Slashdot Mirror


Remote Workers Can Get a Cushy Apartment, Free Office Space, and $10K If They Move To Tulsa (nextgov.com)

Tulsa, Oklahoma is offering full-time remote workers in the U.S. free office space, a subsidized furnished apartment, and $10,000 cash if you move there and stay for at least one year. The city wants to attract so-called "digital nomads," who would, presumably, start paying taxes, launch businesses, and otherwise contribute to the economy of wherever they're drawn to. Nextgov reports: Tulsa Remote is one of several revitalization projects in the region funded by the George Kaiser Family Foundation. The Tulsa-based philanthropic organization was started by George B. Kaiser, an oil and banking billionaire who has signed on to Warren Buffett and Bill and Melinda Gates' "Giving Pledge," whose wealthy signees promise to give away at least half their fortunes to charity.

The organization has budgeted for 20 new remote workers in the program's first year, says Ken Levit, GKFF's executive director. Applicants must be at least 18, eligible to work in the U.S., already working full-time for an employer based outside the boundaries of Tulsa County, and prepared to move to Tulsa within six months. Applications opened Tuesday at the website TulsaRemote.com; the city hopes to settle the first new residents within the next three months, Levit said.

100 of 190 comments (clear)

  1. lol by Type44Q · · Score: 2

    Tulsa's clearly a great town. Just kidding; the only part of it that didn't completely suck was within the four walls of Wild Oats Supermarket (it was lthe closest you could get to leaving that shitty state)... and Whole Foods put a stop to that a while back.

  2. Not the stupidest idea by Qbertino · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sound like a smart and potentially effective programm to Kickstart local economy to me. If digital natives are what you're looking for this could work way better than throwing obscene amounts of tax cuts in Amazons direction.

    Someone has been thinking outside of the box. That alone makes this program and it's proposal intriguing.

    If I were an USian, I'd check this out.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re: Not the stupidest idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I appreciate your comment. TFS struck me as crazy... until I hark back to the day of my midlife crisis: single, employed and stressed out in Silicon Valley. In the end what I did was give away my kidney and move to Europe... but this move to Oklahoma also would have been a cultural experience and opportunity to reboot myself.
      Admittedly, I donâ(TM)t think I could have achieved my goals without renouncing my citizenship... but that is not something on everyone agenda.

    2. Re:Not the stupidest idea by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's just a PR stunt. If you read the article, you'll see they only have 20 "slots" available for this program. That's not a serious effort, it's just a PR stunt designed to grab headlines (and it seems to have worked). If this were a serious program, they would be budgeting for hundreds, or even thousands, of workers to participate, not 20.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    3. Re:Not the stupidest idea by Ubi_NL · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You may want to have a look at the 2016 elect results for Tusla before you pack your bags

      --

      If an experiment works, something has gone wrong.
    4. Re:Not the stupidest idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sound like a smart and potentially effective programm to Kickstart local economy to me. If digital natives are what you're looking for this could work way better than throwing obscene amounts of tax cuts in Amazons direction.

      Someone has been thinking outside of the box. That alone makes this program and it's proposal intriguing.

      If I were an USian, I'd check this out.

      Your optimism is blinded by ignorance as you envision the perfect outcome of this.

      The reality is more like "digital nomads" coming there and being about as productive as they currently are in their parents basement.

    5. Re: Not the stupidest idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe there is a plan for more people and they are just starting small. Ya know, testing it out...instesd of investing in hundreds of thousands of dollars without knowing the type of interest it has.

      Remind me not to hire you for any sort of planning and rollout strategies. Thanks!

    6. Re:Not the stupidest idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Tulsa is actually the democratic bastion of Oklahoma.
      There are definitely worse places to live if you're blue.

    7. Re:Not the stupidest idea by turp182 · · Score: 1

      I'd call it a pilot program. 100 people would have been a better target though.

      --
      BlameBillCosby.com
    8. Re:Not the stupidest idea by mikael · · Score: 1

      If they can achieve critical mass of workers (around 10,000), then it can work. A walkable downtown core with cafes and restaurant bars helps as well. Usually small cities are really like scale models of large cities. They might be 3x smaller (3 mile radius, rather than 10 mile radius), but the main roads are 3x narrower, so you still get a traffic jam.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    9. Re:Not the stupidest idea by mikael · · Score: 1

      High house prices generate high salaries. High salaries let you afford all those expensive computer kit that lets you keep on the leading edge. Some engineering jobs in the UK only pay 15K up in the Highlands. On the South Coast, the same job pays 45K, just due to the cost of housing.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    10. Re:Not the stupidest idea by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      My biggest issue is the current political climate.

      Tech workers politically lean left. Oklahoma is a conservative state. This type of actions can change the political landscape of the City and State.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    11. Re:Not the stupidest idea by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Informative

      If I were an USian, I'd check this out.

      Just to help you out since you're foreign to our lands....we refer to ourselves as "Americans".

      We don't know WTF a "usian" is or means.

      Hope that helps.

      ;)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    12. Re:Not the stupidest idea by geoscodin · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not all tech workers lean left. Where I work here in South Carolina, most (not all) of our programmers and systems staff lean not only right, but far right. But then again so does much of the state.

