Slashdot Mirror


The Whole World is Now a Computer, Says Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella (zdnet.com)

Thanks to cloud computing, the Internet of Things and artificial intelligence, we should start to think of the planet as one giant computer, according to Microsoft chief executive Satya Nadella. From a report: "Digital technology, pervasively, is getting embedded in every place: every thing, every person, every walk of life is being fundamentally shaped by digital technology -- it is happening in our homes, our work, our places of entertainment," said Nadella speaking in London. "It's amazing to think of a world as a computer. I think that's the right metaphor for us as we go forward."

[...] AI is core to Microsoft's strategy, Nadella said: "AI is the run time which is going to shape all of what we do going forward in terms of applications as well as the platform." Microsoft is rethinking its core products by using AI to connect them together, he said, giving an example of a meeting using translation, transcription, Microsoft's HoloLens and other devices to improve decision-making. "The idea that you can now use all of the computing power that is around you -- this notion of the world as a computer -- completely changes how you conduct a meeting and fundamentally what presence means for a meeting," he said.

83 of 182 comments (clear)

  1. I thought the network by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 3, Funny

    And here I thought the network is the computer

    --
    Time to offend someone
    1. Re:I thought the network by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      And here I thought the network is the computer

      It's walruses all the way down. I am he as you are he as you are me, and we are all together. Goo goo g'joob.

    2. Re:I thought the network by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      What's a computer? /StupidAppleAdvertisting

      posted from my mac mini.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    3. Re:I thought the network by jimtheowl · · Score: 1

      Also a warning of what could happen if you rely on computers to educate your children.

    4. Re:I thought the network by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "It's walruses all the way down. I am he as you are he as you are me, and we are all together. Goo goo g'joob."

      Good one. Got a joke for you:

      Cinderella came out of the photo shop and said sadly: One day my prints will come.

    5. Re:I thought the network by Miser · · Score: 1

      Didn't have to scroll far to find this.

      The Miser is pleased. :)

    6. Re:I thought the network by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      This is /.
      We like it that way.

  2. Or even more accuratly by avandesande · · Score: 1

    The world is a network of computers connected by the internet. Profound!

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  3. How original . . . by Idou · · Score: 1

    The network is the computer.

    - John Burdette Gage (1996)

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
    1. Re:How original . . . by greenwow · · Score: 1

      That was when the Wired article with that quote was published. Sun used that phrase for I think nearly a decade before that. I know I heard coworkers quote it many times when I managed Sun workstations in the late 1980s. That was a great time. Other than hard drive failures, which seemed to happen way too often especially with the 200 MB Maxtor SCSI drives, and the electromechanical eject mechanisms on the floppies, they just worked.

    2. Re:How original . . . by jddimarco · · Score: 1

      The 200MB Maxtors were rock-solid. The Quantums, on the other hand, had a sticktion problem. As for the Suns themselves, the ones built into CRTs (SLC and ELC) would bake themselves to death, but the other shoeboxes and pizzaboxes were quite reliable. Previous pre-pizzabox Suns were maybe a little less so.

    3. Re:How original . . . by greenwow · · Score: 1

      The 200MB Maxtors were rock-solid. The Quantums, on the other hand, had a sticktion problem. As for the Suns themselves, the ones built into CRTs (SLC and ELC) would bake themselves to death, but the other shoeboxes and pizzaboxes were quite reliable. Previous pre-pizzabox Suns were maybe a little less so.

      That wasn't my experience with the Maxtors, but you're right about the Quantums wrt stiction. Putting them in a freezer for a few minutes usually helped them start at least one more time. I saved many theses and dissertations using that method. I think I learned that trick from the old Usenet group comp.hardware.

    4. Re:How original . . . by quantumghost · · Score: 1

      The network is the computer.

      - John Burdette Gage (1996)

      Really? He lost to Douglas Adams by about 15 years......the successor to Deep Thought was the Earth.

      Whoosh!

  4. It must be especially exciting... by thegreatbob · · Score: 1

    ... when you think that computer belongs to you.

    --
    There is no XUL, only WebExtensions...
  5. "The whole world is now a computer.." by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    ..and Miscreant-o-soft wants unhindered control over ALL OF IT. Time to break up Microsoft, they're getting too big for their pants.

