Slashdot Mirror
In the Trump Administration, Science Is Unwelcome. So Is Advice. (nytimes.com)
Anonymous readers share a report: As President Trump prepares to meet Kim Jong-un of North Korea to negotiate denuclearization, a challenge that has bedeviled the world for years, he is doing so without the help of a White House science adviser or senior counselor trained in nuclear physics. Mr. Trump is the first president since 1941 not to name a science adviser, a position created during World War II to guide the Oval Office on technical matters ranging from nuclear warfare to global pandemics. As a businessman and president, Mr. Trump has proudly been guided by his instincts. Nevertheless, people who have participated in past nuclear negotiations say the absence of such high-level expertise could put him at a tactical disadvantage in one of the weightiest diplomatic matters of his presidency.
"You need to have an empowered senior science adviser at the table," said R. Nicholas Burns, who led negotiations with India over a civilian nuclear deal during the George W. Bush administration. "You can be sure the other side will have that." The lack of traditional scientific advisory leadership in the White House is one example of a significant change in the Trump administration: the marginalization of science in shaping United States policy. There is no chief scientist at the State Department, where science is central to foreign policy matters such as cybersecurity and global warming. Nor is there a chief scientist at the Department of Agriculture: Mr. Trump last year nominated Sam Clovis, a former talk-show host with no scientific background, to the position, but he withdrew his name and no new nomination has been made.
"You need to have an empowered senior science adviser at the table," said R. Nicholas Burns, who led negotiations with India over a civilian nuclear deal during the George W. Bush administration. "You can be sure the other side will have that." The lack of traditional scientific advisory leadership in the White House is one example of a significant change in the Trump administration: the marginalization of science in shaping United States policy. There is no chief scientist at the State Department, where science is central to foreign policy matters such as cybersecurity and global warming. Nor is there a chief scientist at the Department of Agriculture: Mr. Trump last year nominated Sam Clovis, a former talk-show host with no scientific background, to the position, but he withdrew his name and no new nomination has been made.
That expire in 6 hours, time to use them!
The people giving advice on Korea have been fucking it up for 60-ish years, and REALLY fucking it up for 25 resulting in a viable nuclear program. So I wouldn't listen to them either.
The only thing Trump believes in is money, and money has "In god we trust", so who the hell needs science. And the problem with science advisors, they know WAY too much that Trump does not understand. And as for all the GREAT PEOPLE that Trump knows....he'll probably end up pardoning most of them, including himself.
White House science adviser or senior counselor trained in nuclear physics.
Why would you need EITHER of those people to meet with someone like Kim Jong-un?
They are not going to meet about science. They are not going to talk about how nuclear weapons are constructed.
They are going to meet for the purpose of North Korea *giving up* nuclear weapons and rejoining with the south.
What kind of "experts" can really help you here? Kim Jong-un is not exactly well balanced. What you need is someone who can steer a power-mad and basically unbalanced person into doing something you want them to do, to point out how it's really in their best interests also.
Trump is probably the ONLY president who can pull this off. Because unlike any of the past presidents for many decades, he will speak plainly, and as a result he actually will be more trusted and respected by someone who doesn't really know who to trust.
Trump also has the experience in handling unbalanced megalomaniacs in spades, thanks to his working with real-estate construction all around the world, but most especially New York City. I defy anyone to claim that Kim Jong-un is harder to work with than the upper echelons of the Teamsters.
One last point - the very LAST person you want to bring to a nuclear disarmament party is a nuclear weapons expert, that just screams you are not truly serious about them getting rid of nuclear weapons and they would act accordingly.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
When the effects of poor policy start to take effect, like the unwinding of a tightly coiled spring, who will he blame?
...if this meeting was something other than a photo-op. I don't think anything of substance will be discussed, and the only question is when exactly will the name-calling start again.
Rome taught me patience and assiduous application to detail. Virtues which temper the boldness of great, general views.
Oh, yeah.... Thanks Obama!
One way or another, I have a sneaking suspicion he'll be the last, "businessman" to be "elected" to be "president" of the "United" States.
Our reign has gone on long enough. Indeed. Summon the meteors.
science was also unwelcome when it came to facts like sexual dimorphism, the 'wage gap', and 'patriarchy theory.'
Ideologues hate inconvenient truth.
News for nerds? Bullshit. Good bye slashdot, the past 15 years have been fun.
When North Korean re-joins with the south, taking away a huge potential problem for much of the world - who will you *thank*?
It will be very curious to see the mental gymnastics required to not give Trump any credit for something only Trump could accomplish, when North Korea was obviously on a very different vector under Obama.
Never have I seen so many people hoping something so good for the entire Earth go so completely wrong just because Trump is involved. You and others like you would rather see millions of people around the world burn in nuclear fire than give Trump one iota of credit for a true diplomatic victory.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
This is fucking stupid anti-Trump garbage. The anti-Trump people are calling Trump all sorts of names and 'anti-Science' is just another one of them. The meeting with Kim Jong-Un is 100% politics - and it's something that only exists because of Trump. The previous 2 US presidents failed miserably on any positive relations with North Korea. There is no stance on science being taken in this meeting other than Trump is conducting the negotiations rather than a rainbow team of pseudo-experts working to obfuscate the real issues.
Maybe instead of criticizing Trump all the time, you should start taking his advice. He's been right; you've been wrong. Trump continues to impress me every day he is in office. I did not start off as a supporter - but he won me over early on after I listened directly to what he said rather than a bunch of lying dishonorable talking heads on TV.
