Slashdot Mirror


China Won't Solve the World's Plastics Problem Any More (wired.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: For a long time, China has been a dumping ground for the world's problematic plastics. In the 1990s, Chinese markets saw that discarded plastic could be profitably recreated into exportable bits and bobs -- and it was less expensive for international cities to send their waste to China than to deal with it themselves. China got cheap plastic and the exporting countries go rid of their trash.

But in November 2017, China said enough. The country closed its doors to contaminated plastic, leaving the exports to be absorbed by neighboring countries like Vietnam, South Korea, and Thailand. And without the infrastructure to absorb all the waste that China is rejecting, the plastics are piling up. Between now and 2030, 111 million metric tons of trash -- straws, bags, water bottles -- will have nowhere to go, according to a paper published in Science Advances on Wednesday. That's as if every human on Earth contributed a quarter of their body mass in mostly single-use plastic polymers to a massive, abandoned pile of garbage.

87 of 219 comments (clear)

  1. WALL-E by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    without the infrastructure to absorb all the waste that China is rejecting, the plastics are piling up

    Sorting and re-processing the heaps might be a job for AI.

    1. Re:WALL-E by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I wish it were easier to repair stuff these days. A lot of things that are in otherwise good shape except for a single fatal bad part results in having the toss the entire thing; it's cheaper to buy a new one than pay for repairs.

      And they are often only designed to last 3 years. We have a Japanese-brand microwave oven from the late 90's that still works and is used often. You don't see durability like that now. [Insert git-off-my-lawn joke here.]

    2. Re:WALL-E by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      We have a Japanese-brand microwave oven from the late 90's that still works and is used often. You don't see durability like that now.

      Survivorship bias. How many microwaves from the late 90s ended up in the dump? Things weren't built any better back then, you just got lucky.

    3. Re:WALL-E by sexconker · · Score: 1

      False!

      If that were the case, anecdotes of having to replace the new appliance more frequently than they had to replace the old one (if they ever did) wouldn't be common.

      It's not just that some old things survived. Among those who own old surviving things, the survival rate of new things does not match.

    4. Re:WALL-E by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If that were the case, anecdotes of having to replace the new appliance more frequently

      Anecdotes are not data. I will tell you this, major appliances in the 1990s were in no way any more reliable than they are now.

      People complained about the exact same things in the 1990s, about how their old stuff from the 1970s worked better. Where are all of those 1970s refrigerators anyways?

    5. Re:WALL-E by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It really is true, fridges from the 70's and 80's tended to last 20 years, 90's fridges about 10 years. The ones they sell today seem to only last about 2-5 years. I'm sure they are trying to perfect the system for getting to last only 1 day past the warranty period.

    6. Re:WALL-E by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2

      Sorting and re-processing the heaps might be a job for AI.

      Well, your title says it all . . . the Chinese could build another Great Wall with the heaps of plastic!

      Or another Terracotta Coke Bottle Army.

      Actually my personal favorite work of Chinese Architecture was the "Rainbow Bridge". A new one made of colored plastic and illuminated by Rave Lights would be interesting.

      And what about some plastic Admiral Zheng He's Giant Ships . . . ? If you don't like 'em, you can sink them to create artificial reefs and islands.

      Hey, maybe someone in the US is in the market for a "Great Big Wall" . . . ?

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    7. Re:WALL-E by Lennie · · Score: 1

      Maybe some 3D printing can help.

      --
      New things are always on the horizon
    8. Re:WALL-E by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      well with the advent of the cloud and IoT bullshit, they can do just that. Keep a running tally of every time you fridge door opens, or when it first pinged their servers. Then at the appropriate time (typically around the time the warranty expires, or a set number of 'door opens', fry the circuit board that controls the temperature -- voila.

    9. Re:WALL-E by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      Part of it is back then consumers expected things to last longer such that manufacturers payed more attention to durability and repair-ability.

      For one, products were relatively more expensive. If you pay a lot for something, you kind of expect it to last a while. The "disposable" mentality had not kicked in yet. You had well known and long living brands like Maytag and Hoover that had a reputation for lasting. Now the brands come and go like stray cats.

      A combination of automation and China's low manufacturing costs, perhaps due to subsidies to gain market share, made replacement costs less than repair casts such that the consumer was pretty much forced to choose replacement over repair. And if something is cheap enough, you are less upset if it breaks or is hard to repair.

    10. Re:WALL-E by Falos · · Score: 1

      Why would the industry go to efforts for the sake of repairability?

      The invisible hand? Read the rest of the book, Melvin, or at least the part about informed purchase agents.

      Even Darwinism implies that the product will trend towards the lifespan of the weakest link, eg phone li-ion battery averages N years, ergo the industry will drift towards...

    11. Re:WALL-E by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Anecdotes are not data.

      Of course they are. Either way, you're missing the point.
      Among those that have/had long-lived old things, you will find very few (or none) that have long-lived replacements.

      It's NOT an issue of bias in only looking at examples where old shit happened to last a long time. That's what the person I replied to claimed. It's horse shit. If that were the case, and new shit lasts just as long or longer than old shit, then the typical experience of someone with long-lived old things would be that the new shit is better. That's not the typical experience. If it were, people wouldn't bitch about new shit not lasting long.

    12. Re:WALL-E by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 2

      It's called Continuation Engineering. I worked for a major appliance controls OEM. There are engineers within the company whose job is to cave cents of cost off of $4 controls and components. If it lasts too long, it's a candidate for cost reduction engineering.

    13. Re:WALL-E by mikael · · Score: 2

      Agreed. The worst offender are headphones with a built-in cable and connector. Due to wear and tear, the wire in the cables always ends up failing, or maybe it's that very thin piece of wire connecting the cable to the headphone. But once that cable has gone, the whole headphone set has to be thrown out; speakers, rare-earth magnets, plastic and cable. Bluetooth headphones are a bit better, but DJ style headphones have an extra connector to allow the cable to be replaced.

      For appliances like washing machines, the manufacturers are constantly improving the electronics and software. So the obsolencence is built in.

      Another example are those universal remote controls which never seem to be programmed for the latest brands of TV's and cable/satellite boxes, even after cycling through every of the thousands of code numbers. Those should have a SD card.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    14. Re: WALL-E by triffid_98 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I am perhaps China's worst nightmare, outside of the great orange one. I'm fairly handy and I use "The power of Grayskull...I mean Craigslist/eBay before buying new things".

      The problem is that parts availability for most old repairable things is fading fast. There is only so much welding and epoxy can do. Eventually you need repair parts and they're largely gone for the old stuff. There are exceptions (you can buy replacements for pretty much anything on a 1960s era Ford Mustang) but in most cases you're going to be SOL at some point because some stupid little $2 part breaks 30 years after the fact. When the modern equivalent can't even last 10 that makes me a saaaad panda. That said, I still have many perfectly functional mechanical things dating back to well before I was alive and electronics dating back to 1977, many of which have required no repairs ever. They just work.

      No matter how many baby seals (zero) were clubbed to death to make these things how can you imagine an "environmentally friendly" modern equivalent is actually friendlier than a thing that (given a few replacement parts) will literally last forever?

      That's not to say that everything lasted forever in the "before time" but you had a choice. You could buy cheap garbage or things that cost a bit more and would last. Now you can spend infinity dollars and still end up with stuff that won't last.

    15. Re:WALL-E by iampiti · · Score: 1

      Yup. I can't count the number of in ear headphones I've gone through in the last 10 years. And I don't buy the absolutely cheapest stuff you can buy. Sadly, going up somewhat in price doesn't always seem to mean more durability.
      Recently I discovered there're in fact in ear headphones with detachable cables (not just DJ style as you mentioned) and I'm gonna try that route and see how it works.

    16. Re:WALL-E by TFloore · · Score: 1

      It's NOT an issue of bias in only looking at examples where old shit happened to last a long time. That's what the person I replied to claimed. It's horse shit. If that were the case, and new shit lasts just as long or longer than old shit, then the typical experience of someone with long-lived old things would be that the new shit is better. That's not the typical experience. If it were, people wouldn't bitch about new shit not lasting long.

      I actually wonder about this a little, but not necessarily from the point of view you might think.

      My parents got a washer/dryer set when they got married. The washer lasted about 22 years, the dryer lasted about 31 years. They were Maytags, which, 45 years ago, was a high-quality high-cost American brand. Maytag as a company/brand has been bought and sold about 5 times since then, and they are no longer a high-quality brand, nor are they an American brand any more, really.

      I bought a house about 15 years ago, and bought a washer and dryer at the same time. Reasonable mid-range Maytags, actually (even though, even at the time, the brand wasn't what it once was). The dryer got replaced after about 11 years (after the third repair on it for a rusted drum roller, DIY repair cost about $20). Replaced it with an LG. The washer got replaced after 15 years, don't remember what I replaced it with, I think an inexpensive GE. I don't expect to get 15 years from either one.

      Yeah, I complain that stuff doesn't last as long as it used to. But...

      Part of that, really, is that the market has changed, and there is more low-end short-term crap available. This distorts the market, and makes it harder to be an informed consumer. It is harder to filter out the crap and only buy the high-quality stuff, and, frankly, because it is harder, the sales volumes for the high-quality stuff is lower, and therefore the unit costs go up even more, making the high-quality stuff even more expensive than it otherwise would "need" to be.

      How many people are still willing to buy the high-end high-quality high-cost items that should last a long time? Fewer as a percentage of population than 40 years ago? How many of those (like me) are turned off by the high-tech crap that is needlessly added to appliances? (I avoided a washing machine with an LCD touchscreen display, because I don't expect that to work for 10+ years, and, frankly, I want real buttons. That touchscreen model was $300 more than what looked like an equivalent model with buttons. Was there a quality increase included with that $300 that wasn't appearent, that I missed out on becuase I didn't want the touchscreen? I doubt it, but how would I know?)

      I do wonder if the problem isn't that good-quality stuff isn't around, it is just that the consumer can't tell the difference with all the identically-marketted cheap crap that floods the shelves and the Amazon pages. Read the user/buyer comments on the pages at Amazon, it helps avoid some of the crap... but not all of it.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is... Oops. Frank, I've got your sig again! Where's mine?
    17. Re:WALL-E by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Very true, but was there ever a time that more expensive meant better? I feel like there might have been, but not for at least 20 years. Alot of upscale devices are manufactured the same as cheap junk and just get a different label.

    18. Re:WALL-E by Methadras · · Score: 1

      High tarriffs on many incoming chinese goods should do that.

    19. Re: WALL-E by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I am perhaps China's worst nightmare, outside of the great orange one

      Oh they secretly love that guy: he demonstrates a big down-side of democracy daily.

    20. Re:WALL-E by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      When I was a kid I repaired several sets of headphones. For me the wire tended to break near the plug, probably from being bent when used with a walkman in a pocket. Amputate just above the break and solder a new one on that you bought from Radio Shack for less than a packet of chewing gum.

      Then unsolder it and do it again because you forgot to thread the cable through the screw-on shell first, doh!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  2. space by bobmagicii · · Score: 1

    trash in orbit sucks for things in orbit, but it would be kind of amusing if space-x started launching trash rockets into the sun or something.

    1. Re:space by bobmagicii · · Score: 1

      double amusing if one exploded mid-launch once. surely that would have to happen at least once.

    2. Re:space by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You slay you...somebody ought to.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    3. Re:space by The+Fat+Bastard · · Score: 1, Interesting

      SpaceX already runs a trash service. The ISS astronauts put trash into the supply capsule for disposal in the South Pacfic.

  3. Burn it by DigiShaman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No, really. The recycle process is as follows - Reduce, Reuse, Recycle (in that order).

    No one cares to reduce or reuse. Ok, fine. Then recycle it back to usable form of energy; burn it!

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
    1. Re:Burn it by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      About all you can do with mixed plastics. What are they going to do, fractional distillation?

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:Burn it by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      As much as it makes me cringe, I agree that it is about the only solution at this point. Good news is it is higher energy content than food waste.

      As long as there is proper waste gas treatment, I'll have to live with it. I really wish I didn't need as much single-use plastic packaging as I get stuck with though.

    3. Re:Burn it by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

      You know, lots of people want to ban plastic bags. Truth is, I recycle them to collect and throw out my garbage. It saves me from buying actual garbage bags which would end up in the landfill anyways.

      As for packaging material, and temporary food holding, I could care less if it's paper or not. Plastic used for packaging material is wasteful if biodegradable options exist. And hey, if you can make my plastic bags biodegradable too, I'm cool with that.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    4. Re:Burn it by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      What are they going to do, fractional distillation?

      You mean something like thermal depolymerization?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    5. Re:Burn it by Woldscum · · Score: 4, Interesting

      One company uses 70%+ of all the bags recycled in the US. They claim the average deck uses 140K bags.

      https://www.trex.com/why-trex/...

    6. Re:Burn it by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Now you've got mixed monomers, still worthless except as fuel, would have been cheaper to just burn it.

