Slashdot Mirror


Silicon Valley's $400 Juicer May Be Feeling the Squeeze (bloomberg.com)

An anonymous reader shares a Bloomberg report: One of the most lavishly funded gadget startups in Silicon Valley last year was Juicero Inc. It makes a juice machine. The product was an unlikely pick for top technology investors, but they were drawn to the idea of an internet-connected device that transforms single-serving packets of chopped fruits and vegetables into a refreshing and healthy beverage. Doug Evans, the company's founder, would compare himself with Steve Jobs in his pursuit of juicing perfection. He declared that his juice press wields four tons of force -- "enough to lift two Teslas," he said. Google's venture capital arm and other backers poured about $120 million into the startup. Juicero sells the machine for $400, plus the cost of individual juice packs delivered weekly. But after the product hit the market, some investors were surprised to discover a much cheaper alternative: You can squeeze the Juicero bags with your bare hands. Two backers said the final device was bulkier than what was originally pitched and that they were puzzled to find that customers could achieve similar results without it.

260 of 359 comments (clear)

  1. Not what I expected by halivar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Here I thought you would stick fruit containers in it, and it would pulp them up. But using bags of... juice? Did no one along the line wonder what the device was actually for?

    1. Re:Not what I expected by religionofpeas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Or even better, you could just eat the fruit. Not so messy, more fiber and better filling.

    2. Re:Not what I expected by utahjazz · · Score: 1

      The key is to get Gwyneth Paltrow to tell her followers that this thing is the most awesome device ever created: http://goop.com/the-coolest-in...

    3. Re:Not what I expected by magarity · · Score: 1

      Here I thought you would stick fruit containers in it, and it would pulp them up. But using bags of... juice? Did no one along the line wonder what the device was actually for?

      It's hidden down in the article text; the bags of juice are sold only to people who bought the bag squeezer machine (I can't bring myself to call it a juicer) for $400. Brilliant if you can get enough people to buy in to that model.

    4. Re:Not what I expected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or even better, you could just eat the fruit. Not so messy, more fiber and better filling.

      You want me to eat fruit using my teeth without the assistance of a $400 machine?
      What is this, the dark ages?!

    5. Re:Not what I expected by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you have a relatively unusual issue. For most of the human race, a reasonable amount of fiber (with enough liquid consumption) helps to promote digestive transit time and softens stool. If what you say is true, though, you have my sympathies for the problems it sounds like it causes you.

      I have a 2-3 week travel time. Bowel movements about 1 pound (fist-sized) occur every 18-26 days.

      Are you serious? Do you eat food daily? Are you on some sort of strange liquid-only diet?

      Sounds like "dietary fiber sensitivity" is a thing but nobody wants to claim you can overdose on fiber.

      I don't think any reasonable dietician or doctor would say you can't "overdose on fiber." But it's so incredibly rare that most people don't talk about it. But yes, if you consume massive amounts of fiber every day it can screw up nutrient absorption and other even more serious things than messing with your bowel movement. Again, given how few people even consume the "recommended" amount of fiber -- let alone excess -- it's something rarely talked about though.

    6. Re:Not what I expected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No shit?

      Hey thanks for sharing. Can you talk about your goiter next?

    7. Re:Not what I expected by operagost · · Score: 1

      If I went over two weeks without pooping, I'd assplode.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    8. Re:Not what I expected by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you have a relatively unusual issue. For most of the human race, a reasonable amount of fiber (with enough liquid consumption) helps to promote digestive transit time and softens stool.

      Nope, this is bullshit. It was recently "debunked", and it was recently on Slashdot. (It's always been bullshit and anyone with a brain knows it - fiber does the exact opposite of what they said it did.)

    9. Re:Not what I expected by Holi · · Score: 1

      Are you seriously trying to tell us that you shit only once or twice a month??? I call shenanigans.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    10. Re:Not what I expected by Holi · · Score: 1

      I like fresh squeezed juice, but if I have to buy some bag of processed "juice" that this thing just squeezes out of a bag, I hesitate to call it a juicer, in fact I almost think it is a fraudulent claim.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    11. Re:Not what I expected by dwywit · · Score: 1

      The first doctor I saw after I saw blood in a bowel movement (not my regular GP - he was away) advised me to increase fibre intake, including metamucil.

      This was after I told him that it was a rare day for me to have less than two visits to the porcelain throne. I described my routine in detail - consistency, volume, colour (other than blood, of course), diet, etc. So he suggested metamucil.

      Fortunately my GP, when I finally got to see him, agreed with me that *more* fibre was not the solution.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    12. Re:Not what I expected by clonehappy · · Score: 1

      grow up to be schizotypical wingnuts who eventually try to get into Congress with a backpack full of hand grenades to save us from the Liberal Muslim FEMA Conspiracy.

      You know, I was interested in reading what you had to say until you were compelled to go take a thread about a medical condition and somehow manage to interject bullshit partisan political stereotypes into it.

    13. Re:Not what I expected by youngone · · Score: 1
      That link to Gwyneth Paltrow's site is a sort of look down the rabbit hole really.

      How can anyone be sucked in by that nonsense, I mean does anyone really imagine that Gwyneth sits down every day and writes all those pieces about all those products from her "friends"?

      That juice machine is no worse than the "Nutribullet" that was claiming to turn fruit and vegetables into "Super Food" every time I turned my TV on last year. If I was less lazy I would have complained to our Broadcasting Standards people who would have prosecuted them for telling blatant lies.

      I have seen huge piles of the Nutribullets at various retailers lately however, selling for a tiny fraction of the their original price, so maybe people are not always sucked in.

    14. Re:Not what I expected by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      I actually injected psychiatry into a diet thread. It's still medical; you apparently don't have any experience dealing with Cluster A personality disorders.

    15. Re:Not what I expected by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      The company must think they can monetize the data on users collected by the device. Or else they plan to integrate with "smart" watches to auto-order the right juices for you, all through the handy dandy "health machine"

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    16. Re:Not what I expected by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      Oh my god you just made me laugh. Bravo sir, bravo.

  2. Endless FB Ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This device showed up in my FB feed nonstop. There wasn't one good comment or praise. Mostly people pointed out how wasteful the packaging was. I felt like the lack of fiber was bad too.

    1. Re:Endless FB Ads by FudRucker · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I fucking HATE facebook, that place is divisive and spammy as hell, i told my (real) friends they have my phone number and email address and they wont find me on facebook

      --
      Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  3. That's because it doesn't app apps! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Modern app appers know that ONLY apps can app apps, and this LUDDITE machine doesn't have an appy app app! It only has LUDDITE juice!

    Apps!

  4. Reminds me of the Pico Brewer by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    The Pico Brewer is almost a 1000 dollars for a machine that homebrews beer. I just don't see spending that kind of money on something that could be home built for substantially less.

    1. Re:Reminds me of the Pico Brewer by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      Or you can use the $1000 to go buy beer off the shelf.

    2. Re:Reminds me of the Pico Brewer by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      I kind of liked home brewing. But home bottle sterilizing was a fucking bore.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    3. Re:Reminds me of the Pico Brewer by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      I looked up a review of that thing... it sounds like it is for people that want to home brew but are scared to screw it up, but from the write up it actually doesn't sound any easier to do. It must have a fairly narrow market.

    4. Re:Reminds me of the Pico Brewer by Kagato · · Score: 1

      Pico Brew has always struck me as a machine for a professional brewer that wants to make very specific test batches quickly with the ability to reproduce them ad hoc. In particular if you have other duties and don't want to babysit. But for a $1000 you can get several all grain systems that make full 5 gallon batches. They are not as automated as the PICO brew but I'm looking at quantity, not fully automated.

    5. Re:Reminds me of the Pico Brewer by Altus · · Score: 1

      If you are going to homebrew in any significant volume, you just have to move to a kegging system. Bottles are awful, but kegs (and fridge and a co2 rig) are a significant extra expense in what is otherwise a fairly inexpensive hobby.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    6. Re:Reminds me of the Pico Brewer by SScorpio · · Score: 1

      That depends on which one. The original Zymatic is what you described, and was interesting in that you could easily control temperature at the different stages so it was reproducible and you could try small tweaks and see what happens.

      They also make a different machine that use a pod like system. I'm not sure how easy it is to run your own recipes with it as I didn't bother following it.

    7. Re:Reminds me of the Pico Brewer by ncc74656 · · Score: 2

      I kind of liked home brewing. But home bottle sterilizing was a fucking bore.

      That's why I started kegging after a couple or three years. Sanitizing the bottles wasn't too bad (a trip through the dishwasher would suffice, either with heated drying or (if available) the sanitizing option enabled), but it's much easier and faster to fill one keg than 50+ bottles. You can also dry-hop in a keg.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    8. Re:Reminds me of the Pico Brewer by istartedi · · Score: 1

      Looking over the PicoBrew, it looks like they took the successful coffee "pod" business model and adapted it to beer. Given that, at least it makes sense since brewing beer is, IMHO, more complicated than making a cup of coffee so if you could make the process consistent you might actually add value for people that don't have any aptitude for such things. OTOH, the juicer thing looks to be just squeezing juice out of a bag when you could have poured it out of a bottle instead.

      None of this makes sense to me. I just use a regular coffee machine and it comes out great; but apparently there are a lot of people who like that stuff. I sometimes call them "pod people". This is why I'm sometimes really bad at investing: things that look stupid to me can make an awful lot of money. On the other hand, just because something is stupid is no guarantee it will make money...

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    9. Re:Reminds me of the Pico Brewer by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      At the time, my dishwasher wasn't up to it. Mostly about 'throat cultures' plus dry yeast in the bottles that had stood/laid around. Not much water goes up the neck of a bottle.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  5. Re:Seriously? by cayenne8 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Err...why would anyone need a bag of stuff to juice?

    It is so simple (and I'm guessing more economical) to go to the grocery store and get some veggies and/or fruits and throw down a regular juicer.

    Hell, I have a Breville multi-speed one for about $200....why would someone buy a $400 machine that requires you to buy prepackaged produce to be squeezed out of it...?

    How did so many people think this was a bright idea?

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  6. Heard this before ... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... some investors were surprised to discover a much cheaper alternative: You can squeeze the Juicero bags with your bare hands. Two backers said the final device was bulkier than what was originally pitched and that they were puzzled to find that customers could achieve similar results without it.

    ... from some Fleshlight investors.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:Heard this before ... by HornWumpus · · Score: 5, Funny

      The person that succeeds in the subscription model for fapping will be rich beyond imagining.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:Heard this before ... by Enigma2175 · · Score: 1

      You've never heard of subscription porn sites? And yeah, they pretty much are rich beyond imagining.

      --

      Enigma

  7. Geez, the moronics floweth by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    ...were drawn to the idea of an internet-connected device that transforms...

    ...Plants into juice. You absolutely can't compete in the 'juicer space" without internet connectivity; I wonder WTF their competitors were even thinking...

    1. Re:Geez, the moronics floweth by nwf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This article and the recent ones about Tilt makes me thing that these "investors" decide where to invest almost entirely based on how dynamic and likable the pitchman is, nothing else.

      As for this juicer, you can buy frozen fruit at Costco and juice or make smoothies for pennies on the dollar of this product. But too any good juice or smoothie is just too sweet to be healthy in the first place. Another "health food" gimmick as are almost all of these diets, supplements, programs and devices.

      --
      I don't know, but it works for me.
    2. Re:Geez, the moronics floweth by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      I wonder WTF their competitors were even thinking...

      I think one of their competitors was thinking "will it blend?".

      I wonder if you can get bags of pre-chopped iPads for the juciero so it can compete with the Blendtec.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    3. Re:Geez, the moronics floweth by avandesande · · Score: 1

      Hopefully someone will come up with a slick version of russian roulette, that way we can skip the diabetes and other expensive and boring side effects of consumerism.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    4. Re:Geez, the moronics floweth by Gilgaron · · Score: 2

      I thought to make them healthy you were supposed to add rum

    5. Re:Geez, the moronics floweth by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      'Cardiovascular russian roulette' is the most popular extreme sport in the world.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    6. Re:Geez, the moronics floweth by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      Doubtless there is some sort of tax incentive for taking the occasional loss

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    7. Re:Geez, the moronics floweth by rpstrong · · Score: 1
  8. neither healthy or refreshing by avandesande · · Score: 1

    Too much sugar and it rots your teeth. There is a reason your grandma had those little juice cups that were a bit bigger than a shot glass.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
    1. Re:neither healthy or refreshing by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 5, Funny

      My grandmother kept her juice cups next to her moonshine. Respectable people don't swig from the bottle.

