Slashdot Mirror


Firefox 61 Arrives With Better Search, Tab Warming, and Accessibility Tools Inspector (venturebeat.com)

On Tuesday, Mozilla released Firefox 61, the newest version of its web browser for Windows, Mac, Linux, and Android platforms. The release builds on Firefox Quantum, which the company calls "by far the biggest update since Firefox 1.0 in 2004." VentureBeat: Version 61 brings TLS 1.3, the ability to add custom search engines to the location bar, tab warming, retained display lists, WebExtension tab management, and the Accessibility Tools Inspector. Mozilla doesn't break out the exact numbers for Firefox, though the company does say "half a billion people around the world" use the browser. In other words, it's a major platform that web developers have to consider.

287 comments

  1. How much more electricity will "tab warming" use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean the power supply is already just barely handling what has to do.

  2. Tab warming? by 110010001000 · · Score: 2

    I am guessing this means "preloading tabs"? Ugh. Just stop already.

    1. Re:Tab warming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, just faster switching between tabs. The rendering engine starts the process of rendering the next tab as soon as your mouse begins to hover over it

    2. Re:Tab warming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there's an addon called "load tab on select" that doesn't any content from new tabs until you click them

      i really wonder how this tab warming bullshit will affect it

    3. Re:Tab warming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      no, just faster switching between tabs. The rendering engine starts the process of rendering the next tab as soon as your mouse begins to hover over it

      So the tab doesn't actually get any warmer? How am I supposed to start a tab in the winter?

    4. Re:Tab warming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      no, just faster switching between tabs. The rendering engine starts the process of rendering the next tab as soon as your mouse begins to hover over it

      I switch tabs with the keyboard, you insensitive clod.

    5. Re:Tab warming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am guessing this means "preloading tabs"? Ugh. Just stop already.

      It's sort of preloading, but maybe not like what you are thinking. From the article: "Next up, Firefox 61 introduces tab warming, a fancy way of saying speedier response times when switching between tabs. The performance gains are possible because Firefox is now preemptively loading tabs when you hover over them." (emphasis mine)

    6. Re:Tab warming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What would have been better is having the ability to put the tabs on the side.

      That and getting rid of the Pocket spyware.

    7. Re:Tab warming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      That and getting rid of the Pocket spyware.

      Disable Pocket for Firefox

      If you prefer not to use Pocket for Firefox, follow these steps to disable it:

          - In the address bar, type about:config and press Enter.
                      The about:config "This might void your warranty!" warning page may appear. Click I accept the risk! to continue to the about:config page.
          - Type pocket in the Search box above the list of preferences.
          - Double-click the extensions.pocket.enabled preference to toggle its value to false.

      Note: Disabling Pocket does not remove Recommended by Pocket entries, if present, on the New Tab page. If you would also like to remove those Pocket recommendations, click the cogwheel at the top right corner of the New Tab page and uncheck Recommended by Pocket. See Hide or display content in New Tab for more information.

    8. Re:Tab warming? by Bradmont · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is what I do to. My first reaction after looking up the buzzword was, "People use the mouse to change tabs?"

    9. Re:Tab warming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm all for keyboard shortcuts, but the web is overwhelmingly point and click.

    10. Re: Tab warming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. Btw, the addon "treestyle tabs" puts the tabs on the side.

    11. Re:Tab warming? by Teun · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Indeed we use the mouse to switch tabs, how else to quickly jump from tab 14 to tab 48?

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    12. Re:Tab warming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I made a small program that hooks the event loop and allows me to press ctrl+alt+m then generate mouse movement events with the arrow keys... I'd post code, but, er, it's part of a small "proprietary" Remote Access Tr-uh-Tool...

      ...And that's how I jump between your tab 13 and 42...

    13. Re: Tab warming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None of what you just said stops the Spyware, dipshit.

    14. Re:Tab warming? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      You're assuming that people care about the order through which they access their tabs. Honestly this article was no less interesting than the one about the possibility that we're alone in the universe that I just finished reading. It just happened that the other opened up first when I hit ctrl+4f.

    15. Re:Tab warming? by Rolgar · · Score: 2

      Especially when touching every tab in between will make them all start loading and could bring your machine to a crawl depending on what those tabs are.

    16. Re:Tab warming? by WallyL · · Score: 1

      Easy! In Emacsilla Firefox, just use C-tab, C-N, 48, [enter]!

    17. Re:Tab warming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there any way to stop rendering and javascrip crap running on the tabs which are hidden? Typically I have few dozens of tabs open and at least one CPU is running at 100% load. Having a Adblock+ definitely helps, but still some JS performs spinloops.

  3. Anyone else love pegging? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My personal test case will be with the UniFi 5.7/5.8 Controller web interface page. I've found consistently under the last few versions of Firefox that, while it's fine for at least an hour, if I leave it up constantly for ease of monitoring then after a day or two the Firefox process inevitably ends up pegging an entire core. There is no video whatsoever or any particularly fancy graphical usage, and while they may be doing something odd internally (I haven't had time to really dig into it) I'm not sure Firefox should end up in that state there over time. It's relatively easily repeatable though (will take a day but requires no interaction on my part) so I look forward to testing it. Although if it does resolve the problem I'll be mildly bummed whatever fix it was didn't make it into ESR, but so it goes.

    1. Re:Anyone else love pegging? by Teun · · Score: 1

      It's probably some Java Script going rogue.
      Install the JavaScript toggle and see if this still occurs with JS off.
      YEs it might disable the whole page...

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    2. Re:Anyone else love pegging? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe Firefox feels it's content process little dirty and keeps running garbage collection constantly to get the gift of pegging a core as a reward like a good husband.. I'd start playing with the garbage collection and jits settings first, if the developer tools don't reveal the culprit easily.

    3. Re:Anyone else love pegging? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone else love pegging?

      lay off the soy !

    4. Re:Anyone else love pegging? by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      You can get a Ubiquiti WAP to stay up for an hour? Kudos!

  4. Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what have they removed/broken this time, and what have they added/broken that we need to turn off (like pocket)...?

  5. AWESOMEBAR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    the ability to add custom search engines to the location bar

    Tut tut tut... I believe you mean the AWESOMEBAR.

  6. does TAB MIX PLUS work already ? by gDLL · · Score: 2

    that is what *I* want to know...

  7. Already broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seeing SSL_ERROR_RX_RECORD_TOO_LONG on 40% of the pages I try to use today. Opps.

    1. Re:Already broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Internal sites? Any in particular? I'm not seeing any issues so far and I've tried almost all my bookmarks.

    2. Re:Already broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Internal sites? Any in particular? I'm not seeing any issues so far and I've tried almost all my bookmarks.

      Chrome works fine. Sometimes hitting reload several times works. Happened right after the upgrade.

    3. Re:Already broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you also update the SSL by any chance? It looks like dnscrypt on one of my VM stopped working after I had updated the SSL lib. Haven't tried the new firefox though, still not available for my distro (ubuntu derivative).

    4. Re:Already broken by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      You can just download the tarball and use that until Ubuntu gets the update.

      https://support.mozilla.org/en...

      It will use the same config you currently have so no loss in bookmarks, logins, etc.

      Ubuntu gives some more complex instructions in case you want to make sure to back up your firefox profile first
      https://help.ubuntu.com/commun...

  8. Last version of 52ESR by xack · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Anyone who needs 52ESR will be out of luck soon as its the last patch cycle. Those with Windows XP, XUL and NPAPI requirements are affected. Also Chrome is discontinuing Marvericks support, which also throws perfectly working Macs into the trash. Don’t give me the “it’s old” spiel, Mavericks is less than 5 years old.

    1. Re:Last version of 52ESR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      RIP Firefox. Nearing time to drown your sorry Chrome-clone ass. Long live Waterfox under a Pale Moon.

    2. Re:Last version of 52ESR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Question, why haven't you upgraded your OS? You can upgrade 2009+ macs all the way up to 10.12 and 2007+ macs to 10.11. Do you have a system that's using POWER or one of those first gen Intel machines that Apple produced, because outside of those two, you should at the very least be able to upgrade to 10.11.

    3. Re:Last version of 52ESR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I too support projects with unskilled developers numbering in the single digits.

    4. Re:Last version of 52ESR by TheDarkener · · Score: 1

      Good, that's how big projects start out.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    5. Re:Last version of 52ESR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don’t give me the “it’s old” spiel, Mavericks is less than 5 years old.

      It's tech, everyone assumes that if it's more than 6 months old, that it's full of security vulnerabilities and that no sane person would touch it with a 1000ft pole.

      Of course you're right to complain about the idiot masses being trained this way, but you're barking at the abyss because no one is going to even remotely show any form of sympathy or care for your argument. Welcome to Idiocracy, we're not watering crops with Brawndo yet, but give it time. We have all of the narcissism and ignorance needed to get there. With the mountainous trash piles being made as we speak.

    6. Re:Last version of 52ESR by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      If Apple doesn't want to support those Macs anymore, why should anyone else?

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    7. Re:Last version of 52ESR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vista and Windows Server 2008 as well.

    8. Re:Last version of 52ESR by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      throws perfectly working Macs into the trash

      Hey, I have a Tiger machine that runs TenFourFox just fine* on PPC G5. But anyway, install Debian on the Mac, don't trash it. Apple is very clear that you get only so long on their software and then you're expected to be back at the Apple Store - it's not reasonable to expect Mozilla to support software that even Apple has abandoned.

      * 40% CPU with just one simple lowendmac.com page open even with UBO running ... just in case you thought Firefox didn't have any more optimization to do.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    9. Re:Last version of 52ESR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We still have Netscape

    10. Re:Last version of 52ESR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Waterfox. 64 bit port that forked and retained the good bits of the old versions while still importing the new updates you want.

    11. Re:Last version of 52ESR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How important are the patches if you block most scripts and ads?

    12. Re:Last version of 52ESR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iirc, the seamonkey developers already announced that they will be switching to quantum and web extensions when the code they work from (firefox esr builds) changes

    13. Re:Last version of 52ESR by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      > Don’t give me the “it’s old” spiel, Mavericks is less than 5 years old.

      It's not so much that it's old, but it no longer receives security updates.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    14. Re:Last version of 52ESR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hopefully they won't fuck up the interface and depreciate the options we still have.

    15. Re: Last version of 52ESR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Big projects with absolutely no hope for developer revenue always die this way.

    16. Re:Last version of 52ESR by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      > Chrome is discontinuing Marvericks support, which also throws perfectly working Macs into the trash

      --That's a bit harsh. You can still run Mav without Chrome (Firefox still works), and dual-boot Linux. I'm running a 2008 iMac Aluminum with El Capitan 10.11 right now -- you want them to keep supporting stuff more than 10 years? Volunteer to fork the code.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    17. Re:Last version of 52ESR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be better to really upgrade by installing another operating system. Those machines will run Linux and will be supported for a very, very long time. You could even install Windows and likely be supported for as long as you'd want to keep using that hardware.

  9. Marketing speak by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

    "... the company does say "half a billion people around the world" use the browser. In other words, it's a major platform that web developers have to consider...."

    Web developers will more than likely consider browsers that have significant (i.e., > 15-20%) market share, not one that is hyped up by its developers.

    1. Re:Marketing speak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If 15% is your cutoff, only Chrome will count: http://gs.statcounter.com/browser-market-share

    2. Re:Marketing speak by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

      ...If 15% is your cutoff,...

      Wow, Firefox is less than 6%? No wonder the web developers seem to ignore its existence.

      .

    3. Re:Marketing speak by SeaFox · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If 15% is your cutoff, only Chrome will count: http://gs.statcounter.com/browser-market-share

      Yeah... that's pretty much how they think.

    4. Re:Marketing speak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Chrome fanbois?? Now I've seen it all.

    5. Re:Marketing speak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how many people block all use of statcounter? I did what? around 2001 I think.
      It is and pretty well always has been very inaccurate.
      I almost only use Firefox. The only exception is to use Safari when having to use Google.
      I would not touch Chrome even if you paid me. IMHO, it is nothing more than a data slurp engine for Google.

    6. Re:Marketing speak by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2

      Exactly. Firefox fans might like to think that "it's a major platform that web developers have to consider." Sadly, my analytics disagree. For example, I just checked a leisure-related B2C site I run. Mobile is dominant in this market, so the main Android and iOS browsers rank highest as you'd expect. Of the desktop browsers, Chrome is biggest with nearly half the market share, and most of the rest is split between Safari and IE+Edge between them. Firefox comes just above the 1% mark looking at all traffic.

      I'm sorry to see things going this way, because Safari is like the new IE and I don't think it's healthy for the future of the Web for Google to have so much influence. But the reality is that for sites like this, Firefox is not even close to being a major platform, and since we have bills to pay, our development effort has to follow the user base.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    7. Re:Marketing speak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're in the comments on every article that mentions Firefox.

    8. Re:Marketing speak by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

      ...Chrome fanbois?? ...

      Quite the opposite, actually. I'm sure you'd like to think that everyone who offers critique of Firefox is a Chrome fanboi, but that is nothing more than an error on your part.

    9. Re:Marketing speak by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

      ...I'm sorry to see things going this way,...

      That's my sentiment as well. Firefox's downfall started when the developers started to ignore what Firefox users wanted, and killed off a lot of functionality that Firefox once had, while bloating it with un-asked-for bloat.

  10. Firebug? by TJHook3r · · Score: 2

    C'mon, how about some better Dev tools please?

    1. Re:Firebug? by bjdevil66 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Former Firebug user here: No, the Firebug replacement doesn't have the community extensions that made Firebug better, but I've found that the built-in Firefox replacement has come around to where it's solid enough as a replacement. And it's definitely not as buggy as Firebug was at times.

      The tradeoff of a few extra add-ons for the speed and better stability is a fair tradeoff, IMO.

  11. I object to tab warming by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    If my years in the Canadian Army taught me anything, it's that tab warming leads to tab fires.

    Think of the poor tabs, you filthy Americans!

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:I object to tab warming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you talking about the soda, "Tab"? If so, it's ok to drink it warm you commie bastard! :-P

    2. Re:I object to tab warming by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Only because the Canadian version of Tab has real sugar, not that fake corn stuff you use

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    3. Re:I object to tab warming by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2

      (I should point out the Canadian version of Tab is made from real maple sugar and baby seal hearts)

      (and Canadians are socialists, not commies, there's a difference)

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    4. Re:I object to tab warming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If my years in the Canadian Army taught me anything, it's that tab warming leads to tab fires.

      You're rubbing it wrong.

    5. Re:I object to tab warming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Commies are only more logically consistent.

    6. Re:I object to tab warming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, have to admit you've won that. Unfortunately, too much of our food product contain high fructose corn syrup. I have to do a lot of searching to find natural sugar products anymore. :-/

    7. Re:I object to tab warming by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Commies are only more logically consistent.

      Well, Yanks would know, your White House is full of them

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  12. Can I turn that shit off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I like my browser meek and docile, not aggressively second-guessing me and doing all sorts of crap "just in case". It already does too much!

    How about a way to stop all javascript when the tab isn't active? Or a way to block javascript by domain, instead of having to rely on an adblocker? Opera has had that last one for ages.

    1. Re:Can I turn that shit off? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      All of Opera advantages has been disrupted by its stupid news feature which seems to be nearly impossible to disable.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:Can I turn that shit off? by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      How about a way to stop all javascript when the tab isn't active?

      To what end? Revert the usefulness of the browser back to the early naughties? You do realise that the browser is now a core OS component right, and your tabs are actively running applications right?

      If you don't like multi-tasking, install DOS.

  13. No support for POST requests that take 6 minutes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Just watch it from the web server log for what FireFox actually sends when you send a JQuery post request that goes past the 5 minute mark... you cannot see this from the networking tab in your browser, but wireshark will also grab it for you. So.. not suitable for all web use

  14. Party's over: No more testing on just Chrome! by mileshigh · · Score: 1

    In other words, it's a major platform that web developers have to consider.

    Hear that folks? The article says Firefox isn't a 3rd-class netizen anymore. Party's over: No more testing on just Chrome!

  15. 5.27% market share by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ever since Nov, 2017 when they broke the extensions, their market share has gone down each month. They are currently at only 5.27%. They are irrelevant.

    1. Re:5.27% market share by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are irrelevant.

      Yeah, but they are getting really good at that...

