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I do IT support. All my contracts for 10+ years have prohibited me from working more than 40 hours per week. Last year I got an extra month of pay as a Christmas bonus.

    8. Re:Oh ... my. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think this is partly correct - IF your IT is in need of so much babysitting that you absolutely NEED someone out there to fix a minor breakdown at 3am - you have to hire more IT to do on-call (or even on-site) shift rotation.

      If you hire IT (like in my company) to be there 9-5, then expect them to be there 9-5, and nothing else. Of course, we will work outside of hours (homeoffice be blessed) if important stuff comes up, and of course I will jump into my car when the call comes that something very important has broken down at 2am at the office - but if your company is working well (with a reasonable maintenance budget), this should be rare - it happens for me about once a year, if even that. And, if people think twice about it, a lot of the things that break can actually wait till 8am and don't HAVE to be fixed at 2am, pronto.

    9. Re:Oh ... my. by edx93 · · Score: 2

      Think of it this way: Compare a traditional restaurant vs all-you-can eat buffet. In a restaurant, you typically get one meal and perhaps a desert and call it a night. In an all-you-can eat buffet, you stuff yourself until they have to wheel you out. Why? Because in the first case you're limited by price constraints; the more you buy the more you pay. In the latter, since you paid for it might as well take the most advantage out of the situation as possible so you use the product as much as possible for as long as you can. Same goes with tech workers: hourly pay means higher cost for longer hours. Salaried means lower cost for longer hours (in an hourly basis).

    10. Re:Oh ... my. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just avoid IT adverts that talk about on-call-rotation. Maybe I am doing it wrong...at least that ones already know and openly admit they are dysfunctional.

    11. Re:Oh ... my. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do not ruin a good rant thread with reality...many people do not want to distinguish between shitty helpdesk/lowly IT positions, and higher level techs.

    12. Re:Oh ... my. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try your hand at radio and TV broadcasting. I tell people I meet that I'm an 'On-Call-Ogist. They think I'm a cancer doctor.

    13. Re:Oh ... my. by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      ...many people do not want to distinguish between shitty helpdesk/lowly IT positions, and higher level techs.

      Help desk I haven't done in ten years. I've done PC refresh projects at eBay and a local hospital, and built out a data center for Google. Upgraded and tracked 300+ laptops with 11ac wireless cards at Cisco. I'm currently doing InfoSec remediation for government IT. None of these positions are either "shitty" or "lowly".

    14. Re:Oh ... my. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a difference: the media along with the rest of the arts require no talent to work in, IT takes decades of personal study and experience to be great at. People don't spend those decades to be disposable plebeians fighting each other for reduced wages and long hours in competition, they do it to have a better life. While you might take the stance that all people are equal and deserve the same lot or you might not, the fact is sales+business is worth 20% of the revenue, anything beyond that and there's no room to compromise on long or absurd hours, which is the case in 99% of tech companies.

    15. Re:Oh ... my. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Ah, the belief that the field you are in requires talent, and others don't. Alternatively, whatever you don't understand must be easy, since you don't know the actual difficulties.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    16. Re: Oh ... my. by buss_error · · Score: 1

      What do you do when you get promoted to a management position in a different department and have no clue how to manage people? Do you quit, or try to do the job?

      This is an excellent question. The fact that you ask it indicates that despite a lack of knowledge of the people and the product, you have a fighting chance to actually be successful. To quote someone else: "We ask kittens to fight tigers. We don't expect them to win, but we do expect them to try."

      So, my advice is to just - try. At worst, it won't be as bad as a "dead hand on the helm", and at best, you might discover depths within yourself you didn't know you had. Just keep in mind these five magic words:
      "I was wrong. I'm sorry."
      Use them when needed. It's absolutely amazing what they can accomplish, and to turbo boost that, add these words "What do you see as a path forward?"

      --
      Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
    17. Re:Oh ... my. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Ah, the belief that all people put forth relatively equal effort at life...

      There are, in fact, butt simple things lazy people can and do make shitty livings at. The world needs ditch diggers too.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  9. It's simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You open up linked in and start talking to other companies.

    1. Re:It's simple by Immerman · · Score: 1

      But if you use neither, then how would you know?

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    2. Re:It's simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not like being "on LinkedIn" is a reflection on any given company. I've had to post jobs wherever our HR department wants to post jobs. Hell, my last job I found on Craigslist ffs. If you worry less about the job posting and more about the company, you'll find you have a lot more choices.

    3. Re: It's simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Y'all got trolled hard.

      Snitches get bitches.