      The problem is _mixed_ plastics.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    7. Re:Burn it by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      My next deck rebuild might be that. While it is a special order for both my local Lowes and Home Depot, I'll definitely get a sample of it before I start the project. Though I have a feeling it be expensive as hell, and I'm not sure it's worth the investment for the home i'm currently in. But, it definitely looks like a premium product that will last.

      Too bad there isn't that kind of material used as a substitute for standard fence pickets. I'm about to redo my fence because it was originally builder grade el-cheapo material (none treated wood).

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    8. Re:Burn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      in australia, they mix it with tar, and make new roads that are 60% plastic, and last longer too, if theres one place you want plastic to last for 1000s of years, is a damn road.

    9. Re:Burn it by weberjn · · Score: 1

      Better burn plastic than oil, gas or coal.

    10. Re:Burn it by Xest · · Score: 1

      You'd need to integrate this with something like CCS to prevent even more pollutants being shit out into the atmosphere though no?

      Not that I'm saying that isn't a viable solution, but for whatever reason CCS still seems to be very much in it's infancy despite being hyped for a couple of decades now.

    11. Re:Burn it by coofercat · · Score: 1

      I recently tried to make some raised beds in the garden. I figured I'd make them out of plastic so they don't rot - and sure enough, you can buy wood-substitute plastic planks in various widths, thicknesses and lengths. The trouble is, they work out about four times as expensive as the (treated) wood alternative. Even factoring in lifetime and replacements, they're still somewhere close to twice as expensive.

      That said, plastic planks do have their uses - one use I have coming up is in a shed which has a concrete floor. I'll use the plastic planks as batten upon which to fix the wall panels. The plastic will provide a DPC and avoids needing a 'sacrificial' wood batten at the bottom of the wall panels (and avoids needing some silicon to seal up the bottom of the batten too).

      So... I'd love to see more plastic planks - so many that the price comes down to something in the range of 1.5-2 times (per metre) of the wood equivalent. They're made (I believe) of mixed plastics which get chopped up and glued/melted together.

    12. Re:Burn it by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Do they still cost more if you factor in the value of your time in rebuilding them every few years?

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    13. Re:Burn it by thegarbz · · Score: 3, Informative

      in australia, they mix it with tar,

      No they don't. There are precisely 300meters worth of roads in Australia made with recycled plastic as a technology trial that one small startup did this year. I'll get to why below:

      and make new roads that are 60% plastic, and last longer too, if theres one place you want plastic to last for 1000s of years, is a damn road.

      All roads are made up of a large portion of plastic. However none of it is recycled. The quality of the plastic is precisely controlled and adjusted to suit the conditions of the road surface, both in load, preparation and environment. Also roads break down due to wear and external damage. All roads would last a shitload of time if people didn't drive on them, and if they weren't subjected to extreme temperature changes. It is incredibly hard to make roads to suit conditions which is precisely why the formulation doesn't rely on just recycling some garbage, but rather is a tightly controlled mix of polymers to suit the product.

      There's something strange about talking about plastic waste that brings out some wild theories.

  4. Send it to Sweden by xpiotr · · Score: 4, Informative

    They are running out of garbage, for real.
    In the end they will burn it controlled for heating.
    https://www.independent.co.uk/...

    1. Re:Send it to Sweden by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      They are running out of garbage, for real.

      Sweden has built a very successful export business with its garbage. What do you think all that IKEA paperboard and plasticboard is made of . . . ? That's why they are running out of it.

      If you are brave, daring and unafraid, take your chainsaw to your "Billy" bookcase, and see for yourself what's inside . . .

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re:Send it to Sweden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Swedish garbage recycling has nothing to do with IKEA furniture made in the US and/or Vietnam (that's the two countries that I see listed most often on IKEA products sold in the US). Particle board is also not made of plastics, that would be impractically heavy and require a totally different kind of glue. And when something they sell is made of recycled material, that fact is proudly displayed in their marketing. This idea that they would hide recycled material inside their products unbeknownst to the customer is hilarious.

    3. Re:Send it to Sweden by suss · · Score: 1

      Sweden will not just take any of your garbage, it has to be presorted by quality, and that costs money. The UK is not willing to spend that extra money and now they're complaining nobody will take their low quality trash for a few pennies a tonne.

    4. Re:Send it to Sweden by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Somehow that seems worse than dumping it in a big hole.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    5. Re:Send it to Sweden by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      If you are brave, daring and unafraid, take your chainsaw to your "Billy" bookcase, and see for yourself what's inside . . .

      You don't need to be anything to take a chainsaw to your Billy bookcase. Though if you want to make something practical out of it like I did I suggest using a jigsaw or something with more finesse than a chainsaw. What's inside it? Depending on when you bought it you're either looking at chipboard or more recently a low density wooden honeycomb which they introduced to reduce wood use while maintaining strength.

      Now onto your conspiracy theory: IKEA has several products that are made out of waste, all of them are either rubber (their desk protectors) or made into solid pressed plastic like that single kitchen test example they produced, or that single chair that they sell.

      What are IKEA's paperboards made of? Recycled paper. What is plasticboard made of? Normal non-recycled plastic on the otherside with a similar honeycomb weave on the inside.

      Please leave your crazy conspiracy theories at the door. Sweden is running out of garbage due to strict laws that made it almost impossible to generate heating and energy from other fossil fuels which spurred development in the energy sector that spiked the garbage and recycling demand well beyond supply. They sure as heck don't stuff it in IKEA furniture.

  5. Did they ever solve it? by alvinrod · · Score: 2

    I'm not sure to what extend they were really "solving" the problem. I'm guessing that a lot of what gets sent to China for recycling ends up in a landfill where it's out of sight and mind from the Western world. As China continues to industrialize and build its economy they're probably running out of cheap labor that can handle it, whether that means actually recycling it or just finding somewhere to bury or dump it.

    On the other hand, we might eventually not want to recycle all of our plastic. Eventually we'll stop burning oil and other fossil fuels (as we move to solar and electric power for more and more things) and plastic is a convenient way to sequester carbon. We could even bury it in old mine shafts or find other places to store it where it won't leach into the ground water or get eaten by marine wildlife. Presumably we'll even start scrubbing it from the atmosphere, but we have to do something with it.

    1. Re:Did they ever solve it? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm not sure to what extend they were really "solving" the problem. I'm guessing that a lot of what gets sent to China for recycling ends up in a landfill where it's out of sight and mind from the Western world.

      This is basically the current situation with electronic waste - it is shipped to third-world countries for "reprocessing". Once it arrives there, any recyclable components may or may not be removed before the carcass is dumped in whatever spot is most convenient.

      When one of those countries closes its borders to additional trash (as has happened here, with plastics), then the source countries start looking for another third-world country they can pay to receive it rather than spend the money to truly address the problem.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  6. Dirty! by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    But in November 2017, China said enough. The country closed its doors to contaminated plastic,

    Which from what I've read is the problem. China is sick of our soiled plastic waste. I mean ffs people, we had one job, clean up the waste so it's not disgusting and China would take it on the cheap. But NOOOOOO, lazy fucking Americans can't even be bothered to rinse stuff off and make their garbage slightly more appealing.

    Well, guess what, they're are sick of it and I don't blame them. And you can bet the other countries taking plastic now, they won't put up with it for very long either. Clean it up, or bury it in your own fucking backyard.

    1. Re:Dirty! by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2

      Not actually the problem; it isn't individual plastics being contaminated but rather the joke of "single stream" recycling. A couple things in a truckload of recyclables can contaminate it sufficiently that it isn't worth sorting. At those kinds of numbers the answer is to get rid of single use plastics (and papers).

    2. Re:Dirty! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But NOOOOOO, lazy fucking Americans can't even be bothered to rinse stuff off

      My city told me to not rinse stuff, because it wastes water. I do put stuff with significant food residue in the dish washer, which is much more water efficient than rinsing. One reference, you can find lots more with a quick search.

    3. Re:Dirty! by Daralantan · · Score: 1

      I seem to recall this popping up before with them originally saying no to the UK. I don't think this is "stupid dirty Americans are ruining it for the world"? Maybe "stupid dirty humans"?

  7. Plastic OUT, Plastic IN by devslash0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Somehow they don't see a problem with exporting all that plastic in the form of cheap toys and electronics in the first place, eh? Man up, show some responsibility and start dealing with the problem you yourself have created.

    1. Re:Plastic OUT, Plastic IN by nnet · · Score: 1

      Western demand for cheap shit isn't their fault. Thats like blaming drug cartels for Western drug problems. Remove the demand, then we'll talk.

    2. Re:Plastic OUT, Plastic IN by devslash0 · · Score: 1

      There is much truth in what you said about demand but, surely, drugs are different? While the demand for consumer electronics, toys and other useful or otherwise beneficial items made of plastic comes from customers themselves (ok, with a little bit of marketing), the demand for drugs, which are generally harmful, comes mostly from dealer hooking up customers.

