Slashdot Mirror


Walmart Teams Up With Microsoft To Fight Amazon, Netflix (cnn.com)

Slashdot readers hyperclocker and Hallux-F-Sinister have shared news about Walmart's new strategy to take on Amazon. In a nutshell, Walmart will use more of Microsoft's cloud services and work with the company on AI and machine learning projects. The goal is to reduce its energy consumption and improve its delivery systems. Hyperclocker shares an excerpt from a report: Today, Walmart announced that it has established a strategic partnership with Microsoft to, "further accelerate Walmart's digital transformation in retail, empower its associates worldwide and make shopping faster and easier for millions of customers around the world." What that means in reality is, Walmart is embracing Microsoft's cloud services and will run its digital operations by taking full advantage of Microsoft Azure and Office 365. The partnership agreement lasts for five years and starts with a team of Walmart and Microsoft engineers working together to transition the retailer to Microsoft's ecosystem. Hallux-F-Sinister provides some commentary: According to CNN Money, Walmart and Microsoft are ganging up on Amazon.com. I found myself wondering if this was more like Lex Luthor teaming up with the Joker to fight Sinestro, or Bruce Wayne letting Tony Stark use the Bat Computer to fight against the thing Richard Pryor's character designed in whichever godawful nineteen eighties-era Superman sequel he was in. The story itself would bore an accountant to tears, I am convinced, so I did not dare read it for fear of being rendered insensate; but here is the URL if you find you are in desperate need of sleep. Perhaps this other bit of news will wake you up: Walmart is also contemplating starting its own streaming service to compete with Amazon and Netflix. According to GeekWire, citing The Information, "Walmart is considering various ways to stand out, including undercutting Amazon and Netflix on price or offering an ad-supported free service."

75 comments

  1. Big Loser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..... IBM

  2. can't wait by zlives · · Score: 1

    for people of MicroSoft presented by walmart

  3. lmao by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps this other bit of news will wake you up: Walmart is also contemplating starting its own streaming service to compete with Amazon and Netflix.

    They already did and it sucked. Maybe that's why nobody remembers it.

    1. Re: lmao by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft we need machine learn to make better worker
      Nigga just hire irish and make them live in tent until die
      k

    2. Re: lmao by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      Vudu is still giving strong and itâ(TM)s free with ads. Do they just mean an ad free subscription to Vudu?

  4. If you dont' mind. by DalM · · Score: 1

    Really all I read was: "Multi-hundred billion dollar company, joins up with another multi-hundred billion dollar company to go after an different multi-hundred billion dollar company. "

    If you don't mind, I'll just take one of those hundred billions and you guys go to town on each other. You guys won't miss it.

    1. Re:If you dont' mind. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Old fuddy company joins up with another old fuddy company, and goes after a younger, hipper, trendier version of its self. In five to ten years Walmart is going to wonder why they weren't cool enough. Microsoft just might pick up some interesting tips for a future phase of their organization.

    2. Re:If you dont' mind. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least Walmart doesn't try to extort people into paying a subscription just to buy stuff. The prices you see on Walmart are the prices everyone gets and they don't try to charge you extra for two day shipping, unlike Amazon.

  5. Doomed to fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ask Nokia how partnering with Microsoft went when trying to compete with the big guys at their very own game.
    Walmart should really be investing in their own tech and bringing online their own cloud services without blowing boondoggles worth of investment in Microsofts Cloud services.
    Microsoft is trying hard to compete with Amazon as it is without some little dust mite trying to piggyback to victory. I say trying hard, but I really mean Amazon has already cleaned Microsoft off the bottom of its heel with a stick but Microsoft just doesn't know when its shit fails to stick.

    1. Re: Doomed to fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that Azure is at least as big as the biggest cloud platform (AWS).

    2. Re: Doomed to fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Except that Azure is at least as big as the biggest cloud platform (AWS)."

      Hahahaha.

      You really believe Microsoft's clever accounting where they report almost all their revemue (including Enterprise licemsing of Office, most Enterprise licensing of server software, and all the licensing revenue they get from AWS and other small cloud providers like GCP) as "Azure Intelligent Cloud"?

      AWS is still growong revenue at more than 40%/year and is more than 50% of Microsoft's entire revemue. Microsoft won't be able to claim they Azure is growing faster than AWS again next year unless they put the rest of their products (Xbox hardware, games, Surface hardware etc.) under "Azure intelligent cloud, and then in 2020 they will have to admit that AWS is bigger than all of Microsoft and most of their revenue growth is from licensing Windows for AWS instances.

  6. Hilarious by thundercattt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I find it funny how Walmart is complaining about Amazon. Walmart came into town, under cut everyone and all the other chains folded up shop. Now Amazon is using the same tactics and Walmart cries fowl. Eat a dick Walmart

    1. Re:Hilarious by known_coward_69 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Amazon isn't cheaper than wal mart. Most of the time Amazon is the same price or more expensive. The nice thing about Amazon is I don't have to waste my time driving or taking the train or walking and standing in line to buy stuff when I could be one of many other things.

      Wal Mart has an online arm called Jet.com which is cheaper than amazon for a lot of things, but a lot more for others. and they have free next day shipping

    2. Re: Hilarious by aaronb1138 · · Score: 2

      Walmart built their empire on 4% gross margins on most products at every day pricing. They make their employees employees.

      Amazon by contrast uses price manipulation practices which would be considered deceptive in most states while abusing the independent contractor model for laborers.

      Walmart is a terrible company, but Amazon is worse and more internationally malicious.

    3. Re: Hilarious by moonracer · · Score: 1

      THIS! Walmart can go fuck themselves! They have treated their employees like shit for decades. May they fail miserably.

    4. Re: Hilarious by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      I don't like either, if they go toe to toe and both get bruised I won't complain.

    5. Re: Hilarious by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Amazon by contrast uses price manipulation practices which would be considered deceptive in most states

      I assume this is part of what the AI referenced in the article is going to be about doing

      It's also kind of sad that Walmart is the kinder employer in this comparison, but I tend to think you're correct.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    6. Re: Hilarious by Your+Average+Joe · · Score: 1

      I agree, I hate Walmart. Every time someone partners with Microsoft they end up getting the short end of the shaft. Nokia was a 22 billion experiment and resulted in nothing. I am sure hackers are going to love poking both of these old dinosaurs at will.

      --
      Your Average Joe
    7. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bingo

    8. Re:Hilarious by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Amazon isn't cheaper than wal mart. Most of the time Amazon is the same price or more expensive. The nice thing about Amazon is I don't have to waste my time driving or taking the train or walking and standing in line to buy stuff when I could be one of many other things.

      The nicest thing about Amazon isn't even not having to travel to a store, it's that once you get "to" Amazon, they actually have what you're looking for. Wal-Mart has what I want maybe literally 2% of the time, and something I will accept maybe 5% of the time. Amazon has the specific product I want better than 95% of the time. This particular factor is what is crushing retail. It's extra-hard for me because I am something of a hippie and also a gigantic mutant, and I need weird sizes and don't buy stuff with fragrances. It really just doesn't make sense for me to shop retail any more, unless I need something right away.

      Wal Mart has an online arm called Jet.com which is cheaper than amazon for a lot of things, but a lot more for others. and they have free next day shipping

      Amazon isn't always the cheapest, but their prices are rarely terrible. Why would I even bother with a site whose prices are often ridiculous?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re: Hilarious by raftpeople · · Score: 2

      I wouldn't really call it "toe to toe". Walmart is way too far behind Amazon in online sales and fulfillment to call it that. They are desperately trying any angle to catch up.

      In terms of market share for ecommerce, Amazon is around 50% and Walmart is around 4% (just behind Apple). In terms of infrastructure and capabilities for ecommerce style fulfillment (e.g. high volume of small orders), Walmart is even further behind. It's a completely different animal than the types of facilities they built to support their stores. In the US, Walmart has around 14 centers either built or in process, Amazon has 114. Even if Walmart built out 114 facilities today, it takes time to optimize and figure out what works and what doesn't.

