Slashdot Mirror


India Tech Giant Warns Trump's 'Radical Shift' to Hurt Industry (bloomberg.com)

The vice chairman at Tech Mahindra, one of India's largest technology services companies warned that U.S. President Donald Trump's visa policies will damage the industry as his company reported weak earnings and his stock fell the most in almost two years. From a report: Tech Mahindra said net income was 5.9 billion rupees ($91 million) in the fourth quarter, compared with the average analyst estimate of 7.8 billion, according to estimates compiled by Bloomberg. The U.S. is tightening the criteria for visa programs that Tech Mahindra and other outsourcing companies use to bring skilled foreign workers into the country. Trump and other politicians have criticized the programs for hurting American workers and allowing companies to use cheaper employees from abroad. Tech services companies, including Cognizant Technology Solutions, have been cutting positions in India. Some workers have blamed Trump for prompting the job losses and exacerbating problems in the industry.

153 of 295 comments (clear)

  1. Hm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Omg Tech Mahindra. We only have problems with them.

    1. Re:Hm by slickwillie · · Score: 2

      Is this the company the British Airways outsourced to?

    2. Re: Hm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is excellent as nd one of the main reasons I voted for President Trump.

      Every Rupee they are not making, really is now a dollar for an American IT specialist. I have no pity at all with Indians, I am not going to take a backseat because of some Indian kid in New Delhi.

      America First, Thank you Mr. President!

  2. This is the best news I've heard all day! by HanzoSpam · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Good riddance!

    --

    Progressivism: Parasites helping parasites to help themselves - to other people's stuff.
    1. Re:This is the best news I've heard all day! by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Informative

      [sig] Progressivism: Parasites helping parasites to help themselves - to other people's stuff.

      The lying meme plutocrats use to get even plutoier.

    2. Re: This is the best news I've heard all day! by unixisc · · Score: 2

      They think they have a lock on the Hispanic vote, which is why they support illegal immigration, which is mainly from Latin America.

      In the case of Indians, it's not so clean, particularly since Liberals have made common cause w/ Muslims everywhere, and a good percentage of the Hindu immigrant population is uncomfortable enough w/ that to go Republican, despite the GOP's stand on H1B visas.

    3. Re:This is the best news I've heard all day! by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      You seriously think that progressive politics are antithetical to plutocratic rule or to the aims of the richest who run this country?

      You poor, poor innocent little child. Shit who am I kidding, I envy your lack of cynicism and blind devotion. It would make my life so much simpler.

      The way I see it progressive's aims are orthagonal to plutocratic rule. This is not mere happenstance or coincidence, it is by design. Plutocrats crafted that ideology (and others) intentionally for you to latch onto. Progressivism, as currently practiced and fomented by its adherents in this country, is a perversion of beneficial collectivism, just as republican politics are a subversion of the positive characteristics of individualism. Depending on which way you swing on the collectivism/individualism spectrum, one will appeal to you more. Both are focus-group-honed to razor sharpness and aimed at ideologically cuckolding the unwary. You raise their ideas instead of your own. In return you get dead children on the ground, like so many eggs kicked out of the nest.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
  3. Upset you can't scam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    American companies with incompetent contractors any longer?

    1. Re: Upset you can't scam... by computational+super · · Score: 1

      Too bad my day job is fixing Infosys developed software

      Even that wouldn't necessarily bother me if anybody had anything close to reasonable expectations about that sort of work. I spent a few years (a few years ago) trying to fix an unmaintainable mess put together by an even worse Indian offshorer than Infosys. The constant expectation was that, since there was code that was already written, and the code sort of worked, that fixing the "bugs" should take maybe an hour or two hour each to fix.

      --
      Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
    2. Re: Upset you can't scam... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      It's an old question: How do you deal with a moron for a client? I say: 'Rape them, like the chumps that they are.'

      They are too clueless to recognize 'good work', so just maximize short term revenue.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    3. Re: Upset you can't scam... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      By commenting out the lines that generated errors.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  4. Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Employment by foreign workers is a privilege, not an entitlement.

    1. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not an entitlement, a violation of citizens.

    2. Re: Good by rholtzjr · · Score: 2

      No it was our management and executives who blocked us from hiring who we wanted.

  5. Yaay!!! Go Trump! by JustNiz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Finally, a president that actually demonstrates care about US workers, and also actually follows through on at least some of their campaign promises.

    1. Re:Yaay!!! Go Trump! by JustNiz · · Score: 2

      Of course. I also read this article. Did you?

    2. Re:Yaay!!! Go Trump! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3

      The liberal news that puts a negative slant on everything Trump does? The one that writes stories about Trump not holding his wife's hand, even though Clinton and Kennedy actively cheated on their wives while President? That news?

      Yes, I do. I don't put much stock into it, frankly. For all the "evidence" that everyone in Trump's organization is Russian, a whole lot of nothing has been done about it. Telling to say the least.

    3. Re:Yaay!!! Go Trump! by JustNiz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >> Nothing he does will save auto industry jobs, coal industry jobs, or any other kind of job.

      Seems obvious to me from this and many other similar articles that he's already saving many US software developer jobs. Frankly thats all I care about.

    4. Re:Yaay!!! Go Trump! by houstonbofh · · Score: 3, Informative

      Prior to the visa changes there was a significant economic incentive to fire local IT workers and replace them with significantly lower paid immigrant workers. That incentive is now gone. This will save jobs.
      As for the CAFE standards, they are being abused now. Truck don't count. So now many luxury cars are trucks and suvs... But for some reason we do not export a lot of trucks...

    5. Re:Yaay!!! Go Trump! by CAOgdin · · Score: 1

      You're making the assumption that he acts because of what's "Good for the Country," instead of trying to drive wages down across the board so his 1% friends can make MORE money...which they'll make sure he gets some of, too. It's just that this blatant importing of inferior talent is undermining the very businesses of those plutocrats. Methinks you give him credit for something he doesn't even understand!

    6. Re:Yaay!!! Go Trump! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah I do read the news. It mostly consists of liberal whining. Liberal whining is usually a good sign the country is actually trying to act in it's own best interests. So - I'll continue to read the news, and enjoy every word of it!

    7. Re:Yaay!!! Go Trump! by GLMDesigns · · Score: 2

      Got it. So you're anti-immigrant then as immigrants reduce the value of labor. (More supply of labor leads to a lower price for labor.)

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    8. Re:Yaay!!! Go Trump! by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      As in Betsy DeVos destroying education.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    9. Re:Yaay!!! Go Trump! by ganjadude · · Score: 3, Insightful

      no one said anything related to what you are crying about. maybe instead of reading what someone says and ignoring it so you can complain. maybe actually, listen?

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    10. Re:Yaay!!! Go Trump! by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      methinks you have an agenda to push and are trying to turn a positive into a negative because of that agenda

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    11. Re:Yaay!!! Go Trump! by HornWumpus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This will also help less connected companies hire real, PhD level people, the quota not being filled with infosys 'air thieves'.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    12. Re:Yaay!!! Go Trump! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A Presidents number one job is to make sure the country is the main beneficiary of any bilateral or multi-lateral agreements with foreign countries. Keeping in mind that it is corporate lobbiest who write the countries trade agreements and expect them to be rubber stamped by the government. Why buy all the Senator, Judges, and the President if they are not going to do what they are told to do? And now they have to some how get around a President they don't own. But the President doesn't really have the power to dictate or enforce any agreements. It's the inept morons in the legislative branch who do whatever their paymasters want them to do.

      The biggest mystery is how Trump got elected in the first place. He defeated all the democrats, republicans, independents, and major media corporations he ran against. All the money and political power wielded by his adversaries ended up counting for nothing. And instead of the losers stepping back and reevaluating their policies and vision for the future are still using all their considerable resources to fight every single thing Trump does. And so far their actions are hurting the country more than Trump and they still have little to show for any of their petulant behavior. Trump won because voters hated his adversaries supporters more than they hated him. They didn't vote for Trump they voted to make sure Clinton supporters didn't win. If you are going to stage a political protest you best make sure you don't end up looking like a deranged mob because a lot of people will automatically decide to make sure those making assess out of themselves don't get what they want. (The Berklistan protesters are a prime example)
      Those who think if they just get rid of Trump everything will go back to normal and they are 100% wrong. His adversaries are pursuing a scorched earth campaign with the full support of every major media outlet in the country. We may have a free press but that doesn't automatically equate to a fair press anymore than free trade equates to fair trade. Those leading the witch hunt today are going to find themselves the target of the same tactics when it is their time to occupy the top level of government.

      I am not a Trump supporter but a lot of accusations and incriminations about his relationships and contacts with the Russians is a stunning example of the ludicrous attacks against himself, his staff, and others who are close to him. And harping about contacts before he even ran for President in an effort to muddy the waters with inane bullshit shows just how far the free press has fallen. If you need an example of sketchy relationships between high power US government officials and foreign government officials I have three words for you. The Clinton Foundation. Enough said.

      And now the press is harping on Trump's staff working to setup a back channel communication to the Russian government. This practice of creating a means of communicating, even with your enemies, has been SOP since the founding of the country. These back channels provide a means where countries can communicate with each other unofficially and outside of any standing public policies. Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush, and Obama all had a back channel communications with Iran. With the state of Iran's antagonistic and hostile rhetoric towards the US that government needs to keep any communications it has with the US deniable but they do recognize the need to communicate with US officials occasionally.

      And another positive change initiated by Trump is the leader of Germany finally announcing that Europe needs to start taking care of themselves with a message that they cannot rely on the US. It's about fucking time someone in Europe realized they might need to stop free loading and expecting the US to automatically endorse every policy position of the US. Keep in mind it was a necessary first step but like most European announces nothing much will really change except for some countries to start writing checks for the services provided by NATO. Europe has been talking about creating

    13. Re:Yaay!!! Go Trump! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      CAFE isn't about emissions. When you want to post an irrelevant, off topic rant, try to at least make sense.

    14. Re:Yaay!!! Go Trump! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Seems obvious to me from this and many other similar articles that he's already saving many US software developer jobs. Frankly thats all I care about.

      Nope. They'll just be outsourced instead of H1B'd.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    15. Re:Yaay!!! Go Trump! by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2

      Seriously does anyone believe anything Trump says? Some of what he says is basically nonsense. For example, he promised to bring back coal mining jobs. So how does he plan to do that? While people would like to blame environmental regulations on the downtrend in coal, the most obvious reasons have nothing to do with regulations. Gas and oil are cheaper than coal as coal is much more labor intensive to obtain. Also fewer and fewer industries are using coal and currently the coal supply far exceeds demand. The situation for coal is that there is way more supply than demand and the alternatives like oil are cheaper. Removing regulations would do little to reverse these trends. Yet somehow he's going to bring back these jobs.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    16. Re:Yaay!!! Go Trump! by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      As for the CAFE standards, they are being abused now. Truck don't count. So now many luxury cars are trucks and suvs... But for some reason we do not export a lot of trucks...

      The majority of luxury cars are actually still cars. Only the largest SUVs are still classed as light trucks. And CAFE does not completely ignore light trucks, as many people assume. They are also restricted by CAFE, although not nearly as much. And finally, they have to hit a combined target of 35 mpg, meaning cars and light trucks. Without higher-octane fuel they can only do so much with cars, so they're having to take some of the emissions out of the pickups as well. That's why for example Ford went with an aluminum body for the F-150; it's a high-volume vehicle and any significant improvement in mileage there makes a big difference in their combined mileage. Of course, there's been many calls for Trump to delay CAFE — not to change the targets, only change when the automakers actually have to hit them. But California is not going to change its standards, so the automakers are still going to have to develop the vehicles and technologies necessary to meet CAFE whether they're required to sell them in the three-quarters of the country that doesn't follow California's emissions standards. California is by far the largest automotive market in America no matter how you measure it...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    17. Re:Yaay!!! Go Trump! by benjfowler · · Score: 1

      That's because of one very important fact:

      "You come at the king, you better not miss."

      The people getting ready to clean up this mess are very carefully getting their ducks in a row, because they really don't want to miss. That will take some time.

    18. Re:Yaay!!! Go Trump! by JustNiz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >> Seriously does anyone believe anything Trump says?

      He said he was going to end H1B abuse. Given giant outsourcing companies like Tech Mahindra are sounding the alarm bells and directly blaming Trump after taking about a 33% hit on their net profits I can't see how you could make any rational argument that he's actually NOT following through on what he said he would.