  6. Answer by kackle · · Score: 1

    The percentage of my frustration: 42.

    1. Re: Answer by fluffernutter · · Score: 3, Funny

      You could have just said * (which is ASCII 42)

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    2. Re: Answer by Scarred+Intellect · · Score: 1

      You could have just said * (which is ASCII 42)

      Holy shit I never noticed that. Please tell me that was designed intentionally that way!

    3. Re: Answer by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      #mindblown

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    4. Re: Answer by RobertNotBob · · Score: 1

      My deepest apologies for wasting all of my MOD points before you made this post. --- Awesome.

      --
      ___ I don't respond to Anonymous Cowards, and I Never Mod them UP.
    5. Re: Answer by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      I recently read that they suspect this is why Douglas Adams used the number 42 as the ultimate answer to life, the universe and everything, since he was a computer geek. Don't know if it is true or not.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  7. The World is NOT a Computer by techmage · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The world may have a massive collection of computers. Huge sums of those machines are in cloud computing. But they are all separate. When all of them are connected and act as one, having access to everything all at once, then we will have a world computer. That moment is not now.

    --


    - We dream of the stars. Now let us return to them.
    1. Re:The World is NOT a Computer by bondsbw · · Score: 2

      When all of them are connected and act as one, having access to everything all at once, then we will have a world computer.

      The vast majority of computers are connected and have access to everything that is available to the general public.

      Their ability to "act as one" is arbitrary. I am one person, but my organs do vastly different things.

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    2. Re:The World is NOT a Computer by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

      I have a japanese toilet. I really don't want it to get hacked.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    3. Re:The World is NOT a Computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      OK, let me dumb it down for you: The world is not a fucking computer, and only a pretentious vastly overpaid moron would say that, even as a (terrible) analogy. Got it?

    4. Re:The World is NOT a Computer by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      If Nadella really thinks that the World is a computer, then Microsoft's next product better damn well be "Windows for Earth".

    5. Re:The World is NOT a Computer by BadDreamer · · Score: 1

      Your organs do vastly different things, and they all act as one supporting your body's ability to obey your commands and get the things you want done, done.

      That is what is missing with the computers of the world today. They are like a huge pile of organs in your analogy. You are not. Or so one would hope anyway. ;)

    6. Re:The World is NOT a Computer by bondsbw · · Score: 1

      Some do. Some like my heart don't obey my commands. My gut bacteria are only working for themselves, but as a byproduct they just happen to be useful to me. My appendix doesn't seem to have serve much of a purpose (other than potentially harmful).

      We say they work as one because on the macro level we can see a physical being known as me. Same could be said about computers, at the macro level they act together as the computer engine of the earth.

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    7. Re:The World is NOT a Computer by BadDreamer · · Score: 1

      At a macro level, we are an organism consisting of organs, and we have agency and capability to form and follow goals.

      That is what can not be said about computers. At the macro level they are just a pile of computers.

    8. Re:The World is NOT a Computer by bondsbw · · Score: 1

      I disagree. Cloud computing is largely about working with globally dispersed data centers as a unit. Many such services don't even distinguish individual computers within the network. I make requests to Amazon, not some specific computer located in a specific rack in a specific building.

      I am willing to concede that there isn't A global computer. More like, there are many global computers, in the sense that different corporate data centers and cloud vendors behave distinctly from each other. And of course there are many traditional computers which don't really interact much with any others.

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
  8. So... collective consciousness? by macraig · · Score: 2

    Is this the beginning of the real life Borg, right here at home? I, for one, welcome our new Collective overlords who, being a collective, cannot possibly be as evil as the dictatorial monopolies and tribes we have now.

    1. Re:So... collective consciousness? by TheDarkener · · Score: 1

      I personally believe collective consciousness has always been a thing, it's just humans that need to learn how to "access" it. We're evolving in that direction it seems. Unfortunately I hate thinking about how people currently "in power" would try to control it. I have the feeling AI will play a big role in that attempt.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    2. Re:So... collective consciousness? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Is this the beginning of the real life Borg, right here at home? I, for one, welcome our new Collective overlords who, being a collective, cannot possibly be as evil as the dictatorial monopolies and tribes we have now.

