Slashdot Mirror


The Human Cost of the Apple Supply Chain Machine (bloomberg.com)

Apple is still struggling to improve working conditions at its supply chain factories. China Labor Watch and Bloomberg reported on Tuesday that Catcher, a key supplier for iPhone and MacBook casings, makes workers endure harsh safety conditions and unfair work terms in a factory in Suqian. According to observers and discussions with workers, the machines are not only loud, but spray fluid and metallic particles that frequently hit workers' faces only some of which have access to safety goggles and gloves. From the report: Hundreds throng a workshop where the main door only opens about 12 inches. Off duty, they return to debris-strewn dorms bereft of showers or hot water. Many go without washing for days at a time, workers told Bloomberg. "My hands turned bloodless white after a day of work," said one of the workers, who makes a little over 4,000 yuan a month (just over $2 an hour) in her first job outside her home province of Henan. She turned to Catcher because her husband's home-decorating business was struggling. "I only tell good things to my family and keep the sufferings like this for myself." "I asked for the earplugs many times but they didn't have any. The loud noise of 'zah-zah' made my head ache and dizzy," one of those employees told Bloomberg.

175 comments

  1. Apple shamers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm really tired of the Apple Shaming Society. It's like theres some group of people out there whjo make it their bussiness to rapidly notify all of us apple users or non-users that the company-that-can-do-no-wrong has a skid mark on it's shorts. Really were not thew naive. We don't exhalt apple to sainthood. It's a company that makes products we like or loath but it's not expected to be saintly. And most people even know that apple does go a mile further than most it is making sure it's foxconn suicide nets are secure and that the toxic effluent is at least mint flavored and made from recylced whale blubber not fresh kills.

    1. Re:Apple shamers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > We don't exalt apple
      Not morally anyway.

    2. Re:Apple shamers by Excelcia · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's unfortunate this has been modded down into obscurity, because it's true.

      When you go to the supermarket, do you find out the working conditions of your banana picker? Do people make sure the apple pickers have benefits? I'm from Nova Scotia's Annapolis valley where a lot of the apples in Eastern North America are grown and I will tell you that none of the greedy rich farm owners here pay more than a pittance for the pickers.

      The responsibility for worker conditions lies squarely with the workers and the government of the country they live. Worker conditions aren't changed from the outside. People's conditions are changed when they stand up for themselves. The Magna Carta didn't happen when the French decided not to buy English exports. The 5 day 40 hour work week didn't happen when consumers stopped buying manufactured goods. They happen when people demand it.

    3. Re:Apple shamers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it's because of paying the overpriced markup for the privilege of an Apple device. They should be sending their business to contractors that support human rights and good working conditions. Or bring the assembly back home.

    4. Re:Apple shamers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Please don't shame the apple apologists. They don't like it.

    5. Re:Apple shamers by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Apple says it investigated claims, found no standards breached

      When their obscene profit margin is dependent on NOT finding breaches, no breach shall be found.

      --
      ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
    6. Re:Apple shamers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To a point, yes, but if Apple is aware of the conditions their supply chain works under, AND they're willing to make a significant profit on their blood, sweat and tears AND if Apple didn't pitch itself as the SJW's best friend...then yes, I would agree with you 100%.

      The demands for Apple to watch their supply chain stems from the people buying Apple's products. Call them entitled or whatever, but at least they're considering the consequences of their purchases (and saying, "hey, other people shouldn't have to live like this for me to have my toy. Fix it."). Of course, the obvious downside is the hypocrisy - they continue to buy Apple products and extol the virtues of the sales pitch which doesn't "demand" that Apple do anything other than what it's doing.

      Putting the onus on the workers is the easy thing to do - we aren't living under those conditions, with those restrictions. If Foxconn (or whoever) loses business because of their poor treatment of workers however, they now have a real dollar and cents reason to improve conditions.

      Apple will continue to not fix things as long as people continue SAYING (not doing) that they won't buy Apple products anymore. This is like the typical abused spouse that threatens to leave but never does...all it teaches the offender is "this dog don't bite".

    7. Re:Apple shamers by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      It's like theres some group of people out there whjo make it their bussiness to rapidly notify all of us apple users or non-users that the company-that-can-do-no-wrong has a skid mark on it's shorts.

      We care because the president told us those factory jobs would soon be moving back to the states, and we want to ensure our local workers are safe. That person that jumped to their death from the factory window could be your mother or uncle in a year, or less.

    8. Re:Apple shamers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The difference is that people buy Mercedes Benz products for emotional reasons, not technical or economic reasons. Everyone knows Mercedes Benz products are overpriced. People that choose to make decisions based on emotional reasoning should take into account the emotional cost of their choices for other people in the world.

      The difference is that people buy Cartier products for emotional reasons, not technical or economic reasons. Everyone knows Cartier products are overpriced. People that choose to make decisions based on emotional reasoning should take into account the emotional cost of their choices for other people in the world.

      Pretty much works for ANY high-priced product.

    9. Re:Apple shamers by lactose99 · · Score: 2

      We don't exhalt apple to sainthood.

      Steve Jobs did, that's the point.

      --
      Fully licensed blockchain psychiatrist
    10. Re: Apple shamers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When a banana costs $1k then you might hayve a point

    11. Re:Apple shamers by Miguelito · · Score: 1, Troll

      People love to attack the top dog(s).

      --
      - My favorite error message: xscreensaver, running on an old Sparc 5 w/ 8bit color: bsod: Couldn't allocate color Blue
    12. Re:Apple shamers by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      It sure does. The key difference is that this is Slashdot. Unlike Cartier or Walmart or China National Petroleum, Apple is the biggest urinator in our end of the pool.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    13. Re:Apple shamers by goombah99 · · Score: 0

      No they don't buy them for emotional reasons but because they out perform others in reliablilty, lifespan, ease of use and low maintain costs while having superb software sets available. they are not overpriced and therefore not every one knowns they are over priced.

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    14. Re:Apple shamers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is important to shame the assholes. They are always shamelessly trying to get more people behind their closed gardens, saying how much they love their idevices. It must be clear to everyone what kind of asshole someone who exalts apple products is or else decent people might start buying their products out of ignorance.
      The fact that you are free to support such company is already too little consequence, shaming you is not enough, but it is what can be done. You are supporting putting people under conditions that would be illegal in your country, if it was against your people.

    15. Re: Apple shamers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are certainly over priced.

      Throwing on updates without testing how slow it will make the os is cheap.

      Providing minimum RAM so future updates necessarily need to be gimped. Features that are software\server based like voice assistant intentionally excluded from older phones for no reason?

      Typically the lowest resolution screen?

      Yup, overpriced

    16. Re:Apple shamers by Solandri · · Score: 2

      1. Apple is held to a higher standard because of their huge profit margins. Typically 20%-25%, vs about 5%-8% for the rest of the consumer electronics industry (net margin). One would hope some of that cornucopia of money consumers hand Apple would be put to use improving working conditions and paying their subcontractors more.

      2. Completely agreed that a lot the time this goes completely overboard. e.g. criticizing suicides at Foxconn, when Foxconn had a lower suicide rate than Americans of the same age group.

    17. Re:Apple shamers by youngone · · Score: 1

      That person that jumped to their death from the factory window could be your mother or uncle in a year, or less.

      Except that it won't be, and you know it.

      When Mr. Trump says something, there is no reason to believe him, he says lots of things. Some of what he says can be understood, and some of the things he says are even nearly true, but "bringing manufacturing jobs back to the US" is not something anyone really believes.
      Including Mr. Trump.

    18. Re:Apple shamers by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

      When you go to the supermarket, do you find out the working conditions of your banana picker? Do people make sure the apple pickers have benefits?

      Back in the 1960s consumer boycotts of grapes and lettuce helped better conditions for farmworkers in the US, so, yes, enlightened individuals do inquire about the working conditions of those who provide their goods.
       