    13. Re:Not the stupidest idea by BringsApples · · Score: 1

      $10,000 x 10,000 potential businesses = $100,000,000

      $100,000 x 1,000 poorest families = $100,000,000

      I wonder which of those would be a better improvement. Sometimes the poor are poor because they make poor decisions. But, generally, the idea of starting 10,000 businesses in one city seems like it'd only make for a good sitcom.

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    14. Re:Not the stupidest idea by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Sound like a smart and potentially effective programm to Kickstart local economy to me. If digital natives are what you're looking for this could work way better than throwing obscene amounts of tax cuts in Amazons direction.

      Someone has been thinking outside of the box. That alone makes this program and it's proposal intriguing.

      If I were an USian, I'd check this out.

      Honestly sounds like the worst idea to try to kick start an industry. Bribe people to move there, when the bribes dry up, they'll move somewhere else.

      Australia tried to prop up an unprofitable car industry this way. For decades and hundreds of billions of state funding were thrown at them without any regard. However as soon as the gravy taps were tightened even a little bit, Ford and GM Holden picked up sticks and left.

      If Tulsa wants people to move there, provide the infrastructure. Better public services, decent education, things people want in a new home. Hell, just making sure there is affordable and fast internet will get interest from tech companies.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    15. Re:Not the stupidest idea by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      I never said ALL I said LEAN.
      Meaning a general trend in that particular direction.
      Yes they are a lot of politically right tech workers, that is fine. But more then half of them have a leftward political bias. If a City is willing to use Government money, to attract these workers into their town, and give these people in essence free money to live there, it is a bit more attractive to the leftward individual, who has more trust in government handouts, then someone on the right.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    16. Re: Not the stupidest idea by geoscodin · · Score: 1

      While I used the word "all" I never said that YOU did, although with no clarifer like "some" or "most" you could be interpreted as such. Having done consulting from Massachusetts to Hawaii over the past 20 years I'm not entirely sure you are correct about more thAn half, although I don't have statistics to support either case.

      All that said, I agree with your general premise, if not your opinion on political leanings.

    17. Re:Not the stupidest idea by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      If I were an USian, I'd check this out.

      Nah. We USians are familiar with Oklahoma.

    18. Re:Not the stupidest idea by Too+Late+for+Cool+ID · · Score: 1

      High house prices generate high salaries. ...

      High house prices don't generate high salaries. They drive out people with low salaries.

    19. Re:Not the stupidest idea by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

      I haven't been there, don't know much beyond the stereo types, but I looked at their promo shots. It looks rather shabby, and under resourced. I'm not sure there's much that could be wrecked; definitely could use some gentrification. Personally, if I was going to go cheap and "rough it" Tulsa certainly wouldn't fill the top slot. I'd much rather go take their median home price and head down to Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Puerto Rico, etc..

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    20. Re:Not the stupidest idea by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Unless this is your first or second post on Slashdot, you (and probably everybody else) knows what a US-ian is. "Americans" is the non-computer standard, but this has faded a bit because there's a whole lot of Americans (land masses) vs. Americans (single political unit in said land masses).

      I've yet to meet a fellow American in America, that uses the term "Usian".

      It is not what we call ourselves, period.

      It's a stupid term......

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    21. Re:Not the stupidest idea by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      Tulsa is actually the democratic bastion of Oklahoma.

      That applies to almost every city (or cities) in otherwise red states. Look at Texas. Hard-red, except for blue enclaves radiating out from Houston, Dallas, Austin, San Antonio, El Paso and Corpus Christi.

    22. Re:Not the stupidest idea by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      Whether you support or oppose the results, we don't want you if that is your criteria for deciding whether or not to move here

      What a ridiculous thing to say, Anonymous Coward.

      Of course how a region votes would be one critical determinant as to whether you'd feel comfortable living there. If you're gay, or a non-Christian or non-white and you move to a neighbourhood full of Trump signs, do you think you'd feel comfortable or welcome? It's no different than a homophobic evangelical christian feeling uncomfortable moving into the Castro District in San Francisco.

      As a Canadian working in high tech, I've had numerous opportunities to move to the USA which I've turned down due to political differences.

    23. Re:Not the stupidest idea by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      Oklahoma is one of the lowest cost of living states in the US if someone that is a full time remote worker came on with a company in a higher cost of living state with a higher wage then it could be a smart move even without the subsidized apartment, shared office space, and $10K. The problem is you need to be content with living in a place with little in the way of entertainment, culture, or opportunities for advancement.

    24. Re:Not the stupidest idea by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Yeah moving to Tulsa, unless you are a leader in your specific tech niche, is a dead end for your career. There are no meet-ups, no other tech businesses that you will want to network with/do business with, and local talent is going to be at minimum 5 years behind where you are moving from.
       
