Slashdot Mirror


Germany Plans To Fingerprint Children and Spy On Personal Messages (fortune.com)

From a report: Germany is planning a new law giving authorities the right to look at private messages and fingerprint children as young as 6, the interior minister said on Wednesday after the last government gathering before a national election in September. Ministers from central government and federal states said encrypted messaging services, such as WhatsApp and Signal, allow militants and criminals to evade traditional surveillance. "We can't allow there to be areas that are practically outside the law," interior minister Thomas de Maiziere told reporters in the eastern town of Dresden.

127 of 225 comments (clear)

  1. Wait, what? by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I thought Germany was one of the countries that valued privacy, the 'right to be forgotten' on the Internet, etc? How come all of the sudden they sound like the UK?

    1. Re:Wait, what? by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty surprised.

      They recently had a ruling in their courts that Children's private communications were protected (from parents).

      The case was a death and a parent wanting access to the Facebook account. The court ruled no, because the instant messages were a private communication.

      I don't know how German laws work, but that would seem to make this a law that wouldn't stick (applying US common law principals, and our communications being covered by a higher document than law). I don't know where privacy is codified into German law.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    2. Re:Wait, what? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Which, I believe is why they've tried not to act like Nazis anymore. Until now, it seems.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    3. Re:Wait, what? by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      What do you expect from left wingers?

    4. Re:Wait, what? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      nope, about 25 percent of the population support far right wing ideology. All those Nazis supporters and their children did not magically disappear in 1945.

    5. Re:Wait, what? by kelanos · · Score: 1

      >I thought Germany was one of the countries that valued privacy
      That's what their media tells them, and you

      >How come all of the sudden they sound like the UK?
      Because that was the point in giving them the notion stated above to begin with.

    6. Re:Wait, what? by fazig · · Score: 2

      Because the article fails to mention that this particular idea is intended for immigrants and refugees from Islamic countries. You know, the entire foreigners commit a lot more crimes than others and therefore don't deserve the same basic human rights schtick.
      Federal elections are coming up very soon and this would be one attempt to win over voters that rather want to feel safe than free. This is spurred by two major things, the recent terror attacks in Europe, which politicians use as leverage to win over elections, and the fact that a good portion of refugees simply disappear from the eyes of the authorities once they're in the country, escape the process of asylum and become illegal aliens. The latter being the fault of the government itself.

      However, odds are that the president won't sign such a legislations or the constitutional court will overturn the law as being unconstitutional, like they did in the past with similar laws.

    7. Re:Wait, what? by Altrag · · Score: 1

      73 years is hardly "overnight."

      Not to mention there's no shortage of right wing fervor in basically all Western countries right now -- Allies and Axis alike, so blaming the trend in Germany specifically on the Nazis kind of ignores the rest of the world in a way that makes little sense.

      If anything, fear of their Nazi history being brought up has slowed down Germany's adoption of these shiny new oppression techniques that other Western governments have been salivating over for the past 10-15 years. But slowed is not stopped and until the world as a whole decides that acting out of terror (ie: exactly what the terrorists want) isn't really solving the problem, we're just going to see more and more countries slowly joining the parade into nationalistic fear of "the other."

    8. Re:Wait, what? by thegarbz · · Score: 4, Informative

      They do. The summary left out key details. a) the encryption thing is still covered under the same warrants and rules that apply to any other police interaction and b) they are only fingerprinting asylum seekers, non Germans, and the change is that they are proposing to change this age from 14 years old to 6 years old.

    9. Re:Wait, what? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      You don't know how it works because the summary left out a key word: Asylum seekers. They aren't fingerprinting Germans.

    10. Re:Wait, what? by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 2

      Yes, you fucking idiot. That country that was ruled by Hitler a long time ago but has changed a lot since, and I must tell you this because you're too fucking dense to see for yourself.

      The Nazis were not mutants, aliens, monsters, or psychopaths. They were us. Only their circumstances were different. Like other aspects of history, circumstances tend to repeat themselves over time. The changes that would be necessary to rule out a recurrence of the Holocaust cannot arise from our politics, but only from our nature. Such changes take place over eons, not decades or centuries.

      If you make it impossible for people to hide their activities, identities, and locations from the State, your next Holocaust will kill sixty million, or perhaps six hundred million, instead of only six.

    11. Re:Wait, what? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but they are explicitly forbidden from announcing it in public, or espousing their views publicly, so attempts to count them fail. When I heard people talking all that shit about how Merkel is now the leader of the free world, I just shook my head. They don't even have free speech in Germany.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:Wait, what? by johanw · · Score: 1

      And now they "need" to break encryption because Stormfront.org has now https too.

    13. Re: Wait, what? by johanw · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, unlike what we read about the US, if stupid laws are passed in Europe, they are usually just ignored. WhatsApp is not going to backdoor their encryption and Signal certainly not. Even Silence, the encrypted sms fork from Signal when they dropped encrypted sms, is developed in France and Canada.

    14. Re:Wait, what? by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 2

      So, even if a million of them are dangerous, psychotic extremists, you're still condemning 1200 people for every one bad guy.

      That makes it a bit difficult to tell who the bad guys actually are, doesn't it?

    15. Re:Wait, what? by gweihir · · Score: 4, Informative

      German interior ministers immediately lose their minds when coming into office and start to look up what the Nazis did to keep the population under control and then try to find ways to improve on that. It is not known what causes the effect, but the current office-holder is even more affected than usual, probably because he has no useful skills at all.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    16. Re:Wait, what? by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 2

      My point is, if you feel it's OK to kill 1,200 innocent people to make sure you get the one actual terrorist in their ranks, you might just be the bad guy you've been looking for all along.

    17. Re: Wait, what? by aliquis · · Score: 1

      But this is "good" socialist authoritarian/non-democratic/non-individualist rule & control. Not "unacceptable" right-wing one.

      Sweden is a "democratic people's" monarchy already. Rest of EU to follow?

    18. Re:Wait, what? by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      I thought Germany was one of the countries that valued privacy, the 'right to be forgotten' on the Internet, etc? How come all of the sudden they sound like the UK?

      I guess like many things in life this is bound to remain a mystery.

      Leaked Report Says 6.6 Million Refugees Are Trying to Get into Europe

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    19. Re:Wait, what? by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      I dunno about you, friend, but I'm getting pretty gods-be-damned tired of witnessing how my species treats it's own. At our best, we're so much better than this, and I say this knowing damn well that it's easy to be kind and generous when everything is fine and there is plenty of everything to go around, and that you really don't know people until you've seen them at their absolute worst. But it's the fact that we can be so much better than this and all the crap that's going on in the world right now that simultaneously saddens and angers me the most. At current I can't call homo sapiens a 'civilized' race and keep a straight face.

      No reply required. I'm just getting thoughts out of my head, before it explodes. Again. :-/

  2. hmmm.... by fish_in_the_c · · Score: 2

    ""We can't allow there to be areas that are practically outside the law,"
    And this in the country where if it weren't possible for many to be outside the law they would have been killed.
    Isn't it better to shield citizens from the political apprentice and let criminals go free then to risk what may happen when the wrong group takes power? But the German's are a different culture. So trusting of government. The way my aunt who lived there for a while put it is ' The German people believe police officers never lie, which works pretty well so long as the police officers continue to believe they never lie too.'

    --
    âoeTolerance applies only to persons, but never to truth. Intolerance applies only to truth, but never to persons.
    1. Re:hmmm.... by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      It's a cultural difference. What's the meme we get here? Never talk to police? That is the exact opposite of healthy advice in Germany where the police aren't actually out to get you on minor details to raise money or to put you away in prison to appease the prison industry complex.

    2. Re:hmmm.... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I don't know the ratio of good/bad US police, but here are some examples of good US police:

      I know, but people like to focus on the bad, that's why I called it a meme.

  3. Why not? by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

    Worked well for them last time.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  4. Were to PC to actually protect you by DarkOx · · Score: 1

    So because it would politically incorrect to you know not let the militants into the country in the first place they will just abolish basic freedoms instead.

    Pathetic.

    --
    Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    1. Re:Were to PC to actually protect you by Altrag · · Score: 1

      Its pretty politically incorrect to abolish basic freedoms as well. But I mean, as long as you can wrap it in a coating of "AMG terrorists!" we seem pretty willing to get those in power do whatever they want. This is not a new phenomena, and its hardly limited to Germany. The US and UK have been (publicly and proudly) doing shit like this for years now, and many other countries that we hear less about aren't exactly far behind.

  5. Re:too bad! by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 2

    I never thought I would see Nazi tactics return to Germany! Guess I was wrong...they have failed to learn from their own history.

    I've you've ever been a USCIS biometric center you would have seen that the US government fingerprints children all day.

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  6. Not the first time... by judoguy · · Score: 1

    "We can't allow there to be areas that are practically outside the law," interior minister Thomas de Maiziere told reporters in the eastern town of Dresden.

    Or as Mussolini said "Everything in the State, nothing outside the State".

    --
    Peace is easy to achieve, just surrender. Liberty is much harder get/keep.
  7. Government-installed Spyware by Powercntrl · · Score: 2

    From TFA:

    Among the options Germany is considering is "source telecom surveillance", where authorities install software on phones to relay messages before they are encrypted. That is now illegal.

    Wow, just wow. This is something you'd expect from China, not somewhere in the supposedly enlightened western civilization. It's things like this which make me think maybe those second amendment nuts really aren't so crazy. Give up one right, and pretty soon it's a slippery slope right to big brother being installed on your phone.

    --

    ---
    DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    1. Re:Government-installed Spyware by rmdingler · · Score: 2
      One of tThe key differences between totalitarian societies and free societies is the rights of individuals are not compromised just to make things easier for the State.

      A right guaranteed by a constitution may be a hindrance to those elected to conduct the people's business, but it's one that must remain if the society is to remain free.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

  8. The Germans can't help themselves. by steak · · Score: 1

    Between this and Merkel turning the EU into the fourth reich. It's like the one country is composed of Bond villains.

    1. Re:The Germans can't help themselves. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Between this and Merkel turning the EU into the fourth reich. It's like the one country is composed of Bond villains.

      unlike the US which is filled with Austin Powers villains?

    2. Re:The Germans can't help themselves. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Between this and Merkel turning the EU into the fourth reich. It's like the one country is composed of Bond villains.

      American's can't help themselves but to read garbage summaries not at all related about what is happening and drawing conclusions about them.

  9. Re:So Hitler taught them nothing? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The current lurch towards authoritarianism in Europe is profoundly disturbing. You really would think Germany of all places would know better than to give in to the politics of fear.

    It is also rather depressing that here in the UK, apparently Ariana Grande has a more mature view of the attacks in Manchester and the appropriate response to them than Theresa May.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  10. Re:For the Children! Fight Terrorists! by jaklode · · Score: 1

    thought police in 3..2..1

  11. Re:So Hitler taught them nothing? by avandesande · · Score: 1

    Right now Hitler is touching himself in his grave....

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  12. Germany = East Germany? by gti_guy · · Score: 1

    Well, at least half the country should be used to this environment.

    1. Re:Germany = East Germany? by sasparillascott · · Score: 1

      This is depressing, one of the things the bad guys want is to get rid of the all the freedoms in the west...and they're getting us to do it.

      Notice it talks about putting OS level monitoring software to relay everything typed etc. to the "good guys" to get around message encryption - the whole tech world looks like upgraded ankle bracelets to our governments.

  13. Re:So Hitler taught them nothing? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
    You mean, parents cannot refuse to have their kids fingerprinted there?!?

    What happens, the govt comes door to door and demands you bring your kid out for fingerprinting?

    Geez....why would the populace stand for this?

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  14. Re:So Hitler taught them nothing? by fish_in_the_c · · Score: 4, Informative

    hmm... when my son was born here in the united states the put his hand prints and foot prints in his birth records. Probably attached to his birth certificate. I guess I didn't think to ask if it was 'optional'. It certainly wasn't presented as such.

    --
    âoeTolerance applies only to persons, but never to truth. Intolerance applies only to truth, but never to persons.
  15. Re:So Hitler taught them nothing? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

    hmm... when my son was born here in the united states the put his hand prints and foot prints in his birth records. Probably attached to his birth certificate. I guess I didn't think to ask if it was 'optional'. It certainly wasn't presented as such.

    Wow?? Really?

    I wonder when they started doing that in the US? Maybe it is only at some hospitals?

    I'd certainly not want that done to my kids.

    I know of hearing of such programs available if parents wanted them, but never heard of it being forced upon US parents or being done without their expressed consent....

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  16. Re:So Hitler taught them nothing? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

    There are cultural difference between how children are raised in Germany vs America. In Germany, kids are viewed as more of a collective responsibility rather than just the concern of the nuclear family. Other cultures take it even further. In Japan, it is common to see five year olds traveling alone on the subway everyday on their way to kindergarten. That would be unthinkable in America, and probably get the parents arrested. But in Japan, it is perfectly safe, because everyone is watching out for those kids, and stepping in at the first hint of a problem.

  17. Re:European hypocrites by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

    You Europeans complain about the US spying and how our government is out of control....

    Not all Europeans are the same.

    Like Americans, different Europeans have different opinions and say different things.

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
  18. Re:So Hitler taught them nothing? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Geez....why would the populace stand for this?

    Probably because they're afraid. Remember, as an expert on the subject infamously observed, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger.

    (That was Gestapo founder Hermann Goering, for those who missed the reference. The original comment was about the futility of relying on popular elections to avoid a war that the political leaders want, but the principle seems just as relevant in this context.)

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  19. Re:So Hitler taught them nothing? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    The current lurch towards authoritarianism in Europe is profoundly disturbing. You really would think Germany of all places would know better than to give in to the politics of fear.

    Note: The following is intended as clarification - NOT in defense of the measure.

    While TFS doesn't mention this... this new measure only affects asylum-seekers. Currently German law allows fingerprinting of all refugees age 14 or older - they're lowering that now, to age 6.

    I'm sure there are people here who will have no quarrel with fingerprinting 6-year-old Muslims.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  20. Re:So Hitler taught them nothing? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    Wow?? Really?
    I wonder when they started doing that in the US?

    I was born in 1960, and my birth records include my handprints and footprints.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  21. Re:So Hitler taught them nothing? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    It's too bad that "collective responsibility" doesn't extend to preventing the groping of female subway riders in Japan.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  22. Wrong. Headline is complete bullshit. by Qbertino · · Score: 5, Insightful

    German gouvernment is planning to pass a law that requires messaging services such as WhatsApp to be monitorable like phonecalls should a court order requested by the authorities give them the permission to do so in order to fight crime.

    There, FTFY.

    Like many politicians German politicians too have little clue about how the internet and computers work, but that's no reason to write headlines that are so sensationalist that they are flat out wrong.

    My 2 cents.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:Wrong. Headline is complete bullshit. by kwerle · · Score: 1

      Holy crap - thank you for pointing that out.

    2. Re:Wrong. Headline is complete bullshit. by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Yet muslims are routinely gang raping girls in the streets and setting up zone of sharia law and no-go zones wherever they please? And all this is financed by the taxpayers?

      [citation needed]

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    3. Re:Wrong. Headline is complete bullshit. by Kjella · · Score: 2

      German gouvernment is planning to pass a law that requires messaging services such as WhatsApp to be monitorable like phonecalls should a court order requested by the authorities give them the permission to do so in order to fight crime. There, FTFY. Like many politicians German politicians too have little clue about how the internet and computers work, but that's no reason to write headlines that are so sensationalist that they are flat out wrong.

      I doubt they're that ignorant. WhatsApp will tell them the system doesn't work that way, it's all end-to-end encrypted by the clients and they don't have the keys. The government will tell them that's not our problem, change your system to comply with the law or get banned/fined/jailed. And don't think asking the clients to send an extra copy to WhatsApp will suffice, the only way it can be implemented is if WhatsApp MITMs everything then only gives the police what they have a warrant for. Just like with the FBI and Apple there's now a war on private communication and private storage. Hopefully a losing one because otherwise you can kiss your Linux box goodbye, that backdoor-free open source box will become an illegal terrorist tool. Hopefully they'll lose but with all the neo-fascists in office, who is to say what will happen.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    4. Re:Wrong. Headline is complete bullshit. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Nope they are well aware how they work, which is why they are looking at things like requiring back doors on the source devices to intercept before the encryption takes place.

      Also the rest of the headline is wrong too. They are only fingerprinting asylum seekers, and they are proposing changing that limit from 14 yrs down to 6 yrs.

    5. Re:Wrong. Headline is complete bullshit. by Altrag · · Score: 2

      should a court order requested by the authorities give them the permission to do so in order to fight crime.

      That part might is definitely important from a legal perspective, but technologically its still a clusterfuck. If the encryption can be broken at all, for any reason, then it can potentially be broken by hackers. And so far, history indicates that "potentially broken by hackers" is only a handful of days away from "has been broken by hackers."

    6. Re:Wrong. Headline is complete bullshit. by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Germany does not always need the keys just the full cooperation to find the users of encryption. Full device access to a gov from a networked device is good too.
      Germany will get legal court documents and present them to any band or telco in Germany.
      The brand will then have to offer a front door, a trap door to be able to keep offering products and services in Germany.

      If the code is free on the internet and been used? The user is good at trade craft? All Germany will need to find that user and their connected device.
      So any commercial, branded, company encryption and device, hardware in Germany will be junk quality as sold.
      Plain text, voice, messages will be readable by the German government to keep network access in Germany.

      Any OS/device that lets a user download, compile and use encryption on a device will have to be open to the Germany gov as a telco connected device.
      So the hardware will offer a way for the German government to get between the text input, files transferred, voice and any free app level encryption.
      How to find people using any free/different/unexpected encryption that works?
      A new version of XKeyscore https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... or Tempora https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... just for Germany.
      "Detect people who use encryption by doing searches"
      'Showing the usage of virtual private networks (VPNs)"
      Who downloaded encryption files today? Who uploaded new encryption software, its first links and who is looking for it?
      Once a user is detected using a VPN or having downloaded any encryption software/code their device will be altered to grant a gov plain text/voice/file access.
      Germany will get access to all commercial encryption.
      If a user attempts to make or finds their own app, Germany will discover that and get full computer or telco device access and save any messages.
      Hardware sold will have to support gov access to get plain text input and output, voice, files.
      The options for a user are:
      Dont use any encryption at all and don't get detected but trade craft has to be perfect.
      Use the same junk big brand US encryption on the US OS or social media app and never use interesting words, terms, files.
      Re 'that backdoor-free open source box will become an illegal ..."
      The hardware box on average will come with a few CPU options and ethernet/wifi. The box will be police friendly as designed and sold globally.
      What OS and complier, app is been used on top will not prevent gov access and key logging.
      The use of any new or existing encryption on any German network will be detected.
      Find open source encryption and expect the networked device/computer hardware/OS to be accessed by the German gov.

      The part Germany does not understand is all the interesting people can just meet face to face at their place of worship.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    7. Re:Wrong. Headline is complete bullshit. by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      The part about the mass fingerprinting is misleading, as well. Refugees, or better stated, those who claim to be refugees, need to register with the German government authorities, and present an application requesting asylum. This can take a few years to process, and the system is extremely overwhelmed now. Only folks from certain "dangerous" countries are considered.

      If you are from somewhere "safe", you will be turned back immediately. So a lot of folks just toss away any identification that they have, and claim to be from a "dangerous" country. A big problem is that some folks register multiple times, in different cities. Why? Hey, register twice and get twice the benefits! The open door to refugees lets in foul air, along with the fresh air. There was even a case recently where an applicant could not even speak the language of the country that he claimed as his home. Lots of folks who get rejected, just "disappear" into the underground.

      So, without any "trustworthy" documentation, fingerprinting is how they tell who's who among refugees. Now, I am an American citizen, so when I travel to the US, I get to go in the "fast" lane, and am only subjected to the normal harassment and intimidation from Three Letter Thugs. I see old grandmothers who were on the plane with me giving up their thumbprints. Everyone who is not a US citizen gets fingerprinted. So I really can't understand why my fellow Americans are getting their bowels in an uproar about fingerprinting refugees, who have no other form of identification.

      Oh, and if the German government really did announce a plan to fingerprint everyone, the Green Party, who have seats in the national parliament, and rule in coalitions in some states, would be out hootin' and a hollerin' on the streets . . . along with the Autonomen, the infamous "Black Block" at otherwise peaceful demonstrations.

      So I look outside my window right now, and I don't see any riots. Just a few drunk college students, because tomorrow is a holiday in Germany.

      What's sad about this, is if I wasn't familiar with "how things work" in Germany, I might have been tempted to assume that Germany was going to Hell in a hand-basket.

      Shame on you MsMash . . . this wasn't exactly fake news, but definitely a deliberate attempt to drum up a flame war . . .

      . . . "with malice aforethought" . . .

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  23. Re:So Hitler taught them nothing? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

    Yes, the Japanese in particular seem to have a much more enlightened view of parenting and more generally how to look after young children than certain heavily controlling trends in the West.

    I'm not sure that such cultural differences excuse the kind of intrusions we're talking about here, though. I see no evidence that fingerprinting all children is somehow necessary to preserve their safety or security. Indeed, the examples you just gave yourself seem to show clearly that it is not.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  24. Re:So Hitler taught them nothing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's safe enough because Japan is a homogeneous society without a subclass of predators.

  25. Re:So Hitler taught them nothing? by Topwiz · · Score: 5, Informative

    I was also born in 1960.
    Those birth certificates with hand and foot prints are issued by the hospital. They are just a souvenir, not the official birth certificated file with the state.

  26. Re:So Hitler taught them nothing? by anegg · · Score: 1

    How would you prove your infant child was yours if your child was stolen away from you? Today you could perhaps have DNA testing. Back when the footprint/handprints were initiated, that wasn't an option. I don't think the footprints/fingerprints work as a long-term ID, just a short-term ID.

  27. Re:So Hitler taught them nothing? by Khyber · · Score: 1

    "I wonder when they started doing that in the US? Maybe it is only at some hospitals?"

    Forever. It's a souvenir from the hospital and not an official record. My father and grandfather both had prints on their hospital-issued 'certificate' as well as did I.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  28. Re:So Hitler taught them nothing? by lactose99 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Its fingerprinting for asylum seekers as young as 6 (current minimum age is 14), not all residents.

    Summary fails to note that point.

    --
    Fully licensed blockchain psychiatrist
  29. Re:So Hitler taught them nothing? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

    Thank you for posting that. I'm not sure whether it should make any difference to the ethical or practical position here, but it's certainly a significant detail that was omitted from the original summary.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  30. It has been done before by LordHighExecutioner · · Score: 1

    It seems that german history is going to repeat itself again and again.

  31. Re:Reuters by postbigbang · · Score: 1

    Even when the source is Reuters, unnamed parties quoted in an article of any kind is sufficient motive to cast enormous doubt up on the veracity of the information imparted.

    Fakes news, propaganda, gov't-sponsored memes, these are all tools of the "unnamed". It can therefore be considered as clickbait fodder and nothing more.....

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  32. Re: too bad! by moronoxyd · · Score: 2

    Well, then you should be fine with what Germany plans to do. The summary fails to mention that the fingerprinting only applies to refugees.

    Disclaimer: I'm German and I think this descision is wrong. But I gave up hope that our minister of the interior (Innenminister) understands the necessary balance between security and freedom long ago.

  33. Re:So Hitler taught them nothing? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's too bad that "collective responsibility" doesn't extend to preventing the groping of female subway riders in Japan.

    They provide "women-only" subway cars during busy periods. Other than that, anyone that has boarded the Yamanote line at at Shinjuku station at rush hour will know that there isn't any obvious solution. Courts have been tightening up penalties, but that only works if the groper gets caught, which is rare. There has recently been a backlash because of people falsely accused. Since Japan has such a low crime rate, any criminal conviction has severe social consequences, often resulting in losing your job, becoming unemployable, and basically destroying your life.

  34. Re:So Hitler taught them nothing? by lgw · · Score: 1

    Depends on how much choice economic migrants have. Sounds fine to me to say "if you want to bypass our normal immigration rules, we'll let you in under these different rules, or you can pick a different nation in Europe".
    .

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  35. Re: Don't laugh at the Germans... by moronoxyd · · Score: 1

    The German minister of the interior who is responsible for todays descision is a member of Merkels conservative party.

  36. You'll never stop it by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    People have been speaking in code and enciphering messages since beginning of civilization and will continue to do so as they please regardless of impediments erected by their governments.

    From "lets get a pizza" = meet me at 5:00 PM at the square to exchange drugs, weapons and unstable ordinance.

    To 6 year old children knowing how to encrypt and decrypt messages over ANY communication medium using a pencil, paper and codebook.

    You can't stop it no matter what you do. The only thing anti-encryption and government spying legislation can ever achieve is erosion of legitimacy and corruption of law enforcement.

  37. They should be more thorough by Tangential · · Score: 1

    You would think, in the interests of thoroughness that they would also require the recording of all conversations at all times. I am sure that there are a lot of conversations happening that are 'outside of the law'.

    --
    Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But then I repeat myself. -- Mark Twain
  38. Ipocrisy? by feranick · · Score: 1

    One cannot post images of public places in Germany for privacy reasons. Yet it's perfectly fine to collect fingerprints. Weird.

    1. Re:Ipocrisy? by Altrag · · Score: 1

      "One" is not the same as "the government." Governments, not just in Germany but everywhere and pretty much by definition, have many powers that are not entrusted to individuals and even a few that we haven't yet entrusted to corporations.

      If you personally went around fingerprinting 6 year olds, you would probably find yourself in a fair bit of trouble regardless of the powers the government gives to itself.

    2. Re:Ipocrisy? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Because of the US after 9/11 all of Europe is issuing passports only with biometric info, aka fingerprints.

      What exactly is your point?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  39. Re:So Hitler taught them nothing? by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    Those are just souvenirs that go on the fake birth record they send home with the parents. The real ones do not have the handprints or footprints.

  40. Re:So Hitler taught them nothing? by Northdot · · Score: 1

    It's been done for many decades for newborns so as to serve as an unambiguous identification in case of potential mix-ups or disputes re. the baby. As a parent I would probably appreciate it.

  41. Re:So Hitler taught them nothing? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ariana Grande isn't going to be the one standing in front of thousands of constituents trying to figure out how to protect innocent citizens from being murdered

    It's remarkably clear what needed to happen to prevent that particular attack, and the authoritarian dross Theresa May has been advocating since then certainly isn't it. The bomber was brought to the attention of the authorities on at least five occasions over a considerable period before the attacks, but the resources weren't there to follow up on a credible threat and we all know the tragic result.

    At least the locals stood up that night and showed solidarity and support over anger and hatred, and the celebrities turned up a few days later to show that life goes on and we shouldn't give in to fear. That's two groups of people who are both doing better than our national government.

    I also don't recall New Yorkers holding hands and singing kumbaya around the fucking campfire after the 9/11 attacks either.

    And truly, the way the US responded to 9/11 was an example we should all follow, what with the vast numbers of innocents killed or injured in the resulting wars, destabilisation of an already precarious region of the world, and consequent creation of the largest terrorist threat to the West today.

    The US leadership of the time would have done better to show some actual leadership, instead of just ramping up the anger and revenge and fear. The world would be a much, much better place today if they had.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  42. Re:So Hitler taught them nothing? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

    Goering founded the Gestapo. Himmler took over about a year later.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  43. Re:So Hitler taught them nothing? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

    Yes, maths is still maths (and this is why the argument for banning encryption is futile).

    But you shouldn't have to risk jail time just for wanting to communicate with someone privately. That is not at all how civilized, free societies work.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  44. Re:The Apple by DickBreath · · Score: 1

    I thought The Apple provides strong encryption.

    At least they're spying on Personal Messages and not on Personal Massages.

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  45. Re:So Hitler taught them nothing? by OtisSnerd · · Score: 1

    Wow?? Really? I wonder when they started doing that in the US?

    I was born in 1960, and my birth records include my handprints and footprints.

    I was born in 1953, and mine include them as well.

  46. Turning point by XSportSeeker · · Score: 1

    Just another evidence pointing out we're right at the turning point for totalitarian regimes sprouting once again in response to a politics of fear and complacency from citizens. Time is a flat circle.

  47. Re:Totalitarian's pattern by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    You missed something. They are only cracking down on the privacy and free speech of muslims.

    Yes that's right the entire fingerprinting thing is for asylum seekers, and the idea of intercepting encryption in some way is still governed by the same laws that cover every other form of communication which are far more strict than anything the rest of the world has on the books. Good luck using Stingrays to spy on everyone in Germany.

  48. Re:Totalitarian's pattern by Altrag · · Score: 1

    You fail to acknowledge that fact that the majority of the terrorist attacks post-911 have been by home-grown Muslims. There's no "importing" required.

    And worse, it becomes a bit of a death spiral since the more we persecute the Muslims in our community, the higher chance that at least a few of them are going to be thinking about getting involved with more accepting communities. Occasionally that new community will be a terrorist organization, and only a small number of those otherwise-displaced people need to be indoctrinated in order to start the cycle over. Just one person can be sufficient to instigate a terror attack that gets reported around the world -- driving a truck down a busy pedestrian area doesn't really need a lot of co-conspirators or detailed organizational skills. It just needs a single person with access to a truck and a willingness to die for their cause.

    If you just stuck with #2 and #3, you'd have pretty much hit the nail on the head though.

  49. Re:Germany plans to "fingerprint" children by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Better yet, forgo the encryption entirely and make it a crime to NOT lay out your entire life before anyone who asks. Or even better, change the law so that it's read: "Guilty Until Proven Innocent".

    Once we get the hard AIs developed, we'll train them to be ruthless government agents that monitor you 24/7 and report EVERYTHING crime or no. Complete with pre-authorization to terminate you at anytime for any reason. Death is the only punishment.

    Because nothing less will defeat terrorism / protect the children / get rid of communism / kill all the gays / defeat Hitler / etc.... but it won't do the one thing that needs to be done: Getting rid of tyrannical governments that terrorize their citizens in the name of power and greed.

  50. Re:So Hitler taught them nothing? by ma1wrbu5tr · · Score: 1

    And to think they told us the Nazis lost World War II.

    --
    Why can't we go back to using jumpers to configure slot adapter cards? Why? I say!
  51. Re:too bad! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    I've you've ever been a USCIS biometric center you would have seen that the US government fingerprints children all day.

    That, and the ubiquitous fraud of suggesting that children be fingerprinted because if someone snatches your kids, the fingerprints might help the cops find them. Thanks for believing that bullshit, mom, you fucking idiot.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  52. Re:So Hitler taught them nothing? by johanw · · Score: 1

    They should not let them in in the first place, but with Merkel in charge that's not going to happen. And she needs to break encryption to prevent anyone being able to organize against her.

  53. Re:So Hitler taught them nothing? by johanw · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Merkel is a product of the DDR (former East Germany, notorious for its secret police STASI) and it shows.

  54. Re:Germany plans to "fingerprint" children by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

    Once we get the hard AIs developed, we'll train them to be ruthless government agents

    Version 2.0 will be named "Smith"

    --
    The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  55. Re:So Hitler taught them nothing? by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

    Just for giggles, try comparing those prints to your current hand/foot prints. The entire reason they used footprints was that handprints were relatively useless for ID, but parents liked having the representation. Both are useless for ID purposes later on.

    --
    The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  56. Re:So Hitler taught them nothing? by fish_in_the_c · · Score: 1
    --
    âoeTolerance applies only to persons, but never to truth. Intolerance applies only to truth, but never to persons.
  57. Re: too bad! by johanw · · Score: 1

    Not really, he should not let any new muslims in the country anyway. If they come anyway, there are some nice places in Poland where to send them.

  58. Re:Totalitarian's pattern by johanw · · Score: 1

    Importing more muslims will get you a new home-grown generation in 25 years. And you can look for a solution to the same muslims: the Turks showed it to us when they wanted to get rid of the Armenians.

  59. Re: too bad! by KGIII · · Score: 1

    LOL

    If you enjoy living in Brazil, you must be one of the luckier ones who isn't a slum. I've visited your country. It has some nice features, but it's a corrupt shithole, pretty much everywhere - except for the wealthy and tourists.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  60. Re: too bad! by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    And on which legal and moral basis should he do that?
    Kill them at the border? Or hunt them down after they sneaked through the border?

    You are an idiot.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  61. Re:So Hitler taught them nothing? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    You are an idiot. ... They are in such denial about the Nazi time that they don't teach it in school....
    Germans learn in history classes in school: 25% greek roman stuff, 25% Napoleon, and 50% world war II/third reich/Hitler.
    And there are "weiÃY Gott" plenty of things that are equaly or more important history things to learn in school.

    You are bloody damn stupid idiot.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  62. Those words by dmomo · · Score: 1

    Clever word crafting. They want to soften the blow of invasive privacy violations with the word "traditional". Traditional surveillance is a stake-out, or phone tapping with a warrant. Traditional surveillance is not monitoring all communication and movement of the entire citizenry.

  63. Re:Totalitarian's pattern by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    They are only cracking down on the privacy and free speech of muslims.
    Actually they/we are not.
    What has fingerprinting to do with privacy and free speach?

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  64. Re:So Hitler taught them nothing? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Re "You really would think Germany of all places would know better"
    They really do know better but not in any good way.
    In the 1920-30's Germany faced communist issues so the German gov had to use the telco networks to see how the communists got funding, support.
    From the 1930's-1945 Germany had to worry about many different spies moving around.
    So a really good understanding of the telco network was needed.
    After 1945 the mission was to keep communism and fascism out of West Germany.
    In East Germany the CIA, MI6, NGO's and their groups tried to create issues deep in East Germany. So the telco networks East and West had to be able to track all calls.
    Enigma was also a something Germany learned from later. Understanding all encryption is how to win.

    Thats generations and decades and decades of telco workers legally helping very different governments in Germany.
    Germany has had a collect it all mind set for generations of workers.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  65. Re:So Hitler taught them nothing? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    AC the use of any encryption will be detected on any network.
    Big brand encryption junk will not work and be open to the gov.
    Any attempts to download and use free, open source or create encryption will be discovered.
    The connected telco device or networked computer will be accessed and a created private app will be giving plain text, files and voice due to device changes.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  66. Re:So Hitler taught them nothing? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Not really, it's just not talked about.

    In some ways, Japan is more open about it. For instance Japan has sex dolls for pedophiles. Although data is preliminary, these dolls appear to reduce predatory behavior by giving pedos a harmless outlet. It is unthinkable that America could do something this sensible.

  67. Re:So Hitler taught them nothing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Not just a souvenir, used to identify a baby should they be switched or what not.

  68. Democracy in Action by Capsaicin · · Score: 1

    There are cultural difference between how children are raised in Germany vs America. In Germany, kids are viewed as more of a collective responsibility rather than just the concern of the nuclear family.

    This is not about fingerprinting German kids, nor is it really about children at all.

    On its face it's about surveilling people thought to be at risk of committing acts of terror. Primarily this would involve listening in on electronic communications and attempting to regulate encryption. As a (minor) part of this initiative, the age at which fingerprinting could be carried out would be lowered from 14 to 6, according to TFA "for asylum seekers" (and I imagine for non-citizen children generally). Now if anyone were going to be fingerprinted under this initiative, it would overwhelmingly be young (ca.16-35) islamic male asylum seekers.

    This may look like a simple over-reaction to the recent >weekly Ramadan terror attacks in Europe ... think again. What is soon to take place in Germany?

    Note especially where this announcement was made: Dresden. That is to say the birthplace of PEGIDA . Is that not pointed enough?

    What this is, is the ruling conservative party, the CDU , gearing up to election mode and trying to stem the flow of a portion of their electoral base to the neo-nationalist AfD farther to their right. The centre, as always, is being defined by the extremes.

    Electoral politics is what you get when the people are allowed to vote for a government of their choosing. What we are witnessing, though the naive might see it simply as a "lurch towards authoritarianism," is in fact democracy in action ... warts and all.

    --
    Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke
    1. Re: Democracy in Action by aliquis · · Score: 1

      EU and democracy doesn't go hand in hand.

    2. Re: Democracy in Action by aliquis · · Score: 1

      German? I said EU.

      I won't consider any nation with restricted freedom of speech and information a democracy by any means because then you can't have educated voters. I will consider all representative democracies shit for not necessarily being according to the will of the people but in the end I will view enforced collectivism and democracy something bad even in the best of worlds because at its best it's the rule of the majority over everyone else and I don't want to be ruled in the first place. So .. There.

      Even if a nation WAS a democracy as soon as you've let it disable the foundation of democracy then any further progress shouldn't be considered the result of democracy. Because the choices or what led up to them wasn't really free. It was rigged.

  69. Re:So Hitler taught them nothing? by chihowa · · Score: 1

    That happened to me as a kid as part of a Boy Scout event and I remember being a little weirded out about it later. I recently did a forensics demonstration at an middle school and I made a point of letting the kids keep their fingerprint cards to do with as they pleased. They were the standard FBI cards that say "Applicant", so I did tell them that they were the first step to join FBI if they wanted to hold onto them!

    --
    If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
  70. Re:So Hitler taught them nothing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Depends on how much choice economic migrants have.

    It doesn't apply to migrants, who by definition would be abiding by "normal immigration rules," but to asylum seekers, who are instead relying on their Asylrecht.

  71. Re:So Hitler taught them nothing? by cold+fjord · · Score: 1
    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  72. Re:So Hitler taught them nothing? by lgw · · Score: 1

    It doesn't apply to migrants, who by definition would be abiding by "normal immigration rules," but to asylum seekers, who are instead relying on their Asylrecht.

    Ah, the imaginary asylum seekers. Dude, they're looking for a country with a real economy. More power to them for that, but they're economic migrants.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  73. Re:Totalitarian's pattern by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    That was a typo on my part. They aren't cracking down on the privacy of normal people any more than it already is. There's no new allowances for data collection here only for the facility to collect data unencrypted.

    What has fingerprinting to do with privacy

    Do you really have to ask this?

  74. My children have already been fingerprinted by mooterSkooter · · Score: 1

    It's for their school cafeteria and I told my wife that I didn't want it done but apparently I was being "paranoid".

  75. Is encryption even a problem? by sabbede · · Score: 1

    You already can't listen in on physically private conversations, like two people in a room you couldn't bug ahead of time, or any of the zillion ways spies and terrorists have passed messages in the past. It's hardly new that there are ways to communicate that can't be intercepted or monitored, it's just more convenient now. At least now security agencies can often tell if communication has occurred.

  76. Ya know, Germany... by OfMiceAndMenus · · Score: 1

    If you want people to stop associating you with the Nazis of your past, maybe you shouldn't repeat their actions...

  77. Re:So Hitler taught them nothing? by Bitbeisser · · Score: 1

    Its fingerprinting for asylum seekers as young as 6 (current minimum age is 14), not all residents.

    Summary fails to note that point.

    And even more, the actual reason as to why the finger printing is to be done is to prevent that the same person (child) gets registered and receives services under more than one name. Children change their appearance very quickly, so a photo on an ID doesn't serve much of a purpose for them...

  78. Re: So Hitler taught them nothing? by aliquis · · Score: 1

    The fine thing with a final solution is that it is final.

    Also: where do you put kebabs?

  79. Re: So Hitler taught them nothing? by aliquis · · Score: 1

    the world would had been a much much safer

    Sounds like fake news and alternative facts to me.

  80. Re:Totalitarian's pattern by Altrag · · Score: 1

    Or they become a community that supports your existing Muslim population and a few less start looking toward ISIS and friends for a place to belong.

    Fear and hatred have never done much to stop violence. Occasionally though, an olive branch can.

  81. Re:Totalitarian's pattern by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    Yes, I have to ask this. As I don't see any connection to real life.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  82. Re:Totalitarian's pattern by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Yes, I have to ask this. As I don't see any connection to real life.

    So you would also be happy to adopt a national ID scheme, facial recognition scheme, maybe barcodes on the back of people's necks? Part of privacy is anonymity.

  83. Re:Totalitarian's pattern by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    Face recognition and fingerprints are already (thanx to the USA) on all passports in the EU and most other nations.

    What bar codes on the neck have to do with that is escaping me ...

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  84. Re:Totalitarian's pattern by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Yes, be a good citizen. You will be rewarded.

  85. Re:Totalitarian's pattern by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    You are an idiot.

    I'm talking about FACTS.

    Not about my OPINION, idiot.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  86. Re:Totalitarian's pattern by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    I'm talking about FACTS.

    There's not a fact in any of your posts. Just ignorance when you can't see how things related to each other.

  87. Re:Totalitarian's pattern by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    There are two facts, actualy three:
    a) you are an idiot
    b) you can not read
    c) I explained several times that evey European, and also most other world nations, who have a relatively new passport already have biometric info and that includes fingerprints on those passports

    I never talked about anything totalitarian, nazi like or if I like it or don't like it.

    But thanx for insulting me just because you are to dumb to read and answer a honest question.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  88. Re:Totalitarian's pattern by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    But thanx for insulting me

    Yeah it sucks when someone insults back doesn't it.

  89. Re:Totalitarian's pattern by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    You started it.
    And pointing out that you are an idiot is not an insult but just stating a fact :)

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.