Slashdot Mirror
US Congressmen Reveal Thousands of Facebook Ads Bought By Russian Trolls (mercurynews.com)
An anonymous reader writes: Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee on Thursday released about 3,400 Facebook ads purchased by Russian agents around the 2016 presidential election on issues from immigration to gun control, a reminder of the complexity of the manipulation that Facebook is trying to contain ahead of the midterm elections. The ads, which span from mid-2015 to mid-2017, illustrate the extent to which Kremlin-aligned forces sought to stoke social, cultural and political unrest on one of the Web's most powerful platforms. With the help of Facebook's targeting tools, Russia's online army reached at least 146 million people on Facebook and Instagram, its photo-sharing service, with ads and other posts, including events promoting protests around the country...
Rep. Adam Schiff of California, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, said lawmakers would continue probing Russia's online disinformation efforts. In February, Robert S. Mueller III, the special counsel investigating Russia and the 2016 election, indicted individuals tied to the IRA for trying to interfere in the presidential race. "They sought to harness Americans' very real frustrations and anger over sensitive political matters in order to influence American thinking, voting and behavior," Schiff said in a statement. "The only way we can begin to inoculate ourselves against a future attack is to see first-hand the types of messages, themes and imagery the Russians used to divide us...."
The documents released Thursday also reflect that Russian agents continued advertising on Facebook well after the presidential election... They marketed a page called Born Liberal to likely supporters of Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., the data show, an ad that had more than 49,000 impressions into 2017. Together, the ads affirmed the fears of some lawmakers, including Republicans, that Russian agents have continued to try to influence U.S. politics even after the 2016 election. Russian agents also had created thousands of accounts on Twitter, and in January, the company revealed that it discovered more than 50,000 automated accounts, or bots, with links to Russia.
Rep. Adam Schiff of California, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, said lawmakers would continue probing Russia's online disinformation efforts. In February, Robert S. Mueller III, the special counsel investigating Russia and the 2016 election, indicted individuals tied to the IRA for trying to interfere in the presidential race. "They sought to harness Americans' very real frustrations and anger over sensitive political matters in order to influence American thinking, voting and behavior," Schiff said in a statement. "The only way we can begin to inoculate ourselves against a future attack is to see first-hand the types of messages, themes and imagery the Russians used to divide us...."
The documents released Thursday also reflect that Russian agents continued advertising on Facebook well after the presidential election... They marketed a page called Born Liberal to likely supporters of Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., the data show, an ad that had more than 49,000 impressions into 2017. Together, the ads affirmed the fears of some lawmakers, including Republicans, that Russian agents have continued to try to influence U.S. politics even after the 2016 election. Russian agents also had created thousands of accounts on Twitter, and in January, the company revealed that it discovered more than 50,000 automated accounts, or bots, with links to Russia.
but they didn't have any mod points.
In my parts about any political force is using shills on forums and even at physical manifestations. Did not democrats use them?
If not, it is very nice of them, but a bit naive.
Imagine that. Facebook has revenues of roughly 30+ Billion/year, it's no wonder it's taken so long for the specifics to surface. If you wanted to find them you would have had to use a microscope and tweezers.
P.S. I'd suspect more people voted for Lemon Pledge due to facebook ads than were influenced Russians.
You might say: "But, but, the United State of America is a sovereign state, it's the voters and alone the voters who need to decide". Sure, but there is propaganda bought by the parties themselves, by multinational corporations having no allegiance to any country, and whoever wants to put money into influencing a vote. Don't forget that the US likes to interfere with elections of other countries too, but that's a-ok, right?
Is it perhaps, just the admission that voters are easily swayed by bad propaganda that is hard to admit?
Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
The Russians gave more money to the NRA than the left-wing Democrats did. That is the real problem and why they both want to bring down the biggest threat to their power and control, the left-wing activists.
"The only way we can begin to inoculate ourselves against a future attack is to see first-hand the types of messages, themes and imagery the Russians used to divide us...."
/sarcasm
If they did anything, it's profit on already pre-existing divisions, they are certainly not the cause of it. There already were stories about some 17yr old KIDS from Poland or Hungary or something creating fake sites / and raking it thousands of dollars in ad revenue (by exploiting the already existing division between left and right)
I'm bored of saying it but... Yes, it's all Russia's fault.
Reason Trump got elected - Russia.
Reason BREXIT happpened - Russia.
When somebody gets poisoned... you know who did it ? - Russia
Doping scandals - Russia
When you come from that part of the world, the money is 100% motivation. When you grow up not having any, all you can think off is getting it, especially if you're a teen and your parents always were and are broke - something most Americans can't understand.
The political situation in US (and religious in the world) is RIPE for making money on, you just have to have a little bit of imagination and have to be kept down for a very long time.
The article is just fluff we all already knew. Show me a link to the actual ads.
There are far more opposing political views and forces inside the U.S. itself that attempts to do exactly what the American propaganda and misinformation agencies are doing right now.
They are just taking ALL of the opposing views and assigning them to Russia, because that works well with the current agenda.
We are living in times where it's not allowed to question the status quo or have an opposing view, because then you're labeled as a "Russian troll", and if you're Russian then you're guilty, just for being Russian. Wake up and realise just how fucked up this is.
right-wing republicans you mean. You guys really are confused.
You can't shut someone down just because you don't like zir country of origin.
Maybe if the idiots using Facebooks quit posting pictures of cats and instead educated themselves on the issues, this wouldn't even be a problem. Generally
Facebook aficiandos are dimwit bottom feeders whose depth of world knowldege maxes out with Kim Kardashian..
It's just fake news. Hillary isn't getting back in my little deep state minions. The Iran deal is off no matter how much more fake news you conjure out of thin air.
There is always a spike in this fake news when Trump defies them, and he;s really defying them now on Iran.
This is utter made up BS guys. Degenerate crap. I even felt like it might be true for a moment before I came to my senses. But it's literally all fabricated.
There is always a spike in hysteria spread by the "powers that be" when Trump defies them.
Saudi Arabia had more influence on the elecetion than Russia, given they funded 20% of Hillary's campaign.
This is made of hogwash.
I guess some people who go with the flow would've seen these posts and believed them. Personally when I see a person being overly political online I tend to either follow or block them.I have pub rules for social media. No politics/religion.
You can't shut someone down just because you don't like zir country of origin.
Maybe if the idiots using Facebooks quit posting pictures of cats and instead educated themselves on the issues, this wouldn't even be a problem. Generally
Facebook aficiandos are dimwit bottom feeders whose depth of world knowldege maxes out with Kim Kardashian..
Maybe if Americans got off their asses and kicked their federal government out of the public education business they might stand a chance of actually being educated with real, useful, and relevant knowledge instead of the current daycare/indoctrination centers they've had for decades turning the population into exactly the kind of people that spend lots of time on FB and following the Kardashians while in their 'safe space' with their comfort-puppy so they don't hear any opposing opinions because speech is violence.
It reminds me of a line from an '90s American action film with Stallone called "Demolition Man" where the story is set far in the future.
The protagonist, "Simon Phoenix", also from the past, is talking to other recently-awakened bad guys when he says; "All right, gentlemen, let's review. The year is 2032 - that's two-zero-three-two, as in the 21st Century - and I am sorry to say the world has become a pussy-whipped, Brady Bunch version of itself, run by a bunch of robed sissies."
Just back the year quoted up a bit, because America is already there.
Be well.
... about the writer's use of a four-dot ellipsis. What the heck were you thinking?
...
The Russians gave more money to the NRA than the left-wing Democrats did. That is the real problem and why they both want to bring down the biggest threat to their power and control, the left-wing activists.
Left Wing Democrats? LOL. Real left wingers? There might be all of three of those. The rest, it's nigh on impossible to tell them apart from Republicans. Real Republicans that is. Not the Alt-Right nut jobs. Alt-Right is just a polite way of saying Nazi.
It wouldn't take much for Russians to give more money than left wing Democrats.
So why are the Russians being targeted like this? Blatant racism, thats why .
Thousands of Facebook ads "maybe" would have swung 1, maybe 2 people. Coming from a family who is partially obsessed with Facebook, all of my family made their mind up without Facebook on who they voted for.
Like our government doesn't get involved in foreign elections.....
Everyone here seems to think this is no big deal, and that's a bit odd. The main reason it's a big deal is because it skirts campaign finance laws, which encourages American politicians to court relationships with foreign states who want them elected. If you have a foreign state financing your campaign, that's something the American people really should know. More information and more transparency is better.
The next reason why it's a big deal is that Russia's reason for doing this wasn't about getting Trump elected (they reportedly thought it was impossible) -- it was to weaken the US by stoking more hatred amongst Americans. They're encouraging the far left & right and suppressing the middle group. They've actually succeeded in making you all believe that your "side" winning is more important than working together. Divided you fall.
"I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
Russians bought ads in the US to push an agenda and sow discontent. So what?
The First Amendment doesn't just protect the right of Americans to speak, it protects the right of Americans to hear all views and propaganda, including that of foreigners. This is also not new. Russia has been trying to sow discontent and anger (including using race as an issue) in the US since the Russian revolution. Conversely, the US has been trying to manipulate public opinion and political systems abroad for a long time. Voice of America is one of the more benign examples; the US government has brought down entire governments through media manipulation.
The US clearly in the past has stood by the principle that broadcasting and distributing political propaganda internationally is legitimate and protected. Censorship of foreign broadcasts is wrong and harmful for the same reason that censorship of domestic broadcasts is wrong and harmful. And that's a principle we should continue to stand by.
Like... this poison?
Many thanks for the link !!!!
For national security, all browsers must implement ad blockers and within a year we should ban all ads on all websites as well. In two years we should take down all physical ads. Ads are a threat to our freedom, our independence, our way of life. For our children and our children's children, we must ban ads.
indicted individuals tied to the IRA for trying to interfere in the presidential race. "They sought to harness Americans' very real frustrations and anger over sensitive political matters in order to influence American thinking, voting and behavior,"
Whassup, dudes beyond the sea?!? We didn't confess to this!
Lets not forget the Steel Dossier, made by a foreign agent, using Russian intelligence, paid for by a presidential campaign, used illegally by the FBI to get a wiretap on a opposition presidential campaign. VS. Some ads on Facebook.
Since Trump has been elected, DNC donors have given Steel an additional $40-$50 million to get more Russian info on Trump, but a few ads on Facebook is the biggest issue with foreign interference?
You lefties are literally dumber than monkey shit. Keep up your idiocy, I think some people haven't completely turned on you yet but there is still time before November.
donations in US elections. Funny that. Hillary had no plans to do so and gladly took 20% funding from Saudi Arabia.
If ads as incredibly stupid as the few that anybody has actually shown were so amazingly effective as to decide the election, then Russian/Schmussian; every US entity will be running ads just like them next time.
They'd be idiots not to.
In reality of course, the Dems just plain lost (albeit by a small margin, as is normal lately), something they just can't seem to come to grips with.
If this Russian narrative were true, I'd be hiring every single Russian involved. To advertise chewing gum, if nothing else. They are apparently the most awesome and most cost effective advertisers, ever.
Evidence that Russian operatives bought and paid for ads on Facebook?
Seriously, buying ads is serious crime? I may prefer that the Russians stayed out of campaign advertising, but finding it hard to get too worked up over this. These Russian-backed groups didn't do anything that countless American-backed groups didn't also do...
Tell me Russians snuck into warehouses and tampered with voting machines and I'll be outraged, tell me mark zuckerberg sold them some online ads, hard to get worked up over that.
Ken
Shutdown the interwebs.
You're our only hope, Congress Critter Obiwan.
As long as the majority of troll posts are conservative the Republicans in Congress will say there's no problem here. They'll instead grill Zuck on why Facebook is censoring their hatespeech feeds.
Hohohohoho see the CLASSIC proof of that here soyboys as you DRINK the golden wine https://tech.slashdot.org/comm... straight from MY tap (of GOLDEN piss), all natural ingredients, naturally filtered (of ME pissing right into your shitbag mouths & funniest part is, you help me DO it - you LIKE it, lol!).