Get this shit off Slashdot. And, fuck you for posting it.
--- We need more Ron Paul!
There are a lot of steps on the road towards denuclearizing any country, you fuckwit. Science is required. You're a moron.
Was my pleasure showing your kind = liars & MORONS https://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12209990&cid=56761056/ you welfare sucking leeches.
APK
P.S.=> You're also traitorous scumbags on the payroll of that HUMAN SWINE George "Jabba the Hut" Soros (everyone KNOWS thru his "Open Society Foundation" he pays ALL the radical groups too)... apk
Many people like to blame Trump, but he is a symptom of the US Environment. When Education is constantly cut for a period of 40 years and constant hate towards educated people, this is how things end up.
On TV you see nothing but Reality Shows and shows talking about Ancient Aliens and other such things. You end you with a population that believes Science is fake and thinks Angels and other such things will come and 'save us'.
More people seem to believe in pseudoscience (wikipedia) than anything else, thus you get a Trump and I do not see that changing
That's all you need to know.
... because the Americans are anti-science, anyway.
The People voted and it's their right to reject science.
They have the right to want coal and oil jobs, and to prevent nuclear power plant shutdowns.
They have the right to elect politicians who will deregulate industry so sales will go up.
Americans want to be an isolationist, nationalistic, under-educated, Evangelical Christian, English-speaking country and that's their right.
If and when Americans decide to change direction, they will communicate such via the election booth.
Until then, all's right with the world.
It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
Kendall, you are a moron. The idea that Trump without even familiarizing himself with the necessary steps and goals in pursuing arbitration can wing it and achieve denuclearization of North Korea is retarded. You are retarded.
Kendall if you need to use AC to prop your retarded faggot shit up, please try to be less obvious about it you traitor apologist faggot INCEL leadner from the New Orleans chapter.
This is exactly the discussion the leaders of the G7 are having today about Donald Trump.
And what luck are they having? None at all it would seem. Trump steamrolled them at the G7 summit and uncovered a lot of uncomfortable facts about a long-time status quo the G7 would rather have remained obscured (like a 270% tariff on dairy going into Canada, a very real and chilling fact about which I had no idea previously).
Meanwhile Trump has actually gotten the U.S., NK and SK together in a room to talk for the first time in decades.
So many Trump knows something the megalomaniacs running the EU (if you don't think every single person running each country is a kind of megalomaniac you are an idiot) do not. It's not like their own countries are faring well enough they make great examples to point to for how to run anything.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
This is coming from the New York Times. Keep that in mind as you read this article.
;)
Just my 2 cents
He's a traitor, let's not overstate the obvious. He's Putin's little bitch moron.
It's a people problem.
No wonder nothing got done with Obama. Always listening to the wrong advisors!
Fuck Kendall's asshole today, only 200 dollars! New Orleans is CHOCK FULL of Republican Incel faggots like Kendall! Visit!
The only way North Korea will rejoin with the south is if Kim Jong-un is allowed to rule it. Will you consider that a victory? I certainly would not.
I wouldn't consider that much of a victory but I also don't consider it a possibility so it really doesn't warrant any thought.
Kim Jong-un isn't going to give up control of the North
Oh, you didn't mean ALL of Korea. (or did you? Not very clear). Nor does he have to, he just has to open up borders and trade between the two countries. That *is* very possible. And is very much a massive victory.
Trump might, however, create some kind of deal. The only leverage he has is lifting economic sanctions or war.
"The only advantage Trump has are these giant massive levers here". Um, yes, those are actually two massive advantages. NK is dying as a country, Kim Jong-un knows this, all he needs is a path to a graceful exit rather than a blaze of glory - and Kim Jong-Un as crazy as he is, obviously is a person who wants to live in luxury rather than die in fire. Have you paid no attention to how he lives?
There's no guarantee that the North would either negotiate in good faith or adhere to the "new rules".
Oh they will not, but long term it will not matter if the people of the two Koreas are allowed to freely mix.
The problem isn't the intelligence, prior attempts, or the people who worked on the problem before...
Then why have there never been talks like this before? Instead all we saw, was countries getting played via telephone from North Korean leaders. Trump is not someone you can play like that because he knows the game, and is will to actually pull the levers unlike previous leaders who NK knew would never ever touch them - even in the face of nuclear weapons being built by North Korea.
All politicians are sociopaths.
Yes, but Trump is actually a strong sociopath unlike presidents for decades before him.
That doesn't guarantee intelligence or good decision making.
Neither does it preclude the same; Not having a nuclear war is great for Trump, it just also happens to work out for everyone else really well. Obama invited conflict (like invading Libya) so he could prove how tough he was. Obama really was the ultimate God of War.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
Only when it served them, othertimes Republican fascism was enough.
I'm sick of people in big cities telling us all how smart they are. Globalism isn't good for populist America, it is just good for the wealthy guys like Bezos and Slim and Buffet and Soros. Populist America isn't as dumb as they think.
Of course they do but South Korea credits Trump for talks with North Korea - wouldn't they be in a little better position to know who to credit than you?
I mean, for decades there has been the opposite of progress, with North Korea developing nuclear weapons unchecked, killing soldiers from South Korea and America without repercussion. The government of South Korea has been as it is for a very long time.
The only variable in this large equation that has changed is the introduction of Trump. So yes South Korea aided this by being open to talks, but it would not have happened (because it DID NOT HAPPEN) without Trump. End of story.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
Yes, yes, we've seen that. You guys are worried over who has a tough handshake. Yet, somehow, all the focus is on Trump. Meanwhile Trump has Trudeau trying to justify why it's okay for them to have tariffs and bad if we do it and is working on negotiating leverage, not that you know what that is.
The US has a bad deal right now. Having no deal is preferable to a bad deal. So you're going to give in to his demands, one way or another, in fear of losing more, or else you'll lose even more. Take your pick.
You've lost to Trump before and you'll keep losing. No surprise there.
Trump takes plenty of advice and got to where he was in part by having trusted advisers and being a great leader. Just because he doesn't listen to the people who tried to run our country into the ground doesn't mean he doesn't follow advice from experts on all subjects. He does listen to real scientists, just not Bill Nye the Science Lie.
Then I suppose you also don't know that the US provides over $22 billion a year in direct subsidies to US dairy producers
Actually I did know that after looking into the background behind the dairy issue.
A couple of points:
1) Why is a 270% tariff required or reasonable to offset a %40 subsidy?
2) Very obviously a reduction of that subsidy would be part of any talks in removing or (far more likely) lowering that tariff.
That is why Canada has a tariff on US dairy products
Again, even if you were so naive as to believe that was the sole reason for the tariff, why the huge discrepancy in amount? Shouldn't the tariff logically merely correct for the subsidy instead of going far overboard?
Sorry for bringing logic to a shit-flinging party, can't help myself.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
Are you fucking serious?
I don't respond to AC's.
So what on Earth is It that one or few nuke specialists going to add?
...and the story it is in response to somehow is not? You're a strange one, slashdot.
Our reign has gone on long enough. Indeed. Summon the meteors.
and he made it very, very clear he'd oppose any effort to address or even recognize climate change or do anything whatsoever that would get in the way of business (under the theory we'd all be better off thanks to a large increase in employment opportunities).
/. (which is ostensibly a site for pro-science nerds) when it was so obvious Trump would oppose everything this site stands for. I mean, yeah, I don't like Hilary and voted against her in the primary, but she at least has a firm grasp on reality and believes in the scientific method.
This is exactly what we signed on for, America. What I find odd is that there's so many pro Trump folks on
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
Kim has two choices
1. Make peace and play nice with the world
2. President Trump finishes the Korean War, the hard way.
North Korea can not be allowed to launch nuke ICBMs at Japan, Guam, USA, or anyone.
They also can not be allowed to sell such weapons on the open market, to other countries - such as Iran.
Nothing personal, it's just not going to happen.
One way or the other.
I congratulate North Korea on it's science successes - proving they are just as smart and just as skilled as other technological countries.
However - now they have proven they can manufacture Nuke ICBMs, they no longer have to manufacture ICBMs - an expensive project for a cash poor nation.
Ideally - United Korea could re-form and the great success of South Korea would rapidly grow and enrich North Korea.
Samsung , LG, and KIA will no longer stand in the shadow behind USA companies - they will enjoy massive growth and wealth.
So, get ye hence, build ye your bunker etc.
Or maybe just curl up and weep.
If he's unsure of who to trust, perhaps he should look at how Trump treats his allies.
You mean actual U.S. allies like Israel, India, Saudi Arabia, or Japan?
Yes, yes it would make pretty clear how the U.S. treats real allies instead of bullshit artists who want nothing to do with possible U.S. success and work hard against it.
I'm sure Kim has factored this in as well; for as crazy as he may be he's also been pretty shrewd.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
It takes resources to do Science; the best thing we've got to create flows of resources is a Free Market.
Trump is probably the most pro-Free-Market President we've had in a very long time, and even then he's not very pro-Free-Market.
Just because it's been this way since WWII, doesn't mean it has to be that way. Or that it is relevant any longer. Or that it was a good idea to begin with. A single Science Adviser is like saying that, there is an expert for EVERYTHING. Not. Having a science adviser hasn't seemed to help the last few administrations deal with this problem. So why does not having one immediately doom this administration's efforts? What is the definition of the word 'crazy' again?
I used to think SlashDot readers were more logical thinkers. More scientifically-minded if you will. But this particular article doesn't seem to move in that wave at all. If you results are going off the rails - which enough people believed our government was. You change something, and observe for better results. That is what we as US citizens did in November 2016. As so far, the man has done what he has said he was going to do. Like it or not.
For those of you that didn't vote - shut up and participate next time or don't complain about the outcome. For a country as westernized as ours for only 1/3 of the population to participate in a federal election is shameful For those of you that couldn't vote - we really don't care about your feelings or opinions - not that our intentions were/are to harm you - we just don't care. Our decision, our election, our country, our President.
If only we had a Nobel Peace Prize Winner in office, who bombed the fuck out of a place like Libya for giving up their weapons years ago and failed to protect the Ukraine (after they agreed to give up weapons for our support), then we'd be able to inspire trust and honest bargaining.
Was my pleasure showing your kind = liars & MORONS https://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12209990&cid=56761056/ you welfare sucking leeches.
APK
P.S.=> You're also traitorous scumbags on the payroll of that HUMAN SWINE George "Jabba the Hut" Soros (everyone KNOWS thru his "Open Society Foundation" he pays ALL the radical groups too)... apk
This post is exactly right, and a great indicator why the talks will be a success. Because NK knows more than anyone the costs of the talks failing.
There may yet be a bit more drama and back and forth, but ultimately NK can't realistically fight a war of any kind for more than about an hour and at this point probably cannot hurt SK very much. So Kim Jong-un will take the path that lets him continue to party and live the high life.
More than anything it would also play so well to his ego...
As you say it is amazing to think what an economic powerhouse a unified Korea would be.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
Last time I watched Bill Nye he tried to turn ice cream gay.
Well, at least they haven't started WWIII over the issue up until now.
They very much did by allowing to let North Korean (and Iran) get within one launch or a smuggled shipping port nuke away from starting WWIII (or at least a nuclear conflict).
You can start wars through inaction as well action, you know.
Just because the nuclear shot has not been fired does not mean the war has not begin.
I mean, we have dead U.S. soldiers (from Iran and North Korea) and everything... how is that not a war?
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
until Saddam & Gaddafi. In both cases we secured promises, backed up by extensive international inspections, that they would not develop weapons of mass destruction. And in both cases we proved to be untrustworthy and brutal and arranged for both men to be murdered (Gaddafi died with a bayonet twisting in his gut).
Kim would be a real mad man if he stopped trying to get nukes after seeing what we do to people who relinquish them
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
See recent Slashdot submission titled Petroglyph Explanation Remains Ignored After 15 Years. This situation with Trump lacking a science advisor is not especially different in that the person making these petroglyph claims, Anthony Peratt, is a government scientist specializing in high-energy density plasmas and nuclear physics, and has even advised the US government on the Non-Proliferation Treaty.
The Submission ...
The Slashdot community does not itself seem especially concerned about warnings from nuclear scientists, as the submission has had plenty of time by now to make it to the homepage.
who can speak intelligently about nuclear weapons vs nuclear power?
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
like logic, reason, truth, compassion, honesty, decency.
Just ask the leaders of the free world, AKA the G6.
Most people follow leaders, and most leaders lead towards progress not away from it.
I'm sure the other countries aka "turd world" countries will follow the USA.
The way to tell when an American is lying, "words are coming from their mouth".
Do you have any examples (specific quotations would be awesome but I think that might be asking too much) of bad science advice people have given with regards to Korea?
Well the scientists working with intelligence agencies have been wrong about the speed at which North Korean could develop nuclear weapons and delivery technology basically forever - from the most recent example:
" At the start of Donald Trump's presidency, American intelligence agencies told the new administration that while North Korea had built the bomb, there was still ample time - upward of four years - to slow or stop its development of a missile capable of hitting an American city with a nuclear warhead."
But this kind of terrible under-estimation goes back decades.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
and there's plenty to support Trump being anti-science. To wit:
His EPA chief is ignoring air and water quality research and reducing controls on water and air quality
He called Global Warming a Chinese hoax, despite the overwhelming condenses of peer reviewed science recognizing it
He opposes Net Neutrality and ignores studies that show eliminating it would have negative effects on the free exchange of ideas.
He and his VP support Abstinence based education even though it's been shown to be completely ineffective (again, by science).
Two words: Clean Coal.
Two more words: Betsy Devos
I could go on and on. The scientific position to take is that Trump is, in fact, anti-science. He doesn't believe in evidence and facts, preferring the "I substitute your reality with my own" school of thought. To call him anything but anti-science is itself anti-science. It's an attempt to ignore or refute reality itself.
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
...oh really.. by all means tell us about history's great scientists and what they were trying to sell?
You might want to go out and get a few dress hats, you can wear. Because if Korea is reunified as a result of recent developments it's pretty obvious that you'll end up tearing out your hair. You never-Trump fucks are the same dog-turds as the never-Obama fucks were. We need to flush your remains down a sanitary sewer and move on.
I would save the celebration for a while. Absolutely nothing has been solved thus-far. America is increasingly isolated by the antics of your glorious leader, including his pursuit of Russian interests while he is being investigated for collusion with the Russians.
Your crapflood is boring. Weak. Pathetic.
You embarass the balanced and rational people who oppose Trump. They wish your kind would just shut up.
Trump is using AI to solve this, the true millennial genius he is! You so woke bro!!
Like the USA. It's filled with USAmericans.
Out and out editorials, no facts, nothing at all. Just a pure, garbage opinion piece.
Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
You're such an Amerikuk Kendall.
The Washington Post? Oh go fucking hang!
President Trump is not anti-science or anti-advice.
He is PRO getting the job done.
O.k. I'll bite...
Tesla / Westinghouse Vs Edison / General Electric
There's not going to be any re-unification, perhaps some opening up of the borders.
North and South Korea have diverged enough that even the language is hard for each to understand, the young S. Koreans aren't interested in re-unification and it would be as expensive as shit (see Germany), though with Trump's understanding of finances, perhaps America will borrow more and underwrite the cost.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
this is a person who won an election by sheer spite and sits around watching eight hours of television every day (google it)
he is literally the crank uncle you must have over every thanksgiving who sits at the table spouting garbage, but now in charge of a country
everything that happens is out of sheer dumb luck
if he gets to pick supreme court judges, you are screwed for decades
We've already heard that song.
Stop the presses!
Breaking news:
> In the Trump Administration, Science Is Unwelcome. So Is Advice.
Who knew?!?
What DID the romans every do for us?
Science has turned into joke. Science is now bad statics. Causation and correlation don't matter. Just publish to publish. If no one has published, that means you're correct. Peer reviews are dead.
Trump beat Hillary! We hates him! Hates him my precious! Hates him forever!
By way of "My pussy hurts."
It's not like this is going to be a handshake deal and done.
And we have this nifty thing called THE INTERNET. We can move gazillions of bytes a day over it.
So any proposals can be put before the eyes of a pro at this stuff in minutes if necessary.
But no. TRUMP MADE MUH HEAD ASPLODE!
he is reducing government regulation. But there's going to be consequences. He's repealing the laws put in place from the 2008 crash. There's going to be another, worse crash. He's rolling back EPA regulations on clean air and water. He's reducing regulations that required schools to teach science instead of religion. Those are the kinds of regulations he's reducing.
Most regulations were done for a reason. They were reactive, not proactive, and they're not just some libtard trying to spoil everybody's fun or some science nerd trying to bilk a paycheck out of the public Universities. There are going to be some nasty consequences for all this deregulation. The annoying part is it'll be like it always is. A Republican deregulates, something blows up and a bunch of awful things happen, then a Dem cleans up the mess. That's where the 'cyclical' nature of the economy comes from.
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
One imagines that psychoanalysts and cultural experts and perhaps defected army officers would be those who might provide relevant insights to help in the denuclearization negotiations. Physicists not so much.
"Oh so the bomb uses an IMplosive mechanism to trigger the critical mass! Oh NOW I know what to say to Kim in the next meeting, we've been doing it all wrong!"
your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
*postwar reconstruction
No hard character limit on the mobile site.
your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
The Nazi left had eihht years to fix the problem and now everythjbg is President Trump's fault? And I suppose the 9-11 plot wasnt hatched under Clinton either, the 1993 WTC bombing was Bush's fault? ae911truth org
msmssh needs to go back to rewriting Wikipedia history because everyone here knows the Nazis were leftists like him, not alt-right or neo-con or whatever nonsense libtards are spewing.
(like a 270% tariff on dairy going into Canada, a very real and chilling fact about which I had no idea previously).
Then I suppose you also don't know that the US provides over $22 billion a year in direct subsidies to US dairy producers, accounting for over 40% of all dairy profits?
That's right -- American taxpayers are paying for >40% of all dairy production in the US.
Canada (at least in Ontario) also subsidizes dairy producers, by limiting the number of producers. The industry pretends in their literature that this matches supply to demand, which is trivially absurd because "demand" does not exist independent of supply. It's a curve, not a single value. (For the literature, see, e.g., https://www.milk.org/Corporate...)
So basically, they're keeping the number of dairy licenses low which makes the wealthiest farmers rich, the poor farmers unable to enter the market, and dairy more expensive for everyone. They keep the price artificially high by doing this and by having insane tariffs on importing dairy. It's not like they're just putting tariffs on commercial imports--they charge ridiculous tariffs if an individual drives across the border with it.
I'm not defending the President's actions--ultimately he's doing something anyone competent knows is stupid to appeal to voters who don't understand trade. The most obvious example is NAFTA, which could be renegotiated, but no meaningful business in the world will make significant plans that are dependent on a treaty with a five-year sunset clause like he wanted. (The clause was probably about presenting Canada with two options: back out because the treaty is unworkable and dumb at that point, or agree and set up the Republicans to campaign on renegotiating or cancelling it for reelection from the masses while ALSO campaigning on it with their donors getting money in exchange for their promise to renew it)
But still, it would be inaccurate to claim only one country is subsidizing dairy. What's actually happening is bad enough.
"Russian" is the new "Benghazi"
Same playing surface, just the sides have switched.
I'll just respond to one of the parrots of this "interesting" talking point being spread by the Hive Mind.
Just because the known facility was destroyed does not mean they could not simply move on to another..
They have a very large one sitting right next door for example. Or the entire ocean... maybe during a training exercise by other nations. Oops!
Basically the thought they would have to be done because one facility is close to collapse is idiotic and ignores the realities of a nuclear weapons program.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
Since you seem incapable of understanding simple words, I'll repeat them to you until it percolates through your brain there is a question: How are dead American soldiers, purposefully killed by North Korea and Iran, not part of and cause for a war?
Until you answer that simple question it is you who are trying to hand-wave away the simple facts of the matter.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
when WAS the last Science friendly administration ?
Late 60's ?
"I know science better than the generals, beliebe me! The relativity guy, Albert Weinstein even endorsed me. My science gave me beautiful hair that defies gravity. Everyone comes to see it and touch it in wonder; bigly popular. Long lines!"
It takes resources to do Science; the best thing we've got to create flows of resources is a Free Market.
That's weird, I could have swore that the USSR was the first country in space. I'm also pretty sure that what has made the U.S. such a scientific powerhouse has been tons of federal grant money that flows into our universities for basic research. The free market turns that into money afterward. There's also the issue of all those nifty advancements brought about through NASA's research.
The free market is important, but when you make it the be-all, end-all, you'll find that things don't work out as well as Ayn Rand's stories would have you believe.
"From the depths of my skeptical and rationalist soul, I ask the Lord to protect me from California touchie-feeliedom."
Up and down the thread, delusional Incel Bing is trying to support the delusional Trump.
Trump will get screwed by Kim.
Trump is a Christian. The answer to everything is "God did it!".
Who needs science?
My German girlfriend likes to rate our sex between 1-10. She kept shouting NINE! That's the best I've done yet.
captcha: fingers
Mrs. Mash likes her opinion pieces. She's a gossiper.
There is no surface anymore.. Your top security agency warns agains Russian aggression, and your president advocates for them. The smartest thing for any country to do at this point is to have as little as possible to do with the U.S.
These are the same people that advised he wouldn't win the election. The same professionals that said NAFTA and H1B visas are so awesome for the united states. The same people that when my parents lost their jobs said that manufacturing was dead in the US and to learn computers at 65 years old. The same professionals that skyrocketed the price of coal, that my 75 year old Aunt on fixed income uses to cook and heat their house, because it "might" be bad. The same climate scientists who can't account for the fact that temperatures are actual dropping. The same professionals that said North Korea would never agree to talks. The same economists who laughed at tax cuts, because we should look at the "big picture" and let our money disappear into a giant federal sinkhole. Wake up and use your own brain to evaluate the evidence just as Trump has.
Free market is the engine of innovation that runs the ground bone dust of people who died from cancer, pollution-based illnesses, or physical smashing. Their blood is the fuel of the pistons.
If the so called "Science adviser" believes in global warming, is he really a scientist? Global warming has no science to back it up. If anyone tells you Climate change is a science, ask them to run test to prove it.
Trump has been doing a great job so far, so if he thinks he does not need one, then one isn't needed. Besides, there are a lot of positions unfilled because of Democrats stall tactics, that is much more important story to write about.
Deutschland Uber Alles!
l . . lnazina
l . . l . . .
l . . l . . .
lnazinazinazi
. . . l . . l
. . . l . . l
nazinal . . l
You probably don't need a team of scientists, but knowing what will show up on satellites, or what the impact of agreeing to X is going to do to their ability to make bombs seems important. Otherwise, how is he going to know if the tradeoffs make sense.
Your ad here. Ask me how!
You tell 'em, Ivan!
Keep your atheistic science you'll burn in hell forever. The sooner this world ends the better off all God fearing people will be. #MAGA
If Obama hadn't let little Kimmy get Nukes, he would never have had the confidence to meet Trump as an equal.
So all credit obviously goes to Obama for doing all the legwork in setting up the deal for Trump to just swoop in and take the credit.
More people decided that they didn't care enough to even vote for either candidate.
I see plenty of facts here. Let me quote the first paragraph of the summary:
As President Trump prepares to meet Kim Jong-un of North Korea to negotiate denuclearization, a challenge that has bedeviled the world for years, he is doing so without the help of a White House science adviser or senior counselor trained in nuclear physics. Mr. Trump is the first president since 1941 not to name a science adviser, a position created during World War II to guide the Oval Office on technical matters ranging from nuclear warfare to global pandemics. As a businessman and president, Mr. Trump has proudly been guided by his instincts. Nevertheless, people who have participated in past nuclear negotiations say the absence of such high-level expertise could put him at a tactical disadvantage in one of the weightiest diplomatic matters of his presidency.
The first two sentences are purely facts. You may not like these facts, but they are facts. The last two sentences are arguably opinion, but are you really going to argue the opposite of the statements in those sentences?
This has nothing to do with physics. Just more nazi-left slander.
... I'll tell you this: he will also be the first president that will try and may be succeed to enforce a third term for his presidency.
Bach says it all.
You probably don't need a team of scientists, but knowing what will show up on satellites, or what the impact of agreeing to X is going to do to their ability to make bombs seems important. Otherwise, how is he going to know if the tradeoffs make sense.
Let me preface this with "I hate Trump too".
That said, not having advisors there, physicists or preparing for the meeting isn't really a problem. It's not like Trump is going to honor any commitment he makes. He violated the Iran deal. He agreed to the G7 then cancelled it the same day. Trump isn't to be trusted, nor is the American government while this is going on.
That said, Russia is the one pushing this shit, so watch where the puppet strings lead before you buy into the enemy of my enemy.
I was ok with Republicans until Bush Jr, I liked Bernie and voted for Clinton when that was the choice remaining. As an American, I say this. We will forgive all bullshit tit for tat after Trump is gone. We understand why you have to push back now. America will be back, we will be your friend again. We're not broken up, we're just on a break. Please forgive us when we demonstrate we learned our lesson.
Anything that comes out of Universities is SJW now.
Advisor would not be exception.
Perhaps he has advisor and doesn't want others to know about him?
Nobody defeats themselves like you do unidentifiable anonymous coward liar & it was my pleasure exposing it https://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12209990&cid=56761056/
* LOL!
( YOU SUPPORT ME VIA YOUR STUPIDITY I USED AGAINST YOU IN THE LINK ABOVE! )
APK
P.S.=> You're SO unbelievably dumb it makes me laugh... apk
If the Americans make so much cheese, why don't they eat any of it? When I went there to visit, all I could find was this bright yellow-orange stuff called "cheese food" or something similar, but no actual cheese...
So the trump administration is going to be the first administration in the past few decades to negotiate de-nuclearization in North Korea without a senior White House science advisor at the table (or even in the administration, right?
And every other administration for the last few decades has had a senior White House science advisor at the table for such talks, right?
Well, honestly, every prior administration that negotiated with North Korea got rolled and wound up pouring money, aid on North Korea while they kept working on getting the bomb.
Do we really need to repeat the failures of prior administrations? Why didn't the presence of a senior White House science advisor prevent all the prior administrations from signing flawed agreements?
Ken
In fact you are answering this using a subproduct of the CERN, a multistate funded organization :-)
Trump is smart enough to know Germany is doing well in the economic stakes - and gaining through science, and for some reason have not become speculators. Trump knows China is like a thousand flea bites, grabbing money while upping -err science. Yeah. Maybe he hopes sheer economic clout may win, over science - but it sure seems to not be going that way. Re-write trade agreements- yeah that may work.
Boycotting China is hard to do - if they wont throttle NK harder. Somehow one does not think NK will exit the arms trade
unless the are huge benefits over and above Chinas present low low border rate. In fact a trade war may drive NK to say no thanks, as exporting stuff then, has lower margins. Doubt US will do a Cuba agreement -which may work.
Oddly, Trump need to know outsourcing science to China is bad - but he has done nothing.
More and more bovine feces for the pile! Feces as far as the eye can see! No, not in the Trump administration but right here on Slashdot!
Most people seem unaware of it's presence as they gleefully consume each rancid, greasy, non-factual turd.
The NY Times is far left, and the claim is completely unfounded.
The Trump administration embraces science and advice, but it's not going to just accept whatever is offered.
We will NOT pay a carbon tax.
I work with a lot of physicists. I have three masters degrees myself. There is no such thing a 'scientist' is the sense that there is someone who is qualified advise on nuclear weapons, cybersecurity and AGW. As I said I work with physicist and to many of them think they are competent to speak on any subject, which is of course bollocks.
If you want to know about nuclear weapons find a nuclear weapons expert, who might be a physicist, but more likely is a nuclear engineer or might even be a historian or a political science major, who has specialize in disarmament and disarmament verification.
if you want to know about cybersecurity ask a cybersecurity expert. Having a physicist science adviser and asking them about cybersecurity makes as much sense as asking a biologist or a philosopher.
As for AGW I'm sure there's a propagandist around to give pointers on how to use panic to transfer wealth or you could find someone who knows statistics and model building to explain to the credulous how science really works.
please crawl back under your rock. Not having a science advisor is not a crime. Having one who insists on "climate change" is as bad as CNN ... lies lies and more lies!
Trump did the right thing! When science starts doing what science was meant to do, explain the truth; then maybe Trump will get one. But again, he doesn't need another liar in his ear!
Cheers
ps
trudeau is a lying backstabbing schmuck!
hey justin, find your balls boy! tell the old f$ck up front what your issues are... NOT AFTER HE WENT HOME! AND NOT IN PUBLIC FIRST - MAN TO MAN !
This denuclearization summit has dick to do with science. KJU either agrees to destroy his NWP, or Trump will do it for him. That's what this summit is about. This doesn't have to do with science. This has to do with "I'm going to bomb the snot out of your entire military if you don't stop acting like a petulant child, but I will give you the grace of saving face by having this summit with you, to allow you the chance to make it look like you are doing something wonderful."
Also, could someone please point to the law that says the President must have a science advisor?
So we should just have our mouths open wide while we let the education system shove it down our throats? Of course not. We're taught so-call facts while at the same time being fed bias and then you wonder why people don't want to listen it. When you look at colleges these days full of lefty loon students, agenda biased professors, and greedy leaders, sure it's hard to trust the education system. It's no wonder people scoff at the education system. Just because it's taught doesn't always mean that it's true? Or are you just opening wide? And yeah, score one for you for lumping people who watch reality shows and ancient aliens with trump supporters - way to understand the problem.
Talk about Hyperbole. Please continue telling us all anyone who doesn't agree with the DNC are Nazis.
Screw your idiotic propaganda.
I saw this bumper sticker on a car a few days ago; "Bernie 2020"
The government employs thousands of scientists. I was once one of them. There are high level scientists who have access to white house staff at agencies like NSF, NIH, DOE, CDC, NASA, and DOD. The government still operates government labs through those organizations. There are openings at all of these agencies, but that is nothing new. There are ignored reports coming out of these agencies, but that is nothing new.
The major office that is going unfilled is in OSTP. Perhaps once this office had a great scientific purpose, but it is a political office now. The job of staff at OSTP is to make the president and administration look good. It's a very useful science marketing department, but it is frequently at odds with the people who actually perform science inside the government. This is because organizations like DOE and DOD have a responsibility to get nuclear testing right while OSTP has recently had a responsibility to make it look good. At times, making the test look good is more important than it being done right. However, this function should not be confused with "science." You will generally find great scientists at OSTP, you will also find press briefings given by precocious interns.
Those who have personally worked with her say she did a good job. The political process always nitpicks and magnifies things. I'd rather have somebody with a careful mouth negotiating than a loose one. I don't believe T's Yosemite Sam negotiation style works well, based on personal experience.
As far as "the emails", a lot of politicians bungle technology, including the current crew and the prior crew. Just make sure you hire good tech guidance.
Table-ized A.I.
Mr. Trump
Only since 2016 has the press taken to changing the President's title to "Mr."
He won. Get over it.
It's not like this is a technological problem, or an agreement that hinges on scientific understanding. It's completely political. Time and time again we've signed agreements, given them money, only to have them continue to develop nuclear weapons. What requires a scientist to understand that dichotomy?
I don't believe in karma, I just call it like I see it.
The science that conveniently ignores facts and manipulates data to support an agenda isn't real science. The science where two thirds of studies cannot be replicated by their peers and peer reviews in general are bad or non-existent. Science has become politics.
Ayn Rand died on welfare. I swear, that fact should be printed in large letters on the side of a building beside the major highway in every town in America.
I'm no fan of Ayn Rand, but she took social security and Medicare, not welfare. She acceded because she had paid into those entitlements.
Trump is an obvious thug, in the likes of John Gotti Sr and Al Capone.
He "rules" by his gut, which, as POTUS, is akin to speculative gambling with non-discretionary monies!
Self-importance and self-indulgence is the root of ALL evil.
The Orange Oaf is trying to take up back to the Dark Ages so he can be Donald the First (Assclown the First would be so much better).
with a childlike faith reminiscent of a five year old waiting for Santa Clause.
Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
It's not opinion that scientific advisors haven't been appointed, it's fact.
enriched bleached wheat flour (flour, reduced iron, "b" vitamins (niacin, thiamine mononitrate (b1), riboflavin (b2), folic acid)), water, sugar, corn syrup, high fructose corn syrup, partially hydrogenated vegetable and/or animal shortening (soybean, cottonseed and/or canola oil, beef fat), whole eggs, dextrose, contains 2% or less of: soy lecithin, leavenings (sodium acid pyrophosphate, baking soda, cornstarch, and monocalcium phosphate), whey, modified corn starch, glucose, soy flour, salt, mono and diglycerides, cellulose gum, cornstarch, sodium stearoyl lactylate, natural and artificial flavor, sorbic acid (to retain freshness), polysorbate 60, soy protein isolate, calcium and sodium caseinate, yellow 5, red 40.
Please explain, which of the above ingredients is bad for you (in moderation) and why?
I've been voting for over 40 years. During that time I have written to every single president. Now, I know that my mail is probably simply categorized and reported in a broad statistic I write to them either to approve or disapprove what they do. However, it is interesting to note that the only president who has not had his staff respond back to me, was Obama. I've "heard back" from Trump every time I've written. It kind of made me wonder. Was the mail I sent to Obama just 86ed? Were they even tallying the information for him?
Have you looked at a map? I donâ(TM)t think so.
You don't need a nuclear physicist, either. This isn't a science problem. This is a political problem. We have to get them to agree that they don't need nukes. Once you do that, THEN you can bring in the scientists to make sure it's done, and done correctly.
NK is giving them up. What else do we need to know? NK is really a broken country with no options. Their test site collapsed and is totally useless now. They're just about out of food and out of options. Just bad options and options that get a lot of their people, including KJU killed. China has had enough of them too. Especially after his hits abroad.
Trump is exactly the right guy at the right time to do this. Get us out of another Democratic mess. Just like Nixon got us out of Kennedy's Vietnam mess.
It's really strange that no matter who is president, there are military conflicts constantly around the world, dontcha think?. How those are handled is one of many things that define a presidency. Do you know why the news isn't constantly talking about the war in Libya? BECAUSE THERE ISN'T ONE. The Democrats didn't think a full scale invasion was necessary to deal with it. You think Romney or McCain wouldn't have put 150,000 boots on the ground? How's that Iraqi and Afghanistan war going for ya? Can you name a US "leftist" war still going on? Clinton got us out of Bosnia. Carter avoided one with Iran. Obama switched to tech like drones to reduce real person casualties and even attempted a withdrawal though unsuccessful. Democrats, of this decade anyway, are not warmongers no matter how much you stretch your equivocations.
Yes it can be. You don't think much. Something can be your fault and the reasons why will never be divulged to you. Or it could be your fault and the aggrieved party is not gonna tell you how they'll fix it. Or it could be that it's your fault, they aren't gonna tell you why, aren't gonna tell you the solution, and sure as fuck don't want your help. Hence, your fault AND none of your business.
You mean your president is only good for name calling. Crooked Hilliary, Lying Ted, Pocahontas, Mr Magoo, Little Rocket Man, I'm sure I've forgotten others.
I didn't even finish the post. As soon as I saw Dirty Donald I KNEW some jackhole would be down here bitching about it as if thier shit smells like roses and here you are. I'd instruct you to google "hypocrisy" but you'd probably just think it was referring to someone else.
Scientists have opinions just like everyone else, but they also have better opinions according to cultural norms. There is a big problem that a Scientist's opinion is better than other peoples, because that means the Science career track draws people who want to use that power. It draws opinionated people who want to enforce their opinions on other people, which is not the point of science. Science is great, but let facts speak for themselves. Scientists can and should be wrong. We can't hold them on higher moral ground. Trump is wrong a lot, I didn't vote for him, and saying what I'm saying is not saying Trump is right. Its saying scientists aren't special, and there is no reason a president can't operate effectively with a lot of smart people who are not scientists.
You honestly don't think he has a TEAM of various specialized Science Advisors!? Of course he does. If he chooses not to show his hand (his kitchen cabinet) to the media or public, then so be it. He's BOSS! Deal with it .....
The Voice of the Deplorable.
This is a Big Giant Orange Head level of lies, misinformation and misleading statements. Here are just a few, just to give a taste of the predilections of the Deplorables:
"The Iran Nuclear deal is an example of a treaty that gives everyone involved something while giving nothing to the US."
Yeah, "nothing for the US" except for the nuclear nonproliferation angle. You know, the whole reason for the deal in the first place?
"Trump called the NATO countries out as well about their penchant for never meeting their financial responsibilities to NATO."
Every President since Nixon (IIRC) has made this point. But no, BGOH is different, because of his Big Giant Orange Head?
"The G7 countries are not upset because they think the current trade policies are fair (true and then a bunch of nonsense statements after)..."
BGOH brought in steel and aluminum tariffs on the basis of a lie (national security my ass!). Then he claimed there was a trade imbalance with Canada and even admitted he lied about that one. "Calling out" selective trade imbalances completely misses the point because trade relations depend upon the idea of "competitive advantage".
Most single product or service trade balances will be unbalanced due to competitive advantage, that was the whole point!! I'm not surprised the Deplorables don't know this. Alternatively, they do know this and don't mind lying about it.
Which makes the Deplorables look better, willful ignorance or willful deception?
Neither. They both look stupid. And destructive, and that includes self-destructive. That's why the G7 are mad.
Not your whiney list of shit you know little or nothing about.
Sanders was leading, and ruined by his own party of assholes. (As opposed to that other party of assholes, owned by the same owners of course.)