  9. Re:Seriously? by OffaMyLawn · · Score: 1

    I had originally thought I misread about the bags, saw your comment, reread TFS, and then the article. I have to agree, what exactly is the purpose of this "juicer"?

    Seems like they would have been better off just marketing the bags, instead of some overpriced $400 contraption that seems to be completely worthless.

  10. Re:Seriously? by Coisiche · · Score: 1

    Because "internet connected". Somehow people with money to invest are bedazzled by those words. Eventually they'll learn that it isn't always a good thing.

    In the meantime I haven't heard of internet connected irons (as in the ones that heat up and smooth clothes) yet. Feel free to run with that idea because I can't be arsed.

  11. Juice from an IV bag.... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Back in the old days. a pair of HP engineers put in purchase order for a Saturn V rocket launcher and it got all the way to VP before it got cancel. These days you can combine a toaster with an iPhone, call it iToast, and no one will think twice about throwing money at it.

    1. Re:Juice from an IV bag.... by Moof123 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Thankfully stories like this are a sign that serious air is coming out of the startup bubble. The fervor from just 2-3 years ago has settled down, and now you see at least a little more skepticism when someone pitches iToast type BS.

      At this point anything "internet connected" or controlled by an app has lower value to me. I want simple crap that works, with REAL buttons/knobs, can't get malware, doesn't require constant updates, can't get "orphaned". Less is more.

    2. Re:Juice from an IV bag.... by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      I really can't see a need for anything in my house to be Internet connected. Now, locally networked without the ability to route traffic to or from the rest of the world? Sure, there are things that might be interesting to network if it was inexpensive enough to do, maintenance-free, easy to set up, and wouldn't cripple the device if the connectivity portion failed.

      Think about a fridge that constantly reports to a home monitoring appliance so it can give energy usage stats, maybe to let you know the door isn't properly closed or the compressor is failing. Or an HVAC system that does the same.

      How about motion sensors that track human activity so the temperature can be adjusted for optimal energy efficiency as the system learns your patterns?

      Then there's the standard home automation stuff that would be nice if it was ubiquitous - like a thermostat talking to your windows and blinds and external sensors to determine if it's a good idea to close the blinds or open the windows.

      I just don't want any data leaving my home unless I specifically authorize it.

    3. Re:Juice from an IV bag.... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      During the first dotcom, I thought the toaster that printed a weather map on the toast was actually one of the better ideas. But that was before ubiquitous smartphones.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    4. Re:Juice from an IV bag.... by tomhath · · Score: 1

      When I worked for GE a couple of engineers invented a "flame emitting diode", basically an LED that they poured lighter fluid on and lit. If I recall correctly it was published in Electronic Engineering Times (albeit as a humorous article). Today they could rich on an idea like that assuming it was internet enabled.

    5. Re:Juice from an IV bag.... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 5, Funny

      During the first dotcom, I thought the toaster that printed a weather map on the toast was actually one of the better ideas.

      Toasty with a chance of butter?

    6. Re:Juice from an IV bag.... by operagost · · Score: 1

      Except that's actually minimally practical, because maybe you could use the iPhone's microphone to listen for the toast popping up and tell you it's done in case you walked out of the room. This juicer is useless.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    7. Re:Juice from an IV bag.... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      [...] maybe you could use the iPhone's microphone to listen for the toast popping up and tell you it's done in case you walked out of the room.

      That's what the smoke detector is for. I'm not joking. The moment the toaster pops up, the smoke detector goes off.

    8. Re:Juice from an IV bag.... by operagost · · Score: 1

      You need to swap out the detector near the kitchen with a photoelectric type.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  12. Let's define terms here by Nidi62 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's not a juicer if it doesn't even make juice. All it's doing is squeezing already made juice out of a fancy bag. So if anything, it is a $400 (after the price drop, looks like it was originally $700) juice dispenser, not juicer. Looking at the photos in the article, it looks like what we would have if CapriSun was made by Apple.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    1. Re:Let's define terms here by religionofpeas · · Score: 2

      Maybe they can sell it to garages to lift up Teslas ?

    2. Re:Let's define terms here by xession · · Score: 1

      Maybe I missed it but what's the plan after the bag gets used for a single serving anyway? Do you then have to remove the bag and place it back into the fridge? This after having to first remove it from the fridge in the first place, put it in the machine and then place you glass under it. Couldn't they just sell jugs of juice that you could put in your fridge, pull out and pour a single glass? Have we become such a lazy society that pouring a glass of juice is too much?

    3. Re:Let's define terms here by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 2

      All it's doing is squeezing already made juice out of a fancy bag.

      All a regular juicer does is squeeze already-made juice out of a fruit, so...

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    4. Re:Let's define terms here by MattskEE · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The bags are not filled with juice, they are filled with pre-chopped fruit and/or vegetable pieces. Or at least that's the idea behind the bags. I have a little difficulty believing that you could hand squeeze vegetables as effectively as a machine, but fruit should be easy enough.

      But at $5-8 per bag, a $400 machine or one to two minutes of hand squeezing I don't really find this compelling. I'm sure the juice is delicious but it costs more than I spend on my whole lunch.

    5. Re:Let's define terms here by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      The bags are not filled with juice, they are filled with pre-chopped fruit and/or vegetable pieces. Or at least that's the idea behind the bags. I have a little difficulty believing that you could hand squeeze vegetables as effectively as a machine, but fruit should be easy enough.

      Look at the little GIF in the article. As easy as that juice is coming out with the hand squeeze she either had to have pounded the bag with a meat tenderizer, or it was already pulped up or liquefied. While a person can,albeit inefficiently, hand-squeeze juice from fruit, I have a hard time believing that person could squeeze vegetables hard enough for juice to come out. With the coloring of that juice being as green as it is, there has to be a significant amount of green/leafy vegetables in it, which means they were already liquid.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    6. Re:Let's define terms here by MattskEE · · Score: 2

      I decided to do a bit of searching, and found this detailed article which has some photos of the contents inside the pouches:
      http://www.businessinsider.com...

      So it contains "chopped" vegetables, but it's actually already pretty finely shredded for the greens. It looks like the fruit chunks are a bit bigger in size. So this is not fully juiced, but it's about halfway there.

  13. Re:Seriously? by Moof123 · · Score: 2

    For more durable transport and easier handling you could even offer options for putting it in cartons or jugs. Where's my $120M now?

  14. 'Jucers' are a meme by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Too many people fall for the 'jucing' meme every year, which is why shitty companies keep producing them. You want to eat healthier and be healthier? Eat whole fruits and vegetables instead. Goal attained, and you saved hundreds of dollars in the process. You're welcome.

    1. Re:'Jucers' are a meme by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      'Jucers'

      I'd like to take a moment to express how much I HATE, HATE HATE the keyboard on this gods-be-damned Lenovo notebook they stuck me with at my job. :-(

    2. Re:'Jucers' are a meme by Nemyst · · Score: 1

      A much healthier choice, if you want your fruits, veggies and other similar things in liquid form, is a good old blender. The modern, more expensive stuff can turn fruits into a very fine paste. Add water or milk and you have a fresh, healthy and quick beverage. All the fibers remain in the drink, all the nutrients are preserved, but you get to make the mixes you want too.

    3. Re:'Jucers' are a meme by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      You want to eat healthier and be healthier? Eat whole fruits and vegetables instead.

      And no need to go crazy on the fruit either, since most fruit is very high on sugar, and low on nutrients.

    4. Re:'Jucers' are a meme by asavage · · Score: 1

      Yeah exactly. A juicer gives you basically the water and sugars from the fruit with all the healthy stuff removed. A blended juice/smoothie gives you the whole fruit.

    5. Re:'Jucers' are a meme by religionofpeas · · Score: 2

      A blended juice/smoothie gives you the whole fruit.

      You're still likely to overconsume it, compared to chewing the whole fruit. You can juice 4 apples into a single beverage that you can drink in 15 seconds, but eat a single apple, and you probably had enough.

    6. Re:'Jucers' are a meme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      To be fair, we knew you weren't going to be using it for work related activities, so it made sense to cut your equipment budget. Honestly, I pushed to get you an Etch-A-Sketch, but my management nixed the idea.

      Sincerely,
      Rick's Manager.

    7. Re:'Jucers' are a meme by OrangeTide · · Score: 3, Insightful

      People don't want to choke down 2 raw carrots and a cup of kale every day when they can slam it with some apple juice in one gulp.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    8. Re:'Jucers' are a meme by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Satiety has at least as much to do with the act of eating something, how long it takes, how much effort it takes, etc, as it does with the food itself. Also it takes time for your brain to register satiety.

    9. Re:'Jucers' are a meme by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      And no need to go crazy on the fruit either, since most fruit is very high on sugar, and low on nutrients.

      I wouldn't exactly say it's "low on nutrients," and the amount of sugar depends on the fruit. And part of the issue is how we tend to define "fruit" which is not a botanical definition but one seemingly mostly based on sweetness. If you include the varieties of botanical fruits (from cucumbers to peapods), "fruits" in general have a great variety of nutrients and aren't necessarily very sweet. And a lot of how your body processes the sugar has to do with what else you consume with it. A whole fruit at least has the fiber that regulates the digestive process a bit more.

      But yeah -- if you define "fruit" as "sugary stuff" -- better to load up on more vegetables than lots of fruit in general. Still, eating whole fruit is often a lot better than eating a bunch of other junk food.

    10. Re:'Jucers' are a meme by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Too many people are fallin into the fruits-and-vegetables meme every year. These types of foodstuffs tend to be mediocre in nutritional value, high in sugars, and heavily-imbalanced in nutrient profile. Generally, fruits and vegetables overload one nutrient (magnesium, calcium, a particular vitamin profile) and are anemic in another, requiring a complex and varied diet to obtain a complete nutrient profile; it's incredibly-common for mostly-vegetable consumers to end up deficient in a critical nutrient. For some nutrients, "high content" is relative, such as in the case of Calcium (broccoli is high in calcium, at some 4%-8% daily value per serving).

      By contrast, animal products tend to have a broad and balanced content of most minerals, and are a better source of most vitamins. Animal products are an exclusive source of human-metabolizable B12 and supply a form of Vitamin A six times as active as Beta Carotine (the most-potent plant-source Vitamin A vitamer), while also providing significant levels of magnesium, sodium, calcium, potassium, silicon (barely-available from plant sources), sulfur, iron, phosphate, all B vitamins, Vitamin K, and a broad span of fatty acids (Omega-3 and -6, notably).

      Plant foodstuffs are a near-exclusive source of the primary Vitamin C, which enables many biological processes and provides chelation of heavy metals such as lead and mercury. Animal sources of Vitamin C include certain organ meats such as goat liver, and only supply a small quantity. Vitamin E is also more-common in plant foodstuffs.

      High-sugar and high-starch diets lead to diabeetus and heart disease; low-fat diets lead to lowered testosterone levels. Most people are fairly-tolerant to dietary fiber, although there are many fiber-sensitive individuals who experience severe constipation from excessive fiber intake. Optimal human nutrition incorporates 25%-40% carbohydrate intake; high-quality carbohydrate sources provide high amounts of Vitamin C, and the next-best sources are things like Sweet Potato and Pumpkin which supply more resistant starch and less insoluble dietary fiber along with a broad and relatively-high-load nutrient profile.

    11. Re:'Jucers' are a meme by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      People don't want to choke down 2 raw carrots and a cup of kale every day when they can slam it with some apple juice in one gulp.

      Yeah, that "with some apple juice" part bugs me. It drives me a little nuts when you see those expensive "juice blends" sold at the store claiming to be full of veggies and labeled "green goodness" or "green goddess" or whatever.

      Except a lot of times there's mostly high sugar apple or pear juice or whatever.

      I get that most people like sweet stuff compared to savory stuff. But I think a lot of that is cultural conditioning. Stop eating a lot of products with added sugar for a while, and suddenly even a lot of vegetables start tasting "sweet" when they're ripe and fresh. It's frustrating that even the high-priced "vegetable" juice blends are mostly packaged sugar products, with a minor amount of stuff with more nutrients.