    2. Re:5.27% market share by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are 100 ways to slice things like market share, & in this case your numbers are a bit misleading. The overall total for Firefox desktop market share is 11.55%, & they are the most relevant desktop browser that isn't Chrome. As they are also the biggest true open source browser, they are very relevant to me & many others, though I would prefer some more UI flexibility such as having something like 'Classic Theme Restorer' available. Otherwise Firefox Quantum has been excellent to me & is as fast as advertised while offering plenty of relevant add-ons like 'uBlock Origin'. Firefox may not be perfect, & its mobile presence may be as crappy as ever, but it is very far from irrelevant. Everyone should want a solid competitor to Chrome, & Firefox seems like the best & most relevant major option by far.

      http://gs.statcounter.com/browser-market-share/desktop/worldwide

    3. Re:5.27% market share by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Net Marketshare has them hovering around double that. I prefer checking there than statcounter because, like many other Firefox-users, statcounter is blocked on my browser for hosting 3rd-party trackers. That fact that it relies on commonly-blocked trackers for its stats probably explains why it rates Firefox lower than other stats sites.

    4. Re:5.27% market share by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      IMO a good deal of what killed them is shaving off percentages of users with every release because they don't seem to care about them. They ignored the corporate user. The power user. The addon user. Each on their own only a slice of their marketshare but adds up to a significant drop overall. I use a Firefox derivative (Waterfox) on the desktop and Firefox on the phone and I wish them well, but they need to stop whoever is making these stupid decisions and quick.

    5. Re:5.27% market share by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      SJWs, just saying. Remember when the CEO was ousted? That was "Game Over", you've just been watching a losing battle ever since.

    6. Re:5.27% market share by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brendan was not ousted, he stepped down, big difference.

    7. Re:5.27% market share by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > Brendan was not ousted, he stepped down, big difference.

      Come off it, he had no choice, and you know it.

      It's like saying Steve Jobs resigned from Apple. Technically yes, but being stripped of all managerial duties and taken off all projects basically means "we want you to leave, but don't have the balls to actually fire you."

  16. pls fix memory leaks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FF uses 2GB of RAM on my 4GB machine. it's a hog. Thunderbird is second.

  17. Re:Looking forward to nearly all of this! by arth1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "Tab Warming" sounds like a great, well thought out feature! Yay!

    Not necessarily.
    Do you want the rendering of the current page to slow down because you flicked the mouse out of view, which happened to be over a tab?
    Do you want the machine and network to slow to a crawl because you dragged the pointer across a great many tabs on the way to the one you wanted, and they all start rendering?
    Do you want even higher memory/CPU use for a product that's already considered seriously bloated?

  18. Go to ESR 60.1 by williamyf · · Score: 2, Informative

    Dear all:
    Tired of google changing the browser, moving the interface around and breaking things Every 6 Weeks?
    Tired of microsoft changing the browser, moving the interface around and breaking things Every 6 Weeks?
    Tired of using safari and not having support of big boy tools, like iLO, IPIMI and the web consoles of Orocle and SAP?

    Welcome to the wonderful world of Firefox ESR.

    Current ESR (60) will be supported for about a year, with no new features or UI changes, only security patches and bug fixes. It has the full power of Quantum (which means more or less performance parity with the other browsers).

    The version released today is 60.1, which means that ESR 60 has been in the wild for a couple of months now, allowing time to iron any rough edges, and includes a Fix for tab_selected so it works when headerURL is not set (uplifted to 60)...

    Also, since the "Great breakage" of PlugIns and Add-ons happened in FireFox 53, chances are most of your plug-ins and extensions already have been ported (or have suitable equivalents).

    As we speak, I am downloading it, and will install it over ESR 52, after I delete as much as possible of all the NPAPI Plug-ins that litter my Computer (Citrix, saba-meeting, WebEx, iLO, Huawei IPIMI, etc).

    ESR Is the best balance for people who use the Browser as a Tool to "get things done", and not as an entertainment/media consumption.

    --
    *** Suerte a todos y Feliz dia!
    1. Re:Go to ESR 60.1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      moving the interface around and breaking things Every 6 Weeks?

      That's funny. My browser has had the same interface for over 20 years

    2. Re:Go to ESR 60.1 by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Tired of google changing the browser, moving the interface around and breaking things Every 6 Weeks?

      *me looks at the Google browser*. "Seems like everything is where it was last year. No I'm not tired at all, but thanks for asking." /marketing fail.

    3. Re:Go to ESR 60.1 by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      > Welcome to the wonderful world of Firefox ESR

      --No thanks. I'll keep using Palemoon on Linux (NewMoon on Mac OSX), kthxbai

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  19. I wouldn't open the page if I wasn't going look at by raymorris · · Score: 1

    For me, when I open a page, in a new tab or the same one, I open it because I intend to look at the page. I *want* my browser to get a page ready to view when I open it.

    Where I may not want it loaded right away is when I re-open my browser and have many tabs open from an earlier session. That's a niche where a well thought-out new UI feature would be good, though - pages I intend to use this week, but not right now. Bookmarks feel more permanent than that use case; I use bookmarks for things I plan to return to months later. Tabs aren't really the right choice, either, though - having many pages loaded that I'm not going to miss today is wasteful.

    Bookmarks / favorites require a few more clicks than tabs. Tabs are "right click, open in new tab" to start, "close tab" to end, a total of three clicks. Bookmarks add many additional clicks - "open in new table, bookmark this page,select the folder, close the page", then "open bookmarks, find the right bookmark folder", then afterwards, navigating bookmarks again, and removing the bookmark, then closing the tab.

    I'd like to "right click - add to read later", two clicks. Then right-click on the close button to "close and remove from read later".

  20. What's really important by AlanObject · · Score: 1

    Does the upgrade give you an advantage in agar.io? If not then skip it.

  21. Re:How much more electricity will "tab warming" us by mrclevesque · · Score: 3, Informative

    "How much more electricity will "tab warming"

    Minimal.

    Firefox Tab Warming explained:

    https://www.ghacks.net/2018/01...

  22. Perhaps it's just me, but ... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    From TFA:

    Firefox 61 for desktop brings an improved search experience by letting you more easily add custom search engines to the location bar. Mozilla offered a helpful example: “Imagine searching an actor’s name; now with Firefox you can automatically search through IMDB in the location bar.”

    Sorry, the Location Bar (thank you for not perpetuating the "Awesome Bar" myth) is for URLs not searching. Stop trying to "improve" my "search experience" within the fucking browser. Browsers are for browsing, search engines are for searching.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:Perhaps it's just me, but ... by kekx · · Score: 1

      Hm, again just speaking for me, not anybody else, but i love the ability to use shorthands (g for google, m for maps, w for wikipedia, etc + a ton of work related ones) for different search engines in the URL bar. Is there anything that speaks against this type of dual usage of the URL bar? I cannot come up with something off the top of my head.

    2. Re:Perhaps it's just me, but ... by Bosconian · · Score: 1

      duckduckgo.com has a nice shorthand for single-site searches. !w for wikipedia.. uh, I can't remember any others.
      https://duckduckgo.com/bang
      You could set it as default search in URL bar and use the 11.4K bang abbreviations... though for some sites bang autocomplete might better be used in the search box instead.
      And they have the best site abbreviation as well: https://ddg.gg/

      --
      Scarce, scared, scarred, sacred... -Col. Bruce Hampton
    3. Re:Perhaps it's just me, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I type a URL in the address bar I expect it to go to the URL, when I type an assortment of words I expect it to submit those words to Google Search and take me to google.com to show me the results. That's how Chrome works and how every browser should work. Adding "search engines" for various other websites to the toolbar is a throwback to IE8 that nobody wants. If I type: IMDB:Tom Cruise then I expect Google to show me the search results for IMDB first, no need for another engine to be installed.

  23. Why whould anyone want this? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    From TFA:

    There’s also a small update to extensions built using the WebExtension API. WebExtensions can now hide tabs and manage the behavior of the browser when a tab is opened or closed.

    And how do I disable it? Seriously, why would we want the browser to do stuff like this? Just what I need, more seemingly random things happening that I can't see and/or presumably control ...

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:Why whould anyone want this? by CrashNBrn · · Score: 3, Informative

      For extensions like, Tab Mix Plus, Tree Tabs, Tree Style Tab, etc. If you don't install extensions that manage tabs then don't worry about it.

    2. Re:Why whould anyone want this? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      For extensions like, Tab Mix Plus, Tree Tabs, Tree Style Tab, etc. If you don't install extensions that manage tabs then don't worry about it.

      Thanks for the info. Seems like a potentially dangerous idea though...

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    3. Re:Why whould anyone want this? by bjdevil66 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      If Firefox could collect more data on its end users (or ideally - from a UX research point of view - everything you do, like I'm sure Chrome does its best to do), the developers would have a much better view of what people want.

      Instead, the Firefox devs have to deal with us grouchy, "Don't track me!!", users. As a result, they have to make their best guesses based on their relatively meager datasets... Hell - Maybe that's why the Firefox UI is so much more like Chrome than it used to be: they had to get their UX market research from somewhere...

    4. Re:Why whould anyone want this? by washort · · Score: 1

      You can volunteer for this now: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-...

    5. Re:Why whould anyone want this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, there definitely needs to be a "hidden tabs" indicator, and a "show hidden tabs" button.

    6. Re:Why whould anyone want this? by radarskiy · · Score: 2

      "If you don't install extensions that manage tabs then don't worry about it."

      It's reasonable to assume that extension that explicitly states that it will try to manage your tabs will try to manage your tabs. How do you know that an extension that is claiming that it isn't trying to manage tabs won't try to manage your tabs?

      Now, a snarky response might be that it a user doesn't trust an extension then the user shouldn't be installing it, but that a) just pushes the problem up the stack to "How does a user determine whether an extension is trustworthy", b) needs to be repeated constantly as extensions update, and c) doesn't account for plain old bugs.

    7. Re:Why whould anyone want this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Firefox could collect more data on its end users (or ideally - from a UX research point of view - everything you do, like I'm sure Chrome does its best to do), the developers would have a much better view of what people want.

      Instead, the Firefox devs have to deal with us grouchy, "Don't track me!!", users.

      What does it matter if developers have a "view of what people want" if they don't fucking do it?

      Captcha: alcohols - I wish - stone cold sober
      Once upon a time there was a more interactive community and forum where reports and posts weren't deleted for being contrary to the latest 'improvement'.

      You want to learn what people want via UX/tracking? Go fuck yourself. Or to be more pleasant, how exactly do I wiggle the mouse to tell you and your ilk to go fuck yourselves?

      There are lots of Firefox fails, my recent - and among my favorites - is the 'heartbeat pulse' thing. I had to Duck-It! to see if it was really Mozilla behind that bullshit or if my phone had been pawned.

      It is that fucking stupid. When you look for how to disable it, there's this passive agressive motherfucker with a 3-step process. The first step is - as always - 'about:config' - the second step is where ever the fuck they hid their bullshit (and the bullshit never has a helpful link to kill itself or tell you what the about:config setting is) - the third step - and this beautiful - was some fuckface Mozilla employee saying 'Have a nice day.'

      Whoever told marketers to kill themselves was spot on.

      More Mozilla fails, how their privacy page is gazillions of pages and third party TOS spread over multiple documents. It would be trivial to give people a page of slider-bar settings that actually work and let you instantly disable bullshit questions and default to 'no' for all websites. (Allow this site to send push notifications? Share your location with ...?).

      Another good one is when 'Reader View' pops up over my content to tell me how it can make reading my content easier. How about not popping up over my fucking content? That guy should eat a bullet too.

      Sorry - lots of curse words that don't likely translate into UX tracking.

    8. Re:Why whould anyone want this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's because of people like you that we lost all customization in Firefox and that it is now only a dumb Chrome clone.

  24. "the ability to add custom search engines..." by SeaFox · · Score: 2

    the ability to add custom search engines to the location bar

    I've been doing that for years now. Did Mozilla forget about their own feature, one of the features that keeps me on Firefox, I might add?

    1. Re:"the ability to add custom search engines..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One would assume you can add them like in Chrome, rather than an unintuitive bookmarks hack.

  25. Silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Use trve Norwegian Vivaldi, instead of shady Chinese Opera.

    1. Re:Silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol. Vivaldi is based on chromium, which has Opera (Chinese) and Yandex (Russian) devs contributions in the code. In fact, if you look at the AUTHORS file in master https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/master/AUTHORS your likely to spy lots of Chinese, Korean, Indian, Arabic and other non-Norwegian sounding names listed as well. It even lists a Mozilla corp addy.

  26. Slow SVG rendering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Why is Firefox so slow to render and pan/zoom an SVG image? We have a custom SVG base map and Firefox is significantly slower than all other browsers. So much so that it's unusable and I can no longer recommend the browser to my users. *sigh*

    1. Re:Slow SVG rendering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have that bug or feature in my version of 52 where if following a link to a svg file in Wikipedia, I'm prompted to download it. I don't want to download it, I want it rendered in the browser (typically a map)

  27. Re:No support for POST requests that take 6 minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Down votes by people that don't test and don't care

  28. Re:I wouldn't open the page if I wasn't going look by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tabs are "right click, open in new tab" to start, "close tab" to end, a total of three clicks.

    You can bring that number down to two. Middle click (clicking with the wheel) a link and it will open in a new tab.

  29. Re: Make FF faster & safer via hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the hell is this bullshit? It looks like spam and is really hard to read. Who posts this shit?

  30. Re: No & I only quote what he said: Here 'tis. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am belittling APK's work. It's just not that useful. Hosts files are a blacklist solution while it would be much better to use a whitelist approach. That's especially true if used in isolation, as you seem to do.

  31. Re: Make FF faster & safer via hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that this garbage has been modded down, expect APK to repost it. For browser security, a whitelist tool like Noscript or uMatrix is a much better choice.

  32. Re: Registered /.ers review of the Win64 model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What, no testimonials for the Linux version that you're shitposting about? It must suck, otherwise someone would have posted something remotely positive after all the spamming you've been doing, and you'd retentlessly repeat their statement.

  33. Re: I don't care what "your kind" says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure doesn't look like stalking to me. If you don't like being criticized for spamming, don't post spam.

  34. Re: Make FF faster & safer via hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who will APK blame the criticism on this time? Khyber? Zontar The Mindless? Coren22? Ol Olsoc? Brockmire? Whipslash?

    Your program provides a false sense of security and you vastly overstate its capabilities. There are plenty of better choices for security.

  35. You've BELITTLED yourself, lol - how? ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BIG PROBLEM w/ whitelists = counterfeit libs/dlls 'slip thru' 'em easily (either in new models used in e;g; OLE marshalling by progs or dopplegangers of existing ones) - THIS IS A HUGE "HOLE" IN WHITELISTING THAT BLOWS IT AWAY & RIGHT THRU IT!

    (Especially w/ say, fakes of runtime libs since in Windows they do NOT all run from %WinDir%\system32 BUT also from inside application's OWN folders (which takes precedence & thus EASY WAY to create this problem)).

    SEE SUBJECT: Trying to "belittle me" is a BAD MOVE - you only BELITTLED yourself (from such BRAVE (not) hiding behind UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous troll posts, lol - such CONFIDENCE (not) "standing behind your words" (lol - ERRONEOUS ONES I JUST TORE UP EASILY)).

    APK

    P.S.=> Lastly vs. the rest of your bullshit: Hosts ARE useful by BLOCKING SOURCES OF THREATS in known bad hosts serving malware OR malscript the SOURCE of such an attack above (stopping the problem above way, Way, WAY BEFORE it can even happen)... apk

    1. Re: You've BELITTLED yourself, lol - how? ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're talking about whitelisting in the context of blocking network-based threats. A whitelist approach is superior to any blacklisting. Besides, hosts doesn't use wildcards and that makes it inherently limited in blocking threats. There are much better approaches to preventing counterfeit libraries, and your hosts file system isn't going to prevent that, either. You moved the goalposts to dismiss my criticism.

  36. 1st: Where's ones for YOUR ware? They're not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: They're not (@ ALL) & You've got mine for starters - I.E./E.G. What others like in Win32/64 isn't as GOOD as the LINUX model which LITERALLY does 2x the work in 1/2 the time as I said vs. the older Windows one (honestly, I know, I wrote it) + give it time - it took almost a YEAR before my 1st ones for that Windows model started from others!