      Also WTF does coal have to do with this? but I'll respond since you bought it up. here's a direct quote from HIllary Clinton during the March 13 CNN Town Hall:
      "....we're going to put a lot of coal miners and coal companies out of business, right?"

      BTW congratulations on choosing a clearly appropriate user name.

    19. Re:Yaay!!! Go Trump! by rholtzjr · · Score: 1

      There it is. I was waiting for the typical response from the Intolerables.

    20. Re:Yaay!!! Go Trump! by rholtzjr · · Score: 1

      Those were jobs already on there way out. In other words, who cares. If they outsource the entire Silicon Valley it would be a boon to the US and maybe wake up the rest of California.

    21. Re:Yaay!!! Go Trump! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Those were jobs already on there way out.

      Yes, that's what I said. Thanks.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    22. Re:Yaay!!! Go Trump! by JustNiz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ...or... they actually have nothing.

    23. Re:Yaay!!! Go Trump! by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      You have to go to the type 2 diabetes demographic? Wow scraping the barrel there much?

    24. Re:Yaay!!! Go Trump! by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      Far more unlikely, but even if true its far more likely to at least include some American workers.

    25. Re: Yaay!!! Go Trump! by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      So they're plotting some type of coup? Just as you say, they better hope they succeed.

      Of course, a judicial coup might well lead to a military or poplar counter-coup. Any of you who think a civil war would be just a swell idea ought to read Bao Ninh's fine book "The Sorrow of War". We *really* don't want a civil war in America.

      Maybe you baizou could just try accepting democracy for a while?

    26. Re: Yaay!!! Go Trump! by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      Complete offshoring has a reputationâ for miserable failure.

      But hey, if they want to brazenly fuck over their countrymen for a buck, why not just nationalize their sorry excuse for a company? Of course the erstwhile owners of these companies will be free to go to India and start a new company there. Under Indian laws and regulations. And without the capital they stole from American workers.

    27. Re:Yaay!!! Go Trump! by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Yeah that's not true at all. Extracting coal is cheap, very cheap. It's the regulations that have caused coal mining to become expensive and push people out of that work. Let me give you an example. Under the Obama administration, they tightened regulations so much that coal mines in Canada were being shut down because markets dried up. Now under Trump without those regulations, those mines are now re-opening and that's on top of the fact that they have provincial and federal government anti-coal stances in Canada.

      Coal is still a profitable industry, as long as regulations don't drive the cost through the roof. Another example from Canada, in Alberta they used mainly coal for generating electricity. Lots of coal, lots of areas of the province with sparse populations far away from everyone else. This means they didn't have to place high voltage transmission lines. So they voted in the NDP and what happened? They went anti-coal, those power plants are now shutting down. They have to build new transmission lines to remote communities to keep them powered as well. The price of electricity went from $80/mo 4 years ago to $230/mo this year because of it. $160 of that $230 was transmission costs.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    28. Re:Yaay!!! Go Trump! by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      > Coal is still a profitable industry, as long as regulations don't drive the cost through the roof.

      It was profitable to the mine owners. To the health of the public, and to the health of the workers, the cost was very high. We're seeing the effects of poor environmental and miner safety regulation in China, just as we used to see it in the USA. And because coal is a limited fossil fuel, slowing its consumption is actually preserving its availability for the next few generations. While US coal reserves are quite large, the amount of safely, easily minable coal is not: this is a critical factor in the increasing cost of coal.

    29. Re:Yaay!!! Go Trump! by penandpaper · · Score: 1

      The liberal news that puts a negative slant on everything Trump does? The one that writes stories about Trump not holding his wife's hand, even though Clinton and Kennedy actively cheated on their wives while President? That news?

      Yes, I do. I don't put much stock into it, frankly. For all the "evidence" that everyone in Trump's organization is Russian, a whole lot of nothing has been done about it. Telling to say the least.

      Slow down there A.C. you also forgot about a complete rejection of journalistic ethics when reporting anything Trump such as an abandonment of the Goldwater rule and narrative over facts or just making up facts ("we have no evidence for this claim but will still claim it") and using cherry picked experts to support that narrative or made up fact. Because only CNN can look at leaked classified material, trust us don't read what was leaked.

      Or not even doing the basic job of journalism by actually looking for people that you make assumptions about. Looking at you Van Jones with your "white lash" didn't even bother to look into who a Trump supporter was until after the election and his claim of "white lash". Only after he made a fool of himself he found the mythical unicorn like creature, the non-racist Trump supporter. He found a family that he was wrongly stereotyping and put them on parade in a dog and pony show to congratulate himself on doing journalist work and to show off the unicorn of modern politics to other believers of his faith.

    30. Re:Yaay!!! Go Trump! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Trump said he was going to stop abuse... It remains to be seen if he will stop abuse, or just all H1B, or push tech jobs out of the US. It's too early to tell.

      "....we're going to put a lot of coal miners and coal companies out of business, right?"

      Yes, in the context of "we are going to stop these industries outsourcing their costs, but also do something to help the people they employed". Nice selective quoting there.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    31. Re:Yaay!!! Go Trump! by lactose99 · · Score: 1

      "So long as I got mine the other fuckheads can suffer...."

      The New New Colossus

      --
      Fully licensed blockchain psychiatrist
    32. Re: Yaay!!! Go Trump! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      But hey, if they want to brazenly fuck over their countrymen for a buck, why not just nationalize their sorry excuse for a company?

      Were you trying to advocate communism here? I mean sure, I'm with you, comrade.

      If they were shit enough to use H1Bs where they could have found Americans to do the job, they'll be shit enough to outsource.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    33. Re:Yaay!!! Go Trump! by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      That whole everyone should care about me thing... how's that working out for you?

    34. Re:Yaay!!! Go Trump! by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      The top three vehicles sold in the US are full sized pickup trucks. Then 2 suvs. You have to get to number 5 before you get the first car, a Camry. And Truck have less impact on CAFE then cars, so the do bend the rules. And hence, the $70k pickups! http://online.wsj.com/mdc/publ...

    35. Re:Yaay!!! Go Trump! by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      You could do what we do here in Canada. We just take the entire mountain apart, works well and you get the RE's and other minerals and metals to boot. Usually iron and titanium, sometimes bauxite and uranium. Then when we're all done we turn the lowland area into a town.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    36. Re:Yaay!!! Go Trump! by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      Canada is not as densely populated, nor as energy hungry per capita, as the USA. The result is that the pollution from careless coal use is more of an issue here, and needs considerable regulation to prevent much higher casualty rates.