      I never really got into the "juicing fad," but I did use a juicer occasionally for a while. But I rarely juiced sweet fruits -- the sweetest stuff I'd do would often be stuff like carrots. Carrot juice is actually quite sweet, sweet enough to pair with a lot of more savory or even bitter juices once you actually get used to it.

    12. Re:'Jucers' are a meme by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      People don't want to choke down 2 raw carrots and a cup of kale every day

      That's why I cut up the carrots and kale and cook them in dinner (not necessarily at the same time), skip the apple, and add some berries to dessert.

    13. Re:'Jucers' are a meme by ripvlan · · Score: 1

      Thank you !! Absolutely. Eating Fresh fruit delivers the benefits. Squishing it into a juice removes that benefit.

      Blending them breaks down something that your body needs to "chew" on the food - otherwise it is a direct inject to the bloodstream and your glucose spikes. Like the crack version of fruits.

    14. Re:'Jucers' are a meme by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      It's OK to have some sugar, be it from cane, sugar beet, or fruit. But we tend to have way too large of a percentage of our calories from sugar, especially given that most people are not active enough to really justify it. The slight advantage of apple, pear or grape juice for your sweetener is that they have other nutrition beyond what you find in highly refined sugar.

      But a table spoon of white sugar in your coffee and a pile of grilled cauliflower is going to be a healthier breakfast than a huge glass of orange juice. I'm only going by adding up the numbers, real health food nuts want to make this more complicated than I believe it is. Also it's hard for me to have a discussion with someone who is passionate unless it is fact based.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    15. Re:'Jucers' are a meme by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Animal sources of Vitamin C include certain organ meats such as goat liver

      I'm working on a $400 WiFi-connected machine for juicing goat livers.

      Upgrade to the $800 machine and you can juice the whole goat, which has more fiber.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    16. Re:'Jucers' are a meme by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      I'm not defending the "juicer" crowd.. I have never experienced a "juice" myself. I can see some appeal, though.

      Some people do not enjoy the taste of all fruits/veggies. At the same time, different fruits/veggies have different health benefits. Me, for example, not a huge fan of blueberries but I know they have anti-oxidant properties. I do like bananas, though. If I could get a "juice" that gave me the benefits of the blueberries but basically tasted like a banana, that sounds more appealing than eating the two separate.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    17. Re:'Jucers' are a meme by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Why should I have to do that? Seriously, how hard is it to design in a decent, usable keyboard? Bugger off.

    18. Re:'Jucers' are a meme by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Eat whole fruits and vegetables instead.

      You know what's better? Getting multiple flavours from different fruits. The trick is getting them in small enough quantities to mix together. Kind of like a juicer.

    19. Re:'Jucers' are a meme by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      But this misses a few things that juicers provide:
      - the ability to sprinkle bee pollen, acacia, flax, and other nasty stuff into the juice
      - the uplifting effect you get from joining a cult
      - ability to have more recyclable containers that will get tossed into a landfill.
      - smugness.

      (don't forget, Whole Foods once sold pre-peeled oranges in plastic containers because the original container (aka, peel) wasn't hip enough)

    20. Re:'Jucers' are a meme by Megol · · Score: 1

      Style over function... I can understand (but not in any way like it) on consumer devices but not for something that is labeled a mobile workstation.

    21. Re:'Jucers' are a meme by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      The modern island-style Lenovo keyboards are amazing, at least the ones they use on Thinkpads. Dunno about the budget models.

      T420 at home, T440 at work. The T440 is wildly superior.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    22. Re:'Jucers' are a meme by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Four apples a day every day? You'd probably end up seeing a gastroenterologist, trying to figure out why it is you spend half your day sitting on the toilet.

    23. Re:'Jucers' are a meme by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Oh, I dunno, I take a 3-ounce baggie of baby carrots to work with me every day, steam them in the microwave, and eat them with my lunch. Pretty good, actually.

    24. Re:'Jucers' are a meme by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Some people do not enjoy the taste of all fruits/veggies.

      Well, I'm not going to soft-pedal this at all: They need to LEARN TO LIKE them. Humans are omnivores; we need to eat all different things in order to be healthy. People need to stop looking at food as merely something they put in their mouths because they enjoy it, and start looking at it more like medicine they need to take daily in order to be healthy; being sick all the time or having chronic diseases is a low quality of life. People need to get away from everything having to be SWEET, SWEET, SWEET all the time. Once they get past that they'll find they like unprocessed (or less processed) foods much better. Or, if they still don't, then tough! Eat vegetables and fruits anyway, they're good for you. Same goes for exercise; if you like it, great, bonus points for you. If you don't, tough! Do it anyway. Of course all this I'm saying is about as unpopular as things to say can get, but that's just tough all around for some people, too, so far as I'm concerned. For decades and decades they've tried to persuade people to eat a reasonably healthy diet and get a reasonable amount of exercise every week, and they just won't do it, and we (Americans, and first-world countries in general) are fatter and unhealthier than ever, so I think it's time to get tough about it.

    25. Re:'Jucers' are a meme by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Sure. Put different fruits in your mouth at the same time, that works. It's called 'fruit salad'. A knife to cut them up costs a few bucks, not $400 for some meme appliance that actually makes your poorer and less healthy overall. ;-)

    26. Re:'Jucers' are a meme by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      You forgot:
      - the ability to stock up thrift stores with juicers that were used maybe 5 times then left to collect dust in a kitchen cabinet, until your wife told you to get rid of it
      - Getting $10 back from the $400 you spent on your juicer when you sell it at a garage sale

    27. Re:'Jucers' are a meme by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Hey look, they saved 10c by not having to include an 'i' key. That extra savings was passed onto your company, I'm sure!

    28. Re:'Jucers' are a meme by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      If you're comparing a fruit salad to a fruit juice you've not had a proper fruit juice.

      There's no denying the health benefits of fruit is higher, and that it's cheaper. But claiming that you can replicate the taste is absurd on the face of it especially given your own admissions that you end up consuming different things.

    29. Re:'Jucers' are a meme by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      I don't care about 'replicating the taste'. I'm saying 'give up fruit juice as a bad idea entirely' and just eat whole fruits and vegetables. You do not NEED fruit juice. You NEED to eat healthy foods, and juice is not on the list. You may as well just drink a soda, or stir a bunch of sugar into a glass of water.

    30. Re:'Jucers' are a meme by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I don't care about 'replicating the taste'.

      Then why did you bother replying to me in the first place. Go waste someone else's time with your changing arguments and shitty logic.

    31. Re:'Jucers' are a meme by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      People need to stop looking at food as merely something they put in their mouths because they enjoy it, and start looking at it more like medicine they need to take daily in order to be healthy

      I disagree emphatically with this. This would suck all of the joy out of food entirely and turn it into a chore.

      That said, I'm with you in that it would be helpful for most people to seriously reduce the amount of things like sugar in their diets. The key, though, isn't to get people to treat food like medicine. It's to teach people how to make food that is fulfilling and delicious while at the same time being good for you.

      Part of that is to stop telling people to eat certain things because "they're good for you" and encourage people to eat the foods that they like that happen to be good for them.

      Another part is that it's far from clear that any specific type of food is good for you regardless of who you are. The best dietary advice both in terms of being supported by research and in terms of real-world experience is to eat a wide variety of things, and to eat in moderation.

  15. Agreed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's called economy of scale. You can make a lot of beer more cheaply on a per liter basis than a liter at a time.

  16. Silicon Valley is all about "What the fuck?!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Silicon Valley is one of the weirdest places you can visit on Earth.

    Strange things happen when you take naive, out-of-touch leftists and then give them huge amounts of money that they didn't really earn in any meaningful way.

    For example, you end up with a city like San Francisco that's supposedly "liberal" and has immense financial wealth, yet it also has the highest concentration of homeless in America. What's worse, they aren't just homeless, but they act in the most uncivilized ways possible. They urinate and defecate on sidewalks, for example, and then turn around and sleep in their own filth! There are entire districts of the city where this is a typical scene.

    You end up with absurd property zoning bylaws that prevent anything resembling modern high-density development. So not only are there many homeless, but housing becomes increasingly scarce and nearly impossible to afford even for those who should be able to support themselves. It even gets to the point that highly-paid professionals, who in other cities live in very nice housing, end up living out of their vehicles.

    You end up with a large number of adults who have a mentality that's comparable to that of a child. What's worse, these people somehow become CEOs and other executives at companies. They expect all sorts of unreasonable accommodation, and you shouldn't be surprised to see them crying (yes, with actual tears and pouting) if they don't get their way, or especially if somebody says something "mean" to them.

    You end up with technology that's utterly asinine in its concept and execution. For example, just look at the UIs of software like Firefox and Chrome. They're total rubbish. Or you end up with devices that cost a huge amount of money for delivering very little practical value.

    When visitors come to Silicon Valley, one of the first things they notice is that they're saying "What the fuck?!" to themselves constantly. The more you learn about the region and its people, the more idiotic it all seems. Things happen there that would be laughed at and ridiculed everywhere else, yet these things are considered perfectly normal by the local inhabitants, despite how much stupidity and idiocy is often involved.

    Silicon Valley is all about "What the fuck?!"

    1. Re:Silicon Valley is all about "What the fuck?!" by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      SF != SI valley

      Geographically close.

      There are a few companies in the new generation that have setup in SF, but it's not SanJose.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re: Silicon Valley is all about "What the fuck?!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Um, no. There is no WTF in the flyover states. But there is a lot of WTH, as in WTH are you doing here. Get back on the plane and go back to your big cities, your crime, your crazy housing prices, your traffic, your pollution, your starless night skies and don't come back here with your snotty, better than everyone else attitude. Life is just fine without your kind wandering around our neighborhoods.

    3. Re:Silicon Valley is all about "What the fuck?!" by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Strange things happen when you take naive, out-of-touch leftists and then give them huge amounts of money that they didn't really earn in any meaningful way.

      And then they become Republicans.

      When visitors come to Silicon Valley, one of the first things they notice is that they're saying "What the fuck?!" to themselves constantly.

      Silicon Valley != San Francisco

    4. Re:Silicon Valley is all about "What the fuck?!" by unixisc · · Score: 2

      And then they become Republicans.

      There are about as many Republicans in CA as there are pink unicorns with gold plated horns. Which explains why the last senate elections was between TWO DEMOCRATS, rather than the (D) vs (R) that one has everywhere else

    5. Re:Silicon Valley is all about "What the fuck?!" by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

      There are about as many Republicans in CA as there are pink unicorns with gold plated horns.

      While the CA Republicans have more in common with the endangered spotted owl than 1/10th of the US population. Republican fundraisers still swing by to pick up checks from Silicon Valley companies..

      Stock for stock and dollar for dollar, Silicon Valley companies give more political donations to Republicans than Democrats, and are more likely to have right-leaning stockholders to boot, according to a new report by news site The Daily Dot. This runs contrary to Silicon Valley's reputation as waving the banner of American liberalism but the numbers don't lie.

      http://www.businessinsider.com/silicon-valley-gives-more-to-republicans-than-democrats-2015-3

    6. Re:Silicon Valley is all about "What the fuck?!" by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      No, they remain out-of-touch leftists that blame Republicans for their failures.

      That could explain why McCain and Romney stomped through Silicon Valley for campaign contributions 2008 and 2012.

    7. Re:Silicon Valley is all about "What the fuck?!" by Holi · · Score: 1

      Depending on the district you are so far from wrong it's actually a little funny.

      Or do you not know Darrell Issa is from Cali?

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    8. Re:Silicon Valley is all about "What the fuck?!" by guises · · Score: 2

      Oh, bless your heart. Someone told you that Republicans were scarce in California, and you believed them... Why? 31% of voters in California are Republicans, compared to 45% Democrats. In fact, according to the Public Policy Institute of California more Californians identify as Conservative than Liberal: 36% vs 35%. It's just that, thanks to the magic of the Electoral College, their opinions and votes don't matter in presidential elections. Bribes, of course, are always welcome from anyone though. Er, "campaign contributions."

    9. Re:Silicon Valley is all about "What the fuck?!" by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Someone told you that Republicans were scarce in California, and you believed them...

      Uh, no. Read my comment again. Republicans are ignoring the biggest block of conservative voters in the state: Latinos. Because they're not white and not Protestant, they're ignored. No wonder they vote Democrat. The funny thing is that Trump did better than Romney with Latino voters.

    10. Re: Silicon Valley is all about "What the fuck?!" by clonehappy · · Score: 1

      No, he probably just meant braindead liberals like yourself. You know, the ones always projecting their racism onto everyone else?

    11. Re:Silicon Valley is all about "What the fuck?!" by guises · · Score: 1
      Okay... I'll read your comment again. You said:

      While the CA Republicans have more in common with the endangered spotted owl than 1/10th of the US population. Republican fundraisers still swing by to pick up checks from Silicon Valley companies..

      In response to:

      There are about as many Republicans in CA as there are pink unicorns with gold plated horns.

      Hm. I guess maybe you intended that as corroboration for the grandparents' comment about people turning into Republicans when they get lots of money, rather than agreement that Republicans are rare in California? Okay, point made.

    12. Re:Silicon Valley is all about "What the fuck?!" by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Even weirder than Silicon Valley is the media perception of Silicon Valley. Seriously, the valley is nothing whatsoever like the media portrayal, or even the news media portrayal. The far out wierdos are rare. Yes there are a lot of stupid startups, but those generally have 2 or 3 people with a dumb idea expecting to get rich, and 10-20 more who just want a paycheck and don't expect to get rich but treat it as a nice thing if it did happen.

      It is not full of wacked out leftists, there's a distinct trend towards libertarians, a solid backing of down to earth moderates, and enough hard core conservatives to balance it out. There are plenty of gun clubs here.

      Even if you head to San Francisco there are indeed moderate streaks to be found, and conservative areas. There is no place anywhere in America that is all red or all blue. Just because a few peacocks strut around doesn't mean those are the only birds. When a gun toting crazy redneck walks around Alabama asking to see the passport of anyone with a tan you don't assume that the entire state is full of wackos, so why assume all of SF or Silicon Valley are full of ditzy goofballs just because you bump into someone that makes vegan quinoa jello?

    13. Re:Silicon Valley is all about "What the fuck?!" by Duds · · Score: 1

      Times it's ok to stop reading a comment #27

      "If they, with no apparently irony, actually use the word "Leftist".

    14. Re:Silicon Valley is all about "What the fuck?!" by Lord+Flipper · · Score: 1

      Strange things happen when you take naive, out-of-touch leftists and then give them huge amounts of money that they didn't really earn in any meaningful way.

      Leftists in Silicon Valley? Who are you referring to... the homeless? LOL

      Listen up son, most of the owners/investors in Silicon Valley are right-wingers or Libertarians (Sorta the same thing...).

      I take it you're from Des Moines, or some other backwater where hasty generalizations blow up in people's faces on a regular basis, yeah?

    15. Re:Silicon Valley is all about "What the fuck?!" by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      For example, you end up with a city like San Francisco that's supposedly "liberal" and has immense financial wealth, yet it also has the highest concentration of homeless in America. What's worse, they aren't just homeless, but they act in the most uncivilized ways possible. They urinate and defecate on sidewalks, for example, and then turn around and sleep in their own filth! There are entire districts of the city where this is a typical scene.

      San Francisco is very much not Silicon Valley, politically, socially, or otherwise. The homeless problem is due to a number of factors that attract the homeless to the area.

      First, the weather, it's never too hot, and very rarely too cold, and until this year not that rainy either. In other words, it's one of the few urban locations that is perfect weather-wise for someone who wants to live outside 365 days/year.

      And I said "wants" there for a reason -- most of the chronically homeless in SF are not people "down on their luck," who have problems finding work, they are people who have serious mental disorders, who cannot and in some cases do not want to integrate with society. Since we decided as a society that we cannot institutionalize people against their will unless they are violent, and Saint Reagan closed down the sanitariums, this has left all the homeless on the streets and under the bridges. The formal institutions have been replaced by a less formal system of outreach: homeless shelters, soup kitchens, etc. There are also quite a few well-meaning but foolish folk who give the homeless tools to set up camp -- tents, stoves, canvas, etc, so they can make encampments, which they do.

      Finally, although most people are sick of the homeless problem and want action, you have a lot of politically-connected advocacy groups who push for (and often get) more money. More, more money, all the time. I can't think of another city in the US that spends more money trying to "solve" the homeless problem, and it usually fails because it doesn't take into account that most of these people cannot be 'fixed' and there's not enough political will to, say, run them all out of town.

      But back on topic, one of the biggest problems with Silicon Valley startups is the lack of diversity. Not necessarily diversity of race or gender or whatnot, but diversity of opinion. You're creating a company by hiring your friends, people who probably think and act the way you do, and if you're off the rails, you don't necessarily have that important voice in the room to tell you that your idea is nonsense. "A juicer with these amazing juice packs that cost $5-$8 each!! And it's Internet-connected! So it sucks power all the time, it tells you things that your eyes can totally see already! Yes, I'd totally put $400-$700 down on that, all that is awesome! My friend Larry agrees with me, we'll start a company!" Very few people are that super-pricey-fad-conscious, but if your close circle of friends is that way, you aren't necessarily going to recognize that demand is not going to have your product leaping off the shelves.

      In most cases, this is where a good venture capitalist would step in, evaluate the product and business plan, and refuse funding if it didn't seem like there was a path to prosperity. Unfortunately, there are a lot of investors who seemed to have a blind spot here as well. Shark Tank can be kitschy and entertaining, but the sharks are usually good enough to ask "so how am I getting my money back? Who is actually going to buy this? Who is purchasing these packs?"

      I've got the sneaking suspicion, especially with the price drop of the juicer itself from $700 to $400, that it's the juice packs that are actually the profit center, and that the company comes out ahead if people bought just the packs but not the juicer. However, then there would be nothing to stop people from switching to a slightly cheaper competitor, in which case then all the business will be gone.

    16. Re:Silicon Valley is all about "What the fuck?!" by Maritz · · Score: 1

      "leftist" lol. Yet to meet someone use that word who wasn't a cunt.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  17. Re: Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Uh, your juicer obviously isn't internet connected, duh. How else can you use their IoT app to start the juicer, automatically request shipments for more overpriced veggie/fruit bags (with DRM in the future I'm sure, (
    Kuerig anyone?), and make needless automated social media posts about your healthy juicing/nutrition with embedded advertisements. Oh boy.

    I'm sure they also have plans to link with a select for exercise apps/smartwatch apps to import your juice bag data to track your diet and make you feel like you're a super hero.

  18. Re:Seriously? by gfxguy · · Score: 1

    But it doesn't seem like the machine actually makes juice, it sounds like it's just a press that squeezes the juice out of the bags.

    --
    Stupid sexy Flanders.
  19. Re:Seriously? by gnick · · Score: 1

    So ... Juicero Inc. makes a juice machine and that juice machine makes juice ...

    It makes both the juicer & the bags that go in it, containing the juicing material. It appears that Juicero makes both juicers and juice. The question might have been about which their focus was on. At $400, they're not giving away the shaver to sell blades, but it's clear that they're partly counting on the subscription model.

    --
    He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
  20. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    what exactly is the purpose of this "juicer"?

    Provide a gravy train of free investor money for a select few at the head of the operation. Duh.

  21. Packets by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    So you buy packets of fruit instead of going to a farmer's market for locally grown organic fruit? Seems like they don't understand the target demographic of juice-a-holics.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:Packets by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      It looked like just packets of juice in the article... fruit cups might've made sense on some level. I think you could replicate this with a can crusher and packs of Hi-C.

    2. Re:Packets by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      It seems extremely lame. It would be like if K-Cups were filled with instant coffee.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  22. Re:Seriously? by HornWumpus · · Score: 5, Informative

    I confess, I RTFA.

    Bags are $5-$8 and produce about 8 fluid ounces of juice. There are a lot of chumps in the world, but this is just pushing stupid a few steps too far. Even the special kind of 'stupid' that comes from lack of meat in the diet won't fall for this crap (outside LA anyhow).

    The company obviously doesn't understand it's own business model. They are now only selling the bags to known machine purchasers. Apparently to stop 'hand squeezers'. Would HP refuse you printer ink because you hadn't registered your inkjet?

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  23. Re:Seriously? by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    look at melitta soft pods..

    Save the planet... same ease for producing a cup of coffee.

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  24. Re:Seriously? by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

    Cleaning a Keureg is more time-consuming and still has to happen. Automatic drip is essentially cleaned by brewing an empty pot of white vinegar.

  25. Re:Seriously? by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

    That's a good point... not wanting to sell loss leading machines to nonsubscribers would be one thing, but the consumables certainly ought to be generating margin...

  26. Re:Seriously? by xession · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Dumbass investors saw this as a Kuerig for vegans. A new device that accomplishes the goal of selling the most amount of cheap material crap to people at a exorbitantly marked up price, with a potentially successful marketing message of a "better way".

    Somehow people bought heavily into the concept of Kuerig, even though you have had small (even single) serving coffee machines for decades and decades. But no, now you can buy a wasteful and expensive single serving cup that you drop in and there's a water tank and a pump that will eventually fail too, all for the low price of 5-10 small, simple, almost never failing, thermosiphon drip coffee maker. Oh and you get to pay tons more for your easy to use coffee cups now too! Yay!

    A lot of people seem to think their lives get better as they acquire more technology. Doesn't matter what it is. If it has a button and a screen and it does something that didn't have a screen before, its better. Now it even has the internet so it can do... even more things or something.

    TL;DR Why? Because stupidly blind and wasteful consumerism.

    It puts a smile on my face to see such an expensive shit device like this fail so hard.

  27. Re:Seriously? by c · · Score: 1

    How did so many people think this was a bright idea?

    There's a lot of people out there who seem to think that the more money they spend on a "health product", the healthier they'll be.

    I... honestly don't know how these people seem to have the disposable income to pay for this stuff. You'd think they'd have been fleeced and left in a cycle of poverty shortly after moving out of their parents home...

    --
    Log in or piss off.
  28. a 30 dollar blender can do it cheaper by FudRucker · · Score: 1

    and who is stupid enough to think all my kitchen appliances need internet connections, sheesh only an idiot would pay 400 dollars for a juicer, these fools deserve to go bankrupt,

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  29. Re:Seriously? by ncc74656 · · Score: 4, Informative

    why would someone buy a $400 machine that requires you to buy prepackaged produce to be squeezed out of it...?

    Consider this quote from TFA: "Tech blogs have dubbed it a 'Keurig for juice.'" Then consider how Keurig machines and the coffee pods they use have sold over the past few years. Nobody ever went broke overestimating people's laziness.

    --
    20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  30. Re:Seriously? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    It is so simple (and I'm guessing more economical) to go to the grocery store and get some veggies and/or fruits and throw down a regular juicer.

    Or just buy some juice.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  31. Re:Seriously? by xevioso · · Score: 1

    We have these at work. The juice is quite good, but I see it as a thing for companies or people with money to burn. I make my own juice at home with a Nutribullet every morning: Kale, a pear and an apple. Takes a minute and it's always fresh.

    The juicero stuff is quite good, no doubt about it, so no complaints about the quality.

  32. Re:Seriously? by tomhath · · Score: 5, Funny

    Not only internet connected, but the founder managed to conjure up the ghost of Steve Jobs and inject "Tesla" into his public statements, even though neither has anything to do with a juice squeezer.

  33. Re:Seriously? by retchdog · · Score: 1

    probably because their business model was sold to investors as people subscribing to "X juice bags per month for the price of X^1.5! (two-year minimum contract required)". you need the $400 sunk-cost foot-in-the-door to nudge people to sign up for shit like that.

    you are describing a relatively reasonable way to make modest profit. this is completely irrelevant, if not antithetical, to Valley business practice.

    --
    "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
  34. Evil loves your self-hatred by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Doug Evans, the company's founder, would compare himself with Steve Jobs in his pursuit of juicing perfection.

    So.. your overpriced machine will only juice fruits that were purchased through your company. i.e. the only people who would buy your product, are people who hate themselves.

    Juicero sells the machine for $400, plus the cost of individual juice packs delivered weekly.

    OMG, I was just kidding. But apparently I was right: it really is just like an iPhone.

    That products like these are considered viable, is one of the saddest things ever. But on the bright side, why would a user squeeze the packets themselves? That doesn't waste enough money, and the customer's desire for self-harm is your market. Don't worry about the packet-squeezers; they never would have bought your machine, nor your overpriced packets in the first place. Concentrate on the self-loathing idiots, just like Apple did.

