Slashdot Mirror


FCC Chief Tells Apple To Turn on iPhone's FM Radio Chip (cnet.com)

FCC Chairman Ajit Pai pushed Apple on Friday to activate the FM radio chips in the iPhone. From a report: In the wake of three major hurricanes that have wiped out communications for millions of people over the past month, Pai issued a statement urging Apple, one of the largest makers of cellphones in the US, to "reconsider its position, given the devastation wrought by Hurricanes Harvey, Irma, and Maria." FM radios that are already included in every phone could be used to access "life-saving information" during disasters, he said. For years the majority of smartphones sold in the US have included FM radios, but most of them have been turned off so that you couldn't use the function. Why? Mobile customers would be a lot less likely to subscribe to streaming music services if they could just listen to traditional, free broadcast radio. This incentive is especially true for Apple, which has a streaming music service. Apple said in a statement: "iPhone 7 and iPhone 8 models do not have FM radio chips in them nor do they have antennas designed to support FM signals, so it is not possible to enable FM reception in these products."

134 of 235 comments (clear)

  1. Turn it on, will not work by WillRobinson · · Score: 5, Informative

    No internal antenna.

    1. Re:Turn it on, will not work by freeze128 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Head of FCC tells Apple to bring back the headphone jack. That's what the headline should say.

    2. Re:Turn it on, will not work by TexasDiaz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When Apple removed the audio jack in the iPhone 7, they removed the ability to plug in an antenna to the device - in Android devices, you have to plug wired headphones into the audio jack to act as the antenna for the radio. But why would the FCC chairman blow smoke out his bunghole without speaking directly to them first? Is it some unwritten requirement that they have to publicly shame themselves rather than putting on their big-boy pants and actually directly talking to someone? It seems like if you're the head of the FCC you can find a technical contact at Apple to speak to before being an ass about it.

    3. Re:Turn it on, will not work by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      antenna dongle

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:Turn it on, will not work by mikael · · Score: 1

      Android phones in Europe use the earphone socket cable as an antenna - No external antenna

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    5. Re: Turn it on, will not work by mikael · · Score: 1

      I miss my old Saisho Walkman - for me, it was the iPod of the time, had detachable speakers, play music on cassettes, had FM/AM radio reception and could fit inside my pocket if I removed one speaker. Could wear headphones or listen to the music from the speaker.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    6. Re:Turn it on, will not work by reboot246 · · Score: 2

      Lots of people don't have the latest, greatest iPhones. They still own phones WITH the audio jack, so it would benefit millions.

      Apple's answer referred to the iPhone 8, like that's the only version out there. They wish.

    7. Re:Turn it on, will not work by Solandri · · Score: 1

      Use the charging port. Apple is always saying how they can't comply with the EU's microUSB charger mandate because the Lightning charging port they use is so much more capable than USB. So it should be trivial for them to connect an FM antenna lead to it.

    8. Re:Turn it on, will not work by Octorian · · Score: 1

      For some reason, these features (especially the FM part, but the others too) are common among shit-tier phones but quite uncommon among higher end models.

    9. Re:Turn it on, will not work by Graymalkin · · Score: 1

      There's no amplifier on those phones with an analog audio jack. So even if the situation was as simple as enabling a software change (it isn't) the FM reception would be complete shit. You'd have to stand under the transmitter to get a usable signal.

      --
      I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
    10. Re:Turn it on, will not work by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Android phones in Europe use the earphone socket cable as an antenna - No external antenna

      Most Android phones use the earphone ground as an antenna cable, which certainly is an external antenna. The fact that it is also the shield on the earphone audio doesn't mean it isn't also an antenna.

    11. Re:Turn it on, will not work by TimHunter · · Score: 1

      The sooner people realize Apple is in it solely for Apple, and not to elevate their users, the sooner this disaster of a company goes away.

      Except for Mr. Cancelled, who doesn't realize this? Is BMW in it for anything other than BMW? Is Tesla? Microsoft? Does Samsung sell phones to elevate their users? This shouldn't need explaining (except to Apple-haters). Businesses - including Apple - are in business to make a profit. Apple under Tim Cook is enormously successful at this.

      Cancelled, you wish you had stock in this "disaster of a company." I do, and it pays for my iPhone and Verizon contract.

    12. Re:Turn it on, will not work by Maury+Markowitz · · Score: 1

      > Apple prevented this in order to ensure that users had to pay for services.

      Right, like the hundreds and hundreds of app I can download to get any of those services without paying Apple.

      And it's impressive how they figured out a decade ago how they were going to remove the headphone jack in the future *so they could turn off FM*.

      Yeah, like that.

    13. Re:Turn it on, will not work by tepples · · Score: 1

      Receiving an update means you have Internet access for an hour, not for a whole month.

    14. Re:Turn it on, will not work by tepples · · Score: 1

      Good luck getting those apps to connect to their respective services without paying a recurring fee to Verizon, AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile, or MVNOs that use their networks.

    15. Re:Turn it on, will not work by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      So simply require that they put it back for emergency purpose, it's called regulation in the public interest. Why would you think it would be bad for the government to be able to broadcast to the public in times of emergency. It's kind of common sense, especially in light of the growing number of weather based disasters. Instead you applaud, it cost $5, people should shut up and die instead, that's GOD blessed profit, just ask the majority of US politicians.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    16. Re:Turn it on, will not work by Mr.+Cancelled · · Score: 1

      Cancelled, you wish you had stock in this "disaster of a company." I do, and it pays for my iPhone and Verizon contract.

      More money? Sure... Why not?

      But explain again the rationale of putting the profits from your Apple stock, which you paid for, back into the company paying you dividends?

      You buy their stock.

      You buy their products with the profit from their stock (this is a one way road btw, you're not making money on this "investment")

      I mean... If you make lots of money from your stock and have other play things, great! It sounds more like you have just enough stock to pay for your phone and contract (which again goes directly to Apple for the phone, a portion of your Verizon contract is also shared w/Apple, I believe), which is cool I guess, but does not overly impress me.

      It's actually kind of fanboy'ish. But to each their own...

      I see a morally bankrupt company who's lost their direction, forgot their mission, and are out of original ideas.

      You see an easy way to save $100 a month and get a "free" iPhone.

      C'est la vie

    17. Re:Turn it on, will not work by Mr.+Cancelled · · Score: 1

      And it's impressive how they figured out a decade ago how they were going to remove the headphone jack in the future *so they could turn off FM*.

      No... They planned to remove the headphone jac ka decade ago as that's about the time they thought the market would be saturated with products that utilized the headphone jack, and the profits would have dried up.

      So the move was more of a way to ensure a steady income as consumers who wanted to stick with a familiar product upgraded all of their peripherals.

      You should understand this... It speak volumes about what motivates them these days. (Hint: It's not what's best for the consumer!)

    18. Re:Turn it on, will not work by Mr.+Cancelled · · Score: 1

      I wasn't saying that modern iPhones have this hardware. Older versions did via the wifi chip, but Apple never built in the additional features that would be needed to enable it.

      I agree, based on how they've built the things, turning your phone into a radio via a software update is just not possible.

    19. Re:Turn it on, will not work by Grishnakh · · Score: 1, Troll

      The people at Apple have already proven themselves to be asses, so why should he bother?

      I'm not a fan of this Pai guy at all so far, but I'd become his biggest fan if he made a ruling that all smartphones needed to have FM radio capability, even if that means bringing back the headphone jack. Even better if he made it retroactive, and Apple was forced to recall and replace all their shitty jack-less phones. (And another bonus if, as the other poster said, they forced them to change iOS to change the shitty flat UI.)

    20. Re:Turn it on, will not work by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it's because Apple isn't a radio manufacturer. If people need a radio receiver, they can buy one. Every corner drug store in the US sells FM radios in some form or another.

    21. Re:Turn it on, will not work by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      I'd be a fan if Pai issues a ruling that all shits going by the moniker Grishnakh had to gargle with hydrochloric acid every morning.

    22. Re:Turn it on, will not work by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      I see a morally bankrupt company who's lost their direction, forgot their mission, and are out of original ideas.

      That could describe any of a million corporation in the world.

      What you really see is a washed-up shit who hates people who does things he doesn't like because he feels left out. But that's because you spend too much time in front of a mirror.

    23. Re:Turn it on, will not work by JonBoy47 · · Score: 1

      You're undoubtedly referring to the single PCB trace, from the FM antenna pin of the Qualcomm modem to the Lightning jack. And some software, which has no incremental cost beyond the initial development.

    24. Re:Turn it on, will not work by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      When Apple removed the audio jack in the iPhone 7, they removed the ability to plug in an antenna to the device

      If you believed the had the audio jack wired to the never enabled FM receiver, you are a fucking moron.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    25. Re: Turn it on, will not work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Dead cat on the table, I suspect. Get everyone riled up/distracted about something other than net neutrality?

    26. Re:Turn it on, will not work by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 2

      Use the charging port. Apple is always saying how they can't comply with the EU's microUSB charger mandate because

      ... there is no such thing. Stop pretending.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    27. Re:Turn it on, will not work by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      No internal antenna.

      Just connect something to the headphones jack, and here is your antenna.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    28. Re:Turn it on, will not work by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      And they and all other manufacturers included them. Ass-hole.

    29. Re: Turn it on, will not work by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      No it doesn't jackass.

    30. Re:Turn it on, will not work by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      If you leave out ridiculous status symbol devices like diamond-encrusted phones and ultra-secure models made for the high security niche, iPhones are in the top tier of pricing. The upcoming iPhone X raises the bar for flagship phone pricing.

    31. Re: Turn it on, will not work by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      You're embarrassing yourself.

    32. Re: Turn it on, will not work by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      That's internal antenna. External means outside and connectored.

    33. Re: Turn it on, will not work by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      He's clearly touching himself.

    34. Re: Turn it on, will not work by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      Do you have reading comprehension problems? The whole paragraph was generally "this makes sense and is a good idea" . The first paragraph explained there's a fucking reason to do it. What the fuck is your problem? Get a new bowl if someone pissed in your Cornflakes.

    35. Re: Turn it on, will not work by interstellarsurfer · · Score: 1

      Apparently a piece of wire with a 3.5mm TRS connector doesn't meet your definition of an external antenna.

    36. Re:Turn it on, will not work by slashdotwannabe · · Score: 1

      Ducking FUH. That doesn't make it an FM radio any more than my wifi router is.

      --
      This comment is my opinion and does not represent an official position of Donald Trump or others I do not work for
  2. Television? by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When I was in Korea a few years back I was intrigued to see everyone on the subway watching OTA broadcast TV on their phones. This wasn't "streaming" video coming in over their data plan - The phones and tablets had antennas that extended from them and they were watching broadcast TV.

    1. Re:Television? by FudRucker · · Score: 2

      in the USA they want everyone to buy subscriptions to everything, satellite radio, streaming music by paid subscription, netflix, everything is being geared to milk the consumer for money, i refuse to play their cash cow game fuck em they can FOAD for all i care

      --
      Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    2. Re:Television? by yo303 · · Score: 1

      In Korea only old people stream video.

    3. Re:Television? by Kristoph · · Score: 1

      I pay a small fortune for cable television I don't use. I recently went to just having local channels and I am still paying though the nose for the stupid 'FIOS triple pack'. When I call them and tell them I want just have internet they tell me I will have a 'cool down period' where I will have no internet if I do this.

      It's a rip off.

      I'll take: HBO - for GoT and Westworls, Startz - for American Gods, and now CBS All Access - for ST: Discovery and iTunes - for everything else any day. At least I know why I have these services and if I don't like them I just cancel them ( and I can even cancel them off season when the shows I watch are now available ).

    4. Re:Television? by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      When I was in Korea a few years back I was intrigued to see everyone on the subway watching OTA broadcast TV on their phones. This wasn't "streaming" video coming in over their data plan - The phones and tablets had antennas that extended from them and they were watching broadcast TV.

      There are only a couple of manufacturers of Android ATSC tuners that can plug into a phones usb port, I suppose because the demand is low. You can find a few more options for DVB-T

    5. Re:Television? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is called 1seg. Started in Japan, it's low quality 12 FPS video but easier and more reliable to receive on the move. Many cars have it, I was really surprised to see people watching TV while driving.

      The name of because it uses one segment of the available digital TV spectrum. It trades quality for extra error correction and redundancy.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:Television? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      You are not kidding: https://community.verizonwirel...

      You can't even change your service. Fuck Verizon and fuck all cable companies right up their asses.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    7. Re:Television? by Graymalkin · · Score: 2

      The South Korean version of this is called DMB and is distinct from but similar in concept to 1seg. The US might see this some day in the form of ATSC-M/H.

      All of them are similar in they use H.264 for video and HE-AAC for audio multiplexed in an MPEG transport stream.

      --
      I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
    8. Re:Television? by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

      I'll just leave this here:

      https://www.ftccomplaintassistant.gov/

    9. Re:Television? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The US is sparsely distributed. This makes broadcast TV relatively ineffective. Works great in cities, but not so much in the flyover states.

      "The flyover states" are filled with translators that get the TV signal to tiny 100-person towns only Wikipedia knows about.

      And the US would really, really like to use that huge amount of bandwidth for something else.

      They already did that; why don't you remember?
      Current broadcast TV uses a tiny fraction of the spectrum that was allocated to the good old analog version.
      .

    10. Re:Television? by Ark42 · · Score: 1

      But if you have a 1seg-capable phone, the NHK man can come collect fees from you, even if you never use it. I'm glad my phone doesn't have 1seg because I bought it from the states.

    11. Re:Television? by whatever_01 · · Score: 1

      I have that for my laptop but I don't know if you would get any reception on a cell phone without a regular antenna attached to it

    12. Re:Television? by Trogre · · Score: 1

      My no-name Android tablet came with an inbuilt TV antenna and analogue receiver. It worked fine for three months before my country moved to digital TV and re-allocated the analogue TV frequencies to cell phone carriers.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  3. interesting by Osgeld · · Score: 1

    my LG G6, which I hate and its a slow chunk of crap, just tells you to plug in a set of headphones for an antenna cause FM radio is not that hard to pick up

    That doesn't really help if the receiver part of the chipset is just terminated, but it really wouldn't kill anyone to enable that feature in the future

    1. Re:interesting by fisted · · Score: 1

      My LG L40 can receive FM without connecting an external antenna. I wonder why this isn't possible in a device that costs many times that from the same manufacturer...

    2. Re:interesting by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      I dunno but they botched everything IMO, I thought it would be a decent phone with my previous experiences with LG, but its lethargic in everything it does, the LCD screen is nothing to write home about either

    3. Re:interesting by Xenx · · Score: 1

      My first guess, and I'm not knocking the phone, the LG L40 is a bulkier cheap plastic phone. Most people don't care about FM radio, so why bother making room for it in the premium devices where they're striving for minimize everything but the display?

    4. Re:interesting by fisted · · Score: 1

      Could be, though the G6 is substantially bigger (a bit thinner though) and has 8.7 cm^3 more volume than the L40

  4. Free markets rule by Dorianny · · Score: 1

    He could try to shame the tech companies to support his plan or he could use the FCC authority to do so. But of course to Pai that would be a outrageous attempt at interference with the free markets, no matter how many lives it saves

  5. Yeah, but at least make it usable by dargaud · · Score: 1

    Having an FM tuner is one of the requirements when I change my Android phone (the others being 4G, USA+Europe frequencies, 3.5mm headphone jack, SDXC >64Gb, screen >=1920x, screen >=5.5", removable battery, >2Go mem, >16Go onboard, 150g). This being said the last 3 phones I've had had shitty radios that kept on changing channel by themselves. I have no idea why. I suspected that the cabling of the earphones had something wrong and sent some fake 'next channel' signal, but it happens with different earphones and some phones are worse than others.

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
    1. Re:Yeah, but at least make it usable by Frederic54 · · Score: 1

      Strange, the phones I have (Galaxy SII, Moto G2, Zenfone 2) all have FM radio and I never had a problem with channel changing, maybe if it's in your pocket the touchscreen is getting touched. I'm a bit like you and always buy unlocked phone with audio jack and SD card, and $300.

      --
      "Science will win because it works." - Stephen Hawking
    2. Re:Yeah, but at least make it usable by iampiti · · Score: 1

      Which models can you buy these days that still have a removable battery? I'm having trouble with my current phone and the only one I could find in the 200 - 300 € range is last year's lg g5

    3. Re:Yeah, but at least make it usable by dargaud · · Score: 1

      Well, in this case it's an ARCHOS 50b Cobalt/Lite, 32Gb, I got 2 weeks ago for 140€ and quite usable I must say.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
  6. Nothing to do with streaming services by Guspaz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    iPhones were shipping with the FM support disabled long before Apple Music or Spotify existed.

    1. Re:Nothing to do with streaming services by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

      The iTunes Store still existed, though.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:Nothing to do with streaming services by eclectro · · Score: 1

      i beg to differ. Other countries have FM support for their cellphones. It's just in the US big corporations and special interests expect complete control of their platforms and what there is on them.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    3. Re:Nothing to do with streaming services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Some Apple iPod devices included FM Radio. Apple intentionally disabled. And now that Apple is designing their own chips; they are excluding the FM Radio chips on purpose.

  7. on a side comment on all in one functions by WillRobinson · · Score: 2

    Why not just buy like a transistor radio with solar cell charging, their very cheep. Where's my Swiss knife pop out of my Iphone, that would be more useful.

    1. Re:on a side comment on all in one functions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why not just buy like a transistor radio with solar cell charging, their very cheep. Where's my Swiss knife pop out of my Iphone, that would be more useful.

      Or get a hand cranked radio/flashlight/iPhone charger for emergencies.

    2. Re:on a side comment on all in one functions by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Why not just buy like a transistor radio with solar cell charging, their very cheep. Where's my Swiss knife pop out of my Iphone, that would be more useful.

      It's ironic that you mention a single purpose built device in the same post as a multipurpose tool, and compare the two.

      The only thing useful is the device you have with you. That is precisely why the Swiss army knife is great in a pinch but not a very good knife, or scissors, or nail file, or (insert other function here). What good is the solar power transistor radio if it's somewhere else in a box I can't find when I need it?
      What good is my Miyabi pearing knife in my kitchen when I'm at work?

  8. Pffffft by sit1963nz · · Score: 1

    In an emergency my pocket radio powered by 2 AA batteries will significantly outlast any smartphone. And last time I checked you could even get them with a crank handle that recharges batteries using a dynamo . Emergency, what a dumb excuse.

    1. Re:Pffffft by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      > In an emergency my pocket radio powered by 2 AA batteries will significantly outlast any smartphone.

      Does that go with you to work? Is it on your person right now?

    2. Re:Pffffft by sit1963nz · · Score: 1

      Actually, yes.
      I also have ethernet cables, USB-Serial Adaptors, Bootable USB sticks (OSX), Various Mac cables (USB-C, Thunderbolt, Firewire, etc) A Torch, a Multitool , my laptop, etc etc etc

      Plus there is another radio in my car (as well as phone charger) and another LED based emergency torch, etc + water, first aid kit, and a toolkit.

    3. Re:Pffffft by narcc · · Score: 1

      I keep one in the house, one in each car, and one on my desk at work.

      They're inexpensive, often less than $20, and could very well prove invaluable in an emergency.

      It's the same reason you likely keep a first aid kit all of those places, like I do.

      Of course, unlike the first aid kit, the hand-crank/solar radio doesn't require regular replacement. They're essentially a one-time cost. The one I have next to me is more than 10 years old and still works as well as the day I bought it. It just seems foolish not to make those a part of your normal emergency planning.

      That doesn't mean you should give up your phone. After all, you can charge it with your emergency radio.

  9. Again, Pai demonstrates his stupidity by GerryGilmore · · Score: 2

    As Apple pointed out, their phones truly just do not support OTA radio broadcasts. But Pai could not be bothered to uncover this little technical fact first....Now, if he were really serious about this "life-saving" stuff, he could use his R majority on the FCC to mandate that - after, say, 2020 - all smartphones sold in America must be able to receive and play OTA broadcasts but the chances of THAT happening are below zero.

    1. Re:Again, Pai demonstrates his stupidity by idontusenumbers · · Score: 1

      Maybe they could include a migration from the wasteful analog FM we have today to digital.

    2. Re:Again, Pai demonstrates his stupidity by Bartles · · Score: 2

      Pai didn't specify iPhone 7's and 8's now, did he?

    3. Re:Again, Pai demonstrates his stupidity by Known+Nutter · · Score: 1

      He said "flip the switch" which could reasonably be interpreted to mean existing products. Regardless, specific models of iPhones would be a technical detail. His statement was without any technical detail whatsoever (beyond 'switch'). There is an ulterior motive here and it has nothing to do FM broadcasts for hurricane victims and more likely to do with the FCC poking Apple on behalf of the NSA. I know that sounds like tin-foil hat talk, but these days, nothing is outside the realm of possibility and nothing seems to matter anyway.

      --
      Beware of the Leopard.
    4. Re:Again, Pai demonstrates his stupidity by PPH · · Score: 1

      wasteful analog FM we have today to digital

      There is already support for digital (HD) radio. And you can buy a receiver today. Problem: FCC selected a proprietary format, owned by iBiquity. The licensing terms are such that a couple of local FM stations have dropped their HD simulcasts and gone back to analog only.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    5. Re:Again, Pai demonstrates his stupidity by idontusenumbers · · Score: 1

      Looks like it's all owned by DTS now.

    6. Re:Again, Pai demonstrates his stupidity by jandrese · · Score: 1

      iBiquity is one of the most shameful examples of regulatory capture I have ever seen. Their system is entirely proprietary and protected by DRM and yet they are mandated as the only option for these chunks of the public spectrum. As you might expect the takeup has been slow and unenthusiastic. It's a tremendous waste of precious bandwidth.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
  10. tell them ALL to do it by FudRucker · · Score: 2

    Tell Samsung, Tell Pixel, Tell Motorola, tell ALL the smartphone manufactures to turn on the FM radio chip so i can at least get local broadcast FM radio music, news and weather

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:tell them ALL to do it by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Tell Samsung, Tell Pixel, Tell Motorola, tell ALL the smartphone manufactures to turn on the FM radio chip so i can at least get local broadcast FM radio music, news and weather

      Many of those devices already to have their FM radios enabled, but lack software to drive them. I use the free NextRadio app on my Kyocera Hydro Vibe and it works great. It uses the headphone wire as an antenna, so they (or a speaker) must be plugged it, but you can also output through the built-in speaker.

      Here's the official list of supported devices. Note that my device wasn't listed when I first installed the app, but it worked anyway. I sent some feed back telling them it worked and my device is now listed.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    2. Re:tell them ALL to do it by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      I use the free NextRadio app

      NextRadio demands to know where you are so it can ... "look up" local radio stations, before it will allow you to use the tuner to find your own. It makes you go through two opt-out pop-ups just to keep it from tracking you using GPS, and then sits at a "zip code" entry page with no way past.

      It is probably not a good choice for FM tuner in an emergency, since the network will be down and it won't be able to look up stations for you.

    3. Re:tell them ALL to do it by spire3661 · · Score: 2

      My Moto G1, G4 and G5 all have FM hardware and software by default.

      --
      Good-bye
    4. Re:tell them ALL to do it by jwhyche · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have a samsung S7 and I can't believe that actually worked.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    5. Re:tell them ALL to do it by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

      Just install the software, e.g. NextRadio. Or can't you be bothered to go to the app store? FM radio works perfectly well on my S8+ (US model).

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    6. Re:tell them ALL to do it by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

      One might think you'd have already installed the software prior to the cataclysm. Also, nothing prevents you from saying "no" to the GPS request, nor from providing an alternative ZIP if you really don't want to offer your real one. It simply assists with station presets.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    7. Re:tell them ALL to do it by freeze128 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I was curious about NextRadio so I installed it. My device (LG G2) wasn't on the supported list, but it detected my location, and showed me my local FM stations. They played great.... I was suspicious.

      So I turned off WiFi and Mobile data, and the stations stopped dead. This fucker was ***STREAMING*** audio to my phone over a data connection, not using the FM tuner. Also, for some reason, it needs access to your files and photos.

      Unsurprisingly, I uninstalled it.

    8. Re:tell them ALL to do it by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      So I turned off WiFi and Mobile data, and the stations stopped dead. This fucker was ***STREAMING*** audio to my phone over a data connection, not using the FM tuner. Also, for some reason, it needs access to your files and photos.

      Previously the app only provided FM usage. Looks like the app has been updated in version 4 to add a streaming mode and use more data in FM mode. In streaming mode, it works like any other streaming app. In FM mode, there are now two levels of functionality: enhanced and basic. When a data connection is available (WiFi or mobile) it uses some data to get your location, local station information and download tiles of the current songs playing. Without a data connection it is simply a manual FM tuner.

      Previously there was only enhanced FM and basic FM - I've only used basic before the version 4 updates. I just tried the updated version and am less pleased. Sorry for the confusion, and that the app has been updated like this.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    9. Re:tell them ALL to do it by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      I use the free NextRadio app

      NextRadio demands to know where you are so it can ... "look up" local radio stations, before it will allow you to use the tuner to find your own. It makes you go through two opt-out pop-ups just to keep it from tracking you using GPS, and then sits at a "zip code" entry page with no way past.

      It is probably not a good choice for FM tuner in an emergency, since the network will be down and it won't be able to look up stations for you.

      Previously the app only provided FM usage. Looks like the app has been updated in version 4 to add a streaming mode and use more data in FM mode. In streaming mode, it works like any other streaming app. In FM mode, there are now two levels of functionality: enhanced and basic. When a data connection is available (WiFi or mobile) it uses some data to get your location, local station information and download tiles of the current songs playing. Without a data connection it is simply a manual FM tuner.

      Previously there was only enhanced FM and basic FM - I've only used basic before the version 4 updates. I just tried the updated version and am less pleased. Sorry for the confusion and that the app has been updated like this.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    10. Re:tell them ALL to do it by blindseer · · Score: 1

      There's two possible explanations for this behavior that come to mind for me.

      First, the FM receiver is so tightly integrated into the WiFi/Bluetooth/cellular chip that it is impossible to disable one without also disabling the other. This may in fact be desired behavior to comply with "airplane mode" requirements.

      Second, the software developers decided to include the ability to stream the radio station audio to make up for poor FM reception when cellular or WiFi is available.

      I don't use NextRadio but I've heard their advertisements. They don't hide the fact that it uses data, they just say it uses *LESS* data than the competition, with the competition being those apps that don't take advantage of the FM radio. Your comments and others like it make me think that my phone not having an FM chip isn't so bad. If someone cannot offer an app that gives me access to FM radio and not also need internet access then the FM radio is effectively worthless.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    11. Re:tell them ALL to do it by Frederic54 · · Score: 1

      My Samsung Galaxy SII and my Motorola G2 both have FM radio, unlocked.

      --
      "Science will win because it works." - Stephen Hawking
    12. Re:tell them ALL to do it by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      I didn't disable the radio chip, I disabled WiFi and Mobile data only. Voice calls are still active, as was bluetooth.

      What really ticks me off is that the app didn't give me any kind of warning that I was going to be using data for its service. I would expect an app not to misrepresent itself.

    13. Re:tell them ALL to do it by Goetterdaemmerung · · Score: 1

      One might think you'd have already installed the software prior to the cataclysm.

      Why would you think this?

      Separately I've been burned a few times by apps that I downloaded in advance of going to a remote area. When I get there I find I can't use them because they need a network connection to register.

      Apps are designed for always-on connectivity. Expecting them to work in a disaster is wishful thinking.

  11. Assuming Apple could do this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How are people going to download the updated firmware to enable the FM radio? If they were in a position to do so, they wouldn't need to anyway.

  12. The Cluelessness of the FCC Chair is Amazing! by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In order to get FCC Approval, Apple has to submit not only samples of their "production-ready" Phones; but full documentation, including SCHEMATICS and SPECIFICATIONS...

    TO THE FUCKING FCC!!!

    But now, that same Clue-Free MORON has the temerity to attempt to make Apple look like "Bad Guys" that have simply REFUSED to "turn on" that which does not exist!

    And he Bloody-Well SHOULD have known that, BEFORE he even made his "Demand"!!!

    FFS! Our Tax Dollars at Work...

    1. Re:The Cluelessness of the FCC Chair is Amazing! by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      But...how do you know it doesn't actually exist? Have you seen the full schematics? Do you work for apple.
      Sure, apple told you it doesn't exist. But they also produce the iTunes application, and anyone responsible for that monstrosity has no clue whatsoever as to what's real and what's not.

    2. Re:The Cluelessness of the FCC Chair is Amazing! by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      But now, that same Clue-Free MORON has the temerity to attempt to make Apple look like "Bad Guys" that have simply REFUSED to "turn on" that which does not exist!

      And we should just trust apple because they say it doesn't have one? Both AT&T and Samsung have told me that my S7 doesn't have a radio chip in it. An i trusted them and left it at that. Well turns out it does. I just tested it myself..

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    3. Re:The Cluelessness of the FCC Chair is Amazing! by PPH · · Score: 2

      REFUSED to "turn on" that which does not exist!

      Maybe. Maybe not.

      Does Apple have a different hardware model for the Indian market? Because FM radio in your phone is a pretty important over there. Don't have one and you won't be selling any phones in India.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    4. Re:The Cluelessness of the FCC Chair is Amazing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Except Apple only stated iPhone 7 and 8. Therefore it's reasonable to assume other models of iPhones DO have the ability and Apple has come up with this misleading statement until otherwise. Most people don't have either a 7 or 8 model of iPhone yet.

    5. Re:The Cluelessness of the FCC Chair is Amazing! by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      But now, that same Clue-Free MORON has the temerity to attempt to make Apple look like "Bad Guys" that have simply REFUSED to "turn on" that which does not exist!

      And we should just trust apple because they say it doesn't have one? Both AT&T and Samsung have told me that my S7 doesn't have a radio chip in it. An i trusted them and left it at that. Well turns out it does. I just tested it myself..

      Well, as someone else posted, due to iFixit teardowns, you don't have to take Apple's word for it; that is, assuming you can read a part number and a datasheet.

    6. Re:The Cluelessness of the FCC Chair is Amazing! by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      REFUSED to "turn on" that which does not exist!

      Maybe. Maybe not.

      Does Apple have a different hardware model for the Indian market? Because FM radio in your phone is a pretty important over there. Don't have one and you won't be selling any phones in India.

      Strawman.

      TFA was about the FCC, which means it only pertains to iPhones for the US market.

      Can't speak to the Indian model; for some reason, there doesn't seem to be an iFixit teardowns of that one...

    7. Re:The Cluelessness of the FCC Chair is Amazing! by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Not everybody has an iPhone 7 or 8. I have a 5s which is very similar to the current production iPhone SE. Plenty of my firneds have iPhone 6's and all of these could play FM radio if only the firmware allowed it.

      Best argument for jailbreaking I've seen.

      Interesting point. So does jailbreaking give you FM radio on an iPhone? Answer: NO.

      So what does that tell you? Right: the jailbreakers are in cahoots with Apple so they can sell you streaming. Any other "explanation" simply doesn't make sense.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    8. Re:The Cluelessness of the FCC Chair is Amazing! by hondo77 · · Score: 1
      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    9. Re:The Cluelessness of the FCC Chair is Amazing! by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1
  13. Sorry, not possible by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    Sure, most of the wifi/bt chips have an FM radio built in too.
    It enable the feature it requires an antenna. It's usually done via the headphone cable, as you can't really make a decent antenna for ~100MHz signals inside a phone. The optimal length is around 1.7m. The headphone jack needs low-pass filters so it can be used an antenna. It can't be electrically connected to the metal body of a phone without a filter.

    1. Re:Sorry, not possible by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Sure, most of the wifi/bt chips have an FM radio built in too.
      It enable the feature it requires an antenna. It's usually done via the headphone cable, as you can't really make a decent antenna for ~100MHz signals inside a phone. The optimal length is around 1.7m. The headphone jack needs low-pass filters so it can be used an antenna. It can't be electrically connected to the metal body of a phone without a filter.

      More than that, really. You need an antenna, and you need a I2S connection to your CODEC chip (for the audio). After all, FM receiption is pointless if you can't actually hear the audio, so the chips include an ADC to digitize the audio and make it available as an audio source. Turning the chip on is useless if the antenna and audio lines are not hooked up at all.

      And yes, I'll go with transistor radio, because those can get AM radio, which is where I'd go for my news. FM is full of Clearchannel crapola so even in an emergency I probably won't think to turn on FM radio.

    2. Re:Sorry, not possible by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      And yes, I'll go with transistor radio, because those can get AM radio, which is where I'd go for my news. FM is full of Clearchannel crapola so even in an emergency I probably won't think to turn on FM radio.

      Don't just top at AM if you are getting one for emergency. Get one that handles the shortwave bands too. The shortwave bands can pick up radio from all around the world so the can get signals that are come from outside of a disaster area. If the disaster is big enough it might take out all the AM stations in range of your radio.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
  14. Re:FM a threat to streaming? by MountainLogic · · Score: 1

    I could not agree more about what unclearchannel consolidation has done to homogenize our community media. Of greater risk is the destruction to our communities' resiliency. It used to be that broadcast radio was a critical infrastructure in times of disaster. I remember ("kids, get off my lawn") power and towers going down and the station techs/DJs and maybe a ham driving out to back-up transmitters winging it live and helping to coordinate communications and resources when needed. I assume these days most of these corporate stations are just an unmanned transmitter attached to DSL line without a local tech to be seen in the same city. At least we do have NPR with real engineer, tech and talent that knows the phone numbers for local resources.
    The fact that the handset vendors are selling $k phones without such a simple, basic lifesaving resources as an FM receiver + weather radio (~162 MHz) is criminal.
    Then again, I gess we are all just consumers so who need real community.

  15. FM is a threat to streaming? by hawguy · · Score: 1

    Why? Mobile customers would be a lot less likely to subscribe to streaming music services if they could just listen to traditional, free broadcast radio

    Is that really the justification? Seems pretty weak. My car has an FM radio, yet I still choose to pair it with my phone so I can listen to streaming stations -- radio is not a substitute for a station where I get to pick the music.

    And since cellular providers are always whining that their customers are eating up valuable cellular bandwidth with streaming (which forces them to cap "unlimited" plans), seems like they'd be *happy* to reduce streaming.

    1. Re:FM is a threat to streaming? by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Radio signal wobbles in and out. Even FM is shit quality. I don't understand why people want the buzzing, crackling, and volume-swaying experience of FM instead of the crisp, clear, consistent experience of BlueTooth.

      Even AM radio is better-quality than FM. The signal has better reach and better power; it responds really poorly to electrical interference (FM doesn't).

    2. Re:FM is a threat to streaming? by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      I don't understand why people want the buzzing, crackling, and volume-swaying experience of FM instead of the crisp, clear, consistent experience of BlueTooth.

      Because I can pick up FM stations from 50 miles away, and the bluetooth signal fails at 50 feet. And that "consistent" bluetooth "experience" has failed while walking around the campus here, where 2.4GHz wifi is swamping everything else on the band. The phone is about 8 inches from the headset and it drops out. But you're comparing apples and oranges.

      Even AM radio is better-quality than FM.

      Wow. It must be radio hell where you live for AM to be better than FM.

      The signal has better reach and better power;

      "Better reach" is a side-effect of the frequency band being used and depends a lot on time of day. "Better power" is a function of the transmitter, not the receiver.

    3. Re:FM is a threat to streaming? by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Nope. My car comes up with FM music stations that buzz and fuzz; the AM 1090 talk radio station is clear the whole ride to work. FM just doesn't like distortion; it's fine with electrical interference. AM is fine with distortion, but not great with electrical interference. This is because FM relies on modulation of frequency (hence FM) across a small range of frequencies (channel) and so can handle EM noise close to those frequencies raising the amplitude across them; while AM relies on modulation of amplitude and so simply plays noise as noise. AM is less-vulnerable to attenuation (and reflection off buildings) due in part to the frequency ranges used, and in part due to bouncing off the ionosphere and raining from the sky instead of traveling line-of-sight from the transmitter.

      AM generally loses its quality when you have radio interference, e.g. thunderstorm.

      It amazes me anyone finds FM listenable at all, considering the short range of the stations, the tendency to overlap stations in between regions (interference in large areas, lots of fading in and out), and the amount of fading in and out that happens in terrain that's hilly or near tall buildings.

    4. Re:FM is a threat to streaming? by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Nope. My car comes up with FM music stations that buzz and fuzz; the AM 1090 talk radio station is clear the whole ride to work.

      Your car radio is fucked. You're basing your evaluation of FM on a moving car radio and pretending that that's the only way anyone ever listens.

      It amazes me anyone finds FM listenable at all,

      Like I said, you must live in radio hell. And thanks for the lecture after comparing FM to Bluetooth.

    5. Re:FM is a threat to streaming? by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Bluetooth's transmission tower is like a meter from the receiver and has line-of-site and digital error correction.

      Who listens to the radio outside their car? Does anyone actually own a radio anymore?

  16. If they have sent in portable info stations. by deviated_prevert · · Score: 1
    To help deal with the disaster then it makes sense. Yes still having radio functions on a cell is a very good idea in situations like what has happened in the Caribbean islands. My cheap ass Polaroid branded android phone has the function. Apple disabling the feature was rather short sighted on their part. Obviously herding the sheep to mostly get their tunes from an iTunes subscription was a big part of the equation in Apples move to disable the function.

    One question will the radio function still work with any wire set connected to the lightning connector? Or does it only detect lightning not modulated rf? Maybe if the function is reactivated then the red cross can send in emergency head phone adapters for all the poor disconnect iPhone users on the islands, along with a hack to reactivate all the disconnected iOS radio software. Either way I don't see an easy solution to getting newer iPhones to pick up radio stations again. By the time Apple reacts and releases an update to activate the function most likely full cell service will have been restored.

    --
    This message was not sent from an iPhone because Peter Sellers really was a deviated prevert without a dime for the call
  17. Re:FM a threat to streaming? by Obfuscant · · Score: 2

    I could not agree more about what unclearchannel consolidation has done to homogenize our community media.

    If a community doesn't support its local radio station to the point that the station needs to sell out to a national chain in order to exist, then was it truly community radio to begin with? Is it better for the station to close down and have the equipment removed, or to be in place so that it can be used do disseminate emergency information when necessary? Why does it matter what it plays at other times?

    At least we do have NPR with real engineer, tech and talent that knows the phone numbers for local resources.

    Our "NPR" tech/engineer works in the big city 60 miles away and has the numbers for resources 60 miles away. That's not local. There are places where that 60 miles is more like 180 and a four or five hour drive.

    The fact that the handset vendors are selling $k phones without such a simple, basic lifesaving resources as an FM receiver + weather radio (~162 MHz) is criminal.

    For those to be "lifesaving", they need to be listened to. Most people don't know about NOAA radio, and even most of those that do don't listen on a regular basis. How many people have a properly configured and working weather radio where they are? I have one and I have yet to hear it alert on anything, including the alleged regular tests. It's basically useless.

  18. What about earlier iPhones? by rtfa0987 · · Score: 1

    The Apple answer is not complete. What about earlier models?

  19. Re:Why not just use Pandora/Spotify? by SeaFox · · Score: 1

    Try reading the summary, dumbass. Cell phone system are knocked out in natural disasters. A radio station only needs power for one transmitter for a large geographic area.

  20. Maybe just maybe... by Graymalkin · · Score: 2

    Pai could read up on WEAs. They work with existing cell phones with no additional hardware necessary. They use out of band signaling so a flooded network does not affect them and cell sites don't actually need MSC connectivity to send them out.

    Pai could also call out the CTIA et al, for dragging their feet and suing the government to not be required add backup power to cell sites. This was something the FCC mandated after Katrina but got thrown into legal limbo for years by the CTIA.

    --
    I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
  21. Ridiculous by ai4px · · Score: 1

    If you happen to have an iPhone 6 and can get internet for the âoeupgradeâ to FM radio, you can get your news. How much is a FM radio these days? And a purpose built radio will work head and shoulders above a radio inside a cell phone with no antenna. Sheesh.

  22. Hand crank emergency radio by spinitch · · Score: 1

    Anyone who can afford a recent iPhone can afford an inexpensive emergency radio. In Japan, where earthquakes, floods, landslides have raised awareness for people to stock basic emergency supplies including hand crank charging radio/flashlights which are fairly inexpensive and more reliable in an emergency. Of course these are typically left at home. Phones usually with a person but unless on a hike should be near some place with a functional radio. Yes, would be helpful if iPhones offered FM radio. Apple stingy on this small feature should be explained. As others indicated an antenna adapter could be an accessory. Many folks would probably forgo and use the $20 for a more functional dedicated FM/AM radio. My Sony Walkman has FM radio though signal often poor but good enough for hearing voice warnings. Think Apple will wait for a calmer time to address this issue which is being amplified due to the emergency. iPhone scoped out the feature since rarely important to most. A water proof iPhone 7 could be argued more durable and useful when a hurricane rolls through. Sorry but I think the outrage is over blown on this feature missing in an iPhone. If important get an Android or a dedicated radio.

  23. Re:Why not just use Pandora/Spotify? by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 2

    Just download the emergency broadcasts before the hurricane starts and listen to them later in the comfort of your soon to be destroyed home.

    All you smart people and you can't come up with this obvious solution! Come on guys!

  24. Re:Q: Why? by PPH · · Score: 2

    Most pocket-sized radios use the headphone cable as an antenna. So just plug your headphones into your iPhone ...... Oh.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  25. Just Jailbreak by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

    Just jailbreak your iPhone, then you can switch on the radio chip. I do it all the time, and switch on the microwave chip every time I need to reheat a coffee.

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  26. So how are you going to receive FM by guruevi · · Score: 1

    With a system that's designed to only stay "alive" for ~120 hours in standby and has ~20 hours of low-power (like FM radio) usage. Puerto Rico is facing months of power loss, I'm pretty sure very few of the iPhone/Android devices on the island are powered at this point.

    If you want people to listen to FM radios, provide them with them with one that doesn't require power, you know like a crystal radio, you can get them mass-produced under $0.50 - so for less than 1 year of Ajit's salary, you can provide the ENTIRE island of Puerto Rico with radios.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  27. iTunes by dohzer · · Score: 1

    What a dummy. Everyone knows you have to download your FM radio shows using iTunes at $1.99 per station.

  28. Re:What would work... by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

    The problem is, in real-world use, so-called "HD Radio" sounds like over-compressed total SHIT compared to even mediocre analog FM. In terms of audio fidelity, digital radio is a HUGE step backwards. To me, at least, everything on "HD Radio" sounds like a bit-starved mp3 file (no channel separation, no sense of "spatiality", general "dead" sound... the higher-order audio artifacts that stick out like a sore thumb once you know what to listen for).

    The problem with TELEVISION in American phones & tablets isn't power, it's the fact that ATSC 1.x is damn-near IMPOSSIBLE to tune at all in a moving vehicle (somehow, the ATSC committee totally forgot about doppler-shift as a "something to care about" when evaluating 8VSB), and even the doppler-shift induced by an antenna swaying in hurricane-force winds is enough to render ATSC 1.x channels unwatchable.

    Continuing on the "power" theme, I think you'll find that right now, people in Puerto Rico fall into basically two categories:

    * People who don't own a generator, and for whom watching TV is probably the least of their real-world concerns right now.

    * People who own a generator. If the generator is running, the amount of extra power required by a modern LCD TV (or a wireless access point, HD-Homerun, and one or more phones or tablets running Silicon Dust's TV app) is minimal. If the generator isn't running, they're temporarily screwed anyway & probably too miserable in the heat & humidity to care about TV tonight.

    As far as I'm concerned, solar power doesn't even matter in this equation. Compared to a cheap gas generator, solar power is EXPENSIVE. Solar is for people who already own a generator, and have enough money to invest in a last-ditch backup power source to use when the generator isn't available.

  29. Re:Therefore not a headphone cable. by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

    It's a headphone cable into the lightning adaptor. The phone needs the headphone because the wire acts like an FM antenna. If that antenna stops at the adaptor, it doesn't act like one for the phone.

    Dumbass.

    If that antenna stops at the headphone jack, it doesn't act like one for the phone either, you bloody imbecile.

    --
    Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  30. Headline is Wrong by EndlessNameless · · Score: 1

    It should read, "Idiot Bureaucrat Demands the Impossible."

    It's almost like FCC Chairman Pai barely know what's going on in one of the industries he regulates.

    --

    ---
    According to the latest ruleset, this post should be modded as Vorpal Flamebait +5.
    1. Re:Headline is Wrong by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      Or change your response to ass-hole doesn't read article:

      "the iPhone 6S and iPhone 6S Plus introduced in 2015 do have an FM radio as part of its chipset, but the radio isn't activated nor is it attached to an antenna that would allow it to receive a signal. "

  31. FCC Delicensed Puerto Rico Station Before Maria by An+dochasac · · Score: 1

    If Ajit Pai is interested in emergency communications, he should ask his outgoing audio media chief if it was really a good idea to pull the license for 3 synchronous A.M. boosters for the only Puerto Rican radio station that continued to broadcast after Hurricane Maria.

  32. Idiot! by martinfb · · Score: 1

    Ajit is a total idiot! Period.

    --


    Self-importance and self-indulgence is the root of ALL evil.
  33. Re: Therefore not a headphone cable. by Brockmire · · Score: 1

    You do know you're wrong and look stupid, right?

  34. Re:Apple, enable the goddamned radio on the phone. by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

    Enable. The. Fucking. Radio.

    Didn't you get the memo? There is no radio to be enabled.

  35. Re: Therefore not a headphone cable. by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

    You do know you're wrong and look stupid, right?

    Talking to yourself again, you retard?

    --
    Of course news about a fake are Fake News.