Slashdot Mirror


'Why PC Builders Should Stock Up on Components Now' (pcmag.com)

Michael Kan, writing for PCMag: NZXT is a popular PC desktop case vendor, but the California-based company recently had to raise its prices. The reason? The new US tariffs on Chinese imports includes PC cases. In September, the Trump administration imposed the 10 percent duty, which also cover motherboards, graphics cards, and CPU coolers from the country. As a result, NZXT had to introduce a 10 percent price increase on PC cases to deal with the added costs, VP Jim Carlton told PCMag in an interview.

And building a PC could get even more expensive in 2019; US tariffs on Chinese-made goods will rise from 10 percent to 25 percent in January. "If I needed to build a system in the next six months, I'd definitely build it before the end of the year," Carlton told us. For PC builders, the tariffs risk adding a few hundred dollars to the total cost of components for a custom desktop. "If it's a $2,000 purchase on 25 percent tariffs, it's going to be a $2,500 purchase," Carlton said. "So we are very concerned with the direction of where this is going. I don't have a 10 percent [profit] margin I can just throw away and absorb the tariffs," he added. "And certainly no one has a margin for 25 percent."

177 of 346 comments (clear)

  1. Or... Buy quality components by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There is no law of god or men that says all electronics should come from China.

    Order a quality motherboard from Japan. A GPU from Singapore. A CPU from Mexico. A PSU from Canada, and so on.

    If you are human and care about human things, you should already be boycotting China.

  2. Re:But muh Jewelry by MightyYar · · Score: 1

    A couple of points:
    1. The people lining up are not necessarily the people buying the products of the companies featured in the article.
    2. Given the example is a $2000 custom-built rig, we are firmly in Apple territory. The cases by NZXT in the summary can be very bling.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  3. Interesting Thing About Tariffs by sycodon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People often dislike tariffs because it means more expensive goods. But they don't stop to think about why those good are inexpensive.

    It all pretty boils down to the fact that, even when accounting for the cost of living, youcould not take a factory building anything in the third world andbring it to the use because of.

    1. Labor laws...minimum wage, working hours, overtime rules.
    2. Government regulations...safety, healthcare, discrimination, etc.
    3. Environmental laws...emissions, hazardous waste disposal, etc,

    Most would agree that all these regulations and laws are for the good and that we don't want a steel plant in the US operating like it does in China.

    However, the same people who don't want to have the dirty, dangerous manufacturing here are more than happy to have it somewhere else and then take advantage of the cheap prices. Hence, their opposition to tariffs.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    1. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by Iamthecheese · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Even if you support tariffs against China for their poor regulations and human rights these tariffs are stupid. It costs billions of dollars to make a new chip foundry. Do you seriously think anyone will build one in America before the president after Trump (whether that's in 2020 or 2024) undoes these tariffs? It's not going to force any changes in China, just remove money from the pockets of the American consumer and put it into the pockets of the American government.

      --
      If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
    2. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by caseih · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sure, but tariffs themselves don't actually address any of those problems. Especially when there are no local sources for any of these goods. This money doesn't go to improve the working conditions of the poor workers. It doesn't fix any environmental problems. It rarely changes government regulations.

      Let's be clear. All tariffs are are taxes paid for by consumers. They don't punish foreign countries or companies nearly as much as proponents claim.

    3. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by DalM · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's really funny how things have flipped politically in America. In reality (the reality-reality kind, not the alternate-facts kind) the free market was doing a great job at improving those three points you made before the tariffs.

      It's weird that it's the liberals who have become defenders of open and free markets and conservatives that have become proponents of heavy regulations, protectionism and taxes -well, taxes for everyone except Trump's buddies.

      (Oh, you didn't know that Trump's tax bill is scheduled to skyrocket your taxes in a few years, while decreasing the wealthiest's taxes even more.)

    4. Re: Interesting Thing About Tariffs by aliquis · · Score: 1

      It's a tax but it's on foreign work.
      Better on theirs than yours.

    5. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by mark-t · · Score: 2

      The theory goes that imposing tariffs on foreign goods would decrease domestic demand for that foreign good, and thereby impose economic pressure on the foreign supplier, indirectly punishing them that way.

      This actually can work if the foreign demand for the product is already quite low, or at least the exception and not the rule in the first place (ie, if the country already domestically meets all or virtuall all of its own needs for the product they want to impose tariffs on), but for mainstream consumer products like PC's where domestic production doesn't come anywhere near competitive levels, that doesn't work as well, because the domestic demand for these products is high enough that consumers will simply (however begrudgingly) ultimately pay that increased cost, and the actual demand will drop only very marginally... so the bottom line always ends up like you said.

      I would rate the likelihood that this will somehow create sufficient pressure to actually increase domestic production capacity enough that foreign demand would actually start to drop off significantly in accordance with the theory, to be somewhere in the vicinity of the same likelihood as our sun spontaneously evaporating in the same time scale.

    6. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      That's hardly the whole story. I don't see the current US government caring much about the environment or people's health. What I do see is "America first" protectionism.

      To clarify, imagine that the Chinese steel plant was identical in operation to the US one, with all the labour and environmental regulations etc. Further, imagine that the cost of transport were negligible, so that the final price for both products in the US were roughly the same. Which one would you buy? More importantly, would you still have those tariffs in place? I'm guessing you would.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    7. Re: Interesting Thing About Tariffs by houghi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The moment the taxes increase, they bet that the other party is in power to blame them

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    8. Re: Interesting Thing About Tariffs by Rockoon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      its a tax on your purchase

      better yours than... oh... wait

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    9. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by zmooc · · Score: 1

      That used to be very true, but it is increasingly becoming less true as Chinese wages are rising and regulation is increasing while automation is becoming more accessible. Production is increasingly moving back to the US and Europe and these tariffs are only going to speed that up. This may end up being a major problem for China. Or it may not because they own half of Africa, are sitting on a ridiculous pile of cash and they are increasingly selling their stuff to their own people.

      These tariffs are not here for any good reason, though. They will probably disrupt US markets more than Chinese markets.

      --
      0x or or snor perron?!
    10. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Sure, but tariffs themselves don't actually address any of those problems. Especially when there are no local sources for any of these goods.

      You touched on the fundamental problem here and the lack of understanding by the GP. These kinds of tariffs are good but they need to exist up front from the startup of the industry, not as some retaliation. When tariffs are eliminated and the cost of goods get externalised and production moves to another country re-introducing the tariffs only serves to depress the buying power of your local economy.

      I am for basic tariffs on certain Chinese goods. However these tariffs here at the moment covering the things they do and with the reasons for introduction have got to be the dumbest thing I have seen in the global market short of countries thinking all they need to do to fix their economy is print money.

    11. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      You are fundamentally right about tariffs. However you can be against the application of them in certain situations. You see what you propose is to level a playing field which fundamentally works only before the game has started. What's happening right now is that the playing field is leveled at half time. The jobs have left the country, the investment has occurred overseas, and the end result now is that consumers who have gotten a taste and an addiction to a certain life style and a certain cost of goods suddenly are faced with a new cost that was brought in jarringly quickly without transition, and for incredibly dubious reasons.

      There are ways to level the playing fields which don't end up screwing the local economy. A sudden introduction of a tariff isn't it.

    12. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It's not just a case of building a chip factory either, you need massive supply chains for all the other parts you need.

      And that's the biggest reason why China is so cheap. It's not the labour costs, it's the supply chains and economy of scale.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    13. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by nagora · · Score: 2

      Even if you support tariffs against China for their poor regulations and human rights these tariffs are stupid. It costs billions of dollars to make a new chip foundry. Do you seriously think anyone will build one in America before the president after Trump (whether that's in 2020 or 2024) undoes these tariffs?

      Well, if you support tariffs against China for their poor regulations and human rights maybe you should vote for the candidate who won't undo those tariffs.

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    14. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by nagora · · Score: 1

      No local sources for PC cases? Are you living on Rockall?

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    15. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by epyT-R · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No. Progressives are just anti anything trump and/or the republicans do, and vice versa. To say that republicans aren't still interested in tax breaks for the 1%, and that progressives are not still interested in more taxation of everyone, is an outright lie.

    16. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Import tariffs are necessary to protect US quality of life. Our minimum wage and other worker protections make us fundamentally noncompetitive with countries that can exploit slave labor (or something close). Without trade protections, either our workers have to work for peanuts, or our economy will eventually tank. Import tariffs (and the related topic of export subsidies) generally protect our comparatively strong social policy.

      Secondly, we aren't the only ones suffering. Our trade policies have utterly destroyed the spread of democracy. If you have a smart phone, it was made by a slave. If you drive a foreign car, the people who built it most likely barely make enough money to survive. Our trade policies promote poverty and class stratification around the world.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    17. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by MobyDisk · · Score: 2

      So I'm not sure what to take from this story. Why did the Japanese manufacturers iterate on quality while the EU manufacturers did not? It seems silly that the EU government had to get involved in something as trivial as vacuum cleaners when in Japan the free market naturally did that.

    18. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by mark-t · · Score: 1

      f people aren't willing to pay the higher prices they'll go without...

      That works for certain classes of luxury goods, but no so well for mainstream consumer products. Because of the lack of domestic supply as an alternative, people will just begrudgingly pay more, and get less value for their money.

    19. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by DalM · · Score: 1, Informative

      Again, in the reality world and not the alternative-fact world you live in the democrats had no power at all to affect the tax bill in any way. During the Healthcare debates, the democrats respected the filibuster. They needed Olympia Snow's vote to get the bill out of committee. They got that by giving concessions to republicans.

      Fast forward to 2017. The Republicans have trashed the filibuster completely and put the bill on the floor without going to committee. This tax bill is 100% on them. And so is the debt that it's putting on my generation.

    20. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by Paul+Pierce · · Score: 1

      I used to think exactly like this, could have written this post myself, but there is more logic to apply to this. Remember that these workers in China are actually doing better now than before these jobs came in. The next step for them is to start to demand all the above that you mention (labor laws, minimum wage, working hours, etc...); can you think of a country that didn't start at the bottom?

      Do you think that Norway a thousand years ago had environmental laws and overtime rules?

      The cheap labor in China actually improves the standard of living for millions of people worldwide buying their products while also slightly improving their standard of living as well. When, and it's already happening, they start demanding more rights the prices rise and the cheapest labor shifts to India and other poor highly populated areas looking for any wage. If the government was a democracy the process would be much quicker and poverty worldwide would shrink quicker. We need to let people start at the bottom; not eating at McD's hurts the young kid trying to make enough to get an education to not have to work at McD's.

      Now, we can play a role in minor improvements, myself prefer to buy something at Target over Walmart because Target treats their employees better.

    21. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Part of it is a culture in Japan where people value features and are invest a bit of time in figuring out what to buy. In Europe people just look for something in their price range and get the one with the biggest motor, because moar power must be better and its an easily understood number.

      Maybe Japans small apartments have an effect too, since people value things like compact size which tends to preclude having huge motors. Also they use 100V AC, so the maximum power delivery per outlet is realistically about 1000W, and even that is pushing it. Most of the high end cleaners seem to be in the 250-300W range.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    22. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by tepples · · Score: 1

      In the 1960s, Bela Balassa and Pete Samuelson proposed that if a developing country with decent labor protection starts exporting goods in large quantities, other countries' demand for its currency will reduce exchange rate disparity over time.

    23. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by Iamthecheese · · Score: 1

      Screw that, I'm not voting for a lizard. I'm voting Mickey Mouse in 2020. Unless he denuclearizes and stabilizes North Korea, in which case I'll campaign for him.

      --
      If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
    24. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by Shazatoga · · Score: 2

      Even if you support tariffs against China for their poor regulations and human rights these tariffs are stupid. It costs billions of dollars to make a new chip foundry. Do you seriously think anyone will build one in America before the president after Trump (whether that's in 2020 or 2024) undoes these tariffs? It's not going to force any changes in China, just remove money from the pockets of the American consumer and put it into the pockets of the American government.

      Good thing we have 80+ chip foundries in the US.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Intel, TSMC, GlobalFoundries, Micron, Samsung, etc all make CPUs in the US. Intel is building a new foundry in AZ as we speak.

    25. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by DalM · · Score: 1

      Right. The only generation of white men left that hasn't voted to turn the nation over tor fascist authoritarians.

    26. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Only because they don't know the definition!

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    27. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by sycodon · · Score: 1

      Millennials don't even remember Harry Reid.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    28. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by sycodon · · Score: 1

      Hint: Fascist != someone who merely disagrees with you.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    29. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Sure, but tariffs themselves don't actually address any of those problems. Especially when there are no local sources for any of these goods.

      Except you'd be hard-pressed to find goods for which that is true. Even modern silicon fabs are springing up in Taiwan and Japan. And with Foxconn setting up a manufacturing line in Wisconsin, the few companies that are able to take advantage of that (read "not tied to specific chip vendors") are going to clean up.

      In particular, I expect Apple to make out like a bandit, and everybody who depends on Qualcomm CPUs to take a big hit. And frankly, I'm okay with that. It isn't going to add any real number of American jobs, because those factories are going to be so automated that almost nobody will work there, proportionately, and I have no real hope that it will improve working conditions in China, either, but at least it reduces the externalities a little bit.

      So the economic effects of these tariffs don't concern me at all. What does concern me is that China's dependence on the U.S. is one of the things that keeps the world away from war. The U.S. government should be cautious when weakening those ties, because if they weaken them too much, they will break, and bad things will happen.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    30. Re: Interesting Thing About Tariffs by aliquis · · Score: 1

      So are taxes on foreign workers.
      When you buy their work you're definitely paying for the tax part too.

      But by only taxing their work you can buy from someone else instead.

    31. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Look at the steel tariffs. The US exports steel while also importing steel. Why? Because not all steel is the same. The US does not manufacture steel of the quality and quantity needed for a lot of domestic industries. The demand for foreign steel is high. These industries are then forced to pay tariffs or apply for an exclusion which is a random process. Meanwhile it takes years for domestic steel production to revamp itself to make the types of steel that are needed. So steel industry gains some jobs, while other industries lose jobs, and meanwhile prices of goods go up so the economy is not any better for the tariffs.

      Also, note that there is a difference between tariffs and boycotts. Tariffs are economic tools, boycotts are political tools. They shouldn't be used interchangeably.

    32. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I think there's been a bit of shift from blue collar workers who were traditionally pro-union, and unions were traditionally pro-Democrat. The shift is towards Republicans. This is the group that has a strong interest in job protection and trade protection. So protectionist tariffs have left the Democratic camp and ended up in the Republican camp. And go back a century and it was flipped again.

      This is one reason why having only two viable parties leads to a total mess because those two parties feel compelled to cover every single political issue. It is frankly unnatural to assume that every voter can be divided into one of two groups with which they feel comfortable on the majority of issues. It should be absurd if you can look at someone's views on abortion and then predict how they will stand on trade issues, and yet that's the situation we seem to have in the US.

    33. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      Found the dumbshit

    34. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

      Well, if you support tariffs against China for their poor regulations and human rights maybe you should vote for the candidate who won't undo those tariffs.

      I'm going to say the same shit the Republicans say when it comes to healthcare: Remove the barriers to competition and let the free market sort it out. This isn't a something the government should be meddling with.

      The obvious difference is that healthcare should be a basic human right. Being able to work a manufacturing job, is not. The Republicans have it ass backwards.

      --

      ---
      DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    35. Re: Interesting Thing About Tariffs by DalM · · Score: 1

      Right. Fascist means locking innocent children in cages and then abusing them for the entertainment and delight of cable news viewers.

      I disagree with that. That makes you a fascists. And your elected officials are literally still doing it!

    36. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

      Import tariffs are necessary to protect US quality of life.

      Quality of life improves when your money has more buying power, not less. Why don't you ask the people of Venezuela how they feel about the buying power of their currency?

      --

      ---
      DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    37. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by vix86 · · Score: 1

      Liberal here. I'm not the biggest free market proponent, I'm for socializing a number of obvious industries. That said, I don't support many of these tariffs because they just don't make any sense to me. Most of the tariffs look like attempts to magically turn the clocks backwards and bring back industries that we gutted in the US decades ago. Tariffs in industries we already have or are in their infancy make more sense to me, though it'd probably be better to subsidize those industries temporarily to help them out instead of tariffing competitors. Countries get more backlash for tariffs than they do for subsidizing by my reckoning.

    38. Re: Interesting Thing About Tariffs by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Nobody needed proof. We know you don't know the definition, but thanks for making it clear.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    39. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      It's weird that it's the liberals who have become defenders of open and free markets and conservatives that have become proponents of heavy regulations, protectionism and taxes

      It's not that weird. Liberals have gotten older and wiser while conservatives have gotten even older and senile.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    40. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      An older and wiser 'liberal' IS a conservative.

      Don't laugh, it will happen to you too.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    41. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      An older and wiser 'liberal' IS a conservative. Don't laugh, it will happen to you too.

      It already happened, I'm conservative but did not lose my humanity. Hence having nothing to do with evil clown Trump.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    42. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Giant douche was worse.

      I'm hoping this is the last of that stinking generation we have to deal with, but it looks like Giant douche is going to run again (ensuring turd sandwich a second term).

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    43. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      You characterization is crude and inaccurate. But I am with you nonetheless, I agree that Hillary Clinton should do the right thing and stay on the bench, even though the country would be immeasurably better with her in the oval office than evil clown Trump (a characterization that is both warranted and accurate, unlike yours.) She should step back because she is not the best candidate to defeat evil clown Trump. That colossal mistake must not be repeated. One can only hope that she can read the pattern in her cheerios.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    44. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      I still haven't heard a plausible, non-corrupt explanation for why the bribe flow into the Clinton Global Fund went to zero the day after the election.

      Do you have one?

      What I know for sure, Heller was decided by one vote. Today the second amendment (and everything it protects) is safe for my lifetime.

      I'll be even happier after Ginsburg is gone.

      I haven't laughed as hard as 2016 election night in a long time. Just awesome!

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    45. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      I haven't laughed as hard as 2016 election night in a long time. Just awesome!

      So basically what you're saying is, you're a giant douche, projecting. I still agree with you about Hillary staying out, hardly for the same reason but thanks for self-identifying.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    46. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      It was awesome! Nothing like a terrible outcome avoided and evil and/or stupid people crying ('hearing the lamentations of their women').

      No answer. You admit she is corrupt to her core?

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    47. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Hillary is the most investigated candidate ever, nothing stuck. Trump on the other hand...

      So yes, you are a douche, but you know that. You probably like it.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    48. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by nagora · · Score: 1

      Remove the barriers to competition and let the free market sort it out. This isn't a something the government should be meddling with.

      If your government isn't meddling in (i.e., defending) human rights then you need a new government. Check your Declaration of Independence for details.

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    49. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      The theory goes that imposing tariffs on foreign goods would decrease domestic demand for that foreign good, and thereby impose economic pressure on the foreign supplier, indirectly punishing them that way.

      That's half the theory. The other half is that it is to stimulate domestic production of the same good because they no longer have to compete against an artificially price reduced import.

      The reality is though, that the domestic product price jumps to be the same price as the tariffed good and consumers pay more.

      Think of it this way - you make a widget for $50, and want to sell it for $100. Importers can bring in a foreign made version for $90. So you can sell your widget for $100 while a competitor sells it for $90,, or you can compete for $90. Let's say a tariff gets imposed of 20%, so now your foreign competitor costs $108 ($90 + $18 tariff). Now what do you do - sell your product for $100? Or sell it for $108 and make an extra $8 over what you wanted?

      In the mean time, other foreign competitors are forced to adapt to $90 widgets, so if the tariff is removed, now you've been enjoying the $18 premium and suddenly have to compete with $90 competitors again. It will not end well for your business because while everyone else had to compete, you didn't and have grown inefficient, fat and flabby on the excess.

    50. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Okay, who is so fragile that they were triggered by a post about vacuum cleaners and had to mod it "troll"???

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    51. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

      How often do Japanese homes have carpet? Vacuuming on hardwood requires significantly less power.

    52. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      They often have tatame mats, but the wider point is that suction power isn't great for carpets. What you need is a beater to release the dirt.

      That's why a battery powered vacuum with beater head will do a much better job than a 2500W mains powered beast without one.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    53. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Face facts, it was hilarious. Nothing like overconfidence biting idiots in the ass.

      We'll see what happens when she isn't investigating herself. I'm hoping it will make the Ds dump their dirt, then the Rs dump their whole load. Repeat until they're both unelectable.

      Trump also meets that standard, as does Dick Cheney, LBJ and ALL the most corrupt politicians for the last 100 years. Hint: They have dirt on each other, like teenage sibs.

      Still not even an attempt at explaining open corruption. That's the shit side of the Ds. Open corruption just ignored, their side so 'not evil'.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    54. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Nothing is hilarious about the current situation, whatever your politics. Only a nut or a troll would say that. Which one are you?

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    55. Re:Interesting Thing About Tariffs by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

      Good point. So perhaps it is not that the Europeans added pointlessly more powerful motors. Maybe Europeans are just dirtier and have thicker carpet in their homes so they needed powerful beater heads. You are right about suction not being the ultimate need: I have a new carpet that has a "liner" underneath and even on the lowest power setting the vacuum seals against the carpet and I can hardly move the head. Even with the beater bar running.

  4. Red herring by rogoshen1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's too bad that machined sheet metal is too difficult technically speaking for an American company to start producing. Whatever will we do?

    Concern over hardware with a long supply chain like cpu's, mobo's, ram etc is one thing.. but something as stupidly simple to produce as a fucking metal box? come on.

    Hopefully the outcome of these tariffs is that another country (maybe even the US?) will step up and start producing and supplying components. It is somewhat foolish to allow one single country to have a near total monopoly on something as important as electronics.

    (But more than likely some enterprising individual will setup shop in Mexico or Canada; and import the goods from China, then just ship them across the border to avoid the tariff.)

    1. Re:Red herring by mark-t · · Score: 1

      (But more than likely some enterprising individual will setup shop in Mexico or Canada; and import the goods from China, then just ship them across the border to avoid the tariff.)

      That doesn't work.... all that does is subject that country to tariffs, effectively negating free trade.

      And it's not like the current US administration hasn't already shown that they are willing to do this... so no, all it means is more expensive goods for everybody. The market will adapt... because it's still cheaper than building new domestic factories.

    2. Re:Red herring by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Hopefully the outcome of these tariffs is that another country (maybe even the US?) will step up and start producing and supplying components.

      ...because only NZXT currently builds components? Hell, they barely build any at all... and thats their real problem.

      NZXT wants to be able to build low volume flashy cases, in a world where high volume always wins. As someone who has been waiting for ram prices to drop so has been iterating over component selection, one of the brands of desktop case that has not made it to my newegg cart is NZXT because they sell looks rather than quality or purpose. Giant glass windows instead of ventilation, rounded corners, stupid "machine learning" fan controller dongles, and so on.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    3. Re:Red herring by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      It's too bad that machined sheet metal is too difficult technically speaking for an American company to start producing. Whatever will we do?

      Here's a business idea: Why not open up a factory and start producing. I mean right now you have just had your golden opportunity handed to you right?

      Or maybe despite your post you understand that bending a piece of metal and covering with spraypaint may sound like a fun weekend project, but is not as trivial when you ship 40000 of the things yearly, and propose to do so in a country where tariffs have been applied on the raw materials used by your #MAGA factory with your #MAGA workforce, all the while realising that this #MAGA obsession is likely temporary and the rug will be pulled out from under your factory by the next administration shortly.

      Common. It's easy.

      Just Do It. ... Bad choice, I think that's the slogan of a Chinese sweatshop.

    4. Re:Red herring by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      That's a fair point actually; the flip-flopping, transient nature of american politics makes long term investments like that difficult (assuming of course I had the capital to invest in a factory, which of course I don't.)

      However, others do.

      Domestic manufacturing is a good thing; if we had the political capital to make it a long-term movement -- on-shoring american manufacturing, it would be in our best interest. In this particular example, a factory which uses automation to produce these metal boxes (and paint them to, oh my!) could probably be cost competitive with Chinese slave-ish labor.

      But for what it's worth, just because you don't start foaming at the mouth at the mention of Trump, doesn't make you into the whole #MAGA thing or a rabid Trump supporter.

    5. Re:Red herring by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      more than likely that enterprising individual setting up in Mexico or Canada will just be the Chinese manufacturer. similar tactic is used by US companies to avoid tarrifs around various parts of the world. Regardless even with the tarrifs I seriously doubt any US company could compete locally on price.

    6. Re:Red herring by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      Your Dear Leader has put tariffs against steel and aluminum from Canada and a number of other countries. Even after signing the new USMCA free trade agreement the tariffs are still there and we don't know when they are going to go away.

      Another tariff that is popular for the US to apply against Canada is for lumber. Every five to ten years this comes up again and again. The "problem" is supposedly that the Canadian governments (Federal and provincial) aren't charging a high enough stumpage fee (the fee to cut down a tree on crown land). So the US government see it as an unfair subsidy on lumber and applies a tariff to it. The strange part is if the unprocessed trunk is exported to the US the US government doesn't see the low stumpage fee as an unfair subsidy. Essentially the US government is using the tariff to transfer forestry jobs over to the US. Anything other than cutting the tree down and transporting the trunk to the border is said to have an unfair subsidy. But if that was true it should also apply to supplying the lumber to the mills. Both the Dems and the Reps have been doing this to us.

      These tariffs aren't about getting China to behave properly and treat their workers and the environment properly. Trump believes that the US has to have a positive trade balance with every country, not just an overall trade balance. Tariffs are a way to protect jobs if used correctly but they can't be used like Trump has been doing.

  5. I'm wondering if this'll come home to roost by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Insightful

    in 2020. The one thing that's kept my meager standard of living up is cheap goods from China. It's not like tariffs will stop the flow of cheap labor from India flooding IT. Meanwhile Trump's tax cut wasn't as big as folks think. A lot of people set their withholding lower than they should and are going to get an unpleasant surprise in April when they either have a smaller than average refund or maybe even owe.

    Normally the decisions made by a president don't show up immediately. It took close to 8 years for Obama to repair the damage from the 2008 crash. But tariffs and tax cuts are immediate. If folks don't see a positive effect they're gonna get uppity. We'll know in a few years.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I'm wondering if this'll come home to roost by themusicgod1 · · Score: 1

      It took close to 8 years for Obama to repair the damage from the 2008 crash.

      That damage includes
      * the US federal debt, which has certainly not gone back to pre-2008 levels
      * the income inequality within US society, which hasn't been this high since the 1930s, and student loans, payday loans, and consumer debt are at near crisis levels. Much of a whole generation of americans have been left behind.
      * the systematic risk of big banks which the banks have since only gotten bigger and more systematically risky
      * the worldwide loss in confidence in the financial system (the 2008 crash was not limited to the US)
      * QEing the american dollar into the point where it's no longer possible to use america's unique status as the world's reserve currency to get out of a crisis again.
      Some progress has been made in picking up the pieces, but the problems caused by the Obama administration's actions will take generations to fix, and with global climate change there isn't that much time left.

      --
      GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    2. Re:I'm wondering if this'll come home to roost by mcvos · · Score: 1

      It took close to 8 years for Obama to repair the damage from the 2008 crash.

      That damage includes

      * the US federal debt, which has certainly not gone back to pre-2008 levels

      Pre-2008 federal debt levels were already spiraling out of control. The 2008 crash has nothing to do with it. As long as the excessive tax cuts aren't reverted and the US doesn't stop waging stupid wars, the debt will continue to spiral out of control.

      The US hasn't balanced a budget since the 1990s, and that was during the biggest economic boom in ages.

      * the income inequality within US society, which hasn't been this high since the 1930s, and student loans, payday loans, and consumer debt are at near crisis levels. Much of a whole generation of americans have been left behind.

      Again, not so much the 2008 crash, but the tax cuts, which are primarily for the rich.

    3. Re:I'm wondering if this'll come home to roost by Layzej · · Score: 1

      ...Meanwhile Trump's tax cut wasn't as big as folks think. A lot of people set their withholding lower than they should and are going to get an unpleasant surprise in April...

      The tax cut is projected to increase the deficit by over 2.3 trillion over a decade, or 1800 / family each year. That's money that you or your kids will need to pay back with interest. The average tax cut for all households in 2018 will be about $1,200. That means the average household is getting screwed. They're spending $1800 and are thrilled to receive $1200 in return - the remaining $600 going to folks who are already richer than them.

      When it comes time to pay the piper, is there any doubt on whose shoulders the burden will fall? My bet is that those same middle class folks will be asked to step up.

  6. get some furniture quality hardwood by FudRucker · · Score: 1

    and build a PC case out of it, i seen some great PC cases made from hardwood and they look more like art-deco furniture than a PC case

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:get some furniture quality hardwood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is the HW equivalent of the OSS crowd telling non-programmers to fix/change the Linux kernel or their desktop environment or LibreOffice, right?

      I'm a woodworker, and I make things very similar to PC cases, so I can say with absolute certainty that your suggestion is stupid beyond belief. Well, almost beyond belief, consider what site we're on...

    2. Re:get some furniture quality hardwood by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      So what you are saying is that proper geeks use a 3D printer instead of a skill saw?

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    3. Re:get some furniture quality hardwood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh, I've never seen this. And my google skills suck, apparently.

      administration imposed the 10 percent duty, which also cover motherboards, graphics cards, and CPU coolers

      Could you please post a link to mobos, graphic cards and CPU coolers made out of wood?

    4. Re:get some furniture quality hardwood by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      As someone who did just that let me say it's not as easy as you may think. I finally got rid of my 15 year old hand build case this year for an off the shelf one due to a component upgrade not playing well with the poor airflow and insulation properties of the materials.

      Despite what it may look like, designing high end and flexible cases is actually not trivial and even companies in the business for many years can often get things quite wrong, especially when they prioritise form over function.

    5. Re:get some furniture quality hardwood by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      Yeah I like woodworking but I think it'd make more sense to skin a cheapo case with veneer than try to build it out of wood and layout the hardware mounts...

    6. Re:get some furniture quality hardwood by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Sure, it takes just hundreds of dollars of tools to turn dozens of dollars of wood into something with the fit and finish of a $50 PC case...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:get some furniture quality hardwood by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Oh indeed, but that case is about to be 25% more expensive ;-P

  7. Re: But muh Jewelry by aliquis · · Score: 1

    The case doesn't cost those amounts.

    A 9900K and a 2080Ti and you are just about there on those alone.

  8. Re:How much more by MachineShedFred · · Score: 2

    Yeah, but with that logic, planted stories in the industry-friendly press won't lead to increased sales for Q4. Buy now before the tariffs increase your needlessly expensive case by $5! And other FUD statements!

    Won't you think of the shareholders?

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  9. Re: How sillly by aliquis · · Score: 1

    So you'll get paid to take it?

    Recently saw someone say something like three times less without (none 1) reference fraction.

  10. Re:#MAGA by giggleloop · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You seemingly don't realize that this is just a tax on American citizens... There is no "American-made" alternative to most of these components, so it will serve only to raise the prices Americans are forced to pay while the countries of production don't notice a difference.

  11. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a business opportunity to make PC cases in the US so Americans aren't 'forced' to buy Chinese shit.

  12. Supply chains and China by sjbe · · Score: 1, Interesting

    There is no law of god or men that says all electronics should come from China.

    Laws of economics do dictate where electronics come from. The overwhelming majority of the supply chain for electronics depends heavily on China because that's where the companies are located and it's been trending that way for decades. If you can find a way to shift the supply chains away from China have at it but you'll find that near impossible.

    Order a quality motherboard from Japan. A GPU from Singapore. A CPU from Mexico. A PSU from Canada, and so on.

    Good luck with that. You'll find the components on that motherboard, power supply, graphics card, etc are made in China even if the assembly was put together elsewhere. If you want something made with just local content be prepared to spend a fortune on it. Companies like Apple and the rest don't source from China because they like China. They do it because there are no practical alternatives.

    If you are human and care about human things, you should already be boycotting China.

    Why? Because you think your country is owed something and shouldn't have to compete? Because you have a jingoistic view of China and it's people? You think 20% of the world's population should just sit on the sidelines economically because it's inconvenient for Americans or Europeans?

    1. Re:Supply chains and China by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      If you can find a way to shift the supply chains away from China have at it but you'll find that near impossible.

      That's what the tariffs might help do.

      Why? Because you think your country is owed something and shouldn't have to compete? Because you have a jingoistic view of China and it's people? You think 20% of the world's population should just sit on the sidelines economically because it's inconvenient for Americans or Europeans?

      No. It's because I don't want to end up living in the same economic, social, and environmental squalor that 95% of chinese apparently think is a-ok.

    2. Re:Supply chains and China by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Our trade policies created China. Our trade policies can tear it apart, too.

      Putting tariffs on goods and services abroad will increase prices in the short term, but over the long term it will allow for local businesses to compete. This will pull manufacturing power back into the U.S. and away from other countries. We will see higher US Employment, and as US Citizens, they will have rights and privileges as you'd expect.

      Countries that were used previously to make things cheaper because their people were treated like cattle rather than human beings are no longer cheaper because of said tariffs. Now there is no incentive to produce goods over there which will also remove incentive to force people into slavery to make our goods. Now they can make things for themselves and focus their efforts on reforming their own governments and pursuing their own interests.

      If tariffs are such a terrible idea, then why do Canada, Germany and China do so spectacularly well with them? All of them block US goods of one sort or another, and China outright prohibits US companies from setting up shop in a ton of industries.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    3. Re:Supply chains and China by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Tariffs may work if they're tightly focused. This current round of tariffs are broad based and of the sort that have been discredited economically for longer than most of us have been alive.

    4. Re:Supply chains and China by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

      Putting tariffs on goods and services abroad will increase prices in the short term, but over the long term it will allow for local businesses to compete. This will pull manufacturing power back into the U.S. and away from other countries.

      The next administration can press the "undo" button, which makes increasing domestic production a risky investment. All tariffs accomplish is reducing the buying power of the dollars in your wallet. It punishes China by punishing average, hard working Americans.

      It's like right here in Florida, people voted to end greyhound racing, ostensibly because they care about the welfare of the dogs. Problem is, there won't be enough homes for all the retired dogs, so most of them will inevitably end up being put down. But the cause is just, so unforeseen consequences be damned.

      Fuck this timeline.

      --

      ---
      DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
  13. Thanks god I have vintage machines for years ;-) by ReneR · · Score: 1

    Only need to track some Linux kernel timing regression that mostly affects USB and audio, and my Transmeta Crusoe Oqo 01+ is as good as new: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  14. Re: But muh Jewelry by Rockoon · · Score: 2

    Its hard to imagine a build where the DDR4 cost isnt dominating the equation... but you did it.

    --
    "His name was James Damore."
  15. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    So when the orange moron changes his mind again on a whim and the tariffs go away, you can lose a ton of money. Sounds like a great business plan. Good luck!

  16. Re:#MAGA by Alioth · · Score: 1

    The production countries will notice: undoubtedly demand for their products will fall with an increased price due to tarriffs.

  17. Re:But muh Jewelry by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    Good design and appearance matters. Just like how people will buy a Silk Suite, a fancy car... However there is stuff that appearance is secondary to functionality and affordability.
    Also people will normally buy as much as they can afford to get. If a Macbook that cost $2,500 moved up to $3,000 it may end up being too much for some people. But there are also people who are just wanting to spend under $1,000 for a system. With this artificial cost added to the products, will mean you will get less for your dollar.

    Apple may take a small hit, as people are expected to pay a premium for its products... However Apple isn't the only player by a long shot.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  18. Labor intensity vs captial intensity by sjbe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Concern over hardware with a long supply chain like cpu's, mobo's, ram etc is one thing.. but something as stupidly simple to produce as a fucking metal box? come on.

    Sure, we know how to make cheap metal boxes in the US. That's never been a problem. The problem is the percentage of labor content that goes into producing cheap metal boxes and the cost of labor. Cheap metal boxes tend to be labor intensive to make unless you make those boxes in HUGE volumes. It's more economical to have them made in a country with cheap labor. China has cheap labor and the US does not. QED they get made in China and not the US.

    Goods that are capital intensive are made in countries with high labor costs but access to cheap capital. The US has the cheapest cost of capital in the world so goods that have low labor content tend to be made here. Stuff like jumbo jets, earth moving equipment, cars, CPUs, chemicals, etc. The US has a manufacturing sector worth about $3 TRILLION annually which makes one of the 5 largest economies in the world - roughly the same size as the entire GDP of the UK or Germany. We make lots of stuff but we can't compete on cheap metal boxes just like China can't (currently) compete with the US on jumbo jets.

    Any time you see an idiot politician (like Trump) promising to "bring back manufacturing jobs" to the US they are promising the impossible. The only way those "cheap metal boxes" will get produced here in the US is if we experience a massive reduction in wages to bring us close to those paid in China. No amount of tariffs will change that economic reality. I'm pretty sure you don't actually want such a fall in wages to happen. The good news is that as China becomes more prosperous their wages will rise and labor intensive production will leave China for other places with still cheaper labor. Already happens in some industries.

    1. Re:Labor intensity vs captial intensity by mark-t · · Score: 2

      No amount of tariffs will change that economic reality.

      Only because any tariff that might otherwise be sufficient to accomplish it would only result in a domestic black market being created to meet the demand.

    2. Re:Labor intensity vs captial intensity by caseih · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Mod parent up. Absolutely right on. The US has been and continues to be a manufacturing powerhouse. It's just that American manufacturing involves very few people (relatively speaking) and is highly automated, involving robots and CNC machines.

      There are still some things in American industry that are very labor-intensive (such as building construction and agriculture), but even those involve a very small number of workers relative to the population, and still have a fair amount of automation involved. And it's work that few Americans are interested in doing.

      The problem with Trump's tariffs are that they actually punish the domestic industry and manufacturing that we have without creating the new industries promised. For example the already high cost of farm machinery is rising by 25% also now, which puts pressure on everyone else down the line. Farm machines are for the most part made with steel produced in US plants, often right next to the manufacturing plants. But the tariffs drive up domestic steel prices nearly as much as foreign steel.

    3. Re:Labor intensity vs captial intensity by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Why are there so few chip foundries in the USA? Surely this is a very capital-intensive process?

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  19. Re:#MAGA by wizkid · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You seemingly don't realize that this is just a tax on American citizens... There is no "American-made" alternative to most of these components, so it will serve only to raise the prices Americans are forced to pay while the countries of production don't notice a difference.

    The reason there is no American alternative is because, although all of this was designed in the US, China used it's slave labor force to build this stuff by people required to work 14+ hour days. And every time American ingenuity came up with a way to compete with the slave labor force, the Chinese government changed the exchange rate to make sure we weren't competitive. Who needs a tariff when you control the exchange rate?

    --
    I take no responsibility for what I say. Even though I'm never wrong :)
  20. Yay Canada! by da_guy2 · · Score: 1

    So Canada doesn't have any of these tariffs, but somehow I have a feeling we'll be paying them anyways but the money just goes to greedy companies and not the government. Yay, Canada!

  21. Re:And if I do my math right.... by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1

    So with a 10% tariff on the cost of bringing this into the US... assuming they're passing 100% of the cost of this to customers

    Assuming a typical 100% mark-up then the cost of components is 50% the retail/end-user cost of product. So if a 10% increase in a component results in a 10% increase in sale price they are making extra profit as a result of the increase in import tariff/duty.

  22. Tax cuts but no spending cuts by sjbe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Meanwhile Trump's tax cut wasn't as big as folks think.

    It was plenty big for certain people with several commas in their annual income. That isn't the real problem though. The real problem is that they cut taxes without cutting either Medicare/Medicaid or the defense budget or social security which together account for around 3/4 of federal spending. So we continue to accrue debt at a rate of nearly a $trillion per year with no end in sight which our children are going to have to pay off sooner or later. In 2017 we basically borrowed the entire defense department budget. ALL of it.

    So enjoy the party while it lasts. Sooner or later the bills will come due and your children will "thank" you for it.

    1. Re:Tax cuts but no spending cuts by Fencepost · · Score: 1

      While the sibling AC is a bit yelly, he's basically correct - Social Security is its own separate thing, and traditionally has actually loaned money to the rest of the US government (when Social Security has/had surplus revenue it used it to purchase US Treasury Bonds, aka loans to the government). Personally, I've always called that "Greenspan's Bait and Switch" because they jacked up FICA rates back in the '80s then loaned the money to the federal government so the government could spend a huge amount without raising taxes. Since FICA is a regressive tax, it amounted to a huge tax increase on lower and middle income people but because it was "for your retirement, it's not a tax increase!" they got away with it.

      2018 is the first year in which Social Security is not projected to have that surplus and in which it will instead be redeeming some of those bonds. Basically now that the IOUs/bonds are starting to come due, there's great interest by some in killing whoever those IOUs are owed to (Social Security). Any claim of "Social Security is too expensive and we can't afford it!" is *really* a claim of "We can't afford to pay back all the money we borrowed from Social Security, but we can't default either! Social Security Must Die (so we can claim to be the proper heirs and make all those debts quietly go away)"

      --
      fencepost
      just a little off
    2. Re:Tax cuts but no spending cuts by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      The fund was first raided (stolen from) by LBJ.

      SS was never actuarially sound. It actually got better in that respect over time, but as you point out, the trust is full of bullshit. If the rates had been higher, there would just be a higher stack of bullshit in the trust today.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  23. Re:#MAGA by Rockoon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sounds like a business opportunity to make PC cases in the US so Americans aren't 'forced' to buy Chinese shit.

    Apparently you missed the past decade where big businesses has been positioning to transition to using south american cheap labor instead of southeast asian cheap labor.

    --
    "His name was James Damore."
  24. Re: #MAGA by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    Moral of the story: it may take a little time for long-term strategies to pay off. Stagnant (or nonexistent) industries obviously aren't going to spring to life overnight.

  25. Well we can make them in the usa with the CPU'S by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Well we can make them in the usa with the CPU'S

    If the cpu's can be made in the usa why not the ram and MB as well??

    Trump killed the EPA so can go USA! USA! USA!

  26. Re:#MAGA by Sarten-X · · Score: 2

    Not really.

    The vast majority of sales on any product is supplying industry for other projects. The 10-25% increase in a component's price just becomes a small percentage of the final product price. All together, the final assembled product is more expensive to produce, but for no directly-attributable reason. It's not "the tariff on the case". It's "parts just cost more for this batch".

    Now, that takes place over a span of years, as parts work their way through supply-chain warehouses. Computers are some of the fastest-moving products, but they can still take a couple of years to move inventory from manufacturer to consumer. It's a few months at the importer, a few months at the retailer, and a few months at the assembler, but it adds up. That delay further reduces the visibility of the tariff's impact. Parts just seem to have generally-higher prices, even if they appear to come from American sources.

    By the time the product gets to the consumer market, it's still listed with the usual markup, and sells at a slightly-reduced rate, but since the tariffs affect all manufacturers with American supply chains, consumers can't get a better deal by going elsewhere. Even if another manufacturer were able to sell at lower prices, they now have an option to raise their prices to keep the market status quo (which is likely right what they're tooled for and ready to produce). In short, the US manufacturers' profits are cut, and foreign manufacturers' profits grow.

    --
    You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
  27. china factory's also make a lot of smog! by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    china factory's also make a lot of smog! that lowers costs as well.

  28. Think about WHY we don't make PC cases by sjbe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Sounds like a business opportunity to make PC cases in the US so Americans aren't 'forced' to buy Chinese shit.

    Go ahead and try since you think it is so easy. We can talk about how it went after your bankruptcy.

    Here's a little clue for you though. The reason we don't make PC cases in the US has NOTHING to do with our technical ability to make such cases and has everything to do with the cost of labor and to a lesser extent cost of materials. We know how to make them but we cannot do it as cheaply as they can in China. No amount of tariffs will change that fact nor will they cause the supply chains for goods made in China to shift to the US in any substantial way.

    1. Re: Think about WHY we don't make PC cases by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

      Boxx custom fabricates their own cases for every system they sell and seem to be doing just fine.

      Their systems, however, are typically on the higher end of things.

    2. Re:Think about WHY we don't make PC cases by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      We know how to make them but we cannot do it as cheaply as they can in China.

      It is indeed the labor, but I dont think most people here understand what the costly labor is. The costly labor isnt the people running the machines that produce the parts in a mass production environment. The costly labor is the human assemblers they need when it either isnt a mass production scenario or when they need fastest possible time-to-market.,

      A company like NZXT probably cant seriously consider mass production (they arent selling millions of a case), and their time-to-market is probably important to them given their focus on looks and flashiness.

      The fact is that there is going to be a lot of production labor per unit when sales targets are in the thousands instead of millions.

      Some people may argue about where NZXT sits in the marketplace, but its pretty obvious to me that they are a low quality producer with mid-range prices, a price markup made possible by focusing on eye-catching exteriors.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    3. Re:Think about WHY we don't make PC cases by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      You don't think it's wrong to use the fruit of slave labor that works 14 hours a day? If it's cheap, it must always be the right solution? Do you even hear yourself talk?

      Tariffs absolutely will change the equation. Low tariffs are what created China in the first place. If tariffs are so bad, then why have Canada, Germany and China done so spectacularly well with them?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  29. Re:#MAGA by mark-t · · Score: 1

    So the theory goes.... but for mainstream consumer products like PC's, the demand wouldn't fall enough... and any tariff sufficiently high to actually discourage the demand enough to make a difference would only result in the creation of a black market that would be large enough to make up that difference, so no.... you can't win.

    Also, labor is cheaper in China not just because of poorer working standards but because the supply of labor in China is more than triple that of the USA... and simply by virtue of that oversupply of labor, the price of it is inherently forced down.

    If the USA had a population of more than a billion people, labor in the USA would be pretty cheap too.

  30. Tariffs hurt many to benefit a few by sjbe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You seemingly don't realize that increased cost will reduce demand AND create a market advantage to production of these items in the US.

    Speaking as someone who actually makes products like this for a living including electronics that go into metal boxes, you could not be more wrong. If it reduces demand, it doesn't matter if the box is made in the US or China. The China+tariffs vs US made at the same price will not benefit US consumers. It means we are costing taxpayers a huge amount of money to support a tiny little industry with a handful of jobs. Explain to me the logic of making literally every PC purchased more expensive in order to gain a few hundred jobs in a niche industry? Tariffs are almost never a good idea and this is no exception.

    Raise the price of steel to support the roughly 80k steel workers in the US and you raise the price of every car made which hurts 2 million auto workers + everyone who buys a car. You are robbing the many to benefit a few.

    1. Re:Tariffs hurt many to benefit a few by alexgieg · · Score: 1

      Raise the price of steel to support the roughly 80k steel workers in the US and you raise the price of every car made which hurts 2 million auto workers + everyone who buys a car.

      That isn't necessarily bad if it were done across the board so as to better equalize the standard of living between all professional categories, as in that case the auto workers would also benefit on the long haul. The real problem is doing that to the lowest level of the economic pyramid, while allowing the distance between the base and the top. Then there's no real benefit, just a reshuffling that keeps the true beneficiaries intact.

      --
      Conservatism: (n.) love of the existing evils. Liberalism: (n.) desire to substitute new evils for the existing ones.
  31. Tarrifs will not last until 2020 by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    What all of the people complaining about the tariffs do not seem to get is that they are simply tools to get other countries to reduce THIER tariffs. Ours go away when the other side re-negotiates.

    Trump and others have stated this multiple times yet it seems to elude many people.

    Since they are merely negotiation tools, if there was a whiff they would hurt elections they would be gone. But they didn't seem to hurt Republicans any in the mid-terms; the reality is many voters either do not care about tariffs or see them also as simply a tool.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Tarrifs will not last until 2020 by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      Are you talking about the tariffs the other countries put in place to retaliate against the US tariffs? The US were the first to put tariffs in place and should be the first to put them down.

    2. Re:Tarrifs will not last until 2020 by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      The U.S. was not the first to impose tariffs. Even if you don't like Trump he is 100% correct right when he complains about tariffs from the EU and China being in place for years that are heavily weighted against the U.S.

      What you are probably thinking about is reading recently about China raising new tariffs - but that does not mean they did not already have plenty to begin with.

      What you and others not familiar with the by now ancient world of tariffs do not realize is, just how weak a hand China has... they will eventually capitulate. Just as Canada did.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    3. Re:Tarrifs will not last until 2020 by gravewax · · Score: 1

      and in turn those tarrifs exist because of US tariffs and subsidies to various industries.

  32. Re:But muh Jewelry by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    Sure some people upgrade every chance they get, but those people are in the minority. Most keep their systems for at least a few years. Normally for me I upgrade when there is a big need to. I had my Laptop for 7 years before I upgrade, I keep my phone for about 4-5 years before upgrading. However for those who are on systems that really need upgrades, having to wait an extra year is just going to hurt them more.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  33. Subject is wrong by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

    Should be "Why US PC Builders Should Stock Up on Components Now'" the rest of us don't give a fuck. You stupid "trade" war is a prime example of someone shooting themselves in the foot. Good luck with that.

    --
    There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
  34. Re:#MAGA by houghi · · Score: 1

    Has been going on for a bit longer. I bought a car 15 or so years ago. I live in Belgium, next to Germany. My VW came from Mexico, not from Wolfsburg.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  35. Re: But muh Jewelry by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

    The 9900K is made in the USA.

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  36. Re:But muh Jewelry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    He's certainly declared bankruptcy more often and garnered more scorn than the average person.

  37. Re:#MAGA by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    American citizens can hire other Americans (or even non-Americans in the US) to repair their existing hardware. Money stays in the US economy and more domestic jiobs that way.

  38. Re:#MAGA by dddux · · Score: 1

    In laymen terms, it's like a penis up your arse, covertly. ;)

    --
    "It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society." - Jiddu Krishnamurti
  39. Re:But muh Jewelry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Its sad when someone points out that getting lots of money through money laundering & fraud and cheating on your immigrant wives to get some extra sex is now the american dream.

  40. Tariffs are blunt instruments by sjbe · · Score: 2

    Only because any tariff that might otherwise be sufficient to accomplish it would only result in a domestic black market being created to meet the demand.

    Incorrect. The problems with tariffs is that they are a blunt instrument and they almost always have unintended consequences. You raise prices on steel and it raises prices on everything made with steel which is a far larger industry than just the steel industry. You protect a few jobs at the cost of far more. Take an economics 101 course and you'll learn how tariffs almost invariably result in a net loss to the economy of both countries individually and collectively. They almost never actually accomplish the intended goal without substantial collateral damage to the broader economy.

  41. Re:#MAGA by TomGreenhaw · · Score: 2

    >Sounds like a business opportunity to make PC cases in the US so Americans aren't 'forced' to buy Chinese shit.

    A business opportunity for higher cost domestic products - maybe. The tariffs are a poorly disguised inflationary consumption tax needed to make up for the tax cuts to the corporations and wealthy.

    --
    Greed is the root of all evil.
  42. Made In The USA? by Toad-san · · Score: 1

    I was hoping that there were PCs still being made in the US, but apparently not. Oh, they may be _assembling_ some, but most of the components come from overseas.

    https://www.neweggbusiness.com...

  43. Tariffs will not have the outcome you desire by sjbe · · Score: 1

    That's what the tariffs might help do.

    No they will not. No amount of tariffs are going to move more than marginal amounts of the electronics supply chains away from China. Worse even if the tariffs did cause damage to China's electronics industry they will cause MORE damage to our economy in the process and STILL will not result in those electronics being made in the US. Tariffs are a blunt instrument that invariably cause collateral far great damage to the broader economy. Seriously, this stuff is economics 101. Do not make the mistake of thinking that tariffs will result in the outcome you favor.

    No. It's because I don't want to end up living in the same economic, social, and environmental squalor that 95% of chinese apparently think is a-ok.

    I've actually been to China and clearly you haven't. Your idea of what China is actually like has no relationship to reality.

    1. Re:Tariffs will not have the outcome you desire by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Seriously, this stuff is economics 101. Do not make the mistake of thinking that tariffs will result in the outcome you favor.

      I haven't. Yet, somehow you that china dictating more and more of the US economy is in my interests?

      I've actually been to China and clearly you haven't. Your idea of what China is actually like has no relationship to reality.

      Which small, relatively affluent part of that huge country did you visit?

  44. Re:#MAGA by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    No, it's because China as the supply chains. A US designed GPU has to be combined with a large number of other parts to be useful, and they are all made in vast quantities in China. So either you ship them all to the US individually for assembly, or you make the GPU and assemble the card over there and ship the finished product.

    Conditions in Chinese factories are actually pretty good for the most part. Demand from western manufacturers, a desire to be seen as high quality to get business from the west and the necessity of things like a clean environment and consistent quality to produce highly complex goods has improved things greatly. Of course there are still some bad ones, particularly for textiles, but the idea that it's "slave labour" that is driving China's competitiveness is a myth.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  45. Re:#MAGA by Shotgun · · Score: 1

    Except that a marginal amount of the production will be repatriated and the taxes will offset some of the income taxes the feds would collect. Meanwhile, the Chinese will be at the bargaining table to work out a FAIR trade agreement.

    --
    Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
    Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  46. Re:#MAGA by Shotgun · · Score: 1

    Local suppliers will need steel. Last I heard there are higher tariffs on that as well, because we don't make that here anymore either.

    The US Steelworker's Union would beg to differ.

    https://tradingeconomics.com/u...

    --
    Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
    Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  47. Taiwan? by habig · · Score: 1

    So where does Taiwan sit in the component industry these days? Thinking motherboards and video cards. CPUs, the US. Memory: Korea and Japan (... and Micron here in MN). Drives: Korea, Japan, and MN again (Seagate). At first glance, stuff from Newegg you'd put together yourself seems to have more non-China sources than a lot of the other current Trade War items might. You're not getting away from it entirely, of course, but there at least are options.

  48. Re:#MAGA by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

    Sorry but Americans care more about cheap than the conditions the products are created in. Walmart anyone?

    We are a selfish and greedy society. I'll admit to being part of the problem, though I do try and buy from non mega chain stores when possible. It's hard to do now.

    --
    "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
  49. OTOH by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    These more expensive cases now come with a free 'orange man bad' sticker.

  50. My company would buy American if it were an option by ASCIIxTended · · Score: 1

    Given a choice between an American-made components and those imported from any non-free nation, my company would choose the American made products every time even at 3 times the cost. It's a matter of principals.

    --
    I do not belong to the church of the lowercase 'i'
  51. He has all the subtlety and finesse of a CHAINSAW by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    Trump, that is. Any number of past Presidents, I'm certain, could have addressed the trade problems we have with China in such a way as to not wreck the U.S. economy in the process, but Trump is about as ham-fisted as anyone could be.

  52. Tarriffs are better than taxes by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    Gonna put that money in to pay down the debt, right? *cough*

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  53. Re: But muh Jewelry by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know the case isn't $2000, but people blinging out on their case are not exactly price sensitive. It's not a dig - I have a nice case because I like the look, noise suppression, vibration reduction, and the serviceability. But let's be honest, it's a frivolous expense - my old stamped sheet metal case with the sharp edges was perfectly serviceable.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  54. Re: But muh Jewelry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    He is a trust fund turd who pays 6 figures for sex with women who tell the world that he has small, weird looking junk.

  55. Re:#MAGA by bob4u2c · · Score: 1

    I own a 48 year old German car. Repair forums always say to buy German steel parts if you can find them, even with minimal maintenance they will outlast you. If you can't find those, get North American, general maintenance and the part will last quite a while. South American parts require a bit more maintenance but not much more, usually setup and installs required a bit more finesse. Then lastly, Chinese made parts, even the expensive ones will need constant maintenance and still fail.

    Take some CV joints for example, German made $60 will last about 40 years, American about $45 will last about 30 years, Chinese about $30 will last maybe 5 years (some have barely made it 10K miles before failure). So yes, the cost is more, but the quality is worth it. Especially if it is something you only want to do once or twice in your lifetime.

    So unless you like changing parts regularly, stick to good steel. Now I don't know about needing a case to last this long, and a steel case is kind of heavy to be moving around all the time.

    I must say though that I bought a case in early 2000 and have changed the components at least 5 times since then. The case is still in good shape and has taken everything I can throw at it. As for ports; those are extended via cables to the desk as the computer sits on the floor about 3 feet away. The only reaching down I need to to do is to turn it on. I could wire a simple switch to the desk if it really bothered me, but it doesn't.

  56. Re:#MAGA by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

    You seemingly don't realize that this is just a tax on American citizens... There is no "American-made" alternative to most of these components, so it will serve only to raise the prices Americans are forced to pay while the countries of production don't notice a difference.

    Well, so much for that tax break everyone got last year.

    I've started to wonder if this wasn't some evil-genius type of plan by the Republican Party. First, give a huge tax break that mostly goes to the upper class, but make sure there's enough going to the lower and middle classes that a majority of people will support it. After that, impose new tariffs that increase prices of consumer goods. If they get all the numbers correct, the total revenue from the tariffs equals the total amount of the tax breaks, prices go up by more than the tax break for the lower and middle classes, and they've successfully transferred more money from the lower and middle classes to the upper class.

  57. The really hilarious part? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    The trade gap between China and US has hit new record highs since the Trump tariffs were put in place. That's right, folks, the Trump tariffs have made things WORSE, not better! That's how incompetent Trump is!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  58. Re:How sillly by lazarusdishwasher · · Score: 2

    Cases from the 90s WTF, that shit doesn't have a USB 3.0 port on the front.

    A Case from the 90s may have spare drive bays, a quick search for front panel USB hub yields results that can mount directly into a 3.5 or 5.25 inch drive bay.

  59. Re:Only Losers Build Things by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    We don't even need hardware anymore since everything is in the cloud!

  60. That would be fine if we did that by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    but that's not what we're doing. So far the tariffs have been a give away to the Steel industry (who donated heavily) and a rather childish middle finger to the Chinese electronics industry (which we are in no way shape or form prepared to take over even if the companies wanted to put factories here). What we have _not_ done is demand China improve environmental, safety and labor pay in order to bring their workers up to parity with US workers. Canada OTOH has done this.... to America.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  61. The Liberals are doing no such thing by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    the left favors tariffs and labor protection. That said we want to do it carefully. Trade wars are _not_ easy to win.

    Now, Clinton Democrats (e.g. the right wing of our party that followed Bill & Hilary into becoming Republican Lite) are happy to have open borders. Hell, Hilary got caught outright saying she wanted to eliminate the borders. It was one of the reasons she lost.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  62. Re:#MAGA by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    Most of these cases are just lower quality stell sheets stamped into shape by machines and then coated. The "work" is split between operating the machines and changing the manufacturing process for each part. The first set of workers are cheap but the second set of workers are more expensive. So, make a million of these and labor cost is low, build a couple thousand and labor cost is high.

  63. Re:How much more by Darinbob · · Score: 3, Funny

    Free-range?

  64. Re:#MAGA by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    Good. Maybe then all those immigrants from South America will STAY in South America. Why pay for a wall when the same cost would be better spend on spending on products over there will employment and jobs will benefit them directly. Win/Win the way I see it.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  65. Buy computer parts from by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Taiwan
    South Korea
    Japan
    Can a brand in the USA work with metal/plastic and add color computer controlled lights?

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  66. Re: But muh Jewelry by aliquis · · Score: 1

    GamersNexus made a video where he took the SilverStone RL06 case which has great air-flow and limited the noise level to the BeQuiet SilentBase 601 or whatever it's called.

    It achived quite a bit better CPU temp but a bit worse on GPU temp, but all in all I guess one could say better.

    There's of course the possibility the noise dampening remove more annoying noise but for noise level it seem like one doesn't have to spend more money but could just spin the fans slower instead in a cheaper well ventilated case.

    I haven't even bought my Noctua fan myself but they have sent me thermal paste with fan mounting thingies, AM4 and Socket 115x kits in three different packages to me free of charge. Personally I'm not sure the AIO or custom loop coolers are worth the price (or risk) but I would be fine paying even a bit extra for Noctua stuff considering the amazing customer support (and MTBF & warranty.)

  67. Re:#MAGA by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    Who needs a tariff when you control the exchange rate?

    You mean like China devaluing the Yuan like they're doing now?

    Well, it's causing banks in China to go on a run. And, their real-estate bubble is about to pop with massive over supply and artificial scarcity by limiting how many can be on the market. There's already been conflict in the news with prices being slashed shortly after previous buyers paid full price.

    In short, China is about to implode into a black hole. Question is, will the event-horizon ensnare the rest of the world?

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  68. Re: Or... Buy quality components by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    What if somebody lives in China, should they also be boycotting China?

  69. 10% tariff = 10% increase? by kenh · · Score: 1

    In September, the Trump administration imposed the 10 percent duty, which also cover motherboards, graphics cards, and CPU coolers from the country. As a result, NZXT had to introduce a 10 percent price increase on PC cases to deal with the added costs, VP Jim Carlton told PCMag in an interview.

    The items from China are taxed (tariff) 10% on the value of the material imported, not the retail price - for example, import a TV at a $100/cost from China, sell it for $250 with a warranty, support, etc. and the street cost should only go up $10, or 10% of $100 value of imported goods, not $25, or 10% of $250 value once imported.

    --
    Ken
  70. Re:And if I do my math right.... by kenh · · Score: 1

    Exactly. They are doubling the impact of the tariff, pocketing the difference, and they get to blame Trump for it!

    --
    Ken
  71. Re:#MAGA by kenh · · Score: 1

    First, give a huge tax break that mostly goes to the upper class, but make sure there's enough going to the lower and middle classes that a majority of people will support it.

    The tax breaks are proportional to the taxes one pays - in case you weren't aware, the rich actually pay more taxes than the middle class or poor.

    Fourty-seven percent pay net-zero income taxes, the top 20% pay about 80% of all federal income taxes collected. That 80% of the tax "breaks" as you refer to them is appropriate.

    --
    Ken
  72. Re:#MAGA by kenh · · Score: 1

    Increased costs for imported goods has the possibility of opening up opportunities for domestic production.

    One of the stated goals for the increased tariff on steel was for National Defense - to spur on domestic steel mills to increase production so that in times of need, there will be better access to domestic steel.

    --
    Ken
  73. Not a supporter of tariffs, but .... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    I think the reason some people are finding it odd that you have conservatives suddenly supporting these new import taxes, while liberals are suddenly against them, is because TRUMP suggested them. He's been such a polarizing force, people will flip-flop on their ideals just to get behind the man, or to bash another one of his decisions.

    If you can step away from all that nonsense for a bit and just look at the facts? I think you'll find that most libertarian, pro free-market types are as much against the tariffs as they've ever been about tariffs in general. But China has also been kind of a "worst case scenario" for America because we rely so heavily on them for things we used to manufacture here, but stopped bothering with. Under normal circumstances, you don't have to compete against a foreign government that's artificially subsidizing production of goods getting exported, to ensure they can be bought far below the cost of production. That's often what China has done, in a gambit to destroy our will to do production ourselves. This absolutely happened with the market for solar panels, and I've heard claims it happened with items as basic as roofing nails.

    I really don't think it's our government's job to try to enforce other governments treating their citizens at what we deem an "acceptable standard". Chinese citizens will be the ones who have to revolt against their own government, if they want real change and better working/living conditions. So no, I don't support slapping on tariffs just to try to offset Americans getting great buys on imported products. I do, however, think you can't really have a fair global economy if the playing field isn't level thanks to a government covering losses on sales to undercut ALL competitors.

  74. Tariffs targeting the wrong things by jonwil · · Score: 1

    When picking which goods to apply tariffs to, instead of targeting inputs to other things (such as circuit boards and components) they should have targeted finished consumer goods, especially those where China isn't the only country that makes them.

    But no, that would make all the cheap Chinese crap they sell at Walmart more expensive and given how powerful Walmart is (and how much money they likely give to politicians of all sorts via "donations") that would never fly. Better to target goods that are only imported by people who aren't powerful enough to matter to Trump and his supporters...

  75. Re: But muh Jewelry by mhail · · Score: 1

    Allll the way down here to find the truth...sigh

  76. Trump tax on stupidity by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

    Trump imposed a tax on stupidity. This tax will end when the stupidity ends. Note that Trump doesn't actually have the authority to impose tariffs, that is the purview of congress.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  77. Sucked in USA by aybiss · · Score: 1

    Welcome to how the rest of the world feels when buying products from you.

    --
    It's OK Bender, there's no such thing as 2.
  78. As Emo Phillips once said by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    it's not much of a problem because when China comes to collect their money they'll ask "Well what did you spend it all on?" and we'll just answer "Well, all these bombs".

    Seriously though, gov't debt doesn't really function like household debt. Most of it (2/3rds) we "owe" to ourselves. This is the one and only thing Trump got right. Deficits don't really matter all that much. They're a boogieman of the right. Google "starve the beast" sometime. It's a trick to get you to accept education and healthcare cuts while they raid the public coffers for their cronies.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  79. Re:How sillly by RickyShade · · Score: 1

    So why buy a case when I can keep using an ancient trash case by buying *other* things to make it workable!!!

    Fascinating.

  80. Re:But muh Jewelry by sarren1901 · · Score: 1

    I use to need to upgrade more often, but now that all the games I play are "old", I don't have much of a reason to upgrade. My biggest problem is going to be windows 7 eol but by then (maybe even today) all the games I play will run on Linux either natively or via wine so even that won't be a deal breaker.

    Unless you are doing something massive, you don't need to spend more then $600 on a computer (not counting monitor, mouse, keyboard or speakers/printer).

    As long as nothing burns out, I'm set for another couple of years. May have to replace the power supply but I've already upgraded the video card, ram and storage in the past two-three years and have essentially hit my mobos upgrade capacity.

    In two more years who can tell what will happen.

  81. Obvious Chinese Propaganda Is Obvious by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

    1) Stock up on PC components.
    2) PC component producers move to the US to avoid tariffs.
    3) People are stocked up on PC components so they can't compete with overseas manufacturing due to lack of sales.
    4) Yet another attempt by China to corrupt our economy for their own benefit succeeds.

    No thanks, communist scum.

  82. Re:How much more by sarren1901 · · Score: 1

    If I hadn't already commented I'd mod you up. Free-range. You Sir, win the Internetz.

  83. Re:#MAGA by Prien715 · · Score: 1

    Of course there are still some bad ones, particularly for textiles, but the idea that it's "slave labour" that is driving China's competitiveness is a myth.

    You do remember the Foxconn suicides right? Or here's a more recent article. I'll quote:
    When I look back at the photos I snapped, I can’t find one that has someone smiling in it. It does not seem like a surprise that people subjected to long hours, repetitive work and harsh management might develop psychological issues. That unease is palpable – it’s worked into the environment itself. As Xu said: “It’s not a good place for human beings.”

    While I agree with Trump on virtually nothing, slapping tariffs on goods produced with subpar labor conditions is EXACTLY the purpose of a tariff. As far as other sources, you could always manufacture in Dresden Germany which produces AMD microprocessors and shouldn't be affected by said tariff which would encourage investment in a country that shares our values and ideals.

    --
    -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
  84. Re: But muh Jewelry by dougdonovan · · Score: 1

    when did we stop stocking up ? its called overhead which translates to $.

  85. Re: But muh Jewelry by FuzzyDaddy2 · · Score: 1

    Well, if you have a story about tariffs lowering prices I would encourage you to submit it.

  86. Re: #MAGA by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    Everyone here seems to assume Chinese companies will play by our rules. They are already experts at dodging tariffs on oil, honey, steel, and cars â" what makes anyone think PC cases are going to finally stump them? All they do is ship them somewhere else first and voila â" those PC cases were made somewhere not subject to tarrifs. If the lie is discovered and the company is banned, then a new company pops up to take its place, buys all the inventory from the first company, and the charade continues.

    Tarrifs are a joke.

  87. Re:#MAGA by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    I haven't forgotten, in fact Foxconn is an example of what I was talking about. Apple and other companies that outsource their manufacturing to Foxconn demanded improvements, and got them. Publicity like that forced them to improve.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  88. Re: How sillly by RickyShade · · Score: 1

    I wonder how much older you are than me. I'm 36 and I don't want to use a beige InWin case, OK?

  89. PC Builders by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    As someone who has built his own PC's for many years I can also attest to the fact that most of us probably have 2 or 3 extra boxes just lying around not being used. If I REALLY want to build a rig, and I was REALLY put off by case prices, I'd probably just re-use an old one. It isn't like they really wear out or anything (sure you might have to replace a fan or something for a few bucks). The only reason to buy a new case really is if you really want something shiny or a different size, or something new and shiny :).

    Really the only reason I haven't done a new build (my current one is getting a bit old in the tooth at probably 5+ years old) is:
    A) It still does what I need it to do, and can still play the games I want to play (at least for now).
    B) The prices of video cards have been stupid since the whole bitcoin craze started.

    So tariffs aside, I'm more waiting until my rig can't handle the next big game I want to play, or all the bitcoin folks finally loose their shirts and the bitcoin miners all go out of business. Whichever comes first really. Trying to save 10% by hoarding components seems a terrible idea.