    1. Re:Evil loves your self-hatred by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      An iPhone is actually useful, and you aren't restricted to buying a phone and data plan from Apple. It's well made, and if you're going to use something multiple times a day for three or more years it's probably worth paying a few hundred more for a device you like more. You're probably going to have a pocket phone anyway, so it won't take up more space.

      This thing is not as central to the average user. It locks the user into an expensive fruit and veggie plan. If the manufacturer goes out of business, it's useless. It takes up space that other and less expensive solutions don't.

      Seriously, this doesn't make sense to the typical iPhone user.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  35. A fool and his (or her) money by fredrated · · Score: 1

    are soon squeezed dry?

  36. GOOGLE invested in this? by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1

    TFA says that Alphabet is one of the investors in this miraculous juice technology.

  37. Re:Seriously? by Aeros · · Score: 2

    BUT, now you have the power to lift your TWO Teslas!

  38. Re:Seriously? by xevioso · · Score: 1, Informative

    The selling point is that each bag has a QR patch on the back that is read by the machine when you hook the bag up. It's connected to the internet so that if you attempt to use the bag past it's freshness date, which is on the QR patch, the machine won't let you. The bags are also reusable; the company comes to our office and picks up the used bags and then reuses them (presumably after washing them) to redeliver more juice bags at a later date.

    The QR patch and internet connection also allows info to be sent if there's a recall on a bad batch of juice. I would also suspect the company is collecting data on which juices are the most popular and adjusting their products accordingly, as I haven't seen the "Spicy Greens" juice packs in my office in a while, as it seems no one but me was drinking them.

    This is not a product for the average user. It's sold I would suspect to companies with a fair amount of employees who can go through the packs regularly and make it worthwhile for the company to purchase packs on a constant basis. The average user probably wouldn't get a great deal of value out of it. But for our company, it is used regularly and often. It's pretty good juice, no doubt about it.

  39. Re:Seriously? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    X raised to factorial(1.5) or factorial(X raised to 1.5)?

    At $5/day (1 bag/day) this POS is $1825/year. It's just too much of a rip for anyone sane, but then again, people go to Starbucks.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  40. Re: Seriously? by Aeros · · Score: 1

    Well yea if your drinking your juice box.

  41. Re: Seriously? by xevioso · · Score: 1

    You can mention it, but that doesn't make it true. I prefer the fiber in my pressed juice, so I use a nutribullet at home, which is essentially a superfast blender.

    But you do get a lot of the nutrients when you use a pressed juicer like the juicero. The different packs have quite a variety of healthy greens and vegetables in them.

  42. Re:Seriously? by xevioso · · Score: 1

    I don't understand why they would think that "hand-squeezing" would defeat their business model. You can't get all of the juice out by doing that, and it's inefficient, and the selling point is that you hook the bag up and press a button, and that's it. That's easier than pressing your own damn juice out of a bag.

  43. Re:Seriously? by Aeros · · Score: 1

    Im thinking the internet connection is so it would automatically reorder new bags when you are close to running out or let you manually order extra or different flavors. Nothing that you couldnt set up on your own. Im sure this is just a novelty added to the machine for the 'wow factor'.

  44. Re:Seriously? by xevioso · · Score: 2

    It's sold primarily to companies with many employees. If your office has a kitchen where lots of employees mingle, getting coffee and using the refrigerator and so on, you are their market. The idea is that companies that can afford to spend money on "wellness" for their employees will be willing to spend 5-8$ a bag to keep them happy. It's an office perk, like a fancy coffee machine.

    Whether that is a valid business model or not, I have no idea.

    But their juice is quite tasty. I'd recommend it if that's your thing.

  45. Re:Seriously? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    At least carnivores have the decency to kill their food before they eat it. That apple is still alive while you eat it.

    Red Green, para.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  46. This is clickbait... by shaitand · · Score: 1

    So the real purpose of the article? Create a trumped up controversy in order to generate hype before the IPO. Everyone is supposed to think the stock is cheap because of the controversy while thinking they are the clever one who sees the business model will work because the consumables are what matter. When everyone is the clever "one" they all buy the stock and the original investors get the profits.

    *yawn*

    1. Re:This is clickbait... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I agree it's the consumables that matter. That's why I wouldn't invest a dime in this.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  47. Re:Seriously? by gfxguy · · Score: 1

    Ok, but that's not what I meant. You need to clean the brew basket (at least throw away the paper filter, or clean and rinse the permanent one) after every brew. With Keurig you just throw away the cup. Yes, very wasteful - but easy, convenient, and most importantly: fast. On a "daily" basis the only thing Keurig needs is adding water to the reservoir.

    --
    Stupid sexy Flanders.
  48. Re:Seriously? by HornWumpus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Per the article: $5-$8 per bag. 8 oz juice/bag.

    Your office manager has to be a special kind of stupid. All costs are opportunity costs, you could have an 'endless' bowl of fresh fruit and a weekly keg of good beer in the office for less. I'd be bitching about wasting bene money on overpriced crap.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  49. Re:Seriously? by gfxguy · · Score: 2

    I read the article. The packets are moronically expensive, but there's a sucker born every minutes. At the same time, while, on the whole, it may be cheaper to do it yourself, if you don't use your juicer a lot then it may be more expensive in the long run when you have to buy many different ingredients that don't last that long. It all depends on how much you use it. Like any recipe, if I don't cook a lot, then I often need to buy a bunch of ingredients that other cooks might take for granted - certain uncommon spices, for example, that end up costing me several dollars for the bottle when I only use it once because I don't cook that much. Suddenly it would have been cheaper to go out or buy it ready made.

    --
    Stupid sexy Flanders.
  50. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Juicero is mimicking the process of the Norwalk juicer, which is trituration (grinding into a pulp through a low-RPM device) of produce followed by hydraulic pressing of the juice from a pulp containing cloth bag. This is distinct from centrifugal and other forms of juicing. A home unit of a Norwalk is very expensive at ~$2600 and is to some people the Rolls Royce of juicers. Why do people pay more for such a unit? i) Some taste a difference in quality of juice produced, ii) certain leafy green vegetables (i.e. parsley) cannot be juiced in appreciable yields via centrifugal methods but can via trituration/pressing methods, iii) in daily use, the higher yields of trituration/pressing versus centrifugal methods (realistically, predominantly for leafy green vegetable-heavy juices) will pay for the juicer in produce savings over the course of a few years. Related to point i), the perceived higher quality juice is presumed to be more nutrient rich, in the sense that fewer of the compounds in the juice have degraded during production and to a certain extent, that the extraction yields of such nutrients is higher for trituration/pressing than other methods. That compounds degrade less by one versus another method has not been scientifically validated (unless one considers the long-term, quasi-evolutionarily-proven "taste" test). Because each vegetable can synthesize hundreds or even thousands of chemicals (well beyond the oversimplified repertoire of vitamins and molecules frequently cited in USDA characterizations), the purification and structural elucidation of each compound would be an Herculean task, not to mention the subsequent study of juicer-induced changes to said molecules. Now, this all being said, it should be overwhelmingly clear at this point, that this represents a niche market (and that's a very kind, broad claim), even before the advent of Juicero. Where does Juicero come in? The trituration/pressing methods are very labor intensive relative to centrifugal juicing. Thus, having a bag, for small consumption purposes, is cheaper than personally hiring someone to make juice for you. Presumably (I honestly haven't looked) Juicero is marketing that such a process will produce a superior quality juice, although that cannot be presumed to be the case. Trituration of vegetables will rapidly start the degradation processes that change apparent taste (and presumably nutritional profile) of the juice. I recall that their bagging system was supposed to greatly retard this process, but in the absence of data other than taste, it is hard to tell whether their claims are justified. (Typically, juices would need to be deoxygenated to preserve their contents; many of the chemicals that flavor the juice, be it orange, apple, etc, are volatile and removed during deoxygenation, thus killing the taste of fresh juice, necessitating the addition of flavor packs. I doubt Juicero is doing something like this). It would be quite comical if their method of production/storage rendered the claimed benefits of the juicing process moot in the case of Juicero's business. It would not be unreasonable to characterize the VC's who invested in this as nothing more than a bunch of lemmings chasing money off a cliff.

    (On pricing, costs of organic supermarket produce can give juices at about $0.10-$1 per ounce (the former being carrot and the latter being fresh pomegranate juice). But Juicero will be buying wholesale, which should at least halve the costs if not more).

  51. Re:Seriously? by ripvlan · · Score: 1

    One must ask --- Why not just buy a carton of "fresh" juice from the many "Naked" drink companies?

    This doesn't sound like the Jack LaLanne Juicer thingy (which sells for $150). I think the Premium Experience folks ran amok on this one- those Tech Billionaires must have thought "yeah I'd drop $400 on this" but forgot to test the market. I personally don't need another kitchen gadget - let alone a $400 one.

    My friend used to have a coffee maker that you filled with beans and it would drop in & grind one serving on demand. Seemed cool and was expensive. After using it while visiting for a week I can't imaging a IoT angle to it. I just put my cup under it and pressed "go"

  52. Re:Seriously? by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

    But it doesn't seem like the machine actually makes juice, it sounds like it's just a press that squeezes the juice out of the bags.

    And none of the idiots thought of making the opening bigger, and put it at the top, so you could just pour it.

  53. Re:obligatory simpsons quote by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    How difficult is to answer a call by pressing a button on your wireless headset?

  54. Re:Seriously? by ripvlan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Which reminds me --- Coca Cola pulled out of the Cold Drink effort with Keurig. After product launch it all tanked. --- again they forgot to test the market. Nobody wanted to pay a big price for the machine, have it occupy counter space, and then fork over about the same money as a can of soda costs.

    oh- and everyone is getting wise to health and sugar -- and that they should drink less soda.

    http://www.businessinsider.com...

  55. Re:Seriously? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    At the price they're charging for the bags, that's an easy $0.50/bag in waste. At about 800 bags you 'break even'.

    Of course a small hydraulic press from Harbor Freight (plus a fixture) would likely get out even more juice, for less than a quarter the price. But you'd have to pump that by hand.

    People that are concerned about price aren't this company's target audience. Everybody loves a chump.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  56. Re:Seriously? by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

    Automatic espresso machines are as easy to use and less wasteful: you only need to keep the water and bean reservoir topped up, and empty the coffee grounds bin every now and then. In terms of convenience, when you stumble down the stairs half asleep for a cuppa, all you need to do is push a button twice (once to wake up the machine and start the heater, once to have it brew a cup of coffee), same as the Keurig. Decent machines are not that expensive anymore, and the price per cup is hard to beat. (Currently on Nespresso until I get around to fixing my espresso machine...)

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  57. Just great by TheSouthernDandy · · Score: 1

    And just how the hell will I now forget to put a receptacle in place and dispense $5 of pre-made juice onto my kitchen counter by phone? BY PHONE, do you understand?? This is Internet-connected! IoT! AI! Deep Learning!

    I'll bet it could order its own $1000 worth of juice refills from Amazon automatically, too, dammit.

  58. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    > here's a sucker born every minutes

    Can you get the juice out that way too?

  59. Juicero and Theranos by bayankaran · · Score: 1

    They should collaborate, co-mingle or do some sort of strategic conaplication. They are made for each other.

    --
    Tat Tvam Asi
  60. Anyone paying $400 for a juicer should be fired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Anyone paying $400 for a juicer should be fired out of a cannon and into a brick wall. In Russia we made and still make juice with a cotton pad and a baking roller. No motors. No machines. Works fine. No mess because everything is on the pad and you toss the pad when you are done. Hell, my grandparents generation would wash the pad and reuse it too. Its degenerate to spend $400 like this. Criminal.

    1. Re:Anyone paying $400 for a juicer should be fired by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Most of these vegetable juices are too low in sugar to ferment anyhow. Russia is clearly not their target market.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  61. Re: Seriously? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

    You can mention it, but that doesn't make it true. I prefer the fiber in my pressed juice, so I use a nutribullet at home, which is essentially a superfast blender.

    That's a form of a smoothie...not juice from a juicer that pretty much by definition, is only the liquid and no fiber included.

    That being said, I find room for both in my diet when possible.

    I like smoothies...I try to eat LOTS of whole veggies. I also try to supplement that with mostly vegetable nutrients from juicing, to get more in my system than I could possibly eat if I kept the fiber in everything consumed.

    I have a Breville juicer and a Vitamix for the blender...two different beasts, each with their own place.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  62. Re:Seriously? by goose-incarnated · · Score: 2

    So sure, having just a "regular" juicer not only gives you a lot more options, but it's healthier and you get fresher fruits and vegetables in your juices

    Fruit juice isn't healthy. It's basically all of the sugar from the fruit with none of the fibre to slow down absorption.

    Eat the fruit instead. The fruit as a whole is good for you, the extracted sugar, not so much.

    --
    I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  63. Re:Seriously? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

    but the "bags" are actually a very good idea to capture the same market that Keurig captured with K-Cups. A decent drip coffee maker can cost a fraction of a K-Cup machine, and even if you don't want to grind the beans yourself (the best option for the freshest coffee), pre-ground coffee by the bag/can costs WAY less than a comparable amount of K-Cups. Yet K-Cups were wildly successful - because there are too many things going on in life - people don't want to waste time grinding coffee of cleaning up the pot and brew basket when all they wanted was an easy cup of coffee that they could just push a button for while getting ready for work in the morning.

    I"m not much of a coffee drinker myself I must confess, but I imagined that most people that owned those systems used the refillable K-Cups to fill with their own coffee that is cheaper to buy, and just mostly did the reusable stuff with it, but that it was handy for single cup brews quickly.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  64. Which is Worse? by StormReaver · · Score: 2

    I don't know which is worse: that a company exists that thinks there are people stupid enough to pay ten times what this thing is worth, or that that there are enough stupid people in the country that will pay that outrageous price to support such a company.

    With my $40 blender, I can make a frosty, 40-ounce Organic slushy by adding ice and about $3.00 worth of Organic fruits and vegetables. That's about sixty cents for an 8-ounce glass of a tasty, healthy snack in drink form.

  65. Re: Seriously? by xevioso · · Score: 1

    Smoothie, juice; potato, pototo. Why do you need to supplement your smoothies or whole veggies with juice? Just eat more veggies or drink more smoothies. You aren't getting anything from the juice you wouldn't get from the smoothie wor whoile veggies, and you are getting less fiber.

    I make a smoothie every day before work. I will use the juicer machine at work for one reason and one reason only: I like the taste. I like strong, bitter veggies. I can't stand sugary juice; gimme all the bitter melon, bok choy and other strong tasting stuff you can find; I'll eat it all.

  66. Re:Seriously? by gfxguy · · Score: 1

    You imagined wrong. Some people do that. Most do not. The reason is quite simple - the whole point of K-Cup is that it's easy and fast. If you just turn it into a mini drip coffee maker, you're not gaining anything - now you just have a smaller "brew basked" to clean after making coffee. I do think a lot of people have backtracked to single-cup drip coffee makers (that don't require "cups" or "pods"), but most people using K-Cups are doing it for the convenience. It's quite wasteful, but I admit to having one. On a normal day we brew a half pot with our Ninja coffee maker, but if I'm making one cup for myself, I'll just use the K-Cup. I do have the refillable, but they are practically pointless. The other upside is getting variety packs of K-Cups. Also, since we make most of our coffee with the Ninja, I have the luxury of walking through the coffee aisle and just getting what's on sale.

    To continue on with the conversation, as it seems to relate to the "internet connected" portion of the article about the juicer, the most boneheaded thing Keurig did was to make the 2.0 makers that will not make a cup that doesn't have their blessed RFID chip in it. These juicers apparently double-check the barcode on the juice bag. Way to alienate your customers, idiots!

    --
    Stupid sexy Flanders.
  67. Re:Seriously? by xevioso · · Score: 1

    I read the article, but you didn't read my comment.

    We have this thing at work. Given the choice between standing there and squeezing out juice like a moron for a minute and a half, or putting a bag in a machine and pressing a simple button, guess which one I'll pick?

  68. Re:Seriously? by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

    Rolling pin for that last half ounce.

  69. Re:Seriously? by xevioso · · Score: 1

    They stay fresher longer, but they still go bad like any other vegetable kept in a fridge.

    The QR code on the back and the much-maligned internet connectivity ensures that when people start putting bad batches of juice in the machine, the machine won't press them, and the company gets notified that customer X's bags of veggies are past their use-by date, so they send someone over to pick up the used bags and deliver more.

    I dunno if this is a good business model or not, but that's how it works, and people in my office use the heck out of that machine.

  70. Re:Seriously? by xevioso · · Score: 1

    Very few of the juicero juice bags are just fruit. All of them have some vegetables in them as far as i can tell. Some of them are sweet, but most of them are not as sweet as you would think or compared to Naked or Odwalla juices.

  71. If you want juice, don't buy a juicer by steveha · · Score: 1

    Having lots of fibre and vitamins in your diet is good. But a juicer is basically a machine for separating the fibre from the juice, and it also separates the skin of the fruit which often contains a lot of vitamins.

    Juice by itself is sweet and tasty, but it basically gets all of its calories from carbohydrates, and without any fibre the carbs will hit your system quickly. The glycemic index of carrot juice is very high, while eating carrots will not usually have much effect on your blood sugar. (See the difference between glycemic index and glycemic load: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glycemic_load)

    If you want to enjoy a tasty beverage that is better for you than juice, I recommend you get a VitaMix. The VitaMix company has been around for decades, and their product is an extremely expensive blender that is IMHO worth the expense. A VitaMix is so much more powerful than a cheap blender that it can do things the cheap blender cannot do.

    So a typical fruit smoothie will start with some juice or even water and then throw fruit in, where the 2 horsepower motor at full speed breaks the fibre, skin, and even seeds down to the point where you don't really even know they are there. If you want to add a pleasing orange color to a smoothie, throw in some carrots; the texture will be a bit thicker and the color will be orange but you won't find any carrot chunks.

    VitaMix has competitors, and some of the competitors may be as good. BlendTec and Ninja seem to have similar horsepower. I'm only recommending VitaMix since I have had one in my house for like two decades now. We use it so much that, despite the high purchase cost, it has a very low cost per operating minute... our food processor cost less but we hardly use the thing.

    My favorite recipe: put a cup of plain yogurt into the blender, and add a spoonful of sugar and a squeeze of lime juice. Then dump a 10-ounce bag of frozen organic strawberries in (still frozen!), and run the blender on "high" while using the "tamper" to push the berries down into the blades. When the texture is smooth, serve. Don't overblend because you don't want to heat up the mixture. It's a tasty sweet dessert, and much healthier than any strawberry frozen yogurt you can buy.

    Here's an example of throwing various hunks of vegetables into the thing to make a vegetable smoothie. After that demo the next demo is a sweet fruit smoothie. https://youtu.be/1qemLSu63d0?t=1m36s

    P.S. LOL, YouTube appears to have a channel called "Blender Babes" where young females demonstrate blenders. I wonder what would happen if they tried to get a booth at a conference that bans "booth babes"... would they not be allowed at their own booth? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nXG65NgmrIM

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    1. Re:If you want juice, don't buy a juicer by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      My favorite recipe: put a cup of plain yogurt into the blender, and add a spoonful of sugar and a squeeze of lime juice. Then dump a 10-ounce bag of frozen organic strawberries in (still frozen!), and run the blender on "high" while using the "tamper" to push the berries down into the blades. When the texture is smooth, serve

      Sounds like a lot of work. I just put some frozen (straw)berries in bowl, put it in the microwave to thaw, add some yogurt, and eat it.

    2. Re:If you want juice, don't buy a juicer by steveha · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a lot of work.

      It really isn't.

      I just put some frozen (straw)berries in bowl, put it in the microwave to thaw, add some yogurt, and eat it.

      That doesn't sound like it makes strawberry frozen yogurt. I like strawberry frozen yogurt, and the way I make it, it includes a whole lot of strawberries.

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
  72. Re:Seriously? by steveg · · Score: 1

    You'd be wrong. I'd say the number of people who even *own* the refillable cup is tiny, and the number who actually use it regularly is smaller still.

    It removes the convenience. You'd have to dump the grounds and clean it, and then refill it. If you're doing all that, why not just do a pour-over?

    --
    Ignorance killed the cat. Curiosity was framed.
  73. Re:Seriously? by xevioso · · Score: 2

    Which no one would eat. No one in an office eats fruit from a fruit basket. It just doesn't happen. I dunno why, but if you put a bowl of bananas or apples on the table in the office kitchen, chances are it will still be there, untouched a week later.

    I don't know what the actual cost of those bags are to us; I suspect that the price drops if you order in bulk or have a contract over time. We do go through a lot of them. I think we were one of the early adopters, so we may have gotten some sort of deal there too; I should ask our HR person.

    Look, its a perk. Some companies spend extra money for employees on massages, coffee, beer, or soda. We spend it on a juicer. :-)

  74. Re:Seriously? by postbigbang · · Score: 1

    You must be a shareholder.

    Any old mixer or juicer will work fine. Once it's down in your digestive track, it all does the same thing.

    If you're hinging your post on saving a minute and a half compared to a manual method, then you must bill your time.

    But you accused people of being morons, so it's more likely you are indeed a lawyer. Me, I eat my veggies the old fashioned way, one fork full at a time.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  75. Re:Seriously? by xevioso · · Score: 1

    The best comments are always at the bottom, which sucks.

    Anyway, my only test of these bags of juice would be the taste test, and with that I'd say the juice is excellent. I use a nutribullet regularly, so I drink a lot of juice/smoothies, and I'd say the juicero juice is very good. You definitely can taste the "freshness" in their juice. There's also a wider variety of ingredients int ehir bags, so I'm getting tastes I don't normally get in their juice, but so far so good.

    As I've posted here, whether or not it's a valid business model remains to be seen. There's a large subset of the population that laughs at this sort of stuff, and perhaps rightly so, but there's also a subset that, well, wants to be healthy and believes drinking fresh juice helps with that. It can't hurt; it's an office perk for employees; it's easy and convenient, and it tastes good. It's also expensive, but hey, not my problem.

  76. Re:Seriously? by Moof123 · · Score: 1

    Funny, for a while our break room had apples and bananas. They sold pretty well. Sadly it did not work well with our model of restocking from Costco every 2-3 weeks. Bananas in particular have about a 2-3 day window at office temperatures in which they are ripe but not over-ripe. Chips and cookies are "good" for months of shelf life.

  77. Re:Seriously? by AntronArgaiv · · Score: 1

    ...what exactly is the purpose of this "juicer"?

    At $400?
    To make money for the folks selling it, obviously. ...and it seems to be quite effective at this :-)

    [silly valley]

  78. Re:Seriously? by xevioso · · Score: 3, Funny

    Because the kale is fresh; I just bought it this morning too from a local corner store, and I shop there daily so I know when they get in fresh veggies. Do you have something against kale? Are you a kale-hater? A kaleophobe, if you will? Are you antikale? A misakaleopic person, mind you?

  79. Re:Seriously? by sexconker · · Score: 1

    Err...why would anyone need a bag of stuff to juice?

    It is so simple (and I'm guessing more economical) to go to the grocery store and get some veggies and/or fruits and throw down a regular juicer.

    Hell, I have a Breville multi-speed one for about $200....why would someone buy a $400 machine that requires you to buy prepackaged produce to be squeezed out of it...?

    How did so many people think this was a bright idea?

    I guarantee you this is how they attracted investors: "It's the Keurig of juicers."

  80. Re: Seriously? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

    kale juice, all the way

    All the way where?

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  81. Re:Seriously? by sexconker · · Score: 2

    those Tech Billionaires must have thought "yeah I'd drop $400 on this" but forgot to test the market

    No, they thought "Yeah, I'd drop $699 on this.".
    $399 is the "Oh shit, no one is buying these", fire sale price.

  82. Re:Seriously? by sexconker · · Score: 1

    Nope.
    It was $699 and no one bought it. It's not $399 and no one is buying it. It's a massive failure.

  83. Re:Seriously? by sexconker · · Score: 1

    Why squeeze at all? Just cut the bag open and pour it all out (more than the machine can extract) into a glass.
    If there's some straining / dicing action happening at the neck of the bag, feel free to use a strainer or blender.

  84. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Dumbass investors saw this as a Kuerig for vegans. A new device that accomplishes the goal of selling the most amount of cheap material crap to people at a exorbitantly marked up price, with a potentially successful marketing message of a "better way".