    37. Re:Yaay!!! Go Trump! by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      He said he was going to end H1B abuse. Given giant outsourcing companies like Tech Mahindra are sounding the alarm bells and directly blaming Trump after taking about a 33% hit on their net profits I can't see how you could make any rational argument that he's actually NOT following through on what he said he would.

      And how would that bring back coal jobs? I don't see many people from Tech Mahindra working in a coal mine.

      Also WTF does coal have to do with this?

      You mean as an example of Trump making promises that he can't deliver and why people shouldn't believe anything he says?

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    38. Re:Yaay!!! Go Trump! by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Why the fuck would you not mine coal if there is a market for it and if you can sell something back to China why not?

      Did you miss the part about cost? If it's cheaper to buy oil than coal, why would you buy coal? Do you think China would not buy cheaper Middle Eastern oil as opposed to more expensive American coal? Also China would never buy American coal as China has a large supply of coal themselves.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    39. Re:Yaay!!! Go Trump! by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Yeah that's not true at all. Extracting coal is cheap, very cheap.

      That's not what I said. I said oil and gas are cheaper.

      Let me give you an example. Under the Obama administration, they tightened regulations so much that coal mines in Canada were being shut down because markets dried up. Now under Trump without those regulations, those mines are now re-opening and that's on top of the fact that they have provincial and federal government anti-coal stances in Canada.

      And the prices of oil and gas being lower had nothing to do with that?

      Another example from Canada, in Alberta they used mainly coal for generating electricity

      And that's realistically the only market left. Here are all the markets that used to use coal: homes, businesses, trains, power plants. Which market is left: power plants.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    40. Re:Yaay!!! Go Trump! by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      > You mean as an example of Trump making promises that he can't deliver and why people shouldn't believe anything he says? ...and yet your comment is even attached to an article directly showing that how Trump HAS delivered.
      What it actually is, is another example of how all you snowflakes will even sink to "alternative facts" and obviously false generalizations to continue your retarded smear campaign against the President because you're all STILL so butt-hurt that Hillary lost.

  6. I despise Trump but... by ilsaloving · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I despise Trump with a passion, but I can't argue with this one.

    The visa program has served no purpose other than to cause North American wages for tech workers to stagnate because companies could simply bring someone over for cheap. There have been more than plenty of stories of companies inventing positions that exactly matched the resumes of offshore works *just* so they couldn't be filled by local people.

    There has *never* been a shortage of qualified talent in the west. At least, there hadn't been. There may well be so now, since the shenanigans North American companies have been playing have driven candidates right out of the field.

    1. Re:I despise Trump but... by houstonbofh · · Score: 2

      There is no shortage if you want to pay them. They is a big shortage if you want to pay $25k a year...

    2. Re:I despise Trump but... by nctritech · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This video is always relevant, more so in the way they discuss avoiding employing American workers than PERM in specific: PERM Fake Job Ads defraud Americans to secure green cards

    3. Re:I despise Trump but... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Before you scoff, there is legitimate research in AI to write their own software to solve problems.

      Paint me skeptical because these are pattern matching systems we have. They don't "think" things through. You can get maybe 80% right using such, but manually cleaning up the 20% will be a bear.

      We already have RAD tech that can get you 80% pretty quick. The bottleneck is always the last 20%.

    4. Re:I despise Trump but... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I despise Trump with a passion, but I can't argue with this one.

      Can we mash Trump up into a bunch of little Trumplettes and keep the few we like and toss the rest?

    5. Re:I despise Trump but... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      ... since the shenanigans North American companies have been playing have driven candidates right out of the field.

      But we gotta fix that before we throw out the baby.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    6. Re:I despise Trump but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No. We don't. If they need to, these North American companies can find a way to teach/train/qualify North American residents.

    7. Re:I despise Trump but... by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

      Like someone else said... even a broken clock is right twice a day.

  7. Thank you Trump! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Good riddance you underpaid cockroaches! Stop stealing jobs that you can't do without tons of hand holding!

    1. Re: Thank you Trump! by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      Baizou fact #356: horribly overpaid, subhuman cockroaches built the internet.

  8. This is awesome... by ckatko · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...Slashdotters don't know what to hate more. Cheap IT outsourcing of entire departments through abuse of the VISA program, or, Trump.

    1. Re:This is awesome... by iMadeGhostzilla · · Score: 1

      I think in this case the choice for most is clear.

    2. Re:This is awesome... by houstonbofh · · Score: 2

      Some of the best movies have no good guy. Payback... Last Man Standing... Trump vs Tech Mahindra... :)

    3. Re:This is awesome... by rholtzjr · · Score: 1

      No contest on this one. H1B is broken and wide open for rampant abuse.

    4. Re:This is awesome... by ckatko · · Score: 1

      Wait... did you just imply Trump is some kind of anti-hero badass out for revenge?

      p.s. Payback is an amazing movie.

    5. Re:This is awesome... by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Hubba hubba! ;)

  9. Woo-hoo! Go Trump! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A study after the dot com bust predicated that the IT industry will have a shortage of 1M skilled workers in 2030 from baby boomers retiring and foreign workers going home. Nature is taking care of the baby boomers. Trump is getting rid of foreign workers. Now is a good time to be in IT.

    1. Re:Woo-hoo! Go Trump! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

      Dude, you are old and in IT. YOU will be screwed. It doesn't matter how good you are or your experience.

      If the IT industry has a 1.5M+ shortage of skilled IT workers (as expected in recent studies), they're not going to care about how old I am. The construction trades are already experiencing a shortage in skilled trade workers because kids are going to college, American workers are aging out of the workforce and foreign workers are going home. If Trump ever signs a $1T infrastructure bill, most of those "shovel ready" jobs won't start due to a lack of construction workers.

    2. Re: Woo-hoo! Go Trump! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      You get so excited about creimer... How do you clean the jizz off your keyboard when you're done? Oh... I see - you don't clean it off.

      Studies do show that the average keyboard is two to three times dirtier than a toilet.

    3. Re: Woo-hoo! Go Trump! by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure it has nothing to do with obsession. If you have been around slashdot for a while you will know about what he's saying. It's more like feeding him his own poison.

