Slashdot Mirror
Netflix Deletes All User Reviews (engadget.com)
Netflix has removed all user reviews from its site, just like they said they would in early July. Here's what Netflix now has to say about posting reviews on its site: "Netflix customers were able to leave reviews on Netflix.com until mid-2018, when reviews were removed due to declining use. To learn how Netflix suggests TV shows and movies we think you'll love, visit our Ratings & Recommendations article." Engadget reports: Netflix probably had reasons other than the section's decline in use, as well. For instance, it had to deal with issues like "review bombing" by trolls hoping to bring down a show's rating back when it used stars instead of the thumbs up-down system. Netflix might have decided that reviews don't lead to enough views to warrant spending resources on policing them. It has a "percentage match" system that suggests titles based on previous ones you've watched, after all, so there's probably very little incentive for the platform to keep the reviews section running.
It's probably due to trolling. IMDB is the same, certain movies are heavily trolled, e.g. Black Panther.
const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
before they had tons of dvds, they needed reviews to predict which ones to stock up.
now they control production and presentation. they will tell you what to watch and when. and you will watch and like it.
It has a "percentage match" system that suggests titles based on previous ones you've watched, after all, so there's probably very little incentive for the platform to keep the reviews section running.
Which of course doesn't work very well because Netflix didn't consider the fact the user stopped the video after 15 minutes and has no way to indicate they didn't like the movie
Turd up or Turd down isn't really of any use to me.
If it's Turds down, I'll probably never bother even putting it in my queue.
Their recommendation system is at best, horribly broken. Anything below 92% appears to be just a wild guess at best, and a feeble attempt to draw traffic to something I have no interest in.
There are many other different web resources to scour Netflix for things worth watching, I use instantwatcher.com
http://instantwatcher.com/
I'm sure it has nothing to to with the fact that they had trouble gaming the "best guess for you" ratings on their self-produced content.
Netflix's suggested ratings used to work extremely well, back when they were only offering third-party content - I could pretty much count on my opinion matching pretty closely with their algorithm's prediction. But then they started producing their own stuff, and amazingly it always was displayed as between 4.7 and 5 stars as their "best guess" for me - so I'd watch it, expecting something great, but most of the time the content was mediocre at best, so my actual rating would end up being 2-3 stars.
I suspect they got rid of the star rankings because of their own show's relatively bad real-world performance - but that still left the problem of less-than-glowing written reviews. So the final solution was to get rid of those as well.
#DeleteChrome
Is why we cant have nice things. Thanks again, idiots.
delete the kitchen
Only the latest company to figure out that the wisdom of the crowds only works if the crowd is a small, thoughtful hand picked group with no trolls in it. That kind of thing simply doesn't exist in large numbers.
Most modern tech companies are founded on the concept of making a platform - any kind of platform - where the users do all the work for them. Anything the company has to do itself at scale using humans is very costly - any kind of moderation, screening or ratings. So they'll try everything they can before taking that kind of action. It's the 'cheap and lazy' tech approach to everything, and usually results in the dumbing down of whatever the thing is. At the scales they operate at, it's also pretty much the only choice they have in many cases. With Netflix that's not really the case. There are a finite amount of titles they carry, and a solid ratings system could be effected with a little bit of moderation and professional input, in addition to user feedback.
Reading third party professional or amateur movie critics reviews is probably the best way to get a good idea of whether you might like a show or not, as netflix' ratings and recommendations of their own shows are inherently suspect...
It would not be trolled that heavily if the media is not that hell-bent on forcing a "cartoon" into a social commentary. A few points for the real social justice worker (as opposed to social justice warriors).
1. Wakanda is not real (and for that matter, very different from the real Africa).
2. Africa needs real help. Not from us, but from their own hard work.
3. Making Black Panther successful doesn't atone for your "sins" (if any).
Here we have another ignorant motherfucker who has never read history, comics and thinks the Ayn Rand is insightful.
before they had tons of dvds, they needed reviews to predict which ones to stock up.
They still have physical discs, they still need to know which ones to stock... however I would guess the queue is a WAY more useful metric for what to stock as you can put un-released discs there.
now they control production and presentation. they will tell you what to watch and when
They no more "control" production and presentation of all movies than a third grader with a steady cam does. They offer internal selection, yes - but Netflix still provides physical discs, as I said, and you can still rate them - you just can't write out a review explaining your rating.
Online Netflix hasn't had star ratings for like a year or more - but you can still vote thumbs up or down, and get a percentage match from other users who liked/disliked similar stuff. Even for Netflix content....
Ask Michele Wolf how much Netflix controls what you watch, never mind how much you will like it.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
Definitely a loss of functionality. I read the reviews a lot, when shopping titles outside my usual fare; shopping a new genre; trying to decide whether to take a chance on an obscure title, or some B movie I'd caught wind of.
“And the thing about so much of what this movie is, I think white men, critics would enjoy it, would enjoy my work, but often I think there is a critic who will damn it in a way because they don’t understand it, because they come at it at a different point of view, and they’re so powerful, Rotten Tomatoes.”
Brie Larson adds:
“What I am saying is if you make a movie that is a love letter to women of color, there is an insanely low chance a woman of color will have a chance to see your movie, and review your movie.”
Larson informs us that more than 63 percent of reviewers are white and male. (Almost the same percentage of women to men in university), and only 18 percent are both white and female
Only 4.1 percent are female and from underrepresented groups
“I don’t need a 40-year-old white dude to tell me what didn’t work about ‘A Wrinkle in Time,'” Larson added. “It wasn’t made for him. I want to know what it meant to women of color, biracial women, to teen women of color.”
Now to my thoughts There are the reasons that quasi-official sites like Netflix are removing reviews. This is a pretty big problem, and the movie industry needs positive reviews, and the trend in movies is proving a to be a little problem. The people who make such blatantly sexist movies must hear that they are good, and if people do notlike them, they must have a a target of blame. To them, The all female Ghostbusters did not fail because it wasn't funny and because it was sexist in nature, It failed because of thos fucking teenage boys. As Kaling decrees. https://www.indiewire.com/2016...!
What is amazing is that ability to scream about racism and sexism, and simultaneous replace it with sexism and racism so blatant and in your face that you can proclaim people pointing out the problem with your work is somehow racist and sexist. The worm ouroboros as it were.
But anyhow, there is the problem - White males.
The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
Id rather viewers had keywords that could be tagged to shows that way we could weed out what we care not to watch...
Everybody knows Netflix has hit peak finantial performance from sheer user-base growth alone, so they now have to cut the losses And that's mostly by reducing the number of views popular, expensive content. This is absolutely no different than what Spotify is doing with their Discover system - they will suggest you stuff based on your tastes BUT most of it will be stuff they play for cheap from their catalogue. Or worse, suggest you stuff their catalogue owners want you to listen.
So this is not about trolls of good movies bombing them, or trolls of bad movies praising them - it's about real people giving honest reviews that will obviously troll their business model.
You now get a thumbs up/down by percentage, which can be 1 person or 1 million, so you might be watching The Room because of its 100% rating by the sole positive rating by weird-Tommy. Ever wondered why play counts disappeared on Spotify?
Most of the reviews were like this: "I can't believe they paid that fat cow Amy Schumer real money to stand up in an outfit made of electrical tape to talk about her nasty vagina for 2 hours."
Mods, downvote parent troll.
That would make no difference on it's truth, and would be the same thing that Kaling et al demand, which is suppression of disagreement, especially as they say - from white males.
Activist groups have long demanded suppression of statements that do not agree with their narrative, and when it is the truth, it needs suppressed even more. The problem of course, is that for whatever short term success it might have, the truth always comes out.
And despite any oppression, the misandryst movies will fail because they just are not good movies.
The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Or it might be because Netflix content sucks, and they don't want to have 200 movies with shit reviews on them ?
I know that if I had a product that sucks, I would certainly hate to give people ability to comment on it.
netflicks knew the movie's where going to get ripped off there service. its why they made that massive investment on originals. they whant to be the next hbo where originals are there bred and butter and movies second.
In the end, Netflix will only have one movie that exists in every category.
https://www.youtube.com/c/BrendaEM
...Reviews:
They have their own pathetic and stupid (even for "ostensible" AI) rating system. It goes like this:
"Oh, you LIKED this movie? Here are 254 other movies your SURE TO LIKE, too!!!"
But, of course, none of them are even vaguely interesting to that viewer, because each movie has probably 10 (or more) unique features that the viewer might chose to use to select similar movies: Actors, plot-lines, Director, subject matter, characterization, music, etc, and Netflix has NO IDEA what YOUR interests are (they could probably collect historical data and figure it out, but their interest it not in YOUR satisfaction...just that you pay them each month...so ANYTHING you pick next makes them happy).
Bogus recommendation in the extreme.
Trolls! Everybody wants to rule the world.
Sorry. Trolls have no place in any society.
Self-importance and self-indulgence is the root of ALL evil.
I read the book and saw the movie. I thought the movie was fine. Not as good as the book but better than many book to movie transitions. I suspect that as with most novel to screen transitions the balance between making it interesting to those who had read it while not totally losing those who had not read it was tilted toward the reader and that could put people off. I watched it with my daughter and we enjoyed it.
I didn't find that the racial composition of the cast made a major difference to the story. Some stuff was cut, some was changed, some was added but that is necessary with adaptations.
I'm not sure that the actress is the person with the best perspective. She played a role, she did not write or direct. The book certainly had a religious and political point of view and I think the author was OK with the adaptation.
You got me into this! You were the ideologue! I'm only a poor assassin! - Twenty evocations, Bruce Sterling
Whether it's Yelp, Forums, or Netflix, the world of reviews and opinions is 50/50. Sometimes it serves a greater good. And sometimes you just get spam or people gaming the system. Its unfortunate the bad ones ruin it for the good ones.