  10. Make a movie called Horrible Bosses 3? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    That should solve everything.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  11. You never leave a company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You leave your boss.

    1. Re:You never leave a company by ruir · · Score: 1

      Often you leave both.

  12. You all show up in suits ... by davecb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And have appointments out of the office at odd times. A colleague started that, and promptly got button-holed by the VP Financial (who had been our receiver in a former startup). The VP then started a reference check on the problematic boss...

    --
    davecb@spamcop.net
  13. Mine: The absent manager by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On one hand, it's super nice. Who doesn't want a manager who's never around!? The downside is he's never around! He's too busy doing onsite visits for his second job.

  14. jump ship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the illusion of permanence is the root cause of all suffering

  15. Look for a new job by redmid17 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seriously, you're not going to get anywhere under a terrible manager. Moving to a different team will look petty and personal (even if it is). Moving to a new company lets you start over fresh.

    1. Re:Look for a new job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except most companies are filled to the brim with these privileged asshats.

      Let's call it what it is, privilege. A certain type of "social climber" is the preferred boss type, and they all suck at being bosses.

    2. Re:Look for a new job by hambone142 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I was reorged and placed under a kiss ass manager-ette. My solution: I called up my old manager and asked is I could go back to work for him. Viola. Done. I think she was in to some "categorize work tasks in to a flow chart" thing . I couldn't take the situation. I am an adult. I think she may have given head to someone at the top.

      This lady was like a Marissa Mayer on knee pads.

      Got out, kept my sanity, survived well.

      You can't change crappy managers. Best to distance oneself.

    3. Re: Look for a new job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good litmus test - if you're a Dev and you ever see a Gantt chart, get the fuck out

    4. Re: Look for a new job by prunus.avium · · Score: 1

      Gantt charts have their uses with project planning. As long as you remember that it's a plan and plans change. And when they change the end-times and start-times of the tasks need to be adjusted.

      I was at one company and they insisted on starting the testing phase based on the original chart...but development was 3 months behind schedule.

      The devs were not happy about having defects raised against code that hadn't even been written yet.

    5. Re:Look for a new job by quintus_horatius · · Score: 1

      I was reorged and placed under a kiss ass manager-ette.

      There's no reason to be a misogynist to make your case. There are plenty of epithets that you could use to describe your former manager that don't disparage other women in the process. Kiss-ass is good, as is toady, moron, bosshole, stooge, empty suit, or sycophant.

      By the same token, don't call the woman driver who cuts you off a bitch or a cunt, or the male driver a prick or a faggot. You can call all of them 'assholes,' for example, and convey the proper level of insult without pointlessly insulting other members of their respective genders. Same idea as the above.

    6. Re:Look for a new job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are wrong.

      If I WANT to insult someone badly, OF COURSE I use sexism too if I believe it has any negative effect. And if the person I insult happens to be black or jewish or muslim or young or old or whatever - they all have their special nastynames that really bites
        just for them.

      It is in the nature of insulting that this is exactly the thing to do. An insult should not be PC, quite the oppposite. Similiar to how warfare is not environmentally friendly.

    7. Re:Look for a new job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what I find more offensive than gratuitously sexist insults? Politically-correct censorship.

      Self-righteous pricks like you who presume to tell other people how they should talk can fuck off.

      You don't get to edit my use of language, prick.

    8. Re:Look for a new job by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Insulting someone because of some group they involuntarily belong to dilutes the effect and makes you seem intolerant. Insulting people based on who they personally are or what they've personally said or done works better in general. Calling her a kiss-ass who wouldn't have a spine if it wasn't for the Gantt charts up her butt is more effective.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    9. Re:Look for a new job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There you go lecturing again. One thing you may not have noticed about your unsolicited opinions is that nobody asked for them...

  16. You just do as I say... by Zemran · · Score: 0

    ... and STFU.

    --
    I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
  17. Re: I Just Got Fired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    some people just need to survive and do what there told just remember not to take the blame and record in many ways ie make sure its the right thing to do stating your grievances and your options to more than him/her publically with management.

  18. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  19. Re:I Just Got Fired by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    I was driven out of every job, mainly because I didn't respond properly when ordered to "do it wrong or you're fired."

    Just an FYI, I have been absolutely willing to "do it wrong" (nothing unethical, of course), but it doesn't seem to help. If a manager doesn't like you, it's not because of the work you're doing, it's because he feels threatened, or has inter-personal issues, etc.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  20. I trained them ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 2

    ... I guarantee you those bastards (or bitches) came to realize that when I was happy, they were, too.

    It's like training Pavlov's dog.

    For one son of a bitch in Reston, Va., I programmed our fax machine to forward to his cell.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    1. Re: I trained them ... by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Every good boss I have had (which is most of them) quickly figured out that I may be their employee, but they report to me :-)

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    2. Re: I trained them ... by chipschap · · Score: 2

      Every good boss I have had (which is most of them) quickly figured out that I may be their employee, but they report to me :-)

      There's a lot of truth to this. I've posted on /. before about having managed as many as 600 people in diverse groups. No way I could know all their jobs. The only option? Listen to the people who actually knew how to get the work done, understand the obstacles they faced, and get those obstacles out of the way so they could do what they do best.

      You know what? It worked. I didn't need to pretend I knew it all or run around giving orders. Amazing what people can do if you make sure they have what they need and then stay out of the way until they need something else.

    3. Re:I trained them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked in Reston. Were you at Oracle, Accenture, Microsoft?.....

    4. Re: I trained them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every good boss I have had (which is most of them) quickly figured out that I may be their employee, but they report to me :-)

      This is what people with a reputation as good managers have said to me: both that this is correct, and that they had to learn it.

      Getting a bad manager made me look closer at the pressures on managers. At my company they are judged separately on being a "people manager" and a "manager," and there's a list of good people manager traits, but it's like, "no, really, this stuff does matter to us. Please pay some attention to it when judging managers. Please! It's the official right thing to do," and I feel like, more and more, management heirarchy is like, "whatever. We're tired of having our will disrespected, and whenever we succeed in the marketplace it is a result of our brilliant leadership so why should we respect the people doing the work? Knock these primadonnas into line." After going through the experience of a bad manager I'm less convinced that good people management is a goal the company takes seriously, and there is not much else I have to work with. If I were able to get managers removed for other reasons, I'd be a manager myself.

      What I thought would be a successful strategy:

      - explain to manager's manager what he was doing wrong, how it was hurting the quality of the team's work, how this harm was being hidden by misdirection, and how one might look closer to weigh it.

      - talk with manager's other reports about overlapping areas of concern, and focus on the overlap with manager's manager, so that after we all talk to him, he gives our concerns more credence.

      It did not work, because:

      - manager gave me an unexpected negative performance review which destroyed my credibility.

      - manager's manager blamed me for all my complaints, even in ways that didn't fit the facts.

      - when I summarised my manager's-manager meeting to coworkers, they chickened out and fumbled their conversations with him, skipping all the areas we agreed were overlapping concerns. Do not expect your peers to have a spine! However, they did tell me they'd chickened out (albeit not in so many words), so I'm not saying don't trust them. I'm just saying, the level of unsafety that can stop someone from doing the right thing is much lower than I expected.

      Here is what seemed to help:

      - explain the situation to senior programmers who trust me and ask for advice. I think it matched things others were saying, and they talked to someone like manager's manager's manager about it, or something. Some companies respect senior engineers.

      - send a long email to HR about evidence manager was retaliating against me for conversations with manager's manager and other ways that I did not "support" manager like disagreeing with him on bugs about technical issues. HR may strategize to get rid of you instead of helping you so many people are afraid to go to them. They are also not supportive: they answer long emails with "let's meet." However, at my company they are fairly traditional, so when other people are being sneaky and inattentive, HR dampens it. This may be a corollary to "spineless": the amount of fear required to make someone abandon a risky manipulation is small. The fact that you're thinking about quitting anyway is an asset.

      - yearly surveys about "people manager" skills (micromanaging, psychological safety, actionable feedback, fair performance evaluation) identify my manager as a bad manager. However, at my company, we see managers survive with absolutely terrible survey results for at least two years, and there's no transparency about it, so the surveys could be venting opportunities for workers and completely ignored. Most people trust the company to use them, but now that I've seen cases they actually need to be used, I think it's just internal PR. I believe if a manager is very good at forcing the team to comply

  21. Add Psychopaths to the list by mykepredko · · Score: 1

    See: https://www.amazon.com/Snakes-...

    If you get that, you're basically fucked. Document what they've done to you (and your team) and quit (which is what the book tells you to do).

    It's a tough world out there.

    1. Re:Add Psychopaths to the list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Came here to say this. You can't win fighting a psychopath / sociopath.
      The only winning move is to quit - and move to a higher paying job.

      The best revenge is living well.

  22. Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try killing them.

  23. It is quite well known. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2

    You deal terrible IT manager the same way countless people have dealt with their bad managers. Stop pretending bad tech managers are somehow different.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  24. Understand your boss by AHuxley · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If your wealthy and smart start you own company.
    If your not wealthy or smart?
    Your stuck with having to understand your boss and have to try and reason with them.
    Try and understand your boss and their origins.
    Overeducated for the role and wanted to be promoted in the past but failed?
    Had some connection with others in management that secured their role but they are not a productive boss?
    Someone who once had good ideas but has less to offer every year?
    They use their own boss as a method of advancement and just keep staff around to fill in the role of been a boss? Their own advancement is the project not anything that needs to be done.
    The boss has issues from university, never went to a good "university" in the traditional way, was too poor to enjoy university, did not fit into any social setting at university. Was smart but did not have the correct level of wealth to fit in? All that can shape the mind and issues a boss projects. Poverty made them have many, many issues decades later.
    Social acceptance issues? Even been a "boss" just does not wash away that feeling of not been accepted by management.
    Lack of ability to learn new skills. The boss is using past success to just stay in place for a few more years. They don't want to lean new methods. They have staff for that.
    They have the wrong education. It was ok years ago and got them the job but they feel different from their better educated peers.
    They had a good memory that as able to fake their way past university exams, the interview and the social skills to become a boss.
    Even average staff know they have a lack of ability needed in their role. So the boss takes steps to hide that issue.
    Most people have traits they bring up from university and as they enter the work force. What was your boss like? Could they even study on their own or did they always need help? Could they work on a project or did they always need a lot of support?
    Once you understand your boss aviod the things that make them unhappy.
    If your wealthy and happy don't remind your boos of their own poverty filled past.
    If your boss is smart, learn from them.
    If your boss is lacking in skills, don't be the person that knows too much about their past.
    Other traits are the boss who has to talk about their new found wealth and what they are doing socially. The charities, social events, music, art, a new car.
    If you are wealthy and enjoyed all that as a given, it becomes almost comical to sit and listen to your boss trying to buy their way into society. Try to be positive and just be happy for your boss. If you boss finally has the wage to enjoy opera or some other social event just smile and ask them all about their experience.
    A normal boss will work hard, bring new ideas, have the educational background to study and keep learning new things, want the best for the company and all staff. They will want to share their own skills and learn.
    If not something is wrong, just take the time to find out what. Poverty, educational issues, a well hidden lack of talent.
    Good interviews and hiring on merit with background investigations will usually detect any of the bad traits. Always interview, hire on merit and look into pasts, then a company can avoid staff issues.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re:Understand your boss by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 2

      No. Quit, and give no hint until the exit interview as to why. Frequently you will not have an exit interview. So call your boss's boss on the way out.

      You don't have any other power. This psychobabble bullshit might work if you already knew it, but it won't help anyone who needs to read it and finds it insightful. Actually quit, and name names.

    2. Re:Understand your boss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, this is a general understanding of humanity. And understanding of oneself. You're, (and I use that word correctly, unlike you), pretty black & white and have a lot of assumed character traits of Bosses (as opposed to visionary leaders & inspirational types), vs. workers who you see as the ones is on them to go through deep psyche-understandings of their management.

      You may have those roles flipped bud.

    3. Re:Understand your boss by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Only if you don't need the reference. It won't change a thing and will ruin the reference. Some shit managers only give bad refs on 'principle', in that case fuck him/her as hard as you can.

      For most companies: Lie, lie, lie on the way out, just like they did to you on the way in. Don't burn that bridge.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    4. Re:Understand your boss by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

      If you have a terrible manager, you don't want that reference. That reference is not predictable. Do not list it, and explain in your next interview that your manager was an idiot, which is part of the reason you left. Not immediately, but find a subtle way to compliment the chance to work for new management with some sort of understanding of what you do, as opposed to the arsehole you used to work for.

      You're leaving for a reason, and you don't want that reason to be something you enter into day 1. If necessary, give those details during the interview. If they balk, YOU DO NOT WANT THAT JORB.

  25. Re: All you need by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    Pliers for the fillings...

  26. Wait long enough for them to get fired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It happens

  27. Re:I Just Got Fired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, at-will pretty much means you better hope you click with your manager(s) or they will find anything to let you go when they're being pressured to downsize, or even if they don't have a good reason, they'll make something up to justify it to their superiors. If you get along, they may also be a bit more willing to accept your feedback.

  28. Only had issues with the micro-manager by Snotnose · · Score: 2

    All the others (haven't run into them all, but...) I dealt with just fine. But the person who interrupts me all day long, to the point where I just get into the problem and am pulled out of it for trivia? Never figured out how to deal with them.

