Microsoft Office 2019 Will Only Work on Windows 10 (theverge.com)
Microsoft on Thursday provided an update on Office 2019, in which it revealed that the apps will only run on Windows 10. From a report: In a support article for service and support of Windows and Office, Microsoft has revealed you'll need to upgrade to Windows 10 if you want the latest version of Office without subscribing to the company's Office 365 service. It's a move that's clearly designed to push businesses that are holding off on Office 365 into subscriptions, as the standalone Office 2019 software will only be supported on Windows 10 and not Windows 7 or Windows 8.1 machines. Microsoft is also altering the support lifecycle for Office 2019, so it will receive 5 years of mainstream support and then "approximately 2 years of extended support."
Eat my ass, MS. I'm not running Windows 10, and you can't make me!
LibreOffice includes a word processor, spreadsheet, presentation, and a database.
It's free!
https://www.libreoffice.org/
https://www.youtube.com/c/BrendaEM
As a self employed contractor software subscriptions are killing my business. Adobe has forced me into a subscription model where I'm paying 50$ a month to use their software, Microsoft is pretty much forcing the subscription model of Office 365 on me. Will Microsoft have Windows on a subscription model soon? My monthly fees are going to pile up it's going to make the decision to seek open source alternatives and simple choice.
Sent from my TARDIS
I can't imagine business standing for this. I'm sure many would run Office 2016 for 10 years if they had to.
I have to run Windows. It was my choice -- accounting software. It is really the ONLY reason Windows is in the office anymore...
Sadly Word / Excel work better on Windows IMHO; too many keyboard shortcuts missing in Office for Mac...
I hate ribbons too. Won't use them.
So I prefer Office XP which runs just fine on Windows 7 which run just fine virtualized running as a process on a Mac server.
Windows has no business talking to the Internet (so it can't) which removes a whole bunch of security issues. I can run like this indefinitely. So ... fuck you Microsoft.
Comment removed based on user account deletion
That's fine by me. We're still using Office 2003. Works fine.
I don't respond to AC's.
Yeah, there's definitely no legitimate reason that an upcoming project would decide to deprecate support for an OS that will be 10 years old at the point of release (Win7 came out in '09). Supporting and doing quality assurance on multiple OS targets is totally free from an engineering and testing standpoint. All API features from newer OSes are backported to decades-old ones.
Note that LibreOffice dropped support for OSX 10.8 (2012) and required various Linux components (Kernel/GTK) from 2006.
Removing support for old stuff at the right time is part of the software flow. Supporting the everything-on-everything model means less resources (both development and testing) for other stuff. Surely there's a "too soon" for deprecation" but also a "too late". One decade sounds pretty dang reasonable.
h, there's definitely no legitimate reason that an upcoming project would decide to deprecate support for an OS that will be 10 years old
You really need to stop being a voice of reason around here. I mean we can't have these great hate microsoft bashing threads if you keep using your common sense.
Geezz. get with the program.
I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
You really need to stop being a voice of reason around here.
Somebody has to. You should see my political campaign. I got in an argument with some guy who keeps telling me capitalism is past its end and it's time we moved on; he was very angry when I pointed out that the CEO of Home Depot taking lower pay and fewer bonuses wouldn't "pay for higher wages and benefits" because Home Depot has 300,000 employees and the entire executive suite nets $28/year per employee in cash compensation between them. His argument was I'm wrong because "their wealth is built on the backs of mistreated employees" (notice this ignores the numerical analyses).
Even when you ditch the socialists, that's the voice of today's progressive left movement: make the rich pay, make the businesses pay, make everybody with power pay, make Wall Street pay. I can agree with regulation about banks and such; and I'm interested in something today's progressives aren't talking about: strategies to bring the poor out of poverty and provide more economic fairness to the middle-class.
It makes people angry. It's like the progressive left don't really care about the poor, only about the rich. Somebody's got to say it.
Support my political activism on Patreon.
And here's the link to give them your money.
(T>t && O(n)--) == sqrt(666)
From my cold dead hands
No real reason to at this point....
Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
You can also see the effects of the "progressive" left here on slashdot. Anything that doesn't fit the status quo of "trump bad" gets modded down.
I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.