Do you LIKE the taste? Obviously yes - just like folks like my hosts engine, anything I put out, even piss, is GOOD (unlike "your kind").
Above all else though? Hey - MOMMY LOVES YOU!
APK
P.S.=> Hahahahaha (I think this is the BEST overall letting you SHEMALE soyboys destroy yourselves for GOLD (ask SuckerBERG about that - he's the expert as is all his kind are - heading into ZylonB & Furnace time again judging by what's happening - the PRICE of it is that, always, they don't learn)... apk
Remembet Cleetus, it's "You want fries with that..."
Your big line, you'll be saying it your whole life!
How do you not kill yourself you so woke? Watch out for those Clinton assassins!
And we should also put arsonists in charge of fire departments and bank robbers in charge of the police departments. But only the very best arsonists and bank robbers, no amateurs.
RIP free speech, we hardly knew yea....
For ads targeting "Location - Living in: United States", and specifically marked as "US Politics" Can't they just not do that? I seem to recall Zuckerberg was asked about it in the hearing. They shouldn't accept dollars for political ads in Russia either. But I guess they like money.
Regardless of the small magnitude of these ads compared to advertising by the Democrats and Republicans, it is still intriguing to read these ads and the lists of people whom they were intended to target.
It is an interesting look inside the minds of those who would wish to manipulate us.
> Even assuming all that were true, isn't it pretty fucking humiliating to admit that a dozen russians with broken english and a 5 figure budget were SO much more effective than the $Billions worth of marketing people on Hillary's side doing the exact same shit (including plenty of foreigners)?
That argument also doesn't make sense because the Russian ads were trolling both ways, trying to stir up discord, pitting Americans against each other.
They ran Black Lives Matter ads, ads on both sides of the gun control debate, etc. Nearly half their ads were the same type of things the Hillary campaign was saying. Rather than compete with the United States, Russia would rather compete with the Divided States.
The Russians were trying to make black people mad with #BLM stuff, Hillary was trying to make black mad with #BLM stuff. Russia wanted a bunch of ultra-feminist women angry at men, Hillary wanted a bunch of ultra-feminist women angry at men. There's no "Russians beat Hillary", the Russians were running slightly more extreme versions of the same type of ads Hillary was running half the time.
The Russians know we're stronger when we're united. They don't have to fight against us if they can get us to fight against ourselves.
They want Mexicans coming in waving the Mexican flag chanting "Viva Mexico" while working-class Americans get angry and scared. What the Russians don't want is the United States to be United, proud new Americans working alongside those who have been here longer. They want to divide us - chop us up into black America, women vs men, rich vs poor, etc. None of that involves beating Hillary. A lot of it involves taking a lesson from Hillary.
The Irish Republican Army (IRA) is the problem?
Have
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/MTOkOCK...
In GOD we trust, all others we monitor.
So if I, as an American, hire a Russian company to spam Facebook with political ads, is that a problem? Any different than if I did the same but with an American company?
The dems spearheading this should be taken to task for spreading propaganda. The ads have been largely debunked as non-effective. Personally I know of nobody who put much worth on the ads.
This is a non-issue and is a waste of time.
Just because something happens all the time doesn't mean it's not a problem. It's a problem because it's not propaganda in the traditional sense. This is a hostile foreign power. Their interests are directly opposed to us. Their purpose is to weaken us. That's why it's a problem.
The goal is to get real and accurate information that people can understand into their hands. When people work off of bad information bad things happen. When that information is specifically crafted to cause bad decisions on a national stage terrible things happen.
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
Our various intelligence agents have said this is all being done by the Russian government through shell companies. That's pretty much a Russian agent. There's also been several independent articles (Colbert did a long one during the election) about how these "Troll Farms" were actually just fronts for the Russian government.
That makes sense when you think about it. Would anybody really spend tens of thousands of dollars on Facebook ads for the lulz? OK, maybe 4chan, but it would be something about a party van or Boaty McBoatface.
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
Link: Debbie Wasserman Schultz Resignation
Just before the election, while many people were making their final decisions about which candidate to choose, FBI Director James Comey influenced the election: Comey Tried to Shield the F.B.I. From Politics. Then He Shaped an Election.
I'm amazed that Comey could be so out of touch with social reality.
it's probably not that subjective. You could pretty easily show it if you had the data, a few decades of voter states and a background in statistics. But that's still years and years of work. Historians might tell us what the impact was but Trump will be long gone and the damage done.
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
i can understand why people of Irish descent end up as US president.
Yes, let's look deeply into what happened. Here is an album of the tweets from Russian trolls released by Congress extracted from the PDFs. The parts blacked out were done by Congress.
It looks like the Russian trolls were busy supporting BLM and opposing police abuse. Would you still agree that the safest thing is to make sure that doesn't happen again?
It's been turned into an imgur album which is nicer than the PDFs:
https://imgur.com/a/ZjQ3PLS
This is nothing new. Governments propagandize. We do it as well and have for decades. I'm not sure why it's such a big deal now, I guess because the US media that overwhelmingly supported Clinton, first against The Bern and then even more stridently against Trump, got outplayed. Propaganda, in the eyes of the MSM, is their monopoly in the USA.
holy crap. I can't guarantee that i haven't been, indirectly or directly, influenced by these. I like to think i look at everything on the internet as fake until it's been verified multiple times by multiple sources, but I am far more worried about how much further back they go than this representative set. I'd be terrified if was facebook right now looking at/for other "faction" ads that might not be represented here. Thus far I've found the alt right, the alt left, BLM, LGBTQ as being targeted (and it seems like they target you not by challenging you, but agreeing with your existing world view, and slowly ramping up to extremist posts over time)
really, we americans need to look at this and learn from it. Maybe the current extent of our adversarial internal view has been created completely by this campaign, or maybe it has just been magnified. But if you honestly read through a few hundred of these things and don't see an image, or read something that has been forwarded to you or just sitting in the background of a post or page in some form or fashion you really haven't been on the internet.
they are insanely subtle in some cases, an example is a bundle targeting people who liked or followed college humor showing "dumb memes" I couldn't figure out the connection until i realized, every single one had a poster's picture that was a black person, and/or featured a black person. like downright insanity.
as a people(not just americans), we need to stop and think about how much of our opinion is shaded by the internet if not outright based on it. It's easy to say.. meh, nutjob post, or pfft, ad - next.. but seeing these things, for years of your life can make changes happen that you aren't aware of. This isn't a right wing, or left wing, or racial, issue.. this is a human issue. Until there is a technical fix, we really need a mental short circuit that allows us to step back from our own extreme 100% held beliefs and say.. hey what's the other person's stance.. no matter how strongly we disagree.
Your arrogance will be your undoing.
"I'm so smart, I'm impervious to the plots of others! My knowledge is perfect and my wisdom is peerless. All who look upon me admire and marvel!"
Pride goeth before the fall.
That you were influenced by Russian trolls. They laid out the bait and you took it. And you took it because they were telling you what you wanted to believe.
This is the thing the Russia Deniers cannot accept. They wanted to vilify Clinton, they wanted to vilify the so-called mainstream media, they wanted Trump to be their golden boy. All these preferences made them easy targets for the Russians. You were suckers.
The Republicans just can't let go of the Clinton thing, when the Democrats have long since moved on. The issue here is the interference in an American election by Russians, lying about who they were, and lying about the stories they were shilling. Yet to admit the Russians interfered gives the Republicans problems they don't want to think about:
1). It might be true that there was collusion of some form, between the Trump campaign and the Russians;
2). The voters for Trump got suckered by a 3rd rate flim-flam from Russia;
3). The voters for Trump got suckered by Trump himself.
So the imperative for Republicans is to deny this story. And that's what we see: Deny, Deny, Deny!
The denials take many forms but it all adds up to denial. Denial there was any interference. Denial there was much interference. Denial that anyone read those ads, or took action based upon them. Denial that the interference was a conspiracy, organized and paid for. Deny everything!
Denial is becoming quite the habit of the political Right.
> > Hillary was trying to make black mad with #BLM stuff.
Oh bullshit. Fuck your RWNJ projection.
Thank you for your hilarious parody of a mad Clintonite.
Does anyone remember when "troll" meant "someone who tried to piss you off" instead of "someone who's astroturfing"?
Pepperidge farm remembers.
Proven false? When? By whom?
Also, the sun goes round the earth.
Carrying 10 more states and 77 more votes isn't really close. It was only a "close" race if you ignore the actual rules and result.
Of course the US doesn't elect it's president by the popular vote, but your numeric framing of the issue is even more misleading. Clinton got 2.86 million more votes from voters overall, but the electoral college means that what mattered was where those votes where more that just the number. It didn't matter if Clinton won California with 100% of the vote, and likewise it didn't matter if Trump won Utah with 100% of the vote. So to really figure out how close it was, you need to focus on the "tipping point" states, a combination of the closest states with enough EVs to swing the election depending upon their outcome. The "tipping point" state in the conventional definition of the term was Wisconsin, as losing that would have made her still lose the EC even if she had won the closer states of Michigan and Pennsylvania.
Clinton lost Pennsylvania by about 44.3k votes, Michigan by about 10.7k votes, and Wisconsin by about 22.7k votes. So those are the margins Clinton would have needed to make up to win, or a higher number of votes in a less optimal mixture of states.
I know Trump lives in the alternative reality where he won the popular vote somehow, but practically speaking his win in the EC was due to those margins, which is less than 100k votes total. That's pretty close for a presidential election. Not as close as 2000 and Bush vs Gore, but still pretty close.
If we judge by results, Russian trolls are a failure. US foreign actions are quite hostile to Russian interests.
Russians and Arabs (amongst many others) have attempted to influence the voters in the US for many decades.
Over the decades, many American politicians have sought such external influences. At the height of the cold war, Democrat Senator Ted Kennedy sought the help of the Russian government in his attempt to defeat Reagan in the 1984 campaign. In 2016, Hillary Clinton not only used illegal aliens in her campaign (foreign influence, by definition) but she also funneled millions of dollars through the law firm Perkins Coie to the American journalist outfit Fusion GPS that hired Christopher Steele (a British spy, thus foreign influence) who in turn bought dirt from Russian spies which was then placed in a document (now referred to as "the Steele Dossier") that was used to start the whole Trump-Russia meme.
This foreign influence in our elections may well be disgusting, but it's hardly new. Hell, in Democrat-run states the politicians are working overtime to allow illegal aliens to actually cast votes. AFAIK nobody has found any evidence that Trump was working to allow Russian citizens to cast actual votes in the USA. There's currently still no evidence that anything in that Steele Dossier is true or that there was any Trump-Putin collusion at all.
Has no-one noticed the quid pro quo of getting Trump elected? Obama forced oil prices down to choke Putin's income. Trump has allowed oil prices to rise - the only folks that benefits in the US are a few wildcatters in Texas - I doubt they're Trump's constituents - however the biggest winner for higher oil prices is Russia and Putin who are raking it in again.
I'm starting to think that this constant flow of articles about stupidly low number of ads influencing an election *is* the actual russian propaganda. Because what better way to cause discord than to make Americans doubt the results of their own democratic election ? How did 100k in advertizing trump the millions that both sides spent on campaigning ? If that's true, then both candidates and both parties are incredibly out of tune with reality.
Apparently, the problem is that those Russians were advertising, and effectively. The American people are such dolts, so easily duped, that whoever sprays the voters with the most well-crafted hooey will control the election outcome.
It's not expressed in quite those words, of course. It's considered unwise to tell the people you're duping that you think they're idiots. But that's how I understand the complaint.
The voter turnout figures suggest otherwise. About half don't bother voting. No matter how much hooey they are sprayed with, no matter how well-distributed the hooey, no matter how carefully crafted, they just won't fall for it. My guess is, most of them see the products hawked by Team Elephant and Team Donkey to be too awful to support. So they don't
There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
indicted individuals tied to the IRA for trying to interfere in the presidential race.
What? Irish terrorists are getting in on the game, too?
We are so fucked.
Hillary spent $1B. If you can't win with that, stop whining about Russians when our own government does the same thing with our money.
Trump - 4 more years! 4 more years!