Slashdot Mirror


Female Uber Drivers Get Paid Less Than Men, Says Study (recode.net)

According to a new study by Uber and Stanford economists, male Uber drivers get paid 7 percent more than their female counterparts in the U.S. "That's surprising, because Uber's driver assignments and pay are gender-blind, meaning a driver's gender isn't considered when matching riders or assigning fares," reports Recode. "Rather, pay has to do with trip length, distance and whether it's happening during surge-price hours or not." From the report: There are more male drivers -- women make up 27 percent of Uber drivers in the U.S. -- and male drivers tend to work longer hours. However, on an hourly rate, women still make less, according to the data, which measured trips by 1.8 million drivers from 2015 to 2017. According to the study, discrimination on the customer side isn't the reason for the pay gap, either. So why are female Uber drivers paid less than men? The study points to three reasons that make the gap disappear:

When and where: The times and places female Uber drivers work seem to be less profitable. That could be fewer overnight shifts, shifts with shorter wait times or surge-price shifts than men.
Driver experience: Drivers who've been with Uber longer get paid more, on account of knowing which routes and times tend to pay more. In general, men work for Uber longer than women so they are more experienced. The attrition rate after six months is 77 percent for women and 65 percent for men.
Speed: Male Uber drivers conduct more trips per hour than women, meaning they're actually driving faster, according to the data. More trips mean more money. About 50 percent of the earnings gap is explained away by differences in driving speed.

166 of 338 comments (clear)

  1. Shocking. by poptix · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Turns out the wage gap really is simply because of personal choices.

    --
    Just because you disagree doesn't mean it's not true.
    1. Re: Shocking. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Equal pay for eeual work. Sums it up nicely.

    2. Re:Shocking. by aussiekrom · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Beyond being able to state that fact, it also allows anyone who wants to earn more see specifically what factors they might be able to change to do so.

    3. Re:Shocking. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Turns out the wage gap really is simply because of personal choices.

      In other news, the leading cause of poverty (that is, people who *become* poor) is getting knocked up at a young age and having a bunch of children you cannot afford instead of completing your education and establishing a career.

      Yet if you dare suggest things like delayed gratification, birth control, the fact that we all know where babies come from ... well it's amazing how people will villify you for that. Even people who did it that way themselves!

    4. Re:Shocking. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Turns out, women aren't fucking stupid enough to drive for Uber.

    5. Re: Shocking. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Is it, though? Seems to me the data proves what we all already knew. Personal choice is still the number one factor for determining success in the United States.

    6. Re:Shocking. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In your troll universe, parents who already have careers never get laid off and lose their income.

    7. Re:Shocking. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They're also not stupid enough to climb 1500ft radio towers, drive garbage trucks, weld, mine, work in construction, or many other low-skill/high risk jobs that pay well.

      Hmmmmmmm...

    8. Re:Shocking. by cayenne8 · · Score: 2

      Funny, when I read that I infer self preservation, by avoiding the type of life threatening or permanently traumatizing situations that are more likely to happen at night (e.g., drunk male passengers). That's a dramatically different situation from actual personal choice.

      It's the old Risk vs Rewards decision tree we've seen before for age in almost any endeavor to make money.

      It certainly is all about choice here, much as it is in some form or fashion any time you want to make more money.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    9. Re:Shocking. by david_thornley · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The next step is to investigate those personal choices. Why are women not taking the more profitable shifts? Why are they dropping out as drivers more than men? Why are we rewarding people for speeding? This just kicks the can a way down the road, rather than explaining everything.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    10. Re:Shocking. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      male

      Ah ha! There it is. Thank you so much; the blame has been properly assigned. Good work, comrade.

      Now on to solutions. Ultimately, we'll need to rid ourselves of these males, but that's going to take another generation or two. In the mean time we should supply female Uber drivers with an armed officer, and tax men to fund it.

    11. Re:Shocking. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In your troll universe, parents who already have careers never get laid off and lose their income.

      For one who so quickly calls "troll!" you sure do seem to have difficulty with reading comprehension. Assuming your "misunderstanding" was not intentional, of course.

      You see, getting laid off, otherwise losing a job/career, becoming disabled, etc. are also counted when causes of poverty are studied. Believe it or not, they're not in the same category as "oops, I'm still in my teens and got knocked up!" Yes, a minority of the time people become poor through no fault of their own, but that's not what "leading cause" means. This is easy to understand, except of course that failing to understand it gives you something to rail against. That's what matters, right?

      Sorry, this is not the easy slam-dunk victory you seem to have wanted. You are not the clever guy who noticed what others have overlooked all along. Shockingly, not everyone who disagrees with you is stupid. Care to argue with facts and reason? If you were raised by a single mother or something like that, you should admit you have a personal bias here. That would demonstrate integrity, emotional maturity, and the ability to be objective.

    12. Re:Shocking. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Last I checked, all the people born that I know about had two parents, one male and one female. This suggests that it isn't just the woman who's making that choice.

      Female selection is seen all throught nature, including in humans. The female generally has more power in a relationship. She generally decides when they have sex, and a host of other important decisions. Did you ever meet a woman who was deathly afraid that her man might "put her in the doghouse"? Didn't think so. If the woman wants to abort the baby, the man legally has no say at all in the matter. If she wants to have it, same deal. Men have exactly one effective form of non-permanent birth control while women have about a dozen. This is not a level playing field. How can you pretend that it is?!

      With greater power comes greater responsibility. Of course the male bears some responsibility. The law recognizes that in the only way that it can, by making him pay child support. But the female has more power in this situation. It is therefore resonable to expect her to bear a bit more responsibility. If the roles were reversed you'd have no problem accepting this, likely because the "woman as victim" narrative is still quite prevalent (makes you feel "noble" like a White Knight) no matter how strong the evidence against it is.

    13. Re:Shocking. by bigman2003 · · Score: 1

      Except for the fact that men are at greater risk of being victims of violent crime. (According to the US Department of Justice)

      --
      No reason to lie.
    14. Re:Shocking. by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 4, Funny

      Turns out the wage gap really is simply because of personal choices.

      You are obviously mistaken. What's happening here is that the statistics are obviously sexist, and probably misogynistic as well. I'm sure if I could be bothered to RTFA it would also become apparent that the statistics are not only racist but homophobic too. I even heard from a friend, who's sisters ex-boyfriend's third cousin's step daughter said that these very same statistics are part of a neo-Nazi group and abuses puppies on Thursdays.

    15. Re:Shocking. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I submit that "whiteness" is cultural, and that anyone can become "white". Here are a few simple rules to do this: a) When in Rome, do as the Romans do. b) While in Rome, do not find fault with the Romans. c) Remember that anyone, by following the above rules, can become a Roman. Indeed, if you can understand how Romans act, and act that way yourself, you are perceived by the Romans as one of them -- or, at the very least, an ally. You will find that Romans reward those who are their allies, and prefer to do business with other Romans. And, since most people with money in Rome are Romans, it does one best to cultivate their company.

      If you constantly find fault with the Romans, you are not one of them, and they will close ranks in both subtle and overt ways against you. You will find that Romans do not want to do business with you, and anything you want to do which needs Roman help becomes harder.

      Indeed, what has happened to the Africans -- the most notable of the not-Romans? They have been bought off by rich Romans -- been thrown a few slices of bread and been given a few circuses -- so that they can feel like they have accomplished something, while their schools are deliberately given undereducated teachers who look like them to prevent upward mobility, and their children are convinced that single parenthood is liberating -- exactly the opposite of what is needed in Roman society to excel.