    / Typical example, Quit bugging me, send me email,
    // boss sends email
    /// boss pokes head in as I'm reading email, "have you read my email yet?"
    //// should be a stand your ground type law for bosses like this

    1. Re:Only had issues with the micro-manager by tommeke100 · · Score: 1

      The Push Over / Overwhelmer is equally bad though. Because they will just add stuff to your plate, interrupting you constantly as well.
      Say you're busy with a 2 day task. By noon, you will already need to pull a report for something else because he promised it up the hierarchy or other meeting where he didn't dare say no. He will promise two other high priority tasks that you also have to perform in the mean time and by the end of the 2 days, where you had basically 2 hours of work on the initial project, he will ask why the initial task is taking so long. They are basically setting you up for failure and make you look bad. Because you'll be the scapegoat and the guy who's bad at time-management when one of the tasks aren't handled properly or over time.

      micro-managers are the worst though, because they suck every ounce of creativity out of you, and often take credit for your stuff.

    2. Re:Only had issues with the micro-manager by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Push Over / Overwhelmer is equally bad though. Because they will just add stuff to your plate, interrupting you constantly as well.

      Say you're busy with a 2 day task. By noon, you will already need to pull a report for something else because he promised it up the hierarchy or other meeting where he didn't dare say no. He will promise two other high priority tasks that you also have to perform in the mean time and by the end of the 2 days, where you had basically 2 hours of work on the initial project, he will ask why the initial task is taking so long. They are basically setting you up for failure and make you look bad. Because you'll be the scapegoat and the guy who's bad at time-management when one of the tasks aren't handled properly or over time.

      micro-managers are the worst though, because they suck every ounce of creativity out of you, and often take credit for your stuff.

      Simply keep a running task list on your white board. When they ask you to do something else point to the white board and ask them where in the priority list does this task fall. Sometimes they will tell you to place it above other tasks, sometimes they will walk away muttering to themselves. Either way you have an answer.

  29. Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Look for another job, life is too short to fight this kind of thing and HR will always side with the manager first because usually those rats are good at their game and will already have dirt on you (real or made up, does not matter) in case you talk and spin it to HR in your file the second they smell that you will start complaining. Your career will be stalled completely as long as that manager will be your boss anyway. Move on.

  30. ironic... by CaptnCrud · · Score: 1

    because that's generally how anyone horrible at their job seems to get that position in the first place. They hide out or "follow the rules" long enough for someone to leave or there is simply no one else to fill the role.

    In many of my anecdotes as a contractor, its seems the last people standing in a company (the primary shit stain of sales or the senior dickwad of software) are almost always the most worthless people that just new how to hide well....the good people bailed or were blamed and fired long before.

    1. Re:ironic... by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      because that's generally how anyone horrible at their job seems to get that position in the first place. They hide out or "follow the rules" long enough for someone to leave or there is simply no one else to fill the role.

      In many of my anecdotes as a contractor, its seems the last people standing in a company (the primary shit stain of sales or the senior dickwad of software) are almost always the most worthless people that just new how to hide well....the good people bailed or were blamed and fired long before.

      You're more correct than you think - I posted this before, but another post can't hurt.

      The lifecycle of a company is such that once it is out of the growth phase it will be filled by useless wastes of oxygen. That link above provides excruciating details into why this happens.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    2. Re:ironic... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Good people find it much easier to bail out. The ability to get a decent job is a good parachute.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  31. Re: The same away women always get ahead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you think all women have penises, you have been trolled pretty badly by someone.

  32. hehe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sabotage their network jack, and guilt trip them into troubleshooting it themselves.

  33. Document, document, document... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I had a supervisor who assigned me two separate projects that had a one-month gap between them. I documented that I would take them with the understanding that there will be trouble if the two projects overlapped. The inevitable train wreck came when the first project overlapped the second project, both projects got delayed and later reassigned to other people to straighten out. Supervisor tried to throw me under the bus but I had documentation that he didn't lift a finger to help me. What happened? Supervisor got promoted out of the department and I didn't have a project for 90 days.

    Next supervisor told me not to document any of his activities. Of course, I documented that and everything else. Soon I was being written up for insubordination for... you guess it... documenting his interference with my project. When he gave me the "his way or the highway" speech, I resigned as soon as my current project was done. I was the third out of a dozen senior employees who headed for the exits that year. Supervisor rode the company into bankruptcy.