    APK

    P.S.=> Now, lastly - go AWAY puny UNIDENTIFIABLE Jealous "Lil' Jowie" (lol, love that as it describes "your kind" the "ne'er-do-well" DO-NOTHING zero perfectly & makes me lmao @ u) - you WISH you were me & could do things like this that others LIKE & USE in MY work, not yours (even /.ers https://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12279772&cid=56849394/) & I JUST BLEW YOU AWAY ON WHITELISTS too easily https://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12279772&cid=56850202/ ... apk

    1. Re: 1st: Where's ones for YOUR ware? They're not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't seem to have a firm grasp of reality, considering any of the things you've said. Any testimonial offered by you is highly suspect, to say the least.

    2. Re: 1st: Where's ones for YOUR ware? They're not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think this is bad you should see when he goes full retard about Khyber, BarbHudson, ArsTechnica, Zontar the Mindless, AV scanners that flag his wares as malicious because they act like it, or any number of other things. It gets even better when he starts posting unsigned post to make it look like someone actually supports his stupid shit. Although the best is when he ends up going off the deep end into one of his antisemitic rants or conspiracy fueled frenzies. For now just expect APK to act like an asshole, try to dodge criticism, and demand other prove they created something better than a file concatenator.

  37. "said unidentifiable ac stalking me", lol! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: I see others post on INFERIOR methods like browser addons, PiHole (cost vs. hosts = free) & NOBODY SAYS A THING!

    Discriminating against ME? YES.

    Why??

    EASY - MY STUFF BLOWS ALL THOSE AWAY on LOADS of levels!

    I.E. My INFERIOR competitors = SCARED SHITLESS of me, & webmasters + ADVERTISERS are too - & I know that's WHO YOU ARE!

    WhipSlash SPAMS on OpenSORES + ADS (ones I never see OR his scripts + 3rd party ones, hosts block 'em FASTER vs. NoScript can (no parsing tags + @ IP stack kernelmode precedence speed vs. LAYERED on browsers messagepassing & usermode slower too))

    ADS ON /. = WORST SPAM (& I blow it away totally via hosts), so "f" off fool!

    (You've been "PWN'D")

    * You were PWN'd on WHITELISTS https://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12279772&cid=56850202/

    APK

    P.S.=> See subject - "sticking up for urself" UNIDENTIFIABLY ANONYMOUS when U posted what u "defend" too - lol! apk

    1. Re: "said unidentifiable ac stalking me", lol! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Discrimination my ass. That's one of the dumbest things you've ever said, and you've set a high bar for being a dipshit. There are some very useful browser addons that provide security through whitelisting. Those are inherently more secure than your blacklisting approach. The reason people recommending addons and PiHole aren't criticized is because they don't spam their recommendations where it's offtopic, then make unreasonably angry posts when spam is properly called spam. You're criticized for being a spammer and an asshole. If others engaged in the same type of behavior, especially over a prolonged period of time like you, they'd probably be subject to the same criticism. However, you have a unique combination of asshole behavior and persistence not otherwise seen on Slashdot. Discrimination against you? Bullshit. You deserve far more criticism than you actually receive.

    2. Re:"said unidentifiable ac stalking me", lol! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it doesn't. Your work is as effective as an AV scanner that only matches based on file names. It may keep out very small children but doesn't actually stop real threats as it is easily circumvented. Besides you can't do the real security work of discovering actual threats instead you manually scrape other people's web pages and aggregate other people's host files.

      Unlike other solutions your work also is incapable of stopping entire classes of attacks. Your work provides no mathematical provable security either. Also who wants to fucking babysit a shitty utility all the time like you seem to do.

      When you can't make an argument you try to change the subject because you are trying to hide how fucking stupid you actually are.

  38. LOL! You're the one that ran from a question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL! You ran from a FAIR question "Forrest" + I wrote it & who'd know better the code's more efficient & faster vs. old model others LIKE & USE https://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12279772&cid=56849394/ ALREADY?

    * Go away "Forrest"...

    APK

    P.S.=> Instead of wasting your already obviously WASTED do-nothing "ne'er-do-well" so-called 'life' STALKING & TROLLING me do something of service to others instead - you're a perfect illlustration of IDLE HANDS are the DEVIL's workshop (all the jealousy & envy flowing from you there JEALOUS "lil' Jowie (lol))... apk

    1. Re: LOL! You're the one that ran from a question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Again, you don't have a firm grasp of reality. Any claims you make that praise your own work should be considered highly suspect.

      As for what I've done, I'm not in the business of creating security software. That doesn't mean I don't understand the principles of security well enough to know how limited and inept your hosts file software really is. As others have pointed out, blacklisting cannot provide the security that's necessary to protect against threats that haven't yet been added to the blacklist.

    2. Re: LOL! You're the one that ran from a question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't create security software? It's you with no firm grasp of reality of it then. Apk creates it and others like and use it. You can't change that and you ran from a fair question.

    3. Re: LOL! You're the one that ran from a question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What we have here is APK pretending to be someone else so he can make it appear that there's someone out there who supports him. I really don't understand the point of it, because everyone immediately recognizes that it's APK making the post. It's really quite sad and pathetic, though I'm not sure that makes it different from anything else APK does.

    4. Re: LOL! You're the one that ran from a question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I'm not Apk but I see you stalk him for months anonymously. I don't need you stalking me. Dont talk if you don't create securityware. Don't talk at all then. Apk does. You don't and do not know the first thing about it.

    5. Re: LOL! You're the one that ran from a question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are APK. Even when you're not claiming to be APK, you do some distinctive things in your posts that make you instantly recognizable. The limitations of your software have been pointed out throughout this thread as they have so many times in the past. The criticisms are valid, no matter how much you'd like to pretend otherwise.

    6. Re: LOL! You're the one that ran from a question by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Hi, APK! How's the weather in Syracuse?

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    7. Re: LOL! You're the one that ran from a question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The above post was totally not from APK but from that totally useless fucking iTardshitstian AlecStaar from ArsTechnica.

    8. Re: LOL! You're the one that ran from a question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are just an anonymous troll jerk that stalks Apk. Are you are proud of your distinction making you an instantly recognizable jerk? The are no limits to your lies. Apk points out whitelists shortcomings and you all went crazy with down moderation to hide that and then did 20 posts successively to bury your defeat also. You are deluding yourself if you think members here do not see you doing it. Most of us browse below 0 moderation level. We see it. You don't care do you as you hide behind your anonymous posts like the real coward you are. I don't care if you think I am Apk but I am not. I feel bad for him that he has a troop of jealous jerks harassing so I had to do this post anonymously before you start trouble with me stalking me also or what you jerks do to creimer also.

    9. Re: LOL! You're the one that ran from a question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      APK has multiple personalities. However, they are all equally obnoxious.

  39. Big mistake: Wildcards make falsepositives! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Big mistake: Wildcards make falsepositives! A known issue in wildcarding & WHITELISTS = maintenance nightmare (users bitch like mad being blocked & I've seen it) & just go TRY "whitelist" every scriptsource & see what I just said happen (let alone blacklisting EVERY possible site or IP range under the sun JUST to let a few thru).

    * Blacklists like hosts, work! (OR are you doubting our /. peers quoted here https://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12279772&cid=56849394/ )

    APK

    P.S.=> Nice try though... apk

    1. Re: Big mistake: Wildcards make falsepositives! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blacklists do not prevent threats that aren't yet known. Whitelists do. As for wildcards, you can't even block all the subdomains within a domain that's being used by malware. Wildcards can do that, but hosts cannot. Whitelists aren't a hassle and they provide a level of security that your software cannot. As a basic principle of security, block everything, then explicitly allow certain things through. Whether sanitizing requests to a server side script or operating a firewall, it's just a generally good security practice that you cannot implement through hosts.

    2. Re:Big mistake: Wildcards make falsepositives! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meanwhile uMatrix does whitelisting and wildcarding just fine. It's more dynamic, you can pick which resource (cookies, images, scripts, css', xhrs, media, etc) you want to whitelist (or blacklist if that's your thing). And it offers more.

  40. Re: Make FF faster & safer via hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The mentally deficient individual is Alexander Peter Kowalski. He doesn't like it when people point out the truth about him and when they do he will go pick someone off of his enemney's list and go full retard for a few days.

  41. Make FF faster & safer via hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & APK Hosts File Engine 2.0++ 64-bit for Linux h t t p : / / a p k . i t - m a t e . c o . u k / A P K H o s t s F i l e E n g i n e F o r L i n u x . z i p (remove spaces between characters & download).

    Yields more security/speed/reliability/anonymity vs. any SINGLE solution (99% of threats = hostnames vs. IP address that most firewalls use) more efficiently/FASTER + NATIVELY 4 less!

    (Vs. "Bolt on 'MoAr' illogic-logic" competitors slowing you, hosts speed you up 2 ways (adblocks + hardcodes u spend most time @) vs. competition loaded w/ bugs (DNS/AntiVir) + their overheads (messagepass ('souled-out' to advertiser addons) + filtering drivers) & their complexity leads to exploitation).

    * ONLY 1 of its kind in GUI on Linux!

    (Better vs. Windows model in speed/efficiency + new "merge" feature)

    APK

    P.S.=> I use FF on Linux & it works like a DREAM w/ hosts... apk

  42. Re: Make FF faster & safer via hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    APK can't accept that his offtopic spam belongs at -1, so he reposts the same idiotic spam again.

    You are an asshole spammer. Go away.

  43. Registered /.ers review of the Win64 model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your software is just fine - well written, functional... I'm going to continue using the Host File Engine by mmell February 17, 2017

    (APK's work), I've flat out said it's good by BronsCon February 11 2016

    his hosts program is actually pretty good by xenotransplant August 10 2015

    his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources by alexgieg September 25 2015

    I like your host file system by Karmashock September 09 2015

    I do use APK's host file on all my systems at home by OrangeTide December 01 2017

    I personally use a HOSTS file blocker produced from a genius called APK by 110010001000 October 27 2017

    * See subject: Best part = Linux 64-bit model's faster/more efficient (does 2x the work in 1/2 the time)

    APK

    P.S.=> Enjoy a faster/safer/more reliable internet... apk

  44. Re: Registered /.ers review of the Win64 model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yup, the same out-of-context list of recommendations for your crapware. Even those who think there's a bit of value in your software also recognize that you're a total asshole.

  45. whitelist = NO speedup 4 users (hosts do) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Hosts DO 2 ways (hardcodes where they spend most time @ vs. remote DNS resolution (or local) & ADBLOCKING + hardcodes AVOIDS dns security issues (redirects being one) OR being down + DNS LEVEL requestlog TRACKING - whitelists OFFER NO DNS LEVEL PROTECTION).

    APK

    P.S.=> Hosts SPECIFIC PRECISION makes no MISTAKES Your wildcards do i.e. CAN BLOCK INNOCENTS too (not all *.tucows.com domains ARE BAD after all PROVING my point so you fail 3 ways above: NO SPEED GAIN & FALSIES + A MAINTENANCE NIGHTMARE (I've seen users under whitelist BITCH they are blocked from things they NEED & USE))... apk

  46. Re:No & I only quote what he said: Here 'tis.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keep dodging there APK everyone sees you for the useless shit stain you are because BrosCon fucking told you yesterday to stop using his name and quoting him.

  47. Re:How much more electricity will "tab warming" us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TLDR, it's a partial workaround (not an actual fix) for a problem with tab-switching that only Firefox has.

  48. BLEEPING COMPUTER says differently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "hosts trick to block the Coinhive" https://www.bleepingcomputer.c... & on 100's of botnet C&C's I've blocked + sources of malscript OR malware.

    APK

    P.S.=> I can also get a LOAD of security sites' people to back me more - need those too? Ask... apk

    1. Re:BLEEPING COMPUTER says differently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your link shows that of the recommended methods to defeat Coinhive, using a host file is listed last behind AV and browser extensions. That's because Coinhive and similar miners are often hosted by the site you want to visit. There's no 3rd party being called. Hosts are useless.

      I've pointed this out and you've ignored it, and here you are posting the link like you think it proves anything.

      APK. Dishonest or just illiterate? It's hard to tell. Probably a bit of both.

    2. Re:BLEEPING COMPUTER says differently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is just more of APK trying to make it seem like his work is more useful than it actually is. In reality everything his work does can be done in other ways better. Also it is funny when he posts links to other security sites that "back him up" especially when they are much like the bleeping computer article above where hosts is mentioned as a less effective also ran, or instead of supporting APK's belief that hosts is effective instead make that case that hosts should be used. Don't worry when his bullshit is called out he will deflect and change the subject because he lost.

  49. SECURITY PROS #1/2 disagree w/ you troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SANS ("A related approach to the DNS issue is to create a hosts file on each system that sends requests for spyware to some place else. Both Ramu and an anonymous reader have suggested this" hosts by myself & RAMU right @ START of "malware explosion" mid 2005 on) https://isc.sans.edu/forums/di...

    SANS (lists using hosts blocks) https://isc.sans.edu/forums/diary/Botnet+malware+defense/4138/

    BLOCKING (What hosts do) BEFORE SCANNING @ SANS https://isc.sans.edu/forums/di...

    APK

    P.S.=> More are coming (to your PUBLIC dismay)... apk

    1. Re:SECURITY PROS #1/2 disagree w/ you troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first link mentions using hosts but states that it isn't effective without other things.
      The second link mentions using hosts but it is in a list of other random things.
      The third link doesn't mention hosts at all.
      This ignores the fact that those are random posts by random people on a security forum where anyone can post if they sign up for a free account. Your support always seems to fall apart when examined. It doesn't matter if it is "experts supporting hosts", other "successful" examples of your body of work, or other people's "support" of your work. No wonder you live in a dumpy duplex that is worth less than most people's down payment would be.

  50. SECURITY PROS #2/2 disagree w/ you troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aryeh Goretsky/ESET/NOD32: hosts = good security http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=7442373&cid=49747129/

    ZD NET http://www.zdnet.com/article/how-to-use-a-hosts-file-to-improve-your-internet-experience/ "Hosts files really shine by letting you block ads, spyware sites, malware sites, & tracking sites"

    Steve Gibson on hosts https://www.grc.com/sn/sn-045.htm/

    Oliver Day (SYMANTEC/SECURITYFOCUS) http://www.securityfocus.com/columnists/491/ "Host file browsing the Web - is actually faster

    Spybot S&D add a layer of defense against trojans & other forms of malware to hosts

    "classic Windows hosts trick to block the Coinhive or Crypto-Loot domains" - https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/a-new-player-joins-coinhive-on-the-browser-cryptojacking-scene/ - BLEEPING COMPUTER

    Malwarebytes hpHosts hosts & RECOMMENDS my program.

    APK

    P.S.=> + SANS too https://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12279772&cid=56850524/ ... apk

    1. Re:SECURITY PROS #2/2 disagree w/ you troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry shit stain retard Alexander Peter Kowalski that isn't looking very good for you
      1. Some random shit you wrote without any support or evidence
      2. A pop computer site, not a good source for real security advice
      3. A transcript of an old AOL radio interview, again not something that should be trusted
      4. Someone who lays out all the issues with blacklists, specifically host files, and advises against them
      5. An old program that still does more than your work
      6. Yet another pop computer site, not a good source for real security advice
      7. Another lie by you as there is no recommendation of your work there and your work is hosted on a different site registered in a different country
      8. A random post on SANS fourm where hosts is the 10th thing mentioned but stated that it is worthless unless you have other things

      Thanks Alexander Peter Kowalski for proving that you are a fucking retard, your advice is garbage, and you should not be trusted.

  51. Re:No & I only quote what he said: Here 'tis.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12270256&cid=56841066

    (cont.) Also, it seems that much has changed in the quality of your software in the past two years and several months. You see, there appears to be a glaring bug in your Slashdot spamming script that is causing it to double-post, though the grammar modification algorithm appears to be working (despite being obvious).

    Please cease using my moniker at least until that has been fixed. Preferably, cease using it at all, especially while you're bitching about a company using your initials, when you know damn well the Android Package isn't named after you and more than the NSA is named after Norman Stanley Alexander.

    I added the bold for emphasis, to show exactly where BronsCon told you to stop using his username to promote your software. If you have any integrity at all, you'll comply with his request.

  52. I like what Bronscon said here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I've never tried to belittle (APK's work), I've flat out said it's good" by BronsCon (927697) on Thursday February 11, 2016 & no changing that (he may not like me but he says my work's good).

    * I'll be TRUE to that & continue using it, lol!

    (He has a "personal issue" w/ ME now, NOT MY WORK, he even says its good now to this day in THAT conversation)

    APK

    P.S.=> Poo' "Lil' JEALOUS Jowie" - you WISH people said they like & use something GOOD you did as I can easily show & "your kind" the "ne'er-do-well" DO-NOTHING undereducated/unskilled LAZY anonymous STALKING me online kind, can't, lol... apk

    1. Re: I like what Bronscon said here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BronsCon said your work is good. He explicitly stated yesterday that he neither likes nor uses your work. BronsCon did say that you are toxic and vile, and that your numerous personal vendettas against people means that people shouldn't trust that you wouldn't use your software to maliciously target your enemies. Your behavior seems to prevent BronsCon from being able to recommend your software. While he acknowledged that your software may be clean and safe now, you cannot be trusted.

    2. Re: I like what Bronscon said here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BronsCon told you to stop using his username in your testimonials. You have just refused to do so. That says a lot about your lack of character.

  53. Re:How much more electricity will "tab warming" us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, so pretty dumb feature if you use keyboard to switch?
    Using keyboard is faster, so I imagine most power users use it.

  54. Dangerous? Essential! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The lack of this feature has kept me on FF 52. If this feature was not added, then I would stop upgrading FF forever (consequences: bad).

    The essential features lost in the 52 -> 53 transition are slowly reappearing. It's just possible that enough have been restored now to consider moving to the latest version.

    It's been an ugly time. With luck, FF isn't actually dying, no matter how hard the developers try to piss us all off in every release.

  55. Re:I wouldn't open the page if I wasn't going look by tepples · · Score: 1

    Many laptops' trackpads lack a middle button or emulation thereof.

  56. I trashed you on whitelists easily, lol... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & whitelist = NO speedup 4 users OR dns protection + anonymity (hosts do) https://news.slashdot.org/comm... (plus no maintenance nightmare whitelists are)!

    * Go AWAY fool - trying to "take me on" ONLY ends up with YOU with EGG ON YOUR FACE every single time, lol... makes me laugh & you can BET everyone's LAUGHING @ YOU TOO!

    APK

    P.S.=> Of course that's ALSO why you post ac so you don't have to bear me getting YET ANOTHER RECORDED DEFEAT of 1 of your MANY SOCKPUPPET Fake names you use for your FAKE LIE of a "so-called 'life'" I've done TONS of times already, hence your hiding behind anonymous AND so you can "downmodbomb" me to try effetely "HIDE" your DEFEATS vs. me LIKE THE LINK ABOVE which IS what ALWAYS HAPPENS TO YOU (& downmodding? Hey, any IDIOT can do THAT but idiots like that/you CAN'T DO THIS (but I can) Mb (not your nonexistenceware, lol) https://news.slashdot.org/comm... )... apk

    1. Re:I trashed you on whitelists easily, lol... apk by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      APK doesn't project much at all, does he?

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  57. Re:No support for POST requests that take 6 minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FYI: A post request that lingers a long time before the server replies is how some sites implement "push" to the browser. The connection is sitting there idle until the server has a notification to send, then it completes the connection with the data, and the client side code opens a new connection to the server (possibly sending a payload in reply to the server), then waits for more data. the technique is called COMET (and is a bit better than the AJAX polling Web2.0 technique). However, we now have all sorts of silly crap in browsers to do push (though graceful degradation is becoming a pipe dream).

    IMO, the sooner we destroy the entire bubble-gum and duct-tape internet and remake it like a phoenix rising from the distributed mesh wireless ashes the better off (and deduplicated) we'll be.

  58. Re: Registered /.ers review of the Win64 model by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

    Known as "quotemining" in the trade.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  59. 11.55% of desktop and 0.3% of mobile by tepples · · Score: 2

    Your Net Marketshare link with Firefox at 9.92% is narrowed to desktop as opposed to mobile. If you likewise narrow StatCounter to desktop, Firefox is at 11.55% (source). The negligible (0.3%) mobile usage share of Firefox for Android (source: StatCounter) is probably dragging down the overall numbers.

  60. I don't care what "your kind" says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't care what "your kind" says as you STALK me by UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous posts "standing behind your words" (not).

    * You're a loser!

    APK

    P.S.=> ... & you KNOW it, constantly PROVING IT for me, lol... apk

  61. Lack of character? You = unidentifiable AC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have real NERVE saying I lack character as you STALK me behind your UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous posts!

    APK

    P.S.=> Unbelievable you F'ing hypocrite slime... apk

  62. Re:Looking forward to nearly all of this! by Waccoon · · Score: 1

    Exactly. These silly acceleration features are exactly what cause responsiveness issues, not solve them. Every good UI programmer is supposed to know this.

  63. How's the weather in the loony bin psycho? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take your meds mentalcase https://slashdot.org/comments.... & You're a druggie too https://slashdot.org/comments....

    Going to make more sockpuppets to stalk & troll me with you loon https://slashdot.org/comments.... ?

    Sending me postcards with threats too https://slashdot.org/comments.... ??

    * You're a butthurt loon freak, plain & simple - you did it to yourself, loser... see below for proof.

    APK

    P.S.=> Still trying to live down how I shot you to pieces in the art & science of computing Mr. Butthurt https://slashdot.org/comments.... ?

    How about proving hosts & my program that builds them are useless too https://slashdot.org/comments.... ? ... apk

    1. Re:How's the weather in the loony bin psycho? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      More spamming and quote-mining. (Like the man said, Qu'on me donne six lignes écrites de la main du plus honnête homme, j'y trouverai de quoi le faire pendre.) More evasion. More bullying and lying. More magical thinking along the lines of "If I attack others, then say they're really doing it to me, well, that's proof they're attacking me". Something that most people figure out doesn't work by the time they're ready for primary school.

      But you never did. Sad!

      Rather than whingeing that someone whom you went out of your way to antagonise tracked you down, you should instead be grateful that, this case, that someone was me. I sent you a cheery postcard that said only, "Greetings from Stockholm! Behave yourself! Regards, Zontar." That's all it said, and you and I both know it, and you can stop lying about it.

      If you felt threatened by the fact that, due to your long history of screwups and harassing nearly everyone you've come in contact with, you left your info where anybody whom you've threatened* can find it without much effort, guess who's responsible for that? Not the people you've harassed.

      *(By, I dunno, say, trying to run them off a discussion board by spamming them with hundreds of posts per day, day after day? And posting and re-posting lies and half-truths about them, day after day? Sound familiar? I'm pretty sure it does.)

      What might a less ethical being have done in my place? Hmmmm? If you feel by threatened by that line of thought, perhaps you should start recognising that your actions do indeed have consequences.

      But you won't, because it seems that you're never going to grow up, and that you are never going to accept responsibility for your actions.

      As a result you'll spend the rest of your life in your mother's basement, cowering in fear of all the people you've attacked over the years.

      Well, Booga-booga to you, then. Hope you enjoy lying on the bed of nails you've made for yourself.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    2. Re:How's the weather in the loony bin psycho? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Going to make more sockpuppets to stalk & troll me with you loon

      Funny you accuse others of doing the very thing you did on ArsTechnica.

      How's that leaky roof on that shitty house converted to apartment treating you? Bleak, grey, porch is missing half of its roof, white trim rotting away. Fans in the windows, must not have very good AC. Blankets and towels over the windows instead of proper blinds and curtains. Unkempt yard. Bet your neighbors and landlord are drug users. Must be a nice life living in that shithole, blaming everyone but yourself for your problems.

  64. Says UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous stalker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Says UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous stalker of me in a DO-NOTHING "ne'er-do-well" JEALOUS "Lil' Jowie" waste of life fearing me HIDING behind his anonymous trollings.

    * ... That about "sums you up" (for your ZERO-SUM So-called 'life' (wasted life)).

    APK

    P.S.=> Man - I couldn't have described YOU or "your kind" ANY better than that... apk

    1. Re:Says UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous stalker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Soyboy APK is coming to the defense of iTard AlecStaar from ArsTechnica, either that or APK doesn't like it when someone points out that he is a loser who needs to fake support for himself.

  65. Pissed I made ya look DUMB on whitelists? Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pissed I made ya look DUMB on whitelists vs. hosts here? Yes, lmao https://news.slashdot.org/comm... (I bet that just TOOK THE WIND right out of your sails, lol - IN FACT, I KNOW IT DID, I can tell whenever I get the best of you idiots you start the abused downmods & flurries of useless filler posts to TRY BURY you being BURNT by "yours truly").

    * Another poster even noticed it in his replies to you and you all RODE HIM like no tomorrow but he just laughed you off...

    (I went & ate a nice dinner right after that post & SAW the same as everyone else did - a HUGE "FLURRY" of your hiding from me (since you fear me obviously hiding as you do) ANONYMOUS posts to try to BURY IT along with a downmod of the parent post... lol, like THAT "hides" ANYTHING from people here - they see it. I'd say a good 99% of people here surf below where you can HIDE IT with the BOGUS "downmoderation system" here (I've seen others not like it too recently saying how the BEST POSTS are hidden in rotten abused downmods & they're right since little weezils like YOU have to hide when you get your heads kicked in (& you do, A LOT)).

    APK

    P.S.=> You're only fooling yourselves BUT that's also WHY you TROLL & STALK by UNIDENTIFIABLE ANONYMOUS or FAKE NAMES for your FAKE LIES of so-called "lives" you wasted (& you KNOW it)... apk

    1. Re: Pissed I made ya look DUMB on whitelists? Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With all of that rage and stress, you are no doubt destroying your health. Your posts aren't making a lot of sense, suggesting that you're becoming mentally impaired. All of that stress from being so angry about Slashdot increases your risk of a variety of health issues including heart attacks and strokes. I'm concerned about all the harm you're doing to yourself by continuing to have so much rage and hate directed at others. It's not healthy.

  66. You project you're pissed I trashed you, lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You project you're pissed I trashed you on WHITELIST inferiority vs. hosts Zontar The Mindless https://news.slashdot.org/comm...

    * I take GREAT PLEASURE in utterly destroying "your kind", especially on a TECHNICAL LEVEL - why?

    WHAT I SAW AFTER I POSTED IT (others posting saw it too): I ate dinner after & said "that cuts them to shreds" & laughed - I came back, saw my parent post downmodded (to try HIDE the link above the MOST I strongly suspect, lol) & TONS of UNIDENTIFIABLE ANONYMOUS STALKER POSTS to "bury" your OBVIOUS DEFEAT @ MY HANDS as always... lol!

    APK

    P.S.=> What's it LIKE "hiding" behind your FAKE NAME for your FAKE LIE of a WASTED "so-called 'life'" Zontar The Mindless being a DO-NOTHING "ne'er-do-well" HIDING in FEAR from me & knowing others KNOW you're a mentalcase druggie loon PSYCHO stalking me per https://news.slashdot.org/comm... hmmm? apk

    1. Re: You project you're pissed I trashed you, lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moderation isn't being used to avoid addressing your posts. You're being modded down because 1) your posts ate offtopic and 2) you're an asshole.

  67. Re:How much more electricity will "tab warming" us by Waccoon · · Score: 2

    Nothing in that article suggests "minimal" other than the usual marketing BS. In fact, it works exactly as I expected it to, which is far from minimal.

  68. LMAO - like whitelists you overstate on? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whitelists you overstate capabilities of that I tore you APART easily on whitelists vs. hosts here https://news.slashdot.org/comm... that took the wind outta your sails?

    You freaked out after that & I did you in there & HOW do I know? Easy:

    The SECOND I get the better of you fools & you KNOW it, the downmod of MY parent posts I do occurs (to try "hide" the fact I nuke you @ every turn always, lol) & then TONS of your ANONYMOUS stalking posts come to try "Forums Slide" BURY it more... lol, in vain - most here surf WELL BELOW the default "downmoderation" hiding systems' DEFAULT 1 threshold & SEE MY POSTS ANYWAY!

    You lose no matter what & others see it - but then again, you MUST be a TOTAL LOSER to have to "hide" from me & STALK ME by UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous posts...

    APK

    P.S.=> After I posted it I said before going to eat a nice dinner "that was satisfying - it cut the trolls to pieces" & I came back seeing that EXACT behavior of yours you execute when defeated (you're only FOOLING YOURSELVES - everyone reading SEES you get BLOWN AWAY BY ME anyhow, lol)... apk

    1. Re: LMAO - like whitelists you overstate on? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have a problem with one person, then you have a problem with one person. If you have the same problem with lots of people, then you're likely the problem. There are quite a few very successful and very productive people on this site, not the least of which is Bruce Perens. While a few anonymous trolls try to provoke him from time to time, he doesn't have anywhere the number of issues on Slashdot that you do. You are unique in this regard, because lots of people dislike you for the same reason: you're a belligerent spammer. You are the problem. Your behavior is not that of a well-adjusted person. None of the personal attacks that you lob at me will change anything about your awful behavior.

  69. I agree w/ him my work's good (it is) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I've never tried to belittle (APK's work), I've flat out said it's good" - by BronsCon (927697) on Thursday February 11, 2016 @06:48PM (#51491263) & he may not like ME but my work's GOOD - read 'em & WEEP stalkers - it's RIGHT THERE in black & white (nothing you can do about that - LMAO).

    (You & "your kind" in "ne'er-do-well" UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous trolls waste your lives STALKING me only to be BLOWN AWAY by me everytime e.g.whitelists vs. hosts https://news.slashdot.org/comm... )

    APK

    P.S.=> After I posted it I said "THAT totalled them" as always - I get back after dinner & see your typical "try HIDE it" abusing sockpuppet downmodpoints on my parent post & then a FLURRY of your UNIDENTIFIABLE ac posts to try "forums slide" BURY your defeat vs. me - to no avail - MOST HERE BROWSE WELL BELOW "downmoderation system" threshold of 1 (easily cheated by sockpuppets you use if you're NOT stalking me by your ac posts) & see it: You lose)... apk

    1. Re: I agree w/ him my work's good (it is) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you have just proved you have no integrity. BronsCon told you directly to stop using his username to promote your work. The direct quote has been posted elsewhere in this thread, which you've conveniently ignored. Someone with so little integrity as you cannot be trusted to secure anyone's computer. BronsCon doesn't think you can be trusted, and because of your utter lack of integrity, I don't think you can be trusted, either. You are a spammer and a total piece of shit. You have no regard for anyone but yourself. All you care about is promoting your delusions of grandeur, which are evident throughout your posts.

      You've written one dinky little program that relies on the work of others by downloading their hosts files and using them. You've written an aggregator, which downloads other people's hosts files, sorts them, and removes duplicate entries. That's it. Without other people's work, your software would be useless. And yet you pretend like you're superior to everyone here. You're not a security professional, and a whole lot of what you say is deceptive. You're fortunate that your software isn't relevant and people don't take it seriously. If they did and trusted your ridiculous claims, you'd be vulnerable to liability claims if they were compromised. Your software is shit, and you're a piece of shit human being. You don't amount to a damn thing and you never will.

      You'll come back and attack my character, because that's what you do. You might even demand my name, address, and phone number, while threatening me with violence. That's part of your playbook. Meanwhile, you'll ignore that you've been a complete asshole and demonstrated once again your lack of integrity.

      Fuck you.

  70. Defeating stalkers in you makes me an ahole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: 1st - EVERYONE I quoted did say they like or use my ware OR that my work's good (you saying they didn't?) 2nd - totalled you https://news.slashdot.org/comm... on hosts vs. whitelists so TOTALLY (lmao) you UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous STALKERS of myself went nuts!

    * I.E./E.G. - Downmod 'hiding' (via your many SOCKPUPPET mere FAKE NAME for your FAKE LIES of "so-called WASTED 'lives'" accounts you keep & game the system here with for MERE "modpoints" I easily get around & NULLIFY via MY ability to post UNLIMITEDLY which RUNS YOU DRY inevitably of those, lol (pats self on back for OUTSMARTING you potato brains (lol)) my PARENT POST there to vainly try "HIDE" your MASSIVE DEFEAT in the link above!

    Then the REST of what gives you fools away when you are RUNNING with your TAILS BETWEEN YOUR LEGS - you TRY "forums slide" BURY it with FLURRIES of your UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous posts - in vain - MOST HERE BROWSE BELOW the default EASILY CHEATED by many sockpuppets you trolls use "downmoderation system" threshold & SEE I DUST YOU LOSERS everytime, ANYHOW, lol!

    APK

    P.S.=> Outsmarting & outthinking you 10 below plantlife IQ unidentifiable anonymous stalkers of mine? Cake - make me feel as if I am battling WHITE MICE, lol... apk

    1. Re:Defeating stalkers in you makes me an ahole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But yet you don't include the full quotes. Probably because they also say you are an asshole, that you overstate your abilities, and that you overstate what hosts do. The best thing in there is that someone says your program manages to generate a proper hosts file. Hardly an accomplishment when you use other people's existing host files as source material. You really don't like it when people point out the truth about you.

  71. Re:Looking forward to nearly all of this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The feature implies they are/will be aggressively unloading resources in unfocused tabs. So enjoy finding that spot in an infinitely loading page when you switch away for more than a moment or the JS-based sites where the URL never changes. Good luck getting back to where you left off.

    I hate the modern web as well as well as the constant worsening of software programs.

  72. Zontar it's known as FACT & truth... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Question: Who I quote didn't say they like/use my work or it's good? This is known as dusting ya hosts v whitelists https://news.slashdot.org/comm...

    I PISSED YA (fake name 4 ur fake lie of a so-called life of a LOON you live https://it.slashdot.org/commen... ) & YOURS (UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous STALKERS of myself) OFF in that link (behavior patterns' same & PREDICTABLE):

    I posted it I ate dinner & after saw your typical defeated by APK indicators:

    #1 - DOWNMOD "HIDE" APK'S PARENT POST hiding others below it

    #2 - DO UNIDENTIFIABLE AC POSTS to "forums slide" BURY LOSING

    (Useless - MOST browse BELOW +1 default "downmoderation threshold" u do SOCKPUPPET ACCOUNTS for modpoints to downmod me BLOWING U AWAY & THEY SEE YOU LOSE vs. me ANYHOW!

    So obvious others see your method (weak like you) - SO easily seen thru & your FAV COLOR = "transparent".

    APK

    P.S.=> It's why you use FAKE NAMES 4 FAKE LIES of "so-called WASTED loser 'lives'" + UNIDENTIFIABLE ac STALKER posts

    1. Re: Zontar it's known as FACT & truth... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of that rage you express in so many posts can't be good for your health.

  73. Re: No & I only quote what he said: Here 'tis. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny how APK replies to every other post but conveniently ignores the quote of BronsCon telling APK not to use his username in testimonials.

  74. Only bullshit's what you spew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not MY fault you can't read ILLITERATE stalker of mine by anonymous posts & I shit on you here hosts v whitelists https://news.slashdot.org/comm... rather EASILY (as always vs. mere "ne'er-do-wells" like you that CAN'T create things folks like & use + compliment ME (not you, never, lol) on GOOD WORK on too ala https://news.slashdot.org/comm... lol @ U, dolt)

    * You WISH you were me (& judging by ALL THE TIMES both I & others see you IMPERSONATING me too? That is a FACT!)

    APK

    P.S.=> Seeing you STALK ME by UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous posts also GIVES AWAY you FEAR ME (why do it otherwise?) & also shows your POOR LOW "character" in that you don't STAND BEHIND YOUR WORDS like the slimy SLINKING rodent you prove yourself to be vs. me, constantly - RoTfLmAo - TRUER WORDS were NEVER SPOKEN on /. ... apk

    1. Re:Only bullshit's what you spew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't his fault you can't manage to string 2 actual words together in a cogent manner.

  75. Proof of "your kind" & your mental deficiency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Proof of "your kind" & your mental deficiency = ME destroying you EASILY potato-brain on hosts vs. whitelists https://news.slashdot.org/comm... & that's the TRUTH of you ALONG with you FEARING to face me behind your REAL NAME (or even your FAKE NAME for your FAKE LIE of a "so-called WASTED 'life'" hahaha in 1 of your MANY sockpuppet guises you use (& I know many of you DO with proof (see Zontar reply I did, lol)).

    * By the way - ANYONE w/ EYES can see you DOLTS attack me ONLY TO FAIL (hence you HIDING behind UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous posts you STALK ME with too).

    APK

    P.S.=> TO win vs. you morons? Heck - I don't even HAVE TO TRY - why? YOU DEFEAT YOURSELVES for me RoTfLmAo (see link above as proof thereof)... apk

  76. Non-sequitur: He says my work's GOOD period by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He says my work's GOOD period (nothing YOU or "your kind" the "not-men" INFERIOR deficient ones can do about it) "I've never tried to belittle (APK's work), I've flat out said it's good" - by BronsCon (927697) on Thursday February 11, 2016

    ESPECIALLY as you SHOW EVERYONE YOU FEAR ME - why?

    Well, proof's You HIDE behind UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous posts STALKING ME due to butthurt of me CONSTANTLY & EASILY annihilating you wannabes as I did today on hosts vs. whitelists https://news.slashdot.org/comm... as usual for me!

    APK

    P.S.=> FUNNY PART: I ate dinner as that link TOTALLED your bs (limited range WEAK know-how in computing you UNIDENTIFIABLE ac trolls have) & you did what ALWAYS BETRAYS you KNOW YOU LOST TO ME again in downmod "hiding" my PARENT post so it hid that + TONS of your UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous posts to TRY to "forums slide" BURY that defeat of yours (@ my hands as usual easily, of course, hahahaha)... apk

    1. Re: Non-sequitur: He says my work's GOOD period by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BronsCon requested that you stop using his username to defend and promote your software. It's unfortunate that you don't have the integrity to honor his request.

      As for whether or not I have integrity, that's irrelevant and has no bearing on whether it's reasonable for you to use Bronson's username to promote your work.

      Answer one simple question: Why do you believe it's appropriate for you to use BronsCon's username to promote yourself when he directly requested that you not do so?

  77. You talk 'integrity' posting unidentifiable ac? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have NONE: U post unidentifiable ac STALKING me & talk integrity? LMAO! U get ANNIHILATED by me hosts vs. whitelists https://news.slashdot.org/comm... & EASILY, lol!

    * You try "put down" my work others CLEARLY like & use + like BronsCon say is GOOD work (as always from me, my NAME is on it, I have PRIDE in it - you CLEARLY DON'T HIDING behind your ac STALKING me posts, lol) https://news.slashdot.org/comm...

    YET YOU HAVE NOTHING BETTER TO SHOW YOU'VE EVER DONE? LMAO - that makes YOU a BLOWHARD ingrate windbag - nothing more!

    There's hugely known & used COMMERCIALLY SOLD CODE w/ my NAME on it out there dumbass (& tons of time more of my work's in publications in computing GALORE too), lol - how about you?

    You're no peer of mine ESPECIALLY when you PROVE you FEAR ME since you won't STAND BEHIND YOUR WORDS & STALK ME by UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous posts!

    Attack your character? You have LOW character (see subject).

    (Then when I DUST YOUR DOORS out as in the link above you are SO PREDICTABLE your fav color = TRANSPARENT, you downmod HIDE my parent post vs. your defeat (or so you think, most see it browing beneath the easily sockpuppets you use cheated 'downmoderation system' here & see you LOSE (you know it too, hence your UNIDENTIFIABLE ac posts)).

    APK

    P.S.-=> Then you do a FLURRY of your posts to TRY (& fail in) HIDE IT MORE via "forums sliding" post burial - in vain OTHERS SEE YOU GET NUKED by me as most browse below the "downmoderation system" your type cheats by SOCKPUPPETS (everyone knows /. for it) - but I thank you for MAKING ME LOOK GOOD & yourself like shit you are (hiding & you KNOW it, lol)... apk

  78. Whitelists = inferior vs. hosts & why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Hosts speed you up 2 ways (hardcodes where they spend most time @ vs. remote DNS resolution (or local) & ADBLOCKING)

    Hosts hardcodes also AVOID dns security issues (redirects being one) OR being down + DNS LEVEL requestlog TRACKING!

    FACT - whitelists OFFER NO DNS LEVEL PROTECTION & whitelists DO NOT SPEED YOU UP 2 ways hosts do as noted above.

    You FAIL!

    Hence your UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous posts you STALK me by FEARING me & fearing standing BEHIND YOUR WORDS & you CAN'T CREATE tools you USE user & I do (good ones folks LIKE & USE + praise saying my work is GOOD (not YOUR "non-existence"ware)).

    APK

    P.S.=> Hosts SPECIFICS avoids MISTAKES wildcards do BLOCKING INNOCENTS (e.g. not all *.tucows.com = BAD PROVING my point & you fail 3 ways: NO SPEED GAIN as hosts does 2 ways & FALSE POSTIVES in droves in wildcarding + whitelists = MAINTENANCE NIGHTMARE (I see whitelisters BITCH they are blocked from things they NEED)

  79. u FEAR ME hiding behind ac posts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously U FEAR me hiding by UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous you HARASS me w/ FAILING hosts vs. whitelist https://news.slashdot.org/comm...

    You STALK ME by UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous & LOSE vs. me EVERYTIME (see link above).

    What GIVES AWAY you know you lost? 2 things:

    HIDING my parent post (came RIGHT after link above & you "downmod hid it" - but unlike MOST ac's I have NO POST LIMIT & RUN YOU DRY of your limited # of "downmodpoints" you ABUSE & I repost).

    You give it away MORE you got NUKED by me as you do FLURRIES of posts to try "forums slide" BURY you got your ass kicked - you must be sadomasochists!
    APK

    P.S.=> & MULTIPLE personalities? YOU losers do SOCKPUPPETS galore OR FAKE NAMES for your FAKE LIES of WASTED lives - proof?? Look @ Zontar's "TrollingForHostsFiles" https://slashdot.org/comments.... to HARASS & STALK me (I dusted him in BOTH guises FAKE NAME & sockpuppet)... apk

  80. Whitelists = inferior vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Hosts speed you up 2 ways (hardcodes where they spend most time @ vs. remote DNS resolution (or local) & ADBLOCKING)

    Hosts hardcodes also AVOID dns security issues (redirects being one) OR being down + DNS LEVEL requestlog TRACKING!

    FACT - whitelists OFFER NO DNS LEVEL PROTECTION & whitelists DO NOT SPEED YOU UP 2 ways hosts do as noted above.

    You FAIL!

    Hence your UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous posts you STALK me by FEARING me & fearing standing BEHIND YOUR WORDS & you CAN'T CREATE tools you USE user & I do (good ones folks LIKE & USE + praise saying my work is GOOD (not YOUR "non-existence"-ware)).

    APK

    P.S.=> Hosts SPECIFICS avoids MISTAKES wildcards do BLOCKING INNOCENTS (e.g. not all *.tucows.com = BAD PROVING my point & you fail 3 ways: NO SPEED GAIN as hosts does 2 ways & FALSE POSTIVES in droves in wildcarding + whitelists = MAINTENANCE NIGHTMARE (I see whitelisters BITCH they are blocked from things they NEED)

    1. Re:Whitelists = inferior vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There you go again lying some more you sack of shit. Hosts has plenty of misses, most notably false negatives. These are probably the simplest way around your fake security but I will leave it to you to figure out what is meant by that. But wait there is more, hosts still has a problem with false positives, as there are erroneous entries on those lists. So you lost there too.

      It gets even better because if you have a lot of entries in your hosts file you have to do a long linear look up using strings but other software can assume a sorted list and perform a substantially quicker search performing substantially fewer expensive string comparisons. So here again you erroneously claim it is faster. Even here I ignored the time and effort I would have to put in fucking around with your little toy program to get things working which only makes things worse for your stupid program.

      APK even complains that whitelists are a maintenance nightmare but blacklists like his are just as bad in that regard. However unlike whitelists, blacklists are proven to provide no actual security.

      APK must really like losing, but then he is all about the fail.

  81. He still says it's good & you admit it too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject your answer & ib "integrity" & "character" u say I have none of https://news.slashdot.org/comm... & YOU STALK ME BY unidentifiable AC saying that? Please.

    * U lack GOOD character fear ME (obviously) + fear standing behind your words STALKING me by unidentifiable ac + u lose hosts vs. whitelists https://news.slashdot.org/comm...

    APK

    P.S.=> I'll still use his quote (he STILL says my work's GOOD) & he's CHILDISH & 'butthurt' PERSONAL. He MAY not like me I don't CARE - he says my work's good & many do + USE & LIKE IT & I'm not here to win a highschool popularity contest RIGGED by SOCKPUPPETEERS proof = Zontar The Mindless=TrollingForHostsFiles https://slashdot.org/comments.... OR to obey YOUR UNIDENTIFIABLE no integrity/won't STAND BEHIND YOUR BS anonymous STALKING me psycho ass - I'm here WINNING

    1. Re: He still says it's good & you admit it too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None of your unsubstantiated personal attacks toward me change the fact that you are showing poor character by continuing to take BronsCon's quote out of context and use his username against his wishes. Every time I see you use his username to promote your software, I'm going to reply with a link to BronsCon's request that you not do so. I'll remind everyone that it ignoring BronsCon's request shows that you lack integrity. I'll point out that users who run software from someone like you who lacks integrity is putting their security at extreme risk.

      Don't like it? There's an easy way to prevent me from making such posts. All you have to do is follow BronsCon's request that you stop using his username to promote your product.

      Undoubtedly, you're reply and claim that I'm stalking you and that I lack integrity. And when you do that, you'll be projecting yet again.

  82. If you have more than 6-9 tabs open ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    permanently, you meant to use bookmark folders.

    You can even pretend the bookmark toolbar is another level of tab bar, and/or that the folders are sessions.

    If you can't, you need to get a therapy, cause you're a hoarder.

  83. It's called bookmark sidebar! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, you all use tabs precisely like bookmarks ... while for some bizarre non-reason refusing to use bookmarks.

    1. Re:It's called bookmark sidebar! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put down the crack pipe and explain how wanting tabs to be on the side, which is completely logical given that computer displays are wide aspect, equates to using them like bookmarks?

      FYI, I do use bookmarks/speed dial in my browser (Vivaldi). I don't want to end up bookmarking a bunch of shit that I only need open temporarily. That's the reason tabs exist.

  84. Dear Unidentifiable anonymous stalker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject w/ sockpuppeteers: many on /. w/ proof Zontar The Mindless=TrollingForHostsFiles https://slashdot.org/comments.... HARASSING me too TIL I blew him away under BOTH - thus your kind does UNIDENTIFIABLE ac posts now instead (I RUN YOU DRY of your 'abused' sockpuppet FARMED 'downmodpoints' + I run you out of SOCKPUPPETS I FLOOR too)

    I blew you FOOLS out hosts vs. whitelists https://news.slashdot.org/comm...

    YOU + "your kind" (do NOTHING zero wastes of LIFE "ne'er-do-well" weak JEALOUS "Lil' Jowies" (that one gets ya all "hot" since it's TRUE of you "not men", lol)) call ME an asshole AS YOU STALK ME via UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous posts?

    Bwaaahahaha!

    * You & all "your LOW kind" in DEFICIENT ones as gweihir calls you & what I call you in "InFeRiOr OnEz" (lol) = WEAK lazy assholes & unskilled chattering LOSERS!

    APK

    P.S.=> I showed this to 2 of my pals tonite & my roommate & they said you're SICK little FUCKS & Pussies (verbatim per ex-Marine in 1)... apk

    1. Re: Dear Unidentifiable anonymous stalker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prove that you have two pals and a roommate. I find this highly suspect because I can't imagine anyone wanting to live with someone who behaves the way you do.

    2. Re:Dear Unidentifiable anonymous stalker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think bragging that you have 2 pals and roommate is a good thing, then you're absolutely wrong.

      You're what 56 years old now? 57? And you were bragging that you have roommate, LOL.

    3. Re: Dear Unidentifiable anonymous stalker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      APK is 56-ish years old, and bragging about roommate. Just think about that, LOL.

    4. Re: Dear Unidentifiable anonymous stalker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you know how expensive a single occupancy room at the mental institute is, of course he has a roommate. Medicaid doesn't pay for single occupancy rooms and APK can't pay out of pocket.

    5. Re:Dear Unidentifiable anonymous stalker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well apparently he does need a roommate for his side of that dumpy duplex.

  85. Re: You talk 'integrity' posting unidentifiable ac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd actually prefer your posts get modded up instead of down, especially your more vicious personal attacks. I'd like to see them at least at +1. That way, they'll show up when Google and other search engines index Slashdot. I want your posts to he visible to search engines. I hope that whenever someone searches for your hosts file software or looks up your name, they see lots of results of you making vicious attacks. I hope the visibility of your personal attacks is actually increased so that anyone who searches for you or your software immediately sees just how much of an asshole you are and how much you lack integrity. I hope your posts get modded up so that more people see how you conduct yourself. I hope your vicious personal attacks define your character for anyone who isn't already aware of your vile behavior. I may start modding up your most vicious personal attacks right before those discussions get archived. That way, your behavior will be more visible to search engines and your comments here will define your reputation whenever anyone searches for you or your software. I hope your own words destroy what little reputation you have left.

  86. Zontar the Mindless PSYCHO LOON part 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Going to make more sockpuppets to stalk & troll me with you loon SOCKPUPPETING STALKER https://slashdot.org/comments.... & Sending me postcards with threats too https://slashdot.org/comments.... YOU OBVIOUSLY SICK IN THE HEAD WHACKO?

    * You're a CHICKEN-DICK little FAKE NAME using FUCK online hiding his FAKE LIE of a "so-called 'life'" you WASTED obviously.

    APK

    P.S.=> Your bed of nails is right up there & in the post you replied to YOU SELF-ADMITTED weak WHACKO "mentalboy" LOON https://slashdot.org/comments.... & You're a druggie too https://slashdot.org/comments.... WEAK LITTLE "depression boy" WHIMP, lol - take some MORE DRUGS & ADDLE YOUR already weak little BRAIN even MORE pussy - & KEEP STALKING ME TOO everyone SEES what a nutjob you are DOING it, thanks - proves my point... apk

    1. Re: Zontar the Mindless PSYCHO LOON part 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fact: Zontar's postcard didn't contain a threat.

  87. Come over so I can prove it & fix your wagon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & FUNNY you don't WANT anyone seeing posts about Zontar The Mindless SOCKPUPPET STALKING ME too https://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=5038387&cid=46782891/

    Nobody would want to LIVE with PUSSIES like you Zontar The Mindless (& I just LOVE exposing YOU weak PSYCHO BOY mentalcase too https://slashdot.org/comments.... )

    * No WONDER you "hide" behind your FAKE NAME for your FAKE LIE of a NUTJOB touched in the head WASTED druggie https://slashdot.org/comments.... so-called 'life'

    You're DEPRESSED (pussy) because you KNOW you're FUCKING WORTHLESS!

    APK

    P.S.=> As to your BULLSHIT you just spewed, FREAK? You're just "so good" STALKING me with SOCKPUPPETS (see above) & trying to HARASS me (when what I have for you WAS pity, but now it's utter disgust) now via UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous posts? You're so WEAK it's the "Best ya got" but I knocked the SHIT outta you & your "not men" on whitelists vs. hosts easily https://news.slashdot.org/comm... cuz your too STUPID to EVER get the better of me & "YOUR KIND" certainly don't have others speaking WELL of your work as I DO https://news.slashdot.org/comm... & anyone can SEE that easily - you're wastes & LOSERS, no questions asked IS why on ALL accounts I just noted... lol & your FAKE NAMES prove it too... apk

  88. Re: Come over so I can prove it & fix your wag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What do your friends and roommate think of the posts you're making? Surely they saw those posts as well.

  89. Re:Looking forward to nearly all of this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My 9 year old pc renders web pages within a second, what the hell kind of website do you open that accidentally flicking your mouse over a tab would slow down the page you are on? O_o I just updated to 61, and hoovering over all tabs ups the cpu use to one step above barely useable.

  90. You're so good SOCKPUPPET stalking me too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Going to make more sockpuppets to stalk & troll me with you loon https://slashdot.org/comments.... (yes I know it's YOU by UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous Zontar The Mindless DUE TO YOUR DRUG ADDICTION LOSER https://slashdot.org/comments.... that SCRAMBLED YOUR BRAIN permanently evidently!

    * There's some links I HOPE make it to Google search engines, lol, but I BET YOU DON'T!

    No wonder you HIDE behind FAKE NAMES or UNIDENTIFIABLE AC STALKER posts pussy. You're damaged goods.

    APK

    P.S.=> Why should you CARE anyway? Oh, maybe since OTHERS will use these links against YOUR SORRY SICK PSYCHO ASS tooI suppose BEHIND your FAKE NAME (unless you STALK ME by UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous like you are NOW that is & yes I know it's YOU Zontar The Mindless) for your FAKE LIE of a WASTED loser's life - maybe I ought to start enmasse posting it via scripts constantly onto /. - that way there is NO WAY to hide or downmod it away & it WILL make SEARCH ENGINE indexes... what do you think about that You psycho that SENDS ME POSTCARDS https://slashdot.org/comments.... like the butthurt OBSESSED psycho WHACKO you are since I dusted you in technicals constantly & your "FRAGILE" weak 'depression whimp' EGO can't handle it (you know you're worthless is why - only GOOD THING outta SWEDEN whereyou are from where you let MUSLIMS RAPE YOUR WOMEN you spineless bitch is Koenigsegg supercars)

    1. Re: You're so good SOCKPUPPET stalking me too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, so much rage. All that hatred must be destroying your mind and body. Have you seen a doctor lately to check up on your health? I'm concerned for your well-being, with all that rage and stress you constantly exhibit in your posts. It's just not healthy. If you're not careful, one day you're going to get so angry arguing with people and you'll have a heart attack or stroke from the damage all that stress does to your body.

    2. Re: You're so good SOCKPUPPET stalking me too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You very much want this to be about Zontar, Khyber, or anyone else. Anyone but you, because that might force you to address your own lack of integrity and persistent nasty behavior toward others. You've been asked to do one simple thing: stop using BronsCon's username to promote your product and defend yourself. You're refusing to do that, and for no good reason at all. That demonstrates that you lack integrity, and none of your personal attacks and criticisms of others will change that. Only you acting with integrity can change this, and you can start by not using BronsCon's username to promote your software or yourself.

      Using BronsCon's username to promote your software without his permission and against his wishes is probably illegal. People generally control how their name and likeness can be used to promote things, and that probably extends to usernames. Every time you use BronsCon's username to promote your product or defend yourself, which you've done many times in this thread, you're probably breaking the law. It's funny how you cry about Zontar supposedly breaking the law by sending you a postcard, which you've done repeatedly on this thread, but you don't seem to think the law applies to you.

      You should reconsider your behavior before you cross too many lines and end up in legal trouble you can't get out of.

  91. How would YOU know UNLESS you're Zontar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: You're Zontar now STALKING me by UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous vs. SOCKPUPPETS https://slashdot.org/comments.... right?

    * I have the postcard - SENDING IT ALONE is a threat & so is his (YOUR) "warning" to me fucker...

    APK

    P.S.=> Let me give you a WARNING, you demented mentalboy pussy poo' lil' WEAK "depression" oh 'pity me' whimp https://slashdot.org/comments.... that SCRAMBLED YOUR ALREADY DIM BRAIN by ABUSING ILLEGAL DRUGS https://slashdot.org/comments.... - you don't WANT me ever seeing you face to face to show you "how it REALLY works" fucker... ever! apk

    1. Re: How would YOU know UNLESS you're Zontar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus said to love your enemies. There's not a single bit of love in your post. Your posts make Jesus sad.

  92. Zontar the Mindless You = mentally impaired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Zontar the Mindless You = mentally impaired ADMITTEDLY by your own words https://slashdot.org/comments.... due to YOUR DRUG ABUSE https://slashdot.org/comments.... with which you SCRAMBLED YOUR BRAIN & ruined your health (you just project that AND say what I say in those links you LOONY that STALKS ME BY SOCKPUPPETS https://slashdot.org/comments.... & now by UNIDENTIFIABLE ac posts now obviously too (you're a whacko & I don't DOUBT that normal english doesn't make SENSE to you SWEDEN BOY where Muslims RAPE YOUR WOMEN & you "not men" there LET IT HAPPEN in SWEETIE sweden).

    APK

    P.S.=> Zontar The Mindless - you come from SPINELESS swede bitch men, see above & you HELP PROVE THAT with your actions in those links & NOW too... apk

    1. Re: Zontar the Mindless You = mentally impaired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's probably time to share your posts with law enforcement in New York state. As hateful as you are, continually posting your manifestos on Slashdot, you seem like a high risk to engage in violent activity such as a mass shooting. For your own sake, as well as those of any potential victims, law enforcement needs to be aware of your very obvious mental health issues. Carrying on in this manner can't end well for you. You'll either eventually drop dead from all of the stress, probably through a heart attack or stroke, or all of your hate will come out in an act of violent rage. That wouldn't end well for you, either. Let's hope for your sake and for that of any potential victims that you don't own any firearms and aren't able to acquire them.

      I'll pray for you, because you need it. But because I care about you and love you as Jesus commands, it's necessary for me to bring your actions to the attention of law enforcement.

  93. Jesus also WHIPPED the Pharisees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jesus also WHIPPED the Pharisee of the Synagogue of Satan (fake jews per John the Revelator) Zontar sockpuppeteer https://slashdot.org/comments.... right out of the TEMPLE when he couldn't take their CRAP corrupting the Lord's house too you drug brain addled LOON https://slashdot.org/comments.... Now STALKING ME via UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous obviously.

    APK

    P.S.=> Don't even TRY "play scripture" w/ me you ADMITTED mental fruitcake since You'll LOSE just as you did on whitelists vs. hosts https://news.slashdot.org/comm... weakling UNDEREDUCATED & UNSKILLED fake name ONLINE or UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous STALKING me weezil & you do NOTHING of value others like & use + SPEAK HIGHLY of as I do you INFERIOR damanged mental good loser https://news.slashdot.org/comm... you DISGUSTING cockroach... apk

    1. Re: Jesus also WHIPPED the Pharisees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a very confused individual. Jesus commanded his followers to love their enemies and to turn the other cheek. Jesus didn't insult His enemies. Jesus said things like, Father, forgive them, for they know not what they are doing. He forgave the people who convicted Him on bogus charges, the people who scourged and beat Him, the people who mocked Him and placed a crown of thorns on His head, and the people who crucified Him.

  94. Go ahead Zontar the Mindless & why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I already REPORTED YOU for your postcard you sent me & this threat you made too https://slashdot.org/comments.... you obsessed lunatic ADMITTED whacko https://slashdot.org/comments.... (yes they saw that too during the report AND that you ABUSE DRUGS https://slashdot.org/comments.... also LONG ago (day after I got it) + the FACT you try HARASS & STALK ME (by sockpuppets admittedly here) https://slashdot.org/comments....

    THAT WAY THEY WILL KNOW WHERE YOU ARE so they can DEAL with your PSYCHOTIC obsessed LOON stalking & threats you made to me asshole.

    APK

    P.S.=> PLEASE do it & think you 'scare me'? LMAO - go on DO IT so I can get your ass busted & ABOUT TIME... apk

    1. Re: Go ahead Zontar the Mindless & why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are very confused and mentally ill. Reporting you isn't a threat but an act of mercy. Perhaps if law enforcement is aware of your obviously severe mental illness and your violent threats, they can help you get the treatment you need. I forgive you for your angry and vicious words because I understand it's not your fault that you're mentally ill. I just want you to get the help you need and to ensure that you aren't able to harm anyone, whether it be others or yourself. Jesus loves you and so do I. Reporting you is an act of compassion and I promise I will pray for you as well.

  95. Told you Zontar the Mindless sockpuppeteer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Told you already Zontar the Mindless sockpuppeteer & harasser of myself admittedly by you https://slashdot.org/comments.... - they said you're pussies and f'd up & b>you ARE admittedly a "wee bit 'mental'" you nutjob freak https://slashdot.org/comments....

    APK

    P.S.=> Small wonder they said that seeing as you use FAKE NAMES online + SOCKPUPPETS to STALK & HARASS me for your FAKE LIE of a ruined DRUGGIE "life" https://slashdot.org/comments.... you disgusting reprehensible SICK PSYCHO loser that sends me postcards with THREATS https://slashdot.org/comments.... & that IS a threat I quote there from you WHACKO... apk

    1. Re:Told you Zontar the Mindless sockpuppeteer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It appears you have ruined your life far more than Zontar The Mindless, Ol Olsoc, Khyber, or BarbHudson.

  96. Then lookup what I wrote Zontar sockpuppeteer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've written much I'm not good as Jesus but try & I don't turn the other cheek vs. sockpuppeteer STALKERS https://slashdot.org/comments.... like you Zontar The Mindless (yes I know it's you by UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous posts which yes others will see & word will get out & they will TOSS IT BACK INTO YOUR FACE here on /,. I am sure once you PISS THEM OFF as you do to everyone freak).

    Jesus forgives. I don't. You're done fucker...

    APK

    P.S.=> Want to THREATEN me https://slashdot.org/comments.... with "watch your mailbox" you LOONY drug addict https://slashdot.org/comments.... & mentalboy due to that drug abuse you LOSER https://slashdot.org/comments.... ?

    I reported you to the NY State authorities 2nd day AFTER you sent me that postcard with MORE THREATS in it too fucker - you're fucked in the head & they KNOW it too...apk

    1. Re: Then lookup what I wrote Zontar sockpuppeteer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seek help. Jesus forgives. If you won't, your eternal soul may be in peril. That's unfortunate.

  97. Do it: I reported YOU long ago Zontar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do it: I reported YOU long ago to NY State Police after you sent me your "watch your mailbox" threat & postcard https://slashdot.org/comments.... you obsessed loon!

    PLEASE do it so they can put YOU in the NUTHOUSE where you admittedly BELONG https://slashdot.org/comments.... you drug addict that RATTLED YOUR BRAIN LOOSE admittedly too https://slashdot.org/comments....

    PLEASE DO IT so they can tag you FINALLY & then deal with you.

    APK

    P.S.=> You go for it, lol - we'll SEE what happens to YOU... apk

  98. You STALKING me by unidentifiable ac = good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    STALKING me by unidentifiable ac = good? Making SOCKPUPPETS to stalk & HARASS me = good Zontar https://slashdot.org/comments.... ??

    * Don't play "moral" with me you pitiful DRUG ADDICTED SCUMBAG https://slashdot.org/comments.... admitting that AND yet NOT admitting drug ABUSE is the source of your mental problems you also ADMITTED https://slashdot.org/comments....

    YOU ARE THE LAST PERSON WHO SHOULD TALK INTEGRITY seeing you UNWILLING to STAND BEHIND YOUR WORDS using your REAL name identifying yourself & instead STALKING ME by UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous posts you LOON loser.

    APK

    P.S.=> I'll keep using Bronscon saying my work = good "I've never tried to belittle (APK's work), I've flat out said it's good" - by BronsCon (927697) on Thursday February 11, 2016 @06:48PM (#51491263) as it's true + FACT & OTHERS say so too https://news.slashdot.org/comm... but they surely do NOT of SOCKPUPPETING drug addicted mentalcases in YOU Zontar The Mindless... apk

    1. Re: You STALKING me by unidentifiable ac = good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stalking? You keep using that word, but I don't think you know what it means.

  99. APK, please be my boyfriend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe it's a little weird, but I can't be the only guy who gets turned on when you make posts like this. Your personal attacks are HOT and I get really turned on reading them. I even tried your suggestion about injecting soy milk and, wow, it's been amazing. I would just love for you to call me a soyboy. And I totally get turned on when you post about the anonymous unidentifiable "ne'er-do-wells" and how jealous they are. And when you say others are stalking you, wow, the thought of other guys stalking you just makes me jealous and I get even more turned on. I can only imagine that you're just as buff as when you played lacrosse and that you must be one hunk. I'm getting wound up even by writing this post. No matter what others may say, I'm totally you're admirer. I've seen you tell others to post their name, phone number, and address. I'll totally do that if you promise to go on a date with me. I want you to be my boyfriend.

    Bryce

    1. Re: APK, please be my boyfriend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, where are you? I'm still interested in you!

  100. Wrong: I'm laughing @ you Zontar The Mindless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject : I hope you get dumber vs. making sockpuppets to harass + stalk me w/ + your new threat https://news.slashdot.org/comm... that I have been just WAITING for you to TRY to set yourself up like a bowling pin to FINALLY pin you down (I won't, the authorities in the NY STATE POLICE will as you'll supply the tracking for it).

    * GO FOR IT, make GOOD on that NEW 'threat' of yours like your "Watch your MAILBOX" one https://slashdot.org/comments.... & postcard I have still as evidence w/ more "warnings" of yours on it in YOUR handwriting whacko touched in the head LOON you ADMIT you are https://slashdot.org/comments.... having RUINED YOUR MIND via DRUG ABUSE too causing that mentalboy 'depression' (everyone KNOWS weed causes depression eventually if not schizophrenia which I suspect you have too probably) https://slashdot.org/comments.... druggie whacko you are.

    APK

    P.S.=> PLEASE - DO "make good" on your LATEST 'threat'ok? You do that, we'll SEE what happens to you, lol... apk

  101. Everyone sees you do it Zontar The Mindless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: All over /. & now too + your NEW threat I hope you follow thru on & why https://news.slashdot.org/comm... so you F yourself up more since I took care of this LONG ago.

    Why no more sockpuppets you make to HARASS me Zontar The Mindless = TrollingForHostsFiles (you obsessed psychotic loon) https://slashdot.org/comments.... ?

    * Listen - please: DO MAKE GOOD on your latest "threat", ok? Puh-leese DO... by all means.

    APK

    P.S.=> You do that, lol, please do - we'll SEE what happens to you then & you'll supply your OWN demise for the good of myself & I am guessing MANY OTHERS you stalk & harass you psycho... apk

    1. Re:Everyone sees you do it Zontar The Mindless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's right APK, everyone in this whole discussion is actually Zontar The Mindless. It coulnd't possibly be that there are many people who are sick of your spam, lies, off topic rants, incoherent ramblings, and petty childish name calling and threats. Maybe you should go post your garbage over on reddit or 4chan. You could even go and start your own sub reddit all about your file aggregator.

  102. Re:Looking forward to nearly all of this! by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Do you want the rendering of the current page to slow down because you flicked the mouse out of view, which happened to be over a tab?

    If you're spending so much time rendering the page that this is an issue then the web designer should have their testicles removed for the good of humanity.

    Do you want the machine and network to slow to a crawl because you dragged the pointer across a great many tabs on the way to the one you wanted, and they all start rendering?

    There is a difference between pre-fetching and pre-rendering.

    Do you want even higher memory/CPU use for a product that's already considered seriously bloated?

    Define higher CPU usage. Just because I do an activity earlier than planned doesn't mean I do more of it.

  103. Re:Looking forward to nearly all of this! by thegarbz · · Score: 2

    Exactly. These silly acceleration features are exactly what cause responsiveness issues, not solve them. Every good UI programmer is supposed to know this.

    What an absolute daft reply. UI responsiveness issues come up when a lot of activities queue at the same time. Starting some of them earlier and delaying others is one of the main ways to improve this responsiveness and has been part of the speed improvements from everything like UI design, background service management, kernel schedules, and even CPU design itself.

  104. Don't need full quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: When folks state verbatim they like & use my ware OR say it's good. They may not like me personally (they don't even know me) I don't care. I care they like & use my work - you've done better than that? Prove it. Show us/.ers speaking well of your "hotairblowhardnonexistentware". ARE YOU SAYING I DON'T QUOTE WHAT USERS OF MY WORK (not your 'notware', lol) ACTUALLY SAID in quotes of them saying my work's good (it is best of its kind & ONLY 1 of its kind on Linux/BSD in GUI)?

    * I only state verifiable concrete fact. No overstating anything - &what do I 'overstate' per your bs?

    Answer that too.

    APK

    P.S.=> Come on now chickenshit UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous do-NOTHING lazy "ne'er-do-well" loser you are, answer those questions! You won't & you'll do your usual "Run, Forrest: RUN!!!" vs. them/me as you do always when cornered by "yours truly"... apk

    1. Re:Don't need full quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You overstate your ability to program as you hold up work you did that would be barely acceptable in someone's first programming class as the pinnacle of programming. You overstate hosts ability to provide security. You overstate your own knowledge on the topic of security. Basically everything you manage to pound out on the computer is an overstatement or is some incoherent rant. Unlike you I don't need random people on slashdot to validate my work. Besides those quotes you keep using and have been told not to are taken out of context.

  105. Zontar this isn't good for your health by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & "GO TO JAIL" no passing GO + no collecting $200 either if you do your latest "threat" to me https://news.slashdot.org/comm... & I DO SINCERELY HOPE YOU FOLLOW THRU ON IT to YOUR own dismay + jailtime.

    * Puh-LEESE do follow thru so the NY State Police can FIND you & put you away for what I note there YOU supplied the ammo for, lol!

    APK

    P.S.=> I mean it - do your puny 'threat' since they KNOW about you when you threatened me "watch your mailbox" & sent me a postcard w/ 'warnings' on it like the PSYCHO LOON you are from your own mouth https://slashdot.org/comments.... & drug addict https://slashdot.org/comments.... that makes SOCKPUPPETS to STALK/HARASS me w/ too https://news.slashdot.org/comm...

  106. I sought help & NY State Police don't forgive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & your FREEDOM is in peril if you make good on your latest little THREAT Zontar The Mindless https://news.slashdot.org/comm... - so YOU DO THAT & try it, lol - we'll see how much SAVING GRACE you'll get since I long ago sought help from NY State Police that WON'T forgive you.

    * What's UNFORTUNATE is you make SOCKPUPPETS to STALK/HARASS me with https://slashdot.org/comments.... & ruined your limited dull already dim BRAIN with your DRUG ADDICTION https://slashdot.org/comments.... that made you a "depressed" (pussy) LOON you admit too https://slashdot.org/comments.... freak now STALKING me by UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous posts vs. your "phantasyland" FAKE NAME for your FAKE LIE of a WASTED so-called ruined 'life', loser.

    APK

    P.S.=> You go your puny 'threat' & watch it BACKFIRE on your dumb ass - PLEASE do it... apk

  107. Yet you have ZERO to your name/credit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Vs. me w/ TONS to that effect & you have SQUAT supporting you from security pros even in the one you replied to as you STALK me via UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous pussy loser posts.

    * Why? You KNOW you're reject defective merchandise DAMAGED goods so you TRY to SPREAD your MISERY to me!

    (Me who does programs even /.ers LIKE & USE + say is GOOD WORK https://news.slashdot.org/comm... that a JOKE like YOU will NEVER ever manage (minus copying OpenSORES & getting bugs it + shared libs are notorious for VS. writing your code BY HAND from SCRATCH as I do in 12,000 lines + 75 procedures + 10 functions for Linux that's BETTER & FASTER vs. the Windows model /.ers liked no less))

    Again - why?

    You WASTE your already WASTED loser LIFE on STALKING/HARASSING online (what miserable FUCKS like you do trying to DRAG GOOD PEOPLE DOWN to your SHIT level (hell)) vs. doing good things of service to others.

    APK

    P.S.=> Instead of your NO-MIND mere DO-NOTHING "ne'er-do-well" great 'critic' (which any asshole can do) if you do something like I did that others on /. + 100's of 1,000's worldwide like & use as they do my hosts engine? THEN, talk you windbag ingrate BLOWHARD chattering dolt - I know you never can or will (& so DO you loser)... apk

    1. Re:Yet you have ZERO to your name/credit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It took you 12,000 lines of code for a program that reads in several lists of strings, combines them into one list, sorts that list, eliminates duplicates, and writes it out to a file? Even wrapping with a GUI that shows you write some shitty bloated code. You must be fucking terrible at coding to have a program that does so little from some many lines of code. I wouldn't trust something like that, too many places for bugs to hide.

      How about you now tell us all about your "success" that time when you had your shitty simple suggestion rejected by some other project. That is your standard method of arguing. When your lies and BS are exposed and/or you are proven to be incompetent you change the subject and try to deflect. Every time you do that you admit that you lost, but hey a loser like you just can't help it.

  108. I annihilated ArseHOLETechnica easily by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Arstechnica = losers who stalked me (as you do now anonymously unidentifiably) to NTCompatible.com & Windows IT Pro magazine forums to their public dismay in Jeremy Reimer & Jay Little + Jarrett DeAngelis (who posts here on /. until I drove his ass off too) when their websites were REMOVED by their hosting providers in Shaw Canada & CrystalTech (for both email harassing me caught on a tracking ticket + stalking me & posting lies about me on them AFTER I destroyed them both PUBLICLY @ Windows IT Pro on Exchange Servers memory being freed UNHALTING them (which tells you Exchange is HEAVILY POINTER ORIENTED linked list driven, which leads to memory fragmentation that CAN halt a serverware)).

    Jay Little the "self-proclaimed 'EXCHANGE EXPERT'" HAD TO CONCEDE IT from MICROSOFT'S OWN DOCUMENTATION proving it FOR me there (where they as usual stalked me AS YOU ARE NOW AS YOU'RE OBVIOUSLY ONE OF THOSE IDIOTS TOO ) & they can't "ban me" ANYMORE than I can be "banned" here on /. - as nothing stops ME, but me!

    I just left their site after a VERY BRIEF visit in 2001 (finding they are UNDEREDUCATED DO-NOTHING LAZY WANNABE "Fake it Till you Make It" types - shams & "ne'er-do-wells" just like YOU).

    APK

    P.S.=> It's GOT to suck to be a miserable worthless unaccomplished WRETCH like you - has to - as I see you STALK/HARASS me constantly I know you KNOW you're crap & hate seeing others like me DO WELL as I did in my hobby ware even that /.ers like & use that is NOW multiplatform on Linux + BSD & FASTER/BETTER & ALL THE VERIFIABLE SUPPORT I NEED vs. SHIT like you https://news.slashdot.org/comm... vs. the Win32/64 model even: MY DEEDS SELF SUPPORT ME & I don't NEED sockpuppets YOU USE https://slashdot.org/comments.... loser - you TRY 'drag me down' to your PERSONAL do-NOTHING zero "ne'er-do-well" level & FIND YOU CAN'T - I'm TOO STRONG vs. whimps like you (things I do prove it while you WALLOW in self-hatred, envious of myself or folks LIKE me you loser)... apk

  109. WTF? Sorry not interested/not gay here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Try deflect you all ATTACKED me 1st & I just ask others do BETTER or @ least as good w/ our /. peers saying good of THEIR work as they do mine - that's all & my WEEZIL weak 'naysayers'/'detractors' (with SHIT to show for themselves no less except for more of their BULLSHIT that is, lol) can't manage it - speaks WORLDS of them & backs me perfectly w/ their LACK of solid results I have & get from our /. peers alone (w/ 100's of 1,000s worldwide using my work too) they just plain don't & NEVER WILL stalking me by UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous posts WASTING their LIVES (already wasted obviously having ZERO to their name/credit & yet they take "potshots" @ me & DOWNMOD HIDE when I nuke 'em ala hosts vs. whitelists today here too https://news.slashdot.org/comm... )

    * See subject: SORRY TO "disappoint" I'm no gay so FIND YOURSELF ANOTHER DISH (I'm NOT on the menu to be (ugh, disgusting) "GrOOm'd"))

    APK

    P.S.=> NOTHING against you homos. I never understood you till I lived in Atlanta Ga. "San Fran of the South" 1995-2000 & asked (after stumbling into little 5 points off PeachTree where our offices were & I'd take chicks to mine (was great) off the strip, lol) fags in a gaybar (didn't KNOW it was that & thought "hey this is AOK by APK" when guys bought me drinks left & right BUT then as time got later & they dimmed the lights & GUYS JUMPED ON THE BAR ripping their clothes off & kissing one another + worse RIGHT there? I asked this "professor looking" dude w/ a Peter Sellers trenchcoat & pipe "Man, is THIS a gaybar & ARE YOU GAY HITTING ON ME?" He said "yes, what did you think?" & I told him having been there less than 1 yr. + coming from a town w/ NO gaybars @ all (til I returned 1/2 decade++ later that is NOW there is) & he told me so + even the BOUNCER was gay so I get loaded in disbelief I ended up in 1 & asked fags by me "Excuse me guys but I gotta know - WTF do you SEE in another man's HAIRY ASS?" & the bartender starting laffing trying to hide it hand over mouth & said "That CAN get you KILLED around here" & I said to them all "No, I just REALLY want to know is all, tell me" & the gays said "You like women & were BORN that way, right?" so yea, I said "That's right" & they said "Same here except we like guys" so I said to myself "It's just how they are from the get-go, perhaps a genetic aberration accident of fetal development is all & NOT their 'fault'" etc. - I have NOTHING against it between 2 consenting adults who are HOW they are ONLY if it's FORCED on others (& not put on kids) & I'm no "fagbasher" (hitting gays = possible suicide, you make 'em BLEED & cut your hand doing it = AIDS imo) + gays I know SAY I.M. SAFE (I let them know even AFTER they HIT on me putting their hand on my ass once but I don't get violent - they understand ONCE you tell them "not my cup of tea/wrong door boy" & that happened w/ a MARRIED GAY COUPLE of men up here (one was bitch got all PISSY saying "That BITCH does this all the time" & I just laughed (& took off FAST,lol)) - & there ya go... apk

  110. Right here & gotta tell ya... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject + 1st THIS https://news.slashdot.org/comm... & it creeps me out what you're doing BUT I realize MOST of you can be cool & stop once you hear what's in the link I posted.

    * You got, I figure, 2 kinds of "STRAIGHT" guys regarding "guys" like YOU seem to be - violent PUNCH YOUR LIGHTS out cretins (not me) or ones that handle your type how I DO in that link.

    NOT INTERESTED though/not gay here.

    APK

    P.S.=> I like you GAYS better than the 'not men' PUSSIES that STALK/HARASS me here nigh constantly though - Especially w/ their UTTER do-ZERO do NOTHING "ne'er-do-well" mere JEALOUS "Lil' Jowie" ENVY driven (obviously) attacks on me nigh constantly due to their WASTED time stalking me vs. bettering themselves + bs & 'chatterbox' bullshit vs. doing GOOD THINGS of SERVICE to their fellow man. I don't think they "get it" OR ARE SATANISTS (they believe in starting shit in life the way I'm getting it OR WORSE in murderous rituals for "more power in hell" & they BELIEVE the KING OF LIARS who HATES them as God's children in humanity - they are GETTING PLAYED as useful idiots like Hitler used the BROWNSHIT SA & killed them later after he didn't NEED them & NOBODY is better than FAUST & he lost to the "I WANNABE GOD" Demon Satan too (too many centuries of weaving his web of lies & an evil wisdom NO MAN can beat so STAY AWAY from him "Capt. HOWDY"))... apk

    1. Re:Right here & gotta tell ya... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does your ex-marine friend do any good with your asshole, APK? He always uses lube, right? What's his johny size? Small, medium, big, large, BBC? If he doesn't do you any good for you, I'll always be there for you, my dear, APK.

      XOXOXO

  111. Re:Come over so I can prove it & fix your wago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm proudly repeating Zontar's post: APK doesn't project much at all, does he?

  112. Run APK.. run... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keep deflecting, that's what you best at..

    Run APK.. run...

  113. Re:Looking forward to nearly all of this! by mlw4428 · · Score: 1

    Yes, I too long for the days of static HTML pages, 10dpi 320x320 gifs, and Geocities. Shun change! Yarr why do computers even have harddrives - we should be toggling binary switches for each program we want to run. Yarrrr change rabble rabble rabble.

  114. FTFY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You do realise that the browser has now hijacked core OS right, and your tabs are actively running malware right?

    Et Fin.

  115. Re:I wouldn't open the page if I wasn't going look by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many laptops can have a mouse attached making using a laptop seventy times better.

  116. Re:I sought help & NY State Police don't forgi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except he never made a threat. It's interesting how you are just a prisoner in your own mind. Maybe with all the threats you make, you should be a real prisoner.

  117. Re:I sought help & NY State Police don't forgi by Khyber · · Score: 1

    Hell, he probably threatened his own mother, which is why she left his ass in Syracuse (they shared the same address) and moved to Florida.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  118. All about Khyber/Alex McQuown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's what I see as FACT about you: Arrest & prison time + probation violation threatening a gov't. official (District Attorney - HOW STUPID ARE YOU?) #1/2 https://www.rapsheets.org/cali...

    #2/2 prison time https://unicourt.com/case/ca-r... (brb in a minute w/ ones out of state of California)

    Guess what DUMBFUCK? Can't SUE me for facts about you I read from LEGAL SOURCES stupid fuck!

    FELONY THREATS to a DA & threats to SUE me repeatedly https://yro.slashdot.org/comme... OR "come visit me" https://slashdot.org/comments.... or "dox" me etc. & WORSE https://slashdot.org/comments.... is that AGAIN with your other EXTORTION, JAILTIME, PROBATION VIOLATION recidivism.

    MORE THREATS TO "kill me" or "end my sanity" https://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12199712&cid=56738758/ ? TRY IT you deviant ABNORMAL twisted little COCKSUCKER. It'd be the LAST THING you ever try.

    * Keep it up like THIS threat of yours @ me AGAIN sweetie https://slashdot.org/comments.... pusscake!

    You'll get ENDED or you'll be in the BUNK w/ "Good Ole' LEROY" soon enough as his Special "Lil' Teddybear" that you OBVIOUSLY deeply MISS, SOON enough BOY, hahahaha!

    Nobody BELIEVES A WORD YOUR DEMENTED ASS SAYS after the above & what you've DIRECTED MY WAY TOO you fucking LITTLE 10lb. PUSSY motherfucker bitch homo https://slashdot.org/comments.... (despite your UNIDENTIFIABLE ANONYMOUS SUPPORT NET here & there, lol)

    From what I heard about you? YOU ARE A BITCH that TAKES IT RIGHT UP THE ASS, ugh (disgusting/abnormal/DEVIANT/weirdo) AFTER you've been PUMPED UP with "good drugs" (man, even worse - sounds like you SELL it for dope, lol) per https://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=7892497&cid=50385967/ @ a porn shop as a sexworker (lol) YOU BRAG OF https://slashdot.org/comments.... & FIRED JOB AFTER JOB+ ARREST after ARREST https://tech.slashdot.org/comm... BRAGGING YO A Gangstuh https://slashdot.org/comments.... (lol, punk pussy is more it).

    APK

    P.S.=> Perhaps LIBEL of myself should be amongst your "FINE RECORD" (not) per:

    "NOD32 detects a trojan in APK's HOSTS bullshit." - by Khyber on Saturday August 22, 2015

    VirusTotal & NOD32 SHOW CLEAN IN ITS EXES

    https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    + MORE LIES

    "he's tying to get your fucking information." - by Khyber on August 22, 2015

    My program doesn't transmit outward!

    TONS more than this on you too on your HUGE tech fuckup record vs. me!

    (Truth about you KILLS you, blame yourself, not I - freak)... apk

  119. Bwaahahaha: ArseHOLETechnica? I dusted 'em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Arstechnica? Heh: Ask Jeremy Reimer &/or Jay Little if theirs ISP/BSP's, hosting providers, and yes, the police were summoned when they too were "frustrated" into looking stupid, like yourself here, and they:

    ---

    1.) Made threats on my life (Jay Little, whom CrystalTech.com removed his website for it)
    2.) Impersonated me (Jeremy Reimer on HIS own forums, & also at arstechnica - parts of his website were removed)
    3.) Email harassed me (Jeremy Reimer, & his ISP Shaw.ca put him on a tracking ticket & he ceased it)
    4.) Stalked me online (Jay Little did this & got himself banned @ NTCompatible.com for it)

    ---

    and more? Why?? Because I:

    1.) Asked them if ANY of them ever did anything that was well-noted in publications (as I have many times) in the art & science of computing (an ENTIRE FORUMS of them, not a single one had - I thought it was funny, because they like to "play computer expert" like Jeremy Reimer especially, & yet, not a single one of them then even had a CSC degree, or even CIS degree... not even MCSE certs) - that, clearly, got to their "geek angst" & the truth that not a SINGLE ONE OF THEM was really any form of "computer guru", period.

    2.) I made them look foolish @ Windows IT Pro, where Jay Little & Jeremy Reimer stalked me to (after I asked via email that Reimer remove a post on his forums that said it was I, when it was not (Reimer later had to PUBLICLY ADMIT it wasn't me, once his ISP got ahold of him alongside his website hosting provider)).

    E.G.-> The fat fool, Jay Little, literally said he was, verbatim, an "expert on Exchange (MS)", & when I showed evidence from Microsoft on how memory optimization programs could un-halt stalled Exchange servers? Jay Little ran & started stalking me, site to site & making death threats from his own personal websites that I should be put to death, & more etc.

    APK

    P.S.=> IF that's MY home you speak of I suggest you take a look again OR get current photos - it doesn't look like what YOU say (lies) @ all... apk

  120. Bullshit but I beat him to the punch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject due to this post of his on "reporting me" https://news.slashdot.org/comm... & like I said "GO FOR IT" to Zontar The Mindless (& yes I know it's him as he's stalked me in THIS thread too) due to my LONG AGO reporting him for NUMEROUS crap threats "watch your mailbox" & sending me postcards with "warnings" on them https://news.slashdot.org/comm... & FAR more (links are right there).

    * It's VERY INTERESTING how you HIDE behind UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous posts vs. STANDING BEHIND YOUR WORD identifying youself (not) punk.

    APK

    P.S.=> Don't worry: I KNOW you're going for "forums sliding" BURIAL of these postings but I keep them bookmarked for FUTURE REFERENCE next time you STALKING losers try it & they're insta ready for when you WON'T be able to BURY THE ENTIRE THREAD in a deluge of your AC posts & everyone will see all of this you MISERABLE sick little demented weirdo bastards... apk

  121. Told you: I'm NOT homosexual/gay... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & WRONG - again: Not homosexual/gay/queer etc. here so go find yourself another dish. I'm not on the menu, ok? Good.

    * Neither is my ex-Marine roommate.

    (So you're "SOL")

    APK

    P.S.=> Now, go on "shoo" lil' TROLL & unidentifiable anonymous stalker... apk

  122. You're running & HIDING unidentifiable ac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're running & HIDE as unidentifiable ac: Why NOT use your registered 'lusername' vs. UNIDENTIFIABLE ac posts? Lack of character = you. Lack of GOOD character you miserable scumbag.

    * Jerks like you RUIN forums like these!

    APK

    P.S.=> Answer that question... apk

  123. You UNIDENTIFIABLE ac stalkers = all the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You UNIDENTIFIABLE ac stalkers = all the same as far as I'm concerned: Chickenshit do-NOTHING zero "ne'er-do-well" scum I love to expose for WHAT you really are - online trashbags & shitbags in the "real world" too undoubtedly.

    APK

    P.S.=> No, I'll just keep DESTROYING you publicly (even though you losers went for "forums sliding" BURIAL of these posts I see them & nex time you do it, what I refine from THIS exchange will be brought to bear on each of you as I have here WHEN YOU CAN'T BURY or abuse downmods from your Zontar sockpuppets to HIDE them)... apk

  124. Re:I wouldn't open the page if I wasn't going look by tepples · · Score: 1

    I use an external mouse with this laptop when at my desk. When it's on my lap, such as when I'm riding the bus or waiting on a bench for someone, there really isn't room or a good angle.

  125. Re:I don't care what "your kind" says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only thing proven here is that Alexander Peter Kowalski is a spamming retard who should not be trusted and who's advice should not be taken.

  126. Forget it until they fix Tab Mix Plus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Firefox Quantum is completely irrelevant to me until TMP is working.

  127. Prove you've done better... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: I do my best & folks seem to like + use & say good things about my work & security it provides blowhard windbag https://news.slashdot.org/comm... - how about you, "big talker"?

    * Answer the question in my subject-line...

    APK

    P.S.=> I've never seen a program that did well created by UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous coward (alias JEALOUS "Lil' Jowie" YOU, lol)... apk

    1. Re:Prove you've done better... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you actually can't refute anything anyone actually says about you or your work but instead you keep deflecting. When you deflect, change the subject, start making random demands, or go to petty name calling it means you lost the argument because you can't defend your previous statements or refute what others said. You really are a loser. Besides others have pointed out that your work is equivalent to that of someone who is just learning a programming language so not something to really be proud of there. Besides we weren't discussing what I have or haven't produced but the piss poor quality of what you produce and how your overstate it's greatness.

  128. Why 'refute' good things said about my work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & https://tech.slashdot.org/comm... TRY put it down but registered /.ers say otherwise (vs. UNIDENTIFIABLE obsessed LOON you STALKING me by anonymous posts & doing NOTHING of value yourself JEALOUS "Lil' Jowie", lol).

    * You & "your kind" (lowest of the LOW lazy "ne'er-do-well" DO-NOTHING's) can even try put ME down but a man's judged by his actions NOT his words (especially YOUR BLOWHARD windbag HOTAIR & notware hotairware (you know, the kind YOU produce, doesn't exist/unsubstantial)) ?

    HOWEVER: You're GOOD @ 2 things vs. me (yes, you are):

    1.) YOU HELP ME no less - you lose, lmao!

    2.) You're BETTER than me @ 1 thing: always LOSING!

    "*RoTfLmAo*"

    (Vs you? I don't even have to TRY win - you & yours DEFEAT YOURSELVES for me, lol - it's great & just (gotta do it, it's tradition) "too, Too, TOO EASY - just '2ez'" vs. JEALOUS "Lil' Jowie" do-NOTHING zero "not-men" who STALK ME in "idle hands is the devil's workshop" spiritual virus laden envy & JEALOUSY)

    * You WISH you were me - how do I KNOW that? All the times you've IMPERSONATED me on /., lol!

    APK

    P.S.=> You're a REAL helping hand to me - whether you KNOW IT (& you don't know much, hence you running when I ask you to show you've done better yourself & you have to DEFLECT from that fact (You're also projecting now on 'deflecting' you're guilty of)) - I LOVE IT, thanks... apk

  129. What do I want? OK... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: I want you to GET A LIFE & stop STALKING me by UNIDENTIFIABLE ac posts. "Integrity" you speak of YET you STALK me behind your UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous posts?

    Please, lol! Your HYPOCRISY's astounding!

    I'm only "nasty" (or rather TRUTHFUL about "your kind", the "ne'er-do-well" do-NOTHING little JEALOUS Jowies in life out there who "take potshots" @ me only to find they come RIGHT back @ you, lol - & you do NOT like that, or TRUTH/FACT about you doing it) only IF I get nasty 1st directed MY way - when in rome, do as the romans do & SPEAK TO THEM IN THE LANGUAGE THEY THEMSELVES USE so they UNDERSTAND.

    * I may NOT be expressing myself well in YOUR LANGUAGE (lol) - of STUPID - hehehehe so something MAY get "lost in translation" for me (I'm not as 'Fluent in STUPID' like you) when I attempt to communicate w/ "your kind" (perhaps SQUEALING like a RAT you are would work BETTER, lmao).

    APK

    P.S.=> Where'd I use BronsCon (I can still IF I wish, he spoke well of MY work saying it's GOOD (not yours though JEALOUS Jowie (lol))? See 2 recent links (I've got LOTS of others LIKE HIS, no shortage who do the SAME speaking GOOD of my work (which YOU can't stand hahahaha) as you can see (+ more than these lot) https://tech.slashdot.org/comm... + https://tech.slashdot.org/comm...

  130. Re:No support for POST requests that take 6 minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IMO, the sooner we destroy the entire bubble-gum and duct-tape internet and remake it like a phoenix rising from the distributed mesh wireless ashes the better off (and deduplicated) we'll be.

    You know, that would make a great name for a browser.

  131. Re:Looking forward to nearly all of this! by Waccoon · · Score: 1

    If you mouse-over a tab and it starts rendering something that's not even visible, that requires system resources and can slow down the whole system. That is NOT queuing things in a reasonable way, especially if garbage collection kicks in, yo.

  132. Re:Looking forward to nearly all of this! by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    If you mouse-over a tab and it starts rendering something that's not even visible, that requires system resources and can slow down the whole system.

    Or the correct way of looking at it: you use idle system resource to reduce load on the system when the actual event takes place. You're right, it's not queueing. It's prediction. You don't like prediction buy yourself a 486 and run DOS. Prediction to speed up operations has been a mainstay of computer in all forms, and directly against your complaint: was also parts of project butter and other changes to UIs that improved their responsiveness.

  133. Re:Looking forward to nearly all of this! by Waccoon · · Score: 1

    Pre-rendering a page when you move a mouse cursor over a tab isn't prediction, it's reaction.

    Using so-called "idle" resources to render a page in the background takes time away from the browser UI. In this situation, the most likely outcome is that there will be a slight pause if you actually do click on the tab after mousing over it (and Firefox has had TONS of problems with random pauses over the last decade, especially with regards to garbage collection). I perfectly understand what you're saying, as I've studied CPU design, but despite all the hype and promises, these techniques never actually result in a net benefit in the real world. Hardware people get caches and prediction. From what I've seen, software people don't.

    UIs were responsive in the days of Win2K and arguably XP, but that all went to hell when people started using all this turbo superprefetch nonsense, and used that as an excuse to justify tons of new bloat. Take a look at Win10. It does preventive maintenance all day long using "idle time" and it's slow as a dog and completely unpredictable, even if you have an SSD. The same has been happening to Linux for a while (at least with the distros I've tried).

    When they actually make UIs more responsive, then I'll be impressed. Mozilla has been crooning about both speed and responsiveness for a decade... and I haven't seen it. Nobody else has, either, which is exactly why they've lost so much market share.

  134. Re:Looking forward to nearly all of this! by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Pre-rendering a page when you move a mouse cursor over a tab isn't prediction, it's reaction.

    Oh really? And if I don't click? Did it just react to something I didn't want to? That's kind of the textbook definition of prediction, doing something anticipating the following action.

    If you can't even understand the base principle how can we have a discussion on it.

    Using so-called "idle" resources to render a page in the background takes time away from the browser UI

    What a stupid thing to say. Take time away from a UI that literally is about to take time to do something, all the while almost certainly consuming little to no resources.

    the most likely outcome is that there will be a slight pause

    The most likely outcome is you wont notice shit other than the tab will appear to be faster.

    and Firefox has had TONS of problems with random pauses over the last decade

    Yeah, and have done a lot of improvements in the last decade too leading to the latest iteration to be among the fastest releases to date. Excuse me for giving the developers who have proven themselves a little rope.

    these techniques never actually result in a net benefit in the real world

    I agree, except for all the places where they have. As said this has been a basis of many projects that have actively improved UI responsiveness. You claim otherwise, and you're wrong.

    UIs were responsive in the days of Win2K and arguably XP, but that all went to hell when people started using all this turbo superprefetch nonsense

    I get it now. This comment combined with the bit where you've studied CPU design ... you have no idea how software works. That's the only conclusion that someone can make given you think superprefetch has anything remotely to do with the UI.

    Take a look at Win10. It does preventive maintenance all day long using "idle time" and it's slow as a dog and completely unpredictable

    Yeah, except for the bit where it's faster than all previous versions of windows down to 7 as measured by both synthetic and workload benchmarks.

    The same has been happening to Linux for a while

    Yeah I agree. The new kernel schedulers and advances in X have made Linux faster and snappier too! (Yes I know I'm playing with your sentences)

    When they actually make UIs more responsive, then I'll be impressed

    No you won't, quite evidently. Car analogy time. You're claiming that a V8 engine with 400bhp is no more powerful than a shittly little 4cyl with 200bhp simply because your only frame of reference is a small hatchback vs a 3-tonne utility vehicle. You complain that the utility vehicle doesn't accelerate completely ignoring you have a different car.

    You want to feel some speed, how about you disable all window animations and then see how fast notepad.exe appears. That seems to be your frame of reference completely ignoring the massively more complex software and functions you are attempting to do now over the Win2k days.

    Mozilla has been crooning about both speed and responsiveness for a decade... and I haven't seen it.

    Observation bias. They most definitely haven't been. A decade ago Mozilla was talking about speed exclusively in terms of javascript performance. 6 years ago there was no talk of speed at all but a focus entirely on memory footprint, 5 years ago the talk was exclusively on sandboxing, security and the plugin architecture. A part of that was UI responsiveness changes with Australis and the UI took a nice jump up in speed then which a lot of people then instantly shit on with a laundry list of plugins because they didn't like the look. Even firefox quantum didn't talk about the UI focused exclusively on page rendering.

    Nobody