Slashdot Mirror


'Big Brother' In India Requires Fingerprint Scans For Food, Phones, Finances (nytimes.com)

The New York Times reports of the Indian government's intent to build an identification system of unprecedented scope. The country is reportedly "scanning the fingerprints, eyes and faces of its 1.3 billion residents (alternative source) and connecting the data to everything from welfare benefits to mobile phones." Here's an excerpt from the report: Civil libertarians are horrified, viewing the program, called Aadhaar, as Orwell's Big Brother brought to life. To the government, it's more like "big brother," a term of endearment used by many Indians to address a stranger when asking for help. For other countries, the technology could provide a model for how to track their residents. And for India's top court, the ID system presents unique legal issues that will define what the constitutional right to privacy means in the digital age. The government has made registration mandatory for hundreds of public services and many private ones, from taking school exams to opening bank accounts.

Technology has given governments around the world new tools to monitor their citizens. In China, the government is rolling out ways to use facial recognition and big data to track people, aiming to inject itself further into everyday life. Many countries, including Britain, deploy closed-circuit cameras to monitor their populations. But India's program is in a league of its own, both in the mass collection of biometric data and in the attempt to link it to everything -- traffic tickets, bank accounts, pensions, even meals for undernourished schoolchildren.

132 comments

  1. You probably don't want to think by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Interesting

    about what India's ruling class does to maintain their status. Or what any country's ruling class does to maintain their status.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:You probably don't want to think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We already know they'll drop an atomic bomb on yer ass.

      Or as Letterman once said, *Think of the worst, most despicable thing a human can do to another, and know that somewhere in the world, somebody is doing it.*

      I hope the tech can be applied in both directions. We have to make sure that nobody gets the advantage, expect the true defenders. Those who draw first blood must die.

    2. Re:You probably don't want to think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It is probably to stop people from abusing the system.

      In the US we have food banks all over the place to help people.

      I know at least 4 different people that try to rope my wife into going into them and saying she has 4 kids. Just to get 'free food' on top of their existing EBT cards. This sort of 'crime' is wildly common unfortunately. One dude I knew had a job and makes payments on 2 cars (he is single and lives by himself). STILL does this.

      The food banks usually quickly go under due to lack of resources. People are abusing these systems that are designed and funded to help people. I will quote what one of them told me when I said "hey that food is for people who need it" "well I need it" "you need enough food for 6 people?" "well I run out" "then stop buying junk food with the thing and let me help you plan better, I have seen your fridge and cupboards" he wanted none of that. He is getting well over 500 bucks a month in just food aid.

      This is unfortunately why things turn into command and control government style systems. There are a bunch of people playing by the rules. Then a group who really do not give a shit just so long as they get theirs.

      These give away systems are ripe for abuse and the people who abuse them are well versed on doing so. It is why communistic systems fail into dictatorships and why capitalist systems fail into feudal systems. With communism/socialism it fails because the very greedy people who make up the system do not suddenly become un-greedy. They find ways to make your rules even more authoritarian to work around these people. In capitalistic systems they fail towards feudalism because of greed of the same nature. Both systems realize you can control other people through the use of capital (political or monetary) to buy rules to lock people into non freedom.

    3. Re:You probably don't want to think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      about what India's ruling class does to maintain their status. Or what any country's ruling class does to maintain their status.

      It has been going on since long before computers, and will go on with or without new technology. It's a social problem that whining about fingerprinting or iris scans or government databases will not solve in the least bit.

    4. Re:You probably don't want to think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ehh, Don't worry. They'll get to the brain chip stage soon enough so that "thinking" problem won't be an issue. That or they'll skip that phase and go straight to the "androids replacing people permanently"* phase.

      I'm completely unphased by the levels of "I don't give a fuck" these people have anymore, nor do I dare put anything beneth them. If it's even a remotely tangible benefit to them, I assume they'll do it the split second it's convenient for them, damn the consequences. On a related note, I also assume that the masses will do absolutely nothing to defend themselves and just bend over for the same reasons.

      You just can't make people care.

      *By "replacing", I mean for every drone rolled off the assembly line, a bullet is put in a person's head to cut operating costs.

    5. Re:You probably don't want to think by mrclevesque · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "You don't get people off welfare by giving them more welfare. You get people off welfare by assisting them in job placements, financial planning, drug rehabilitation, and educational endeavors."

      How about : You don't get people out of hospitals by giving them more hospital care. You get people out of hospital by assisting them in job placement, drug rehabilitation financial planning, and educational endeavors.

      i.e. financial assistance or hospital care doesn't exclude other forms of assistance, and vice versa.

    6. Re:You probably don't want to think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You get people off welfare by assisting them in job placements, financial planning, drug rehabilitation, and educational endeavors."
      Believe it or not there are programs and people that try to provide the services you mentioned. The problem is the amount of resources these efforts are allotted by the local, state, or federal governments. The second problem is getting those on welfare to take advantage of these services. But there are people who receive welfare and don't have the slightest interest in stopping those payments.

      But expecting the federal government to fix this problem is pretty much a waste of time and effort. When is the last time the Federal government fixed or did anything right for the everyday citizens they claim to work for? How bad do the existing political parties, politicians, and their diehard supporters have to be if Trump was able to win the Presidency? Both the Democrats and Republicans demonstrated their incompetence for all to see. Even the media drove more people towards Trump with their open animosity and biased publications about everything related to Trump. Even the people who pumped billions of dollars into both the Democratic and Republican candidates failed to make sure Trump wasn't elected. If that is not a display of total incompetence and idiocy I don't know what else to say. Even the expert political talking heads who are hired and paid large sums of money to pontificate about their insider understanding on everything government related were wrong. None of those paid for mouth pieces ever thought Trump would win. Anyone making that big of mistake in any other profession would have been shit canned from their jobs. If the people wielding power behind the scenes along with the pitiful MSM could not prevent Trump from winning the election how would they ever be expected to solve any of the problems they promise to address during their campaigns?

    7. Re: You probably don't want to think by peragrin · · Score: 1

      I. Keene NH you have homeless people on the street panhanding in the dead of winter too.

      I live there too. And I hadn't seen some many homeless until I came to NH.

      You call it good? I call it ineffectual. Keene ccould use two to three more homeless shelters because the one can't keep up with demand.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    8. Re:You probably don't want to think by anegg · · Score: 1

      I don't know why the parent was marked down to -1. The poster has expressed his/her opinion of why the Indian government may want to establish a form of identification/authentication tied directly to individuals, and cited examples of potential fraud in the US system that by analogy are relevant.

      I have personally observed similar instances of potential fraud, and have had other instances related to me, so the poster's observations appear valid and relevant to me.

    9. Re: You probably don't want to think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      False equivalency

    10. Re: You probably don't want to think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The way to deal with homeless people is to make a homelessshelter on a big enough island and provide only a one way ticket there. Or you better get used to it. We have too many people on the planet and we are getting more by the minute

    11. Re: You probably don't want to think by mrclevesque · · Score: 1

      No, my point was they're both nonsensical to the same degree.

      Like why would "assisting them in job placements, financial planning, drug rehabilitation, and educational endeavors" exclude "giving welfare".

    12. Re:You probably don't want to think by mrclevesque · · Score: 1

      "Slaves didn't have to pay for healthcare, housing, or food"

      Yes they did, maybe not with money but they still payed.

      "Whoever pays for life's essentials is your master"

      No, that doesn't follow.

      "Some of us prefer to not allow the government to steal from us to pay for its slaves"

      They don't.

    13. Re: You probably don't want to think by TrumpThemAll · · Score: 0

      Half the people you see panhandling on the street aren't homeless. In California we see people who were standing in the middle of the road with a signs a few minutes ago, get into their fancy cars and drive away. People can actually make good money pretending to be homeless.

    14. Re: You probably don't want to think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, spot on.

    15. Re:You probably don't want to think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know for me, the very thought that there are evil, selfish people makes me want to give up all my rights, especially the right to my privacy. That'll show those pricks.

    16. Re: You probably don't want to think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you really just type the word like?

    17. Re: You probably don't want to think by mrclevesque · · Score: 1

      No. These are both examples of false equivilancies:

      "They're both living animals that metabolize chemical energy. There's no difference between a pet cat and a pet snail."

      "The Deepwater Horizon oil spill is no different from your neighbor dripping some oil on the ground when changing oil in his car."

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      ---

      I'm referring to a similarity in logical construction

      To get someone off welfare it isn't nonsensical to continue giving them welfare so they can get things like assistance in job placements, financial planning, drug rehabilitation, and educational endeavors -- so that they will be able to get off welfare.

      If someone is often in the hospital because they have problems with drugs, it makes more sense, to offer them both hospital care and support like drug rehabilitation, rather than offering them only one or the other, hospital care or drug rehabilitation.

    18. Re: You probably don't want to think by mrclevesque · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      I used Like because I was only stating one of the ways the original assertion is faulty.

      Kind of like using 'for example', but it adds a level of sloppiness to the argument, which I found appropriate, as I'm still not clear on all that's involved.

    19. Re:You probably don't want to think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ur reply is so relevant that it can apply to the morgue too! /s

    20. Re:You probably don't want to think by mrclevesque · · Score: 1

      Not sure how you mean, please elaborate

    21. Re: You probably don't want to think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a load of Mr. Clev[er]esque over here. Slashdot pseudo-intellectual #1413593

      Like, OMG, he so totes doesn't even.

      "Welfare(TM)", as it is commonly talked about (including by governments), refers to money, food, clothing, other goods and housing (ie. FREE SHIT). It does not refer to societal rehab... but it should.

      The problem people have is, if it is just FREE SHIT, it shouldn't be funded by tax payers. Keeping people dependent does nobody any lasting good and it opens the door for scumbags to defraud the system. Let people who simultaneously can afford to and want to give FREE SHIT to those in need and are willing to either eat the losses or pursue the scumbags do that.

      If it were societal rehab then yes, tax payer funding would be justifiable (but still shouldn't be required) and your comparison to hospital care would apply. Teaching people applicable skills, building their morale, motivation and work ethic? Keep that coming. Scumbags can't defraud that. What are they gonna do, turn into upstanding members of society? God forbid.

    22. Re: You probably don't want to think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Job placements, financial planning, drug rehabilitation and educational endeavors are not "Welfare(TM)".

    23. Re:You probably don't want to think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is in a slave-owners best interest, given that he wants his slaves to perform tasks for him, to keep said slaves healthy enough to do said tasks. If they are not, then he does not have slaves, he has corpses.

    24. Re: You probably don't want to think by mrclevesque · · Score: 1

      Yes, of course.

      But that is not what I'm saying. To simplify, I mean that it makes sense to give welfare and other forms of social support at the same time because then one can pay for housing and food while one receives the other support services.

    25. Re:You probably don't want to think by mrclevesque · · Score: 1

      I'm not disagreeing but I'm not sure how that's relevant.

    26. Re: You probably don't want to think by mrclevesque · · Score: 1

      My argument is that it isn't nonsense to support someone financially (for rent, food, etc.) and at the same time support them on other levels.

      We can try to make sure we understand each other's arguments and word use better. Reducing the signal to noise ratio in comments can help on that level.

      Your 'just free shit' and 'scumbag fraudsters' arguments are certainly worth debating but they're not what I have issue with here.

    27. Re: You probably don't want to think by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

      While there are people who just live off the FREE SHIT and don't actively get a job or try to get back on their feet, the vast majority are just people who have fallen on hard times. The fact the the system that supports giving out FREE SHIT has to be secured against the people abusing it by using invasive privacy techniques like biometric scans is not a fault of the system, it's a fault of the people abusing said system. Biometrics is invasive, and I don't like it. Come up with a better solution and you will have more money than you can count. In fact the real problem is that signing up for one government system to get FREE SHIT should not involve the sharing of that data with every other person on the planet. THAT IS THE PROBLEM!

      A case in point, they recently installed camera's in my neighbourhood to record the number plates of those entering and exiting it, in an attempt to bring down property crime. My wife was fine with the idea, I however have an issue that whomever now has access to that database of innocent and well intentioned data knows when my wife is alone at home, and I am off to work. Who has access to that data? How secure is it? It can also be used to track police and private security patrols, if it can be linked to my vehicle registration they can decide if my vehicle is worth being stolen, and if it's a make and model with a know security vulnerability they can use that as well. All without leaving their armchairs. When is your daughter alone at home? Think about that.

      So no, I don't like them collecting all this data for the simple reason that it's very very clear they cannot protect it. It CANNOT be protected, so fucking stop collecting it.

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
  2. One step away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the mark of the beast

    1. Re: One step away by Bruha · · Score: 2

      Itâ(TM)s not the mark of the beast. Unless you consider our fingerprints and DNA the mark already.

    2. Re:One step away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One step away from being treated like cattle. Prodded and tagged.

    3. Re: One step away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is actually a plausible interpretation that the 'mark' of the beast on the hand or face is referring to fingerprints or eye scans.

    4. Re: One step away by youngone · · Score: 1

      Have you actually read the Book of Revelation though?
      How anyone could take that drivel seriously is beyond me.

    5. Re:One step away by youngone · · Score: 1

      It sounds pretty bad, but it's India, so it won't work very well, and most people will pay a small bribe to avoid it in some way.

    6. Re: One step away by rossz · · Score: 1

      I have. And I want what that guy was smoking.

      --
      -- Will program for bandwidth
    7. Re: One step away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is actually a plausible interpretation that the 'mark' of the beast on the hand or face is referring to fingerprints or eye scans.

      I do not believe you are correct. Revelation 13 says "And he causes all, the small and the great, and the rich and the poor, and the free men and the slaves, to be given a mark on their right hand or on their forehead, and he makes sure that no one will be able to buy or to sell, except the one who has the mark, either the name of the beast or the number of his name."

      We are born with fingerprints. In these verses the beast is giving people the mark so it cannot be talking about fingerprints as is what the article is about.

      With that said, this could certainly be opening up the door for that time. Those scriptures were written almost 2000 years ago, and nothing has come even close to making that possible until the current time we are living in.

    8. Re: One step away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although you are correct the OP was correct, one step away. In other words just change from fingerprints and DNA to a chip implant either in the hand or forehead then require everyone to use that in order to buy or sell. We could be quite close to that, especially with the various bogeymen we somehow need protected from.

    9. Re: One step away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And he causes all, the small and the great, and the rich and the poor, and the free men and the slaves, to be given a mark on their right hand or on their forehead

      A tattoo saying "wipe your ass with the other one" and a red dot, respectively?

    10. Re: One step away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's notably less plausible than interpreting it as a simple brand.

      The concept of branding livestock (including slaves) predates the story and the concept of "we'd all be as slaves" is sufficient to explain it's inclusion in a story about a horrible future. Adding the unproven assumption that the statement is based on knowledge of the future to allow interpreting it as a misinterpretation of modern biometric ID systems cause the explanation to fail Occam's Razor.

  3. Same Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They do exactly the same as here in Europe. Only the method of using biometrics is different due to cost and scale issues. Maybe the horrified civil libertarians could come here to be horrified and explain to the various EU countries and banks how to interpret the banking directive without endangering our Vishnu given freedoms..

  4. Just slightly ahead of the curve. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We are getting it here in the west too. I live in Sweden and its getting increasingly difficult to communicate with government run services with out a "mobile ID" (which is made by a private firm and requires a newish smartphone BTW) even riding a bus requires a "smartphone" and you have to show a valid ID to ride a train.... Strangely you can still fly in Europe without showing an ID, its easier to get on a plane incognito than a local bus...

    1. Re:Just slightly ahead of the curve. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      In Europe there is no resistance (really in India either). It's as if everyone turned French. It's happening everywhere. The majority wants this and more. They want to feel safe. It's much easier to build a pretty facade than the greasy infrastructure.

    2. Re:Just slightly ahead of the curve. by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      There's more resistance in Europe than in the US. Ask the average American, and they'll say that privacy doesn't matter if you're not doing anything wrong. European countries and the EU have explicitly recognized privacy rights under law, whereas the US is stuck with the 4th Amendment, which only applies to police.

    3. Re: Just slightly ahead of the curve. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Americans distrust government but love corporations. So we don't mind letting the corporations have our data but dammit it's none of the fed's business if I made $100k under the table selling commemorative Bitcoin USB sticks.

    4. Re:Just slightly ahead of the curve. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please! Quite simply the law cannot protect your 'privacy'. In fact, with data retention laws, etc, you are much more at risk. And in Europe you still have no real free speech protection either. As worthlessly as it is being enforced, the Americans still have the 1st Amendment, which is also under attack for being too liberal(!). Nope, sorry, this is what the majority wants, all over the globe. It wouldn't happen otherwise. So now, we have to hope for a technological solution to counter the fascist majority. Something nobody can penetrate, and we need tech to prevent information from being taken down. We need all this because humans won't live and let live.

    5. Re:Just slightly ahead of the curve. by Megol · · Score: 1

      Stop lying.

      You want to communicate with government services? Use your phone - yes even a dumb phone or a land line would work. Or download some papers and send away. Or go to local branches of whatever you want to communicate with and ask for some assistance.

    6. Re:Just slightly ahead of the curve. by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

      Europe has similar levels of free-speech protection as the US. Possibly greater, as you can't be fired at will in many countries if you voice an unpopular opinion. True, in some countries, you can be arrested or fined for Fascist speech, but that stands to reason. Fascism caused a lot of suffering in Europe, and wanting to bring those times back is pretty close to treason.

      Basically, it's a threat -- you're promoting government action to take away people's rights. The US equivalent would probably be something like burning a cross on the street in front of someone's home.

    7. Re:Just slightly ahead of the curve. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fascism caused a lot of suffering

      Yeah, so it did. Blame the followers who pulled the trigger, not the 'leaders' who placed the order. Censorship is much more offensive. It is a fascist concept. You and most the others have it exactly backwards. And if it wasn't for American occupation, Europe would still be at war, as it has been for its entire existence before the end of World War 2. European "enlightenment" is as phony as a three dollar bill.

    8. Re:Just slightly ahead of the curve. by ISayWeOnlyToBePolite · · Score: 1

      We are getting it here in the west too. I live in Sweden and its getting increasingly difficult to communicate with government run services with out a "mobile ID" (which is made by a private firm and requires a newish smartphone BTW) even riding a bus requires a "smartphone" and you have to show a valid ID to ride a train.... Strangely you can still fly in Europe without showing an ID, its easier to get on a plane incognito than a local bus...

      You can still communicate with every government run service by oldschool phone, and the kind of mail you put a stamp on. Bank ID isn't just for mobiles, but you'd need a windows computer. Tickets for public transportation can be bought with cash. Afaik every airline in Europe demand that you have a valid ID to show upon request.

    9. Re:Just slightly ahead of the curve. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They want to feel safe.

      This is not what this is about. These are all anti-money laundering, anti-organized crime and anti-social security fraud measures. It's also a precursor to an electronic government. But I guess the anti-crime aspect is a safety issue as well, although it's mostly a "they took our tax moneys and run!!" issue. Envious people are capable of terrible things.

    10. Re:Just slightly ahead of the curve. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it is still physically possible, that is why I wrote "increasingly". Its just really hard and getting harder each day.

    11. Re: Just slightly ahead of the curve. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, fascist speech will get you funded by the government in Spain.

    12. Re:Just slightly ahead of the curve. by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

      Strangely you can still fly in Europe without showing an ID, its easier to get on a plane incognito than a local bus...

      It depends on where you are travelling to; even some Schengen-area countries have re-imposed ID checks - France, for example.

    13. Re: Just slightly ahead of the curve. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EU âoeRightsâ or more than useless they are so full of holes they are basically worthless.

    14. Re:Just slightly ahead of the curve. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weird. I Norway, I can pay cash for bus & train tickets. I can get cheaper fare by buying a card that uses near-field communication - but I can still pay for that card with cash if I wish to commute incognito. Mobile phones may be used (plain sms or fancy 'apps'), but they are not needed to travel or even to get the best prices.

      But then, we have a law saying that anyone demanding 'payment' cannot refuse 'cash' except for ridiculous stuff like paying a large sum with small change.

      I wonder where you can fly without ID though? I don't need a passport for a national flight, but need some kind of ID (driver licence or similiar). I always thought that was in order to have a valid passenger list if the plane crashes - but perhaps also for effecting "no fly" lists and for tracking suspicious people.

    15. Re:Just slightly ahead of the curve. by Kiuas · · Score: 2

      I live in Sweden and its getting increasingly difficult to communicate with government run services with out a "mobile ID"

      Finn here; we use e-banking credentials (all of which are required by law to use 2-step authentication) lo log in and identify to government services like filing taxes etc. There's a notable difference between requiring a trustworthy method for people to identify themselves in order to access their own personal information stored and handled by the government and requiring fingerprints and facial ID to buy food or taking an exam.

      I quite like the fact that I can handled my taxes (both personal and those of my startup) online using 2-step identification instead of a less secure method.

      Strangely you can still fly in Europe without showing an ID, its easier to get on a plane incognito than a local bus...

      So wait, have they stopped selling single-use tickets at kiosks and stores? Last time I was in Stockholm I happily rode the metro with complete anonymity using these. Again, just because a service is offered (you can buy mass transit tickets with the phone here as well) does not mean said service is mandatory. You're comparing apples to oranges here.

      Secondly: no you can't be on the plane incognito. Even though you won't have to show your ID necessarily, your name is still on the passenger manifest. Obviously you can book a flight under a false name, but this is actually not allowed. That is, if they do decide to check your ID (which they are allowed to do) and find that your ticket is booked under a different/false name you will not get on the flight.

      --
      "It is the business of the future to be dangerous" -Alfred North Whitehead
    16. Re:Just slightly ahead of the curve. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fighting fascism by registering every individual, tracking and tracing every person and every opinion and every device of communication and criminalizing every uttering of unpopular opinions?

      That's now fighting fascism. It's recreating it.

    17. Re:Just slightly ahead of the curve. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How did you pay for your single use GUID marked ticket? Cash? No? Anonymous my ass...

  5. Fuck India by AndyKron · · Score: 0, Troll

    Fuck India.

    1. Re:Fuck India by Memnos · · Score: 2

      Umm.. you realize that's probably not necessary. They're obviously already doing a lot of fucking just amongst themselves.

      --
      I don't trust atoms -- they make up stuff.
  6. Re:It's all IBM's FAULT! by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1
  7. upright citizens, saving food by harvey+the+nerd · · Score: 1

    scan 1.3 billion, edit the list, unlisted or nonlisted save some wasted food...
    make that 1.25 billion....

    start a war, or announce new taxes and onerous collection, listen for protests, edit the list,
    make that 1.24 billion....
    give extra food to supporters
    make that 1.31 billion....

    see how that works ?

    1. Re:upright citizens, saving food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same way the Republicans in the US steal from the people to starve us by, for example, their last round of tax cuts that did nothing for the people that don't pay taxes or have a negative rate like me. I got nothing extra from the tax cut. Then we die and there's fewer Democrat voters then they gain more power then they kill more of us.

  8. Poor And Surveilled by OpenSourceAllTheWay · · Score: 0

    Its a lose-lose for India's residents.

    1. Re: Poor And Surveilled by pele · · Score: 1

      Elaborate?

  9. Well, at least ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... they haven't resorted to tracking their citizens when overseas. India's government are a bunch of pikers when it comes to real surveillance of their populace.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  10. That's great by pele · · Score: 1

    Unlike liberal liberals I see nothing wrong in this. In fact I think it's great.

    In switzerland you notify your local community office that you moved in and everyone gets notified of the change (including your bank). Same when you leave. Everyone who cares knows you left and your new place of abode.
    If you can do other things with it like make people pay their parking tickets or notify next of kin of some mishap then great.

    1. Re:That's great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First, you're not thinking this through. This is not even remotely like notifying institutions when you move. It's well established that population controls backfire and power corrupts.

      Second, ffs - It's not a liberal point of view to oppose monitoring citizens it's a conservative one.

      (If that's too confusing: liberals want more governing, conservatives want less)

    2. Re: That's great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ^^^ another sheep boys. Keep eating that grass.

    3. Re:That's great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlike liberal liberals I see nothing wrong in this.

      How about conservative libertarians? How about intelligent people everywhere who can be more than a label? Surely the wish to limit the power of the state should be a conservative position and so if you are going to contrast yourself with "liberal liberals" you should be demanding this stop?

    4. Re:That's great by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 3, Insightful

      India still has a caste system going nice and strong--several of the things that 'Big Brother' here is intended to do would work very, very well for ensuring people will have a very difficult time attempting to escape their preordained proper place (such as daring to want to have a job that wasn't dirty, dangerous and demeaning), punish those who try anyway, and probably also cull the population.

      Oh, and they've got problems like people being legally dead when they're not being deceased. Admittedly, this system will ensure that such errors are quickly fixed...by blocking the legally dead person from access to the basic necessities of life.

      Any system which makes it so the state can (intentionally or by accident) prevent you from being able to obtain basic necessities for yourself is not a good one, especially if it'd be possible to pretend your genocide is just a massive clerical error that merely happened to take you years to correct.

      RTFAing says that one of the benefits they're claiming is that this will fix India's endemic government corruption. The only way to get rid of corruption in the state is to ensure that corrupt officials are likely to be caught, that the penalty is significant, and that there is as little benefit to being corrupt as possible. (The more power they have, the better the odds need to be of a corrupt official being the guest of honor at a surprise necktie party.)

    5. Re: That's great by pele · · Score: 1

      It seems to me you confused yourself there. And that's exactly why you are an anonymous coward.
      So to recap - this is a good thing because it enables streamlining if tedious paperwork.

    6. Re: That's great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the contrary, in Europe conservatives want more government control on citizens (we had several constitutional monarchies in the past and we still have some in Spain, Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark and so on) while liberals wants less government control on citizens. It just boil down to where you came from in your past history...

    7. Re: That's great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So loss of Privacy, the tracking of all my comings and goings and purchases and the need to self censor lest something I say online today might be considered subversive 10 years from now is all well and good so long as we "streamline the paperwork"

      FUCK YOU YOU FASCIST PIECE OF SHIT

    8. Re:That's great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not that bad. Since it takes 2 days at police station to get VISA cleared for leaving the country legally, you need to anticipate 1-2 weeks at police station to be cleared of being legally dead. What is bad is that by paying money, you can make it in just a wee hours. People much more friendly than in the West though, generally.

    9. Re:That's great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any system which makes it so the state can (intentionally or by accident) prevent you from being able to obtain basic necessities for yourself is not a good one, especially if it'd be possible to pretend your genocide is just a massive clerical error that merely happened to take you years to correct.

      Like pen and paper? Typewriters? News flash: genocide, repression, and caste systems, are not high tech affairs. See for example, every genocide repression caste system ever.

    10. Re:That's great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well the way they decided to get rid of corruption, through the use of this system, is by making it easier to remove anyone who realizes there's corruption going on.

    11. Re:That's great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>> India still has a caste system going nice and strong--several of the things that 'Big Brother' here is intended to do would work very, very well for ensuring people will have a very difficult time attempting to escape their preordained proper place (such as daring to want to have a job that wasn't dirty, dangerous and demeaning), punish those who try anyway, and probably also cull the population.

      yeah, like most of the white western countries have their racism against anyone brown or black.

      for your information, India has had presidents that are from minorities, 'lower' castes, etc., including the current president. And plenty of women at the really top positions of power. So talk about caste system when you have had a president who is at least half black, and maybe a woman president too.

    12. Re: That's great by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      yeah, like most of the white western countries have their racism against anyone brown or black

      Not even close.

    13. Re:That's great by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      It's not that bad. Since it takes 2 days at police station to get VISA cleared for leaving the country legally, you need to anticipate 1-2 weeks at police station to be cleared of being legally dead. What is bad is that by paying money, you can make it in just a wee hours. People much more friendly than in the West though, generally.

      Try 19 years to get it cleared up, and the official only needing about a US$20 bribe to declare him legally dead in the first place.

    14. Re:That's great by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      Any system which makes it so the state can (intentionally or by accident) prevent you from being able to obtain basic necessities for yourself is not a good one, especially if it'd be possible to pretend your genocide is just a massive clerical error that merely happened to take you years to correct.

      Like pen and paper? Typewriters? News flash: genocide, repression, and caste systems, are not high tech affairs. See for example, every genocide repression caste system ever.

      Sorry, I assumed that it was reasonably obvious that 'any system' would include the low tech ones as well. But if you want to get into the nasty parts, it's relatively well-established that the world will ignore its agreement that genocides--strictly defined as government-run obviously-intentional slaughters of an entire people--are bad and should be stopped, and the only reason to bother much with providing a plausible excuse is to make it slightly less obvious that they don't actually care.

      High tech is useful here, because the main thing it does is make it unfortunately plausible--this is /., I should not need to help you with how quickly a PHB's moronic nephew can cause you to be having to hope that the data has been backed up very recently.

    15. Re: That's great by darth.hunterix · · Score: 1

      Just out of curiosity: when are you required to inform that office that you moved in? When you want to, or every time you move?

      For example, if I move, but for some reason I still want all mail to go old address (so nobody needs to know, as far as they are concern I'm still reachable there, I'm physically elsewhere) am I required by law to register under new location anyway? And if so, what is the punishment for disobedience?

      --
      What is best in life? Hot water, good dentishtry and shoft lavatory paper.
    16. Re:That's great by NewYork · · Score: 1

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... should solve corruption in India

  11. Better than killing them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are way too many Indians, they should be happy they arenâ(TM)t killing 50% of them.

  12. Can't have it both ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want the government to provide welfare services that people expect in a country like India with a 75% literacy rate you're going to get what's in TFS. If you've got a better way to do it the Indian government would probably like to hear from you.

    1. Re:Can't have it both ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want the government to provide welfare services that people expect in a country like India with a 75% literacy rate you're going to get what's in TFS. If you've got a better way to do it the Indian government would probably like to hear from you.

      I'm also illiterate in Hindi, you insensitive clod.

  13. Biometrics: Easy to Copy, Hard to Replace. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A nearby grocery store chain had the idea of using fingerprints to pay for groceries. Turns out folks leave fingerprints on everything they touch. I mean everything! Door handles. Windows. Cups. E-V-E-R-Y-T-H-I-N-G. Turns out you can trivially forge fingerprints. Their scanner was optical, so a photocopy would work. With some of the newer systems you have to etch a 3D PC (circuit) board or whatever. Perhaps impress the fingerprint onto a correct-temperature-with-pulse organic matrix afterwards. Gummy bears work really well that!

    Did I mention this grocery store chain had stores in the nearby economically depressed areas? Whole fingerprint controversy lasted only a couple days. They lost a lot of money.

  14. Modi and corruption by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

    That political windbag Modi claims it will root out corruption. Maybe. Corruption in India is simply a way to work around bad government. It might remove some corruption, but it won't fix the underlying problem of a useless government and corruption at the higher levels.

  15. Most western countries essentially have this by Kjella · · Score: 3, Informative

    All sorts of official activity here in Norway is linked to my "fødselsnummer", essentially my DOB + a 5-digit code to make it unique assigned at birth. Immigrants and others with business in Norway get a D-number which is the same only in a different number series. Can't open a bank account, can't pay taxes, can't own property, can't really do anything official without it. That was all well and good, but then the US started pushing for biometric passports and around here a country is the size of a US state so practically everybody has to have a passport. So since 2010 that all goes into a big database and since you have to renew them every ten years it's now pretty much the entire population. The only thing that prevent them from using it like in India is the law, all the data is already connected and linked.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    1. Re:Most western countries essentially have this by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The only thing that prevent them from using it like in India is the law, all the data is already connected and linked.

      I'm sure our best people will be happy to teach your law enforcement all about parallel construction. (I imagine we're probably better at it than most, because most of the places it's scarier to be than the USA don't bother justifying what they're doing.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Most western countries essentially have this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All sorts of official activity here in Norway is linked to my "fødselsnummer", essentially my DOB + a 5-digit code to make it unique assigned at birth. Immigrants and others with business in Norway get a D-number which is the same only in a different number series. Can't open a bank account, can't pay taxes, can't own property, can't really do anything official without it. That was all well and good, but then the US started pushing for biometric passports and around here a country is the size of a US state so practically everybody has to have a passport. So since 2010 that all goes into a big database and since you have to renew them every ten years it's now pretty much the entire population. The only thing that prevent them from using it like in India is the law, all the data is already connected and linked.

      Most if not all of Europe is in the same boat, and that, as well as this aadhaar thing, as well as Chinese identity cards and now social scores, Russian internal passports and so on, are exactly why all those things may well seem like a good idea but in the long run are nothing but a tool to control the population.

      It should come as no surprise that the whole "force every citizen to have a traceable identity" thing, over here courtesy Napoleon, was put in place to track and suppress political dissent. Everything else is window dressing and promises from politicians.

    3. Re:Most western countries essentially have this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but then the US started pushing for biometric passports and around here a country is the size of a US state so practically everybody has to have a passport.

      Everybody needs a passport if they want to travel outside the Schengen area. If you enjoy holidays in your own country - no need for a passport.

      Also, while biometric passports hold a lot of information about you, you only need them while travelling abroad. They are not inspected at every street corner.

    4. Re:Most western countries essentially have this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but then the US started pushing for biometric passports and around here a country is the size of a US state so practically everybody has to have a passport.

      Everybody needs a passport if they want to travel outside the Schengen area. If you enjoy holidays in your own country - no need for a passport.

      Also, while biometric passports hold a lot of information about you, you only need them while travelling abroad. They are not inspected at every street corner.

      Ha ha. The Schengen treaty got sold to us saying we wouldn't need passports at the border. All those countries now require their citizens to carry ID cards at all times, everywhere. Often that rule was added with explicit reference to the Schengen treaty's effects.

      "ID cards are not passports", you say? Even though they're not valid outside the Schengen area, they are equated to passports within. Which is why they also have that RFID/NFC chip and the biometrics. Even though the reason the chip got added was the USoA, where the ID cards aren't valid. But again because ID cards are legally passports within their area of validity, yes, chip and biometrics.

      So yes, you have to have that passport or passport-without-booklet on you at all times. Everywhere. In fact, you're not allowed to work, unable to get benefits, even unable to get medical or dental care without it. And so many other things.

      I know, I've been unable to get my own government issue me a new one after the old one expired. I'm now destitute. Of course, not carrying a card is an offence, but not issuing a card to someone legally required to have one is not. Funny how that works.

    5. Re:Most western countries essentially have this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The USA will soon require a REAL ID or passport for air travel. That law was passed over a decade ago. The USA is phasing in a national ID card too, but people are too busy fighting over transgendered bathrooms to have noticed or cared.

    6. Re:Most western countries essentially have this by ProzacPatient · · Score: 1

      That sounds a lot like the Social Security Number that we have in the United States. Unfortunately there is nothing secure about it and wasn't intended to be a defacto password to your identity but everyone uses it like that anyway. Once someone has stolen your social security number they can pretty much take over your life.

    7. Re:Most western countries essentially have this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference might be that there should be a national ID card in Norway as well. The card is then the real key to your life. It contains a chip with biometrics in it, a photograph, a signature, the number and probably other codes. You would actually have to physically present the card with you to perform any sensitive or reported activities, like access your medical information or open a bank account or make a cash transaction through a bank such as paying a bill. A system like that would probably be too inconvenient in a large country like the US, until the medical and personal information becomes more expensive than the travel costs. Or a reliable electronic version of the same activity is created.

  16. how is it news? by jarkus4 · · Score: 2

    This system has been working for a long while. It had already went through massive data leaks in 2017

  17. Singapore has it, sweden has it... by Daneel+Olivaw+R.+ · · Score: 3, Informative

    In singapore it was called Nric/FIN, linked to tax, bank, mobile, all govt services and then I first came to sweden, I had restricted to my new swedish bank account among other things till I got "swedish id" card. It is used everywhere from new house search, new mobile number, authentication in any swedish service (not just govt services, include insurance/ investment / share market/ etc.) TBH, I find having this convenient so I do not have to register in multiple places. I understand the concern about hacks like equifax one. There is a solution for that Blockchain based stuff like "civic" (yes, you hate blockchain I get it) In india's case, it helps with reducing corruption already (no, you can't have oversight without data and some centralized way to identify what the whole population does), and authorizing myself with fingerprint in a bank is kinda convenient considering the fact the each of my signature is unique despite my best effort to duplicate. My point is, NYT tends to blow things out of proposition and whatever is happening in india has already been done in at least sg and sweden and I have not seen any outraged articles about that. My point is

  18. Undernourished Children by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The meals for undernourished children do not reach the undernourished children. Biometric verification will ensure that the food was really fed to the child and not sold out for money. If you've got a tougher idea then please reply.

    1. Re:Undernourished Children by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How would that work? 'All undernourished, line up and get a plate of food when you've passed the fingerprint scanner'?

      With corruption, it'll be 'All undernourished, line up for the fingerprint scanner'. Then they get a quarter plate of food, the rest being sold for profit. Or perhaps they organize it like a lottery, so a few of those scanned 'wins' some food. With stricter control, the kid gets his plate of food, but will have to 'donate' most of it around the corner if he don't want to be hit with that baseball bat.

      Biometric verification only ensures that some fingers got scanned - and hardly even that. Perhaps a few kids get employment in a fake finger factory. (Fake fingers crudely manufactured so the corrupt can scan a bunch of fakes before selling the provided food. No need to organize that show on the street then - more convenient.)

  19. Maybe this is okay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd be okay with this for free government services. Might cut out loads of red tape.

    Not so much for services I have to pay for (like cell phones, etc)

  20. Press here to play by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    'Big Brother' In India Requires Fingerprint Scans For Food, Phones, Finances

    Wow. Foreign TV shows are weird.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  21. USA Prejudices by tekelymailcom · · Score: 1

    Fingerprint and photograph as part of your ID has been obligatory in my country for at least 70 years. And you need your ID to indentfy yourself for like.. everthing. I just can't see what's the big deal of making that digital. It looks pretty innevitable actually.

    1. Re:USA Prejudices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's because you're a sheep or a shill or both.
      This is the definition of evil. A government exists for the people. Not just the people who are "lawful citizens", but all the people within it's borders that it is privileged enough to serve. If it doesn't want to serve certain people, it should eject those people and simply cite the racism of the majority.

      Government exists because some things are easier to handle as a large group and thus it maintains a monopoly on violence and monopoly on justice. If you require people to register and document every single thing they do, then allow automated enforcement processing. The sheer number of laws and the fact that most people break at least 7 laws a day, will cause the courts to be inundated with petty criminals like people who fail to register every action, rather than people who have committed real crimes that would require investigation by authorities and prosecution by the justice system. You can't automate justice, but that's what they are trying to do.

      The net result here is that an underground will develop and eventually the people will band together, rebel and bring the government to heel. Look at the rise of cryptocurrencies as one solid example of this happening right now. No one wants to have to register every single transaction and frankly banks "derisk" people and deny them access to their money with no due process whatsoever and we aren't even at the level they are talking about in the article. So people started using crypto currency as a way of bypassing the restrictions at the bank. This despite the wild fluctuations in value that are the risk inherent in holding my assets on the blockchain. That risk of 25% or more daily fluctuation is still better than the near 100% chance the bank will close my account on a whim with no notice. After all, if I have hungry kids sitting at home in Iran, or Cuba, or Venezula, why shouldn't I be able send money to my family no matter where I'm working?

      Furthermore, biometrics are nothing more than a password that you can never change. It serves poorly because biometrics are based on "nearest matching". The larger the population, the higher the chance of a false positive. How would you like to go to the ATM and find your account drained with no possible way to get it back because the person ahead of you was a "close enough match" and the law assumes the technology is infallible instead of the truth, which is that these systems are built with the idea that it only has to be close enough. Even if you could build a biometric system with a 1 in a million rate of incorrect identification, in a population of 600 million people, there's 600 people who would be a perfect match for you.

      Yet that's exactly how these systems work. The very best biometric we have are fingerprints and the best fingerprint systems in the world have a false positive rate of only 0.0001%.
      Sounds awesome doesn't it?

      Yet in a world with 10 Billion people that's 100,000 people who could be a perfect match and that's just baysian statistics. In reality the birthday paradox means that one out of every 10,000 people will be a perfect match even with fingerprint scanning, that's if they did an FBI level, deep search on 30 or more markers. The truth is 99% of fingerprint scanners out there only take 10 markers and have a 0.1% false positive rate and that's what they have here.
      This means that 1 out of every 1000 "links" are going to be incorrectly attributed. That's 100,000,000 incorrect attributions out of every 10 billion attributions.

  22. The weird priorities of Indian governments by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Each new Indian government seems to obsessed with showing the rest of the world that India is an advanced, leading-edge country. And every new Indian government neglects doing anything much about the conditions of more than 600 million (and growing) Indian citizens who lack access to such basic services as running water, electricity and sanitation. Really strange, and unfair to those unfortunate Indians.

  23. Next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The furute requirement will be the mark of the beast.

  24. Right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Time to nuke India. Nothing but glassy craters where all their government buildings and industries involved in doing this will once have been. Collateral be damned, this is for the species here.

  25. in other breaking news, the President has been sho by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    t. On Nov. 22, 1963. But Slashdot has decided that something that was implemented mid-2016 is suddenly news, right? So why not 54 years?
    Good old BeauHD. It's hard to believe that slashdot missed this, or the several in-depth articles describing what a cluster-frack it is. Mr. Kahn? I'm sorry, you're dead. So, no you can't open a bank account or get a credit card. Yes, I see you standing in front of me, but the system says you're dead, so you will have to appeal to the board. They do have a backlog but (if you grease the right palms) it's only 3 to 6 months... In one of the most corrupt countries in the world, what could possibly go wrong?

  26. mark of the beast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also it causes all, both small and great, both rich and poor, both free and slave, to be marked on the right hand or the forehead, so that no one can buy or sell unless he has the mark, that is, the name of the beast or the number of its name. This calls for wisdom: let the one who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man, and his number is 666.

  27. Compare to China, the Indians had it easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Each new Indian government seems to obsessed with showing the rest of the world that India is an advanced, leading-edge country. And every new Indian government neglects doing anything much about the conditions of more than 600 million (and growing) Indian citizens who lack access to such basic services as running water, electricity and sanitation. Really strange, and unfair to those unfortunate Indians.

    So the 'Big Brother' In India Requires Fingerprint Scans For Food, Phones, Finances, but that is child's play when compare to China

    In China, the 'Big Brother' Requires the Human Head in exchange For Food, Phones, or Finances

    1. Re:Compare to China, the Indians had it easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With a "social obedience" fico score as well.

  28. Not So Bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a toss up. Sure people lose privacy but they can also gain a fairly crime free society as well as using the data to improve the health and lives of the public. For example, if the system knows that you avoid eating green leafy vegetables they can take action to protect your health. If you use too much alcohol the system can save you and maybe save others as you probably drive drunk now and then. Tax cheats and idiotic officials who order a $31,000 table for their office will no longer be able to do such wasteful stuff on the public dime. How about being able to stop people from using cell phones while they drive? We should not just have a knee jerk reaction when data collection and analysis really have the potential to take our lived better. Great evil is cloaked by the notion of privacy.

  29. progress... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At some point we are going to owe Luddites an apology.

  30. So what should they do instead? by houghi · · Score: 1

    Fro what I can read, the 'food' part is free food that they get. I do not think it to be way to strange to see that people do not abuse the system. The scanning of the ID is done, as far as I can see, instead of having an ID card.

    In Belgium having an ID card is mandatory since at least WWII and perhaps longer. (Napoleon?). If you want to open a bank account, you will need to have an ID and if you open a credit (e.g. a bank account that you can go below 0 EUR) you will be registered at the National Bank.(No, not everybody can see it)
    If you want to buy a phone, you need to have an ID since the terrorist attack in Brussels. No more burner phones.
    If you want some sort of benefit, you will be registered in one form or another, so they will be able to see you do not get money or services you are not entitled to.

    In Belgium everybody from the age of 12 has an ID with a chip reader. That can be accessed by open source software eID. Look it up.

    I have absolutely no issues that if people receive benefits from the state (and that is what we are talking about) that there is some sort of verification that people do not abuse it.

    And how do I feel walking around with an ID that could be checked at random? Pretty safe. They asked me once for my ID at random. The next day I saw them asking somebody else who looks very, very similar as to how I looked, so it was clear they where looking for somebody.
    I am sure that was not just a shoplifter as it was the (then) rijkswacht (Federal Police) and not standard police. So if they did that once in all these years, I rather they do it than have a criminal walking around.

    That said, I do live in a country where we can complain about e.g. the police when they abuse their power and things will happen. We have reasonable privacy (soon even stricter). On the downside, we are communists and give people a way to live, even when they do not work. And if we work, we are forced to take holidays.

    It would amaze me that people can just walk in and ask food stamps in the US without proper identification, because if that is the case, why would people just ask for them once per month? I would ask for them even if I had a job. It is like handing out free money.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    1. Re:So what should they do instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I have absolutely no issues that if people receive benefits from the state "
      That is your error sir.
      Did the Russians sent to the Gulag "receive a benefit"?
      Did the Chinese, starved by their own government, for "industrial progress" "receive a benefit"?

      No the state is evil, and it always must be suspect, and controlled, and setup with as little power as necessary. Something the Europeans forget centuries ago.

    2. Re:So what should they do instead? by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1

      If you want to open a bank account, you will need to have an ID ...
      ... if you open a credit ... you will be registered at the National Bank ...
      If you want to buy a phone, you need to have an ID ...

      ... if people receive benefits from the state (and that is what we are talking about) ...

      One who opens an account with a private bank does not "receive benefits from the state".

      One who purchases a phone from a private retailer, and receives wireless service from a private telecommunications provider, does not "receive benefits from the state".

      Requiring ID to prove that one qualifies for tax-subsidized welfare programs is one thing. Mandating state-issued ID for private services is an entirely different matter. (Nationalising banking and telecommunications services such that there is no private equivalent is, of course, much worse than merely requiring ID.)

      Moreover, this 'Big Brother' system goes far beyond a simple state-issued ID. Proving your identity is one thing, but this system is designed to collect huge amounts of very personal information—where you live, work, and shop, your bank accounts and lines of credit, your phone numbers and exam results—into a single database the government can troll through at will looking for "undesirables". Plus, of course, the inevitable hackers; given how much trouble powerful, self-interested, and reasonably competent entities have keeping their own critical data private, third-party data held by an unaccountable government bureaucracy doesn't stand a chance.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
  31. POWER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2 quotes: The bigger the government gets, the smaller the individual becomes.
        Any government that can give you everything you need, can take away everything you have.
    Bonus:
    I would rather die a free Man, than live as a Slave.

  32. And these will be stored in owncloud, securely ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    securely, as if any php webapp could possibly be secure.

    The issue with biometric data being used for identity to buy food is just scary. Why is my first question. What does tracking 1.3B people food do to help? Total waste of time and resources.

    Only HDD and network equipment makers think this is a good idea.

  33. Maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem with your post is that it reads like this: "Nothing can be done! Corruption forever! Read this and despair, there's no point to living!"

    Remember when Kolkata was The Black Hole of Calcutta? Why did Mother Theresa work there? Did she give up and walk away, as you appear willing to do?

    "Well, the poor are fucked, so there's no reason to give them any thought at all. Where's my croissant and the strawberry jam had better be fresh this time!"

  34. Horrifying. by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    Horrifyingly wrong.
    Not a future I'd want any part of.
    I wish the Indian opponents of this the best of luck stopping it.

    1. Re:Horrifying. by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      not really, these people want to sponge off others, they have no right to complain of needing to be on file to combat fraud and double dipping. It's the price one pays to be a parasite

    2. Re:Horrifying. by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Ah I see, 'one bad apple ruins the whole bushel', is that it? One person in 1,000,000 doesn't follow the rules, so everyone then gets to be treated like a convict?
      Oh and of course people who think like you, when this comes to your country, will be shocked and appalled when they're required to be subjected to it, because you somehow magically think you'll be exempted from it, like you're special or something. Well guess what? You'll be treated like a convict or an animal in a zoo like everyone else, and you'll be threatened with actual prison if you don't submit to it. Enjoy being under a microscope the rest of your life. Be sure to keep chanting "I've done nothing wrong therefore I have nothing to fear" to get yourself to sleep at night, knowing full well every single move you make from that point forward will be tracked, logged, and judged, because that's the world you'll be living in. That is why this needs to never happen in India, if it's 'successful' there then other countries will want to do it, too.

    3. Re:Horrifying. by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      What are you blathering about, this is for welfare recipients. I am one of the people who pays the bills. It's long overdue here, the fraud is rampant and much higher than your made-up stat you pulled out of your ass.

    4. Re:Horrifying. by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      The country is reportedly "scanning the fingerprints, eyes and faces of its 1.3 billion residents (alternative source) and connecting the data to everything from welfare benefits to mobile phones."

      Try reading at least the headline before shooting your mouth off, idiot.

    5. Re:Horrifying. by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      those phone number are for part of receiving welfare benefits. There have been article here before about that including Facebook trying Indian system for user ID, but you have the attention span and intellectual capabilities of a gnat

    6. Re:Horrifying. by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Idiot.. What part of "(all) 1.3 BILLION" do you not understand?

    7. Re:Horrifying. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it is for everyone

    8. Re:Horrifying. by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      the part where those who ACTUALLY are made to sign up are receiving government welfare. but you only read dumbed-down articles