    3. Re:Plastic OUT, Plastic IN by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      Somehow they don't see a problem with exporting all that plastic in the form of cheap toys and electronics in the first place, eh? Man up, show some responsibility and start dealing with the problem you yourself have created.

      Think about that a moment. Sure they send toys, electronics... that if I were to melt them the toys I gave my kids down would easily fit into a 5 gallon can. On the other hand the bottled water dumbasses keep consuming because they somehow don't want tap water is staggering. Ever check out the grocery store? I was just at one that they had so many bottles it's in the bulk section and out into the isle nearly blocking it and more in the back. So many people frightened to use tap water.

  8. How many Americans is that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "That's as if every human on Earth contributed a quarter of their body mass"

    A more relevant analogy would be to say something like "as if every American contributed an elephants worth of plastic...cause they probably do". I doubt the 2-3 billion people living in poverty are contributing anywhere near as much as my neighbors who manage to fill 2 96 gallon bins every week.

    1. Re:How many Americans is that? by Luckyo · · Score: 4, Informative

      When it comes to plastic waste, the opposite is actually true. This is because most of such waste is packaging.

      If you were to ever go to a market in poor countries, one of the first things you'll note is that when you buy your daily products, they come in daily doses, packaged as such. Tiny shampoo packages, tiny soap packages, tiny deodorant, etc. Even food is commonly sold packaged as "this is your portion for the next meal".

      This is because people in poor countries can't afford to pay for a bottle that will last them a month. That's a month you have to pay up front. Poor overwhelmingly live day to day, and products are portioned to match this need.

      So for the same amount of product, you get order(s) of magnitude more plastic waste. Which is why the plastic garbage problem is far worse in Pacific and primarily originates from poor countries on the West end of Pacific.

  9. Because China has enough of it by hackingbear · · Score: 5, Informative

    Why would China allow importing other countries' garbage? That would amount to treason. That's because it was the WTO concession imposed upon China in exchange for them getting access to the world market at lower tariff. So while we are complaining "unfair trade" with China and ridiculing their environment problem, we must feel shameful about ourselves -- China (and other poor third world countries) had to sell out their environment in order to survive economically while we have ripped the benefits of a clean environment, something that our politicians and media never want to mention. Get down from your moral high horse!

  10. I hate plastic by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I hate plastic. The feel of it, the look of it, how quickly it breaks down with use. I've been slowly and surely eliminating plastic wares from my life for years. Moving to metal mixing bowls, glass bowls for storing things instead of tupperware, saving and re-using glass jars for storage instead of ziplock bags. I have a stainless steel milkshake cup I use for most of my beverages, instead of the typical american giant plastic cup with a sports team name on it. You know, simple changes.
    The main thing that spurred all this was probably a mixing bowl.
    I had a set of white plastic mixing bowls, and at some point I had to store some tomato based pasta sauce in one, after which, no matter how much I washed it, it was forever tinted orange. It just looked gross, and sparked the realization that; if the damn plastic bowl was so porous as to be permanently stained by tomato sauce, what the hell else might it have soaked up, and/or leached out of it?
    After that, whenever I get a chance, I buy a stainless steel or glass version. Sure, costs more and will take longer to acquire some items, but I figure its worth it.
    It all reminds me of the humorous observation:
    At what point, did drilling an oil well in the middle east, pumping out that oil, putting the oil on a ship, sail that oil filled ship across the ocean, unloading the oil in America, piping it to a refinery, refining it into some form of plastic, trucking that plastic to a factory, forming that plastic into an object, boxing that object up, putting that box into another truck and trucking it to a warehouse, then from the warehouse to a store, from the store to your house, to be opened, used once, and then thrown away, ALL BECOME EASYER THAN WASHING THE FUCKING FORK.

    --
    I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    1. Re:I hate plastic by avandesande · · Score: 1

      I am similar only need to take out the trash bin to the curb every 3rd or 4th week if I do it sooner it's because it is starting to stink. I used to have an obese family that lived across the street would put two bins out every week and they were usually overflowing.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    2. Re:I hate plastic by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      I like the way you think. I use metal utensils for eating, bamboo utensils for cooking, metal mixing bowls and glass containers for storage.

      I do use paper plates and bowls sometimes, but they go in the compost pile. Nearly everything except meat scraps and oils can be composted.

      The only problem I have right now is that I'm up to my ass in empty Amazon boxes. They're a pain to break down and put in the recycling bin, but if I don't catch up soon they'll bury me!

