Slashdot Mirror
Mozilla Testing an Opt-Out System For Firefox Telemetry Collection (bleepingcomputer.com)
An anonymous reader writes: "Mozilla engineers are discussing plans to change the way Firefox collects usage data (telemetry), and the organization is currently preparing to test an opt-out clause so they could collect more data relevant to the browser's usage," reports Bleeping Computer. "In a Google Groups discussion that's been taking place since Monday, Mozilla engineers cite the lack of usable data the Foundation is currently receiving via its data collection program. The problem is that Firefox collects data from a very small fraction of its userbase, and this data may not be representative of the browser's real usage." Mozilla would like to fix this by flipping everyone's telemetry setting to enabled and adding an opt-out clause. Engineers also plan to embed Google's RAPPAR project [1, 2] for anonymous data collection.
Firefox, faced with a shrinking user base after the extension extinction event that is Firefox 57 will monetize it's remaining users. Mozilla knows there are no good alternatives, Opera, Chrome, Microsoft, Apple, Vivaldi, Pale Moon all track users data in some way so they can get user data for money.
Not enough people were choosing to compromise their privacy, so we're going to do it for them.
Yet another reason to switch to Pale Moon if you haven't already done so.
Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
Mozilla is hellbent on killing their browser.
You need to understand that you keep on fucking with your base, the technicians. Once they are gone (the few that still are using a browser that wont "allow" them to access their devices, 'caus Mozilla does not like the certificate), they wont come back. Ever.
Yeah, I know, it's with the best of intentions. But the effects are horrendous.
Catering for ever dumber and dumber users actually *makes* users dumb.
At some point I had a discussion with one Mozillian about the disappearing of that "enable Javascript" checkbox: you know what he told me? Telemetry, he said, has shown that it confuses (some?) users, that's why it was removed.
Tinkering, you know, involves sometimes getting bitten. I think it's software's responisbility to incite the users to tinker (unless you're trying to build a silo, that is, but Mozilla isn't, we hope?), even if that involves some risk. It's OK to mitigate the risks as much as possible, but eliminating them by bricking that one door shut...
Who thinks their users are stupid *will get stupid users*. Users know how to adapt.
Opt-out telemetry is a fucking bad idea (your users don't opt in because they are stupid and you know better? Think again).
To care about user privacy.
Why is the telemetry data from the production builds needed at all?
Perhaps telemetry can identify performance issues, but telemetry is already turned on by default in the beta builds of Firefox mobile (and probably in the desktop builds, too, though I haven't checked to be sure). I understand that this may be useful to identify performance issues when testing new features, so it makes a little more sense for beta builds. Why is additional telemetry data beyond this actually needed?
Telemetry data doesn't include crash reports, which absolutely provide valuable information for identifying bugs. Turning on telemetry isn't going to help find the cause of crashes, so that's not a case for it.
So, I'll ask again, why is telemetry data necessary, especially from production builds? I'm quite possibly totally ignorant here, but can anyone provide me a cogent explanation of how this additional telemetry data is really needed to improve Firefox?
I might even consider using their shitty browser
Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.
Are you sure this is a geek site?
It is amazing that we have developed as a civilization in the days before all this privacy-busting data collection.
...Engineers also plan to embed Google's RAPPAR project [1, 2] for anonymous data collection....
Using the word "google" with the phrase "anonymous data collection" may invoke laughter. And disbelief.
Fixed that for them.
The Mozilla Foundation has really lost its way, especially given that the issue isn't with all this 'needed telemetry', but rather that they don't listen/act on nearly enough of the bug reports/feature requests people DO send in to them.
Maybe if they weren't spending so much time on nepotism related purchases, social justice/welfare programs and pet (non-browser!) projects, they would have the time, attention, and integrity necessary to return Firefox and related projects (Thunderbird, Seamonkey, etc) to the status of commonly used and word of mouth advertised community projects.
Instead we have a white tower of assholes looking down on the common man, ignoring his needs, and now taking a very microsoftian step towards authoritarianism with 'opt-out' telemetry that they're just going to 'forget' to ensure toggles exist to turn off, because that is what their REAL masters have beholden them to do.
If the internet had one of those Death Clock things like the possibility of World/Nuclear War, we would be at 11:59:30 right now. If this shit passes, anybody sane will have to jump to Palemoon, without the resources or security advisories to necessarily stay safe. Or jump to the variety of Webkit/Chromium based browsers which are already leaking private info today. Most of the alternative browsers, besides not having some/all HTML5/CSS2.1+/Javascript support, generally also lack the hooks necessary to create privacy plugins like NoScript, Adblock, uBlock, or uMatrix or internal features to provide equivalent anonymity of browser data.
If this comes to pass it WILL be abused. It WILL compromise TBB. And it WILL be a major blow to privacy on the internet.
You're getting a ton of data: Most Firefox users don't agree with the collection of "telemetry". What good could more data do when you're doing the opposite of what that data tells you?
Mozilla's online poll today on firefox's browser default starting page:
Completely skewed questions, biased and will only bring answers they want to hear.
Sad, very sad.
The project is called RAPPOR, not RAPPAR.
https://github.com/google/rappor
It was unpopular then and it is unpopular now.
I don't have a citation on hand so I hope someone can dig up a reference.
Citation please?
Saline solution with a trace amount of salt.
It seems like Mozilla will go out of their way to make major changes that users don't want and have expressed that they don't want (which I won't list here because it's well documented in other Slashdot article comments).
Actual user feedback may have told them that users don't want the changes, but Mozilla doesn't appear to have cared. I know I've tried to submit feedback linking to Slashdot articles so that our comments are hopefully read.
Now Mozilla wants to listen to feedback, but from Firefox telemetry, not from the users, which [I guess] helps users with stability issues. But maybe this will mean Mozilla will ignore our actual feedback even more (maybe the telemetry is all they'll have time for?) and implement changes that could further damage their market share and relevance.
Maybe the question is what data are they looking for when they want "more data relevant to the browser's usage"?
opt-out is a dark pattern
Telemetry collection should be opt-in, not opt-out.
... else it just gets disabled/dropped from a future release.
I've been testing out Epiphany as a faster replacement for Firefox.
Its time to take a plunge.
My first response: They're about to kill its best, remaining feature in the minds of many, and now they say, "Let me spy on you."
But I ultimately get what they're trying to do. After all this online complaining, they may finally be having to accept that they really need to know more about how people use their product. Considering how many people here have complained about how the Mozilla devs "don't know what we really want!! Why are they doing X??", this should be something they should consider doing.
Sounds like they're damned if they do, damned if they don't. Maybe us complainers should look in the mirror and realize we may be one of the toughest crowd of browser users in the world to please. "No, you can't collect my data!.... Wait - Why are you removing X? I USE THAT FEATURE! Don't you know that about your users?
Maybe that's why Google Chrome has outstripped Firefox over the last several years when it comes to user base size. They KNOW what most people want, even if we don't like to admit to everything we want?
I'm a loyal Firefox user - and I'll probably still opt-out while I grumble about losing most of my add-ons. But I won't honestly be able to say that Firefox's eventual demise will be on the Mozilla Foundation alone.
The constant update cycle, trying to become Chrome-but-worse, disabling treasured extensions and plugins, all of these tactics and more have cratered Firefox's market share, but some people still apparently have it installed on their system.
Clearly, these few remaining miscreants must be driven away as fast as possible. Default collection of private data should do the trick!
I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
Is this the same data that led to MozColonSlashSlashA's infantilization of the user interface around the late 20s (version number, that is)? What good is getting more data from more users if they will simply make bad decisions based on it? (I've been a grateful user of Classic Theme Restorer since then, but unfortunately it will fall victim to the coming addonpocalypse.)
The knee-jerk reaction is that all telemetry is a privacy nightmare.
As a thought experiment, what kind of telemetry might be acceptable?
For example, suppose it were 2 integers collected weekly:
* number of HTTPS sites visited
* number of HTTP sites visited
Unavoidably, there would be metadata: IP address and date/time of data collection. So as well as the intended analytics ("what proportion of the sites users are visiting are HTTPS sites?") it would be possible to build a per-IP profile of number of sites visited over time.
Is this level of telemetry unacceptable?
If it is acceptable, then we've established that it is not telemetry per se that is bad but rather the data being collected.
Ongoing telemetry would require trust ("when I consented you were collecting two integers, but now you're collecting all sorts of other things") unless totally transparent, but perhaps even with total transparency the burden of verification that then falls on the user is too onerous.
I wonder if there could be a role for someone like the EFF to be the guardian of telemetry info, i.e. Firefox sends telemetry data to the EFF and they then decide whether it's ok or not, or anonymize it (e.g. strip out IP addresses in the above example), before sending it on to Mozilla. Of course, they'd want to be paid for this service, and since users reject the notion of paying for a browser the obvious payer would be Mozilla, but that creates moral hazard. Given that it'd be a public good, the government could run and/or fund it, but I suspect there's a large overlap between the set of people who have a problem with telemetry and the set of people who distrust their government.
I don't have a citation for Pale Moon tracking. But I do have a citation for another claim in comment #55069105:
Firefox, faced with a shrinking user base after the extension extinction event that is Firefox 57
Citation please?
"[T]he extension extinction event" is described in "Add-ons in 2017" by Kev Needham, published on November 23, 2016:
The implication that it will lead to "a shrinking user base" is in a comment by Mozai to "Add-ons in 2017":
Firefox is used to visit WEBPAGES.
This is likely to run into a definition dispute, sometimes called "no true Scotsman", "misunderstood word", or "Layne's Law". To avoid this, we need to clarify something first:
"WEBPAGES" means "HTML documents", which are parsed into a DOM that is styled with CSS and edited in response to user actions with JavaScript. Is this what you meant? Or do you specifically refer to static HTML documents, whose only forms of user interaction are navigation, form submission, and checkbox-hack hiding and showing?
Anybody who claims that Firefox protects their privacy probably hasn't actually looked at Firefox's privacy policy.
Below are some excerpts from the Firefox privacy policy that is dated July 31, 2017.
Be sure to notice the type of information being collected and possibly even transmitted to third parties (including Google, some "Leanplum" company, a "mobile analytics vendor", and "certain developers"). We see terms like:
Here are the excerpts:
I'm assuming that your preference to omit "Everything else" implies omitting JavaScript. If so, then what do you prefer to replace JavaScript?
Web applications ought to run server-side Good luck having to click-wait-click-wait-click on server-side image map, with a full page reload each time, in order to use any web application with substantial interaction. Web applications that require JavaScript ought to be rewritten as native applications Not only does a native application tend to have even less "sandbox[ing] from the OS" than a web application, but it also works on only one operating system family. Even if using a multi-platform library such as Qt, the developer still needs to acquire an instance of each target platform on which to test each executable. Expect to see a lot more notices to the effect "Sorry, this application is not available for [your OS]. If you want to see this application on [your OS], please contribute to our crowdfunding campaign."They really are lowering their standards.
Is it just because Chrome is even worse at privacy violations? A lack of sufficient alternatives? What is the real motivation behind this, as in who is their primary client for the telemetry data?
It is amazing that we have developed as a civilization in the days before all this privacy-busting data collection.
But how have we developed? When was the last thing you heard anything positive about new software? The number one complaint is that the vendors don't seem to know how users actually use the software and thus make stupid changes. This goes back a good 10+ years now.
Now they introduce telemetry to actually find out how users use software and the users lose their shit.
How did we develop? Poorly!
I dont use it anymore.
Indeed. I always cringe when telemetry is represented as "critical" in some way.
Even setting aside the politics of privacy, it's far from clear to me that telemetry has been, on the whole, all that much of a benefit in terms of software quality. Generally speaking, software quality has been declining for years, and I often see objectively bad decisions being made on the basis of telemetry.
Good use for telemetry: getting a better understanding of how your software is malfunctioning. Bad use for telemetry: using it to make or justify "user experience" decisions.
The next logical step is to set your sights higher up your own leg. And Mozilla is being oh-so-logical, although I fail to understand the peculiar logic that's driving them to squander the paltry remainder of their user base.
'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
One alternative to flipping everyone to enabled and having a tickbox you've got to discover to opt out is perhaps some sort of increasingly spaced out nagging? I'm thinking that everyone who isn't sending telemetry gets a nag dialogue that they can delay the re-appearance of in increasing intervals (e.g. for one month after first nag, 3 more months after second nag, 1 year after third nag and finally never nag me again after that).
If they get a load of take-up after nag 1 in the first month, they can use a future Firefox release to adjust the nag intervals or even remove them altogether. This way, it remains opt-in, but with some increasingly-less-frequent nag factor to persuare people to turn on the telemetry collection. I think opt-in has failed because no-one was nagged about it, so they simply didn't change the default settings.
I think you'd have to be quite careful about the wording in the nag dialogue - it would have to be "we need telemetry to improve the performance/reliability/security of future Firefox releases - by turning on telemetry collection, you will help us with this improvement effort and ultimately make Firefox a better browser for you." Users need to see some sort of benefit for giving up their telemetry data - just telling them you want the data isn't enough.
If the 'opt out clause' just means I have to go into settings and uncheck some boxes, and Mozilla otherwise isn't going to pull any Microsoft-level bullshit like quietly countermanding me again when I'm not looking, then that's fine.
If, on the other hand, they do something nasty, like remove the checkboxes entirely, and make you jump through a bunch of hoops to 'opt out', and then you have no way of independently verifying your 'opt out' choice has been taken seriously, then I say "screw you, you bastards, you have become everything you hate".
Because that https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvks70PD0Rswas before all the kewl millennials decided to use Agile/Scrum as the only way to develop code. No QA as your users are the testers with smily or frowns. Windows 10 has had no QA at all whatsoever as an example.
http://saveie6.com/
They don't want to give you the data. If you make them opt out, they will opt out. If you change their settings, they will leave. If you force them to opt in, they will leave.
And in all cases you will spend goodwill to get fuck all.
Stop demanding telemetry.
If you have data, use it. If it you don't believe it useful, stop collecting it altogether.
...think that users must be tracked all the time? Is it because users are lame when it comes to "report bugs properly" or what?
Make bloody decent programs once and for all. If there is something the update fever show is that developers do not know how to develop properly.
At least for anything even remotely identifying people. IP addresses, for example, fall under this. It always has to be opt-in.
Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
.
Privacy-busting data collection is not going to fix that problem, as the data will more than likely be interpreted by the developers to confirm their misdirected vision.
Instead of data collection (something that is done because it is easy, not necessarily the proper solution), the Firefox developers need to take a step back and look at their vision for Firefox. That is the conversation that needs to take place with the Firefox users.
Offhand, I'd say that priority #1 is that the Firefox users don't want Firefox to continue on the goal of turning into a Chrome clone. With the addition of data collection, that goal is almost met.
I could go on, but I doubt if anyone is reading, they're probably drooling over all the data they will be collecting soon.
If you didn't look directly into the sun the damage is likely limited. Your brain will probably learn to compensate for it, but this can take some months. It is usually the same with spot damage caused by laser exposure.
Do you remember why Firefox was created, and why it took off? I certainly do, I remember using IIRC .6 of it, and it got smaller with each release. Why was that? because it was removing the Mozilla/Netscape crap. It also worked to put users in control of not just the browser experiance, but the browser.
Well what do you think happened when Mozilla/Netscape died and they took over Firefox as their flagship product? Sure they are ignoring their users and chase telemtry now admiting that the data could be wrong.
Back on topic with Telemtry. Anonymise the data, using generated tokens(can be regenerated any time). Option to regenerate each time on application launch Users can view data saved by tolken, and remove or even strip out data, such as
number of tabs open, number of tabs active, total sites visited since launch,
ram usage, cpu usage, System Info OS/RAM/CPU/Resolution, etc
domains, FQDN, or full URL.
Number and what Addons installed.
Preference changed, About:config options changed
I can go on, but you get the idea, where all data is viewable, and truly able to be removed being collected and what has been collected.
Also a way to input data, like a questionair with top feature, etc. And not just filled with what the dumbass I mean top level management who killed mozilla/netscape and is killing firefox.
The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions that I wish it to be always kept alive
Utter, self-serving horse shit.
Nobody complains about the vendors not knowing how their users use the software. The number one complaint is usually about focusing on idiotic, superficial, workflow-breaking makeovers or equally useless gimmicks instead of the core functionality of their programs, like making them efficient, stable and reliable. But that would take real skills, instead of just being a dipshit monkey.
Bad use for telemetry: using it to make or justify "user experience" decisions.
I could add another one: Writing code which is known to be shit from the start and relying on "telemetry" to help you find the places which needs propping up so the whole fucking thing doesn't fall flat on it's face.
When was the last thing you heard anything positive about new software? The number one complaint is that the vendors don't seem to know how users actually use the software and thus make stupid changes. This goes back a good 10+ years now.
Now they introduce telemetry to actually find out how users use software and the users lose their shit.
You are inverting reality.
Telemetry has existed for a long time now. The stupid changes in Firefox date back to Firefox 4, which development started in 2010.
Most of these stupid changes were "justified" by Mozilla as being "based on telemetry" (the most common case being "the removal of features because most users don't use them" -and now you read this telemetry came "from a very small fraction of the userbase"-, but there are many other cases of stupid application of stats without any significant analysis...).
While stats can have their uses in some contexts (but for public use, considering the huge intrusion even of "anonymous" stats, it must absolutely be strictly opt-in), "developers" for a long time now have relied on stats far too much, without any serious analysis... It is completely insane, and it shows grave incompetence...
Telemetry is precisely why Firefox lost more than two-thirds of its userbase since Firefox 4.
It is always my suspicion that telemetry is being used as an excuse to justify decisions made for other reasons...though sometimes I'm at a loss to guess *what* those other reasons were. Often it just seems to be "I'm bored with the current layout, so let's change something.".
I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
What I don't get is: it's a web browser with almost no user interface left -- How in the world do they think people use it?
Did any of you need telemetry when designing applications? It's nonsense. Prosecute and expose the companies that want telemetry. They're working together with the feds against you.
I understand what you're saying, but consider that at no time before in the history of mankind has "privacy-busting data collection" ever taken place to the extent it does today. Are you suggesting you're okay with that?
Years ago, when I first discovered that Firefox had joined the spy on your users club, I disabled that "feature" on the about:config page. But, between that and the constant effort to make Firefox look and act like chrome, I also started a search for a replacement. I found several reasonable options then stumbled onto Palemoon. Been using that for years now along with NoScript and UBlock (which I had already been using on Firefox). I still keep an eye on the other browsers I liked... just in case Palemoon self destructs like Firefox did.
It's really sad, but happens all the time. You find a tool like Firefox with a decent user interface and good functionality... then someone starts "improving" it until it becomes garbage like the other, so called, leading tools (in this case Chrome and Internet Explorer).
Other spectacular examples of this kind of fail would be the Gnome desktop (with the change to v3) and Linux (with systemd)... so now I, for one, use the Mate desktop and switched back to BSD Unix for servers. I did find a passable desktop Linux (PCLinuxOS) that doesn't use that cancer called systemd.
I surmise that all this is basically the result of the windoze crowd becoming involved. These are the same people that think win10 is an actual improvement. So, of course, they want to improve other things in similar and abusive fashion. What is astonishing to me is that things like Gnome 3, systemd, win10 and the like actually get traction and there are people that really want them and don't see what's wrong with it all.
New is not always improved... Old is not always bad...
Change is not necessarily a bad thing, but change for the sake of change is, generally, a very bad thing.
--
Steve (AC because I haven't bothered to register in all these years)
If Firefox is to have any hope of survival, this is what I think Mozilla needs to do starting right now:
1) Strip out all of this "telemetry" stupidity. That doesn't mean just disabling it. That means stripping it out completely. Remove the code. Throw it all away.
2) Get rid of the Australis UI, and get rid of the Photon UI nonsense we've been hearing about. Revert the UI back to how it looked in Firefox 3.6. This includes restoring the menu bar and restoring the status bar. Anyone who was responsible for Australis and/or Photon should be removed from the project.
3) Ditch the plan to stop supporting non-WebExtensions extensions starting with Firefox 57. If they go ahead with this, it could very well drive away many of the few remaining users, without bringing in any new users.
4) Remove Pocket, Hello, and stupid shit like that which they've added in lately. If anyone really wants to use that sort of shit, then they can install it as an extension.
5) Reduce Firefox's memory usage and increase its performance. These have been long-standing complaints. Steps 1), 2) and 4) may actually help with this, because they remove unnecessary crap from Firefox.
6) Focus on privacy. Make that Firefox's selling point. This is something that Chrome, for example, inherently can't compete with Firefox on. This includes forcing the user to opt in to anything that might result in information being sent to Mozilla or third parties, even if this might affect functionality like geolocation or address bar searches.
7) Kill the Rust and Servo projects. They're just a distraction, and take resources away from Firefox.
8) Gradually start using C++14, or even C++17. They address pretty much all of the problems that Rust is supposed to address, without Rust's many drawbacks. Modernize Firefox's C++ code with each release, eliminating custom code in favor of modern standard library code whenever possible
9) No more "social justice" bullshit. Focus only on software development. All resources, financial and otherwise, should go toward improving Firefox's performance, reducing its memory usage, and increasing the privacy it offers users. Any people who can't help with those goals should be fired or otherwise removed from the project.
10) Again, because this is so critical to Firefox's survival, focus on improving its performance, reducing its memory usage, and increasing the user privacy.
Get off their shaft.
Software quality is shit now despite of the telemetry.
Fuck that lie.
I think the problem with inherent with number 6 is that they need money from outside sources and those outside sources so far are heavily invested in advertising. a browser that puts privacy first is not compatible with those partners.
Mozilla needs to remember that Firefox is an open source project. Many people contribute to it, including from outside of the Mozilla Corporation(tm). It is against the spirit of open source for them to treat Firefox as a product that they own.
The default theme in 57 is more or less what you have with Classic Theme Restorer. The 57 is the best in years, except for the addons. Let's hope the best addons reamin usable.
Firefox will have telemetry settings turned on by default so in order to turn them off, you have to launch Firefox, which then ironically sends telemetry data in the first place. So, all Firefox users phone home their computer info at least once regardless and are add-on free. I guess all of my new Firefox installs will be opened without the Internet on. Still better than Chrome's privacy.
Get with the program, internally Google pronounces it "RAPER".
I would pay for a browser that behaved itself and guaranteed my privacy.
We pay for lots of other software, so why not a good browser?
Firefox ESR for Apple's OS X already has telemetry settings enabled by default.
Firefox's performance gets worse with every release, so it's highly unlikely they are looking at/using the telemetry data.
I can do a clean Linux install, and then install an old Firefox and a current Firefox - the old will load some pages on a high-speed link in seconds while the same pages on the newer versions can take 10 or 20 minutes.
Sucks sucks sucks.
The "programmers" currently working on Firefox seem to have forgotten some of the most-basic concepts - like [a] the GUI should be the most-responsive (so the user can STOP stuff and EXIT if needed) and [b] no script processor should ever be allowed to consume all the performance and keep the GUI from being responsive. Web pages are increasingly stuffed full of video ads (often multiple per page), and traking scripts, google garbage, facebook garbage, etc and newer versions of Firefox allow themselves to get stuck running all that crap when it probably SHOULD sense a slow script or a sluggish ad server and then auto-blacklist the source to never-again be loaded without approval. Any scipt that ever takes more than about 10% of the CPU should be auto-blackballed. Perhaps we need an option to auto-strip scripts from webpage html as the page arrives at the browser as a way to stop the madness.
you don't collect data at all?
Telemetry does not help with software design.
Anyone who possesses sufficient domain knowledge *and* is trained in interface design *and* who has some talent (i.e. anyone qualified to fill the actual job) will do a much better job than some retard perusing telemetry reports.
About Mozilla...
Embracing lowest common denominator fanatics on the quest to destroy all what makes a software different from the rest.
*irony on*
After all, we all are humans, there should not be any difference in any kind of way. All must be stupid, simple - so the most non-skilled user must be able to feel comfortable in his safe technology space without being humiliated by some check-box or general function he/she is unable to understand or in the worst case would be able to humiliate that user as it is not running in line with a not leftist/progressive way. While the software developer takes the chance to limit their software as it is a "trademark you are not allowed to touch or modify in a massive way"
*irony off*
All while embracing anti free speech fanatics and decide that only left propaganda is the real truth. Mozilla are seriously fascist-flavored developers today. Running behind their role-model sugar-daddy Google and embracing whatever they spit out..