Slashdot Mirror


Nintendo Discontinues the NES Classic Edition (polygon.com)

A Nintendo representative has confirmed today that the company will be discontinuing the NES Classic Edition, "a plug-and-play console that became popular with collectors as soon as it launched last fall," reports Polygon. The last shipments of the consoles will hit stores this month. From the report: [Nintendo said in a statement to IGN:] "Throughout April, NOA territories will receive the last shipments of Nintendo Entertainment System: NES Classic Edition systems for this year. We encourage anyone interested in obtaining this system to check with retail outlets regarding availability. We understand that it has been difficult for many consumers to find a system, and for that we apologize. We have paid close attention to consumer feedback, and we greatly appreciate the incredible level of consumer interest and support for this product." "NES Classic Edition wasn't intended to be an ongoing, long-term product. However, due to high demand, we did add extra shipments to our original plans," it told IGN.

104 comments

  1. Only Nintendo... by DogDude · · Score: 5, Funny

    Only Nintendo would discontinue a product due to high demand. Who runs that company, a couple of idiot plumbers?

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:Only Nintendo... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nintendo probably didn't want a retro console to cut into sales of the new Switch, as they're the only console company that makes money off of the hardware.

    2. Re:Only Nintendo... by Luthair · · Score: 2

      No one is cross shopping a switch and an NES Classic Mini.

    3. Re: Only Nintendo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Switch has or will have the Virtual Console, where Nintendo sells NES games that can be played on the Switch. Nintendo doesn't want people saying "eh, I have all the NES games I want on this NES classic".

    4. Re:Only Nintendo... by thegarbz · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Artificial scarcity though limited production runs keeps the value high and keeps the the people wanting it when they introduce it again next year.

      In the mean time the focus is on the Switch. Who runs the company? People who know what they are doing.

    5. Re:Only Nintendo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They can either have a retro console that THEY SELL to "cut" into sales of the Switch or they can have people download NES ROMs and use emulators.

    6. Re:Only Nintendo... by William+Baric · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Artificial scarcity is great to keep price high and so profit high, but when you don't sell the product, you don't make any profit, no matter the value or the demand. The only ones who will benefit from artificial scarcity are resellers. So unless Nintendo is looking at selling the NES on Ebay, Artificial scarcity in this case is just really, really dumb. As for the Switch, as many people said, it's a different market. I would buy a Classic NES, but there's no way I will buy a Switch.

    7. Re: Only Nintendo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Right, because it's not like they don't have Virtual Console on Wii. Or Wii U. Or, hell, even 3DS. Nope, it's only on Switch where they have a Virtual Console where people can buy classic NES games.

    8. Re:Only Nintendo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they'll probably do something like offering an NES classic v2 or SNES classic for Christmas this year. By cutting off supplies for the NES classic now and limiting sales, the bean counters probably figure they will sell more. Some to the people who would get the product no matter what and those who would have bought a classic and not seen the point of upgrading to the v2 or SNES one.

    9. Re: Only Nintendo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are. Mad. Market demand and I will pay say nothing to them. Who did they kill they cannot produce more DS/DSi?

    10. Re: Only Nintendo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except they are selling every single unit made. Well, at least they have so far. Therefore, it's been very profitable. Or else they would have already discontinued it.

    11. Re: Only Nintendo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They are. Mad. Market demand and I will pay say nothing to them. Who did they kill they cannot produce more DS/DSi?

      On the internet, no one knows you're a dog. Unless you type like that. Then everyone knows you're a dog.

    12. Re: Only Nintendo... by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      I think they killed the DS/DSi for the 3DS.

    13. Re: Only Nintendo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but demand remains sufficiently high that I'm not seeing any units available. I'm definitely not going to be buying a Switch and I refuse to buy ROMS for their virtual machine due to them not belonging to me.

      So, if I can't find a copy for a reasonable price, they won't be getting any money from me. I doubt very much that I'm the only one that's in this boat. The supply of these hasn't really been able to keep up demand at all from the point where they were released. This seems like a foolish time to cut it off.

    14. Re:Only Nintendo... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      but when you don't sell the product

      Who says they're not selling the product? Emphasis mine:

      NOA territories will receive the last shipments of Nintendo Entertainment System: NES Classic Edition systems for this year.

      Limited production runs per time period is pretty much one of the definitions of artificial scarcity. The run ending at a time when you're pushing an alternative platform is then just good business sense.

      As for the Switch, as many people said, it's a different market.

      It's only a different market to people who are after a certain thing: The latest current console. In terms of general entertainment it's actually the same market only with a bias towards nostalgia vs a bias towards portability (not technology, because if you're after the best in those terms you wouldn't be looking at Nintendo).

    15. Re: Only Nintendo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not a good reason. I buy DS/DSi consoles as a matter of course for backup because of the games I have, but 3DS is just too expensive, three times the console and up to twenty times the cartridges. And can no longer find it new. The new Switch is ugly as hell, inelegant, overerexpensive and do not think it fits my pocket either. And the cameras? And hatena? I even managed to download a Mario Bros calculator and a game with my picture before the download stations were gone. The problem is the company couldnot handle so much fame and is shutting down, like in mind shutting down.

    16. Re: Only Nintendo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I buy games in GOG because they sell for 1.50~ and am curious, otherwise they wouldn't see a single dime from me. There are just too many options, they will make better revenue selling as low as cereal box bonus plus console gift, potentially the whole population buying just out of collecting the trinket.

    17. Re: Only Nintendo... by nhat11 · · Score: 1

      That makes no sense, Nintendo knows when the switch is coming out, if they really didn't want it cutting into their VC they won't even release NES mini in the first place because now people have the NES minis in their house

  2. Fuck You Nintendo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is bullshit.

  3. WTF, Nintendo?! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

    I was looking forward to getting this console but haven't found a store that had them in stock. Now I'm pissed.

    1. Re:WTF, Nintendo?! by Luthair · · Score: 2

      Sadly this will just encourage the scalpers.

    2. Re:WTF, Nintendo?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why? It's a gigantic plastic PoS. Do yourself a favor and get yourself an Analogue Nt Mini.

      All that Nintendo has these days is its IP, so it's stuck selling the same shit it innovated way back when and haven't created anything worthwhile in some time.

    3. Re:WTF, Nintendo?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All that Nintendo has these days is its IP, so it's stuck selling the same shit it innovated way back when and haven't created anything worthwhile in some time.

      Right. That's why I want a cheap, turn-key version of of their way back when stuff

    4. Re:WTF, Nintendo?! by Drakonblayde · · Score: 3, Informative

      I had the same problem, couldnt find one in retail stores, still cant, and I've checked in many different states (I'm a road warrior).

      So I finally said screw it, got myself a Raspberry Pi, installed RetroPi, and it was so stupidly simple I wondered why I'd bothered worrying about the NES Classic. I ended up building a second one to take on the road with me, since my wife and kids enjoy the first one so much that they'd slit my throat if I tried to take the first one with me for weeks at a time

    5. Re:WTF, Nintendo?! by ogdenk · · Score: 2

      Except that it isn't. It's an ARM-based emulator. Has nothing to do with the original hardware. If it was an NES implemented in a little FPGA or something it'd be kinda neat but it's just software emulation.

      They still make the 6502 and the 65816... that plus a cheap CPLD or two and you could probably have something closer to the real deal.

    6. Re:WTF, Nintendo?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For $450 you could get like 6 or 7 of the original ones and have replacements on hand in case the unit you usually use to play dies.

    7. Re:WTF, Nintendo?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let it. I'm not going to be buying from them even if they end up with the only units for sale.

      It's the buyers that encourage the scalpers though. All people had to do was simply avoid the temptation of buying something for more than retail price and the scalping problem would disappear overnight.

      If I see a classic at the store, and I have money at the time, I'll pick up a copy. Otherwise, not interested, and not going to feel like I'm missing out on anything.

  4. Screw the console, the emulator is the product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's new, a capitalist company who refuses to make money. If only somebody managed to release their ARM emulator into the wildâ¦

    1. Re: Screw the console, the emulator is the product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surprised at how good some of the Android emulators work. Was playing Mario 64 and Goldeneye the other day on my (pretty low-end) Acer tablet. Aside from occasional audio glitches everything else was bang-on.

    2. Re:Screw the console, the emulator is the product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why wait? There's plenty of NES emulators on Android, which is ARM based.

  5. How could they not expect this? by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 1

    Especially in the American market. Of course everyone was going to jump on this gem!
    I thought that was the entire point of this to begin with?

    --
    I tend to rant.
  6. Uhhh... by AAWood · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Throughout April, NOA territories will receive the last shipments of Nintendo Entertainment System: NES Classic Edition systems for this year.

    for this year

    for this year

    I would not be surprised if news of the NES Classic's demise is being greatly exaggerated.

    1. Re:Uhhh... by zlives · · Score: 2

      perhaps you have overestimated their writing abilities to actually mean what is said and not implied.

    2. Re:Uhhh... by gweilo8888 · · Score: 1

      Prepare to be surprised. You don't stop shipping a product in April if you intend to continue selling it the following year. Another NES Classic Edition-like product -- probably with stronger DRM -- may well be back. This one most definitely won't be.

    3. Re:Uhhh... by msauve · · Score: 1

      More likely, they recognize they've found a new target market. Expect a Classic II, which includes a few more games, and sells at twice the price. They're not going to give up all the available profit to scalpers.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    4. Re:Uhhh... by zlives · · Score: 1

      this would be a better option and maybe the wording makes more sense with that in mind.

  7. Smart. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keep demand up, supplies limited. Keeps the IP feeling exclusive instead of old-as-fuck.

  8. Because of the Switch? by dstyle5 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've seen a few comments online where people have speculated this was a bridge product to bring in some $ until the Switch was released. This does make sense in that the Wii U was a colossal failure from a business perspective (Disclaimer: I own a Wii U) and this helped bring in some holiday season revenue. In typical Nintendo fashion they didn't read the market place correctly and didn't make enough units to satisfy demand. I still have friends that would be buy a NES Classic if they were available.

    If they are in fact halting production because of the Switch and it maybe getting virtual console support (which it currently does not have) I think its another big misreading of the market by Nintendo. I can't see a big crossover between buyers of the NES Classic and Switch. Most people aren't going to buy a $300 console to play a few virtual console NES games, but a lot will pay $60 for the Classic. If anything I think the Classic could be a bridge product for people who haven't bought Nintendo games/consoles for a while and get them interested in their products again. Discontinuing the NES Classic seems like yet another blunder by a company who has had a lot of difficulty reading the market.

    1. Re:Because of the Switch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      My read is that it is because of the Switch, but NOT because they think the NES Classic is cannibalizing sales from the Switch. At least not directly. Nintendo only seems to want to spend X amount of money on manufacturing capacity, so if you want to increase the number of Switch units, something else has to give. So you've got the Switch, 3DS, and NES Classic. Which one do you cut to free up capacity for the Switch? If you ignore the option of simply increasing the budget to buy more production time in some Chinese factory, the NES Classic is the obvious choice.

    2. Re: Because of the Switch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just bought a used Wii U. Going to hack it and enjoy playing all the Wii and Wii U roms.

    3. Re:Because of the Switch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless the NES classic isn't making much profit, or they are building both in their own factories (which I really doubt is the case), and increasing capacity would require a substantial outlay for them, then it seems like an incredibly stupid business decision to cap manufacturing capacity like that.

    4. Re:Because of the Switch? by zerocommazero · · Score: 1

      I think its so they can refocus more production into the Switch as its selling very well.

    5. Re: Because of the Switch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget about the Gamecube as well. Hackers do what Nintendont.

  9. Maybe they will focus on version 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wireless controllers. Ability to purchase new games online. SNES games as well.

    1. Re:Maybe they will focus on version 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wireless controllers suck. Why take the great analog controller that those games were designed for and fuck it up with digital signals through bluetooth?

  10. Exactly: no cross, *yet*. by DrYak · · Score: 1

    No one is cross shopping a switch and an NES Classic Mini.

    That's exactly the point :

    - Currently, retro-loving geeks will buy a NES Classic (of which Nintendo only makes a few bucks through licensing and that's about it).
    They would never ever had thought about buying a Switch. The idea would have never crossed their mind.

    - If NES Classic is shut down, retro-geeks will be left without a platform. Some of them might end up biting the bullet and buy a Switch, and then re-buy all the old classics again from the virtual shop of the Switch. (Nintendo thus makes more money by selling hardware, and re-selling again ROMs of classics).
    The rest of the retro geeks will probably try other 3rd party unlicensed emulators, but these Nintendo is going to try to sue anyway.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re: Exactly: no cross, *yet*. by thundercattt · · Score: 1

      Or retro geeks will mod their Wii, Original Xbox and play the retro games on machines lying around the house

    2. Re: Exactly: no cross, *yet*. by Drakonblayde · · Score: 3, Informative

      Or they'll realize that NES ROM's are really easy to find, and that building a RetroPi is stupidly easy

    3. Re:Exactly: no cross, *yet*. by ogdenk · · Score: 1

      Or they'll blow the dust off their old NES, get a less shitty power supply and play the games on the original hardware. Maybe even buy a multicart.

    4. Re:Exactly: no cross, *yet*. by Merk42 · · Score: 1

      Power supply? For me it was the part where the cartridge goes in. Thankfully Blinking Light Win works like a charm

    5. Re:Exactly: no cross, *yet*. by Merk42 · · Score: 1

      Power supply? For me it was where the cartridge goes.
      Thankfully Blinking Light Win works like a charm!

    6. Re: Exactly: no cross, *yet*. by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

      Or they'll realize that NES ROM's are really easy to find, and that installing an emulator on their current computer is even easier, faster and cheaper.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    7. Re:Exactly: no cross, *yet*. by choovanski · · Score: 1

      $30 for that?! Just spend $8 on the actual part that needs replaced. http://www.mcmelectronics.com/...

    8. Re:Exactly: no cross, *yet*. by Merk42 · · Score: 1

      Oh, it does other stuff too.

  11. Dear Nintendo by Pollux · · Score: 1

    I don't own an NES classic, but I grew up playing these games, and I love them dearly. Playing them periodically is a joy, both for myself and my young son. Shall I...

    A) Enjoy my favorite NES games illegally on a PC emulator?

    or

    B) Enjoy my favorite NES games legally on an NES Classic Edition?

    I look forward to your reply. Thank you.

    1. Re:Dear Nintendo by WDot · · Score: 2

      Other legal alternatives:

      Play them on the Virtual Console for Wii, 3DS, and Wii U (and probably Switch eventually). That is, most Nintendo consoles in the past 11 years.
      Play them in other repackaged forms on Nintendo consoles that have been coming out since the SuperNES (e.g. Super Mario All-Stars).
      Play them on the original hardware that you can find in garage sales or eBay.

    2. Re:Dear Nintendo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Emulators definitely, if only for the added features: Savestates are pure cheating, but when used judiciously they can mitigate some of the bullshit that some old games insisted on, like finite respawns and continues. Fast forwarding is great too; I couldn't imagine playing any grindy RPG like Dragon Quest or Earthbound without it. Then of course you have the convenience of playing on your existing hardware, with any controller, and no cartridges or cables.

      Some purists say it's not quite the same, but the differences seem to boil down to things like certain colors or sounds being off in barely-detectable ways. I played the NES/SNES for my entire childhood and I'll be damned if I can spot the difference, much less give a crap.

      AFAIC the only reason to do anything else is if you're the type who insists on doing everything the legal (read: always objectively worse) way, but imo Nintendo stubbornly continuing to find more ways to sell new copies of 30 year old games is a blatant cash grab that should not be tolerated.

    3. Re:Dear Nintendo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      VC games are overpriced, under-featured (compared to emulators), and worst of all, you don't actually own them.
      Most games aren't repackaged for newer consoles (at least not outside of VC).
      Playing on original hardware is legal, but Nintendo don't see any of that money anyway. I'm not a collector, so I don't want a bunch of old crap laying about just to be "legal", and I don't really want to pay collector prices.

      One big problem is copyright is way way way longer than it should be, really it should be around 15 years,but mostly thanks to Disney corrupting the legislature to ensure they can keep Steamboat Willy (i.e. the original Mickey Mouse for those that didn't know) under copyright, it has been extended way beyond its usefulness to the public, and copyright is basically an agreement with the public. For most things 15 years is plenty to make money off a copyrighted work, after that the public should be free to do what they want with it.

      So, if it wasn't for the obscene copyright terms currently in effect, I would already be able to play all these old games legally. It is only because Nintendo packaged a bunch of their old games in a nice package for a reasonable price that I'd be willing to pay for it despite my views on copyright, however if it wasn't for copyright, someone else would have been able to do this years ago, and likely cheaper too.

  12. Switch Virtual Console by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

    Hopefully this means that the virtual console is coming to the switch sooner rather than later.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:Switch Virtual Console by darkain · · Score: 1

      Technically the virtual console has been there since almost day one. Its just that thus far, it has exclusively been NeoGeo games.

  13. Piracy Vessel (prevailing theories) by Marc_Hawke · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Shortly after the NES Classic was released, people found out it was easily hacked, and released tools that allowed you to expand the 30 bundled games to over 300 unlicensed ROMs. It all fit neatly into their UI and everything (from what I saw.) I've heard it surmised many times on the Internet (and that makes it true) that they weren't interested in shipping their own 'Kodi Box' equivalent.

    However... there's also the stories of 'how to build your own NES classic' using a Raspberry PI or equivalent, including adding all the ROMS you want. Supposedly it's cheaper than the NES Classic as well. The only thing you don't get is the nostalgic (tiny) little box and the cute ( short tailed) controllers.

    You could ask, 'why don't they decide to own that market, and just write off the 30 vs 300 as irrelevant?' (They'd already picked the best 30.) At least then they'd get their mark-up. (Whatever that was.)

    --
    --Welcome to the Realm of the Hawke--
  14. Grrrrr by Frag-A-Muffin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was being casual about trying to get one, now I'm just angry. I think to punish Nintendo, I'm going to NOT buy a Switch now.

    --

    AirSpeak - http://itunes.com/apps/AirSpeak
    1. Re:Grrrrr by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      I wasnt going to buy a switch anyway, its just a portable wii-u for a pile of money

      why bother? I can play 1.5 gen old games on my phone and not have to carry a fragile brick with me

    2. Re:Grrrrr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Buttons and joysticks. All i want is a phone i can play games on without shitty touch controls. And I don't want to carry a seperate controller.

  15. dear Nintendo by future+assassin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have yet to find one unit since its initial release in any store locally. I can get them from CL for $400 and now you discontinue it? Go fuck yourself.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  16. Because nintendo hates money by jediborg · · Score: 1
    This is baffling a lot of consumers and nintendo fans. Here are the possible reasons why nintendo discontinued production, culled from various sources online and conversations in my office
    • Production Costs - perhaps nintendo was not making money on the mini-console. This sounds implausible, due to nintendos track record of always making money off of hardware. More plausible is that at a $60 price point they weren't making ENOUGH money on the mini-console to justify increasing production
    • Production Capacity - nintendo stopped producing mini-nes' because they wanted to switch those production lines over to increasing switch production. we know that nintendo is trying to double switch production this year from this article : https://arstechnica.com/gaming...
    • Marketing Strategy - the mini-nes was only intended to gin up exposure to the 'nintendo brand' so consumers would be aware and excited when the new switch platform came out, unfortunately the mini-nes was a huge success and getting in the way of the switch marketing strategy
    • Licensing issue - the mini-nes had 30 games on it and not all where from nintendo. You would think nintendo would get a rock-solid licensing contract for the mini-console games, but maybe something went wrong with a licensee and they had to suddenly pull the product
    • licensing costs - similar to production cost and "licensing issue" perhaps the costs of licensing those third party titles was higher than nintendo was comfortable with, but shipped the mini-nes anyways thinking it would not be a big release. Now that it is ridiculously popular, the licensing costs where perhaps not worth continuing production
    • cannibalization of upcoming product - why would a consumer pay $5 a game to play these classics on the $300 nintendo switch when they could just buy the mini-nes for $60? Currently you can't play any of these classic games (legally) on the switch but it is expected that nintendo will release a virtual console for the switch enabling this functionality in the future. The timing of this announcement would line up with a possible virtual console announcement in E3, the trade show coming up in a few months

    Full disclosure: I work in the video gaming industry

    1. Re:Because nintendo hates money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The NES Classic was planned to be short term. It generated new interest in Nintendo before the Switch was released. It was a marketing tool and nothing else.

    2. Re: Because nintendo hates money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently, it also was a tool to piss off a bunch of would-be customers as well.

  17. Probably similar to Atari Flashback by joeflies · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Atari Flashback has been released, discontinued, revised, a bunch of times. There are differences in versions, there are changes in licenses but I'd guess that selling memories requires driving up the artificial demand by limiting availability.

  18. NES Classic 2 by mentil · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm guessing Nintendo stopped manufacturing the NES Classic BECAUSE it was such a huge hit. They were probably expecting modest sales far lower than what they were, so they outsourced as much as they could, half-assing the device. Thus why it's not (officially) expandable, has no internet connectivity etc.

    So they're ending production now in preparation of an improved version, likely with longer controller cables, internet connectivity that lets you purchase additional games, and improved DRM (e.g. Nintendo-signed ROM files tied to your device hardware ID.) Perhaps it'll even support Super Nintendo games, or access to games already purchased for Virtual Console. If they kept selling units up to the day they introduce an improved version at the same price, people will be peeved they got the older model; however, pulling it for 6+ months before the new one is out will make it feel more like a 'new generation' and reduce buyer's remorse for those who got the old ones. I'm kind of surprised by the implication this won't be released for holiday '17, though, maybe they're too busy with the Switch.

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    1. Re:NES Classic 2 by brettw · · Score: 1

      This could be a pretty good theory. I own one. To be more precise, I have owned 3 of them (2 sent back for warranty due to hardware failure).

      It's wonderful when it works.

      Now I'm left wondering if I should keep it as a collector's item instead of playing it (and then have it fail on me).

    2. Re:NES Classic 2 by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      I don't know.

      The standalone version works quite well - plug in a controller, plug in the TV, plug in power, and game away. It's super simple to use.

      Add in all the network connectivity and expandability and you've complicated it 100 times. Plus it has to cost more - additional storage, network/wifi equipment, etc. And then there's the whole billing and account stuff that needs to be done.

      The NES Classic as it is right now is perfect. You can be playing games in about 30 seconds. An enhanced version will cost more and be less easy to use.

    3. Re: NES Classic 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why not announce v2 and keep selling v1? It just seems so silly. Sony and Microsoft will happily sell current gen hardware until the new consoles come out. People are stupid, but give them some credit to decide for themselves whether they want one now or don't mind waiting.

    4. Re:NES Classic 2 by dj245 · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing Nintendo stopped manufacturing the NES Classic BECAUSE it was such a huge hit. They were probably expecting modest sales far lower than what they were, so they outsourced as much as they could, half-assing the device. Thus why it's not (officially) expandable, has no internet connectivity etc.

      The NES classic sold around 1.5 million units. The Wii U sold 13.56 million over its lifetime. Arguably the Wii U had a much longer lifetime, and you could actually buy one for a larger % of that lifetime. But I wouldn't say the NES classic was a huge success, for Nintendo. It had no continuing revenue stream after sale, was found to be easily hacked to play other NES, SNES, and even N64 games. From an accountant's perspective, that's a negative revenue stream since it may erode Virtual Console sales. Accountants run the show nowadays, so it is not surprising they killed it.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    5. Re:NES Classic 2 by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      and once this margical fart classic 2 comes out, you wont be able to buy one of them either, just like all of nintendo's current lineup

    6. Re:NES Classic 2 by Daetrin · · Score: 1

      Your other points stand, but comparing Wii U sales numbers to NES Classic sales numbers is really apples and oranges.

      The Wii U was out for approximately 52 months before the Switch launched last month. That means sales of 0.26 million per month on average, with the system being easily findable over that period of time.

      The NES Classic has been out for five months, mid-November to mid-April, for an average of 0.3 million sales per month.

      The WiiU was probably selling higher at the beginning of its 52 month run than the average, but still the NES Classic selling more than the Wii U average even while being out of stock most of the time is a significant achievement.

      The NES Classic _probably_ had a lower potential sales total than the Wii U, but there's really no way to know for sure now.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  19. I guess that means I lucked out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've never owned a Nintendo product in my life (always been a PC gamer), but when I heard they were coming out with a miniaturized version of their first console, and saw the price, and that it came with a bunch of games, I figured why the hell not. Of course, nobody had it in stock, and I was *not* hellbent on getting one anyway, so I figured, oh well...

    About a month ago I happened to walk into a local EB Games at the mall, and remembered about the console - so I casually asked the guy behind the counter if they were still impossible to find...and he pulled one out from behind him and handed it to me. Paid for it, walked out, got back home, hooked it up, it did exactly what it said on the tin can, so to speak, and that was that.

    Oh, and I did use it long enough to realize--like everybody else who's used one--that the controller cable is way too short.

    So, what's the starting bidding price...? :-)

  20. Re:Piracy Vessel (prevailing theories) by DaHat · · Score: 2

    I'd argue that this discontinuation, like the lack of availability is going to contribute more to piracy.

    Having tried multiple times to find one during the first couple of months it was out, I gave up and simply went the RetroPi route.

    Shame Nintendo didn't want to take my money.

  21. 1/n because Slashdot suck. by aliquis · · Score: 0

    The lameness filter is so disturbing. I'll never understand the US and how they treat speech and text there. Say whatever you want but absolutely don't swear! When the filter doesn't inform you what the problem is ... It's so annoying:

    Stuck in it so I'll post in parts until it go through.. Stupid /., you s***.

    Only Nintendo would discontinue a product due to high demand. Who runs that company, a couple of ***** plumbers?

    Well. Valve did their own controller with touchpads to be able to play not-for-controller-game-controller-schemes on their specific controller and then thought it was a great idea to support other controllers including the Sony Dual Shock 4 and then "emulate" the Steam controller pad on that one and then the whatever control schemes people had come up with for that on top of it.
    So a controller game can get DS4 layout on emulated Steam controller on DS4 driver in Steam; well, if you're lucky and that work, which it doesn't in my case.

    1. Re:1/n because Slashdot suck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The lameness filter is so disturbing. I'll never understand the US and how they treat speech and text there. Say whatever you want but absolutely don't swear! When the filter doesn't inform you what the problem is ... It's so annoying:

      Are you sure it isn't the shitty internet filter installed by your bitch-ass parents, you fucking faggot?

      (I was originally going to use the n-word instead of faggot, but apparently you do have part of a point. Because /. wouldn't let me post this with the n-word, but the exact same post with the n-word removed, and it cleared the lameness filter. Go figure. *shrug*)

    2. Re:1/n because Slashdot suck. by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Are you sure it isn't the shitty internet filter installed by your bitch-ass parents, you fucking faggot?

      (I was originally going to use the n-word instead of faggot, but apparently you do have part of a point. Because /. wouldn't let me post this with the n-word, but the exact same post with the n-word removed, and it cleared the lameness filter. Go figure. *shrug*)

      Yeah, that's ok if you just want to post a bit of a text and you haven't used as many such words.
      The thing is I wanted to post a lot of text with a lot of words which maybe they didn't liked, so that made it frustrated.
      I could of course try parts of the text without ever posting just to figure it out but instead I posted all of it for each text piece which passed because /. is stupid incompetent idiots who can't make a good forum and can't fix it for 5h1t.

    3. Re:1/n because Slashdot suck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bruh, have you even seen this place? It's explicitly designed to make it difficult to say anything, and then difficult for anyone to read what you said even if you did manage to post something. And the swear filter is peanuts compared to having to reboot my router any time I want to post more than once every ten minutes.

  22. Nintendo explicitly stated what they were doing by radarskiy · · Score: 1

    “We also see the nostalgic interest in these products as an opportunity to draw consumers’ attention to our latest game system, Nintendo Switch.” http://www.news.com.au/technol...

    1. Re:Nintendo explicitly stated what they were doing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      “We also see the nostalgic interest in these products as an opportunity to draw consumers’ attention to our latest game system, Nintendo Switch.” http://www.news.com.au/technol...

      That's funny, but I guess it makes sense when you consider that all of Nintendo's newer games are just rehashes of the same old crap you can just play on an emulator like this.

    2. Re:Nintendo explicitly stated what they were doing by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Same formula, different direction. They do that a lot. Breath of the Wild is getting a lot of commentary on how it's different and confusing, because it's still Zelda but maybe not Zelda. We were used to Ocarina of Time, Majora's Mask, Wind Waker (not sailing), Twilight Princess, and Skyward Sword, and now there's ... this ... which isn't so different, but not so much the same.

      Nintendo did that with Metroid Prime 2 and 3. Prime had elevators and areas; Prime 2 had a dark world to go with the light world, and multi-dimensional puzzles; and Prime 3 had multiple planets and landing sites (meaning basically free-select transits rather than site-to-site), as well as some cooperative scenes where you had to lead generic marines into an area and not let them get killed. When they brought out Federation Force, people freaked out for... no reason; but Federation Force is a completely-different, mission-based game more in line with the generic FPS scene than the 3D FPS-Metroid style of the Prime series. It feels less open, as-you-go exploration and more explicit, short-term missions because it is.

      Nintendo is constantly innovating. Sometimes they do something people like; sometimes they do something very wrong. Most of the time, people are comfortable with smaller steps; often the bigger steps are uncomfortable; and the really big steps tend to overshoot what people eventually like, rather than just exiting the comfort zones. Part of controlling that is using the same series and structure so that deviations in gameplay style are backed by something familiar, thus anything that's not actually bad is more-easily swallowed. New ideas with new faces scare the hell out of people.

  23. 2/n because Slashdot suck by aliquis · · Score: 1

    They also decided that the way to really be able to make PC gaming compete with gaming consoles was to go with the same experience, so hence to even configure your controller at all you have to launch the slow bloated Big picture mode which is slow as **** and ****ed down and ****** just like anything using controllers could be assumed to be to both enable the controller and select the configuration for your controller and launching your game.
    Because to make PC gaming "work" that's exactly what we need! Not just a normal Windows user interface and some sort of standard controller like settling for the Xbox controller (and then if they wanted to do their "hand controller which act like a PC" feel free to do so with their own controller but keep them separate.)

    1. Re: 2/n because Slashdot suck by chispito · · Score: 1

      You have to use the big picture mode so you can actually navigate your games library with a controller. It's not rocket science and it runs fine

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    2. Re: 2/n because Slashdot suck by aliquis · · Score: 1

      You have to use the big picture mode so you can actually navigate your games library with a controller. It's not rocket science and it runs fine

      But I don't want to browse it with my controller.

      Just because I have a controller connected to my PC doesn't mean I don't have a keyboard and mouse too.

      It's just a desktop PC with a controller. It's not a gaming console without keyboard and mouse. I want to use the controller for playing the game not for controlling Steam. If I wanted it for controlling Steam then I could always switch to big picture mode voluntarily. Why can't I configure the controller without entering big picture mode? Why do I have to have the big picture mode overlay over the game as soon as a controller is connected?

      It's just slow and pretty shitty for keyboard and mouse which is the interface I will use for quick and easy access.

  24. 3/n because Slashdot suck by aliquis · · Score: 1

    Of course now Microsoft is in on it too so now we've got Xbox on Windows with their Game bar on top of games too. Push Windows + G to enter it. Because gamers totally like to have the Windows button enabled; it's not like you'd accidentally been thrown out of a game to open up the start-menu by pressing that one before is it?
    And why wouldn't you want even more blo**-ware overlays on top of your games?
    Everyone do their own thing too. Before to use the DS4 controller you could use something like DS4Windows, InputMapper or SCPToolKit to emulate a Xbox360 controller, but now since Steam support it natively maybe you want to use that instead. That's fine and all but what if you want to use the controller in Uplay and that doesn't support it natively (does it?)
    Also of course the lack of standardizations in general and assumptions of Xbox controllers with green A buttons and so on doesn't really match the other controllers.

  25. 4/n because Slashdot suck by aliquis · · Score: 1

    So where am I going with all this?
    Well, beyond this controller stuff and ****** overlay, Valve still haven't released Half-Life 3 and the CS:GO updates they do are stuff like music kits with StatTrak to show your MVPs and even more knifes and what not, and maps where you can walk on top of the map, and a $2000 negev with ~infinite ammo which shot straight as * (but to be fair the enemy will at-least know where you are when using it .. so you may still get destroyed.)
    So Nintendo may act like ***** plumbers. But when the competition is Valve and Ubisoft and such do they really need to worry? Really?

  26. Re:Piracy Vessel (prevailing theories) by Osgeld · · Score: 1

    doesnt matter, the vast majority of people never even saw one in real life, its a unicorn touting piricy on a 30 year old console where every rom has been available for download for 25 years

    nintendo failed, again, to keep track of what actually makes them popular

  27. Put it on your coffee table by tepples · · Score: 1

    the controller cable is way too short.

    It's like the short controller cords on the Famicom and the Super Famicom. The length is just fine if the console sits on a kotatsu or coffee table with the video cable reaching from there to your TV.

  28. Emulator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tried to buy a legal version, but they won't sell one to me, so I guess I'll have to finally get around to slapping an emulator on an RPi.

  29. I'm pissed too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was no way I was going to buy anything modern, but for nostalgia I had every intention... fuck you Nintendo.

  30. Not a loss by Mike+Frett · · Score: 1

    Not a big loss since you can't find one anyway. It's the Unicorn of the Console World.

  31. Re:Piracy Vessel (prevailing theories) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shortly after the NES Classic was released, people found out it was easily hacked, and released tools that allowed you to expand the 30 bundled games to over 300 unlicensed ROMs

    So? You can do the exact same thing without a NES Classic. What you describe contributes absolutely nothing toward piracy whatsoever. All it does is provide a proof of concept to show that there is no technical reason Nintendo can't sell any and every ROM they own.

  32. Re:Piracy Vessel (prevailing theories) by Megane · · Score: 2

    At a Fry's last month, I saw an end-cap display with what appeared to be a NES Classic running (IIRC) SMW. Looking closer, I saw the roughness of a 3D-printed case. It was actually a display for Nintendo-style USB controllers, using a RasPi in a 3D-printed case.

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  33. Re:Piracy Vessel (prevailing theories) by j2.718ff · · Score: 1

    Yup, same here. When the NES Classic was announced, I got excited. I knew I could get my own emulator cheaper (I didn't yet know about RetroPi), but would rather go the legal route, and felt it would be nice to support Nintendo for producing something like this.

    I gave up on finding one, and threw together a RetroPi. So I can say that Nintendo caused me to build a RetroPi. Had they not made the NES Classic, I wouldn't have been reminded of the fun NES games of my youth, and wouldn't have felt the desire to play them again.

  34. Re:Piracy Vessel (prevailing theories) by ezelkow1 · · Score: 1

    yea there are tons of 3d printed cases on etsy for all the rPI variants. So you can make it look like a mini-nes, snes, n64, atari, whatever you want. Nintendo style usb controllers have also existed for a long long time

    So there really is no point to an NES classic, unless you are that much against downloading some roms that you would now be willing to pay 100-300$ for 30 games. If you are willing to mod an NES classic to insert all your own roms than why even bother

  35. Re:Piracy Vessel (prevailing theories) by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

    People wanted more games on the NES Mini. If Nintendo had put a VC store on the damnable thing, they'd have made a mint. Likewise if they unified their VC platform.

    Too bad it ran at 60fps instead of 59.94. I'd have preferred hardware NES with a proper hardware clock and software mappers. It'd be trivial to add some boot software that comes up with a register mapping to a system controller, giving access to access a flash filesystem, configure Wifi, and make network calls.

    In the best-case engineering, the hardware control could be on a separate chipset, such as ARM, which takes you right down to system requirements similar to a Pi Zero W--a $10 board with 1GHz ARM, 512MB RAM, built-in Wifi, and an SD slot. You wouldn't need an actual Pi Zero W; there'd be some specialized hardware in there instead, which would include that kind of CPU, RAM, and wifi. Sound and video would go through a hardware HDMI encoder, coming off the NES hardware itself; likewise, controller input goes to the NES-on-a-Chip, not to the main CPU.

    In Classic NES mode, an MMU would give DMA between the hardware NES ROM/SRAM/PRAM and the appropriate RAM area, so the Pi could load appropriate data in memory and handle it as-needed. This MMU would need to respond to some programmable mapper calls to emulate the NES properly, and trigger an interrupt when writing to SRAM-labeled area. That allows the OS to read a ROM, load it into RAM, describe the mappers, describe the locations of appropriate pages in RAM, and reset the NES. Suddenly: Gameplay.

    In Extended mode--the default boot mode--the NOAC comes up with a special mapper pointed at a set of registers. This allows communication with the host OS. On startup, the primary user interface loads by loading an Extended Mode program as an NES ROM. This program shows you the games available, lets you select them, lets you configure Wifi, lets you configure the main OS, etc. The main OS can even write picture data or otherwise on-the-fly, allowing for things like access to huge amounts of storage, complex graphics, and so forth.

    Obviously, you could create an EM game that takes advantage of this, whereas a normal NES game would unmap the communications line to the OS.

    Too bad they didn't go that route. It would have cost something like $20 more though, after you got through all the specialized chipsets and communications buses.

  36. Just buy a RetroPi and some USB controllers by TheOuterLinux · · Score: 1

    It'll run everything, including PS1 and maybe 2. Costs just as much.

  37. Letter I wrote to them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wrote Nintendo's customer service a letter about this situation:

    I am really frustrated by Nintendo stopping production of the NES Classic. I am frustrated at the whole NES Classic situation that Nintendo has created. Nintendo has had such a limited release of the NES Classic that I have been completely unable to find one for sale. Every time I drive to the city (300km away) I always looked for the NES Classic and it has been always sold out. Every online retailer either doesn't allow shipping or is sold out of the NES Classic. I am the proud owner of a massive Nintendo game collection. I would estimate it to be worth around 50,000 to 60,000 dollars. I own most of the rare games for the NES, SNES, N64, GC, Wii, as well as the Game Boys including the major gems like Little Samson, Flintstones Surprise at Dino's Peak, Earthbound, Mega Man 1-7 + X1-3, boxed copies of Chrono Trigger, Secret of Mana, and other rares like Zombie Nation among others. With a massive collection like this I have been forced to buy these games on the secondary market, but I have accepted that because I was unable to afford those games when I was a kid. I do not want to accept that I was unable to buy this NES Classic because I tried. I tried hard to buy this system. I drove to stores, I made phone calls, I had friends try to pick them up for me and they have always been sold out. Now that Nintendo has discontinued the system I find myself wondering should I pay a scalper five times the price for the NES Classic, or should I just say I am done with collecting Nintendo games and stop buying them in the future. I own a Switch along with the new Zelda Breath of the Wild, but I haven't played it yet. I always find myself drawn into the classic games on the NES and, to be honest, I'd just as soon leave my NES plugged into the TV than try the new system. The NES Classic would make this easier for me since they both use HDMI connections.

    I'm really frustrated by this. As far as I'm concerned Nintendo has dropped the ball on the NES Classic and this really makes me question whether or not I want to continue to support the company in the future. I want to buy a NES Classic for retail price, plus tax and reasonable shipping. I have been utterly unable to do that and I blame Nintendo for it.

    I really hope they listen to it and others anger about this product.