      A few escape that trap and become Romans -- only to be told by their peers that being Roman is something ugly which severs them forever from non-Roman Africans. Indeed, those who fight to become Romans are beset both by those rich Romans who do not want them, and by their own people, who do not realize that it might do them far better if they were to achieve true Roman citizenship. And yet, many manage; if their children can ignore the besmirchment of their parent by non-Romans, they are easily set up to be Romans too.

      To understand this, just watch TV.

    16. Re:Shocking. by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      Actually, by law, it is ( at least in the united states ). Men have procreation rights, women are free to get abortions.

      Of course, if you meant that they have a choice whether to have sex or not, sure; that much is true. However, women then have a superset of rights compared to men whether to have a child or not.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    17. Re:Shocking. by grasshoppa · · Score: 2

      Actually, by law, it is ( at least in the united states ). Men have *NO* procreation rights, women are free to get abortions.

      Of course, if you meant that they have a choice whether to have sex or not, sure; that much is true. However, women then have a superset of rights compared to men whether to have a child or not.

      See correction.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    18. Re:Shocking. by Wycliffe · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In your troll universe, parents who already have careers never get laid off and lose their income.

      Parents who already have degrees and careers tend to be able to recover quicker. The #1 reason for extreme poverty is out of wedlock children and having children young. That being said, there is likely some selection bias there. Many people who plan on going to college intentionally hold off on having children where people who have no plans to go to college have less incentive to wait to have children. Sure there are other reasons for poverty like health problems, etc... but that doesn't negate the fact that the #1 preventable way of staying out of poverty is delaying children until you are stable.

    19. Re:Shocking. by yuriklastalov · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's not just the statistics which are bigoted. It turns out that all math and science are White Supremacist, so pretty much everything just needs to be destroyed so we can have our perfectly Diverse Utopia.

    20. Re: Shocking. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Anecdotes are like assholes. I got a buddy whose wife pretty much runs his life. Says when he gets to eat, have sex, go out, he basically says yes mam no mam. She has him so warped, he thinks she is doing it because she loves him. Abuse.

      Also, please list contraceptives for men, I'll wait.

    21. Re:Shocking. by tonywong · · Score: 1, Interesting

      There could be other conflating factors as well, given that women have been traditionally underpaid as well.

      1. Women could be expected to drop their shifts sooner than men to do other chores and family tasks. Men already make more than women for the same labour, so by the same token, women should be expected to do non-paying tasks more than men. This is a self-selecting and cultural bias.

      2. Women could already have fewer and less resources than men, so with less income and capital to start with, they may drop out sooner than men overall. By this I mean a woman's car may not be in a similar condition to a man's car, because she could not afford any better to begin with. Or the cost of fuel is more of a drag on her daily income than a man's, on average. They could control for this by seeing if income and age of the vehicle, and income of the driver are affecting the driver's Uber income, regardless of sex.

      3. Of course the big one that everyone is not wanting to refer to is biology. Women deliver the babies and men do not. Women are expected to be the primary care givers so they are *expected* to be the ones who get the kids etc. How are the women Uber drivers expected to pick up riders getting their children when the driver has to retrieve their own child at the same time? I would guess that countries with strong government mandates in health care and child care have a much narrower gap in pay.

    22. Re:Shocking. by Mashiki · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The only gap there is what women *earn* not pay. If women go out and decide to work at a mine as a digger, they're going to be paid $20/hr just the same as a man. The man on the otherhand will be more likely to take that extra 20hrs/week in OT, and she is not. If a woman goes out and becomes a truck driver, she's going to make that same $0.60-0.70/mile plus dock-in/downtime repairs. But she's also not going to take higher stress routes through the NE corridor which have bonus rate pay because city/traffic volume. Where as a man will, repeatedly because it pushes his per/mile payout over $1.08/hr. But according to you and the author of that article, she's being *paid* less in both cases.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    23. Re: Shocking. by guruevi · · Score: 1

      The rate at which either happens is different. Also, when an established educated person gets laid off, they'll have a hell of a lot better chances than an uneducated person in a poor job market.

      As much as we like to see equality for all, it's still all about the economies of simple Darwinian survival and that won't change until you have a free energy market.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    24. Re:Shocking. by aphelion_rock · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They get paid the same, it is just that men prefer to work longer hours, take on riskier jobs and probably take less breaks/ spend less time chatting than women..

    25. Re: Shocking. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Except the data doesn't support anything you're saying. You people have got to stop making shit up. The study shows evidence that female Uber drivers make less than make Uber drivers because they're unavailable during peak hours/ Don't work as long. It doesn't attempt to go into what the average woman's motivation was for making themselves unavailable or working fewer hours. So no there's only one interpretation. Yours is irrelevant conjecture and requires further study. I suggest you stop the retarded nonsense. Get off your ass and put the work in to do your own study on the issue.

    26. Re:Shocking. by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

      Turns out the wage gap really is simply because of personal choices.

      ...when it comes to Uber drivers. The unfortunate thing here is that sexists will seize upon this and tout it as evidence that there is no such thing as an unjustified gender pay gap, without acknowledging that the factors causing it here are not relevant to other industries and types of employment.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    27. Re:Shocking. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Asking why is not the same as forcing equality of outcome.

      Not giving a shit is the worst kind of intellectual incuriosity.

    28. Re: Shocking. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is an article that is literally about the gap being real.

      I don't know where this idea comes from that a gap isn't real once it's explained.

      There's no debunking it, this is just a simple stat without a lot of room for interpretation. You can debunk to what degree the stat is influenced by, say, maternity leave vs. paternity leave, but you can't debunk that there's a pay gap, because that is a point of absolutely proven fact.

    29. Re:Shocking. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, and importantly we can do without Slashdot's click bait like headline.

      The headline should have read 'female uber drivers earn less than men'.

    30. Re:Shocking. by ckatko · · Score: 4, Informative

      The personal choices are already known.

      Women choose quality of life, over raw income. That's because only the male's income (as a number) is a signal of worth, whereas women don't have that requirement. Any man, will date any woman, no matter how crappy her job is. And women choose happiness over shitty hours. So men work more crap shifts to get more money... to demonstrate their value to society and potential mates.

      And this isn't some new theory. It's been settled in the scientific community forever.

    31. Re:Shocking. by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      The mileage is interesting.

      Are the men driving faster than legally possible?
      Or are the females driving slower than they legally should?

      Do the men have more accidents and expose Uber to more liability?
      Do the men have more accidents than average male drivers?

      Are the women driving so slowly that they are having more accidents and exposing uber to more liability?
      Do the women have more accidents than average female drivers?

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    32. Re:Shocking. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Last I checked, all the people born that I know about had two parents, one male and one female. This suggests that it isn't just the woman who's making that choice.

      Last I checked, the women had an option to not be a parent. When a woman gives birth that is an explicit and conscious choice to be a parent. After all, once she finds that a baby is on the way she can choose not to be a parent.

      Men don't get that choice. Only women do.

    33. Re:Shocking. by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Not quite.... these are all broad generalizations. SOME do, but on average fewer women seem to
        have the disposition resulting in them choosing or pursuing those particular jobs than men.

    34. Re: Shocking. by PaulRivers10 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I've been saying this forever. How many guys do you know move in with their girlfriend and live off her paying the rent? How many guys do you know have their girlfriend frequently pay for their meals? How many girls are mocked by guys because they still live at home? Not a lot. You know why? Because don't NEED to do the extra work to make more money like men do. Women earn less money because they can. Because they have a backup plan that involves a guy paying for their stuff. Feminism is about sacrificing women's happiness for more profits. That's why it hates families, sabotages relationships, promotes promiscous sex while fearing emotionally bonding sex. Because by taking away options from women, it forces women to make more sacrifices for money. If women are miserable it doesn't care, as long as women are more profitable.

    35. Re: Shocking. by PaulRivers10 · · Score: 1

      The ones that are still alive get more reward.

    36. Re: Shocking. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Contraceptives for men:
      1) abstinence (arguably)
      2) condoms
      3) pornhub et. al.

      To help facilitate 1), consider trying:
      a) getting an engineering or, even better, CS degree
      b) reading slashdot
      c) APK's hosts file

    37. Re:Shocking. by mjwx · · Score: 3, Informative

      Turns out the wage gap really is simply because of personal choices.

      In other news, the leading cause of poverty (that is, people who *become* poor) is getting knocked up at a young age and having a bunch of children you cannot afford instead of completing your education and establishing a career.

      Yet if you dare suggest things like delayed gratification, birth control, the fact that we all know where babies come from ... well it's amazing how people will villify you for that. Even people who did it that way themselves!

      I agree with your point about life choices... but the leading cause of poverty is still being born into poverty. A young girl from Bello, Colombia isn't going to magically elevate herself out of that place because she resists having a kid, it still takes money to go to school, money her family is short of.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    38. Re:Shocking. by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      Your forgot "as a single woman"

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    39. Re:Shocking. by Cederic · · Score: 1

      The unfortunate thing here is that sexists will seize upon this

      Why? It blows a massive hole in their sexist 'wage gap' propaganda.

    40. Re:Shocking. by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 2

      This suggests that it isn't just the woman who's making that choice.

      This is demonstrably false.

      • Men and women make the choice to have sex.
      • Women have the choice to use the pill, IUDs, sponges, condoms, etc. or refuse to have sex with the man.
      • If a woman gets pregnant, she has the choice to have an abortion and the man has zero say in the matter. If he wants the baby, he can't stop her from having an abortion. If he doesn't want the baby, he can't make her have an abortion.
      • If she doesn't put a name for the father on the birth certificate, she can choose to keep it or put it up for adoption and the man has no say.
      • If she keeps the baby, she can then sue for paternity and he will be required to pay child support, even if he didn't want the baby and he may be denied contact with the child. The man has no say.
      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    41. Re:Shocking. by houghi · · Score: 1

      So why is it that men prefer to risk their live more than women? Most likely because big boys don't cry. (Rather shoot yourself in the head than not be tough). Talking, especially about emotions, is seen as female and you can't be seen as female, because that would be bad as you would not be a though guy.

      I see it not as women not doing those jobs, but men somehow feel they must do that type of jobs.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    42. Re:Shocking. by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      I notice you keep using the word "could". This shows you are just making up excuses with no data.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    43. Re:Shocking. by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      Women tend to pick jobs and employers on different criteria, specifically how they feel about the employer and job. Men are much more money focused.

      Women are more likely to take a job in a non-profit that pays 20% less because working for the non-profit makes them feel better about themselves. Men are more likely to take a job with a company they don't like because it pays 20% more.

      Women will tend to stay in a job with a company they like with people they like even if they are offered more money from a company they are ambivalent to with people they don't know. Men will tend to jump at the higher salary

      Men are much more likely to take a shitty job that pays a lot so they can leave the job and get a higher salary at the next company than women. Women are more likely to choose jobs based on non-financial benefits such as flex time, time off, company culture, and how the job makes them feel about themselves.

      Men and women have different priorities when it comes to career choices. The above was determeined by a female economist

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    44. Re:Shocking. by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1
      He said:

      You're saying that I should be able to take 10 years off work and open up a shop on Etsy and make the same as the CEO of a Fortune 500 company.

      You said:

      So women are the only people who are allowed to be on Etsy and all CEOs of Fortune 500 companies should all be men?

      Why are you lying about what he said, Tony?

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    45. Re:Shocking. by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      Women tend to pick jobs and employers on different criteria, specifically how they feel about the employer and job. Men are much more money focused.

      Women are more likely to take a job in a non-profit that pays 20% less because working for the non-profit makes them feel better about themselves. Men are more likely to take a job with a company they don't like because it pays 20% more.

      Women will tend to stay in a job with a company they like with people they like even if they are offered more money from a company they are ambivalent to with people they don't know. Men will tend to jump at the higher salary

      Men are much more likely to take a shitty job that pays a lot so they can leave the job and get a higher salary at the next company than women. Women are more likely to choose jobs based on non-financial benefits such as flex time, time off, company culture, and how the job makes them feel about themselves.

      Men and women have different priorities when it comes to career choices. The above was determined by a female economist

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    46. Re: Shocking. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Indeed. There are two separate issues that often get conflated.

      1. Equal pay for equal work. There is some debate about how much difference experience should make here.

      2. Equal pay regardless of gender. This is more complex because there is much debate about how much things like pausing a career to become a parent is truly free choice for both parents, and if employers are acting free from bias etc.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    47. Re:Shocking. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Article mentions a book that argues mostly naming ideas in maths after Europeans and Greeks gives the impression that they invented all of it. Note that ancient Greeks were not "white".

      Somehow you read "all math and science are White Supremacist". I think the problem here is your reading comprehension.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    48. Re: Shocking. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I would worry that c) above would be permanent though...

    49. Re:Shocking. by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Did you ever meet a woman who was deathly afraid that her man might "put her in the doghouse"?

      Yes; it's why there are so many battered women's shelters around.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    50. Re:Shocking. by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 2

      Would you advocate giving men rights over the unborn child, and if so what rights and how would they be balanced against the rights of the mother to control her body?

      How about if women are able to unilaterally decide to abort their unborn children, men can unilaterally decide to cede their paternity & be off the hook for child support?

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    51. Re:Shocking. by grasshoppa · · Score: 2

      I'm a fan of fiscal abortion being available to both parties, but more than that I advocate for women to be required to legally inform the father of any pending birth so that he might make an informed decision about his role as a father.

      Note: I reserve the right for the woman to be the sole decision maker when it comes to getting an abortion. Biology isn't fair, and I respect that's a decision that should be left to the woman. However, after that I want men to have control over their own legal and fiscal destiny. Effectively the same rights that women now enjoy.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    52. Re:Shocking. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes; it's why there are so many battered women's shelters around.

      Given the lack of men's shelters and the fact that actual rates of DV are about even across genders, I don't think this makes the point you think it does.

    53. Re:Shocking. by torkus · · Score: 1

      At some point, some sane person will point out that men and women, while equal, are still DIFFERENT.

      Those differences manifest in many ways with various benefits and negatives. As a man, I'd LOVE to have the default option to stay at home and play housewife or not have to worry about my income being the main/required one for survival as most women still have in their minds today.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    54. Re:Shocking. by torkus · · Score: 1

      Turns out the wage gap really is simply because of personal choices.

      ...when it comes to Uber drivers. The unfortunate thing here is that sexists will seize upon this and tout it as evidence that there is no such thing as an unjustified gender pay gap, without acknowledging that the factors causing it here are not relevant to other industries and types of employment.

      And others will simply dismiss one of the few clear examples of detailed factual information from which clear conclusions can be drawn.

      But, ya know, confirmation bias is not really a thing either. /sarcasm

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    55. Re:Shocking. by Pyramid · · Score: 1

      Oh, it's 21% now? I thought it was 7%. I mean 9%. I mean 24%.

      Funny how the number is all over the place...

      --
      ~Any apparent grammatical or typographic errors are caused by defects in your display device.
    56. Re:Shocking. by Pyramid · · Score: 1

      Yes, the gap is real. But demonstrably, not purely because of sex. Womens' choices are kind of important, don't you think?

      --
      ~Any apparent grammatical or typographic errors are caused by defects in your display device.
    57. Re:Shocking. by i286NiNJA · · Score: 1

      Bingo! Politics aren't rational at all.

    58. Re: Shocking. by dcw3 · · Score: 2
      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    59. Re:Shocking. by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      You ask the wrong question in a wrong way, and invent answers that are so naive they seem to be intentionally created to cause misunderstanding of the issues. You seem to be a disgusting sexist pig, but I will give you the benefit of the doubt. You may just be incredibly ignorant.

      Men don't prefer to risk their lives, and women don't have to. This is sexism at it's most basic level. Admit it. Understand it.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    60. Re: Shocking. by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      They would if they were competing for the same job, but that's not likely the case. You just need to look back at the last recession when a lot of out of work managers were trying to get accepted into lower paying jobs, and being told they were "over qualified".

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    61. Re:Shocking. by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Would you advocate giving men rights over the unborn child, and if so what rights and how would they be balanced against the rights of the mother to control her body?

      In the event that she decides to give it up for adoption, I most certainly would give the father rights, unless there's legal proof of some kind of abuse.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    62. Re:Shocking. by WeezulDK · · Score: 1

      Thank you, finally I see someone pointing out the obvious flaw in the "wage gap" issue: It's not that women are paid less than men for the same jobs (that's been illegal since the legislation passed in the 60's), but the actual *earnings* that are different due to behaviors and decisions made.

    63. Re: Shocking. by guruevi · · Score: 1

      You're never overqualified to do line work and other day labour. As long as you can pick up a fryer or stand on your feet for 8 hours, you're hired. You don't show up the next day and they really won't care. Those are the jobs these people are competing for and it's highly unlikely they'll do any better than store manager.

      You cannot go into a McDonalds and apply for a store manager job with a managers' resume, they know that whenever you get a better offer, you'll be out of the door, they want these people that have worked themselves up from fry cook because they know that's the highest they can possibly attain without further education and they're more likely to stay on in that position, providing stability for the franchise.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    64. Re:Shocking. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I'm asking questions I don't know the answers to. I don't know what, fundamentally, is going on.

      I do know that a lot of people want to see investigations until the investigation comes up with one that satisfies their prejudices, and then take that as the correct answer. Some people note the pay gap and consider that wrong. Some people look at more investigations that come up with reasons behind the pay gap, and conclude that, since there are reasons, there's nothing to worry about. I'm asking what happens if we go further, if we explore why these reasons exist for men and women. That's one thing Damore tried to do at Google. I like some of the questions he was bringing up.

      We could also discuss equality of opportunity. Women are more vulnerable to physical attack than men, on the whole, and that isn't equality. Should we do something about that?

      Or the reasons for the reasons. Pay and promotions seem to be based on things more typically male. If we looked at contributions differently, could we come up with a different perspective?

      I'm not offering up answers here. I just want to see questions out there.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    65. Re:Shocking. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Rats. I forgot about the one who has two mothers (one genetic and one gestational) and a sperm donor. Sorry.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    66. Re: Shocking. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      And I've known a guy or two who controlled his wife like that. It goes both ways.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    67. Re:Shocking. by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 2

      The problem with the "male abortion" is that it give the man a very easy way out of their responsibilities. It's generally recognized that for most woman an abortion is no small matter or easy decision, but it's considerably easier for the man to just sign the paper and leave the mother to figure out what she is going to do.

      Legally, a man can't stop a woman from having an abortion, and he can't force her to have one either. If women get a choice, then so should men. Your perception about the difficulty of those decisions shouldn't have any bearing.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    68. Re:Shocking. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Aside from sexual assault (much more likely to be man-on-woman than the reverse), the man and the woman hold equal power. both need to agree to have sex. If you're saying that women have more power because men always want sex, you're stereotyping and claiming that men are usually irresponsible. You're giving up on men and putting responsibility for their actions on women.

      Lots of people of both sexes are firmly against abortion. I'm not, but many are, so abortion is out of the question. The only 100% sure form of contraception is abstinence, and that's just as much a man thing as a woman thing.

      The man is, under no circumstances, forced to be pregnant. Pregnancy is pretty dangerous as far as conditions go nowadays. There's a lot that can go wrong, and not all of that is fixable after birth. It does semi-incapacitate woman for months. It can cause really weird mood swings. The man can walk away with only a financial obligation, and many try to get out of that. This is not a symmetric situation.

      Finally, your psychoanalysis sucks.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    69. Re:Shocking. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I just looked at the moderation on this. Currently, it got +1, Interesting and -2, Overrated. I take it that Slashdotters don't want to talk about this.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    70. Re: Shocking. by MisterFnortner · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Equal pay for equal work is utopian nonsense since there is no way to a) gauge work effort, and b) work is an input not an output. Better: equal pay for equal value. Most employers understand this implicitly. Case in point, women Uber drivers 'work' their auto and their calls just like men, but don't make as much per hour. They are not doing the valuable work that men are.

    71. Re: Shocking. by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      You jest, but that concept is taboo among the more elite SJWs. Gender is a social construct, don't you know.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    72. Re:Shocking. by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      Turns out the wage gap really is simply because of personal choices.

      In other news, the leading cause of poverty (that is, people who *become* poor) is getting knocked up at a young age and having a bunch of children you cannot afford instead of completing your education and establishing a career.

      Yet if you dare suggest things like delayed gratification, birth control, the fact that we all know where babies come from ... well it's amazing how people will villify you for that. Even people who did it that way themselves!

      The reason for not being able to complete an education is not because of having a child and being married, its because there is no available low cost government funded daycare as there is public funded schools.

      In Quebec Canada, daycare started out more than 10 years ago at $7.00/day. Today, it is less than $10.00 per day/child (no food offered).

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    73. Re:Shocking. by SunTzuWarmaster · · Score: 2

      Here are some interesting facts for you:
      https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat...

      13% of mining industry is female.
      9% of the construction industry is female.
      7% of leatherworkers are female.
      9% of sewage treatment facility operators are female.
      7% of industrial maintainers are female.

      had to dig a little deeper to find welders/brazers:
      https://www.bls.gov/cps/wlftab...
      4% of the welders are female.

      Approximately TWO percentage of the carpentry field is female (https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11.htm). You could host all ~30K of them in a conference center.

      However...
      27% of computer programmers are female.

      But it seems to be one long non-stop onslaught of "women in tech, women in STEM, female programmers, female venture capitalists."

    74. Re:Shocking. by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      (1) That's a very questionable statistic. The biggest predictor, by far, of poverty is your parent's poverty. So focusing on how people become poor seems far less important than focusing on why people who grow up poor stay poor

      (2) I'm not sure how "properly using birth control" is related to delayed gratification. I will say a lot of Republicans really really hate the idea of teaching birth control methods in school and making it freely available to students. Given that Democrats tend to be in favor of this, I'm imagine the only vilification would come from religious conservatives.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    75. Re:Shocking. by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      Biology isn't fair.

      However, if we want to pretend to be a fair and equal society, then men should be entitled to the same procreation rights that women enjoy. So either we openly take the stance that men should be ultimately responsible for everyone's choices, or we afford them those rights.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    76. Re: Shocking. by kenh · · Score: 1

      Equal pay for equal work

      But, as outlined in the article summary, the women typically aren't doing 'equal work' so their per hour pay is not 'equal' to their male co-workers.

      The moment a woman decides not to work a late night shift, to only take fares near her home, or to only work the hours her children are in school she's chosen to limit her income potential.

      The only way something like Ãoeber can offer 'Equal pay for equal work' is to shift to an hourly pay structure instead of their current commission-based/per-mile compensation model.

      --
      Ken
    77. Re: Shocking. by kenh · · Score: 1

      Getting laid off from a professional, salaried career, does not explain generational poverty in families where 34 year old women are called 'Grandma' and all three generations are living on public assistance.

      --
      Ken
    78. Re: Shocking. by kenh · · Score: 1

      It's majority white, but not 'Norway' white.

      --
      Ken
    79. Re: Shocking. by kenh · · Score: 2

      A woman that learns how to provoke a man into hitting her - possibly even by hitting the man first - will invariably 'win' in the both the court of public approval AND the court of law.

      It's not fair, but it is the truth - there is no defense in any but the most extreme and well-documented cases for striking a woman.

      --
      Ken
    80. Re: Shocking. by kenh · · Score: 1

      The man has no say.

      The man has absolute say over where his 'boy parts' go, and if/how to TRY and prevent conception... Likewise the woman has absolute say over what goes into her 'lady parts' and how to TRY and prevent conception.

      --
      Ken
    81. Re: Shocking. by kenh · · Score: 1

      Contraception in America is free - see Obamacare debates - and I'm not aware of the US abortion rate going down.

      Democrats like to talk about making/keeping abortions "Safe, Legal, and rare." Next time a democrat spews that party line, ask the man what they do to help make abortion "rare"...

      --
      Ken
    82. Re:Shocking. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Someone probably already has made a suggestion like growth hormone for girls and malnutrition for boys. It's amazing the range of crackpot opinions you can get. No group with any actual power is going to push them.

      I like the metric "Does shit get done? Is it good shit?", and wish it were used more. There are some jobs where it's easily measurable. A factory worker might make sixty widgets in a day, and a random five may pass quality control. There are other jobs which require cooperation and teamwork, and it's difficult to attribute that to individuals. In the case of software development, it's hard to know if it is good for some time. Something that works just fine might have security holes and completely unintelligible code.

      Therefore, employers employ proxy measurements instead of actual productivity, and those are a lot more subjective. Working extra hours is seen as dedication rather than semi-incompetence or being bad at time management. (On-call is relevant to the business.) Soft skills, which can be very important in keeping teams running smoothly, can be undervalued (and probably are frequently). On the opposite side, it seems to be easier to get rid of someone for lack of technical skills than in bad social skills that undermine other people's performance.

      Heck, if employers were interested in getting good stuff done, they would work at getting employees to do that, rather than going with the business fad of the year. Open-plan offices for software developers is not generally a good idea, but it's trendy, or at least used to be. One of the things I like about my current job is the relative lack of crap involved in doing good stuff.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    83. Re:Shocking. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      No, this means coming up with hypotheses that might be testable.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    84. Re:Shocking. by laie_techie · · Score: 1

      Yes, and importantly we can do without Slashdot's click bait like headline.

      The headline should have read 'female uber drivers earn less than men'.

      In this day and age, is there any doubt as to how they chose to word the headline? Female Uber drivers earn less means the onus is on the female drivers; Female Uber drivers get paid less suggests bias on the part of Uber. Which wording is more sensational and more likely for earn clicks?

  2. Women aren't aggressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    About 50 percent of the earnings gap is explained away by differences in driving speed.

    In general, men work for Uber longer than women so they are more experienced.

    Simple biology.
    But no, we'll be told that this is proof of unfair compensation practices by Uber and they should change their algorithms to compensate or force men not to speed by monitoring their GPS while driving.

    1. Re:Women aren't aggressive by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      Well... if they're aware their service is encouraging breaking of public road safety regulations... yeah, they should put a soft speed cap on, perhaps by fining drivers who exceed the limits.

      I say that as someone who routinely speeds and generally doesn't respect speed enforcement (speed limits are artificially low in my opinion, 'everybody' speeds and the roads aren't red with blood so it isn't for safety)... but having a company encourage such behaviour is a different matter.

    2. Re: Women aren't aggressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Who said anything about speeding? It said they drive faster than the women, not that they were breaking the law (or that the women weren't either, for that matter). Nice try at spinning it into something it's not, but you'll have to try a bit hard next time.

    3. Re:Women aren't aggressive by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      That's quite a jump you made there. The article said the men drove faster. It didn't say they were speeding. It could very well be that the women drivers simply drove s-l-o-w-e-r.

    4. Re:Women aren't aggressive by cayenne8 · · Score: 2

      Well... if they're aware their service is encouraging breaking of public road safety regulations... yeah, they should put a soft speed cap on, perhaps by fining drivers who exceed the limits.

      Oh come on...

      I don't know where you live, but where I live and have lived, if you're going the speed limit, you're in serious jeopardy of getting run over by every other driver on the road.

      No one goes the posted speed limits here....I guess, except a few female uber drivers I guess. I'm guessing those are the ones everyone is honking and and getting pissed off about?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    5. Re:Women aren't aggressive by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      'everybody' speeds and the roads aren't red with blood so [speed limits aren't] for safety

      Hah! That's a good example of the logical fallacy called modus tollens:

      If speeding is unsafe, then speeding will make the roads red with blood.
      The roads are not red with blood.
      Therefore, speeding is not unsafe.

      Here's the example from Wikipedia:

      If Rex is a chicken, then he is a bird.
      Rex is not a bird.
      Therefore, Rex is not a chicken.

      Maybe the reason the streets are not red with blood is not because speeding is safe but because we've scared away anyone who isn't protected by a cage of steel and glass.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    6. Re:Women aren't aggressive by Srin+Tuar · · Score: 1

      > If Rex is a chicken, then he is a bird.
      > Rex is not a bird.
      > Therefore, Rex is not a chicken.

      Uh, that's actually the contrapositive. Its not only not a fallacy, its foundational logic.

      Perhaps you should read the very top of the wikipedia page you linked:

      > In propositional logic, modus tollens[1][2][3][4] (or modus tollendo tollens and also denying the consequent)[5] (Latin for "the way that denies by denying")[6] is a valid argument form and a rule of inference.

      > is a valid argument form

      is a valid argument form

    7. Re:Women aren't aggressive by stoborrobots · · Score: 5, Informative

      The relevant numbers are an average of 19.5 miles per hour for men in Chicago, vs 18.8 for women in Chicago.

    8. Re:Women aren't aggressive by Baron_Yam · · Score: 2

      In my area, the only people who go under the limit are in that age range where a doctor should be checking to see if they're still able to safely operate a vehicle. (And man, do I wish the Grim Reaper upon them frequently since one of my common driving routes passes by a retirement community...) In my experience, the only way for men to drive faster than women is for the men to be speeding.

      Statistically, men tend to be riskier drivers (which I'm willing to attribute to testosterone, the cause of and solution to all men's problems!). We have the big accidents that kill people. Women have a lot more of the fender-bender type, likely because they're still over represented in the 'running errands all day' category. Take those 'facts' with a grain of salt, as it's been a while since I've read up on the subject and things may have changed or I may be recalling incorrectly.

    9. Re:Women aren't aggressive by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      'everybody' speeds and the roads aren't red with blood so [speed limits aren't] for safety

      Hah! That's a good example of the logical fallacy called denying the antecedent!

      If speeding makes the roads red with blood, then speeding is unsafe.
      Speeding does not make the roads red with blood.
      Therefore, speeding is not unsafe.

      Here's another example:

      If Rex is a chicken, then he is a bird.
      Rex is not a chicken.
      Therefore, Rex is not a bird.

      Maybe the reason the streets are not red with blood is not because speeding is safe but because we've scared away anyone who isn't protected by a cage of steel and glass.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    10. Re:Women aren't aggressive by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      Thanks! Fixed.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    11. Re:Women aren't aggressive by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Or even that they took routes with more congestion.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    12. Re:Women aren't aggressive by torkus · · Score: 1

      If it's less than 1.0 I think it counts as a micro-aggression.

      Or at least a mini-aggression!

      Deci-aggression?

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    13. Re:Women aren't aggressive by torkus · · Score: 1

      I assume your area is not a major metropolitan one. In big cities the speed limits are 25-35 MPH (lower near schools, higher on highways of course). Typically people rarely drive the speed limit. Either they are stuck in traffic and going well below it (or stopped at a light) or there is no traffic and they go as fast as they can (well, within vaguely sane bounds). IOW, people get stuck behind a few stopped cars, go aroudn them, speed through the next few green lights until they catch a red one or more traffic, and repeat.

      I based this off working in NYC for 20 years and frequent travel to a dozen+ other major cities around the US (including Chicago)

      I'm amused by the confirmation bias in your second paragraph, but not enough to actually dignify it with a response.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
  3. Alternate headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Alternate headline: Data Proves Male Uber Drivers Should Have Their Licenses Revoked

    1. Re:Alternate headline by pubwvj · · Score: 1

      "Alternate headline: Data Proves Male Uber Drivers Should Have Their Licenses Revoked"

      I assume you mean because they drive faster than their female counterparts. But you make a possibly false assumption to justify your chauvinism: you are assuming that the male Uber drivers are driving over the speed limit. That is not what the article said. It merely said that the male drivers are driving faster than the female drivers. There are several possible explanations for such a result such as the male drivers drive at the speed limit and the female drivers drove slower than the speed limit or perhaps the male drivers are quicker to see and take opportunities such as lane changes or timing lights. All of these are valid reasons why one group may be faster than the other group without violating the law. Shame on you for your sexism and your ASSumptions.

    2. Re:Alternate headline by ruir · · Score: 1

      Or some drivers know better their way around and do not depend so much on GPSes.

    3. Re:Alternate headline by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Alternative headline: AC Proves We Should Ignore ACs Who Don't RTFA

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  4. I'd drive a taxi... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    But besides not being able to afford me, the passengers would need a diaper.
    The Stig

  5. Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you do the same analysis in the workplace you come up with no gender pay gap as well.

    Good info though for why no equal pay laws are needed.

  6. Are we different by Doub · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wow, it turns out women and men are different. Are we on the verge of finding a way to tell a man from a woman?

    1. Re:Are we different by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Are we on the verge of finding a way to tell a man from a woman?

      No, that definition is getting more blurred all the time. Soon the "gender pay gap" will disappear because there won't be any recognition of gender.

    2. Re:Are we different by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Apparently not, given the number of people here who don't believe in gender dysphoria. That would require acknowledging that there are more than the obvious physical differences between men and women.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    3. Re:Are we different by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Who here doesnt believe in gender dysphoria?

      Looks like you are projecting something onto people that simply acknowledge that dysphoria is a mental illness and that we shouldnt be chopping off the body parts mentally ill people just because this time its a sex organ instead of an arm or leg.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    4. Re:Are we different by nonBORG · · Score: 1

      The LGBT will let you know that your gender is your choice. You do not have a significant birth Gender, I think there was a news artificial about some parents who decided not to put down the gender on the birth certificate until the child was old enough to decide. Of course the old visual method for identifying if it is boy or girl bits and pieces is over ridden by this new and more advanced method that does not relate to fact or truth but to feelings etc. There was a time where someone who looked at the facts and stated something different was the case would be called delusional.

      --
      You can't handle the truth! - Because I don't post left all my comments get modded down, bye bye Karma.
    5. Re:Are we different by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Wait, which gender...
      https://apath.org/63-genders/

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    6. Re:Are we different by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I've seen plenty of people who refer to Chelsea Manning as "him".

      Gender dysphoria is a mismatch between body and brain. Currently, we can alter the body a lot easier than we can alter the brain. The most successful treatment appears to be gender reassignment. If you're going to try to deny effective treatment for people with what you consider a mental illness, we are not friends.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    7. Re:Are we different by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      I've seen plenty of people who refer to Chelsea Manning as "him".

      Its a mentally ill man. Its the correct pronoun.

      Gender dysphoria is a mismatch between body and brain.

      The most successful treatment appears to be gender reassignment.

      Doesnt alter their suicide rates one bit. Ergo, its not a treatment. Its just bullshit pandering to a mentally ill person.... a mental illness that we dont pander to when its an arm or leg that they want to cut off.

      Dysphoria is magical when its a penis... because magic waving hand reasons NONE OF YOU PANDERING ENABLING CUNTS EVER GIVE.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    8. Re:Are we different by mcsynk · · Score: 1

      Are we on the verge of finding a way to tell a man from a woman?

      Yes. Take a look at their paycheck.

      Bdoom tss !

    9. Re:Are we different by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Sure. Most transgender people I'm aware of just get what they need and go on with life. However, there are people who don't like transsexuals for some reason, and deny their existence, accuse them of being mentally ill, and keep referring to them by inappropriate pronouns and names.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    10. Re:Are we different by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      We don't persecute people for thought crime here. Not yet anyway.

      And now you're talking about the ways people persecute others who are guilty of the thought crime of thinking their gender isn't the same as the sex assigned at birth. Just because something's legal doesn't mean it's right.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  7. feminists BTFO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So in a completely gender blind pay scheme, women still manage to make less then men?
    Can all of you please shut the fuck up about the pay gap now?
    It's clear that any remaining difference is caused by women themselves.

    1. Re:feminists BTFO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So in a completely gender blind pay scheme, women still manage to make less then men?
      Can all of you please shut the fuck up about the pay gap now?
      It's clear that any remaining difference is caused by women themselves.

      And here's the real take-away from that: since the differences are caused by women themselves, trying to artificially change them would be a total failure to treat women as equals by respecting their decisions!

      They're either equals who get to make their choices and experience the consequences just like men do, or they're delicate flowers who need to be protected from themselves. Can't have this one both ways (though a great effort is put towards trying and failing).

    2. Re:feminists BTFO by ph0rk · · Score: 1

      Parent doesn't do data science, I hope.

      Here is a pretty big hint, though: The only thing the population of Uber drivers is representative of is Uber drivers. Maybe also we could infer to Lyft drivers.

      --
      semantics are everything!
    3. Re:feminists BTFO by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think it more likely to be caused by confirmation bias.

    4. Re:feminists BTFO by Kjella · · Score: 1

      So in a completely gender blind pay scheme, women still manage to make less then men? Can all of you please shut the fuck up about the pay gap now? It's clear that any remaining difference is caused by women themselves.

      I doubt it. It's still possible to argue that gender roles are what leads to women working less profitable shifts and having higher turnover, like for example that female drivers may get more sleazy propositions from drunk men late at night on weekends when prices are high or that mom is the one staying home to watch the kids at night or that they get less social acceptance for being an Uber driver. A lot of the glass ceiling wasn't that they didn't get equal pay for equal jobs but that they could get equal jobs in the first place even if they had the qualifications or they'd get harassed for being a woman. I recall reading an article on Ars Technica about Ivy Hooks, here's a few quotes from the 60s:

      Before the NASA opportunity, Hooks had interviewed for jobs in the region's main industry - oil and gas extraction. Despite her degree in mathematics, these companies just wanted her for secretarial jobs. NASA, however, desperately needed talent, regardless of gender

      By and large, the Apollo programs at this time remained bastions of masculinity. To thrive, Hooks had to prove her professional skills and have a thick skin. "I had some of the worst treatment I ever had that first year," Hooks recalled. "In today's day and age they'd probably all be in jail or something, or probably at least gotten fired.

      "When they yank it off there's a little garter snake, or a garden snake, but definitely not venomous. I guess they were waiting for me to scream, or jump up, or do something. So I just reached over and picked it up and turned around to the guys behind me and said, 'Go play somewhere else.' That probably did more for my NASA career than any work I ever did."

      That said, you get pretty much equal pay for equal work. But that's actually pretty well known for anyone who cares to know the truth, they have dug into those numbers and found that actual, comparable men and women doing the same work duties with the same amount of responsibility, overtime and whatnot have very close to equal pay. Some feminists and SJWs simply choose to ignore it. Sure there's the occasional bigot but not many enough to exclude women from getting market wage.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    5. Re:feminists BTFO by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      Parent doesn't do data science, I hope.

      Here is a pretty big hint, though: The only thing the population of Uber drivers is representative of is Uber drivers. Maybe also we could infer to Lyft drivers.

      In the US, I've yet to see an Uber driver that isn't also a Lyft driver and visa versa.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    6. Re:feminists BTFO by fafalone · · Score: 1

      That's perfectly ok, because respecting other womens decisions is fundamentally unacceptable to women today. Some women choose to be housewives, and some choose to be strippers or prostitutes. Some choose to use sex to get ahead. In all these cases and more, the far-left thinks women should not in fact be free to make those choices (by punishing men for them, incidentally, and having police enforce it at gunpoint in the case of some choices).

    7. Re:feminists BTFO by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      So in a completely gender blind pay scheme, women still manage to make less then men?
      Can all of you please shut the fuck up about the pay gap now?
      It's clear that any remaining difference is caused by women themselves.

      I would still encourage young girls to get into STEM and especially computers. There are still social presures teaching them at a young age that that they should be seeking low-paying jobs, and we can still fix that.

    8. Re:feminists BTFO by Cederic · · Score: 1

      the gender pay gap is currently

      a fucking myth put forward by sexist shits that want all the rewards for none of the work.

    9. Re:feminists BTFO by 19061969 · · Score: 1

      No, it's not an explanation. But it is a viable hypothesis that females' own life choices might be more responsible for their lower salary than males rather than institutional misogyny. What is needed is further research, most definitely, but this work presents an interesting (though desperately unfashionable) hypothesis that is actually supported by some evidence: Rather more evidence than the "world = sexist" hypothesis, at the very least.

      --
      bang goes my karma... again...
    10. Re:feminists BTFO by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      As a STEM father with a daughter who was going down that path, I'm glad she decided to switch.

      STEM jobs in general are high stress, low degrees of physical activity, and contain an abnormally high percentage of individuals with poor social skills due to diagnosed and undiagnosed mental conditions. All of this leads to a comparatively poor working environment.

      There's a real reason behind why, at the high school level, only 20% of computer science students are female. Women with the skills to work in computers/IT have the skills to get much better jobs and much better working environments so they are happier and healthier.

      In my daughter's case, it's architecture.

      Yeah except in architecture there are more graduates than jobs.. Sure if she is good she will get a good job, but I know several architects working as waitresses.

  8. "Get paid less" vs. "earn less" by katz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Glancing quickly at the headline, "Even female Uber drivers get paid less", one may get the impression that women drivers are discriminated against. The article could have gone with "Even female Uber drivers earn less than male drivers", but that phrase doesn't carry the same biting edge, does it..

    1. Re:"Get paid less" vs. "earn less" by bogaboga · · Score: 1

      "Even female Uber drivers earn less than male drivers", but that phrase doesn't carry the same biting edge, does it..

      I agree with you 100%. That's sensationalism at work. Some people would characterize this as a small salvo at what should be called fake news.

    2. Re:"Get paid less" vs. "earn less" by Calydor · · Score: 1

      That's actually a pretty good catch. I hadn't noticed it myself until you pointed it out. What a difference a near-synonym can make.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    3. Re:"Get paid less" vs. "earn less" by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      "Female drivers get paid less" and "female drivers earn less" have exactly the same edge to me. But if you want to start nitpicking on the implications of the wording, "earning" is something one does for oneself, which would put more focus on what the drivers are doing. "Getting paid" is something that an employer does for (or to) the drivers, putting the focus on what the employer is doing.

  9. Fun Facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Equal opportunity does not guarantee equal results.
    Unequal results does not necessarily mean there's a bias.

     

  10. Girly dollars by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 1

    Make one girl dollar equal to 1/.78 of a man dollar. That'll even things out.

    1. Re:Girly dollars by Cederic · · Score: 2

      Ok, but make one man tax dollar equal to three girl tax dollars to even up that disparity too.

      I'd seriously support that.

    2. Re:Girly dollars by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      But then the girls get to live 4.8 years longer on average (81.2 vs 76.4 according to 2012 CDC data), so make one man year equal .94 women years. How many dog years is that?

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  11. Re:I don't care *why* they get paid less! by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

    Holy crap, people, I'm kidding!

  12. fixed that for you... by SchroedingersCat · · Score: 5, Informative

    Female Uber Drivers EARN Less Than Men, Says Study

  13. Re:I don't care *why* they get paid less! by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 1

    Too many lobsters.

  14. Re:I don't care *why* they get paid less! by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 1

    I knew that. You knew that. But somewhere out on the internets an army of SJWs are about to crown you their emperor.

  15. Re:Are we different: We both powder our nose by rmdingler · · Score: 1

    Apparently not, given the number of people here who don't believe in gender dysphoria. That would require acknowledging that there are more than the obvious physical differences between men and women.

    Ever watch a lot of Football? European or the American variety... it plays the same. I give you, the the makeup call. Sometimes, official calls are muffed due to the inherent imperfections of the human referees. When the call is appreciably unfair, the human refs remember and there's a makeup call a comin'. You'll also see this when one team's player maliciously fouls an opponent and stands over him briefly in impolite, rather demeaning, celebration.

    The women, finally, are getting their makeup call. As long as the window of advantage is limited fairly, I'm cool with it. Just remember, like the player who lingers over his vanquished opponent a smidge too long, there is a shelf life before it begins to stink.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  16. Re:I don't care *why* they get paid less! by pubwvj · · Score: 1

    "The real question is, how are we going to fix this problem?"

    There you go assuming there is a problem. Nothing here demonstrates a problem that needs any fixing.

    There are all sorts of things where group X is different than group Y but that does not mean there is a problem.

    Men on average have greater muscle power, can lift more weight than women, but that does not mean that women are discriminated against. It is just biology.

    Women on average have less heart attacks and live longer than men, but that does not mean that men are being discriminated against. It is just biology (for the most part). When women stop producing as much female hormones they begin catching up with the men who stop producing as much male hormones which is really much of the issue. Not really an injustice problem that needs "fixing" by PCers.

  17. Working harder, having more expierence, and... by greenwow · · Score: 1

    accepting less desirable routes shouldn't earn you more. This is how men earn more in general by staying on the job for more years and working more hours a week.

  18. Females also tend to drive safer. by Narcocide · · Score: 1

    It's an artifact of cultural influence, and it is not news. Insurance companies have known this for decades.

    1. Re:Females also tend to drive safer. by intertrode · · Score: 1

      It is an artifact of biological influence (testosterone). That is why insurance rates rise and fall with average male testosterone levels.

  19. Re:I don't care *why* they get paid less! by yuriklastalov · · Score: 1

    That's easy, #KILLALLMEN

  20. OHNOEZ! UBER IZ SEKSYST? by Chas · · Score: 1

    Waiting for some mouth-breathing drool-fountain to start claiming gender wage gap and sexism.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  21. Correction to the clickbait title by bjdevil66 · · Score: 2

    Female Uber Drivers Get Paid Less Than Men - Mostly Because They Drive Slower

    Men drive faster and get more fares in over the same timeframe, making roughly 3.5% more cash. (The other 3.5% is postulated to be a combination of more work experience due to higher female job attrition, and women working at less profitable times.)

    It has nothing to do with a battle of the sexes going on - no matter how inflammatory it can be for some to speculate about.

    1. Re:Correction to the clickbait title by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      I would be willing to guess that the men also consume more fuel per mile, because they drive faster. Since traffic is the same whether you drive aggressively or not, this probably means they accelerate faster and weave through traffic more. The extra fuel use should show up in their expenses although it does not show up in their gross pay.

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  22. Re:A Problem by grasshoppa · · Score: 2

    Equality does not mean "equal outcomes", it means "equal opportunities". Results should never be taken as confirmation of bias, but rather as a starting point to ask "Why?".

    This situation is a great bite-sized example of the wage gap, which itself is explained largely through personal choice.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
  23. Re:Women probably choose not to drive terrible hou by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

    Or pick up random drunk men when the bars close.

    I don't blame them.

    I don't doubt that female and male Uber drivers might have different driving profiles. That's fine, but when I drove for Uber (briefly) that was how you made money in my area - ferrying drunks to and from bars. Otherwise it meant waiting a while between trips, sometimes quite a long time. Uber was new here at the time and demand during more reasonable times of day has certainly increased, but I'd guess 9pm - 2:30am is probably still the peak time anywhere there is a bar scene, at least.

    If you don't want to drive at peak times, that's perfectly acceptable, but the days of the week and times of day need to be factored into any statistical analysis before drawing any conclusions about gender inequity with a company that allows workers to choose when, where and largely how they work. I'm not trying to be contrary or sexist at all, just hoping for good science and statistics.

    --
    This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
  24. Re:Overgeneralize by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

    Just because it's true in this situation, doesn't make it true in others.

    There was a farmer had a dog...
    Of course we'll never convince sexists that this does not negate an unjustified gender gap in many other areas.

    --
    This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
  25. Re:How many of Slashdot's editors are women? by Etcetera · · Score: 1

    Do you really care about this sort of trivia?

    I really don't care about this sort of trivia. I hate that, much as spam drowns out the email you want to get, the blathering from the Rust community seems intent on making me have to care by flooding out the useful things with their social justice coding PR.

  26. Why doesn't anyone ever talk about the Prison Gap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Good to see honest statistics about the pay gap.

    Interestingly there is an 800% prison gap. That is there are 9 times more men in prison than women. And when convicted of the same crime, men are sentenced 60% longer.

    This is proof that those who scream for "equality" between the sexes don't actually care about it. If they did, they would look for equality where it matters most - the courtroom.

  27. Misleading title by goranb · · Score: 2

    They get payed the same, but choose to work less...

    1. Re:Misleading title by ruir · · Score: 1

      Modding someone down for stating the truth is not nice.

    2. Re:Misleading title by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      If they got paid the same, but worked less, they would be getting a higher pay-per-hour. The title means exactly what it says. Saying it's misleading sounds like either being deliberately obtuse, or ignoring the details, which are spelled out nicely in the summary - which wouldn't fit in the headline.

  28. Re: I don't care *why* they get paid less! by PaulRivers10 · · Score: 1

    Obviously to solve this inequality problem, women should be required to wear shock collars, that shock them if they're not working the same hours as men. We need to solve this inequality problem - to help women!

  29. Re:Women probably choose not to drive terrible hou by ruir · · Score: 1

    There is actually a problem there, if I get a Uber driver at those times he will tell me he has been driving for 10-12 hours.

  30. Re: How many of Slashdot's editors are women? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It does matter.

    I won't risk the future of my business (and those who rely on me to pay their bills and feed their families) on decisions made by illogical and deeply emotionally unstable people.

    The code might be great until they get pissy and do something stupid like kick out a great contributor because his private consensual sexual activities don't align with the politically correct safe space sensitivities of some other developers.

    But that could never happen, right?

  31. Re:Overgeneralize by Cederic · · Score: 1

    Who are these sexists that support an unjustified gender gap?

    Most of us are wandering around trying to see where the fuck this supposed gender gap actually is.

  32. Paid for quantifiable performance by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1

    This illustrates quite clearly that one can't measure performance unless it's quantifiable. The blanket statement that women make less than men because of sexism isn't quantifiable. Performance on jobs like driving for Uber or producing physical products is easy to measure. How many widgets did you make? How many miles did you drive? Most jobs aren't like that. Two graphic artists can't be measured against each other regardless of the gender of the artist because they don't work on the same project and with the same team of marketing flakes. Some team members may be more demanding than others and some projects may be more complex than others. Ergo, you have to resort to more subjective means to evaluate performance.

  33. SOLUTION by PortHaven · · Score: 1

    FORCE WOMEN TO WORK EQUALLY...

    I mean, my ex-wife is taking $2,000/month. By choosing to work part-time, she gains herself more free money.

    No more stay at home moms, make them work.

  34. Or the child support gap... by PortHaven · · Score: 1

    Or the fact, that even when a father receives primary custody, or makes less than the mother. Mothers are often assigned lower child support payments for equivalent wages. Furthermore, mother's are less likely to pay their support obligations than fathers.

  35. This is good data by adfraggs · · Score: 1

    It's a really good example of a wage gap with a good breakdown of how that gap occurs. What you make of that is another discussion, but at least there is now some robust data to fuel that discussion.

  36. Re:Why doesn't anyone ever talk about the Prison G by adfraggs · · Score: 1

    It's fairly obvious that people fighting for these kinds of issues are focused on some specific group or another. It's beside the point to get uptight because they might use the word "equality". That reduces it to some petty argument over semantics when I think we can mostly all admit that each of us is focused on helping ourselves and whatever groups we identify with. The important issues are the ones that highlight a genuine inequality, and the sentencing and incarceration rates for men are a genuine inequality. That isn't going to get addressed by heckling feminists and complaining that they're not universally addressing every possible instance of gender inequality in the world. If you think something should be done, get on it yourself. It's taken women 100s of years of activism to get to where they are today, it's not necessarily going to be any easier for men to get the same results.

  37. Re:I don't care *why* they get paid less! by iggymanz · · Score: 1

    there are already apps for that, it's just that you don't get to ride in a car