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delano_grape_strike

    19. Re:Apple shamers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. We buy them because it works for us, it fits our use case. If you don't want to use Apple products, fine. It is the same when people dump on others for the brand of car they drive or where they live. People have different needs and desires. Pick your poison. Your statement amounts to, "Stop liking what I don't like!"

    20. Re:Apple shamers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would take into account working condition if I was able to figure them out. But you can't even do that on eggs. "Free roam" and all the other terms they use are all bullshit with the legal definitions so twisted they're effectively meaningless. Even then, the companies regularly lie so if the terms were meaningful it still wouldn't matter. Remember when General Mills starting saying they are gluten free even though they weren't doing any testing? Probably not. A bunch of people got sick then General Mills admitted their GF cereals had gluten. No penalties. Now they're back to 'trust us, we're actually testing our self correctly this time.' Bullshit.

      In America, you can't be a smart shopper because all the companies lie and get away with it.

    21. Re:Apple shamers by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      and I will tell you that none of the greedy rich farm owners here pay more than a pittance for the pickers.

      Comparing the life of an underpaid fruit picker to someone working an electronics production line shows that you either have no empathy for people or no clue at just how bad life is for the latter group.

      Do your farmers put nets around their farm to stop their workers comitting suicide?

    22. Re:Apple shamers by coofercat · · Score: 1

      When you go to the supermarket, do you find out the working conditions of your banana picker? Do people make sure the apple pickers have benefits? I'm from Nova Scotia's Annapolis valley where a lot of the apples in Eastern North America are grown and I will tell you that none of the greedy rich farm owners here pay more than a pittance for the pickers.

      Actually, in some sense yes, I do. Although I'll agree that a lot of people buy the cheapest food they can find, and so the supply-chain care is unlikely to be as good in those sorts of supermarkets.

      I'll bet a "worker on a pittance" in Nova Scotia looks like a king/queen compared to one in the factory talked about here. Most western nations have some minimum working/living conditions laws, but it seems China does not.

      Back on topic: You bet Apple need to do something here. Sure, they might not have to do anything legally, but being the richest company in the world has a few moral obligations, which at least extend to a few earplugs and safety glasses. If this factory can't/won't provide them, then Apple needs to find one that will. I'm sure Apple wouldn't appreciate the precious silver-white apple with a bite taken out of it to be synonymous with sweatshops, premature death/illness, etc. These stories keep coming out, and it's always at an Apple supplier - it's only a matter of time.

    23. Re:Apple shamers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > When you go to the supermarket, do you find out the working conditions of your banana picker? Do people make sure the apple pickers have benefits?

      Ever heard of fair trade coffee?

    24. Re:Apple shamers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I buy iPhones because I don't need/want all the gadgetry that comes with android (I get enough of that in my day job). And, they're smooth as silk when it comes to responsiveness. I just want something to do the basics, talk, text, email, surf, and is smooth and responsive. I couldn't give two shits about 'status'. Being an iPhone user actually gets me negative status at my workplace.

    25. Re:Apple shamers by Excelcia · · Score: 1

      Sure I have. Back at you. There are a lot of "fair trade" cooperatives that technically comply with fair trade rules. All it requires is for the person who sells the product to get a certain percentage of profit. The same immensely rich Nova Scotia Annapolis Valley farm owners I spoke of in my post have several such cooperatives. They benefit from being able to label their products fair trade, then charge a premium from unsuspecting buyers, and further profit while their flown-in no benefits seasonal pickers make a pittance. I have zero confidence in fair trade cooperatives when I see wealthy landowners here laughing because they qualify under fair trade rules.

      But let's say you do buy fair trade coffee, and even if you think it makes a difference, what about your bananas and mangoes and laptop batteries and automobile trim and USB cables? At a certain point you have to realize that all those oppressed workers are sentient people, and at some point you have to credit them with having the ability to stand up for their rights. I would argue that artificially partially reducing the harshness of those workers' environment by pressuring their employers from the outside only accomplishes as little change as those employers can absolutely get away with and simply turns a boiling situation into one that is merely simmering. If you are the kind of person who exploits workers for profit, the moral outrage of end customers is not likely to affect you much. No, it's better to leave the heat source on, so to speak, and let the pressure boil over from within so they will stand up for themselves.

    26. Re:Apple shamers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait until your throttling code kicks in.

    27. Re:Apple shamers by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      > Apple didn't pitch itself as the SJW's best friend

      They do? Well... I must admit that I don't catch many Apple ads in the years since I've had a DVR. I'm pretty sure I haven't seen them mention "SJW"s in any that I've seen though. Perhaps you have links to the videos on YouTube that would support your claim?

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    28. Re:Apple shamers by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      More to the point; Apple is far from the only or first company to contract out to Foxxconn or Chinese manufacturing in general. Considering that we never seem to see stories on slashdot about the working conditions where Cisco or Microsoft or Acer or Netgear or HTC or Panasonic or Visio or Samsung or Fitbit or Huawei produces are made; I smell the distinct aromas of double standards and hypocrisy today.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    29. Re:Apple shamers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only this: "Apple's Supply Chain" is the exact same supply chain of: HP, Dell, Acer, Asus, HTC, Sony, etc. etc.

      IF you own a computer made since 1995, you have bought into and have contributed to the exact same supply chain because all current "computing" and "telecom" devices use the same supply chain. >95% of ALL ELECTRONICS manufacturing on Earth use the same supply chain. There is NO US supply chain. There is NO EU supply chain. There is NO Japanese supply chain. There is NO Korean supply chain. Silicon Valley no longer makes silicon!! Get into the 21st century already!!

      People who complain about this are so fundamental ignorant about the realities of current technology and current supply chains that they have no legitimacy to even talk about any of it.

  2. Re:The treason cost of a blackmailed fraud POTUS by DickBreath · · Score: 1

    Please explain what does this have to do with making china great again?

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  3. FTFY by Hognoxious · · Score: 1, Troll

    Apple is still struggling to give the impression that it gives a tinker's cuss about working conditions at its supplier chain factories.

    FTFY

    P.S. Supply chain, not supplier chain.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:FTFY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, this is about the supplier of the chains they use to keep their "employee's" at their work spots in their own factory

    2. Re:FTFY by tgeek · · Score: 1

      Correct. Apple can fix this problem with a single phone call that goes something like: "Fix these working conditions or our business is going elsewhere". That's sorta a perk of being one of the world's richest companies. OTOH, not making that call maybe helped make them one of the world's richest companies /shrug

    3. Re:FTFY by Train0987 · · Score: 1

      And then there's the return phone call where the supplier explains how much more per unit that will cost Apple.

    4. Re:FTFY by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2, Informative

      I am sceptical about the accuracy of TFA. Jiangsu is one of the most prosperous provinces in China, and is within commuting distance of metropolitan Shanghai. These workers have plenty of other options, so if the conditions are really as horrific as described, why would they work there?

    5. Re:FTFY by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      Apple can fix this problem with a single phone call

      Can, and won't.

      Corporations will, by their nature, do what maximizes profits. Until the local laws change and they have to conform or be penalized, or until Apple's customers stop buying their products over it, things will continue as-is.

      Anyone throwing their $1000 iPhones or their $3000 MBPs into the trash over this? No? Then nothing's changing.

    6. Re:FTFY by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Because there probably aren't that many places they can earn 4000 yuan a month doing work that requires minimal skill. Minimum wage in Shanghai this year is 2300.

    7. Re:FTFY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is nothing new. This has been going on for decades. Apple's customers don't give a fuck though. Chinese don't give a fuck either, they don't give a fuck about each other, look at youtube and liveleak for proof.

      So don't feel too bad I guess.

  4. Cut Apple some slack by DickBreath · · Score: 5, Funny

    Apple had the courage to remove the headphone jack. And to drive prices up to $1,000 per unit. These measures will ultimately result in improved working conditions for those who are privileged to be building Apple's hardware. I heard that the wealth trickles down.

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    1. Re:Cut Apple some slack by zlives · · Score: 2

      this is 100% true, wealth trickles down, so the bottom gets a penny (trickle) for each 1000$ unit.

      now if we only had torrent down economics... but i think that's illegal.

    2. Re:Cut Apple some slack by cmseagle · · Score: 1

      I heard that the wealth trickles down.

      You joke, but in China, it did. Over the past 20-30 years we've seen the explosion of the Chinese middle class, and it all started with unskilled industrial jobs that brought people from the countryside into what are now megacities. A growing share of those new middle class households are starting to be able to afford iPhones of their own.

  5. Robots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All of this feels like a problem in need of a solution.

    I do not know that the solution will not have its own problems perhaps worse than the original problem.

    I think of slavery in relation to modern robotics, only in strict economic terms and minus the human cost, it allowed the foundation of american commerce in regard to certain industries. Robots are servants with no cost. Was society more or less prosperous with servants that had no cost? Our current lifestyle does not account for servants with no cost, would our lifestyle change?

    Would automation improve the lives of these people, or would modern robotics wipe out potentially the only source of income available leaving them in a worse economic situation?

    My gut tells me that we should proceed, automate all jobs possible to automate and begin to move past a society with money. If for no other reason than to have experimented with it, failed, but learned along the way.

    1. Re:Robots by Falos · · Score: 1

      > we should proceed, automate all jobs possible to automate
      Happening no matter how we feel about it.

      > Would automation improve the lives of these people
      Sure, if they own the factories or are a share-holder.

      > potentially the only source of income available
      Nonsense. The 0.001% will create demand for human ottomans, artists/poets/musicians, and a blowjob waiting list stretching halfway across shantytown. That or we'll employ three billion robot repairmen.

      Seriouslytho, Prolekistan has ONE export and it's going to evaporate. The drips of tourism are a rounding error. I will assume everyone knows what happens to countries with no export.

      Maybe we'll get lucky and the Omicronians will just enslave Earth. It's a slightly better outcome because at least the human race will have a step up in medicine and stuff.

  6. Victorian by tsa · · Score: 2

    19th century working conditions. If all countries had laws that required the selling company to prove that their workers are treated and paid humanely the world would look quite different. Which, of course, is exactly why this will never happen. Greed is good for too many people in high places.

    --

    -- Cheers!

    1. Re: Victorian by c6gunner · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If all countries had laws that required the selling company to prove that their workers are treated and paid humanely ...

      ... the third world would spiral further into poverty and desolation thanks to rich western doogooders taking away their only competitive advantage: cheap labour.

    2. Re: Victorian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We should hasten their ascension to wealth by keeping them hungrier and poorer than they are now. It's the least we can do.

    3. Re: Victorian by tsa · · Score: 1

      Or, they would be self-sustaining and not need the West to take away their assets for far too cheap because they are too expensive thanks to the labour laws.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    4. Re: Victorian by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Or, they would be self-sustaining

      Yes, I suppose that living in the stone age is technically "self sustaining", but by that definition they're self sustaining now, too. Not sure what kind of change you're imagining, exactly.

    5. Re: Victorian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no reason most African countries would have to live in the stone age other than the fact that their resources and people have been repeatedly pillaged over thousands of years. When you have countries actively trying to keep them down it is rather difficult for me to stand there and make such a callous supposition such as yours.

    6. Re: Victorian by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      ... the third world would spiral further into poverty and desolation thanks to rich western doogooders taking away their only competitive advantage: cheap labour.

      iPhones are not cheap and the profit margins are huge. Adding a few cents to the cost to cover better conditions and pay for the workers isn't going to make Apple move the factory to somewhere else, because it will still be the cheapest place by far and they have the supply chain set up in China.

      We say this with things like RoHS and environmental levies. Companies selling in the EU had to comply, they asked their Chinese manufacturing partners to comply, and things got better all round. The cost to the consumer was minimal, and it didn't disadvantage or hurt China.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re: Victorian by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      ... the third world

      China isn't the third world.

    8. Re: Victorian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or force American companies to observe the same labor and environmental standards when they move operations overseas.

      If the overseas workers are really willing to work for less in American working conditions, good for them. OTOH, this policy would make it more likely that American companies manufacture in America, providing jobs for the people who provide the legal and physical and security infrastructure that the company executives themselves wish to work in.

    9. Re: Victorian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technicallly Switzerland and Sweden are Third World countries.

      However, by the pop culture definition of "Third world = poor country", China ranks below the Dominican Republic and Botswana in per capita GDP.

    10. Re: Victorian by c6gunner · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There is no reason most African countries would have to live in the stone age other than the fact that their resources and people have been repeatedly pillaged over thousands of years.

      Right, because, say England, France, Germany, Japan, and South Korea were completely free from repeated pillaging for thousands of years. Nobody ever invaded them or took any of their resources.

      When you have countries actively trying to keep them down it is rather difficult for me to stand there and make such a callous supposition such as yours.

      The history of mankind is basically a constant struggle between tribes and nations "actively trying to keep others down". At different times in history different groups did it with different degrees of success, but to use that as a cop-out is incredibly naive. When African nations were raiding and pillaging Europe, nobody suggested that Europe would be a utopian wonderland if only those damn Africans would cut it the fuck out. When Vikings were raiding England, there was nobody blabbering about how those poor besieged Britons would be just fine if only everyone else would leave them alone.

      The rise and demise of nations is an incredibly complex subject; it's a fools errand to try and isolate it down to simplistic causes. Anyone who pretends to have "the answer" is an ignoramus at best. And if that answer happens to be "isolationism" then you're a dangerous ignoramus as well.

    11. Re: Victorian by Kjella · · Score: 1

      ... the third world would spiral further into poverty and desolation thanks to rich western doogooders taking away their only competitive advantage: cheap labour.

      I think you're confusing cause and effect. American wages were steadily increasing until the liberalization of international trade, it's American wages being depressed to stay in competitive range of cheap labor from China, India and so on. If they demanded better pay and treatment US workers would increase their rates too while the 1% would make less profit. I mean seriously look at that red bar, "Real median weekly earnings of full time workers". The median is more representative of the typical American than the mean (called average in graph). Full time workers exclude changes in demographics, the fact that more women work, most of the boom-bust cycles etc. and basically looks at what does an ordinary job pay. And it's been stagnant for close to 50 years. If you want to find Trump's pissed core voters, there they are.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    12. Re:Victorian by ghoul · · Score: 1

      The flip side of bad working conditions in China is a higher standard of living in USA. If US consumers had to pay the real cost of production lots of poor Americans would be living a poor Chinese lifestyle and lots of Middle Class Chinese would be living an American Middle Class lifestyle. Be careful what you wish for.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    13. Re: Victorian by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      I think you're confusing cause and effect. American wages were steadily increasing until the liberalization of international trade, it's American wages being depressed to stay in competitive range of cheap labor from China, India and so on.

      It's both; wages in the US can't rise so much as to be uncompetitive, but neither can wages in other narrations. What ends up happening is that wages in the better-off nation (the US) rise relatively slowly, while wages in the worse-off nation (China) rise much more quickly. Eg. an increase of 50 cents per hour in the USA is offset by an increase of, say 25 cents per hour in China, but the latter makes a much more significant difference to the standard of living for the average Chinese worker than the former does for the average American worker. Wages in both nations rise, but neither one rises enough to seriously affect their ability to compete with each other.

      Of course the statistics you're quoting are somewhat misleading because the liberalisation of trade in the USA coincided with other factors like greater female representation in the workplace and a steady increase in wage equality between men and women. That also drove down the average "real" wage to some extent. But you're right to point out that free trade did indeed have a negative effect on salaries in the USA; you've essentially subsidised the corresponding increase in wages of other nations. Had trade not been liberalized, wages in the US would likely have continued to rise while wages in China and India continued to stagnate.

      If they demanded better pay and treatment US workers would increase their rates too while the 1% would make less profit.

      That's incredibly naive. An increase in worker salaries doesn't magically eliminate the need for corporations to turn a profit. Increases in costs get translated to increased prices for goods, which largely eliminates the benefit of increased wages. That's why corporations look for cheap labour in the first place; because it allows them to keep prices low, which is necessary in order to remain competitive. If you remove that cheap labour pool then no corporation can take advantage of it any more, so all of them will have to raise their prices.

      The profitability of corporations also doesn't just affect "the 1%"; it affects anyone who holds stocks or bonds, whether directly or via retirement funds and such. Even if the corporations were to just take it on the chin and accept much lower profits, it would have a negative affect on millions of people, not just your eeeevil rich boogyman.

    14. Re: Victorian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that you could use the same kind of argument to justify slavery, don't you ?

    15. Re: Victorian by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      No, I do not. Please explain to me how a moderate approach to wage increases is an argument for slavery.

    16. Re: Victorian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless they stopped respecting the first world patents and copyrights, you know, like the US did to ascend.
      They would be the only market they can sell to, so their patrons would be interested in internal market growth, instead of being interested in keeping the population poor for cheap labor.

    17. Re: Victorian by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Unless they stopped respecting the first world patents and copyrights, you know, like the US did to ascend.

      They already do. The amount of knockoffs being pumped out of China and India is astounding, and when it comes to software and media use within their nations, the vast majority is pirated. Same goes for the rest of the third world; you can buy all the latest Hollywood blockbusters for $1 per disc in any Afghan market, but good luck finding a legit copy.

    18. Re: Victorian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technicallly Switzerland and Sweden are Third World countries.

      However, by the pop culture definition of "Third world = poor country", China ranks below the Dominican Republic and Botswana in per capita GDP.

      But they make up for it on volume.

    19. Re: Victorian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      racists gonna race

  7. whom the f*ck cares. Not heartless pls read below by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where is my new iphone I want one!!!!!
    Why is my ifone battery delayed 2 months
    This is sillycon valley. Mine, give me now give me more.
    Bla, etc. I'm entitled.

    Seriously, yes it is horrible.. No human is worth an I fone..

  8. We've known about this for close to a decade now. by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    This is not new.
    It doesn't take 10 years to fix this.

    It's clear apple isn't really trying to fix it.

    Especially for trivial inexpensive things like safety glasses and ear plugs.

    The workers need to be able to sue Apple for disability.

    THEN Apple will fix the problem.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  9. Re:Wait what? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The wife works in a factory and the husband owns a home decorating business? Well THERE'S your problem.

    In China, most factory workers are women. The men are back on the farm doing heavy labor. Most modern factory work requires dexterity, not strength.

    But how far up the chain should Apple's responsibility go? Should they be responsible for the farmers that grow the rice served in the company cafeteria?

  10. Re:We've known about this for close to a decade no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple only cares precisely to the degree that the law, and their customers, require them to care. Not an ounce more.

    The law doesn't require them to care hardly at all, since it allows them to use this cheap foreign labor.

    Their customers complain about this, but continue to be their customers. Therefore, their customers also don't require them to care.

    So, there it is.

  11. Re:We've known about this for close to a decade no by servo335 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why do you expect apple to fix this? Yout hink all the others using China are nto keeping the same deplorable conditions? China needs to step up and say treat people better but they wont!

  12. Re:We've known about this for close to a decade no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's clear apple isn't really trying to fix it.

    Why would they? Businesses don't do things that reduce their profits, unless someone forces them. So the U.S. govt. needs to make laws that govern how US companies treat sweatshop laborers in foreign countries.

    Without these laws and regulations, the businesses will continue the abuse.

  13. iPhone X costs £1,000 by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1

    I thought that part of the reason for the high price was to be able to better pay those who make it.

    Silly me.

    1. Re:iPhone X costs £1,000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's because Apple C-levels need a few new jets.

    2. Re:iPhone X costs £1,000 by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2

      Nope. High prices only go to pay higher executive salaries and to compensate investors and stockholders.

      Companies no longer view that they have any moral skin in the game.

      Use child labor? Fine if it is more profitable.

      Use child labor under conditions that blind people and kill several children a year? Fine if it is more profitable.

      It's horrific. And if we don't stop it there, it is going to return to here.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    3. Re:iPhone X costs £1,000 by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      It never completely left here. Go visit a corporate farm at harvest time.

  14. Let's be honest about this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How much of this is Apple, and how much of this is China, which has a long history of not giving a fuck about silly little things like human rights, and who has some very corrupt businesspeople who will do anything to make enough money to maybe escape the shithole that is living in Communist China?

    Before anybody gets on their high-horse over this, I am saying it's split evenly between BOTH APPLE AND CHINA. Apple would be charging $2000 for a goddamned iphone if they had to pay for U.S. wages and working conditions, and China really doesn't value human life, and treats workers like farm animals and throw-aways. Apple can't make what we'd call real 'hard decisions' because no other smartphone company is going to, so Apple would go out of business. China isn't going to change because they clearly and objectively don't give a fuck, the 0.001% of Chinese who have any wealth will do anything to ensure them and their families have enough money to escape Communist rule.

    The only way this shit changes is if ALL OF US stop buying shit mass-produced for cheap in China and other Asian countries that treat human beings like dogshit. Of course none of you are going to do that so we perpetuate our entire SPECIES acting like brutal animals that prey on our own kind.

    Maybe we deserve to be annihilated for our collective crimes against humanity, day after year after millennia.

    1. Re:Let's be honest about this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You make some excellent points.

    2. Re:Let's be honest about this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering how quickly an iphone can be assembled, almost certainly less than an hour from start to finish, assembling them in the US probably wouldn't add more than $50 to the price of the phone. Considering the parts and materials in the phone only cost $200-$300, apple is walking away with a shit ton of profit. If they can't take a $50 hit in profit to build them at home, or at least somewhere that respects their workers. If they were selling the phones for $400-$500 it might be more understandable, but its fucking $1000

      Considering they position themselves as a luxury device manufacturer is all the more reason to have better paid more skilled workers doing the work. I guarantee if some of the luxury swiss built watch brands moved their manufacturing to China, a lot fewer people would want the watches.

    3. Re:Let's be honest about this: by tsqr · · Score: 1

      Apple would be charging $2000 for a goddamned iphone if they had to pay for U.S. wages and working conditions

      I'm hearing echos of "Lettuce would be $10/head if farmers had to pay decent wages." Of course, that isn't true; neither, apparently, is the assertion that the price of an iPhone would double if Apple had to pay for U.S. wages and working conditions. In both cases, the fraction of labor cost in production just isn't that large.

      According to this, the cost of labor for an iPhone 7 is $5.00 and material is $219.80, for a total manufacturing cost of $224.80. Selling price is $649 for the lowest version. You could increase the labor cost by an order of magnitude and maintain the same price to cost margin by increasing the price by less than 8%.

    4. Re:Let's be honest about this: by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      who has some very corrupt businesspeople who will do anything to make enough money

      You just described every nation in the world.

    5. Re:Let's be honest about this: by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1

      It's not just Apple. Pretty much any company that makes mass-produced products in China with razor thin margins is doing it this way. Blaming it all on Apple says more about the one throwing the stones than it does about the working conditions.

  15. At least Apple is trying by SuperKendall · · Score: 1, Insightful

    As bad as this is, what about Samsung case makers? Or any other computer for that matter? They are pulling even worse shit that you in your Apple Hatred are too blind to also point out, implying only Apple is to blame...

