Slashdot Mirror
How the NSA Identified Satoshi Nakamoto (medium.com)
An anonymous reader shares a report: The 'creator' of Bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto, is the world's most elusive billionaire. Very few people outside of the Department of Homeland Security know Satoshi's real name. In fact, DHS will not publicly confirm that even THEY know the billionaire's identity. Satoshi has taken great care to keep his identity secret employing the latest encryption and obfuscation methods in his communications. Despite these efforts (according to my source at the DHS) Satoshi Nakamoto gave investigators the only tool they needed to find him -- his own words. Using stylometry one is able to compare texts to determine authorship of a particular work. Throughout the years Satoshi wrote thousands of posts and emails and most of which are publicly available. According to my source, the NSA was able to the use the 'writer invariant' method of stylometry to compare Satoshi's 'known' writings with trillions of writing samples from people across the globe. By taking Satoshi's texts and finding the 50 most common words, the NSA was able to break down his text into 5,000 word chunks and analyse each to find the frequency of those 50 words. This would result in a unique 50-number identifier for each chunk. The NSA then placed each of these numbers into a 50-dimensional space and flatten them into a plane using principal components analysis. The result is a 'fingerprint' for anything written by Satoshi that could easily be compared to any other writing. The NSA then took bulk emails and texts collected from their mass surveillance efforts. First through PRISM and then through MUSCULAR, the NSA was able to place trillions of writings from more than a billion people in the same plane as Satoshi's writings to find his true identity. The effort took less than a month and resulted in positive match.
So who was Shakespeare?
Yeah the NSA would love if we would believe this.
I'd love to meet Satoshi Nakamoto. He/she/they must be brilliant. But if the NSA can positively identify them it is probable that no one is truly anonymous unless you simply don't ever post email, forum posts, or anything else online. I keep a low profile but it sounds like only cave dwellers and hermits can escape big brother!
Be More, Be Manly, The Manly Geek Ubergeek Extraordinaire Blogger: www.manlygeek.com/blog Podcaster: podcast.man
According to the author - ME.
Sounds truthy enough.
It's beneficial that I exercise Grammarly. Straight away those concerned with distinguishing me, will undergo unhingement.
Nice warrant they used there. View EVERYONES email because everyone is a suspect.
Now, lets hear from the liberals telling me I need to pay more taxes for crap like this. After all, I do like to use roads, police, and NSA spying on everything everyone writes ever.
An anonymous reader shares a report... "according to my source at the DHS..."
Well, I am not anonymous and my source at DHS says that these claims are BS. Who is more credible?
In 2014 Newsweek was pretty damn sure they had the right Satoshi and dragged a poor soul through hell and back because of their "beliefs". Can we give this topic a rest, until we know for sure and for real? None of this anonymous reporter citing anonymous sources at DHS crap.
Aaand? Who is it?
I am the real Satoshi Nakamoto.
captcha: owning
bumpier heads.
And a fleet of airplanes is spraying weather- or mind-controlling chemical trails through the sky to ensure crop yields or subservience.
Did they stop investigating?
the NSA, I recall lawsuits after the Snowden releases were kicked out of court because they couldn't show they had standing. Apparently Satoshi Nakamoto can show he has standing because the NSA has copies of his emails.
no big deal, it's just meta-data, not much to be had from that; no, we don't collect data en masse; no no, that's not piss on your back, it's rain
if this were true, and the guy was a US citizen not under suspicion or any other legally obtained need, is that a crime? does the Constitution have any meaning to these people?
So is US current, Euros, etc - it's just different people telling us they're worth something. This is the power of mass agreement.
Subject says it all.
(And yes, I read the paragraph saying there are no sources, as if this somehow represents original research.)
I call bullshit on this one. Yes, you can analyze data like this. But we all know it. What I find more likely is that they're trying to somehow undermine Bitcoin with this "leak."
Bitcoin doesn't have the backing of the most powerful governments and militaries on earth.
I can't help but be impressed though.
I don't think nearly as many people use Monopoly money for money laundering and ransomware, though.
Canadian money doesn't have the most powerful government and military on earth and yet we all live daily with it. Most places will also accept american dollars but won't even give you any exchange rate for it.
#DeleteFacebook
...will the real Satoshi please stand up
....ducks!......
please stand up
please stand up
they used illegally-gathered data.
There aren't many people crazy enough to pay over $4,000 each for Monopoly dollars, though.
Like it or not, any item (even Bitcoin) is worth what someone is willing to pay for it. Whether or not it will still be worth $4,000 a year from now it anyone's guess at this point. It could become the next Mastercard, or the various world governments might outlaw the currency and start prosecuting enough users to make it's value plummet.
Personally, the lack of certainty either way is enough to make me stay away at this point.
You can learn everything you want to know by reading the source code of the bitcoin nodes. Knowing the identity of the guy who wrote the first version doesn't really add anything.
This brings up a question, if you were writing anonymously how much effort is needed to bypass this method? Seems like you could easily just write something as you normally would, then spend an extra 10 minutes or so per large text block size replacing some words and sentence structures. Even if you followed a consistent pattern would that make it unlinkable to your other non-anonymous writings?
Also did they have a short list of people they wanted to compare to? Hypothetically if I wrote exactly like him would they have matched me? Or only look at certain people with a background in this type of thing who happened to write online articles semi-connect to this.
Doesn't this person deserve the right not to have their identity known? They have not (as far I as I know) committed a crime or being investigated for a criminal act. I'm sure the motivation behind remaining anonymous is for his own safety and well being. If someone has not released their identity on purpose, and even more so gone to lengths to keep it private why is anyone trying to find out who he is. Sure there's an interest level there. There's quite possibly a lot to learn, but at what cost? I know most of these points are completely obvious and the answers are also unfortunately obvious, but it needs to be said anyway.
Sent from my TARDIS
So now that they know who he is, they can blackmail him, and use it to fund covert ops, and new data-centers? That sounds fair.
What was the critical "national-security" need that drove his unmasking? Was this a recruitment technique? Did the banks that own modern politicians drive them to do it in order to try and damage the value of bitcoin? Was he financing Saudi Arabia?
This sounds like a mis-use of federal funds, and a circumstance with exceptional opportunity for abuse.
Why identify Satoshi Nakamoto? Wouldn't it be of more use to identify the users of Bitcoin?
On the other hand, public knowledge (at some point) of Satoshi's identity could serve to protect him against pressure or retribution from the TLAs. If he or his associates can prove his identity, the gov't or banks can't very well engineer his disappearance.
Have gnu, will travel.
Now its being openly used for trivial shit like identifying someone who wrote software that is in no way illegal.
Illegally gather the data, use it to identify random people online that have done nothing wrong but are interesting to you.. IS EXACTLY WHY MASS SURVEILLANCE ISN'T OK
Dogecoin to the moon! Dogecoin will be valued at over two dollars before the end of the year.
#DeleteFacebook
Reminds me of the early days (mid 1990's) of PGP, when there was a now obviously ineffective campaign to encourage everyone to put their emails into the 'encryption envelope.'
We didn't listen. Now this is possible.
CBS already has subservience. Did you see how quickly Hillary Clinton went from anti-gay to pro-gay? Did you see how quickly America did?
Do not attribute to a complex thing that which is more than adequately explained by a simple thing. TV already owns you.
Is Satoshi Nakamoto suspected of a crime? Is he or she a threat to national security?
The NSA has expended all this effort and violated Satoshi's and a billion other people's privacy for.... what? Shits and giggles?
I am Satoshi Nakamoto.
And so's my wife!
Thought this was a good law enforcement power for Obama to abuse. Which he did. Extensively.
And then other Americans gave this power to Trump and his minions.
Good job. Won't be abused at all. Nope, no way.
The next asshole in the white house is going to be the real tyrant.
To find all the jokes Carlos Mencia stole.
A quick sanity check, suggests the story as submitted isn't true, if Satoshi Nakamoto used encryption all the time, the first port of call would be to filter for people using encryption. Then by links to others known to be involved in Bitcoin. i.e. you wouldn't use stylometry which is known to be limited.
So what is the story here?
AC submitter is trying to sell his phrenology technology, erm I mean stylometry technology? That could be it.
Or prehaps he's trying to plant the 'NSA bulk search of text using stylometry' idea in peoples head. i.e. that NSA gets all the *contents* of everyone emails and bulk searches those. Something it would have to fight a lot of companies to do. But then if it had the contents, why wouldn't it search for discussions on bitcoin algos?
So no, I don't think the story rings true.
"But why? Why go to so much trouble to identify Satoshi? My source tells me that the Obama administration was concerned that Satoshi was an agent of Russia or China—that Bitcoin might be weaponized against us in the future. "
Yeh, unlikely plot, given its open source you could just check the code.
Did you get the new CD?
Nothing new here folks, same method was used to nail Ted Kaczynski - of course it was much more difficult back then so a far greater accomplishment.
Did you ever wake up in the morning, with a Zombie Woof behind your eyes? -- FZ
I'm sure there will be loads of posts here denouncing the NSA for this, because it is in fact creepy and invasive. However, this kind of thing is *exactly* what they should be doing. "Satoshi Nakamoto" is a figure who created a economy-changing product, and as a result holds assets that value in the billions. Their motivations, ideology, and state ties were unknown, though they maintained they were not an American. It's completely reasonable for government to find out who this person is, and determine if they were and ally, an enemy, or neither. Now that they know they can act accordingly.
A 50-dimensional cow. Okay, now I am worried
Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
Canadian money doesn't have the most powerful government and military on earth and yet we all live daily with it. Most places will also accept american dollars but won't even give you any exchange rate for it.
Even Brazil struggles to keep their [pretty strong] currency [artificially] down.
I thought it was that Australian guy.
Interesting, there was a story recently on Fresh Air/NPR about how they caught the unabomber through linguistic work. It wasn't until his manifesto that they had enough writing to analyse. They didn't mention stylometry but the FBI interviewee discussed breaking down the writing into geographical location, writer's age, etc.
YES, the NSA is reading ALL our emails, recording ALL our phone calls. Damn the Constitution full autocracy ahead.
That's actually a bit careless. Even I am completely aware of this. When I'm posting something anonymously, I swap cuz/cause and don't put commas before a "lol" and single space my sentences and don't use an oxford comma and use semicolons incorrectly on purpose. All you have to have is a basic awareness of how it works and you can avoid it. I blame him for not being cautious enough.
Subject line says it all. Besides, I keep it short to make fingerprinting by words last 2 months long.
If this is true, it begs the question: why is the NSA looking for Satoshi? Where are the warrants to do this kind of search? This is a fairly involved process, even if the software was already written, collecting the entirety of Satoshi's writing for input is time consuming work.
As a taxpayer, there be something pretty fuckin important they need to ask Satoshi personally to justify this waste of my tax money.
HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
Just ask that guy who was making gold coins a few years back.
Pretty sure they can find/make precedent to crush him as a criminal as an example to anyone who would defy the government and multinational banking interests.
Anybody who has watched GoT should know the Iron Bank isn't just a fantastic example: It is exactly how large banks have been run since ancient times.
What's the point of this effort? Did he break any laws?
Or is this just more dick-waving by the NSA?
More proof that the security services are out of control?
The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
Stylometry is nowhere near the level of accuracy (or more importantly, low false positive rate) that this post is claiming.
The techniques described here are pretty trivial, and stylometry does a heck of a lot more than count frequencies of common words. PCA and embedding into a multidimensional space is pretty trivial as well.
Even with much more advanced techniques than this, it is impossible to eliminate false positives in stylometry once you increase the number of potential candidates. Definitively finding the author of a text in a set of 50 authors is possible, but doing it in a set of hundreds of thousands of authors is absolutely ludicrous. The false positive rate at that point would be above 50%. No way this is real.
I would also add that, Canadian money or not, I do not have to wait for more than an hour to confirm a transaction.
Why are my tax dollars paying for the NSA to find a private Billionaire who's committed no crimes? A total waste of taxpayer money on a non-issue. What congressional group is pushing for the NSA to be funding for these type of illegal spying operations without any probable cause?
I imagine the IRS wants his name and a good chunk of any cash it feels entitled to.
But Canadian money does have a real and considerable threat physical force behind it, unlike Bitcoin. If you don't think it does, try counterfeiting the Canadian dollar in any useful quantity and see what happens.
Yes, and nobody knows what the false positive or false negative rates are. Stylometry is not a reliable way of identifying people, and it is quite disturbing that people pretend it is.
This is just as bad as the lie detector scam. The real objective of such announcements it to create fear and doubt among the population; they want to be able to bully suspects into saying "come on, admit you're guilty, stylometry/lie detectors already prove it, but we'll give you a lighter sentence if you cooperate".
Try to send CAD or USD or any other currency from America to Asia... Probably you will have to wait longer than one hour unless you pay some crazy fees to WU or some other monopol ( which also doesnt' work in all parts of the world ).
I wonder how long it will take the NSA to unmask Slashdot's Anonymous Coward.
A 50-dimensional cow. Okay, now I am worried
What if all cows have 50 dimensions but we can only perceive 3 of them?
"That's the way to do it" - Punch
It was Rusty Foster the whole time! Who would have thought?
We don't appreciate you pestering Satoshi either.
You're an App...
You're an App.
I'm an App.
We're all Apps,
We wouldn't be Apps if we weren't here.
We wouldn't be here if we weren't Apps.
Apps!
Now who am I? (No, I'm not a Hosts File. I'm not APK. I'm an App.)
Real money also doesn't use 170kW/h of electricity for every transaction.
(current power usage of the Bitcoin network is 0.08% of the worlds production)
https://digiconomist.net/bitco...
No sig today...
I can't think of too many drug dealers that accept monopoly money.
“Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
If only kW/h was an unit of energy...
My first program:
Hell Segmentation fault
Is Nakamoto accused of any kind of crime whatsoever? Why have I and the other U.S. taxpayers forked over the funds for over a MONTH of work for who-knows how many analysts and expensive CPU cycles to determine this person's identity? What is the benefit to the US American taxpayer?
The fact that all the the hackers participating in the definition of Bitcoin shared their correspondence with Satoshi, except one, was also a cue;)
Stylometry is a useless tool that works by racial and cultural stereotypes. Anyone with a half-decent education will stymie this system almost immediately.
Take two students from the same school, whom have had the same classes, especially the language classes, right to the same teacher.
Odds are quite high that they will phrase things quite similarly.
As if this weren't evident enough in the amount of cheating that happens in middle and high school.
Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
I don't need to! I earn Canadian Tire money with every purchase I make on my MasterCard!
#DeleteFacebook
The kilowatt hour (symbolized kWh as per SI) is a composite unit of energy equivalent to one kilowatt (1 kW) of power sustained for one hour. One watt is equal to 1 J/s. One kilowatt hour is 3.6 megajoules.
If he's a US Citizen, then they definitely broke the law. There would absolutely no possible way to do this legally.
If he's not a US Citizen, then either they have failed to verify that there aren't other people (e.g. US citizens) with the same language hash .. or they have verified it but, in so doing, they broke the law.
So either the story is wrong (either they didn't really do this at all, or they neglected to compare the writings to Americans' writings), or they broke the law and at least tens of millions (probably over a hundred million) US victims' rights were violated and (if only someone could prove that that the crime happened) they would have standing to sue the NSA.
Well, that's the way mice work.
If this story is not BS, then I would like to know why is the NSA spending taxpayer dollars on this fishing expedition. Is Satoshi wanted for a crime? which one(s)?
Creating Bitcoin is not a crime. What reason do they have to waste tax payer resources on persecuting this poor man?
My sources in the Illuminati say that Bill Gates invented Bitcoin. He does not cash out because he does not need the money.
That's clearly Dave Grohl...
https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/800/1*TKs780EbWQBbeyfclRcGBQ.jpeg
There are legitimate reasons for the NSA to massively violate the privacy of non-US, non-criminal citizens.
e.g. Suppose you're a total law-abiding manager at a plant in charge of refining fissionable weapons material in the USSR in 1979. Hell yes the NSA should be learning anything it can about you. Or suppose we don't know if you're law-abiding or criminal, but you were a Russian contractor cleaning up an ex-Soviet reactor in 2008 and some material was unaccounted for. Oh, hell yes they should be looking at you, and prying as deep as they can get away with.
That's their excuse, and it could be ok.
The catch is that if they really did this, and if they also had to look at millions of Americans' private papers in order to rule them out and make sure they got the right foreigner, then suddenly it wasn't legit and whoever gave the go-ahead needs to spend the rest of their life in prison.
There aren't many people crazy enough to pay over $4,000 each for Monopoly dollars, though.
Like it or not, any item (even Bitcoin) is worth what someone is willing to pay for it. Whether or not it will still be worth $4,000 a year from now it anyone's guess at this point. It could become the next Mastercard, or the various world governments might outlaw the currency and start prosecuting enough users to make it's value plummet.
Personally, the lack of certainty either way is enough to make me stay away at this point.
People essentially use Monopoly money now. Actually, they're closer to already using BTC than any physical currency since in the US, at least, plastic is the main way to pay. Many people never even see physical currency. I really don't understand why people like you seem to have such a problem with this. Ask Greece how their paper currency is working out. Or maybe look at the GBP? They're both way down because of various political and economic factors and a very, very simple concept that a disturbing amount of the population doesn't understand: NO CURRENCY IS TRULY STABLE. Everything is ultimately a barter system with "currency" simply acting as a facilitator. Even the USD could plummet as Trump continues his presidential free fall of failure. The point is currencies collapse and new currencies are created. It happens. Remember the Euro? While different, that wasn't too far of from Yes, it's a volatile, speculative market at the moment. Go check out the Forex for plenty more of that happening decades before BTC. If that scares you, stick to the pathetic return of blue chips but be careful. Even though those can fail as well.
The very notion that you think the "world governments" could outlaw BTC just proves you don't understand it at all so yes, you really should stay away. Also stop posting about it because your ignorance does nothing but spread bullshit fears about something you clearly know nothing about.
Any time he sells a bitcoin and doesn't declare the gain on his quarterly taxes, it is called tax fraud.
So ... how many bitcoins has he sold per year and at what profit?
The same applies if he bought a diamond 10 yrs ago and sold it for 3x the value this year. There are taxes to be paid, assuming he is living above poverty level.
Besides that little detail, his privacy is fine. He created something from nothing, packaged it, sold others on it, and there's a barter economy around it. He could have used specific sea shells instead.
Musicians sell music (something created from nothing), and they pay their taxes too.
They mean kWh.
So the next step for Satoshi is to create service which will make him anonymous in terms of style of his messages.
The other use of this is to employ NSA to harass somebody on-line. We just need to collect somebody's messages and write crappy offensive post in social networks imitating the same style. So he/she would be under constant surveillance and investigation from NSA agents :-) lol
I just love this! Welcome to the real world! lol
...will the real Satoshi please stand up
please stand up
please stand up ....ducks!......
Satoshi don't mess around because he loves bitcoin and this we know for sho!
This is my sig, there are many like it but this one is mine
Worship of the spook and math wizardry aside, there is a chance that they misidentified him. Unless the kidnapped him and rubber hosed him into a confession, they THINK they know his identity.
This is one of the ways that mass surveillance, big data, and a lack of constraint reduces the space for private life and privacy. I'm not saying that privacy is dead, any more than any other civil liberty in the burgeoning surveillance state we live. Just that we need to defend our liberties.
kWh is not kW/h though. The GP said kW/h. He probably meant kWh though.
Canadian and U.S. Money, like all fiat currencies, can be instantly devalued simply by the gov't choosing to print more at any time. It IS NOT a guaranteed store of stable value.
Think about it, this is the guy who invented bitcoin. He would know better than anyone that it's a deflationary currency and the longer he holds onto his pile of coins the richer he will get. Why bother selling until you're worth more than Bill Gates? The NSA probably want to unmask him to determine if he's funding terrorists/who the hell he is. I don't think they should be conducting surveillance/this sort of analysis against this particular target because the methods being used are wrong. However I can understand the interest in him. This is someone who is using up to date encryption methods. It's basically someone the NSA would be targeting anyway to try and stay ahead in electronic warfare techniques. When your entire reason for existence is to decode intelligence communication, it's a requirement you can/try to break all encryption methods available/potentially available to your adversaries.
I call BS.
As any machine learning person would know, the number of false positives when you are looking at millions of people will be very high. Looking at a simplistic feature representation like 50 most common words in online data and claiming your system will uniquely identify a person is even more unbelievable. So there will be many people who are excellent matches in the search results which might be plausibly contain Satoshi.
What we need is an open-source (what else?) application that can maintain several writing profiles for each user. Each profile would differ in the most common/distinguishing text metrics (such as the one described here). Input would be text in your natural writing style. Output (with tweaks controlled by the user, so meaning is preserved) would be modified text that matches (within some margin) the chosen writing profile.
The program (via a GUI) would prompt you to do such things as "shorten your average word length", "lengthen your sentences", "get rid of your 4 longest words [listing them]", etc. Making those changes would hide your natural style, while morphing the document/message/e-mail into the chosen profile.
This would be tedious, but if you really need to remain anonymous (and can handle all the other things you have to use such as Tor), this would overcome this latest hurdle. Changing the most prominent aspects of your style would invariably change other metrics, making it difficult for the NSA etc. to avoid false positives.
Additionally, you could input others' writings, create a profile from them, and then have yours morphed into theirs. Yes, this could be used nefariously to put your words in someone else's mouth, but would also have the effect of blurring the data, thereby rendering it less useful.
I've thought about starting such a project, but don't have the time.
You DO realize that we can perceive 4 dimensions, right? Width, Height, Depth, and Time.
It is pretty trivial to do when you group the related ones. At work I visualize 20+ dimensions.
i.e. 14 Dimensions:
* X, Y
* Width, Height
* r,g,b,a
* Rot X, Y, Z
* Scale X, Y, Z
There are numerous videos on how to visualize higher dimensions
* Jos Leys - Ãtienne Ghys - Aurélien Alvarez (Dimensions - A walk through mathematics)
* Rob Bryanton (Imagining 10 Dimensions - the Movie)
If you try to anonymize your writing by running it through hained translations you had better have those translators running on yiur own hw else you are just moving part of the tracing problem to the traffic analysis space
Satoshi is dead anyway, so it's not like any of this matters that much.
By taking Satoshi's texts and finding the 50 most common words, the NSA was able to break down his text into 5,000 word chunks and analyse each to find the frequency of those 50 words. This would result in a unique 50-number identifier for each chunk.
ok.
The NSA then placed each of these numbers into a 50-dimensional space and flatten them into a plane using principal components analysis.
That's purposely sounding complex to make it look more impressive than it is. Fuck that hype. Strive for quality journalism and stop bullshitting us.
The result is a 'fingerprint' for anything written by Satoshi that could easily be compared to any other writing
ok. But really it just means there's another layer of obfuscation required. If you really want to be anonymous, now you need to pass everything you write through a SIMPLE-WORDS filter. Parish the thought of giving the NSA even a modicum of tyranny inducing panopicon. ....OH SHIT!
eh, just restrict yourself to Simplified Technical English or basic English when writing your manifesto, and be sure to randomize both sentence length and word choices.
"They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
I don't doubt that being a billionaire thoroughly reduced the number of people they actually had to look into. People that rich can't remain anonymous to any government.
That makes me question the necessity of checking "trillions of messages from billions of people". Get the big list of however many hundreds or thousands of billionaires there are, compare their messages against Satoshi's, and be done with it.
Plus depending on whether any mention of penance or Moloch or any other satanic bullshit exists in Satoshi's messages, you can pretty much narrow it down to de Rothschilds n' pals or exclude them.
CAPTCHA: ritual
Sounds like a Philip Dick novel. Why is everybody arguing about whether currencies are valuable instead of discussing the inability to stay anonymous?
enuf said
Death to all tyrants. They said they weren't spying on US citizens. Kill them all. Fucking treasonous pieces of shit.
My guess is that most of them would accept monopoly money if it was in combination with a first-edition of the monopoly game.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...
scarcity of a popular item equals value.
Yeah, what's weird is that it doesn't seem to matter and enough people believe in it to drive up the value. Just finished "cryptonimocon", in which the premise of the story is people want to set up a digital currency backed by a hoard of WW2 gold they were hunting for. It seems quaint now because it turns out you don't even need the gold. (Although it's an awesome book)
It is hard to hide a net worth of > $1BEEELion. Check with Forbes for the list of candidates && cull.
Remove multi-generational money, and non-computing folks. The short list probably has the name. And it is not going to be Gates, Ellison, Balmer, Allen, etc.
Most? meaning more than half. I'm skeptical an average drug dealer would barter with collectibles given that I don't think I could properly identify a first edition board game even though I'm a member of my work's board game club and my Mom is an antique dealer.
“Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
the real question i have is why the NSA felt the need to identify him in the first place
What one does is use the same trick as the NSA does, then morph your writing into someone elses.
For as evolved as we seem to have become, we're still cavemen for how we barter. Someday, maybe we should at least have a fair valuation of currencies. I have to wonder how we could ever have stable currency if we can't even stop fucking each other blind.
Try counterfeiting bitcoin in any useful quantity and see what happens. I guarantee you far more than if you counterfeit Canadian money.
If your boyfriend is fucking you blind maybe he's doing it in the wrong hole(s).
TFA explains why:
Why go to so much trouble to identify Satoshi? My source tells me that the Obama administration was concerned that Satoshi was an agent of Russia or China -- that Bitcoin might be weaponized against us in the future.
Whether you agree with what that motive or not, it's good someone was concerned about such things.
That that is is that that that that is not is not.
Satoshi is Timothy Lord.
If this is true, it begs the question: why is the NSA looking for Satoshi?
Its a research project, you have to look for someone attempting anonymity. Satoshi would be a fun target. Also an anonymous person with a larger collection of public writing would be make the research easier.
In fact, I would be surprised if they didn't make an offer in their initial communications with him, in honor of his outstanding achievements and unique skills.
With all that power, why can't we get a copy of the medical tests confirming Alzheimers or a list of off-shore tax avoidance bank accounts of .... a certain reality TV bimbo-in-chief.
The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
Satoshi is a serious threat to any large government since he/she/they single-handedly created the most popular and valuable de-centralized currency in the world.
Currency in any form is one that any government wants exclusive control over.
Have you ever fallen asleep at the keybhanusdiog?
Try counterfeiting Bitcoin. The analogy of needing force to promote acceptance of fancy colored paper in exchange for services and products just doesn't work with Bitcoin. No one is forced to use it at all.
That is the beauty of it and what makes in potentially more valuable the fancy colored paper. How long before force is being used to REQUIRE the use of "government backed money only as a form of exchange? Of course the govern.ent would then have to do something about the "pure trade economy...eg my extra bag of oranges for your extra bag of apples.
There aren't many people crazy enough to pay over $4,000 each for Monopoly dollars, though.
Like it or not, any item (even Bitcoin) is worth what someone is willing to pay for it. Whether or not it will still be worth $4,000 a year from now it anyone's guess at this point. It could become the next Mastercard, or the various world governments might outlaw the currency and start prosecuting enough users to make it's value plummet.
Personally, the lack of certainty either way is enough to make me stay away at this point.
You mean like stocks. More specifically stocks that don't pay dividends
http://saveie6.com/
Going off the mixture of British and American spellings they are probably an Aussie!!
We get taught the British/English spellings and are then forced to suffer with American softwares that insist whet we have just typed is wrong.. I have found multiple counts where i have mixed U.K. And u.s spellings in the same documents..
Eh... if you are going to look through billion people for any match you are going to get some, probably thousands, doesn't mean you found the person you were looking for. Can't say I'm surprised about intelligence agencies looking for the fella, but it's kind of late now, bitcoin is fart in the wind by now, there is no catching it anymore, getting paws on Satoshis personal bitcoin cache might be important in the long run tho. Governments can only hope it will fail on its own, if it doesn't... that wouldn't bode well for world economy. My personal opinion is that Satoshi, whoever he may be, purposefully designed the thing to be an economical doomsday device.
while the techniques work mostly.. the conclusions & accuracy are cut from whole cloth... ie its BS kids...
btw cypherpunks been playing with these approaches since the late 80s
without any substantiation of the main claim
wonder how this got through the /. content selection process
They might not like him for creating a new currency -- If he's a US citizen, that is likely illegal. They can claim he is supporting terrorism by creating an untraceable currency. They can point to an increase in untraceable transactions -- money laundering -- supporting and an all crimes -- they can blame almost anything -- and then ....
If they can't prove it, they can do to him what they did to Capone and hit this "millionaire" for tax evasion.
Or do you think he paid taxes on all his bitcoins?
I'm Satoshi Nakamoto and so is my wife.
I don't think nearly as many people use Monopoly money for money laundering and ransomware, though.
Agreed. The vast majority of criminals use US dollars.
Perhaps someone should investigate the shady groups behind this hugely overvalued national currency? I suggest they start with the NSA, CIA, US Treasury and the US "Federal Reserve". They could then expand their enquiry to The US oil industry and the petrodollar.
I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
From the article: "Many readers have asked who Satoshi is and I’ve made it clear that information wasn’t shared with me. Based on my conversation I got the impression (never confirmed) that he might have been more than one person. "
Yeah, the team that discovered this probably looked over their cubicles and said "Hi Bob, Joe, Jane, and John!" -- now we know your pseudonym is "Satoshi!"
What gave this bunch the impression that they had the need or right to do this?
I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
All these questions of why, why, why? I say so what?
Now that they found him, what are they going to do with him? That's the real question.
Tracy Johnson
Old fashioned text games hosted below:
http://empire.openmpe.com/
BT
So, all those countless hours and men power just to properly tax the one that created Bitcoin? Impressive.
This means 'toshi is probably dead or locked away forever.
LONG LIVE THE SPIRIT OF SATOSHI!
Who knew the NSA was having so much trouble locating it's employees?
The tool, they can B fooled? If grammatical errors purposely maybe throw wrench. Brain human good quite without-out gramatikal misteke && spelin. + heard the lad swotch between brittany and colony word-preference. You get my drift?
Can NSA analys' bypass , identifty, denoise?
You can all plainly see that WalMart is loaded with hillbillies and rednecks.
You know it's true. Don't try to pretend you haven't noticed.
You definitely know this guy is a filthy Trump supporter.
I rest my case.
There is a similar analysis on the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto which dates back to 2014, and the answer is public, here: https://likeinamirror.wordpress.com/
There should be a version of Google Translate that does an English-to-English conversion, but which changes the style of whatever text is entered into some really common style. Also, I wonder what other kinds of things that could be applied to.