      I assume Walmart will keep dumping money into catching up with Amazon and eventually will probably be a solid #2 competitor, but it will take a long time.

    10. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Werid. I didn't know Walmart employees were slaves. Every job I've ever become dissatisfied with I've left (from small business to chains to government and even Microsoft). If only more employees who were shit on would follow suit, these employers couldn't afford to shit on folks. The point is-- if you're shit on (and stay there to continue to get shit on)-- you're a large part of the problem. I know that is sacrilege in today's victim based society, but it also happens to be the truth.

  7. Loser+Loser==??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what do you get when you team up two losers in the online space? Just a giant cluster. Way to go, MicroMart (or is it WalSoft?) - I see this as being yet another epic failure and waste of money. But I guess if you don't try you're not doing your job. Just two dinosaurs that are going to get left behind like K-Mart and IBM.

    1. Re: Loser+Loser==??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What next ? Sears and Novell ? Bwa ha ha ha

    2. Re: Loser+Loser==??? by ClaraBow · · Score: 1

      Funny!

  8. Technology vs. Buying by captaindomon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    At it's heart, Amazon is a technology company. It's filled with technologists, and the success it has had in retail is, in some ways, a side effect. At it's heart, Walmart is a bulk purchasing company and a real estate company. It is filled with buyers and real estate experts. Microsoft doesn't care about Walmart succeeding in retail, it cares about selling more cloud processing to Walmart, by making things more complicated and AI-driven, requiring more computing power. It's like teaming up with IBM. I shop at Walmart all the time in their brick and mortar stores, but Walmart will never be able to compete with Amazon online, because the experience will be clunky, due to the factors above. Amazon has a very seamless online buying experience, and excellent customer service, and that's what people care about when purchasing things online.

    --
    Just because I can hook a shark from a boat, I do no offer to wrestle it in the water.
    1. Re:Technology vs. Buying by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      A big deal of Walmart's success also has to do with sound IT practices. They aren't just a bunch of stupid troglodytes. They eat everyone else's lunch by focusing on what's important in terms of data and not getting distracted by meaningless nonsense.

      Walmart can compete on Amazon's own terms. Their grocery pickup service is a good example of this. Amazon's attempts are sad jokes by comparisons.

      Each "faction" uses tech to it's advantage. It's not as one sided as you want to make it out to be.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    2. Re:Technology vs. Buying by known_coward_69 · · Score: 0

      wal mart was big in retail IT before amazon became big. They even pioneered a lot of stuff people now call AI to figure out what people buy.

      wal mart's problem is that they are cheap and don't pay. And too many jobs are in arkansas or some other horrible place where they hate you unless you're a WASP and no starbucks or whole foods.

    3. Re:Technology vs. Buying by whoever57 · · Score: 2

      And too many jobs are in arkansas or some other horrible place where they hate you unless you're a WASP and no starbucks or whole foods.

      They also underwent a re-org of their IT some time back which resulted in 4 silos instead of one IT department. This whole effort is probably driven by politics between the silos.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    4. Re:Technology vs. Buying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      giving your money to either walmart or amazon

      You're part of the problem.

    5. Re:Technology vs. Buying by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Microsoft doesn't care about Walmart succeeding in retail, it cares about selling more cloud processing to Walmart, by making things more complicated and AI-driven, requiring more computing power.

      Eventually that might be true, but in order to have a cash cow, you first have to grow a cow. Walmart is way behind Amazon in online retailing. MS is known to play the long game (or at least the medium game). Thus, it's in MS's best interest to help Walmart get big enough.

      It's like teaming up with IBM.

      But MS's cloud is more competitive than IBM's. Sure, they are both full of AI hype, but AI is only a fraction of the stack.

    6. Re:Technology vs. Buying by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Right, and if you go to pick up your crap at Wal-Mart you have to see the miserable employees and witness the drama.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    7. Re:Technology vs. Buying by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Why do people always do that shit! OMG

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    8. Re:Technology vs. Buying by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      A big deal of Walmart's success also has to do with sound IT practices.

      But Walmart uses tech to support retail. Amazon makes most of their profit directly from tech. AWS generates most of Amazon's profit. Retailing is just a side business.

    9. Re:Technology vs. Buying by Miser · · Score: 1

      Consider this though - they have great data analytics - and a lot of their "stuff" doesn't run on Microsoft ....

      Makes me wonder if old M$ is going to try converting them?

    10. Re:Technology vs. Buying by raftpeople · · Score: 1

      A big deal of Walmart's success also has to do with sound IT practices.

      They did do a good job of creating supply chain systems that worked well for supporting their retail stores. The problem is that model is mostly incompatible with ecommerce fulfillment. That's why Walmart is racing to build out it's infrastructure to support ecommerce fulfillment but Amazon has a huge lead.

      Currently, in the US, Amazon has about 114 facilities for ecommerce fulfillment, Walmart has 14 built or in the process of being built. In addition to the raw numbers, it takes time to figure out how to make these systems work and optimize them, Amazon has been learning for 20 years.

      Walmart will probably get there eventually ("there"=become a legit competitor to Amazon for ecommerce), but it will take a lot of money and many years.

    11. Re:Technology vs. Buying by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      Walmart has the advantage of already having property somewhat suited to the task in virtually every population center in the US. Even in an ordinarily bad scenario, a Walmart closing, it can be converted to a straight up warehouse practically overnight. Amazon had to buy Whole Foods to get that kind of footprint, and even then having a grocery store in every town isn't as good as having a grocery + mega general store in every town.

  9. TRUMP IS A TRAITOR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GET A ROPE

    1. Re:TRUMP IS A TRAITOR by wjcofkc · · Score: 0

      Are you an actual CNN employee?

      --
      Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    2. Re:TRUMP IS A TRAITOR by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

      If not. Get with the details.

      --
      Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    3. Re:TRUMP IS A TRAITOR by Tablizer · · Score: 0

      I'm leaning toward Hanlon's razor on that guy. He's off his rocker. His puzzlement over everyone's reaction, including GOP & Fox's thumbs-down, appears to be genuine.

  10. Walmart cries fowl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You probably meant "foul". However, Walmart's chickens have come home to roost.

    1. Re:Walmart cries fowl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. Fouled that up. Sick!

    2. Re:Walmart cries fowl by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Damn jive turkeys!

  11. I don't see how this is going to work. by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 0

    Microsoft should stick to windows and Walmart should stick to selling racist t-shirts.

    1. Re:I don't see how this is going to work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft should stick to windows and Walmart should stick to selling racist t-shirts.

      They also sell white nationalist t-shirts.

    2. Re:I don't see how this is going to work. by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

      -1? I see we have some Walmart fans. Well played you bastions of propriety.

  12. MOAR CONTENT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What absolutely everyone wants from a movie streaming service is a BIG DAMN LIST of movies to watch.

    Every offering available right now has like 20% of what I actually want to see. I think of something I want to watch, I check, and nope, they don't have it. 4 times out of 5.

    The best deal out there, right now, is Netflix's old dvd-by-mail offering. It blows all the streaming offerings away in terms of range of content. Though, sadly, even it has been cut down from what it was during its heyday, with many older movies and shows lost to the "unknown availability" void forever.

    We want it all. One service, with all the options. That's exactly what the industry refuses to give us because ever IP holder thinks they need to spin up their own service instead of license the content out. Fuck you, you greedy bastards, you will MAKE UP FOR IT IN VOLUME if you give us the all-in-one streaming service that we ALL want.

    1. Re:MOAR CONTENT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's true, but it will never happen.

      The all-in-one is a mythical giant that would sit at the nexus of all paid content. The ultimate gatekeeper of entertainment. Google is currently making this play with Chrome + Google. Each one trying to position itself at the base of the chain. This is an unbelievably powerful position that goes beyond simple entertainment.

      The industry is balkanized with pure greed. None of them are ready or willing to concede their position to a larger or more competent player, if they think they can get even a small slice of the base position for themselves.

    2. Re:MOAR CONTENT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We want it all. One service, with all the options. ...

      It's true, but it will never happen.

      It has already happened, it's just not very legal.

      I do agree it is unlikely that a single, legal streaming service is likely to pull it off.

      However, a well done aggregation site/app/whathaveyou could do it after some fairly small modifications to the laws or licensing or tech updates. The various streaming sticks (apple tv, roku, fire tv, etc) all attempt to offer some form of global search already. What could work is, instead of striving for a netflix like solution, work towards making all content available in some sort of pay-per-view way direct from each producer (or they can use a service to implement that if they like). That way, your local software (roku/firetv/etc) could do its global search, get you the feed, and negotiate the pricing.

      Under that sort of setup, if someone wanted to provide a flat rate streaming service, they could take that gamble (like US mobile phone operators and their "unlimited" plans). You pay them a flat rate; they pay for each stream. That's more-or-less what is happening already... let's just cut out all the middle men and get to the point already! The providers could even force their own commercials if they wanted. The providers *could* make more money that way; End users could save money that way. I don't see any good reason why that can't or won't happen.

      To be honest, the main cord cutting sites (netflix, hulu, prime, etc) are holding us back more than anything else. If a content provider did the above, some other producer (ex. netflix) could simply refuse to do so with their own content, but license that other stuff, and probably hold onto their market... just like they're doing right now.

      FWIW, I don't expect the content producers/providers to be trusted to do the right thing, and I know the others are sort of necessary evils right now, but I still think we could get there. Music has mostly done got there, so why not?

    3. Re:MOAR CONTENT by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      At least there's cross-licensing. Some TV shows and movies are available on both Prime and Netflix, for example. That said, with Disney trying to move their (substantial) IP to their own streaming service, and newcomers like that nonsense CBS all access, I see the ecosystem fracturing rather than consolidating. The era of Big Three streaming providers of just Netflix, Prime, and Hulu is coming to an end. Sad because by having 2 out of 3, I had everything I could possibly want.

      It's strange that for streaming services, fewer providers is better (at least before they have driven the final nail in other forms of video distribution, at which point they'd become just as expensive as cable packages).

  13. Part of a bigger trend... by aaronb1138 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now that AWS is profitable, every brick and mortar retailer is on there way out of AWS and into GCP and Azure. Walmart made the "stop putting money into a malicious competitor's hands" over a year ago. They're just now done with internal PoCs and such to validate migration plans.

    Nobody really likes doing business with Amazon at the corporate tier because you never know when Jeff is going to decide to consume your market for himself. Bezos need to get a fluffy white cat to complete the Bond villain thing he has going.

    1. Re:Part of a bigger trend... by theCoder · · Score: 1

      Nobody really likes doing business with Amazon at the corporate tier because you never know when Jeff is going to decide to consume your market for himself.

      Good point, but hasn't that been Microsoft's modus operandi for many decades? It's not like partnering with Microsoft in the past has often ended up a good thing for the non-Microsoft partner. I suppose for Walmart, Microsoft is probably the lesser of two evils here, but it's still not a great choice.

      --
      "Save the whales, feed the hungry, free the mallocs" -- author unknown
    2. Re:Part of a bigger trend... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Good point, but hasn't that been Microsoft's modus operandi for many decades?

      Yes, but only in Software. It's not a problem for corporations in other industries, because Microsoft doesn't go into them. (Well, they are dicking around with hardware, but they're not very serious about it...)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  14. Walmart has other problems by reboot246 · · Score: 2

    Have any of you ever visited Walmart's website? It's a total clusterfuck. Go there and search for an item in a local store or online only. You'll see.

    1. Re:Walmart has other problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, none of us has, thanks.

    2. Re: Walmart has other problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why yes I have visited the peopleofwalmart website, and it's great!

      I don't see any people of Amazon website.

  15. "Sure" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everybody forgets that Sears was the leader of this whole circle and look how they faired after all the years of not changing. This should help with some marketing changes but bottom line is both companies will end up still taking their cut from your or somebodies wallet. BTW - Walmart already has a streaming service called VUDU and has not faired well against Netflix primarily because they just can't deliver the same way.

  16. Sad story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kind of hard for all the local retailers, but Walmart has my respect for being a company that can move into a town and kick butt.
    They do this the old fashioned way by appearing to do a good job of providing consumer value.
    In other words, the user is the customer. If we serve him, we will do well.

    There was a time when Msft at least tried to provide value to the user who was their customer.
    At this point they do not seem to even try to appear to provide value.
    Instead they use the market position from the good ole days to cram their way into a user as a product business plan.
    User is the product, lets make money by exploiting him.

    These are two dramatically different strategies.
    Old school physical value versus new school secondary feed on old school.
    It seems a futile act of desperation to try to get them to work together.
    Amazon's plan is both the buyers and sellers are our customers.
    Walmart alienated a great many sellers when it killed the local folks.
    Perhaps a better path forward than a wizzy web page is to figure out a way to embrace them?

    1. Re:Sad story by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Wal-Mart rolls into town and strangles the local government with lawyers while handing out mountains of cash to groups of people who would otherwise not support them. First hand experience in the 90's.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  17. The enemy of my enemy is my friend... by erp_consultant · · Score: 1

    Amazon is a direct competitor of both Walmart and Microsoft. Walmart on the retail side and MS on the cloud services side. Yes, Walmart's online website sucks but it will get better. If they have proven anything over the years it is that they are tenacious and they know how to make money.

    As near as I can tell, AWS is the only profitable division in Amazon. Everything else loses money and yet their stock price is through the roof. Traditional measures like P/E ratio don't seem to count for much in today's market.

    Microsoft has been able to turn the corner. They rely less on Windows license revenue and have done a nice job with Azure.

    I guess we'll see how it all works out but I think it's a smart move. Amazon is the big dog right now but I'm starting to see some backlash at how big they have become and some of their business practices. This is a smart strategy for both Walmart and Microsoft.

  18. Walmart shifts from Google to MS by RhettLivingston · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised not to see Google in this deal. Walmart has been a vital partner to Google in opposing Amazon. There has been no mention of a change in that relationship. If that relationship is still intact, this is a strange menage-a-trois.

    This isn't likely about datacenters. Walmart already has six mega-datacenters that haven't been online very long and many more smaller ones. Walmart is cloud-based and runs its own cloud with something like 80% of operations using their own datacenters. Their data is core to their business and they are ahead of most with their algorithms performing the pricing of their products on a store-by-store basis dependent on local sales data versus stock.

    They have been criticized by investors for not selling their excess capacity and making it its own business like Amazon has. Perhaps this is part of what is going on. If they were using MS standard cloud services, it might make it easier to sell capacity.

    But, I lean more towards the recent news about MS's behind-the-scenes efforts to develop a marketable checkout free retail capability. Perhaps they have talked Walmart into a partnership in that arena. The compute power necessary to provide that kind of service in stores the size of Walmart's would be massive. Like most such efforts, MS's is said to rely on cameras watching every person taking everything off of every shelf. It could only be done with on-site processing of a scale that would multiply Walmarts processing requirements. Any AI tech MS could provide to make that processing more efficient could have a huge impact on the expense.

  19. Competition, please [Re:Hilarious] by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    I find it funny how Walmart is complaining about Amazon. Walmart came into town, under cut everyone and all the other chains folded up shop. Now Amazon is using the same tactics and Walmart cries fowl. Eat a dick Walmart

    But we need competition. If Amazon is the only viable web store and Netflix is the only viable show provider and google is the only viable search engine; then things will get stagnant, expensive, and have lousy costumer service just like the big "neighborhood" telecoms (Comcast, AT&T, etc.). The fewer the competitors, the stupider companies will get.

    They are all dicks, but at least lets have competitive dicks.

  20. Walmart Greeter by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Microsoft Bob will be their new door greeter

    1. Re:Walmart Greeter by gtall · · Score: 1

      Nah, they'll have a phalanx of tiny Microsoft Bobs following you around the store like a posse...

      Posse (in tiny little voices voiced in unison): Wouldn't you like some nice genuine imitation maple syrup? Toilet paper, every one needs toilet, get the industrial size.

      You: Thank you, I'll shop by myself.

      Posse: Ooooo...that's dangerous, an unattended shopper, we're here to help and serve.

      You: No, damnit, let me alone.

      Posse: We believe you'd be happier with a new computer with Microsoft Software.

      You: Dear G-d, make them go away.

      Posse: How about a gun?

      You: Okay, mind if I load it here.

      Posse: Not at all, here, use one of ours.

      You: (shoots self in head)

      Posse: Next!!!

  21. Alien v Predator by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    doesn't matter who wins, we lose.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  22. Remember Nokia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Walmart should look at Nokia before partnering with Microsoft

  23. OMG, a match made in heaven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just add McDonald's, and you'll have the pablum trifecta.

    1. Re:OMG, a match made in heaven by beep54 · · Score: 1

      "Just add McDonald's, and you'll have the pablum trifecta." Already there. At least at the Walmart I infrequently go to there is already a McD inside.

  24. Make content great again by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Steps to great new content creation in the USA.

    0. Keep US politics away from any creative product that has to sell globally.
    1. Find some people who really understand US culture. What people enjoy watching. Movies and TV series.
    Vampires and the humans they have adventures with. Billionares doing many things with lots of money. Pirates with big ships and non trivial treasure maps.
    Medical dramas with drama not just more US SJW politics.
    2. Find the best people in the USA who can put the above into written words for a movie, series. Get the written work is done to the best standards.
    Skilled people who can write English and have everything needed to create a movie, get a TV series ready.
    3. Find parts of the world that give tax credits, gov support for TV and movie making with a failed currency. Locations must look like the USA as needed.
    3.5 Find funding outside the USA so the funds will go for actual content creation. No US party politics suggesting political changes to plot from US investors.
    4. Find actors with no past problems in the above tax friendly English speaking nations who can look and speak like above average actors from the USA.
    Make sure the actors cant made demands on future profits.
    5. TV shows with plots like vampires, billionaires, pirates, medical can be created.
    6. Test the resulting product on US audiences. Are the non US actors photogenic and did they have the accent skills needed?
    Find new actors with much better skills if they cant create the needed content to US standards.
    7. Demand nations selected as locations give further deep tax reductions and more gov support if they want to more movies and TV series made in their nations.
    Walk away from any nation that hesitates to fully support the investment in their movie and TV sector.
    Get their governments to understand the costs of location use, computer time, software. As part gov support their local workers.
    8. Start producing content. Be aware of changes to currency and be ready to move to nations with lower costs and better tax rates at any time.
    9. Do just enough work in the USA to enter US awards. That creates branding in the USA.
    10. Profit.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  25. Dear lord! by beep54 · · Score: 1

    Walmart + Microsoft. Now there's a match made in Hell.

  26. Office365? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I hear a company is moving to Office365 all I hear is a company that is outsourcing as much of their IT department as they possibly can. Replace in-house servers and staff with a low-monthly bill and a little expenditure in some better network infrastructure to handle the increased Internet traffic. My manager opted to retire rather than complete a company transition to outsourced Help Desk support which is the only reason I still have a job. My Systems Administrator title no longer matches my workload though which is now relegated to turning things off and on for people that are too incompetent to do so themselves and remind people to enter their full email address for their logon instead of their old username. Easy money for now but it won't last. Once they get a new manager hired my position will be outsourced and I will be looking to transition to a new field that still hires employees rather than outsource every last person they can.

  27. Maybe they will start selling to customers outside by BrookSmith · · Score: 1

    Maybe they will start selling to customers outside of the US