Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft's Fall Creators Update Already on More Than Half of All Windows 10 PCs (betanews.com)

Wayne Williams, writing for BetaNews: Microsoft releases two big feature updates a year for Windows 10. 2017 saw the arrival of the Creators Update in April, followed by the Fall Creators Update in October. The Creators Update was a slow and at times problematic release. A quarter of Windows 10 users still didn't have it by the time its successor rolled out. Thankfully, Microsoft seems to have learned some important lessons, and the Fall Creators Update is being installed at a much faster rate. According to the latest figures from AdDuplex, a mere two months after it launched, the Fall Creators Update (1709) is already on more than half of the Windows 10 PCs in use -- 53.6 percent to be precise. That's up from 20.5 percent a mere month ago.

140 comments

  1. After the last one bricked tons of computers by ckatko · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think I'll wait and let everyone else take the brunt of the damage.

    Microsoft's new strategy: Crowdsourced bug testers!

    1. Re:After the last one bricked tons of computers by ckatko · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, and since every major update, Windows goes out of it's way to UNINSTALL CoreTemp and Win8Gadget (adds windows 7 gadgets back so I can have a CoreTemp gadget), and reset all my security and group policy settings... and Windows Classic Shell... I'm really not looking forward to having to reset all my manual settings.

      I've got clients where their custom IE settings that are required for business apps to run, get reset every creators update and brings the entire system down. Why even have manual settings if you're just going to nuke them? HOURS of paid tech support with the IE team and CRM team, and they couldn't even tell me why it was happening.

    2. Re:After the last one bricked tons of computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple, you do things the way Microsoft wants you to do them...WHEN Microsoft wants you to do them. Last year
      is way to ancient for them. Changing defaults is child's play.

    3. Re:After the last one bricked tons of computers by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      and Windows Classic Shell...

      On Windows 8.x I was a hardcore Classic Shell user.

      On Windows 10 it just seems more trouble than it's worth. I still have it, but likely going to uninstall it soon.

    4. Re:After the last one bricked tons of computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      new

      Seriously. Milk shot out my kneecap.

      Crowdsourced

      ibid

    5. Re:After the last one bricked tons of computers by greenwow · · Score: 1

      None of our ~150 Windows 10 machines bricked, but they all took over a week to install the update while the computer was unusably slow. Microsoft cost us a lot of productivity and a couple of customers.

    6. Re:After the last one bricked tons of computers by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      I'm really not looking forward to having to reset all my manual settings.

      I installed a new win 10 machine, disabled the windows update service, unpinned all of the useless ugly abusive crap from my start page, installed iTunes to auto-download my podcasts (the main reason for this system in the first place now that my XP system won't download most of them.) Also installed Calibre for regular newspaper downloads. Left the VNC client connected (the system is headless.)

      A week later I noticed the pods had not updated for a couple of days. The VNC client complained the network connection had broken. I fire it back up and bingo! The new system was sitting at a "Welcome to the Fall Update" page and had not bothered to start the programs I had configured it to. It had reset the sharing so I could no longer access the pods remotely, and put everything back on the start page, including a bunch of new, useless crap. (Not just useless, but actively running and phoning home as active content on my start page, without my permission and despite being removed once.) Also Edge was back on the taskbar, plus some crap about "people" wanting to access my contacts so MS can find out who I know.

      Once I thanked Microsoft profusely for abusing my system and giving me a lot of new crap, the two things I wanted to run started up. And I once again disabled the update service, removed everything from the start page, removed Edge, but was only able to "remove from taskbar" the nosey "people" thing.

      I'm supposed to be able to downgrade a 10 system to 7, but of course without an OS disk and key I cannot. Daily I pray that NK tests it's next nuclear missile on the east side of Seattle. Sorry all the people I like in Seattle, you chose to live close to ground zero.

    7. Re: After the last one bricked tons of computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are you dong this manually more than once? Either export a reg patch and batch file to apply as part of the startup scripts or use group policy/powershell to automate it.

      Do you think horses are better than cars on long trips too, because you don't realize you can drive the car instead of pushing it?

    8. Re: After the last one bricked tons of computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      N1ggers complain about a n1gger OS. News at 11.

    9. Re:After the last one bricked tons of computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disable People on the taskbar?
      OK Settings -> Personalization -> taskbar scroll down to the bottom of the window --->
      Holy Shit Batdick -> move the sliders to OFF (I suggest working from the bottom up)

      dumbass look around before you have a give birth to a cow.

    10. Re:After the last one bricked tons of computers by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Disable People on the taskbar?

      I already did that, dumbass. Taking it off the taskbar is not the same as disabling it altogether, just as taking Edge off the taskbar does not remove it from the system. I know, it's complicated, isn't it?

  2. So Win 10 is on nearly half of Win 10 PC's? by OffTheLip · · Score: 2

    That is big news.

  3. Except for my Dell laptop... by cdreimer · · Score: 0

    My Dell laptop won't upgrade to the latest and greatest version of Windows 10. I have to do a fresh install every time. Meh... I needed a larger SSD anyway.

    1. Re:Except for my Dell laptop... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can buy it with the money you're making from Youtube videos of the Apple cafeteria or nerd conventions. How much have you made so far?

    2. Re:Except for my Dell laptop... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought you had creimer "sandboxed at -1". You're a bigger joke than he is. Asshole.

    3. Re:Except for my Dell laptop... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Translation: Creimer kicked my sorry ass after I declared victory. Sad.

    4. Re:Except for my Dell laptop... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      My ego is normal, not a malignant pulsing purple mass like yours.

      Says the bully who picks on retarded kids.

    5. Re:Except for my Dell laptop... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Donnie, is that you?

    6. Re:Except for my Dell laptop... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      creimer confuses his Slashdot signature with an animated gif.

      --
      Balena!

    7. Re:Except for my Dell laptop... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I told him to leave you alone.

    8. Re:Except for my Dell laptop... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Creimer posted another comment. So much for keeping him "sandboxed at -1". You're a fucking joke.

    9. Re:Except for my Dell laptop... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and it's at -1. So what's the joke? I don't get it, Chris.

      You lost, Chris. Face it. No one is taking your side here. Have you noticed that?

    10. Re:Except for my Dell laptop... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You lost, Chris. Face it. No one is taking your side here. Have you noticed that?

      Creimer isn't playing your game. He's playing for web clicks from Slashdot to YouTube.

      Who gives a shit about whether you're winning or losing? No one on Slashdot.

    11. Re: Except for my Dell laptop... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you have basically no clicks. You could literally have 100 times as many clicks and still not make any money. This latest money making scheme isnâ(TM)t going to work out for you dude, move on to a new one.

    12. Re: Except for my Dell laptop... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know the old saying: "If you're on YouTube to be a YouTuber, you're not a YouTuber."

    13. Re: Except for my Dell laptop... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's another saying: "If you leave any food around creimer, it's going to be AROUND creimer."

    14. Re:Except for my Dell laptop... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Creimer isn't playing your game."

      Then why do you care if I say you're at -1, Chris?

    15. Re:Except for my Dell laptop... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You probably thought it said Deli on it, that's why you ordered it.

  4. Creation by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

    Ergo there must be a lot of creating going on

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
  5. I couldn't disable it. by BlueCoder · · Score: 3, Informative

    I remember it telling me it was going to update. I spent a half hour trying to figure out where to disable it before turning to the web where I spent another wasted two hours before I just gave up. I feel very violated.

    1. Re:I couldn't disable it. by rogoshen1 · · Score: 2

      If you ever figure this out, please let the rest of know.

      Somewhere along the way MS lost the plot in regards to a user actually owning their computer, and therefore having the right to update it or not at their discretion.

      fuckers.

    2. Re:I couldn't disable it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even worse, after disabling normal updates with a bunch of registry hacks. It still applied the creators update without notice on my girlfriends laptop.

      Only sure way I found to "disable" updates is to have a broken registry at which point updates fail to apply and the update process goes into a loop of trying to apply updates on each boot and failing. (One way to do this is moving "program files" to a different partition after installation)

    3. Re:I couldn't disable it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a user actually owning their computer

      *an user
      *his computer

    4. Re:I couldn't disable it. by jasonharrop · · Score: 1

      To regain control of when my Win 10 laptops reboot, I virtualised them.

      They've been VMs running in VirtualBox (on KDE Neon) for 5 months now, and they seem very happy with things this way. Me too.

      In my VirtualBox settings, I've simply disabled their network adapters. Maybe I could've done that in the original Windows machines, but having a single machine is so much more convenient (and satisfying). Just make sure you don't run out of disk space on the partition containing those images!

    5. Re:I couldn't disable it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Encrypt your system partition with veracrypt. AFAIK, so far each Win 10 update has been like a reinstall and they fail to include the device filters to support veracrypt. Hence, it'll try and fail to do the update.

    6. Re:I couldn't disable it. by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      a user ?
      an user?

      dude... read what you're suggesting aloud, tell me if it sounds right: (hint, user starts with a consonant sound, so it's "a")

      Also, women apparently don't own computers?

    7. Re:I couldn't disable it. by rastos1 · · Score: 1

      Just disable Windows Update service.

    8. Re:I couldn't disable it. by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      "His" is correct, since the subject is singular and of unknown gender.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    9. Re:I couldn't disable it. by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Why do you assume the user is a he? Their is a perfectly acceptable term.

    10. Re:I couldn't disable it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you assume the user is multiple people?

    11. Re:I couldn't disable it. by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      I don’t.

      Definition of their

      2 : his or her : his, her, its —used with an indefinite third person singular antecedent
      anyone in their senses —W. H. Auden

    12. Re:I couldn't disable it. by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      ‘Their’ was already correct and didn’t need fixing.

    13. Re:I couldn't disable it. by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Just disable Windows Update service.

      Been there, done that, got the Fall Update shoved down my throat anyway.

    14. Re:I couldn't disable it. by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      What happens if boot from something else and change the permissions on the windows update files?

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    15. Re:I couldn't disable it. by Desler · · Score: 1

      Singular 'they' has been used for centuries and is perfectly correct.

    16. Re: I couldn't disable it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      âoeTheirâ is also an accepted use of the singular possessive pronoun when the gender is unknown.

    17. Re:I couldn't disable it. by Obfuscant · · Score: 2

      'Their' was already correct and didnâ(TM)t need fixing.

      "Their" is plural. Unless every computer is owned by two or more people, "his" is the correct pronoun. "Their" is the half-assed attempt at political correctness, or is it "social correctness", that results from ignorance of one meaning of "his" as "gender unknown third person pronoun". Can't say "his" because ignorant people will attack you for being sexist, "hers" is completely incorrect, so let's use the incorrect "their" and show how socially correct but illiterate we are.

    18. Re:I couldn't disable it. by Desler · · Score: 1

      If you're going play the part of a a grammar Nazi at least be correct. Singular they has been used in English for numerous centuries.

    19. Re: I couldn't disable it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Their

      Wtf is up with quotes being converted to special characters?

    20. Re:I couldn't disable it. by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 0

      "Their" is plural.

      Only to people woefully ignorant.

      Definition of their

      2 : his or her : his, her, its —used with an indefinite third person singular antecedent
      anyone in their senses —W. H. Auden

      https://www.merriam-webster.co...

    21. Re:I couldn't disable it. by Obfuscant · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Singular 'they' has been used for centuries and is perfectly correct.

      There is no singular "they", but there is a genderless, singular "he". The fact that some people choose to abuse the language by using the wrong pronoun doesn't mean it is suddenly the best choice for clear language.

    22. Re:I couldn't disable it. by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      And if you don't trust Merriam Webster we can even go to the OED:

      1.1 Belonging to or associated with a person of unspecified sex.
      ‘she heard someone blow their nose loudly’

      Fail much?

    23. Re:I couldn't disable it. by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 2

      There is no singular "they",

      Poor troll is poor.

      This is an example of what is often referred to as ‘singular they’.

      The grammatical subject—every employee—is singular, as is the verb is expected, but the following pronoun, their, is plural. Hence the name. It happens when they, them, their, and themselves refer back to subjects that are grammatically singular:

      Is it grammatically correct?

      Despite objections, there is a trend to use ‘singular they’. In fact, it is historically long established. It goes back at least to the 16th century, and writers such as Shakespeare, Sidney, Byron, and Ruskin used it:

      https://en.oxforddictionaries....

      But I'm sure you know more than the Oxford English Dictionary, right?

    24. Re:I couldn't disable it. by Obfuscant · · Score: 2

      Documenting common usage is not documenting correct usage.

    25. Re: I couldn't disable it. by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Slashcode is shit.

    26. Re:I couldn't disable it. by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 0

      Shifting the goalposts now. Also, the English language is defined by common usage and the singular they has been in common usage for 500+ years.

    27. Re:I couldn't disable it. by Dragonslicer · · Score: 2

      There is no "suddenly" about it. As was pointed out above, Merriam-Webster (which is a pretty credible source when it comes to the meanings of words) lists examples going back as far as Shakespeare.

    28. Re:I couldn't disable it. by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      FFS! Learn something new every day...

      "Somewhere along the way MS lost the plot in regards to USERS actually owning their computerS, and therefore having the right to update or not at their discretion."

      Better?

    29. Re:I couldn't disable it. by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      There is no "suddenly" about it.

      Exactly. It's been around in common usage longer than Modern English has even existed. Usages can be found dating back to the late 1400s during the period of Middle English.

    30. Re:I couldn't disable it. by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Since "they" has the plural meaning, "he" is still the correct, clearer choice. No, I don't, and did not here.

    31. Re:I couldn't disable it. by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      They has a singular meaning as well. Anyone who isn't just a fake Grammar Nazi would know this. It has been used a such since the Middle English period. Go back under your bridge, troll.

    32. Re:I couldn't disable it. by Obfuscant · · Score: 0

      Shifting the goalposts now.

      Yes, I noticed you did that.

      Also, the English language is defined by common usage

      No, I'm sorry, but a bunch of ignorant people using the wrong word doesn't suddenly make it right. It only makes confusion. Why have a language if none of the words have a truly correct meaning?

      and the singular they has been in common usage for 500+ years.

      I haven't been alive that long, but I remember when "they" became the "socially correct" replacement for "he" in the late 70's or early 80's. That's hardly 500+ years. (Doest thee protest, thy anger is great!) Now even that abuse is not enough, we're getting "zee" and "zey" thrown into the mix. Apparently "they" doesn't mean what you think, since "they" just wasn't unsexist enough.

    33. Re:I couldn't disable it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Singular they is politically correct hogwash.

    34. Re:I couldn't disable it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Documenting common usage is not documenting correct usage.

      So you'e saying William Shakespeare was using English incorrectly when he used it throughout his writing? Clearly what a dunce he was. It's not like he's one of the most renowned English writers in history or anything.

    35. Re:I couldn't disable it. by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 2

      Yes, I noticed you did that.

      Worst comeback ever.

      No, I'm sorry,

      Then why does your English not look like this:

      Forrrihht anan se time comm
          att ure Drihhtin wollde
      ben borenn i iss middellærd
          forr all mannkinne nede
      he chæs himm sone kinnessmenn
          all swillke summ he wollde
      and whær he wollde borenn ben
          he chæs all att hiss wille.

      Oh right, that's because English evolves and changes and is defined by common usage.

      I haven't been alive that long, but I remember when "they" became the "socially correct" replacement for "he" in the late 70's or early 80's. That's hardly 500+ years. (Doest thee protest, thy anger is great!) Now even that abuse is not enough, we're getting "zee" and "zey" thrown into the mix. Apparently "they" doesn't mean what you think, since "they" just wasn't unsexist enough.

      I didn't realize that writers like Early of Chesterfield, John Ruskin and William Shakespeare were only from the 1970s and 80s. Oh did you not know that they used the singular they centuries ago?

    36. Re:I couldn't disable it. by MercTech · · Score: 1

      Because the male gendered designation is the generic. Yes, "man" is the generic case for all mankind. Isn't insisting otherwise making "women" generic and interchangeable? (Yes, I'm hitting a skewed meme for humor value.)

      --
      NRRPT/RCT
    37. Re:I couldn't disable it. by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Yeah, William Shakespeare, a prominent user of the singular they in his writing, was well-known for his political correctness. *yawn*

    38. Re:I couldn't disable it. by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      That should be the 4th Earl of Chesterfield.

    39. Re:I couldn't disable it. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      One of the reasons I paid extra for the Pro version was so I could schedule upgrades for my convenience. (I knew I couldn't postpone them indefinitely.) Therefore, I got up one day, turned my computer on, and found that it had rebooted (fortunately I never leave work unsaved) overnight, and insisted on not only leaving the machine unusable for some minutes but also inflicting an instructional app to tell me what they've done.

      They at least included one change I found useful: changing the screen colors at night. Of course, if I'd found that really useful, I would have already gotten a third-party fix for the problem.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    40. Re: I couldn't disable it. by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      You expect Unicode quotes to work on /. shitty's code? You must be new here.

      /sarcasm ASCII or bust.

      * U+2018 LEFT SINGLE QUOTATION MARK
      * U+2019 RIGHT SINGLE QUOTATION MARK
      * U+201C LEFT DOUBLE QUOTATION MARK
      * U+201D RIGHT DOUBLE QUOTATION MARK

      I mean its not like they had a decade or two to fix their code ... oh wait ...

      --
      Hey /. editors -- fix the crappy Unicode support already ...

    41. Re:I couldn't disable it. by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      When you cannot prove your point, namecall.

    42. Re:I couldn't disable it. by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      Isn't that just fucking brilliant though? Charge a ~$200 premium for allowing something that was available in every single version going back to XP.

      if i wasn't a nerdy computer gamer, i'd just install mint.

    43. Re:I couldn't disable it. by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      If you ever figure this out, please let the rest of know.

      I'm pretty sure the solution you are looking for begins with the phrase: "Contact your domain's Active Directory administrator..."

    44. Re:I couldn't disable it. by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      windows 10 home.

    45. Re:I couldn't disable it. by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      windows 10 home.

      Sorry, pretty sure the (Microsoft supplied) solution you are looking for begins with the phrase "Have your IT Support upgrade your computer to Windows 10 Enterprise..."

    46. Re:I couldn't disable it. by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      Your nickname is a pretty good description of MS and how they're handling windows 10.

  6. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  7. Idiotic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their dev tools don't even fully support targeting the 16299 SDK.

    What a joke. Scratch the surface even a teensy tiny bit and you find that every computing platform: Windows, MacOS, and Linux - they're all in a total state of disrepair.

    1. Re:Idiotic by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      Scratch the surface even a teensy tiny bit and you find that every computing platform: Windows, MacOS, and Linux - they're all in a total state of disrepair.

      Yeah, it's almost as if writing a bug-free modern, general-use computer operating system wasn't trivial! I mean, it's just a glorified abacus FFS, right? Maybe MS should ask the Chinese for help...oh wait...

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  8. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  9. Why is it branded for "creators"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trying to make Windows seem like less of a platform for spreadsheet jockeys and gamer dweebs?

    1. Re:Why is it branded for "creators"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because 'creators' love to suck their own cocks like Steve Bannon.

    2. Re:Why is it branded for "creators"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because those two groups still create more valuable things than any iFruit vomiting out Garageband garbage or Lintard writing out another DE nobody wants or will ever use for the sole purpose of shitposting about it.

    3. Re:Why is it branded for "creators"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don’t forget Linturds writing 10,000 init systems.

    4. Re:Why is it branded for "creators"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After skimming the changelog, it seems the "creative" parts are some new filter/text tools in the Photos app and a new "Emoji panel". And as I recall the last "Creators Update" featured some 3D tools in Paint that no one will ever use.

      This is what "creativity" means to MS.

    5. Re:Why is it branded for "creators"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I *knew* Trump was involved in this somehow!

  10. Shit updates by rfengr · · Score: 1

    Seems most major windows 10 updates are pieces of shit that won’t install anyway, without manually flushing the update repository folder and stopping services.

  11. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  12. Is the NVME Bug Fixed by STRICQ · · Score: 1

    Have they fixed the NVME bug that prevents installation on certain machines?

    1. Re:Is the NVME Bug Fixed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Don't use the Microsoft driver. I use the Samsung Nvme driver for my 950 and it works very well.

  13. Fall Creator's Update by Dwedit · · Score: 1

    This update is actually a good one, it finally fixes the Diagonal Tearing Problem with Nvidia Optimus Laptops.

    1. Re:Fall Creator's Update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unless you use sli then its not so good...

  14. It would be more if update worked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Three of my 9 computers would not update. Two of them failed and rolled back. The third got stuck in a boot loop. However, when I formatted the hd and clean install 1709, they run just fine now. Four pc updated just fine and the other two I am still putting off.

  15. How odd by quonset · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When you force people to update their systems, regardless if it destroys their configurations or mangles their programs, machines get the update.

    It's almost as if not giving people a choice whether to upgrade means they're going to get the update.

    1. Re:How odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft learned about Apple's lack of respect for Apple users and decided to apply it 10x to Windows users.

      It's just a matter of time before viable alternatives start popping up, probably originating in Asian countries.

    2. Re:How odd by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      You know, I've never had a surprise update from Apple. The iOS updates have nagged, but they've never just gone ahead and updated my phone. This is indeed an area where Microsoft has surpassed Apple.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  16. Strange Windows 10 behavior by freeze128 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Microsoft add/changes features too often in Windows 10. This has caused some really strange behavior on my Windows 10 machines. Some things it has done:

    - I have specifically set my lock screen background image to "image 1". Sometimes when I boot my machine, the lock screen background has been changed to "image 2". Often, another reboot sets it back to "image 1". What's the point in having a setting if the system doesn't always honor it?
    - When the Creator's Update was installed, I noticed that it looked like one of my desktop icons was missing. Upon further inspection, it just looked like some (but not all) of my desktop icons were moved around a little, and a gap left at the top.
    - I have never joined any of my home machines to a Windows domain or workgroup, but on some reboots, there is an icon on my desktop called HOMEGROUP. It cannot be moved or deleted. Only stopping the "Homegroup Provider" service causes the icon to vanish, and then it stays away until some other random time.

    1. Re:Strange Windows 10 behavior by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way too often.

    2. Re:Strange Windows 10 behavior by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      On the reboot after I posted that, all my desktop icons were auto-arranged for me without my consent! I swear Microsoft is reading my posts and just fucking with me now.

  17. Aptly named by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    The language nazi in me can stay quiet and not go into an "It's Autumn, idiots!" rant.

    Personally I'd have called it the "Crash Update", but Fall Update is close enough.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Aptly named by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 2

      I thought at first it said "Fail Creators Update" and wondered how they could tell the difference.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    2. Re:Aptly named by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      "It's Autumn, idiots!"

      Spring, even.

  18. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  19. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  20. Who's AdDuplex and why should we trust them? by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

    Who's AdDuplex and why should we trust them?

    Looks like it's an online advertising company and by default those outfits aren't to be trusted unless the opposite is proven.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  21. Malwarebytes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had successfully avoided it until I stupidly installed Malwarebytes and it enabled the windows update service and associated scheduled tasks, without asking my permission to do so or even notifying me.

    Malwarebytes used to be a good scanner. Now it is completely useless to me, they can't be trusted anymore.

  22. Malware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The reach and scope of this Windows 10 botnet is truly shocking. Can't we shut down the C&C servers before it impacts more machines?

  23. Exciting by WaffleMonster · · Score: 3, Funny

    It must be wonderful to get a new version of Windows packed with great new features.

    When you have some time in your busy schedule waiting for updates to finish installing, interrupting boot loops, reinstalling software Microsoft doesn't want you to use, dodging regressions and restoring all of your settings (again) send me a postcard of all those amazing new features that makes Windows 10 so much better.

    1. Re:Exciting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eat muh skrunk faggot.

    2. Re:Exciting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, you just keep eating Microsoft's skrunk fanboi.

    3. Re:Exciting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I get to port some scripts to Racket, because the Fall update breaks GNU MIT Scheme.

  24. Helpful tip for blocking all Windows updates by nctritech · · Score: 5, Informative

    Microsoft is shady as shit and despite disabling the Windows Update service on my Pro machines I find it re-enables and demanding restarts, even restarting in violation of the "no auto-restart with logged on user" group policy, so here's a solution to blocking Windows 10 updates that works.

    Go to regedit, find HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\services\wuauserv, export that key to a .reg file somewhere, open an admin command prompt and "net stop wuauserv" and then DELETE that key. This disables and deletes the entire Windows Update service from the system. If you want to update, import that .reg file you saved and update. "net stop wuauserv" and delete it again when finished (you don't even need it once the settings panel indicates it needs a restart, the post-update work is done by internal Windows components.)

    Make a .reg file with these contents as a companion to your "install wuauserv.reg" and call it "delete wuauserv.reg":

    Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

    [-HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\wuauserv]


    No, it's not a pretty solution and won't work for your mom and dad, but it keeps Microsoft from shooting update torpedoes up your computer's buttpipes.

    1. Re:Helpful tip for blocking all Windows updates by jimprdx · · Score: 1, Troll

      >> it's not a pretty solution

      It's not even a solution. Seriously, it's nearly 2018 and people are still suggesting disabling Windows Update as a viable solution to anything at all?! If your lack of trust or Microsoft is that deep, then how can you trust your operating system at all? Either use Windows and keep the damn thing updated and out of a botnet that will affect others, or switch to an alternative OS that you do trust.

      If you have the Pro version of Windows 10, you can trivially delay the installation of major updates for up to six months, which is plenty of time for MS to get the bugs ironed out. With Microsoft in general (and Windows 10 in particular), either you're in and constantly-updated, or you're left behind and unsecured. I can understand people not liking that, but that's the way Windows works these days, so forget bad pseudo-solutions and either sign up or log out and move to MacOS, Linux, BSD, Android...

    2. Re:Helpful tip for blocking all Windows updates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My general policy on Group Policies in Windows 10 is to assume that they won't work, unless they pertain only to windows 10. And then I treat them as if they can stop working at any time, because they basically can. Group policies to disable onedrive in particular seem to be completely worthless.

    3. Re:Helpful tip for blocking all Windows updates by nctritech · · Score: 2

      Oh please, another update absolutist.

      Don't waste everyone's time with your "let it update or the AIDS will get you" line. With major yet rare exceptions such as WannaCry, nearly every single security update I've seen for Windows since the XP days has patched some theoretical obscure vulnerability that usually required the person to already be logged into an account on the machine to exploit or it was plugging holes in the Swiss cheese that I don't use called Internet Explorer. Unless the security issue is really big, it's better to force updates to happen when you make the choice to do it than to run the high risk of the unattended updates hosing the machine somehow. I just did three clean Windows 10 reinstalls so far TODAY because of massively bungled updates going wrong and destroying the OS. Save your theoretical security concerns for ignorant people who don't use their computers to get real work done.

      Perhaps you also missed the bit where I mentioned that Windows 10 Pro was ignoring the update group policy settings including the one that stops updating from restarting the computer automatically overnight. It is more important to me that my overnight 4K After Effects render completes than that I am "secure" a couple of days earlier than I care to be but have to start many hours worth of waiting over.

      Forced updates and reboots are not okay. If you don't like that, that's fine; I don't care if you're unhappy over how my computer is set up.

    4. Re:Helpful tip for blocking all Windows updates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a solution, but it's the only solution. As an MSP if we let Windows do its own thing, then every time there's an update our customers networks would all slow to a crawl, since they each have potentially dozens of machines on (Optimistically) a 10Mb connection. So Windows update is disabled, we push out patches to our on-site server, and then we push them to the workstations early Sunday morning using our 3rd party MSP software. Microsoft's official stance is that if you don't have 100Mbps per workstation on your internet connection, then you can go fuck yourself. They usually won't out and out say that, but they've let it slip a few times:
      https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2013/04/microsoft-employee-on-rumored-xbox-internet-requirement-dealwithit/

      The worst thing is that windows 10 has a peer to peer method that lets machines download the updates from other PCs on your LAN, but when it works at all, it can saturate gigabit links for days on end with only 2 windows 10 machines on the network, and then fail to actually update anything as well. Always remember that Microsoft doesn't give a fuck about what you want or need, and be prepared to work around it, and you'll be fine. Expecting Microsoft things to "just work" will wreck your day (and possibly nights and weekends as well) every time.

    5. Re:Helpful tip for blocking all Windows updates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have the Pro version of Windows 10, you can trivially delay the installation of major updates for up to six months, which is plenty of time for MS to get the bugs ironed out.

      So, first you recommend everyone get the Pro version of Windows 10 so that when invariably something breaks, you can revert the changes and then wait six months hoping MS gets around to ironing out the bug for the next update? Meanwhile, MS updating your system and ironing out the bugs works out the same way Apple dealt with the whole older batteries on iPhones. At best, it's going to work horrible. At worst, it's going to be a broken mess. This is MS with a much wider collection of hardware configurations. Ie, it's going ot be a broken mess.

      Oh, and if you don't believe me about them really ironing out bugs, they still don't properly system update a Windows 10 system with VeraCrypt. That's been a problem since at least Anniversary edition.

    6. Re:Helpful tip for blocking all Windows updates by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      people are still suggesting disabling Windows Update as a viable solution to anything at all?!

      It's a bad solution, but it's the only solution available.

      If your lack of trust or Microsoft is that deep, then how can you trust your operating system at all?

      You can't.

      or switch to an alternative OS that you do trust.

      I generally do, but unfortunately it's not possible in every circumstance.

      If you have the Pro version of Windows 10, you can trivially delay the installation of major updates for up to six months

      You can? My Windows installation begs to differ. Sure, you can tell it to, but it will ignore you.

      which is plenty of time for MS to get the bugs ironed out.

      What Microsoft considers to be a bug and what I consider to be a bug are very often different things.

      either you're in and constantly-updated, or you're left behind and unsecured.

      Which is a problem Microsoft made (intentionally) all by themselves by combining security updates with other sorts of updates. If the result of that is that people dodge security updates in order to avoid the other updates, the blame falls on Microsoft, not on the users.

    7. Re:Helpful tip for blocking all Windows updates by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Actually, this is the main reason I bought the Pro version. It didn't stop Microsoft from deciding my laptop needed to reboot on Microsoft's schedule, and wait until I actually wanted to use the thing to finish the update.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    8. Re:Helpful tip for blocking all Windows updates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ah and then they say linux is hard to use? bollocks!

  25. Re:Suckers by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    come 2019 it will go to a subscription model. Pay up or they brick your computer...

    This doesn't sound so bad given current malware as a service model Microsoft has adopted for Windows 10.

  26. Just saw a friend's laptop install this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We had some friends and family over for the holidays. One of them brought his laptop over so we could play some online PvE games together. After about 3 or 4 hours, we both needed a break and went into the kitchen to grab some apple pie and go watch a movie.

    I remember jokingly saying "you sure we can leave that Win 10 system alone?" and he replied with "yeah, I killed Windows Update, it'll be fine".

    Two and a half hours later, he's running the Fall Creators Update. It not only broke the game we were playing (instant crash on launch), but fucked up about a dozen different 3D programs in various ways, uninstalled several of his applications, and broke the system audio output.

    To say he was livid was an understatement. He had a full system image at home so it wasn't that big of a deal, but it totally fucked up our night regardless. He swears WU and every other idiot auto-updating process was disabled or neutered, and yet the FCU still made it's way onto that system- almost purposefully waiting for the computer to go idle and for us to walk away before it did anything.

    Last I heard, he was looking into replacing that laptop with something that could boot Linux and run Windows 7 under a VM. It's pretty fucking clear you don't own a a Windows 10 system, and you'd have to be a moron to assume that such a computer could be relied upon in any way.

    It's a shame ReactOS isn't further along than it is. If they had decent Windows 7 x64 compatibility and domain support, they'd probably wipe Microsoft off the face of the planet right about now.

    1. Re:Just saw a friend's laptop install this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeaaaahh... too bad I suspect this is a flat-out lie. Funny how many of those happen on here.

    2. Re:Just saw a friend's laptop install this by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I suspect it's the truth, based on my own experience.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    3. Re:Just saw a friend's laptop install this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny how many of those happen on here.

      "Those" = Lies or things you summarily dismiss as lies because they don't fit your preconceived biases?

    4. Re:Just saw a friend's laptop install this by DingerX · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I've seen similar and worse. The updates only break a small percentage of PCs, but those PCs tend to be the most used, in terms of time and features. You remember when tech companies courted "Early Adopters?" Microsoft tries really hard to piss them off.

  27. Every major update break something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can no longer mirror to Roku 2 (driver error) and have to relearn the idiosyncrasies of the touchpad all over over again. That is just for starters.

  28. Betanews again? Does ./ get $$$ for promoting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Betanews this, Betanews that. It's all about directing traffic to Betanews so Betanews can get some advert revenue. Does Slashdot get a nice "thank you" envelope handed over at the end of the month?

  29. How many devices were not supported? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know if its a lot of devices, but I know that at least several users report being upgraded to Fall Creator that had devices, software or apps that were not supported. Of course with software and apps sometimes the update simply disables or uninstalls it. There is some hardware that appears to not support Fall Creator too. I don't know if half is a really good number since so many get pushed this update automatically. Or if plenty of devices are either preventing the upgrade or simply not capable of accepting it? More then half would be great on a voluntary upgrade path for a OS. But clearly a forced upgrade probably by now should see something a bit more then a little over half.

  30. I just had a really terrible terrible idea.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe we should request North Korea turn their hackers on Microsoft, and offer to crowdfund via virtual currency different levels of attacks against Microsoft infrastructure in exchange for helping North Korea stay financed in spite of international embargoes against them.

    Sounds like a win-win situation to me.

  31. Re:Suckers by Obfuscant · · Score: 2

    come 2019 it will go to a subscription model. Pay up or they brick your computer...

    I am seven days away from Cisco bricking a gigabit switch I thought I bought but apparently only rented, because I am not going to pay a surprise maintenance fee to keep it working. "That's some nice PoE switch you've got there, t'd be a terrible thing if somethin' happened to it..." After a year of no mention of a maintenance fee, suddenly I get a "pay up or we turn it off" demand, every few days for the last two months.

    The maintenance fee is large enough that I can buy 8 Netgear switches that do the same thing. My Netgear switch can fail seven times over the next three years and I'll come out even, and Netgear has never threatened to brick something I bought from them because I won't pay them more.

    Proudly windows free for 5 years.

    In seven days or less I will be proudly Cisco free.

  32. Errrr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about test your update thoroughly prior to release with and deploy it to all systems as soon as possible?

  33. So it disabled me. by DingerX · · Score: 1

    Nor could I, on my (Home Version) Asus ultrabook with wifi-only. It eventually forced the update. The update broke the wifi. "Let's cross this one off your list". It was never on MY LIST. HOW CAN YOU PRESUME TO KNOW WHAT'S ON MY LIST?

  34. Windows 10 LTSB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Might wanna check out the not-so-widely known 'Windows 10 Enterprise LTSB'. By default, there's no metro crap, no windows app store, no edge browser, no installed bullshit "apps", no cortana, full control over telemetry, full control over Windows Update (as in not temporary postpone, indefinitely--entirely up to you), no random reboots, no unremovable tiles in the Start menu. This edition also doesn't get horseshit like "creators updates", it's updated entirely differently; 10 years of support for security patches/fixes.
    Keep in mind "Enterprise" is _NOT_ the same as "Enterprise LTSB" (Long term service branch); it's intended for "mission critical" machines as MS puts it, machines that require stability over all the above listed BS anti-features. Sadly enough, and to their loss, Microsoft doesn't sell these editions to individuals/general public, so you'll have to be a little creative and acquire it by other means.
    This is what a real upgrade from Windows 7 SHOULD have been all along.
    The real sad part is, MS doesn't want people running Enterprise editions, not sure how to justify creating what basically everyone has cried about since the release of 10, and continue serving up crap to the consumer editions... I'd say its almost an identical situation as Vista vs Server 2008, the difference was night and day.

  35. Typo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *infecting more than half

    Youâ(TM)re welcome.

  36. Re:Suckers by WallyL · · Score: 1

    Please share what model, or is it pretty much any Cisco product?