  10. Is Donald Trump Michael J Fox in disguise? by TimothyHollins · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Some workers have blamed Trump for prompting the job losses and exacerbating problems in the industry.

    How exactly can Trump be responsible for the job losses from outsourcing to India? Does he own a DeLorean? As far as I know he has had nothing at all to do with the instigation of H1Bs, though I'm sure he has used them on occasion.

    Is this a case of "let's blame Trump for the bad weather"?

    1. Re:Is Donald Trump Michael J Fox in disguise? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Like the Republicans blaming Obama for the government bail out even through George W. signed the legislation into law prior to Obama being sworn into office.

    2. Re: Is Donald Trump Michael J Fox in disguise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Who was the junior senator from Illinois at the time and how did he vote on the bankster bailout?

      Both the R team and the D team were wrong.

    3. Re:Is Donald Trump Michael J Fox in disguise? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      And so I assume that Obama wished it was never signed into law? That he spoke out against it?

      Your assumption is wrong.

      Are you just that stupid or is it deliberate?

      This assumption is also wrong.

    4. Re:Is Donald Trump Michael J Fox in disguise? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

      Are you agreeing that Trump isn't to blame?

      Under a normal administration, most policies don't become reality until the following year after transferring power from the previous administration. Nothing is normal about Trump or his administration. It's a bit early to assign blame. Wait a few months.

    5. Re: Is Donald Trump Michael J Fox in disguise? by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      Duuuuuude, muh FACTS! The New York Izvestia and the Washington Pravda said it's true, so I know it's a FACT!

  11. Oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...Poor company that make money off if the backs of others.

  12. ...bring DKILLED foreign workers into the country by CAOgdin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! ...

    Sorry, I just couldn't help myself. They can't interview customers, they can't write a report, they're incompetent at writing a spec, and they lack basic programming skills. But they're CHEAP! (And, I've never seen a client who found them less expensive on an overall-project-wide effort. Only bean counters love 'em.)

  13. Forgot the word HIS by scsirob · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The headline is incorrect. This Indian VP dude is afraid it will hurt HIS industry, not THE industry.

    --
    To Terminate, or not to Terminate, that's the question - SCSIROB
    1. Re:Forgot the word HIS by swillden · · Score: 1

      The headline is incorrect. This Indian VP dude is afraid it will hurt HIS industry, not THE industry.

      He's speaking to his investors. To him and to them, his industry IS the industry. Why would he be talking about some other industry, of interest only to other people elsewhere in the world?

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  14. I haven't seen any real action on Trump's part by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    he's made some pronouncements, but so far just words. Talk to me when some legislation is being voted on. Or hell when he's rescinded Obama's 2014 executive order allowing H1-B spouses to work in the country. I noticed a _lot_ more female tech workers after that... And it got through while the economy was (and is) still crap. So far Trump is all populist talk and Goldman Sachs action.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I haven't seen any real action on Trump's part by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      he's made some pronouncements, but so far just words. Talk to me when some legislation is being voted on.

      The prez does have some discretion over how visas are handed out (it is the "executive" branch, after all), and he's issued instructions to better scrutinize applications from co's who appear to hoard low-pay visas. How it actually plays out has yet to be seen. But it's got big-box outsourcers sweating.

  15. ORLY? by SeaFox · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Tech services companies, including Cognizant Technology Solutions, have been cutting positions in India. Some workers have blamed Trump for prompting the job losses and exacerbating problems in the industry.

    I'm sure they regret voting for him in the last election now.
    Oh wait...

    Why would these people assume a foreign president has their best interests at heart again? If they want to get angry about unemployment, it should be at the people actually responsible for their corner of the world.

    1. Re:ORLY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why would these people assume a foreign president has their best interests at heart again?

      Because western leaders have been choosing foreigners and big international financiers and rootless cosmopolitan elites over their own countrymen for a long time.

    2. Re:ORLY? by swillden · · Score: 1

      Why would these people assume a foreign president has their best interests at heart again?

      Why would you think they would assume anything of the sort. You have a VP of an Indian company, talking to his investors and other people in the Indian IT industry, warning them that Trump's changes may negatively impact their industry. There's no indication of any assumption that Trump should be watching out for them, just a warning that Trump's actions may damage them.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  16. No kidding. I love how he's "warning Trump" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What's his "or else"?

    What's he going to DO if Trump cuts the shitty Indian programmer "industry" out of the US market?

    NOT ground British Airways?

    Threaten to stop delivery of shitty, bug-ridden software?

    I'm shaking in my boots. Sure I am.

    ROFLMAO.

  17. Tech Mahindra are hopeless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've had the misfortune of having these utterly inept assclowns come and mess up our codebase. Their leaders talk a good game, but their coders write garbage and have cost us money.

    Our greedy, short-sighted managers then brought them in to take over maintenance of a bunch of old applications, having learnt absolutely nothing.

    These people prey on Anglo-Saxon MBA culture to always go for the cheapest option, no matter what. The Western disease of MBA penny-pinching false economy, coupled with their own greed and complete ineptitude is a cancer.

    Tech Mahindra should kindly do the needful, and STFU.

  18. PHB-to-English Translation: by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    "The industry is changing and I'll probably get fired. I must spread FUD!"

  19. Re:Blaming others for his failure by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Sounds like my job in a way. There are high-end tools available that the contractors could use to get their jobs done faster, but they're not available because a full-time employee accidentally installed the wrong patch on 10K+ workstations. The logic of this restriction is, "Can you imagine what would happen if a contractor used the same tool?" Never mind that the colossal screw ups were caused by full-time employees and the contractors had to clean up the mess.

  20. No champions by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 2

    This president does not give one tenth of one shit about US workers. He still owns a visa mill. His "deals" brokered with Ford and Carrier turned out to be completely fake, just as we believed at the time. Nothing he does will save auto industry jobs, coal industry jobs, or any other kind of job. Even rolling back the CAFE standards would actually be detrimental to US automakers, at least the competent ones.

    Too bad there isn't a champion, someone with leadership and broad vision, to come forward and oppose him!

    1. Re:No champions by rholtzjr · · Score: 1

      Ouch, I felt the heat from that burn from here.

  21. Better scrutinizing doesn't mean less visas by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    it might mean the companies have to work a little more (very little) to get 'em, but the goal is jobs going to Americans. I haven't seen any evidence of that whatsoever (unless you count the places the H1-B's sometimes shop at as 'jobs for Americans', which the pro-H1-B side does).

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  22. Re:THIS DOOD--ECONOMIC TERRORIST? by ganjadude · · Score: 1, Troll

    no, most violence is carried out against trump supporters, not by them.

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  23. What kind of arrogance is this? by HangingChad · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That any country would act like they have a right to the US labor market? I don't think much of Trump but I agree with this move. When companies start replacing staff with H1-B visa holders, that's when it's gone too far.

    It's our country and, if we decide you can't come here, that's too damn bad. What really gripes me is the suggestion that anyone outside the US thinks they have a right to come here and work. Let me say this in all sincerity...fuck you.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:What kind of arrogance is this? by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 2

      Theoretically, I could totally seeing Indian companies making these claims on coming into the UK. After all, the UK is the one that "colonized" an already existing country and forced them into being a vassal state for over 100 years. They have zero claim to any inherent jobs in the US. The only "ethnic group" that has any claims to inherent US resources like jobs, money, land, etc would be the Native Americans; and we all have seen how well that has gone.

    2. Re:What kind of arrogance is this? by Tailhook · · Score: 2

      What kind of arrogance is this?

      It's the kind of arrogance Trump spoke of routinely while campaigning. Our elites have their heads so far up foreign asses that other nations feel entitled to receiving every deference for their concerns, and they can't help but publicly melt down if those concerns ever meet any resistance. Not since Reagan pushed back on Japan (limiting motorcycle imports and establishing content requirements in auto manufacturing) has there been any resistance to the destruction of the US industrial base or the displacement of the US worker.

      A whole generation of foreign leaders and captains of industry have emerged that is utterly unable to imagine there being any friction with the US. It doesn't even occur to them that someone in the US might be offended by their reactions to it.

      --
      Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    3. Re:What kind of arrogance is this? by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Funny, the US goes around talking like that about access to other countries markets all the time. It goes around demanding other countries have to have the same intellectual property laws and have them the same way. Other countries must allow access to American genetically modified food. But I guess it's not arrogance when the US does it, right?

  24. Tech Mahindra SUCKS! by gabrieltss · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We have to use them as our first choice for contractors at work. EVERY SINGLE one they have sent us - we sent back within two weeks because they didn't know the technology, don't know how to code their way out of a paper bag. Can't write code that even compiles! Their people are just cr@p! THAT is why they are losing money! I bet NO ONE wants their resources because they suck! I can get Americans RIGHT out of college that are FAR superior than their folks that supposedly have 5-7 years experience!
    I hope they lose enough money they go OUT OF BUSINESS!!!

    --
    The Truth is a Virus!!!
    1. Re:Tech Mahindra SUCKS! by Chas · · Score: 1

      It's because they aren't given knowledge of a platform/technology.

      They're taught just what they need to know to pass a test and regurgitate the book on demand.

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    2. Re:Tech Mahindra SUCKS! by Rudisaurus · · Score: 1

      I hope they lose enough money they go OUT OF BUSINESS!!!

      Yeah, another few quarters of $91 million net income will drive them right into the ground.

      --
      licet differant, aequabitur
    3. Re:Tech Mahindra SUCKS! by NetNed · · Score: 1

      Have heard the same rumbling through out the tech industry again and again that Tech Mahindra is terrible. They are their own reason for losing money. They suck as a company all the way around.

  25. Re:THIS DOOD--ECONOMIC TERRORIST? by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    Let's discuss "most deaths."

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  26. Re:No kidding. I love how he's "warning Trump" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ROFLMAO

    You should be shitting your pants and peeing down both legs.

    The business channel for major US tech is outsourcing and visas. Because of that, American students are avoiding tech.

    The US brokers that handle foreign workers for the major players like Apple, Facebook, Google, Microsoft, etc., are laying off local administrators.

    Trump's "Buy America; Hire America," only works if those things actually exist.

    Meanwhile, shareholders don't give a flying shit where workers come from.

    Trump is stepping on your dick.

    Wishful thinking? Or simple close-mindedness based on "Ewwww, Trump's a RETHUGLICAN!!!!"?

    If Trump is stepping on my dick, what the hell was Obama doing?

    Cutting it off, grinding it up, and feeding it to the sharks?

    If you haven't noticed, Silicon Valley tech companies and their billionaire 1%er owners that are behind the outsourcing of technical labor to India are HUGE supporters of Democrats. Who coincidentally LOVE illegal immigration - another giant sucking sound for jobs.

    And along the way, Obama et al decided I need to "pay my fair share" so he could give MOAH FWEE STUFFS to "people that look like him"? (What's that? Half-WHITE and raised in Indonesia?!?!?!)

    All the while, he was bailing out his bankster billionaire 1%er supporters.

    If you liked the guys doing all that, your characterization if Trump as "stepping on my dick" is about as worthless as tits on a bull.

    Because if you liked the guys doing all that, you're living in fantasyland. You actually think Democrats care about you. Yep, you actually believe in the ONE party that's behind the utter collapse of inner city schools - leaving black children without hope, trapped in an endless cycle of poverty, doomed to vote for "MOAH FWEE STUFFS!!!!" because they've been abandoned, left alive only to vote "D".

    But they'll "help" you too...

    Fuck that shit. I don't need to pay $6,000 a month in taxes just for fucking lazy freeloaders to whine about minimum wage not being high enough or lard-ass layabouts to pine for a "guaranteed minimum income", or to make sure some always-drunk-or-high won't-get-a-fucking-job pothead gets "free health care" so he can get a liver transplant to replace the one he pickled.

    Just so the damn Democrats can get your vote - so they can sit as Secretary of State and sell control of the US uranium industry to the biggest Russian donors to their "charitable foundation". So they can say to YOU "At some point, YOU'VE made enough money." Then when they're ex-President they turn around charge $300,000 for a 15-minute speech.

    Yeah, fooled YOU, haven't they?

    Fuck that shit. You can't get a good job? You made your bed. Lay in it. I have a family to raise, kids to make sure have a future. You wanna flush your future running around "punching Nazis" and violently shutting down any ideas you don't agree with, like the good little brainwashed progtard Brownshirt you are? It ain't on me to bail your worthless ass out. GFY.

    Serioiusly. GFY With a fifty-foot flaming telephone pole covered with splinters from two decades of lineman climbing up and down the pole with spikes.

    No, I don't think Trump is out to help me.

    But he ain't out to HORSE FUCK me in order get money to bribe people to vote for him.

  27. Re:THIS DOOD--ECONOMIC TERRORIST? by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    You really need to lay off the chems.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  28. Isn't that the entire point? by taustin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    To shift revenue from foreign companies to US companies? Sounds like Trump is doing exactly what he promised to do.

    1. Re:Isn't that the entire point? by pjbass · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the people who are too blinded by their pure hatred of one extreme or the other cannot see past that hatred and see the reality of what is happening. Or they're just not willing to admit a politician is actually fulfilling campaign promises, for better or worse.

  29. Not Trump, the jig's just up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    IT America has started to have enough of outsourcing. The code is generally cheap and awful. What's anecdotally weird is the few clients I've had that also paid their overseas team to do basic data entry did not get a good price on the typing jobs, the rate seemed like a US data entry rate ($10 - ~$14 hr). They got a good price on someone trying to learn frameworks on the clock but they didn't get finished product.

  30. Re:No kidding. I love how he's "warning Trump" by sjames · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not really, no. There are plenty of good tech workers right here in the U.S. already. Students will move back to tech once the glut of under-employed U.S. tech workers is absorbed.

    I'm no fan of Trump, but even a stopped clock is right twice a day.

  31. Good! by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1

    Outsourcing generally leads to poor quality work and a lack of standards. I have yet to work with an outsourcing company that can remotely compete with home raised talent and skills.

  32. Re:THIS DOOD--ECONOMIC TERRORIST? by ganjadude · · Score: 1

    do we really wanna talk about most deaths with the only variable being whether someone is pro trump or anti trump? because from where i look, cities tend to be anti trump vs rural areas being pro, and MOST "deaths" seem to take place in the cities, by people who most certainly didnt support trump.

    now, this isnt saying that this is a good way to look at it or come up with any kind of useful information, but if thats the only variable, i stand by my statement. between the gangs in the cities and antifa in colleges, the violence is much stronger on the left

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  33. Re:No kidding. I love how he's "warning Trump" by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

    Unless the clock is right three times a day.

  34. Re:No kidding. I love how he's "warning Trump" by wierd_w · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So, what you are delicately trying to say, is:

    Fuck you, i've got mine.(And if you were smart, you would do the same thing!)

    There's just one problem with that. This mentality leads to systems that self-destruct, as the vital infrastructure required to sustain them is systemically removed to meet your absurd desires of both "self enrichment" + "Oppression/disablement of others". Basically, your money (which is a promise to have work done for you, and nothing more.) becomes less valuable, because you have destroyed the availability of labor, by removing the labor itself (the jobs to be done) from the market.

    This will do nothing but cause a massive market contraction when taken to the extremes, which is exactly where people like you are driving it towards.

    Good luck living the high life, when the standard of living drops like a stone.

  35. Because REEEEEEEE! by Chas · · Score: 1

    Basically, these people will never admit that they're wrong and their views are cockeyed.

    The most they'll ever do is devolve into autistic screeching if you try to force a real answer out of them.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  36. Re:No kidding. I love how he's "warning Trump" by CaptainDork · · Score: 2

    There are plenty of good tech workers right here in the U.S. already.

    The definition of "good," is not what you think it is.

    "Good," is defined by the people who hire.

    "Good," in this context, is, "cheap."

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  37. He can roll to his second business by Chas · · Score: 1

    [Mumbai Accent] Hello, this is Bob from Microsoft. We have detected that you are infecticated with a computer virus. We would like to enter your system and fix this for you. We just need access and a credit card...

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  38. Re:THIS DOOD--ECONOMIC TERRORIST? by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    You are more full of shit than a Christmas turkey.

    Try to focus on the ball. It's the small round thing called white supremacy.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  39. United American Tech Workers by StormReaver · · Score: 1

    Regardless of our political leanings, I think the majority of us Americans in the technology industry approve of Trump in at least this one area.

  40. Re:No kidding. I love how he's "warning Trump" by sjames · · Score: 1

    Well, that's off the table now. They'll have to settle for good as in competent. Why should I shit my pants over employers having to pay employees what they're worth?

  41. If you're looking for sympathy... by kuzb · · Score: 2

    ...you'll find it in the dictionary in between shit and syphilis. It's high time countries started forcing companies to take care of their own instead of being allowed to bring in cheap Indian replacements. Let India solve it's own labor problems.

    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
  42. Re:THIS DOOD--ECONOMIC TERRORIST? by rholtzjr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Are you kidding? Who was the other candidate that actually had a lengthy Death List? Hint: It wasn't Trump.

  43. Re:No kidding. I love how he's "warning Trump" by omnichad · · Score: 1

    Daylight savings time only ends one day a year, though.

  44. Tech Mahindra by unixisc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So Tech Mahindra has weak earnings, and it's Trump's fault? Just b'cos Tech Mahindra can't keep bringing in Indians in for every req they have. A recruiter I know told me that they have a policy of hiring only ethnic Indians (be they US or Indian citizens), and very rarely do they prefer Americans. The sooner they're driven out of the US market, the better.

    Congress should pass a special law banning Tech Mahindra from using any H1Bs, L1s or anything like that. It won't hurt the industry, just losers like Tech Mahindra, Syntel, et al

  45. Re:No kidding. I love how he's "warning Trump" by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    Why should I shit my pants over employers having to pay employees what they're worth?

    Because employers are not the ones taking a hit.

    You are.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  46. Re:THIS DOOD--ECONOMIC TERRORIST? by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    Fail.

    Trump is making America hate again and you're enabling.

    Shame on you.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  47. Conservative vs Economic Nationalism by unixisc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not exactly. The Conservatives - the ones in the Heritage Foundation, American Enterprise Institute, Club for Growth, et al, still believe that companies should have the freedom to hire anyone they want, even if it means making it easier to legally migrate. Their problem: Trump has run away w/ their party. When someone wins the White House by carrying states that haven't voted (R) since President Reagan's 49 state landslide in 1984, it's tough to argue w/ him, let alone stop him from calling the shots in the party.

    What's new here is the Economic Nationalists - the people like Bannon, Sessions, Miller, et al, who do not believe in making it easier for companies to offshore jobs and then resume selling their wares in the US. And that's likely to become a growing and increasingly powerful faction in the GOP, displacing the classic George Will, Steve Forbes, Charles Krauthammer types who believe in letting the market simply work its magic, no shackles involved.

    1. Re:Conservative vs Economic Nationalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You type out this 900 word essay, but then you shorten with to w/?
      Why?

  48. Re:THIS DOOD--ECONOMIC TERRORIST? by rholtzjr · · Score: 1

    You have already done that with your previous posts. I am just striking back.

  49. Re:No kidding. I love how he's "warning Trump" by sjames · · Score: 1

    No, I'm really not. Sure, prices of some things may go up a bit, but by the time you factor the number of units software development costs are amortized over plus the savings brought by higher quality development (yes, Indian programmers can be great, but Infosys doesn't typically hire those programmers), the additional cost is quite small.

  50. Re: No kidding. I love how he's "warning Trump" by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

    Nice disaster porn wet dream, broham. But ya know... the kind of guy who would actually become a despot in a failed state is likely neither anonymous nor cowardly. Just sayin'...

  51. Re: THIS DOOD--ECONOMIC TERRORIST? by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

    There are lots and lots of us big city people who prefer Trump over the establishment. You know that he made his name as a New York real estate developer, right? Whatever else be might be, Trump is a city boy.

    PS: fuck the suburbs and the know-nothing self satisfaction they seem to engender.

  52. Good, let's keep on doing it. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    A good start, but it's time to make them feel the same pain that they inflicted on Americans.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  53. Re: No kidding. I love how he's "warning Trump" by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

    I find people with attitudes like his very funny. Because if it does go down how he portrays. somebody like me will have him kissing the ground telling them where his food and weapon supply is.

  54. Re:No kidding. I love how he's "warning Trump" by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    Slashdot consensus seems to be:

    - Tech is not a good place to work, avoid if possible

    - Tech requires innate, DNA level qualities for people to find it attractive (hence women aren't interested)

    - Any attempt to increase the labour pool is to drive down wages or some kind of social justice jihad

    - Only westerners are any good at it, Indians in particular all suck so hard most can't even get their code to compile

    - Companies prefer this level of incompetence because CEOs prosper in the short term from the cost savings, even though it's been happening for decades apparently

    - It's so bad some places are 90%+ Indian, but for some reason in the US rather than just opening an office in India where wages are even lower

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  55. Economics and zero-sum outcomes by swb · · Score: 1

    I am not an economist and most of my "education" in economics consists of news magazines and the EconTalk podcast.

    But whenever I talk to someone online or in person who has an economics background, we often get around to the topic of whether economics has a zero-sum component to it and nearly all of them say it does not.

    I can always think of lots of examples in the short run where it is zero sum -- a firm has a finite revenue in a given period, thus profit is a finite value, and how that profit is distributed is zero sum -- if more is paid to the CEO, that means less is available to be paid to everyone else.

    This seems like another example of zero sum outcomes -- a finite amount of capital is allocated for labor costs, and more spent in the US means less spent on Indian outsourcing firms.

    1. Re:Economics and zero-sum outcomes by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      whenever I talk to someone online or in person who has an economics background, we often get around to the topic of whether economics has a zero-sum component to it and nearly all of them say it does not.

      The average business as it is practiced is negative-sum, because virtually all businesses are predicated upon the spending of natural capital more rapidly than it can be replenished, even if it's just the power to keep the lights on. There are counterexamples, but they are far in the minority.

      Modern economic activity as a whole is negative-sum.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  56. Re:THIS DOOD--ECONOMIC TERRORIST? by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

    Check me out. I live in a big city. You may have heard of it. Las Vegas. And what he explains is 100% true. And your rebuttal just made you look like more of a fool than this site thought you were. So please take your ball(identity politics) and go home. We don't want to play with you.

  57. Re:THIS DOOD--ECONOMIC TERRORIST? by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    I did not vote for that pussy-grabbing coke-snorting tiny handed bully.

    You did.

    Own it.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  58. Re:THIS DOOD--ECONOMIC TERRORIST? by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    I checked you out.

    You don't want to play with anyone whom you don't know. They scare the shit out of you.

    And, there's no cure for people like you.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  59. Re:No kidding. I love how he's "warning Trump" by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    You negated yourself.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  60. I didn't know that by nomad63 · · Score: 1

    I didn't know that, as US of A, we have a responsibility to keep the India's tech sector afloat, by allowing them to dump their tech workforce as a cheap replacement for American workers. What a shocker. These guys are far worse than the entitled minded millennial generation.As far as I am concerned, they can pack their bags and go home and stew in their own pot. For the past 20 years, US has given too much leeway to these clowns. Time to reclaim it back.

    --

    __________
    The more I know people, the more I love animals
  61. Re:THIS DOOD--ECONOMIC TERRORIST? by rholtzjr · · Score: 1

    Typical response from a liberal snowflake troll. No one cares about your opinion anymore.

    OWN THAT!

  62. Re:THIS DOOD--ECONOMIC TERRORIST? by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

    Let me guess. You say that because my comment history shows that I really only chime in on stuff I actually know about instead of just spewing bullshit off at every turn like you and a lot of the slashdot community does? Sorry but I observe and learn more than I spew bullshit. You should try it some time.

  63. Re:No kidding. I love how he's "warning Trump" by sjames · · Score: 1

    Only if you consider yourself brutally assaulted when a gnat lands on you.

    If you want to crap your pants over $0.50, that's your call, there are probably people who will give you a dollar to let them video it.

  64. Re:No kidding. I love how he's "warning Trump" by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

    It has nothing to do with when we change the clocks, forwards or backwards. And it's right three times a day every day.

  65. Re:THIS DOOD--ECONOMIC TERRORIST? by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    You cared enough to respond.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  66. Re:THIS DOOD--ECONOMIC TERRORIST? by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    You guessed wrongly.

    I didn't check out any of your stuff.

    Thanks for playing.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  67. Re:THIS DOOD--ECONOMIC TERRORIST? by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

    Ahh I see. You're just full of shit. Makes sense.

  68. Add another requirement... by martinfb · · Score: 1

    Add another requirement: MUST speak CLEAR, fluent English!

    That will weed out another 80%!

    --


    Self-importance and self-indulgence is the root of ALL evil.