Slashdot Mirror


Skipping Breakfast May Be Linked To Poor Heart Health, Study Says (theguardian.com)

A new study says that skipping breakfast could be linked to poorer cardiovascular health. The findings reveal that, compared with those who wolfed down an energy-dense breakfast, those who missed the meal had a greater extent of the early stages of atherosclerosis -- a buildup of fatty material inside the arteries. The Guardian reports: The research is part of a larger study that will follow the participants over a decade or more to see how disease in the arteries progresses. Published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology, the research looked at the health and diets of 4,052 middle-aged bank workers, both men and women, with no previous history of cardiovascular disease. At the start of the study, which is partly funded by the Spanish bank Santander, participants completed a detailed questionnaire into what they had eaten and when over the previous 15 days. Body mass index, cholesterol levels and other measures were collected, together with data including the participants' smoking status, educational attainment and level of physical activity. Imaging techniques were used to track the extent of the early, sub-clinical stages of atherosclerosis in six arteries, including those around the heart, thighs and neck. The results reveal that, compared to those tucking into more than 20% of their daily calories at breakfast, those who consumed next to nothing for breakfast had a greater extent of atherosclerosis.

165 comments

  1. Question by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Funny

    What if my preferred breakfast is glazed donuts?

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re: Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, good question.
      My preferred breakfast is chips.

    2. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a glazed donut, you insensitive clod.

    3. Re: Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, this study is bullshit. I take no breakfast at all, and I only eat chips, all day long, and I'm twice as fat as you. So surely there is some hormonal thing.

    4. Re:Question by taiwanjohn · · Score: 1

      Well, donuts would certainly qualify as "energy-dense" as described in the summary, but this is all a very recent aberration in our evolutionary development. Obviously, donuts don't grow on trees. In fact, such pure sources of carbohydrate are extremely rare in nature, which is why we are not well adapted to them. (Carbs have no nutritional value; you could eliminate them completely from your diet, and get along just fine.) The fruits that do grow on trees are rich in carbs, but they are only available in season. Our bodies are optimized for a low-carb diet.

      In fact, in pre-historic times, we probably spent most of the time fasting, and "breakfast" was simply whatever meal you were lucky enough to get a few times a week.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve your problem, you're not using enough of it. --AC
    5. Re:Question by ls671 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Anyway, I almost pass out sometimes around 5 PM when I forget to eat breakfast. Since I will be 82 in a few weeks, it is understandable although. I am sorry, I guess that what I am trying to say is that maybe I should have eaten you for breakfast when that happens. Better than nothing I guess...

      I am truly sorry again dear glazed donut,

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    6. Re:Question by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You know what else isn't available in nature? Cooking. Oh, and in the northern regions, forget about citrus fruits, so enjoy your scurvy from time to time.

      Just because something is "unnatural" doesn't mean it's bad. It does instinctively make sense to say "hey, our ancestors didn't have X, they evolved without X, so we don't need X to survive". The fallacy here is that our ancestors only needed to survive until they could procreate to keep the species going. So dying with 30-35 is perfectly fine. You'd procreate before (at about 14-16 years of age, maybe have 2-3 more kids and die when they in turn reach the ripe age of 14-16), so the species is fine.

      You probably ain't, but who gives a shit? It's natural!

      So please can the "it's unnatural" argument. It's bollocks.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Carbs have no nutritional value

      Ah. That must be why battery chickens, which eat little else, just die.

    8. Re:Question by religionofpeas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh, and in the northern regions, forget about citrus fruits, so enjoy your scurvy from time to time.

      There's plenty of vitamin C in other things, including raw meat.

      So dying with 30-35 is perfectly fine

      Not at all. It's very beneficial for a tribe to have elders with experience.

    9. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > So dying with 30-35 is perfectly fine
      > Not at all. It's very beneficial for a tribe to have elders with experience.

      Those would be the elders, in a hypothetical scenario. The equivocation is over what the meaning of "perfectly fine" is supposed to be.

    10. Re:Question by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      Yeah... I would consider a paleodiet when coding for money will be called a paleojob.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    11. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I am a glazed donut, you insensitive clod.

      ^^^^ This. A thousand times, this!

    12. Re:Question by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      That must be why battery chickens, which eat little else, just die.

      Are they eating Lithium-Ion batteries, or lead-acid? or do they, in reality, have a mixed diet?

      Enquiring minds need to know!

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    13. Re:Question by Kohath · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What if it is? There's nothing particularly bad about eating a glazed donut a few times a week. Diet related health problems are related to the total of all foods eaten over long periods of time (in combination with other lifestyle factors), not specific food items.

    14. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do we have an "oblig. goatse.cx" culture? Or is this only an XKCD-related thing?

    15. Re: Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When my wife asks me to âoeglaze her donutâ, she ainâ(TM)t talkinâ(TM) âbout breakfast!

    16. Re:Question by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Neither of what you stated invalidates the GP's core argument, that just because something isn't "natural" doesn't mean it's not good for you.

      You know what else we consumed in pre-historic times? Older meat. We weren't above scavenging, at least not until someone correlated it with death and disease.

      Cooking solves a world of problems. The pre-historic argument which was being replied to was an incredible load of shit. Yeah they didn't get cancer. We wouldn't either if we lived such short lives. Kids crank out offspring as soon as they biologically could, and the 30 year olds WERE the tribal elders back then.

    17. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      People with a genetic makeup of primarily agricultural heritage don't fare as well with ultra-low carb diets as those with a more nomadic heritage. While most people can cut nearly all of their carb intake and probably gain health benefits, there are genetic dispositions that limit the lower healthy amount of carb consumption.

      In general, you need to be careful about blanket statements about diet. With the advent of cheap genetic sequencing, we're starting to find a correlation between an optimal diet and genes. Seemingly, personalized optimal diets can vary quite a bit, but more info to come over the next decade as this research avenue gets more attention.

    18. Re:Question by hduff · · Score: 1

      What if my preferred breakfast is glazed donuts?

      The you are doing it right.

      --
      "I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it." : Dogbert
    19. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No wonder you can't lose weight. You're in starvation mode, you big idiot. Of course, no one's advice is ever good enough for your thick brainstem.

    20. Re:Question by coastwalker · · Score: 1

      I used to mistakenly think that you needed citrus fruit for vitamin C. This is a very bad and wrong idea. The point about citrus fruit is that it contains a ton of teeth rotting citric acid so you can store it for sea voyages without anything growing in it - particularly if you mix it 50:50 with Rum to prevent the vast quantities of sugar in citrus juice from fermenting and exploding out of its container. Citrus fruit is a shit source of vitamin C unless you are on a medieval sailing boat, contains no dietary fiber, too many sugar calories and teeth rotting acid.

      What you should be eating is Broccoli 75% daily requirement in 50g (2oz), Bell pepper 65% daily requirement in 50g (2oz), Cabbage 60% daily requirements in 100g (4oz), Kale 200% in 50g (2oz) and many there are other vegetables that contain vitamin C.

      Meat contains proteins, fat, salt and no vitamins. As an aside your microbiome will die if you do not eat the dietary fiber from vegetables. This is very bad for your long term health.

      Somebody should nuke the marketing executives in the food industry from space and teach youngsters at school which foods contain life sustaining Fats, Carbohydrates, Sugars, Fiber, Protein and Vitamins as it sure as fuck is not what the T.V. or clean eating morons are advertising as food.

      --
      Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
    21. Re:Question by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      When you died at the old age of 35 a million years ago, chances are that you have seen the birth of your grandchild maybe managed to be there to see it through those critical first 3-5 years of its life, how much more "elder" do you want to get? Ok, granted, maybe you can make it to 40 and see your great-grandchild be born, but I guess that's already asking a bit much, ain't it?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    22. Re:Question by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Screw this, all you need it a healthy intake of the four big food groups: Fat, sugar, salt and caffeine.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    23. Re:Question by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      So dying with 30-35 is perfectly fine

      Not at all. It's very beneficial for a tribe to have elders with experience.

      Elder is a relative term.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    24. Re:Question by wardrich86 · · Score: 1

      Are you me?

    25. Re:Question by tomhath · · Score: 1

      You know what else isn't available in nature? Cooking

      There's plenty of evidence that human evolution took off around the time they learned to use fire. Cooking meat and vegetables makes them easier to digest, providing the extra energy needed by larger brains.

    26. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love the old "people died at 35 until the last century" line. It's total bullshit. 30,000 years ago, sure.

      Sure, perhaps people weren't living until 80-90 regularly like they do now, but it wasn't uncommon for someone who survived being born and the first few years of their lives to live until 65-75 even as far back as the middle ages.

      Yes, the AVERAGE lifespan was 35-40 years. This was heavily skewed downwards by the fact that LOTS of babies died at birth (most estimates put that upward of 35% infant mortality rate), lots of infants and young people died from simple infections and conditions we can easily prevent or treat nowadays, and LOTS of mothers (usually aged 16-18) were dying during childbirth.

      I'm also positive that the quality of life after, say, 50, probably wasn't great for a lot of people. I'm not discounting that modern medicine is wonderful and helps many people live much better lives than they otherwise could have. But IF you survived your first, say, 5 years the chances of living in to old age weren't as far off as they are now. We just don't have large percentages of very young people dying like we did back then.

    27. Re:Question by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 2

      >Meat contains proteins, fat, salt and no vitamins.

      Are you lying or are you genuinely that misinformed?

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    28. Re:Question by houghi · · Score: 1

      I have read somewhere that the average age was so low because child death was so high. Average was actually around 50 when you deduct the kids dying after the first year.

      So there where elders and it was an average, so older ones where there as well.

      Not sure where I got the info from or what period it spoke of.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    29. Re:Question by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      What if my preferred breakfast is glazed donuts?

      You need some protein with that. I recommend a boilermaker with a pickled egg on the side.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    30. Re:Question by grub · · Score: 1

      82? Your UID should be in the single digits!

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    31. Re:Question by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I had a similar discussion with a friend of mine who studies prehistory and early human development.

      It's pretty hard to determine the "real" average age of ancient people just by digging through their graves (if they have anything like this at all). Let's imagine you find a prehistoric graveyard. What will you find? Well, a bunch of people who were buried there, of course. What will you not find? Anyone whose body could not be retrieved by the tribe. In other words, you will not find the kids that the lion caught or that were abducted by other tribes, you will not find the hunters who had a broken bone and couldn't quite run so fast anymore when defending the catch against the lions turned bad with more lions showing up and you had to hightail it. Telling the average age from graves is very tempting, but very misleading.

      What the graves tell us, though, is that those people that did get old usually did so in bad health. Often malnourished, bones that show off how their life was a daily struggle, many with injuries that made them probably a liability for their tribe. Funny enough, this was probably also the reason just WHY they got so old, if you break your leg at age 20 and can't hunt anymore, but you survive it and now you "work at home", so to speak, your chance to die in a hunting accident or falling off a tree while trying to gather fruits is way lower.

      Old people (over the age of 50) were still rare. Many died much earlier from accidents, from animals that refused to become food or from animals that wanted to turn the human into food. If anything, this is a testament of our ability to work in medium sized groups. One "old" person is enough to teach a tribe of young hunters, and one old granny can keep an eye on a dozen kids or two.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    32. Re:Question by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Where does that "last century" come from? I'm pretty sure it's clear I'm talking about ancient times, quite a bit before even the 30,000 years you talk about.

      I am talking about a time before humans learned to cook their food. Cooking wasn't invented in the last century FFS.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    33. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why did you feel the need to share this with 94 Escort Wagon?
      You're not supposed to be eating two power bars at once either but whatever.

    34. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So dying with 30-35 is perfectly fine. You'd procreate before (at about 14-16 years of age, maybe have 2-3 more kids and die when they in turn reach the ripe age of 14-16), so the species is fine

      The shorter lifespans of early humans had more to do with high infant mortality, and inability to fend for oneself after physical injury than it did malnutrition. Think about it. If you live to be 70, and have a couple of children, 50% of whom make it to 15 years old, that brings the average age down considerably.

      From the cited paper above:

      life expectancy at age 15 is 48 years for Aborigines, 52 and 51 for settled Ache and !Kung, yet 31 and 36 for peasant and transitional Agta. Survival to age 45 varies between 19 and 54 percent, and those aged 45 live an average of 12–24 additional years

      and

      nfant mortality is over 30 times greater among hunter-gatherers, and early child mortality is over 100 times greater than encountered in the United States. We see that on average 57 percent, 64 percent, and 67 percent of children born survive to age 15 years among hunter-gatherers, forager-horticulturalists, and acculturated hunter-gatherers./quote?

    35. Re:Question by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Just because something is "unnatural" doesn't mean it's bad.

      Also, the idea that there are things that are "natural" and "unnatural" is a weird, artificial notion largely without meaning.

    36. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why did you feel the need to share this with 94 Escort Wagon?

      Creimer answered that question yesterday.

    37. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about your lunch of cottage cheese and other vending machine garbage, creimer? You really mean to say that you wait 12 hours for that?

      Eating a bunch of sugar and fat mixed with a bunch of shitty preservatives and shelf stabilizers is probably also the reason you've got man-tits the size of watermelons. You want a good breakfast?

      Eat an egg with some fresh vegetables, and maybe a little fruit.
      Eat a bowl of home-cooked oatmeal, with a quarter cup of berries mixed in.

      Stop eating sugar and fat by the bucket, and maybe your attempts to lose weight will bear fruit. Until then, enjoy gaining weight and being miserable, unhealthy, and working on suicide by fork.

    38. Re:Question by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      Cooking wasn't invented in the last century FFS.

      You're right. Cooking was invented in 2002 by Rachael Ray.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    39. Re:Question by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Thanks - I'm on it!

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    40. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      C.D. Reimer is a renowned Slashdot collaborator, as he puts it himself; "Because of the quality of my posts and my article submissions, I'm a highly rated commentator and moderator."

      But does anybody ever wondered what "C.D." stands for? Well, it stands for Creimy Dumpty of course!

      Creimy Dumpty sat on the wall,
      Creimy Dumpty had a great fall.
      All the king's horses
      And all the king's men
      Couldn't put Creimy Dumpty
      Together again.

      Creimy's siblings video and theme song, very realistic, especially the pants, just like Creimy's:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      Creimy's real pictures:
      Before the sex change:
      https://ibb.co/cc7Ddw
      After the sex change:
      https://ibb.co/gVad65

      Creimy's "enterprise-level" chair, he talks about it all the time on slashdot:
      http://www.keynamics.com/image...

      Creimy's head, while his supervisor was talking to him, not with him, since it is impossible to do with Creimy:
      https://school.discoveryeducat...

      Creimy acting in educational resource document, he actually confirmed himself on Slashdot that he was handled by Special Education for the Santa Clara County Office of Education! He is really a king Dumpty!:
      http://www.sccoe.org/depts/stu...

    41. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly! We, at Special Education for the Santa Clara County Office of Education, couldn't agree more with you!

      For the valuable /. users that might already have read the following, please note that there is an important update.

      IMPORTANT UPDATE:
      Special Education for the Santa Clara County Office of Education has invested money to buy Chris a new chair:
      http://www.keynamics.com/image...

      Information about Christopher Dale Reimer and autistic people:

      Autistic people have obsessions about things normal people don't care. For example, one of our autistic patient went haywire when he realized that there was a penny missing in his pocket change.

      To calm him down, one of our educator pretended to have found it on the floor and gave a penny to him.

      The autistic patient condition went even worse because he realized it wasn't the same penny!

      Chris has an obsession with budgeting every penny. He doesn't understand that most people do not budget to the penny and have a flexible amount they allow for miscellaneous items.

      I am Nancy Guerrero and I am Director of Special Education for the Santa Clara County Office of Education. We use Chris' (a.k.a. creimer,cdreimer) picture in our document because he is the hardest case we have ever had to handle:
      http://www.sccoe.org/depts/stu...

      Our artists were inspired by the low carb diet that Christopher follows scrupulously for the small lunch box and by the picture linked below for the rest. I am sure that you will notice the similarities such as the bump on the side of his chest and more:
      https://ibb.co/gVad65

      Please be easy on Christopher although, I am aware that some of our staff handling Chris post joke comments here and obvoiusly, the Santa Clara County Office of Education disapprove that behavior vehemently:
      https://school.discoveryeducat...

      But it isn't Chris' fault if he is the way he is. We do the best we can do with him and he is partially integrated into society. We try to cure his abnormal need for attention but he is kind of stubborn and won't listen to anybody.

      Thank You dear users,
      -Nancy Guerrero

    42. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At 82, their UID should be in the negative 7 digits.

    43. Re:Question by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      (Carbs have no nutritional value; you could eliminate them completely from your diet, and get along just fine.)

      This is simply and plainly not true. Carbs are an important energy source for your body. Yes, if you cut them out completely your body will get energy from proteins and such, but there will be health impacts over the long haul, primarily with your central nervous system.

      What is true is that the typical American eats far, far more carbs than is required, and reducing them will often bring health benefits.

    44. Re:Question by taiwanjohn · · Score: 1

      Carbs are an important energy source for your body. Yes, if you cut them out completely your body will get energy from proteins and such

      No, fats are an important energy source for your body. Carbs are just empty calories.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve your problem, you're not using enough of it. --AC
    45. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't go into starvation mode from skipping lunch.

    46. Re:Question by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Most of human evolution happened near the equator. Seasons aren't very strong there, and fruit is available year-round.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    47. Re:Question by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      The phrase "empty calories" is generally understood to mean "food without vitamins or minerals". Pure carbohydrates, pure fats, pure protein are all empty calories.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    48. Re:Question by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      The sugar spike of a glazed or filled doughnut on an empty stomach is in itself harmful. Damage accumulates slowly.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    49. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Diet related health problems are related to the total of all foods eaten over long periods of time (in combination with other lifestyle factors), not specific food items.

      Then you learn that specific food items are the drivers of many health problems. Especially in this case, where it is implied the glazed donuts are being eaten over a long period of time.

    50. Re:Question by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      I think you should have a chat with an actual nutritionist. "Empty calories" means no vitamins. Those calories are still used to fuel your body, though.

    51. Re: Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll have chips for breakfast, but only if they come with fish.

  2. Correlation ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People who take the time to breakfast probably also hit the sack earlier and get more sleep.

    1. Re:Correlation ... by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

      People who have the time to breakfast also probably suffer from less stress and generally have more time to prepare healthy meals instead of stuffing their face with whatever is available to rip open and stir into hot water.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Correlation ... by thesupraman · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

      Journalists love to ignore the simple fact that correlation is not causation.

      Because it makes for great headlines, but also has caused many many problems.

    3. Re:Correlation ... by Bongo · · Score: 5, Informative

      Anyone interested can check the blog of Dr Malcom Kendrick. He's been rabbitting on for about 30 episodes now on all the factors involved, and how the conventional view -- a view which is starting to be rejected by the mainstream, but the man in the street is yet to hear about it -- the conventional view became dogma but doesn't make sense. The lipid hypothesis is dead. The notion that fat clogs up the arteries like a drain clogged with lard, is dead. His very latest blog discusses the mechanical fluid forces inside the arteries, and in combination with what, might be a cause (the damage is usually seen only where these forces are greatest in the vessels, so always the same places, end so on). One thing reading his blogs is that he makes it abundantly clear that it is not a simple problem. But medicine kinda fell into a dogma about it. Anyway, yeah, the people not having breakfast, why is that? Maybe they are not going to be early, getting up early, and having time to eat breakfast. Maybe they are stressing themselves and not getting sleep. And a lot of repair happens during sleep. And Kendrick also talks about how the internal scabs in the arteries would be broken down gradually in a healthy person, but in some people this doesn't happen, so they eventually get too big and break off and cause a stroke, It is fascinating stuff. A quite entertaining blog is nothing else.

    4. Re:Correlation ... by Bongo · · Score: 1

      Sorry about the fifteen million typos in that post. :-(

    5. Re:Correlation ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who have the time to breakfast also probably suffer from less stress and generally have more time to prepare healthy meals instead of stuffing their face with whatever is available to rip open and stir into hot water.

      It's up to YOU to control your own damn life.

    6. Re:Correlation ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's likely those who eat breakfast more likely get low-fat carb cereals (or really healthy carbs like Oats) while those that don't go out later in the day and eat greater amounts of restaurant food that's typically not healthy - high fat, high protein, meat and cheese laden.

    7. Re:Correlation ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The lipid hypothesis is not dead except among bloggers, typically paleo and keto. They typically point to studies where under 30% fat from calories is considered "low fat" but that isn't low fat (I would say the borderline on that is 15%).

      The only thing Ancel Keys got wrong is that in his studies animal protein had higher correlation with heart disease than saturated fat. But the two are married together typically, so it's forgiveable.

    8. Re:Correlation ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    9. Re:Correlation ... by Bongo · · Score: 3, Informative

      The current president of the world heart federation came out and agreed with nina teicholz's book which exposed the hypothesis was based on fraud. The president of the world heart federation himself said it was based on flawed biased science. It's on youtube even.

    10. Re:Correlation ... by leathered · · Score: 1

      There was an FDA study in the 70s or 80s that showed that pipe smokers lived on average three years more than non-smokers. If true then it's certainly down to stress or lack of it, I mean have you ever seen an angry pipe smoker?

      --
      For all intensive porpoises your a bunch of rediculous loosers
    11. Re:Correlation ... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      People who have the time

      Time is something in control of the people. There is almost no one on the planet who can't find 15min in his day to eat a decent breakfast, if they know of basic time management.

      Want to eat breakfast in your tight morning schedule? Wake up 15min earlier. Want to free up your evening schedule? Spend 15min less time on Slashdot / rotting in front of the TV.

    12. Re:Correlation ... by Bongo · · Score: 1

      The medical world seems quite conservatively minded. They get taught a lot of information in school and they don't have time to question it. And they have to take responsibility for people's lives, and make mistakes. So it is humanly difficult. And when something as public and big as public health advice which has been given out for decades, turns out to be questionable, a lot of people are going to have a problem with that on principle. Also, there's the argument that food companies became vested interests in this whole thing too. So here's the deal: I've personally been following this LCHF thing for going on ten years, and try as I might to bear in mind my own bias, I continue to be surprised at how much better I'm doing on it. The other month I went to a conference and there were about 100 doctors in the room who were interested in using LCHF with their patients (as they'd tried it themselves) but were in a quandry because there is so much resistance from various parts, that they fear they'll be disqualified from practice, yet having tried it themselves, they find it works for them, so there is something obviously not adding up. So yes you can find many people attacking LCHF, and many people making claims on it. Human health is not a solved problem, and it is hard to study, for many reasons. If one population smokes like a chimney but doesn't get much lung cancer does that mean the smoking-cancer link is bogus? If a study claims they had one group on low carb, was it actually low enough carb? If you get people to eat one food, you automatically reduce their eating of other foods, like for vegetarians, they cut out a lot of stuff, so are they better because of the veggies or because they didn't eat as much sugar anyway, or because they are more health conscious in other ways? It is complex. My own opinion is that once people go LCHF, the health effect is too large to ignore. There is something in it. YMMV.

    13. Re:Correlation ... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      May I be present when you discuss this with a minimum wage earning single mom working double shifts?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    14. Re:Correlation ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      May I also discuss birth control and responsibility?

    15. Re:Correlation ... by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      May I also discuss birth control and responsibility?

      I'll drop in at the end when you discuss time travel.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    16. Re:Correlation ... by bradley13 · · Score: 1

      "People who have the time to breakfast also probably suffer from less stress and generally have more time to prepare healthy meals"

      No, it's just a choice, like any other. I choose to get up about 45 minutes earlier, so I can do a bit of exercise, drink a cup of coffee, and eat a cooked breakfast. This costs me a bit of sleep, but (for me) the health benefits are worth it.

      There are days I can't pry myself out of bed, and that's fine. As Scott Adams says in his book: you just need a system, and your doing fine, if you system mostly works.

      --
      Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
    17. Re:Correlation ... by Solandri · · Score: 1

      The lipid hypothesis is dead. The notion that fat clogs up the arteries like a drain clogged with lard, is dead.

      When I was in grade school in the 1970s, our parents came to our class one by one over about a month so we could get a sense of what types of careers there were. My friend's father was a bioresearcher. He brought in samples of rabbit aortas. They'd been experimenting by feeding rabbits diets with different amounts of fat in their food. (Yes, herbivores can eat and process meat.) After a few years (however long rabbits live), they dissected the rabbits, and sliced and unrolled the aorta to measure how much arterial plaque had built up on the walls.

      The display board he brought in had 4 or 5 aorta sections, arranged from no-fat diet to increasing fat diet. There was a visually obvious correlation between amount of fat in the diet and amount of plaque built up on the artery walls.

      I'm sure the mechanism is much more complicated than simply "consumed fat turns into plaque on artery walls." There's probably a threshold below which consumed fat doesn't clog your arteries. And I'm sure other types of food could be converted by your body into lipids which turn into plaques. But there most assuredly is a positive causal correlation between fat consumption and arteriosclerosis.

    18. Re:Correlation ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are always going to be doctors that tell you what you want to hear.

    19. Re:Correlation ... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Sure, I'll bring the popcorn. I always love the part where you get torn a new one as a substitute for the cheating asshole that left her alone with the brat.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    20. Re:Correlation ... by jeffporcaro · · Score: 1

      Although rabbits can eat and digest meat, they are herbivores by nature. Forcing them to eat meat probably leads to conclusions that cannot easily be generalized to humans.

      --
      It is not the doing of things that is difficult. What is difficult is getting in the right mood to do them. ~~ Brancusi
    21. Re:Correlation ... by Sperbels · · Score: 1

      Yes

    22. Re:Correlation ... by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      Actually it's more a lifestyle choice. My wife and I eat breakfast together daily, a cooked breakfast that I make. We have lives as busy as anyone else's but this is a priority for us. Obviously there are extreme cases - a soldier on patrol can't do this. But since a cooked breakfast takes about 10 minutes to cook and about 15 minutes to eat, we're talking half an hour here.

    23. Re:Correlation ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Compare with this. My morning start is a continuation of the night previous - evening boredom broken up by youtube,lonely masturbation, wake with a slight hangover, rush out the door to work and wonder where the last two years went while staring out the window of the bus. Finally eat at 10am.

    24. Re:Correlation ... by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      A minimum wage earning single mom working double shifts represents what portion of the population?

      Even with quick, cheap breakfasts there is a range of choices. Oatmeal is better than pop tarts. Cheerios or Wheaties in milk are better than chocolate frosted sugar bombs. Orange juice or coffee is better than Old Overholt or Schlitz.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    25. Re:Correlation ... by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Interesting point. Pipe smokers either tend to be a certain type of personality or pipe-smoking makes them that sort of person. Pipe smoking requires more ritual and skill than cigars, cigarettes, snuff, or chaw. By requiring more attention to getting the fire going and maintained, pipe smokers tend to be more contemplative people, more likely to think through actions before acting. (When smoking was allowed in public places, security guards didn't have to worry much about pipe smokers stealing things [or so I've heard].} Generally, pipe smokers don't inhale, pipe smoke is cooler than cigarette and cigar smoke, and a lot of the poisons get deposited inside the stem.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    26. Re:Correlation ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Humans are physiologically herbivores with 160 million years of herbivore history. Look up Dr Milton Mills lecture on youtube.

    27. Re:Correlation ... by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      I eat breakfast at work, as do several of my co-workers. For me that's got less to do with having/making time, as I just don't like mornings. I get up as late as possible, do as little as possible to get to work, and I'm not usually really hungry until I get there anyway.

  3. Correlation is not causation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Need I say more?

    1. Re: Correlation is not causation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Smelly shitty obnoxious hindu-chimps correlate with invasion of america by H1B scammers. Coincidence?

    2. Re:Correlation is not causation by Smidge204 · · Score: 2

      Correlation does not imply causation, except when it does;

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      =Smidge=

    3. Re:Correlation is not causation by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Causation correlates with correlation. Causation causes correlation.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  4. Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I regularly don't have breakfast as I don't feel hungry....

    isn't eating when your not hungry the definition of being a fat arse?

    1. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually no. Most people get fat because their body keeps screaming "HUNGRY!!!!".

    2. Re:Bullshit by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 1

      In some cases, yes. Some peoples bodies do not feed the correct signals.

      In most cases those people are confused and do not know what "Hungry" actually is and associate another feeling (maybe "Not completely satiated"?) with the need to gorge...

      Like people who have never been truly thirsty and cannot appreciate water

  5. correlation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this only a correlation study?

    Maybe people who are already fat are skipping breakfast to try and lose weight?

  6. Intermittent fasting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hmm... this is interesting.

    >Participants who skipped breakfast had the greatest waist circumference, body mass index, blood pressure, blood lipids and fasting glucose levels.

    I skip breakfast (i'm on 12/12 intermittent fasting schedule) and I'm fit, healthy BMI, no high blood pressure. Dunno about glucose, but I'm also on low carb diet, so it should never really skyrocket.

    >Participants who skipped breakfast were more likely to have an overall unhealthy lifestyle, including poor overall diet, frequent alcohol consumption and smoking. They were also more likely to be hypertensive and overweight or obese.

    I think this pretty much excludes all of us who intentionally fast. i believe more research is required, it could be that fasting + high carb diet ("normal" western diet) is really bad (which would make sense due to sugar spikes), not intermittent fasting itself!

    1. Re: Intermittent fasting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wanted to try intermittent fasting but go hypoglycemic. You can buy a glucose monitor for around $100. I used it to map my glucose levels at hourly intervals for a whole day. This did convince me to stop snacking between meals, keeps glucose levels too high.

    2. Re: Intermittent fasting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did intermittent fasting and I went hyperglycemic. According to my doctor, the fasting caused my liver to convert a lot of fat into sugar, I lost 25kg in 3 years, which caused me to become diabetic. Now I need to take meds that will cause my liver to produce more insuline, meaning that it will try to get me fat again, I have to fight hard to loose weight, in fact I've given up on loosing weight by eating less and instead I am working on increasing muscle mass instead.

    3. Re: Intermittent fasting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I did intermittent fasting and I went hyperglycemic. According to my doctor, the fasting caused my liver to convert a lot of fat into sugar, I lost 25kg in 3 years, which caused me to become diabetic. Now I need to take meds that will cause my liver to produce more insuline, meaning that it will try to get me fat again, I have to fight hard to loose weight, in fact I've given up on loosing weight by eating less and instead I am working on increasing muscle mass instead.

      I will say this: It seems you should be looking for a new doctor.

      1- Hyperglycemia is not something that would have been caused by intermittent fasting unless you were a type 1 diabetic to begin with.
      2- Your doctor said that fasting caused your body to convert fat into sugar, which is not what happens, the large amount of calories during a fast come from fatty acids which are converted into ketones. Ketones have caloric energy which is on the order of 28 times that of carbohydrates. Granted stored triglycerides within the body have a glycerol backbone which can be metabolized into a limited amount of glucose, but that is not what your body is "running off of" if that happens, much more calories will be coming from fatty acid metabolism. A simple way for your doctor to have determined this would have been with a fasting test of your ketones.
      3- You said you have to take meds to make your liver produce insulin? Did your doctor tell you that? Insulin is produced in the pancreas by beta cells. The liver converts glucose into a storage form called Glucagon, and can convert it back into glucose upon demand among many other things. Insulin comes from the pancreas though, not from the liver. Your liver is not going to "Try to make you fat" it is simply processing what you give it to process into fuel and waste products.

      4- Lots of people feel they have to fight hard to lose weight, While this may take a lot of effort, the main thing is keeping your insulin level as low as possible so that the exercise you are able to do is fueled by stored body fat in a slight (usually about 10%) caloric deficit. Trying to go faster than losing a pound or two per week will throw you into a mode that will cause blood sugar fluctuations in the short term but in the long term if you don't overdo it you will lose weight from body fat. (provided you don't have type 1 diabetes and need to inject insulin which is a problem whose cause is unrelated to what you have eaten in general, we don't really know if there are food or toxins or infections that cause type 1 diabetes in susceptible people , finding a combination of things like that is statistically difficult and probably is a dead end in terms of research.)

      I would say you should find another doctor because your doctor does not seem to understand how the body works.

    4. Re:Intermittent fasting by sacremon · · Score: 1

      That's nice. You are an n =1. From the article, 2.9% of 4052 people in the study skipped breakfast, which works out to either 117 or 118 people. Some of them might be just like you, but probably not too many.

      There might be other factors involved, like culture or the job. Unless the authors control for it, maybe there is something with being a Spanish bank employee that leads to this kind of poor health if you don't eat breakfast?

      --
      If you can't beat them, embrace and extend them.
    5. Re:Intermittent fasting by alvinrod · · Score: 1
      The general problem though is that if the group that does skip breakfast overwhelmingly falls into other categories that are also suspected to contribute to poor heart health. The study even spells out as much:

      Participants who skipped breakfast were more likely to have an overall unhealthy lifestyle, including poor overall diet, frequent alcohol consumption and smoking. They were also more likely to be hypertensive and overweight or obese. In the case of obesity, the study authors said reverse causation cannot be ruled out, and the observed results may be explained by obese patients skipping breakfast to lose weight.

      In that case it doesn't matter that he's the exception in that group, which already seems to be an exception to most of the study population. It's far more likely that the results are not due to skipping breakfast given everything else we know.

    6. Re:Intermittent fasting by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      I skip breakfast (i'm on 12/12 intermittent fasting schedule) and I'm fit, healthy BMI, no high blood pressure. Dunno about glucose, but I'm also on low carb diet, so it should never really skyrocket.

      No doubt due to the advantages of the famed healthy Russian diet, you "anonymous" coward.

  7. stupid studies by mocm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Who remembers what they have eaten the last 15 days? How many of the answers were incorrect, either because the people forgot or lied for
    whatever reason. These medical studies are just usefull enough to find trends that have to be backed up by real research into cause and effect.
    To even publish such early results is irresponsible and might even bias other research by leading them into a wrong direction.

    --
    ***Quis custodiet ipsos custodes***
    1. Re:stupid studies by mentil · · Score: 2

      I might not be able to remember everything I ate yesterday, but I could remember if I skipped breakfast.

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    2. Re:stupid studies by speedplane · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And here's a study just last year saying breakfast doesn't matter. This is typical. Decades of nutritional studies have often turned out useless and in many cases harmful. Hard to trust anything now. Gotta just trust your gut.

      That's a pun, but it's often true. Pay close attention to how your body reacts to what you put into it. It's the best feedback mechanism we have.

      --
      Fast Federal Court and I.T.C. updates
    3. Re:stupid studies by Cederic · · Score: 4, Funny

      Gotta just trust your gut.

      Having seen the remains of what my gut does to breakfast I'm not sure I want to trust it.

    4. Re:stupid studies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having seen the remains of what my gut does to breakfast /.../

      You should definitely eat slower.
      Or drink less alcohol in the morning.

    5. Re:stupid studies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is how I feel about three large meals a day. I rarely spend enough energy to warrant more than two. Have a bottle of water with you whenever you're sitting around. Make that your snack, and you won't even notice the habits you're breaking.

    6. Re:stupid studies by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Hard to trust anything now. Gotta just trust your gut.
      That's a pun, but it's often true.

      It's not just a pun, your guts actually make decisions. And what's more, they seem to be pretty good at it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:stupid studies by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Who remembers what they have eaten the last 15 days?

      The answer to that would depend highly on if I was part of a study that was to record my habits.

      The only studies that come out of the blue and surprise people without any kind of forewarning are psychological studies.

      I did one of these while I was at uni. The "detailed questionnaire" I completed, well I do so on the run over a period of one month. I didn't need to remember anything more than the last night, and if I couldn't remember there was an option for that too.

    8. Re:stupid studies by Lastfree · · Score: 1

      To be honest I remember all my breakfasts from the last 15 days. But it's only because I don't change its ingredients:)

      --
      And for coloring fans: Topcoloringpages
    9. Re:stupid studies by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Decades of nutritional studies have often turned out useless and in many cases harmful.

      They have done nothing of the sort and most have been quite consistent in their conclusions. What has turned out useless and harmful is distilling the entire study down to a soundbite or headline such as "fat bad" or "carbs bad" instead of the actual conclusion that these many decades of studies have actually drawn: "Fat is bad in the complete absence of a balanced diet given conditional modifiers which are too long to explain in a headline". It just doesn't sound as catchy, and "eat a balanced meal" is too complicated of a message for most people to absorb.

      Despite the fact that has been a very consistent conclusion from decades of nutritional studies.

    10. Re:stupid studies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And here's a study just last year saying breakfast doesn't matter. This is typical. Decades of nutritional studies have often turned out useless and in many cases harmful. Hard to trust anything now. Gotta just trust your gut.

      That's a pun, but it's often true. Pay close attention to how your body reacts to what you put into it. It's the best feedback mechanism we have.

      I know the trend is to call the things in life we wish were different "Fake news" but science is not one of those lest we put ourselves in great peril. Throwing out the baby with the bathwater and going back to an 1850's level of understanding of the world does not do us any good, regardless of the political climate and rhetoric usage in the world around us.

    11. Re:stupid studies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And here's a study just last year saying breakfast doesn't matter. This is typical. Decades of nutritional studies have often turned out useless and in many cases harmful...

      There is another theory that is reinforced by laws and polices that shows that government supports capitalism no matter the cost.

      Capitalism and Greed are NOT served well by a person who never gets sick, never goes to their doctor, or never needs to obtain multiple prescription medicines.

      The medical industry does NOT seek out cures for anything anymore, only perpetual treatments bring endless revenue.

      Many products that are THE top killers of humans are perfectly legal, because they create massive revenue and perpetuate death.

      What does this all mean? It means that nutritional studies may in fact be more helpful than you think. Unfortunately, truth and facts fight against many in the world today who represent ruthless capitalism, and are dismissive of advice that would lead to a long and healthy life, to include your doctor. As you said before, go with your gut. It will be a hell of a lot more honest than the bullshit peddlers we're surrounded with today.

    12. Re:stupid studies by HighOrbit · · Score: 1

      According to the latest study, you can't eat anything.

      Granted, "The Center for Consumer Freedom" is a blatant lobby group for the food industry, but their radio ad campaigns that they run in the DC area are hilarious. For real laughs, listen to their archives of radio ads.

    13. Re:stupid studies by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Panasonic and GM are well served by people who never get sick.People who die young tend not to develop new products, nor buy them.

      Many products that are THE top killers of humans are perfectly legal, because they create massive revenue and perpetuate death.

      The message that you're trying to hide is that you think you should be the dictator who tells everyone what they may or may not do.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    14. Re:stupid studies by speedplane · · Score: 1

      Decades of nutritional studies have often turned out useless and in many cases harmful.

      They have done nothing of the sort and most have been quite consistent in their conclusions.

      Where to begin? For decades: the food pyramid was dominated by carbs; saturated fats were deemed harmful and replaced with sugar; animal fats were replaced with trans fats, so much more.

      --
      Fast Federal Court and I.T.C. updates
    15. Re:stupid studies by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      You can begin by reading my comment. Scientists have NEVER suggested replacing saturated fats with sugar. Likewise the food pyramid is not dominated by carbs, even if it were the largest base category (which it never was outside of the USA). The last thing you mentioned also wasn't supported by science.

      Now repeat after me: "Marketing materials from food companies and governments is not science." "Catchy one liners are not science." "I will read and understand a comment on Slashdot before replying".

      Have a good weekend.

    16. Re:stupid studies by speedplane · · Score: 1

      Now repeat after me: "Marketing materials from food companies and governments is not science." "Catchy one liners are not science."

      Not quite.... The FDA has the power to regulate misleading or false marketing materials by food companies, but often gives its seal of approval to totally dubious claims. The sugar industry and food lobby have funded tons of "science" that is more often than not conveniently aligned with their business interests. I agree, marketing is not good science, but like it or not, when the FDA allows a dubious marketing claim and academic researchers accept industry money to provide evidence for these claims, it is often accepted as science.

      --
      Fast Federal Court and I.T.C. updates
    17. Re:stupid studies by speedplane · · Score: 1

      You can begin by reading my comment. Scientists have NEVER suggested replacing saturated fats with sugar.

      Yes they did. Back in the 60s, fat was evil. They didn't explicitly say to replace it with sugar, but the industry filled the void for them.

      --
      Fast Federal Court and I.T.C. updates
  8. impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You cannot skip breakfast.

    If you don't have meal after you woke up and eat around midday, that would be your breaking of the fast.

    No such problems in German, French, Italian or Portuguese speaking countries/people.

    Same problem in Spanish speaking countries (desayuno does really mean breaking the fast too in Spanish)

    1. Re:impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and in French, déjeuner (or petit déjeuner depending on which side of the Atlantic you're from) DOES mean unfast aka breaking the fast.. so............

  9. correlation ... causation ... blah blah blah by religionofpeas · · Score: 2

    Always the same story. Correlation does not equal causation, especially not in extremely complex environments such as diets.

    Better research would be to tell people to start skipping breakfast, or -- if they already skip it -- to start eating one, and see what happens to these people.

    1. Re:correlation ... causation ... blah blah blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya, but that's considered unethical because of the damage your recommendation may cause. More importantly in the corporate world, it's a liability if you find they damaged themselves with your advice, so the result of the research is squelched or predetermined.

    2. Re:correlation ... causation ... blah blah blah by speedplane · · Score: 2

      Always the same story. Correlation does not equal causation, ...

      True, but in nutritional studies, correlation/causation is just one of the many problems. They are often based on inaccurate surveys, are in uncontrolled environments, and use unrepresentative populations.

      There's a good Malcom Gladwell podcast all about nutritional study experimentation. So many of these studies are horrible. There are exceptions though. Facilities where everything can be controlled can often make for decent nutritional studies (e.g., prisons, mental health facilities). These are few and far between for the obvious reasons.

      --
      Fast Federal Court and I.T.C. updates
    3. Re:correlation ... causation ... blah blah blah by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      Ya, but that's considered unethical because of the damage your recommendation may cause

      Use volunteers, and have them sign a paper that states they are aware of the risks.

    4. Re:correlation ... causation ... blah blah blah by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Facilities where everything can be controlled can often make for decent nutritional studies (e.g., prisons, mental health facilities). These are few and far between for the obvious reasons.

      Alas, they are far from few, or far between. (I know what you meant, but it's not the only way to read what you wrote, nor even the most logical way if you take it out of context... which is fun.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  10. I can smell..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..... some bitch creating bullshit. Actual science proven breakfast, lunch is BS. So how about that she and her school go make a shallow grave and dump this shit in there.

    1. Re:I can smell..... by amalcolm · · Score: 1

      Did you stop taking your meds?

      --
      Time for bed, said Zebedee - boing
    2. Re:I can smell..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Screw you, daddy. I don't want to hear about your societal norms or the small life you think you have. You want to put me in a drug prison, but I won't be that kind of bird. I'm free, I'm flying high above the ground, and I'll shit on all those honest and insipid clones of yourself...

  11. Breakfast by geekymachoman · · Score: 1

    I understand not all people are the same, and I know people that don't eat breakfast... however, for me.. I'm just not right if I don't eat. I feel weak, dizzy, and I cannot wake up properly ( i do not drink coffee or other stimulants ), sometimes I get a headache that doesn't go away until the next day.

    Simple breakfast such as cheese, slice of bread or (not sweet) croissant and tomatoes work nicely. Doesn't have to be a full english fry up. Who has time for that ?

    1. Re:Breakfast by speedplane · · Score: 1

      The lightness and subtle discomfort of being on an empty stomach gets me reved up. My mornings skipping bfast are usually productive, then not so good after lunch. To each their own.

      --
      Fast Federal Court and I.T.C. updates
    2. Re:Breakfast by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Same here! I don't feel right until I eat something (might be a quick bite of cheese or bread) and some juice (usually orange).

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  12. many possible explonations by Dorianny · · Score: 2

    People generally skip breakfast because they can't make time for it. If you would rather skip breakfast then wake up a half hour earlier then it is likely that you aren't getting a full nights rest and chronic lack a sleep has long been long been associated with poor health

    1. Re:many possible explonations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus many breakfast foods are basically multivitamins. If the skippers simply popped a pill would that increase their health a comparable amount, perhaps even more since they wouldn't be getting the additional sugar?

  13. I could never skip breakfast by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Funny

    Without my morning Red Bull and the two aspirin I'm simply not functional.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:I could never skip breakfast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Without my morning Red Bull and the two aspirin I'm simply not functional.

      Drugs with a drug chaser. Ah, nothing like a well-rounded diet.

    2. Re:I could never skip breakfast by avandesande · · Score: 1

      Too sweet. Vodka and bacon works for me.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    3. Re:I could never skip breakfast by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You have odd eating habits. That's more suited for a dinner than a breakfast.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  14. i was being impersonated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that was not me i discover years later.. cease fire stand down.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=myo9wXrNUP4 if the (r)evolutionary movement stops the patient dies..

    1. Re:i was being impersonated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that was not me i discover years later.. cease fire stand down.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=myo9wXrNUP4 if the (r)evolutionary movement stops the patient dies..

      wasn't that the plot of a Jason Statham movie?

  15. Yeah, it's nation-wide pandemia... by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    Who in the right or wrong mind skips breakfast? God made you the best time of the day: morning, when you are fresh and ready to do great things. God made you a steaming hot cup a joe and God gave you the concept of breakfast, a hearty meal full of proteins and carbohydrates to exploit the morning freshness 100% until life kills you in the evening.

    What kind of cockamamie problems bother nowaday "researchers"?

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  16. OUTLAW THE CONTINENTAL BREAKFAST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It gonna kill you!

    Course, you cheap mofo too, but who ain't. amirite?

  17. Likely to be down to indirect effects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the article (I cheated and actually read it):

    But, the researchers add, the link is likely to be down to indirect effects.

    “People who skip breakfast, not only do they eat late and in an odd fashion, but [they also] have a poor lifestyle,” said Valentin Fuster, co-author of the research and director of Mount Sinai Heart in New York and the Madrid-based cardiovascular research institute, the CNIC.

  18. stating our terms in irrrevocable language/process by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cease fire stand down,, bury the hatchet,, thanks all around.. discourse as though the moms are watching.. sing along.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KF0gsbQKhD8

  19. Beer Breakfast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Beer Breakfast

  20. Atherosclerosis is an inflammatory process by Zorpheus · · Score: 1

    It can be stopped by a relaxed walk of 20-30 minutes per day. A lack of physical activity is the main cause of heart attacks. I think this is an accepted fact today.
    Nutrition does not seem to be too important, these studies rather seem to find symptoms of an unhealthy lifestyle. Kinda funny is: I lived in Germany for a long time, where people eat lots of salt and not so much fat. Regarding nutrition they are mostly worried about the fat they eat, thinking that it will block their arteries and lead to high blood pressure and heart attacks. Now I live in Scotland for a while. They have a diet rich in fat and meat and eat very low amounts of salt. Yet they are most worried about eating salt, thinking that it will increase their blood pressure and lead to heart problems.
    I think they are both wrong. E.g. I would bet the Germans have a higher blood pressure due to their general attitude to work, but they also eat more salt than others. A study looking for the relation between salt consumption and blood pressure would see a link if it includes the Germans and other Europeans, while it might just be a random correlation. I don't know the study that stated the link of salt consumption to high blood pressure, but knowing the different cultures I would bet it is not a real link.

    1. Re: Atherosclerosis is an inflammatory process by Zorpheus · · Score: 1

      Someone who listens to their body will walk enough to avoid atherosclerosis, will sleep enough and will eat what is healthy. Someone with a difficult life won't have time to listen to their body, won't sleep enough, won't have time for breakfast or walking and so on. I would say that is how everything is related, and why all this links seems to be linked in studies.

  21. Maybe != Is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is this news? So they see some minor correlation in their data that basically equates to "well, it might have something to do with it, but we don't actually know". Post a story when you have definite proof, and stop trying to scare people with your "maybe" bullshit.

  22. Who sponsored the study? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    With absolutely no information I boldly predict, if you dig through all the funding sources, you would find a breakfast food company funding this study.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  23. "May" be linked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Weasel words.

    It also "may not" be linked.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  24. Abstract Debunks Summary Claim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is written in the damn abstract of the damn journal article:

    "Participants who skipped breakfast were more likely to have an overall unhealthy lifestyle, including poor overall diet, frequent alcohol consumption and smoking. They were also more likely to be hypertensive and overweight or obese. In the case of obesity, the study authors said reverse causation cannot be ruled out, and the observed results may be explained by obese patients skipping breakfast to lose weight."

    Well Duh...

    Also, only 2.9% of their already tiny population of study participants were in the "skipped breakfast" group, which means there is likely not a sufficient population to have any confidence in this claimed result.

  25. Reading slashdot may be linked to poor health... by Drethon · · Score: 1

    Researchers have looked at readers of slashdot and them to be more unhealthy as compared to the greater population. Their typical diet being pizza in their parents basement was dismissed as unrelated to the study.

  26. High Carb = Western by sacremon · · Score: 2

    BTW, a recent article in The Lancet looked at 135,335 individuals from 18 countries over a median time of 7.4 years and they found that a diet high in carbs (as a percentage of total calories) was far more typical in Asia than in the West.

    --
    If you can't beat them, embrace and extend them.
    1. Re:High Carb = Western by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      The difference in type of carbs matters. In Asia it might be seaweed, in the West, potato chips.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  27. Correlation or causation by JohnStock · · Score: 1

    I hope being scientists they know the difference.

  28. Brought to you by ... by PPH · · Score: 2

    ... Denny's.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Brought to you by ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could go for a Moons Over My Hammy right now.

  29. I'm Proof of This by eepok · · Score: 1

    Last February, I committed to eating breakfast every day. By November, I had lost weight (44 lbs of fat!) felt healthier and better than I ever had.

    Other variables
    I stopped drinking alcohol
    My breakfast on weekdays: 2 hard boiled eggs, 10 baby carrots (Changed from pastries)
    My lunch on weekdays: turkey sandwich (Changed from burgers, tacos, soda, etc.)
    My dinner on weekdays: Home-cooked chicken, fish, or lean pork with a bunch of veggies and some rice or pasta. (Changed from "anything delivery")
    I had one "cheat day" a month where I could eat/drink anything I want.
    I ran 2 miles in the morning 4 times a week and did a 10k on the weekend

    So, as you can see, breakfast fixed everything!

    1. Re:I'm Proof of This by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

      So maybe running 8 miles a week had as much to do with your health as eating breakfast!

      I rarely eat breakfast, but I otherwise eat a reasonably healthy diet and get good exercise. I'm not overweight, my blood pressure is 120/70, my heart rate is 50, and otherwise enjoy good health.

      So for every individual example, there's a counter-example.

  30. Obvious connection. by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    Those who breakfast are more chill than those who start the day off going 120%.

    Sounds plausible to me.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  31. Trust your gut by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    Well, my gut complains vigorously if I skip breakfast.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  32. Doomed by JohnFen · · Score: 1

    Food is actively repulsive to me until I've been awake and active for a few hours.

    So I guess I'm doomed.

  33. What do you mean "have time" for breakfast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People who have the time to breakfast . . . blah, blah, blah . . . rip open and stir into hot water

    What's the big problem? Get out of bed ten minutes earlier.

    What are you proposing needs to be thrown into hot water? Instant oatmeal? That doesn't sound all that unhealthy.

    Better yet, eat an apple, avocado, banana, carrots, etc. Supplement it with a slice of cheese, if you wan't some protein. Or, throw an egg in the microwave - it only takes a minute. Walnuts, almonds, peanuts, a bowl of cereal . . .

    Breakfast doesn't have to be some big, elaborate meal. All of the above can be prepped in two minutes and eaten in five. I don't understand the concept of not having the time.

  34. In my experience... by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

    Most people I know who eat a large breakfast get up earlier, and are usually more physically fit: They're eating breakfast then hitting the gym.
    Most people who don't are usually less active, rushing to work last minute ( strees..), and don't have time for breakfast.

  35. Maybe yes Maybe no Poor Heart Health by Milo+GrafX · · Score: 1

    As a small child I learned being able to eat when your hungry is good . Being hungry and not having food is bad. As I got older I learned going without food when your body needs it is unhealthy as are a lot of things. preliminary findings although perhaps interesting are not definitive. In fact as the article stats its more likely linked to poor lifestyle. Another misleading title and a scathing indictment of our current level journalism. among other things.

  36. Wrong end of the horse. by Reziac · · Score: 1

    Lack of morning appetite is a common hypothyroid symptom. (Incidentally, so are both insomnia and a need for more sleep than normal. See today's other discussion.)

    Arteriosclerosis is caused by calcium being pulled out of the blood and deposited where it doesn't belong (arteries, also joints). Which is caused by low thyroid. Which also causes poor protein metabolism and consequent flabby heart syndrome (ie. future heart failure), and high blood cholesterol (because it's not transported efficiently into the cells where it can be used).

    80% of people over age 50 have some degree of hypothyroidism at the tissue level, due to reduced conversion of T4 to T3 (TSH will still be in range, which is why it's critical to get a complete workup).

    Examine and normalize thyroid first and foremost, and a host of health issues vanish without further treatment. Thyroid affects *EVERYTHING*, but hypo symptoms can appear unrelated (as varied as adult-onset tooth decay, some types of cancer, and most of what we think of as "normal aging") -- and are generally not recognised by current medical practice, which tends not to see the forest for the trees.

    I sound like a broken record on this, but I read the research literature, and it's astounding how little has filtered down to general medical practice, and how seldom the symptoms are identified. A non-exhaustive list:

    http://hypothyroidmom.com/300-...

    Not to mention its end-stage, hyperparathyroidism (the body's response to low blood calcium, and probable root cause of osteoporosis).

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?