    1. Re:Document, document, document... by johhnjoseph · · Score: 1

      It has happened before, and it will happen again!

  34. The Know It All by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't we just elect one of these to be president?

  35. Be lucky by riverat1 · · Score: 2

    I had a terrible manager a long time ago but fortunately he knew nothing about my job (systems and database administrator on a VAX system). He'd come over and talk to me and I'd just bury him with VAX specific jargon. As long as the VAX ran fine (and it always did) I was left alone. Others in the department weren't so lucky because he thought he knew something about PCs and the phone system and he was a micromanger. He lasted less than two years as head of IT but got moved to other departments and had similar problems (a manger can manage anything, right?). Eventually he got fired when he go caught trying to return an expensive camera system that he'd "borrowed" without approval. It was needed for some tests.

    The one time he did get to me (and the others in the department) was when he insisted that all email go through him for approval. This was in the days before ubiquitous internet email so we had two systems, the local VAX email and the corporate system called sysm. That only lasted for about a week. We buried him in emails then complained when he wasn't able to keep up and deliver the messages in a timely manner. At the time I was changing usernames on the VAX to the new corporate standard so I was sending out 20 or 30 messages a day telling users about the new usernames they'd have the following morning. Users were complaining and I told them "Talk to Ted, he was supposed to forward the message on to you".

  36. http://ten.thecomicseries.com/comics/3/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://ten.thecomicseries.com/comics/3/

  37. Re: The same away women always get ahead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm pretty sure OP was trying to make a joke that made you think he was a she until the penis line.

    However, OP forgot that no women come to Slashdot.

  38. Change departments or failing that companies. by Lord+Kano · · Score: 2

    Several years ago I had a manager whom I could not stand and who was not fond of me. I chose to apply for a position in a new department and moved there.

    If the person is a manager, they're adept at playing the game. They're going to beat you at office politics. Unless you have knowledge that they're stealing or otherwise ethically/legally compromised, don't try to fight them. Get out.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  39. Re: The same away women always get ahead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's called tumbr.

  40. The Toxic manager by Nuitari+The+Wiz · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure why but they are missing the Toxic manager in there.
    I used to have a manager that would ensure that whoever he nominates to be the lead on a project would fail to accomplish most, if anything in the project.
    First very unrealistic time tables for the project, which was essentially a rewrite of an existing CMS from scratch. 3 months.
    He booked easily 60% of my time in various meetings. Spent a lot of the rest of the time planning and designing features to "stay ahead of the curve".
    Of course during that time I still had to make sure that the legacy systems still worked.
    Then pulls me aside to say that "my" team feels that its weird that I am not programming on the rewrite.
    And of course, keep changing who is on the project team to ensure complete discontinuity.

    Then came the low performance review and this is when I realised how much of a shaft was waiting for me. I quickly transferred to another team within the company and a recruiter thankfully called my cell phone shortly after.

    Essentially the manager I had stayed in place because the team was responsible for generating most of the revenue for the business and he always had someone to preassign the blame.

    2 years after I resigned he was made the lead of a new team. Those team members refused to work with him within the first month. HR eventually wisened up and looked at the part performance reviews and exit interviews that targeted that manager, he was demoted and told that he can keep working in his corner until he can find a job at another company.

    The major lesson I learned is to never tolerate a bad manager. As soon as you can, leave.

    1. Re:The Toxic manager by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to have a manager that would ensure that whoever he nominates to be the lead on a project would fail to accomplish most, if anything in the project.

      That method of undermining is called "Charlie Browning"; it's what happens when Lucy pulls the football away, as Charlie Brown runs to kick it. He ends up flat on his back.

    2. Re:The Toxic manager by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      The organization was simple at the 'sabotage' level of process immaturity. The 'process immaturity model' is a useful lens to look at companies.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    3. Re:The Toxic manager by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Manager has reached his level of incompetence and knows it. Wants to surround himself with other incompetents (to hide among them). The key in that situation is to identify the 'king moron' (the one who started to herd of incompetents, likely hired your direct supervisor). If you can't possibly take over that role, the place is doomed and you should just use it to learn knew skills while looking for new work.

      It's a corollary to the peter principle, whose name escapes me at the moment...'When a person has reached their level of incompetence, at some level they know it and proceed to surround themselves with even more incompetent people.' Common problem at older companies...again from the Peter principle...'the older the organization, the greater the number of incompetents at all levels.' 'Ranking and rating' was supposed to address this, so now old companies are full of people whose only skills are gaming R&R.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  41. I might have a problem... by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

    ...I actually enjoy these managers.

    Hacking management behavior is loads of fun. Give me 6 months with any manager and I can provoke damn near any reaction I want, all the while they think it's their idea.

    ...why yes, I do enjoy my coffee black, why do you ask?

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:I might have a problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the problem with that is, you spent 6 months on something you shouldn't need to spend 6 months on.

      That's the ultimate problem with bad managers. They waste everyone's time, they waste corporate resources, and they generate loads of negativity in their departments. Which leads to employee turnover, poor morale, lousy work product, and all the rest. Complete organizational implosion is not an unknown result.

  42. Re: I Just Got Fired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't it semi-literate? Says the overseas janitor...

  43. 10 penny fuse by Chas · · Score: 1

    Then have him go in and check it.

    Make sure you unscrew all the lightbulbs in that area.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  44. Easy - bust the hell loose of it... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From 1994-2007 I worked in cities that cost TONS to live in (NY City, Atlanta etc.) & saved money (doing roommates) to come back home to a LOW COST city (after making 3-4x what I could here) to get into real estate (breaking free of the "wageslave" model & being STUPID believing what I call "the beer commercial life" ala "get a little capt. in you" preying on the fact that in your 20's-30's "young, dumb, full of come" nature as a male you exist on/for (which is the "flower of your youth" & reproductive urge essentially)).

    * The BIGGEST hardest trick? Maintain discipline & sit on your dough until you can buy into a BETTER way of life (where you are BOTH the CEO & yet the janitor too, but the coin/dead-presidents? They are ALL yours, not crumbs off a rich man's table PLAYING your dumb ass).

    Working for others, selling the TRUE commodity (your time on this earth)? IS DUMB... yes, you have to for a LONG time, but eventually if you play it right? You don't. Takes time, lots of it. Good guidance (keep it around you), surround yourself w/ intelligent like minded folks (success BREEDS itself) & above ALL else?? Don't let the 'great social experiment' of NOT THINKING FOR YOURSELF take ahold of you & PLAY you like a fool...

    It works. It worked for me. How? Go into business for yourself.

    APK

    P.S.=> It worked for me & it's "Welcome home Mr. Cobb" ala the end of the film "Inception" & yes, it can work for you too (but you have to keep a TIGHT ass leash on your own nature & not be a stupid fool giving in to a mind game oriented & keeping you STUPID & POOR)... apk

  45. Discuss with HR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let them sort it out. Chances are you wont be the first to mention this character...

  46. Micromanage back by rossz · · Score: 1

    I had a manager who tried to micromanage me. I can play that game. I became incapable of making the simplest of decisions. I kept going to his office every few minutes to ask stupid questions, like what color he wanted a particular header in. I made sure to only ask one question at a time for maximum impact. So every few minutes I'd interrupt him with something stupid. I had actually expected to get fired, not win the battle. Imagine my surprise when he finally just yelled, "just do whatever you want", and left me the hell alone.

    --
    -- Will program for bandwidth
  47. Re:You forgot two... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You forgot the "arrogant young prick", that has the social grace of a sack of shite. You can't take these brogrammers out to customer sites without risking some pointless drama that results in a key brogrammer storming off in a huff while you apologize profusely to a customer. Just because the VP won't let me fire your ass doesn't mean this is over.

  48. Manager Tools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have hundreds of Podcasts in their Manager Tools and Career Tools sections.

    Some of the things I learned there, that make me sure they have what you need to deal with this, are:

    - proactive reporting, political & general strategies to handle bad bosses
    - specific guidance to help people perform their best in a plethora of work-related situations
    - the best guidance I've ever found on changing jobs, if it comes to that

  49. Management != leadership by jandersen · · Score: 1

    This is something that should receive more emphasis, I think; a lot of managers don't understand that they aren't leaders - and that they are not even supposed to be leaders. Management is something that requires a certain set of skills - you are required to manage people, ie. you tell your staff what tasks they have to do, you evaluate their performance, you communicate with the wider administration, so your team members don't have to bother with the trivia of administration. In many ways, a manager is a secretary for the team. No leadership is required.

    Leadership, on the other hand, is a very simple concept: if you go in front and others follow, you lead. A good leader is often a member of the team, somebody who comes up with ideas about ways to do things. You can see how these concepts can easily get into conflict - a manager will very often not know enough to actually lead, because their expertise is management, not whatever the team is working on; this is what leads to many of the problems people talk about: the manager trying to lead highly skilled workers, who know far better what they are doing and how it should be done.

    I'm not sure what can be done from the employees' side about a bad manager - managers certainly need to be able to understand their own limitations and have to trust that their employees wan't to do a good job and are capable of doing it. Quite possibly a manager shouldn't really try to lead - that should be delegated to somebody in the team (or somebody new, who can then become part of the team). This is perhaps one thing the military has got right: you have the officers, who do whatever it is officers do, and they leave the actual leadership to sergeants and lieutenants; this is system that works, simply because it has been tested quite literally to destruction.

  50. None-of-the-above by pci · · Score: 1

    So, I've worked with all flavours of these managers listed, yet none of them are the most frustrating manager I've worked for.

    The most frustrating manager was the guy who read all the books, always knew what to say, tried to be your friend, but never actually let you do the things you wanted to get done. He'd never say no, but make you resubmit your requests 10 times with various tweaks almost like he wanted you to give up.

    Then in staff meeting's he'd complain that no one was being innovative except his favourites who can do no wrong.

    He'd give you just enough information to do the thing he asked, then give you a bit more information with an enhancement request. If I had that information up front I could have done it all at once instead of two cycles taking twice as long.

    He was also vindictive, if you didn't tow his view of the company line, you were basically shit listed and he would do everything he could to transfer or fire you.

    I did not enjoy that work, and I left the company because of it.

    1. Re:None-of-the-above by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of my worst CEO I answered to. A liberals art guy, with low esteem and even less technical savvy.
      He also tried to micromanage me....and it did not go well.
      He tried to fire me, was fired first.

  51. Start looking by houghi · · Score: 1

    It depends from company to company, but you must understand that no matter what, the outcome might be that you need to seek employment elsewhere.

    I have had a boss who was a terrible people manager. I went to HR and explained the situation. Somebody else did the same. HR spoke to the manager and I must complement him that he changed and became a better manager. I knew however that it could have ended that I would have had to leave.

    Another manager had no clue as to what the job of our team was. And I mean no idea. So I ran the department as if I had his position and took decisions in his place. The first meeting I went to, the other managers asked if my manager knew I was there. I bluffed and told them that if he didn't know, would they think I would be there.
    That was the end of that. He was left out of the loop and things worked great.
    No I never reported anything to him.

    At a third place I had a manager that was incompetent. Any questions that where a bit harder than the time of the day where send to me. I was unable to do anything, because my N+2 was holding a hand above her head. Going to N+3 would be futile as he would point to N+2.

    Once N+2 was fired, N+1 was left without protection. I knew that the new manager would give her 3 months to change and that she would be fired after 3 months. I was correct on the week. The cry of joy in the department when it was official was weird. Nobody was sure if they where allowed to be happy and if she was still in the building.

    So be sure that whatever steps you take, the result might be that you need a new job. See also if others experience the same that you have, because perhaps you just are unable to work for your manager and the issue is between the two of you, not with him.
    That does not mean you are a bad employee or he is a bad manager. It means that sometimes people are NOT compatible and it would take to much work for both to force it to work.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  52. Here's how I deal with it by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    I start building a case against said bad manager. Last job we managed to get a VP of Engineering fired.

  53. They made a documentary by Dareth · · Score: 1

    They made a documentary about this. Jason vs Freddy

    Jason is a psychopath and Freddie is a sociopath. Freddie even at one point gets angry that Jason kills so indiscriminately.

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  54. Petty Children by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of the comments reveal a lot of terrible, petty employees on Slashdot.

  55. The Hurricane by mitchy · · Score: 1

    That's one that's not mentioned and really hard to deal with. Found common in startups, the Hurricane Boss is a brutiful combination of all of the above, cranked up to eleven.

    I had one, a precocious Frenchman, who once walked back to my team's area, clapped his hands (in a way only a precocious Frenchman can), and commanded, "I want rounded corners and dropshadows. On everything." And then left. Fifteen nerds stopped dead in their tracks, concentration broken, pulled out of the zone. For rounded corners and dropshadows.

    I moved my team as far away from the windows as possible as that was where he liked to loiter, but I never could protect them from the Hurricane. Productivity? Focus? Not here, my friend.

    --
    "The mind is a terrible thing to, um, uh, oh bollocks." -- Me
  56. Re:I Just Got Fired by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Rule of 3s: If you've had 3 bosses with the same problem, it's not their problem, it's yours.

    Either you are dealing with your bosses wrong, or you are working in the _wrong_ industry. FYI If you are working for an industry that makes pure commodities (e.g. life insurance), your boss will be a marketer and you will be seen as pure overhead.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'