    3. Re:I hate plastic by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

      At what point, did drilling an oil well in the middle east, pumping out that oil, putting the oil on a ship, sail that oil filled ship across the ocean, unloading the oil in America, piping it to a refinery, refining it into some form of plastic, trucking that plastic to a factory, forming that plastic into an object, boxing that object up, putting that box into another truck and trucking it to a warehouse, then from the warehouse to a store, from the store to your house, to be opened, used once, and then thrown away, ALL BECOME EASYER THAN WASHING THE FUCKING FORK.

      When minimum wage was enacted. Not saying we should drop minimum wage. Europe's solution is to make people pay the entire cost of disposing of that plastic fork. That makes it cheaper to pay somebody to wash dishes.

      --
      Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    4. Re:I hate plastic by willy_me · · Score: 2

      if the damn plastic bowl was so porous as to be permanently stained by tomato sauce, what the hell else might it have soaked up, and/or leached out of it?

      All plastic is porous - if not washed right away it eventually absorbs whatever it is in contact with. Interesting fact, you know PEX water pipe that is used in newer house builds? It is made of plastic and works great. However, standard PEX is not used for in-floor heating applications. The reason why is that oxygen can travel though the PEX and cause rust within the closed heating system. To prevent this they use a PEX that contains a internal layer of aluminum foil. Because to stop oxygen (or any other gas), you can not rely on plastic.

    5. Re:I hate plastic by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Minimum wage was implemented back before plastics were common. America was late to the party, introducing it (nationally) in '38, 40 years after Australia.
      Earlier, like in 1349, there were maximum wage laws. Just because the labourers were mostly wiped out by the black death, didn't mean paying them more, no matter how much the peasants thought otherwise.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    6. Re:I hate plastic by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      This is also the reason for sell-by dates on bottled water. The water slowly escapes from the bottle while it sits on the shelf, through the plastic. It's so slow that it doesn't cause puddles or anything, but after some years the amount of water in the bottle is less than the advertised 2L or whatever and can't be sold at full price any more.

      It also tastes of plastic by that point but that isn't a legal problem.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:I hate plastic by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      I would not say it is totally commonplace, but It does happen. Sadly, more in lower income households than elsewhere.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    8. Re:I hate plastic by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      The touch, the feel, of plastic. The fabric of our lives.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    9. Re:I hate plastic by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      At what point, did drilling an oil well in the middle east, pumping out that oil, putting the oil on a ship, sail that oil filled ship across the ocean, unloading the oil in America, piping it to a refinery, refining it into some form of plastic, trucking that plastic to a factory, forming that plastic into an object, boxing that object up, putting that box into another truck and trucking it to a warehouse, then from the warehouse to a store, from the store to your house, to be opened, used once, and then thrown away, ALL BECOME EASYER THAN WASHING THE FUCKING FORK.

      When minimum wage was enacted. Not saying we should drop minimum wage. Europe's solution is to make people pay the entire cost of disposing of that plastic fork. That makes it cheaper to pay somebody to wash dishes.

      I doubt that. If the costs of washing something are greater than using disposable and just carrying out the trash at minimum wage, they will still be be at pretty much any other pay rate too. The labor of washing is always going to be more than just taking out the trash. When the price of disposable forks undercuts the costs of real forks, washing apparatus, and shop space for both is when disposable comes first. Especially considering that disposable forks must be kept around and stored anyway for take out foods as well as when dish washers break down (as somebody that has had that job, this happens a lot). Then there are other factors that come into play such as presentation. Especially in fast food, brand new disposable will appear more appealing and result in more return customers than presenting beat up industrial metal forks. Let's also not forget the costs of those forks being tossed out by customers who just don't care that much. Even in nice restaurants (especially in nice restaurants), dishware being tossed out by mistake (or stolen) is an issue.

    10. Re:I hate plastic by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      Well depends. There's nothing like feeling a pair of nylons on my wife.

  11. It's time to dump CCC! by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Cheap Chinese Crap needs to go!

    1. Re:It's time to dump CCC! by evil_aaronm · · Score: 2

      There would be no cheap Chinese crap if people didn't buy it.

  12. When we got a big problem... by hackingbear · · Score: 1

    ... we think of China?

    Are we just wishing them death nowaday?

  13. Far more concerned about CHina's dumping by WindBourne · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Look at the MONSTER plastic reef in the oceans. China is #1 nation with tagged plastic in it. IOW, they continue to dump their plastics into the ocean. Like CO2 and air pollution, this needs to stop. Hopefully, we will see china dumping less plastics into the oceans, while the other nations (dominantly western nations) clean up their own act.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re: Far more concerned about CHina's dumping by WindBourne · · Score: 1
      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  14. we need to find a way to recycle it by FudRucker · · Score: 2

    i seen where shredded plastic was mixed with hot asphalt and roads and parking lots paved with it, i seen where old tires were converted in to rubber mats of various sizes. so with a little imagination i am sure plastic can be recycled in to something usable

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  15. Awesome! by dbrueck · · Score: 2

    I love reports like this. Some people are going to say that government regulation is the way to go and that people should cut back on consumption, etc. Maybe that's true to some extent, I dunno.

    But really, I hope most people see this as a huge opportunity and that it lures creative entrepreneurs. That's how these problems are most effectively solved, and somebody is going to get absurdly rich off it, and I'm excited to see what they come up with. Don't bury it, don't send it to the sun, but find some way to make it useful again.

  16. I guarantee the plastic will have somewhere to go. by Distan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    > Between now and 2030, 111 million metric tons of trash -- straws, bags, water bottles -- will have nowhere to go

    Unless the laws of conservation of mass are to be repealed I guarantee that plastic will go somewhere. Therefore, by definition, it will have somewhere to go.

  17. Start injecting deep into the earths crust by bonedonut · · Score: 1

    So it can turn back into oil.

  18. Um... is that safe? by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    not a chemist, but it doesn't sound particularly safe. Don't most plastics have additives in them?

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Um... is that safe? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      For that exact reason you use scrubber technology with your incinerators.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  19. Thank god! by Darkling-MHCN · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If solving the world's plastic problems meant dumping it in the Yangtze river thank god!

    The out of sight out of mind policies of 1st world countries, off loading their environmental responsibilities on to countries that are least able to deal with it has to stop, it's an hypocrisy the world's ecosystem can no longer afford

  20. Thermal depolymerization by Iamthecheese · · Score: 1

    It's a solved problem The only problem with it is the solution is a tiny bit more expensive than people want, and it stinks. This isn't a plastic problem, this is a choice people don't want to make.

    --
    If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
  21. Re:Steven Burn by another_twilight · · Score: 1

    Yes, I asked you to provide a link or proof to Steven Burn saying he recommends your software. You didn't

    I followed your link. None of them are Steve Burn.

    So we come back to my initial point that you've failed to disprove

    Malwarebytes describes APKs software as 'small'. Similar software is 'small' and 'useful', but APK is just small. Not useful.
    APKs software isn't useful - just ask Malwarebytes. APK thinks this is a 'RECOMMENDATION'

    Shall I add

    APK claims Steve Burn recommends him, but can't prove it

    I have no idea what you mean in your next lines. It's not english. It's some kind of word salad. Try again. In english.
    No, I'm not a webmaster. I'm a slashdot user who is tired of your spam and ridiculous claims.

    I don't need to cut you down. You can't even provide proof that Steve Burn recommends you. All you have is a list of about a dozen quotes, taken out of context, from nearly a decade on this site. FFS, HomelessInLaJolla got better press.

  22. why? by sad_ · · Score: 1

    why do they keep shipping garbage (not just plastic, but everything) to the other side of the world?
    we know how to recycle ALL THESE THINGS! it's a solved problem, for years.
    i get that it is cheaper, but it doesn't solve anything, the garbage is still there, how short-sighted must you be not to realise that?
    It's only cheaper now, it will be more expensive to deal with it later.

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  23. one quarter by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

    That's as if every human on Earth contributed a quarter of their body mass in mostly single-use plastic polymers to a massive, abandoned pile of garbage.

    Yikes, I might produce that much every year. I really gotta cut back.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  24. Re-branding by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Sadly much/most of the companies that made quality things that last went out of business because they couldn't compete with the cheap crap. So now everything is crap. Worse is that no matter where you buy now, it all comes from the same place, is all made by the same people, it is just re-branded six ways from Sunday. It is pretty obvious to look around and find the exact same widget or bobbet and apart from some logo or whatnot is the exact same item being sold from china. Buying from a "quality" store you just pay for the brand and a massive markup.

  25. "international cities"? by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

    What's this "international cities"? Places like Detroit-Windsor, McAllen-Reynosa? El Paso-Juarez?

    --
    There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.