      If you're a digital nomad building CRUD php websites for legacy businesses etc then Tulsa is probably the place for you. Better for Tulsa to have some tech industry, rather than no tech industry....it's a small bet that could possibly pay off well in 20-30 years. Digital nomads aren't exactly community leaders and big on social interaction or starting companies, but having 20 developers in your city instead of 1 or 0 is a start, no matter how meager. As Woody Allen (probably) said, 80% of life is showing up.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    25. Re:Not the stupidest idea by dpidcoe · · Score: 1

      Trump called Latin Americans rapists

      Nope.

      insulted women

      Sure, he's a sleezeball. I've not met a politician who wasn't. Tell us something we don't already know.

      wants to trample over trans rights

      Hyperbole.

      is a racist "birther"

      I personally think the birther thing is kinda dumb, but does believing a conspiracy theory make one a racist?

      who called Nazis "very fine people"

      I'm not familiar with that one, but I feel like it's safe to assume it's as misquoted as your "he called Latin Americans racist" claim.

      and then put children in cages

      Thanks Obama!

      wants to rip away healthcare

      One mans "rip away healthcare" is another mans fixing healthcare. I was one of those people who didn't get to keep my doctor despite liking him.

      insulted veterans, muslims and gold star parents

      Still less people insulted than literally insulting half the country.

      put in a VP who believes you can "pray away the gay"

      Having actually looked into some of that, most of the "mike pence wants to kill all the gays" stuff is pure sensationalist hyperbole. As a guy who currently has a boyfriend, I have no issues with Pence.

      Because anyone putting a sign on their lawn or wearing a MAGA hat is saying "I'm fine with all that!"

      If you actually believe even half the claims you just made are the full and unbiased/unsensationalized truth, then I don't blame you. I would humbly suggest though, that the problem might be with your perceptions rather than the average american with a MAGA sign.

    26. Re:Not the stupidest idea by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      Oklahoma would probably be a better place to retire to after you have money although not in Tulsa maybe in the surrounding areas with easy access to services.

    27. Re:Not the stupidest idea by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Because the time you had left to live would seem like forever and when death finally came, it would be sweet relief!

      Decatur Illinois would be even better in that respect.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    28. Re:Not the stupidest idea by WolfgangVL · · Score: 1

      I'll be right behind you, spinning up the snake cult of emptiness.... that sort of thing is tax exempt right?

      --
      You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
    29. Re:Not the stupidest idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think it's funny that you tried to bait the other guy into building your strawman of people in the Castro for you, and then when he didn't, you just went ahead and did it yourself.

      MAGA hillbilly rednecks from shithole states are historically a lot more violent than are gays in San Francisco.

    30. Re:Not the stupidest idea by Can'tNot · · Score: 1

      That is a new development, and largely thanks to Trump. Only Auston was previously a solid blue enclave with 80%+ voters going Democratic: Dallas was in the sixties, and Houston was pretty close to evenly split. Trump has really polarized things - they're all blue now.

    31. Re: Not the stupidest idea by astrofurter · · Score: 1

      "It's got nothing to do with "bias" and everything to do with facts."

      I know as a SCIENTIFIC FACT that the people I dislike are subhuman evil monsters! - "Progressive" Democrat partisans, 2018

      Where have we heard this before? Hmmmm.....

      I know as a SCIENTIFIC FACT that the people I dislike are subhuman evil monsters! - Adolph Hitler, 1935

  3. But Tulsa... by QuadEddie · · Score: 2

    Having lived in OK for a few years, more parts are shit-holish than not. There are small pockets of nice areas, but I'm pretty sure Tulsa isn't one of them. This seems like their gasping for new blood.

  4. Oklahoma? by riverat1 · · Score: 1

    This comment is redundant but who would want to live in Oklahoma. It certainly wouldn't be me. If I wasn't retired and was working remotely I can think of a thousand other places I'd rather live than Oklahoma. I guess if you're just getting started on your career it could be kind of attractive but you usually don't get the privilege of working remotely until you've proven yourself.

    1. Re:Oklahoma? by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2

      While it wouldn’t be for me— I need the ocean close— many people can do a lot to change their lives in a year in this kind of scenario. Save money, take risks, etc. Even if the “nomads” don’t stay, there is a chance to impact some locals and potentially set forth positive change.

      One thing that did surprise me though, prompted by this story, is just how many >$1MM homes for sale there are in Tulsa.

    2. Re:Oklahoma? by s122604 · · Score: 1

      https://www.zillow.com/homes/f... Skiatook OK (one of the nicer burbs) real estate

      looks like you can get a 3-4 bedroom house, with land, for a mortgage equal to, or even less, than what you would pay for a shit-hovel apartment in NYC or SF...

      just sayin... that might appeal to some

    3. Re:Oklahoma? by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      So I get something I need to spend more money, and more importantly time, to maintain and have to drive to get anywhere? And that anywhere only gets me to Tulsa? You're just making it worse.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    4. Re:Oklahoma? by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      So I get something I need to spend more money, and more importantly time, to maintain and have to drive to get anywhere? And that anywhere only gets me to Tulsa? You're just making it worse.

      That's fine; stay where you are ...

    5. Re:Oklahoma? by s122604 · · Score: 1

      Ok... clearly paying 2 thousand bucks a month to a landlord to live in a broom closet is the wise, adult choice...

    6. Re:Oklahoma? by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Compared to the pains of owning a house and having to live in the middle of nowhere? Yes it is. I've owned houses- worst mistake I ever made financially and from a personal happiness standpoint.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    7. Re:Oklahoma? by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

      Just because I can plop half a million down in OK and get 5,000 sq/ft palatial bubble instead of a broom closet, doesn't mean that on the other side of the bubble isn't OK.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    8. Re:Oklahoma? by s122604 · · Score: 1

      opposite for me..
      my home has appreciated in value handsomely, even counting maintenance against equity, and its affordable enough that one spouse can stay home with our two young children

    9. Re:Oklahoma? by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      I rent a fairly large place for $700 a month. I have no interest in spending my weekends, or spare money, on upkeep. The housing market is fairly stagnant here and I know people that had to sell their houses for less than they bought. As well my utility costs are significantly lower than a house.

      I have a good gig where I'm working, but if another opportunity came up elsewhere, I could bail pretty quick without the financial burden of a house.

  5. Oklahoma, land of failed tax experiments by Paronymous_Coward · · Score: 1

    Oklahoma is hurtling off of a fiscal cliff, and it's entirely self-inflicted. They must be getting desperate.

    https://www.csmonitor.com/Busi...
    https://www.economist.com/unit...

  6. Feds should set the example by MikeRT · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Feds could easily snap their fingers and send several thousand new knowledge worker jobs to Tulsa within the next 1-3 years just by giving marching orders to a few agencies to move out of metro DC and set up jobs in that general region. It would also save the taxpayers probably on the order of 25-40% on contract costs.

    I have never understood why the other 48 states, particularly California with all of its collective bitching about paying more than it receives, has allowed MD and VA to grow fat on all of these jobs. Metro DC could easily be forcibly disassembled by the other 48 states legislatively if they chose to cooperate.

    1. Re:Feds should set the example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Counter-point: do you want anyone good enough to have career options to work for the government? Because if so, you're going to find a very strong downside to moving the agency to Tulsa as soon as most people quit instead of going there.

    2. Re:Feds should set the example by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Coorporations realized a long time ago if none of them pay more then X they can effectively control the market. I lived in a small city, and I knew someone once who was told that he couldn't be paid what he asked because it would start a salary war with the other companies in the city. As an employee it is hard to win that way.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    3. Re:Feds should set the example by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      Feds could easily snap their fingers and send several thousand new knowledge worker jobs to Tulsa within the next 1-3 years just by giving marching orders to a few agencies to move out of metro DC and set up jobs in that general region. It would also save the taxpayers probably on the order of 25-40% on contract costs.

      I have never understood why the other 48 states, particularly California with all of its collective bitching about paying more than it receives, has allowed MD and VA to grow fat on all of these jobs. Metro DC could easily be forcibly disassembled by the other 48 states legislatively if they chose to cooperate.

      New jobs, maybe. Moving existing jobs is not easy, for several reasons. First is Congress will protect jobs in their region since they represents voters and money. Moving Fed workers isn't easy either. they have a number of job protections so they can't simply say move. As a result, years of expereince walks out the door, and is not easiliy replaced. Buildings have to meet new security requirements that older ones don't. I've seen some government moves and they often wind up with fewer jibs moving than initially promised.

      As for the other states cooperating, can you imagine the fighting over say 100K jobs and the accompanying spending? I doubt many politicians would help anotehr state get jobs at their state's expense.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    4. Re:Feds should set the example by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      I lived in a city where people were trying to do this - Federal spending to keep the city afloat.

      It doesn't work all that well. Recruitment is still incredibly hard, and the city is still a shithole that can't afford to properly operate basic services like schools, younger people who grow up there desperately fleeing the area, and a general sense of dread permeating everything.

      It would be better for the federal government to fund moving everyone who wants to move out, and let the place die.

    5. Re:Feds should set the example by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Standard leftist lie.

      There is a 'free enough market', get over it.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  7. Re:I would take it... by mrbester · · Score: 1

    Would the time taken for the move on a whim be about a day?

    --
    "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
  8. I'm a freelancer looking for somewhere cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm a freelancer who would love to get in on this idea. I don't qualify, however, as I am not a fulltimer. Good luck, Tulsa! Looks like North Carolina remains at the top of my list.

  9. Re:lol by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 4, Funny

    Chandler: Y'know how people say that Tulsa is the Paris of Oklahoma?
    Monica: What? Who says that?
    Chandler: People who've never been to Paris.
    The One where Emma cries / 12:50

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  10. Re: Dead end deal by rmdingler · · Score: 1

    Although the extra position left of the decimal point would improve recruiting efforts, I suspect you meant $1.0x10^4...

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  11. Hey look, a libertardian! by MikeRT · · Score: 1

    That's called government directed businesses, or "pork barreling". What happened to free market enterprise eh?

    Ok, I'm going to break it down real simple for you because the point just flew over your head like a Space-X rocket over a Pacific cargo cult...

    1. These are government jobs. "Duh free merkitz" don't apply to key aspects like location because the location is wherever Uncle Sam says it is.
    2. Most of these are jobs are needlessly situated in one of the highest cost regions in the United States.
    3. If the feds moved a few thousand large scale projects to Tulsa, many contractors would move there if the pay rates were comparable.
    4. Pork barreling is when you send bullshit back to your district just to bring local money in. A realignment of the federal workforce to get most of the work out of metro DC is not pork barreling because it's--on paper--real work.

    With that base, OK would have a shot of improving its tax base and have a core constituency that it can use to drive other programs to make people relocate.

    1. Re:Hey look, a libertardian! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So basically you want a federal welfare state for OK.

      Got it, very conservative of you. Self sufficient state economy? nah, just pump federal dollars and generate federal jobs that /exist/ due to DC proximity and force a relocation. Most would fly back constantly to DC, you're effectively forcing a commute to prop up an economy.

    2. Re:Hey look, a libertardian! by gtall · · Score: 1

      You'd also lose the economy of scale by having Fed jobs concentrated in and around D.C. Government agencies are not stand alone shops, that stopped it the 60's. And the beltway bandits would also then have to split their operations, and charge the government more. Reagan started the move to "privatize" government work and the Shrub continued it. It is Republican orthodoxy that the private sector can do things cheaper. However, when the Fed. Gov. "privatizes" its functions, the beltway bandits become more powerful and able to squeeze the government for "services rendered"...and they are not directly accountable to any voters.

      How about we privatize SS and put it in Oklahoma? Eh? Wanna see your Grandma attempt to play ball with an unaccountable private company controlling her SS?

    3. Re:Hey look, a libertardian! by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 1

      Huh? Who are these "beltway bandits squeezing the government" with magical open-ended contracts for "services rendered"? Names please. And please post links to any non-competitive contracts being awarded to these companies, preferably to the actual awards as shown on fbo.gov. The press would absolutely have a field day with that stuff, and signing the gov't onto a bad (meaning illegal) contract is one of the few things a Federal employee can actually get outright fired for these days. As long as you have at least two vendors bidding on an opportunity, you'll have competition, which naturally drives down the price (unless they collude, which is highly illegal). Here's a hint: what you're describing might have existed long ago but unless you're a) someone with the clout of Amazon or b) a defense contractor offering truly one-of-a-kind capabilities, EVERYTHING in DC is competitive, and has been for the last several decades at least. I routinely see larger DC-area companies get lazy and not put forth their best effort and pricing on an RFP response and get booted, even though they were the incumbent in an agency for decades. If anything, Federal procurement is more competitive than the way private sector firms purchase, because of the transparency and because the Fed purchasing folks typically have a legal obligation to save the taxpayers money whenever possible. Now, we can talk about whether or not the gov't goes too far the other way treats certain specialized services as pure commodities when they're really not, but that's another conversation.

    4. Re:Hey look, a libertardian! by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      With that base, OK would have a shot of improving its tax base and have a core constituency that it can use to drive other programs to make people relocate.

      Goody, I like numbered points too:

      1. It doesn't fucking work. I would consider suicide before moving to Oklahoma. A state where the ruling party is so stupid that they are metaphorically sawing off the branch they are sitting on has no attraction.

      2. I find your concept of "have a core constituency that it can use to drive other programs to make people relocate." a little odd. The Republicans have moved to the point of making people relocate?

      Regardless, Oklahoma is a pretty dreary place. Aside from the general lack of visual diversity in the locale - rolling plains gets old very quickly - Oklahoma is populated by people who are more than happy to install politicians who vote against their self interests. The school system has been gutted, and the politicians elected want to stay the course. This crypto-conservative state has utterly failed. This is the same thing that happened in Kansas, another grand Republican experiment that failed miserably

      Now give me a good reason to move to this incompetence center. I'm not even a liberal, but I can see that the powers that be are incompetent and corrupt, and show no evidence of gaining competence or honesty. As well, I'd have to be around people who purposefully voted them into office. Nahhhh, do not want.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    5. Re:Hey look, a libertardian! by chill · · Score: 1

      3. If the feds moved a few thousand large scale projects to Tulsa, many contractors would move there if the pay rates were comparable.

      I'd expect contract pay change to mirror Fed pay change. Tulsa is considered "Other US" for locality adjustment, which is 15.37% above base GS Schedule pay. The DC area is 28.22% above, so there will be about a 13% decrease in pay on average.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    6. Re:Hey look, a libertardian! by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

      Hate to break it to you but I think OK is already pretty high up on that list.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
  12. You've obviously never worked with the Feds by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 4

    The senior people who actually run the gov't on a day-to-day basis live in the metro DC area and that's not changing. Tribal knowledge is key. Two years ago I saw a senior purchasing contract officer try to retire and a large part of an entire agency was unable to buy anything for over six months. Out of desperation, they talked her into coming back part-time for awhile, but she eventually retired for good and shut the thing down for another year, forcing them to send out a ton of RFPs at the very end of fiscal just so they didn't lose funding. Many other parts still require submission of paper invoices and other documentation. Sure they've made progress, but the US Gov't is the world's biggest employer, and customer, and they're based in Washington DC. The investment in infrastructure alone to support even one decent sized Federal agency is staggering. You're living in a fantasy world if you think that's ever changing. On the contrary, as shown by Amazon and others, DC just continues to become more important.

    1. Re:You've obviously never worked with the Feds by gtall · · Score: 2

      As an example, the VA's computer systems just crumpled under their load and a lot of VA benefits recipients are now even further behind the eight ball. This is what happens when the pols decide that starving an agency so they can piss off the money on their home districts comes back to bite.

      Worse, the last tax giveaway was sold as "paying for itself" because of all that wonderful investment it was going to allow companies to do. The only problem was that companies aren't going to invest if they do not see any rise in demand, and the tax giveaway did nothing for demand. So after the short run sugar high, companies are back to minimal investing. And the deficits will now balloon to over $1 Trillion/Year. Needless to say, that is unsustainable.

      All it will take is one recession and the U.S. will be in a world of hurt. That last one took out a good part of the global economy. The next one will have Congress unable to increase spending to increase economic activity. Because of the debt, the Fed. won't be able to lower interest rates since they must convince people and countries to buy U.S. debt by offering an attractive interest rate. After the Great Recession, they didn't have to do that because the rest of the world was also in recession. Now, things will be different.

    2. Re:You've obviously never worked with the Feds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Important" as in parasitic. Just FYI.

  13. Things you should know about Oklahoma: by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 4, Informative

    There are few places that I warn people about and Oklahoma is one of them.

    First off, about half of Oklahoma's power is generated from burning coal which something they take pride in. However you feel about coal energy, there are health consequences for living downwind from a coal plant. If you are still on board then perhaps you will be interested to know that Oklahoma is deeply Republican, very pro-gun, anti-abortion and anti-science.

    However you feel about these topics, I just think people should know what they are signing up for before the find themselves in a situation they may be unhappy with.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:Things you should know about Oklahoma: by Greyfox · · Score: 3, Informative

      Apparently they have one of the worst educational systems in the USA too. Alabama, Mississippi and Kentucky might be keeping them from dead last. So if you have kids, you won't be doing them any favors by moving there. Unless you live in Alabama, Mississippi or Kentucky.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    2. Re:Things you should know about Oklahoma: by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      you will be interested to know that Oklahoma is deeply Republican, very pro-gun, anti-abortion

      Sounds like an ideal home for most slashdotters

      and anti-science

      Probably not a deal breaker as long as it's just climate science and Evolution they oppose, as again plenty of people here are fine with that. I doubt that even the most rabidly reactionary Christian fundamentalist is opposed to engineering or chemistry.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    3. Re:Things you should know about Oklahoma: by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
      Educated, liberal women will scotch any idea of moving to such a backward place like Tulsa, OK.

      Pharmacists can refuse to dispense contraception. Plan B not available. Can be prosecuted if you go out of state for abortion.

      Politicians dont care, laws dont apply to them. They get abortions for their family members and other cheating partners all the time out of state. They know they will not be prosecuted. They know people who know people. But working stiffs who might be tempted by 10K and an apartment, they are not going to risk facing a district attorney hoping to score some news access by making them the scapegoat.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    4. Re:Things you should know about Oklahoma: by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
      Indian Americans will be tempted. They dont depend on the school district to educate their children. They spend a lots of time educating the kids at home after school. All kinds of math lessons, and science projects and home work help. So moving to Tulsa might give them lots of easy school topping valedictorian opportunities.

      Already Edison NJ, and Cupertino, CA school districts have been converted to the very same pressure cooker rat race school system of Indian middle class has created in India. Most of the Indian immigrants of the 1990s are from such systems, they are the top 0.1% of Indian academics, and they are not going to rest till their kids make it to Caltech *and* Harvard. We just hope the first generation Indian American kids are saner than their parents when they come of age.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    5. Re:Things you should know about Oklahoma: by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Educated, liberal women will scotch any idea of moving to such a backward place like Tulsa, OK.
      Pharmacists can refuse to dispense contraception. Plan B not available. Can be prosecuted if you go out of state for abortion.

      Educated, liberal people will do the same. Consider their marijuana laws. Life in prison for making hash? Yeah, I'm not going anywhere near those fucks. Oklahoma is not OK. They know nothing about personal freedom.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Things you should know about Oklahoma: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It brings me great joy to tell you Alabama, Mississippi, and Kentucky all scored higher on the SATs in 2017 than California. How does it feel being dumber than a bunch of inbreed hillbillies?

    7. Re:Things you should know about Oklahoma: by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Way to treat fellow Americans as The Other. How much did Putin pay you for this post? If you didn't get paid, you're a sucker to do it for free. The Russians pay good money for people to spread divisive propaganda that sets Americans at each others' throats as you have done.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    8. Re:Things you should know about Oklahoma: by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      The Russians pay good money for people to spread divisive propaganda that sets Americans at each others' throats

      I knew this could be controversial so I wrote it in a very neutral manner.

      sets Americans at each others' throats as you have done.

      *sigh* I suppose if you are looking for a fight then even windmills will do.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  14. Actually... by LordHighExecutioner · · Score: 1

    ...I personally know a few people who worked in Tusla, and moved away as soon as they had the possibility of remote working.

  15. Anybody else think of this? by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1
  16. Aparetnemt by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    Well the cushy apartment will be great for me, but where will my wife and kids stay?

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  17. Re:lol by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    According to the the Post Office Tulsa is OK.
    It may not be great, but it isn't that bad either.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  18. Why pick Tulsa? by dasunt · · Score: 1

    I don't work remotely, but if I was in an industry where all I did was remote work, I don't think I'd pick Tulsa. Would anyone?

    If you need to be in a walkable large city with a diverse culture and lots of things to do, Tulsa doesn't fit the bill.

    If you want to occasionally drive to a large city, there are better cities than Tulsa.

    And if you want to take advantage of working remotely to explore the best of nature (skiing, hiking, mountain climbing, etc), there's still plenty of small rural towns with cheap properties available

    1. Re:Why pick Tulsa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Wasn't Tulsa one of the cities where Google Fiber managed to gain a foothold? Seems like that'd be better for remote work than some rural town where your only options are Comcast and 2x priced DSL.

  19. Reasons not to do this by jjshoe · · Score: 2

    Before you rush off to Tulsa for $10k and a little housing subsidy:

    https://www.hrw.org/news/2018/...

    --
    -- botsex is {grep;touch;strip;unzip;head;mount} /dev/girl -t {wet;fsck;fsck;yes;yes;yes;umount} {/de
    1. Re:Reasons not to do this by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Before you rush off to Tulsa for $10k and a little housing subsidy:

      https://www.hrw.org/news/2018/...

      Seriously. There is the evil duo of Crypto-conservatism again.

      States so incompetent that they legislate themselves into ideological bankruptcy, but they have time to sneak in an important bill to regulate people who don't stick their genitals in the ideologically allowed place.

      This pretty much tell us what living there would be like. Most of the country could care less about who puts what thing where, but the states who do are more concerned about it than they are about fiscal responsibility.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  20. DEATH TO TULSA by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 3, Funny

    I mean, Oral Roberts, the Klan and shit.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
    1. Re:DEATH TO TULSA by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      George Gobel saved Tulsa from the Japanese (19:11) during the war (the big one)

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  21. Do you like bugs? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    Lots of flies and gnats and creatures like that? Then head to Oklahoma!

    How about excessive humidity? They’ve got that in spades!

    When I was a kid, we used to drive through Oklahoma every summer as part of our annual trip from our west coast home to visit my dad’s family in Indiana (speaking of bugs and excessive humidity...). Oklahoma was roughly where the environment started getting unpleasant.

    Colorado, though? I loved Colorado.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Do you like bugs? by antdude · · Score: 1

      What about digital bugs? They're everywhere like on your device right now!

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  22. Everyone dumping on OK by erp_consultant · · Score: 2

    The general consensus here is that Oklahoma is a shit hole and no way I'd ever live there...etc. I have been to Oklahoma many times and it's not nearly as bad as some here are casting it. Tulsa does have some bad neighborhoods, like nearly every city in the USA, but it isn't terrible. Given the choice I would choose Oklahoma City over Tulsa because there seemed to be more to do. But we did manage to find some very good restaurants there are some nice neighborhoods too.

    On the plus side, if you are young and starting out you can buy a really nice house for surprisingly little money. Think about that while you are scratching a rent check for 4K a month for some closet sized apartment in Silicon Valley. Traffic is not bad either, a nice change from a lot of large US cities. Weather? It's not terrible as long as you can avoid the tornado paths, which always seem to strike the same places year after year.

    Personally, I am fully settled and not looking to move anywhere but if I were young and mobile I would give this some thought. After all, it is only a 1 year commitment.

    1. Re:Everyone dumping on OK by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      There are options beyond Silicon Valley and Tulsa. And they don't come with all the bible thumping, anti-intellectualism, and shitty government services. Some of them even think your kid's teachers shouldn't live in poverty.

  23. State income tax is the problem by nasor · · Score: 2

    I am a full-time remote worker who can live anywhere, so this is interesting...but the problem is Tulsa's 4.87% combined state and city income tax. I currently live in a state with no income tax, and paying that extra tax would more than wipe out the $10k. If OK wants to make itself attractive to high-earning teleworkers who can live anywhere, maybe rethinking the state income tax would be a good place to start.

  24. That's not how it works by aepervius · · Score: 2

    Your method is the best way to run into budget problem or useless empty places. You do a first study, then an initial program with very few places like their 20. THEN if a lot of people start to want to participate, you increase the programs budget and size of available places.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
    1. Re:That's not how it works by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      Sometimes it takes a bigger investment to get network effects though. The schools will suck until enough smart people move in and start demanding better schools. Restaurants will be limited to the local flavors until you get a group of people willing to pay more for variety. Internet will be slow until a few thousand techies collectively demand (and pay for) high speed internet.

  25. Re:Lol by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 1, Informative

    I think the problem with Oklahoma is fundamental... I mean fundamentalist.

    A quick Google of "oklahoma religion in schools" brings somewhat horrifying results.

    Oklahoma is a genuine and true heartland of America state. Tulsa is the heart of that heartland. Even if they were offering $100,000 plus all the other benefits to anyone who would bring a startup to the state, I could not in good faith consider bringing my children there.

    "The racial diversity in the population of Oklahoma is currently at 72.9% Caucasian, 7.7% two or more races, 7.4% Native North American, 7.3% African American, 2.6% other races, and 2% Asian."

    Notice that the demographics specifically show that the vast majority of the state is white as all hell, Native American, because the federal government didn't place enough value on the land in Oklahoma to try and ship the native Americans off of it, a whole bunch of people who are descended from slaves. I'm not going to suggest a black person never voluntarily chose to move to Oklahoma, but Oklahoma was VERY DEFINITELY a Klan state... and like other similar places I've visited, when the American civil war ended, Oklahoma proactively segregated. What this did was horrifying for the entire state population. It made the entire state dumber than before. Stupid begets stupid. And to be fair, Oklahoma may have changed since the 50's, though but there are both white hate and black hate groups across the state. Organized black hate groups happen because ignorant black people organize as a possibly violent herd to respond to perceived threats from ignorant white herds. You know racism and education are horrible when people choose to establish hate groups to combat hate groups.

    Then there's Asian... there's 2% Asian and I can't possibly figure out how the hell that happened. There appears to be a small Muslim population... I'd suppose this must be due to some industrial relationship or possibly some effort by the immigration services to foster integration by refugees. There is also Buddhism which suggests that East Asian descendants, possibly rail workers for example settled. There's also a chance there was industrial reasons. And there's Hindu as well, that's not surprising, people from India seem to be willing to settle pretty much anywhere if it provides the opportunity for them to establish a better future for their families.

    What's important about all of this is that Oklahoma makes it very clear from the demographics "You're not welcome here... unless you're white, christian, and a fan of both kinds of music."

    Oklahoma also seems to have the absolute worst educational statistics in the entire U.S.. They have a low drop out rate which suggests the curriculum is too easy. High school curriculum's are specifically designed to promote a healthy drop-out rate. There's none of this "Participation Trophy" bullshit in high school. Either do your work and discipline yourself or learn how to use a shovel and get a good pair of boots. But it seems that Oklahoma has a very high rate of students staying in school. That means that while the work-place isn't being flooded by children, it also means that the top performers are punished by the bottom achievers.

    The standardized testing results for Oklahoma clearly say that people from Oklahoma are systematically made stupid. Maybe it's the water or the air. I would suggest it's misallocation of limited government resources.

    Oklahoma is the 40th worst ranking state by average income level. This program to get remote workers sounds great because the average person in Oklahoma doesn't have enough money to pay any real taxes. Most of the state is almost tax exempt on a federal level. A LOT of the state is on welfare... but this is true for much of the U.S. at the moment. Oklahoma has one of the highest unemployment rates in the country. Oklahoma is in the worst 10 states for higher educate either undergraduate or graduate. To me this means the state is generally apathetic or that people with education simply do go back

  26. Reverse Magic Dirt Theory by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

    Should be an interesting experiment.

  27. Re:Anti-LGPT laws are a plus for some people. by LostMyAccount · · Score: 1

    What do North and South Dakota have that Oklahoma doesn't?

    My wife is from North Dakota and I've been everywhere from Bismark/Mandan, Devils Lake, Grand Forks and Fargo. Literally none of those places meet any of your criteria -- shit airports with flights to MSP or maybe Denver. No interesting activities beyond mainstream movies and (admittedly good) college hockey. The food is for shit unless you're a bar food fan. They do like to drink A LOT there, if that's your thing. Grand Forks and Fargo are prone to flooding and are cold even by my Minnesota standards in the winter. The only outdoor activities are hunting and fishing.

    I mean, the people are great, I've liked most people I've met, but it's the ass end of the universe.

    I can't comment about South Dakota too much, as I was only there twice,20 years ago, but it's not much different IMHO. Neither Rapid City or Sioux Falls are any better than Fargo or Bismark.

    Nebraska at least has Omaha, but really, it's not great, either.

    These dying-ass, country-fuck places need to pull their heads out of their asses. They can decide if they want to dry up and blow away or get into the 21st century. Fiber internet everywhere. Legalize pot. Make air travel easy, even if it means leasing a 737 and running 3x daily shuttles to an airport with direct international flights.

  28. Apparently you've never been there by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    It's really a beautiful city. The photo in the picture shows the large building, the BOK (Bank of Oklahoma) building, not scene to the west of this photo is the BOK center, hockey, basketball and large concerts. In May they close off the entire downtown area for a festival. Good times. Yeah, there are bad sections of Tulsa, as you would expect in any major city, but it has the Arkansas River area which is being built up, a beautiful Oklahoma Aquarium, and many things to see and do. I'm from southwest Missouri, 3 hour drive and I'm down there about 5-6 times a year. Never had a bad time in Tulsa. Now, the traffic on 71st near the mall can be a zoo most of the time, or on 71st, around the Rhema Bible Church during Christmas with their HUGE walk through Christmas light display. And, you might have to put up with a tornado from time to time, but they usually skip over most of the city proper.

    1. Re:Apparently you've never been there by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You need to see the world. Seriously.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  29. Ahhh Oklahoma. by meglon · · Score: 2

    I put in my time stationed at Fort Sill. The common saying was: Fort Sill isn't Hell, but you can see Hell from the front gate.... and they weren't shitting.

    --
    Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
  30. Re:Oklahoma is a shithole state by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Texans hate Oklahoma because the states are exactly alike. They're just unaware.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  31. Re:Jokes on them - i get 40k bonus not being in US by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    That got reported to the IRS...

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  32. Re: I mean... by Whomp-Ass · · Score: 1

    A careful reading of the requirements states that you need to âalreadyâ be employed remotely.

    The demographic they're trying to attract is one with a progressive, entrepreneurial character...not deadbeats trying to bootstrap their underwater basket weaving business.