Slashdot Mirror


Twitch To Ban Users For 'Hate' on Other Platforms (bbc.com)

Twitch has updated its guidelines so that abuse taking place on other platforms can contribute to a suspension on the streaming site. From a report: Directing "hate or harassment" towards someone on Twitch using other services will be considered a policy violation. Conduct Twitch deems "hateful" on any platform will result in an "immediate indefinite suspension." Sexual conduct rules have also been changed to consider the "context" of a stream. Moderators will pay attention to clothing, the title of a stream, camera angles and chat moderation when deciding whether something is sexually inappropriate.

155 comments

  1. Good idea by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    This should cut down on the instances of female gamers with suspiciously low cut tops and suspiciously high camera angles.

    1. Re:Good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being a conservative Republican, I am offended by the idea of anyone engaging in sexual behavior except me.

    2. Re:Good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cleavage streamers are arguably the largest source of traffic/income for Twitch, they're going nowhere. This is all about getting rid of the annoying shits who can't go 5 minutes without espousing vitriol and also use the same usernames for multiple services.

    3. Re:Good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't Twitch all about money? I probably wouldn't try to cut down on such things if I wanted more money.

    4. Re:Good idea by RedK · · Score: 2

      This should cut down on the instances of female gamers with suspiciously low cut tops and suspiciously high camera angles.

      Yeah, stop showing those heels off! You'll make yourself unfit to marry!

      --
      "Not to mention all the idiots who use words like boxen."
      Anonymous Coward on Monday August 04, @06:49PM
    5. Re:Good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I once posted here that I thought windows was a fine OS for desktop computing and twitch banned me

    6. Re:Good idea by Woldscum · · Score: 1

      Will not do damned thing. If Twitch wanted to stop it. They only need to ban cleavage and muscle/spaghetti strap shirts. For both males and females. Problem would be solved. But they want the Boob streams on Twitch. Think Corporate work casual Friday.

    7. Re:Good idea by 110010001000 · · Score: 4, Funny

      No one in 2018 uses sexuality for personal gain. That would be exploitation and no modern company would support exploitation of their customers and content creators.

    8. Re:Good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody is pro-Big Brother. Methinks a shill is afoot.

    9. Re: Good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Women and men are exactly the same. Except that one group will willingly toil, take risks, sacrifice and even die to bang the other group. That's all.

    10. Re: Good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dammmmn dude! dat dis was sick! He just got rekt bro.

    11. Re: Good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ask Mueller what he believes lol. Then find out, bitch traitor.

    12. Re:Good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What holes? And what does this have to do with the British Broadcasting Corporation?

    13. Re:Good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Cleavage streamers"... are they like Cleveland Steamers? If so, I'm not sure I want to see that.

    14. Re:Good idea by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      It is about getting the Riff-Raff out. So they can get serious investors money in it.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    15. Re: Good idea by c6gunner · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It was only a matter of time until democrats ended up pursuing their own version of McCarthyism.

    16. Re:Good idea by Thruen · · Score: 1

      You have been a comment hero lately, good sir. Thanks for your contributions! You'd get all my mod points if I had any.

    17. Re: Good idea by Train0987 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      The best thing Trump has ever done is exposing the tyranny of the Left.

    18. Re: Good idea by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, that's changing. Look at marriage rates and even sex rates in the newer generations.

    19. Re:Good idea by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Twitch is popular with the kids, whose parents get them the subscriptions... So they want to different themselves from camgirl sites.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    20. Re: Good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMEGALUL

    21. Re:Good idea by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      Cleveland has nothing to do with cleavage

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    22. Re:Good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what does this have to do with the British Broadcasting Corporation?
      When you film it they are "actresses".

    23. Re:Good idea by nnet · · Score: 1

      Of course he does.

    24. Re:Good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get investors money in? The company is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Amazon!

    25. Re:Good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being a conservative Republican, I am offended by the idea of anyone engaging in sexual behavior except me.

      Damn, you uppity liberals never cease to amaze me with how big of douches you all are. Please kindly piss off back to Europe, all of you. Now.

    26. Re:Good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea heaven help children who'll see a booby streamer. Gamers suddenly become prudes when girls are making money on *their* platform.

    27. Re: Good idea by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Killing off both the Clinton and the Bush dynasty was a real and positive accomplishment, too.

    28. Re: Good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You tell 'em, Boris!

    29. Re:Good idea by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I find it dishonest. Just take your fucking bra off and stream on a porn service.

      Leave games to people that actually like them. I hate twitch streams that include video of the person playing the game because I'm there to see the fucking game, not the person playing it, whatever gender they are.

    30. Re:Good idea by Cederic · · Score: 1

      The financial services company I recently worked at had people wearing spaghetti straps on Fridays.

      Some of the girls, too.

    31. Re: Good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His greatest accomplishment will be dying obese in prison.

  2. Re:Consistency? by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    Twich, not Twitter. You are my brother, but you need to learn to read the headline!

  3. Re:Consistency? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    If insulting a world leaders was seen as a violation of this policy, pretty much anyone who posts about politics would be muted.

  4. Re: Consistency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What exactly does it take to get certain members off of twitter?

    Not sure. But what has that got to do with Twitch?

  5. The cure for gamer cancer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No more edgy gamer bois screaming the N-word, well not televised, you'll need to play whatever game to get the full cancer expierence.

    1. Re:The cure for gamer cancer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Growing pains. Right now marketing is binary, porn and everything else, but eventually it will balkanize to where nobody will watch edgy gamers who don't say the n-word.

  6. Re:Consistency? by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 2

    Son of a.

    Yep. I was wrong. Apparently I can't even read TFH these days.

    Nothing else. I was wrong.

  7. Re:Consistency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Insulting world leaders"

    So you are saying anybody who insults Trump on any social media platform should be banned from Twitter?

    THANKS FOR PLAYING!

  8. Re: Consistency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You didn't even read the headline, much less the summary.. You fucking imbecile.

  9. Re:Consistency? by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    It is OK. Soon AI will take over the world and all of your problems will disappear.

  10. Benevolent Overloards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Good thing there's no disagreement on the internet what the definition of hate speech is and the benevolent overloads over at twitch will adhere to the strict definition and show no cultural or PC bias in how they dole out justice.

    Another platform about to be ruined by PC hysteria.

    1. Re:Benevolent Overloards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Voat is over there, Sparky. Feel free to use it to voice your outrage with the other 40 people that represent the silent majority that don't find the words ni*ger and fa*got offensive, even in the context gamers use them.

    2. Re:Benevolent Overloards by Z80a · · Score: 1

      And then you get banned from twitch anyway.
      To not mention that this could slip down to stuff like "hate speech against corporations", such as telling how your phone exploded on your face, or sent all your personal data to some advertising company.

    3. Re:Benevolent Overloards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm glad you feel comfortable in the majority who are faggots who take offense over words.

    4. Re:Benevolent Overloards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't take offense, chief. I just don't expect someone's else's platform to support my bullshit and then cry about it when they don't. Personal responsibility is a mother fucker, and not simply some buzzword so you get to pay less taxes.

    5. Re:Benevolent Overloards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right, it very well could. And if you don't like it, vote with your wallet and boycott the site or use another that has looser rules. But let's not pretend this is SJW fascism at work. They don't want tits on display and they don't want excess trolling getting out of hand and they're free to do this with their property. Full stop.

  11. Wikipedia does the same thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They have their own BADSITES policy meaning if you talk bad about the power hungry admins on another site they will ban you.

    1. Re: Wikipedia does the same thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How tolerant

    2. Re:Wikipedia does the same thing by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      This is known as "taking responsibility for your actions".

      Yes if you act like an utter arse in one pub, people who know you're an utter arse aren't going to magically treat you as a new person when you try another pub. The same applies online and I'm honestly surprised to find that people seem to think otherwise.

      You have a right to free speech, yu don't have a right to insist that people forget what you said and treat you as if you haven't said it.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    3. Re:Wikipedia does the same thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, when some PC asshole tone polices a conversation between others and takes offense when he's told to fuck off, all's good? After all, his state of mind just a consequence of his expression, right? Somehow, I doubt such sanctimonious hypocrites would agree.

      You're right that there can be consequence to speech, but the true colors of social justice show when the magnitude varies not by what's said, but by what social groups are involved (typically assumed by skin color/genitals/preferences etc). When these PC hypocrites take such attributes (often while claiming they shouldn't be used to judge people), and use them to decide who gets fundamental rights like speech and who doesn't, they become the tyranny they claim to fight.

    4. Re:Wikipedia does the same thing by ayesnymous · · Score: 1

      How would they know, assuming you're not stupid enough to use the same username on another site?

    5. Re:Wikipedia does the same thing by Cederic · · Score: 2

      If I act like an utter arse at the pub my employer doesn't sack me.
      If I act like an utter arse in the office, my friends still go to the pub with me.

      I'm still the same person, I look the same, I use the same name. My behaviour is differentiated by where I am and the context.

      If I call you a cunt on Slashdot it's because I feel you've been acting like a cunt and Slashdot (mostly) doesn't censor its users language. Why the fuck should that get me banned from Twitch?

    6. Re:Wikipedia does the same thing by serviscope_minor · · Score: 0

      If I call you a cunt on Slashdot it's because I feel you've been acting like a cunt and Slashdot (mostly) doesn't censor its users language. Why the fuck should that get me banned from Twitch?

      Translation: why to those evil librulhs insist I take responsiblity for my actions.

      If you act like an arse it's your fault if people don't want to deal with you.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    7. Re:Wikipedia does the same thing by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      If I act like an utter arse at the pub my employer doesn't sack me.

      I don't think the conversation is about being denied employment, merely access to social spaces on the basis of behavior in other social spaces. Most social spaces have some degree of gatekeeping taking place, and it's not unknown for pubs to ban people on the basis of extreme "acting like an utter arse" in other pubs.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    8. Re: Wikipedia does the same thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Arse" & "Pub" are a dead giveaway that we are dealing with another Brit Twit yet again demonstrating why the UK is slowly sliding into irrelevancy. The British Empire was once the ruler of the world. Now they squirm and wince if someone uses bad language or suggests that sand monkeys are transforming the place into another Crapistan. I guess the riff raff are too used to bowing to their betters. Now toddle off and pucker up and plant one right on the Queen's backside like a good little serf.

  12. Game Experience May Change During Online Play by bigmacx · · Score: 5, Funny

    We really, really shouldn't shed light on the world of text chat and voip in online gaming.

    All you're gonna find is a toxic anti-world where we act in ways we're nothing like in RL and there's a periodic appearance of a squeaker using a surprisingly well-versed foul mouth completely inappropriate for their level of life-experience. I always ask them to put their hot single mom on the headset.

    Squeakers, the Easter Eggs of online gaming.

    1. Re:Game Experience May Change During Online Play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn straight!
      I earned my sailor's mouth by actually serving in the Navy!
      Little $#%^&#& @@#$@#$ ##%%$ E$&&$'s can suck soap!

    2. Re:Game Experience May Change During Online Play by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      A lot of channels have their own moderators, and add generally quite civil and fun. Check out streamers like Grand Poo Bear and Barbarian, for example.

      YouTube style cesspools are not inevitable it seems. Oh, and the mods are fans working for free, like many forums.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:Game Experience May Change During Online Play by bigmacx · · Score: 1

      Put your hot single mom on the Slashdot

    4. Re:Game Experience May Change During Online Play by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      "Warning: this stream may include language you heard on the bus as a kindergartner."

      --
      -Styopa
    5. Re:Game Experience May Change During Online Play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out streamers like Grand Poo Bear and Barbarian, for example.

      You mean BarbarousKing. And, I agree, they're both really good.

    6. Re:Game Experience May Change During Online Play by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I do swear in front of friends' children, but since some people think their precious little darlings must be protected from all that is evil my twitch stream is marked as 'adult' - purely and entirely because if you listen to me playing computer games, you will hear the full range of anglo-saxon and occasional French and German.

  13. Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought feminists were telling us that clothing doesn't mean anything when it comes to sexual assault, but now we're being told that clothing does matter. I guess they mean the clothing of the accuser doesn't count, but the clothing of the accused does. More leftist double standards.

    1. Re:Funny by omnichad · · Score: 1

      They're not being removed from Twitch for sexual assault. You're really oversimplifying things here.

    2. Re:Funny by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Ok, the rules are very simple.
      1. You don't assault women.

      If a woman is dressing inappropriately that can be called out, however it isn't an excuse to assault women.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    3. Re:Funny by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If a woman is dressing inappropriately that can be called out

      No, it can't. Watch out, or you'll be sent to the SJW reeducation camp..

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    4. Re: Funny by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      So you can assault men?

      Your rules suck.

    5. Re:Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Inappropriately for company standards. twitch is allowed to set terms of use for their service. If lady gamers want to dress like they're going out partying, they might have to find a different service to stream from.

    6. Re:Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... can be called out.

      For what; we're all naked underneath? I went to the supermarket the other day and saw a young woman in skin-tight crotch pants (most female clothing is crotch-pants) and a plunge t-shirt bra (similar to a bikini halter-top), that is all. They're her tits, if she wants to show them I don't care. In fact, I want to see her tits since I'm sure that she likes fucking too. I have a problem when women claim I should care how many people groped her breasts and it's not prick-teasing: No and NO; it's not my job to save her or pretend her sexual organs aren't sticking-out. What we need is more men to act like women: That is, stick-out Their sexual organs and talk about how good it feels.

    7. Re:Funny by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      If it's wrong for SJWs to criticise slut shaming, why is it okay for you to criticise criticism of slut shaming?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re:Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's wrong for SJWs to criticise slut shaming, why is it okay for you to criticise criticism of slut shaming?

      It's not. There's absolutely nothing different. That's kind of the point, though I don't know if the OP was actually trying to make it. Everyone is persecuted in some way for something. It's pretty easy to make an argument that SJWs are a kind of ad-hoc hate group masquerading as people fighting for women's rights but then you could say similar things about many organizations. I know I have long associated you with SJWs simply because I often see you attacking anyone that speaks out about them. But that's completely anecdotal as I really know nothing about you beyond the occasional random comment I see.

      These are just the same cycles we (the US and to a lesser extent the world) go through again and again so the people who recognized that get tired of it. We choose a demographic, analyze all the ways it's persecuted down to the smallest, most trivial detail and then cater everything to that demographic to the point of absurdity where it eventually is just seen as parody. If anyone dare to speak out against that cycle they are shamed and harassed, often in the same way as the persecuted demo, until they go away and the demo of the week is "right" again. Any number of logical fallacies are used to accomplish this. Personally, I find tu quoque (what you did), Straw man, Ad hominem or red hearings in general, loaded questions (also arguably what you did), burden of proof (what you implied), anecdotes (what I did earlier) and false equivalencies to be among the most common. Anyone half-way intelligent can appear to discredit just about anyone with liberal application of logical fallacies.

      With the exception of some exceptionally screwed up cultures, no normal person thinks sexual assault and harassment of women (or anyone) is OK. The cultures where it is viewed as acceptable have had people fighting to change that for a long, long time and amazingly aren't usually labelled SJWs. But slut-shaming? Get over it. As far as I'm concerned a person of any gender can be and dress as "slutty" as they want. They also have to accept that to world is not obligated to be nice to them. This is not new. People have been assholes forever and it will NEVER stop. The only thing that changes is which assholes are the most visible and which assholes are being persecuted. If you're not currently in one the sacred cow groups just give it some time and you will be.

      In the spirit of logical fallacies I'll leave you with this: If it's wrong to criticize criticism of slut shaming, why is it okay for to criticize criticism of SJWs? Fair warning: the only answer to that question that won't rely on logical fallacies is "It's not".

    9. Re:Funny by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Because SJWs don't exist. It's the same reason why it's not OK to make movies where hoards of black people/women/French people/etc attack and are gunned down, but it's OK to have zombies in that role.

      SJWs are more or less a figment of the average alt-righter's imagination. That's why they call people SJWs and then describe things SJWs supposedly do that the people they called SJWs would never do in a million years. Being fictional beings, it's absolutely fine to treat them as the enemy and attack them. It's just a shame people who do keep mixing them up with, you know, ordinary people who believe women should be treated as human beings, and black people probably shouldn't be killed for reaching for their driver's licenses.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    10. Re:Funny by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      So, you're accusing the 'average alt-righter' of generalizing about the people they disagree with and promulgating stereotypes about them.

      Huh.

    11. Re:Funny by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      That depends on which feminist you ask.

    12. Re:Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or so you mean the alt-right worship jeebus or be damned in infinite hell boot camp? Please educate me, I have trouble understanding the right wing cry baby likes nowadays m. You know the we are all free speech unless you talk about our sacred White voodoo

    13. Re:Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a male, if you sit down to talk with a woman and you can see her cleavage, then she is guilty of sexual harassment.
      (Came from company sponsored sexual harassment training.)

    14. Re:Funny by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I've noticed that a lot of conservatives get labelled as SJWs now. It really is a completely meaningless phrase.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    15. Re:Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of conservatives - nay, people in general -
        get called racist, sexist, homophobic, etc for much, much, longer. I guess those terms are REALLY meaningless too.

    16. Re:Funny by Cederic · · Score: 1

      So if you stare at the harassing article, whose harassment wins the case? Or is the company fucked on both fronts?

    17. Re:Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, because 99% of the time when the term racist, sexist, or homophobic is used it's appropriate. Conservatives get called that more frequently because as a group conservatives are more tolerant of sexism/racism/homophobia, and thus conservatives with sexist, racist, or homophobic thoughts are more likely to share them.

      The point about SJW is that it's lost all meaning. If you call someone an SJW, and then attribute views to "all SJWs" that the majority of people you call SJWs don't have, and if this becomes normal, then it's no longer clear you have a definition in mind when you call people that. It's just a throwaway insult.

      If, on the other hand, you describe someone as racist because they, for example, made some dubious statement that smeared all black people, then you do actually have a definition in mind. If people were to then continue from that with "and racists are all vegetarians and want to force everyone to not eat meat", then yes, you'd be reducing the term to meaninglessness. But that's not what's happening.

    18. Re:Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, because 99% of the time when the term racist, sexist, or homophobic is used it's appropriate

      "Appropriate" is another word that has lost all meaning.

      Who decides what is "appropriate"? Oh right, the person making the accusation. So of course they're going to say it's "appropriate" to call the person they're accusing the thing that they're accusing them of.

      Ask somebody who calls AmiMojo an SJW. They'll say it's always "appropriate" to call him that.

      Conservatives get called that more frequently because as a group conservatives are more tolerant of sexism/racism/homophobia

      I'll let this other poster respond to your idiotic prejudice.

      The point about SJW is that it's lost all meaning. If you call someone an SJW, and then attribute views to "all SJWs" that the majority of people you call SJWs don't have, and if this becomes normal, then it's no longer clear you have a definition in mind when you call people that. It's just a throwaway insult.

      That's... exactly what people do with racist/sexist/homophobic/etc. Most people don't have definitions in mind when they throw racist/sexist/homophobic/etc around

      Take this statement: "all lives matter". If people really have a definition for racism, this line wouldn't trigger them. But somehow conservatives who say that are often called racists. The accusers insist conservatives don't really mean the words they say, but something else in their mind... as if the accusers just know what conservatives are thinking better than conservatives themselves.

      Or when you discuss policy, the accusers will never take your reasoning

      If you want a wall, it can't be because you want stronger border control. It must be because you hate Mexicans
      If you want to reduce government spending, it can't be because you're fiscally conservative. You must hate poor people.
      If you really don't think the government should pay for women's contraception or abortions, it can't be because you don't think that's the government's responsibility. It must be because you're sexist and want to force women back to act like it's the 1820's

      AmiMojo complained about this. What he misses is that this is what happens to conservatives all the time. No matter a conservative says to defend their position, anti-conservatives (I wouldn't call them liberals or progressives... there's nothing liberal or progressive about their dogmatic intolerance) insists they know better than the conservative what the conservative is really thinking, and what the conservative is really thinking must be racist/sexist/homophobic/etc.

      And thus, conservatives get called racist/sexist/homophobic/etc lot. Not because conservatives are somehow more tolerant of those things, but because the anti-conservatives are on witch hunts

    19. Re:Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SJWs don't exist, the University of Berkeley is a bastion of free speech and water is not wet.

  14. Anything can be sexualized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Some people would be more turned on by seeing a bare foot than a full nude wearing socks. Good luck determining what is sexual content. Also hope no one streams the Witcher or Mass Effect series. A whole lot of boning goes on in those games.

    1. Re:Anything can be sexualized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people would be more turned on by seeing a bare foot than a full nude wearing socks.

      How is this even a thing? How do these "want to have sex with a foot" genes get passed on?

    2. Re:Anything can be sexualized by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      Sexual content is whatever they say it is. Muslim thinks any woman showing more than eyes is displaying sexual content. This TOS is just an excuse to ban anyone or anything and have something to point to when they're sued.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    3. Re:Anything can be sexualized by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      Some people would be more turned on by seeing a bare foot than a full nude wearing socks.

      How is this even a thing? How do these "want to have sex with a foot" genes get passed on?

      Probably same way as the "want to have sex with same sex" or "I want my sexual organs cut off" gene

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  15. Re:Consistency? by darkain · · Score: 1

    Admittedly, I read it wrong too... And was wondering why they were talking about streamers on Twitter. Which I think is even worse, since I use Twitch more than Twitter.

  16. Since Every Tech Company Is Doing This by Kneo24 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sometime soon in the near future, everyone will be banned from everything for something they did that one time, that ultimately, no one gives a shit about.

    1. Re:Since Every Tech Company Is Doing This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Arrested? Me? Why?"

    2. Re:Since Every Tech Company Is Doing This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh please. We need to intolerant of intolerance in order to be tolerant.

    3. Re:Since Every Tech Company Is Doing This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I used to read about Victorian culture and boggle at how closeted and demanding it was, how rigid facades were required to get anywhere in life and wonder how the fuck a society could ever get that way.

      Yeah, I don't wonder about that shit anymore...

      When the new counter-culture hits (as it must) it's going to make the 60s look sedate.

    4. Re:Since Every Tech Company Is Doing This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The new counter-culture is already hitting and it looks absolutely nothing like the 60s.

      Remember kids, when you act like a self-superior smug cunt in the name of Progress, you are also recruiting for the very monsters you wish to slay.

    5. Re:Since Every Tech Company Is Doing This by Cederic · · Score: 2

      I used to read about Victorian culture and boggle at how closeted and demanding it was, how rigid facades were required to get anywhere in life and wonder how the fuck a society could ever get that way.

      Mainly through constant and (this is the important bit) socially acceptable hypocrisy. e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      There's still a fair amount of book form Victorian erotica around - mostly involving spanking and other forms of chastisement. Or maybe that's just a subset I encountered.

  17. Re:THOUGHT EXPERIMENT by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    Farmville 2 on an old Windows Vista PC. He would arrange the crops to draw Stormy Daniels' boobs.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  18. Re: Consistency? by omnichad · · Score: 1

    Well...maybe Twitter will decide to look at their users' activities on Twitch to decide whether to ban them.

  19. Re:THOUGHT EXPERIMENT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's obvious you've got a hard-on for Trump's side boob as much you rant and rave all day.
    The things you hate the most are really the things you love the most aren't they?

  20. No right to free speech on private servers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eat cock Amerikuk nazis!

  21. Re:THOUGHT EXPERIMENT by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's obvious you've got a hard-on for Trump's side boob

    You mean Pence?

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  22. They just HATE it when people do that !! by micahraleigh · · Score: 2

    Whoops ... an institutionalized double-standard.

  23. What the Hell is "TWITCH"??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Twitch is what I do when I see your sorry face online.

    Aw dammit! I'll never be allowed in that exclusive club now...

    1. Re:What the Hell is "TWITCH"??? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Twitch is where dorks go to watch other play video games.

      Yeah. People actually do that, for some reason.

  24. Speech != Hate by bryanandaimee · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This would be less troublesome if Hate had not become synonymous with

    Conservative opinion
    Religious opinion
    Liberal opinion
    Biology
    Logic
    Statistics
    Independent thought

    The only thing you can say these days that is not considered hate speech is up-to-the-nanosecond left wing (not liberal) PC group-speak.

    1. Re:Speech != Hate by eaglesrule · · Score: 1

      The subjectiveness of hate is not a bug, it is a feature.

    2. Re:Speech != Hate by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      For those in power, sure.

      But the entire concept of hate speech was to help the powerless.

    3. Re:Speech != Hate by eaglesrule · · Score: 1

      The entire concept of hate speech was to be a tool for the powerful to control speech.

  25. Yeah. Fuck that noise. by Chas · · Score: 1

    Sorry. I don't need Twitch, or anyone else Big Mother'ing me on every platform I happen to use.

    Additionally, I'm not going to subscribe to a moving target like the chimera that is "Hate".

    No.

    If that means I don't use their shit, I don't use their shit. Fuck them.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  26. Re:THOUGHT EXPERIMENT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tic-Tac-Toe, and he would be losing constantly.

  27. Get rid of ASMR. It's a legal fetish. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its just sexy gamer girls whispering and making wet sounds in a microphone. There's no age laws on this stuff either. ASMR is nothing but lonely Koreans or 40 yr old perverts YouTubing the youngest teens they can find. "Make me some slurpy noises with that Popsicle cucumber sucker. It helps me sleep." Orgasms usually do you sick fucks.

  28. Ducati, blonde women in bright red... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    San Francisco, evening, Wednesday night.

    The regional unveiling of their latest bike models (primarily the new V4s). A couple hot blondes, lots of catering staff in all black, so they would blend into the background. Booze, snacks, and 'exclusive' entry accommodations.

    Was mostly middle aged guys, of a certain type, including a few people with their wives and very young children.

    Cool tech from the vehicle standpoint, although 'fully networked bike electronics' is a bit concerning if they also have any form of wireless networking available. A green-screen photography booth for both the outgoing 959 special edition and later for the V4 S model. A fan to blow your hair and clothes and make it look like you were riding on the model, with instant capture, background placement, and photo printing, including email and social media posting.

    For the record, it felt like a cult introduction more than a vehicle unveiling.

    Of course the trim that was most obvious was when you went back outside to get the valet to return the key for your car (now helpfully parked in front of the venue as parking has become available after-hours) was the trio of Aprilia bikes interspersed with the otherwise colorful selection of Ducatis parked out front from the more hardcore in-city riders.

  29. Re:THOUGHT EXPERIMENT by lgw · · Score: 1

    Well played, sir.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  30. The end of twitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kids just love following rules

    (streamlab)

  31. Re:Consistency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait.... which one do I need to ask for bitcoin advice?

  32. let's dox twitch users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this mean that if I don't agree with your content then I can impersonate you on another platform, report that impersonation to twitch, and basically dox you out of a monetized revenue stream?

  33. PC Police round 2 by torkus · · Score: 2

    Welcome to the PC Police folks. Now anything "bad" you say, think, do, display, endorse, allow, don't challenge, or otherwise are in any associated with is reason to hang you out to dry everywhere forever in a fit of righteousness.

    Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain who decides what and when something is bad with very little 'why' involved. Oh crap...I mean person of unknown gender located in a region generally near an item of environmentally friendly, non-GMO, vegan cloth-like covering which may or may not be protecting their privacy or identity as it best suits them.

    --
    You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    1. Re:PC Police round 2 by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The slippery slope is an easily debunked logical fallacy.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:PC Police round 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it? The past decade or so, as far as I'm concerned, has shown just how real it is.

    3. Re:PC Police round 2 by bryanandaimee · · Score: 1

      It's not a slippery slope argument if you are talking about current conditions.

    4. Re:PC Police round 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The idea that slippery slopes can never be true due to logical fallacies is easily debunked.

    5. Re:PC Police round 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Leftists are masters of applying the slow-cooked-frog method. Slippery slope very much applies here.

    6. Re:PC Police round 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What slippery slope? We are already there. Shouldn't you be celebrating? You love shit like this.

    7. Re:PC Police round 2 by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      True, that's a delusional argument.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re:PC Police round 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drink! AmiMojo is gaslighting again!

    9. Re:PC Police round 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slippery slope is not a logical fallacy. There is a continuum fallacy which may encompass some forms of slippery slope argument. Yes, many here are engaging in such a fallacy, but there is an argument to be made for the eventuality of their predictions to be correct. The path where a company makes content judgments using subjective criteria in a context of financial interest and fear of aggressive interest groups does seem to lead to a prospect of bland content devoid of challenging concepts.

  34. Re:THOUGHT EXPERIMENT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not surprised, I'm just surprised you'd actually admit it.

  35. "Content & context" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People can get turned on by fucking door knobs.
    You can't apply your own bias to such things.
    Likewise with hate.

    ANYONE can claim they are being attacked by saying something triggers them and that's some innocent persons channel nuked. It has happened countless times before and still happens now.
    Fuck perma-triggered children in adult bodies. They should be stripped of any adult mobility and rights for being fundamentally immature when you really get down to it. They are broken people.
    Of course, let's not kid ourselves, most adults are fucking immature. If they were actually capable of reasoned, well-thought out decision-making skills and of sane mind, they'd not be in 10 trillion kinds of debt, being abused by shops, junk food, fake sale sales and so on.
    But at least they aren't whiny cunts, just dumb cunts. Dumb cunts I can care for.

    1. Re:"Content & context" by Cederic · · Score: 1

      People can get turned on by fucking door knobs.

      Is a door knob still a door knob if it's not on a door? Just that if it's on the door there are some logistical challenges here.

  36. so...no Democrats allowed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who defines "hate"?

    I have yet to meet a Democrat who does not HATE Donald Trump, who is "someone".

    Something tells me this is just another situation in which huge piles of censorship and virtue signalling will be done by left-wingers who are so insular in their social circles and thought processes that they label anything they disagree with as "hate speech" which they try to eliminate. This is the opposite of "free speech", "open minded", "intellectually curious", and so many other things that were cornerstones of Western Civilization before the leftists stormed the ramparts at the 1968 Democrat National Convention and started slowly bending the Democrat party into the Orwellian nightmare it has become.

    How about we all get back to the idea of FREEDOM? We all need to allow each other to freely express what we believe, and debate each other vigorously but peacefully where we disagree.

  37. Frosty Piss by negRo_slim · · Score: 2

    Censorship is terrible. To think otherwise is baffling, what went so wrong to encourage your kind of mind set?

    --
    On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
    1. Re:Frosty Piss by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Censorship is terrible. To think otherwise is baffling, what went so wrong to encourage your kind of mind set?

      Censorship is terrible. However, not providing people with a free platform is not censorship.

      There is no censorship here. Twitch doesn't want them, but they have plenty of other places to go including ponying up a tiny amount of cash and hosting it themselves.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  38. Top streamers gagged, #twitch channel modded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Should have seen both the Town Hall (yes, it 's as bad as it sounds), from yesterday and Twitch Weekly today. There's a lot of misdirection and strawmen using rules that are absolutely valid - no child porn for example, no violence against women, etc. But completely ignore the real problem policies and their retroactively going through vods, using what is said outside twitch, etc.

    Today's "udpate", essentially followed the sjw response of denying anything was new, blaming a "vocal minority" (even though some of their larger streamers have also come out against it), etc. They literally spent less then 10 min on it and that was regurgitating what was said yesterday. It _really_ didn't help the guy doing it (Brian) was acting like your stereotype douchebag. Beard'n all.

  39. Dispelling your delusions/illusions w/ reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & where I kicked "your kind's" (unidentifiable ac no-minds) lying asses https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=11715333&cid=56091145/ only a day++ ago, lol!

    * I see you can't STAND when I expose how easy it is for me to BLOW YOU AWAY by your downmod 'hiding' last 2x I posted this here https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=11726377&cid=56096587/ & here too https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=11726377&cid=56097351/

    APK

    P.S.=> No small wonder you have to 'hide' behind UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous posts & use your effete + ineffectual "downmodpoints" vs. me (which I easily nullify via my UNLIMITED posting ability even as an AC poster myself (but I "id" myself @ least unlike whimps like YOU)) - you have to HIDE everytime I blow your sorry dumbasses away (which is EVERY SINGLE TIME you try it, lol - thanks for making me look GOOD & yourselves? Well, what you are - stupid!)... apk

  40. Dangerous precedent by edgedmurasame · · Score: 1

    They want to invite a bit of Orwell by going beyond platform conduct.

    --
    "Forget the engineers." -Carly Fiorina, briber of MIT Technology Review.
  41. About Time #MeToo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a man, I am sick and tired of being sexually harassed by women.

  42. Know your customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Sexual conduct rules have also been changed to consider the "context" of a stream."

    And then twitch vanished, and was never heard from again.

  43. Seems abuse friendly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, take the profile of a twitch user, register on a obscure social fring platform. Be abusive there. Using a different fake profile, report the original. Whoopsie!

  44. There goes the 2 timing 2 timer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And you just made your way to twitch, for the 2 time, with the champions club. Maybe a name change to Dr Respect??

  45. I HATE twitch... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....now ban me from Twitch .... please !!!!

  46. it's their platform etc etc by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

    All hail private property - Big Corporate Brother we love you - MOAR CENSORSHIP NOW!!!!!!

  47. Re: Consistency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yup, such actions make someone unfit to govern, not unfit to tweet.