Slashdot Mirror


Bill Gates Just Bought 25,000 Acres in the Arizona Desert (kgw.com)

What's the world's second-richest man up to now? A Phoenix news station reports: One of Bill Gates' investment firms has spent $80 million to kickstart the development of a brand-new community in Arizona's far West Valley. The large plot of land is about 45 minutes west of downtown Phoenix off I-10 near Tonopah. The proposed community, made up of close to 25,000 acres of land, is called Belmont. According to Belmont Partners, a real estate investment group based in Arizona, the goal is to turn the land into its own "smart city."

"Belmont will create a forward-thinking community with a communication and infrastructure spine that embraces cutting-edge technology, designed around high-speed digital networks, data centers, new manufacturing technologies and distribution models, autonomous vehicles and autonomous logistics hubs," Belmont Partners said in a news release.

A former columnist for the Phoenix newspaper writes that "Unless Gates plans to turn the land into a preserve, he might want to know a few things that the locals didn't tell him..." First, Arizona doesn't have enough water to continue these kind of developments, no matter what the mouthpieces of the Real Estate Industrial Complex say... Second, climate change poses a clear and present danger to Arizona now. Summers are significantly hotter and lasting longer than a few decades ago. Massive wildfires are common, another new phenomenon. Whether Phoenix will even be inhabitable by mid-century is an open question. Already, it is a man-made environment totally dependent on electricity to power air conditioning and gasoline delivered by vulnerable pipelines. All of which make it questionable whether all the dreamed developments ever get built, much less last long.
"To be fair, wealthy people who were clever in one area -- especially tech -- often think they know a lot about everything," the columnist concludes. "If this is the case here, he might want to study up."

179 of 313 comments (clear)

  1. Arcosanti II, anyone? by Speare · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I grew up in Arizona, and let me tell you, a couple decades ago it was HOT. Like, 122 F in Tucson and Phoenix was not unheard of. Now, it's fairly likely to hit that every year.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arcosanti

    Since the 1950s, people have thought that the cheap land could be tamed and "new ideas" would just blossom out of the goodness in people's hearts. Arcosanti is a great example, but not the only one. Last I saw the place, it had a gift shop where the hippy owners took money selling semi-erotic paintings and charcoal drawings, and invited the young folks to spend some quality time mixing concrete with desert sand... or pose for the artist. There's never going to be an Arcosanti the way it was originally envisioned, or even with a population over 10.

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
    1. Re: Arcosanti II, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I wish an escrow account would be setup where all of these idiots who think Arizona will be inhabitable in our lifetime could put their money behind their stupid words. It would make for a very nice retirement fund when I win the bet.

    2. Re: Arcosanti II, anyone? by XXongo · · Score: 1

      Who's the dullard? The AC post you responded to had a flashing red sarcasm tag 10 feet tall, How did you miss that?

      Because of Poe's law.

    3. Re:Arcosanti II, anyone? by JimSadler · · Score: 2

      Never is a very long time ! I doubt that Bill Gates jumped into this project while being deaf, dumb, blind and stupid. Heat is a challenge as is water supply. I can tell you that Florida is forced to dump billions of gallons of fresh water every year as we simply can not contain our tropical rains. One day some investors may pipe that water to ares that need it. My local spillway often has to dump 1.5 billion gallons a day and there are many spillways and canals tasked with removal of excess water.

    4. Re: Arcosanti II, anyone? by dougdonovan · · Score: 1

      this news is a week old. welcome to our hood bill.

    5. Re:Arcosanti II, anyone? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Last I saw the place, it had a gift shop where the hippy owners took money selling semi-erotic paintings and charcoal drawings, and invited the young folks to spend some quality time mixing concrete with desert sand... or pose for the artist.

      Sandy mix, buy some pics, or show your bits, nobody visits for free!

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    6. Re:Arcosanti II, anyone? by pfleming · · Score: 1

      There's already a Bellemont, AZ. No one will be confused by a slightly different spelling,

  2. water shortages are bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The naysayment regarding water is dumb. If you have cheap energy, you can either condense water from the air, even at relatively low humidity levels, or you can desalinate seawater. And Arizona DOES have cheap energy, because "solar panels in a desert".

    So this city may be a stupid idea for other reasons, but not because of water shortages.

    1. Re:water shortages are bullshit by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      So this city may be a stupid idea for other reasons, but not because of water shortages.

      Just envisioning a city designed around data storage and computing in the middle of a desert - that's grade A retardation unless he has some new computer chip which doesn't convert 99.99% of the energy put into it directly into heat or has a much much higher flops:W than we have now.

    2. Re:water shortages are bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Looks like all that time I spent learning the binary language of moisture vaporators is finally going to come in pay off.

    3. Re:water shortages are bullshit by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The naysayment regarding water is dumb.

      It is also dumb for another reason: 90% of the water in Phoenix goes to water lawns. So just build the new city without grass, and use xeriscaping instead. Problem solved.

    4. Re:water shortages are bullshit by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2

      Hahaha. Good luck.

      First, one of the reasons Arizona is hot is because it is dry. There is less moisture to be had from the air than in, say, the Olympic Peninsula.

      Solar stills are not very efficient in desert conditions. Their use as a method of even emergency survival in a desert area is discouraged because it takes more energy to build enough stills and time to build them than it is worth. You'll likely die of thirst in the interim.

      To get anything like the amount of water for a large community, you would need large facilities and possibly more land area than the community itself.

    5. Re:water shortages are bullshit by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Or not-scaping.

      The plants used in xeriscaping can save water, but they don't supply any significant amount.

      Dust and gravel works too. But I kind of doubt that's what Gates had in mind.

    6. Re:water shortages are bullshit by blindseer · · Score: 1

      Looks like all that time I spent learning the binary language of moisture vaporators is finally going to come in pay off.

      Now all you need is a scrawny and whiny teenager that knows how to swap out bad motivators in maintenance driods.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    7. Re:water shortages are bullshit by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      Plenty of solar power to cool everything down. If you build the data center in a cooler climate, you still have to cool quite a bit but you may have long periods without solar. You may actually be better off with a reliably scorching hot sun powering A/C.

      Water is probably the bigger problem, I think the GP is being overly optimistic, I would like to see a system that condenses enough water from the desert air to feed a small city. Not saying it can't be done, but I'd like to see it first.

    8. Re:water shortages are bullshit by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If Los Angeles could produce its own water by desalination, inland areas would be able to retain the water we are now sending them. But until that happens each state on the Colorado River gets a specific annual allocation of the water in it. The Phoenix metro area has a local supply of mountain drainage, but Arizona law requires that any new development prove out a 100-year supply of water before it can be built. Water is the limiting factor for any development in this state.

      Energy will not be a problem. The area gets over 300 days of hard clean sunlight a year, and is next to a large nuclear plant. But Gates is going to have to change the name. There is already a Bellemont on I-40 in the mountains, a large new residential development near Flagstaff.

    9. Re:water shortages are bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What good is a desalination plant 100+ miles from the ocean?

    10. Re:water shortages are bullshit by sg_oneill · · Score: 1

      If you have cheap energy ..[a wizard will fix it]

      Where does this "cheap energy" come from? Extracting water from the air, desalination, and so on are all energy expensive operations. Like, really expensive. Its pretty clear theres no such thing as "cheap energy" anymore, not on the old scales, since carbon based fuels logically have to be phased out sooner rather than later. And all the other options, Nuclear, Solar, or Wind , are not "cheap" at all.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    11. Re:water shortages are bullshit by tburkhol · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Everyone's got an argument where 'plenty of solar power' solves each of the myriad problems of living in a sun-baked desert. The far easier solution is not to live in a sun baked desert.

      Location is still the most important consideration in sustainable development, because the annual energy cost of living is proportional to how far the temperature is from 70 oF. Everything after that is just mitigating the cost of the environment you've chosen. We could live in a comfortable area, or we could install a big power plant to make it comfortable. We could live somewhere with reliable access to clean water, or we could install a big power plant to harvest, purify, or import water. We could live somewhere with easy transportation, or we could install a big power plant to knock down mountains and catapult goods from 1000 miles away.

      Just because your big power plant is solar, doesn't prevent it being wasteful.

    12. Re:water shortages are bullshit by Migraineman · · Score: 2

      Just put the desal plant on one of Arizona's coastal regions, then use the abundant solar power to run the pumps. Distance problem solved!

    13. Re:water shortages are bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's even more of a reason to start developing a city like this. Where are you going to find 70 degree weather to live in anymore? Most of the desirable areas are already overpopulated and not affordable for most people. Just because it's not 100% efficient, doesn't mean it should not be pursued.

    14. Re:water shortages are bullshit by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 3, Funny

      Water is probably the bigger problem, I think the GP is being overly optimistic, I would like to see a system that condenses enough water from the desert air to feed a small city. Not saying it can't be done, but I'd like to see it first.

      I know a place that condensed so much water from the air that in the end they flooded the entire place. There's a bad side to this story though, the place was full of warlords fighting for a spice of some kind.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    15. Re:water shortages are bullshit by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Now all you need is a scrawny and whiny teenager that knows how to swap out bad motivators in maintenance driods.

      And hopefully he'll get a droid that knows enough about languages that it can fix your posts.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    16. Re:water shortages are bullshit by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      The plants used in xeriscaping can save water, but they don't supply any significant amount.

      What do you mean by "they don't supply any significant amount"? As if lawns are supplying any water on their own?

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    17. Re:water shortages are bullshit by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      My dehumidifier will produce 40L of water/day. In a very humid environment with about 20kwh of energy. ~0.5kwh/L is very poor performance no matter how cheap energy is.

    18. Re:water shortages are bullshit by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Everyone's got an argument where 'plenty of solar power' solves each of the myriad problems of living in a sun-baked desert. The far easier solution is not to live in a sun baked desert.

      Humans really like temperatures around 70 F/21 C. Solar power in the desert doesn't work very well unless there is water to evaporate. There you tend to need the "swamp cooler" type AC.

      I'm a big fan of solar power. But to provide cooling in the desert, it's best use is being under the panels in the shade they throw.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    19. Re:water shortages are bullshit by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Water is probably the bigger problem, I think the GP is being overly optimistic, I would like to see a system that condenses enough water from the desert air to feed a small city. Not saying it can't be done, but I'd like to see it first.

      I know a place that condensed so much water from the air that in the end they flooded the entire place. There's a bad side to this story though, the place was full of warlords fighting for a spice of some kind.

      Sounds like the Poppy growers in Afghanistan.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    20. Re:water shortages are bullshit by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      from 70 oF

      As you become acclimatized, this number goes up. We used to cool our house down to 84F, 29C, and it seemed normal. And as the population ages, old people prefer warmer temps.

    21. Re:water shortages are bullshit by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      It is also dumb for another reason: 90% of the water in Phoenix goes to water lawns. So just build the new city without grass, and use xeriscaping instead. Problem solved.

      Because people like their lawns, and their golf courses and fountains and ponds and swimming pools and daily showers.

      It's the "I want it all" syndrome. Make the people exist in the actual environment, and with the actual amount of water that the environment provides, and the number of people that select to live there will plummet. Here in the green rainy northeast, we hardly think about water until it reaches flood stage.But that's why the predominant color is green. But it gets uncomfortably humid in the summer, and cold in the winter, so some folks want to move to the warm places. But they still want the good stuff which takes water. And they sure as hell don't want that 120 degree summer temperature, so they spend their days in the house using the swamp cooler. which takes water.

      If the desert was easy for a lot of people to live in comfortably, there would be a lot of people living there already in the native conditions.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    22. Re:water shortages are bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not quite the solution you're looking for.

      The naysayers aren't smart enough to know what a "smart city" would look like. A desert-based smart city would probably have condensers to pull moisture out of the air at night and inside air conditioning, treat it, and use it for drinking water, while other things like baths and toilets would use non-potable water that is recycled.

      The initial period of time might require importing water, but after that, you just don't have stupid uses of water like pools and hot tubs, particularly outside.

      That is just one thing to consider.

      Another thing to consider is don't make a 25,000 Acre city, make a 25,000 acre building. Think "Tokyo-3" from Evangelion, where the actual smaller buildings are elevated or rotated covered with solar panels, so that they make the most efficient use of sunlight. If a building is too hot, it can be sent back underground to cool down.

      But I somehow doubt we will see anything really smart at all. It will be yet another concept city where everyone lives in a single family home and has to be driven to a central place to work. Wasteful.

    23. Re:water shortages are bullshit by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      Lawns have significantly decreased from when I was a kid. I remember an editorial cartoon concerning influx of people from Michigan (kinda like Californication of today) with and old guy watering some cactus captioned, We'll have this place looking like Michigan in no time

    24. Re:water shortages are bullshit by stabiesoft · · Score: 2

      Given that when I lived in Tucson the house was cooled by evaporating water (they are called swamp coolers) and the house had no A/C, I just don't see squeezing enough water out of the air to be worth it even with free energy. I think it was like 6-8% relative humidity. There is a reason Tucson has a giant airfield for mothballing thousands of old Air Force planes.

    25. Re:water shortages are bullshit by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Human body temperature is 100F/37C.
      Both in summer as in winter 70/21 is to cold for me.

      I actualy avoid AC like a plague, I can not understand why people cool down houses/offices so far that you need to wear a suit to be able to tollerate it.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    26. Re:water shortages are bullshit by rnturn · · Score: 1

      Ah... but do you know of a real place that's done this? Fictional places don't make very good examples. I hope you were kidding around.

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    27. Re: water shortages are bullshit by mikael · · Score: 2

      The great lakes are polluted with mercury and other heavy elements used from wood harvesting and heavy industry. Effectively the equivalent of that green stuff from a Doom level.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    28. Re:water shortages are bullshit by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      That's even more of a reason to start developing a city like this. Where are you going to find 70 degree weather to live in anymore? Most of the desirable areas are already overpopulated and not affordable for most people. Just because it's not 100% efficient, doesn't mean it should not be pursued.

      Why 70 degrees? If you're goal is a city based entirely on computing power then put it in Alaska. Wind can work just as well as solar there and your cooling costs are limited to a fan.

    29. Re:water shortages are bullshit by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Human body temperature is 100F/37C. Both in summer as in winter 70/21 is to cold for me.

      I actualy avoid AC like a plague, I can not understand why people cool down houses/offices so far that you need to wear a suit to be able to tollerate it.

      My SO likes the temps at least 75, I can't stand anything over 70. There is a fellow I know, who is around 75 years old, and he keeps his place at 85 degrees. I'm always amazed at the different Range of temps that people prefer.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    30. Re:water shortages are bullshit by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I've not kept up to date with the current state of the art in photovoltaics, but when did solar cells start requiring water in their sunlight->electricity conversion process?

      I should have phrased that better.

      Solar provided electricity - or any electricity doesn't do crap for AC in arid environments unless there is water to use in the process. Here in the humid Northeast, we use compressor AC because it works better the higher the humidity.

      In the desert, with little humidity to remove, the AC of choice is called the swamp cooler, which relies on the evaporation of water to cool the air. But you have to have water to evaporate to cool the air.

      It isn't the electricity, it's the impending lack of water,

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    31. Re: water shortages are bullshit by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      In the modern world a/c uses ammonium for heart Transfer. Closed Loop.

      Are you saying that this works in arid environments?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    32. Re:water shortages are bullshit by guruevi · · Score: 1

      In the desert, you need cooling.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    33. Re:water shortages are bullshit by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Well,
      I'm comfortable in a wide range, but ofc I adjust clothing. However in summer I find it absurd to wear clothing, that is suited for outside, and need extra warm clothing for inside, because it is to cold inisde.
      My GF in Thailand is coling down her car to minimum, something between 16-18C. I even got a bladder infection because I litteraly freeze my ass off.
      On top of that inside, they use AC, only cooled down to about 20C but then they have fans everywhere.
      There is nothing worse for me than cold air flow, I really hate it :P

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    34. Re:water shortages are bullshit by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It's to cold? What is it from?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    35. Re:water shortages are bullshit by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      I lived in Arizona for six months, more than 20 years ago. I don't remember having to fill up the A/C with water, and it wasn't connected to a water feed either. Don't they use some kind of refrigerant gas that's easy to liquefy and that just goes through the system in a closed loop? Surely you can cool things without any water involved?

      The air conditioning in an airplane certainly doesn't use any water. They are noisy as hell, but all they do is compress air (so it heats up), send it through a heat exchanger to cool it down, then let it expand again so it cools down below ambient temperatures. No water needed.

      Sure, a heat exchanger can be made more efficient by spraying water onto it, but it's not a necessity.

    36. Re:water shortages are bullshit by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      We were talking about AC.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    37. Re: water shortages are bullshit by swillden · · Score: 1

      In the modern world a/c uses ammonium for heart Transfer. Closed Loop.

      Are you saying that this works in arid environments?

      Refrigerated air conditioning not only works fine in arid environments, it works more efficiently than in humid environments, because much less energy is spent chilling water that condenses out of the air and is discarded. Swamp coolers also work very well in arid environments (and don't work at all in humid environments).

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    38. Re:water shortages are bullshit by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      True, if he can get a Certificate of Assured Water Supply (CAWS), He can use the water for a new community. If not, well, even drilling his own wells is a problem.

      And energy could be solar, but that has its own environmental costs. No one wants to contemplate those.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    39. Re:water shortages are bullshit by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      The key there is that Swamp Cooling is the AC of choice because it has traditionally been cheaper to install, operate, and maintain than heat pumps. As fresh water becomes more scarce it is conceivable that they would no longer be viewed as economically viable. Heat pumps work just fine in the desert just not as efficiently as they do elsewhere.

      The other thing that could really help is to require new construction, and remodels, to implement much better insulation and design practices. I spent a few months once in a desert sitting in a steel box with large thick windows. There was a generator with an AC unit attached that ran from sun up to sun down, and managed to keep the inside of the box in the mid 80's. It would seem that a lot of people give more thought to how their home looks than how it performs.

  3. We'll see... by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 5, Insightful

    According to Belmont Partners, a real estate investment group based in Arizona, the goal is to turn the land into its own "smart city."

    I'm really interested in how they plan to deal with the water issue, it seems like a show-stopper. Maybe they can build something to recover water from the dry arid air - because otherwise they're going to have to pipe it in, and the Colorado River is already over used... They must have considered this issue when they bought the dry desert land...

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:We'll see... by tlhIngan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm really interested in how they plan to deal with the water issue, it seems like a show-stopper. Maybe they can build something to recover water from the dry arid air - because otherwise they're going to have to pipe it in, and the Colorado River is already over used... They must have considered this issue when they bought the dry desert land...

      Or you use water smartly and not waste it. Sure you have to truck some in now and again, but if they're envisioning a next-generation "smart city", smart water use would also be a part of it.

      Our daily lives we waste enough water to make any third world country cry. Watering lawns is practically a complete waste of water unless you are using it wisely as a filter medium for example.

      Lots of sunlight also means cheap solar stills for water purification.

      And I'm sure Gates has considered the water issue. In fact, he may have bought it because of that - with climate changing, the real issue IS going to be access to water. (We are relatively fortunate in North America as we have almost half of the world's reserve of freshwater).

      It could be a very smart play - get the technology used to recycle and conserve water working now, so when its really needed, you've just cornered the market in patents, and the technology has matured to be usable, while everyone else is scrambling to find fixes.

    2. Re:We'll see... by naughtynaughty · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Perhaps they'll produce enough reliable power to offset some of the production of the nearby Palo Verde nuclear power plant that consumes as much as 20 millions of gallons of water per day.

    3. Re:We'll see... by amorsen · · Score: 2

      Desert air is generally quite wet, in an absolute sense. In a relative sense it's low humidity, because warm air holds so much water. But cool it down to 5C and you'll see quite a lot of water precipitate out of it.

      I did a quick Googling, and Phoenix apparently has quite high relative humidity in summer, whereas it is lower in spring and autumn. This is handy, as that means the water extraction has lots of humidity available right when solar panels are at peak output.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    4. Re:We'll see... by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      And I'm sure Gates has considered the water issue. In fact, he may have bought it because of that - with climate changing, the real issue IS going to be access to water. (We are relatively fortunate in North America as we have almost half of the world's reserve of freshwater).

      Perhaps Gates already *has* AI (or has used his money/power for either/or bribes/research to find out) and it looked at climate change and predicted, as the Sahara has been similarly predicted, that it will become "green". Maybe not rain forest levels or tropical/sub-tropical ranges, but dramatically higher average rainfall averages than current.

      Maybe Gates (or his estate/successors) will become even richer selling excess rain water to California/LA, etc, while simultaneously reaping profit and accolades for helping to mitigate dangerous flooding in the newly-verdant Arizona by already having significant rain collecting/flood control technology, systems, and infrastructure already in place!

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    5. Re:We'll see... by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 4, Informative

      Extracting water from the air would only work at all during summer monsoon, which is from early July through early September. The rest of the year, the air is so dry that the adjacent nuclear plant is the only nuke in the world that uses desert air as a heat sink, rather than a large body of water. It gets a boost from Phoenix municipal sewage.

    6. Re:We'll see... by Kaenneth · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I don't get why people assume that 'global warming' means 'desert'

      Jungles are hot as well.

    7. Re:We'll see... by currently_awake · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Build underground. The insulation from the sand makes it cheap to temperature regulate, and you capture the evaporation and runoff from your plants and lawns.

    8. Re:We'll see... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      It's a self-enforcing gated community

      A community with Gates? Duh. Of course it is.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    9. Re:We'll see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How is this insightful??

      The water is not 'consumed' it's used to cool the secondary loop. There's no radiation in that section and the water doesn't evaporate instantly into the air.

      Once the water goes through the cooling section its still there. It hasn't disappeared.

    10. Re:We'll see... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      I'm really interested in how they plan to deal with the water issue, it seems like a show-stopper. Maybe they can build something to recover water from the dry arid air - because otherwise they're going to have to pipe it in, and the Colorado River is already over used... They must have considered this issue when they bought the dry desert land...

      They aren't going to be able to do that, and there are some presumed cheap ways to extract water from the air, but they just cannot provide enough water on a city scale. If this smart city is to live within the desert conditions, and not just be another drain on the overwhelmed Colorado river, people there will have to learn to exist in some pretty hot temperatures in the daytime,cold at night, a massive reduction in the number of showers that Americans are used to, extreme water conservation, and a standard of living that will keep most of us away. The only thing missing will be the spice.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    11. Re:We'll see... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      Or you use water smartly and not waste it. Sure you have to truck some in now and again, but if they're envisioning a next-generation "smart city", smart water use would also be a part of it.

      But most people don't want to conserve in that manner.

      Our daily lives we waste enough water to make any third world country cry. Watering lawns is practically a complete waste of water unless you are using it wisely as a filter medium for example.

      It depends on where you are located. Here in the rainy Northeast, we worry a hella lot more about floods than we do about running out of water. I water my lawn, and it doesn't make a difference. No one is harmed, and no one goes without. There is no point in conserving water unless we are experiencing a rare drought.

      And since it isn't practical to pipe it to the places where water is in short supply, we might as well just use it

      Lots of sunlight also means cheap solar stills for water purification.

      And I'm sure Gates has considered the water issue. In fact, he may have bought it because of that - with climate changing, the real issue IS going to be access to water.

      And those solar stills aren't going to supply enough water for a city unless all the water is going to sustain life and precious little else-at best. The Dune books and their stillsuits make fascinating reading, but it's hard to imagine most people dealing with the problem.

      (We are relatively fortunate in North America as we have almost half of the world's reserve of freshwater).

      It could be a very smart play - get the technology used to recycle and conserve water working now, so when its really needed, you've just cornered the market in patents, and the technology has matured to be usable, while everyone else is scrambling to find fixes.

      Or people could just live where the basics to sustain life already are. Here in the Northeast, we don't have to worry about dying if the solar still quits working.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    12. Re:We'll see... by fermion · · Score: 1

      Certainly they can get unlimited electric with solar panels. If you never want to go outside, and can afford a plane to Santa Fe, it would not be a bad life. For household use they can basically make water if they want to pay enough. My concern would be manufacturing, which is a stated goal, and requires vast amount of cheap water. I can imagine that if they were just mining bitcoin this would be a good setup.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    13. Re:We'll see... by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      it isn't practical to pipe it to the places where water is in short supply

      Well, we just have to set the autopilot on our nuclear powered tunnel boring machines, send them off, wait a few years, and *voila!*, instant pipeline from the Pacific to the Atlantic

      Or people could just live where the basics to sustain life already are.

      One of the cool things about being human is being able to live wherever we want. We have solved all distribution problems during world war 2. All shortages these days are only caused by a disagreement over the price.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    14. Re: We'll see... by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      I see you attempting some kind of sarcasm, but you failed miserably. Everything you wrote is literally true. Everything he has ever done has been about his personal wealth. That hasn't changed just became he also seeks ways to do that which make him *appear* to be a philanthropist of some kind.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    15. Re:We'll see... by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      California's water problem is not one so much of supply though. Allocation is the problem. Thanks to a ridiculous hodgepodge of "water rights" laws dating back over a century and a half; a single industry, agriculture, is allowed to use... mostly for free and often for wasteful flood and spray irrigation... 80% of the state's water supply while contributing only 2% of the state's economic output. Every other industry plus all the households have to fight for what's left; paying increasing rates and accepting usage restrictions.

      Reforming the laws, such that all users pay a fair rate based on availability and production, storage, and transport costs... along with a ban on revoltingly wasteful practices like spray and floor irrigation, in favor of modern drip systems... would solve the problem for decades to come, even if no additional supplies were brought online. Of course the agriculture companies fight tooth-and-nail every time this is proposed. They like their feee ride, and they have heretofore had enough sway in Sacramento to torpedo such efforts. But California does have the advantage of the ballot initiative system. So if the water situation continues for too long, or worsens, and the people get too upset. Well... 2% vs 98% and with the majority of the people NOT being in the 2% industry; BigAg could very well find themselves on a shorter end of the stick than if they embrace good-faith reform.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    16. Re:We'll see... by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      ...Palo Verde nuclear power plant that consumes as much as 20 millions of gallons of water per day.

      Consumes? What do they turn it into?

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    17. Re:We'll see... by amorsen · · Score: 1

      Consumes, yes. The water is turned into steam.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    18. Re:We'll see... by amorsen · · Score: 1

      Showers with built-in water recycling exist commercially already. They are just expensive. Then you can pretty much have as many showers as you want.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    19. Re: We'll see... by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      Everything he has ever done has been about his personal wealth. That hasn't changed just became he also seeks ways to do that which make him *appear* to be a philanthropist of some kind.

      If the default state is Gates not helping any groups, causes, or creating/funding new things, why is it a problem if he makes a profit when he voluntarily chooses to use his wealth & position to do so? And, if he's helping/creating wouldn't that 'profit' be simply mitigating the costs of helping, as surely many if not most of Gates' various projects don't see black ink on the ledgers, ever.

      Of course, the devil's in the details so more & more-specific data is needed, but I don't see a problem on general principle.

      I mean, the guy doesn't have to bother in the first place. At all. With anyone or anything for the most part. Not with that much money. He could seclude himself in a "Dr. Evil Headquarters" in some dormant volcano somewhere Howard-Hughes-style with truckloads of blow and hot-and-cold running hookers and have it all, including his wealth, "blow up" when he died without helping anyone.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    20. Re:We'll see... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      All shortages these days are only caused by a disagreement over the price.

      That is kinda important. Even more important is the will to allow the import, and in the end, availability.

      The western States have sucked the Colorado River dry. There's no wiggle room.

      So now, Cali is looking toward Oregon to tap into the Columbia River. There has even been dreams of diverting Great Lakes water to the west. For some reason, the people in those areas are not terribly excited about the idea. And now they are talking about getting water from Alaska.

      So these people have looked at what we did to the Colorado River https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... and say they want no part of shipping their water off to the Southwest to water lawns and golf courses, build fountains, and grow almonds. http://www.motherjones.com/env...

      Yet we grow Most of those crops mentioned in the Mother Jones article here in the Northeast (almond and Pistachio excluded) with no irrigation at all.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  4. pot, meet kettle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You know who was never clever in any area but still thinks he knows a lot about everything? Reporters.

    1. Re:pot, meet kettle by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      You know who was never clever in any area but still thinks he knows a lot about everything? Reporters.

      Journalists are trained to give us Pulitzer-winning coverage of political scandals. They are piss-poor at developing any sort of science/technology story.

  5. ENERGY dependence? by Bruce66423 · · Score: 2

    "Already, it is a man-made environment totally dependent on electricity to power air conditioning and gasoline delivered by vulnerable pipelines."

    Those really aren't the issues if photovoltaic cells get as good as they are on course to. Will they even bother to go on the grid for electricity? The real issue is water.

    1. Re:ENERGY dependence? by Gussington · · Score: 1

      "Already, it is a man-made environment totally dependent on electricity to power air conditioning and gasoline delivered by vulnerable pipelines."

      Those really aren't the issues if photovoltaic cells get as good as they are on course to. Will they even bother to go on the grid for electricity? The real issue is water.

      There's a whole ocean of water that can be used for drinking water if you've got a lot of free or cheap electricity. Just add some pipes and a desal plant.
      Cheap energy pretty much makes every other problem easy.

    2. Re:ENERGY dependence? by amorsen · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I just checked, Arizona is landlocked. If desalination was the plan, surely it would make sense to move the project closer to the ocean?

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    3. Re:ENERGY dependence? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      There's a whole ocean of water

      Not near Arizona. Or did the San Andreas do the big one while I was out?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    4. Re:ENERGY dependence? by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      I just checked, Arizona is landlocked. If desalination was the plan, surely it would make sense to move the project closer to the ocean?

      Dude, remember the rising oceans? Gates bought beach front property, just 100 years from now.

    5. Re:ENERGY dependence? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Maybe his plan is to buy large amounts of land in the interior and then nuke the coast with hijacked ICBMs to move the coast?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    6. Re:ENERGY dependence? by Gussington · · Score: 1

      I just checked, Arizona is landlocked. If desalination was the plan, surely it would make sense to move the project closer to the ocean?

      Because pipes aren't a thing?
      Pipes are also cheaper than ocean front real estate.

    7. Re:ENERGY dependence? by Gussington · · Score: 1

      There's a whole ocean of water

      Not near Arizona.

      What is you definition of 'near'? There's no oil wells near New York yet someone built petrol stations there...

    8. Re:ENERGY dependence? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Does your average New Yorker use 100 gallons of a petrol per day?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    9. Re:ENERGY dependence? by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Does your average New Yorker use 100 gallons of a petrol per day?

      Does Bill's new town plan on having 20 million people in it?
      The point is, whatever problem you can think of, money and cheap energy can probably solve it.

  6. It's the freeway by stoolpigeon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They bought the land to develop because a big freeway is supposed to go right through the middle. They'll extort the state for a ton of money, make a huge amount of profit and then exit before the community is fully done. So the long term viability of the site is irrelevant.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    1. Re:It's the freeway by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      A big freeway which is not yet funded, that is. And in Trump's America, there seems to be little motivation to spend money on anything that will improve the country. But maybe Gates knows something we don't about that?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re: It's the freeway by Kaenneth · · Score: 2

      So, pork projects and tax increases or deficit spending.

      I thought Republicans wanted smaller federal government?

      Sounds like Trump played you like a fiddle to enrich his cronies.

  7. Bates by tquasar · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Bill must think of the desert as an empty sandbox for him to play in, but there is a vibrant community already there in the plants and animals that have evolved to survive in the climate and terrain . Use the google, there's a website about it: https://www.desertusa.com/. What knowledge will be lost about the Anasazi and Sinagua people? I've walked on pre-Columbian trails where people migrated from the hot Colorado desert to the cool Laguna and Palomar mountains as the seasons changed.

    1. Re:Bates by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      Are you saying that the desert is an ocean with its life underground and a perfect disguise above?

      I thought it was the other way round.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:Bates by tquasar · · Score: 1

      There is life above and below ground. I saw a desert tortoise crawling over rocks then disappear into a burro in the ground. I wondered how long it took to excavate the hole in the ground. I found an empty shell I considered taking but hung it from tree branch instead. Some plants are pollinated by birds, others by moths. There was a rattlesnake laying in the little shade provided by an ocotillo plant. I stepped away and continued my hike.

    3. Re:Bates by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      The rabbit went into a donkey? I won't ask which end.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  8. Nukes? by John+Da'+Baddest · · Score: 1

    Maybe he's looking for a site to build one of his new reactor gadgets?

    http://terrapower.com/updates

    1. Re:Nukes? by blindseer · · Score: 1

      If Gates and company can show off a nuclear reactor that can operate without water in the Arizona desert heat then he will be a very rich man... I mean richer than he already is.

      There are already plans for reactors that can run without water. In fact the lack of water is their greatest safety feature. When exposed to heat and radiation water likes to boil, corrode metals, separate into its constituent elements, and sometimes all three at the same time... very rapidly... and then explode.

      A molten salt reactor, which is one thing TerraPower is working on, operates at high temperatures. Temperatures high enough that desert heat won't bother it.

      If that's part of the plan then we'll hear about it, the federal government frowns on unlicensed reactors under their jurisdiction.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    2. Re:Nukes? by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If that's part of the plan then we'll hear about it, the federal government frowns on unlicensed reactors under their jurisdiction.

      That was before Trump handed the keys to the Department of Energy to a guy who wanted to shut the whole department down, if he could only remember its name.

      I say let Gates give it a shot. He can hardly make things worse than they'll be soon enough anyway, given the current bunch of drooling stooges in charge.

    3. Re:Nukes? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      This might be why he chose this particular location. Palo Verde has ample room for expansion, so why not add some of his experimental units to it?

    4. Re:Nukes? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The DOE was created in 1977 - we did pretty well without it up until that time. Interesting to note, too, that the only nuclear power plant emergency we've had - Three Mile Island - happened after the creation of the DOE. Perhaps creating a big, overreaching, overarching Federal Department allows local/regional control to relax because "the Feds got it covered"...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    5. Re:Nukes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "The DOE was created in 1977 - we did pretty well without it up until that time."

      Sigh. Another fucking Libertarian cretin...
      DOE was a reorganization of ERDA, which was a reorganization of the AEC. It raised some three decades of Nuclear Research to the Cabinet level, which was an extremely good thing. It also took most of the Weapons Delivery out of the Research side, and transferred it to the Cabinet level DOD.
      Along the other ongoing realignments, the Nuclear Industry now reported to the NRC, which was not at Cabinet level.
      DOE had nothing to do with the US Industrial mess that was Three Mile Island. The DOE shares some responsibility for some Research Reactors with the NRC, that's all.
      Research Reactors and other aspects of Physics Research were not the only areas of DOE concern. It's the Department Of Energy, all Energy, you myopic mosquito. That includes Nuclear, Solar, Petrochemical/Coal, Wind, Renewable, and a few dozen things that you've never thought of and would never comprehend if you did. Yes, they inherited the responsibility for the Nation's Nuclear Stockpile, because frankly nobody else could be trusted with it. Oh, and it's no coincidence that DOD tilts Right, NRC is Business Friendly, and much of DOE tilts Left. Very bright people tend to be cautious Liberals, which is why Perry and his lapdogs wanted the DOE abolished, and because they are relative blundering idiots, had no idea what to replace it with.

      Next Generation Reactors, whether Fission or Fusion, are still primarily the responsibility in the US of the DOE, because Industry has utterly failed here. I wish Terrapower well... but they've been around for a decade now and produced nothing but ideas, and in fact are currently surviving on DOE funding.
      Should they get more funding? Perhaps. But that means giving the DOE more funding, which is anathema to the turd currently serving as DOE Secretary. He wants more money for Oil and Coal only.

    6. Re:Nukes? by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

      It's completely irrelevant when the DOE was created, or by whom. What's relevant is that it is the agency currently responsible for matters pertaining to the management, utilization, and disposition of nukular stuff.

      Point is, the Trump administration wants to destroy things they don't even understand. This is not a good position for any political party or candidate to adopt.

  9. What is this shit? by Gussington · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "To be fair, wealthy people who were clever in one area -- especially tech -- often think they know a lot about everything,"
    Unlike say columnists?
    C'mon, I'm sure Bill didn't just smoke a blunt and decide to go build a new city in the desert. You can bet there's a ton of experts involved who have already thought about whatever it is Mr Columnist or Mr Forum poster thinks and then some. Because that's the thing with smart people, they think about all the things you think about, plus some more.
    Why did we need this ignorant opinion in the summary? It only serves to dumb down the real story which could be something really interesting.

    1. Re:What is this shit? by blindseer · · Score: 1

      C'mon, I'm sure Bill didn't just smoke a blunt and decide to go build a new city in the desert.

      I'm not so sure. Marijuana is legal in Washington, Arizona, California, and 20+ other states. Maybe one of his buddies shared his blunt while talking about retiring in the desert and Bill took the idea and ran with it. Judging by some of his past projects I suspect mind altering substances were involved in many of them as well.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    2. Re:What is this shit? by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      Plus, we're talking about $80,000,000 here, which is 1/1000th his fortune. It would be like me throwing a few hundred bucks at something.

  10. Lightings anyone ?!? by LordHighExecutioner · · Score: 1

    Given the amount of electronic equipment they are going to install, I would check first issues about lighting protection, soil conductivity, etc.
    From some statistics, although Arizona isn't exactly in the "hottest" place for lightings, in Summers it seems they get a lot of thunderstorms as well. Raising constructions over a flat land could easily change statistics, however.

  11. To be fair... by LetterRip · · Score: 1

    To be fair - technologists nearly always know a hell of a lot more about whatever the columnist is pretending to be knowledgeable about.

    1. Re: To be fair... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      And it also exceeds the technology of 99% of all homes in the US today, meaning he was a realist as well as a technologist. Someone who showed how to use technology in realistic manners that could be done within 20 to 40 years.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  12. 25,000 acres in the desert? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I know what Bill Gates is planning to do - he's going to build a pyramid for himself.

    Sure, the other guy is richer, but does he have a pyramid? Didn't think so.

  13. Gates' Gulch? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Wonder if this is an escape hideout for when the shit hits the fan?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  14. Energy Independence by mentil · · Score: 1

    Concentrated solar with molten salt storage, plus electric vehicles, could easily produce energy independence for Belmont. Water could be a problem, but if cables are run, they could use some of that electricity to power a desalination plant on the west coast (and pump the water back via pipeline). Given that high-speed internet is a major part of the city, that suggests fiber. Electric lines could be buried underground along with the fiber. Bonus points if there's a hyperloop between Belmont and the Bay Area. The only reasons I can think of this being done in Arizona rather than, say, Nebraska, are proximity to Silicon Valley, and effective solar power.

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    1. Re:Energy Independence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The only reasons I can think of this being done in Arizona rather than, say, Nebraska, are proximity to Silicon Valley, and effective solar power.

      You can grow food on land in Nebraska. We need to stop using land that can grow food just to live on. The land in Nebraska is too valuable. Deserts, preferably underground in deserts, are exactly where we need to be.

      Everything above-ground should be covered with solar cells - even the windows if they bother to have any. Nothing above ground should be absorbing sunlight without converting it to electric. If it can't be converted, reflect it. Make it so cool that the usage of energy within the community is necessary to keep it warm.

  15. Don't worry by TheOuterLinux · · Score: 1

    If the heat doesn't melt everything, the Indian burial ghosts will clean house.

  16. Re:Government by blindseer · · Score: 1

    I'll agree. So many other planned communities failed based on far smaller problems.

    That's one thing that bothered me about some of these planned projects for a new floating nation-state, or some other plan to create some kind of new community, they never considered the basic problem of having an economy. People will need jobs, they need food, and the two kind of go hand in hand.

    Reading the article it sounds like they've figured out a lot of such things. Creating a government will be a problem, especially when the vision for the city is in one person's mind. His vision might quickly come into conflict with how others think things should be run.

    --
    I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
  17. "I hear your vacation to Belmont went poorly." by magusxxx · · Score: 1

    "Well...there was a girl...and a lighthouse..."

    --
    Care killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back.
  18. The Drying of the West by messymerry · · Score: 1

    There was an excellent article in National Geographic called, "The Drying of the West". In it, the author conducted a ring study of the Bristlecone Pines in southern California. These are some of the oldest trees in the world. What was discovered was that the 20th century was the wettest in the last 2000 years. The author(s) argue that conditions in the western United States are returning back to more normal levels of dryness and this could very well be a very very long trend. GOOD LUCK Billy, I know 80 million is peanuts to you, butt I suggest you should look long and hard at "exactly where" your filthy money comes from...

    --
    Dear Microlimp: I give you 2 valid product keys for win7 and you reject both of them. Piss off you wankers!!!
  19. The water knife? by ecotax · · Score: 1

    Maybe he read Paolo Bacigalupi's novel

    --
    "Money is a sign of poverty." - Iain Banks
  20. Musk can help solve the water issue. by BlueCoder · · Score: 1

    If you can just get the water from the pacific ocean to the desert then there should be half a dozen ways to turn it into fresh water with all that dry sun during the day and cold at night. Just having a large enough lake and the ground should filter the salt and replenish some small portion of the ground water that is being sucked dry. Arizona and New Mexico and eastern California could become exporters of clean water. They could also build massive molten salt plants and instead of generating electricity simply dump the heat into the salt water and collect the steam.

  21. Naysayers by nospam007 · · Score: 3, Informative

    "First, Arizona doesn't have enough water to continue these kind of developments,"

    Just if for some reason you want to have lawns around each house, that ship has sailed, not only in Arizona.

    "Summers are significantly hotter and lasting longer than a few decades ago."

    Great! The solar roofs on every house and garage will like that. That's one of the reasons they chose Arizona.

    "Massive wildfires are common, another new phenomenon. "

    That's why they chose the desert, with no trees, no fires.

    "Already, it is a man-made environment totally dependent on electricity to power air conditioning "

    Yes, great for solar and no heating in winter, what's not to like?

    "and gasoline delivered by vulnerable pipelines."

    Gasoline? This is new 21th century, nobody needs gasoline anymore. These people will drive Teslas, not F150s.

    1. Re:Naysayers by whoever57 · · Score: 2

      "Summers are significantly hotter and lasting longer than a few decades ago."

      Great! The solar roofs on every house and garage will like that. That's one of the reasons they chose Arizona.

      Solar panels don't run off heat, they convert sunlight to electricity. As the temperature rises, they become less efficient.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  22. Because columnists are always right... by XSportSeeker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Look, Bill Gates can get a lot of things wrong, that much anyone can tell.
    But quite frankly the smugness of the columnist is quite hillarious, on how stupid someone can be.
    As if he's more equipped to know how Bill's investment will pan out from a very superficial reading, like in comparison to a guy who made his top 3 world fortune position out of a garage upstart and is currently driving one of the most effective and important foundations in the world. Smugness tied to ignorance, good way to show the entire world how much of an idiot you are.

    With the sort or money and power Gates has, he can turn any desolate land into paradise. He could build a tropical paradise out of Antarctica. It's the sort of backing that made places like Las Vegas and Disney.

    Climate change, massive wildfires, hotter summer? Does this guy even know who he's talking about? There's a whole range of ways to make the region profitable.
    And even if he doesn't, people have to understand that the stuff Bill Gates invest on these days are not always running around profit.

    You can hate his Microsoft years and whatnot all you want, and you can throw arguments about tax deductions and whatnot against his foundation all you want, the fact is that there's probably no one else in the world right now investing more on charitable causes. We're talking billions of dollars often on causes that will have no financial return.

    People often don't realize how much he and his foundation did because most of the stuff it's currently investing on are ways to address basic health, hygiene and sanitation problems in the poorest countries, so we don't directly see results as much, but for certain regions in the world his contributions probably advanced things several decades in years time.

    He's not the kinda guy who is gonna be worried about infrastructure problems in an arid region. He's the guy who has the best chances of finding out a way of solving such problems there, and then selling or sharing the knowledge to do the same to other parts of the world.

    1. Re:Because columnists are always right... by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Look, Bill Gates can get a lot of things wrong, that much anyone can tell.
      But quite frankly the smugness of the columnist is quite hillarious, on how stupid someone can be.

      At least it wasn't written by E J Montini, our other Democrat.

  23. Experimentation comes into play by Targon · · Score: 1

    For all of the people seeing the reasons for this to fail, there are other possible motivations that may be at play. First, he may actually put up a dome over the whole place, and there may be some ways to pull in whatever moisture there is in the air at night, though I don't know if it would be nearly enough. The dome solution would help with both the heat and the pure dehydration effects caused by the heat, and might also apply to those who want to see people living on Mars.

    This is all speculation, but too many people think in terms of your typical developers who expect people to just build houses and wonder why it doesn't work. Those with the resources, as well as some vision for the future, may look for ways to deal with climate change, and what better way to experiment than by going into an extreme climate and trying to make things work THERE?

    Then again, experimenting with things like climate change, pump in tons of water from the pacific ocean in a pipeline the way oil is pumped in, and see what happens if you desalinate that water and use it to grow plants and actually try to convert the desert. It may take decades, but that is to be expected if that is attempted.

    1. Re:Experimentation comes into play by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Well, if he really wants to build a city with a dome over it, he should contact someone with experience like the EPA.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  24. So much money by CarterMeyers · · Score: 1

    Supossedly, he has so much money, he can't give it away fast enough... how bout, bill, ya give some to do some good here in the ole usa!

  25. Re:Biosphere by queazocotal · · Score: 1

    Look at the air conditioning requirements of Biosphere II. They were _massive_.

  26. Martin Chuzzlewit by chthon · · Score: 1

    Reminds of Dickens' Martin Chuzzlewit. Now, if Gates plays the role of Martin Chuzzlewit or of Scadder, that is something for you to decide.

  27. Siiiiigh by rmdingler · · Score: 2, Insightful
    As the population of humans on the planet continues to grow, it will becomes increasingly necessary to move into and settle regions previously considered inhospitable.

    Learning to live in new environs is what resourceful life does when it refuses to die and depopulate at the edge of the Petri dish.

    If we cannot figure out how to live (and eventually thrive) in the earthly atmosphere of the Arizona desert with its excessive heat and limited water, off-planet settlements are the dreams that come from pipes.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

    1. Re: Siiiiigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You know this is utter bullshit, right? As our population continues to grow we will eventually have to USE more of he land on Earth, but it doesnâ(TM)t mean cities are going to have to grow up in the desert or tundra. Look at the US, the vast majority of the central part of th country is minimally developed yet FAR easier to live in than the desert or tundra. People can cram into extremely dense communities the problem is food production and raw material sourcing.

    2. Re:Siiiiigh by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      As the population of humans on the planet continues to grow, it will becomes increasingly necessary to move into and settle regions previously considered inhospitable.

      New Jersey is not that bad.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    3. Re:Siiiiigh by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 3, Interesting

      As the population of humans on the planet continues to grow, it will becomes increasingly necessary to move into and settle regions previously considered inhospitable.

      Learning to live in new environs is what resourceful life does when it refuses to die and depopulate at the edge of the Petri dish.

      If we cannot figure out how to live (and eventually thrive) in the earthly atmosphere of the Arizona desert with its excessive heat and limited water, off-planet settlements are the dreams that come from pipes.

      Your first sentence gives the answer for the last sentence. The numbers of humans are what makes it difficult.

      Humans living in arid places has been done for a long time. Some incredible adaptation has occurred in Africa. But that is humans adapting to the local conditions. People have lived in America's southwest deserts as well, perhaps not as acclimated as Bedouins, but they got by. Even in Death Valley.

      The difference is in the numbers. We try to convert the desert to what we think is ideal. We like the grass in our lawns, we like nice water fountains, and we like a lot of people inhabiting these places. This is completely unsustainable.

      Going to Mars, it will be a few people, and probably living in containers like domes or maybe even underground. That isn't comparable to trying to turn the Southwest desert into paradise. 10 or 20 people - possible. Millions? Nope.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    4. Re:Siiiiigh by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 2
      I grew up there. Phoenix is very much thriving, moreso than many places I've seen in my travels.

      I used to hate it growing up there, but now that I'm older, I don't know another place where I'd rather live, except it is becoming very crowded with people moving from more hospitable places to live.

    5. Re:Siiiiigh by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 3, Informative

      As the population of humans on the planet continues to grow, it will becomes increasingly necessary to move into and settle regions previously considered inhospitable.

      New Jersey is not that bad.

      Digressing here, but New Jersey is a state of incredible contrasts. The northern part is "which exit you live at" land, and the one most people think of. Urban AF. Then going south it becomes pine forests and a lot less population density, finally ending in Cape May, which is exceptionally different.

      And in the meantime, they somehow produce enough food to support Chris Christie, and you know that can't be easy.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    6. Re:Siiiiigh by rmdingler · · Score: 2
      You're correct, of course.

      Living on the Space Station, for example, recycling water and testing how our bodies respond to the lack of gravity are much better tests for humans considering off-planet settlements.

      Yet, learning to live within the confines of what the environment is able to provide is not without value. Xeriscaping, rainwater collection, grey water reuse, and Municipally-mandated water restrictions are all the offspring of scarcity. It's not inconceivable that scarcity could lead to more innovative approaches to the fresh water shortage we're destined to endure if the population growth continues unchecked.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    7. Re: Siiiiigh by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      We will terraform Mars. It will be what the first travelers want it to be.

      It will be a constant battle as the solar wind strips the atmosphere away.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    8. Re: Siiiiigh by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      They'll do it at night. Do I have to do all the thinking round here?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    9. Re: Siiiiigh by Wycliffe · · Score: 2

      You know this is utter bullshit, right? As our population continues to grow we will eventually have to USE more of he land on Earth, but it doesnâ(TM)t mean cities are going to have to grow up in the desert or tundra. Look at the US, the vast majority of the central part of th country is minimally developed yet FAR easier to live in than the desert or tundra. People can cram into extremely dense communities the problem is food production and raw material sourcing.

      That's not the point. The point is that it is still FAR FAR easier to live in the desert or the tundra than it is to live on mars. Yeah, Bill Gates could buy a bunch of great farmland but what's the point of that. Just like Bill Gates doesn't need any more money, he doesn't need an easy project. Buying dirt cheap land in the middle of a desert, with lots of free solar, a few minutes outside of a major city and he both gets the challenge of building something out of nothing and possibly even gets the change to increase the value of the land and open up the ability to increase the value of useless land elsewhere.

    10. Re:Siiiiigh by Wycliffe · · Score: 2

      It's not inconceivable that scarcity could lead to more innovative approaches to the fresh water shortage we're destined to endure if the population growth continues unchecked.

      A settlement for humans won't really solve the real problem. Fresh water for humans will never be a problem. We could survive on bottled water. Also, there is plenty of water in the ocean and we have plenty of technology for purifying, and piping the water to where it needs to be. Water is also dirt cheap. Even desalinated water is dirt cheap for human usage. Swimming pools and even lawns are not the problem. The problem is really agriculture. We cannot afford to desalinate water and use that water to water our millions of acres of corn and other crops. We could, but if we did then food would once again become a significant portion of a person's budget instead of the insignificant portion it has become today. Regardless, the fresh water shortage is not a problem. It's more a problem for the environment than for humans. For humans, it's easy enough to get fresh water to where it needs to be.

    11. Re: Siiiiigh by Type44Q · · Score: 2

      Look at the US, the vast majority of the central part of th country is minimally developed yet FAR easier to live in than the desert or tundra.

      Hicks, ticks, fleas, flies, mites, mosquitoes, roaches, leeches, snakes, spiders, humidity, mold, fungus, earthquakes, tornadoes and ice storms... Oklahoma: not fit for human habitation (don't ask me how I know). I'll take the high desert (minimum 7,000' elevation) any day...

    12. Re: Siiiiigh by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 2

      Oh, jersey can be an adventure for sure. I'd just just be an entirely different KIND of adventure.

      "Ding dong, the Christie's fed..."
      "Follow the foul-smelling road..."
      "If I only had a gun..."
      "Crackheads and junkies and bums, oh my!"
      "Just click your heels together and repeat: 'There's no place like SOHO... there's no place like SOHO...'"

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    13. Re: Siiiiigh by mikael · · Score: 1

      Those problems are encountered in Europe as well (ticks, fleas, flies, mites, mosquitos, roaches, leeches, spiders, humidity, mold, fungus, earthquakes, tornadoes and thundersnow).

      I would guess that enclosed or semi-underground cities are the future. They do the underground thing in Canada, with cities like Vancouver, Toronto and Montreal having underground shopping malls as well as a metro system in order to avoid the extreme heat and cold of Winter and Summer. Norway have turned many of their outdoor markets into air-conditioned atriums by placing glass planels above these areas, The Japanese have perfected the art of building office block basement sewage treatment works. Dubai is working on an domed city.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    14. Re: Siiiiigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      We will terraform Mars. It will be what the first travelers want it to be.

      It will be a constant battle as the solar wind strips the atmosphere away.

      Possibly. Or possibly we may set up an artificial magnetosphere. There are actually some practical methods for doing it. It would be a major project, of course. One proposal is an equatorial superconducting loop, Another is a giant electromagnet at a Lagrange point (trouble with that one is that, every time I hear about it, I wonder how much thrust the deflected solar wind would generate. Going by the numbers I can find for magnetic sails, a magnetic "bubble" of 100 km diameter would produce 70 Newtons of thrust at 1 AU. So, it would be about 30 Newtons at about Mars distance from the sun. The bubble for protecting mars would need to be at least as big as Mars, and probably about 50% bigger. So it would need to be 10,168.5 km in diameter, and would have a cross sectional area (facing the sun) of 81,208,838 sq km. So, that would be 10,340 times the cross section of the 100 km bubble, so it would be about 310.2 kN of force (basically 31 tons of force). That's quite a lot, but the equipment to produce such a field would have to be quite massive, so that wouldn't send it instantly hurtling into the outer solar system. It might be possible to keep it relatively stationary by putting it in a "virtual" Lagrange point where the push from the solar wind keeps it locked to the actual Lagrange point. Maybe a solar sail array could even be used to help keep it in position.

    15. Re: Siiiiigh by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      They'll do it at night. Do I have to do all the thinking round here?

      That's why we pay ya the big bucks!

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    16. Re: Siiiiigh by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      We will terraform Mars. It will be what the first travelers want it to be.

      It will be a constant battle as the solar wind strips the atmosphere away.

      Possibly. Or possibly we may set up an artificial magnetosphere. There are actually some practical methods for doing it. It would be a major project, of course. One proposal is an equatorial superconducting loop, Another is a giant electromagnet at a Lagrange point (trouble with that one is that, every time I hear about it, I wonder how much thrust the deflected solar wind would generate. Going by the numbers I can find for magnetic sails, a magnetic "bubble" of 100 km diameter would produce 70 Newtons of thrust at 1 AU. So, it would be about 30 Newtons at about Mars distance from the sun. The bubble for protecting mars would need to be at least as big as Mars, and probably about 50% bigger. So it would need to be 10,168.5 km in diameter, and would have a cross sectional area (facing the sun) of 81,208,838 sq km. So, that would be 10,340 times the cross section of the 100 km bubble, so it would be about 310.2 kN of force (basically 31 tons of force). That's quite a lot, but the equipment to produce such a field would have to be quite massive, so that wouldn't send it instantly hurtling into the outer solar system. It might be possible to keep it relatively stationary by putting it in a "virtual" Lagrange point where the push from the solar wind keeps it locked to the actual Lagrange point. Maybe a solar sail array could even be used to help keep it in position.

      Yes - I forgot about the Lagrange point electromagnet scenario. That would probably work, and certainly isn't the biggest technical issue.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    17. Re:Siiiiigh by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      I had the misfortune of living in NJ (Princeton) for a short time.

      People smoked at work and the company wouldn't do anything unless forced by the state. Maybe this has since changed.

      Restaurants advertised as a *feature* that they had no non-smoking section.

      I saw a guy in a suit pull his BMW over on the side of a road so he could jump out and steal 4 ears of corn from a field.

    18. Re:Siiiiigh by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Two hours north of Phoenix is all forest until you hit the Grand Canyon. Hour and a half if you go north east.

      Flagstaff is very much like Pennsylvania.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    19. Re: Siiiiigh by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Those problems are encountered in Europe as well (ticks, fleas, flies, mites, mosquitos, roaches, leeches, spiders, humidity, mold, fungus, earthquakes, tornadoes and thundersnow).

      Unfortunately, those things used to be milder in the past in Europe but are getting worse now because of the changing climate. I, for one, am definitely not looking forward to tropical parasites and diseases spreading into my neighborhood.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    20. Re: Siiiiigh by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      We will terraform Mars. It will be what the first travelers want it to be.

      It will be a constant battle as the solar wind strips the atmosphere away.

      All civilization is constant battle to keep it maintained. The energy cost to terraform Mars is measured in days of total energy output of the sun. If they can manage to do that, then keeping in maintained will be trivial.

  28. Proof of Concept: Phoenix by XXongo · · Score: 2

    This settlement is 45 minutes outside of Phoenix, a city of population 1.6 million. And growing. Rapidly. All the critics here who are chorussing "oh, Gates is so stupid, he doesn't know that Arizona is uninhabitable" are silly: we already know it's possible because 1.6 million people already live there.

    He merely needs to make a suburb that's somewhat more attractive than the other suburbs currently being built. And he can sell this to, not new people who had never thought of moving to Arizona, but some of the 81,000 people moving to the Phoenix area every year.

    1. Re:Proof of Concept: Phoenix by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 3

      And people are saying the people already living there are in trouble. Not enough water, requires a lot of energy just to stay livable by our modern standards, and on top of that it's going to be far from work so that means even more energy to move people back and forth between home and work twice a day.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:Proof of Concept: Phoenix by rmdingler · · Score: 4, Informative

      And people are saying the people already living there are in trouble. Not enough water, requires a lot of energy just to stay livable by our modern standards, and on top of that it's going to be far from work so that means even more energy to move people back and forth between home and work twice a day.

      Sure, but of the 200K years mankind's footprint has been expanding on the planet, most of it has been spent exploiting the rich natural reserves of the planet.

      The conservation of (and stretching of) resources has arguably only advanced in times of extreme shortage. The exponential growth (intended) of crop yields to keep feeding a booming population is but one example. People are resourceful, intelligent creatures for the most part, yet often complacent unless propelled by hardship.

      It's not Arrakis, but living in desert cities has already prompted water conservation and recycling unheard of a few generations ago.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    3. Re:Proof of Concept: Phoenix by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 5, Interesting

      All the critics here who are chorussing "oh, Gates is so stupid, he doesn't know that Arizona is uninhabitable" are silly: we already know it's possible because 1.6 million people already live there.

      Cool story bro, except it isn't that the desert is uninhabitable, it's that there are limits and you are pressing them. While your real estate brochure version of living in the desert is cool, it seems to assume that there will always be plenty of water, plenty of air conditioning, and will be just like living in 70 degrees all year round - perfect comfort.

      And it's sort of funny - why move to an area when all you want to do is alter the environment to something the environment isn't.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    4. Re:Proof of Concept: Phoenix by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      And people are saying the people already living there are in trouble.

      Since the 70's (as far back as I remember).

    5. Re:Proof of Concept: Phoenix by plopez · · Score: 3, Interesting

      All the critics here who are chorussing "oh, Gates is so stupid, he doesn't know that Arizona is uninhabitable" are silly: we already know it's possible because 1.6 million people *already* live there.

      You are committing a fallacy. You are assuming the past and the future will always resemble each other. It will not in this case as there are resource limits and the resources are shrinking see: https://uanews.arizona.edu/sto...

      Jared Diamond wrote a nice book on what happens to societies when a critical resource(s) are depleted.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    6. Re:Proof of Concept: Phoenix by mikael · · Score: 2

      They could reduce the loss of water from evaporation by covering the reservoir with shade balls.

      https://static01.nyt.com/image...

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    7. Re:Proof of Concept: Phoenix by fatwilbur · · Score: 1

      I see your point, but perhaps you're exaggerating the danger yourself. I live in Canada, in a major city of over 1 million people, and if you went outside right now without adequate clothing you'd be suffering within minutes, severely injured within an hour, and dead not too long after that unless you get into a warmer temperature.

      Hot weather is tough for sure, but having some bottled water and a shirt to avoid burns, it is relatively easy to avoid death and injury. So, people are well accustomed to living in even harsher climates.

    8. Re: Proof of Concept: Phoenix by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile, vast swathes of Kentucky and West Virginia are quite uninhabited and livable with no assistance!

      It doesn't just have to be liveable for a tech town; it has to have a big city to provide people and amenities that the people want.

      The Phoenix metro area has more than 4.5 million people, which is more than the entire state of KY, and more than twice the state of WV in tourist season. That's the incentive. The environment is just an inconvenience to be conquered through technical solutions.

      The Microsoft campus wasn't built in Bellevue, Washington because of the nice weather. It was built there because it's right next door to Seattle.

    9. Re:Proof of Concept: Phoenix by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      "why move to an area when all you want to do is alter the environment to something the environment isn't."

      In other words, do what people have been doing since forever. You central planning types are too early, come back next century when your consciousness can be uploaded and you can exist in perfectly planned nirvana.

      I think what happens iin these cases though is that people use a small set of desires. If someone wants to live in a desert, and has wanderlust and wants the experience, by all means. I love the stark beauty of much of the American Southwest.

      But Joe Blow, who retires and wants warmth and a change of pace isn't being adventurous. He moves to Phoenix or Miami, then tries to make it over. Arizona used to be the place where people with allergeies were suggested to live. NOw places like Tuscon now have more than double the incidence of asthma and hay fever than the nation as a whole.

      How did such a thing happen? Those stupid assholes that moved here to escape the allergens brought the same damn plants they were allergic to and popped 'em in the ground, watered the hell out of them so they would survive, and made Arizona about th elast place an allergy sufferer would want to be.

      Wanderlust and the human urge to explore is about the best quality of humanity. Retiring to a warm place is the opposite of that.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    10. Re:Proof of Concept: Phoenix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hey, he's not trying to start a farming community in Arizona - just something residential with fancy tech. You have no sense of scale if you think that there is a finite amount of water for Arizona, or that the AC might stop working. Actually, if current trends in solar panels continue, the desert that Gates bought will be able to generate some of the cheapest power in the US. When you have cheap power, you have all kinds of options regarding water, including pipelines and recycling. And residential water is really not very much compared to even light agriculture.

      I personally think it's crazy, but Americans seem to prefer moving to hotter places. That's why the northern states are losing population and Florida, Arizona, Nevada, etc., seem to be getting new congressional districts like every election. So even as we freak out about global warming, we actually seem to want to live in a warmer place. Even I, when I moved from upstate NY to DC, (not for the weather - ick!) thereby accepted a "personal warming" of +8C, which is off the scale of even the most pessimistic global warming forecasts.

      If you're a reader of slashdot, you probably think we should live on fucking Mars, so stop being such a pussy about people moving to Arizona. We will figure it out with technology. I really hate defeatists who are like "Waaaa, Nature does not want people to live in the desert (or fly, or leave the caves)" How about asking instead: How can we find a way to live really comfortably in a desert?

    11. Re:Proof of Concept: Phoenix by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      I Hot weather is tough for sure, but having some bottled water and a shirt to avoid burns, it is relatively easy to avoid death and injury. So, people are well accustomed to living in even harsher climates.

      If they live in the manner that the environment encourages. So many of the people who move to these places have no intention of living the desert lifestyle. I remember when my father in law moved to Florida. He Bought a refrigerater/freezer specially to put flower bulbs that need cold weather to set, like tulips. And amazing to me, after moving to Florida, they almost never went outside. My Sister moved to Phoenix AZ, same issue, and she was in her thirties when she moved. 5 years and she was back. Basically they traded nice weather in the winter for Nature trying to kill you in the summer. Here in PA We only have maybe a month and a half of hard winter. You obviously have more.

      But, I've been in Ontario and Quebec in the summer, and it's heavenly. Ottawa in the summer is super nice, and I went to Winterlude in Ottawa once, and it's a bit of a different world then.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    12. Re:Proof of Concept: Phoenix by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      If you're a reader of slashdot, you probably think we should live on fucking Mars, so stop being such a pussy about people moving to Arizona. We will figure it out with technology. I really hate defeatists who are like "Waaaa, Nature does not want people to live in the desert (or fly, or leave the caves)" How about asking instead: How can we find a way to live really comfortably in a desert?

      There are many ways to live comfortably in a desert. People can also live comfortably in cold places. But unless this project is completely different than other modern desert towns, that isn't how people will choose to live.

      I've pointed out that people who moved to Arizona for allergy problems planted the same plants that they were allergic to back home, and successfully watered the crap out of them. Point is, they want the warmth and the sunshine, and all of the things they had back home. I haven't seen anything yet to convince me otherwise.

      If you are going to sustainably live in a desert, you need to use what the desert provides.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    13. Re:Proof of Concept: Phoenix by KingBenny · · Score: 1

      well ... hostile environment ... extra challenges ... should attract some adventurous minds, maybe some co-op with SpaceX mining ideas for survival in hostile environments sounds great to me actually, its an experiment, right ? not a venture or a company trying to sell something for profit, its research, a privilege of those who lose more money than you make in a year while running for the bus

      --
      Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
  29. Smarty city? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

    A "smart" city would be one that's not built in a freakin' desert .

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  30. I lived in Phoenix for about 4 years, here's what by mark_reh · · Score: 4, Funny

    I found...

    There's no shade.
    There's no water (except at the golf courses)
    All the plants have thorns
    All the insects are venomous
    All the animals are venomous
    It's too hot to be outside for about 9 months of the year.

    Everything about the place screams "humans do not belong here!", yet most of the population lives in the Valley of the Sun.
    I guess that explains the voting record...

  31. Re:Biosphere by currently_awake · · Score: 1

    It was also an air tight greenhouse. It deliberately captured large quantities of sunlight. Proper desert buildings use shade and air flow to keep cool.

  32. I guess ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... Seattle is getting a bit too close to Kim Jong Un's missiles for Mr. Gates.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  33. 25.000 acres for what?? by Neuronwelder · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be better for an array of solar steam generators or solar panels? At least if you are going to gobble up a huge chunk of one of the few the last places of open land we have., do something USEFUL with it!! Lower the amount of Carbon we put into the atmosphere. (Brainless people with money are dangerous!)

  34. Not gonna happen by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    it's mostly the rich here that get those watered lawns. Even in the middle class neighborhoods you're only going to see small patches (and even then during winter). And, well, the rich aren't going to give up their lawns because they don't have to. The cost of water will just go up for the working class and poor.

    And yeah, nobody thinks much of Phoenix when it comes to wealth, but it's full of multi millionaires and even billionaires. When you get old the dry air is good for you so lots of folks come here if they can afford it.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  35. Yeat another rich retirement community by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    There's just nothing for miles around there. Nobody employed will want to live there because the commute will be insane. We've already got at least two such failed experiment communities outside of and both already much closer to Phoenix (called Verrado and Anthem) I guess Gates doesn't do his homework.

    The last thing AZ needs is yet another half-occupied community full of seniors and snowbirds.

  36. Gentrification by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    There's a really easy way to deal with it: Gentrification. Which is a really fancy way of saying screw to poor and lower working class. Water resources will be diverted to the well to do and a select few who serve them and the rest of us will be left to fight for the scraps. In all the discussions about how to solve the water problem I've not heard this one mentioned once, and it's by far the most likely...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  37. Beachfront property by dlingman · · Score: 1

    We've seen how this plays out before. Except we don't have Superman to go back in time to fix it....

    Watch his hair - if it turns out to be a toupee, we're doomed.

  38. Faulty Premise by boudie2 · · Score: 1

    The article seems to speculate that Gates was ignorant when he bought the land. I would suggest that given his wealth and power he knows a few things that some of us peons don't. According to some, Arizona in 20-30 years will be too hot to inhabit and instead we'll be settling Mars. Sounds like science fiction to me. Of course many like that sort of entertainment.

  39. Re:I lived in Phoenix for about 4 years, here's wh by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    Complete fact-free crap.

  40. If this city's going to be so smart... by rnturn · · Score: 1

    ... why is it going to be located in a place with virtually no water?

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  41. It's Westworld by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1

    Obviously. Also, ironically, there's a place near Scottsdale called Westworld.

  42. Noble idea by linuxguy · · Score: 1

    If his other charitable endeavors are an indication, he may be conducting an experiment on how to make desert hospitable using technology. It might or might not work. He has the money to conduct such an experiment and learn from it. Much of the world does not have the option to move to a better place. If he can crack this problem and share the results with the world, he can potentially help many.

  43. Oh, Well. . . by business_kid · · Score: 1

    On the wisdom of the Gates Purchase: Richard Feynman put it fairly well:
    "I believe that a scientist looking at nonscientific problems is just as dumb as the next guy."
    And Again:
    "In talking about the impact of ideas in one field on ideas in another field, one is always apt to make a fool of oneself."
    But heck, it's ONLY $80 million. Not like he'll miss it. But it doesn't show much thought for those who really need a dig out. :

  44. Useless pop-sci newb calls BS on useless reporter by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 2

    Let's for the moment assume that me and the reporter are equally qualified to talk shit about science we both obviously don't understand. Then I'll chime in on what I can get from using common sense and maybe a little multidimensional thinking.

    Solar and Wind - These two tools are really useful for solving power issues. They're not end-all solutions and large batteries in the desert will get hot and cooling them to a reliable operational level that don't leak constantly will require large air-conditioned facilities or at least massive underground storage. On the other hand, using it should be possible using Elon Musk's tech to build most internal walls of each climate controlled home and office to collect and store quite a bit of power without the need for large centralized facilities. A reliable automated method of washing roof tiles will be needed, but I imagine that sprinkler systems mounted on the roof should assist with this.

    Niagra falls and the NYC aqueduct. This was accomplished originally in 1907 with technology from 1907... as a government project it was expanded substantially in 2015 and that was one of the biggest examples of government corruption in NY history... the land of the mafias... Those aqueducts have supplied tens of millions of people with water across a 262km stretch for over a hundred years. The issue is to bring water...not necessarily fresh, but simply water to the desert. It should be possible for Bill Gates to buy a "Boring Company" drill and get zoning to drill from the Gulf of California to his plot. Alternatively, he can lay an above ground pipe which might be more profitable. The reason is that using vacuum a heated pipe will start sucking water uphill without the assistance of pumps if the pipe is correctly designed. In addition, pumps will further assist. This can allow a large salt water reservoir to be established near/on his plot. Then the problem is desalination.

    Desalination - The only real problem with desalination is the energy cost and salt disposal... which in a desert isn't overly problematic. One method is either to use solar electricity. An alternative is to build glass boxes ... from sand (if there is any sand for clear glass there) which will cause water to evaporate and then be caught on the top of the box and drip off the sides to be collected. The salt can be dumped into the desert as one option, it can also be gathered through maintenance (probably using low cost labor or robots). If using solar electricity, also keep in mind that it doesn't need to work 24/7. Instead of storing electricity, it can simple overproduce during the day and be stored as fresh water to be filtered for drinking after.

    There is also ground water. Ground water is quite plentiful but difficult to access in the desert. Of course, this option debatable as there are many ground water problems in the desert. The most obvious is that as the water level decreased, the desert sinks too. This can be a nightmare for construction and infrastructure.

    There are also many methods for extraction of water from the air. This is becoming more and more common in African deserts. Of course, the yield is low (at least on an urban scale) and dries out the environment further.

    Purification generally requires power and filters. The most obvious filter which solves an economical problem as well is coal. I am no expert on chemistry and don't understand the process of producing the specific types of coal required for water purification, but I would imagine that this would increase demand for non-energy related coal.

    Wildfires are always a problem in hot climates. So the solution for this is increase water, that means pumping more sea water in. The desert is a nightmare to make lakes in, but it's possible to do. On method is major concrete basins. Other methods could be to scorch the earth further to bring the sand closer to glass. I'm sure there are people far smarter than me who can come up with methods of building massive pools for salt and clean water

  45. To the naysayers ... by Tjp($)pjT · · Score: 1

    The electric and gasoline issue is solvable by having zero in city gas stations but plenty of electric vehicle chargers. Then install a very large solar power plant. Augment with some wind power. And talk to Tesla about a city sized battery bank. The Gigafactory is close by so shipping cost won't be painful. And just install high efficiency heat pumps. Capture the November to April cold from the nights in heat banks to offset the May to October high temps. Store some of the Summer heat to offset Winter nights. And get water from Lake Mead, but also recycle it. Make it so all point of use is separated to gray water and black water sewerage. The gray water is easier to recycle. The black water a little harder. And no outdoor non-native plants! Use porous surfaces for the sidewalks and roads (requires a separate freight to shops delivery system) and help out a bit. Capture the water and use it for the sewerage treatment system. Augment the city electric provisions with capture at point of use in the residential areas. An earth banked home will remain cooler; there are a lot of designs that would capture that 20-25 degree cooler region. Envelope designs are also pretty good in hot climates to mitigate high daytime temperatures.

    This is a project I have worked over multiple times on "paper" over the years. I'd love to have Bill Gates contact me to work on this project. It is easily possible he believes global warming will present a difficult time for humans and he's researching a city in a climate that is already hot.

    --
    - Tjp

    I am in wallow with my inner money grubbing capitalistic pig. ... Oink!

  46. This can work fine, with enough financing.... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    The negative comments seem to completely ignore the fact that in MOST new communities, the resource limitations are a "make or break" situation because the inhabitants can't afford to pay taxes high enough to cover the costs involved in overcoming them.

    (Heck, where I live - we're a town of about 6,000 people, right along the Potomac River. And a big reason some people who come here don't stay long is the high water and sewer bills. Treating the river water is quite expensive.)

    If the second richest man in the world is the guy who wants to experiment with making a city work in the desert, I think he could do it. But it depends on how bad he WANTS this to work. Desalination plants could provide ocean water pumped in and processed using solar energy arrays. That's the kind of infrastructure that would get the job done, but at a really big up-front cost if you want it to be viable for residents after it's in place.

  47. Sure - all it will take is total dictatorship by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

    Enforce draconian laws regarding land use, water use, building materials, power use and so on.

    It'll be like a HOA from hell, with computers.

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
  48. This columnist is an idiot... by erp_consultant · · Score: 2

    First of all, it isn't "Arizona's" west valley. It is the west valley of Phoenix, a city in the state of Arizona.

    Secondly, in Tonopah there are massive aquifers (underground rivers essentially) and the water is very close to the surface. Makes it easier and cheaper to drill wells.

    "Whether Phoenix will even be inhabitable by mid-century is an open question" - I think he meant habitable. In any case, lots of people are moving there. Minnesota in January - that's inhabitable.

    "Already, it is a man-made environment totally dependent on electricity to power air conditioning and gasoline delivered by vulnerable pipelines." - That may be true now but Arizona is perfectly set up for solar and wind. The kind of city that Gates envisions is achievable.

    Phoenix is expanding in basically two directions. Due west, towards Los Angeles. And north west towards Las Vegas. The east valley (Scottsdale, Chandler, Tempe) are basically built out. There is very little land left and what is left is very expensive. To the south, South Mountain effectively cuts off everything south of it from Phoenix making travel into Phoenix difficult. To the north you have the densely packed suburb of Anthem. Beyond that the only freeway (the I-17) goes down to two lanes. And there are Indian reservations hemming in the east valley. In fact, many of the big office towers in Scottsdale are built on land leased from Indian tribes. And they are never selling that land.

    People in Scottsdale have traditionally looked down their noses at the west valley of Phoenix. But those are the only large parcels of land left. Jerry Colangelo, who used to own the Phoenix Suns basketball team, made a shit-load of money developing land in the west valley. As did a guy named John F. Long, whose family donated the land that the Arizona Cardinals stadium sits on today. They were buying up land at $5-10 dollars an acre. Today an acre of raw land - no house, no utilities, no water - will set you back about $100,000.

    Gates knows exactly what he is doing.

  49. tree hugging hippy by bigtreeman · · Score: 1

    Bill's a bit old to be starting up a hippy commune.
    Not a real good place to grow dope,
    but a good place for a dope.

    --
    Go well
  50. This game is no fun on Easy Mode. by Malkin · · Score: 1

    As engineering projects go, smart cities are far more interesting challenges if you choose hostile terrain for your project. Also, it's a great way to catalyze technologies that might eventually help us:

    1. 1.) Survive potential global warming scenarios, and
    2. 2.) Colonize other planets.

    That said, I'm no Pollyanna. I would absolutely love to see a bold commitment from the project leads that they won't put new, additional strain on the water resources in Arizona.

  51. Also to be fair by Anarchduke · · Score: 1

    Also, to be fair, the columnist calling one of the richest men in the world an idiot for buying land in arizona probably barely clears rent each month. So I'm sure he knows best.

    --
    who prays for Satan? Who in 18 centuries has had the humanity to pray for the 1 sinner that needed it most? ~Mark Twain
  52. Why trade 1 well for another by huckamania · · Score: 1

    The first settlements off planet will be in asteroids or habitats. Many will be employees of the Green Mars effort. By the time Mars can support 1000 people, there will be millions already living in space and many of them will be in orbit around Mars.

    The resources needed to green Mars will be mined from asteroids and other sources. At some point humans will realize that we don't need no stinking gravity well, at least one as inhospitable as Mars and better planets will be sought. Except for a few sites, Mars will be left uninhabited.

  53. Second richest remedy by von+Stalhein · · Score: 1

    Bit obvious i'd have thought - way to get back to being the richest man on the planet. Get 25K acres in the desert and - METH LAB!!