    But Apple actually monitors and takes actions against bad suppliers. How many other companies do anything at all?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:At least Apple is trying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ah, SuperKendall. I knew I would find you here defending your employer. How's work going?

    2. Re:At least Apple is trying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what about Samsung case makers? Or any other computer for that matter?

      Isn't this the "whataboutism" that you so proudly opposed when it was in fashion?

    3. Re:At least Apple is trying by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Why do you say that Samsung is doing even worse, what is your evidence of that?

      Samsung actually has factories of its own, many in Korea where the labour conditions are relatively good. They use other manufacturers in China as well for some stuff.

      You say Apple monitors this, but clearly they didn't notice what was happening at this factory. Is there any evidence that they have people on the ground? I know they said they would do it, but did they go through with it?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:At least Apple is trying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hypocrisy and apple worshipers are pretty much synonyms.

    5. Re:At least Apple is trying by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      How many other companies do anything at all?

      For all I know, most of them. Link your references otherwise.

    6. Re:At least Apple is trying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah classic whataboutism...

      This is about Apple, not Samsung, nor any other company Chinese or otherwise.

    7. Re:At least Apple is trying by Uberbah · · Score: 0

      Ah classic whataboutism...

      classic Apple Hateboi Wankery

      This is about Apple, not Samsung, nor any other company Chinese or otherwise.

      It's about just about every single electronic device you've bought over the last ten years. But it's only a problem when Apple is involved, due to the Hatorade Distortion Field.

  16. There will always be complainants, isn't it? by bogaboga · · Score: 1

    No matter what an employer does, there will always be complainants. Even for Google, where many think is an utopia to work, has folks who complain. Heck, some have even quit...yet thousands keep applying to join.

    Are we asking Tim to kinda randomly send scouts to these factories?

    1. Re:There will always be complainants, isn't it? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      Are we asking Tim to kinda randomly send scouts to these factories?

      Actually, Apple actually already does that. They did over 700 comprehensive site audits (i.e. random inspections, interviews, the whole shebang) of their suppliers last year alone, and if you read the article they apparently conducted 150 interviews with employees at this particular factory as soon as they got wind of the impending report. What the summary leaves out that the article mentions is that Apple already addressed these issues publicly by saying that they found no evidence that the site was failing to meet their standards.

      So, either their standards are too low, they're lying, they couldn't uncover the issue, or the issue doesn't exist in the first place. Take your pick.

      For my part, I've seen Apple cut ties with or otherwise call out suppliers who weren't meeting their standards, oftentimes before the violations were otherwise known to the public (e.g. last year when they announced out of the blue that their audits had uncovered a supplier who was forcing interns to work illegal overtime). As such, a coverup seems out of character for them. I seriously doubt that Apple would try to sweep something this minor under the rug if they thought it was an actual issue, given that it's a trivial issue to correct. So either they didn't find evidence of the issue or the issue never existed in the first place.

    2. Re:There will always be complainants, isn't it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given that it is apple we are talking about; id pick b) they're lying.

    3. Re:There will always be complainants, isn't it? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      And that's your prerogative! Even though the evidence we have from recent history doesn't seem to bear out your opinion and your reason for holding that opinion bypasses any consideration of further evidence, it's still your opinion to hold.

      As I said, however, there's quite a bit more to this story than the summary and headline suggest, much of which was addressed in the significantly less slanted article. It would've been nice if the summary had simply reflected the more neutral tone of the article, rather than carrying such a heavy slant, or if it had simply mentioned some of the other salient details so that people could come to an informed opinion of their own.

  17. Re:We've known about this for close to a decade no by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Last time you bought something, did you check if everyone involved was being treated fairly? Are you responsible for all the production steps that happens when you buy anything?

    Let's say you buy some Oreo cookies:
    - where did all the ingredients come from? Was there any people or animals harmed? What about harm to the land itself?
    - how was the packaging manufactured? Which method was used to procure the oil used to make the plastic packaging? Was it harmful to the environment?
    - how much polution was produced to make the cookies, the packaging, transport it between the supplier and the warehouse, then the warehouse to the grocery store where you shop? And when you drove there to buy them and bring them back to your house?

    Say what you want, but even if Apple are trying, they're only working via contracts with manufacturers. They can ask of them to adhere to certain standards, but the fact is that everything costs money. That's capitalism at work.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  18. Re:The treason cost of a blackmailed fraud POTUS by Train0987 · · Score: 1

    Ignore the Russian troll sent here to make liberals look like baffoons.

  19. Not possible by 110010001000 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Apple isn't able to produce phones that sell for only $1,000 without slave labor. They only have $231 billion of cash on hand. Think of the children of the Apple executives.

    1. Re:Not possible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they don't have over $200 billion of cash on-hand. They have about $16 billion of cash on its balance sheet which is used to runs its operations. The rest of the money isn't actually cash but long term (over a year) securities. This is what is referred to as cash reserves and it doesn't mean it is on-hand.

  20. mod up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I came here to post that too

  21. Everyone knows Asian people are short by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    but 12 inch doorways seem truly cruel

  22. Re: Wait what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    As responsible as the customers want them to be. I personally wouldn't justify paying 1k + for a phone that took $2/hr to make. Especially not when the phone screams "overpriced pretentious tech built on exploited labor" to everyone around me. Sad thing is these workers can't even afford to send a sad face emoji on the iPhone X.

  23. That is what they do by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Apple can fix this problem with a single phone call that goes something like: "Fix these working conditions or our business is going elsewhere".

    Apple has said repeatedly they move suppliers who do not meet their standards. The same goes here, if they do not improve Apple will find someone who can...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re: That is what they do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its not that essy to switch suppliers in many cases. How many can manufacture VCSELs of the required quality and volume?

  24. Re:The treason cost of a blackmailed fraud POTUS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You misspelled balloons.

  25. Re:We've known about this for close to a decade no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oreos are vegan

  26. USA congratulates itself for working conditions by CrankyOldEngineer · · Score: 2

    The USA congratulates itself for having excellent workplace safety, child labor, and environmental laws. Meanwhile we export our jobs to countries that don't give a damn. This makes no sense. Maybe free trade should be contingent on following practices similar to ours. Just an idea.

    --
    COE
    1. Re:USA congratulates itself for working conditions by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 1

      Think of how bad the working conditions must be in general for jobs like this to be considered much better than the alternative options in China.

      Many Americans don't have a clue how much better they have it compared to most of the rest of the world. Even most Western European countries are only as wealthy as say, Mississippi or Alabama in the U.S.

      However, stopping free trade or making it contingent on some other country making laws similar to ours is literally one of the things (To be fair, there are many other reasons) slowing down the process of these countries from catching up and having a better life like in the United States. There is a wealth increase curve where people can afford more and more nicer things. Some of those nicer things include better working conditions and more spending on stuff we take for granted as "normal" in the U.S.

      Picture yourself dropped alone into a wilderness. No law is going to improve your working conditions, instead at the wealth level you find yourself in, you have to work hard just to survive. Having someone elsewhere who doesn't have to cope with that level of survival telling you how you shouldn't babysit your fire and look for food more than 8 hours in a day isn't exactly helpful. Instead, as you work hard, eventually you start to be able to increase your wealth (creating traps for fish and animals, making a knife, carving dishes, etc...) Analogize appropriately to this poor person's situation. There's a reason the savings rate is so high in China. The people want to get their family's lives better as quickly as they can.

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    2. Re:USA congratulates itself for working conditions by toadlife · · Score: 1

      Even most Western European countries are only as wealthy as say, Mississippi or Alabama in the U.S.

      Really?

      Which ones make up that majority?

      The EU average GDP per capita appears to be right around Southern "shithole" state territory, but that average is dragged down by Eastern European countries, not Western European countries.

      Here is a quick list I looked up. This is GDP per capita.

      Norway - $52111
      Germany - $45552
      France- $42013
      Britain (UK) - $41603
      Italy - $34284
      Alabama - $37,402
      EU Average - $35632
      Mississippi - $32,102
      Spain - $31450

      Of course, income distribution and the fact that every European countries guarantees or subsidizes health care also affects the quality of life.

      Sources:

      https://tradingeconomics.com/countries
      https://www.opendatanetwork.com/entity/0400000US01-0400000US28/Alabama-Mississippi/economy.gdp.per_capita_gdp?year=2016

      --
      I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
    3. Re:USA congratulates itself for working conditions by Chriscypher · · Score: 1

      The Romans had Pax Romana (Latin for "Roman Peace"), which they extended to their conquests. No more wars. Good for society and business.

      America should have a Pax Americana, where we extend our hard fought safe working conditions, environmental protections, and living wages to the rest of the world. If you do business with the largest economy, we expect you to abide.

      It would be the best gift to the world of the true American dream.

      --
      "You have liberated me from thought."
    4. Re:USA congratulates itself for working conditions by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 2

      The GP was probably referring to this analysis: If Sweden and Germany Became US States, They Would be Among the Poorest States.

      This analysis was based on median income (not mean or per capita income or GDP) to address concerns about wealth inequality, and takes into account social services, taxation, and cost-of-living. A glance at the second chart, the one adjusted for regional price parity, shows that adjusted median income in Louisiana—the poorest of the U.S. states—is higher than that in France, Ireland, and the United Kingdom, half of the OECD member states of Western Europe (as defined by the CIA), and also higher than the median incomes in Spain and Portugal, the two OECD countries in Southwestern Europe. The exceptions are Belgium (5.1% by population), Luxembourg (0.2%), and the Netherlands (7.6%).

      In other words, 87% of the population of the OECD countries of Western and Southwestern Europe live in a country with a lower median income (including tax-funded social services) than the poorest U.S. state, after adjusting for cost-of-living.

      Based on the above statistics, I feel that the GP was actually quite generous in comparing the wealth of most Western European countries to Mississippi or Alabama.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
    5. Re:USA congratulates itself for working conditions by _merlin · · Score: 1

      But then you'd lose your artificially high buying power and massive profit margins on selling things built in low-cost labour markets. The "American dream" depends on this exploitation to exist at all.

    6. Re:USA congratulates itself for working conditions by Freischutz · · Score: 1

      The GP was probably referring to this analysis: If Sweden and Germany Became US States, They Would be Among the Poorest States.

      This analysis was based on median income (not mean or per capita income or GDP) to address concerns about wealth inequality, and takes into account social services, taxation, and cost-of-living. A glance at the second chart, the one adjusted for regional price parity, shows that adjusted median income in Louisiana—the poorest of the U.S. states—is higher than that in France, Ireland, and the United Kingdom, half of the OECD member states of Western Europe (as defined by the CIA), and also higher than the median incomes in Spain and Portugal, the two OECD countries in Southwestern Europe. The exceptions are Belgium (5.1% by population), Luxembourg (0.2%), and the Netherlands (7.6%).

      In other words, 87% of the population of the OECD countries of Western and Southwestern Europe live in a country with a lower median income (including tax-funded social services) than the poorest U.S. state, after adjusting for cost-of-living.

      Based on the above statistics, I feel that the GP was actually quite generous in comparing the wealth of most Western European countries to Mississippi or Alabama.

      I don't quite agree with his figures though. Some 33 US states are at or below the US annual income per household per capita and another 4 are no more than $1000 above the US median and that includes wealthy California. It sounds to me as if Germany, Sweden and California are about on the same level in terms of per capita income and all are competitive high tech modern economies with a highly educated population. Also, if you are comparing Germany with Alabama you are comparing a country of 82 million people that has a fairly high average standard of living with a state that has a population of 4.8 million, that is a net recipient of federal aid money and has some of the worst poverty levels in the US. Comparing Germany and Sweden to California would be a better comparison.

      According to him:
      EU Average - $35632
      Which sounds about right if we are talking about median income per capita per annum.

      However, according to this: https://www.ceicdata.com/en/in... I get the following average incomes per household per capita:
      US: $29,865.60
      Germany: $31,136.72

      According to OECD per household per capita:
      http://www.oecdbetterlifeindex...
      http://www.oecdbetterlifeindex...
      Sweden: $30,553
      Germany: $33 652
      OECD average: 30 563

      US states (according to the 2010-2014 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates):https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_by_income
      The 2016 figures are from here: http://www.deptofnumbers.com/i...

      Highs:
      1) District of Columbia: $45,877 (2016: $45,545)
      2) Connecticut: $39,373 (2016: $41,087)
      3) New Jersey: $37,288 (2016: $38,911)

      Around median:
      15) California $30,441 (2016: $33,389)
      16) Illinois $30,417(2016: $32,849)
      17) Hawaiii: $29,736 (2016: $32,634)

      Absolute lows:
      49) West Virginia: $22,714 (2016: $24,769)
      50) Mississippi: $21,036 (2016:$22,694 )
      *) Puerto Rico: $11,241

    7. Re:USA congratulates itself for working conditions by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 1

      Yep, if you look at median income and include purchasing power, which is the best comparison.

      Also, if you were to look at various measurements of things like housing size/quality, etc... you see some stark differences in how people actually live across various countries.

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    8. Re:USA congratulates itself for working conditions by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 1

      What you're still missing is purchasing power parity based on cost of living. You need to have both parts, both income and what that income will buy. There's a reason $50K in income would mean you're poor if you live in NYC while you'd be upper middle class in Mississippi.

      Using JesseMcDonald's helpful reference, the countries you're comparing are lower once you compare PPP of the income.

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    9. Re:USA congratulates itself for working conditions by cmseagle · · Score: 2

      Maybe free trade should be contingent on following practices similar to ours.

      That was one of the ideas behind the Trans-Pacific Partnership.

    10. Re:USA congratulates itself for working conditions by toadlife · · Score: 1

      mises.org, the Austrian economics advocacy group? Sure.

      --
      I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
    11. Re:USA congratulates itself for working conditions by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1

      mises.org, the Austrian economics advocacy group? Sure.

      Your opinion of the Mises Institute in particular or Austrian economics in general is irrelevant, as the data speaks for itself. Those median income figures are direct from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, and the regional price parity data is from the U.S. Department of Commerce's Bureau of Economic Analysis—both very well-known (and not particularly Austrian) institutions.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
  27. Think Different.* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    * Does not apply to all human beings.

  28. Form follows function by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    The Human Cost of the Apple Supply Chain Machine

    As demonstrated in their upcoming HumancentiPad product line.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  29. Huh? by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1, Insightful

    only some of which have access to safety goggles and gloves.

    China makes these things by the 100s of millions. You mean they can't walk over to the factory next door and get a few pairs?

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's stealing. Those goggles and gloves will be sold to rich American lesbians who go down on and finger their girlfriends.

    2. Re:Huh? by rkordmaa · · Score: 1

      Chinese mentality is to save money at any cost. Example, I had to spend some time repairing a machine doing some wiring. The toolbox didn't have a wire stripper, I had to make do scissors, they do bloody everything with scissors if they can. So I told the local guys, wtf, go buy some wire strippers, they come back with the shittiest pair you have ever seen. I ask wtf, how much did you pay for these, 40yuan. And why didn't you just buy better ones? Back home decent pair would be maybe 50 euros or so, the answer was, oh I would never buy so expensive tools. I had to carefully explain that the time spent fixing the machine cost way north of 50 euros and a good tool would have payed for itself that very first time it was used, don't think the local guys quite got it. Sometimes I wonder how the bloody hell can Chinese manage their own space program.

    3. Re: Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, the gloves I get, but goggles? I've never seen goggles used during lesbian sex, and I watch a lot of porn. I mean, a _lot_.

  30. Re:We've known about this for close to a decade no by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    And that is why we have governments.

    To ensure people and animals are not being harmed.

    And that's a problem with allowing companies in a country with one set of work standards to use .. say... human slaves in another country where slavery is legal.

    If we don't stop slavery, and deadly working conditions for products sold in our country, then slavery and those working conditions will return to our country.

    Apple isn't trying. Paying a third party to perform random inspections would be trivial to implement.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  31. Re:We've known about this for close to a decade no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Other manufacturers do not charge $1000 for a phone. I would not be surprised to find that the poor sods making phones that sell $30 are exploited, but come on do you need to exploit people to make phone that sells for $1000 profitable?

  32. Re:We've known about this for close to a decade no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can't use that as an excuse to support a company that has literally hundreds of BILLIONS of dollars but only pays their workers $2/hour. Basically at best what you are saying is "It's a pretty big job so it's better that we don't start it" or at worst "Fuck you, I got my iphone".

  33. $1000 in profit on every phone... $100B in cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'd think Apple could solve this problem while they're making $1000 profit on every phone and sitting on $100B in cash. Just pay people more, build better working facilities, hire more people so they don't have to work 16 hours/day.

    It's easy to solve labor condition problems with money. There just isn't the will to do it. Apple loves slave labor like every other capitalist.

  34. Re:We've known about this for close to a decade no by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

    wiling to bet that every single of bit of consumer electronics you own, have owned, or will own is made in very similar conditions.

    Apple is not special in this case; they just make themselves an easy target by the price premium and dodgy tax shit they pull (which again, they are not special or unique in this regard)

  35. The beauty of global business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you can't have the Triangle Shirtwaist factory here due to labor protection laws, you just move it overseas. Sell at American prices, pay slave labor. Win-win.

    If the lazy, entitled American worker insists on things like clean air, clean water, weekends, OSHA standards and the like, move your factory to a more rugged-individualist-friendly nation.

  36. Re:We've known about this for close to a decade no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last time you bought something, did you check if everyone involved was being treated fairly? Are you responsible for all the production steps that happens when you buy anything? ...

    ...Say what you want, but even if Apple are trying, they're only working via contracts with manufacturers. They can ask of them to adhere to certain standards, but the fact is that everything costs money. That's capitalism at work.

    I think most of the mockery at Apple here is based on their faux-concern. They acted like this was all a shock to them, and they had no idea conditions were so bad the first time this was reported. They were going to solve this problem.

    Obviously they haven't. And Obviously they could have. It would take a hit on their profits, but not put them in any dangerous water.

    The mockery at Apple is they were going to fix this problem; their PR department said they would. Then they did nothing. Sure, I bet all phones are made under equally terrible conditions, but only Apple is showing mock outrage and then doing nothing about it.

  37. I am a Samsung Case Manufacturer by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

    As bad as this is, what about Samsung case makers? Or any other computer for that matter? They are pulling even worse shit that you in your Apple Hatred are too blind to also point out, implying only Apple is to blame...

    But Apple actually monitors and takes actions against bad suppliers. How many other companies do anything at all?

    You can buy 3d-printed Samsung cases from many first world countries. You can even download a model and print one out yourself. Ironically the abuses by Apple, a company I boycott due to their human right abuses, anti consumer lobbying, media manipulation, anti greenpolicies and simply not producing good products. Shamefully Google keep trying to move manufacturing to the USA unlike Apple. In fact the raspberry pi is made in the UK in a Sony factory. As an ethical consumer I buy from these companies.

    1. Re:I am a Samsung Case Manufacturer by Uberbah · · Score: 2

      In fact the raspberry pi is made in the UK in a Sony factory. As an ethical consumer I buy from these companies.

      Uh huh. And you typed this post on the pi? Cuz pretty much every computer and mobile devices you can buy is made by the same suppliers Apple uses, and it's been that way for a very long time.

      Apple, a company I boycott due to their human right abuses, anti consumer lobbying, media manipulation, anti greenpolicies and simply not producing good products.

      Sounds more like you've been swept up in the Hatorade Distortion Field and are looking for reasons to justify your irrational, religious-like beliefs in one company's products.

  38. Re:Wait what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Until is more fair?

  39. this is crony capitalism, not capitalism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this were capitalism at work, we would see those jobs HERE IN THE USA.

    Since they're in China, that's because of crony capitalism, companies bought politicians to open China up for such abuses.

    1. Re:this is crony capitalism, not capitalism. by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Capitalism does not mean caring about abuses.
      Capitalism means getting something for the lowest possible cost.
      That's exactly what's happening here.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  40. too big to behave [Apple] by siamesevodka · · Score: 1

    The turn off for me is the overseas sheltered profits. The overbearing miserable greedy Buddhist who founded the company.[That's an oxymoron in itself} Putting suicide nets around the top of the foxconn building should have been a clue.But some people are still believing that because the product is "Swell" the company cannot be that corrupt when it comes to human rights. Burns and Smithers have nothing on these folks. I buy my phones from other companies.Are they that mean to the help? I do not know,but I have heard enough bad news about this overpriced product to take a pass on them.

  41. Re:We've known about this for close to a decade no by tuppe666 · · Score: 2

    Last time you bought something, did you check if everyone involved was being treated fairly?

    In this case that person is Tim Cook who has the Billions laying around he could do worse than properly investigate. Hell hire me. I can solve this problem. How hard is it to walk into a factory and look around for children; workers rioting; basic safety conditions. I don't as a "ethical" consumer do those things. I simply boycott Apple products. If you don't you are part of the problem.

  42. Re: Wait what? by Stolovaya · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Please. Apple makes BILLIONS in profit. You're simply trying to pass the buck. "It's not Apple's fault, they're a business!" Saying that they have to make a profit above any and all other considerations is bullshit.

    Sorry, but people are going to pay attention to this kind of stuff, and they're going to ream Apple about it (though this kind of thing is not exclusive to Apple). That's the cost of doing business. Paying someone so low that it's pretty much slave labor isn't going to get you any gold medals.

  43. Re:We've known about this for close to a decade no by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    It's not a binary "I did nothing" vs. "I checked every human involved at every stage". If you buy a cheap widget on eBay for next to nothing you wouldn't expect much, but if you paid a huge amount of a high end phone from a company that claims to care about this stuff you might be forgiven for thinking that they make at least some effort.

    And yes, I do pay a bit more for stuff I know was manufactured in good conditions some times. It's often worth it because stuff made in countries like Japan and Germany is usually better quality. Actually you can get a lot of very cheap stuff, competitive with Chinese prices, from eastern Europe now, where EU worker's rights are in force. The fact that the goods can be delivered over land and tariff free helps them compete.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  44. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  45. but... but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Steve Jobs!

  46. Re:We've known about this for close to a decade no by sound+vision · · Score: 1

    Did I check? No, but I'm not a global company with billions of dollars and hundreds of capable employees. Apple certainly did check, they have (or had) boots on the ground in China doing so. They are fully aware, they've just decided it doesn't matter.
    Despite not having the resources to check personally, when it's brought to my attention that there are such problems, I avoid contributing to them wherever possible. For example, by not buying Apple products.

    Let's be frank: Apple is a luxury brand. They are not hurting for cash, and their profit margins are fatter than Rosie O'Donnell. They say "Pay", and America asks "How much this time, Daddy Cook? Is a thousand enough?" They have just as much pull with their suppliers, who are in competition for that huge Apple contract. They could easily go to their contractors and say: "Buy these guys some gloves and ear plugs, and we'll cut you an extra 15%." At the stroke of a pen, Apple could prevent these workers from going deaf. That option is not open to individual consumers. Apple wants to have all the power, but none of the responsibility. That is not what "capitalism" means. "Tyranny" is closer.

  47. Murray energy? by dprimary · · Score: 1

    So they work under better conditions then you would at a Murray Energy Mine.

    1. Re:Murray energy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then
      than

      Two different words. Try finding out what they mean.

      American, by any chance?

  48. Re:We've known about this for close to a decade no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I simply boycott Apple products. If you don't you are part of the problem.

    yeah, it's better if people in third world countries starve to death

  49. Re: Wait what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spoken like the greedy MBA trash that you are.

  50. Re:We've known about this for close to a decade no by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    Do they really use vegan sugar, though?

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  51. Re:We've known about this for close to a decade no by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    Not using that as an excuse, but Apple also does NOT pay workers $2/hour. They're using manufacturers who pay their workers $2/hour. There's also the problem of talking about hourly rates in foreign countries in US dollars.

    I know it doesn't change anything for the workers in the end, but let's assign the blame where it belongs. Twisting facts is not a good way to debate subjects.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  52. Re:We've known about this for close to a decade no by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

    Do you boycott 99% of all electronic products? Because they're almost ALL made in China.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  53. Re: Wait what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, why have labor laws at all if someone is willing to kill themselves for a buck?

    Seriously, you can't be this far up Ayn Rand's cunthole

  54. Som day Apple will fall but until then.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple fits in nicely in China.

  55. #FakeNews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously? That Chinese factory has better landscaping than my high school.
    That Chinese cafeteria is far cleaner.

    #FakeNews

  56. Re:We've known about this for close to a decade no by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

    They can ask of them to adhere to certain standards,

    Actually, what they can do is contractually require the manufacturer to adhere to the standards.

    but the fact is that everything costs money. That's capitalism at work.

    Absolutely! Did you know that the vast majority (>95% last I checked) of money spent on making an iPhone goes toward electronic components? Assembly is like 3% of the cost to make an iPhone. Apple sells them for 5x the cost of making it, so doubling the cost of assembly would literally be less than $5.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  57. Re:Wait what? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...Until is more fair?

    It is not Apple's job to give everyone in the world the equivalent of an American middle-class lifestyle. $2 per hour is a fair wage in China, especially for an unskilled worker. It is not enough to afford an SUV and a four bedroom house with a white picket fence, but it is enough for a moped and a room in shared apartment, and with two adults working, and the grandparents providing childcare (normal in China), it is enough to support a family.

  58. Re: Wait what? by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

    Don't shoot the company thats actually over there paying them. IF Apple voluntarily paid them more than it had to though, its management would be guilty of defrauding the shareholders, since they have a fiduciary responsibility to protect and maximize returns by negotiating the best possible deal.

    Let me translate that from business-speak into English: "If you're a mere consumer and not a part-owner of Apple, you must not use the only tools available to you (i.e. buying someone else's product and telling the world why) to try to stop them making the world a shittier place."

    Of all the players in this game, Apple is both the only one that we can persuade to make things better, and the one with the most power to change things because they have the power to dictate terms. It's not like the Chinese government or the Chinese companies would give a shit what we think.

    Apple's hipster cred is the only thing keeping them in business, and on some level they know it.

    --
    sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
  59. Apple and California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You know what they have in common? Building their economy on slave labor. California loves its illegal immigrants working cheap and Apple loves its slave labor camps it has outsourced its parts manufacturing.

  60. Re: Wait what? by Njorthbiatr · · Score: 1

    Maybe because you didn't grow up there you pretentious fuck.

  61. Re: Wait what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you're one to say that basic safety equipment like earplugs and goggles are optional and if you die from working with toxic chemicals, it's your own damn fault?

  62. Re:Wait what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh my lord you're sick.

  63. Apple doesn't give a crap by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    Oh, they will say they do when the cameras and microphones are on, but, in the board room, they don't care...not really too many companies do or they would manufacture in other parts of the world. They know that labor is CHEAP in China, thanks to the communist control over its people, and their lives. No big deal for them to take you out and shoot you if you don't toe the line. All the companies doing business in China are doing nothing more than using slave labor. The people "live" in dorm rooms if they are lucky, work overtime constantly. Heck, remember a few years ago they had to put anti-suicide nets on some of the buildings because employees (slaves) were jumping off the buildings? The only time working conditions look "good" is when they invite the media in, and then it's all smiles and everything looks nice. It's a shame everyone gives Apple a pass on a lot of this, but, it's because they want the iPhone, Mac, iPad etc...and they look the other way.

  64. People don't like to hear how the sausage is made by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every consumer should be concerned about the effects of having their demands met. In order to preserve their appetite, people would rather not research the evils that take place to appease it. Those benefiting from people's appetite also wish to preserve it by deliberately hiding the evils that take place to appease it. Everybody except the mistreated workers are morally compromised (you could argue that overpopulation is a form of evil that took place in China). Apple is the middle-man that uses the desires of an ignorant group of people to fuel the suffering inflicted on another group of people.

    Ignorance is what leads well-intentioned individuals to produce so much suffering in the world.

  65. Re: Wait what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He didnâ(TM)t talk about that stuff at all. Go shave your hipster mustache.

    That company should provide safety equipment and ensure a clean place to work. But that pay isnâ(TM)t the issue here. Thatâ(TM)s what waiters make before tips. Think about that.

  66. Re:We've known about this for close to a decade no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Were any animals harmed? There are millions of vegans in the world, who ALWAYS think about animals when they buy products.

  67. Re:Wait what? by MoarSauce123 · · Score: 1

    Quite a difference between hiring dirt cheap suppliers and cafeteria rice...which I doubt the workers get a break to eat anyway. Apple has so much cash that they struggle putting it somewhere. There is absolutely no need for Apple to continue business with companies that treat employees that badly. Of course, enslaving Chinese workers might just eek out that extra cent per part to make the already wildly obnoxious profit margin even bigger. So how far up does the responsibility go? Within Apple it goes all the way to the top. Sadly, Chinese workers lack the legal protections that are common in other places. So how far does the responsibility go? All the way to the side as well. Anyone buying Apple product is endorsing such labor practices!

  68. Re: USA congratulates itself for working condition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shit...... 50% of Americans don't visit the dentist because they can't afford it....lol

    Are the American per capita income figures before or after their ruinous healthcare insurance and education costs ?

  69. Sent from my android? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you write that polemic from within your google walled garden?

    1. Re:Sent from my android? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol, no.

  70. Company "fiduciary duty" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Parent said:

    "IF Apple voluntarily paid them more than it had to though, its management would be guilty of defrauding the shareholders, since they have a fiduciary responsibility to protect and maximize returns by negotiating the best possible deal."

    Complete bullshit. Please stop repeating this. This is a right wing myth.

  71. Re:Wait what? by DeVilla · · Score: 1

    But how far up the chain should Apple's responsibility go?

    Absolutely no higher than the bonuses that rewarded these choices.

  72. Re: Wait what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would you work in a loud enough work place to develop headaches, hearing loss, etc plus be exposed to metal debris small enough to damage your lungs let alone cause eye damage? Who knows what the chemicals are on the liquids mention we're exactly.

    Then do it for wages per day only the most desperate poor would consider.

    Apple micromanages it's entire process so many esp top exec know fully how deplorable conditions are in it's supply chain.

    Apple CEO just announced bin mainstream media it has over 600 Billion in overseas profits it would bring to US under new tax code is tax her now cheaper than any taxes owed overseas. So not like they can't afford better conditions in their factories.

  73. Annapolis valley by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Squints suspiciously at you...

    I'm also originally from there. Where abouts in the valley are you from?

  74. Trend by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Just like folks export resource extraction like rare earth mining someplace else because it is dirty.

    Just like German, and so I hear California shutting down nuclear power stations, but have zero problem buying the now deficient power from other places that produce it from nuclear power anyway.

    It's basically just NIMBY at a global scale.

    The insane part is walking around patting each other on the back like a job well done, when really they are just offloading whatever problem it is someplace else.