      That sounds dangerously similar to an individual opinion, and collectives don't allow such acts of rebellion. Careful what you think, Comrade,the Telescreen is always on.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    3. Re:So... collective consciousness? by macraig · · Score: 1

      What, me worry? Individual opinions that coincide collectively are a Consensus and a Movement!

    4. Re:So... collective consciousness? by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      Is this the beginning of the real life Borg, right here at home? I, for one, welcome our new Collective overlords who, being a collective, cannot possibly be as evil as the dictatorial monopolies and tribes we have now.

      Or earlier, Isaac Asimov (Nemesis; Foundation's Edge and Foundation and Earth).

  9. That's frightening. by Pezbian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Imagine a worldwide BSOD.

    --
    In a world of the blind, the one-eyed man is king--and the two-eyed man is a heretic.
    1. Re:That's frightening. by greenwow · · Score: 1

      In the days of Ping of Death, that pretty much happened. Was teaching a CS class in 1997, and I was standing in the back of the room when I saw over thirty Windows machines all blue screen at once. At work, we would often have several floors worth of Windows machines blue screen within seconds. That bug also affected Linux, Solaris, FreeBSD, SunOS, Irix, OS/2, Novell, and HP printers that we had where I worked at the time so basically it was a "worldwide BSOD."

    2. Re:That's frightening. by balbeir · · Score: 1

      It's not blue. It's orange

    3. Re:That's frightening. by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      What do you think climate change is?

      Totally fake news! Loser scientists just want crooked government money, believe me! Bigly rigged.

  10. Capitalism by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I've frequently suggested regulating economies and creating public services to use the market as a computer.

    In healthcare, for example, the US can provide a public option that guarantees everyone healthcare at all times. When they can get affordable care, we can put a payroll tax on their employer (and an additional income tax on their paycheck) for either the affordable rate or (if less) the amount they usually pay, thus ensuring neither gets a monetary benefit by selecting the public option over the employer's plan (selection of healthcare is 100% based on perceived quality of service).

    Medicare tries to calculate a local market rate for a service. That results in many things, such as providers who can provide the service at lower cost billing in-line with other providers in the area, thus making wide profit margins from the government.

    Our regulators have petabyte databases of remittance rates negotiated between every insurer and provider for every service. They're hooked up to powerful mainframes that can process the whole of this data in short hours. It's ridiculous.

    So at each individual (service,provider) tuple, we can compute the normal distribution of remittance rates, and then select two standard deviations down. That's our negotiation cap. The Federal Public Option--Medicare Part E--negotiates rates at individual providers already; instead of using the market rate, Medicare would use the low-end remittance rate.

    Somewhere, an insurer has negotiated a pretty good rate. The others might be getting robbed, but that doesn't matter. We are, at all times, for all services, nearly the ideal insurer.

    This obviously requires some consideration. Sometimes, the insurer paying less also gets less service--sorting that out takes a lot of time; or we just make that practice illegal. We'll have to tweak the regulations to fit around the obvious outcome of providers creating slightly-different, substantially-similar packages for each insurer, and further when we see what the providers actually do about all this when we tell them they're not allowed to screw around like that.

    Still. Wetware computer. No sinking tons of taxpayer resources into trying to win an information arms race against the market of suppliers, providers, and hospitals.

    There are other things we need. An investigation into why our healthcare costs so much (I've looked at every explanation given and we might be able to squeeze it down to maybe 15% of GDP while still getting less service than Germany at 11% GDP--something is broken, and e don't know what). Publish local market standards of fairness so the private insurers getting the worst deals can argue their rates down. Make all insurers and hospitals operate as not-for-profit.

    Universal healthcare is easy. Going from "universal healthcare" to "low-cost, high-performance universal healthcare" is going to take some work and the integrity to stick with it when it gets hard.

    1. Re:Capitalism by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      I've frequently suggested regulating economies

      Because that has worked out so well in all sorts of places. It is like you don't even recognize that failures of the current system are linked to exactly what you're suggesting. I'll give you a big reason why, because you said this yourself.

      Universal healthcare is easy.

      No, it isn't. It is fraught with all sorts of difficult decisions that make really bad headlines, the most recent being Alfie Evans case in Britain, where the STATE decided to end life support, when there were other viable options outside that system.

      The fact that you claim "Universal healthcare is easy" is all the evidence that I need to keep you and anyone like you away from the economy.
       

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    2. Re:Capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      " there were other viable options outside that system"
      no, these people were poor, they had no options, in USA he would of been dead before he even entered the hospital, if they were rich then a few capitalist healthcare providers would be a bit more richer but the end result would of been the same.

    3. Re:Capitalism by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      They had options, including offers from other places to take and care for the boy. The state (UK) prevented them from leaving.

      Yes, they were poor, so now I know what Socialized Medicine really is, state control of poor people. How is that different than now again?

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  11. Absolutization of one's domain by Bradmont · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There is a common tendency among experts of every domain to absolutize their field : particle physicists tend to make every physical effect into a particle. Evolutionary biologists try to explain every behaviour as a result of natural selection. Clinical psychologists make everything a result of their chosen theory of mental health. Economists make economics the ultimate cause and solution of every human problem. When you spend your entire life digging deeply into one topic, you start to see the world through the lens of your expertise. Sometimes this can lead to great discoveries. But it often leads to harmful overgeneralizations, or making a fool of yourself in public. This is one of those latter cases.

    1. Re:Absolutization of one's domain by Monkey-Wrench-Inc · · Score: 1

      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.

    2. Re:Absolutization of one's domain by Myrdos · · Score: 1

      Agreed.

      "People are very seldom concerned with some kind of universal model of capital T Truth; they're almost always concerned with creating models that help them get their job done. This is inevitable, and it creates problems when you try to glue data from different sources together. The *unnecessary* problems that arise come from people who don't accept that their useful domain-specific models don't describe all of objective reality." -- Matt Leo

    3. Re:Absolutization of one's domain by goombah99 · · Score: 1

      The answer is Quills people, Quills.

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    4. Re:Absolutization of one's domain by jimtheowl · · Score: 1

      I am not a particle physicists, but in that list, they would seem to have the upper hand.

      Although, I presume that they would tend to make every physical effect into a particle or wave, or both.

      That would also take care of computers, the world and the CEO's ranting about computers.

  12. What is a computer? by greenwow · · Score: 1

    Sounds like he is behind the times.

  13. The Mice by Strider- · · Score: 1

    I knew the mice must be in on it...

    Guess I'll just go back to my pan galactic gargleblaster.

    --
    ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
  14. Brahmin attitude - all of your stuff is mine by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Seriously, why is he saying this?

    GPDR this fool.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  15. Re:Obvious conclusion: by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella is a fucking idiot.

    I find him a lot like Bill Gates, for good or bad.

  16. But... by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

    we should start to think of the planet as one giant computer

    Does it run Linux?

  17. MS CEO discovers human language by saltydogdesign · · Score: 1

    Wow, metaphors are neat, aren't they? Here's one: Satya Nadella is a vacuum.

    --
    // This is not a sig.
    1. Re:MS CEO discovers human language by avandesande · · Score: 1

      more of a tautology "the earth is a computer because I called the earth a computer"

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
  18. Re:Obvious conclusion: by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 4, Funny

    Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella is a fucking idiot.

    The world is a computer and it's running Window's Vista.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  19. The world is not a computer. by quietwalker · · Score: 2

    It's so unrelated to the concept he is trying to describe - that (primarily the citizens of advanced nations) encounter or operate some sort of microcontroller or computer so many times in their daily life that they can be considered ubiquitous and having a great impact on our life - that it's not a useful metaphor nor phrase.

    Pick any other technology that's done the same. Like, I dunno, cars.

    "It's amazing to think of a world as a car. I think that's the right metaphor for us as we go forward."

    Look how stupid that sounds. Same with just about every other transformational technology; radio, tv, cell phones, airplanes, etc. It's not a useful abstraction or insightful discussion point. It's pure pablum.

    1. Re:The world is not a computer. by tsa · · Score: 1

      It's managers' speak. Everyone but managers themselves knows that managers usually say mindbogglingly stupid things.

      --

      -- Cheers!

  20. Satya Nadella says by mandark1967 · · Score: 1

    "The idea that you can now use all of the computing power that is around you -- this notion of the world as a computer -- completely changes how you conduct a meeting and fundamentally what presence means for a meeting,"

    mIRC 365, anyone?

    --
    Sig Follows: "Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself." -- Mark Twain
  21. Re:Obvious conclusion: by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    The world is a computer and it's running Window's Vista.

    That explains a lot.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  22. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  23. Initiate by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

    Human Computer Formation

  24. Re:Got a computer the size of a planet... by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

    Underrated post.

  25. If all the world is a computer by TheDarkener · · Score: 1

    I sure fucking hope it's OS isn't Windows.

    Or anything BUT open source based for that matter.

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  26. A hope by techdolphin · · Score: 3, Funny

    I just hope that nobody decides to reboot. That would mean 4.5 billion years down the drain.

    As an aside, can somebody improve my memory retrieval function? It has been having some issues lately.

    1. Re:A hope by antdude · · Score: 1

      God is the admin. He can do whatever He wants. :P

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  27. Nailed it. by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    When all you have is a hammer...

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  28. That was SUN's slogan, Nutella by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    I wonder how many people got your post. That was SUN's slogan. The Network is the computer. They were still using that up until they ceased.

    I wonder if Nutella knows that?

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:That was SUN's slogan, Nutella by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nadella is an ex-Sun employee....

  29. Re:Let's call it Deep Thought by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    If you read the comment above and needed to know this was a quote by Douglas Adams, you don't belong here.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  30. Re:Obvious conclusion: by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

    Yup, that's apropos.

  31. When geese need GPS for navigation... by newbie_fantod · · Score: 1

    ...I'll take this statement a little more seriously.

    The vast majority of Earths inhabitants have absolutely no use for computers, and aren't even aware of their existence.

  32. Or even more accurately: Nadella is a computer! by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    "The Whole World is Now a Computer, Says Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella."

    Computers are trying to sell the idea that they will rule the world. Satya Nadella is one of those computers. Think that's wrong? Think Nadella is probably human? I have proof! A human would never treat other humans so badly as forcing them to see advertisements on Windows 10 desktop computers.

    Someone! Make the world a better place! Find Satya Nadella's off switch. Leave him off until major updates are available. (I hope the updates are of better quality than those for Windows 10.)

    Okay, that's a joke, with strong truthful elements.

  33. Re:AI? by avandesande · · Score: 1

    Actually they programmed AI to do exactly this and it said to roll back to Windows 7. I guess they didn't like the answer.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  34. Obligatory by jklappenbach · · Score: 1

    42.

  35. Re:Obvious conclusion: by Order_66 · · Score: 1

    He isn't even half the man that Gates was during his prime.

  36. How can it be, by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

    that the CEO of one of the world's largest and most important tech companies can spout so much blatant, blithering nonsense? This missive sounds like one those pseudo-profound 'revelations' that rock the worlds of people who are very stoned on really good weed. Most of these people, when they come down from the high, recognize the sophomoric and pedestrian nature of their 'insights'. Maybe Satya is still stoned - or maybe he simply has that combination of narcissism and stupidity that that is the hallmark of those who habitually have their heads up their own asses.

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
  37. Re:Obvious conclusion: by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    He isn't even half the man that Gates was during his prime.

    In what sense? Strategic brilliance? Evil? I'm not necessarily claiming he is as strategically smart as Gates, just a similar personality. (MS is doing fairly well financially, I'd note.)

    For example, my personality is fairly similar to Leonardo da Vinci's, but I don't claim to be nearly as brilliant nor as creative. I formulate or encodify lots of different ideas, but procrastinate on the implementation and jump around between them, just like he did. (For example, table-oriented programming, table-oriented AI, dynamic relational, MASP {a map-oriented take on LISP}, merging file-system/database/cms into one system using dynamic relational, the "Assume Balance" accounting model as an alternative to double-entry model {which is bad factoring}, etc.) I also dabble in art and music, including auto-composing. Perhaps you can compare me to Leonardo with lead poisoning and/or football injuries. Who knows, maybe one day the ideas will catch on when the world realizes my brilliance. (Hey, stop coughing so loud.)

  38. And BSOD is.... by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    World is a computer, and its Blue Screen Of Death is made of resource exhaustion, climate change, and loss of biodiversity.

  39. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  40. Okay! Now I get it! by Doctrinsograce · · Score: 1

    I wondered why the world is full of so many bugs. :-)

  41. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion