Slashdot Mirror


Most Cities Would Welcome a Tech Billionaire, But Peter Thiel? (bloomberg.com)

Sarah McBride, writing for Bloomberg: Tech billionaire Peter Thiel is moving to Los Angeles from San Francisco, adding another dose of legitimacy to a burgeoning startup scene in Southern California -- along with some controversy. The co-founder of PayPal and an early investor in Facebook, Thiel runs Founders Fund, one of the more-respected venture capital firms in Silicon Valley. He comes with a little baggage, though, including his staunch support for President Donald Trump, his secretive funding of the legal battle between Hulk Hogan and Gawker.com, and comments some people say have been derogatory toward women. "I'm not sure why Peter Thiel believes he'll receive a warmer reception on the L.A. tech scene than he's had in Silicon Valley," said Tracy DiNunzio, chief executive officer of Tradesy, a fashion-reselling company based in Santa Monica, California. "Our venture and startup ecosystem is fairly left-leaning."

121 of 283 comments (clear)

  1. Re:He can stay out of L.A.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Guy's a Trump troll who also bankrolled lawsuits against media whose main crime was breaking the law.

    Fixed that for you.

  2. Why do his politics matter? by Ritz_Just_Ritz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you're a startup and you need funding and you've got a demonstrably astute tech investor with a deep rolodex and sacks of money to invest, why do you care who he votes for?

    I certainly wouldn't.

    This politicization of every aspect of life is way out of hand.

    1. Re: Why do his politics matter? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 2

      Oh wait, I know this one! Because when you lay down with dogs you wake up with fleas.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    2. Re:Why do his politics matter? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You don't care who he votes for. You do care what his involvement in your startup will mean for PR, partnering, hiring, acquisition and other aspects of business. He was an early and public supporter of Trump and bankrolled the anti-Gawker lawsuit. Because of this, him being involved in your company may make it harder to get other people's attention that you need.

      Or not. Maybe he'll help direct attention to your start up in a way that adds something.

      But you have to accept it will have both positives and negatives.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    3. Re:Why do his politics matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      There's absolutely nothing wrong with discriminating against conservatives. In fact, it's a very good thing. Deal with it.

    4. Re:Why do his politics matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes. We would ask that question today. Most leftists today would say that making everything about religion is foolish. Yet somehow they can make everything about politics.

    5. Re:Why do his politics matter? by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      So angry. What’s wrong snowflake? Your vodka running low?

    6. Re:Why do his politics matter? by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      Typical gutless passive-aggressive response from the left making such remarks while hiding behind AC.

    7. Re:Why do his politics matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The anti-Gawker lawsuit? You mean the one concerning whether or not it is okay to publish someone's private sex tape after a judge had ordered it to be taken down? That anti-Gawker lawsuit?

      I don't know anything about the guy's politics, but that one sounds about right to me.

    8. Re: Why do his politics matter? by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Ok, the Trump association, I can sort of understand.

      But putting out of business a tabloid (with other questionable practices) that published a full sex tape of a celebrity without his consent (a sex tape which had no redeeming news value of any kind, other than the fact that some guy gave consent for his wife to have sex with a celebrity while he was videotaping it).

      How is that bad? Is the porn industry in LA really upset over this? Or is it the tabloids or the papparrazis?

    9. Re:Why do his politics matter? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Most "conservatives" today aren't really conservative by the classical definition. They are classical liberals. The Left usurped the term "liberal" when the label "progressive" got a bad reputation due to its association with socialism, fascism, eugenics, and racism in the early 20th century. They've worked really hard since then to push the worst of those associations onto the right, but originally everyone knew they were associated with the left, and "progressives" in particular.

      Ironic that when conservatives speak to the Left the way the Left speaks to conservatives every day, The Left considers it a sign of mental instability.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    10. Re: Why do his politics matter? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      I am referring to his Trump support. The fact that he is a gay man I could not care less about, and I really couldn't care less about Hogan / Gawker either.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    11. Re:Why do his politics matter? by Solandri · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So 25 years ago when GLBT people were still seen as "queer" by the majority, you would've been OK with businesses shunning people who were overtly pro-GLBT?

      70 years ago when interracial marriages were frowned upon by the majority, you would've been OK with businesses shunning interracial couples?

      100 years ago when women didn't have the right to vote, you would've been OK with businesses shunning people who thought women should be able to vote?

      160 years ago when slavery was the norm in half the country, you would've been OK with businesses shunning anyone advocating freeing the slaves?

      See, the problem with basing acceptance on what's deemed "normal" by the masses is that "normal" changes over time. People are fickle, and tend to follow what's popular, not necessarily what's right. What's normal today won't be what's normal 25, 50, 100 years from now.

      Democracy's strength doesn't come from the majority imposing its will upon the minority. Its strength comes from allowing a wide variety of viewpoints to coexist. That allows it to find and take advantage of better ideas more quickly. Other systems of government may not even consider that idea because they've suppressed and subjugated the minority who would've brought it up for consideration. Minorities like people who were anti-slavery in the early 1800s, pro women's suffrage in the late 1800s, for racial integration in the first half of the 20th century, and opposed to discrimination against GLBT people in the second half of the 20th century.

      Democracy's strength comes from preserving that minority, even if you disagree with it. Especially if you disagree with it. If democracy hadn't protected people with those ideas when they were unpopular, those reforms never would've happened. That's why we don't discriminate against people based on how they voted (secret ballot), or their political opinions, or their religious views, or their race, or gender, or a myriad of other things which simply aren't relevant to running a business. Sure if you don't like that racist, you don't have to go camping with him. But discriminating against people in an activity which is completely orthogonal to the reason you dislike them - that is destroying the fundamental basis of democracy.

      The whole point of democracy is protecting and preserving people's right to disagree. Advocating discrimination against people who hold a different opinion than yours, for no other reason than because they hold a different opinion, makes you a bigot. What, you thought that term only applied to racists? Perhaps you should look up its definition in the dictionary. Take away the right to disagree (while still living a normal life) and you've gutted democracy.

      Tolerance doesn't mean accepting only people who hold the same beliefs you do. It means accepting and coexisting with and even defending people who hold different beliefs than you do.

      "'I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - Evelyn Beatrice Hall

    12. Re:Why do his politics matter? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Most "conservatives" today aren't really conservative by the classical definition. They are classical liberals.

      Libertarians are classical liberals. Conservatives are classical authoritarians. Classical liberals didn't build walls, start trade wars, vote for massive debt increases, and cozy up to foreign dictators.

      They've worked really hard since then to push the worst of those associations onto the right.

      They had a lot of help with that from the right.

    13. Re:Why do his politics matter? by w3woody · · Score: 1

      The problem, both with your examples and with your argument, is that they mix morality and money.

      Now I'm all for morality. God knows I've been a strong supporter of LGBT causes and my (Scots-Irish) father in another era spent some of his misspent youth in Memphis protesting for black equality. I'm also all for money--and using money to build an organization, to hire people, to create wealth and to build something that adds to the economic gestalt. I'm even for consumers being picky with their money, deciding to spend their money on things they support, such as organic farming or refusing to cater to businesses who don't treat customers with equality and respect.

      But it has been my experience that when we start mixing morality and money on the grand stage, both money and morality lose. And that's precisely what you're advocating here: that we as a society (rather than as individuals) choose how we spend our money based on a moral framework that, more often than not, is incomplete once we move onto the grand stage. (It's easy as a consumer to avoid a bakery who refuses to sell a cake to a gay couple. But as a society do we punish the Kosh Brothers for their stance in criminal justice reform, a position taken for a decade before President Obama praised their position? Or is it more complicated than that?)

      So sure, take your moral stance on Peter Thiel. If y'all don't want him in California, we'll certainly take him in Raleigh. There are plenty of people who aren't as repulsed by his politics, and certainly we'd be happy to spend his money in areas like the American Tobacco campus in Durham, which has a bustling startup culture and which has the potential to create significant employment opportunities for minorities.

      Because let's "spread that money around a little" (as a famous person once quipped) and help build some wealth before we start spitting on someone's assistance.

    14. Re:Why do his politics matter? by w3woody · · Score: 1

      As an aside, in the State of California, political affiliation and belief are protected classes.

      So, from a legal perspective, it is in fact illegal to discriminate against conservatives. Just as it is illegal to discriminate against liberals.

    15. Re:Why do his politics matter? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Try to grow up a little and stop simply relying on the stereotypes

      I am not relying on stereotypes. I am relying on the official actions and stated policies of the party and their national leaders:

      A majority of the Republican party (74%) supports building the wall.

      Congressional Republicans just voted for a budget that adds $1.5 trillion to the national debt.

      Several Republicans have been indicted for colluding with Putin and Russian hackers.

      Does any of this sound like "classical liberalism"?

    16. Re: Why do his politics matter? by kenh · · Score: 1

      Says the fellow that can't imagine liberals remaining in the minority.

      If shunning conservatives is OK, then do is shunning liberals... "What's good for the goose..."

      --
      Ken
    17. Re:Why do his politics matter? by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      >bankrolled the anti-Gawker lawsuit

      WHy suddenly people saying that like it was a bad thing to do?

      Gawker, that piece of shit tabloid sleezy crapball yellow crap deserved to die.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    18. Re: Why do his politics matter? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      So it's conservatives that want to:

      Control what you eat (salt, beverage size, etc),
      Take away your guns,
      Indoctrinate your children in meaningless head-start programs as soon as they're potty-trained,
      Regulate waterways that only exist after heavy rains,
      Force everyone to buy healthcare coverage as dictated by government,
      Bans books from libraries because they deal factually with historic race relation,

      What's your point? Libertarians don't want to do any of those things either. But self-described "conservatives" want to do plenty of authoritarian crap that is the antithesis of "classical liberalism".

    19. Re: Why do his politics matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      tl;dr: every group straight white men extended freedom to has allied against us.

    20. Re:Why do his politics matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      When you're a fucking loser who can't win an election despite 99.99999% odds in their favor, declaring anyone who disagrees with you is a Russian plant is one of the dumbest yet most common tactics. It's a favorite among you brain dead sheep.

    21. Re: Why do his politics matter? by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That was nothing more than a pretext and you know it. Peter Thiel never gave a flying shit about Hulk Hogan. He was nursing a (Totally nonsensical, considering he lived in California, and for now in the Bay Area no less.) years-long grudge against Gawker for mentioning that he's gay in an article last decade. Pretending that the lawsuit was really just about the sex tape is purposefully obtuse at best, really more like intellectual dishonesty, and at worst nothing more than trolling.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    22. Re: Why do his politics matter? by javaxman · · Score: 1

      If you have a choice, and it costs nothing to choose ethical business partners, why do otherwise? He is not the only investor in town, especially if you are a good investment.

    23. Re:Why do his politics matter? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If I had to define "tolerance" it would be something like "respect and kindness toward members of an outgroup".

      The Emperor summons before him Bodhidharma and asks: "Master, I have been tolerant of innumerable gays, lesbians, bisexuals, asexuals, blacks, Hispanics, Asians, transgender people, and Jews. How many Virtue Points have I earned for my meritorious deeds?"

      Bodhidharma answers: "None at all".

      The Emperor, somewhat put out, demands to know why.

      Bodhidharma asks: "Well, what do you think of gay people?"

      The Emperor answers: "What do you think I am, some kind of homophobic bigot? Of course I have nothing against gay people!"

      And Bodhidharma answers: "Thus do you gain no merit by tolerating them!"

      -- I can tolerate anything except the outgroup

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    24. Re: Why do his politics matter? by Kartu · · Score: 1

      Doesn't american left look authoritarian to you?
      There is no valid criticism, it's all misogyny/some sort of nazi/bigotry/etc.
      Only one right way, silence/ban/fire everyone who disagrees,

      European social democrat voter here, if it matters.

    25. Re: Why do his politics matter? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Doesn't american left look authoritarian to you?

      Yes. What's your point? That doesn't mean conservatives are "classical liberals".

    26. Re:Why do his politics matter? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      This politicization of every aspect of life is way out of hand.

      Absolutely, doing something unethical is absolutely fine if you do it for money.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    27. Re: Why do his politics matter? by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      Equality before the law is and always has been a lie.

    28. Re:Why do his politics matter? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      If you're trying to set up a Conservative friendly social media or video sharing service his politics are actually a plus.

      The interesting thing is that Sam Altman is probably a libertarian type too.

      http://blog.samaltman.com/e-pu...

      You can't tell which seemingly wacky ideas are going to turn out to be right, and nearly all ideas that turn out to be great breakthroughs start out sounding like terrible ideas. So if you want a culture that innovates, you can't have a culture where you allow the concept of heresy-if you allow the concept at all, it tends to spread. When we move from strenuous debate about ideas to casting the people behind the ideas as heretics, we gradually stop debate on all controversial ideas.

      This is uncomfortable, but it's possible we have to allow people to say disparaging things about gay people if we want them to be able to say novel things about physics. Of course we can and should say that ideas are mistaken, but we can't just call the person a heretic. We need to debate the actual idea.

      Political correctness often comes from a good place-I think we should all be willing to make accommodations to treat others well. But too often it ends up being used as a club for something orthogonal to protecting actual victims. The best ideas are barely possible to express at all, and if you're constantly thinking about how everything you say might be misinterpreted, you won't let the best ideas get past the fragment stage.

      I don't know who Satoshi is, but I'm skeptical that he, she, or they would have been able to come up with the idea for bitcoin immersed in the current culture of San Francisco-it would have seemed too crazy and too dangerous, with too many ways to go wrong. If SpaceX started in San Francisco in 2017, I assume they would have been attacked for focusing on problems of the 1%, or for doing something the government had already decided was too hard. I can picture Galileo looking up at the sky and whispering "E pur si muove" here today.

      I.e. what the SJWs who infest Google and FB (and Reddit, whose board Altman was on) are scared of is that the people who have haven't drunk the Koolaid and may - horror of horrors - fund people who want to start companies who challenge their control of The Narrative.

      Odd really, I always thought Altman's politics were like those of the average Redditor. However read that blog post and it's clear they're not. The dude is OK.

      Also The Guardian mentioned him negatively in a hit piece on Thiel :

      https://www.theguardian.com/ne...

      If you're interested in the end of the world, you're interested in New Zealand. If you're interested in how our current cultural anxieties - climate catastrophe, decline of transatlantic political orders, resurgent nuclear terror - manifest themselves in apocalyptic visions, you're interested in the place occupied by this distant archipelago of apparent peace and stability against the roiling unease of the day.

      If you're interested in the end of the world, you would have been interested, soon after Donald Trump's election as US president, to read a New York Times headline stating that Peter Thiel, the billionaire venture capitalist who co-founded PayPal and was an early investor in Facebook, considered New Zealand to be "the Future". Because if you are in any serious way concerned about the future, you're also concerned about Thiel, a canary in capitalism's coal mine who also happens to have profited lavishly from his stake in the mining concern itself.

      Thiel is in one sense a caricature of outsized villainy: he was the only major Silicon Valley figure to put his weight behind the Trump presidential campaign; he vengefully bankrupted a website because he didn't like how they wrote about him; he is known for his pu

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    29. Re:Why do his politics matter? by Spamalope · · Score: 2

      'White men are guilty of original sin by existing' narrative is central to their narrative. If original sin is a core belief can they really be a purely political and not religious movement? I looks more like religious fanaticism from way (waaaay) over here, complete with cries of heretic!

    30. Re:Why do his politics matter? by Marisaze · · Score: 1

      Your carefully cultivated echo chamber is not representative of most of anything. If you actually go out and talk to people, and then actually listen to those that don't share your political ideology, you might realize that most people are individuals that have opinions that don't always follow party lines. Someone who on the grand scale could be Liberal or Conservative can very easily have opinions on specific things that are drastically different from other Liberals/Conservatives.

    31. Re:Why do his politics matter? by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      He bankrupted a media company that was doing Evil. I see nothing wrong with using money to stop Evil.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    32. Re: Why do his politics matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      tl;dr: every group straight white men extended freedom to has allied against us.

      I was trying to disagree with you but I can't, seems every group straight white men have helped have allied against them, while Asians seem to not care about those groups and continue to take over the world. It will be strange years from now when Asians own everything and set all these freedoms people have been enjoying back a few hundred years

    33. Re:Why do his politics matter? by pots · · Score: 1

      ... Why? Why don't you see anything wrong with that? You're talking about a vigilante.

      If I used my gobs of money to bankrupt you, would you have a problem with it then? There's probably someone out there who thinks you're evil.

    34. Re: Why do his politics matter? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      An important consideration is that in today's political environment, many people are what you would call Capital C conservatives. They've made it into a brand and they rally beneath it. Whereas a conservative is somebody who resists big changes.

    35. Re:Why do his politics matter? by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

      NC would be a perfect place for him. Considering what facists the Republican party has been there.

    36. Re: Why do his politics matter? by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

      Or reject what science says and go with junk science from non-scientists. Force a country to be a christian nation, follow christian ideology

    37. Re:Why do his politics matter? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      I'm not opposed to Gawker going out of business. I am opposed to billionaires secretly funding revenge lawsuits against people who have wronged them. See also: I'm not opposed to the KKK going out of business. I am opposed to the government arresting them all just for advocating their idiocy.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    38. Re:Why do his politics matter? by pots · · Score: 1

      I checked the dictionary because I thought you might be technically correct there, but no: going outside the legal system is not required. It might be technically inaccurate to call him a vigilante because it doesn't seem like he was really after justice, just revenge. This seems like an unimportant distinction though.

      The parent claimed that his actions were justified because the results were positive, I said that isn't how it works.

  3. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Why do conservatives insist on coming to California if it's such a shithole? It's the most liberal state in the country and SF and Silicon Valley are much further to the left and have been that way for the last century. Just make your own tech companies in the podunk flyover states you come from.

    Stop trying to leech off our companies and our success. You aren't welcome here and, to be quite honest, you can't compete here. Be gracious that we subsidize your podunk state and stay out.

  4. The real reason by u19925 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The real reason why he wants to move out of Silicon Valley is that he can't afford housing in this area. All others are just excuses.

  5. Re:Why not? by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

    If Sadat, used commas, they way you, do I'd say, it was, justified.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  6. Of course LA will receive him better by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    in LA money is king, no matter what your views.

    In SF money is also king, but you don't have to like it.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Of course LA will receive him better by alvinrod · · Score: 4, Informative

      Maybe he was trying to go for a Funny mod based on a story that ran sometime back about Thiel being a customer of a company that does transfusions for people using blood from young people based on some supposed health benefits of doing so that were observed when doing this in mice.

      The story got a lot of traction and got repeated in the tech press and well known blogs, but after some tech journalists looked into it, it turned out to be bogus. However, it's one of those things that seems to have stuck around probably because it's both interesting as well as silly.

    2. Re:Of course LA will receive him better by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Gawker had it coming. They refused to take down a sex tape on their server after a judge ordered them to.

      It's adorable that you think Peter Thiel's lawsuit against Gawker had anything to do with a tape of a sad has-been having depressing sex with the coke-whore wife of his friend as a radio stunt.

      Say, how's your blood, anyway? Would you like to make a few bucks?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    3. Re:Of course LA will receive him better by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      My fans...I love 'em. Think of the time he put into this.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  7. Re: Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You subsidize them? Who builds your cars, grows your food, makes your clothes? Here's a hint - it's not f'ing you. Skipping over the fact that third world countries subsidize most of the developed world, in terms of actual tangible work, the "podunk" states you so despise do much more to maintain your standard of living than you think. Try heating your home or feeding your family with HTML5, AI, blockchain, or whatever it is you clowns rave about these days. Fact is most of the crap coming out of silicon valley is less than useless, distracting the rest of the world with constant noise while reducing their productivity and ability to solve problems themselves, and turning future generations' brains to mush. That's not economic value creation, it's destruction, and the world is finally starting to come around to that realization. So get off your high horse and wake up to the fact that it is you that is subsidized by actual hard working people, and their views matter as much as yours.

  8. Re:Because. by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

    Cities dwellers aren't nerds, there's too many distractions. You wastes of space are marketing and sales people.

  9. Some bint who owns a dress shop by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny

    "I'm not sure why Peter Thiel believes he'll receive a warmer reception on the L.A. tech scene than he's had in Silicon Valley," said Tracy DiNunzio

    Who?

    chief executive officer of Tradesy

    What?

    Yeah, I'm sure he like totally cares what she thinks.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  10. Re:Ok? by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

    I'd prefer that NOBODY bribes our politicians.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  11. Re:Because. by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

    Because you can be a "nerd" without being involved in "relevant" development, or even development at all. Fuck off, you needlessly elitist piece of shit.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  12. Re:Because. by JustNiz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Personally I wouldn't choose to live the lifestyle that working for Google etc forces on you, no matter what they paid me.

    Apart from anything else, being surrounded by the obligatory bunch of neckbearded hipster millennials who all think they're "alternative" yet all look, dress, speak, think and act exactly the same, and all march lock-step according to extreme peecee liberal brainwashing, would drive me nuts.

  13. Re:Overt liberal bias much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    POTUS is not the government. He is one elected official at the head of three co-equal branches. Supporting him is not synonymous with supporting the government, just like supporting the government doesn't not necessarily mean one supports Trump.

  14. Re:Ok? by BlueStrat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    people need to stop suppressing the beliefs of others simply because you disagree with them.

    The problem is that so many Leftists adamantly believe in an ideological/political structure that cannot hold up to logical, intellectually-honest debate or comparisons with others. If such were widely allowed in public discourse, they would not gain adherents and would lose nearly all support.

    Strat

    --
    Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  15. Concise an well said by CraigCruden · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Extremely well said and concise. Bringing into how we relate to people because of their personal politics (conservative vs liberal vs progressive vs socialist) is extremely toxic. If we cannot talk or do business with people that hold differing political views - the civility of society will only continue to decline.

  16. Re:Why not? by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    "If Sadat, used commas, they way you, do I'd say, it was, justified."

    Alas, you have, a point. :-)

  17. Re: Why not? by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Who builds your cars, grows your food, makes your clothes?

    A bunch of retarded hicks that are easy to manipulate. Thanks Cleetus.

    And the Committee to Re-elect Trump fires off their favorite line, which will ensure his victory in 2020.

    --
    If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
  18. Re:Overt liberal bias much? by DogDude · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Since when is supporting the government "baggage"?

    Since that part of our government is a piece of shit, that's since when.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  19. Texas... by Templer421 · · Score: 1

    Is always welcoming to entrepreneurs and has no state sales tax.

    To hell with California, come to a free country where you can do just about anything you want.

    1. Re:Texas... by theCoder · · Score: 1

      Texas has a 6.25% state sales tax. Maybe you meant it has no state income tax?

      --
      "Save the whales, feed the hungry, free the mallocs" -- author unknown
  20. I actually agree with the Politburo on this one by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Thiel would not be a good fit for Los Angeles. He should come to Arizona, where we love his politics and where he would appreciate the lower rents and cost of housing for workers. The Phoenix area is a burgeoning tech scene that has grown up around Arizona State, Intel, Honeywell, and a host of newer and smaller tech enterprises. Hardly a Silicon Valley yet, but he can help make it one.

    1. Re:I actually agree with the Politburo on this one by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      The advantage of gay neighbors is that their garage sales rock. Their stuff is higher quality, and it matches.

  21. So the question is does money trump decency? by gweihir · · Score: 2

    In the end I expect it will, because most people that have or want power or money use "decency" only for virtue signalling, but do not actually believe in it. Thiel may just be more honest in his evil than others. Which, paradoxically, makes him a little less evil.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  22. Admission by liberals ... by WoodstockJeff · · Score: 1

    ... that they are intolerant of any views other than their own.

  23. Re:Is LA that different? by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

    The politics in LA, San Francisco and a few other coastal enclaves are about the same, although SF may lean even farther than the rest. Except for that, the rest of the state tends to be conservative. The reason most people don't know that is that the left coast enclaves have the majority of the population, and run the state for their benefit and ignore the rest of us.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
  24. Re: Why not? by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

    You snowflakes are so funny.

    --
    If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
  25. Re:Overt liberal bias much? by fredrated · · Score: 1, Troll

    Supporting Trump is not supporting the government, it is supporting a mentally unstable narcissist that cares for nothing but himself, and that reflects on Thiel, at least in the part of the community with brains.

  26. Tolerance by Kohath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why would there be an article like this?

    "Our venture and startup ecosystem is fairly left-leaning."

    So intolerant then. If Peter Thiel wouldn't be welcomed because he's not like you, what does that make you? I guess it has finally become obvious to everyone how intolerant and exclusionary "left-leaning" cultures are.

    1. Re:Tolerance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Peter Thiel isn't welcome anywhere not because he's not like them, but because he's an asshole.

  27. Taxes by kenh · · Score: 2

    So he should stay in SF and not contribute to LA tax base?

    --
    Ken
  28. Re: Why not? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    Who builds your cars, grows your food, makes your clothes?

    Last time I checked it was...Japan, Mexico, Vietnam.

  29. Re:Because. by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    You've had fun living on the industrial legacy of your state's early innovators, but it's not going to be easy to live like the Jetsons when today's California requires ten years of impact studies and a hundred-lawyer HR staff before you can back your Prius out of your own driveway.

  30. Re:Why not? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

    It's an example, of the the use of the so called Shatnerian, comma. Indicates a pause, for dramatic, purposes.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  31. I'd care about the character by rsilvergun · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Of my investors. Ever read the history of the Commodore Amiga? Jack Tramiel basically backed the engineers into a corner that let him take everything until Commodore road in and saved the day. Tech investors have a long history of screwing over start up. So yeah, I'd care who the guy voted for. Maybe I'd still risk it. But I'd be aware of the risk...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  32. One woman's baggage by poity · · Score: 1

    is another woman's badge of honor

    --
    your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
  33. Re:Why not? by HiThere · · Score: 1

    IIRC, Mr. Thiel went to Stanford which is where it hooked up with some friends or acquaintances and together built a company that got him that fortune. So he's not exactly a new import into Silicon Valley.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  34. Re:Is LA that different? by xx_chris · · Score: 1

    The California House Congressional delegation is 39 Democrats to 14 Republicans. There are two Democratic Senators from CA. There are no Republicans elected statewide to any governing posts, Governor down to State Superintendent of Public Instruction. Cheeto lost statewide in California, 61.73% to 31.62%. California is a deeply blue state.

  35. Isn't he a Kiwi? by ClarkMills · · Score: 2

    Peter Thiel is a New Zealand citizen.

    I didn't vote for him... :)

    1. Re:Isn't he a Kiwi? by twosat · · Score: 1
  36. Re:He can stay out of L.A.... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    And yet Gawker lost their court case.

    Its weird how a not breaking the law gets a court to find against you.

    Oh wait, you're wrong.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  37. Re:Is LA that different? by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

    If you'll look at a map of California's counties, you'll see that the coast is strongly Democrat and the inland counties are Republican. However, if you look at a map of the population, you'll see that most of the voters live on or near the coast, and outnumber the comparatively thinly-populated inland. Thus, by population, California is a blue state, even though most of its area is red. Guess which one matters in an election.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
  38. "coming to California"???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    we're already here and have been all along.

    California is the state of Ronald Reagan, Bob Dornan, etc.

    The left was only able to hijack the state and make it one-party-rule by super-majorities in the state house by importing millions of immigrants from leftist countries. Now we have the highest gas taxes in the nation, while our trasportation infrastructure crumbles. We now have some of the highest income taxes in the nation, while we hae the worst income inequality. We now have some of the highest business taxes and regulations, while our manufacturing businesses flee the state (SpaceX and Tesla do NOT offset all the other losses). We now have the highest levels of homelessness and poverty and the highest rates of welfare consumption in the nation.

    The very same progressives who try to hush all this stuff up by claiming California is a "net maker" and other states are "net takers" are outraged that Trump just partly unmasked that lie by taking away PART of the SALT federal tax deduction that Democrats in places like New York and California have for decades used to hide the true impact of their tax-and-spend policies. California lawmakers are currently trying to re-classify California taxes as "charitable deductions" to try to thwart this and keep hiding the effects of their policies. As a general rule, if you think you need to be that dishonest in your lawmaking, you are almost certainly in the wrong.

    The sad truth about morons like you is that the "tech workers" who are the most liberal are the ones working on phones, and tablets, and web sites, whereas those of us who work in aerospace, defense, and other areas that actually matter and where lives are on the line tend (Musk and some of his people being outliers) to be on the political right - and plenty of us are still here but finding the place increasingly fascistic and jack-booted. Right wingers in tech tend to keep their views to themselves, not having that National Socialist tendency to demand that others listen to their views and agree with them, so you might well have right wingers working around you who would surprise you. You guys on the left, however, lack the self-control to shut up and just do the work; the rest of us are all forced to notice you, so we know who you are. California may well be currently in the death-grip of you Marxist-leaning loons with your propaganda and speech codes and intrusive bloated totalitarian government worship, but things that connot be sustained won't..... and we'll be here to pick up the bits and pieces when your drug addled fantasies collapse .... we like the weather.

    1. Re:"coming to California"???? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      What's striking is driving across from Arizona and seeing gasoline a full dollar higher on the California side.

  39. Re:Seems like New Hampshire would have fit better by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    But in Arizona, you can be a libertarian who golfs and hikes year round.

  40. Re:Is LA that different? by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

    That's my point. I called them "enclaves" because they're fairly small, geographically, but they're heavily populated, mostly with liberals. Most of the state is much more conservative, but the population density is fairly low, so the the liberals in LA, SF and a few other places can control the state.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
  41. You gotta love sed by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    It's, possible, to, overdo, it, though.

    I, ,m,e,a,n, ,r,e,a,l,l,y,

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:You gotta love sed by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      sed, is incapable, of knowing when Shatner, would put a dramatic pause, in.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  42. Re: Why not? by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

    You subsidize them? Who builds your cars, grows your food, makes your clothes? Here's a hint - it's not f'ing you. Skipping over the fact that third world countries subsidize most of the developed world

    You keep using that word. It doesn't mean what you think it means.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  43. Re:He can stay out of L.A.... by Hal_Porter · · Score: 3, Informative

    Ignoring a judge's order to take down a sex tape isn't a very good idea

    http://gawker.com/a-judge-told...

    It's also hypocritical given they'd earlier criticised people for not taking down Jennifer Lawrence's nudes. Jezebel and Gawker were both owned by Gawker Media.

    https://imgur.com/a/ULIA4

    Gawker pissed of Thiel by running this

    http://gawker.com/335894/peter...

    Apparently they outed him when he was on a business trip to Saudi Arabia.

    So Thiel backed Hogan's lawsuit, and that bankrupted Gawker media.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  44. Re: He can stay out of L.A.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So the lesson here is people living in glass houses shouldn't throw stones at people who own hail makers.

  45. Re: Why not? by Barsteward · · Score: 1

    academic excellence does not necessarily mean you are smart at anything else other than those subjects.

    --
    "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
  46. Re:Proud to be prejudice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's bitztream the autism-hating, custom EpiPen-hating, Musk-hating, Qualcomm-hating, Firefox tabs-hating, Slashdot editors-hating Slashdot troll!

  47. Re:Thiel is a libertarian and you're incompetent by HiThere · · Score: 1

    The actions of his that I have noticed do not signify someone who's trying to get rid of or minimize the state, but rather someone who's trying to use it to his own advantage.

    I may well claim to be a libertarian, I haven't read anything he's written, but that's not what the actions of his that I have notices show. What actions has he taken that cause you to believe he is trying to eliminate or minimize the state rather than to use it to his own advantage?

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  48. Fix error in post: by HiThere · · Score: 1

    Not:
    I may well claim to be a libertarian (I used to, but now I'm a minarchist),
    but rather:
    He may well claim to be a libertarian

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  49. Re:What?!? by MoaDweeb · · Score: 1

    Yeah; free national health car is one of the things that your so-called left brings us.

    Our right wing party (National) is to the left of the Democrats in many ways but Thiel still wanted citizenship here.
    Any foreigners allowed in your 'burb or do you just shoot them?

    --
    New Zealanders are well balanced with a chip on each shoulder. One represents Australia, the other the rest of the world
  50. Re:Why not? by unixisc · · Score: 1

    He's a supporter of Donald Trump, who wants a military parade, like the ones the French have, to celebrate the day when the 99% began cutting off the heads of the 1%. Sadat was also fond of military parades, until the day, when a couple of the tens of thousands of armed people walking by, shot him dead. Perhaps Peter can stand beside him during the parade.

    He is? I read that he was one of the people potentially backing Steve Bannon after the Mercers withdrew their support to the latter. That would put him at odds w/ the president, not endear him to the White House or for that matter, the mainstream GOP

  51. Re:What?!? by youngone · · Score: 1

    Thiel still wanted citizenship here.

    Yes, in very dubious circumstances.

    How much did he "donate" to the National party to be granted citizenship in New Zealand despite having been here for a total of 12 whole days, then never returning or investing the money he said he would.
    I imagine there was a payoff to the Labour party as well, because I can't imagine why there has never been an inquiry about the whole matter.
    Not that it's an isolated incident, no-one is really sure what this criminal is called, but the minister of immigration gave him citizenship as well, against the advice of officials.

  52. Re:Because. by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

    As an engineer turned marketing, I think you're off base. The company I work for now, has people with backgrounds in theater and dance. The kind of creative energy that comes between us is really amazing. I sometimes thing like a engineer, and they approach problems different from me. I feed them the tech and community input and then we together create a story.

  53. Re:What?!? by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

    What a laughable argument. Ever been to a left of center rally? It's an amazingly positive vibe. it's because the left is a highly diverse set of people with different views that we try to accept. A right of center (if such a thing exists these days) doesn't have the diversity seen in the left and suffers from group think. Since they are mostly fighting for something they can't have, it is a pit of rage and hostility.

  54. Re: Why not? by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

    You do realize that California by itself has an economy bigger than most countries, right? Agriculture is one of it's biggest exports. The entire west coast is filled with agriculture as well as a burgeoning tech culture. It is well documented that a number of red states (san places like Texas and Florida) take more than they give when it comes to federal dollars. Blue states tend to have to pay more to make up for shitty economic policies of red states or whatever they call conservatism. In the war of ideas, conservative ideas have failed time and time again - see Kansas and Oklahoma. Ask yourself, why doesn't Peter Thiel not go to Kansas? It's because assholes have tried trickle down economics to the point that they can't even fund 5 days of school. If you're a startup, do you think that's a good place to setup shop. Nobody is going to go there where there are poor resources.

  55. Re:Ok? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You mean like debating evolution versus creationism? Or climate change versus sticking your head in the sand?

  56. Re:Why not? by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

    Yeah, that's why despite all that Trump is reputedly still calls Bannon for advice. ::eye roll:: The mainstream GOP doesn't give a shit about anything as long as they can pass more tax cuts. That's the only ideas they have.

  57. Re:Because. by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

    As an engineer turned marketing, I think you're off base.

    You literally proved my point AND attempted to refute it in the same sentence. Then you even expounded upon it. Honestly can't tell if this is an expert troll or a mentally deficient city dweller, well played.

  58. Re:Are you talking about the bankruptcy? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    2) He hated them, they've posted all kinds of agitprop going after him,

    None of which was false.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  59. Re:What?!? by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

    Yeah; free national health car is one of the things that your so-called left brings us.

    TANSTAAFL

    Nothing is free (as in beer). Not even free beer. They just shuffle things around so you don't notice (over)paying for it. And if it's run by the government, it's wasting your people's money, time, and resources to do a barely-passable at best job of it.

    Strat

    --
    Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  60. Re:Because. by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 2

    I'm not sure what point you were trying to make other than "marketing and sales people" are wastes of space. Which makes absolutely no sense in a business. You need all parts to succeed. Your condescending tone and arrogance is amusing though. Not that your opinion matters much to me. My comment wasn't directed at you anyways as much for others reading this thread.

  61. How's life in the hypocrite lane?

  62. Re:Because. by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

    The point was that city dwellers are marketing and sales people. "Wastes of space" wasn't even used as a modifier but a qualifier.

  63. Re:What?!? by MoaDweeb · · Score: 1

    Imagine all you like, there is no indication of anything improper for Mr Thiel's citizenship application. We do not have a history of bribery here of public officials esp. political parties.
    That said you don't need money if you just play to the vanities of politicians.
    Yeah Bill Yan is also a dody s**t and that was under Labour in 2001 (?). So a decade between drinks.

    The Immigration Minister made the call for Thiel who was recommended I beleive but with no real information and apparently does not recall the incident.
    Seems Thiel just schmoozed with the senior National Party figures and blew smoke up their ass

    --
    New Zealanders are well balanced with a chip on each shoulder. One represents Australia, the other the rest of the world
  64. Re:What?!? by MoaDweeb · · Score: 1

    Umm I know you are right wing enough not to be running on oxygen however our Governments balanced budget is paid from general taxation.
    Can you spell b-a-l-a-n-c-e-d 'Merkins?
    We could privatise it and then pay twice as much - once again 'Merkins show the way.

    That is what tax is for to pay for things the private sector cannot/ will not provide.

    --
    New Zealanders are well balanced with a chip on each shoulder. One represents Australia, the other the rest of the world
  65. Re:What?!? by youngone · · Score: 1

    You're right, we do not have a history of bribery here in NZ, but there is at least one incident which springs to mind, involving Mr. John Banks and Kim Dotcom's $50,000 donation to his mayoral campaign.
    Although Mr. Banks was found not guilty on appeal, the circumstances of the new evidence were extremely odd, and it also cost Mr. Banks his marriage.
    You are probably correct about Mr. Thiel's ability to charm which just raises a whole host of further questions about various senior National party people's judgment really.

  66. Re: Because. by MercTech · · Score: 1

    Yep, them dumb country boys don't make phone apps. They make something stupid like rockets to mars. https://www.nasa.gov/centers/m...

    --
    NRRPT/RCT
  67. Re:What?!? by MoaDweeb · · Score: 1

    If I recall correctly Our Fat German was found to be an unreliable witness regarding Banks being asked to spit the donation into 2 x $25,000 cheques. Last time that he trusted the Tories I am sure!

    And Banks did not help out Dotcom after he got arrested; with the recent paternity suit Banks lost it puts a new light on the law 'n' order scumbag that Banks traded on with National as Minister of Police (and talkback radio).

    NZ does not suffer from bribery so much as ' a mate doing a favour for a mate' and, of course, nepotism.

    --
    New Zealanders are well balanced with a chip on each shoulder. One represents Australia, the other the rest of the world
  68. Re: Because. by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

    You mean like...the only people to ever get to the moon?

    If we had more resources dedicated to rednecks we'd be raping and pillaging alien civilizations by now as payback for all the anal probes.

  69. Re: Why not? by Outta_the_way_peck! · · Score: 1

    You subsidize them? Who builds your cars, grows your food, makes your clothes?

    China?

  70. Re:Because. by painandgreed · · Score: 1

    Apart from anything else, being surrounded by the obligatory bunch of neckbearded hipster millennials who all think they're "alternative" yet all look, dress, speak, think and act exactly the same, and all march lock-step according to extreme peecee liberal brainwashing, would drive me nuts.

    Like most older generations, you misconstrue what "alternative" means. They don't mean alternative to each other, they mean alternative to you. They've seen what you are like, what you have done with the world, and have decided, collectively as a group, it was all a mistake and needs to be changed.

  71. Re:Because. by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    > what you have done with the world

    Don;t blame me. I didn't do anything with it.

  72. Re:Because. by painandgreed · · Score: 1

    > what you have done with the world

    Don;t blame me. I didn't do anything with it.

    And like every generation tells the one before, "Your failure to do anything is why it is crap."

  73. Re:Because. by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    I look forward to your response when kids start telling you this.

  74. Re:Is LA that different? by Reziac · · Score: 1

    And if L.A. wasn't constantly trying to play Keep Up With San Francisco, it wouldn't be nearly as liberal as it is. I've had the thought that we might all be better off (especially Californians) if S.F. was split off and became functionally the American Hong Kong.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?