Slashdot Mirror


Facebook Exec: 'Just Not True' That We Listen To Your Phone's Mic (theoutline.com)

Adrianne Jeffries, writing for The Outline: Facebook executive stepped outside of official channels of communication last night by tweeting about a negative rumor that seems to keep resurfacing no matter how many times the company denies it. "I run ads product at Facebook. We don't - and have never - used your microphone for ads. Just not true," tweeted Rob Goldman, vice president of ads products at Facebook. That includes Facebook-owned Instagram, he said. Goldman was responding to a tweet from PJ Vogt, one of the co-hosts of the tech podcast Reply All, which is producing a segment about the persistent belief that Facebook spies on users through the microphone. Vogt had asked people to call in to share their stories of why they think Facebook may be using the microphone to collect information for advertisers.

152 comments

  1. What for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What DO you use the mic to listen in for then if not ads?

    1. Re:What for by mr_mischief · · Score: 2

      Maybe they're getting ready to launch the Facebook Virtual Assistant.

    2. Re:What for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What DO you use the mic to listen in for then if not ads?

      Well, I'm not a facebook user and have never installed the facebook app, so I'm no authority here. But I'm gonna go out on a limb here....am I wrong, or doesn't the app allow you to record videos and post those to your feed?

    3. Re: What for by nazsco · · Score: 1

      it is in the wording.

      ads are pretty much untrusted code you run in your app (hint, nobody pays you if you won't allow them to run 3rd party traffic validation coded in real time).

      so FB might be honest. THEY don't use the mic. but since the app secured the permission, that 3rd party ad code might very well use the mic.

    4. Re:What for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well its there for the NSA and other alphabet spaghetti US departments to use.

      How else do you think the USA is able to track all those ISIS fighters, Trump will probably take credit when they finally admit the truth /conspiracy

    5. Re: What for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We never listen to your mic for ads! We just mine the data and sell them and what others do with it is not our fault!

    6. Re:What for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can send voice messages in Messenger. That presumably requires mic and camera permissions.

  2. They don't need to spy via microphone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The users are the product, willingly sharing info. Facebook already uses them for the info they provide.

  3. I get it. by Type44Q · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just not true.

    So it is, then.

    1. Re:I get it. by halivar · · Score: 1
    2. Re:I get it. by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If a company is innocent of an acquisition, how are they to prove this to the public?

      They cannot confirm it because it is untrue, they cannot deny it, because it makes them seem like they are lying about it. If they say they will investigate it, it means they are dragging their feet. If they can find the source of the acquisition they may be able to sue them for libel, but then it is the greedy big business covering up the plight of the little guy.

      In the world of lies, how do you promote the truth?

      Now there are a lot of companies that will just outright lie when they are guilty too, but the bigger problem is, how can we show the truth, as the Lies get more press.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    3. Re:I get it. by mikael · · Score: 1

      They don't need to. It was known that ISP's themselves were doing deep packet inspection for advertising revenue purposes. There was a company in the UK called Phorm that was doing exactly this. They would sign a deal with ISP's. One of their little black boxes would be placed at the ISP's gateway to the rest of the Internet. This little black box would sift through internet traffic for keywords and other such things to present targeted advertising. They essentially looked through keywords of your Emails, web pages, blogs, forums and build up a profile associated with that IP address at that time. Then advertisers could subscribe to their service and whenever a match between the profile and the advertiser happened, a targeted advert would be displayed. Any other time it would be a random or blank advert. This would now be extended through to voice analysis by cloud computer systems. Any guesses who that has that kind of computing power these days?

      http://www.telegraph.co.uk/tec...

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    4. Re:I get it. by orient · · Score: 2

      A friend has asked a butcher, while buying meat, where to get an industrial meat grinder. He spoke the question, did not write/e-mail/text/IM it. Same evening, at home, Facebook started showing him ads for industrial meat grinders. This happened last year. Coincidence, right?

      --
      Laudele lor desigur m-ar mahni peste masura.
    5. Re: I get it. by Zeromous · · Score: 1

      Happened to me a few times like my wife and i are done having kids. Talking with my friends about their upcoming baby and boom next thing i know im getting pampers ads and investing in my childs education ads againsl all of sudden.

      I got a new phone and only use facebook via web and grant it no axs. It has not happened since

      Facebook isnt lying but they dont stop others from using it

      --
      ---Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A START
    6. Re:I get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't - and have never - used your microphone for ads. Just not true.

      Yeah right. And not just ads. Much, much besides. Like the supercookie that tracks your every action even if you "logged out". Just the tip of the iceberg.
      Me, I don't "do" FB or "social media". But these americunts have shadow profiles for sure as I am surrounded by a*holes who are on these 'services'.

    7. Re:I get it. by el_smurfo · · Score: 1

      Commenting here is essentially social media. You are commenting to create social conversation over a media topic.

    8. Re: I get it. by k2r · · Score: 2

      So you have been geographically close to someoneâ(TM)s mobile with a search history of baby related stuff, or maybe even on the same WiFi?
      No microphone access needed...

    9. Re:I get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      simple fix: stop your ads from being able to access the mic via your code... this isn't rocket surgery.

  4. He added by 110010001000 · · Score: 4, Funny

    He added "But thats a real good idea! Thanks!"

  5. Yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    We don't - and have never - used your microphone for ads, YET...

    1. Re:Yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      We don't - and have never - used your microphone for ads, YET...

      No, sir. Not wittingly.

  6. Scare-mongering, *sigh* by EndlessNameless · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Any communications app could do this because they all have permission to access the mic and the network. This is not new, and you basically have to trust whatever you install.

    If people could confine themselves to crying wolf when there is evidence of a wolf, that would be great. Because we already gloss over too many real vulnerabilities and poor practices in favor of sensationalism and nonsense.

    --

    ---
    According to the latest ruleset, this post should be modded as Vorpal Flamebait +5.
    1. Re:Scare-mongering, *sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      sensationalism (in this case) gets people thinking about things like "why does this app have access to the mic?". Now that awareness is being raised, it's time to bust out the flood gates of all phone permissions and how they are abused so that real changes can be made.

      You shouldn't have to trust what ever app you install. You should be able to trust your phone OS to block apps as you desire. App makers should be held accountable to detail exactly why they need permissions they ask for and a phone OS should be held accountable to let users allow/disable said permissions as they see fit. And not just in a "This app needs X permissions or it will not load". More like a "This app asks for permissions unrelated to it's operation and will be banned from the store if it refuses to work without them"

    2. Re:Scare-mongering, *sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Anything that can be abused cheaply, will be abused cheaply.

      It would not surprise me if Facebook made a seperate 3rd party company they send all audio data to while simultaneously claiming *they* don't listen to the microphone.

    3. Re:Scare-mongering, *sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any communications app could do this because they all have permission to access the mic and the network.

      Any communications app running on Android could do this. When an application in the background is recording sound in iOS, there's a bar along the top of the screen notifying you.

    4. Re:Scare-mongering, *sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...in favor of sensationalism and nonsense.

      ...you basically have to trust whatever you install.

      No, you don't have to. It is possible to deny different permissions by choice and still run these programs. Is this really Slashdot?

    5. Re: Scare-mongering, *sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true. iOS apps can use the microphone without changing the status barâ" foreground or background. The trick is, if an app is switched to the background, itâ(TM)s process is usually suspended. What Facebook did (and was caught red-handed) was register as a music playing app with the system, then continuously play silent audio to prevent the system from suspending its task. If it had microphone permissions, because fhe audio session was active (from âoeplaying soundâ), it could listen to the microphone, convert the sound to phonemes (the basic parts of speech) and send a list of the phonemes back to Facebook for processing and conversion to text.

    6. Re:Scare-mongering, *sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is not facebook exec a oxy-moron_?
      Children running a kiddy-type 'communications' enterprise.
      Like the exec's even know or care what Really going on w/ all their tykes.
      As long paycheck arrives in the playpen and keep the game going.

  7. Overly specific by wwalker98 · · Score: 1

    Maybe it is just me, but the denial seems overly specific. Maybe the mic is used to maintain a profile for each user. Oh, and the profile is used to target ads. Talking out loud about tin-foil hats now to see if I get any ads for a discount.

    1. Re:Overly specific by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      AKA "The Xbox defense"

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    2. Re:Overly specific by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Talking out loud about tin-foil hats now to see if I get any ads for a discount.

      Find a shortwave radio and tune it into a station that is broadcasting Chinese or some other language than English. Leave your phone there for several hours then take note if any ads come up in that language.

    3. Re:Overly specific by keltor · · Score: 1

      I don't really speak Spanish, and outside of visiting the local taco truck, I don't ever say any word in Spanish, BUT I can tell you, if I call ahead to order some tacos before I drive over there ... FB now shows Spanish ads. And it's only Facebook, no other application does it. The way that they deny it SURE makes me suspect something is up there.

    4. Re:Overly specific by Kaenneth · · Score: 2

      Hi Wayne, have you considered Reynold's brand foil hat for your next show?

    5. Re:Overly specific by mikael · · Score: 1

      You can do quicker than that. Get a GPS spoofer app. Change your location to central Mongolia, Afghanistan, Siberia or the North/South pole. Now wait for the targeted advertising messages.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    6. Re:Overly specific by mikael · · Score: 1

      Did you look up their phone number. Do you have their phone number in your contacts?

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    7. Re:Overly specific by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do openly admit to track who you send and receive texts to and from as well as who you place calls to and from, so that's really no surprise.

  8. Snorers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How do they know to target me with anti-snoring advertisements?

    1. Re: Snorers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two thirds of Americans are overweight. They're just playing the odds...

  9. And then ... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    Vogt had asked people to call in to share their stories of why they think Facebook may be using the microphone to collect information for advertisers.

    ... he listened to the callers - via their microphones. Checkmate.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  10. Which phone apps spy on you? by careysb · · Score: 1

    Which phone apps spy on you? All of them.

    1. Re:Which phone apps spy on you? by hackel · · Score: 1

      No, they don't. You obviously need to spend a bit more time over at https://f-droid.org/.

    2. Re:Which phone apps spy on you? by zlives · · Score: 1

      what face book does can never be considered spying. even if they did listen to the mic... the the meatpopsicle is the product.

    3. Re:Which phone apps spy on you? by thejynxed · · Score: 1

      F-Droid is no guarantee anymore either, more and more apps are creeping in that are asking permissions for things that sort of app has no business needing access to.

      --
      @Mindless Drivel: 100% of Twitter posts ever Tweeted.
  11. Nothing from your microphone ... by powerlord · · Score: 3, Funny

    " ... now your Camera ... no comment. But we do not use information from your microphone"

    --
    This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
  12. Very carefully worded by ugen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Watch the carefully worded denial, no doubt approved by company's lawyers.
    "We don't - and have never - used your microphone for ads. Just not true.". Ok, so they did not use microphone *for ads*. What did they use it for?

    (Here are some ideas that are not contrary to this denial: listening in for research purposes, compiling data on behalf of a government)

    1. Re:Very carefully worded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn! I bet you figured it out! I always wondered how they manage to get sound when I use the 'record and post a video' thingy! It never occured to me that they could be using the mic!

      Are you really that stupid?

    2. Re:Very carefully worded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Data mining != ads. Just like Facebook doesn't sell your data, it asks advertisers the type of person they want to target and then Facebook looks through its data to find which people to send the ad to.

      Listening to TV beacons isn't using the mic for ads either. It's using the mic to determine what you're watching, not to show you an ad. It's impossible to deliver ads to you through a mic, so if he made his statement with that interpretation then it's a meaningless assertion.

      English really sucks as a language. You can turn interpret any phrase into something meaningless. Unless he specifically says we only use the mic for XYZ where XYZ is specifically defined, then you have no clue what Facebook uses the mic for and whatever they say can be reinterpreted at a later date to mean anything. Not that anyone would care if they lie, companies lie all the time and it only makes them more and more profits. Go sign up to a class action newsletter and you'll be amazed on the amount of false advertising lawsuits companies quietly bury or settle away.

    3. Re:Very carefully worded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Compiling data on behalf of a government" is 100% cost and no return for Facebook. Why would they do it?

      I'm not saying they couldn't, or wouldn't. Just that I don't see what's in it for them. Do you think some TLA would pay them enough to make it worth their while? I gravely doubt it, they have other methods of getting at your mic if that's what they want.

      "For research purposes" - I don't really see what they could hope to gain from that, either. What "research" would be worth the reputational risk to try that, even on an experimental scale?

    4. Re:Very carefully worded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure lots of facebook shills in this here thread...

    5. Re:Very carefully worded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nor did they write "will never"

  13. There is a saying about this sort of thing. by sehlat · · Score: 2

    I think it originated in the Soviet Union:

    "Nothing is verified until it is officially denied."

    So.....

  14. Wow what a problem, now only if... by Neuroelectronic · · Score: 5, Interesting
    1. Re:Wow what a problem, now only if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the correct answer. Sorry, I don't have mod points today.

    2. Re:Wow what a problem, now only if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lineage OS...Privacy Guard takes care of this for you.

  15. Quick question by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 1

    Just not true.

    So it is, then.

    Quick question: Does Facebook make up its own ads to serve to people, or does it use an ad-delivery service where another company aggregates the ads for them?

    What I'm asking is: does Facebook somehow curate the javascript and other gunk that is served as advertizing, or does the ad service, or do the advertizers themselves somehow curate those programs?

    All the web sites that pop up a message saying "we notice that you are using an ad blocker - please stop" makes me mentally reply "I notice you let anyone serve me malware via ads, no way!".

    Is it the same for Facebook? Do they let advertizers run just 'any old javascript on my computer?

    (And as a corollary to that: can malicious javascript listen to my mike?)

    1. Re: Quick question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The Facebook ad platform was pretty locked down when I used it. Facebook runs and controls the whole system, no third party ads. They do it all.

    2. Re:Quick question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Quick question: Does Facebook make up its own ads to serve to people, or does it use an ad-delivery service where another company aggregates the ads for them?

      # Block Facebook IPv4
      127.0.0.1 api.ak.facebook.com
      127.0.0.1 api.connect.facebook.com
      127.0.0.1 api.facebook.com
      127.0.0.1 app.facebook.com
      127.0.0.1 apps.facebook.com
      127.0.0.1 ar-ar.facebook.com
      127.0.0.1 badge.facebook.com
      127.0.0.1 blog.facebook.com
      127.0.0.1 connect.facebook.com
      127.0.0.1 connect.facebook.net
      127.0.0.1 de-de.facebook.com
      127.0.0.1 developers.facebook.com
      127.0.0.1 es-la.facebook.com
      127.0.0.1 external.ak.fbcdn.net
      127.0.0.1 facebook.com
      127.0.0.1 facebook.de
      127.0.0.1 facebook.fr
      127.0.0.1 fb.me
      127.0.0.1 fbcdn.net
      127.0.0.1 fr-fr.facebook.com
      127.0.0.1 hi-in.facebook.com
      127.0.0.1 it-it.facebook.com
      127.0.0.1 ja-jp.facebook.com
      127.0.0.1 login.facebook.com
      127.0.0.1 profile.ak.fbcdn.net
      127.0.0.1 pt-br.facebook.com
      127.0.0.1 ssl.connect.facebook.com
      127.0.0.1 static.ak.connect.facebook.com
      127.0.0.1 static.ak.fbcdn.net
      127.0.0.1 www.facebook.com
      127.0.0.1 www.facebook.de
      127.0.0.1 www.facebook.fr
      127.0.0.1 zh-cn.facebook.com
      # Block Facebook IPv6
      fe80::1%lo0 facebook.com
      fe80::1%lo0 login.facebook.com
      fe80::1%lo0 www.login.facebook.com
      fe80::1%lo0 fbcdn.net
      fe80::1%lo0 www.fbcdn.net
      fe80::1%lo0 fbcdn.com
      fe80::1%lo0 www.fbcdn.com
      fe80::1%lo0 static.ak.fbcdn.net
      fe80::1%lo0 static.ak.connect.facebook.com
      fe80::1%lo0 connect.facebook.net
      fe80::1%lo0 www.connect.facebook.net
      fe80::1%lo0 apps.facebook.com ::1 www.facebook.com ::1 facebook.com ::1 login.facebook.com ::1 www.login.facebook.com ::1 fbcdn.net ::1 www.fbcdn.net ::1 fbcdn.com ::1 www.fbcdn.com ::1 static.ak.fbcdn.net ::1 static.ak.connect.facebook.com ::1 connect.facebook.net ::1 www.connect.facebook.net ::1 apps.facebook.com
      # Block IPs above

  16. Exactly what I was wondering by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I didn't think Facebook used the microphone for anything before i read that comment - they literally created doubt where there was none!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Exactly what I was wondering by gnick · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I didn't think Facebook used the microphone for anything before i read that...

      Apparently there are FB features that allow video capture. That's why they claim they need mic access. I'm not worried about the mic - It's what they do with my location that gives me the creeps. Of course, that's easy to turn off if you're willing to give up the perks.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    2. Re:Exactly what I was wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you know about the control panel that controls Flash's access to your camera and mic? It's set to wide open from installation.
      Google "flash control panel".

    3. Re: Exactly what I was wondering by GhengisCohen · · Score: 1

      It is Facebook messenger on at least Android phone I think is doing this. It won't run without mic permissions

  17. Overly suspicious by A10Mechanic · · Score: 3

    They never started denying it until we started accusing them. But all joking aside, has anyone de-compiled the app to see what's under the hood?

    1. Re:Overly suspicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not good enough. You also have to watch all traffic to see if it downloads additional code which isn't ever saved. And you have to do that for everyone since perhaps they're only spying at a few targeted groups at a time. There's no longer any guarantee that everyone runs the same program even if the version numbers or file hashes match.

  18. Liar by OYAHHH · · Score: 0, Troll

    An absolute crock of steaming piled high bullshit! I've personally had their damn apps spy on me.

    --
    Caution: Contents under pressure
    1. Re:Liar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is stunning how pathetically styooopid these bosses are. If they wanted metadata they could ask honestly and get large numbers of volunteers.

  19. Everything is a conspiracy! by hackel · · Score: 0

    People who give an advertising app like Facebook permission to record audio from their microphone *deserve* to be listened-in on. Services like this should only be accessed in a sandboxed, open-source web browser that gives you full control of what information they have access to.

  20. how else would they know my back hurts? [targ ads] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    :) I only mentioned it in gmail, in "private" facebook message to my friend, on a random site that used fb auth.. it has got to be the microphone!

  21. App developers need to stop the BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Most of the apps that I see on Google's store require access to everything.
    Why? Why does a timer need locations access?

    Or access to my contacts? Or camera?

    Google's apps are the worst.

    And Samsung put facebook on my J1 Ace. I can't get the fucker off. And the fucker starts itself up when I disable it. WTF?!?

    So, since facebook's app acts that way, I don't believe a word that asshole says.

    1. Re:App developers need to stop the BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every app wants camera, GPS, phone, contacts, music, and photos access. Even a generic fleshlight app, it wants everything under the sun as permissions.

    2. Re:App developers need to stop the BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? Why does a timer need locations access?

      Because time and space form a continuum? [:shifty]

    3. Re:App developers need to stop the BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even a generic fleshlight app, it wants everything under the sun as permissions.

      TMI

    4. Re:App developers need to stop the BS by EndlessNameless · · Score: 1

      And Samsung put facebook on my J1 Ace. I can't get the fucker off. And the fucker starts itself up when I disable it. WTF?!?

      So, since facebook's app acts that way, I don't believe a word that asshole says.

      I wouldn't know how Facebook's app acts, but the fact that you can't remove it is 100% Samsung's fault. Only the OEM can mandate a third-party app.

      Don't like it? Don't buy their products.

      --

      ---
      According to the latest ruleset, this post should be modded as Vorpal Flamebait +5.
    5. Re:App developers need to stop the BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NoRoot Firewall in the Playstore. Your welcome.

    6. Re:App developers need to stop the BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every app should have its own filesystem sandbox. Then it gets permissions either to read from other application sandboxes, write to them or not at all.

    7. Re: App developers need to stop the BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, that is indeed how Android works.

  22. Why would it be true? by ilsaloving · · Score: 2

    There are so many easier and more efficient ways of stealing everyone's personal information en masse. Why would they bother resorting to surreptitiously activating your phone's microphone?

    1. Re:Why would it be true? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not like they're stealing anything, either. People are *giving* them all their personal information. They don't even have to listen to anything. It would be way more resource intensive.

    2. Re:Why would it be true? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      There's an even easier way than stealing. Just ask by giving someone a form to fill in. The information people are willing to hand over for nothing is simply incredible.

    3. Re:Why would it be true? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Record keystrokes, which with enough samples can be translated to words with very high accuracy... words that can include user names and passwords. And most IT professionals still work with their phones at their sides all day. With enough mobile market penetration, you could break into practically anywhere.

  23. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Do you use GPS location for ads?
    Do you use cell phone tower broadcast information for ads?
    Do you use people's contacts
    Do you base facial recognition based on photos that people on contact list posted without permissions?
    Do you own Whatsapp or whatever it's called to get phone numbers from people?
    Does Whatsapp get voice data from people who use the amp? Well it's not "facebook" technically
    Do you do get user data based on instagram posts?
    Do you work with other companies and purchase personal data based on existing data that you already own on users, email addresses to get birthdates, addresses, phone numbers, occupations info from airline rewards, utility companies, credit card companies, banks, credit bureau companies?
    How closely do you work with the government, domestically and foreign? What about users that aren't part of your government's jurisdiction?

  24. just "never have" ? by Weirsbaski · · Score: 1

    "I run ads product at Facebook. We don't - and have never - used your microphone for ads. Just not true,"

    "Never have" is nice, but would you put it in writing that you never will?

    --

    I am not a sig.
  25. It's not Facebook... by C3ntaur · · Score: 1

    It's Google or Apple listening to your phone's mic. Facebook just buys the data your phone's OS provider is already harvesting.

    --
    Loading...
  26. I've had their apps before. by pecosdave · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you want me to believe you DON'T listen through my Mic when just having your crap installed runs my battery down 40% faster - even when I'm not using it - you're on the wrong track.

    IF you want me to believe you DON'T listen through my Mic but you just about break your neck trying to force me to install your chat app after I remove it by making it so that mobile browsers can't access chat anymore, you're on the wrong track.

    IF you want me to believe you aren't spying on me in general and you feel the need to try to force me to install your normal app by making streaming video unavailable if I use a mobile browser you aren't convincing me.

    I had their crap years ago. One of the first things I did after rooting my HTC One M8 was remove the crap that was put on their by HTC and/or AT&T.

    Now that I have a Pixel it didn't come with a Facebook app, and I haven't installed it on this phone - ever. I do have other social network stuff installed, like Minds, Google +, and a couple of others. I'm pretty sure Google spys as bad as Facebook did, only it does that with Google + installed or not, and I'm pretty sure it has less battery impact.

    I bought my wife one of those $50 Amazon tablets mostly because she wanted something like that just for Facebook and chat, the battery life was so pathetic she didn't ever start using it regularly. Now that the Facebook crap has been removed our son uses it for hours on end on road trips watching his kids shows. It's scary how long that battery lasts without Facebook software on it.

    No Facebook - if you want to convince me you're not just there to spy on me you'll stop working with manufacturers to put your shitty software on phones in a manner that it can't be removed unless you're geeky enough to use the Android Developer kit and do some ROM flashing to get rid of it. I'm suspicious of ANYTHING that presents itself as mandatory. You'll also make your crap to where it doesn't run unless I start it. You literally make hardware akin to useless. I laugh at the people I see running around having to charge their phones all the time because they shit they have running on it constantly runs their batteries down. I don't carry a power bank and I laugh at people who do. Bullshit apps like Facebooks are what kills battery life, for the most part modern phones running a stable OS build without extra bullshit have incredible battery life.

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    1. Re:I've had their apps before. by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 1

      Pro Tip: You can see your Facebook messages in a mobile browser by using the browser's "Request Desktop Site" command. You shouldn't have to, but you can.

      --
      Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
    2. Re:I've had their apps before. by ctilsie242 · · Score: 2

      Rooting not just allows you to rip crap like that out, but gives you the ability to firewall, guaranteeing that if it ever came back, it wouldn't be able to phone home. I wish DonkeyGuard or xPrivacy were maintained. Those programs were top notch at not just keeping an app from getting to goodies, but giving it fake info, so it thinks it has contacts, photos, camera, mic... but in reality, it is pulling random numbers and repeatedly uploading a black screen.

    3. Re:I've had their apps before. by pecosdave · · Score: 1

      I know about that. I hate working on a phone screen enough as it is that I don't usually do that. I just hold it against Facebook and I know that anyone that can't wait until I get to a desktop to see what they sent me can contact me in about a dozen other ways.

      --
      The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    4. Re:I've had their apps before. by pecosdave · · Score: 1

      YES! Virtual bullshit inputs, I like the idea. Yeah, you're right, I would totally consider those programs for apps that ask for permissions they don't need. I keep my quantity of installed apps down due to crap like that. I quit playing Angry Birds years ago when they first started wanting access to my call log and address book.

      --
      The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    5. Re:I've had their apps before. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can check for this easily... Set up your phone to only use wi-fi and let it connect to wi-fi router. You might need to chain two wifi routers together Run wireshark on a PC connected to the wi-fi router at the bottom of the chain. You should see all the traffic going through from the phone to the Internet.

    6. Re:I've had their apps before. by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      My buddy's got a Samsung Galaxy S7. Since he rooted it and got rid of the crapware, his battery life is vastly improved. He figures at least double, though he didn't jump through all the hoops to do a rigorous analysis.

      The list of apps he disabled and/or removed was jaw-dropping. Screen after screen of them.

      When the time comes for me to finally let my old (still immaculate) iPhone 4S go to its reward, I will very definitely be going down that path.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    7. Re:I've had their apps before. by pecosdave · · Score: 1

      My original Evo 4G WiMax model went from 12 hours to close to 60 of standby after rooting it and putting an alternate ROM on it. That Nascar app, college football app among others that always ran killed it.

      --
      The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
  27. Look at bandwidth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does the bandwidth look big enough for audio?
    Is there less bandwidth used when there is no mic?
    Does bandwidth spike when you plug in a mic?

    If you want to know if it's the truth
    Then, my friend, you are going to need proof
    Come up with a test
    Yeah, you need a test
    -- They might Be Giants -- Put it to the test

  28. Agree. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The decision to keep the featurewall features out of the core OS was made in full conscious awareness of the moral inappropriateness of doing so.

    It was clear to everyone attempting to make a phone OS that their OS would get squashed if it didn't prioritize app-developer desires over end-user desires. And, that is still true today, precisely because there aren't enough end-users who are serious enough about protecting their privacy to actually change the balance.

    The majority of end-users just put up with it. So long as that is true, the rest of us will have to put up with it as well (or opt-out completely, as I have done. I use a dumbphone. It works great.)

    1. Re:Agree. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am starting to think this way too. This is way too much.for me to allow in my life. A simple/dumb phone looks better and better

    2. Re:Agree. by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      Users put up with it because there is no alternative OS. There are just 2 mobile OS competitors with >99% of the market. Both contenders are made by dystopian Progressive-Capitalist Silicon Valley companies with close ties to the US security services and open contempt for freedom, who consider their users a product to be sold to the highest bidders.

      Were there another viable mobile OS on the market - one that did not constantly snoop on its users - I'm sure many people would rush out to buy phones running it. Otoh, it's probably illegal to sell a privacy-respecting mobile OS in the the States. Maybe illegal in China and Russia too - their regimes have just as little respect for privacy and freedom as does our regime.

  29. Re:how else would they know my back hurts? [targ a by OYAHHH · · Score: 1

    I have literally said "my Father-in-law drives a mercedes" and then found a mercedes advert on my FB feed the next refresh. NOTHING else like you described. Turned off their app access to microphone and that crap disappeared.

    --
    Caution: Contents under pressure
  30. Seems kind of weird by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People spew their life's intimate and sordid details onto Facebook all the time... but they get up in arms that Facebook might be using the microphone to record them?

    This is almost as bizarre as those people who demand the government take away constitutional rights due of terror attacks which kill at most a few dozen people a year, yet don't bat an eye at the ~ 9,000 annually who die due to drunken driving.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Seems kind of weird by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      but they get up in arms that Facebook might be using the microphone to record them?
      You seem not to grasp the difference between giving snd taking.
      a) I give you $100. I have $100 less, you have $100 more.
      b) You take away $100 from me. Same result. Except for the law suit following.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    2. Re:Seems kind of weird by bluegutang · · Score: 1

      People post what they CHOOSE to post. They don't choose to be listened to nonstop. That's a fundamental difference.

      You might as well justify stealing from a generous person - "he gives money to so money other people, why would he care if a little money also goes to me?"

  31. Fixed that for ya, Ronnie Boy... by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    "I run ads product at Facebook. We don't - and have never - used your microphone for ads. Just not true,"

    Translated into English: "You think we actually have to listen in to know how often you creep your ex's page and spank the monkey?

    "You make it so very easy for us to spy on you, and we already have so many ways to do so, we don't have to bother with your effing microphone. "

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  32. Always listening... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't tell if it's Google, Microsoft, or FB anymore...

    A little while ago, I had a cough for about 4 days. Despite never searching for/purchasing cough syrup or communicating to anyone explicitly that I had a cough during that period, by the third day, I started receiving ads for cough syrup. Only way I can think of that information being available is if my phone had been listening to me during my drive to/from work.

  33. I TEXTED SOMEONE ABOUT MY F-150 and guess what by kfh227 · · Score: 1

    I texted a friend about my truck. Didn't even say I want a new one. I used the stock text messaging app.

    And god damn it, if Facebook didn't all of a sudden start dropping Ford F-150 ads on me.

    I was pretty pissed off to be frank.

    1. Re:I TEXTED SOMEONE ABOUT MY F-150 and guess what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You (or your friend) probably just visited a web page about F-150s, and they connected the dots the 2005 way (super-cookies, embedded trackers, who you know, etc).

    2. Re:I TEXTED SOMEONE ABOUT MY F-150 and guess what by tgetzoya · · Score: 1

      I have a similar story as grandparent. I was in a stand-up, at work, when someone mentioned whitewater rafting. An hour later I opened Facebook to see numerous ads on whitewater rafting.

      He and I are not friends on FB and I had only been in the office for less than a month.

      I understand that FB can use proximity detection and all the "big data" points you made, but it is too coincidental for me. This is only one example, but there were a few of these that happened to me before I stopped using FB entirely.

    3. Re:I TEXTED SOMEONE ABOUT MY F-150 and guess what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if Facebook knew that he was going to get a new truck before he did?

      Maybe it's like that case where Target figured out a woman was pregnant before she knew she was pregnant, or ... what if Ford is actually paying Facebook to "inception" people into buying new cars and trucks? (e.g. Subliminal stuff like linking you to a friend of a friend who took a picture in front of a car with bald tires. The a week after that, maybe there's a trending video of some guy's transmission falling off as he drives down the road, so they make sure you see that.)

    4. Re:I TEXTED SOMEONE ABOUT MY F-150 and guess what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uninstall messenger. You will not be pissed going forward. Problem Solved.

  34. Get Russia off your brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The quote pre-dates the Soviet Union by several decades: https://quoteinvestigator.com/2015/08/07/believe/

    1. Re:Get Russia off your brain by sehlat · · Score: 1

      Thank you for the clarification and the citation. The Soviet Union was the context in which I originally encountered the saying.

  35. OK, Facebook doesn't listen to your phone mic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but that doesn't mean others don't take advantage of it. We've already found out about companies purposely leaving back doors in apps for NSA and others, so it only makes sense they willfully ignore the abuse governments do with their applications. Now they can say, "yeah, WE don't use your mic...".

  36. Yes, but his later tweet: by bagofbeans · · Score: 1

    Alex Goldman @AGoldmund
    Replying to @robjective @PJVogt

    Hi, Rob. I don't believe that facebook is listening, but a number of our listeners called yesterday with stories that are hard to dismiss.

    I don't believe that facebook is listening takes his assertion from fact to opinion.

  37. Subtle Irony by TexasDiaz · · Score: 1

    And to think, I was just having a conversation with my buddy about how I thought Facebook was listening to me via my phone's microphone when it seemingly answered back, "No, we're not!"

  38. Prove it by spire3661 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Post the source code.

    --
    Good-bye
  39. Bet Amazon won't publicly say this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My wife and I have had conversations about things we never type into a keyboard and then get Amazon ads for those very things the next day in our email. And no, we do NOT own any Amazon surveillance devices like the Echo. We have mostly Apple products, and turn off Siri the second we get them because, to quote a friend, "Go away Siri, no one likes you!"

    1. Re:Bet Amazon won't publicly say this. by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 1

      Maybe you could suggest a repeatable experiment for us on the intertubes?

      --
      Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
    2. Re:Bet Amazon won't publicly say this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One I remember distinctly, we talked about getting flowers for someone we know. Neither of us looked up flower shops or anything online because we already have a shop we go to when we have the need. The next day both of us were receiving ads for flower seeds, pots, delivery services, etc. Neither of us had ever received those type of ads before.

    3. Re:Bet Amazon won't publicly say this. by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 1

      Maybe the two of you should try talking about the nasty around it and see what happens. You could have fun!

      --
      Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
  40. Not for ads... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    >"We don't - and have never - used your microphone for ads"

    Yeah. We just feed it into out AI (Codename "Suckernet"), which then plays out the ads to you...

  41. MARK ZUCK had Tape over his camera and microphone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets all be honest. If the ZUCK has tape on his camera and microphone why shouldn't we? He knows something we don't? C'mon folks.

  42. Because Zuckerberg tapes over/disables his shit by Khyber · · Score: 2

    Which means HE KNOWS his shit's being used to do that, you fucking imbecile.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    1. Re:Because Zuckerberg tapes over/disables his shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it means he thinks there's a good chance it could be. That's all.

      And don't we all think that?

      I assume Zuck has other software than "just Facebook" installed on his computer. An OS of some kind, for instance. He probably trusts FB more than anything else, because at least he knows what it does.

    2. Re:Because Zuckerberg tapes over/disables his shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That you think Facebook is a piece of software instead of a website just shows how dumb you are.

  43. Open source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Simple solution, Facebook: open your source code and prove it.

    1. Re:Open source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Open source for Facebook? What are you, a Russian agent? A white Nazi? Worse, a Trumpkin?

  44. true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is 100% true. Facebook, if you give it access to your microphone, listens for words to display ads on their platform. I have seen this multiple times on my phone and my girlfriends. We would be watching TV and some ad would come on about whatever, and boom, the ad was in our Facebook feed seconds later. Fuck Facebook. I installed the app for that reason alone. Also makes you wonder why Google Chrome, and other apps like it need access to your microphone? For ads duh.

    1. Re:true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ** Uninstalled. haha

    2. Re:true by mikael · · Score: 1
      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  45. The bs is so thick... by sizzlinkitty · · Score: 1

    2-3 years ago I was having a conversation with my wife about some home upgrades over dinner, this was the very first time we spoke about it and neither one of us were doing research online before hand. That night I loaded up facebook and saw ads for home supply warehouses.

  46. All things considered.. by WolfgangVL · · Score: 1

    We are talking about an app spying on you for marketing purposes because it is installed on the operating system that the biggest advertising giant on the planet developed and "gave away"?

    Everything on android is harvesting data. In scary huge amounts. I imagine Apple does the same and just shares it less. It's exclusive, right?

    When I'm forced to carry a smartphone, I get what apps I need from f-droid. I't may be a false sense of security, but I do prefer seeing "This app requires no special permissions" over "This app must access everything"

    The only social media I use on a smartphone is google-centric stuff. The way I see it, it's their OS, they are collecting anyway, I might as well get something out of it, and so many are using gmail that even if I don't use it, they are reading my messages by proxy regardless.

    Worried about fb collecting on a smartphone? Can you see the forest through the trees?

    --
    You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
    1. Re:All things considered.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only social media I use on a smartphone is google-centric stuff. The way I see it, it's their OS, they are collecting anyway, I might as well get something out of it, and so many are using gmail that even if I don't use it, they are reading my messages by proxy regardless.

      So, this might finally be the Year of G+. They've made it at last!

  47. Judgement Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lol! The rumors persist because every time I have a conversation with my wife about a topic. An ad related to that topic shows up on her wall. This happens with minutes! It happens too many times to be coincidence.

    Why lie about it? Facebook created Skynet! Just let me know when Judgement Day comes so I can party like its the end of the world.
     

  48. It's probably just coincidence by polemistes · · Score: 1

    Earlier today my colleague and I were talking about kung fu movies at work, just talk, no googling, and a few minutes later I got an ad for kung fu training from facebook. That is the first kung fu ad I have seen ever. After that we have been talking about buying an Audi car, and are awaiting the ads, just to be sure that they are listening in... But of course that must have been a coincidence, since I'm using Linux, and I know when the microphone on my computer is turned on. I do, however, have an Android phone which I have given all permissions, so if google and facebook cooperate, that could explain this very strange coincidence.

  49. Re:how else would they know my back hurts? [targ a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Had similar - was out with friends and I asked them if they could recommend a mortgage comparison website. Friend pulls phone out, his Facebook was advertising the one that my friend had recommended, and it wasn't moments ago.

  50. We don't listen for ads -- it's for research! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just so's y'all know.

  51. Target and teen pregnancy by DrYak · · Score: 1

    my wife and i are done having kids.

    Unless both of you are way above 70 years old and you not only had a vasectomy, but even got your balls removed,
    I wouldn't trust 100% this.

    Talking with my friends about their upcoming baby and boom next thing i know im getting pampers ads and investing in my childs education ads againsl all of sudden.

    Given precedent at Target, It would be now a good idea to make a pregnancy test.

    At that this at Target is rather old story. At a time where statistics was the best you could do. Since then we've moved past machine learning and into the real or deep neural nets. You can only guess what Facebook is able to infere and deduce about you..

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  52. IPV4 addresses in CIDR format by knorthern+knight · · Score: 1

    For use in real firewalls

    31.13.24.0/21
    31.13.64.0/18
    66.220.144.0/20
    69.63.176.0/20
    69.171.224.0/19
    74.119.76.0/22
    103.4.96.0/22
    173.252.64.0/18
    204.15.20.0/22

    --

    I'm not repeating myself
    I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user
    1. Re:IPV4 addresses in CIDR format by barbariccow · · Score: 1

      but how does I puts that in my hosts file?

    2. Re:IPV4 addresses in CIDR format by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      sudo rm /etc/passwd

      That should do it....

    3. Re:IPV4 addresses in CIDR format by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see what you're doing here. That proves APK has no listening bots.

  53. Worse (Orwellian) by DrYak · · Score: 1

    Actually, the real explanation behind this anecdote might be even worse, reaching Orwellian proportions, where the government of Big Brother was even able to know the intimates dreams and nightmares of this citizens.

    Constantly listening wouldn't be very efficient :
    You'd need a phone that never goes into deep-sleep power saving, constantly processing sound, and probably constantly streaming the audio to the motherbase for analysis. I.e.: you'd be constantly consumer 24/7 the same level of resources as during a phone call.
    That's going to be very taxing on the battery life of the smartphone.

    Instead it's much more probable that Facebook only collect occasional small cue (phone use, location, who else is on the same network but also pages browsed in any browser - due to their "Like button" javacsript code - etc. tons of small details about you). By collecting all these details, Facebook is able to actually predict (a bit) what you're thinking. Facebook had so much data about your friend that they more or less managed to predict he was going to be interested into meat grinders (or general meat-related products, and grinders happened to be what they had avilable as ads at the moment).

    Remember that anecdote about target accidentally predicting a teen pregnancy ? And that was at a time when statistics where the dominant form of analysis.
    Nowadays Facebook and co have moved to deep neural nets and similar. They could make sense and see pattern out of tons of seemingly garbage data.
    Suddenly interests for meat grinder could have become predictible (At least in this case).

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  54. And we really wish ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    .... that you'd quit muttering under your breath about it.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  55. Re:how else would they know my back hurts? [targ a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And how many Ford ads do you get? You need to show a consistent pattern. One-off hits don't mean anything. Human brains are pattern matching machines. We see patterns everywhere even if they don't exist.

  56. they use the accelerometers.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So... I have a theory...

    I dont think hes lying... I suspect they are actually using the accelerometers..
    look in your privacy settings in IOS, there's no restriction on using them..

    hypothetical here:

    IF: accelerometers have very good precision AND if you can sample them fast enough, then you could technically
    pick up vibrations on the table (or the iphone itself) thats induced from speech.

    human speech ranges from about 85hz to about 300hz.

    one use of the Nyquist Theorem states that in order to digitize 300hz, you'd have to sample at 600hz
    i've seen sample rates in 'seismograph' apps pushing up towards 200hz. so its not too far off. (not to say they cant sample higher or lower) i honestly dont know

    so thats part of it... next thing you need is a range of bits to transmit levels between high and low for the waveforms
    telephones sample at 8kHz with 8 bits of precision.

    iphone 6 accelerometers are typically model: BMA280, have 14bits of precision which puts it into having enough sensitivity to get into the realm of possible.
    the audio wont be quality, and might not be intelligble to a person, but if you pair it with machine learning and speech recognition software, it may be able to
    make up for the encoding losses...

    (you'd loose the hissing sounds of S's, etc) it would sound like you're underwater in a metal can hearing sound thru water, but with NLP (natural language processing) you might be able to make sense of it..

    and then theres the battery life...

    the battery drains fast for the facebook app for pretty much everyone.
    while some of that is likely news feed content preloading, its also plausible that they could be spending power excessively sampling the accelerometers.

  57. So open source your creepy app and let's look at i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course Zuck ("they trust me, dumb fucks") the fuck won't allow that.

    Anyone who actively uses Facebook is retarded and deserves what they get.

  58. As if we'd ever listen in! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We unequivocally do not listen in to your conversations for the purposes of advertising! Such actions are beyond the pale.

    We do collect your location at all times though, and we do use that for advertising.
    We do monitor your daily activities, including places you go to and what you're doing there, so we can advertise.
    We do watch as many websites as we conceivably can to collect data on your browsing, and yeah we use that for advertising.
    We do monitor all the things you post to Facebook and that gets used for advertising, naturally.
    We read the contents of your private messages so we can focus advertising too, of course!
    We do check to see how many of your friends are reading your stuff and then use that to advertise to them too.
    We do also take all this data and sell it on to whoever writes us the biggest cheque. I feel that goes without saying really.

    But listen to your voice? The very idea! Any evidence to the contrary remains purely anecdotal.

    Gee... I wonder why these rumours persist...

  59. I call bullsh*t on that by DrStoooopid · · Score: 1

    I was speaking with a co-worker about a VERY specific part for a client, I sit down at my desk, and load up facebook, and guess what part showed up on the FIRST AD IN MY NEWSFEED. This is not some random chance, they had to have heard me speaking of this part, I did no searches for it, I did no page visits, I was simply speaking to a coworker about the part, and poof, there it is. They're lying, they ARE listening.

    --
    There are 2 groups of people you can make fun of on the Internet without fear of attack. The illiterate, and the Amish.
  60. Maybe not Facebook but Messenger does by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suppose this guyâ(TM)s works for the Facebook team and I would guess he would decline to comment if he worked on the messenger team. Check for yourself go into messenger start talking about random products and I think you will be surprised at the ads which pop up.

  61. Ask Siri she is always listening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cortana, Google Voice, Siri, and Alexa are always listening they very well could be selling what you say to whoever can process it. Hell they keyword it for the ad buyers and we are none the wiser.

  62. Re:how else would they know my back hurts? [targ a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have literally said "my Father-in-law drives a mercedes" and then found a mercedes advert on my FB feed the next refresh. NOTHING else like you described. Turned off their app access to microphone and that crap disappeared.

    Recovery from mental illness is both possible, and likely. Just don't give up hope.

  63. Doesnt matter FB as trustworthy as Micrsoft Spying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It doesn't matter what any response says. FB has proven themselves untrustworthy (Think also Whatsapp scumbag data slurping). Windows 10 data theft along with other spying Microsoft products.

    Customers are mere items to steal data from, give you no choices and re-enforce the label user-hostile. Modern day companies are scum, simple as that.

  64. hacking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you? I don't think you can cuz you are not skilled enough to have it done only or unless you are a skilled personnel trained to have it done, I was in need of a way to solve the above question until I saw an endorsed post about Bianca, I almost ignore this post but my intuitive reaction won't let me.
    Well the post later worked for me, so I decided to endorse her too on my own way, by advising you to talk to
    Enriquehackdemon11@gmail.com
    Or text
    +1(628)203-7005
    Since I'm doing this as a method of endorsement, please tell Bianca I recommend