    Somehow people bought heavily into the concept of Kuerig, even though you have had small (even single) serving coffee machines for decades and decades. But no, now you can buy a wasteful and expensive single serving cup that you drop in and there's a water tank and a pump that will eventually fail too, all for the low price of 5-10 small, simple, almost never failing, thermosiphon drip coffee maker. Oh and you get to pay tons more for your easy to use coffee cups now too! Yay!

    A lot of people seem to think their lives get better as they acquire more technology. Doesn't matter what it is. If it has a button and a screen and it does something that didn't have a screen before, its better. Now it even has the internet so it can do... even more things or something.

    TL;DR Why? Because stupidly blind and wasteful consumerism.

    It puts a smile on my face to see such an expensive shit device like this fail so hard.

    Mostly what Kurig got right is that it's actually a single serving electric kettle that makes few assumptions about what you want to pour water over/into.

    The cofee makers I'm familiar with make the mistake of assuming that you always want the same beverage (coffee, and often a single blend of coffee) and use a single hopper that may not work for otehr types of beverages at all. The also often dispense several servings at once.

    That works poorly in a shared environment like an office (or family residence) where different people like different things and people are more willing to wait their turn for the devoice than to wait for the device to finish dispensing for everyone.

  85. Re:Seriously? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    I'd buy one for $3.99 though. Surely there's $3.99 worth of parts in that thing.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  86. $5 - $8 for a glass of juice? by holophrastic · · Score: 1

    Dang, $5 for a bag of fruit that I press into juice, with or without a device, is obscene.

    Not only does $5 of fruit amount to WAY more than a single glass of juice around here, but $5 of fruit has WAY more than just juice in it. I can eat the fruit, which quite frankly is WAY better than juice alone.

    And if I want just juice, well then I don't need lovely fruit. I can get unripenned (often better for raw juice) or over-ripe (often better for sweetened juice) even cheaper.

    And if I really just want juice, $5 buys me a beautiful tropicana carton of WAY more than just one glass of juice.

  87. Re:Seriously? by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

    You make an entire pot of 10 cups of coffee in one go by putting a scoop of coffee in a paper filter, pouring in water, and turning it on. Then you pull that out and throw it away. Keurig can give you coffee in 20 seconds instead of 4 minutes.

  88. Re:Seriously? by avandesande · · Score: 1

    Anyone that cares even the slightest amount about wasting money would buy neither the juicer or the bags.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  89. Re:Seriously? by xevioso · · Score: 1

    Except I actually do eat my veggies the old fashioned way, and I use a blender to make a smoothie before work. tastes good. Good for you too.

    The selling point, or rather *a* selling point, is it's convenient. Using the manual method is not. Using a normal blender isn't either because you have to clean. It's a first world problem, sure, but it's still a problem.

    Fast food solves a first world problem too, which is that some people don't have time to cook and don't want to sit down at a restaurant. But it still solves a problem. It creates other problems too, but that's another story.

  90. Re:Seriously? by nwf · · Score: 1

    Cut one open. Is there actual fruit in there or just juice or just a puree? Seems like if you can squeeze out juice, either the fruit isn't very fresh or is already pureed.

    --
    I don't know, but it works for me.
  91. Re:Seriously? by xevioso · · Score: 1

    I'll keep my kale; you can have your shitty iceberg lettuce, thanks.

  92. I highly recommend the blender, and... by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    Don't skimp on the blender part. Also, when I make it I use rum instead of yogurt. It's heaven in a glass, and all-natural so I know it's good for me.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re: I highly recommend the blender, and... by bestweasel · · Score: 1

      Isn't that called a daiquiri?

    2. Re: I highly recommend the blender, and... by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Shhhhh...my wife thinks I'm being healthy.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  93. Re:Seriously? by postbigbang · · Score: 1

    Mmmmm. Tastes good.

    A Craigslist VitaMix does the same thing.

    Fast food involves carbs, which makes the world fat and sick. Yep, you might have to actually do something like the rest of the world.

    Use any rationalization you want: being a slacker is expensive and wasteful. Don't want to sit down in a restaurant? Use your kitchen.

    It creates more problems than it solves, including the up-thread mentioned abuses, supply chain madnesses, and the sudden loss of sanity upon believing your own bullshit story. This product was not only ill-conceived, financed by gold-diggers, but gets even stranger when they don't sell product to anyone, just the stooges that bought the mixer. There are suckers born every minute, and this story is emblematic of suckers all the way through the financing to the consumer.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  94. Re:Seriously? by Pascoea · · Score: 1

    people go to Starbucks

    Ding ding ding. We have the winning answer. People, in general, are bad with math like this. To a lot of people, spending five bucks isn't a budget impacting decision. But when you add it up over the weeks and months, it's a very substantial amount of money. It's exactly why the app and micro-payment model took off so well. Nobody in their right mind would spend $50 to play Farmville or Pokemon Go, but spending 5$ to buy seeds or a box of poke-balls? People usually don't think twice.

  95. Re:Seriously? by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

    If you want some e-fame cut open one of the bags and put it through a strainer.

    I'll bet the vast majority of the juice is in the bag in liquid form already and it just comes out slow by artificial limitations.

  96. Re: Seriously? by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1

    Who needs vitamin C anyway? Scurvy is cool!

  97. How is it a juicer? by Holi · · Score: 1

    So I have to by bags of juice to use a juicer? And people backed this scam?

    Kinda kills the idea that Silicon Valley investors are any smarter then... well anybody.

    --
    Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  98. Re:Seriously? by zugmeister · · Score: 1

    I haven't heard of internet connected irons...

    Actually, there's a use case to be made there. You're driving in to work and you get a text that your iron has been on for 45 minutes and would you like it turned off?
    Sort of related: NEVER wash your fiberglass embedded ironing board cover with your underwear. You will rue the day.

  99. Re:Seriously? by locotx · · Score: 1

    Brilliant but crappy marketing

  100. Didn't they learn anything from deskjet printers? by Ice+Station+Zebra · · Score: 2

    Make the machine cheap and sell the consumables above cost.

  101. Re:Seriously? by JohnFen · · Score: 1

    I have to agree, what exactly is the purpose of this "juicer"?

    The same purpose as the Keurig that they compare themselves to: to extract money from people who don't know any better, or from companies who want to show off how much money they can afford to burn.

  102. Re:Seriously? by JohnFen · · Score: 2

    That's a terrible use case. A better solution to that iron problem is for the iron to just turn itself off once it has sensed that nobody's moved it for 15 minutes or so.

  103. Re:Seriously? by JohnFen · · Score: 1

    The QR code on the back and the much-maligned internet connectivity ensures that when people start putting bad batches of juice in the machine, the machine won't press them, and the company gets notified that customer X's bags of veggies are past their use-by date

    So, in other words, the internet connectivity is nearly worthless.

  104. Re:Seriously? by xevioso · · Score: 1

    I think so, probably yes. About the only benefit I can see is that it checks the bag you put on the machine to see if it's past its freshness date or if it is part oa batch that has been recalled. That would be good to know before you drink the juice.

    But if you are putting out batches of veggie pulp that needs to be recalled, you have many more serious problems.

  105. Re:Seriously? by guises · · Score: 4, Insightful

    At the same time, while, on the whole, it may be cheaper to do it yourself, if you don't use your juicer a lot then it may be more expensive in the long run when you have to buy many different ingredients that don't last that long.

    No, the point is that it's $400 cheaper, with exactly the same results, if you don't buy the juicer at all. Also: No, you could use a standard juicer and throw away half your ingredients (probably much more than that), and it would still be cheaper than $5/eight ounces.

    There's a convenience cost, and for the people willing to pay it that second point is less important, but the first point is the mark of a scam - this product is unnecessary.

  106. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Keurig is awesome. It makes a passable coffee with about two seconds of work. If I want to hand-grind my coffee there's enough space to put in a pour-over cup.

  107. Re: Seriously? by thundercattt · · Score: 1

    I was thinking the same. So what they've done is extracted all the nutrients into a "concentrate" then market it as juice packets. They do realize it is now no longer a healthy product but a manufactured product.

  108. Re: Seriously? by thundercattt · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of the late night infomercials in the 90s. What would one expect to pay for the Juice-a-matic 9000? 999.99? 699.99? Not here! For one night only 7 easy payments of 19.99!! (Crowd gasps) that's right folks.

  109. Re:Seriously? by Falos · · Score: 1

    Does YOUR juicer let you Share your drink to Twitter and Instagram? Is there an APP for your luddite juicer? Are you aware that seeing something in the form of a phone icon is an amazing retard aphrodisiac? Almost strong as seeing a celebrity use it?

    I didn't fucking think so, bitch.

  110. Re:Seriously? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    I'm just saying; I'd be advocating for a pony keg of microbrew (rotating flavors) on Fridays. _Much_ better value for money. Gotta watch the Balmer curve though.

    Perhaps along with a BBQ...grilling on coals anyhow...depending on just how much they are spending on $5/half cup juice, we might make whole/half hogs (depending on office size of course). You could make chicken for the vegans and other weirdos.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  111. Re: Seriously? by thundercattt · · Score: 1

    I said the same with Keurig. I saw the cost of the machine, the pods. Bought a $10 bean grinder, a $10 French press and a bag of beans. Much better vs Keurig

  112. Re:Seriously? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    No one in an office eats fruit from a fruit basket. It just doesn't happen.

    What kind of weird office do you work in? We can't keep the damn fruit stocked enough. Hell the entire system broke down when one guy decided to get up at 3pm and shout "banana break" and that became a daily thing. Now we bring in additional fruit to supplement the fruit basked which was maxed out budget wise.

  113. Re:Seriously? by Falos · · Score: 1

    It's that thing that tried to DRM the lids and got a donut pillow grade pwning.

  114. Re: Seriously? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Fruit with rinds/peels is better. Than you know you're throwing away the parts coworkers have touched. This is tech.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  115. Re: Seriously? by sexconker · · Score: 2

    But that's not all!
    Call today and we'll take care of the first payment.
    That's right, you'll get everything you see here - the Juice-a-Matic 9000, the easy-clean removable cups with 4 colored lids for each member of the family, Dr. Cuntz's premium recipe book with dozens of delicious, healthy smoothie recipes for a better life, and the bonus coupon book with up to $500 in savings - all for just 6 easy payments of $19.99.

    But before we give you the number to call and place your order, I want to offer you all one last thing. Because we know you'll love your Juice-a-Matic 9000, and because we know your family and friends are going to love it, we're going to send you a second Juice-a-Matic 9000 to give to a friend or family member, for free. You just pay separate shipping and handling; ask your operator for details.

    Are you ready to start juicing your way to a healthier, more active lifestyle? Are you ready to lose weight and enjoy the health benefits that will come with daily use of the Juice-a-Matic 9000? Are you ready for your kids to be excited by drinking delicious, healthy fruit and vegetable smoothies? If you are, call the number on your screen now, and get ready to live your life the Juice-a-Matic way! Operators are standing by.

  116. Re:Seriously? by SeaFox · · Score: 1

    Err...why would anyone need a bag of stuff to juice?

    It is so simple (and I'm guessing more economical) to go to the grocery store and get some veggies and/or fruits and throw down a regular juicer.

    You're talking about a kitchen appliance at a time people feel the need to brew coffee one cup at a time from individually portioned filter cups at a cost of 10x just buying a normal container of ground coffee. Never underestimate the millennial's need to be lazy/feel special.

  117. Re:Seriously? by Rakarra · · Score: 1

    One must ask --- Why not just buy a carton of "fresh" juice from the many "Naked" drink companies?

    Maybe for the same reason I buy small crates of oranges at Costco and then use a little hand citrus juicer. Including cleanup time, it doesn't take any longer than two minutes, and the juice tastes noticeably better than any juice I've ever gotten from a bottle or carton.

    But I'm a very atypical person in this regard, and am almost certainly not the target audience for this sort of thing.

  118. Re:Seriously? by gnu-sucks · · Score: 1

    Are any of those any good? I have the whole manual setup right now and the results are stunning, but curious if any of the automatic ones are actually good espresso machines.

  119. Re:Seriously? by Rakarra · · Score: 1

    Properly prepared kale caesar salad is absolutely delicious. I certainly prefer it over romaine lettuce caesar, but that's good too.

  120. Re:Seriously? by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

    why no 5 minutes?

  121. Re:Seriously? by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

    and you don't need to add water if it's tied into the plumbing

  122. Re:Seriously? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

    It seems K-cups are about $15 for a pack of 24 which works out to $0.625 each. That is expensive compared to a bulk coffee maker sure, but it's cheap enough to be acceptable to many middle class people, it's almost certainly cheaper than grabbing a drink from a takeaway/cafe.

    Juicero packs are about $7 each, an order of magnitude more. That is going to be enough to put a lot of people off.

    http://www.keurig.com/beverage...

    https://www.juicero.com/the-pa...

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  123. Re:Seriously? by zugmeister · · Score: 1

    One of the problems with actually doing rather than saying is that reality makes things complicated. How does it "sense" you're done with it? What if someone's using it to heat something and it needs to remain on and immobile? Unless you could make it telepathic, having it ask you if you're done seems like a great way for it to find out.

  124. Re:Seriously? by BKX · · Score: 1

    You just sense whether or not its been tilted recently. That's what my iron does. It only takes a few seconds to heat up if it does go off. It's a pretty good iron. Glad I payed $20 for it at Walgreen's ten years ago.

  125. Re:Seriously? by lokedhs · · Score: 1
    Then you must have read the last part of the article. I quote it here for people who didn't (and I can't blame them):

    Williams, a self-proclaimed health-food evangelist, said she’d like to see the company sell packs by themselves to people who can’t afford the device. “It would be great if they offered people the opportunity to buy the packs and press them by hand,” she said. “I want juice for every man, woman and child.”

    Now, seriously? Apparently the world this person inhabits does not contain fruits, the only way to get juice is to buy them pre-packaged at 8 dollar per serving, and the only thing that stops a poor person from enjoying this is not the ludicrous price but a separate machine.

    Wow. This really exists.

  126. Re: Seriously? by Nocturna81 · · Score: 1

    Opinions differ on that: http://www.thedailymeal.com/he...

  127. Re:Seriously? by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

    The good ones from brands like Jura or Krups easily beat Keurig or Nespresso, especially if you use quality beans (which still comes out cheaper than the prepackaged cups), but they are not as good as manual espresso machines. I can taste the difference but a manual setup is too much trouble; I can barely manage a croissant and egg in the morning, so I'm not going to try being a barista, and I'll stick with the "good enough" automatic.

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  128. Re: Seriously? by Nocturna81 · · Score: 1

    Opinions differ on that: http://www.thedailymeal.com/he...

  129. Re:Seriously? by Cederic · · Score: 1

    Wait? You need texting to alert you that a 40 second process has completed?

    Maybe if it's one of the commercial office installations that takes 20kg of beans and is plumbed in, to inform the manufacturer of any service needs and re-order the beans, but for home use? Really?

  130. Re:Seriously? by Cederic · · Score: 1

    What if someone's using it to heat something and it needs to remain on and immobile?

    Then there's a 99.9% chance they're a fuckwit that needs saving from their own stupidity.

    The other 0.1% can buy a different iron.

  131. Re:Seriously? by Cederic · · Score: 1

    S&H ?

    I'm assuming that's the foreign equivalent to P&P (packaging/packing/parcel and postage/posting).

    As you see, P&P is a very flexible term.

  132. Re:Seriously? by dfm3 · · Score: 1

    Mostly what Kurig got right is that it's actually a single serving electric kettle that makes few assumptions about what you want to pour water over/into.

    The cofee makers I'm familiar with make the mistake of assuming that you always want the same beverage (coffee, and often a single blend of coffee) and use a single hopper that may not work for otehr types of beverages at all. The also often dispense several servings at once.

    That works poorly in a shared environment like an office (or family residence) where different people like different things and people are more willing to wait their turn for the devoice than to wait for the device to finish dispensing for everyone.

    That's true of the more expensive Keurig devices, but the entry level ones I've seen used most often in offices are actually very basic, only brew one way, and are actually more work and time than simply using a small four-cup drip coffeemaker. The one in our office, you have to pour in a single serving of water (it doesn't have a large reservoir like the fancier ones do) then insert the cup and fold over the top, and hit the brew button and wait for it to warm up. In the time it takes to brew two cups you could have made two pots of "4 cups" and split that between 3-4 people, or one 10-cup pot and split it between everyone.

    Heck, for the cost of one of the more expensive Keurig machines (not to mention the K-cups) you can buy a really cheap steam espresso machine that makes coffee the way you want it. For $100-200 you can easily find something used that's not as top-of-the-line as something you'd see at a coffee shop, but that still makes a great cup of coffee and even steams milk. Sure, it can be a lot of work, but I can prepare just about any beverage imaginable from a simple americano (espresso diluted with hot water until it's drop coffee strength) to cappuccinos and mochas if I'm so inclined. Buy some syrups and a can of whipped cream and you can make up a beverage that rivals just about anything a coffee shop would sell but at a fraction of the cost.

    I suppose convenience is a factor, though. At work my compromise (because I can't stand the crappy stuff that comes in K-cups) is to fill a reusable filter with my favorite grind. The filter cost about $10 and the coffee can be whatever I want to use, but almost everybody else still insists on using the disposable cups... because they don't like to have to rinse out the used grounds from the filter.

  133. Re:Seriously? by Maritz · · Score: 1

    Never underestimate the millennial's need to be lazy/feel special.

    I've only met a few people with these and none were 'millenials'. I dare say you see the dark hand of the millenial in all things..? lol.

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  134. Re:Seriously? by dingleberrie · · Score: 1

    I feel the need to restate this in different ways to make it sink in.
    A dollar per oz.
    1 lb = $16.
    1 kg = $35.

    For packaged vegetable juice.

  135. Re: Seriously? by dcw3 · · Score: 1
    --
    Just another day in Paradise
  136. Re:Seriously? by dcw3 · · Score: 1

    BUT, now you have the power to lift your TWO Teslas!

    I'd rather have them fondled.

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
  137. Re: Seriously? by reanjr · · Score: 1

    Ahhh, but there is a distinction between a nutritionally healthy product and a health food product. One is defined by science and physiology, the other is defined by how it appears when you post about your consumption on Facebook.

  138. Re:Seriously? by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

    Problem was the name. Juicero. Should have come up with another bullshit german name because dumb people think anything german is great. Even german shaving blades (if you've been watching TV lately). As if. Maybe Strasse Juicer! Just stick your S bag into the machine, walla! Instant juice you don't have to work for. It's only $7 that can replace a whole $10 meal! (Show a very attractive ripped woman in a bikini with a big smile, sparkle on her tooth) You'll even lose weight! Buy it today!

    Fine print - this product hasn't been evaluated for weight loss nor a viable meal replacement.

  139. Re:Seriously? by Obfiscator · · Score: 1

    That's good. I spend a lot of time in stores reading labels of juices, and most of them use a base of apple, pear, orange, or white grape juice, with just a small amount of other fruit juices to slightly change the flavor.

    Are there any scientific studies out there which show that orange, apple, pear, or white grape juice are actually healthier for you than drinking sugar water with a multi-vitamin? I've seen some articles which say that fructose is not the preferred energy source for either the muscles or brain, and says it behaves more like fat in the body than the other simple sugars (glucose and sucrose). So I'm not convinced 200 calories of orange juice is better for your body than 200 calories of Coca-Cola. One cup of orange juice (248 grams) is about 100 calories, while 330 mL of Coke (give or take 330 grams) is 140 calories, which means the same glass of either one gives you about the same number of calories.

    --
    "Nothing shocks me. I'm a scientist." -Indiana Jones
  140. Re:Seriously? by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

    To my mind this implies they are trying to monetize the data they get from the internet-connected juicer which scans the QR on the bag and phones home.

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
  141. Re:Seriously? by houghi · · Score: 1

    Marketing. People buy water in a bottle that they can get at 1/10 and more of the price at home.

    "But my water from the tap is hard/soft/does not taste nice" Unless you live in Flint, you have fallen for the marketing and making excuses for the companies that sold you into it.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  142. Re:Seriously? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    Your method is not profit filled. His is dripping with profits to be squeezed from the really stupid people of the world.
    That is why investors saw it as a fantastic idea... Extremely high profit margins by fleecing the stupid.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  143. Re: Seriously? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    But eating is passe'. The hip kids drink all their foods.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  144. Re: Seriously? by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

    Yes, because Scurvy is a real problem in the US.

  145. Re:Seriously? by JohnFen · · Score: 1

    What if someone's using it to heat something and it needs to remain on and immobile? Unless you could make it telepathic, having it ask you if you're done seems like a great way for it to find out.

    No, it really doesn't. If you want to cover use cases of people using the iron for things other than ironing, then simply provide an override switch to disable the timeout.

    I would note, as someone else has, that this auto-off feature has been a pretty standard thing on irons for years now. Making things internet connected comes with costs for the user. If the benefit does not outweigh those costs, then it's a bad idea. With an iron, it's hard to see what the benefit actually is.

    Much like with the juicer.

  146. Re:Seriously? by JohnFen · · Score: 1

    Properly prepared kale caesar salad is absolutely delicious.

    I don't believe you. I find kale to be the exact opposite of "delicious" no matter how its been prepared. Not as nasty as cilantro, but in the ballpark.

  147. Re:Seriously? by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

    The Keurig is perfect for some situations.
    I have older parents, shaky hands, etc. They had problems brewing with a regular one cup, getting the grounds out without making a mess, etc.
    If they need coffee, they just pop the single serve cup in and go.

  148. Re:Seriously? by xession · · Score: 1

    That is a fantastic scenario for where a Kuerig can be useful. People of all walks need different aids to help them function in a day. But in general, most people do not need the "convenience" of Kuerig like devices. I can dump old grouds, fill up a coffee pot with water, dump it in the machine, throw in a new filter and new grounds all in under a minute and a half (I know this from heating up the last cup out of the coffee pot taking around 1m30s in the microwave). That doesn't account for other conveniences a Kuerig might provide but it really is typically unnecessary for the expense of the machine price and the continued cost to maintain use of the machine. For those without a huge everyday budget, it becomes pretty damn inconvenient for how convenient it is supposed to be.

  149. Re: Seriously? by lalesk2001 · · Score: 1

    Uh, your juicer obviously isn't internet connected, duh. How else can you use their IoT app to start the juicer, automatically request shipments for more overpriced veggie/fruit bags (with DRM in the future I'm sure, ( Kuerig anyone?), and make needless automated social media posts about your healthy juicing/nutrition with embedded advertisements. Oh boy.

    I'm sure they also have plans to link with a select for exercise apps/smartwatch apps to import your juice bag data to track your diet and make you feel like you're a super hero.

    I only use SuperFruit Smoothie i dont have time to prepare my own smoothie in a blender.

  150. Re:Seriously? by retchdog · · Score: 1

    idk, $5 a week is roughly $260 a year (not that many people actually go to starbucks every single day). if that's a "very substantial amount of money," you're kinda fucked anyway.

    --
    "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
  151. Re:Seriously? by Pascoea · · Score: 1

    "The average Starbucks customer visits the store 6 times per month while a loyal 20% of customers go to the stores 16 times per month" source So the "average" people are spending $360/year, the "loyal customers" are spending $960. At what point does it become a substantial amount of money? $360 covers my car and its insurance for a month, that sounds pretty substantial to me.

  152. Re:Seriously? by retchdog · · Score: 1

    comparing $360/year with $360/month is fucking stupid.

    anyway, coffee is enjoyable and that's worth something. unless you wear rags and survive on nothing but powdered milk and potatoes out of pure stoic idealism, i really don't see your point.

    --
    "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
  153. Re:Seriously? by Pascoea · · Score: 1

    comparing $360/year with $360/month is fucking stupid.

    Yeah, you're right, I'll try something simpler. $360 will cover my water bill for the year. That sounds pretty substantial to me. (Is that easier for you to process, dick?)

    anyway, coffee is enjoyable and that's worth something.

    Couldn't agree more. If you like your $5 coffee, go drink your $5 coffee. More power to you. My point was that people are bad at comprehending how much money is spent in agregate when it is spent in small increments. But I feel as though you are smart enough to understand that, and are just here to argue, so good day to you.

  154. Re:Seriously? by retchdog · · Score: 1

    i would have once agreed with you, but nowadays i think it's more likely the opposite: that people are irrationally averse to spending money as a lump-sum in advance.

    but you are right, this is an increasingly pointless discussion. cheers.

    --
    "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky