Slashdot Mirror


Young Men Are Working Less. Some Economists Think It's Because They're Home Playing Video Games. (nytimes.com)

Video games are instrumental in understanding why younger men are working fewer hours, according to a paper published Monday by the National Bureau of Economic Research. From an article: By 2015, American men 31 to 55 were working about 163 fewer hours a year than that same age group did in 2000. Men 21 to 30 were working 203 fewer hours a year. One puzzle is why the working hours for young men fell so much more than those of their older counterparts. The gap between the two groups grew by about 40 hours a year, or a full workweek on average. Other experts have pointed to a host of reasons -- globalization, technological change, the shift to service work -- that employers may not be hiring young men. Instead of looking at why employers don't want young men, this group of economists considered a different question: Why don't young men want to work? Economists Erik Hurst and his colleagues estimate that, since 2004, video games have been responsible for reducing the amount of work that young men do by 15 to 30 hours over the course of a year (syndicated source). Using the recession as a natural experiment, the authors studied how people who suddenly found themselves with extra time spent their leisure hours, then estimated how increases in video game time affected work. Between 2004 and 2015, young men's leisure time grew by 2.3 hours a week. A majority of that increase -- 60 percent -- was spent playing video games, according to government time use surveys. In contrast, young women's leisure time grew by 1.4 hours a week. A negligible amount of that extra time was spent on video games. Likewise for older men and older women: Neither group reported having spent any meaningful extra free time playing video games.

152 of 283 comments (clear)

  1. Riiiiiight by robinsonne · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It couldn't be that it's harder to find full-time jobs or that the full-time jobs keep having fewer and fewer hours (36.5 hours was the average full-time job last I saw.)

    But no, we're all at home playing video games. I wish I had gotten that memo!

    1. Re:Riiiiiight by Cipheron · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Women work part time jobs: blame the system! Men work part time jobs: lazy men!

      Double standard bite both ways.

    2. Re:Riiiiiight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      This is the most sexist thing I've ever seen on /. (The article, not the parent.) I mean try to imagine "there's no wage gap, these economists say women just spend more time on their hair." (According to the article, women spend the same amount of extra time on "Optional sleeping, eating and personal care." Check me out, I'm an economist.)

    3. Re:Riiiiiight by cheesybagel · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The NEET phenomenon (like they call it in Japan) is due to several reasons. One is that with smaller one-child families it becomes less important to get your own house since there is room to spare. Also houses have become a lot more expensive. Where like 3-4 decades ago in the West someone could buy a house with 3 years work now it takes like 8 years work for the average citizen to get a house. In addition studies take a lot longer so you graduate college at 21 years. Two generations ago someone who was 16 years old typically was in an apprenticeship while at 18 they were employed. If this person then takes a Masters degree they graduate even later and meanwhile they aren't working. Another factor is that it is much harder to find a steady job, or even an entry level job, which pays enough for someone to constitute his own family, especially for those without qualifications, even those with the studies for it are typically required to have prior experience, and even those who are employed typically do not enjoy full employment. Without job security it is hard to be able to pay a loan and get a house. If you only need enough money for clothes and food you only need to work a couple hours per week.

      Also typically modern companies to do not pay for overtime and quite a lot of people don't want to get in the rat race because of this.

      Computer games has little to nothing to do with it. It's not like you couldn't play football or fish on your spare time like they did a couple generations ago. Back then it was also common for people to drive around to spend their time. This became less common as fuel prices went up. Because of higher fuel prices youngsters and the unemployed started holing up indoors, stopped buying cars, and online gaming became more common.

      There was a lot more pressure to leave your parents house with large families with several people in each bedroom and this was a lot easier to do back when houses were cheaper. I have as much room for myself on my parents house today as my parents did when were married. I got a whole floor for myself. So why should I get my own house and lose the advantages of shared living? Even those who don't want to live with their parents today sometimes live in youngster communities once they leave college because of this.

      I got my own car, which I bought brand new and paid for it with cash, I own a plot of land that's over twice the area of my parents house, I can use as much floor space in their house as they did when they got married, and I have like 3 years savings in the bank. Why should I slave away in a thankless job? Fuck em. If the job is interesting I do it, if it's not I don't.

    4. Re:Riiiiiight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      The NEET phenomenon

      NEET means "Not in Education, Employment, or Training" so I don't know why you are talking about master degrees and apprenticeships and such. NEETs don't do any of that.

    5. Re:Riiiiiight by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 2

      As a professional videogame developer, I approve of this trend. Except that we need to get women playing more videogames as well. For equality, of course.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    6. Re:Riiiiiight by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 1

      I wish I was working a bit less and had more time to play videogames.

    7. Re:Riiiiiight by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      If you include mobile/casual, women already make up about 50%.

    8. Re:Riiiiiight by sd4f · · Score: 1

      What category do graduates who work as baristas or in bars fall in?

    9. Re:Riiiiiight by Z80a · · Score: 1

      There's nothing stopping women from playing video games, and they do it.
      But they generally avoid AAA titles because they're generally in for a quick and addictive fun, not a massive boring cutscene fest with shallow gameplay.

    10. Re:Riiiiiight by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Yeah but we're talking about games, not shit.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    11. Re:Riiiiiight by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Weird that you see this as "blaming" men. Why the automatic assumption that men are being victimized?

      It's just an observation. A rather poor one, but it doesn't seem to be saying "men waste time on video games when they should be working" or anything like that. In fact the main thing they found is that when men have more free time due to recession, they often spend it playing video games, and then hypothesise that even when work is available young guys prefer a better work/life balance over long hours at the office.

      Quite likely it's just the positive effect of more women in the workplace changing the culture, or at least some more progressive ideas about priorities in life.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    12. Re:Riiiiiight by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Funny how economists are just as shit at predicting what the economy will do as anybody else. I rarely see this pointed out for some reason.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    13. Re:Riiiiiight by Cipheron · · Score: 1

      Also, any time gender in video games comes up they are keen to remind us that women are 50% of game players. But then they fall back on the same "male lazy gamer" trope when it suits the narrative. You can't win.

  2. That's stupid. by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why don't young men want to work?

    They've made a BIG assumption there. They skipped the important bit about why they aren't hiring and jumped straight to "let's blame them with what they are spending their time on," which is a really shitty thing to do.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:That's stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That was the goal in its entirety.

      Admitting that there are reasons other than "they're lazy ingrates" would be to admit that there is a problem which cannot be blamed on the victims; one that needs significant alterations to the current economic model in order to solve.

      Those same people shipping their entire programming force or engineering work to a middle-eastern call-center want to keep pocketing as long as they can, collapsing middle-class (ideally) be damned.

    2. Re:That's stupid. by ranton · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They've made a BIG assumption there. They skipped the important bit about why they aren't hiring and jumped straight to "let's blame them with what they are spending their time on," which is a really shitty thing to do.

      It's not only a shitting thing to do; it's a brain dead stupid thing to do. I'm starting to think most of our society's problems are caused by idiots who don't understand the difference between causation and correlation. Or even the tendency to mistake the result for the cause.

      I for instance make triple the income I did in my 20's, and I spend about four times as much on housing. By this idiot's methodology, I should probably buy a house four times as expensive as my current one because my income will triple again. Why didn't I think of this earlier?

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    3. Re:That's stupid. by Whorhay · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not that I disagree with that, but why the hell would I want to work? The only reason I have ever wanted to work in my life has been to get money for the things that I want. Doing more work than is required of me is counter productive because it eats up my time for doing things that actually interest me. If I could, I would gladly work fewer hours for proportionately less pay, but my employer isn't interested in that kind of schedule and it doesn't seem like there are many professional jobs with that kind of option.

    4. Re:That's stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Here's a really, really funny fact since Male labor force participation tends to be directly tied to having families.

      The GAO (In retirement security research specifically) and Pew Research occasionally publish statistics about male fertility rates. GAO data on retirement security is very conservative on the matter, Pew Research is very liberal, and there are other data sources that have a lot more colorful outlook on the matter suffice to say. They usually break them down into age ranges of men never married and without children from ages 0-08, 19-24, 24-35, 35-45 and 45. Presently, About 16% of men currently aged 45 and older have never been married and have never had kids. Back in 1992 that rate was 5%. Lots of the demographic data indicates there's 2 groups; one that can't get a decent job, and the other with great paying jobs who saw their fathers get divorced and screwed over and who have decided either they are going to marry miss perfect or nobody.

      If you do the math on the run rate on that one, By the time the current 0-18 male demographic hits 45 in around 27 years, and we're talking irregardless of race here since all races are affected, well over half of them will never have had kids and never will have been married.

      Now think about it a just a little bit further. When that demographic group hits 45, and the rate hits 50% never married no kids, what that means is the 35-45 group is going to be closer to 70% and the 24-35 group is going to be around 90%. Ultimately, what that means is in about 5-10 years, around 50% of men ages 18-45 will not be married and will not have kids. They obviously don't have prospects for families, jobs, incomes, and whatnot. They will also be very, very pissed off given the bleak outlook. Almost every time that's happened, you end up with radicalization and a really crappy ending.

      The US governments solution, and the EU's solution, for the net-negative fertility rates in order to keep the economy from going into a depression, is to bring in lots of foreigners to replace them and do tons of marketing on how being Gay is OK.

      Really, the "economists" are casting what can be effectively readily argued as a eugenics program as mere irresponsability. Nobody likes saying that because it sounds nasty, but that's life.

      The funny part? I don't think those men are going to radicalize, I think they are going to organize, a whole lot of executives and government employee's are going to have some VERY unfair jury trials and end up in solitary confinment for the rest of their lives, those men are going to work harder and smarter than any generation prior because gaming has made them smarter and wiser than any generation prior. Afterall, you have millions of men thinking throught their problems and being social all day long in these games, and learning why being internet dickwad is not constructive. They will also have the most finely tuned BS detectors ever. If the Weimar Republic can turnaround with the kind of tech available in the 1930's, imagine what America can do with what we have today.

    5. Re:That's stupid. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What's daft is the gaming talk when it's an average *two hours* a week out of 60 hours of leisure time. Watching TV rates at 17 hours on the same chart. The charts don't show hours worked so it's like either assumptions on gaming taking away from working hours or they didn't bother to present the information they're working from.

    6. Re:That's stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      also the assumption that you should want to work. If your work is boring and gaming isn't why wouldn't you minimize the prior and maximize the later? That is the problem with econ IMO: they assume that the only thing that matters is money. Maybe gamers can get by on less money because they only need a few hundred a month to buy games vs a $40 smokes and booze habit of yesteryear. If you are happy who cares? Stop working when you have enough.

    7. Re:That's stupid. by E-Rock · · Score: 2

      They also missed the part where these men are happier than their peers that work more.

    8. Re:That's stupid. by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      At my last job (where I was still a bachelor and not like now, where I'm in the early family planning stages) I was locked in to a very low rental rate, had no external expenses (car, insurance, health costs etc) and was continuing to live the same (very, very cheap) lifestyle I had when I was unemployed during the 2008 crisis (a couple hundred dollars a month after rent)... if I could have gone down to 30 or even 20 hours a week I may have taken it. I had enough surplus money to travel extensively, but not enough to really save for the downpayment on a house.
       
      If I didn't have to worry about rising rent costs or cost of health insurance (or family planning) I'd probably opt to take the fewest number of hours to meet my living costs + monthly savings quota.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    9. Re:That's stupid. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      There are decent arguments for overdressing in interviews because suits are prejudiced towards other suits and it can get you more money. Get a really nice suit if you want to play this game, half assing it won't work.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    10. Re: That's stupid. by adolf · · Score: 1

      I am completely uneducated, and recently moved to a new city in the Midwest because I wanted to.

      The very first job I applied for found pays $38k (which is adequate here), and has excellent benefits that far outweigh anything that might seem lacking in payscale. They hired me immediately.

      Am I doing something wrong, or doing something right?

      So far in my adult life, nobody has questioned my education or lack thereof.

    11. Re:That's stupid. by Falos · · Score: 1

      It might seem poorly-supported and inflammatory. But maybe that's because they wanted inflammatory. Because of course they did. Anyone seen Nightcrawler? No, I'm not bringing it up to make a point about the borked job economy - I'm reminding us that media loves misery. It's next-gen clickbait. They exhausted the words "trick", "believe", and "top".

      So they troll.

    12. Re:That's stupid. by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Most likely either because it's pointless due to lack of additional return, or because the amount of money they get per turn of the crank is sufficient. Who said that working should take up 100% of their time? (probably the sackless white knights who think men exist solely to provide for women)

    13. Re:That's stupid. by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      The important question appears to be "why aren't men motivated to work harder"?

      Why work past the point of diminishing returns?

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    14. Re:That's stupid. by swb · · Score: 1

      I think capitalism relies on a large amount of moralizing to coerce workers into unfavorable job markets. Young men wasting time on gaming is just the latest iteration. In years past it was alcohol consumption, opium, and marijuana that were diverting labor into indolence rather than providing capital with a labor force.

      If the segment of workers who find themselves satisfied with less or little labor force participation stay out of the labor market, business owners will wind up with a smaller labor pool better able to negotiate for wages and benefits.

      Creating a morally coercive environment that creates social pressure on disinterested workers to engage in workforce participation enlarges the pool of workers and creates downward pressure on labor costs.

    15. Re:That's stupid. by sd4f · · Score: 1

      Chess is a game...

    16. Re:That's stupid. by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      Who said that working should take up 100% of their time? (probably the sackless white knights who think men exist solely to provide for women)

      Exactly.

    17. Re:That's stupid. by sd4f · · Score: 1

      A lot of games train your brain. Some of the more broadly applicable skills it can help develop is memory and problem solving. Is it comprehensive; probably not, but like when you go to a gym, you want to train everything in order to improve overall. Chess can be one of your exercises.

  3. Work-Life Balance by Timothy2.0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While the article specifically suggests video games, I'd suggest it's a broader dimension of work-life balance. I think there's been a culture shift that killing yourself for your job isn't worth it, particularly when employers are showing less and less loyalty to their employees than in previous generations. Couple that with the idea that people just can't get ahead, be it because of debt from education, etc, and who's going to bust their hump like Grandpa did for 30 years? When the option to work less, enjoy more leisure time, and defer the costs of living to your credit cards is so appealing, is it any wonder that a trend of working less is emerging? Video games just happen to be the entertainment channel of choice.

    1. Re:Work-Life Balance by ProzacPatient · · Score: 1

      This is what I felt also. I think the newer generation is looking at working as a means to live whereas employers expect their employees to live to work and practically worship the company.

    2. Re:Work-Life Balance by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The very definition of having "made it" has changed too. These days if a young person can get a house they are doing pretty well, and that property is also their pension. It's often their inheritance too - in the UK the only way many people can afford property, if they can at all, is with a loan from their parents or just waiting for some relative to die and leave them some money/property.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:Work-Life Balance by swillden · · Score: 4, Interesting

      While the article specifically suggests video games, I'd suggest it's a broader dimension of work-life balance. I think there's been a culture shift that killing yourself for your job isn't worth it

      I don't think so. I look at my own kids and their friends, and I see a definite impact of video gaming on their productivity.

      Note that in what follows, I'm going to start with an illustrative anecdote, then generalize to some more anecdotes. I'm not claiming this is "data", just that it demonstrates a pattern that may explain how video games could actually reduce work hours and related issues, not because of a focus on work/life balance, but because gaming sucks up available time and energy. Perhaps the best word is "focus". Gaming reduces focus on real life issues.

      As my prime example, there's a young man who lives in my house. He's a friend of my sons whose own family life was severely problematic. Not abusive, more inattentive and economically dysfunctional. He ended up abandoning school at age 14 to work full time to support his family because his dad was unable to get a job. At age 18, two years ago, he came to visit us for a month, and stayed. We agreed to let him stay because we had room, felt sorry for the mess he was coming from and wanted to help him. We figured that living with us would give him the time to get his GED, then start getting onto a college career track (he's a bright kid; something of an obnoxious geeky know-it-all, but he has the intelligence to back it up, if only he had the education to use that intelligence).

      Two years in, he has a part-time job flipping burgers, no GED and no college plans.

      Three months in, he didn't even have the job, though he did have a fancy gaming rig that he brought with him. We had been talking to him regularly about his life trajectory and plans, with no effect. To try to get him to make progress, we helped him find information on getting a GED... and we started charging him rent. Only token rent, actually, $300 per month which includes all of his food (he eats at least $300 per month), utilities, etc., and we weren't too picky about him falling behind. That did motivate him to get a job (at the burger place where he still works)... but he didn't actually pay rent very regularly, instead spending most of his money on gaming.

      About a year in, we cracked down on the rent requirement. We gave him a deadline to get caught up on his rent, and said that if he didn't, we'd load his stuff in the truck and take him to his mom's house (500 miles away). Because our three-month deadline was generous, he did nothing until a month before the deadline, then decided it was impossible since what he owed was about 150% of his month's income and he hadn't saved a dime. So, he told his boss that he was giving 30 days' notice, and explained the reason. His boss told him that he didn't want to lose him and would make sure that he had enough hours that month to pay his back rent and get caught up. He did, and has stayed current on his rent.

      But... no movement at all on education. The gaming rig, however, has grown to epic proportions.

      We sat him down for a formal discussion of his future a few days ago, and the conversation was enlightening. We told him that we were going to set a series of deadlines for taking a GED prep course, taking the GED, taking an ACT prep course, and taking that test. He said okay, and we asked him why he hadn't already made progress on the GED. He said that he just hadn't had time... and after some more discussion it became clear that this wasn't an excuse and it wasn't temporizing, it was really what he thought, that his 28-hour work week left him no time to look up when and where to take the GED.

      How could that be? Well, his habit, every day, is to wake up thinking about the games he's going to play, with new ideas about how to approach this boss fight, or optimize that character, or some clever combination of tricks for the other scenario.

      And here's where

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    4. Re: Work-Life Balance by sttlmark · · Score: 1

      Great commentary. Thanks for sharing.

    5. Re:Work-Life Balance by swillden · · Score: 1

      You didn't read the post you responded to. You got halfway through and quit.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    6. Re:Work-Life Balance by swillden · · Score: 1

      Unlike alcohol, I don't want gaming out of my life. I just need a healthier relationship with it where I game when I want to, not because I don't want to do anything at all and that is the easiest way to pass time.

      +1000. I don't want anyone to think that I mean video games are bad. I like 'em myself. But it's appropriate to call them a Skinner's box, and they are addictive in the same way, and for much the same reasons, that gambling is. Gambling can also be great entertainment... if you can approach it the right way, in moderation and as part of an overall healthy lifestyle. But it can be hard not to get sucked in. And gambling is obviously much more destructive than gaming. Excessive gaming deprives you of economic and other opportunities while excessive gambling destroys you financially.

      I hope your teenager figures his shit out so he doesn't have these regrets.

      He's 20 now, so not a teenager. But, yeah, I really hope he figures it out, too. And he's going to have to do it pretty quickly because we're not supporting someone else's kid indefinitely. We aren't willing to support our own kids indefinitely.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  4. Uh-huh. by Tesen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Could it be that "young" men just saw the prior generation(s) go through massive lay off's, lost their houses, their life savings and decided, "screw this, if the reward can be taken away like that, why the F should I work so hard?"

    Really IMHO American corporations have themselves to blame for this. They have done a very good job of removing any kind of job security, chased profits for the sake of chasing profits, off-shored, out-sourced, missed en masse why claiming it was "necessary". Yeah I get it.

    1. Re:Uh-huh. by Tesen · · Score: 2

      *dismissed en masse

    2. Re:Uh-huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Spot on. People are only going to work hard and be loyal to their employer if they get something in return - job security and respect, for example. If loyalty and hard work get you nothing then doing the bare minimum to get by is an entirely rational response: you only get one life, why waste it working for nothing?

    3. Re:Uh-huh. by ausekilis · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Really IMHO American corporations have themselves to blame for this. They have done a very good job of removing any kind of job security, chased profits for the sake of chasing profits, off-shored, out-sourced, missed en masse why claiming it was "necessary". Yeah I get it.

      This exactly. Corporations have been so busy chasing profits that they've forgotten about who makes those profitable products. When you stop caring about your workforce, they stop caring about you.

      Just in my ~15 years of career I've started with 15 days/year of holiday (10 federal + 5 discretionary) with 401k (with up to 8% matching) AND pension plans. Now its 10 days/year of holidays and 401k with 4% matching, if you're lucky. No pensions, less matching of 401k, less vacation (overall), an arguably a higher expectation of hours put in.

        Pay hasn't increased substantially, my starting salary post-B.S. was ~$50k, and it's now somewhere around $53k some 12 years later. When I first started, I knew who the CEO was and they knew who I was (or at least who my boss was). Even more, I had shaken their hand and had a chance to talk to them in person. Now? They're just some guy in that has an aide or intern send an email out every few months telling us how awesome he is.

    4. Re:Uh-huh. by Kiuas · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Really IMHO American corporations have themselves to blame for this. They have done a very good job of removing any kind of job security, chased profits for the sake of chasing profits, off-shored, out-sourced, missed en masse why claiming it was "necessary". Yeah I get it.

      What did you expect them to do?

      Back when global trade began to pick up speed corporations (not just American ones, everywhere) were completely happy using and selling slave labor. It should be pretty clear to people everywhere at this point that corporations as entities are not moral or immoral, they're amoral, driven by profit alone. They've never had any other purpose or goal. They don't even care about breaking laws if the costs incurred by the penalties or settlements are smaller than the profit to be made by doing so. I mean that's what happened in the '08 crisis. The major players settled, a lot of the costs were shifted to the tax-payers in the form of bailouts and many of the banks still made a profit. Why would you expect them to suddenly start acting differently?

      And most importantly they've spent enough money lobbying politicians so that any talk of regulating companies is usually met with instant hatred by the defenders of 'the free market' who firmly believe that only by maximizing 'freedom' on the market through deregulation and giving the corporations even more power to act as they please and less responsibilities will everything be fixed.

      But there's another side to this as well: it's not just the corporations, it's also the consumers. People want cheaper commodities and cutting out expensive western manufacturing labor is one way of meeting that demand. The majority of the products of off shoring production are sold back to western consumers.

      --
      "It is the business of the future to be dangerous" -Alfred North Whitehead
    5. Re:Uh-huh. by luther349 · · Score: 2

      you hit the nail on the head they have been steadily cutting wages removing any job security and even cutting peoples hrs to avoid taxes. company's so busy profit chasing people are forced to work insane hrs for shitty wages and people are only going to do that for so long. once they catch on normally around there early 30s they take a look at what there doing busting ass for little to no reward and simply make changes so they dont have to work so mutch. but big business cant bring up the real issues just like are government refuses to as they also profit chase so they always make some excuse or try and pass the blame.

    6. Re:Uh-huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      People want cheaper commodities and cutting out expensive western manufacturing labor is one way of meeting that demand. The majority of the products of off shoring production are sold back to western consumers.

      I WANT reliable, well-made, lasting commodities. I can only AFFORD cheap, poorly-made, easily-wearing commodities. So I either do without (and try to save up to afford the reliable stuff far down the line, assuming it's a want and not a need-to-survive commodity) or I buy the cheap stuff.

      I've spent the last three years job-hunting for something better, both while employed and not, and the best I've been able to source was a job that had benefits that I would pay 50% for as an optional opt-in, with no increase in pay or other benefits.

    7. Re:Uh-huh. by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      Decades of permissive parenting has produced generations of spoiled Attention-Deficit Retards who are unemployable.

    8. Re:Uh-huh. by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      Could it be that "young" men just saw the prior generation(s) go through massive lay off's, lost their houses, their life savings and decided, "screw this, if the reward can be taken away like that, why the F should I work so hard?"

      Really IMHO American corporations have themselves to blame for this. They have done a very good job of removing any kind of job security, chased profits for the sake of chasing profits, off-shored, out-sourced, missed en masse why claiming it was "necessary". Yeah I get it.

      I know thats where I am.
      My Father worked 50-80 hour weeks when I was young I watched him get screwed over by his boss and work himself into a nervous breakdown on one job and is on his way to another at his current job at which he works 50 to 60 hour weeks. It took him decades to pay off student loans and has little retirement to speak of.
      My Grandfather was a company man worked for them same company after getting out of college paid for by the GI bill, he was laid off just a few years before he could retire.

      Fuck that. They both had the shitty work life balance I want to enjoy life, see my as yet hypothetical children I don't care if we have one used car instead of two newer ones. I can walk bike or take a bus to work/store, I don't need a big house when an apartment/small home will do.
      Employers don't give a shit about us and look at us like swap-able replaceable cogs. You give me scraps form the rich-mans table well I just do the bare minimum then. It is still better than the shit work my borderline retarded coworker do so I still look good to my boss why waste the extra effort.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    9. Re:Uh-huh. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Boomers have all the money and property, so many younger people's plan is now to basically wait until some boomer relative dies and they win the inheritance lottery.

      We are moving back to the days of landed gentry, where the main way most people get to have personal wealth or property is by inheriting it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    10. Re:Uh-huh. by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      you only get one life, why waste it working for nothing?

      And here is another major difference. The previous couple of generations were much more religious than the current 18-40 demographic. So they believed that they would be rewarded after death instead of during life. My generation is calling bullshit on that ideology and making sure that our rewards actually happen.

  5. Or maybe they got smart by Snotnose · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They listened to the greybeards talking about the 50-60 hours weeks they worked when they were young, and now see how the greybeards get kicked to the curb. They smartened up, they know there's no real reward for busting your ass for a company.

    1. Re:Or maybe they got smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I figured that out 25 years ago. It was not too hard to see who was let go first.

      The trick where I worked for 20+ years was to 'look' like you worked hard. Even though it was basically a few scripts that were debugged 10 years ago doing everything.

      The place I work now they think I am busting my ass. I am managing 2 tickets and 4 other people are doing the work...

      Just tell people what is going on and you will NOT be over worked.

  6. Why you get paid fucking nothing these days by Tyr07 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They look into the past and see the amount of time people worked.- Back when working a lot afforded you a house, a car, and you could support your family on single income.

    Now you work for a fraction of the price, barely make ends meet, while putting in a shit ton of hours.
    You can't afford a vacation, you have to rent places that can be questionable, your vehicle is falling the fuck apart.
    You can mostly work and give that money to someone else just for the option to live under a shelter, have food and water, clothes, and transportation to work.

    Who the fuck wants to work for that reason? Like fuck off.

    1. Re:Why you get paid fucking nothing these days by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 2

      Holy doom and gloom Batman! That is fucking bleak! I'm not sure what part of the world and what kind of job you're describing, but you might want to reconsider.
      Current life situation is too hard to make drastic changes? Just look at what people have dealt with throughout history. Today there are opportunities abound, if you care to search and reach for them. Nobody said life was easy.

      --
      I tend to rant.
    2. Re:Why you get paid fucking nothing these days by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 2

      You expect me to hold your hand while you jerk off too?
      Grow up buttercup.

      --
      I tend to rant.
    3. Re:Why you get paid fucking nothing these days by Tyr07 · · Score: 1

      "Proof of shitty economy and serious exploitation of labor by corporations and working together to lower wages so you work hard jobs full time while staying in poverty" - Source: Anyone who works a low wage job in a city that requires 1700$ a month for a one bedroom apartment, move to another city you say? What? One where there isn't even the low wage job?

      You: "Nu uhh, seriously guys, things are great"

    4. Re:Why you get paid fucking nothing these days by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 1

      Thanks for putting nice words in my mouth. Usually people are a little more ignorant than that, you're just slightly ignorant.

      This "proof" of collaboration between all the rich to enslave the poor is borderline on the same mentality as the people who think climate change and everyone that matters, politicians, scientists, et al, is in on the lie. Open your mind a little bit instead of crunching on all the negativity you see here on the internet. It's not an obvious thing to do, but you'll feel much better.

      --
      I tend to rant.
    5. Re:Why you get paid fucking nothing these days by Tyr07 · · Score: 1

      That's pretty dumb. I live in the Vancouver area, I can see it first hand.

      Companies out here like privately owned tim hortons caught shit because they were using immigrant workers in shitty conditions to get away with paying cheap labor.

      Mcdonalds was fined for housing immigrants in shitty conditions taking most of their wages back in rent to get cheap labor.
      Did you know you can be considered collaborating with criminals just by witnessing what is being done in saying nothing?

      Companies constantly claim they need visas for immigrant workers for low end jobs because there isn't enough Canadians to work those jobs.
      Let me rephrase it for you, "There isn't enough people at the wages we want to pay available". Manipulation of the labor market, this is one of the few places where the free labor market breaks down, as they're finding ways to manipulate the prices using outside sources.

      You know, like forcing their current IT staff to train their replacements or lose their severance package. Literally ordered to train their cheaper replacement, some dude who accepted the job for lower wages, and then you're fired.

      This is just what I have SEEN in my local area, first hand. Nevermind the rest of the world. (The IT workers it about that bit going on in Disneyland however)

      It's completely ignorant and retarded to ignore the silent agreement. Obviously you're on the side that benefits from the exploitation of people but companies don't need to literally communicate with each other to co-operate in suppressing wages.

      Now gas stations have been busted for doing it in regards to gas price fixing so they don't compete with each other but there are a significant amount of companies who engage in practices to pay people as little as possible. As companies see other companies do shitty things to lower wages and get people for cheaper, no one one step out of line as they're all doing it to horde money.

      There is literally call centers being opened up in places where it's harder to find steady work, getting people to do jobs that usually pay 16-20$ an hour, and companies are letting go of their staff in their main office that are in higher wage areas, and outsourcing to them for 11$ an hour. Constantly looking for people in more desperate areas to force wages lower. They're increasing poverty. Prices aren't cheaper in these towns either for living.

      If anything you're more like the climate change deniers. All the data is there, it's getting hotter, and a lot of people have reported the changes, and you're like, naw brah, you're being negative, it'll be fine don't worry about it. Just ignore it and keep doing what you're doing.

    6. Re:Why you get paid fucking nothing these days by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 1

      I get it, you're angry, and with reason.
      The problem is people like you who've had enough aren't doing anything but voting in politicians that end up doing nothing. I don't vote.

      I know its cliche but you literally need to be the change you want to see in the world, because evil people will always be evil. Ranting on Slashdot to someone who understands you won't change that.

      Currently employed as a programmer but I'd be more than happy living in the woods like they did thousands of years ago, so maybe that's why I'm much more complacent than the norm when it comes to every day life hitting the already shit-filled fan. No need to resort to name calling to justify your anger though, just take some action.

      --
      I tend to rant.
    7. Re:Why you get paid fucking nothing these days by Tyr07 · · Score: 1

      Okay so basically you just said "Slashdot shouldn't have comments because it's pointless"

      Which you might be right, however if I wanted to live out in the woods which I wouldn't mind either, I'd need a whack of cash to purchase the land, obtain materials if not everything I need is on site, power etc.

      Like it's not some cheap thing anyone can pop up if they want to. You need some significant money to accomplish it, and you can't just live off the land. You need to pay for hunting licenses, and there are restrictions to when you can hunt. E.G restrictions to when you can eat unless you have money.

      I wouldn't make assumptions that I voted either, or who I voted for if I did. Nor am I saying I intended to make the change for all the shitty people out there. I'm sure a natural disaster large enough will take care of a lot of it at some point.

      I also see how any politician that looks like they're not corrupt gets shut down hard by politicians we know are corrupt.

      I play by my own rules to change how this will play out, I'm not stuck at some 11$ hour job like many are or even some of my friends, but there is nothing preventing me from seeing the bullshit and calling the bullshit.

      If enough people get tired of the bullshit, maybe eventually we'll all come together and change it.

      But this idea that one person can change the outlook of everything is crap. One person can be largely responsible for change IF people are following that person, and only if.

    8. Re:Why you get paid fucking nothing these days by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 1

      Okay so basically you just said "Slashdot shouldn't have comments because it's pointless"

      No, you just chose to interpret what I said as such.
      End of conversation, you're hopeless..

      --
      I tend to rant.
    9. Re:Why you get paid fucking nothing these days by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 1

      Ok so I read what you said since I sort just immediately dismissed you.

      Yes you can live off the land. There are ways around pretty much every restriction you pointed out. Nobody is going to care if you shoot a big mammal in northern Alaska, heck, nobody will probably even know you're there.

      So that being said, you sound like I used to be in that you see the bullshit, you call it out, and do nothing about it.
      Now I see the bullshit, barely care to call it out unless I'm feeling ranty (tends to happen, you know), and what I've done about it is education on how to distance myself from it all, should I one day decide to fuck off into the woodly nothingness and rely on nothing but myself. Will I end up dead? Yeah probably. Who cares?

      I think that makes sense. Friday afternoons aren't always the most insightful moments.

      --
      I tend to rant.
    10. Re:Why you get paid fucking nothing these days by Tyr07 · · Score: 1

      Right, but I'm commenting on slashdot, I'm quite confident that I'm doing nothing about it in a meaningful way for anyone else.

      I'm doing things for myself for sure, but uh, I mean, if I'm doing nothing and wasting effort by posting comments, we're brothers my friend.

  7. Or it could be because of high unemployment by MatthiasF · · Score: 2

    The unemployment rates for 20-25 year olds is twice that of the other age groups. Males being the worst off group.

    Source:

    https://www.bls.gov/web/empsit...

    1. Re:Or it could be because of high unemployment by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 3, Informative

      The unemployment rates for 20-25 year olds is twice that of the other age groups.

      Or not. At least in the USA, the phrases "left the work force" and "unemployment rate" are completely disconnected. If you're unemployed for a signficant period, you have "left the workfirce", and are no longer counted as unemployed.

      Which is one of the many things that make our definition of "unemployment rate" pretty much meaningless.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    2. Re:Or it could be because of high unemployment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You're citing the Bureau of Labor Statistics on employment data?
      Could you not find a more reputable source?

    3. Re:Or it could be because of high unemployment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      There are different unemployment measurements. Look up the U-6 unemployment rate. It includes people that could be employed, but have given up and also people that are under employed(part-time), but want more.

    4. Re:Or it could be because of high unemployment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, you have left the workforce when you have stopped looking for work. The ability to collect this data is based on your participation. If you're not working but actively trying you're likely collecting unemployment and reporting that. But if you're not employed after six months or a year it's becoming less likely you're going to report to the local workforce center or unemployment office. If you're not pulling a salary, why would they consider you to be employed or looking for work after that point?

      The real truth here is there are plenty of jobs, it's just that young men with no education who were born here feel they shouldn't have to do those jobs. So, there are plenty of others who will take them even if they don't have citizenship. I watch them build houses , build roads, construct buildings, work on power plants, and nearly every construction work is Hispanic. Why do lower income whites feel this is beneath them? Is the work too hard, or are they too lazy? Did they have an expectation of higher incomes because of their parents and don't feel they should put in the work and time? That they should have a higher standard of living just because they were born here?

      Don't blame the Bureau of Labor Statistics for your failure to find a job. That's on you.

    5. Re:Or it could be because of high unemployment by godrik · · Score: 1

      Or not. At least in the USA, the phrases "left the work force" and "unemployment rate" are completely disconnected. If you're unemployed for a signficant period, you have "left the workfirce", and are no longer counted as unemployed.

      hum... no...
      The unemployement rate is the U-3 measure which only means: "people are without jobs and they have actively looked for work within the past four weeks". (source wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... and reference therein )

      Note that the USA quote the u-3 metric as the unemployement rate to allow direct comparison with other countries but other metrics are also reported.

      There are reasons not to like u-3, but "you are not counted if you have not worked XYZ weeks" is not one of them.

    6. Re:Or it could be because of high unemployment by swillden · · Score: 1

      The unemployment rates for 20-25 year olds is twice that of the other age groups. Males being the worst off group.

      Or maybe gaming is part of the reason for the unemployment.

      I don't know about where you live, but where I live employers are desperate for people. My son-in-law, who has no education, not even a high school diploma or GED, just got a $16 per hour job, full-time, with benefits, and that after getting fired from his last three jobs for not bothering to show up. "Help Wanted" signs are everywhere, and all are offering well above minimum wage for unskilled labor. My son has an offer, at a similar pay scale, also full-time, with a company who will also pay for all of the training he needs to do the job (composites tech, making airplane parts) and then give him a pay raise when he completes the course. He's decided not to take it because he wants to finish college instead (I approve heartily).

      I have less insight into the white collar job market locally, but every reason to believe it's just as hot. I know that local headhunters are knocking down my door.

      And yet, I see lots of unemployed young men. They're unemployed because they don't want to work, not because there is no work available. There is lots and lots of work available.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  8. Mostly down to the drop in teen births, probably by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Fewer young men are becoming fathers and being forced into the workforce at an early age, due to improved birth control and information.

  9. retarded by luther349 · · Score: 1

    people are not working due to many factors the current state of the workforce simply not hiring or paying way to little and demanding you work like a slave. people are growing tired of it and simply cutting the crap out of there lives so they can work less and enjoy life..its a proven fact if employers started paying decent wages there employers would be insanely loyal and do there jobs well but they dont give a shit about that only how to dubble there profits every year then cry people hate there jobs and work as little as they can.playing games is not a factor hear its just something they can try and pass the blame on.

    1. Re:retarded by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      You are definitely on point, but reading that made me die a little on the inside. Please tell me you are not a native English speaker, because the grammar in that paragraph was terrible.

    2. Re:retarded by luther349 · · Score: 1

      my spelling sucks but i litterly have awards in my reading and comprehension skills.

  10. Re: And they demand vacation time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If the senior architects can't take a vacation I think the senior architects have some architecting to do.

  11. Why don't companies give us more hours? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's not so much "we're at home playing video games!"
    But more like companies who have started reducing the work week from 40 hours to 35~38 hours a week. By cutting that extra hour or two each week, they figure they can save a lot of money in the long run.
    Heck, many companies, especially in retail, mainly only hire part timers at 20 to 25 hours a week, because they don't want to provide them with health care or other benefits.
    So before blaming the workers, look the other side for a change.

    1. Re:Why don't companies give us more hours? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Companies are happy to give employees more hours.

      They are just not willing to give more pay.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  12. Re: And they demand vacation time... by HornWumpus · · Score: 3, Funny

    all of the architects

    A little title inflation going on?

    Take a 'Bundy vacation' in the office. Stop working. Wear Hawaiian shirts for a week. Say 'aloha' to everyone. Believe it, you're at a luau! Have your staff instruct _everybody_ to humor you, you're 'architects'...Whoever 'they' are, 'they' will give you some time off.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  13. Re:Mostly down to the drop in teen births, probabl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yet another crime to lay at the feet of the evils of SEX EDUCATION!

  14. If that were true.. by richard+cream · · Score: 1

    why come it takes me over 30 minutes to scrounge together a lobby in DOOM during normal working hours?

    1. Re:If that were true.. by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Because the multiplayer in Doom 2016 sucks?

  15. Video Games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yeah, let blame video games rather than a decade of economic stagnation that has left a generation that feel they can't even aspire to the things their parents took for granted would be attainable.

    1. Re: Video Games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes. In what world do working class stiffs get to choose how many hours they work? If anyone is working less it's because they're wanted less.

    2. Re:Video Games by Green+Mountain+Bot · · Score: 1

      Decade? Try nearly 40 years. Yeah, I know the economy boomed some in that time frame, but all but a sliver of the benefit went to the very wealthiest among us, so the feeling that we can't aspire to things our parents took for granted has been building for longer than a decade.

    3. Re:Video Games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I recall that over the past 25 years, my parents always telling me that if I worked hard, was loyal and honest to my bosses, and continuously improved myself, that I would have a safe and steady job, with a pension, benefits and stability. Then I could marry, raise kids, and fulfill a basic expectation of my ancestors and culture: to have kids and propagate their teachings on success.

      I have three degrees (a BSc, an Assoc. and a Masters). I have 20 years of interrelating experience in my field. I find a job, I work increasingly longer hours, 40, 44, 48, 40 + unpaid oncall one night a week and one full weekend a month, with no pension, minimal benefits of which I pay 75% of, have to choose between coursework and certificates (which may be junk, or the HR people may laugh at or may require or might consider) or blowing off enough steam to be able to go back to work the next day, and the rest of the day-to-day rat race, assuming I haven't been laid off due to recession or wanting to be properly paid for my time worked or respected enough to not be sworn at in front of the entire staff meeting for being right.

      I get it. I'm not in the upper 10% of staff, whatever that means in terms of qualifications. I'm arguably a loser. I keep trying. I keep reaching for that brass ring. I somedays wonder why bother anymore. But I keep at it, because I was raised that way.

      The sole consolation I have in all of this was my father, now in his late 70's, who after a heated debate about all of the above, bothered to do his own research on where employment standards are these days, compared them to his own from the 60's and 70's, and apologized to me over a beer for not seeing that the advice he was pushing down my throat was outdated.

      Best beer since I got my Masters, that.

    4. Re:Video Games by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      I would give you one of my mod points if I hadn't already commented

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
  16. Re: And they demand vacation time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Very funny.

    I did something like that after going four years without a single day off. I had lost nearly ten weeks in vacation time, so I brought in an airmatttess and started closing my office door and taking naps. HR finally got the point.

  17. No reason to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We see a lot of these articles lately.

    The most discouraging part is that the majority of the pieces aren't worrying about the lack of upward mobility, stagnant and negative wage growth, increase in male suicide and mental issues, lack of roles in current society for 50% or so of guys, etc.

    No. The true calamity is, instead, the dearth of marriageable men for the many educated and 30+ women who now cannot find a good man to marry. Of course, what this really means is that women, now making just as much as men (if not more when single) refuse to marry men with lower incomes and / or educations than themselves.

    As for myself in my late 30's, I don't have a problem with finding a good and somewhat stable job and income. My problem is that, after seeing numerous older relatives and now friends torn apart by the family court system during a divorce, I have little interest in marrying a 35-40 year old women who just realized, 15 or so years of having fun and finding herself, that she does, in fact, want the kids and family package she was promised. Unfortunately, most of these women are only looking for a guy with enough cash to pay for it all - something increasingly overpriced (houses, weddings, diamonds, kids) in most areas of the US these days.

    So it turns out, I don't really need to spend very much money as a single guy. Without the kids and mortgage and all the rest, it turns out most guys don't really need much money (women spend approximately 80% of discretionary income - that's why advertisements are targeted to them and not single guys). So no need to continue slaving away at the office for the promise of mgmt. or any piece of the profits - the Boomers are still sucking off all the meat, and will be 'till they're last breath. And for me, that means when I'm in my 50s or so, and won't care anyway.

    1. Re:No reason to work by dyslexicbunny · · Score: 1

      This rings too close to home and I'm in my early/mid 30s.

      Online dating got me feeling like I'm just scraps at this point so my plan is get a place and a couple dogs for companionship then check out of relationships for good.

  18. It's Really About Control by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The people like these researchers see young men not as people, but merely as tools that exist to serve their ends.

    Thus the researchers see any time young men spend on things that interest them rather than "being productive" as time being "stolen" from the society that owns them.

    1. Re:It's Really About Control by mjwx · · Score: 1

      The people like these researchers see young men not as people, but merely as tools that exist to serve their ends.

      Thus the researchers see any time young men spend on things that interest them rather than "being productive" as time being "stolen" from the society that owns them.

      These aren't researchers, they're economists. Calling them researchers is an insult to everyone who has ever managed to pass a high school science class.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    2. Re:It's Really About Control by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      To be fair, it's probably not the researchers themselves (though they are very likely to suffer from ideological lensing), it's the ones who pay them.

    3. Re:It's Really About Control by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      The people like these researchers see young men not as people, but merely as tools that exist to serve their ends.

      Society see's men this way - all through history in all civilisations ever recorded men are motivated to provide for the good of society using females as a reward. In recent times this has changed, hence male behaviour has changed.

      Thus the researchers see any time young men spend on things that interest them rather than "being productive" as time being "stolen" from the society that owns them.

      Because it is, in fact, theft from society. Males have always been a net contributor to society. It's only recently that this has changed. Expect the change to accelerate as it is un-PC to give consideration to men the way it is given to women.

      I believe women (and the productive males) can pick up the slack and keep society going while providing an existence-only lifestyle for the rest of the males.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    4. Re:It's Really About Control by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      I believe women (and the productive males) can pick up the slack and keep society going while providing an existence-only lifestyle for the rest of the males.

      I agree with everything except this line of your comment. Women alone are not capable of picking up their own slack, and far too many men are saying fuck it for those remaining to pick up the slack. Until men are respected again society is diving head first into complete collapse.
      For just a moment, take a look at something around you, it really doesn't matter what it is, and think about it. Ask yourself, "Who built this?", and "Who designed this?", your answer will be a man or almost entirely men for everything you see. It doesn't matter if it is a building, a phone, or an ax.
      When men stop designing and building things society will fall.

  19. Those Pokemon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    aren't going to catch themselves!

  20. Re:Mostly down to the drop in teen births, probabl by blindseer · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I don't think it's that fewer young men are failing to become fathers, it's that fewer young men are failing to become married. There are a lot of single mothers that simply decide to live off the "generosity" of the government instead of marrying the fathers of their children. Without the incentive to provide for a family young men will choose to continue living the life much like they did in their teens. An extended adolescence if you will.

    Also, women have been getting encouragement to join the workforce instead of raising their children. A young married couple where both work will drop the kids off at a day care and then both take off at the same time to pick up the kids and be home for supper. In a household where only the husband works the mother will care for the children and household, which means the husband is motivated to work harder and does not see the same pressure to leave work. There is still the desire to be home for supper, which is flexible, but not when the daycare closes, which is not.

    I know couples with multiple children and both work. Both will have to leave work so that one can get the older kid(s) from school while the other gets the younger one(s) from daycare. If there are three children then this can go on for some time.

    Certainly the improvements in birth control has delayed the need for men to provide for a family but I believe there is more to it than that.

    --
    I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
  21. No reason to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Most of the comments are going to be about the lack of jobs, roles, and status most young men in America are now seeing. And this is probably the majority of the reason for men checking out.

    But as a single guy is his prime (mid 30s) who is able to find well paying jobs and earn a good living, I'll tell you why I'm finding less and less reason to give a shit about my career, money, and status anymore. 2 Reasons:

    1. It's apparent that no matter how hard I work and how well I perform, I'm never going to get a decent mgmt position (i.e. share in the profits) of any company because there are way too many older Boomers who are not letting go. Some of them still need the money, others don't, but just aren't ready to retire. Regardless of the reason, I'm stuck in the middle. And if and when my time comes for a senior role, I'll be in my 50's and will care even less than I do now.

    2. Marriage and kids are too risky. Besides the absurd cost of houses and children, lack of job stability, and all the rest, I've seen too many male friends and family be destroyed by divorce: Losing their kids, their savings, and freedom for a decade or two (child support and alimony). Half my friends who are still married don't look like they're enjoying it either (though they all love their kids).

    Without a mortgage, kids, wedding costs, wife who has a spending addiction, etc - turns out a guy like me doesn't need much money to be content. And since I no longer expect anything for my work, I've decided to not give much, either. Fuck it.

  22. BS Work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Another reason. A lot of the work I do is bullshit. Fixing things that should have been done properly the first time or doing things which don't need to be completed. There's so much rework due to horrible design, both in the code and in the team. And then they put the people who know all the details of the system onto new projects and drop all the convoluted bugs onto new guys with no training and somehow expect the overall system to improve. The old guys never improve as they never have to deal with the crap they originally designed and the new guys get completely lost and burn out.

    Recently senior management has demanded metrics. No explained reason, no clarification, no understanding on what type or how they're going to use them. They just want "metrics". Can we please make sales jobs illegal?

  23. Re:... not really smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There is no real reward for playing video games either.

    Yes, but, in a game, anyone can win and get the hot chick. If you fail, retry as many times as necessary. If you can't beat that game or get bored, you can try another one right away, no hurt feelings.
    In real life? not so much.

  24. Re:... not really smart by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

    Some of them do. Ever looked at Kickstarter or Patreon?

  25. It's the effect, not the cause by mrun4982 · · Score: 2

    I'm playing video games (and doing lots of other things in my spare time) because I'm not stupid enough to waste away my life working, not the other way around.

  26. Just a thought by grimfate · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder if lower marriage rates has anything to do with this. Not being married, having a kid, etc. means less pressure to work and earn as much money as you can. And if people aren't getting married, then there's a chance that this would affect the mood of these men and they would need a vice to fill the void. Video games are easy to access, don't really have any downsides and are completely legal. (I'd wonder if this was just because of the relationship landscape overall, but I don't know if people coupling up is less than it used to be.) The fact that more women than ever are probably working also means there might be less pressure on men to work themselves to death. Two pay checks and gender equality means less necessity for men to be the breadwinner. That said, I'd also put my money on video games being the drug of choice for men to spend their spare time with as opposed to men finding ways to increase their spare time to facilitate their gaming habits. (Not that I wouldn't take a day off from work for a new game now and then.)

    1. Re:Just a thought by luther349 · · Score: 1

      what does getting married and having a kid is simple another large expenise in this day and age when people can barley afford to take care of themselves. we live in a wage slave world and when people catch on to this reduce there cost and work less they hate it because your not paying as much into the system they do nothing but steal from.

    2. Re:Just a thought by grimfate · · Score: 1

      Because you have a lot less money if you have a child and if you are supporting a partner. And having a family to support puts pressure on you, not just to work full time, but to work as much as you can to provide them with the best life possible.

      Also, if you're socially isolated and drifting away into virtual worlds, you are less likely to care about society, so if you're not contributing then you probably won't care. Besides, the article doesn't say that these men are pulling out of the work force or working less than required to support themselves. As far as we know, all the men who are working less and dragging down the average are those who were already earning more than they needed to survive and decided to reduce their hours for a little more breathing room.

    3. Re:Just a thought by somenickname · · Score: 2

      I wonder if lower marriage rates has anything to do with this. Not being married, having a kid, etc. means less pressure to work and earn as much money as you can

      I would like to posit a different theory: Not being married with children makes it more likely that you actually *want* to go home.

    4. Re:Just a thought by grimfate · · Score: 1

      heh makes sense.

    5. Re:Just a thought by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Increase their spare time? How does this work? I don't know of any industry where the full time hour/week rate drops much below 38hrs. Most are way more than that. With insane costs for housing and transportation, only a very few lucky and hardworking people can give up work hours and make ends meet.

    6. Re:Just a thought by grimfate · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking more of maybe shift work, where I assume there is more flexibility to choose the number of hours you work. There might be other types of jobs too where you can negotiate hours.

      If they're earning minimum wage it's probably difficult to survive on less than full time. (I guess we need data to see if there is a specific type of guy working less.) Here (I don't live in the US) we have a minimum wage of ~US$10 and a few years ago I was living decently on ~US$200/week (after tax). This leads me to believe that a guy in most countries (US included) who earns more than $10/hour could probably survive comfortably at 30 hours/week in the right location. Now, I was living in a small city (meaning I could walk everywhere and rent was cheaper) and was renting a house with 3 other people, so there are certainly drawbacks, but if you just want to withdraw from the world and play video games as much as you can, you probably don't care about getting a 2 bedroom apartment for yourself in the heart of San Fransisco, i.e. you can live affordably if you're smart about it.

    7. Re:Just a thought by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      Also, if you're socially isolated and drifting away into virtual worlds, you are less likely to care about society, so if you're not contributing then you probably won't care.

      Personally I have absolutely no concern whatsoever about contributing to society.
      Society doesn't owe me anything and I don't owe it anything.
      In fact, any contribution I make to society is either purely by accident or because it benefits me personally.

  27. Jeebus! No wonder we are in trouble. by stnls_steel_mouse · · Score: 1

    If we listen to economists and they come up with stuff this stupid, no wonder the economy is in the crapper!

    You have to be dumber than a sack of hammers, or explicitly trolling to put forth an idea as ridiculous as this.

    Heck I'm not even one of the offended class here, I'm over 60 and can smell BS when it's this thick.

    No jobs, no education, middle class forced into all the entry level retail jobs, what does any one expect?

  28. They're wrong by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 4, Funny

    Young men are working less. Some economists think it's because they're home playing video games.

    They're wrong. It's because of easy access to p0rn websites.

    Now if you'll excuse me, I have "work" to do.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  29. Re:'Video Games' ... or porn by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

    Who watches porn for an hour?! You looking for a plot??

    [John]

    --
    Shit better not happen!
  30. The double standard is the problem by Guitargeek86 · · Score: 1

    Men who have no skills have all day to knock chicks up are the ones having kids. Whey do you think there are so many single mothers? They are not waiting to get married and have kids like they were years ago, men have wised up. The men who choose to have careers and jobs end up either not having kids, raising a bastard child, or marrying someone younger and having children with her. They are not going to work extra hard just to get taken advantage of women have equal opportunities to support the family too. The options for the partner of the equal status of the American man are gone now. Due to welfare and other items, it actually makes it cost prohibitive for educated men to want to get married and have their own kids. That's some messed up stuff and this is why dudes are playing video games more and leaving women alone and avoiding jobs that don't pay them enough to do better. We need to remove the social norm of the woman having custody, and we also need to remove alimony as a whole. I was really hoping for gay rights for marriage because that also means gay divorces. I know that's one group who would see the bull that alimony and child support is. If the chick spread them to get the kid and then won't let a father who has the means and wants to take care of those children have custody, she can figure it out and work. Men just get taken advantage of when we succeed now. The courts are messed up. The worst person to be in the US right now is a white educated male with a steady job. You're not going to get laid by who you want because you're at work, you're a target for some chick who is looking to gain off you, and everyone is out to claim their card against you because you didn't play a poor me argument in the beginning. So why are these guys going to work hard? There is nothing to motivate them to do more. Women also push little boys down all the time by constantly calling their dad's POS' and stuff, and saying men are the scum. If a dude said that shit though, holy hell would there be a sexual harassment lawsuit happening soon. The double standard is killing men and we're checking out.

    1. Re:The double standard is the problem by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Put on your big boy pants, snowflake, and grow up.

    2. Re:The double standard is the problem by Guitargeek86 · · Score: 1

      My big boy pants are on. There are very real reasons men are checking out and it's because we're tired of being treated like a paycheck and then told we're the problem with society because we worked hard for what we have. Men are saying to hell with it.

    3. Re:The double standard is the problem by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Waah snowflake. You have no idea how lucky you are.

    4. Re:The double standard is the problem by sd4f · · Score: 1

      Said the slave owner to the slave...

      But seriously, this isn't going to end well. Why does someone need to 'grow up', basically you're trying to ridicule someone into conforming to your societal standards. Why should these guys checking out be a problem in a free society?

    5. Re:The double standard is the problem by goose-incarnated · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Waah snowflake. You have no idea how lucky you are.

      Yeah, and that's why men are checking out. They say "the deck is stacked against us" and society replies with shaming language. Then, they check out.

      Working longer and harder is a choice, and yet here you are trying to shame them into fitting your expectations. Good luck with that.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  31. Re: And they demand vacation time... by chuckugly · · Score: 1

    I work for a fairly large ISV, and my manager said we should take a 4 day holiday this weekend. Here I am posting on /. during a build. Some people enjoy the work.

  32. Maybe they're smarter than we think? by ErichTheRed · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's interesting that just a few hours ago, we had an article asking whether or not it was worth it to put in long hours at a job. I'm sure the video game thing was meant to increase the article's clickbait factor, but there might be something to this.

    Back a long time ago from when I started working (so, maybe peaking around the 60s) getting a job with a large US company was about the closest you could come to lifetime employment without earning tenure. I know lots of people from that era who worked from high school to retirement for large manufacturers, AT&T, IBM, etc. There was a degree of loyalty on both sides, employer and employee, that's missing in the modern workforce. Companies hung onto people as long as they could, and barring some major disaster, you could pretty much count on having a job. There was a clear career path internally, such that you always had an income that kept up with your experience. In return, people were expected to give a little more of themselves. I distinctly recall many families being relocated (at company expense) frequently to work on new projects or land promotions. That must have been hard, but it was the price one paid for the employer's loyalty to the employee.

    Am I advocating lifetime employment, no layoff rules/policies and more loyalty on both sides of the fence? Yes, I suppose I am. You don't see companies giving a second thought to sending entire technical departments to India to save 25% in absolute labor costs. And for all but the rockstars, you never see companies paying people to move and take on new jobs. I'm well aware that some people are making out quite well in this new system. But, not enough people are benefiting from what should be a broad period of economic recovery. Companies _can_ afford to offer people stability and security; they just choose not to.

    If I were a recent grad facing 40+ years of the current situation work/life wise, and saw many examples of people being kicked to the curb years short of retirement, then I might not want to bust my ass so hard.

    1. Re:Maybe they're smarter than we think? by kelanos · · Score: 1

      Sure, it's interesting.

      This is how the editors get their pay, by feeding us a stream of stories to influence our thoughts.

  33. Re:Mostly down to the drop in teen births, probabl by PPH · · Score: 2

    There are a lot of single mothers

    Less now than in the past.

    that simply decide to live off the "generosity" of the government

    Our state will hunt you down. If you are a baby daddy and mom decides to live off the dole, they will find you. And you will pay.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  34. Figures don't lie but liars can figure by nickmalthus · · Score: 1

    Why are young men working less? Could it be the languishing great recession recovery for the lower class? Reduced hours due to employer health care costs, outsourcing, or automation? Those troubling answers could contradict the narrative of current economic policies so of course video games must be the culprit!

    Economists are experts on supply and demand and thus supply findings that benefit the employers of economists. Any economists not contributing to the direct benefit of the institution that employs them would eventually be eliminated due to the same market forces they study.

    Employers of economists include finance and consulting businesses, governments, think tanks, and universities. What do all of these institutions have in common? Empowering and enriching corporations of course.

    In my opinion most economists are charlatans practicing a form of social studies pseudoscience.

    --
    If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be-T J
  35. I'm missing the causality thing by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Fucking rubbish article. I've read more interesting phone directories. Hate to use *that* phrase, but I'm not seeing anything close to actual causality here.

    Is this their logic?
    1) younger men are working fewer hours
    2) the drop in young men's hours is more than in old gimmers
    3) young men play more videogames than old gimmers
    4) Therefore, videogames are causing the drop in hours

    I can't see why it isn't equally likely that when you've fuck all to do and no money to spend[1] because you've been made redundant or had your hours cut you play more videogames.

    [1] If you already bought the game & hardware it's a sunk cost.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  36. Re: And they demand vacation time... by ian_billyboy_morris · · Score: 5, Informative

    As a Brit, I think that is insane, I have 5.6 weeks of legally mandated paid leave per year, that is the minimum they are allowed to get away with. My old job gave me 32 days per year, Americans are all bonkers for putting up with the way companies treat you.

  37. Zombie. by meglon · · Score: 1

    Jack Thompson's zombie is on the loose.

    --
    Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
  38. Re:What?!?! by PPH · · Score: 1

    You may be in a wheelchair

    Mobility scooter for fatsos (dad will build you a ramp out of the daylight basement).

    drooling on yourself and shitting in your pants while watching cartoons or Matlock marathons.

    Or playing MMORPGs.

    The more things change, the more they remain the same.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  39. god damn patriarchy. by ckatko · · Score: 2

    freaking men and their "trying to enjoy their lives"

    Selfish assholes.

  40. Rebuttal by Orgasmatron · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Misandry Bubble

    Long article, but well worth the read. On this topic, from the section "The Four Horsemen of Male Emancipation", the fourth is "Male Economic Disengagement and Resultant Tax-Base Erosion".

    Earlier passages have highlighted how even the most stridently egomaniacal 'feminist' is heavily dependent on male endeavors. I will repeat again that there will never, ever be a successful human society where men have no incentive to aspire to the full maximum of their productive and entrepreneurial capabilities.

    The contract between the sexes has been broken in urban America (although is still in some effect in rural America). The 'progressive' income tax scale in the US was levied under the assumption that men who could earn 10 times more than they needed for themselves would always do so, for their families. A man with no such familial aspirations may choose an easier job at lower pay, costing the state more than he costs himself. Less tax revenue not just means fewer subsidies for single mothers and government jobs for women, but less money for law enforcement. Less tax revenue also means fewer police officers, and fewer court resources through which to imprison men. The 'feminist' hypergamous utopia is not self-financing, but is precariously dependent on every beta man working at his full capacity, without which the government bubble, inseparable from the misandry bubble, collapses. Misandry is thus mathematically impossible to finance for any extended period of time. A state with a small government is far more sustainable than a state seeking an ever-expanding government, which then cannot be financed, and descends into a mass of contradictions that is the exact opposite of what the statists intended. See the gangster capitalism that dominates contemporary Russia.

    --
    See that "Preview" button?
    1. Re:Rebuttal by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      Well, that was an interesting, and very long, read. Quite interesting how many of his predictions have already started to come true.

  41. Re:Mostly down to the drop in teen births, probabl by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    All these problems are solved by legal 75th trimester abortions.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  42. If software engineering is anything to go by.... by JustNiz · · Score: 2

    I put it down to most companies increasingly blatant exploitation of their employees leading to said employees being less inclined to work long extra hours on demand for nothing in return, not even any credible guarantees of continued employment..

  43. Re:... not really smart by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    ..or maybe it's just to unwind after a day of passive aggressive office politics getting in the way of your productivity.

    How come watching TV doesn't get all the hate video games do? Far more people flip on the TV after work.

  44. That, or by kelanos · · Score: 1

    The plutocracy has gutted our civilization and there is nothing apparent worth working for in line with our historical values.

    Rest assured though, they will find something to work for soon, and when they do, the plutocrats are going to burning at the stake.

  45. Make the numbers say what you want. by GuB-42 · · Score: 2

    Men have more free time, video games are a relatively new form of entertainment so of course you can say this extra free time is spent playing video games.
    But you could say that same thing of any new thing, like watching YouTube videos. Even household chores probably count since it is becoming less common for women to do everything.
    Just pick the thing you want to push your agenda.

  46. Poor testing methods by grasshoppa · · Score: 2

    So they made an assumption and seemingly tested exclusively against the assumption, attempting to prove it right. Not science.

    Allow me to posit an alternative hypothesis ( which is all they really have ); young men are avoiding marriage until later in life and in some case swearing it off entirely. It's well known that marriage, and the inevitable spawn that comes with it, are a major pressure on men to produce; perhaps the toxic mating culture in today's western society is poisoning the well against that well known mechanism. Young men have seen what divorce puts men through and have wisely decided to "Nope" the fuck out of that equation.

    That's my hypothesis anyway.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:Poor testing methods by WhoBeDaPlaya · · Score: 1

      èé£Y(ç)ç"å (Herbivore men) is an ongoing phenomenon in Japan : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  47. Nope by XSportSeeker · · Score: 1

    We are working less because we keep having to point out in such stories that correlation does not equal causation.
    That's why,

  48. I notice a lot of folks shouting this article down by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    and I can't say I disagree with the assumptions. What I wonder is where are the conservative, right wing /.tters to defend it? Do they just avoid articles like this one?

    Maybe it's a defensive posture to an attack on our favorite hobby. But I'm used to a few of the libertarian types to offer up something besides "of course they don't want to work, not enough reward". Of course, that's perfectly compatible with their ideals but it doesn't address the elephant in the room, which is young men not working enough to have families. For one thing our economy needs them to grow and take care of the old (or we need to bring immigrants over, e.g. H1-Bs) and for another most folks _want_ to start a family. Maybe us nerds can't because, well, we're nerds, but that doesn't preclude us from wanting too.

    Like I said, it's odd that /. is so united on this front.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  49. Re:'Video Games' ... or porn by crimson+tsunami · · Score: 2

    And how many hours a day do you spend here? I see you posting all the time.

  50. Re:I notice a lot of folks shouting this article d by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I am conservative. You won't find many conservatives supporting studies like this because of the blatant disregard for logic, stats, etc. Political affiliation has nothing to do with despising biased, bullshit studies.

    "Like I said, it's odd that /. is so united on this front." United in what? The shared contempt for propaganda?

  51. Re: And they demand vacation time... by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    If you're so valuable, it should be easier for you to negotiate time off.

  52. Re:Video games are fun by epyT-R · · Score: 2, Insightful

    SCHOOLS ARE FUCKING EXPENSIVE TO BUILD INSTANTLY.

    They really shouldn't be. It's just that mounting regulations have turned them into day care centers. For colleges, tuition is artificially inflated thanks to government guaranteed loans.

    HOSPITALS ARE FUCKING EXPENSIVE TO BUILD INSTANTLY.

    Of course. When there's a glut of insurance pools paying the fees, they'll go up because that's what the market will bear. Making it mandatory (like obamacare does) will help make this worse.

    ROADS ARE FUCKING EXPENSIVE TO BUILD INSTANTLY.

    They really shouldn't be. If they are, there's bloat somewhere. Find it and eliminate it. Government contracts are almost always way too lucrative, that's why contractors fight over them. It's easy when the bureaucrats know they're spending other people's money.

    I will agree on the elders, but as you get older, you believe that all of your life experience trumps people who haven't lived their lives yet. Pity that almost all your experience is in the past and not exactly current to the last 5 years, but hey, you're an elder and elders should be respected for that reason alone, right?

    While the young think they know everything. Ignorance is bliss. Remember, the old were once young, too. Many of today's problems are caused by lack of wisdom. Wisdom comes from experience.

  53. Re:If hookers and blow was legal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Not really. Most people get the crazy need for sex and partying out of their systems by the end of their 20s, even if it continues to be easily accessible. With today's socjus targeting so-called 'toxic masculinity' in most institutional policy, it's rapidly becoming too expensive and risky for the average dude to bother. Games are still fun and far less risky, socially and economically...at least for now.

  54. Re:Mostly down to the drop in teen births, probabl by epyT-R · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Our state will hunt you down. If you are a baby daddy and mom decides to live off the dole, they will find you. And you will pay.

    This insane attitude is precisely a BIG reason more and more of these young men just opt out of having relationships and/or families altogether. They know the socjus whiteknights (and/or tradcon wannabes) like yourself are drooling at the opportunity to wave those righteous fingers before throwing them in debtor's prison where, ironically, they can't do shit about making money for anyone. Of course, the obviousness of the latter escapes the irrationality of those who imposed such laws in the first place.

  55. Video Games vs Porn vs Watching TV vs Pinball vs by Required+Snark · · Score: 1
    Playing Baseball/Hoops/Football vs Shooting Pool vs Fishing vs Hanging Out vs Going to Movies vs ...

    Since at least WWII and the rise of "teenagers" there have been an ever increasing number of ways for people to "waste time", and there tends to be more opportunity for younger people to engage in these activities. To claim that video games are somehow different is ludicrous.

    This is an example of trolling by academics. They want to pretend that they are relevant so they pick something that they perceive as topical so it will get noticed. If they had said "streaming" instead of "gaming" they would have gotten less attention. Since nobody but other academics, and a few government types pays any attention, the only way they get any press is coming up with crap like this.

    Nothing to see here. Move along. (Only this time there is really nothing going on...)

    --
    Why is Snark Required?
  56. Hiring trainee for 1$/month 80h/week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Employee must have 10 years of industry experience, know at least 23 programming languages and tools, of which only 2 + SQL will be used.

  57. Re: And they demand vacation time... by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

    This. I look forward to July every year since my useless coworkers are allowed to take their vacation time. I can get more done with fewer distractions. I work with thirty-eight other programmers, and today there's only two of us in the office since most people took off today since tomorrow is a holiday. It's awesome.

    See, now I like it when there's no one else around because I can get away with doing fuck all. Plus, I work in a college and it's a ghost town round here in summers so it's doubleplusgood.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  58. Re: And they demand vacation time... by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

    Well then take some time off idiot. The young ones really don't care how long it's been since you took a holiday or how many hours you can put in a week.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  59. Re: And they demand vacation time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Just take vacation.

    What are they going to do? Fire you?

    That might be an improvement.

  60. Re: And they demand vacation time... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Didn't you go to High School? Sleeping while sitting up was a Senior level elective.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  61. Of course they are working less by strikethree · · Score: 1

    Of course they are working less. They are fewer opportunities for males to participate in higher education and there are only so many burger flipping jobs available.

    --
    "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen